Cover of book: Medicine as Science
Book Titles Open Access Full access

Medicine as Science

The Making of Disciplinary Identity from Scientific Medicine to Biomedicine
Authors:
Publisher:
 2022

Keywords

Bibliographic data

Copyright year
2022
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-8750-0
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-3188-1
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Wissenschafts- und Technikforschung
Volume
22
Language
English
Pages
226
Product type
Book Titles

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 - 11 Download chapter (PDF)
  2. Acknowledgements 12 - 14 Download chapter (PDF)
  3. Download chapter (PDF)
    1. I. Towards a Historical Sociology of Medicine’s Disciplinary Identity
    2. II. The Forgotten Disciplinary Identity of Medicine
    3. III. Historical Semantics and Discourse Analysis – Theoretical Approach and Method
  4. Download chapter (PDF)
    1. I. Academic Knowledge and the Social Structure of Science
    2. II. From the Culture of Science to Cultures of Research
    3. III. The Emergence of Disciplinary Cultures in the Modern Research University
    4. IV. Academic Tribes and Disciplinary Territories
    5. V. Disciplines as Political Institutions
    6. VI. Disciplinary Boundary and Identity Work
  5. Download chapter (PDF)
    1. I. Medicine Between Art and Learnedness – The Conceptual Background
    2. II. The Institutional Environment in Prussia’s Capital
    3. III. Johann Christian Reil’s Plan for Reforming Academic Medicine
    4. IV. A Modern Division of Medical Labor
    5. V. The New Physiology as Modern Medicine’s Scientific Culture
    6. VI. The Function of Medicine as a Modern Academic Discipline
  6. Download chapter (PDF)
    1. I. Medicine as an Exact Science – The Physiological Program
    2. II. The Ideology of Methodology in Mid-Nineteenth-Century Germany
      1. a. The Science of Pathology
      2. b. A Science of Therapy
  7. Download chapter (PDF)
    1. I. German Ideals of Academic Medicine in the American Discourse
    2. II. From Applied Science to the Pure Science of Clinical Medicine
    3. III. Institutional Ambiguities of Medical and Biological Research
  8. Download chapter (PDF)
    1. I. The Birth of the Administrative Shorthand “Biomedical”
    2. II. From “Allied” to “Underlying” Sciences
    3. III. The Political Boundary Between Biomedical Science and the Life Sciences
    4. IV. The Linear Legacy of Biomedicine
  9. Download chapter (PDF)
    1. I. Evidence-Based Medicine and the New Cultural Foundation of Clinical Practice
    2. II. Shifting the Basis of Clinical Medicine Through Guidelines
    3. III. Confirming the Linear Legacy with Translational Science
    4. IV. The Character of Translation Practices
  10. 8. Conclusion – Biomedicine as Discipline and Integrational Category 204 - 212 Download chapter (PDF)
  11. Bibliography 213 - 226 Download chapter (PDF)

Bibliography (230)

  1. Abbott, Andrew. 2001. Chaos of Disciplines. Chicago/London: Chicago University Press. Open Google Scholar
  2. Ahrens, Edward H. 1992. The Crisis in Clinical Research. Overcoming Institutional Obstacles. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  3. Amsterdamska, Olga. 2005. Demarcating Epidemiology. Science, Technology, & Human Values 30(1) Special Issue: Demarcation Socialized. Constructing Boundaries and Recognizing Difference: 17–51. Open Google Scholar
  4. Amundsen, Darrel W. 1979. Medicine and Surgery as Art or Craft. The Role of Schematic Literature in the Separation of Medicine and Surgery in the Late Middle Ages. Transactions & Studies of the College of Physicians of Philadelphia 1(1): 43–57. Open Google Scholar
  5. Appel, Toby A. 1987. Biological and Medical Societies and the Founding of the American Physiological Society. Physiology in the American Context, 1850–1940. Ed. Gerald L. Geison. New York: Springer. 155–176. Open Google Scholar
  6. Appel, Toby A. 1991. Organizing Biology. The American Society of Naturalists and its “Affiliated Societies”, 1883–1923. The American Development of Biology. Ed. Ronald Rainger / Keith R. Benson / Jane Maienschein. New Brunswick/London: Rutgers University Press. 87–120. Open Google Scholar
  7. Appel, Toby A. 2000. Shaping Biology. The National Science Foundation and American Biological Research, 1945–1975. Baltimore/London: Johns Hopkins University Press. Open Google Scholar
  8. Armstrong, David. 2007. Professionalism, Indeterminacy and the EBM Project. BioSocieties 2(1): 73–84. Open Google Scholar
  9. Ash, Mitchell G. 2019. Interdisciplinarity in Historical Perspective. Perspectives on Science 27(4): 619–642. Open Google Scholar
  10. Barker, Lewellys F. 1908. Medical Laboratories. Their Relations to Medical Practice and Medical Discovery. Science 27(694): 601–611. Open Google Scholar
  11. Barker, Lewellys F. 1913. On the Cultivation of the Clinical Sciences of Diagnosis and Therapy. Science 37(959): 731–738. Open Google Scholar
  12. Barker, Lewellys F. 1916. Relation of the Preclinical Laboratory Courses to the Work of the Clinical Years. JAMA 66(9): 631–635. Open Google Scholar
  13. Barnes, Barry / Bloor, David / Henry, John. 1996. Scientific Knowledge. A Sociological Analysis. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  14. Becher, Tony / Trowler, Paul R. 2001. Academic Tribes and Territories. Intellectual Enquiry and the Culture of Disciplines. 2nd ed. Maidenhead: The Society for Research into Higher Education / Open University Press. Open Google Scholar
  15. Benson, Keith R. 1991. From Museum Research to Laboratory Research. The Transformation of Natural History into Academic Biology. The American Development of Biology. Ed. Ronald Rainger / Keith R. Benson / Jane Maienschein. New Brunswick/London: Rutgers University Press. 49–83. Open Google Scholar
  16. Berliner, Howard S. 1985. A System of Scientific Medicine. Philanthropic Foundations in the Flexner Era. New York/London: Travistock. Open Google Scholar
  17. Bleker, Johanna. 1981. Die Naturhistorische Schule, 1825–1645. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der klinischen Medizin in Deutschland. Stuttgart: Fischer. Open Google Scholar
  18. Bleker, Johanna. 1987/88. Medical Students – to the Bed-Side or to the Laboratory? The Emergence of Laboratory-Training in German Medical Education, 1870–1900. Clio Medica 21(1/4): 35–46. Open Google Scholar
  19. Benaroyo, Lazare. 1998. Rudolf Virchow and the Scientific Approach to Medicine. Endeavour 22(3). 114–116. Open Google Scholar
  20. Bonner, Thomas N. 1990. The German Model of Training Physicians in the United States, 1870–1914. How Closely was it Followed? Bulletin of the History of Medicine 64(1): 18–34. Open Google Scholar
  21. Bonner, Thomas N. 1995a. Becoming a Physician. Medical Education in Britain, France, Germany, and the United States, 1750–1945. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  22. Bonner, Thomas N. 1995b. German Influences on American Clinical Medicine, 1870–1914. German Influences on Education in the United States to 1917. Ed. Henry Geitz / Jürgen Heideking / Jurgen Herbst. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 275–287. Open Google Scholar
  23. Borck, Cornelius. 2020. Negotiating Epistemic Hierarchies in Biomedicine: The Rise and Fall of Evidence-based Medicine. Weak Knowledge: Forms, Functions, and Dynamics. Ed. Moritz Epple / Annette Imhausen / Falk Müller. Frankfurt/New York: Campus. 449–482. Open Google Scholar
  24. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1975. The Specificity of the Scientific Field and the Social Conditions of the Progress of Reason. Social Science Information 14(6). 19–47. Open Google Scholar
  25. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press. Open Google Scholar
  26. Bourdieu, Pierre / Wacquant, Loïc J.D. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  27. Broman, Thomas. 1989. University Reform in Medical Thought at the End of the Eighteenth Century. Osiris 5: 36–53. Open Google Scholar
  28. Broman, Thomas. 1991. J. C. Reil and the “Journalization” of Physiology. The Literary Structure of Scientific Arguments. Historical Studies. Ed. Peter Dear. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Open Google Scholar
  29. Broman, Thomas. 1996. The Transformation of German Academic Medicine, 1750–1820. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  30. Bruchhausen, Walter. 2010. “Biomedizin” in sozial- und kulturwissenschaftlichen Beiträgen. Eine Begriffskariere zwischen Analyse und Polemik. N.T.M. 18. Open Google Scholar
  31. Bud, Robert. 2007. Penicillin. Triumph and Tragedy. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  32. Bud, Robert. 2014. Applied Science in Nineteenth-Century Britain. Public Discourse and the Creation of Meaning, 1817–1876. History and Technology 30(4): 1–34. Open Google Scholar
  33. Bush, Vannevar. 1995 [1945]. Science – The Endless Frontier. North Stratford, N.H.: Ayer Company Publishers. Open Google Scholar
  34. Butler, Declan. 2008. Translational Research. Crossing the Valley of Death. Nature 453: 840–842. Open Google Scholar
  35. Bylebyl, Jerome J. 1990. The Medical Meaning of Physica. Osiris 6: 16–41. Open Google Scholar
  36. Bynum; William. 1994. Science and the Practice of Medicine in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  37. Cahan, David (ed.). 2003. From Natural Philosophy to the Sciences. Writing the History of Nineteenth-Century Science. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  38. Cambrosio, Alberto / Keating, Peter / Schlich, Thomas / Weisz, George. 2006. Regulatory Objectivity and the Generation and Management of Evidence in Medicine. Social Science & Medicine 63: 189–199. Open Google Scholar
  39. Chadarevian, Soraya de / Kamminga, Harmke (eds.). 1998. Molecularizing Biology and Medicine. New Perspectives and Alliances, 1910s-1970s. Amsterdam: Harwood. Open Google Scholar
  40. Chalmers, Iain / Glasziou, Paul. 2009. Avoidable Waste in the Production and Reporting of Research Evidence. The Lancet 374: 86–89. Open Google Scholar
  41. Clarke, Adele E. / Shim, Janet K. / Mamo, Laura / Fosket, Jennifer Ruth / Fishman / Jennifer R. 2003. Biomedicalization. Technoscientific Transformations of Health, Illness, and US Biomedicine. American Sociological Review 68(2). 161–194. Open Google Scholar
  42. Clarke, Sabine. 2010. Pure Science with a Practical Aim. The Meanings of Fundamental Research in Britain, circa 1916–1950. Isis 101(2): 285–311. Open Google Scholar
  43. Cohen, Michael Aaron / Stavri, P. Zoë / Hersch, William R. 2004. A Categorization and Analysis of The Criticisms of Evidence-Based Medicine. International Journal of Medical Informatics 73: 35–43. Open Google Scholar
  44. Coleman, William. 1988. Prussian Pedagogy. Purkyně at Breslau, 1823–1829. The Investigative Enterprise. Experimental Physiology in Nineteenth-Century Medicine. Ed. William Coleman / Frederic L. Holmes. Berkley et al.: University of California Press. 15–64. Open Google Scholar
  45. Cooper, Joseph D. 1965. Onward the Management of Science. The Woolridge Report. Science 148(3676): 1433–1439. Open Google Scholar
  46. Crabu, Stefano. 2018. Rethinking Biomedicine in the Age of Translational Research. Organizational, Professional, and Epistemic Encounters. Sociology Compass e12623. doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12623. Open Google Scholar
  47. Cunningham, Andrew. 2002. The pen and the sword. Recovering the disciplinary identity of physiology and anatomy before 1800. I: Old physiology – the pen. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 33: 631–665. Open Google Scholar
  48. Cunningham, Andrew. 2003. The pen and the sword. Recovering the disciplinary identity of physiology and anatomy before 1800. II: Old anatomy – the sword. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 34: 51–76. Open Google Scholar
  49. Daly, Jeanne. 2005. Evidence-Based Medicine and the Search for a Science of Clinical Care. Berkley et al.: University of California Press/Milbank Memorial Fund. Open Google Scholar
  50. Davis, Nathan S. 1891. The Basis of Scientific Medicine and the Proper Methods of Investigation. JAMA 16(4): 114–120. Open Google Scholar
  51. Dewey, John. 1910. Science as Subject-Matter and as Method. Science 31(787): 121–127. Open Google Scholar
  52. Dewey, John. 1997. How We Think. Mineola: Dover. Open Google Scholar
  53. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. 1992. Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA 268(17): 2420–2425. Open Google Scholar
  54. Feinstein, Alvan. 1995. The Crisis in Clinical Research. Review Essay. Bulletin of the History of Medicine 69(2): 288–291. Open Google Scholar
  55. Felt, Ulrike / Igelsböck, Judith / Schikowitz, Andrea / Völker, Thomas. 2013. Growing into What? The (Un-)disciplined Socialization of Early Stage Researchers into Transdisciplinary Research. Higher Education 65(4): 511–524. Open Google Scholar
  56. Felt, Ulrike / Fouché, Rayvon / Miller, Clark A. / Smith-Doerr, Laurel (eds.). 2017. Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. 4th ed. Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press. Open Google Scholar
  57. Flexner, Abraham. 1910. Medical Education in the United States and Canada. A Report to the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. New York. Open Google Scholar
  58. Foucault, Michel. 1973. The Birth of the Clinic. An Archeology of Medical Perception. Trans. A. M. Sheridan. New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  59. French, Roger, 2003. Medicine Before Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  60. Frevert, Ute. 1984. Krankheit als politisches Problem, 1770–1880. Soziale Unterschichten in Preußen zwischen medizinischer Polizei und staatlicher Sozialversicherung. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. Open Google Scholar
  61. Funtowicz, Silvio O. / Ravetz, Jerome R. 1993. The Emergence of Post-Normal Science. Science, Politics and Morality. Scientific Uncertainty and Decision-Making. Ed. René von Schomberg. Dodrecht et al.: Kluwer. 85–123. Open Google Scholar
  62. Fye, Bruce. 1987. The Development of American Physiology. Scientific Medicine in the Nineteenth Century. Baltimore/London: Johns Hopkins University Press. Open Google Scholar
  63. Galison, Peter / Stump, David J. (eds.). 1996. The Disunity of Science. Boundaries, Contexts, and Power. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  64. Geertz, Clifford. 1983. Local Knowledge. Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. New York: Basic Books. Open Google Scholar
  65. Geison, Gerald. 1979. Divided We Stand. Physiologists and Clinicians in the American Context. The Therapeutic Revolution. Essays in the Social History of American Medicine. Ed. Morris J. Vogel / Charles E. Rosenberg. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. 67–90. Open Google Scholar
  66. Glasziou, Paul / Chalmers, Iain. 2018. Research Wast is Still a Scandal. BMJ 363: k4645. Open Google Scholar
  67. Gibbons, Michael / Limoges, Camille / Nowotny, Helga / Schwartzman, Simon / Scott, Peter / Trow, Martin. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. Los Angeles et al.: Sage. Open Google Scholar
  68. Gieryn, Thomas F. 1995. Boundaries of Science. Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Ed. Sheila Jasanoff / Gerald E. Markle / James C. Petersen / Trevor Pinch. Rev. e ed. Thousand Oaks et al: Sage. 393–443 Open Google Scholar
  69. Gieryn, Thomas F. 1999. Cultural Boundaries of Science. Credibility on the Line. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  70. Godin, Benoît. 2006. The Linear Model of Innovation. The Historical Construction of an Analytical Framework. Science, Technology, & Human Values 31(6). 639–667. Open Google Scholar
  71. Godin, Benoît. 2017. Models of Innovation. The History of an Idea. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Open Google Scholar
  72. Greenhalgh, Susan. 2008. Just One Child. Science and Policy in Deng’s China. Berkley/Los Angeles: University of California Press. Open Google Scholar
  73. Hackett, Edward J. / Parker, John N. / Vermeulen, Niki / Penders, Bart. 2017. The Social and Epistemic Organization of Scientific Work. Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. 4th ed. Ed. Ulrike Felt, and Ulrike / Fouché, Rayvon / Miller, Clark A. / Smith-Doerr, Laurel. Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press. 733–764. Open Google Scholar
  74. Hacking, Ian. 1992. The Self-Vindication of the Laboratory Sciences. Science and Practice and Culture. Ed. Andrew Pickering. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press. 29–64. Open Google Scholar
  75. Hacking, Ian. 2012. Introductory Essay. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Kuhn 2012). 4th ed. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press. vii–xxxviii. Open Google Scholar
  76. Hagner, Michael. 2003. Scientific Medicine. From Natural Philosophy to the Sciences. Writing History of Nineteenth-Century Science. Ed. David Cahan. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press. 49–87. Open Google Scholar
  77. Harris, Henry. 1999. The Birth of the Cell. New Haven/London: Yale University Press. Open Google Scholar
  78. Harris, Roy. 2005. The Semantics of Science. London/New York: Continuum. Open Google Scholar
  79. Harvey, A. McGhehee. 1981. Science at the Bedside. Clinical Research in American Medicine, 1905–1945. Baltimore/London: Johns Hopkins University Press. Open Google Scholar
  80. Heinig, Stephen J. / Quon, Andrew S. W. / Meyer, Roger E. / Korn, David. 1999. The Changing Landscape of Clinical Research. Academic Medicine 74(6): 726–745. Open Google Scholar
