, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Monograph No access

Dynamic Interactions Between Public Finances and Economic Activity in Germany

Time Series Perspectives on the Sustainability, Cyclicality, Sensitivity and Economic Impact of Fiscal Policy
Authors:
Publisher:
 2014

Summary

How do German public finances respond to economic developments? And what is the impact of large economic shocks on fiscal sustainability? Vice versa, what is the effect of sustainability restrictions on fiscal stimulus measures? In the context of the ongoing sovereign debt crisis, these questions constitute the core of public finance debates. Based on advanced macro-econometric methods, this study offers new insights to this field. The author shows how expenditure dynamics have been decisive for ruining the sustainability of public finances in Germany and how a debt brake could bring them back on a sustainable path. He demonstrates how static estimation methods fail to detect dynamic relationships between tax bases and tax revenues – especially with respect to profit taxes. Finally, he shows that economic stimuli programmes in Germany have become gradually more pro-cyclical over the last four decades and sustainability restrictions have strong effects on the size of fiscal multipliers.



Bibliographic data

Edition
1/2014
Copyright Year
2014
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-1092-8
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-5198-1
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Neue Studien zur Politischen Ökonomie
Volume
14
Language
English
Pages
158
Product Type
Monograph

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access Pages 1 - 16
  2. Introduction No access Pages 17 - 21
    1. Does Wagner's Law Ruin the Sustainability of German Public Finances? No access Pages 22 - 56
    2. The Timing and Responsiveness of Fiscal Policy in Germany No access Pages 57 - 92
    3. Estimating Dynamic Tax Elasticities for German Data No access Pages 93 - 122
    4. Fiscal Policy under Sustainability Constraints No access Pages 123 - 152
  3. Summary and Conclusions No access Pages 153 - 158

Bibliography (45 entries)

  1. Journal of Applied Econometrics, Vol. 24(6) 960–992. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845251981
  2. Hoeppner, F. (2001): “A VAR Analysis of the E?ects of Fiscal Policy in Germany”. Institute for International Economics Discussion Paper, Bonn. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845251981
  3. Johansen, S. (1995): Likelihood-based inference in Cointegrated Vector Autoregressive Models. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845251981
  4. Johansen, S., Mosconi, R. and B. Nielsen (2000): “Cointegration analysis in the presence of structural breaks in the deterministic trend. Econometrics Journal,Vol. 3, 216–249. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845251981
  5. King, R., Plosser, C., Stock, J., and M. Watson (1991): “Stochastic trends and economic ?uctuations”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 81(4) 819–840. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845251981
  6. Koren, S. and A. Stiassny (1998): “Tax and Spend, or Spend and Tax? An International Study”. Journal of Policy Modelling, 20, 163–191. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845251981
  7. Krusec, D. (2003): “The E?ects of Fiscal Policy on Output in a Structural VEC Model Framework: The Case of Four EMU and Four Non-EMU OECD Countries”. European University Institute, Florence, Working paper. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845251981
  8. Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P., Schmidt, P. and Y. Shin (1992): “Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root”. Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 54, 159–178. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845251981
  9. Lanne, M., Luetkepohl, H. and P. Saikkonen (2002): “Comparison of unit roof tests for time series with level shifts”. Journal of Time Series Analysis, Vol. 23(6) 667–685. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845251981
  10. Legrenzi, G. and C. Milas (2002a): “A multivariate approach to the growth of governments”. Public Finance Review, Vol. 30, 56–76. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845251981
  11. Legrenzi, G. and C. Milas (2002b): “The role of omitted variables in identifying a longrun relationship for the Italian government growth”. International Tax and Public Finance, Vol. 9, 435–450. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845251981
  12. Mountford, A., and H. Uhlig (2009): “What Are the E?ects of Fiscal Policy Shocks?”. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845251981
  13. Heppke-Falk, K., Tenhofen, J. and G. Wol? (2010): “The Macroeconomic E?ects of Exogenous Fiscal Policy Shocks in Germany: A Disaggregated SVAR Analysis”. Journal of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 230(3) 328–355. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845251981
  14. Peacock, A. and J. Wiseman (1961): The growth in public expenditures in the United Kingdom. Allen and Unwin. London. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845251981
  15. Perron, P. (1989): “The Great Clash, the Oil Price Shock, and the Unit Root hypothesis”. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845251981
  16. Econometrica, Vol. 57(6) 1361–1401. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845251981
  17. Perotti, R. (2004): “Estimating the E?ects of Fiscal Policy in OECD Countries”. CEPR Discussion Paper Series, No. 4842. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845251981
  18. Quintos, C. (1995): “Sustainability of the De?cit Process with Structural Shifts”. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, Vol. 13, 409–417. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845251981
  19. Romer C. and D. Romer (2010): “The Macroeconomic E?ects of Tax Changes: Estimates Based on a New Measure of Fiscal Shocks”. American Economic Review,Vol. 100(3) 763–801. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845251981
  20. Roos, M. (2007): “Die Makroökonomischen Wirkungen Diskretionärer Fiskalpolitik in Deutschland – Was Wissen Wir Empirisch?”, Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Vol. 8(4) 293–308. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845251981
  21. Roos, M. (2009): “Die deutsche Fiskalpolitik während der Wirtschaftskrise 2008/2009”. Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Vol. 10(4) 389–412. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845251981
  22. Sims, C. (1980): “Macroeconomics and Reality”. Econometrica, Vol. 48(1) 1–48. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845251981
  23. Wagner, A. (1883): Finanzwissenschaft. Third edition. Winter, Leipzig. Partially translated in: Classics in the Theory of Public Finance, edited by Musgrave, R. and Peacock, A., Palgrave Macmillan (1958). Macmillan for International Economic Association. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845251981
  24. Breitung, J., Brueggemann, R. and H. Luetkepohl (2004): “Structural Vector Autoregressive Modelling and Impulse Responses”. In H. Luetkepohl and M. Kraetzig (eds), Applied Time Series Econometrics, Cambridge University Press, 159–196. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845251981
  25. Afonso, A. and R. Sousa (2009): “The Macroeconomic E?ects of Fiscal Policy”. ECB Working Paper Series, No. 991. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845251981
  26. Amisano, G. and C. Giannini (1997): Topics in Structural VAR Econometrics, Second edition. Springer, Berlin. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845251981
  27. Barnhill, T. and G. Kopits (2004): “Assessing Fiscal Sustainability under Uncertainty”. The Journal of Risk, 6(4) 31–53. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845251981
  28. Baum, A. and G. Koester (2011): “The impact of ?scal policy on economic activity over the business cycle – evidence from a threshold VAR analysis”. Discussion Paper Series 1: Economic Studies, No. 03/2011, Deutsche Bundesbank Research Centre. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845251981
  29. Bergh, A. and M. Henrekson (2011): “Government Size and Growth: A Survey and interpretation of the evidence”. Journal of Economic Surveys, Vol. 25(5) 872–897. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845251981
  30. Blanchard, O. and R. Perotti (2002): “An Empirical Characterization of the Dynamic E?ects of Changes in Government Spending and Taxes on Output”. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 1174, 1329–1368. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845251981
  31. Blanchard, O. and D. Quah (1989): “The Dynamic E?ects of Aggregate Demand and Supply Disturbances”. The American Economic Review, Vol. 79(4) 655–673. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845251981
  32. Bode, O., Gerke, R. and H. Schellhorn (2006): “Die Wirkung ?skalischer Schocks auf das Bruttoinlandsprodukt”. Arbeitspapier 01/2006 des Sachverstaendigenrats zur Beurteilung der gesamtwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845251981
  33. Bohn, H. (1998): “The behaviour of US public debt and de?cits”. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113, 949–963. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845251981
  34. Bohn, H. (2007): “Are stationarity and cointegration restrictions really necessary for the intertemporal budget constraint?”.Journal of Monetary Economics, 54, 1837–1847. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845251981
  35. Afonso, A. (2005): “Fiscal sustainability: The unpleasant European Case”. Finanzarchiv, 61(1) 19–44. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845251981
  36. Caldara, D. and C. Kamps (2008): “What are the e?ects of ?scal shocks? A VAR-based comparative analysis”. European Central Bank, Working Paper, No. 877. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845251981
  37. Caporale, G. (1995): “Bubble ?nance and debt sustainability: a test of the government’s intertemporal budget constraint”. Applied Economics, 27, 1135–1143. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845251981
  38. Cerrato, M., Kim, H. and R. Macdonald (2010): “Nominal interest rates and stationarity”. Discussion Paper 2010-17, Department of Economics, University of Glasgow. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845251981
  39. Davidson, R. and J. Mackinnon (1993): Estimation and Inference in Econometrics. Oxford University Press. London. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845251981
  40. Doornik, J. (1998): “Approximations to the asymptotic distributions of cointegration tests”. Journal of Economic Surveys, Vol. 12, 573–593. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845251981
  41. European Commission (1978): “European System of Accounts ESA 1970”. Eurostat, Brussels. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845251981
  42. European Commission (1996): “European System of Accounts ESA 1995”. Eurostat, Brussels. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845251981
  43. Favero, C. and F. Giavazzi (2012): “Reconciling VAR based and Narrative Measures of the Tax Multiplier”. American Economic Journal.Economic Policy., Vol. 4(2) 69–94. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845251981
  44. Hajo, B. (1996): “Testing Wagner’s law for Germany: An exercise in applied time series analysis”. Journal of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 215(3) 328–343. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845251981
  45. Hakkio, G. and M. Rush (1991). “Is the Budget De?cit Too Large?”. Economic Inquiry, Vol. 29, 429–445. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845251981

Similar publications

from the series "Neue Studien zur Politischen Ökonomie"