Cover of book: Individual Rights under European Union Law
Buy in shop
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Monograph No access

Individual Rights under European Union Law

A study on the relation between rights, obligations and interests in the case law of the Court of Justice
Authors:
Publisher:
 2019

Summary

Anstatt sich Rechten anzunähern, indem sie in verschiedene inhaltliche Kategorien eingeteilt oder von anderen Konzepten wie Prinzipien unterschieden werden, legt dieses Buch nahe, dass individuelle Rechte durch eine relationale Definition besser verstanden werden. Ein individuelles Recht nach EU-Recht kann somit als das Korrelat einer Verpflichtung definiert werden, das durch das Interesse eines Einzelnen an der Erfüllung dieser Verpflichtung ausgelöst wird. Das Buch untersucht die Rechtsprechung des EuGH und zeigt, dass diese Definition von individuellen Rechten dem Test der Zeit und den aufeinanderfolgenden Umgestaltungen der Rechtsordnung der EU widersteht.

Catherine Warin, Rechtsanwältin in der Anwaltskammer Luxemburg, promovierte an der Universität Luxemburg. Dieses Buch basiert auf ihrer Doktorarbeit, für die sie von der Doctoral School of Law der Universität Luxemburg mit dem Pierre-Pescatore-Preis ausgezeichnet wurde.

Keywords

Bibliographic data

Edition
1/2019
Copyright Year
2019
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-5469-4
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-9623-4
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Luxemburger Juristische Studien - Luxembourg Legal Studies
Volume
17
Language
English
Pages
584
Product Type
Monograph

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access 1 - 18
  2. Introduction No access 19 - 28
          1. 1.1.1.1.1. A first glint: Algera No access
          2. 1.1.1.1.2. The Big Bang: Van Gend en Loos No access
          3. 1.1.1.1.3. Defrenne II or the far-reaching effects of direct effect No access
          1. 1.1.1.2.1. The limited relevance of rights and the emphasis on obligations and interests in the French legal culture No access
          2. 1.1.1.2.2. The German emphasis on subjective rights and protective intention No access
          3. 1.1.1.2.3. The focus on duties and remedies in the English legal tradition No access
          4. 1.1.1.2.4. The EU concept of individual rights as an original blend of influences No access
          1. 1.1.2.1.1. Effectiveness as a meta-rule of interpretation No access
          2. 1.1.2.1.2. An instrumentalist conception of rights and individuals? No access
        2. 1.1.2.2. Asserting the intrinsic value of individuals: the development of EU fundamental rights No access
          1. 1.1.2.3.1. Rights, interests and the proportionality principle No access
          2. 1.1.2.3.2. Rights, interests and the prohibition of abuse of rights No access
      3. 1.1.3. Conclusions: the double rationale of individual rights under EU law No access
          1. 1.2.1.1.1. The historical difficulties for consecrating the indivisibility of rights No access
          2. 1.2.1.1.2. A step forward: the Treaty of Lisbon and the Charter No access
        2. 1.2.1.2. The Explanations to the Charter: an atypical ‘tool of interpretation’ No access
        3. 1.2.1.3. The Charter at the heart of the rights discourse No access
        4. 1.2.1.4. The dangers of a closed-circuit, Charter-centred approach and the necessary combination of sources for identifying and applying rights No access
        1. 1.2.2.1. Basis for the distinction No access
        2. 1.2.2.2. A consequence of the diverging conceptions of social rights and principles in domestic legal systems No access
        3. 1.2.2.3. Possible criteria for the distinction No access
        4. 1.2.2.4. Consequences of applying the distinction to Charter provisions No access
        5. 1.2.2.5. Potential problems for rights within the Union’s constitutional structure No access
      3. 1.2.3. Conclusions: structural continuity and conceptual instability No access
        1. 1.3.1.1. The relation between effectiveness and the right to an effective remedy No access
          1. 1.3.1.2.1. Article 47 before Lisbon No access
          2. 1.3.1.2.2. After Lisbon, Article 47 in the spotlight No access
          3. 1.3.1.2.3. The continuing complementarity between effectiveness and the right to an effective remedy No access
        3. 1.3.1.3. Article 19(1) TEU and the extension of the positive obligation to ensure the effectiveness of rights No access
          1. 1.3.2.1.1. Remedies before national courts as consequences of rights under EU law No access
          2. 1.3.2.1.2. Domestic courts and the Schutznorm pressure No access
          1. 1.3.2.2.1. The limited relevance of individual interests in the EU system of remedies No access
          2. 1.3.2.2.2. The restrictive conception of individual interest in the action for annulment No access
          3. 1.3.2.2.3. Union liability: the Schutznorm temptation No access
      3. 1.3.3. Conclusions on the right-remedy relation: looking at both sides of the story No access
    4. 1.4. Conclusion of Part 1 No access
          1. 2.1.1.1.1. Fundamental freedoms in primary law No access
          2. 2.1.1.1.2. Fundamental freedoms in secondary law No access
          3. 2.1.1.1.3. The direct effect of international agreements No access
          1. 2.1.1.2.1. Member State liability: discretion as the key criterion for identifying rights No access
          2. 2.1.1.2.2. Union liability: the fluctuating receptiveness to the Schutznorm approach No access
        3. 2.1.1.3. Interim conclusions No access
        1. 2.1.2.1. Rules applying to enterprises: the development of horizontal liability No access
        2. 2.1.2.2. State aid: the limits of the instrumental rationale No access
        3. 2.1.2.3. Interim conclusions No access
        1. 2.1.3.1. How legitimate expectations give rise to rights No access
          1. 2.1.3.2.1. The dual rationale of administrative procedural rights No access
          2. 2.1.3.2.2. The limits of this balanced vision No access
        3. 2.1.3.3. Interim conclusions No access
      4. 2.1.4. Conclusions No access
        1. 2.2.1.1. Rights in EU social security law No access
        2. 2.2.1.2. Procedural rights in EU staff cases No access
          1. 2.2.1.3.1. The issue of horizontal direct effect in the light of the right-obligation correlation No access
          2. 2.2.1.3.2. Protecting and balancing interests in anti-discrimination law No access
        4. 2.2.1.4. The ‘new’ Charter rights of workers to consultation and representation No access
        5. 2.2.1.5. Interim conclusions No access
          1. 2.2.2.1.1. The rights of Union citizens to free movement and residence as an application of the classic relation between rights, obligations and interests No access
          2. 2.2.2.1.2. A new manifestation of the effectiveness rationale: the concept of derived rights No access
          1. 2.2.2.2.1. The right to vote and to stand as a candidate at elections No access
          2. 2.2.2.2.2. The right to petition No access
          3. 2.2.2.2.3. The right to submit a Citizens’ Initiative No access
        3. 2.2.2.3. Interim conclusions No access
        1. 2.2.3.1. A very conditional right to international protection No access
        2. 2.2.3.2. The right to good administration in EU asylum law No access
        3. 2.2.3.3. The inconsistencies in the case law on the Dublin Regulation No access
        4. 2.2.3.4. Interim conclusions No access
      4. 2.2.4. Conclusions No access
        1. 2.3.1.1. The challenge of identifying and protecting individual rights in horizontal relations No access
        2. 2.3.1.2. The principle of effectiveness to the rescue No access
        3. 2.3.1.3. From the protection of individual interests to the protection of collective interests: the future of functional subjectivation? No access
        4. 2.3.1.4. Interim conclusions No access
        1. 2.3.2.1. The development of classic individual rights in sectoral environmental legislation No access
        2. 2.3.2.2. The development of transversal environmental legislation: environmental impact assessment No access
        3. 2.3.2.3. The Aarhus Convention and EU Environmental procedural rights: broadening the notion of individual interest in domestic proceedings No access
        4. 2.3.2.4. The Aarhus Regulation and the persisting rights deficit on the EU level No access
        5. 2.3.2.5. Interim conclusions No access
        1. 2.3.3.1. Early developments of the right of access to documents No access
        2. 2.3.3.2. The ‘right’ of access to documents in Regulation 1049/2011: a very conditional obligation No access
        3. 2.3.3.3. Presumption or suppression of the interest trigger? No access
        4. 2.3.3.4. Interim conclusions No access
      4. 2.3.4. Conclusions No access
    4. 2.4. Conclusion of Part 2 No access
  5. Conclusion No access 502 - 506
    1. Judgments and Orders of the Court of Justice No access
    2. Opinions of Advocates General No access
    3. Judgments and Orders by the Court of First Instance/General Court No access
    4. Judgments of the Civil Service Tribunal No access
    5. Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights No access
    6. Judgments of the International Court of Justice No access
      1. Denmark No access
      2. France No access
      3. Germany No access
      4. Italy No access
      5. Poland No access
      6. United Kingdom No access
    8. ACCC Findings and Recommendations No access
      1. Treaties No access
    2. Regulations No access
    3. Directives No access
    4. Decisions No access
    5. Recommendations No access
    6. Protocols, Resolutions, Declarations, Communications, Proposals No access
    7. Codes of Conduct, Rules and Guidelines No access
    8. International agreements, conventions and treaties No access
      1. Belgium No access
      2. Bulgaria No access
      3. France No access
      4. Germany No access
      5. Ireland No access
      6. Italy No access
      7. Spain No access
      8. United Kingdom No access
  8. Bibliography No access 545 - 582
  9. Index No access 583 - 584

Bibliography (633)

  1. ROULHAC C, ‘Introduction’ La Revue des droits de l'homme (en ligne) 7 - 2015 <http://revdh.revues.org/1312> accessed 7 June 2016 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  2. RUFFERT M, ‘Rights and Remedies in European Community Law: a Comparative View’ (1997) 34 Common Market Law Review 319 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  3. RUIZ FABRI H, ‘Is There a Case - Legally and Politically - for Direct Effect of WTO Obligations?’ (2014) 25 European Journal of International Law 151 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  4. RUIZ FABRI H, ‘Principes généraux du droit communautaire et droit comparé’ (2007) 45 Droits 127 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  5. SALES P, ‘Rights and Fundamental Rights in English Law’ (2016) 75 The Cambridge Law Journal 86 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  6. SCHILLING T, ‘Beyond Multilingualism: On Different Approaches to the Handling of Diverging Language Versions of a Community Law’ (2010) 16 European Law Journal 47 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  7. SCHLAG P, ‘How to Do Things With Hohfeld’ (2014) 78 Law and Contemporary Problems Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  8. SCHOUKENS H, ‘Access to Justice in Environmental Cases after the Rulings of the Court of Justice of 13 January 2015: Kafka Revisited?’ (2015) 31 Utrecht Journal of International and European Law 46 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  9. SCHWARZE J, ‘Judicial Review of European Administrative Procedure’ (2004) 68 Law and Contemporary Problems 85 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  10. SEMMELMANN C, ‘General Principles in EU Law between a Compensatory Role and an Intrinsic Value’ (2013) 19 European Law Journal 457 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  11. SHARPSTON E, ‘European Community Law and the Doctrine of Legitimate Expectations: How Legitimate, and for Whom’ (1990) 11 Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business 87 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  12. SHAW J, ‘E.U. Citizenship and Political Rights in an Evolving European Union’ (2007) 75 Fordham Law Review 2549 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  13. SIMON D, ‘Y a-t-il des principes généraux de droit communautaire?’ (1991) 14 Droits 73 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  14. SIMON D, ‘Protection juridictionnelle effective’ (2011) Europe comm. 38 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  15. SIMON D and RIGAUX A, ‘La responsabilité des Etats membres en cas de violation du droit communautaire revisitée, ou comment le problème technique de l'odeur sexuelle des porcs non castrés conduit à trancher des questions fondamentales’ (2009) 19 Europe Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  16. SIMONATI A, ‘The Principles of Administrative Procedure and the EU Courts: an Evolution in Progress?’ (2011) 4 Review of European Administrative Law 45 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  17. SIRINELLI J, ‘La subjectivisation du recours pour excès de pouvoir’ (2016) Revue française de droit administratif 529 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  18. SMISMANS S, ‘European Civil Society: Shaped by Discourses and Institutional Interests’ (2003) 9 European Law Journal 473 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  19. SMITH M, ‘Four German Jurists. II’ (1896) 11 Political Science Quarterly 278 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  20. SNELL J, ‘Fundamental Rights Review of National Measures: Nothing New under the Charter?’ (2015) 21 European Public Law 285 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  21. NIC SHUIBHNE N,‘The Resilience of EU Market Citizenship’, (2010) 47 Common Market Law Review 1597 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  22. STRUMIA F, ‘Divorce immediately, or leave. Rights of third country nationals and family protection in the context of EU citizens' free movement: Kuldip Singh and Others’ (2016) 53 Common Market Law Review 1373 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  23. SUEUR J.-J. ‘Imprécision des droits de l'Homme : quelle imprécision?’ La Revue des droits de l'homme (en ligne) 7 - 2015 <http://revdh.revues.org/1313> accessed 7 June 2016 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  24. SWAINE ET, ‘Subsidiarity and Self-Interest: Federalism at the European Court of Justice’ (2000) 41 Harvard International Law Journal 1 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  25. ŠADL U, ‘The Role of Effet Utile in Preserving the Continuity and Authority of European Union Law: Evidence from the Citation Web of the Pre-accession Case Law of the Court of Justice of the EU’ European Journal of Legal Studies, Summer 2015 - Volume 8 - Issue 1 <http://www.ejls.eu/18/209UK.htm> accessed 8 January 2017 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  26. TISON M, ‘Do Not Attack the Watchdog! Banking Supervisors Liability after Peter Paul’ (2005) 42 Common Market Law Review 639 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  27. VAN DEN BROEK B and ENNEKING L, ‘Public Interest Litigation in the Netherlands. A Multidimensional Take on the Promotion of Environmental Interests by Private Parties through the Courts’ (2014) 10 Utrecht Law Review 77 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  28. VAN DROOGHENBROECK S, ‘L'article 17 de la CEDH est-il indispensable ?’ [2001] Revue trimestrielle des droits de l’homme (no spécial : Le droit face à la montée du racisme et de la xénophobie) 543 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  29. VAN EIJKEN H and VAN ROSSEM JW, ‘Prisoner disenfranchisement and the right to vote in elections to the European Parliament: Universal suffrage key to unlocking political citizenship?’ (2016) 12 European Constitutional Law Review 114 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  30. VAN EIJKEN H and VERHOEVEN MJM, ‘‘Lost in translation’. Een bespreking van het arrest Skoma-Lux: de doorwerking van niet officieel gepubliceerde verordeningen’ (2008) Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 165 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  31. VAN GERVEN W, ‘Of Rights, Remedies and Procedures’ (2000) 37 Common Market Law Review 501 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  32. VAN GERVEN W, ‘Remedies for Infringements of Fundamental Rights’ (2004) 10 European Public Law 261 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  33. VAN GERVEN W, ‘Articles 30, 48, 52 and 59 after Keck & Mithouard, and Protection of Rights Arising from Directives after Faccini Dori’ (1996) Columbia Journal of European Law 217 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  34. VAN GERVEN W, ‘Principe de proportionnalité, abus de droit et droits fondamentaux’ [1992] Journal des tribunaux 305 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  35. VAN GESTEL R and MICKLITZ H-W, ‘Why Methods Matter in European Legal Scholarship’ (2014) 20 European Law Journal 292 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  36. VAN HOEK AAH and RIJKEN CRJJ, ‘Rechtsbescherming en het recht van verdediging bij plaatsing op de Europese terrorismelijst - de zaak-Mujahedin-e Kalq v De Raad’ (2007) Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 284 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  37. VAN ROOSMALEN HJTM and PAHLADSINGH A, ‘Het Handvest van de grondrechten van de Europese Unie: beweging in de rechtspraak’ (2013) Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 83 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  38. VAN WAEYENBERGE A and PECHO P, ‘L'arrêt Unibet et le traité de Lisbonne - un pari sur l'avenir de la protection juridictionnelle effective’ (2008) 44 Cahiers de droit européen 126 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  39. VAN WOLFEREN M, ‘The Limits to the CJEU's Interpretation of Locus Standi, a Theoretical Framework’ (2016) 12 Journal of Contemporary European Research 914 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  40. VANDAMME J, ‘C'est arrivé près de chez vous! Het arrest Italmoda en het ontzeggen van rechten aan de particulier op grond van de EU-richtlijn’ (2015) Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 154 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  41. VARUHAS JNE, ‘Judicial Review: Standing and Remedies’ (2013) 72 The Cambridge Law Journal 243 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  42. VON ARNAUD A, ‘Theorie und Methode des Grundrechtsschutzes in Europa - am Beispiel des Grundsatzes der Verhältnismässigkeit’ (2008) Europarecht 41 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  43. VON BOGDANDY A, ‘Founding Principles of EU Law: A Theoretical and Doctrinal Sketch’ (2010) 16 European Law Journal 95 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  44. VON BOGDANDY A, ‘Deutsche Rechtswissenschaft im europäischen Rechtsraum’ (2011) 66 Juristen Zeitung 1 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  45. VON DANWITZ T and PARASCHAS K, ‘A Fresh Start for the Charter: Fundamental Questions on the Application of the European Charter of Fundamental Rights’ (2012) 35 Fordham International Law Journal 1396 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  46. VOßKUHLE A and KAISER A-B, ‘Grundwissen – Öffentliches Recht: Das subjektiv-öffentliche Recht’ (2009) Juristische Schulung 16 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  47. WAELBROECK D and BOMBOIS T, ‘Des requérants "privilégiés" et des autres... A propos de l'arrêt Inuit et de l'exigence de protection juridictionnelle effective des particuliers en droit européen"’ [2014] Cahiers de droit européen 21 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  48. WALDRON J, ‘Critical Notice’ (1985) 94 Mind 281 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  49. WALDRON J, ‘A Rights-Based Critique of Constitutional Rights’ (1993) 13 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 18 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  50. WALKER N, ‘Legal Theory and the European Union’ EUI Working Paper Law 2005/16 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  51. WALLACE W, ‘Europe as a Confederation: the Community and the Nation-State’ (1982) 21 Journal of Common Market Studies 57 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  52. WEILER J, ‘Does Europe Need a Constitution? Demos, Telos and the German Maastricht Decision’ (1995) 1 European Law Journal 219 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  53. WEILER JHH, ‘A Constitution for Europe? Some Hard Choices’ (2002) 40 Journal of Common Market Studies 563 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  54. WEILER JHH, ‘Community, Member States and European Integration: Is the Law Relevant?’ (1982) 21 Journal of Common Market Studies 39 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  55. WEILER JHH, ‘Van Gend en Loos: The individual as subject and object and the dilemma of European legitimacy’ (2014) 12 International Journal of Constitutional Law 94 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  56. WEILER JHH and LOCKHART NJS, ‘'Taking Rights Seriously' Seriously: The European Court and its Fundamental Rights Jurisprudence - Part I’ (1995) 32 Common Market Law Review 51 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  57. WEILER JHH and LOCKHART NJS, ‘'Taking Rights Seriously' Seriously: the European Court and its Fundamental Rights Jurisprudence - Part II’ (1995) 32 Common Market Law Review 579 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  58. WEISSE-MARCHAL C, ‘Quelle réparation pour les dommages causés aux particuliers par la violation d'une directive communautaire dépourvue d'effet direct ?’ (2000) Revue française de droit administratif 402 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  59. WERNICKE S, ‘Au nom de qui? The European Court of Justice between Member States, Civil Society and Union Citizens’ (2007) 13 European Law Journal 380 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  60. WILKINSON MA, ‘Civil Society and the Re-imagination of European Constitutionalism’ (2003) 9 European Law Journal 451 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  61. WILLIAMS G, ‘The Concept of Legal Liberty’ (1956) 56 Columbia Law Review 1129 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  62. WILMAN FG, ‘The end of the absence? The growing body of EU legislation on private enforcement and the main remedies it provides for’ (2016) 53 Common Market Law Review 887 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  63. WOLLENSCHLÄGER F, ‘A New Fundamental Freedom beyond Market Integration’, (2011) 17 European Law Journal 1 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  64. WYATT D, ‘Horizontal effect of fundamental freedoms and the right to equality after Viking and Mangold, and the implications for Community competence’ (2008) 4 Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy 1 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  65. YOUNG KG, ‘Rights and Queues: On Distributive Contests in the Modern State’ (2016) 55 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 65 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  66. ZALASIŃSKI A, ‘Proportionality of Anti-Avoidance and Anti-Abuse Measures in the ECJ’s Direct Tax Case Law’ (2007) 35 Intertax 310 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  67. ZATJAY I, ‘La permanence des concepts du droit romain dans les systèmes juridiques continentaux’ (1966) 18 Revue internationale de droit comparé 353 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  68. ZUMBANSEN P, ‘Semantics of European Law’ (1999) 5 European Law Journal 114 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  69. Theses Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  70. BIGIAOUI-DUHAMEL L, ‘L’abus de droit en droit du travail’ (Thèse de doctorat en droit privé, Université Paris 1 2002) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  71. BOBIC A, ‘Prohibition of Abuse of Rights in EU Law’ (Master's thesis, University of Zagreb, Faculty of Law, Jean Monnet Chair of European Public Law 2011) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  72. DE VOS N, ‘Europeanisering van het vertrouwensbeginsel. Betekenis van het Europese vertrouwensbeginsel voor de equivalente beginselen in Nederland, Frankrijk en België in het kader van een groeiend ius commune’ (Universiteit Utrecht 2011) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  73. KARATZIA A, ‘The European Citizens' Initiative: a laboratory for citizens' participation in EU law-making’ (PhD thesis, University of Surrey 2016) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  74. IONESCU RN, ‘L'abus de droit en droit communautaire’ (Thèse pour le doctorat en droit, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona and Université Toulouse I - Sciences sociales 2009) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  75. LACCHI C, ‘Preliminary References to the Court of Justice of the EU and Effective Judicial Protection: Towards a more protection-oriented approach of Article 267 TFEU’ (PhD thesis, University of Luxembourg 2017) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  76. MARTY N, ‘La Notion de Bonne Administration: À la Confluence des Droits Européens et du Droit Administratif Français’ (PhD thesis, University of Montpellier 2007) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  77. MIHAESCU EVANS B, ‘The right to good administration at the crossroads of the various sources of fundamental rights in the EU integrated administrative system’ (PhD thesis, University of Luxembourg 2014) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  78. NIVERT N, ‘Intérêt général et droits fondamentaux’ (Thèse pour l'obtention du grade de Docteur en droit public, Université de la Réunion 2012) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  79. ÖSTLUND A, ‘Effectiveness of European Union Law versus Procedural Protection. Tracing the tension throughout the case-law of the Court of Justice on ex officio review by the national judge’ (PhD thesis, University of Luxembourg 2017) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  80. RAMADAN AM, ‘L'abus du droit de brevet : étude comparée de droit français et égyptien’ (Thèse de doctorat en droit privé et sciences criminelles, Université de Montpellier et Université d'Alexandrie 2012) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  81. Working papers, electronic articles and blog posts Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  82. ARCURI A and POLI S, ‘What Price for the Community Enforcement of WTO Law?’ EUI Working Paper 2010/01 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  83. ARESTIS G, ‘Fundamental rights in the EU: three years after Lisbon, the Luxembourg perspective’ College of Europe Research Papers in Law 2/2013 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  84. AZOULAI L, ‘L'autonomie de l'individu européen et la question du statut’ EUI Department of Law Research paper 2013/14 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  85. AZOULAI L, ‘The (Mis)Construction of the European Individual. Two Essays on Union Citizenship Law’ EUI Working Paper Law 2014/14 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  86. BILCHITZ D, ‘Article Review: David Bilchitz on Matthias Klatt’s ‘Positive Rights: Who Decides? Judicial Review in Balance’ ’ International Journal of Constitutional Law Blog, August 26, 2015, 359 <http://www.iconnectblog.com/2015/08/article-review-david-bilchitz-on-matthias-klatts-positive-rights-who-decides-judicial-review-in-balance> accessed 27 August 2015 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  87. BIGNAMI F, ‘Three Generations of Participation Rights in European Administrative Proceedings’ Jean Monnet Working Paper 11/03 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  88. CAMPBELL K, ‘Legal Rights’ The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2013 Edition), ed ZALTA, E <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/legal-rights/> accessed 10 November 2014 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  89. DANI M, ‘The subjectification of the citizen in European public law’ EUI Working Paper, Law 2015/02 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  90. HAGNER F, Les particuliers et l'ordre juridique communautaire : l'égalité de traitement entre les hommes et les femmes (euryopa - Institut européen de l'Université de Genève 2003) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  91. HOFMANN HCH, ‘The Right to an 'Effective Judicial Remedy' and the Changing Conditions of Implementing EU Law’ Law Working Paper 2013-02 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  92. JOERGES C, ‘The Law in the Process of Constitutionalizing Europe’ EUI Working Papers, Law 2002/4 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  93. MICKLITZ H-W, ‘The ECJ between the Individual Citizen and the Member States - A plea for a judge-made European law on remedies’ EUI Working Paper Law 2011/15 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  94. MARIOTTI C, ‘Theory and Practice of Emissions Trading in the European Union: Some Reflections on Allowance Allocation in Light of the DK Recycling Case’ European Papers, Vol 1, 2016, No 3, European Forum, Insight of 22 December 2016, 1153-1170 <http://www.europeanpapers.eu/fr/europeanforum/theory-and-practice-emissions-trading-european-union-allowance-allocation#_ftn25> accessed 29 April 2017 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  95. Millénaire 3, ‘L'antidiscrimination, une volonté de l'Union européenne’ Discriminations "raciales" et politiques antidiscriminatoires - Fiche n°1 <http://www.millenaire3.com/uploads/tx_ressm3/syntheses_discrim_fiche1.pdf> accessed 14 April 2015 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  96. REICH N, ‘Rights without Duties? Reflections on the State of Liability Law in the Multilevel Governance System of the Community: Is There a Need for a More Coherent Approach in European Private Law?’ (2009) EUI Working Papers, Law 2009/10 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  97. MILLER V, The Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe: Part II (The Charter of Fundamental Rights) (House of Commons Library, Research Paper 04/85, 2004) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  98. OEHLER U, ‘Environmental Liability and GMOs in the EU and in Germany’ Exeter Papers in European Law No 15 <http://law.exeter.ac.uk/cels/eupapers.shtml> accessed 19 May 2016 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  99. PAQUES M and DONNAY L, ‘Juridiction ordinaire et juridiction administrative en droit belge’ <https://orbi.ulg.ac.be/bitstream/2268/9929/1/Juridiction%20ordinaire%20et%20juridiction%20administrative%20n%20droit%20belge.pdf> accessed 24 January 2016 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  100. PIRKER B, ‘Cases C-401 to 403/12 and C-404 to 405/12: no review of legality in light of the Aarhus Convention’ 29 January 2015 <http://europeanlawblog.eu/2015/01/29/cases-c-401-to-40312-and-c-404-to-40512-no-review-of-legality-in-light-of-the-aarhus-convention/> accessed 26 April 2017 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  101. PIRKER B, ‘Implementation of the Aarhus Convention by the EU - an Inconvenient Truth from the Compliance Committee’ 24 April 2017 <http://europeanlawblog.eu/2017/04/24/implementation-of-the-aarhus-convention-by-the-eu-an-inconvenient-truth-from-the-compliance-committee/> accessed 30 April 2017 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  102. PORAT B, ‘Rights-Based Law v. Duty-Based Law: Old Dilemma, New Perspective’ Hebrew University of Jerusalem Legal Research Paper No 16-04 <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2696463> accessed 12 January 2016 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  103. SADURSKI W, ‘Rights and Moral Reasoning: An Unstated Assumption’ EUI Working Paper, Law 2007/38 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  104. SADURSKI W, ‘Constitutional Courts in the Process of Articulating Constitutional Rights in the Post-Communist States of Central and Eastern Europe, Part I: Social and Economic Rights’ EUI Working Paper Law 2002/14 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  105. SCHNEBEL V, ‘Le juge administratif, un nouveau juge de la constitutionnalité des lois? 14 November 2011 <http://chevalierdesgrandsarrets.com/2011/11/14/le-juge-administratif-un-nouveau-juge-de-la-constitutionnalité-des-lois/> accessed 20 April 2015 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  106. ROGER AJC, ‘A lost opportunity for improving access to justice in environmental matters: the CJEU on the invocability of the Aarhus Convention’, 15 February 2015, available at http://eulawanalysis.blogspot.lu/2015/02/a-lost-opportunity-for-improving-access.html (accessed 26 April 2017) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  107. SULLIVAN M and LAHME R, ‘Class/collective actions in Europe: overview of applicable EU law principles’, Thomson Reuters Practical Law, < https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/2-618-0602?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&firstPage=true&bhcp=1> accessed 3 August 2017 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  108. THAM RKL, ‘The Impact of the Environmental Liability Directive 2004/35 on English Law’ Exeter Papers in European Law No 14 <http://law.exeter.ac.uk/cels/eupapers.shtml> accessed 19 May 2016. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  109. VAN DUFFEL S, ‘From Objective Right to Subjective Rights: The Franciscans and the Interest and Will Conceptions of Rights’ National University of Singapore, 2 <http://ssrn.com/abstract=1467455> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  110. WENAR L, ‘Rights’ The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2011 Edition), ed ZALTA, E <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/rights/> accessed 10 November 2014 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  111. XEFTERI S, ‘Note d’actualité droit de l’environnement de l’UE 1/2017’, Blogdroiteuropeen, février 2017, <http://wp.me/p6OBGR-1Cl> accessed 30 April 2017 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  112. ZACCARONI G, ‘Ultra vires review e applicazione orizzontale del principio di non discriminazione sulla base dell’età : una riflessione (a freddo) su Dansk Industri’, SIDIBlog, May 2017, < http://www.sidiblog.org/2017/05/04/ultra-vires-review-e-applicazione-orizzontale-del-principio-di-non-discriminazione-sulla-base-delleta-una-riflessione-a-freddo-su-dansk-industri/> accessed 13 August 2017 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  113. Reports and official publications Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  114. ‘Le Tiers et le droit public - Le rapport roumain’ Association Henri Capitant, Journées panaméennes, 18 au 22 mai 2015, Les tiers <http://www.henricapitant.org/storage/app/media/pdfs/evenements/tiers_droits_public_2015/Roumanie_7.pdf> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  115. ‘Le juge administratif et le droit de l’Union européenne’, Conseil d’Etat, 23 September 2015, <http://www.conseil-etat.fr/Decisions-Avis-Publications/Etudes-Publications/Dossiers-thematiques/Le-juge-administratif-et-le-droit-de-l-Union-europeenne> accessed 22 June 2017 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  116. AUBY J-M, Les recours juridictionnels contre les actes administratifs spécialement économiques dans le droit des Etats membres de la CEE (Commission européenne, Etudes, Série concurrence - rapprochement des législations, 1971) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  117. BUTT ME, KÜBERT J and SCHULTZ CA, Droits sociaux fondamentaux en Europe (Document de travail, Parlement Européen, Direction générale des études, Séries affaires sociales, SOCI 104 FR, 2000) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  118. BUX U, ‘Le Parlement européen : contexte historique’, Fiches techniques sur l’Union européenne, April 2017, <http://www.europarl.europa.eu/ftu/pdf/fr/FTU_1.3.1.pdf> accessed 17 July 2017 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  119. CURTIN D and LEINO-SANDBERG P, Openness, Transparency and the Right of Access to Documents in the EU. In-depth analysis for the PETI committee (European Parliament DG for Internal Policies, Policy Department C: Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs, 2016) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  120. EDWARD DOA, Oral Evidence Taken before the European Scrutiny Committee on Wednesday 17 November 2004, uncorrected transcript available at https://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmselect/cmeuleg/uc1064-ii/uc106402.htm (accessed 18 April 2017) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  121. EU Network of Independent Experts on Fundamental Rights, ‘Commentary of the Charter’’ <http://ec.europa.eu/justice/fundamental-rights/files/networkcommentaryfinal_en.pdf> accessed 9 October 2015 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  122. European Commission, ‘Judicial Redress – Collective Redress’, June 2013, < http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/solving_consumer_disputes/judicial_redress/index_en.htm> accessed 3 August 2017 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  123. European Commission, Consultation paper for discussion on the follow-up to the Green Paper on consumer collective redress, May-July 2009, <http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/archive/redress_cons/docs/consultation_paper2009.pdf > accessed 3 August 2017 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  124. HEY C, ‘EU Environmental Policies: a short history of the policy strategies’ European Environmental Bureau, 2005 <http://www.eeb.org/publication/chapter-3.pdf> accessed 2 March 2017 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  125. LADENBURGER C, ‘European Institutional Report’ in LAFFRANQUE J (ed) The Protection of Fundamental Rights Post-Lisbon: The Interaction between the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, the European Convention on Human Rights and National Constitutions (Reports of the XXC FIDE Congress, Tallinn, 2012) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  126. PINAULT M, Rapport de la délégation française (8ème colloque de l'Association des Conseils d'Etat et des Juridictions administratives suprêmes de l'Union européenne, du 12 au 15 mai 1982, Copenhague - "La notion de l'intérêt en contentieux administratif (intérêt personnel, intérêt collectif, l'action populaire) notamment en matière d'environnement", 1982) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  127. SCHEUER S, ‘EU Environmental Policy Handbook. A Critical Analysis of EU Environmental Legislation’ European Environmental Bureau, 2005 <http://www.eeb.org/?LinkServID=3E1E422E-AAB4-A68D-221A63343325A81B> accessed 6 March 2017 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  128. SHEATE W and others, The Relationship between the EIA and SEA Directives (Imperial College London Consultants, Final Report to the European Commission, 2005) <http://ec.europa.eu/environment/archives/eia/pdf/final_report_0508.pdf> accessed 29 April 2017 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  129. UIBO L, ‘Defending Estonia's interests in the Court of Justice of the European Union’ Estonian Ministry of Foreign Affairs Yearbook 2010 <http://www.vm.ee/en/yearbook-2010> accessed 14 February 2017 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  130. Conference and seminar interventions, conference papers and interviews Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  131. AZOULAI L, ‘Le droit de l'Union européenne comme mode de vie’ (Université d'Aix-Marseille, Marseille, 27 May 2017), video available at https://blogdroiteuropeen.com/2017/06/12/le-droit-de-lunion-europeenne-comme-mode-de-vie-projet-de-recherche-du-prof-loic-azoulay/ accessed 3 August 2017 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  132. BLANCHET T, ‘Evolution of EU citizenship and the rights attached to it’ (Conference - EU Citizenship and Justice, Luxembourg, 14th and 15th September 2015) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  133. CESPEDES R, ‘Hohfeld’s Taxonomy Revisited: an Update from the Theory of Rights and Modern Public Law, Family Law and Human Rights Law’ ’Tis Forty Years Since: Britain & Ireland in Europe, Europe in Britain & Ireland’ The changing landscape of theory and practice, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh Law School, 2-3 September 2013 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  134. COLE M, HOFMANN HCH and SCHILTZ J-L, ‘The Future of Data Transfers outside of the European Union’ (Seminar at the University of Luxembourg, 20 April 2016) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  135. DELAPORTE F, ‘Droit luxembourgeois et droits européens’, Interview by WARIN C, (blogdroiteuropéen, 2016) <https://blogdroiteuropeen.com/2016/11/10/droit-luxembourgeois-et-droits-europeens-interview-de-francis-delaporte-partie-2/> accessed 20 March 2017 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  136. KOMBILA-IBOUANGA H, ‘La proportionnalité en tant que principe du droit de l’Union’ (VIIIe Congrès mondial de droit constitutionnel, Mexico, 6-10 December 2010) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  137. LAPOINTE U, ‘Boyle, Martin. 2001. ‘’Chapitre I: Legal legitimacy and the Principles of Private and Public Autonomy’’, Towards Justice and Validity: An Investigation into Habermas’ Theory of Legitimacy, Mémoire de maîtrise, Carleton University, pp. 6-45’, in FLEURY G, LAPOINTE U, ROCH L, DEMERS V, 'Légitimité et gouvernance dans les oeuvres de Jürgen Habermas (Raison et légitimité et Droit et démocratie)’ Chaire de responsabilité sociale et de développement durable ESG-UQAM, Recueil de textes CEH/RT-34-2005, Deuxième séminaire de la série annuelle 2004-2005 sur la gouvernance, 6 octobre 2005 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  138. LAW S, ‘The Rationales, Reasoning and Methodology Underpinning the Judicial Recognition of Principles of Union Law’ (Cahiers de Droit européen - Les principes généraux du droit de l'Union européenne, Bruxelles, 10 September 2015) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  139. LENAERTS K, ‘EU citizenship in the light of the case law of the CJEU’ (Conference - EU Citizenship and Justice, Luxembourg, 14th and 15th September 2015) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  140. LENAERTS K, ‘Les défis actuels de la Cour de justice’, Interview by TAMBOU O, (blogdroiteuropéen, 2016) <https://blogdroiteuropeen.com/2016/04/01/interview-du-president-koen-lenaerts-partie-2-les-defis-actuels-de-la-cjue/> accessed 6 July 2016 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  141. MIETTINEN S and KETTUNEN M, ‘Travaux to the Treaties: Treasures or trivia?’ (European Studies Association conference, Boston 5 March 2015) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  142. ORTINO M, ‘A Reading of the EU Constitutional Legal System Through the Principle of Effectiveness’ (Cahiers de droit européen - Les principes généraux du droit de l'Union européenne, Brussels, 10 September 2015) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  143. E. Poillot, ‘Gutiérrez Naranjo and Others’ (PhD Seminar Recent Developments in Theory and Practice of EU Law, University of Luxembourg, 27 June 2017) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  144. POTVIN-SOLIS, ‘Principe général de non-discrimination et situation purement interne’ (Cahiers de droit européen - Les principes généraux du droit de l'Union européenne, Brussels, 10 September 2015) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  145. PRECHAL S, ‘The relation between the rights arising from the Charter and general principles of law’ (The protection of fundamental rights in the EU: future challenges, Luxembourg, 22 October 2012) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  146. RAPOPORT C, ‘L’opposabilité des ‘droits-créances’ constitutionnels en droit public français’ (Communication présentée aux journées de l’association française de droit constitutionnel, www.droitconstitutionnel.org/congresParis/comC8/RapoportTXTpdf, accessed 20 March 2017) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  147. RODRÍGUEZ PM, ‘The principle of legal certainty and the limits to the application of EU law’ (Cahiers de droit européen - Les principes généraux du droit de l'Union européenne, Brussels, 10 September 2015) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  148. ROTOLO A and SARTOR G, ‘Deontic Logic. Introductory materials’, Summer School on Law and Logic, European University Institute and Harvard Law School 2015 <http://lawandlogic.org/coursebasic/session-5-2-2/> accessed 25 August 2015 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  149. SAFJAN M, ‘A Union of Effective Judicial Protection. Addressing a multi-level challenge through the lens of Article 47 CFREU’ (King's College London, February 2014) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  150. SEVER S, ‘General Principles of Law and the Charter of Fundamental Rights’ (Cahiers de droit européen - Les principes généraux du droit de l'Union européenne, Brussels, 10 September 2015) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  151. SIKORA A, ‘The Principle of High Environmental Protection as a Source of Enforceable Rights’ (Cahiers de droit européen - Les principes généraux du droit de l'Union européenne, Brussels, 10 September 2015) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  152. TURGIS S, ‘Notions autonomes et concurrence des juges’ (La concurrence des juges en Europe Le dialogue en question(s), Faculté de Droit de Tours, 25-26-27 November 2015) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  153. VAN MEERBEECK J, ‘Le mode opératoire des principes généraux : de la généralité in abstracto à l'effet direct in concreto’ (Cahiers de droit européen - Les principes généraux du droit de l'Union européenne, Brussels, 10 September 2015) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  154. VITORINO, Speaking points European Convention, 29 October 2002, Brussels, SPEECH/02/531 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  155. ZETTERQUIST O, ‘Fundamental Rights and the Fundamentals of the European Constitution’ (Seminar at the University of Luxembourg, 26 June 2014) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  156. Journalistic and literary works Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  157. RIVAIS R, ‘Strasbourg garantit le droit au logement opposable’ SOS Conso, Le Monde <http://sosconso.blog.lemonde.fr/2015/04/17/strasbourg-garantit-le-droit-au-logement-opposable/> accessed 17 April 2015 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  158. VOLTAIRE, ‘Onzième lettre écrite par le proposant à M. Covelle’, Œuvres complètes de Voltaire, Tome 46 (1784 La Société littéraire-typographique) 447. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  159. WAHNICH S, ‘Sauver ceux qui pleurent’, Chronique ‘Historiques’, Libération 8 February 2017 <http://www.liberation.fr/debats/2017/02/08/sauver-ceux-qui-pleurent_1547222> accessed 22 July 2017 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  160. WITTGENSTEIN L, Recherches philosophiques (Gallimard 2014) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  161. Monographs Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  162. AALTO P, Public liability in EU law: Brasserie, Bergaderm and beyond (Bloomsbury Publishing 2011) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  163. ALEXY R, Theorie der Grundrechte (Suhrkamp 1985) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  164. ALEXY R, A Theory of Constitutional Rights (Oxford University Press 2002) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  165. AUBERT JL, SAVAUX E, Introduction au droit et thèmes fondamentaux du droit civil (Sirey 2016) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  166. AUNE A-C, Le phénomène de multiplication des droits subjectifs en droit des personnes et de la famille (Presses Universitaires d'Aix-Marseille 2007) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  167. AVILA H, Theory of Legal Principles (Springer 2007) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  168. BALLOT E, Les insuffisances de la notion de droits fondamentaux (mare & martin 2014) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  169. BASSET A, Pour en finir avec l’interprétation. Usage des techniques d’interprétation dans les jurisprudences constitutionnelles française et allemande (Institut universitaire Varenne 2015) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  170. BAGIŃSKA E, Damages for Violations of Human Rights (Springer 2015) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  171. BATAILLER F, Le Conseil d’Etat, Juge constitutionnel (L.G.D.J. 1966) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  172. BEBR G, Development of Judicial Control of the European Communities (Springer 2013) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  173. BECK G, The Legal Reasoning of the CJEU (Hart 2012) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  174. BELJIN S, Staatshaftung im Europarecht (Beck 2000) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  175. BERROD F, La systématique des voies de droit communautaires (Dalloz, coll. Nouvelle bibliothèque de thèses 2003) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  176. BERRY E and HARGREAVES S, European Union Law (Oxford University Press 2007) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  177. BIONDI A and FARLEY M, The Right to Damages in European Law (Kluwer Law International 2009) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  178. BIOY X, Droits fondamentaux et libertés publiques (Monchrestien, Lextenso éditions 2011) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  179. BOBEK M, Central European Judges Under the European Influence. The Transformative Power of the EU Revisited (Hart Publishing 2015) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  180. BORCHARDT K-D, Der Grundsatz des Vertrauensschutzes im Europäischen Gemeinschaftsrecht (N.P. Engel Verlag 1988) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  181. BOUVERESSE A, Le pouvoir discrétionnaire dans l'ordre juridique communautaire (Bruylant 2010) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  182. BRAIBANT G, La Charte des droits fondamentaux de l'Union européenne (Seuil 2001) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  183. CAPITANT D, Les effets juridiques des droits fondamentaux en Allemagne (L.G.D.J. 2001) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  184. CARBONNIER J, Droit et passion du droit (Flammarion 1996) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  185. CARBONNIER J, Droit civil : Introduction, Les personnes (Presses universitaires de France 1984) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  186. CARRERA S, In Search of the Perfect Citizen? The Intersection Between Integration, Immigration, and Nationality in the EU (BRILL 2009) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  187. CHALMERS D, DAVIES G and MONTI G, European Union Law: Cases and Materials (2nd edn, Cambridge University Press 2010) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  188. CLAES M, National Courts’ Mandate in the European Constitution (Hart Publishing 2006) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  189. CONWAY G, The Limits of Legal Reasoning and the European Court of Justice (Cambridge University Press 2012) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  190. CORNU G, Droit civil. Introduction. Les personnes. Les biens (8th edn, Montchrestien 1997) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  191. COSTELLO C, The Human Rights of Migrants and Refugees in European Law (Oxford University Press 2016) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  192. CREPEAU P-A, L'intensité de l'obligation juridique ou Des obligations de diligence, de résultat et de garantie (Yvon Blais 1989) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  193. DABIN J, Le droit subjectif (Dalloz 2008) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  194. DAVID R, International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law. Volume II - The Legal Systems of the World, Their Comparison and Unification. Chapter 3 - Sources of Law (Mohr Siebeck 1984) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  195. DELEUZE N and BERTRAND-MIKOVIC A, Introduction générale au droit : le droit objectif, les droits subjectifs, l'action en justice (Studyrama 2005) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  196. DERO-BUGNY D, Les rapports entre la Cour de justice de l'Union européenne et la Cour européenne des droits de l'homme (Bruylant 2015) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  197. DI MAJO A, La tutela civile dei diritti, vol 3 (4th edn, Giuffrè editore 2003) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  198. DOUGAN M, National Remedies Before the Court of Justice. Issues of Harmonisation and Differentiation (Hart Publishing 2004) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  199. DOUGLAS-SCOTT S, Constitutional Law of the European Union (Pearson Education 2002) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  200. DUGUIT L, Traité de droit constitutionnel (2nd edn, Fontemoing 1921) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  201. DUGUIT L, Manuel de droit constitutionnel (4th edn, E. DE BOCCARD 1923) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  202. DWORKIN R, Taking Rights Seriously (Harvard University Press 1977) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  203. ECK L, L'abus de droit en droit constitutionnel (L'Harmattan 2010) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  204. ELEUTHERIADES PZ, Legal Rights (Oxford University Press 2008) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  205. ELLIS E and WATSON P, EU anti-discrimination law (Oxford University Press 2012) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  206. FEYEREISEN M, GUILLOT J and SALVADOR S, Procédure administrative contentieuse (Promoculture Larcier 2013) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  207. FOULQUIER N, Les droits publics subjectifs des administrés. Emergence d'un concept en droit administratif français du XIXè au XXè siècle (Dalloz 2003) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  208. FREDMAN S, Human Rights Transformed. Positive Rights and Positive Duties (Oxford University Press 2008) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  209. FROMONT M, Droit administratif des Etats européens (Presses universitaires de France 2006) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  210. GAILLARD E, Le pouvoir en droit privé (BEBYAI 1985) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  211. GAILLET A, L’individu contre l’Etat. Essai sur l’évolution des recours de droit public dans l’Allemagne du XIXè siècle (Dalloz 2012) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  212. GICQUEL J and GICQUEL JE, Droit constitutionnel et institutions politiques (Montchrestien, Lextenso éditions 2008) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  213. GORDON R and MOFFATT R, EU Law in Judicial Review (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2014) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  214. GRZESZICK B, Rechte und Ansprüche. Eine Rekonstruktion des Staatshaftungsrechts aus den subjektiven öffentlichen Rechten (Mohr Siebeck 2002) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  215. HABERMAS J, Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (REHG W trans, The MIT Press 1993) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  216. HABERMAS J, Droit et démocratie. Entre faits et normes, (BOUCHINDHOMME C and ROCHLITZ R trans, Gallimard 1997) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  217. HARTLEY TC, The Foundations of European Community Law (5th edn, Oxford University Press 2003) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  218. HARTLEY TC, The Foundations of European Union Law (Oxford University Press 2010) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  219. HEUSCHLING L, Etat de droit, Rechtsstaat, Rule of law (Nouvelle bibliothèque de thèses, Dalloz 2002) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  220. HOFMANN HCH, ROWE GC and TÜRK AH, Administrative Law and Policy of the European Union (Oxford University Press 2011) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  221. IGNATIEFF M, The Rights Revolution (Anansi 2000) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  222. IONESCU O, La notion de droit subjectif dans le droit privé (Sirey 1931) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  223. JELLINEK G, System der subjektiven öffentlichen Rechte (1905) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  224. JHERING (VON) R, Der Geist des römischen Rechts auf den verschiedenen Stufen seiner Entwicklung (Benno Schwabe 1954 8th ed) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  225. JERHING (VON) R, La lutte pour le droit (O. JOUANJAN ed., O. DE MEULENAERE trans, Dalloz 2006, first published 1890) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  226. JOSSERAND L, De l'esprit des droits et de leur relativité. Théorie dite de l'abus des droits (Dalloz 1939) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  227. KACZMAREK L, La Responsabilité pour fait normal : Etude critique sur son originalité en matière civile extracontractuelle (Editions Publibook 2012) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  228. KACZOROWSKA A, European Union Law (Routledge 2008) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  229. KELSEN H, General Theory of Norms (Oxford University Press 1991) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  230. KOLB R, La bonne foi en droit international public. Contribution à l’étude des principes généraux de droit (The Graduate Institute 2000) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  231. KOMINOS AP, EC Private Antitrust Enforcement: Decentralised Application of EC Competition Law by National Courts (Hart 2008) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  232. KÜNNECKE M, Tradition and Change in Administrative Law: an Anglo-German comparison (Springer 2007) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  233. LANGLET D and MAHMOUDI S, EU Environmental Law and Policy (Oxford University Press 2016) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  234. LASSER M, Judicial Deliberations. A Comparative Analysis of Judicial Transparency and Legitimacy (Oxford University Press 2004) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  235. LASSER M, Judicial Transformations: The Rights Revolution in the Courts of Europe (Oxford University Press 2009) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  236. LE SUEUR A, SUNKIN M and MURKENS JEK, Public Law. Text, Cases, and Materials (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2010) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  237. LECOURT R, L'Europe des juges (Bruylant 1976) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  238. LECUYER Y, Mémento de la jurisprudence de la CEDH (Hachette Education 2012) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  239. LENAERTS K, MASELIS I and GUTMAN K, EU Procedural Law (Oxford University Press 2014) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  240. LEPETIT-COLLIN H, Recherches sur le plein contentieux objectif (L.G.D.J., collection Thèses 2011) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  241. LEVINET M, Théorie générale des droits et libertés (4th edn, L.G.D.J. , Anthemis/Nemesis 2012) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  242. LEWIS E and others, Non-Contractual Liability of the EU for Damage Sustained by Women Who Received PIP Breast Implants (Amsterdam International Law Clinic, 2013) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  243. LORENZ N-LA, GROUSSOT X and PETURSSON GT, The European Human Rights Culture - A Paradox of Human Rights Protection in Europe? (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2013) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  244. LOUGHLIN M, The Idea of Public Law (Oxford University Press 2003) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  245. LOUGHLIN M, Foundations of Public Law (Oxford University Press 2010) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  246. LYONS T, EC Customs Law (Oxford University Press 2001) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  247. MACCORMICK N, Institutions of Law (Oxford University Press 2007) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  248. MASING J, Die Mobilisierung des Bürgers für die Durchsetzung des Rechts: europäische Impulse für eine Revision der Lehre vom subjektiv-öffentlichen Recht (Duncker & Humblot 1997) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  249. MAURER H, Allgemeines Verwaltungsrecht (11 edn, Beck 1997) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  250. MAURER H, Allgemeines Verwaltungsrecht (17 edn, Beck 2009) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  251. MEDINA ALCOZ L, Libertad y autoridad en el derecho administrativo. Derecho subjetivo e interés legítimo: una revisión (Marcial Pons 2016) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  252. MENDES J, Participation in EU Rule-Making. A Rights-Based Approach (Oxford University Press 2011) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  253. MICKLITZ H-W and WEATHERHILL S, European Economic Law (Asghate Dartmouth 1997) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  254. MILUTINOVIC V, The 'Right to Damages' under EU Competition Law: from Courage v Crehan to the White Paper and Beyond (Kluwer Law International 2010) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  255. NEBBIA P and ASKHAM T, EU Consumer Law (Oxford University Press 2004) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  256. NETTESHEIM M, Die mitgliedstaatliche Durchführung von EG-Richtlinien (Duncker & Humblot 1999) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  257. OST F, Droit et intérêt, vol. 2 : Entre droit et non-droit, l'intérêt : essai sur les fonctions qu'exerce la notion d'intérêt en droit privé (Publications des Facultés universitaires Saint-Louis 1990) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  258. PALMER E, Judicial Review, Socio-Economic Rights and the Human Rights Act (Hart Publishing 2007) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  259. POIARES MADURO M, We the Court (Hart 1998) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  260. PÓŁTORAK N, European Union Rights in National Courts (Wolters Kluwer 2015) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  261. POULET-GIBOT LECLERC N, Droit administratif: sources, moyens, contrôles (Bréal 2007) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  262. PRECHAL S, Directives in EC Law (Oxford University Press 2006) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  263. RICCI J-C, Droit civil - Les biens (Hachette Education 2013) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  264. ROSAS A and ARMATI L, EU Constitutional Law : An Introduction (Hart 2012) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  265. ROUBIER P, Droits subjectifs et situations juridiques (2nd edn, Dalloz 2005) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  266. ROUSSET M and ROUSSET O, Droit administratif - Tome 2. Le contentieux administratif (2nd edn, Presses universitaires de Grenoble 2004) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  267. SAJÓ A, Abuse: The Dark Side of Fundamental Rights (Eleven International Publishing 2006) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  268. SAÜBERLICH U, Die außervertragliche Haftung im Gemeinschaftsrecht. Eine Untersuchung der Mehrpersonenverhältnisse (Springer 2005) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  269. STAEBE E, Rechtsschutz bei gemeinschaftswidrigen Beihilfen vor europäischen und deutschen Gerichten (Duncker & Humblot 2001) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  270. SAURUGGER S, Théories et concepts de l'intégration européenne (Presses de la Fondation nationale des sciences politiques 2009) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  271. SCHERMERS H, Judicial Protection in the European Communities (Springer 2013) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  272. SCHLACKE S, Überindividueller Rechtsschutz: Phänomenologie und Systematik überindividueller Klagebefugnisse im Verwaltungs- und Gemeinschaftsrecht, insbesondere am Beispiel des Umweltrechts (Mohr Siebeck 2008) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  273. SCHWARZE J, European Administrative Law (Sweet & Maxwell 2006) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  274. SCOTT J, EC Environmental Law (Longman 1998) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  275. SIMON D (ed), MARIATTE F and RITLENG D, Contentieux de l'Union européenne : 1/ Annulation, exception d’illégalité (Lamy 2010) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  276. SIMON D, MARIATTE F and MUNOZ R, Contentieux de l’Union européenne : 2/ Carence, Responsabilité (Lamy 2011) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  277. SOMMERMANN, K-P, Staatsziele und Staatszielbestimmungen (Mohr Siebeck 1997) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  278. SUMNER LW, The Moral Foundation of Rights (Clarendon Press 1987) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  279. SUPIOT A, Homo juridicus. Essai sur la fonction anthropologique du Droit (Seuil 2005) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  280. THORSON B, Individual Rights in EU Law (Springer 2016) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  281. TRIDIMAS T, The General Principles of EU Law (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2006) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  282. TÜRK AH, The Concept of Legislation in European Community Law - A Comparative Perspective (Kluwer 2006) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  283. TÜRK AH, Judicial review in EU law (Edward Elgar Publishing 2010) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  284. VAN RAEPENBUSCH S, Droit institutionnel de l'Union et des Communautés européennes (De Boeck 2000) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  285. VILLEY M, Le droit et les droits de l'Homme (3rd edn, Presses universitaires de France 1998) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  286. VILLEY M, La formation de la pensée juridique moderne (2nd edn, Presses universitaires de France 2013) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  287. VIRALLY M, La pensée juridique (3rd edn, Editions Panthéon-Assas, LGDJ 2010) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  288. WAKEFIELD J, Judicial Protection through the Use of Article 288(2) EC (Kluwer Law International 2002) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  289. WALDRON J, The Right to Private Property (Clarendon Press 1988) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  290. WALDRON J, Law and Disagreement (Oxford University Press 1999) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  291. WALINE M, L'individualisme et le droit (Dalloz 2007) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  292. WEATHERHILL S, EU Consumer Law and Policy (Edward Elgar 2005) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  293. WHITE AR, Rights (Clarendon Press 1984) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  294. WIDDERSHOVEN R and MEIJ AWH, Europees recht en het Nederlands bestuursrecht: preadviezen (Samson H.D. Tjeenk Willink 1996) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  295. WINDSCHEID B, Lehrbuch des Pandektenrechts (KIPP T ed, 9th edn, Buddeus 1906) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  296. WITZ C, Droit privé allemand, 1, Actes juridiques, droits subjectifs (BGB, Partie générale, Loi sur les conditions générales d'affaires) (Litec 1992) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  297. Edited books and book chapters Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  298. ABELSHAUSER W, ‘‘Integration à la Carte’ The Primacy of Politics and the Economic Integration of Western Europe in the 1950s’ in MARTIN S (ed), The Construction of Europe Essays in Honour of Emile Noël (Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  299. ALEXY R, ‘Rights and Liberties as Concepts’ in ROSENFELD M and SAJO A (eds), Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford University Press 2012) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  300. ANCEL P, ‘Abus de droit (Interdiction de l’—)’ in ANDRIANTSIMBAZOVINA J et al (eds) Dictionnaire des Droits de l’Homme (Presses universitaires de France 2008) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  301. ARNULL A, ‘The action for annulment: A case of double standards?’ in O'KEEFE D and BAVASSO A (eds), Judicial Review in European Union Law (Kluwer Law International 2000) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  302. AUGSBERG I, ‘Methoden des europäischen Verwaltungsrechts’ in TERHECHTE JP (ed) Verwaltungsrecht der Europäischen Union (1st edn, Nomos) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  303. AZOULAI L, ‘Le principe de bonne administration’ in AUBY J-B and DUTHEIL DE LA ROCHERE J (eds), Droit administratif européen (Bruylant 2007) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  304. AZOULAI L, BARBOU DES PLACES S and PATAUT E, ‘Being a Person in the European Union’ in AZOULAI L and others (eds), Constructing the Person in EU Law: Rights, Roles, Identities (Bloomsbury Publishing 2016) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  305. BAILEY SH, ‘Grounds for Judicial Review: Due Process, Natural Justice, and Fairness’ in FELDMAN D (ed) English Public Law (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2009) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  306. BAILLEUX A, ‘Les droits de la défense et les (autres) droits fondamentaux devant les juridictions de l'Union européenne’ in MAHIEU S (ed) Contentieux de l'Union européenne Questions choisies (Larcier 2014) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  307. BARDIN M, ‘Depuis l'arrêt Algera, retour sur une utilisation ‘‘discrète’’ du droit comparé par la Cour de justice de l'Union européenne’ in DI MANNO T (ed) Le recours au droit comparé par le juge (Bruylant 2014) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  308. BARNARD C, ‘The ‘Opt-Out’ for the UK and Poland from the Charter of Fundamental Rights: Triumph or Rhetoric over Reality?’, GRILLER S and ZILLER J (eds), The Lisbon Treaty, vol 11 (Springer 2008) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  309. BAST J, ‘Legal Instruments’ in VON BOGDANDY A and BAST J (eds), Principles of European Constitutional Law (Hart Publishing 2006) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  310. BELJIN S, ‘Rights in EU Law’ in PRECHAL S and VAN ROERMUND B (eds), The Coherence of EU Law The Search for Unity in Divergent Concepts (Oxford University Press 2008) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  311. BENGOETXEA J and JÄÄSKINEN N, ‘Rights and Diverse Effects in EU Law: A Hohfeldian Approach to the Doctrine of Direct Effect of Directives’ in BANAKAR R (ed) Rights in Context - Law and Justice in Late Modern Society (Ashgate 2010) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  312. BERNARD N, ‘A ‘New Governance’ Approach to Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in the EU’ in HERVEY T and KENNER J (eds), Economic and Social Rights under the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights A Legal Perspective (Hart 2003) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  313. BETLEM G, ‘The Doctrine of Consistent Interpretation. Managing Legal Uncertainty’ in PRINSSEN JM and SCHRAUWEN A (eds), Direct Effect Rethinking a Classic of EC Legal Doctrine (Europa Law Publishing 2002) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  314. BIGNAMI F, ‘Regulation and the courts: judicial review in comparative perspective’ in BIGNAMI F and ZARING D, Comparative Law and Regulation. Understanding the Global Regulatory Process (Elgar 2016) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  315. BOBEK M, ‘The effects of EU law in the national legal systems’ in BARNARD C and PEERS S (eds), European Union Law (Oxford University Press 2014) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  316. BOBEK M, ‘Why There is no Principle of ‘‘Procedural Autonomy’’ of the Member States’, in DE WITTE B and MICKLITZ H (eds), The European Court of Justice and the Autonomy of the Member States (Intersentia 2012) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  317. BOK AJ, ‘Judicial Review of Administrative Decisions by the Dutch Administrative Courts: recours objectif or recours subjectif? A Survey including French and German law’ in STROINK FAM (ed), Judicial Lawmaking and Administrative Law (Intersentia nv 2005) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  318. BOROWSKI M, ‘The Charter of Fundamental Rights in the Treaty on European Union’ in TRYBUS M and RUBINI L (eds), The Treaty of Lisbon and the Future of European Law and Policy (Edward Elgar 2012) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  319. BOROWSKY M, ‘Artikel 52’, in MAYER J, Charta der Grundrechte der Europäischen Union,(Nomos 2010, 3rd ed.) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  320. BRENNINKMEIJER AFM, ‘The Influence of Court of Justice Case Law on the Procedural Law of the Member States’ in VERVAELE JAE (ed) Administrative Law Application and Enforcement of Community Law in the Netherlands (Kluwer 1994) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  321. BURGORGUE-LARSEN L, ‘L'article II-112’ in BURGORGUE-LARSEN L and others (eds), Traité établissant une Constitution pour l'Europe : commentaire article par article Tome 2, Partie II La Charte des droits fondamentaux de l'Union (Bruylant 2005) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  322. CARTABIA M, ‘The Italian Constitutional Court and the Relationship Between the Italian legal system and the European Union’ in SLAUGHTER AM, STONE SWEET A and WEILER JHH (eds), The European Court and National Courts – Doctrine and Jurisprudence. Legal Change in Its Social Context (Hart 1998) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  323. CHETAIL V, ‘The Common European Asylum System: Bric-à-brac or System?’ in CHETAIL V, DE BRUYCKER P and MAIANI F (eds), Reforming the Common European Asylum System The New European Refugee Law (Brill Nijhof 2016) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  324. CLAES M, ‘The European Union, its Member States and their Citizens’ in LECZYKIEWICZ D and WEATHERHILL S (eds), The Involvement of EU Law in Private Law Relationships (Hart Publishing 2013) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  325. CRAIG P, ‘Access to Mechanisms of Administrative Law’ in FELDMAN D (ed) English Public Law (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2009) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  326. CRAIG P, ‘Rights, Legality, and Legitimacy’ in CRAIG P (ed) The Lisbon Treaty: Law, Politics, and Treaty Reform (Oxford University Press 2010) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  327. CURTIN D and MORTELMANS K, ‘Application and Enforcement of Community Law by the Member States: Actors in Search of a Third Generation Script’, in D. CURTIN and T. HEUKELS (eds), Institutional Dynamics of European Integration, Essays in Honour of H.G. Schermers, vol. II, (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1994) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  328. DA CRUZ VILACA JL, ‘Le principe de l'effet utile du droit de l'Union dans la jurisprudence de la Cour’ in ROSAS A and others (eds), The Court of Justice and the Construction of Europe: Analyses and Perspectives on Sixty Years of Case-law (T.M.C. Asser 2013) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  329. DE BURCA G, ‘The Language of Rights and European Integration’ in SHAW J and MORE G (eds), New Legal Dynamics of European Union (Clarendon Press 1995) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  330. DEDERICHS M and CHRISTENSEN R, ‘Inhaltsanalyse als methodisches Instrument zur Untersuchung von Gerichtsentscheidungen, vorgeführt am Beispiel der Rechtssprechung des EuGH’ in F. MÜLLER and I. BURR (eds), Rechtssprache Europas. Reflexion der Praxis von Sprache und Mehrsprachigkeit im supranationalen Recht (Duncker & Humblot 2004) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  331. DE GROOT GR, ‘Law, Legal Language and the Legal system: Reflections on the Problems of Translating Legal Texts’, in GESSNER V, HOELAND A and VARGA C, European Legal Cultures (Dartmouth 1996) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  332. DE SCHUTTER O, ‘Les droits et principes sociaux dans la Charte des droits fondamentaux de l'Union européenne’ in CARLIER JY and DE SCHUTTER O (eds), La Charte des droits fondamentaux de l'Union européenne (Bruylant 2002) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  333. DE WITTE B, ‘Direct Effect, Primacy and the Nature of the Legal Order’ in DE BURCA G and CRAIG P (eds), The Evolution of EU Law (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2011) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  334. DEDERICHS M and CHRISTENSEN R, ‘Inhaltsanalyse als methodisches Instrument zur Untersuchung von Gerichtsentscheidungen, vorgeführt am Beispiel der Rechtsprechung des EuGH’ in MÜLLER F and BURR I (eds), Rechtssprache Europas Reflexion der Praxis von Sprache und Mehrsprachigkeit im supranationalen Recht (Duncker & Humblot 2004) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  335. DOUGAN M, ‘The Impact of the General Principles of Union Law upon Private Relationships’ in LECZYKIEWICZ D and WEATHERHILL S (eds), The Involvement of EU Law in Private Law Relationships (Hart Publishing 2013) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  336. DOUGAN M, ‘Who Exactly Benefits from the Treaties? The Murky Interaction Between Union and National Competence over the Capacity to Enforce EU Law’, The Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, Volume 12 (Hart 2010) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  337. DREXL J, ‘Competition Law as Part of the European Constitution’ in VON BOGDANDY A and BAST J (eds), Principles of European Constitutional Law (Hart Publishing 2006) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  338. DWORKIN R, ‘Rights as Trumps’ in WALDRON J (ed) Theories of Rights (Oxford University Press 1984) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  339. EBNER M and GAMBARO E, ‘The Notion of State Aid’ in SANTA MARIA A (ed), Competition and State Aid. An Analysis of the EC Practice (Kluwer Law International 2007) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  340. EDWARD D ‘National Courts—the Powerhouse of Community Law’ in J. Bell and others (eds), Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, Volume 5 (Bloomsbury 2004) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  341. EDWARD DOA, ‘Direct Effect: Myth, Mess or Mystery?’ in PRINSSEN JM and SCHRAUWEN A (eds), Direct Effect Rethinking a Classic of EC Legal Doctrine (Europa Law Publishing 2002) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  342. EIJSBOUTS T, ‘Direct Effect, the Test and the Terms. In Praise of a Capital Doctrine of EU Law’ in PRINSSEN JM and SCHRAUWEN A (eds), Direct Effect Rethinking a Classic of EC Legal Doctrine (Europa Law Publishing 2002) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  343. EVERLING U, ‘The European Union Between Community and National Policies and Legal Orders’ in VON BOGDANDY A and BAST J (eds), Principles of European Constitutional Law (Hart Publishing 2006) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  344. FELDMAN D, ‘Remedies for Violations of Convention Rights’ in FELDMAN D (ed) English Public Law (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2009) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  345. FREDMAN S and WESSON M, ‘Social, Economic, and Cultural Rights’ in FELDMAN D (ed) English Public Law (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2009) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  346. GARDBAUM S, ‘The structure and scope of constitutional rights’ in T. GINSBURG, R. DIXON (eds.) Comparative Constitutional Law (Elgar Publishing 2011) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  347. GARRETT G, ‘The Politics of Legal Integration in the European Union’ (1995) 49 International Organization 171. W. MATTLI W and A.-M. SLAUGHTER, ‘Law and Politics in the European Union: A Reply to Garrett’ (1995) 49 International Organization 183 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  348. GERKRATH J, ‘Direct Effect in Germany and France’ in PRINSSEN JM and SCHRAUWEN A (eds), Direct Effect Rethinking a Classic of EC Legal Doctrine (Europa Law Publishing 2002) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  349. GRABITZ E, ‘Liability for Legislative Acts’ in SCHERMERS HG, HEUKELS T and MEAD P (eds), Non-contractual liability of the European Communities (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1988) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  350. GRAZIADEI M, ‘Rights in the European Landscape: A Historical and Comparative Profile’ in PRECHAL S and VAN ROERMUND B (eds), The Coherence of EU Law The Search for Unity in Divergent Concepts (Oxford University Press 2008) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  351. GRIFFITHS RT, ‘Europe’s First Constitution: The European Political Community, 1952-1954’ in MARTIN S (ed), The Construction of Europe Essays in Honour of Emile Noël (Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  352. GUASTINI R, ‘L'interprétation de la constitution’ in TROPER M and CHAGNOLLAUD D (eds), Traité international de droit constitutionnel (Dalloz 2012) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  353. HART HLA, ‘Bentham on Legal Rights’ in HART HLA (ed) Essays on Bentham: Jurisprudence and Political Theory (Clarendon Press 1982) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  354. HILSON C, ‘Legality Review of Member States Discretion under Directives’ in TRIDIMAS T and NEBBIA P (eds), European Union Law for the Twenty-First Century: Volume 1: Rethinking the New Legal Order (Bloomsbury Publishing 2004) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  355. HOFMANN HCH, ‘Individual Rights and Information in EU Public Law’, in LIND AS, ÖSTERDAL I and REICHEL J (eds), Transparency in the future – Swedish openness 250 years (Ragulka 2017) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  356. HOFMANN HCH, ‘The Legal Framework to Subsidies and State Aid Review’ in HOFMANN HCH and MICHEAU C (eds), State Aid Law of the European Union (Oxford University Press 2016) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  357. HOFMANN HCH, ‘Effective Judicial Remedies Before the National Courts’ in WARD A and others (eds), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights (Hart 2014) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  358. HOFMANN HCH and TÜRK AH, ‘The challenges of Europe's integrated administration’ in ERIKSEN EO and JOERGES C (eds), Law, Democracy and Solidarity in Europe's Post-National Constellation (ARENA 2006) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  359. HOLLAND S, ‘Economic and Social Cohesion in the 1990's’ in MARTIN S (ed), The Construction of Europe Essays in Honour of Emile Noël (Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  360. HOURQUEBIE F, ‘Les droits publics subjectifs: échec de l'importation d'une théorie allemande en droit administratif français?’ in MELLERAY F (ed) L'argument de droit comparé en droit administratif français (Bruylant 2007) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  361. HUNT J, ‘Fair and Just Working Conditions’ in HERVEY T and KENNER J (eds), Economic and Social Rights under the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights A Legal Perspective (Hart 2003) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  362. JACQUE JP, ‘The Role of Law in European Integration’, in GESSNER V, HOELAND A and VARGA C, European Legal Cultures (Darthmouth 1996) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  363. JAEGER M, ‘Les voies de recours sont-elles des vases communicants?’ in RODRÍGUEZ IGLESIAS GC (ed), Mélanges en hommage à Fernand Schockweiler (Nomos 1999) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  364. JANS JH and PRINSSEN JM, ‘Direct Effect: Convergence or Divergence? A Comparative Perspective’ in PRINSSEN JM and SCHRAUWEN A (eds), Direct Effect Rethinking a Classic of EC Legal Doctrine (Europa Law Publishing 2002) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  365. JONES A, ‘Private Enforcement of EU Competition Law: A Comparison with, and Lessons from, the US (January 14, 2016)’ in BERGSTRÖM M, IACOVIDES M and STRAND M (eds), Harmonising EU Competition Litigation: The New Directive and Beyond (Hart Publishing 2016) - TLI Think! Paper 10/2016 Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2715796 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  366. KADAR L and SHAW J, ‘Article 39’ in PEERS S and others (eds), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights (Hart Publishing 2014) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  367. KADELBACH S, ‘Union Citizenship’ in VON BOGDANDY A and BAST J (eds), Principles of European Constitutional Law (Hart Publishing 2006) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  368. KENNEDY D, ‘The International Human Rights Regime: Stil Part of the Problem?’ in DICKINSON R and others (eds), Examining Critical Perspectives on Human Rights (Cambridge University Press 2012) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  369. KENNER J, ‘Economic and Social Rights in the EU Legal Order: The Mirage of Indivisibility’ in HERVEY T and KENNER J (eds), Economic and Social Rights under the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights A Legal Perspective (Hart 2003) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  370. KORNEZOV A, ‘When David Teaches EU Law to Goliath: A Generational Upheaval in the Making’ in BOBEK M (ed), Central European Judges Under the European Influence (Hart Publishing 2015) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  371. KRAMER MH, SIMMONDS NE and STEINER H, A Debate Over Rights (Oxford University Press 1998) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  372. KRAMER MH, ‘Rights Without Trimmings’ in KRAMER MH, SIMMONDS NE and STEINER H, A Debate Over Rights (Oxford University Press 1998) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  373. LECZYKIEWICZ D, ‘The Constitutional Dimension of Private Law Liability Rules in the EU’ in LECZYKIEWICZ D and WEATHERHILL S (eds), The Involvement of EU Law in Private Law Relationships (Hart Publishing 2013) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  374. LENAERTS K and GUTIERREZ-FONS JA, ‘The Place of the Charter in the EU Constitutional Edifice’ in PEERS S and others (eds), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights A Commentary (Hart Publishing 2014) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  375. MACCORMICK N, ‘Rights in Legislation’ in HACKER PMS and RAZ J (eds), Law, Morality and Society: Essays in Honour of HLA Hart (Clarendon Press 1977) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  376. MAGNETTE P, ‘La citoyenneté au-delà du vote. Droit de pétition et recours au médiateur’, in MAGNETTE P, De l’étranger au citoyen, Construire la citoyenneté européenne (De Boeck Université 1997) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  377. MAIANI F, ‘The Dublin III Regulation: A New Legal Framework for a More Humane System?’ in CHETAIL V, DE BRUYCKER P and MAIANI F (eds), Reforming the Common European Asylum System The New European Refugee Law (Brill Nijhoff 2016) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  378. MAYER F, ‘Artikel 6 EUV’, in Grabitz E, Hilf M and Nettesheim M, Das Recht der Europäischen Union – Kommentar (Beck, 2010) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  379. MELOT R, ‘La conception wébérienne des droits subjectifs : un parcours de l'histoire économique au débat sur la légitimité politique’ in COUTU M and ROCHER G (eds), La légitimité de l'Etat et du droit autour de Max Weber (Presses Université Laval 2005) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  380. MENDES J, ‘Participation and participation rights in EU law and governance’ in HOFMANN HCH and TÜRK AH (eds), Legal Challenges in EU Administrative Law Towards an Integrated Administration (Edward Elgar 2009) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  381. MICKLITZ H-W, ‘The Interest in Public Interest Litigation’ in MICKLITZ H-W and REICH N (eds), Public Interest Litigation before European Courts (Nomos 1997) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  382. MILUTINOVIC V, ‘The ‘Right to Damages’ in a ‘System of Parallel Competences’: A Fresh Look at BRT v. SABAM and its Subsequent Interpretation (July 1, 2013).’ Forthcoming in: LOWE P and MARQUIS M (eds), European Competition Law Annual 2011: Integrating Public and Private Enforcement Implications for Courts and Agencies (Hart Publishing, 2014) < https://ssrn.com/abstract=2293649> accessed 30 May 2017 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  383. MUIR E, ‘The Court of Justice: a fundamental rights institution among others’ in DAWSON M, DE WITTE B and MUIR E eds, Judicial Activism at the European Court of Justice (Edward Elgar 2013) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  384. NEFRAMI E, ‘Quelques réflexions sur l'article 19, paragraphe 1, alinéa 2, TUE et l'obligation de l'Etat membre d'assurer la protection juridictionnelle effective dans les domaines couverts par le droit de l’Union' in BOUTAYEB C (ed) La Constitution, l'Europe et le droit Mélanges en l'honneur de Jean-Claude Masclet (Publications de la Sorbonne 2013) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  385. NEVILLE BROWN L, ‘Is there a general principle of abuse of rights in European Community law?’ in CURTIN D and HEUKELS T (eds), Institutional Dynamics of European Integration Essays in Honour of Henry G Schermers, vol II (Martinus Nijhoff 1994) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  386. NOLLKAEMPER A, ‘The Direct Effect of Public International Law’ in PRINSSEN JM and SCHRAUWEN A (eds), Direct Effect Rethinking a Classic of EC Legal Doctrine (Europa Law Publishing 2002) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  387. PEERS S, ‘The Rebirth of the EU's Charter of Fundamental Rights’ in BARNARD C and ODUDU O (eds), The Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, Volume 13 (Hart 2011) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  388. PEERS S, ‘Taking Rights Away? Limitations and Derogations’, in S. Peers, A. Ward (eds), The European Union Charter of Fundamental Rights (Hart Publishing 2004) 141 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  389. PESCATORE P, ‘Van Gend en Loos, 3 February 1963: A view from within’ in POIARES MADURO M and AZOULAI L (eds), The Past and Future of EU Law: The Classics of EU Law Revisited on the 50th Anniversary of the Rome Treaty (Hart 2010) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  390. PITTIE M and JUSSIAUX A, ‘Les recours en responsabilité non contractuelle devant le juge de l'Union européenne’ in MAHIEU S (ed) Contentieux de l'Union européenne Questions choisies (Larcier 2014) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  391. POIARES MADURO M, ‘The Double Constitutional Life of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union’ in HERVEY T and KENNER J (eds), Economic and Social Rights under the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights A Legal Perspective (Hart 2003) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  392. PÓŁTORAK N, ‘Changes in the Level of the National Judicial Protection Under the EU Influence on the Example of the Polish Legal System’ in BOBEK M (ed), Central European Judges Under the European Influence (Hart Publishing 2015) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  393. PRECHAL S, ‘Direct Effect Reconsidered, Redefined and Rejected’ in PRINSSEN JM and SCHRAUWEN A (eds), Direct Effect Rethinking a Classic of EC Legal Doctrine (Europa Law Publishing 2002) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  394. PRECHAL S, ‘Rights v principles, or how to remove fundamental rights from the jurisdiction of the courts’ in DE ZWAAN J and others (eds), The European Union: An Ongoing Process of Integration - Liber Amicorum Alfred E Kellermann (T.M.C. Asser Press 2004) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  395. PRECHAL S, ‘Protection of Rights: How Far?’ in PRECHAL S and VAN ROERMUND B (eds), The Coherence of EU Law (Oxford University Press 2008) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  396. PRECHAL S and VAN ROERMUND B, ‘Binding Unity in EU Legal Order: An Introduction’ in PRECHAL S and VAN ROERMUND B (eds), The Coherence of EU Law: The Search for Unity in Divergent Concepts (Oxford University Press 2008) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  397. RANGEON F, ‘Droits-libertés et droits-créances : les contradictions du préambule de la Constitution de 1946’ in KOUBI G (ed) Le Préambule de la constitution de 1946 : antinomies juridiques et contradictions politiques (Presses universitaires de France 1996) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  398. RAULUS H, ‘The Charter of Fundamental Rights as a set of constitutional principles’ in TRYBUS M and RUBINI L (eds), The Treaty of Lisbon and the Future of European Law and Policy (Edward Elgar 2012) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  399. RAVO LM, ‘The role of the Principle of Effective Judicial Protection and its Impact on National Jurisdictions’ Sources of Law and Legal Protection (Triestine Lecture 1) (EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste 2012) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  400. REICH N, ‘The Impact of the Non-Discrimination Principle on Private Autonomy’ in LECZYKIEWICZ D and WEATHERHILL S (eds), The Involvement of EU Law in Private Law Relationships (Hart Publishing 2013) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  401. REICH N, ‘‘System der subjectiven öffentlichen Rechte’ in the Union: A European Constitution for Citizens of Bits and Pieces’ in Academy of European Law (ed) Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law, vol VI - 1 (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1998) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  402. ROTT P, ‘The Court of Justice's Principle of Effectiveness and its Unforeseeable Impact on Private Law Relationships’ in LECZYKIEWICZ D and WEATHERHILL S (eds), The Involvement of EU Law in Private Law Relationships (Hart Publishing 2013) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  403. RUIZ-JARABO COLOMER D, ‘Once Upon a Time--Francovich: From Fairy Tale to Cruel Reality?’ in POIARES MADURO M and AZOULAI L (eds), The Past and Future of EU Law: the Classics of EU Law Revisited on the 50th Anniversary of the Rome Treaty (Hart Publishing 2010) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  404. RYAN B, ‘The Charter and Collective Labour Law’ in HERVEY T and KENNER J (eds), Economic and Social Rights under the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights A Legal Perspective (Hart 2003) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  405. SACK, PG ‘Law and Custom: Reflections on the Relation between English Law and the English Language’ in GESSNER V, HOELAND A and VARGA C, European Legal Cultures (Dartmouth 1996) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  406. SAUTER W, ‘Proportionality in EU Law: A Balancing Act?’ in Barnard C, Albors-Llorens A, Gehring MW (eds), Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, Vol 15 439 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  407. SCHAAP M and IMBERS R, ‘Access to environmental justice for NGOs: interplay between the Aarhus Convention, the EU Lisbon Treaty and the European Convention on Human Rights’ in JAKUBOWSKI A, WIERCZY SKA K and Wierczyńska K (eds), Fragmentation vs the Constitutionalisation of International Law: A Practical Inquiry (Routledge 2016) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  408. SHAPIRO M, ‘The European Court of Justice’ in CRAIG P and DE BURCA G, The Evolution of EU Law (Oxford University Press 1999) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  409. SHAW J, ‘Citizens’ Rights and Access to Law’ in MICKLITZ H-W and REICH N (eds), Public Interest Litigation before European Courts (Nomos 1997) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  410. SHAW J, ‘Citizenship of the Union: Towards Post-National Membership?’ in Academy of European Law (ed) Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law, vol VI - 1 (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1998) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  411. SIMMONDS NE, ‘Rights at the Cutting Edge’ in KRAMER MH and others (eds), A Debate Over Rights (Oxford University Press 1998) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  412. SIMON D, ‘SABENA is dead, Gabrielle Defrenne's case is still alive: the old lady's testament…’ in POIARES MADURO M and AZOULAI L (eds), The Past and Future of EU law: the Classics of EU Law Revisited on the 50th Anniversary of the Rome Treaty (Hart 2010) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  413. SUNKIN M, ‘Grounds for Judicial Review: Illegality in the Strict Sense’ in FELDMAN D (ed) English Public Law (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2009) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  414. SUNKIN M, ‘Remedies Available in Judicial Review Proceedings’ in FELDMAN D (ed) English Public Law (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2009) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  415. TENORE M, ‘The Scope for ‘Consistent Interpretation’ in the Area of Dividend Taxation’ in PISTONE P (ed), Legal Remedies in European Tax Law (IBFD 2009) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  416. THOMA R, ‘Das System der subjektiven öffentlichen Rechte und Pflichten’ in DREIER H (ed) Rechtsstaat - Demokratie - Grundrechte (Mohr Siebeck 1932) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  417. VAN GERVEN W, ‘Bridging the Unbridgeable - Community and National Tort Laws After Francovich and Brasserie’ in MICKLITZ H-W and REICH N (eds), Public Interest Litigation before European Courts (Nomos 1997) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  418. VAN LEUVEN N, ‘Droits et principes de la Charte des droits fondamentaux de l'Union européenne : pas d'opposition simple entre hard law et soft law’ in HACHEZ I and others (eds), Les sources du droit revisitées Volume 1 - Normes internationales et constitutionnelles (Anthemis 2012) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  419. VAN MEERBEECK J, ‘Les principes généraux du droit de l'Union européenne’ in HACHEZ I and others (eds), Les sources du droit revisitées Volume 1 - Normes internationales et constitutionnelles (Anthemis 2012) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  420. VAN ROSSEM JW, ‘The Autonomy of EU Law: More is Less?’ in WESSEL RA and BLOCKMANS S (eds), Between Autonomy and Dependence (T.M.C. Asser Press 2013) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  421. VEDSTED-HANSEN J, ‘Reception Conditions as Human Rights: Pan-European Standard or Systemic Deficiencies?’ in CHETAIL V, DE BRUYCKER P and MAIANI F (eds), Reforming the Common European Asylum System The New European Refugee Law (Brill Nijhoff 2016) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  422. VOIGTS H-M, Die Subjektivierung von Gemeinwohlinteressen als Demokratisierung der Verwaltung (LIT Verlag 2016) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  423. VON DANWITZ T, Verwaltungsrechtliches System und europäische Integration (Mohr Siebeck 1996) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  424. VOS E, ‘EU Risk Regulation reviewed by the European Courts’ in VAN ASSELT MBA and others (eds), Trade, Health and the Environment - The European Union put to the test (Routledge 2014) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  425. WALLACE C and SHAW J, ‘Education, Multiculturalism and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union’ in HERVEY T and KENNER J (eds), Economic and Social Rights under the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights A Legal Perspective (Hart 2003) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  426. WALUCHOW W, ‘Constitutions as Living Trees: an Idiot Defends’ in DYZENHAUS D and others (eds), Law and Morality: Readings in Legal Philosophy (University of Toronto Press 2007) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  427. WARD A, ‘More than an ‘Infant Disease’. Individual Rights, EC Directives, and the Case for Uniform Remedies’ in PRINSSEN JM and SCHRAUWEN A (eds), Direct Effect Rethinking a Classic of EC Legal Doctrine (Europa Law Publishing 2002) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  428. WATHELET M, ‘Du concept de l'effet direct à celui de l'invocabilité au regard de la jurisprudence récente de la Cour de justice’ in HOSKINS M and ROBINSON W (eds), A True European Essays for Judge David Edward (Hart Publishing 2003) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  429. WATHELET M and WILDERMEERSCH J, Contentieux européen (2 edn, Larcier 2014) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  430. WEATHERHILL S, ‘The Elusive Character of Private Autonomy in EU Law’ in LECZYKIEWICZ D and WEATHERHILL S (eds), The Involvement of EU Law in Private Law Relationships (Hart Publishing 2013) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  431. WEBER D, ‘Some Remarks on the Application of Community Law, Its Legal Effects and the Relationship between These Concepts’ in PISTONE P (ed), Legal Remedies in European Tax Law (IBFD 2009) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  432. WIDDERSHOVEN R, ‘Naar een bestuurs(proces)rechtelijk Ius Commune in Europa’ in STEYGER E and others (eds), Europees recht en het Nederlands bestuursrecht (VAR-reeks 1996) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  433. WOEHRLING J-M, ‘La France peut-elle se passer du principe de confiance légitime ?’ in Gouverner, administrer, juger Liber amicorum Jean Waline, Mélanges en l'honneur de Jean Waline (Dalloz 2002) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  434. WOUTERS J and VAN EECKHOUTTE D, ‘Giving Effect to Customary International Law Through European Community Law’ in PRINSSEN JM and SCHRAUWEN A (eds), Direct Effect Rethinking a Classic of EC Legal Doctrine (Europa Law Publishing 2002) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  435. Peer-reviewed journal articles Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  436. Editorial comments, ‘EU law as a way of life’ (2017) 54 Common Market Law Review 357 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  437. ABBOT C and LEE M, ‘Economic Actors in EU Environmental Law’ (2015) 34 Yearbook of European Law 26 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  438. ACAR T, ‘Appréhender l'imprécision des droits : approche linguistique’ La Revue des droits de l'homme (en ligne) 7 - 2015 <http://revdh.revues.org/1191> accessed 7 June 2016 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  439. ADAM S, DEVISSCHER P and VAN ELSUWEGE P, ‘Chronique de jurisprudence communautaire : les relations extérieures (1er janvier 2006-31 décembre 2008)’ (2009) Cahiers de droit européen 465 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  440. AGUDO GONZALEZ J, ‘Evolucion y negacion del derecho subjetivo’ (2011) Revista Digital de Derecho Administrativo 9 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  441. ALEXY R, ‘On Balancing and Subsumption’ (2003) Ratio Juris 433-449 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  442. AMAR AR, ‘The Bill of Rights as a Constitution’ (1992) 100 Yale Law Journal 1131 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  443. APPEL I and SINGER J, ‘Verfahrensvorschriften als subjektive Rechte’ (2007) Juristische Schulung 913 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  444. ARNULL A, ‘Case C-432/05, Unibet (London) Ltd and Unibet (International) Ltd v Justitiekanslern, judgment of the Grand Chamber of 13 March 2007’ (2007) 44 Common Market Law Review 1763 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  445. ATRIA F, ‘Social Rights: A Reply’ (2015) 24 Social & Legal Studies 628 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  446. AUGENSTEIN D, ‘Engaging the Fundamentals: On the Autonomous Substance of EU Fundamental Rights Law’ (2013) 14 German Law Journal 1917 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  447. AZOULAI L, ‘‘Integration through law’ and us’ (2016) 14 International Journal of Constitutional Law 449 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  448. BABAC B, ‘La nouvelle procédure administrative et le nouveau contentieux administratif en Croatie - Sur quelques implications des différences dans le traitement de l'objet du litige administratif au regard du contrôle de la légalité de l'action administrative’ (2012) 49 Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Splitu 325 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  449. BAQUERO CRUZ J, ‘What's Left of the Charter? Reflections on Law and Political Mythology’ (2008) 15 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 65 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  450. BARAV A, ‘Enforcement of Community Rights in the National Courts: the Case for Jurisdiction to Grant an Interim Relief’ (1989) 26 Common Market Law Review 369 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  451. BARENTS R, ‘Een grondwet voor Europa (VI): de grondrechten’ (2005) Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 39 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  452. BARENTS R, ‘EU Procedural Law and Effective Legal Protection’ (2014) 51 Common Market Law Review 1437 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  453. BASILIEN-GAINCHE M-L, ‘Cour de Justice de l'Union européenne : Notion de permis de séjour formellement limité’ (2012) Lettre ‘Actualités Droits-Libertés’ du CREDOF Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  454. BECKER F and CAMPBELL A, ‘The Direct Effect of European Directives: Towards the Final Act?’ (2007) 13 Columbia Journal of European Law 401 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  455. BELLAMY R, ‘Still in Deficit: Rights, Regulation, and Democracy in the EU’ (2006) 12 European Law Journal 725 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  456. BENLOLO-CARABOT M, ‘Chapitre 2. Les droits sociaux dans l'ordre juridique de l'Union Européenne’ La Revue des droits de l'homme (en ligne), 1 - 2012, 84 <http:// revdh.revues.org/120> accessed 23 January 2014 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  457. BENNET M, ‘Le droit et l'analyse philosophique des droits selon W.N. Hohfeld’ (2011) 21 Klesis Revue philosophique 133 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  458. BIGNAMI F, ‘Creating European Rights: National Values and Supranational Interests’ (2005) 11 Columbia Journal of European Law 241 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  459. BIGNAMI F, ‘The Democratic Deficit in European Community Rulemaking: A Call for Notice and Comment in Comitology’ (1999) 40 Harvard International Law Journal 451 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  460. BIRKS P, ‘Rights, Wrongs, and Remedies’ (2000) 20 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 1 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  461. BLANQUET M and others, ‘Chronique de jurisprudence - Droit général de l'Union européenne’ (2012) Cahiers de droit européen 75 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  462. BOGDANDY V, ‘National legal scholarship in the European legal area-A manifesto’ (2012) 10 International Journal of Constitutional Law 614 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  463. BOLGAR V, ‘L'intérêt général dans la théorie et dans la pratique’ (1965) 17 Revue internationale de droit comparé 329 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  464. BONNARD R, ‘Léon Duguit. Ses oeuvres. Sa doctrine’ (1929) Extrait de la Revue du Droit public et de la Science politique en France et à l'Etranger 5 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  465. BOUCOBZA I and ROBITAILLE D, ‘Standards jurisprudentiels et contrôle de l’obligation étatique. Des contrôles à géométrie variable’ La Revue des droits de l’homme (en ligne), 298 <http://revdh.revues.org/142> accessed 5 September 2016 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  466. BOUSTA R, ‘Droit des étrangers : mais à quoi sert le droit à une bonne administration?’ La Revue des droits de l’homme [En ligne], 12 | 2017 <http://revdh.revues.org/3216> accessed 6 August 2017 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  467. BOUSTA R, ‘Who Said There is a 'Right to Good Administration’? A Critical Analysis of Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union' (2013) 19 European Public Law 481 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  468. BREDA V, ‘A European Constitution in a Multinational Europe or a Multinational Constitution for Europe?’ (2006) 12 European Law Journal 330 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  469. BRITO VIEIRA M and CARREIRA DA SILVA F, ‘Getting rights right: Explaining social rights constitutionalization in revolutionary Portugal’ (2013) 11 International Journal of Constitutional Law 898 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  470. BROHM WINFRIED V, ‘Soziale Grundrechte und Staatszielbestimmungen in der Verfassung’, JuristenZeitung, 1994, p. 213 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  471. BRUNESSEN B, ‘Retour sur un classique. Quelques remarques sur la catégorie des principes généraux du droit de l'Union européenne’ (2013) Revue française de droit administratif 1217 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  472. BUIJZE AWGJ, ‘Het Hof van Justitie in Kamino-Datema: horen in bezwaar onder voorwaarden gesanctioneerd’ (2014) Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 299 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  473. BURGORGUE-LARSEN L, ‘Ombres et Lumières de la constitutionnalisation de la Charte des droits fondamentaux de l'Union européenne’ (2004) Cahiers de droit européen 683 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  474. BURLEY A and MATTLI W, ‘Europe Before the Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration’ (1993) 47 International Organization 41 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  475. CALLIES C, ‘Kohärenz und Konvergenz beim europäischen Individualrechtsschutz - Der Zugang zum Gericht im Lichte des Grundrechts auf effektiven Rechtsschutz’ (2002) 49 Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 3577 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  476. CARANTA R, ‘Governmental Liability after Francovich’ (1993) 52 Cambridge Law Journal 272 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  477. CERNAT A, ‘The Term of Subjective Right in the Romanian Public Law Doctrine’ [2005] Manager – Juridical Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  478. CHALMERS D and BARROSO L, ‘What Van Gend en Loos stands for’ (2014) 12 International Journal of Constitutional Law 105 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  479. COLLIOT-THELENE C, ‘Pour une politique des droits subjectifs : la lutte pour les droits comme lutte politique’ (2009) 59 L'Année sociologique 231 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  480. COLLIOT-THELENE C, ‘Après la souveraineté : que reste-t-il des droits subjectifs?’ Eurostudia, vol 2, n°2, 2006, 3 <http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/014585ar> accessed 30 July 2016. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  481. CONTIADES X and FOTIADOU A, ‘Social rights in the age of proportionality: Global economic crisis and constitutional litigation’ (2012) 10 International Journal of Constitutional Law 660 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  482. COPPEL J and O'NEILL A, ‘The European Court of Justice: Taking Rights Seriously?’ (1992) 29 Common Market Law Review 669 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  483. COSTA J-P, ‘Concepts juridiques dans la jurisprudence de la Cour européenne des droits de l'Homme : de l'influence de différentes traditions nationales’ (2004) Revue trimestrielle des droits de l'homme 101 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  484. CURTIN D, HOFMANN HCH and MENDES J, ‘Constitutionalising EU Executive Rule-Making Procedures: A Research Agenda’ (2013) 19 European Law Journal 1 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  485. CURTIN D, ‘Challenging Executive Dominance in European Democracy’ (2014) 77 The Modern Law Review 1 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  486. DASHWOOD A, ‘The Principle of Direct Effect in European Community Law’ (1982) 16 Journal of Common Market Studies 229 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  487. DAUKŠIENĖ I and BUDNIKAS A, ‘Has the action for failure to act in the European Union lost its purpose?’ (2014) 7 Baltic Journal of Law & Politics 209 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  488. DAWSON M, ‘How Does the European Court of Justice Reason? A Review Essay on the Legal Reasoning of the European Court of Justice’ (2014) 20 European Law Journal 423 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  489. DE BAERE G and ROES T, ‘EU Loyalty as Good Faith’ (2015) 64 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 829 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  490. DE BURCA G, ‘After the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: The Court of Justice as a Human Rights Adjudicator?’ (2013) 20 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 168 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  491. DE MOL M et al., ‘Inroepbaarheid in rechte van het Handvest van de Grondrechten van de Europese Unie: Toepassingsgebied en het onderscheid tussen “rechten” en “beginselen’, 60 SEW (2012) 222 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  492. DE MUNNIK NJM, ‘Geen ambsthalve toepassing van Europees recht. Vragen van het CBb inzake Van der Weerd e.a. beantwoord’ (2007) Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 246 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  493. DEN HEIJER M, ‘Remedies in the Dublin Regulation: Ghezelbash and Karim’ (2017) 54 Common Market Law Review 859 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  494. DENVIR J, ‘Towards a Political Theory of Public Interest Litigation’ (1976) 54 North Carolina Law Review 1133 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  495. DEROSIER J-P, ‘Enquête sur la limite constitutionnelle : du concept à la notion’ (2008) 76 Revue française de droit constitutionnel 785 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  496. DE ROY C, ‘Visie op de verhoudingen tussen burger en bestuur enerzijds, en tussen bestuur en rechter anderzijds, en de gevolgen hiervan op de organisatie van het administratief contentieux’ jura falconis, jg 39, 2002-2003, nr 3, 429 <https://www.law.kuleuven.be/jura/art/39n3/deroy.htm> accessed 24 January 2016 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  497. DICKSON B, ‘The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights’ European Human Rights Law Review 2015(1) 27 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  498. DONIER, ‘Le droit au service public, reflet des obligations pesant sur les personnes publiques’ La Revue des droits de l’homme (en ligne), 393 <http://revdh.revues.org/151> accessed 5 September 2016 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  499. DONIER V and others, ‘Les débiteurs des droits sociaux’ La Revue des droits de l’homme (en ligne), 388 <http://revdh.revues.org/161> accessed 1 September 2016 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  500. DOUGAN M, ‘Addressing Issues of Protective Scope within the Francovich Right to Reparation’ (2017) 13 European Constitutional Law Review 124 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  501. DOUGAN M, ‘The Treaty of Lisbon 2007: Winning Minds, Not Hearts’ (2008) 45 Common Market Law Review 617 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  502. DOWDING K and VAN HEES M, ‘The Construction of Rights’ (2003) 97 American Political Science Review 281 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  503. DUGUIT L, ‘Souveraineté et liberté - Neuvième leçon, La souveraineté nationale à l’intérieur. La liberté de l’individu.’ Revue générale du droit online, 2014, numéro 18567 <www.revuegeneraledudroit.eu/?p=18567> accessed 31 July 2016 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  504. DUGUIT L, ‘Les doctrines juridiques objectivistes’ Extraits de la Revue du Droit public et de la Science politique en France et à l’Etranger (Octobre-Novembre-Décembre 1927), Revue générale du droit online, 2014, numéro 17072 >www.revuegeneraledudroit.eu/?p=17072> accessed 31 July 2016 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  505. EILMANSBERGER T, ‘The Relationship between Rights and Remedies in EC Law: in Search of the Missing Link’ (2004) 41 Common Market Law Review 1199 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  506. ELEFTHERIADIS P, ‘The Direct Effect of Community Law: Conceptual Issues’ (1996) 16 Yearbook of European Law 205 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  507. ELLIOTT M, ‘Constitutional Legislation, European Union Law and the Nature of the United Kingdom's Contemporary Constitution’ (2014) 10 Columbia Journal of European Law 379 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  508. EMINESCU Y, ‘Les juristes roumains et l'essor du droit comparé à l'Ecole de droit de Paris’ (1989) 41 Revue internationale de droit comparé 737 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  509. ENGLE E, ‘Taking the Right Seriously: Hohfeldian Semiotics and Rights Discourse’ (2010) 3 The Crit 84 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  510. FAUVARQUE-COSSON B, ‘La confiance légitime et l’estoppel' (2007) 11 Electronic Journal of Comparative Law 1 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  511. FELDMAN D, ‘Public Interest Litigation and Constitutional Theory in Comparative Perspective’ (1992) 55 The Modern Law Review 44 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  512. FENNELLY N, ‘Legal Interpretation at the European Court of Justice’ (1996) 20 Fordham International Law Journal 656 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  513. FERCOT C, ‘Précision et droits de l'Homme dans les ordres juridiques allemand et suisse’ La Revue des droits de l'homme (en ligne) 7 - 2015 <http://revdh.revues.org/1330> accessed 7 June 2016 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  514. FERNANDEZ MARTIN JM, ‘El principio de tutela judicial efectiva de los derechos subjetivos derivados del Derecho comunitario: evolución y alcance’ (1994) Revista de Instituciones europeas 845 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  515. FINNIS JM, ‘Some Professorial Fallacies About Rights’ (1972) Scholarly Works Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  516. FØLLESDAL A, ‘Survey Article: The Legitimacy Deficits of the European Union’ (2006) 14 The Journal of Political Philosophy 441 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  517. FOSSUM JE, ‘The European Union in Search of an Identity’ (2003) 2 European Journal of Political Theory 319 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  518. FRANKEN AA and VAN KAMPEN PTC, ‘Toetsing van plaatsing op een sanctielijst na Kadi II’ (2014) Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 116 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  519. FRIEDBACHER TJ, ‘Motive Unmasked: The European Court of Justice, the Free Movement of Goods and the Search for Legitimacy’ (1996) 2 European Law Journal 226 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  520. FROMONT M, ‘L'influence du droit français et du droit allemand sur les conditions de recevabilité du recours en annulation devant la Cour de Justice des Communautés européennes’ [1966] Revue trimestrielle de droit européen 47 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  521. GAILLET A, ‘Chronique de droit administratif allemand (2012), 1. Le droit au recours des associations : l'orientation subjective du procès administratif allemand à l'épreuve du droit européen et conventionnel de l’environnement' (2013) Droit administratif Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  522. GALMOT Y, ‘Réflexions sur le recours au droit comparé par la Cour de justice des Communautés européennes’ (1990) Revue française de droit administratif 255 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  523. GARLAND D, ‘On the Concept of ‘Social Rights’ (2015) 24 Social & Legal Studies 622 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  524. GÁSPÁR-SZILÁGYI S, ‘The Primacy and Direct Effect of EU International Agreements’ (2015) 21 European Public Law 343 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  525. GAY L, ‘Droit de grève et liberté syndicale dans la jurisprudence constitutionnelle : des libertés ‘‘particulières’’?’ Nouveaux Cahiers du Conseil constitutionnel n°45 (Le Conseil constitutionnel et le droit social) - October 2014 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  526. GELBLAT A, ‘Appréhender l'imprécision des droits : approche stratégique’ La Revue des droits de l'homme (en ligne) 7 - 2015 <http://revdh.revues.org/1341> accessed 7 June 2016 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  527. GERKRATH J, ‘Les principes généraux du droit ont-ils encore un avenir en tant qu'instrument de protection des droits fondamentaux dans l'Union européenne?’ (2006) Revue des Affaires Européennes - Law & European Affairs 31 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  528. GEURSEN WW, ‘Handhaving van het objectieve gemeenschapsrecht via het effectiviteitsbeginsel vs. subjectieve rechtsbescherming via het nationaalrechtelijke verbod op reformatio in peius’ (2009) Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 131 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  529. GEWIRTH A, ‘Why Rights are Indispensable’ (1986) 95 Mind 329 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  530. GEWIRTH A, ‘Rights and Duties’ (1988) 97 Mind 441 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  531. GOLDONI M, ‘Constitutional Pluralism and the Question of the European Common Good’ (2012) 18 European Law Journal 385 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  532. GOLDSMITH L, ‘The Charter of Rights-A Brake Not an Accelerator’ (2004) European Human Rights Law Review 473 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  533. GOODIN RE and GIBSON D, ‘Rights, Young and Old’ (1997) 17 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 185 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  534. GREEN L, ‘Two Views of Collective Rights’ (1991) 4 Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 315 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  535. GREER SL and SOKOL T, ‘Rules for Rights: European Law, Health Care and Social Citizenship’ (2014) 20 European Law Journal 66 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  536. GRIMMEL A, ‘‘This is not Life as it is Lived Here’: The Court of Justice of the EU and the Myth of Judicial Activism in the Foundational Period of Integration through Law’ (2014) 7 European Journal of Legal Studies 61 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  537. GROULIER C, ‘Norme permissive et droit public’ (Université de Limoges 2006) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  538. GRÜNDLER T, ‘La doctrine des libertés fondamentales à la recherche des droits sociaux’ La Revue des droits de l’homme (en ligne), 103 <http://revdh.revues.org/122> accessed 5 September 2016 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  539. GRZESZICK B, ‘Das Grundrecht auf eine gute Verwaltung - Strukturen und Perspektiven des Charta-Grundrechts auf eine gute Verwaltung’ (2006) Europarecht 161 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  540. GUÐMUNDSDÓTTIR D, ‘A Renewed Emphasis on the Charter's Distinction Between Rights and Principles: Is a Doctrine of Judicial Restraint More Appropriate?’ (2015) 52 Common Market Law Review 685 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  541. GUTMAN HW, ‘Academic Determinism: The Division of the Bill of Rights’ (1981) 54 California Law Review 295 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  542. GUTTERIDGE HC, ‘Abuse of Rights’ (1933) 5 Cambridge Law Journal 22 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  543. HABERMAS J, ‘Democracy in Europe: Why the Development of the EU into a Transnational Democracy Is Necessary and How It Is Possible’ (2015) 21 European Law Journal 546 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  544. HACHEZ I ‘Précision et droits de l'homme dans l'ordre juridique belge : focus sur la notion polysémique d'effet direct’ La Revue des droits de l'homme (en ligne) 7 - 2015 <http://revdh.revues.org/1261> accessed 7 June 2016 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  545. HALPIN A, ‘Rights, Duties, Liabilities, and Hohfeld’ (2007) 13 Legal Theory 23 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  546. HARBO T.-I., ‘The Function of the Proportionality Principle in EU Law’ (2010) 16 European Law Journal 158 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  547. HAURIOU M, ‘Recours pour excès de pouvoir et tierce opposition, Note sous Conseil d’Etat, 8 décembre 1899 (Ville d’Avignon), 15 décembre 1899 (Adda) S. 1900.3.73’ Revue générale du droit on line, 2015, numéro 15407 <www.revuegeneraledudroit.eu/?p=15407> accessed 22 January 2016. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  548. HERINGA AW and VERHEY L, ‘The EU Charter: Text and Structure’ (2001) 8 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 11 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  549. HILSON C, ‘Rights and Principles in EU Law: A Distinction Without Foundation?’ (2008) 15 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 93 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  550. HILSON C and DOWNES T, ‘Making sense of rights: Community rights in E.C. law’ (1999) European Law Review 121 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  551. HINTON EF, ‘Strengthening the Effectiveness of Community Law: Direct Effect, Article 5 EC, and the European Court of Justice’ (1998) 31 NYU Journal of International Law and Politics 307 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  552. HOFMANN HCH and MIHAESCU B, ‘The Relation between the Charter's Fundamental Rights and the Unwritten General Principles of EU Law: Good Administration as the Test Case’ (2013) 9 European Constitutional Law Review 73 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  553. HOFMANN HCH, ‘Mapping the European administrative space’ (2008) 31 West European Politics 662 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  554. HOHFELD WN, ‘Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning’ (1913) 23 Yale Law Journal Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  555. HOHFELD WN, ‘Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning’ (1917) Yale Law Journal, Faculty Scholarship Series Paper 4378 <http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/4378> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  556. HOLMES OW, ‘Codes, and the Arrangement of the Law’ (1870) 5 American Law Review Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  557. HOLMWOOD J, ‘Social Rights and Complex Freedom: A Comment on Fernando Atria’ (2015) Social & Legal Studies 614 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  558. JACOBS FG, ‘The Evolution of the European Legal Order’ (2004) 41 Common Market Law Review 303 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  559. JANS JH and DE GRAAF KJ, ‘Bevoegdheid = verplichting? Enkele opmerkingen over de uitspraak van het Hof van Justitie in de zaak Kühne & Heinz (2004) Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 98 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  560. JIMENEZ LOBEIRA PC, ‘EU Citizenship and Political Identity: The Demos and Telos Problems’ (2012) 18 European Law Journal 504 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  561. KAPSALI V, ‘L'opposabilité du droit au logement précisée par le Conseil d’Etat' (2013) Droit administratif Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  562. KARATZIA A, ‘The European Citizens’ Initiative and the EU Institutional Balance: on Realism and the Possibilities of Affecting EU Lawmaking’ (2017) 54 Common Market Law Review 177 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  563. KATROUGALOS GS, ‘The Implementation of Social Rights in Europe’ (1996) 2 Columbia Journal of European Law 277 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  564. KEAT R, ‘Individual Rights as Social Rights’ (2015) 24 Social & Legal Studies Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  565. KEUS LAD, ‘Francovich in Nederland’ (2005) Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 283 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  566. KHOSLA M, ‘Making social rights conditional: Lessons from India’ (2010) 8 International Journal of Constitutional Law 739 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  567. KLATT M, ‘Positive rights: Who decides? Judicial review in balance’ (2015) 13 International Journal of Constitutional Law 354 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  568. KOCHENOV D, ‘The Right to Have What Rights? EU Citizenship in Need of Clarification’ (2013) 19 European Law Journal 502 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  569. KORNEZOV A, ‘The Right to Vote as an EU Fundamental Right and the Expanding Scope of Application of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights’ (2016) 75 The Cambridge Law Journal 24 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  570. KOSTOVA-BOURGEIX A, ‘Cour de justice, 1er mars 2005, A. Owusu c/ N.B. Jackson, aff. C-281/02’ Revue des affaires européennes 307 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  571. KROMMENDIJK J, ‘Principled Silence or Mere Silence on Principles? The Role of the EU Charter's Principles in the Case Law of the Court of Justice’ (2015) 11 European Constitutional Law Review 321 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  572. LANSBERGEN A, ‘Prisoner Disenfranchisement in the United Kingdom and the Scope of EU Law: United Kingdom Supreme Court’ (2014) 10 European Constitutional Law Review 126 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  573. LANZA E, ‘Core of State Sovereignty and Boundaries of European Identity in the Lissabon-Urteil’ (2010) 11 German Law Journal 399 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  574. LAURENT E, ‘L'intérêt général dans l'Union européenne. Du fédéralisme doctrinal aux biens publics européens?’ (2007) Regards croisés sur l'économie 27 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  575. LA TORRE M, ‘The Law beneath Right's Feet. Preliminary Investigation for a Study of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union’ (2002) 8 European Law Journal 515 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  576. LENAERTS A, ‘The General Principle of the Prohibition of Abuse of Rights: A Critical Position on Its Role in a Codified European Contract Law’ (2010) 6 European Review of Private Law 1121 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  577. LENAERTS K, ‘Exploring the Limits of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights’ (2012) 8 European Constitutional Law Review 375 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  578. LENAERTS K, ‘‘In the Union we trust’: Trust-enhancing principles of Community law’ (2004) 41 Common Market Law Review 317 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  579. LENAERTS K, ‘Fundamental Rights to be included in a Community Catalogue’ (1991) 16 European Law Review 367 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  580. LENAERTS K and GUTIERREZ-FONS JA, ‘To Say What the Law of the EU Is: Methods of Interpretation and the ECJ’ (2014) 20 Columbia Journal of European Law 3 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  581. LEVINSON DJ, ‘Empire-Building Government in Constitutional Law’ (2004) 118 Harvard Law Review 915 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  582. MANCINI GF and KEELING DT, ‘Language, Culture and Politics in the Life of the European Court of Justice’ (1995) 1 Columbia Journal of European Law 397 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  583. MARTINES F, ‘Direct Effects of International Agreements of the European Union’ (2014) 25 The European Journal of International Law 129 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  584. MARTY N, ‘Le droit de pétition devant la commission des pétitions du Parlement européen : un enjeu institutionnel’ [2013] Revue des Affaires Européennes - Law & European Affairs 731 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  585. MATTLI W and SLAUGHTER A.-M., ‘Law and Politics in the European Union: A Reply to Garrett’ (1995) 49 International Organization 183 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  586. MAUGÜÉ C, ‘Le Conseil constitutionnel et le droit supranational’ (2003) Pouvoirs 53 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  587. MAYEUR-CARPENTIER C, CLEMENT-WILZ L and MARTUCCI F, ‘Chronique de droit administratif et droit de l'Union européenne, 1er janvier 2012 - 1er juillet 2012’ (2012) Revue française de droit administratif 961 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  588. MEEHAN E, ‘Citizenship and the European Community’ (1993) 64 The Political Quarterly 172 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  589. MELLERAY F, ‘La revanche d'Emmanuel Lévy? L'introduction du principe de protection de la confiance légitime en droit public français’ (2004) 56-57 Droit et société 143 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  590. MENDES J, ‘Discretion, Care and Public Interests in the EU Administration: Probing the Limits of Law’ (2016) 53 Common Market Law Review 2 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  591. MENENDEZ AJ, ‘The European Democratic Challenge: The Forging of a Supranational Volonté Générale’ (2009) 15 European Law Journal 277 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  592. MICHALEIDES-NOUAROS G, ‘L'évolution récente de la notion de droit subjectif’ (1966) Revue trimestrielle de droit civil Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  593. MIHAESCU EVANS B, ‘The ‘gaps’ in protection stemming from the (problematic) coexistence of fundamental rights' sources in the EU legal order’ (2016) Cahiers de droit européen Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  594. MILLARD E, ‘Précision et effectivité des droits de l’homme’ La Revue des droits de l'homme (en ligne) 7 - 2015 <http://revdh.revues.org/1215> accessed 7 June 2016 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  595. MILLARD E, ‘La justiciabilité des droits sociaux : une question théorique et politique’ La Revue des droits de l’homme (en ligne), 452 <http://revdh.revues.org/159> accessed 10 January 2017 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  596. MILLER RA, ‘Germany vs. Europe: The Principle of Democracy in German Constitutional Law and the Troubled Future of European Integration’ (2014) 54 Virginia Journal of International Law 579 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  597. MILLER GP, ‘Liberty and Constitutional Architecture: The Rights-Structure Paradigm’ (1993) 16 Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 87 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  598. MITRANY D, ‘The Prospect of Integration: Federal or Functional’ (1965) 4 Journal of Common Market Studies 119 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  599. MOYSE PE, ‘L'abus de droit : l'anténorme - partie II’ (2012) 58 McGill Law Journal 1 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  600. NEACSU D, ‘The Draft of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Step in the Process of Legitimizing EU as a Political Entity and Economic-Social Rights as Fundamental Human Rights’ (2001) 7 Columbia Journal of European Law 141 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  601. O'CALLAGHAN P, ‘Reversing Ubi Remedium Ibi Jus in the Common Law: The Right of Privacy’ (2007) 15 European Review of Private Law 659 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  602. ORGAN J, ‘Decommissioning Direct Democracy? A Critical Analysis of Commission Decision-Making on the Legal Admissibility of European Citizens Initiative Proposals’ (2014) 10 European Constitutional Law Review 422 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  603. PARRET LYM, ‘Effectieve rechtsbescherming: eindeloos potentieel, ongeleid projectiel?’ (2012) Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 157 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  604. PAUNIO E and LINDROOS-HOVINHEIMO S, ‘Taking Language Seriously: An Analysis of Linguistic Reasoning and Its Implications in EU Law’ (2010) 16 European Law Journal 395 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  605. PECH L, ‘Between judicial minimalism and avoidance: the Court of Justice's sidestepping of fundamental constitutional issues in Römer and Dominguez’ (2012) 49 Common Market Law Review 1841 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  606. PEIFFERT O, ‘Un possible malentendu en droit de l’Union européenne : le « droit subjectif » comme condition de l’effet direct’ (2017) RTDeur 655 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  607. PESCATORE P, ‘Les exigences de la démocratie et la legitimité de la Communauté européenne’ (1974) 10 Cahiers de Droit Européen 499 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  608. PETERSEN E, ‘L'influence possible du droit anglais sur le recours en annulation auprès de la Cour de justice des communautés européennes’ [1966] Revue trimestrielle de droit européen 256 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  609. PIC E, ‘Faire de la terminologie en droit?’ (2007) Cahiers du CIEL 57 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  610. PLATON S, ‘Chronique de jurisprudence de droit administratif européen (année 2014)’ (2015) Droit administratif Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  611. POIARES MADURO M, ‘Interpreting European Law: Judicial Adjudication in a Context of Constitutional Pluralism’ (2007) 1 European Journal of Legal Studies 1 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  612. POILLOT E, ‘Le contrôle de la transparence matérielle des clauses portant sur l'objet du contrat : une nouvelle arme en matière de lutte contre les clauses abusives’ [2017] Recueil Dalloz n°19 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  613. POLLICINO O, ‘Legal Reasoning of the Court of Justice in the Context of the Principle of Equality Between Judicial Activism and Self-restraint’ (2004) 5 German Law Journal 283 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  614. PONCELET C, ‘Access to Justice in Environmental Matters - Does the European Union Comply with its Obligations?’ (2012) 24 Journal of Environmental Law 287 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  615. PRECHAL S, ‘Community Law in National Courts: The Lessons from Van Schijndel’ (1998) 35 Common Market Law Review 681 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  616. PRECHAL S, ‘Does Direct Effect Still Matter?’ (2000) 37 Common Market Law Review 1047 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  617. PRECHAL S, ‘Member State Liability and Direct Effect: What's the Difference After All?’ (2006) 17 European Business Law Review 299 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  618. PRECHAL S, ‘EU Gender Equality Law: a source of inspiration for other EU legal fields?’ (2008) European Gender Equality Law Review Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  619. PRECHAL S and HANCHER L, ‘Individual Environmental Rights: Conceptual Pollution in EU Environmental Law?’ (2001) 2 Yearbook of European Environmental Law 89 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  620. PRECHAL S and WIDDERSHOVEN R, ‘Redefining the Relationship between ‘Rewe-effectiveness’ and Effective Judicial Protection’ (2011) 4 Review of European Administrative Law 31 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  621. TOUBES MUNIZ J, ‘Legal Principles and Legal Theory’ (1997) 10 Ratio Juris 267 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  622. RASMUSSEN H, ‘Towards a Normative Theory of Interpretation of Community Law’ [1992] The University of Chicago Legal Forum 135 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  623. RASMUSSEN M, ‘Revolutionizing European Law: A history of the Van Gend en Loos judgment’ (2014) 12 International Journal of Constitutional Law 136 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  624. RAZ J, ‘On the Nature of Rights’ (1984) 93 Mind 194 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  625. RAZ J, ‘Rights and Individual Well-Being’ (1992) 5 Ratio Juris 127 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  626. REICH N, ‘Union Citizenship - Metaphor or Source of Rights?’ (2001) 7 European Law Journal 4 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  627. REICH N, ‘Horizontal Liability in EC Law: Hybridization of Remedies for Compensation in Case of Breaches of EC Rights’ (2007) 44 Common Market Law Review 705 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  628. RIDEAU J, ‘Ordre juridique de l'Union européenne - Sources non écrites’ JurisClasseur Europe Traité, Cote 04 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  629. RIJKEN CRJJ, ‘Het Hof als hoeder van de fundamentale rechten in de zaak Kadi en Al Barakaat’ (2009) Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 140 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  630. ROBIN-OLIVIER S, ‘The evolution of direct effect in the EU: Stocktaking, problems, projections’ (2014) 12 International Journal of Constitutional Law 165 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  631. ROMAN D, ‘La justiciabilité des droits sociaux ou les enjeux de l’édification d’un Etat de droit social’ La Revue des droits de l’homme (en ligne), 2 <http://revdh.revues.org/635> accessed 1 September 2016 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  632. ROMAN D, ‘Les droits civils au renfort des droits sociaux. L’interchangeabilité des droits fondamentaux dans le discours judiciaire.’ La Revue des droits de l’homme (en ligne), 320 <http://revdh.revues.org/144> accessed 1 September 2016 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234
  633. ROSAS A and KAILA H, ‘L'application de la Charte des droits fondamentaux de l'Union européenne par la Cour de justice : un premier bilan’ [2011] Il Diritto dell'Unione Europea 1 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845296234

Similar publications

from the series "Luxemburger Juristische Studien - Luxembourg Legal Studies"
Cover of book: Interfaces between National and EU Law
Monograph No access
Giovanni Chiapponi
Interfaces between National and EU Law
Cover of book: Experimental Law
Edited Book No access
Stefan Braum
Experimental Law
Cover of book: Studies on Enforcement in Multilevel Regulatory Systems
Edited Book No access
Katalin Ligeti, Kei Hannah Brodersen
Studies on Enforcement in Multilevel Regulatory Systems
Cover of book: Implications of Blockchain-Based Smart Contracts on Contract Law
Monograph No access
Chantal Bomprezzi
Implications of Blockchain-Based Smart Contracts on Contract Law
Cover of book: Data Protection by Design in the E-Health Care Sector
Monograph Full access
Giorgia Bincoletto
Data Protection by Design in the E-Health Care Sector

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via your Institution (SSO, Shibboleth, OpenAthens)
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex