Cover des Buchs: Medicine as Science
Monographie Open Access Vollzugriff

Medicine as Science

The Making of Disciplinary Identity from Scientific Medicine to Biomedicine
Autor:innen:
Verlag:
 2022

Zusammenfassung

Der Band beleuchtet die vergessene Identität der Medizin als moderne akademische Disziplin. Viele Arbeiten in der Geschichte und Soziologie der Wissenschaft und Medizin haben diese Identität mit dem Fokus auf die Medizin als modernen Beruf überschattet. Dieses Buch untersucht die Identitätsarbeit der Medizin von den Anfängen der modernen Forschungsuniversität bis zu den aktuellen Diskursen über Wissenschaft und Medizin mithilfe einer historischen Soziologie und unter Verwendung einer begriffsgeschichtlichen Perspektive. Es zeigt, wie wichtige Institutionen und Grundkonzepte der Medizin entstanden sind, und legt ihre kulturellen Ursprünge offen. Es wird aufgezeigt, wie die Idee der Biomedizin heute die enge Verbindung zwischen Laborforschung und Aussichten auf eine bessere Gesundheitsversorgung bedeutet.

Schlagworte

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Copyrightjahr
2022
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-8750-0
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-3188-1
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe
Wissenschafts- und Technikforschung
Band
22
Sprache
Englisch
Seiten
226
Produkttyp
Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 - 11 Download Kapitel (PDF)
  2. Acknowledgements 12 - 14 Download Kapitel (PDF)
  3. Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. I. Towards a Historical Sociology of Medicine’s Disciplinary Identity
    2. II. The Forgotten Disciplinary Identity of Medicine
    3. III. Historical Semantics and Discourse Analysis – Theoretical Approach and Method
  4. Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. I. Academic Knowledge and the Social Structure of Science
    2. II. From the Culture of Science to Cultures of Research
    3. III. The Emergence of Disciplinary Cultures in the Modern Research University
    4. IV. Academic Tribes and Disciplinary Territories
    5. V. Disciplines as Political Institutions
    6. VI. Disciplinary Boundary and Identity Work
  5. Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. I. Medicine Between Art and Learnedness – The Conceptual Background
    2. II. The Institutional Environment in Prussia’s Capital
    3. III. Johann Christian Reil’s Plan for Reforming Academic Medicine
    4. IV. A Modern Division of Medical Labor
    5. V. The New Physiology as Modern Medicine’s Scientific Culture
    6. VI. The Function of Medicine as a Modern Academic Discipline
  6. Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. I. Medicine as an Exact Science – The Physiological Program
    2. II. The Ideology of Methodology in Mid-Nineteenth-Century Germany
      1. a. The Science of Pathology
      2. b. A Science of Therapy
  7. Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. I. German Ideals of Academic Medicine in the American Discourse
    2. II. From Applied Science to the Pure Science of Clinical Medicine
    3. III. Institutional Ambiguities of Medical and Biological Research
  8. Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. I. The Birth of the Administrative Shorthand “Biomedical”
    2. II. From “Allied” to “Underlying” Sciences
    3. III. The Political Boundary Between Biomedical Science and the Life Sciences
    4. IV. The Linear Legacy of Biomedicine
  9. Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. I. Evidence-Based Medicine and the New Cultural Foundation of Clinical Practice
    2. II. Shifting the Basis of Clinical Medicine Through Guidelines
    3. III. Confirming the Linear Legacy with Translational Science
    4. IV. The Character of Translation Practices
  10. 8. Conclusion – Biomedicine as Discipline and Integrational Category 204 - 212 Download Kapitel (PDF)
  11. Bibliography 213 - 226 Download Kapitel (PDF)

Literaturverzeichnis (230)