  81. Heller, Robert. 1975. Johann Christian Reil’s Training Scheme for Medical Auxiliaries. Medical History 19(4): 321–332. Open Google Scholar
  82. Hendriks, Barbara / Simons, Arno / Reinhart, Martin. 2019. What are Clinician-Scientists Expected to Do? The Undefined Space of Professionalizable Work in Translational Biomedicine. Minerva 57: 219–237. Open Google Scholar
  83. Henle, Jacob. 1844. Medizinische Wissenschaft und Empirie. Zeitschrift für rationelle Medizin 1: 1–35. Open Google Scholar
  84. Hess, Volker. 1993. Von der semiotischen zur diagnostischen Medizin. Die Entstehung der klinischen Methode zwischen 1750 und 1850. Husum: Matthisen. Open Google Scholar
  85. Hess, Volker. 1994. Objektivität und Rhetorik. Karl August Wunderlich (1815–1877) und die klinische Thermometrie. Medizinhistorisches Journal 32(3/4). 299–319. Open Google Scholar
  86. Hess, Volker. 1995. Diagnose und Krankheitsverständnis der medizinischen Klinik der Berliner Universität, 1820–1845. Abhandlungen zur Geschichte der Medizin und Naturwissenschaften 67: 101–10. Open Google Scholar
  87. Hess, Volker. 2010a. Die Alte Charité, die moderne Irrenabteilung und die Klinik (1790–1820). Die Charité. Geschichte(n) eines Krankenhauses. Ed. Johanna Bleker / Volker Hess. Berlin Akademie Verlag. 44–69. Open Google Scholar
  88. Volker Hess. 2010b. Fieberbehandlung und klinische Wissenschaft (1820–1850). Die Charité. Geschichte(n) eines Krankenhauses. Ed. Johanna Bleker / Volker Hess. Berlin Akademie Verlag. 70–98. Open Google Scholar
  89. Hippocrates. 2012. On the Art of Medicine. Ed., trans., & commentary Joel E. Mann. Leiden/Boston: Brill. Open Google Scholar
  90. Höpfner, Ludwig Julius Friedrich, 1778. Deutsche Encyclopädie oder Allgemeines Real-Wörterbuch aller Künste und Wissenschaften. Vol. 1: A–Ar. Frankfurt/Main: Varrentrap und Wenner. Open Google Scholar
  91. Huerkamp, Claudia. 1985. Aufstieg der Ärzte. Vom Gelehrten Stand zum professionellen Experten. Das Beispiel Preußens. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. Open Google Scholar
  92. von Humboldt, Wilhelm. 1964. Über die Organisation des Medizinalwesens. Schriften zur Politik und zum Bildungswesen (Werke in Fünf Bänden IV). Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. 56–63. Open Google Scholar
  93. Jacobs, Jerry A. 2013. In Defense of Disciplines. Interdisciplinarity and Specialization in the Research University. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  94. Jasanoff, Sheila (ed.). 2004. States of Knowledge. The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. London/New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  95. Jasanoff, Sheila / Kim, Sang-Hyun (eds.). 2015. Dreamscapes of Modernity. Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  96. Kaldewey, David. 2013. Wahrheit und Nützlichkeit. Selbstbeschreibungen der Wissenschaft zwischen Autonomie und gesellschaftlicher Relevanz. Bielefeld: transcript. Open Google Scholar
  97. Kaldewey, David. 2018: The Grand Challenges Discourse. Transforming Identity Work in Science and Science Policy. Minerva 56: 161–182. Open Google Scholar
  98. Kaldewey, David / Schauz, Désirée (eds.). 2018. Basic and Applied Research. The Language of Science Policy in the Twentieth Century. New York/Oxford: Berghahn. Open Google Scholar
  99. Kaldewey, David / Schauz, Désirée. 2018. Transforming Pure Science into Basic Research. The Language of Science Policy in the United States. Basic and Applied Research. The Language of Science Policy in the Twentieth Century. Ed. David Kaldewey / Désirée Schauz. New York/Oxford: Berghahn. 104–140. Open Google Scholar
  100. Kay, Lilly, 1993. The Molecular Vision of Life. Caltech, The Rockefeller Foundation, and the Rise of the New Biology. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  101. Keating, Peter / Cambrosio, Alberto. 2003. Biomedical Platforms. Realigning the normal and the pathological in late-twentieth-century medicine. Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press. Open Google Scholar
  102. Keating, Peter / Cambrosio, Alberto. 2004. Does biomedicine entail the successful reduction of pathology to biology? Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 47(3): 357–371. Open Google Scholar
  103. Keating, Peter / Cambrosio, Alberto. 2012. Cancer on Trial. Oncology as a New Style of Practice. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  104. Knaapen, Loes. 2014. Evidence-based Medicine or Cookbook Medicine? Addressing Concerns over the Standardization of Care. Sociology Compass 8(6): 823–836. Open Google Scholar
  105. Knorr Cetina, Karin / Reichmann, Werner. 2015. Art. “Epistemic Cultures.” International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Ed. James D. Wright. Second Ed. Vol. 7. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 873–880. Open Google Scholar
  106. Knorr Cetina, Karin. 1981. The Manufacture of Knowledge. An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Oxford et al.: Pergamon Press. Open Google Scholar
  107. Knorr Cetina, Karin. 1999. Epistemic Cultures. How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge/Londong: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
  108. Kohler, Robert E. 1979. From Medical Chemistry to Biochemistry. The Making of a Biomedical Discipline. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  109. Kohler, Robert E. 1982. Medical Reform and Biomedical Science. Biochemistry – A Case Study. The Therapeutic Revolution. Essays in the Social History of American Medicine. Ed. Morris J. Vogel / Charles E. Rosenberg. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. 27–66. Open Google Scholar