  1. Abbott, Andrew. 2001. Chaos of Disciplines. Chicago/London: Chicago University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  2. Ahrens, Edward H. 1992. The Crisis in Clinical Research. Overcoming Institutional Obstacles. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  3. Amsterdamska, Olga. 2005. Demarcating Epidemiology. Science, Technology, & Human Values 30(1) Special Issue: Demarcation Socialized. Constructing Boundaries and Recognizing Difference: 17–51. Google Scholar öffnen
  4. Amundsen, Darrel W. 1979. Medicine and Surgery as Art or Craft. The Role of Schematic Literature in the Separation of Medicine and Surgery in the Late Middle Ages. Transactions & Studies of the College of Physicians of Philadelphia 1(1): 43–57. Google Scholar öffnen
  5. Appel, Toby A. 1987. Biological and Medical Societies and the Founding of the American Physiological Society. Physiology in the American Context, 1850–1940. Ed. Gerald L. Geison. New York: Springer. 155–176. Google Scholar öffnen
  6. Appel, Toby A. 1991. Organizing Biology. The American Society of Naturalists and its “Affiliated Societies”, 1883–1923. The American Development of Biology. Ed. Ronald Rainger / Keith R. Benson / Jane Maienschein. New Brunswick/London: Rutgers University Press. 87–120. Google Scholar öffnen
  7. Appel, Toby A. 2000. Shaping Biology. The National Science Foundation and American Biological Research, 1945–1975. Baltimore/London: Johns Hopkins University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  8. Armstrong, David. 2007. Professionalism, Indeterminacy and the EBM Project. BioSocieties 2(1): 73–84. Google Scholar öffnen
  9. Ash, Mitchell G. 2019. Interdisciplinarity in Historical Perspective. Perspectives on Science 27(4): 619–642. Google Scholar öffnen
  10. Barker, Lewellys F. 1908. Medical Laboratories. Their Relations to Medical Practice and Medical Discovery. Science 27(694): 601–611. Google Scholar öffnen
  11. Barker, Lewellys F. 1913. On the Cultivation of the Clinical Sciences of Diagnosis and Therapy. Science 37(959): 731–738. Google Scholar öffnen
  12. Barker, Lewellys F. 1916. Relation of the Preclinical Laboratory Courses to the Work of the Clinical Years. JAMA 66(9): 631–635. Google Scholar öffnen
  13. Barnes, Barry / Bloor, David / Henry, John. 1996. Scientific Knowledge. A Sociological Analysis. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  14. Becher, Tony / Trowler, Paul R. 2001. Academic Tribes and Territories. Intellectual Enquiry and the Culture of Disciplines. 2nd ed. Maidenhead: The Society for Research into Higher Education / Open University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  15. Benson, Keith R. 1991. From Museum Research to Laboratory Research. The Transformation of Natural History into Academic Biology. The American Development of Biology. Ed. Ronald Rainger / Keith R. Benson / Jane Maienschein. New Brunswick/London: Rutgers University Press. 49–83. Google Scholar öffnen
  16. Berliner, Howard S. 1985. A System of Scientific Medicine. Philanthropic Foundations in the Flexner Era. New York/London: Travistock. Google Scholar öffnen
  17. Bleker, Johanna. 1981. Die Naturhistorische Schule, 1825–1645. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der klinischen Medizin in Deutschland. Stuttgart: Fischer. Google Scholar öffnen
  18. Bleker, Johanna. 1987/88. Medical Students – to the Bed-Side or to the Laboratory? The Emergence of Laboratory-Training in German Medical Education, 1870–1900. Clio Medica 21(1/4): 35–46. Google Scholar öffnen
  19. Benaroyo, Lazare. 1998. Rudolf Virchow and the Scientific Approach to Medicine. Endeavour 22(3). 114–116. Google Scholar öffnen
  20. Bonner, Thomas N. 1990. The German Model of Training Physicians in the United States, 1870–1914. How Closely was it Followed? Bulletin of the History of Medicine 64(1): 18–34. Google Scholar öffnen
  21. Bonner, Thomas N. 1995a. Becoming a Physician. Medical Education in Britain, France, Germany, and the United States, 1750–1945. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  22. Bonner, Thomas N. 1995b. German Influences on American Clinical Medicine, 1870–1914. German Influences on Education in the United States to 1917. Ed. Henry Geitz / Jürgen Heideking / Jurgen Herbst. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 275–287. Google Scholar öffnen
  23. Borck, Cornelius. 2020. Negotiating Epistemic Hierarchies in Biomedicine: The Rise and Fall of Evidence-based Medicine. Weak Knowledge: Forms, Functions, and Dynamics. Ed. Moritz Epple / Annette Imhausen / Falk Müller. Frankfurt/New York: Campus. 449–482. Google Scholar öffnen
  24. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1975. The Specificity of the Scientific Field and the Social Conditions of the Progress of Reason. Social Science Information 14(6). 19–47. Google Scholar öffnen
  25. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  26. Bourdieu, Pierre / Wacquant, Loïc J.D. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  27. Broman, Thomas. 1989. University Reform in Medical Thought at the End of the Eighteenth Century. Osiris 5: 36–53. Google Scholar öffnen
  28. Broman, Thomas. 1991. J. C. Reil and the “Journalization” of Physiology. The Literary Structure of Scientific Arguments. Historical Studies. Ed. Peter Dear. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  29. Broman, Thomas. 1996. The Transformation of German Academic Medicine, 1750–1820. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  30. Bruchhausen, Walter. 2010. “Biomedizin” in sozial- und kulturwissenschaftlichen Beiträgen. Eine Begriffskariere zwischen Analyse und Polemik. N.T.M. 18. Google Scholar öffnen
  31. Bud, Robert. 2007. Penicillin. Triumph and Tragedy. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  32. Bud, Robert. 2014. Applied Science in Nineteenth-Century Britain. Public Discourse and the Creation of Meaning, 1817–1876. History and Technology 30(4): 1–34. Google Scholar öffnen
  33. Bush, Vannevar. 1995 [1945]. Science – The Endless Frontier. North Stratford, N.H.: Ayer Company Publishers. Google Scholar öffnen
  34. Butler, Declan. 2008. Translational Research. Crossing the Valley of Death. Nature 453: 840–842. Google Scholar öffnen
  35. Bylebyl, Jerome J. 1990. The Medical Meaning of Physica. Osiris 6: 16–41. Google Scholar öffnen
  36. Bynum; William. 1994. Science and the Practice of Medicine in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  37. Cahan, David (ed.). 2003. From Natural Philosophy to the Sciences. Writing the History of Nineteenth-Century Science. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  38. Cambrosio, Alberto / Keating, Peter / Schlich, Thomas / Weisz, George. 2006. Regulatory Objectivity and the Generation and Management of Evidence in Medicine. Social Science & Medicine 63: 189–199. Google Scholar öffnen
  39. Chadarevian, Soraya de / Kamminga, Harmke (eds.). 1998. Molecularizing Biology and Medicine. New Perspectives and Alliances, 1910s-1970s. Amsterdam: Harwood. Google Scholar öffnen
  40. Chalmers, Iain / Glasziou, Paul. 2009. Avoidable Waste in the Production and Reporting of Research Evidence. The Lancet 374: 86–89. Google Scholar öffnen
  41. Clarke, Adele E. / Shim, Janet K. / Mamo, Laura / Fosket, Jennifer Ruth / Fishman / Jennifer R. 2003. Biomedicalization. Technoscientific Transformations of Health, Illness, and US Biomedicine. American Sociological Review 68(2). 161–194. Google Scholar öffnen
  42. Clarke, Sabine. 2010. Pure Science with a Practical Aim. The Meanings of Fundamental Research in Britain, circa 1916–1950. Isis 101(2): 285–311. Google Scholar öffnen
  43. Cohen, Michael Aaron / Stavri, P. Zoë / Hersch, William R. 2004. A Categorization and Analysis of The Criticisms of Evidence-Based Medicine. International Journal of Medical Informatics 73: 35–43. Google Scholar öffnen
  44. Coleman, William. 1988. Prussian Pedagogy. Purkyně at Breslau, 1823–1829. The Investigative Enterprise. Experimental Physiology in Nineteenth-Century Medicine. Ed. William Coleman / Frederic L. Holmes. Berkley et al.: University of California Press. 15–64. Google Scholar öffnen
  45. Cooper, Joseph D. 1965. Onward the Management of Science. The Woolridge Report. Science 148(3676): 1433–1439. Google Scholar öffnen
  46. Crabu, Stefano. 2018. Rethinking Biomedicine in the Age of Translational Research. Organizational, Professional, and Epistemic Encounters. Sociology Compass e12623. doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12623. Google Scholar öffnen
  47. Cunningham, Andrew. 2002. The pen and the sword. Recovering the disciplinary identity of physiology and anatomy before 1800. I: Old physiology – the pen. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 33: 631–665. Google Scholar öffnen
  48. Cunningham, Andrew. 2003. The pen and the sword. Recovering the disciplinary identity of physiology and anatomy before 1800. II: Old anatomy – the sword. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 34: 51–76. Google Scholar öffnen
  49. Daly, Jeanne. 2005. Evidence-Based Medicine and the Search for a Science of Clinical Care. Berkley et al.: University of California Press/Milbank Memorial Fund. Google Scholar öffnen
  50. Davis, Nathan S. 1891. The Basis of Scientific Medicine and the Proper Methods of Investigation. JAMA 16(4): 114–120. Google Scholar öffnen
  51. Dewey, John. 1910. Science as Subject-Matter and as Method. Science 31(787): 121–127. Google Scholar öffnen
  52. Dewey, John. 1997. How We Think. Mineola: Dover. Google Scholar öffnen
  53. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. 1992. Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA 268(17): 2420–2425. Google Scholar öffnen
  54. Feinstein, Alvan. 1995. The Crisis in Clinical Research. Review Essay. Bulletin of the History of Medicine 69(2): 288–291. Google Scholar öffnen
  55. Felt, Ulrike / Igelsböck, Judith / Schikowitz, Andrea / Völker, Thomas. 2013. Growing into What? The (Un-)disciplined Socialization of Early Stage Researchers into Transdisciplinary Research. Higher Education 65(4): 511–524. Google Scholar öffnen
  56. Felt, Ulrike / Fouché, Rayvon / Miller, Clark A. / Smith-Doerr, Laurel (eds.). 2017. Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. 4th ed. Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  57. Flexner, Abraham. 1910. Medical Education in the United States and Canada. A Report to the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. New York. Google Scholar öffnen
  58. Foucault, Michel. 1973. The Birth of the Clinic. An Archeology of Medical Perception. Trans. A. M. Sheridan. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
  59. French, Roger, 2003. Medicine Before Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  60. Frevert, Ute. 1984. Krankheit als politisches Problem, 1770–1880. Soziale Unterschichten in Preußen zwischen medizinischer Polizei und staatlicher Sozialversicherung. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. Google Scholar öffnen
  61. Funtowicz, Silvio O. / Ravetz, Jerome R. 1993. The Emergence of Post-Normal Science. Science, Politics and Morality. Scientific Uncertainty and Decision-Making. Ed. René von Schomberg. Dodrecht et al.: Kluwer. 85–123. Google Scholar öffnen
  62. Fye, Bruce. 1987. The Development of American Physiology. Scientific Medicine in the Nineteenth Century. Baltimore/London: Johns Hopkins University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  63. Galison, Peter / Stump, David J. (eds.). 1996. The Disunity of Science. Boundaries, Contexts, and Power. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  64. Geertz, Clifford. 1983. Local Knowledge. Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. New York: Basic Books. Google Scholar öffnen
  65. Geison, Gerald. 1979. Divided We Stand. Physiologists and Clinicians in the American Context. The Therapeutic Revolution. Essays in the Social History of American Medicine. Ed. Morris J. Vogel / Charles E. Rosenberg. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. 67–90. Google Scholar öffnen
  66. Glasziou, Paul / Chalmers, Iain. 2018. Research Wast is Still a Scandal. BMJ 363: k4645. Google Scholar öffnen
  67. Gibbons, Michael / Limoges, Camille / Nowotny, Helga / Schwartzman, Simon / Scott, Peter / Trow, Martin. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. Los Angeles et al.: Sage. Google Scholar öffnen
  68. Gieryn, Thomas F. 1995. Boundaries of Science. Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Ed. Sheila Jasanoff / Gerald E. Markle / James C. Petersen / Trevor Pinch. Rev. e ed. Thousand Oaks et al: Sage. 393–443 Google Scholar öffnen
  69. Gieryn, Thomas F. 1999. Cultural Boundaries of Science. Credibility on the Line. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  70. Godin, Benoît. 2006. The Linear Model of Innovation. The Historical Construction of an Analytical Framework. Science, Technology, & Human Values 31(6). 639–667. Google Scholar öffnen
  71. Godin, Benoît. 2017. Models of Innovation. The History of an Idea. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  72. Greenhalgh, Susan. 2008. Just One Child. Science and Policy in Deng’s China. Berkley/Los Angeles: University of California Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  73. Hackett, Edward J. / Parker, John N. / Vermeulen, Niki / Penders, Bart. 2017. The Social and Epistemic Organization of Scientific Work. Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. 4th ed. Ed. Ulrike Felt, and Ulrike / Fouché, Rayvon / Miller, Clark A. / Smith-Doerr, Laurel. Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press. 733–764. Google Scholar öffnen
  74. Hacking, Ian. 1992. The Self-Vindication of the Laboratory Sciences. Science and Practice and Culture. Ed. Andrew Pickering. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press. 29–64. Google Scholar öffnen
  75. Hacking, Ian. 2012. Introductory Essay. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Kuhn 2012). 4th ed. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press. vii–xxxviii. Google Scholar öffnen
  76. Hagner, Michael. 2003. Scientific Medicine. From Natural Philosophy to the Sciences. Writing History of Nineteenth-Century Science. Ed. David Cahan. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press. 49–87. Google Scholar öffnen
  77. Harris, Henry. 1999. The Birth of the Cell. New Haven/London: Yale University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  78. Harris, Roy. 2005. The Semantics of Science. London/New York: Continuum. Google Scholar öffnen
  79. Harvey, A. McGhehee. 1981. Science at the Bedside. Clinical Research in American Medicine, 1905–1945. Baltimore/London: Johns Hopkins University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  80. Heinig, Stephen J. / Quon, Andrew S. W. / Meyer, Roger E. / Korn, David. 1999. The Changing Landscape of Clinical Research. Academic Medicine 74(6): 726–745. Google Scholar öffnen
  81. Heller, Robert. 1975. Johann Christian Reil’s Training Scheme for Medical Auxiliaries. Medical History 19(4): 321–332. Google Scholar öffnen
  82. Hendriks, Barbara / Simons, Arno / Reinhart, Martin. 2019. What are Clinician-Scientists Expected to Do? The Undefined Space of Professionalizable Work in Translational Biomedicine. Minerva 57: 219–237. Google Scholar öffnen
  83. Henle, Jacob. 1844. Medizinische Wissenschaft und Empirie. Zeitschrift für rationelle Medizin 1: 1–35. Google Scholar öffnen
  84. Hess, Volker. 1993. Von der semiotischen zur diagnostischen Medizin. Die Entstehung der klinischen Methode zwischen 1750 und 1850. Husum: Matthisen. Google Scholar öffnen
  85. Hess, Volker. 1994. Objektivität und Rhetorik. Karl August Wunderlich (1815–1877) und die klinische Thermometrie. Medizinhistorisches Journal 32(3/4). 299–319. Google Scholar öffnen
  86. Hess, Volker. 1995. Diagnose und Krankheitsverständnis der medizinischen Klinik der Berliner Universität, 1820–1845. Abhandlungen zur Geschichte der Medizin und Naturwissenschaften 67: 101–10. Google Scholar öffnen
  87. Hess, Volker. 2010a. Die Alte Charité, die moderne Irrenabteilung und die Klinik (1790–1820). Die Charité. Geschichte(n) eines Krankenhauses. Ed. Johanna Bleker / Volker Hess. Berlin Akademie Verlag. 44–69. Google Scholar öffnen
  88. Volker Hess. 2010b. Fieberbehandlung und klinische Wissenschaft (1820–1850). Die Charité. Geschichte(n) eines Krankenhauses. Ed. Johanna Bleker / Volker Hess. Berlin Akademie Verlag. 70–98. Google Scholar öffnen
  89. Hippocrates. 2012. On the Art of Medicine. Ed., trans., & commentary Joel E. Mann. Leiden/Boston: Brill. Google Scholar öffnen
  90. Höpfner, Ludwig Julius Friedrich, 1778. Deutsche Encyclopädie oder Allgemeines Real-Wörterbuch aller Künste und Wissenschaften. Vol. 1: A–Ar. Frankfurt/Main: Varrentrap und Wenner. Google Scholar öffnen
  91. Huerkamp, Claudia. 1985. Aufstieg der Ärzte. Vom Gelehrten Stand zum professionellen Experten. Das Beispiel Preußens. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. Google Scholar öffnen
  92. von Humboldt, Wilhelm. 1964. Über die Organisation des Medizinalwesens. Schriften zur Politik und zum Bildungswesen (Werke in Fünf Bänden IV). Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. 56–63. Google Scholar öffnen
  93. Jacobs, Jerry A. 2013. In Defense of Disciplines. Interdisciplinarity and Specialization in the Research University. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  94. Jasanoff, Sheila (ed.). 2004. States of Knowledge. The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. London/New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
  95. Jasanoff, Sheila / Kim, Sang-Hyun (eds.). 2015. Dreamscapes of Modernity. Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  96. Kaldewey, David. 2013. Wahrheit und Nützlichkeit. Selbstbeschreibungen der Wissenschaft zwischen Autonomie und gesellschaftlicher Relevanz. Bielefeld: transcript. Google Scholar öffnen
  97. Kaldewey, David. 2018: The Grand Challenges Discourse. Transforming Identity Work in Science and Science Policy. Minerva 56: 161–182. Google Scholar öffnen
  98. Kaldewey, David / Schauz, Désirée (eds.). 2018. Basic and Applied Research. The Language of Science Policy in the Twentieth Century. New York/Oxford: Berghahn. Google Scholar öffnen
  99. Kaldewey, David / Schauz, Désirée. 2018. Transforming Pure Science into Basic Research. The Language of Science Policy in the United States. Basic and Applied Research. The Language of Science Policy in the Twentieth Century. Ed. David Kaldewey / Désirée Schauz. New York/Oxford: Berghahn. 104–140. Google Scholar öffnen
  100. Kay, Lilly, 1993. The Molecular Vision of Life. Caltech, The Rockefeller Foundation, and the Rise of the New Biology. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  101. Keating, Peter / Cambrosio, Alberto. 2003. Biomedical Platforms. Realigning the normal and the pathological in late-twentieth-century medicine. Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  102. Keating, Peter / Cambrosio, Alberto. 2004. Does biomedicine entail the successful reduction of pathology to biology? Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 47(3): 357–371. Google Scholar öffnen
  103. Keating, Peter / Cambrosio, Alberto. 2012. Cancer on Trial. Oncology as a New Style of Practice. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  104. Knaapen, Loes. 2014. Evidence-based Medicine or Cookbook Medicine? Addressing Concerns over the Standardization of Care. Sociology Compass 8(6): 823–836. Google Scholar öffnen
  105. Knorr Cetina, Karin / Reichmann, Werner. 2015. Art. “Epistemic Cultures.” International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Ed. James D. Wright. Second Ed. Vol. 7. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 873–880. Google Scholar öffnen
  106. Knorr Cetina, Karin. 1981. The Manufacture of Knowledge. An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Oxford et al.: Pergamon Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  107. Knorr Cetina, Karin. 1999. Epistemic Cultures. How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge/Londong: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  108. Kohler, Robert E. 1979. From Medical Chemistry to Biochemistry. The Making of a Biomedical Discipline. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  109. Kohler, Robert E. 1982. Medical Reform and Biomedical Science. Biochemistry – A Case Study. The Therapeutic Revolution. Essays in the Social History of American Medicine. Ed. Morris J. Vogel / Charles E. Rosenberg. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. 27–66. Google Scholar öffnen
  110. Kohler, Robert E. 1991. Partners in Science. Foundations and Natural Scientists, 1900–1945. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  111. Koselleck, Reinhart. 1979. Vergangene Zukunft. Zur Semantik geschichtlicher Zeiten. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen
  112. Koselleck, Reinhart. 2006. Begriffsgeschichten. Studien zur Semantik und Pragmatik der politischen und sozialen Sprache. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen
  113. Kraft, Alison. 2013. New Light Through an Old Window? The “Translational Turn” in Biomedical Research. A Historical Perspective. Translational Medicine. The Future of Therapy? Ed. James Mittra / Christopher-Paul Milne. Boca Raton: CRC Press. 19–53. Google Scholar öffnen
  114. Kremer, Richard L. 2009. Physiology. The Cambridge History of Science. Volume 6: The Modern Biological and Earth Sciences. Ed. Peter J. Bowler / John V. Pickstone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 342–366. Google Scholar öffnen
  115. Kuhn, Thomas S. 2012. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 4th ed. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  116. Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action. How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  117. Latour, Bruno. 1998. From the World of Science to the World of Research? Science 280: 208–209. Google Scholar öffnen
  118. Latour, Bruno / Woolgar, Steve. 1986. Laboratory Life. The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  119. Lawrence, Christopher. 1985. Incommunicable Knowledge. Science, Technology, and the Clinical Art in Britain, 1850–1914. Journal of Contemporary History 20(4): 503–520. Google Scholar öffnen
  120. Leng, Gareth / Leng, Rhodri Ivor. 2020. The Matter of Facts. Skepticism, Persuasion, and Evidence in Science. Cambridge/London: MIT Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  121. Lenoir, Timothy. 1997. Instituting Science. The Cultural Production of Scientific Disciplines. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  122. Lindemann, Mary. 1996. Healing & Health in Eighteenth Century Germany. Baltimore/London: Johns Hopkins University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  123. Lohff, Brigitte. 1981. Johannes Müllers “Jahresberichte zur Physiologie” in Müllers Archiv der Jahre 1834–1838. Sudhoffs Archiv 65(1): 32–78. Google Scholar öffnen
  124. Löwy, Ilana. 2011. Historiography of Biomedicine. “Bio”, “Medicine”, and In Between. Isis 102(1): 116–122. Google Scholar öffnen
  125. Löwy, Ilana. 1996. Between Bench and Bedside. Science, Healing, and Interlukin-2 in a Cancer Ward. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  126. Ludmerer, Kenneth M. 1996. Learning to Heal. The Development of American Medical Education. Baltimore/Londong: Johns Hopkins University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  127. Marks, Howard M. 1997. The Progress of Experiment. Science and Therapeutic Reform in the United States, 1900–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  128. Mattingly, Paul H. 2017. American Academic Cultures. A History of Higher Education. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  129. Maulitz, Russel C. 1978. Rudolf Virchow, Julius Cohnheim and the Program of Pathology. Bulletin of the History of Medicine 52. 162–182. Google Scholar öffnen
  130. Maulitz, Russel C. 1979. “Physician versus Bacteriologist.” The Ideology of Science in Clinical Medicine. The Therapeutic Revolution. Essays in the Social History of American Medicine. Ed. Morris J. Vogel / Charles E. Rosenberg. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. 91–107. Google Scholar öffnen
  131. McClelland, Charles E. 1980. State, Society, and University in Germany 1700–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  132. McClelland, Charles E. 2013. The German Model for American medical Reform. Themenportal Europäische Geschichte. www.europa.clio-online.de/essay/id/fdae-1594, accessed: 5. August 2020. Google Scholar öffnen
  133. Meltzer, Samuel J. 1909. The Science of Clinical Medicine. What It Ought to Be and the Men to Uphold It. JAMA 53(7): 508–512. Google Scholar öffnen
  134. Mittra, James. 2016. The New Health Bioeconomy. R&D Policy and Innovation for the Twenty-First Century. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen
  135. Mittra, James / Milne, Christopher-Paul (eds.). 2013. Translational Medicine. The Future of Therapy? Boca Raton: CRC Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  136. Müller, Johannes. 1834. Jahresbericht über die Fortschritte der anatomisch-physiologischen Wissenschaft im Jahre 1833. Archiv für Anatomie, Physiologie und wissenschaftliche Medicin 1: 1–79. Google Scholar öffnen
  137. Müller, Ernst / Schmieder, Falko. 2016. Begriffsgeschichte und historische Semantik. Ein kritisches Kompendium. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen
  138. NIH Study Committee [Chairman: Dean E. Wooldrige]. 1965. Biomedical Science and its Political Administration. A Study of the National Institutes of Health. Washington, D.C. The White House. Google Scholar öffnen
  139. Nowotny, Helga / Scott, Peter / Gibbons, Michael. 2001. Re-Thinking Science. Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Oxford: Polity. Google Scholar öffnen
  140. Nyhart, Lynn K. 1995. Biology Takes Form. Animal Morphology and the German Universities, 1800–1900. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  141. Olesko, Kathryn M. 1988. Commentary. On Institutes Investigations, and Scientific Training. Investigative Enterprise. Experimental Physiology in Nineteenth-Century Medicine. Ed. William Coleman / Frederic L. Holmes. Berkley et al.: University of California Press. 295–332. Google Scholar öffnen
  142. Otis, Laura. 2007. Müller’s Lab. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  143. Pauly, Philip J. 1984. The Appearance of Academic Biology in Late Nineteenth-Century America. Journal of the History of Biology 17(3): 369–397. Google Scholar öffnen
  144. Pauly, Philip J. 1987. General Physiology and the Discipline of Physiology, 1890–1935. Physiology in the American Context, 1850–1940. Ed. Gerald L. Geison. New York: Springer. 195–207. Google Scholar öffnen
  145. Park, Buhm Soon. 2008. Disease Categories and Scientific Disciplines. Reorganizing the NIH Intramural Program, 1945–1960. Biomedicine in the Twentieth Century. Practices, Policies, and Politics. Ed. Caroline Hannaway. Amsterdam et al.: IOS Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  146. Pestre, Dominique. 2003. Regimes of Knowledge Production in Society. Towards a More Political and Social Reading. Minerva 41(3): 245–261. Google Scholar öffnen
  147. Pickstone, John V. 2000. Ways of Knowing. A New History of Science, Technology and Medicine. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  148. Phillips, Denise. 2012. Acolytes of Nature. Defining Natural Science in Germany 1770–1850. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  149. Phillip, Denise. 2015. Francis Bacon and the Germans. Stories from When ‘science’ meant ‘Wissenschaft’. History of Science 53(4): 378–394. Google Scholar öffnen
  150. Pickering, Andrew (ed.). 1992. Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  151. Prüll, Cay-Rüdiger. 2000. Zwischen Krankenversorgung und Forschungsprimat. Die Pathologie Google Scholar öffnen
  152. Quirke, Vivienne / Gaudillière, Jean-Paul. 2008. The Era of Biomedicine. Science, medicine and public health in Britain and France after the Second World War. Medical History 52: 441–452. Google Scholar öffnen
  153. Rabier, Christelle. 2018. Medicalizing the Surgical Trade, 1650–1820. Workers, Knowledge, Markets and Politics. The Palgrave Handbook of the History of Surgery. Ed. Thomas Schlich. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 71–94. Google Scholar öffnen
  154. Rasmussen, Nicolas. 2018. Biomedicine and Its Historiography. A Systematic Review. Handbook of the History of Biology. Ed. Michael Dietrich / Mark Borrello / Oren Harman. Cham: Springer Nature. Google Scholar öffnen
  155. Reil, Johann Christian. 1804. Pepinieren zum Unterricht ärztlicher Routiniers als Bedürfnisse des Staats nach seiner Lage wie sie ist. Halle/Saale: Curtsche Buchhandlung. Google Scholar öffnen
  156. Reil, Johann Christian. 1910. Entwurf zur Organisation einer wissenschaftlich-medizinischen Schule. Geschichte der königlichen Friedrich-Wilhelmsuniversität zu Berlin. Ed. Max Lenz. Vol. 3. Halle/Saale: Verlag der Buchhandlung des Waisenhauses. Google Scholar öffnen
  157. Reiser, Stanley Joel. 1979. Medicine and the Reign of Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  158. Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg. 1997. Towards A History of Epistemic Things. Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  159. Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg. 2009. Recent Science and its Exploration: The Case of Molecular Biology. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 40: 6–12. Google Scholar öffnen
  160. Rosenberg, Charles E. 1997. No Other Gods. On Science and American Social Thought. 2. ed. Baltimore/London: Johns Hopkins University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  161. Roser, Wilhelm / Wunderlich, Karl. 1841. Ueber die Mängel der heutigen deutschen Medicin. Programm einer neuen medicinischen Zeitschrift. Stuttgart: Ebner & Seubert. Google Scholar öffnen
  162. Roser, Wilhelm / Wunderlich, Karl. 1843. Ueber die jetzige Lage der physiologischen Medizin. Archiv für Physiologische Heilkunde 2: 1–5. Google Scholar öffnen
  163. Roth, Phillip H. 2022. Disziplinen und Kulturen der Wissenschaft. Wissenschaftsforschung. Grundbegriffe, Forschungsfelder und Forschungsfragen (Sozialwissenschaftliche Einführungen 4). Ed. David Kaldewey. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Oldenbourg (forthcoming). Google Scholar öffnen
  164. Sackett, David L. / Rosenberg, William M.C. / Gray, J. A. Muir / Haynes, R. Brian / Richardson, W. Scott. 1996. Evidence Based Medicine. What it Is and What it Isn’t. BMJ 312: 71–72. Google Scholar öffnen
  165. Schaffer, Simon. 1990. Genius in Romantic Natural Philosophy. Romanticism and the Sciences. Ed. Andrew Cunningham / Nicholas Jardine. Cambridge: Cambrdige University Press. 82–100- Google Scholar öffnen
  166. Schatzberg, Eric. 2018. Technology. Critical History of a Concept. Chicago/London: Chicago. Google Scholar öffnen
  167. Schauz, Désirée. 2014. What is Basic Research? Insights from Historical Semantics. Minerva 52(3): 273–328. Google Scholar öffnen
  168. Schauz, Désirée. 2015. Wissenschaftsgeschichte und das Revival der Begriffsgeschichte. N.T.M. 22(3): 53–63. Google Scholar öffnen
  169. Schauz, Désirée. 2020. Nützlichkeit und Erkenntnisfortschritt. Eine Geschichte des modernen Wissenschaftsverständnisses (Deutsches Museum, Abhandlungen und Berichte 33). Göttingen: Wallstein. Google Scholar öffnen
  170. Schauz, Désirée / Kaldewey, David. 2018. Why Do Concepts Matter to Science Policy? Basic and Applied Research. The Language of Science Policy in the Twentieth Century. Ed. David Kaldewey / Désirée Schauz. 2018. New York/Oxford: Berghahn. 1–32. Google Scholar öffnen
  171. Schauz, Désirée / Lax, Gregor. 2018. Professional Devotion, National Needs, Fascist Claims, and Democratic Values. The Language of Science Policy in Germany. Basic and Applied Research. The Language of Science Policy in the Twentieth Century. Ed. David Kaldewey / Désirée Schauz. 2018. New York/Oxford: Berghahn. 104–140. Google Scholar öffnen
  172. Schechter, Alan N. / Perlman, Robert / Rettig, Richard A. 2004. Editor’s Introduction. Why is Revitilizing Clinical Research Is So Important, Yet So Difficult? Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 47(4): 476–486. Google Scholar öffnen
  173. Scheffler, Robin W. / Strasser, Bruno J. 2015. Art. “Biomedical Sciences, History and Sociology of.” International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Ed. James D. Wright. Second Ed. Vol. 2. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 663–669. Google Scholar öffnen
  174. Schelling, Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph. 1974. Vorlesungen über die Methode des akademischen Studiums. Hamburg: Meiner. Google Scholar öffnen
  175. Schelling, Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph / Marcus, Friedrich Adalbert (eds.). 1805–08. Jahrbücher der Medicin als Wissenschaft. Tübingen. Google Scholar öffnen
  176. Schelsky, Helmut. 1971. Einsamkeit und Freiheit. Idee und Gestalt der deutschen Universität und ihre Reform. 2. ed. Reinbeck: Rowohlt. Google Scholar öffnen
  177. Schmiedebach, Heinz-Peter. 1992. “Ist nicht wirklich diese ganze zersetzende Naturwissenschaft ein Irrweg?” Virchow und die Zellularpathologie. Medizinhistorisches Journal 27(1/2): 26–42. Google Scholar öffnen
  178. Schneider, William H. 2015. The Origin of the Medical Research Grant in the United States. The Rockefeller Foundation and the NIH Extramural Funding Program. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 70(2): 279–311. Google Scholar öffnen
  179. Schönlein, Johannes. 1926. Rede zur Eröffnung der medizinischen Klinik in Würzburg. Deutsche Ärzte-Reden aus dem 19. Jahrhundert. Ed. Erich Ebstein. Berlin: Springer, 6–12. Google Scholar öffnen
  180. Schweber, Libby. 2006. Disciplining Statistics. Demography and Vital Statistics in France and England, 1830–1885. Durham/London: Duke University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  181. Shapin, Steven. 1992. Discipline and Bounding. The History and Sociology of Science as Seen Through the Externalism-Internalism Debate. History of Science 30: 333–369. Google Scholar öffnen
  182. Shapin, Steven. 2008. The Scientific Life. A Moral History of a Late Modern Vocation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  183. Shapin, Steven. 2012. Never Pure. Historical Studies of Science as If It Was Produced by People with Bodies, Situated in Time, Space, Culture, and Society, and Struggling for Credibility and Authority. Baltimore/London: Johns Hopkins University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  184. Shinn, Terry. 2002. The Triple Helix and New Production of Knowledge. Prepackaged Thinking on Science and Technology. Social Studies of Science 32(4): 599–614. Google Scholar öffnen
  185. Solomon, Miriam. 2011. Just a Paradigm. Evidence-Based Medicine in Epistemological Context. European Journal of Philosophy of Science 1(3): 451–466. Google Scholar öffnen
  186. Star, Susan Leigh / Griesmer, James R. 1989. Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects. Amateurs and Professionals in Berkley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science 19(3): 387–420. Google Scholar öffnen
  187. Starr, Paul. 1982. The Social Transformation of American Medicine. The Rise of a Sovereign Profession and the Making of a Vast Industry. New York: Basic Books. Google Scholar öffnen
  188. Steelman, John R. 1947. The Nation’s Medical Research. A Report to the President. Washington, D.C.: US Government Printing Office. Google Scholar öffnen
  189. Stichweh, Rudolf. 1984. Zur Entstehung des modernen Systems wissenschaftlicher Disziplinen. Physik in Deutschland, 1740–1890. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen
  190. Stichweh, Rudolf. 1992. The Sociology of Scientific Disciplines. On the Genesis and Stability of the Disciplinary Structure of Modern Science. Science in Context 5(1): 3–15. Google Scholar öffnen
  191. Stichweh, Rudolf. 1994a. Professionen und Disziplinen. Formen der Differenzierung zweier Systeme beruflichen Handelns in modernen Gesellschaften. Wissenschaft, Universität, Profession. Soziologische Analysen. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp. 278–336. Google Scholar öffnen
  192. Stichweh, Rudolf. 1994b. The Unity of Teaching and Research. Romanticism in the Science. Science in Europe, 1780–1840. Ed. Stefano Poggi / Maurizio Bossi. Dodrecht/Boston: Kluwer. 189–202. Google Scholar öffnen
  193. Stichweh, Rudolf. 2007. Einheit und Differenz im Wissenschaftssystem der Moderne. Zwei Kulturen der Wissenschaft – revisited. Ed. Jost Halfmann / Johannes Rohbeck. Weilerswits: Velbrück Wissenschaft. 213–228. Google Scholar öffnen
  194. Strasser, Bruno. 2014. Biomedicine. Meanings, assumptions, and possible futures. Report to the Swiss Science and Innovation Council. Google Scholar öffnen
  195. Sturdy, Steve. 2011. Looking for Trouble. Medical Science and Clinical Practice in the Historiography of Modern Medicine. Social History of Medicine 24(3): 739–757. Google Scholar öffnen
  196. Swain, Donald C. 1962. The Rise of a Research Empire. NIH, 1930 to 1950. Science 138(3546): 1233–1237. Google Scholar öffnen
  197. Timmermans, Stefan / Berg, Marc. 2003. The Gold Standard. The Challenge of Evidence-Based Medicine and Standardization of Health Care. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  198. Timmermans, Stefan / Kolker, Emily S. 2004. Evidence-Based Medicine and the Reconfiguration of Medical Knowledge. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 45: 177–193. Google Scholar öffnen
  199. Trowler, Paul. 2014. Academic Tribes and Territories. The Theoretical Trajectory. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaften 25(3). 17–26. Google Scholar öffnen
  200. Tuchman, Arleen Marcia. 1993. Science, Medicine, and the State in Germany. The Case of Baden, 1815–1871. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  201. Tuchman, Arleen. 2000. Ein verwirrendes Dreieck. Universität, Charité, Pépinière. Jahrbuch für Universitätsgeschichte 3: 36–47. Google Scholar öffnen
  202. Turner, Stephen. 2000. What are Disciplines? And How is Interdisciplinarity Different? Interdisciplinarity. The Paradoxical Discourse. Practicing Interdisciplinarity. Ed. Perter Weingart / Nico Stehr. Toronto et al.: University of Toronto Press. 46–65. Google Scholar öffnen
  203. Turner, Stephen. 2017. Knowledge Formations. An Analytic Framework. The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. 2nd ed. Ed. Robert Frodeman / Julie Thompson Klein / Roberto C. S. Pacheco. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 9–20. Google Scholar öffnen
  204. Turner, Steven R. 1980. Bildungsbürgertum and the Learned Professions in Prussia, 1770–1830. The Origins of a Class. Histoire Sociale Social History 12(25): 105–135. Google Scholar öffnen
  205. US Senate, Committee on Government Operations. 1959. The National Science Foundation and the Life Sciences. Washington, D.C. Google Scholar öffnen
  206. Van der Laan, Anna Laura / Boenink, Marianne. 2015. Beyond Bench and Bedside. Disentangling the Concept of Translational Research. Health Care Analysis 23: 32–49. Google Scholar öffnen
  207. Vignola-Gagné, Etienne. 2014. Argumentative Practices in Science, Technology and Innovation Policy. The Case of Clinician-Scientists and Translational Research. Science and Public Policy 41: 94–106. Google Scholar öffnen
  208. Virchow, Rudolf. 1847. Ueber die Standpunkte in der wissenschaftlichen Medicin. Archiv für pathologische Anatomie, Physiologie und klinische Medicin 1: 3–19. Google Scholar öffnen
  209. Virchow, Rudolf. 1849. Die naturwissenschaftliche Methode und die Standpunkte in der Therapie. Archiv für pathologische Anatomie, Physiologie und klinische Medicin 2: 3–37. Google Scholar öffnen
  210. Virchow, Rudolf. 1855. Cellular-Pathologie. Archiv für pathologische Anatomie, Physiologie und klinische Medicin 8: 3–39. Google Scholar öffnen
  211. Virchow, Rudolf. 1877. Ueber die Standpunkte in der wissenschaftlichen Medicin. Archiv für pathologische Anatomie, Physiologie und klinische Medicin 70(1): 1–10. Google Scholar öffnen
  212. Virchow, Rudolf. 1958. Disease, Life, and Man. Selected Essays by Rudolf Virchow. Trans. Lelland J. Rather. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  213. Vogd, Werner. 2002. Professionalisierungsschub oder Auflösung ärztlicher Autonomie? Die Bedeutung von Evidence Based Medicine und der neuen Funktionalen Eliten in der Medizin aus system- und interaktionstheoretischer Perspektive. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 31(4): 294–315. Google Scholar öffnen
  214. Waddington, Ivan. 1990. The Movement Towards the Professionalization of Medicine. BMJ 301: 688–690. Google Scholar öffnen
  215. Wallis, Faith. 2018. Pre-Modern Surgery. Wounds, Words, and the Paradox of “Tradition”. The Palgrave Handbook of the History of Surgery. Ed. Thomas Schlich. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 49–70. Google Scholar öffnen
  216. Warner, John Harley. 1985. Science in Medicine. Osiris 1: 37–58. Google Scholar öffnen
  217. Warner, John Harley. 1986. The Therapeutic Perspective. Medical Practice, Knowledge, and Identity in America, 1820–1885. Cambridge, M.A./London: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  218. Warner, John Harley. 1991. Ideals of Science and their Discontents in Late Nineteenth-Century American Medicine. Isis 82(3): 454–478. Google Scholar öffnen
  219. Warner, John Harley. 1992. The Rise and Fall of Professional Mystery. Epistemology, authority and the emergence of laboratory medicine in nineteenth-century America. The Laboratory Revolution in Medicine. Ed. Andrew Cunningham / Perry Williams. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 110–141. Google Scholar öffnen
  220. Warner, John Harley. 1995. The History of Science and the Sciences of Medicine. Osiris 10: 164–193. Google Scholar öffnen
  221. Weingart, Peter. 2000. Interdisciplinarity. The Paradoxical Discourse. Practicing Interdisciplinarity. Ed. Perter Weingart / Nico Stehr. Toronto et al.: University of Toronto Press. 25–41. Google Scholar öffnen
  222. Weingart, Peter. 2010. A Short History of Knowledge Formations. The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. Ed. Julie Thompson Klein / Carl Mitcham. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. 3–14. Google Scholar öffnen
  223. Weisz, George. 2005. From Clinical Counting to Evidence-Based Medicine. Body Counts. Medical Quantification in Historical & Sociological Perspective. Ed. Gérard Jorland / Annick Opinel / George Weisz. Montreal et al.: McGill-Queen’s University Press. 377–393. Google Scholar öffnen
  224. Weisz, George. 2006. Divide and Conquer. A Comparative History of Medical Specialization. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  225. Weisz, George / Cambrosio, Alberto / Keating, Peter / Knaapen, Loes / Schlich, Thomas / Tournay, Virginie J. 2007. The Emergence of Clinical Practice Guidelines. The Milbank Quarterly 85(4): 691–727. Google Scholar öffnen
  226. Wimmer, Mario. 2015. “Conceptual History: Begriffsgeschichte.” International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Ed. James D. Wright. Second Ed. Vol. 2. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 548–554. Google Scholar öffnen
  227. Wilson-Kovacz, Dana / Hauskeller, Christine. 2012. The Clinician-Scientist. Professional Dynamics in Clinical Stem Cell Research. Sociology of Health & Illness 34(4): 497–512. Google Scholar öffnen
  228. Wunderlich, Karl. 1845. Das Verhältniss der physiologischen Medicin zur ärztlichen Praxis. Archiv für physiologische Heilkunde 4. 1–13. Google Scholar öffnen
  229. Zammito, John. 2018. The Gestation of German Biology. Physiology and Philosophy from Stahl to Schelling. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  230. Zerhouni, Elias. 2003. The NIH Roadmap. Science 302: 63–72. Google Scholar öffnen

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus dem Schwerpunkt "Gesundheit und Medizin allgemein", "Soziologie allgemein", "Medizinethik"
Cover des Buchs: Lehren und Lernen von Bewegungen
Monographie Vollzugriff
Jörg Bietz, Hans-Georg Scherer
Lehren und Lernen von Bewegungen
Cover des Buchs: Health Psychology
Sammelband Kein Zugriff
Philipp Stang, Maren Weiss, Martin G. Köllner
Health Psychology
Cover des Buchs: Systemtheorie und Erzählen
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Ralf Kellermann
Systemtheorie und Erzählen
Cover des Buchs: Rethinking Obesity Prevention
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Vasiliki Kolovou
Rethinking Obesity Prevention
Cover des Buchs: Datenschutz in der Arzneimittelforschung
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Wiebke de Raaf
Datenschutz in der Arzneimittelforschung

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Feedback geben

Wir freuen uns über Ihr Feedback zu Inhalten und Funktionen. Ihre Nachricht hilft uns, unseren Service stetig zu verbessern.

Bewertung
Bild anhängen
oder hier ablegen
PNG oder JPG (max. 3 MB)

Anmelden

Passwort vergessen?
Login via Open Athens
Noch kein Benutzerkonto?
Jetzt registrieren

Publikation zitieren

Download: RIS BibTex