  110. Kohler, Robert E. 1991. Partners in Science. Foundations and Natural Scientists, 1900–1945. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  111. Koselleck, Reinhart. 1979. Vergangene Zukunft. Zur Semantik geschichtlicher Zeiten. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  112. Koselleck, Reinhart. 2006. Begriffsgeschichten. Studien zur Semantik und Pragmatik der politischen und sozialen Sprache. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  113. Kraft, Alison. 2013. New Light Through an Old Window? The “Translational Turn” in Biomedical Research. A Historical Perspective. Translational Medicine. The Future of Therapy? Ed. James Mittra / Christopher-Paul Milne. Boca Raton: CRC Press. 19–53. Open Google Scholar
  114. Kremer, Richard L. 2009. Physiology. The Cambridge History of Science. Volume 6: The Modern Biological and Earth Sciences. Ed. Peter J. Bowler / John V. Pickstone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 342–366. Open Google Scholar
  115. Kuhn, Thomas S. 2012. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 4th ed. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  116. Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action. How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
  117. Latour, Bruno. 1998. From the World of Science to the World of Research? Science 280: 208–209. Open Google Scholar
  118. Latour, Bruno / Woolgar, Steve. 1986. Laboratory Life. The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  119. Lawrence, Christopher. 1985. Incommunicable Knowledge. Science, Technology, and the Clinical Art in Britain, 1850–1914. Journal of Contemporary History 20(4): 503–520. Open Google Scholar
  120. Leng, Gareth / Leng, Rhodri Ivor. 2020. The Matter of Facts. Skepticism, Persuasion, and Evidence in Science. Cambridge/London: MIT Press. Open Google Scholar
  121. Lenoir, Timothy. 1997. Instituting Science. The Cultural Production of Scientific Disciplines. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  122. Lindemann, Mary. 1996. Healing & Health in Eighteenth Century Germany. Baltimore/London: Johns Hopkins University Press. Open Google Scholar
  123. Lohff, Brigitte. 1981. Johannes Müllers “Jahresberichte zur Physiologie” in Müllers Archiv der Jahre 1834–1838. Sudhoffs Archiv 65(1): 32–78. Open Google Scholar
  124. Löwy, Ilana. 2011. Historiography of Biomedicine. “Bio”, “Medicine”, and In Between. Isis 102(1): 116–122. Open Google Scholar
  125. Löwy, Ilana. 1996. Between Bench and Bedside. Science, Healing, and Interlukin-2 in a Cancer Ward. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
  126. Ludmerer, Kenneth M. 1996. Learning to Heal. The Development of American Medical Education. Baltimore/Londong: Johns Hopkins University Press. Open Google Scholar
  127. Marks, Howard M. 1997. The Progress of Experiment. Science and Therapeutic Reform in the United States, 1900–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  128. Mattingly, Paul H. 2017. American Academic Cultures. A History of Higher Education. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  129. Maulitz, Russel C. 1978. Rudolf Virchow, Julius Cohnheim and the Program of Pathology. Bulletin of the History of Medicine 52. 162–182. Open Google Scholar
  130. Maulitz, Russel C. 1979. “Physician versus Bacteriologist.” The Ideology of Science in Clinical Medicine. The Therapeutic Revolution. Essays in the Social History of American Medicine. Ed. Morris J. Vogel / Charles E. Rosenberg. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. 91–107. Open Google Scholar
  131. McClelland, Charles E. 1980. State, Society, and University in Germany 1700–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  132. McClelland, Charles E. 2013. The German Model for American medical Reform. Themenportal Europäische Geschichte. www.europa.clio-online.de/essay/id/fdae-1594, accessed: 5. August 2020. Open Google Scholar
  133. Meltzer, Samuel J. 1909. The Science of Clinical Medicine. What It Ought to Be and the Men to Uphold It. JAMA 53(7): 508–512. Open Google Scholar
  134. Mittra, James. 2016. The New Health Bioeconomy. R&D Policy and Innovation for the Twenty-First Century. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar
  135. Mittra, James / Milne, Christopher-Paul (eds.). 2013. Translational Medicine. The Future of Therapy? Boca Raton: CRC Press. Open Google Scholar
  136. Müller, Johannes. 1834. Jahresbericht über die Fortschritte der anatomisch-physiologischen Wissenschaft im Jahre 1833. Archiv für Anatomie, Physiologie und wissenschaftliche Medicin 1: 1–79. Open Google Scholar
  137. Müller, Ernst / Schmieder, Falko. 2016. Begriffsgeschichte und historische Semantik. Ein kritisches Kompendium. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  138. NIH Study Committee [Chairman: Dean E. Wooldrige]. 1965. Biomedical Science and its Political Administration. A Study of the National Institutes of Health. Washington, D.C. The White House. Open Google Scholar
  139. Nowotny, Helga / Scott, Peter / Gibbons, Michael. 2001. Re-Thinking Science. Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Oxford: Polity. Open Google Scholar
  140. Nyhart, Lynn K. 1995. Biology Takes Form. Animal Morphology and the German Universities, 1800–1900. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  141. Olesko, Kathryn M. 1988. Commentary. On Institutes Investigations, and Scientific Training. Investigative Enterprise. Experimental Physiology in Nineteenth-Century Medicine. Ed. William Coleman / Frederic L. Holmes. Berkley et al.: University of California Press. 295–332. Open Google Scholar
  142. Otis, Laura. 2007. Müller’s Lab. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  143. Pauly, Philip J. 1984. The Appearance of Academic Biology in Late Nineteenth-Century America. Journal of the History of Biology 17(3): 369–397. Open Google Scholar
  144. Pauly, Philip J. 1987. General Physiology and the Discipline of Physiology, 1890–1935. Physiology in the American Context, 1850–1940. Ed. Gerald L. Geison. New York: Springer. 195–207. Open Google Scholar
  145. Park, Buhm Soon. 2008. Disease Categories and Scientific Disciplines. Reorganizing the NIH Intramural Program, 1945–1960. Biomedicine in the Twentieth Century. Practices, Policies, and Politics. Ed. Caroline Hannaway. Amsterdam et al.: IOS Press. Open Google Scholar
  146. Pestre, Dominique. 2003. Regimes of Knowledge Production in Society. Towards a More Political and Social Reading. Minerva 41(3): 245–261. Open Google Scholar
  147. Pickstone, John V. 2000. Ways of Knowing. A New History of Science, Technology and Medicine. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Open Google Scholar
  148. Phillips, Denise. 2012. Acolytes of Nature. Defining Natural Science in Germany 1770–1850. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  149. Phillip, Denise. 2015. Francis Bacon and the Germans. Stories from When ‘science’ meant ‘Wissenschaft’. History of Science 53(4): 378–394. Open Google Scholar
  150. Pickering, Andrew (ed.). 1992. Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  151. Prüll, Cay-Rüdiger. 2000. Zwischen Krankenversorgung und Forschungsprimat. Die Pathologie Open Google Scholar
  152. Quirke, Vivienne / Gaudillière, Jean-Paul. 2008. The Era of Biomedicine. Science, medicine and public health in Britain and France after the Second World War. Medical History 52: 441–452. Open Google Scholar
  153. Rabier, Christelle. 2018. Medicalizing the Surgical Trade, 1650–1820. Workers, Knowledge, Markets and Politics. The Palgrave Handbook of the History of Surgery. Ed. Thomas Schlich. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 71–94. Open Google Scholar
  154. Rasmussen, Nicolas. 2018. Biomedicine and Its Historiography. A Systematic Review. Handbook of the History of Biology. Ed. Michael Dietrich / Mark Borrello / Oren Harman. Cham: Springer Nature. Open Google Scholar
  155. Reil, Johann Christian. 1804. Pepinieren zum Unterricht ärztlicher Routiniers als Bedürfnisse des Staats nach seiner Lage wie sie ist. Halle/Saale: Curtsche Buchhandlung. Open Google Scholar
  156. Reil, Johann Christian. 1910. Entwurf zur Organisation einer wissenschaftlich-medizinischen Schule. Geschichte der königlichen Friedrich-Wilhelmsuniversität zu Berlin. Ed. Max Lenz. Vol. 3. Halle/Saale: Verlag der Buchhandlung des Waisenhauses. Open Google Scholar
  157. Reiser, Stanley Joel. 1979. Medicine and the Reign of Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  158. Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg. 1997. Towards A History of Epistemic Things. Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  159. Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg. 2009. Recent Science and its Exploration: The Case of Molecular Biology. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 40: 6–12. Open Google Scholar
  160. Rosenberg, Charles E. 1997. No Other Gods. On Science and American Social Thought. 2. ed. Baltimore/London: Johns Hopkins University Press. Open Google Scholar
  161. Roser, Wilhelm / Wunderlich, Karl. 1841. Ueber die Mängel der heutigen deutschen Medicin. Programm einer neuen medicinischen Zeitschrift. Stuttgart: Ebner & Seubert. Open Google Scholar
  162. Roser, Wilhelm / Wunderlich, Karl. 1843. Ueber die jetzige Lage der physiologischen Medizin. Archiv für Physiologische Heilkunde 2: 1–5. Open Google Scholar
  163. Roth, Phillip H. 2022. Disziplinen und Kulturen der Wissenschaft. Wissenschaftsforschung. Grundbegriffe, Forschungsfelder und Forschungsfragen (Sozialwissenschaftliche Einführungen 4). Ed. David Kaldewey. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Oldenbourg (forthcoming). Open Google Scholar
  164. Sackett, David L. / Rosenberg, William M.C. / Gray, J. A. Muir / Haynes, R. Brian / Richardson, W. Scott. 1996. Evidence Based Medicine. What it Is and What it Isn’t. BMJ 312: 71–72. Open Google Scholar
  165. Schaffer, Simon. 1990. Genius in Romantic Natural Philosophy. Romanticism and the Sciences. Ed. Andrew Cunningham / Nicholas Jardine. Cambridge: Cambrdige University Press. 82–100- Open Google Scholar
  166. Schatzberg, Eric. 2018. Technology. Critical History of a Concept. Chicago/London: Chicago. Open Google Scholar
  167. Schauz, Désirée. 2014. What is Basic Research? Insights from Historical Semantics. Minerva 52(3): 273–328. Open Google Scholar
  168. Schauz, Désirée. 2015. Wissenschaftsgeschichte und das Revival der Begriffsgeschichte. N.T.M. 22(3): 53–63. Open Google Scholar
  169. Schauz, Désirée. 2020. Nützlichkeit und Erkenntnisfortschritt. Eine Geschichte des modernen Wissenschaftsverständnisses (Deutsches Museum, Abhandlungen und Berichte 33). Göttingen: Wallstein. Open Google Scholar
  170. Schauz, Désirée / Kaldewey, David. 2018. Why Do Concepts Matter to Science Policy? Basic and Applied Research. The Language of Science Policy in the Twentieth Century. Ed. David Kaldewey / Désirée Schauz. 2018. New York/Oxford: Berghahn. 1–32. Open Google Scholar
  171. Schauz, Désirée / Lax, Gregor. 2018. Professional Devotion, National Needs, Fascist Claims, and Democratic Values. The Language of Science Policy in Germany. Basic and Applied Research. The Language of Science Policy in the Twentieth Century. Ed. David Kaldewey / Désirée Schauz. 2018. New York/Oxford: Berghahn. 104–140. Open Google Scholar
  172. Schechter, Alan N. / Perlman, Robert / Rettig, Richard A. 2004. Editor’s Introduction. Why is Revitilizing Clinical Research Is So Important, Yet So Difficult? Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 47(4): 476–486. Open Google Scholar
  173. Scheffler, Robin W. / Strasser, Bruno J. 2015. Art. “Biomedical Sciences, History and Sociology of.” International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Ed. James D. Wright. Second Ed. Vol. 2. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 663–669. Open Google Scholar
  174. Schelling, Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph. 1974. Vorlesungen über die Methode des akademischen Studiums. Hamburg: Meiner. Open Google Scholar
  175. Schelling, Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph / Marcus, Friedrich Adalbert (eds.). 1805–08. Jahrbücher der Medicin als Wissenschaft. Tübingen. Open Google Scholar
  176. Schelsky, Helmut. 1971. Einsamkeit und Freiheit. Idee und Gestalt der deutschen Universität und ihre Reform. 2. ed. Reinbeck: Rowohlt. Open Google Scholar
  177. Schmiedebach, Heinz-Peter. 1992. “Ist nicht wirklich diese ganze zersetzende Naturwissenschaft ein Irrweg?” Virchow und die Zellularpathologie. Medizinhistorisches Journal 27(1/2): 26–42. Open Google Scholar
  178. Schneider, William H. 2015. The Origin of the Medical Research Grant in the United States. The Rockefeller Foundation and the NIH Extramural Funding Program. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 70(2): 279–311. Open Google Scholar
  179. Schönlein, Johannes. 1926. Rede zur Eröffnung der medizinischen Klinik in Würzburg. Deutsche Ärzte-Reden aus dem 19. Jahrhundert. Ed. Erich Ebstein. Berlin: Springer, 6–12. Open Google Scholar
  180. Schweber, Libby. 2006. Disciplining Statistics. Demography and Vital Statistics in France and England, 1830–1885. Durham/London: Duke University Press. Open Google Scholar
  181. Shapin, Steven. 1992. Discipline and Bounding. The History and Sociology of Science as Seen Through the Externalism-Internalism Debate. History of Science 30: 333–369. Open Google Scholar
  182. Shapin, Steven. 2008. The Scientific Life. A Moral History of a Late Modern Vocation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  183. Shapin, Steven. 2012. Never Pure. Historical Studies of Science as If It Was Produced by People with Bodies, Situated in Time, Space, Culture, and Society, and Struggling for Credibility and Authority. Baltimore/London: Johns Hopkins University Press. Open Google Scholar
  184. Shinn, Terry. 2002. The Triple Helix and New Production of Knowledge. Prepackaged Thinking on Science and Technology. Social Studies of Science 32(4): 599–614. Open Google Scholar
  185. Solomon, Miriam. 2011. Just a Paradigm. Evidence-Based Medicine in Epistemological Context. European Journal of Philosophy of Science 1(3): 451–466. Open Google Scholar
  186. Star, Susan Leigh / Griesmer, James R. 1989. Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects. Amateurs and Professionals in Berkley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science 19(3): 387–420. Open Google Scholar
  187. Starr, Paul. 1982. The Social Transformation of American Medicine. The Rise of a Sovereign Profession and the Making of a Vast Industry. New York: Basic Books. Open Google Scholar
  188. Steelman, John R. 1947. The Nation’s Medical Research. A Report to the President. Washington, D.C.: US Government Printing Office. Open Google Scholar
  189. Stichweh, Rudolf. 1984. Zur Entstehung des modernen Systems wissenschaftlicher Disziplinen. Physik in Deutschland, 1740–1890. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  190. Stichweh, Rudolf. 1992. The Sociology of Scientific Disciplines. On the Genesis and Stability of the Disciplinary Structure of Modern Science. Science in Context 5(1): 3–15. Open Google Scholar
  191. Stichweh, Rudolf. 1994a. Professionen und Disziplinen. Formen der Differenzierung zweier Systeme beruflichen Handelns in modernen Gesellschaften. Wissenschaft, Universität, Profession. Soziologische Analysen. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp. 278–336. Open Google Scholar
  192. Stichweh, Rudolf. 1994b. The Unity of Teaching and Research. Romanticism in the Science. Science in Europe, 1780–1840. Ed. Stefano Poggi / Maurizio Bossi. Dodrecht/Boston: Kluwer. 189–202. Open Google Scholar
  193. Stichweh, Rudolf. 2007. Einheit und Differenz im Wissenschaftssystem der Moderne. Zwei Kulturen der Wissenschaft – revisited. Ed. Jost Halfmann / Johannes Rohbeck. Weilerswits: Velbrück Wissenschaft. 213–228. Open Google Scholar
  194. Strasser, Bruno. 2014. Biomedicine. Meanings, assumptions, and possible futures. Report to the Swiss Science and Innovation Council. Open Google Scholar
  195. Sturdy, Steve. 2011. Looking for Trouble. Medical Science and Clinical Practice in the Historiography of Modern Medicine. Social History of Medicine 24(3): 739–757. Open Google Scholar
  196. Swain, Donald C. 1962. The Rise of a Research Empire. NIH, 1930 to 1950. Science 138(3546): 1233–1237. Open Google Scholar
  197. Timmermans, Stefan / Berg, Marc. 2003. The Gold Standard. The Challenge of Evidence-Based Medicine and Standardization of Health Care. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. Open Google Scholar
  198. Timmermans, Stefan / Kolker, Emily S. 2004. Evidence-Based Medicine and the Reconfiguration of Medical Knowledge. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 45: 177–193. Open Google Scholar
  199. Trowler, Paul. 2014. Academic Tribes and Territories. The Theoretical Trajectory. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaften 25(3). 17–26. Open Google Scholar
  200. Tuchman, Arleen Marcia. 1993. Science, Medicine, and the State in Germany. The Case of Baden, 1815–1871. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  201. Tuchman, Arleen. 2000. Ein verwirrendes Dreieck. Universität, Charité, Pépinière. Jahrbuch für Universitätsgeschichte 3: 36–47. Open Google Scholar
  202. Turner, Stephen. 2000. What are Disciplines? And How is Interdisciplinarity Different? Interdisciplinarity. The Paradoxical Discourse. Practicing Interdisciplinarity. Ed. Perter Weingart / Nico Stehr. Toronto et al.: University of Toronto Press. 46–65. Open Google Scholar
  203. Turner, Stephen. 2017. Knowledge Formations. An Analytic Framework. The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. 2nd ed. Ed. Robert Frodeman / Julie Thompson Klein / Roberto C. S. Pacheco. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 9–20. Open Google Scholar
  204. Turner, Steven R. 1980. Bildungsbürgertum and the Learned Professions in Prussia, 1770–1830. The Origins of a Class. Histoire Sociale Social History 12(25): 105–135. Open Google Scholar
  205. US Senate, Committee on Government Operations. 1959. The National Science Foundation and the Life Sciences. Washington, D.C. Open Google Scholar
  206. Van der Laan, Anna Laura / Boenink, Marianne. 2015. Beyond Bench and Bedside. Disentangling the Concept of Translational Research. Health Care Analysis 23: 32–49. Open Google Scholar
  207. Vignola-Gagné, Etienne. 2014. Argumentative Practices in Science, Technology and Innovation Policy. The Case of Clinician-Scientists and Translational Research. Science and Public Policy 41: 94–106. Open Google Scholar
  208. Virchow, Rudolf. 1847. Ueber die Standpunkte in der wissenschaftlichen Medicin. Archiv für pathologische Anatomie, Physiologie und klinische Medicin 1: 3–19. Open Google Scholar
  209. Virchow, Rudolf. 1849. Die naturwissenschaftliche Methode und die Standpunkte in der Therapie. Archiv für pathologische Anatomie, Physiologie und klinische Medicin 2: 3–37. Open Google Scholar
  210. Virchow, Rudolf. 1855. Cellular-Pathologie. Archiv für pathologische Anatomie, Physiologie und klinische Medicin 8: 3–39. Open Google Scholar
  211. Virchow, Rudolf. 1877. Ueber die Standpunkte in der wissenschaftlichen Medicin. Archiv für pathologische Anatomie, Physiologie und klinische Medicin 70(1): 1–10. Open Google Scholar
  212. Virchow, Rudolf. 1958. Disease, Life, and Man. Selected Essays by Rudolf Virchow. Trans. Lelland J. Rather. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  213. Vogd, Werner. 2002. Professionalisierungsschub oder Auflösung ärztlicher Autonomie? Die Bedeutung von Evidence Based Medicine und der neuen Funktionalen Eliten in der Medizin aus system- und interaktionstheoretischer Perspektive. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 31(4): 294–315. Open Google Scholar
  214. Waddington, Ivan. 1990. The Movement Towards the Professionalization of Medicine. BMJ 301: 688–690. Open Google Scholar
  215. Wallis, Faith. 2018. Pre-Modern Surgery. Wounds, Words, and the Paradox of “Tradition”. The Palgrave Handbook of the History of Surgery. Ed. Thomas Schlich. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 49–70. Open Google Scholar
  216. Warner, John Harley. 1985. Science in Medicine. Osiris 1: 37–58. Open Google Scholar
  217. Warner, John Harley. 1986. The Therapeutic Perspective. Medical Practice, Knowledge, and Identity in America, 1820–1885. Cambridge, M.A./London: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
  218. Warner, John Harley. 1991. Ideals of Science and their Discontents in Late Nineteenth-Century American Medicine. Isis 82(3): 454–478. Open Google Scholar
  219. Warner, John Harley. 1992. The Rise and Fall of Professional Mystery. Epistemology, authority and the emergence of laboratory medicine in nineteenth-century America. The Laboratory Revolution in Medicine. Ed. Andrew Cunningham / Perry Williams. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 110–141. Open Google Scholar
  220. Warner, John Harley. 1995. The History of Science and the Sciences of Medicine. Osiris 10: 164–193. Open Google Scholar
  221. Weingart, Peter. 2000. Interdisciplinarity. The Paradoxical Discourse. Practicing Interdisciplinarity. Ed. Perter Weingart / Nico Stehr. Toronto et al.: University of Toronto Press. 25–41. Open Google Scholar
  222. Weingart, Peter. 2010. A Short History of Knowledge Formations. The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. Ed. Julie Thompson Klein / Carl Mitcham. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. 3–14. Open Google Scholar
  223. Weisz, George. 2005. From Clinical Counting to Evidence-Based Medicine. Body Counts. Medical Quantification in Historical & Sociological Perspective. Ed. Gérard Jorland / Annick Opinel / George Weisz. Montreal et al.: McGill-Queen’s University Press. 377–393. Open Google Scholar
  224. Weisz, George. 2006. Divide and Conquer. A Comparative History of Medical Specialization. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  225. Weisz, George / Cambrosio, Alberto / Keating, Peter / Knaapen, Loes / Schlich, Thomas / Tournay, Virginie J. 2007. The Emergence of Clinical Practice Guidelines. The Milbank Quarterly 85(4): 691–727. Open Google Scholar
  226. Wimmer, Mario. 2015. “Conceptual History: Begriffsgeschichte.” International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Ed. James D. Wright. Second Ed. Vol. 2. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 548–554. Open Google Scholar
  227. Wilson-Kovacz, Dana / Hauskeller, Christine. 2012. The Clinician-Scientist. Professional Dynamics in Clinical Stem Cell Research. Sociology of Health & Illness 34(4): 497–512. Open Google Scholar
  228. Wunderlich, Karl. 1845. Das Verhältniss der physiologischen Medicin zur ärztlichen Praxis. Archiv für physiologische Heilkunde 4. 1–13. Open Google Scholar
  229. Zammito, John. 2018. The Gestation of German Biology. Physiology and Philosophy from Stahl to Schelling. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  230. Zerhouni, Elias. 2003. The NIH Roadmap. Science 302: 63–72. Open Google Scholar

Similar publications

from the topics "Health and Medicine General", "Sociology General", "Medical Ethics"
Cover of book: Lehren und Lernen von Bewegungen
Book Titles Full access
Jörg Bietz, Hans-Georg Scherer
Lehren und Lernen von Bewegungen
Cover of book: Health Psychology
Edited Book No access
Philipp Stang, Maren Weiss, Martin G. Köllner
Health Psychology
Cover of book: Systemtheorie und Erzählen
Book Titles No access
Ralf Kellermann
Systemtheorie und Erzählen
Cover of book: Rethinking Obesity Prevention
Book Titles No access
Vasiliki Kolovou
Rethinking Obesity Prevention
Cover of book: Datenschutz in der Arzneimittelforschung
Book Titles No access
Wiebke de Raaf
Datenschutz in der Arzneimittelforschung

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via Open Athens
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex