Cover des Buchs: Individual Rights under European Union Law
Im Shop erwerben
, um zu prüfen, ob Sie einen Vollzugriff auf diese Publikation haben.
Monographie Kein Zugriff

Individual Rights under European Union Law

A study on the relation between rights, obligations and interests in the case law of the Court of Justice
Autor:innen:
Verlag:
 02.04.2019

Zusammenfassung

Anstatt sich Rechten anzunähern, indem sie in verschiedene inhaltliche Kategorien eingeteilt oder von anderen Konzepten wie Prinzipien unterschieden werden, legt dieses Buch nahe, dass individuelle Rechte durch eine relationale Definition besser verstanden werden. Ein individuelles Recht nach EU-Recht kann somit als das Korrelat einer Verpflichtung definiert werden, das durch das Interesse eines Einzelnen an der Erfüllung dieser Verpflichtung ausgelöst wird. Das Buch untersucht die Rechtsprechung des EuGH und zeigt, dass diese Definition von individuellen Rechten dem Test der Zeit und den aufeinanderfolgenden Umgestaltungen der Rechtsordnung der EU widersteht.

Catherine Warin, Rechtsanwältin in der Anwaltskammer Luxemburg, promovierte an der Universität Luxemburg. Dieses Buch basiert auf ihrer Doktorarbeit, für die sie von der Doctoral School of Law der Universität Luxemburg mit dem Pierre-Pescatore-Preis ausgezeichnet wurde.

Schlagworte

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Copyrightjahr
2019
Erscheinungsdatum
02.04.2019
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-5469-4
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-9623-4
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe
Luxemburger Juristische Studien - Luxembourg Legal Studies
Band
17
Sprache
Englisch
Seiten
584
Produkttyp
Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Kein Zugriff 1 - 18
  2. Introduction Kein Zugriff 19 - 28
          1. 1.1.1.1.1. A first glint: Algera Kein Zugriff
          2. 1.1.1.1.2. The Big Bang: Van Gend en Loos Kein Zugriff
          3. 1.1.1.1.3. Defrenne II or the far-reaching effects of direct effect Kein Zugriff
          1. 1.1.1.2.1. The limited relevance of rights and the emphasis on obligations and interests in the French legal culture Kein Zugriff
          2. 1.1.1.2.2. The German emphasis on subjective rights and protective intention Kein Zugriff
          3. 1.1.1.2.3. The focus on duties and remedies in the English legal tradition Kein Zugriff
          4. 1.1.1.2.4. The EU concept of individual rights as an original blend of influences Kein Zugriff
          1. 1.1.2.1.1. Effectiveness as a meta-rule of interpretation Kein Zugriff
          2. 1.1.2.1.2. An instrumentalist conception of rights and individuals? Kein Zugriff
        2. 1.1.2.2. Asserting the intrinsic value of individuals: the development of EU fundamental rights Kein Zugriff
          1. 1.1.2.3.1. Rights, interests and the proportionality principle Kein Zugriff
          2. 1.1.2.3.2. Rights, interests and the prohibition of abuse of rights Kein Zugriff
      3. 1.1.3. Conclusions: the double rationale of individual rights under EU law Kein Zugriff
          1. 1.2.1.1.1. The historical difficulties for consecrating the indivisibility of rights Kein Zugriff
          2. 1.2.1.1.2. A step forward: the Treaty of Lisbon and the Charter Kein Zugriff
        2. 1.2.1.2. The Explanations to the Charter: an atypical ‘tool of interpretation’ Kein Zugriff
        3. 1.2.1.3. The Charter at the heart of the rights discourse Kein Zugriff
        4. 1.2.1.4. The dangers of a closed-circuit, Charter-centred approach and the necessary combination of sources for identifying and applying rights Kein Zugriff
        1. 1.2.2.1. Basis for the distinction Kein Zugriff
        2. 1.2.2.2. A consequence of the diverging conceptions of social rights and principles in domestic legal systems Kein Zugriff
        3. 1.2.2.3. Possible criteria for the distinction Kein Zugriff
        4. 1.2.2.4. Consequences of applying the distinction to Charter provisions Kein Zugriff
        5. 1.2.2.5. Potential problems for rights within the Union’s constitutional structure Kein Zugriff
      3. 1.2.3. Conclusions: structural continuity and conceptual instability Kein Zugriff
        1. 1.3.1.1. The relation between effectiveness and the right to an effective remedy Kein Zugriff
          1. 1.3.1.2.1. Article 47 before Lisbon Kein Zugriff
          2. 1.3.1.2.2. After Lisbon, Article 47 in the spotlight Kein Zugriff
          3. 1.3.1.2.3. The continuing complementarity between effectiveness and the right to an effective remedy Kein Zugriff
        3. 1.3.1.3. Article 19(1) TEU and the extension of the positive obligation to ensure the effectiveness of rights Kein Zugriff
          1. 1.3.2.1.1. Remedies before national courts as consequences of rights under EU law Kein Zugriff
          2. 1.3.2.1.2. Domestic courts and the Schutznorm pressure Kein Zugriff
          1. 1.3.2.2.1. The limited relevance of individual interests in the EU system of remedies Kein Zugriff
          2. 1.3.2.2.2. The restrictive conception of individual interest in the action for annulment Kein Zugriff
          3. 1.3.2.2.3. Union liability: the Schutznorm temptation Kein Zugriff
      3. 1.3.3. Conclusions on the right-remedy relation: looking at both sides of the story Kein Zugriff
    4. 1.4. Conclusion of Part 1 Kein Zugriff
          1. 2.1.1.1.1. Fundamental freedoms in primary law Kein Zugriff
          2. 2.1.1.1.2. Fundamental freedoms in secondary law Kein Zugriff
          3. 2.1.1.1.3. The direct effect of international agreements Kein Zugriff
          1. 2.1.1.2.1. Member State liability: discretion as the key criterion for identifying rights Kein Zugriff
          2. 2.1.1.2.2. Union liability: the fluctuating receptiveness to the Schutznorm approach Kein Zugriff
        3. 2.1.1.3. Interim conclusions Kein Zugriff
        1. 2.1.2.1. Rules applying to enterprises: the development of horizontal liability Kein Zugriff
        2. 2.1.2.2. State aid: the limits of the instrumental rationale Kein Zugriff
        3. 2.1.2.3. Interim conclusions Kein Zugriff
        1. 2.1.3.1. How legitimate expectations give rise to rights Kein Zugriff
          1. 2.1.3.2.1. The dual rationale of administrative procedural rights Kein Zugriff
          2. 2.1.3.2.2. The limits of this balanced vision Kein Zugriff
        3. 2.1.3.3. Interim conclusions Kein Zugriff
      4. 2.1.4. Conclusions Kein Zugriff
        1. 2.2.1.1. Rights in EU social security law Kein Zugriff
        2. 2.2.1.2. Procedural rights in EU staff cases Kein Zugriff
          1. 2.2.1.3.1. The issue of horizontal direct effect in the light of the right-obligation correlation Kein Zugriff
          2. 2.2.1.3.2. Protecting and balancing interests in anti-discrimination law Kein Zugriff
        4. 2.2.1.4. The ‘new’ Charter rights of workers to consultation and representation Kein Zugriff
        5. 2.2.1.5. Interim conclusions Kein Zugriff
          1. 2.2.2.1.1. The rights of Union citizens to free movement and residence as an application of the classic relation between rights, obligations and interests Kein Zugriff
          2. 2.2.2.1.2. A new manifestation of the effectiveness rationale: the concept of derived rights Kein Zugriff
          1. 2.2.2.2.1. The right to vote and to stand as a candidate at elections Kein Zugriff
          2. 2.2.2.2.2. The right to petition Kein Zugriff
          3. 2.2.2.2.3. The right to submit a Citizens’ Initiative Kein Zugriff
        3. 2.2.2.3. Interim conclusions Kein Zugriff
        1. 2.2.3.1. A very conditional right to international protection Kein Zugriff
        2. 2.2.3.2. The right to good administration in EU asylum law Kein Zugriff
        3. 2.2.3.3. The inconsistencies in the case law on the Dublin Regulation Kein Zugriff
        4. 2.2.3.4. Interim conclusions Kein Zugriff
      4. 2.2.4. Conclusions Kein Zugriff
        1. 2.3.1.1. The challenge of identifying and protecting individual rights in horizontal relations Kein Zugriff
        2. 2.3.1.2. The principle of effectiveness to the rescue Kein Zugriff
        3. 2.3.1.3. From the protection of individual interests to the protection of collective interests: the future of functional subjectivation? Kein Zugriff
        4. 2.3.1.4. Interim conclusions Kein Zugriff
        1. 2.3.2.1. The development of classic individual rights in sectoral environmental legislation Kein Zugriff
        2. 2.3.2.2. The development of transversal environmental legislation: environmental impact assessment Kein Zugriff
        3. 2.3.2.3. The Aarhus Convention and EU Environmental procedural rights: broadening the notion of individual interest in domestic proceedings Kein Zugriff
        4. 2.3.2.4. The Aarhus Regulation and the persisting rights deficit on the EU level Kein Zugriff
        5. 2.3.2.5. Interim conclusions Kein Zugriff
        1. 2.3.3.1. Early developments of the right of access to documents Kein Zugriff
        2. 2.3.3.2. The ‘right’ of access to documents in Regulation 1049/2011: a very conditional obligation Kein Zugriff
        3. 2.3.3.3. Presumption or suppression of the interest trigger? Kein Zugriff
        4. 2.3.3.4. Interim conclusions Kein Zugriff
      4. 2.3.4. Conclusions Kein Zugriff
    4. 2.4. Conclusion of Part 2 Kein Zugriff
  5. Conclusion Kein Zugriff 502 - 506
    1. Judgments and Orders of the Court of Justice Kein Zugriff
    2. Opinions of Advocates General Kein Zugriff
    3. Judgments and Orders by the Court of First Instance/General Court Kein Zugriff
    4. Judgments of the Civil Service Tribunal Kein Zugriff
    5. Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights Kein Zugriff
    6. Judgments of the International Court of Justice Kein Zugriff
      1. Denmark Kein Zugriff
      2. France Kein Zugriff
      3. Germany Kein Zugriff
      4. Italy Kein Zugriff
      5. Poland Kein Zugriff
      6. United Kingdom Kein Zugriff
    8. ACCC Findings and Recommendations Kein Zugriff
      1. Treaties Kein Zugriff
    2. Regulations Kein Zugriff
    3. Directives Kein Zugriff
    4. Decisions Kein Zugriff
    5. Recommendations Kein Zugriff
    6. Protocols, Resolutions, Declarations, Communications, Proposals Kein Zugriff
    7. Codes of Conduct, Rules and Guidelines Kein Zugriff
    8. International agreements, conventions and treaties Kein Zugriff
      1. Belgium Kein Zugriff
      2. Bulgaria Kein Zugriff
      3. France Kein Zugriff
      4. Germany Kein Zugriff
      5. Ireland Kein Zugriff
      6. Italy Kein Zugriff
      7. Spain Kein Zugriff
      8. United Kingdom Kein Zugriff
  8. Bibliography Kein Zugriff 545 - 582
  9. Index Kein Zugriff 583 - 584

Literaturverzeichnis (633)

  1. Monographs Google Scholar öffnen
  2. AALTO P, Public liability in EU law: Brasserie, Bergaderm and beyond (Bloomsbury Publishing 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
  3. ALEXY R, Theorie der Grundrechte (Suhrkamp 1985) Google Scholar öffnen
  4. ALEXY R, A Theory of Constitutional Rights (Oxford University Press 2002) Google Scholar öffnen
  5. AUBERT JL, SAVAUX E, Introduction au droit et thèmes fondamentaux du droit civil (Sirey 2016) Google Scholar öffnen
  6. AUNE A-C, Le phénomène de multiplication des droits subjectifs en droit des personnes et de la famille (Presses Universitaires d'Aix-Marseille 2007) Google Scholar öffnen
  7. AVILA H, Theory of Legal Principles (Springer 2007) Google Scholar öffnen
  8. BALLOT E, Les insuffisances de la notion de droits fondamentaux (mare & martin 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  9. BASSET A, Pour en finir avec l’interprétation. Usage des techniques d’interprétation dans les jurisprudences constitutionnelles française et allemande (Institut universitaire Varenne 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  10. BAGIŃSKA E, Damages for Violations of Human Rights (Springer 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  11. BATAILLER F, Le Conseil d’Etat, Juge constitutionnel (L.G.D.J. 1966) Google Scholar öffnen
  12. BEBR G, Development of Judicial Control of the European Communities (Springer 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  13. BECK G, The Legal Reasoning of the CJEU (Hart 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  14. BELJIN S, Staatshaftung im Europarecht (Beck 2000) Google Scholar öffnen
  15. BERROD F, La systématique des voies de droit communautaires (Dalloz, coll. Nouvelle bibliothèque de thèses 2003) Google Scholar öffnen
  16. BERRY E and HARGREAVES S, European Union Law (Oxford University Press 2007) Google Scholar öffnen
  17. BIONDI A and FARLEY M, The Right to Damages in European Law (Kluwer Law International 2009) Google Scholar öffnen
  18. BIOY X, Droits fondamentaux et libertés publiques (Monchrestien, Lextenso éditions 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
  19. BOBEK M, Central European Judges Under the European Influence. The Transformative Power of the EU Revisited (Hart Publishing 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  20. BORCHARDT K-D, Der Grundsatz des Vertrauensschutzes im Europäischen Gemeinschaftsrecht (N.P. Engel Verlag 1988) Google Scholar öffnen
  21. BOUVERESSE A, Le pouvoir discrétionnaire dans l'ordre juridique communautaire (Bruylant 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  22. BRAIBANT G, La Charte des droits fondamentaux de l'Union européenne (Seuil 2001) Google Scholar öffnen
  23. CAPITANT D, Les effets juridiques des droits fondamentaux en Allemagne (L.G.D.J. 2001) Google Scholar öffnen
  24. CARBONNIER J, Droit et passion du droit (Flammarion 1996) Google Scholar öffnen
  25. CARBONNIER J, Droit civil : Introduction, Les personnes (Presses universitaires de France 1984) Google Scholar öffnen
  26. CARRERA S, In Search of the Perfect Citizen? The Intersection Between Integration, Immigration, and Nationality in the EU (BRILL 2009) Google Scholar öffnen
  27. CHALMERS D, DAVIES G and MONTI G, European Union Law: Cases and Materials (2nd edn, Cambridge University Press 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  28. CLAES M, National Courts’ Mandate in the European Constitution (Hart Publishing 2006) Google Scholar öffnen
  29. CONWAY G, The Limits of Legal Reasoning and the European Court of Justice (Cambridge University Press 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  30. CORNU G, Droit civil. Introduction. Les personnes. Les biens (8th edn, Montchrestien 1997) Google Scholar öffnen
  31. COSTELLO C, The Human Rights of Migrants and Refugees in European Law (Oxford University Press 2016) Google Scholar öffnen
  32. CREPEAU P-A, L'intensité de l'obligation juridique ou Des obligations de diligence, de résultat et de garantie (Yvon Blais 1989) Google Scholar öffnen
  33. DABIN J, Le droit subjectif (Dalloz 2008) Google Scholar öffnen
  34. DAVID R, International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law. Volume II - The Legal Systems of the World, Their Comparison and Unification. Chapter 3 - Sources of Law (Mohr Siebeck 1984) Google Scholar öffnen
  35. DELEUZE N and BERTRAND-MIKOVIC A, Introduction générale au droit : le droit objectif, les droits subjectifs, l'action en justice (Studyrama 2005) Google Scholar öffnen
  36. DERO-BUGNY D, Les rapports entre la Cour de justice de l'Union européenne et la Cour européenne des droits de l'homme (Bruylant 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  37. DI MAJO A, La tutela civile dei diritti, vol 3 (4th edn, Giuffrè editore 2003) Google Scholar öffnen
  38. DOUGAN M, National Remedies Before the Court of Justice. Issues of Harmonisation and Differentiation (Hart Publishing 2004) Google Scholar öffnen
  39. DOUGLAS-SCOTT S, Constitutional Law of the European Union (Pearson Education 2002) Google Scholar öffnen
  40. DUGUIT L, Traité de droit constitutionnel (2nd edn, Fontemoing 1921) Google Scholar öffnen
  41. DUGUIT L, Manuel de droit constitutionnel (4th edn, E. DE BOCCARD 1923) Google Scholar öffnen
  42. DWORKIN R, Taking Rights Seriously (Harvard University Press 1977) Google Scholar öffnen
  43. ECK L, L'abus de droit en droit constitutionnel (L'Harmattan 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  44. ELEUTHERIADES PZ, Legal Rights (Oxford University Press 2008) Google Scholar öffnen
  45. ELLIS E and WATSON P, EU anti-discrimination law (Oxford University Press 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  46. FEYEREISEN M, GUILLOT J and SALVADOR S, Procédure administrative contentieuse (Promoculture Larcier 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  47. FOULQUIER N, Les droits publics subjectifs des administrés. Emergence d'un concept en droit administratif français du XIXè au XXè siècle (Dalloz 2003) Google Scholar öffnen
  48. FREDMAN S, Human Rights Transformed. Positive Rights and Positive Duties (Oxford University Press 2008) Google Scholar öffnen
  49. FROMONT M, Droit administratif des Etats européens (Presses universitaires de France 2006) Google Scholar öffnen
  50. GAILLARD E, Le pouvoir en droit privé (BEBYAI 1985) Google Scholar öffnen
  51. GAILLET A, L’individu contre l’Etat. Essai sur l’évolution des recours de droit public dans l’Allemagne du XIXè siècle (Dalloz 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  52. GICQUEL J and GICQUEL JE, Droit constitutionnel et institutions politiques (Montchrestien, Lextenso éditions 2008) Google Scholar öffnen
  53. GORDON R and MOFFATT R, EU Law in Judicial Review (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  54. GRZESZICK B, Rechte und Ansprüche. Eine Rekonstruktion des Staatshaftungsrechts aus den subjektiven öffentlichen Rechten (Mohr Siebeck 2002) Google Scholar öffnen
  55. HABERMAS J, Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (REHG W trans, The MIT Press 1993) Google Scholar öffnen
  56. HABERMAS J, Droit et démocratie. Entre faits et normes, (BOUCHINDHOMME C and ROCHLITZ R trans, Gallimard 1997) Google Scholar öffnen
  57. HARTLEY TC, The Foundations of European Community Law (5th edn, Oxford University Press 2003) Google Scholar öffnen
  58. HARTLEY TC, The Foundations of European Union Law (Oxford University Press 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  59. HEUSCHLING L, Etat de droit, Rechtsstaat, Rule of law (Nouvelle bibliothèque de thèses, Dalloz 2002) Google Scholar öffnen
  60. HOFMANN HCH, ROWE GC and TÜRK AH, Administrative Law and Policy of the European Union (Oxford University Press 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
  61. IGNATIEFF M, The Rights Revolution (Anansi 2000) Google Scholar öffnen
  62. IONESCU O, La notion de droit subjectif dans le droit privé (Sirey 1931) Google Scholar öffnen
  63. JELLINEK G, System der subjektiven öffentlichen Rechte (1905) Google Scholar öffnen
  64. JHERING (VON) R, Der Geist des römischen Rechts auf den verschiedenen Stufen seiner Entwicklung (Benno Schwabe 1954 8th ed) Google Scholar öffnen
  65. JERHING (VON) R, La lutte pour le droit (O. JOUANJAN ed., O. DE MEULENAERE trans, Dalloz 2006, first published 1890) Google Scholar öffnen
  66. JOSSERAND L, De l'esprit des droits et de leur relativité. Théorie dite de l'abus des droits (Dalloz 1939) Google Scholar öffnen
  67. KACZMAREK L, La Responsabilité pour fait normal : Etude critique sur son originalité en matière civile extracontractuelle (Editions Publibook 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  68. KACZOROWSKA A, European Union Law (Routledge 2008) Google Scholar öffnen
  69. KELSEN H, General Theory of Norms (Oxford University Press 1991) Google Scholar öffnen
  70. KOLB R, La bonne foi en droit international public. Contribution à l’étude des principes généraux de droit (The Graduate Institute 2000) Google Scholar öffnen
  71. KOMINOS AP, EC Private Antitrust Enforcement: Decentralised Application of EC Competition Law by National Courts (Hart 2008) Google Scholar öffnen
  72. KÜNNECKE M, Tradition and Change in Administrative Law: an Anglo-German comparison (Springer 2007) Google Scholar öffnen
  73. LANGLET D and MAHMOUDI S, EU Environmental Law and Policy (Oxford University Press 2016) Google Scholar öffnen
  74. LASSER M, Judicial Deliberations. A Comparative Analysis of Judicial Transparency and Legitimacy (Oxford University Press 2004) Google Scholar öffnen
  75. LASSER M, Judicial Transformations: The Rights Revolution in the Courts of Europe (Oxford University Press 2009) Google Scholar öffnen
  76. LE SUEUR A, SUNKIN M and MURKENS JEK, Public Law. Text, Cases, and Materials (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  77. LECOURT R, L'Europe des juges (Bruylant 1976) Google Scholar öffnen
  78. LECUYER Y, Mémento de la jurisprudence de la CEDH (Hachette Education 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  79. LENAERTS K, MASELIS I and GUTMAN K, EU Procedural Law (Oxford University Press 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  80. LEPETIT-COLLIN H, Recherches sur le plein contentieux objectif (L.G.D.J., collection Thèses 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
  81. LEVINET M, Théorie générale des droits et libertés (4th edn, L.G.D.J. , Anthemis/Nemesis 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  82. LEWIS E and others, Non-Contractual Liability of the EU for Damage Sustained by Women Who Received PIP Breast Implants (Amsterdam International Law Clinic, 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  83. LORENZ N-LA, GROUSSOT X and PETURSSON GT, The European Human Rights Culture - A Paradox of Human Rights Protection in Europe? (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  84. LOUGHLIN M, The Idea of Public Law (Oxford University Press 2003) Google Scholar öffnen
  85. LOUGHLIN M, Foundations of Public Law (Oxford University Press 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  86. LYONS T, EC Customs Law (Oxford University Press 2001) Google Scholar öffnen
  87. MACCORMICK N, Institutions of Law (Oxford University Press 2007) Google Scholar öffnen
  88. MASING J, Die Mobilisierung des Bürgers für die Durchsetzung des Rechts: europäische Impulse für eine Revision der Lehre vom subjektiv-öffentlichen Recht (Duncker & Humblot 1997) Google Scholar öffnen
  89. MAURER H, Allgemeines Verwaltungsrecht (11 edn, Beck 1997) Google Scholar öffnen
  90. MAURER H, Allgemeines Verwaltungsrecht (17 edn, Beck 2009) Google Scholar öffnen
  91. MEDINA ALCOZ L, Libertad y autoridad en el derecho administrativo. Derecho subjetivo e interés legítimo: una revisión (Marcial Pons 2016) Google Scholar öffnen
  92. MENDES J, Participation in EU Rule-Making. A Rights-Based Approach (Oxford University Press 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
  93. MICKLITZ H-W and WEATHERHILL S, European Economic Law (Asghate Dartmouth 1997) Google Scholar öffnen
  94. MILUTINOVIC V, The 'Right to Damages' under EU Competition Law: from Courage v Crehan to the White Paper and Beyond (Kluwer Law International 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  95. NEBBIA P and ASKHAM T, EU Consumer Law (Oxford University Press 2004) Google Scholar öffnen
  96. NETTESHEIM M, Die mitgliedstaatliche Durchführung von EG-Richtlinien (Duncker & Humblot 1999) Google Scholar öffnen
  97. OST F, Droit et intérêt, vol. 2 : Entre droit et non-droit, l'intérêt : essai sur les fonctions qu'exerce la notion d'intérêt en droit privé (Publications des Facultés universitaires Saint-Louis 1990) Google Scholar öffnen
  98. PALMER E, Judicial Review, Socio-Economic Rights and the Human Rights Act (Hart Publishing 2007) Google Scholar öffnen
  99. POIARES MADURO M, We the Court (Hart 1998) Google Scholar öffnen
  100. PÓŁTORAK N, European Union Rights in National Courts (Wolters Kluwer 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  101. POULET-GIBOT LECLERC N, Droit administratif: sources, moyens, contrôles (Bréal 2007) Google Scholar öffnen
  102. PRECHAL S, Directives in EC Law (Oxford University Press 2006) Google Scholar öffnen
  103. RICCI J-C, Droit civil - Les biens (Hachette Education 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  104. ROSAS A and ARMATI L, EU Constitutional Law : An Introduction (Hart 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  105. ROUBIER P, Droits subjectifs et situations juridiques (2nd edn, Dalloz 2005) Google Scholar öffnen
  106. ROUSSET M and ROUSSET O, Droit administratif - Tome 2. Le contentieux administratif (2nd edn, Presses universitaires de Grenoble 2004) Google Scholar öffnen
  107. SAJÓ A, Abuse: The Dark Side of Fundamental Rights (Eleven International Publishing 2006) Google Scholar öffnen
  108. SAÜBERLICH U, Die außervertragliche Haftung im Gemeinschaftsrecht. Eine Untersuchung der Mehrpersonenverhältnisse (Springer 2005) Google Scholar öffnen
  109. STAEBE E, Rechtsschutz bei gemeinschaftswidrigen Beihilfen vor europäischen und deutschen Gerichten (Duncker & Humblot 2001) Google Scholar öffnen
  110. SAURUGGER S, Théories et concepts de l'intégration européenne (Presses de la Fondation nationale des sciences politiques 2009) Google Scholar öffnen
  111. SCHERMERS H, Judicial Protection in the European Communities (Springer 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  112. SCHLACKE S, Überindividueller Rechtsschutz: Phänomenologie und Systematik überindividueller Klagebefugnisse im Verwaltungs- und Gemeinschaftsrecht, insbesondere am Beispiel des Umweltrechts (Mohr Siebeck 2008) Google Scholar öffnen
  113. SCHWARZE J, European Administrative Law (Sweet & Maxwell 2006) Google Scholar öffnen
  114. SCOTT J, EC Environmental Law (Longman 1998) Google Scholar öffnen
  115. SIMON D (ed), MARIATTE F and RITLENG D, Contentieux de l'Union européenne : 1/ Annulation, exception d’illégalité (Lamy 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  116. SIMON D, MARIATTE F and MUNOZ R, Contentieux de l’Union européenne : 2/ Carence, Responsabilité (Lamy 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
  117. SOMMERMANN, K-P, Staatsziele und Staatszielbestimmungen (Mohr Siebeck 1997) Google Scholar öffnen
  118. SUMNER LW, The Moral Foundation of Rights (Clarendon Press 1987) Google Scholar öffnen
  119. SUPIOT A, Homo juridicus. Essai sur la fonction anthropologique du Droit (Seuil 2005) Google Scholar öffnen
  120. THORSON B, Individual Rights in EU Law (Springer 2016) Google Scholar öffnen
  121. TRIDIMAS T, The General Principles of EU Law (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2006) Google Scholar öffnen
  122. TÜRK AH, The Concept of Legislation in European Community Law - A Comparative Perspective (Kluwer 2006) Google Scholar öffnen
  123. TÜRK AH, Judicial review in EU law (Edward Elgar Publishing 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  124. VAN RAEPENBUSCH S, Droit institutionnel de l'Union et des Communautés européennes (De Boeck 2000) Google Scholar öffnen
  125. VILLEY M, Le droit et les droits de l'Homme (3rd edn, Presses universitaires de France 1998) Google Scholar öffnen
  126. VILLEY M, La formation de la pensée juridique moderne (2nd edn, Presses universitaires de France 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  127. VIRALLY M, La pensée juridique (3rd edn, Editions Panthéon-Assas, LGDJ 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  128. WAKEFIELD J, Judicial Protection through the Use of Article 288(2) EC (Kluwer Law International 2002) Google Scholar öffnen
  129. WALDRON J, The Right to Private Property (Clarendon Press 1988) Google Scholar öffnen
  130. WALDRON J, Law and Disagreement (Oxford University Press 1999) Google Scholar öffnen
  131. WALINE M, L'individualisme et le droit (Dalloz 2007) Google Scholar öffnen
  132. WEATHERHILL S, EU Consumer Law and Policy (Edward Elgar 2005) Google Scholar öffnen
  133. WHITE AR, Rights (Clarendon Press 1984) Google Scholar öffnen
  134. WIDDERSHOVEN R and MEIJ AWH, Europees recht en het Nederlands bestuursrecht: preadviezen (Samson H.D. Tjeenk Willink 1996) Google Scholar öffnen
  135. WINDSCHEID B, Lehrbuch des Pandektenrechts (KIPP T ed, 9th edn, Buddeus 1906) Google Scholar öffnen
  136. WITZ C, Droit privé allemand, 1, Actes juridiques, droits subjectifs (BGB, Partie générale, Loi sur les conditions générales d'affaires) (Litec 1992) Google Scholar öffnen
  137. Edited books and book chapters Google Scholar öffnen
  138. ABELSHAUSER W, ‘‘Integration à la Carte’ The Primacy of Politics and the Economic Integration of Western Europe in the 1950s’ in MARTIN S (ed), The Construction of Europe Essays in Honour of Emile Noël (Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994) Google Scholar öffnen
  139. ALEXY R, ‘Rights and Liberties as Concepts’ in ROSENFELD M and SAJO A (eds), Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford University Press 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  140. ANCEL P, ‘Abus de droit (Interdiction de l’—)’ in ANDRIANTSIMBAZOVINA J et al (eds) Dictionnaire des Droits de l’Homme (Presses universitaires de France 2008) Google Scholar öffnen
  141. ARNULL A, ‘The action for annulment: A case of double standards?’ in O'KEEFE D and BAVASSO A (eds), Judicial Review in European Union Law (Kluwer Law International 2000) Google Scholar öffnen
  142. AUGSBERG I, ‘Methoden des europäischen Verwaltungsrechts’ in TERHECHTE JP (ed) Verwaltungsrecht der Europäischen Union (1st edn, Nomos) Google Scholar öffnen
  143. AZOULAI L, ‘Le principe de bonne administration’ in AUBY J-B and DUTHEIL DE LA ROCHERE J (eds), Droit administratif européen (Bruylant 2007) Google Scholar öffnen
  144. AZOULAI L, BARBOU DES PLACES S and PATAUT E, ‘Being a Person in the European Union’ in AZOULAI L and others (eds), Constructing the Person in EU Law: Rights, Roles, Identities (Bloomsbury Publishing 2016) Google Scholar öffnen
  145. BAILEY SH, ‘Grounds for Judicial Review: Due Process, Natural Justice, and Fairness’ in FELDMAN D (ed) English Public Law (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2009) Google Scholar öffnen
  146. BAILLEUX A, ‘Les droits de la défense et les (autres) droits fondamentaux devant les juridictions de l'Union européenne’ in MAHIEU S (ed) Contentieux de l'Union européenne Questions choisies (Larcier 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  147. BARDIN M, ‘Depuis l'arrêt Algera, retour sur une utilisation ‘‘discrète’’ du droit comparé par la Cour de justice de l'Union européenne’ in DI MANNO T (ed) Le recours au droit comparé par le juge (Bruylant 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  148. BARNARD C, ‘The ‘Opt-Out’ for the UK and Poland from the Charter of Fundamental Rights: Triumph or Rhetoric over Reality?’, GRILLER S and ZILLER J (eds), The Lisbon Treaty, vol 11 (Springer 2008) Google Scholar öffnen
  149. BAST J, ‘Legal Instruments’ in VON BOGDANDY A and BAST J (eds), Principles of European Constitutional Law (Hart Publishing 2006) Google Scholar öffnen
  150. BELJIN S, ‘Rights in EU Law’ in PRECHAL S and VAN ROERMUND B (eds), The Coherence of EU Law The Search for Unity in Divergent Concepts (Oxford University Press 2008) Google Scholar öffnen
  151. BENGOETXEA J and JÄÄSKINEN N, ‘Rights and Diverse Effects in EU Law: A Hohfeldian Approach to the Doctrine of Direct Effect of Directives’ in BANAKAR R (ed) Rights in Context - Law and Justice in Late Modern Society (Ashgate 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  152. BERNARD N, ‘A ‘New Governance’ Approach to Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in the EU’ in HERVEY T and KENNER J (eds), Economic and Social Rights under the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights A Legal Perspective (Hart 2003) Google Scholar öffnen
  153. BETLEM G, ‘The Doctrine of Consistent Interpretation. Managing Legal Uncertainty’ in PRINSSEN JM and SCHRAUWEN A (eds), Direct Effect Rethinking a Classic of EC Legal Doctrine (Europa Law Publishing 2002) Google Scholar öffnen
  154. BIGNAMI F, ‘Regulation and the courts: judicial review in comparative perspective’ in BIGNAMI F and ZARING D, Comparative Law and Regulation. Understanding the Global Regulatory Process (Elgar 2016) Google Scholar öffnen
  155. BOBEK M, ‘The effects of EU law in the national legal systems’ in BARNARD C and PEERS S (eds), European Union Law (Oxford University Press 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  156. BOBEK M, ‘Why There is no Principle of ‘‘Procedural Autonomy’’ of the Member States’, in DE WITTE B and MICKLITZ H (eds), The European Court of Justice and the Autonomy of the Member States (Intersentia 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  157. BOK AJ, ‘Judicial Review of Administrative Decisions by the Dutch Administrative Courts: recours objectif or recours subjectif? A Survey including French and German law’ in STROINK FAM (ed), Judicial Lawmaking and Administrative Law (Intersentia nv 2005) Google Scholar öffnen
  158. BOROWSKI M, ‘The Charter of Fundamental Rights in the Treaty on European Union’ in TRYBUS M and RUBINI L (eds), The Treaty of Lisbon and the Future of European Law and Policy (Edward Elgar 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  159. BOROWSKY M, ‘Artikel 52’, in MAYER J, Charta der Grundrechte der Europäischen Union,(Nomos 2010, 3rd ed.) Google Scholar öffnen
  160. BRENNINKMEIJER AFM, ‘The Influence of Court of Justice Case Law on the Procedural Law of the Member States’ in VERVAELE JAE (ed) Administrative Law Application and Enforcement of Community Law in the Netherlands (Kluwer 1994) Google Scholar öffnen
  161. BURGORGUE-LARSEN L, ‘L'article II-112’ in BURGORGUE-LARSEN L and others (eds), Traité établissant une Constitution pour l'Europe : commentaire article par article Tome 2, Partie II La Charte des droits fondamentaux de l'Union (Bruylant 2005) Google Scholar öffnen
  162. CARTABIA M, ‘The Italian Constitutional Court and the Relationship Between the Italian legal system and the European Union’ in SLAUGHTER AM, STONE SWEET A and WEILER JHH (eds), The European Court and National Courts – Doctrine and Jurisprudence. Legal Change in Its Social Context (Hart 1998) Google Scholar öffnen
  163. CHETAIL V, ‘The Common European Asylum System: Bric-à-brac or System?’ in CHETAIL V, DE BRUYCKER P and MAIANI F (eds), Reforming the Common European Asylum System The New European Refugee Law (Brill Nijhof 2016) Google Scholar öffnen
  164. CLAES M, ‘The European Union, its Member States and their Citizens’ in LECZYKIEWICZ D and WEATHERHILL S (eds), The Involvement of EU Law in Private Law Relationships (Hart Publishing 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  165. CRAIG P, ‘Access to Mechanisms of Administrative Law’ in FELDMAN D (ed) English Public Law (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2009) Google Scholar öffnen
  166. CRAIG P, ‘Rights, Legality, and Legitimacy’ in CRAIG P (ed) The Lisbon Treaty: Law, Politics, and Treaty Reform (Oxford University Press 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  167. CURTIN D and MORTELMANS K, ‘Application and Enforcement of Community Law by the Member States: Actors in Search of a Third Generation Script’, in D. CURTIN and T. HEUKELS (eds), Institutional Dynamics of European Integration, Essays in Honour of H.G. Schermers, vol. II, (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1994) Google Scholar öffnen
  168. DA CRUZ VILACA JL, ‘Le principe de l'effet utile du droit de l'Union dans la jurisprudence de la Cour’ in ROSAS A and others (eds), The Court of Justice and the Construction of Europe: Analyses and Perspectives on Sixty Years of Case-law (T.M.C. Asser 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  169. DE BURCA G, ‘The Language of Rights and European Integration’ in SHAW J and MORE G (eds), New Legal Dynamics of European Union (Clarendon Press 1995) Google Scholar öffnen
  170. DEDERICHS M and CHRISTENSEN R, ‘Inhaltsanalyse als methodisches Instrument zur Untersuchung von Gerichtsentscheidungen, vorgeführt am Beispiel der Rechtssprechung des EuGH’ in F. MÜLLER and I. BURR (eds), Rechtssprache Europas. Reflexion der Praxis von Sprache und Mehrsprachigkeit im supranationalen Recht (Duncker & Humblot 2004) Google Scholar öffnen
  171. DE GROOT GR, ‘Law, Legal Language and the Legal system: Reflections on the Problems of Translating Legal Texts’, in GESSNER V, HOELAND A and VARGA C, European Legal Cultures (Dartmouth 1996) Google Scholar öffnen
  172. DE SCHUTTER O, ‘Les droits et principes sociaux dans la Charte des droits fondamentaux de l'Union européenne’ in CARLIER JY and DE SCHUTTER O (eds), La Charte des droits fondamentaux de l'Union européenne (Bruylant 2002) Google Scholar öffnen
  173. DE WITTE B, ‘Direct Effect, Primacy and the Nature of the Legal Order’ in DE BURCA G and CRAIG P (eds), The Evolution of EU Law (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
  174. DEDERICHS M and CHRISTENSEN R, ‘Inhaltsanalyse als methodisches Instrument zur Untersuchung von Gerichtsentscheidungen, vorgeführt am Beispiel der Rechtsprechung des EuGH’ in MÜLLER F and BURR I (eds), Rechtssprache Europas Reflexion der Praxis von Sprache und Mehrsprachigkeit im supranationalen Recht (Duncker & Humblot 2004) Google Scholar öffnen
  175. DOUGAN M, ‘The Impact of the General Principles of Union Law upon Private Relationships’ in LECZYKIEWICZ D and WEATHERHILL S (eds), The Involvement of EU Law in Private Law Relationships (Hart Publishing 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  176. DOUGAN M, ‘Who Exactly Benefits from the Treaties? The Murky Interaction Between Union and National Competence over the Capacity to Enforce EU Law’, The Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, Volume 12 (Hart 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  177. DREXL J, ‘Competition Law as Part of the European Constitution’ in VON BOGDANDY A and BAST J (eds), Principles of European Constitutional Law (Hart Publishing 2006) Google Scholar öffnen
  178. DWORKIN R, ‘Rights as Trumps’ in WALDRON J (ed) Theories of Rights (Oxford University Press 1984) Google Scholar öffnen
  179. EBNER M and GAMBARO E, ‘The Notion of State Aid’ in SANTA MARIA A (ed), Competition and State Aid. An Analysis of the EC Practice (Kluwer Law International 2007) Google Scholar öffnen
  180. EDWARD D ‘National Courts—the Powerhouse of Community Law’ in J. Bell and others (eds), Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, Volume 5 (Bloomsbury 2004) Google Scholar öffnen
  181. EDWARD DOA, ‘Direct Effect: Myth, Mess or Mystery?’ in PRINSSEN JM and SCHRAUWEN A (eds), Direct Effect Rethinking a Classic of EC Legal Doctrine (Europa Law Publishing 2002) Google Scholar öffnen
  182. EIJSBOUTS T, ‘Direct Effect, the Test and the Terms. In Praise of a Capital Doctrine of EU Law’ in PRINSSEN JM and SCHRAUWEN A (eds), Direct Effect Rethinking a Classic of EC Legal Doctrine (Europa Law Publishing 2002) Google Scholar öffnen
  183. EVERLING U, ‘The European Union Between Community and National Policies and Legal Orders’ in VON BOGDANDY A and BAST J (eds), Principles of European Constitutional Law (Hart Publishing 2006) Google Scholar öffnen
  184. FELDMAN D, ‘Remedies for Violations of Convention Rights’ in FELDMAN D (ed) English Public Law (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2009) Google Scholar öffnen
  185. FREDMAN S and WESSON M, ‘Social, Economic, and Cultural Rights’ in FELDMAN D (ed) English Public Law (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2009) Google Scholar öffnen
  186. GARDBAUM S, ‘The structure and scope of constitutional rights’ in T. GINSBURG, R. DIXON (eds.) Comparative Constitutional Law (Elgar Publishing 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
  187. GARRETT G, ‘The Politics of Legal Integration in the European Union’ (1995) 49 International Organization 171. W. MATTLI W and A.-M. SLAUGHTER, ‘Law and Politics in the European Union: A Reply to Garrett’ (1995) 49 International Organization 183 Google Scholar öffnen
  188. GERKRATH J, ‘Direct Effect in Germany and France’ in PRINSSEN JM and SCHRAUWEN A (eds), Direct Effect Rethinking a Classic of EC Legal Doctrine (Europa Law Publishing 2002) Google Scholar öffnen
  189. GRABITZ E, ‘Liability for Legislative Acts’ in SCHERMERS HG, HEUKELS T and MEAD P (eds), Non-contractual liability of the European Communities (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1988) Google Scholar öffnen
  190. GRAZIADEI M, ‘Rights in the European Landscape: A Historical and Comparative Profile’ in PRECHAL S and VAN ROERMUND B (eds), The Coherence of EU Law The Search for Unity in Divergent Concepts (Oxford University Press 2008) Google Scholar öffnen
  191. GRIFFITHS RT, ‘Europe’s First Constitution: The European Political Community, 1952-1954’ in MARTIN S (ed), The Construction of Europe Essays in Honour of Emile Noël (Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994) Google Scholar öffnen
  192. GUASTINI R, ‘L'interprétation de la constitution’ in TROPER M and CHAGNOLLAUD D (eds), Traité international de droit constitutionnel (Dalloz 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  193. HART HLA, ‘Bentham on Legal Rights’ in HART HLA (ed) Essays on Bentham: Jurisprudence and Political Theory (Clarendon Press 1982) Google Scholar öffnen
  194. HILSON C, ‘Legality Review of Member States Discretion under Directives’ in TRIDIMAS T and NEBBIA P (eds), European Union Law for the Twenty-First Century: Volume 1: Rethinking the New Legal Order (Bloomsbury Publishing 2004) Google Scholar öffnen
  195. HOFMANN HCH, ‘Individual Rights and Information in EU Public Law’, in LIND AS, ÖSTERDAL I and REICHEL J (eds), Transparency in the future – Swedish openness 250 years (Ragulka 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  196. HOFMANN HCH, ‘The Legal Framework to Subsidies and State Aid Review’ in HOFMANN HCH and MICHEAU C (eds), State Aid Law of the European Union (Oxford University Press 2016) Google Scholar öffnen
  197. HOFMANN HCH, ‘Effective Judicial Remedies Before the National Courts’ in WARD A and others (eds), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights (Hart 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  198. HOFMANN HCH and TÜRK AH, ‘The challenges of Europe's integrated administration’ in ERIKSEN EO and JOERGES C (eds), Law, Democracy and Solidarity in Europe's Post-National Constellation (ARENA 2006) Google Scholar öffnen
  199. HOLLAND S, ‘Economic and Social Cohesion in the 1990's’ in MARTIN S (ed), The Construction of Europe Essays in Honour of Emile Noël (Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994) Google Scholar öffnen
  200. HOURQUEBIE F, ‘Les droits publics subjectifs: échec de l'importation d'une théorie allemande en droit administratif français?’ in MELLERAY F (ed) L'argument de droit comparé en droit administratif français (Bruylant 2007) Google Scholar öffnen
  201. HUNT J, ‘Fair and Just Working Conditions’ in HERVEY T and KENNER J (eds), Economic and Social Rights under the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights A Legal Perspective (Hart 2003) Google Scholar öffnen
  202. JACQUE JP, ‘The Role of Law in European Integration’, in GESSNER V, HOELAND A and VARGA C, European Legal Cultures (Darthmouth 1996) Google Scholar öffnen
  203. JAEGER M, ‘Les voies de recours sont-elles des vases communicants?’ in RODRÍGUEZ IGLESIAS GC (ed), Mélanges en hommage à Fernand Schockweiler (Nomos 1999) Google Scholar öffnen
  204. JANS JH and PRINSSEN JM, ‘Direct Effect: Convergence or Divergence? A Comparative Perspective’ in PRINSSEN JM and SCHRAUWEN A (eds), Direct Effect Rethinking a Classic of EC Legal Doctrine (Europa Law Publishing 2002) Google Scholar öffnen
  205. JONES A, ‘Private Enforcement of EU Competition Law: A Comparison with, and Lessons from, the US (January 14, 2016)’ in BERGSTRÖM M, IACOVIDES M and STRAND M (eds), Harmonising EU Competition Litigation: The New Directive and Beyond (Hart Publishing 2016) - TLI Think! Paper 10/2016 Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2715796 Google Scholar öffnen
  206. KADAR L and SHAW J, ‘Article 39’ in PEERS S and others (eds), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights (Hart Publishing 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  207. KADELBACH S, ‘Union Citizenship’ in VON BOGDANDY A and BAST J (eds), Principles of European Constitutional Law (Hart Publishing 2006) Google Scholar öffnen
  208. KENNEDY D, ‘The International Human Rights Regime: Stil Part of the Problem?’ in DICKINSON R and others (eds), Examining Critical Perspectives on Human Rights (Cambridge University Press 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  209. KENNER J, ‘Economic and Social Rights in the EU Legal Order: The Mirage of Indivisibility’ in HERVEY T and KENNER J (eds), Economic and Social Rights under the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights A Legal Perspective (Hart 2003) Google Scholar öffnen
  210. KORNEZOV A, ‘When David Teaches EU Law to Goliath: A Generational Upheaval in the Making’ in BOBEK M (ed), Central European Judges Under the European Influence (Hart Publishing 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  211. KRAMER MH, SIMMONDS NE and STEINER H, A Debate Over Rights (Oxford University Press 1998) Google Scholar öffnen
  212. KRAMER MH, ‘Rights Without Trimmings’ in KRAMER MH, SIMMONDS NE and STEINER H, A Debate Over Rights (Oxford University Press 1998) Google Scholar öffnen
  213. LECZYKIEWICZ D, ‘The Constitutional Dimension of Private Law Liability Rules in the EU’ in LECZYKIEWICZ D and WEATHERHILL S (eds), The Involvement of EU Law in Private Law Relationships (Hart Publishing 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  214. LENAERTS K and GUTIERREZ-FONS JA, ‘The Place of the Charter in the EU Constitutional Edifice’ in PEERS S and others (eds), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights A Commentary (Hart Publishing 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  215. MACCORMICK N, ‘Rights in Legislation’ in HACKER PMS and RAZ J (eds), Law, Morality and Society: Essays in Honour of HLA Hart (Clarendon Press 1977) Google Scholar öffnen
  216. MAGNETTE P, ‘La citoyenneté au-delà du vote. Droit de pétition et recours au médiateur’, in MAGNETTE P, De l’étranger au citoyen, Construire la citoyenneté européenne (De Boeck Université 1997) Google Scholar öffnen
  217. MAIANI F, ‘The Dublin III Regulation: A New Legal Framework for a More Humane System?’ in CHETAIL V, DE BRUYCKER P and MAIANI F (eds), Reforming the Common European Asylum System The New European Refugee Law (Brill Nijhoff 2016) Google Scholar öffnen
  218. MAYER F, ‘Artikel 6 EUV’, in Grabitz E, Hilf M and Nettesheim M, Das Recht der Europäischen Union – Kommentar (Beck, 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  219. MELOT R, ‘La conception wébérienne des droits subjectifs : un parcours de l'histoire économique au débat sur la légitimité politique’ in COUTU M and ROCHER G (eds), La légitimité de l'Etat et du droit autour de Max Weber (Presses Université Laval 2005) Google Scholar öffnen
  220. MENDES J, ‘Participation and participation rights in EU law and governance’ in HOFMANN HCH and TÜRK AH (eds), Legal Challenges in EU Administrative Law Towards an Integrated Administration (Edward Elgar 2009) Google Scholar öffnen
  221. MICKLITZ H-W, ‘The Interest in Public Interest Litigation’ in MICKLITZ H-W and REICH N (eds), Public Interest Litigation before European Courts (Nomos 1997) Google Scholar öffnen
  222. MILUTINOVIC V, ‘The ‘Right to Damages’ in a ‘System of Parallel Competences’: A Fresh Look at BRT v. SABAM and its Subsequent Interpretation (July 1, 2013).’ Forthcoming in: LOWE P and MARQUIS M (eds), European Competition Law Annual 2011: Integrating Public and Private Enforcement Implications for Courts and Agencies (Hart Publishing, 2014) < https://ssrn.com/abstract=2293649> accessed 30 May 2017 Google Scholar öffnen
  223. MUIR E, ‘The Court of Justice: a fundamental rights institution among others’ in DAWSON M, DE WITTE B and MUIR E eds, Judicial Activism at the European Court of Justice (Edward Elgar 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  224. NEFRAMI E, ‘Quelques réflexions sur l'article 19, paragraphe 1, alinéa 2, TUE et l'obligation de l'Etat membre d'assurer la protection juridictionnelle effective dans les domaines couverts par le droit de l’Union' in BOUTAYEB C (ed) La Constitution, l'Europe et le droit Mélanges en l'honneur de Jean-Claude Masclet (Publications de la Sorbonne 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  225. NEVILLE BROWN L, ‘Is there a general principle of abuse of rights in European Community law?’ in CURTIN D and HEUKELS T (eds), Institutional Dynamics of European Integration Essays in Honour of Henry G Schermers, vol II (Martinus Nijhoff 1994) Google Scholar öffnen
  226. NOLLKAEMPER A, ‘The Direct Effect of Public International Law’ in PRINSSEN JM and SCHRAUWEN A (eds), Direct Effect Rethinking a Classic of EC Legal Doctrine (Europa Law Publishing 2002) Google Scholar öffnen
  227. PEERS S, ‘The Rebirth of the EU's Charter of Fundamental Rights’ in BARNARD C and ODUDU O (eds), The Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, Volume 13 (Hart 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
  228. PEERS S, ‘Taking Rights Away? Limitations and Derogations’, in S. Peers, A. Ward (eds), The European Union Charter of Fundamental Rights (Hart Publishing 2004) 141 Google Scholar öffnen
  229. PESCATORE P, ‘Van Gend en Loos, 3 February 1963: A view from within’ in POIARES MADURO M and AZOULAI L (eds), The Past and Future of EU Law: The Classics of EU Law Revisited on the 50th Anniversary of the Rome Treaty (Hart 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  230. PITTIE M and JUSSIAUX A, ‘Les recours en responsabilité non contractuelle devant le juge de l'Union européenne’ in MAHIEU S (ed) Contentieux de l'Union européenne Questions choisies (Larcier 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  231. POIARES MADURO M, ‘The Double Constitutional Life of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union’ in HERVEY T and KENNER J (eds), Economic and Social Rights under the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights A Legal Perspective (Hart 2003) Google Scholar öffnen
  232. PÓŁTORAK N, ‘Changes in the Level of the National Judicial Protection Under the EU Influence on the Example of the Polish Legal System’ in BOBEK M (ed), Central European Judges Under the European Influence (Hart Publishing 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  233. PRECHAL S, ‘Direct Effect Reconsidered, Redefined and Rejected’ in PRINSSEN JM and SCHRAUWEN A (eds), Direct Effect Rethinking a Classic of EC Legal Doctrine (Europa Law Publishing 2002) Google Scholar öffnen
  234. PRECHAL S, ‘Rights v principles, or how to remove fundamental rights from the jurisdiction of the courts’ in DE ZWAAN J and others (eds), The European Union: An Ongoing Process of Integration - Liber Amicorum Alfred E Kellermann (T.M.C. Asser Press 2004) Google Scholar öffnen
  235. PRECHAL S, ‘Protection of Rights: How Far?’ in PRECHAL S and VAN ROERMUND B (eds), The Coherence of EU Law (Oxford University Press 2008) Google Scholar öffnen
  236. PRECHAL S and VAN ROERMUND B, ‘Binding Unity in EU Legal Order: An Introduction’ in PRECHAL S and VAN ROERMUND B (eds), The Coherence of EU Law: The Search for Unity in Divergent Concepts (Oxford University Press 2008) Google Scholar öffnen
  237. RANGEON F, ‘Droits-libertés et droits-créances : les contradictions du préambule de la Constitution de 1946’ in KOUBI G (ed) Le Préambule de la constitution de 1946 : antinomies juridiques et contradictions politiques (Presses universitaires de France 1996) Google Scholar öffnen
  238. RAULUS H, ‘The Charter of Fundamental Rights as a set of constitutional principles’ in TRYBUS M and RUBINI L (eds), The Treaty of Lisbon and the Future of European Law and Policy (Edward Elgar 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  239. RAVO LM, ‘The role of the Principle of Effective Judicial Protection and its Impact on National Jurisdictions’ Sources of Law and Legal Protection (Triestine Lecture 1) (EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  240. REICH N, ‘The Impact of the Non-Discrimination Principle on Private Autonomy’ in LECZYKIEWICZ D and WEATHERHILL S (eds), The Involvement of EU Law in Private Law Relationships (Hart Publishing 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  241. REICH N, ‘‘System der subjectiven öffentlichen Rechte’ in the Union: A European Constitution for Citizens of Bits and Pieces’ in Academy of European Law (ed) Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law, vol VI - 1 (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1998) Google Scholar öffnen
  242. ROTT P, ‘The Court of Justice's Principle of Effectiveness and its Unforeseeable Impact on Private Law Relationships’ in LECZYKIEWICZ D and WEATHERHILL S (eds), The Involvement of EU Law in Private Law Relationships (Hart Publishing 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  243. RUIZ-JARABO COLOMER D, ‘Once Upon a Time--Francovich: From Fairy Tale to Cruel Reality?’ in POIARES MADURO M and AZOULAI L (eds), The Past and Future of EU Law: the Classics of EU Law Revisited on the 50th Anniversary of the Rome Treaty (Hart Publishing 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  244. RYAN B, ‘The Charter and Collective Labour Law’ in HERVEY T and KENNER J (eds), Economic and Social Rights under the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights A Legal Perspective (Hart 2003) Google Scholar öffnen
  245. SACK, PG ‘Law and Custom: Reflections on the Relation between English Law and the English Language’ in GESSNER V, HOELAND A and VARGA C, European Legal Cultures (Dartmouth 1996) Google Scholar öffnen
  246. SAUTER W, ‘Proportionality in EU Law: A Balancing Act?’ in Barnard C, Albors-Llorens A, Gehring MW (eds), Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, Vol 15 439 Google Scholar öffnen
  247. SCHAAP M and IMBERS R, ‘Access to environmental justice for NGOs: interplay between the Aarhus Convention, the EU Lisbon Treaty and the European Convention on Human Rights’ in JAKUBOWSKI A, WIERCZY SKA K and Wierczyńska K (eds), Fragmentation vs the Constitutionalisation of International Law: A Practical Inquiry (Routledge 2016) Google Scholar öffnen
  248. SHAPIRO M, ‘The European Court of Justice’ in CRAIG P and DE BURCA G, The Evolution of EU Law (Oxford University Press 1999) Google Scholar öffnen
  249. SHAW J, ‘Citizens’ Rights and Access to Law’ in MICKLITZ H-W and REICH N (eds), Public Interest Litigation before European Courts (Nomos 1997) Google Scholar öffnen
  250. SHAW J, ‘Citizenship of the Union: Towards Post-National Membership?’ in Academy of European Law (ed) Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law, vol VI - 1 (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1998) Google Scholar öffnen
  251. SIMMONDS NE, ‘Rights at the Cutting Edge’ in KRAMER MH and others (eds), A Debate Over Rights (Oxford University Press 1998) Google Scholar öffnen
  252. SIMON D, ‘SABENA is dead, Gabrielle Defrenne's case is still alive: the old lady's testament…’ in POIARES MADURO M and AZOULAI L (eds), The Past and Future of EU law: the Classics of EU Law Revisited on the 50th Anniversary of the Rome Treaty (Hart 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  253. SUNKIN M, ‘Grounds for Judicial Review: Illegality in the Strict Sense’ in FELDMAN D (ed) English Public Law (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2009) Google Scholar öffnen
  254. SUNKIN M, ‘Remedies Available in Judicial Review Proceedings’ in FELDMAN D (ed) English Public Law (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2009) Google Scholar öffnen
  255. TENORE M, ‘The Scope for ‘Consistent Interpretation’ in the Area of Dividend Taxation’ in PISTONE P (ed), Legal Remedies in European Tax Law (IBFD 2009) Google Scholar öffnen
  256. THOMA R, ‘Das System der subjektiven öffentlichen Rechte und Pflichten’ in DREIER H (ed) Rechtsstaat - Demokratie - Grundrechte (Mohr Siebeck 1932) Google Scholar öffnen
  257. VAN GERVEN W, ‘Bridging the Unbridgeable - Community and National Tort Laws After Francovich and Brasserie’ in MICKLITZ H-W and REICH N (eds), Public Interest Litigation before European Courts (Nomos 1997) Google Scholar öffnen
  258. VAN LEUVEN N, ‘Droits et principes de la Charte des droits fondamentaux de l'Union européenne : pas d'opposition simple entre hard law et soft law’ in HACHEZ I and others (eds), Les sources du droit revisitées Volume 1 - Normes internationales et constitutionnelles (Anthemis 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  259. VAN MEERBEECK J, ‘Les principes généraux du droit de l'Union européenne’ in HACHEZ I and others (eds), Les sources du droit revisitées Volume 1 - Normes internationales et constitutionnelles (Anthemis 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  260. VAN ROSSEM JW, ‘The Autonomy of EU Law: More is Less?’ in WESSEL RA and BLOCKMANS S (eds), Between Autonomy and Dependence (T.M.C. Asser Press 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  261. VEDSTED-HANSEN J, ‘Reception Conditions as Human Rights: Pan-European Standard or Systemic Deficiencies?’ in CHETAIL V, DE BRUYCKER P and MAIANI F (eds), Reforming the Common European Asylum System The New European Refugee Law (Brill Nijhoff 2016) Google Scholar öffnen
  262. VOIGTS H-M, Die Subjektivierung von Gemeinwohlinteressen als Demokratisierung der Verwaltung (LIT Verlag 2016) Google Scholar öffnen
  263. VON DANWITZ T, Verwaltungsrechtliches System und europäische Integration (Mohr Siebeck 1996) Google Scholar öffnen
  264. VOS E, ‘EU Risk Regulation reviewed by the European Courts’ in VAN ASSELT MBA and others (eds), Trade, Health and the Environment - The European Union put to the test (Routledge 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  265. WALLACE C and SHAW J, ‘Education, Multiculturalism and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union’ in HERVEY T and KENNER J (eds), Economic and Social Rights under the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights A Legal Perspective (Hart 2003) Google Scholar öffnen
  266. WALUCHOW W, ‘Constitutions as Living Trees: an Idiot Defends’ in DYZENHAUS D and others (eds), Law and Morality: Readings in Legal Philosophy (University of Toronto Press 2007) Google Scholar öffnen
  267. WARD A, ‘More than an ‘Infant Disease’. Individual Rights, EC Directives, and the Case for Uniform Remedies’ in PRINSSEN JM and SCHRAUWEN A (eds), Direct Effect Rethinking a Classic of EC Legal Doctrine (Europa Law Publishing 2002) Google Scholar öffnen
  268. WATHELET M, ‘Du concept de l'effet direct à celui de l'invocabilité au regard de la jurisprudence récente de la Cour de justice’ in HOSKINS M and ROBINSON W (eds), A True European Essays for Judge David Edward (Hart Publishing 2003) Google Scholar öffnen
  269. WATHELET M and WILDERMEERSCH J, Contentieux européen (2 edn, Larcier 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  270. WEATHERHILL S, ‘The Elusive Character of Private Autonomy in EU Law’ in LECZYKIEWICZ D and WEATHERHILL S (eds), The Involvement of EU Law in Private Law Relationships (Hart Publishing 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  271. WEBER D, ‘Some Remarks on the Application of Community Law, Its Legal Effects and the Relationship between These Concepts’ in PISTONE P (ed), Legal Remedies in European Tax Law (IBFD 2009) Google Scholar öffnen
  272. WIDDERSHOVEN R, ‘Naar een bestuurs(proces)rechtelijk Ius Commune in Europa’ in STEYGER E and others (eds), Europees recht en het Nederlands bestuursrecht (VAR-reeks 1996) Google Scholar öffnen
  273. WOEHRLING J-M, ‘La France peut-elle se passer du principe de confiance légitime ?’ in Gouverner, administrer, juger Liber amicorum Jean Waline, Mélanges en l'honneur de Jean Waline (Dalloz 2002) Google Scholar öffnen
  274. WOUTERS J and VAN EECKHOUTTE D, ‘Giving Effect to Customary International Law Through European Community Law’ in PRINSSEN JM and SCHRAUWEN A (eds), Direct Effect Rethinking a Classic of EC Legal Doctrine (Europa Law Publishing 2002) Google Scholar öffnen
  275. Peer-reviewed journal articles Google Scholar öffnen
  276. Editorial comments, ‘EU law as a way of life’ (2017) 54 Common Market Law Review 357 Google Scholar öffnen
  277. ABBOT C and LEE M, ‘Economic Actors in EU Environmental Law’ (2015) 34 Yearbook of European Law 26 Google Scholar öffnen
  278. ACAR T, ‘Appréhender l'imprécision des droits : approche linguistique’ La Revue des droits de l'homme (en ligne) 7 - 2015 <http://revdh.revues.org/1191> accessed 7 June 2016 Google Scholar öffnen
  279. ADAM S, DEVISSCHER P and VAN ELSUWEGE P, ‘Chronique de jurisprudence communautaire : les relations extérieures (1er janvier 2006-31 décembre 2008)’ (2009) Cahiers de droit européen 465 Google Scholar öffnen
  280. AGUDO GONZALEZ J, ‘Evolucion y negacion del derecho subjetivo’ (2011) Revista Digital de Derecho Administrativo 9 Google Scholar öffnen
  281. ALEXY R, ‘On Balancing and Subsumption’ (2003) Ratio Juris 433-449 Google Scholar öffnen
  282. AMAR AR, ‘The Bill of Rights as a Constitution’ (1992) 100 Yale Law Journal 1131 Google Scholar öffnen
  283. APPEL I and SINGER J, ‘Verfahrensvorschriften als subjektive Rechte’ (2007) Juristische Schulung 913 Google Scholar öffnen
  284. ARNULL A, ‘Case C-432/05, Unibet (London) Ltd and Unibet (International) Ltd v Justitiekanslern, judgment of the Grand Chamber of 13 March 2007’ (2007) 44 Common Market Law Review 1763 Google Scholar öffnen
  285. ATRIA F, ‘Social Rights: A Reply’ (2015) 24 Social & Legal Studies 628 Google Scholar öffnen
  286. AUGENSTEIN D, ‘Engaging the Fundamentals: On the Autonomous Substance of EU Fundamental Rights Law’ (2013) 14 German Law Journal 1917 Google Scholar öffnen
  287. AZOULAI L, ‘‘Integration through law’ and us’ (2016) 14 International Journal of Constitutional Law 449 Google Scholar öffnen
  288. BABAC B, ‘La nouvelle procédure administrative et le nouveau contentieux administratif en Croatie - Sur quelques implications des différences dans le traitement de l'objet du litige administratif au regard du contrôle de la légalité de l'action administrative’ (2012) 49 Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Splitu 325 Google Scholar öffnen
  289. BAQUERO CRUZ J, ‘What's Left of the Charter? Reflections on Law and Political Mythology’ (2008) 15 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 65 Google Scholar öffnen
  290. BARAV A, ‘Enforcement of Community Rights in the National Courts: the Case for Jurisdiction to Grant an Interim Relief’ (1989) 26 Common Market Law Review 369 Google Scholar öffnen
  291. BARENTS R, ‘Een grondwet voor Europa (VI): de grondrechten’ (2005) Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 39 Google Scholar öffnen
  292. BARENTS R, ‘EU Procedural Law and Effective Legal Protection’ (2014) 51 Common Market Law Review 1437 Google Scholar öffnen
  293. BASILIEN-GAINCHE M-L, ‘Cour de Justice de l'Union européenne : Notion de permis de séjour formellement limité’ (2012) Lettre ‘Actualités Droits-Libertés’ du CREDOF Google Scholar öffnen
  294. BECKER F and CAMPBELL A, ‘The Direct Effect of European Directives: Towards the Final Act?’ (2007) 13 Columbia Journal of European Law 401 Google Scholar öffnen
  295. BELLAMY R, ‘Still in Deficit: Rights, Regulation, and Democracy in the EU’ (2006) 12 European Law Journal 725 Google Scholar öffnen
  296. BENLOLO-CARABOT M, ‘Chapitre 2. Les droits sociaux dans l'ordre juridique de l'Union Européenne’ La Revue des droits de l'homme (en ligne), 1 - 2012, 84 <http:// revdh.revues.org/120> accessed 23 January 2014 Google Scholar öffnen
  297. BENNET M, ‘Le droit et l'analyse philosophique des droits selon W.N. Hohfeld’ (2011) 21 Klesis Revue philosophique 133 Google Scholar öffnen
  298. BIGNAMI F, ‘Creating European Rights: National Values and Supranational Interests’ (2005) 11 Columbia Journal of European Law 241 Google Scholar öffnen
  299. BIGNAMI F, ‘The Democratic Deficit in European Community Rulemaking: A Call for Notice and Comment in Comitology’ (1999) 40 Harvard International Law Journal 451 Google Scholar öffnen
  300. BIRKS P, ‘Rights, Wrongs, and Remedies’ (2000) 20 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 1 Google Scholar öffnen
  301. BLANQUET M and others, ‘Chronique de jurisprudence - Droit général de l'Union européenne’ (2012) Cahiers de droit européen 75 Google Scholar öffnen
  302. BOGDANDY V, ‘National legal scholarship in the European legal area-A manifesto’ (2012) 10 International Journal of Constitutional Law 614 Google Scholar öffnen
  303. BOLGAR V, ‘L'intérêt général dans la théorie et dans la pratique’ (1965) 17 Revue internationale de droit comparé 329 Google Scholar öffnen
  304. BONNARD R, ‘Léon Duguit. Ses oeuvres. Sa doctrine’ (1929) Extrait de la Revue du Droit public et de la Science politique en France et à l'Etranger 5 Google Scholar öffnen
  305. BOUCOBZA I and ROBITAILLE D, ‘Standards jurisprudentiels et contrôle de l’obligation étatique. Des contrôles à géométrie variable’ La Revue des droits de l’homme (en ligne), 298 <http://revdh.revues.org/142> accessed 5 September 2016 Google Scholar öffnen
  306. BOUSTA R, ‘Droit des étrangers : mais à quoi sert le droit à une bonne administration?’ La Revue des droits de l’homme [En ligne], 12 | 2017 <http://revdh.revues.org/3216> accessed 6 August 2017 Google Scholar öffnen
  307. BOUSTA R, ‘Who Said There is a 'Right to Good Administration’? A Critical Analysis of Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union' (2013) 19 European Public Law 481 Google Scholar öffnen
  308. BREDA V, ‘A European Constitution in a Multinational Europe or a Multinational Constitution for Europe?’ (2006) 12 European Law Journal 330 Google Scholar öffnen
  309. BRITO VIEIRA M and CARREIRA DA SILVA F, ‘Getting rights right: Explaining social rights constitutionalization in revolutionary Portugal’ (2013) 11 International Journal of Constitutional Law 898 Google Scholar öffnen
  310. BROHM WINFRIED V, ‘Soziale Grundrechte und Staatszielbestimmungen in der Verfassung’, JuristenZeitung, 1994, p. 213 Google Scholar öffnen
  311. BRUNESSEN B, ‘Retour sur un classique. Quelques remarques sur la catégorie des principes généraux du droit de l'Union européenne’ (2013) Revue française de droit administratif 1217 Google Scholar öffnen
  312. BUIJZE AWGJ, ‘Het Hof van Justitie in Kamino-Datema: horen in bezwaar onder voorwaarden gesanctioneerd’ (2014) Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 299 Google Scholar öffnen
  313. BURGORGUE-LARSEN L, ‘Ombres et Lumières de la constitutionnalisation de la Charte des droits fondamentaux de l'Union européenne’ (2004) Cahiers de droit européen 683 Google Scholar öffnen
  314. BURLEY A and MATTLI W, ‘Europe Before the Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration’ (1993) 47 International Organization 41 Google Scholar öffnen
  315. CALLIES C, ‘Kohärenz und Konvergenz beim europäischen Individualrechtsschutz - Der Zugang zum Gericht im Lichte des Grundrechts auf effektiven Rechtsschutz’ (2002) 49 Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 3577 Google Scholar öffnen
  316. CARANTA R, ‘Governmental Liability after Francovich’ (1993) 52 Cambridge Law Journal 272 Google Scholar öffnen
  317. CERNAT A, ‘The Term of Subjective Right in the Romanian Public Law Doctrine’ [2005] Manager – Juridical Google Scholar öffnen
  318. CHALMERS D and BARROSO L, ‘What Van Gend en Loos stands for’ (2014) 12 International Journal of Constitutional Law 105 Google Scholar öffnen
  319. COLLIOT-THELENE C, ‘Pour une politique des droits subjectifs : la lutte pour les droits comme lutte politique’ (2009) 59 L'Année sociologique 231 Google Scholar öffnen
  320. COLLIOT-THELENE C, ‘Après la souveraineté : que reste-t-il des droits subjectifs?’ Eurostudia, vol 2, n°2, 2006, 3 <http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/014585ar> accessed 30 July 2016. Google Scholar öffnen
  321. CONTIADES X and FOTIADOU A, ‘Social rights in the age of proportionality: Global economic crisis and constitutional litigation’ (2012) 10 International Journal of Constitutional Law 660 Google Scholar öffnen
  322. COPPEL J and O'NEILL A, ‘The European Court of Justice: Taking Rights Seriously?’ (1992) 29 Common Market Law Review 669 Google Scholar öffnen
  323. COSTA J-P, ‘Concepts juridiques dans la jurisprudence de la Cour européenne des droits de l'Homme : de l'influence de différentes traditions nationales’ (2004) Revue trimestrielle des droits de l'homme 101 Google Scholar öffnen
  324. CURTIN D, HOFMANN HCH and MENDES J, ‘Constitutionalising EU Executive Rule-Making Procedures: A Research Agenda’ (2013) 19 European Law Journal 1 Google Scholar öffnen
  325. CURTIN D, ‘Challenging Executive Dominance in European Democracy’ (2014) 77 The Modern Law Review 1 Google Scholar öffnen
  326. DASHWOOD A, ‘The Principle of Direct Effect in European Community Law’ (1982) 16 Journal of Common Market Studies 229 Google Scholar öffnen
  327. DAUKŠIENĖ I and BUDNIKAS A, ‘Has the action for failure to act in the European Union lost its purpose?’ (2014) 7 Baltic Journal of Law & Politics 209 Google Scholar öffnen
  328. DAWSON M, ‘How Does the European Court of Justice Reason? A Review Essay on the Legal Reasoning of the European Court of Justice’ (2014) 20 European Law Journal 423 Google Scholar öffnen
  329. DE BAERE G and ROES T, ‘EU Loyalty as Good Faith’ (2015) 64 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 829 Google Scholar öffnen
  330. DE BURCA G, ‘After the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: The Court of Justice as a Human Rights Adjudicator?’ (2013) 20 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 168 Google Scholar öffnen
  331. DE MOL M et al., ‘Inroepbaarheid in rechte van het Handvest van de Grondrechten van de Europese Unie: Toepassingsgebied en het onderscheid tussen “rechten” en “beginselen’, 60 SEW (2012) 222 Google Scholar öffnen
  332. DE MUNNIK NJM, ‘Geen ambsthalve toepassing van Europees recht. Vragen van het CBb inzake Van der Weerd e.a. beantwoord’ (2007) Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 246 Google Scholar öffnen
  333. DEN HEIJER M, ‘Remedies in the Dublin Regulation: Ghezelbash and Karim’ (2017) 54 Common Market Law Review 859 Google Scholar öffnen
  334. DENVIR J, ‘Towards a Political Theory of Public Interest Litigation’ (1976) 54 North Carolina Law Review 1133 Google Scholar öffnen
  335. DEROSIER J-P, ‘Enquête sur la limite constitutionnelle : du concept à la notion’ (2008) 76 Revue française de droit constitutionnel 785 Google Scholar öffnen
  336. DE ROY C, ‘Visie op de verhoudingen tussen burger en bestuur enerzijds, en tussen bestuur en rechter anderzijds, en de gevolgen hiervan op de organisatie van het administratief contentieux’ jura falconis, jg 39, 2002-2003, nr 3, 429 <https://www.law.kuleuven.be/jura/art/39n3/deroy.htm> accessed 24 January 2016 Google Scholar öffnen
  337. DICKSON B, ‘The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights’ European Human Rights Law Review 2015(1) 27 Google Scholar öffnen
  338. DONIER, ‘Le droit au service public, reflet des obligations pesant sur les personnes publiques’ La Revue des droits de l’homme (en ligne), 393 <http://revdh.revues.org/151> accessed 5 September 2016 Google Scholar öffnen
  339. DONIER V and others, ‘Les débiteurs des droits sociaux’ La Revue des droits de l’homme (en ligne), 388 <http://revdh.revues.org/161> accessed 1 September 2016 Google Scholar öffnen
  340. DOUGAN M, ‘Addressing Issues of Protective Scope within the Francovich Right to Reparation’ (2017) 13 European Constitutional Law Review 124 Google Scholar öffnen
  341. DOUGAN M, ‘The Treaty of Lisbon 2007: Winning Minds, Not Hearts’ (2008) 45 Common Market Law Review 617 Google Scholar öffnen
  342. DOWDING K and VAN HEES M, ‘The Construction of Rights’ (2003) 97 American Political Science Review 281 Google Scholar öffnen
  343. DUGUIT L, ‘Souveraineté et liberté - Neuvième leçon, La souveraineté nationale à l’intérieur. La liberté de l’individu.’ Revue générale du droit online, 2014, numéro 18567 <www.revuegeneraledudroit.eu/?p=18567> accessed 31 July 2016 Google Scholar öffnen
  344. DUGUIT L, ‘Les doctrines juridiques objectivistes’ Extraits de la Revue du Droit public et de la Science politique en France et à l’Etranger (Octobre-Novembre-Décembre 1927), Revue générale du droit online, 2014, numéro 17072 >www.revuegeneraledudroit.eu/?p=17072> accessed 31 July 2016 Google Scholar öffnen
  345. EILMANSBERGER T, ‘The Relationship between Rights and Remedies in EC Law: in Search of the Missing Link’ (2004) 41 Common Market Law Review 1199 Google Scholar öffnen
  346. ELEFTHERIADIS P, ‘The Direct Effect of Community Law: Conceptual Issues’ (1996) 16 Yearbook of European Law 205 Google Scholar öffnen
  347. ELLIOTT M, ‘Constitutional Legislation, European Union Law and the Nature of the United Kingdom's Contemporary Constitution’ (2014) 10 Columbia Journal of European Law 379 Google Scholar öffnen
  348. EMINESCU Y, ‘Les juristes roumains et l'essor du droit comparé à l'Ecole de droit de Paris’ (1989) 41 Revue internationale de droit comparé 737 Google Scholar öffnen
  349. ENGLE E, ‘Taking the Right Seriously: Hohfeldian Semiotics and Rights Discourse’ (2010) 3 The Crit 84 Google Scholar öffnen
  350. FAUVARQUE-COSSON B, ‘La confiance légitime et l’estoppel' (2007) 11 Electronic Journal of Comparative Law 1 Google Scholar öffnen
  351. FELDMAN D, ‘Public Interest Litigation and Constitutional Theory in Comparative Perspective’ (1992) 55 The Modern Law Review 44 Google Scholar öffnen
  352. FENNELLY N, ‘Legal Interpretation at the European Court of Justice’ (1996) 20 Fordham International Law Journal 656 Google Scholar öffnen
  353. FERCOT C, ‘Précision et droits de l'Homme dans les ordres juridiques allemand et suisse’ La Revue des droits de l'homme (en ligne) 7 - 2015 <http://revdh.revues.org/1330> accessed 7 June 2016 Google Scholar öffnen
  354. FERNANDEZ MARTIN JM, ‘El principio de tutela judicial efectiva de los derechos subjetivos derivados del Derecho comunitario: evolución y alcance’ (1994) Revista de Instituciones europeas 845 Google Scholar öffnen
  355. FINNIS JM, ‘Some Professorial Fallacies About Rights’ (1972) Scholarly Works Google Scholar öffnen
  356. FØLLESDAL A, ‘Survey Article: The Legitimacy Deficits of the European Union’ (2006) 14 The Journal of Political Philosophy 441 Google Scholar öffnen
  357. FOSSUM JE, ‘The European Union in Search of an Identity’ (2003) 2 European Journal of Political Theory 319 Google Scholar öffnen
  358. FRANKEN AA and VAN KAMPEN PTC, ‘Toetsing van plaatsing op een sanctielijst na Kadi II’ (2014) Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 116 Google Scholar öffnen
  359. FRIEDBACHER TJ, ‘Motive Unmasked: The European Court of Justice, the Free Movement of Goods and the Search for Legitimacy’ (1996) 2 European Law Journal 226 Google Scholar öffnen
  360. FROMONT M, ‘L'influence du droit français et du droit allemand sur les conditions de recevabilité du recours en annulation devant la Cour de Justice des Communautés européennes’ [1966] Revue trimestrielle de droit européen 47 Google Scholar öffnen
  361. GAILLET A, ‘Chronique de droit administratif allemand (2012), 1. Le droit au recours des associations : l'orientation subjective du procès administratif allemand à l'épreuve du droit européen et conventionnel de l’environnement' (2013) Droit administratif Google Scholar öffnen
  362. GALMOT Y, ‘Réflexions sur le recours au droit comparé par la Cour de justice des Communautés européennes’ (1990) Revue française de droit administratif 255 Google Scholar öffnen
  363. GARLAND D, ‘On the Concept of ‘Social Rights’ (2015) 24 Social & Legal Studies 622 Google Scholar öffnen
  364. GÁSPÁR-SZILÁGYI S, ‘The Primacy and Direct Effect of EU International Agreements’ (2015) 21 European Public Law 343 Google Scholar öffnen
  365. GAY L, ‘Droit de grève et liberté syndicale dans la jurisprudence constitutionnelle : des libertés ‘‘particulières’’?’ Nouveaux Cahiers du Conseil constitutionnel n°45 (Le Conseil constitutionnel et le droit social) - October 2014 Google Scholar öffnen
  366. GELBLAT A, ‘Appréhender l'imprécision des droits : approche stratégique’ La Revue des droits de l'homme (en ligne) 7 - 2015 <http://revdh.revues.org/1341> accessed 7 June 2016 Google Scholar öffnen
  367. GERKRATH J, ‘Les principes généraux du droit ont-ils encore un avenir en tant qu'instrument de protection des droits fondamentaux dans l'Union européenne?’ (2006) Revue des Affaires Européennes - Law & European Affairs 31 Google Scholar öffnen
  368. GEURSEN WW, ‘Handhaving van het objectieve gemeenschapsrecht via het effectiviteitsbeginsel vs. subjectieve rechtsbescherming via het nationaalrechtelijke verbod op reformatio in peius’ (2009) Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 131 Google Scholar öffnen
  369. GEWIRTH A, ‘Why Rights are Indispensable’ (1986) 95 Mind 329 Google Scholar öffnen
  370. GEWIRTH A, ‘Rights and Duties’ (1988) 97 Mind 441 Google Scholar öffnen
  371. GOLDONI M, ‘Constitutional Pluralism and the Question of the European Common Good’ (2012) 18 European Law Journal 385 Google Scholar öffnen
  372. GOLDSMITH L, ‘The Charter of Rights-A Brake Not an Accelerator’ (2004) European Human Rights Law Review 473 Google Scholar öffnen
  373. GOODIN RE and GIBSON D, ‘Rights, Young and Old’ (1997) 17 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 185 Google Scholar öffnen
  374. GREEN L, ‘Two Views of Collective Rights’ (1991) 4 Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 315 Google Scholar öffnen
  375. GREER SL and SOKOL T, ‘Rules for Rights: European Law, Health Care and Social Citizenship’ (2014) 20 European Law Journal 66 Google Scholar öffnen
  376. GRIMMEL A, ‘‘This is not Life as it is Lived Here’: The Court of Justice of the EU and the Myth of Judicial Activism in the Foundational Period of Integration through Law’ (2014) 7 European Journal of Legal Studies 61 Google Scholar öffnen
  377. GROULIER C, ‘Norme permissive et droit public’ (Université de Limoges 2006) Google Scholar öffnen
  378. GRÜNDLER T, ‘La doctrine des libertés fondamentales à la recherche des droits sociaux’ La Revue des droits de l’homme (en ligne), 103 <http://revdh.revues.org/122> accessed 5 September 2016 Google Scholar öffnen
  379. GRZESZICK B, ‘Das Grundrecht auf eine gute Verwaltung - Strukturen und Perspektiven des Charta-Grundrechts auf eine gute Verwaltung’ (2006) Europarecht 161 Google Scholar öffnen
  380. GUÐMUNDSDÓTTIR D, ‘A Renewed Emphasis on the Charter's Distinction Between Rights and Principles: Is a Doctrine of Judicial Restraint More Appropriate?’ (2015) 52 Common Market Law Review 685 Google Scholar öffnen
  381. GUTMAN HW, ‘Academic Determinism: The Division of the Bill of Rights’ (1981) 54 California Law Review 295 Google Scholar öffnen
  382. GUTTERIDGE HC, ‘Abuse of Rights’ (1933) 5 Cambridge Law Journal 22 Google Scholar öffnen
  383. HABERMAS J, ‘Democracy in Europe: Why the Development of the EU into a Transnational Democracy Is Necessary and How It Is Possible’ (2015) 21 European Law Journal 546 Google Scholar öffnen
  384. HACHEZ I ‘Précision et droits de l'homme dans l'ordre juridique belge : focus sur la notion polysémique d'effet direct’ La Revue des droits de l'homme (en ligne) 7 - 2015 <http://revdh.revues.org/1261> accessed 7 June 2016 Google Scholar öffnen
  385. HALPIN A, ‘Rights, Duties, Liabilities, and Hohfeld’ (2007) 13 Legal Theory 23 Google Scholar öffnen
  386. HARBO T.-I., ‘The Function of the Proportionality Principle in EU Law’ (2010) 16 European Law Journal 158 Google Scholar öffnen
  387. HAURIOU M, ‘Recours pour excès de pouvoir et tierce opposition, Note sous Conseil d’Etat, 8 décembre 1899 (Ville d’Avignon), 15 décembre 1899 (Adda) S. 1900.3.73’ Revue générale du droit on line, 2015, numéro 15407 <www.revuegeneraledudroit.eu/?p=15407> accessed 22 January 2016. Google Scholar öffnen
  388. HERINGA AW and VERHEY L, ‘The EU Charter: Text and Structure’ (2001) 8 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 11 Google Scholar öffnen
  389. HILSON C, ‘Rights and Principles in EU Law: A Distinction Without Foundation?’ (2008) 15 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 93 Google Scholar öffnen
  390. HILSON C and DOWNES T, ‘Making sense of rights: Community rights in E.C. law’ (1999) European Law Review 121 Google Scholar öffnen
  391. HINTON EF, ‘Strengthening the Effectiveness of Community Law: Direct Effect, Article 5 EC, and the European Court of Justice’ (1998) 31 NYU Journal of International Law and Politics 307 Google Scholar öffnen
  392. HOFMANN HCH and MIHAESCU B, ‘The Relation between the Charter's Fundamental Rights and the Unwritten General Principles of EU Law: Good Administration as the Test Case’ (2013) 9 European Constitutional Law Review 73 Google Scholar öffnen
  393. HOFMANN HCH, ‘Mapping the European administrative space’ (2008) 31 West European Politics 662 Google Scholar öffnen
  394. HOHFELD WN, ‘Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning’ (1913) 23 Yale Law Journal Google Scholar öffnen
  395. HOHFELD WN, ‘Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning’ (1917) Yale Law Journal, Faculty Scholarship Series Paper 4378 <http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/4378> Google Scholar öffnen
  396. HOLMES OW, ‘Codes, and the Arrangement of the Law’ (1870) 5 American Law Review Google Scholar öffnen
  397. HOLMWOOD J, ‘Social Rights and Complex Freedom: A Comment on Fernando Atria’ (2015) Social & Legal Studies 614 Google Scholar öffnen
  398. JACOBS FG, ‘The Evolution of the European Legal Order’ (2004) 41 Common Market Law Review 303 Google Scholar öffnen
  399. JANS JH and DE GRAAF KJ, ‘Bevoegdheid = verplichting? Enkele opmerkingen over de uitspraak van het Hof van Justitie in de zaak Kühne & Heinz (2004) Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 98 Google Scholar öffnen
  400. JIMENEZ LOBEIRA PC, ‘EU Citizenship and Political Identity: The Demos and Telos Problems’ (2012) 18 European Law Journal 504 Google Scholar öffnen
  401. KAPSALI V, ‘L'opposabilité du droit au logement précisée par le Conseil d’Etat' (2013) Droit administratif Google Scholar öffnen
  402. KARATZIA A, ‘The European Citizens’ Initiative and the EU Institutional Balance: on Realism and the Possibilities of Affecting EU Lawmaking’ (2017) 54 Common Market Law Review 177 Google Scholar öffnen
  403. KATROUGALOS GS, ‘The Implementation of Social Rights in Europe’ (1996) 2 Columbia Journal of European Law 277 Google Scholar öffnen
  404. KEAT R, ‘Individual Rights as Social Rights’ (2015) 24 Social & Legal Studies Google Scholar öffnen
  405. KEUS LAD, ‘Francovich in Nederland’ (2005) Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 283 Google Scholar öffnen
  406. KHOSLA M, ‘Making social rights conditional: Lessons from India’ (2010) 8 International Journal of Constitutional Law 739 Google Scholar öffnen
  407. KLATT M, ‘Positive rights: Who decides? Judicial review in balance’ (2015) 13 International Journal of Constitutional Law 354 Google Scholar öffnen
  408. KOCHENOV D, ‘The Right to Have What Rights? EU Citizenship in Need of Clarification’ (2013) 19 European Law Journal 502 Google Scholar öffnen
  409. KORNEZOV A, ‘The Right to Vote as an EU Fundamental Right and the Expanding Scope of Application of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights’ (2016) 75 The Cambridge Law Journal 24 Google Scholar öffnen
  410. KOSTOVA-BOURGEIX A, ‘Cour de justice, 1er mars 2005, A. Owusu c/ N.B. Jackson, aff. C-281/02’ Revue des affaires européennes 307 Google Scholar öffnen
  411. KROMMENDIJK J, ‘Principled Silence or Mere Silence on Principles? The Role of the EU Charter's Principles in the Case Law of the Court of Justice’ (2015) 11 European Constitutional Law Review 321 Google Scholar öffnen
  412. LANSBERGEN A, ‘Prisoner Disenfranchisement in the United Kingdom and the Scope of EU Law: United Kingdom Supreme Court’ (2014) 10 European Constitutional Law Review 126 Google Scholar öffnen
  413. LANZA E, ‘Core of State Sovereignty and Boundaries of European Identity in the Lissabon-Urteil’ (2010) 11 German Law Journal 399 Google Scholar öffnen
  414. LAURENT E, ‘L'intérêt général dans l'Union européenne. Du fédéralisme doctrinal aux biens publics européens?’ (2007) Regards croisés sur l'économie 27 Google Scholar öffnen
  415. LA TORRE M, ‘The Law beneath Right's Feet. Preliminary Investigation for a Study of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union’ (2002) 8 European Law Journal 515 Google Scholar öffnen
  416. LENAERTS A, ‘The General Principle of the Prohibition of Abuse of Rights: A Critical Position on Its Role in a Codified European Contract Law’ (2010) 6 European Review of Private Law 1121 Google Scholar öffnen
  417. LENAERTS K, ‘Exploring the Limits of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights’ (2012) 8 European Constitutional Law Review 375 Google Scholar öffnen
  418. LENAERTS K, ‘‘In the Union we trust’: Trust-enhancing principles of Community law’ (2004) 41 Common Market Law Review 317 Google Scholar öffnen
  419. LENAERTS K, ‘Fundamental Rights to be included in a Community Catalogue’ (1991) 16 European Law Review 367 Google Scholar öffnen
  420. LENAERTS K and GUTIERREZ-FONS JA, ‘To Say What the Law of the EU Is: Methods of Interpretation and the ECJ’ (2014) 20 Columbia Journal of European Law 3 Google Scholar öffnen
  421. LEVINSON DJ, ‘Empire-Building Government in Constitutional Law’ (2004) 118 Harvard Law Review 915 Google Scholar öffnen
  422. MANCINI GF and KEELING DT, ‘Language, Culture and Politics in the Life of the European Court of Justice’ (1995) 1 Columbia Journal of European Law 397 Google Scholar öffnen
  423. MARTINES F, ‘Direct Effects of International Agreements of the European Union’ (2014) 25 The European Journal of International Law 129 Google Scholar öffnen
  424. MARTY N, ‘Le droit de pétition devant la commission des pétitions du Parlement européen : un enjeu institutionnel’ [2013] Revue des Affaires Européennes - Law & European Affairs 731 Google Scholar öffnen
  425. MATTLI W and SLAUGHTER A.-M., ‘Law and Politics in the European Union: A Reply to Garrett’ (1995) 49 International Organization 183 Google Scholar öffnen
  426. MAUGÜÉ C, ‘Le Conseil constitutionnel et le droit supranational’ (2003) Pouvoirs 53 Google Scholar öffnen
  427. MAYEUR-CARPENTIER C, CLEMENT-WILZ L and MARTUCCI F, ‘Chronique de droit administratif et droit de l'Union européenne, 1er janvier 2012 - 1er juillet 2012’ (2012) Revue française de droit administratif 961 Google Scholar öffnen
  428. MEEHAN E, ‘Citizenship and the European Community’ (1993) 64 The Political Quarterly 172 Google Scholar öffnen
  429. MELLERAY F, ‘La revanche d'Emmanuel Lévy? L'introduction du principe de protection de la confiance légitime en droit public français’ (2004) 56-57 Droit et société 143 Google Scholar öffnen
  430. MENDES J, ‘Discretion, Care and Public Interests in the EU Administration: Probing the Limits of Law’ (2016) 53 Common Market Law Review 2 Google Scholar öffnen
  431. MENENDEZ AJ, ‘The European Democratic Challenge: The Forging of a Supranational Volonté Générale’ (2009) 15 European Law Journal 277 Google Scholar öffnen
  432. MICHALEIDES-NOUAROS G, ‘L'évolution récente de la notion de droit subjectif’ (1966) Revue trimestrielle de droit civil Google Scholar öffnen
  433. MIHAESCU EVANS B, ‘The ‘gaps’ in protection stemming from the (problematic) coexistence of fundamental rights' sources in the EU legal order’ (2016) Cahiers de droit européen Google Scholar öffnen
  434. MILLARD E, ‘Précision et effectivité des droits de l’homme’ La Revue des droits de l'homme (en ligne) 7 - 2015 <http://revdh.revues.org/1215> accessed 7 June 2016 Google Scholar öffnen
  435. MILLARD E, ‘La justiciabilité des droits sociaux : une question théorique et politique’ La Revue des droits de l’homme (en ligne), 452 <http://revdh.revues.org/159> accessed 10 January 2017 Google Scholar öffnen
  436. MILLER RA, ‘Germany vs. Europe: The Principle of Democracy in German Constitutional Law and the Troubled Future of European Integration’ (2014) 54 Virginia Journal of International Law 579 Google Scholar öffnen
  437. MILLER GP, ‘Liberty and Constitutional Architecture: The Rights-Structure Paradigm’ (1993) 16 Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 87 Google Scholar öffnen
  438. MITRANY D, ‘The Prospect of Integration: Federal or Functional’ (1965) 4 Journal of Common Market Studies 119 Google Scholar öffnen
  439. MOYSE PE, ‘L'abus de droit : l'anténorme - partie II’ (2012) 58 McGill Law Journal 1 Google Scholar öffnen
  440. NEACSU D, ‘The Draft of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Step in the Process of Legitimizing EU as a Political Entity and Economic-Social Rights as Fundamental Human Rights’ (2001) 7 Columbia Journal of European Law 141 Google Scholar öffnen
  441. O'CALLAGHAN P, ‘Reversing Ubi Remedium Ibi Jus in the Common Law: The Right of Privacy’ (2007) 15 European Review of Private Law 659 Google Scholar öffnen
  442. ORGAN J, ‘Decommissioning Direct Democracy? A Critical Analysis of Commission Decision-Making on the Legal Admissibility of European Citizens Initiative Proposals’ (2014) 10 European Constitutional Law Review 422 Google Scholar öffnen
  443. PARRET LYM, ‘Effectieve rechtsbescherming: eindeloos potentieel, ongeleid projectiel?’ (2012) Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 157 Google Scholar öffnen
  444. PAUNIO E and LINDROOS-HOVINHEIMO S, ‘Taking Language Seriously: An Analysis of Linguistic Reasoning and Its Implications in EU Law’ (2010) 16 European Law Journal 395 Google Scholar öffnen
  445. PECH L, ‘Between judicial minimalism and avoidance: the Court of Justice's sidestepping of fundamental constitutional issues in Römer and Dominguez’ (2012) 49 Common Market Law Review 1841 Google Scholar öffnen
  446. PEIFFERT O, ‘Un possible malentendu en droit de l’Union européenne : le « droit subjectif » comme condition de l’effet direct’ (2017) RTDeur 655 Google Scholar öffnen
  447. PESCATORE P, ‘Les exigences de la démocratie et la legitimité de la Communauté européenne’ (1974) 10 Cahiers de Droit Européen 499 Google Scholar öffnen
  448. PETERSEN E, ‘L'influence possible du droit anglais sur le recours en annulation auprès de la Cour de justice des communautés européennes’ [1966] Revue trimestrielle de droit européen 256 Google Scholar öffnen
  449. PIC E, ‘Faire de la terminologie en droit?’ (2007) Cahiers du CIEL 57 Google Scholar öffnen
  450. PLATON S, ‘Chronique de jurisprudence de droit administratif européen (année 2014)’ (2015) Droit administratif Google Scholar öffnen
  451. POIARES MADURO M, ‘Interpreting European Law: Judicial Adjudication in a Context of Constitutional Pluralism’ (2007) 1 European Journal of Legal Studies 1 Google Scholar öffnen
  452. POILLOT E, ‘Le contrôle de la transparence matérielle des clauses portant sur l'objet du contrat : une nouvelle arme en matière de lutte contre les clauses abusives’ [2017] Recueil Dalloz n°19 Google Scholar öffnen
  453. POLLICINO O, ‘Legal Reasoning of the Court of Justice in the Context of the Principle of Equality Between Judicial Activism and Self-restraint’ (2004) 5 German Law Journal 283 Google Scholar öffnen
  454. PONCELET C, ‘Access to Justice in Environmental Matters - Does the European Union Comply with its Obligations?’ (2012) 24 Journal of Environmental Law 287 Google Scholar öffnen
  455. PRECHAL S, ‘Community Law in National Courts: The Lessons from Van Schijndel’ (1998) 35 Common Market Law Review 681 Google Scholar öffnen
  456. PRECHAL S, ‘Does Direct Effect Still Matter?’ (2000) 37 Common Market Law Review 1047 Google Scholar öffnen
  457. PRECHAL S, ‘Member State Liability and Direct Effect: What's the Difference After All?’ (2006) 17 European Business Law Review 299 Google Scholar öffnen
  458. PRECHAL S, ‘EU Gender Equality Law: a source of inspiration for other EU legal fields?’ (2008) European Gender Equality Law Review Google Scholar öffnen
  459. PRECHAL S and HANCHER L, ‘Individual Environmental Rights: Conceptual Pollution in EU Environmental Law?’ (2001) 2 Yearbook of European Environmental Law 89 Google Scholar öffnen
  460. PRECHAL S and WIDDERSHOVEN R, ‘Redefining the Relationship between ‘Rewe-effectiveness’ and Effective Judicial Protection’ (2011) 4 Review of European Administrative Law 31 Google Scholar öffnen
  461. TOUBES MUNIZ J, ‘Legal Principles and Legal Theory’ (1997) 10 Ratio Juris 267 Google Scholar öffnen
  462. RASMUSSEN H, ‘Towards a Normative Theory of Interpretation of Community Law’ [1992] The University of Chicago Legal Forum 135 Google Scholar öffnen
  463. RASMUSSEN M, ‘Revolutionizing European Law: A history of the Van Gend en Loos judgment’ (2014) 12 International Journal of Constitutional Law 136 Google Scholar öffnen
  464. RAZ J, ‘On the Nature of Rights’ (1984) 93 Mind 194 Google Scholar öffnen
  465. RAZ J, ‘Rights and Individual Well-Being’ (1992) 5 Ratio Juris 127 Google Scholar öffnen
  466. REICH N, ‘Union Citizenship - Metaphor or Source of Rights?’ (2001) 7 European Law Journal 4 Google Scholar öffnen
  467. REICH N, ‘Horizontal Liability in EC Law: Hybridization of Remedies for Compensation in Case of Breaches of EC Rights’ (2007) 44 Common Market Law Review 705 Google Scholar öffnen
  468. RIDEAU J, ‘Ordre juridique de l'Union européenne - Sources non écrites’ JurisClasseur Europe Traité, Cote 04 Google Scholar öffnen
  469. RIJKEN CRJJ, ‘Het Hof als hoeder van de fundamentale rechten in de zaak Kadi en Al Barakaat’ (2009) Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 140 Google Scholar öffnen
  470. ROBIN-OLIVIER S, ‘The evolution of direct effect in the EU: Stocktaking, problems, projections’ (2014) 12 International Journal of Constitutional Law 165 Google Scholar öffnen
  471. ROMAN D, ‘La justiciabilité des droits sociaux ou les enjeux de l’édification d’un Etat de droit social’ La Revue des droits de l’homme (en ligne), 2 <http://revdh.revues.org/635> accessed 1 September 2016 Google Scholar öffnen
  472. ROMAN D, ‘Les droits civils au renfort des droits sociaux. L’interchangeabilité des droits fondamentaux dans le discours judiciaire.’ La Revue des droits de l’homme (en ligne), 320 <http://revdh.revues.org/144> accessed 1 September 2016 Google Scholar öffnen
  473. ROSAS A and KAILA H, ‘L'application de la Charte des droits fondamentaux de l'Union européenne par la Cour de justice : un premier bilan’ [2011] Il Diritto dell'Unione Europea 1 Google Scholar öffnen
  474. ROULHAC C, ‘Introduction’ La Revue des droits de l'homme (en ligne) 7 - 2015 <http://revdh.revues.org/1312> accessed 7 June 2016 Google Scholar öffnen
  475. RUFFERT M, ‘Rights and Remedies in European Community Law: a Comparative View’ (1997) 34 Common Market Law Review 319 Google Scholar öffnen
  476. RUIZ FABRI H, ‘Is There a Case - Legally and Politically - for Direct Effect of WTO Obligations?’ (2014) 25 European Journal of International Law 151 Google Scholar öffnen
  477. RUIZ FABRI H, ‘Principes généraux du droit communautaire et droit comparé’ (2007) 45 Droits 127 Google Scholar öffnen
  478. SALES P, ‘Rights and Fundamental Rights in English Law’ (2016) 75 The Cambridge Law Journal 86 Google Scholar öffnen
  479. SCHILLING T, ‘Beyond Multilingualism: On Different Approaches to the Handling of Diverging Language Versions of a Community Law’ (2010) 16 European Law Journal 47 Google Scholar öffnen
  480. SCHLAG P, ‘How to Do Things With Hohfeld’ (2014) 78 Law and Contemporary Problems Google Scholar öffnen
  481. SCHOUKENS H, ‘Access to Justice in Environmental Cases after the Rulings of the Court of Justice of 13 January 2015: Kafka Revisited?’ (2015) 31 Utrecht Journal of International and European Law 46 Google Scholar öffnen
  482. SCHWARZE J, ‘Judicial Review of European Administrative Procedure’ (2004) 68 Law and Contemporary Problems 85 Google Scholar öffnen
  483. SEMMELMANN C, ‘General Principles in EU Law between a Compensatory Role and an Intrinsic Value’ (2013) 19 European Law Journal 457 Google Scholar öffnen
  484. SHARPSTON E, ‘European Community Law and the Doctrine of Legitimate Expectations: How Legitimate, and for Whom’ (1990) 11 Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business 87 Google Scholar öffnen
  485. SHAW J, ‘E.U. Citizenship and Political Rights in an Evolving European Union’ (2007) 75 Fordham Law Review 2549 Google Scholar öffnen
  486. SIMON D, ‘Y a-t-il des principes généraux de droit communautaire?’ (1991) 14 Droits 73 Google Scholar öffnen
  487. SIMON D, ‘Protection juridictionnelle effective’ (2011) Europe comm. 38 Google Scholar öffnen
  488. SIMON D and RIGAUX A, ‘La responsabilité des Etats membres en cas de violation du droit communautaire revisitée, ou comment le problème technique de l'odeur sexuelle des porcs non castrés conduit à trancher des questions fondamentales’ (2009) 19 Europe Google Scholar öffnen
  489. SIMONATI A, ‘The Principles of Administrative Procedure and the EU Courts: an Evolution in Progress?’ (2011) 4 Review of European Administrative Law 45 Google Scholar öffnen
  490. SIRINELLI J, ‘La subjectivisation du recours pour excès de pouvoir’ (2016) Revue française de droit administratif 529 Google Scholar öffnen
  491. SMISMANS S, ‘European Civil Society: Shaped by Discourses and Institutional Interests’ (2003) 9 European Law Journal 473 Google Scholar öffnen
  492. SMITH M, ‘Four German Jurists. II’ (1896) 11 Political Science Quarterly 278 Google Scholar öffnen
  493. SNELL J, ‘Fundamental Rights Review of National Measures: Nothing New under the Charter?’ (2015) 21 European Public Law 285 Google Scholar öffnen
  494. NIC SHUIBHNE N,‘The Resilience of EU Market Citizenship’, (2010) 47 Common Market Law Review 1597 Google Scholar öffnen
  495. STRUMIA F, ‘Divorce immediately, or leave. Rights of third country nationals and family protection in the context of EU citizens' free movement: Kuldip Singh and Others’ (2016) 53 Common Market Law Review 1373 Google Scholar öffnen
  496. SUEUR J.-J. ‘Imprécision des droits de l'Homme : quelle imprécision?’ La Revue des droits de l'homme (en ligne) 7 - 2015 <http://revdh.revues.org/1313> accessed 7 June 2016 Google Scholar öffnen
  497. SWAINE ET, ‘Subsidiarity and Self-Interest: Federalism at the European Court of Justice’ (2000) 41 Harvard International Law Journal 1 Google Scholar öffnen
  498. ŠADL U, ‘The Role of Effet Utile in Preserving the Continuity and Authority of European Union Law: Evidence from the Citation Web of the Pre-accession Case Law of the Court of Justice of the EU’ European Journal of Legal Studies, Summer 2015 - Volume 8 - Issue 1 <http://www.ejls.eu/18/209UK.htm> accessed 8 January 2017 Google Scholar öffnen
  499. TISON M, ‘Do Not Attack the Watchdog! Banking Supervisors Liability after Peter Paul’ (2005) 42 Common Market Law Review 639 Google Scholar öffnen
  500. VAN DEN BROEK B and ENNEKING L, ‘Public Interest Litigation in the Netherlands. A Multidimensional Take on the Promotion of Environmental Interests by Private Parties through the Courts’ (2014) 10 Utrecht Law Review 77 Google Scholar öffnen
  501. VAN DROOGHENBROECK S, ‘L'article 17 de la CEDH est-il indispensable ?’ [2001] Revue trimestrielle des droits de l’homme (no spécial : Le droit face à la montée du racisme et de la xénophobie) 543 Google Scholar öffnen
  502. VAN EIJKEN H and VAN ROSSEM JW, ‘Prisoner disenfranchisement and the right to vote in elections to the European Parliament: Universal suffrage key to unlocking political citizenship?’ (2016) 12 European Constitutional Law Review 114 Google Scholar öffnen
  503. VAN EIJKEN H and VERHOEVEN MJM, ‘‘Lost in translation’. Een bespreking van het arrest Skoma-Lux: de doorwerking van niet officieel gepubliceerde verordeningen’ (2008) Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 165 Google Scholar öffnen
  504. VAN GERVEN W, ‘Of Rights, Remedies and Procedures’ (2000) 37 Common Market Law Review 501 Google Scholar öffnen
  505. VAN GERVEN W, ‘Remedies for Infringements of Fundamental Rights’ (2004) 10 European Public Law 261 Google Scholar öffnen
  506. VAN GERVEN W, ‘Articles 30, 48, 52 and 59 after Keck & Mithouard, and Protection of Rights Arising from Directives after Faccini Dori’ (1996) Columbia Journal of European Law 217 Google Scholar öffnen
  507. VAN GERVEN W, ‘Principe de proportionnalité, abus de droit et droits fondamentaux’ [1992] Journal des tribunaux 305 Google Scholar öffnen
  508. VAN GESTEL R and MICKLITZ H-W, ‘Why Methods Matter in European Legal Scholarship’ (2014) 20 European Law Journal 292 Google Scholar öffnen
  509. VAN HOEK AAH and RIJKEN CRJJ, ‘Rechtsbescherming en het recht van verdediging bij plaatsing op de Europese terrorismelijst - de zaak-Mujahedin-e Kalq v De Raad’ (2007) Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 284 Google Scholar öffnen
  510. VAN ROOSMALEN HJTM and PAHLADSINGH A, ‘Het Handvest van de grondrechten van de Europese Unie: beweging in de rechtspraak’ (2013) Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 83 Google Scholar öffnen
  511. VAN WAEYENBERGE A and PECHO P, ‘L'arrêt Unibet et le traité de Lisbonne - un pari sur l'avenir de la protection juridictionnelle effective’ (2008) 44 Cahiers de droit européen 126 Google Scholar öffnen
  512. VAN WOLFEREN M, ‘The Limits to the CJEU's Interpretation of Locus Standi, a Theoretical Framework’ (2016) 12 Journal of Contemporary European Research 914 Google Scholar öffnen
  513. VANDAMME J, ‘C'est arrivé près de chez vous! Het arrest Italmoda en het ontzeggen van rechten aan de particulier op grond van de EU-richtlijn’ (2015) Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 154 Google Scholar öffnen
  514. VARUHAS JNE, ‘Judicial Review: Standing and Remedies’ (2013) 72 The Cambridge Law Journal 243 Google Scholar öffnen
  515. VON ARNAUD A, ‘Theorie und Methode des Grundrechtsschutzes in Europa - am Beispiel des Grundsatzes der Verhältnismässigkeit’ (2008) Europarecht 41 Google Scholar öffnen
  516. VON BOGDANDY A, ‘Founding Principles of EU Law: A Theoretical and Doctrinal Sketch’ (2010) 16 European Law Journal 95 Google Scholar öffnen
  517. VON BOGDANDY A, ‘Deutsche Rechtswissenschaft im europäischen Rechtsraum’ (2011) 66 Juristen Zeitung 1 Google Scholar öffnen
  518. VON DANWITZ T and PARASCHAS K, ‘A Fresh Start for the Charter: Fundamental Questions on the Application of the European Charter of Fundamental Rights’ (2012) 35 Fordham International Law Journal 1396 Google Scholar öffnen
  519. VOßKUHLE A and KAISER A-B, ‘Grundwissen – Öffentliches Recht: Das subjektiv-öffentliche Recht’ (2009) Juristische Schulung 16 Google Scholar öffnen
  520. WAELBROECK D and BOMBOIS T, ‘Des requérants "privilégiés" et des autres... A propos de l'arrêt Inuit et de l'exigence de protection juridictionnelle effective des particuliers en droit européen"’ [2014] Cahiers de droit européen 21 Google Scholar öffnen
  521. WALDRON J, ‘Critical Notice’ (1985) 94 Mind 281 Google Scholar öffnen
  522. WALDRON J, ‘A Rights-Based Critique of Constitutional Rights’ (1993) 13 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 18 Google Scholar öffnen
  523. WALKER N, ‘Legal Theory and the European Union’ EUI Working Paper Law 2005/16 Google Scholar öffnen
  524. WALLACE W, ‘Europe as a Confederation: the Community and the Nation-State’ (1982) 21 Journal of Common Market Studies 57 Google Scholar öffnen
  525. WEILER J, ‘Does Europe Need a Constitution? Demos, Telos and the German Maastricht Decision’ (1995) 1 European Law Journal 219 Google Scholar öffnen
  526. WEILER JHH, ‘A Constitution for Europe? Some Hard Choices’ (2002) 40 Journal of Common Market Studies 563 Google Scholar öffnen
  527. WEILER JHH, ‘Community, Member States and European Integration: Is the Law Relevant?’ (1982) 21 Journal of Common Market Studies 39 Google Scholar öffnen
  528. WEILER JHH, ‘Van Gend en Loos: The individual as subject and object and the dilemma of European legitimacy’ (2014) 12 International Journal of Constitutional Law 94 Google Scholar öffnen
  529. WEILER JHH and LOCKHART NJS, ‘'Taking Rights Seriously' Seriously: The European Court and its Fundamental Rights Jurisprudence - Part I’ (1995) 32 Common Market Law Review 51 Google Scholar öffnen
  530. WEILER JHH and LOCKHART NJS, ‘'Taking Rights Seriously' Seriously: the European Court and its Fundamental Rights Jurisprudence - Part II’ (1995) 32 Common Market Law Review 579 Google Scholar öffnen
  531. WEISSE-MARCHAL C, ‘Quelle réparation pour les dommages causés aux particuliers par la violation d'une directive communautaire dépourvue d'effet direct ?’ (2000) Revue française de droit administratif 402 Google Scholar öffnen
  532. WERNICKE S, ‘Au nom de qui? The European Court of Justice between Member States, Civil Society and Union Citizens’ (2007) 13 European Law Journal 380 Google Scholar öffnen
  533. WILKINSON MA, ‘Civil Society and the Re-imagination of European Constitutionalism’ (2003) 9 European Law Journal 451 Google Scholar öffnen
  534. WILLIAMS G, ‘The Concept of Legal Liberty’ (1956) 56 Columbia Law Review 1129 Google Scholar öffnen
  535. WILMAN FG, ‘The end of the absence? The growing body of EU legislation on private enforcement and the main remedies it provides for’ (2016) 53 Common Market Law Review 887 Google Scholar öffnen
  536. WOLLENSCHLÄGER F, ‘A New Fundamental Freedom beyond Market Integration’, (2011) 17 European Law Journal 1 Google Scholar öffnen
  537. WYATT D, ‘Horizontal effect of fundamental freedoms and the right to equality after Viking and Mangold, and the implications for Community competence’ (2008) 4 Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy 1 Google Scholar öffnen
  538. YOUNG KG, ‘Rights and Queues: On Distributive Contests in the Modern State’ (2016) 55 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 65 Google Scholar öffnen
  539. ZALASIŃSKI A, ‘Proportionality of Anti-Avoidance and Anti-Abuse Measures in the ECJ’s Direct Tax Case Law’ (2007) 35 Intertax 310 Google Scholar öffnen
  540. ZATJAY I, ‘La permanence des concepts du droit romain dans les systèmes juridiques continentaux’ (1966) 18 Revue internationale de droit comparé 353 Google Scholar öffnen
  541. ZUMBANSEN P, ‘Semantics of European Law’ (1999) 5 European Law Journal 114 Google Scholar öffnen
  542. Theses Google Scholar öffnen
  543. BIGIAOUI-DUHAMEL L, ‘L’abus de droit en droit du travail’ (Thèse de doctorat en droit privé, Université Paris 1 2002) Google Scholar öffnen
  544. BOBIC A, ‘Prohibition of Abuse of Rights in EU Law’ (Master's thesis, University of Zagreb, Faculty of Law, Jean Monnet Chair of European Public Law 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
  545. DE VOS N, ‘Europeanisering van het vertrouwensbeginsel. Betekenis van het Europese vertrouwensbeginsel voor de equivalente beginselen in Nederland, Frankrijk en België in het kader van een groeiend ius commune’ (Universiteit Utrecht 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
  546. KARATZIA A, ‘The European Citizens' Initiative: a laboratory for citizens' participation in EU law-making’ (PhD thesis, University of Surrey 2016) Google Scholar öffnen
  547. IONESCU RN, ‘L'abus de droit en droit communautaire’ (Thèse pour le doctorat en droit, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona and Université Toulouse I - Sciences sociales 2009) Google Scholar öffnen
  548. LACCHI C, ‘Preliminary References to the Court of Justice of the EU and Effective Judicial Protection: Towards a more protection-oriented approach of Article 267 TFEU’ (PhD thesis, University of Luxembourg 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  549. MARTY N, ‘La Notion de Bonne Administration: À la Confluence des Droits Européens et du Droit Administratif Français’ (PhD thesis, University of Montpellier 2007) Google Scholar öffnen
  550. MIHAESCU EVANS B, ‘The right to good administration at the crossroads of the various sources of fundamental rights in the EU integrated administrative system’ (PhD thesis, University of Luxembourg 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  551. NIVERT N, ‘Intérêt général et droits fondamentaux’ (Thèse pour l'obtention du grade de Docteur en droit public, Université de la Réunion 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  552. ÖSTLUND A, ‘Effectiveness of European Union Law versus Procedural Protection. Tracing the tension throughout the case-law of the Court of Justice on ex officio review by the national judge’ (PhD thesis, University of Luxembourg 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  553. RAMADAN AM, ‘L'abus du droit de brevet : étude comparée de droit français et égyptien’ (Thèse de doctorat en droit privé et sciences criminelles, Université de Montpellier et Université d'Alexandrie 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  554. Working papers, electronic articles and blog posts Google Scholar öffnen
  555. ARCURI A and POLI S, ‘What Price for the Community Enforcement of WTO Law?’ EUI Working Paper 2010/01 Google Scholar öffnen
  556. ARESTIS G, ‘Fundamental rights in the EU: three years after Lisbon, the Luxembourg perspective’ College of Europe Research Papers in Law 2/2013 Google Scholar öffnen
  557. AZOULAI L, ‘L'autonomie de l'individu européen et la question du statut’ EUI Department of Law Research paper 2013/14 Google Scholar öffnen
  558. AZOULAI L, ‘The (Mis)Construction of the European Individual. Two Essays on Union Citizenship Law’ EUI Working Paper Law 2014/14 Google Scholar öffnen
  559. BILCHITZ D, ‘Article Review: David Bilchitz on Matthias Klatt’s ‘Positive Rights: Who Decides? Judicial Review in Balance’ ’ International Journal of Constitutional Law Blog, August 26, 2015, 359 <http://www.iconnectblog.com/2015/08/article-review-david-bilchitz-on-matthias-klatts-positive-rights-who-decides-judicial-review-in-balance> accessed 27 August 2015 Google Scholar öffnen
  560. BIGNAMI F, ‘Three Generations of Participation Rights in European Administrative Proceedings’ Jean Monnet Working Paper 11/03 Google Scholar öffnen
  561. CAMPBELL K, ‘Legal Rights’ The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2013 Edition), ed ZALTA, E <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/legal-rights/> accessed 10 November 2014 Google Scholar öffnen
  562. DANI M, ‘The subjectification of the citizen in European public law’ EUI Working Paper, Law 2015/02 Google Scholar öffnen
  563. HAGNER F, Les particuliers et l'ordre juridique communautaire : l'égalité de traitement entre les hommes et les femmes (euryopa - Institut européen de l'Université de Genève 2003) Google Scholar öffnen
  564. HOFMANN HCH, ‘The Right to an 'Effective Judicial Remedy' and the Changing Conditions of Implementing EU Law’ Law Working Paper 2013-02 Google Scholar öffnen
  565. JOERGES C, ‘The Law in the Process of Constitutionalizing Europe’ EUI Working Papers, Law 2002/4 Google Scholar öffnen
  566. MICKLITZ H-W, ‘The ECJ between the Individual Citizen and the Member States - A plea for a judge-made European law on remedies’ EUI Working Paper Law 2011/15 Google Scholar öffnen
  567. MARIOTTI C, ‘Theory and Practice of Emissions Trading in the European Union: Some Reflections on Allowance Allocation in Light of the DK Recycling Case’ European Papers, Vol 1, 2016, No 3, European Forum, Insight of 22 December 2016, 1153-1170 <http://www.europeanpapers.eu/fr/europeanforum/theory-and-practice-emissions-trading-european-union-allowance-allocation#_ftn25> accessed 29 April 2017 Google Scholar öffnen
  568. Millénaire 3, ‘L'antidiscrimination, une volonté de l'Union européenne’ Discriminations "raciales" et politiques antidiscriminatoires - Fiche n°1 <http://www.millenaire3.com/uploads/tx_ressm3/syntheses_discrim_fiche1.pdf> accessed 14 April 2015 Google Scholar öffnen
  569. REICH N, ‘Rights without Duties? Reflections on the State of Liability Law in the Multilevel Governance System of the Community: Is There a Need for a More Coherent Approach in European Private Law?’ (2009) EUI Working Papers, Law 2009/10 Google Scholar öffnen
  570. MILLER V, The Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe: Part II (The Charter of Fundamental Rights) (House of Commons Library, Research Paper 04/85, 2004) Google Scholar öffnen
  571. OEHLER U, ‘Environmental Liability and GMOs in the EU and in Germany’ Exeter Papers in European Law No 15 <http://law.exeter.ac.uk/cels/eupapers.shtml> accessed 19 May 2016 Google Scholar öffnen
  572. PAQUES M and DONNAY L, ‘Juridiction ordinaire et juridiction administrative en droit belge’ <https://orbi.ulg.ac.be/bitstream/2268/9929/1/Juridiction%20ordinaire%20et%20juridiction%20administrative%20n%20droit%20belge.pdf> accessed 24 January 2016 Google Scholar öffnen
  573. PIRKER B, ‘Cases C-401 to 403/12 and C-404 to 405/12: no review of legality in light of the Aarhus Convention’ 29 January 2015 <http://europeanlawblog.eu/2015/01/29/cases-c-401-to-40312-and-c-404-to-40512-no-review-of-legality-in-light-of-the-aarhus-convention/> accessed 26 April 2017 Google Scholar öffnen
  574. PIRKER B, ‘Implementation of the Aarhus Convention by the EU - an Inconvenient Truth from the Compliance Committee’ 24 April 2017 <http://europeanlawblog.eu/2017/04/24/implementation-of-the-aarhus-convention-by-the-eu-an-inconvenient-truth-from-the-compliance-committee/> accessed 30 April 2017 Google Scholar öffnen
  575. PORAT B, ‘Rights-Based Law v. Duty-Based Law: Old Dilemma, New Perspective’ Hebrew University of Jerusalem Legal Research Paper No 16-04 <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2696463> accessed 12 January 2016 Google Scholar öffnen
  576. SADURSKI W, ‘Rights and Moral Reasoning: An Unstated Assumption’ EUI Working Paper, Law 2007/38 Google Scholar öffnen
  577. SADURSKI W, ‘Constitutional Courts in the Process of Articulating Constitutional Rights in the Post-Communist States of Central and Eastern Europe, Part I: Social and Economic Rights’ EUI Working Paper Law 2002/14 Google Scholar öffnen
  578. SCHNEBEL V, ‘Le juge administratif, un nouveau juge de la constitutionnalité des lois? 14 November 2011 <http://chevalierdesgrandsarrets.com/2011/11/14/le-juge-administratif-un-nouveau-juge-de-la-constitutionnalité-des-lois/> accessed 20 April 2015 Google Scholar öffnen
  579. ROGER AJC, ‘A lost opportunity for improving access to justice in environmental matters: the CJEU on the invocability of the Aarhus Convention’, 15 February 2015, available at http://eulawanalysis.blogspot.lu/2015/02/a-lost-opportunity-for-improving-access.html (accessed 26 April 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  580. SULLIVAN M and LAHME R, ‘Class/collective actions in Europe: overview of applicable EU law principles’, Thomson Reuters Practical Law, < https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/2-618-0602?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&firstPage=true&bhcp=1> accessed 3 August 2017 Google Scholar öffnen
  581. THAM RKL, ‘The Impact of the Environmental Liability Directive 2004/35 on English Law’ Exeter Papers in European Law No 14 <http://law.exeter.ac.uk/cels/eupapers.shtml> accessed 19 May 2016. Google Scholar öffnen
  582. VAN DUFFEL S, ‘From Objective Right to Subjective Rights: The Franciscans and the Interest and Will Conceptions of Rights’ National University of Singapore, 2 <http://ssrn.com/abstract=1467455> Google Scholar öffnen
  583. WENAR L, ‘Rights’ The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2011 Edition), ed ZALTA, E <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/rights/> accessed 10 November 2014 Google Scholar öffnen
  584. XEFTERI S, ‘Note d’actualité droit de l’environnement de l’UE 1/2017’, Blogdroiteuropeen, février 2017, <http://wp.me/p6OBGR-1Cl> accessed 30 April 2017 Google Scholar öffnen
  585. ZACCARONI G, ‘Ultra vires review e applicazione orizzontale del principio di non discriminazione sulla base dell’età : una riflessione (a freddo) su Dansk Industri’, SIDIBlog, May 2017, < http://www.sidiblog.org/2017/05/04/ultra-vires-review-e-applicazione-orizzontale-del-principio-di-non-discriminazione-sulla-base-delleta-una-riflessione-a-freddo-su-dansk-industri/> accessed 13 August 2017 Google Scholar öffnen
  586. Reports and official publications Google Scholar öffnen
  587. ‘Le Tiers et le droit public - Le rapport roumain’ Association Henri Capitant, Journées panaméennes, 18 au 22 mai 2015, Les tiers <http://www.henricapitant.org/storage/app/media/pdfs/evenements/tiers_droits_public_2015/Roumanie_7.pdf> Google Scholar öffnen
  588. ‘Le juge administratif et le droit de l’Union européenne’, Conseil d’Etat, 23 September 2015, <http://www.conseil-etat.fr/Decisions-Avis-Publications/Etudes-Publications/Dossiers-thematiques/Le-juge-administratif-et-le-droit-de-l-Union-europeenne> accessed 22 June 2017 Google Scholar öffnen
  589. AUBY J-M, Les recours juridictionnels contre les actes administratifs spécialement économiques dans le droit des Etats membres de la CEE (Commission européenne, Etudes, Série concurrence - rapprochement des législations, 1971) Google Scholar öffnen
  590. BUTT ME, KÜBERT J and SCHULTZ CA, Droits sociaux fondamentaux en Europe (Document de travail, Parlement Européen, Direction générale des études, Séries affaires sociales, SOCI 104 FR, 2000) Google Scholar öffnen
  591. BUX U, ‘Le Parlement européen : contexte historique’, Fiches techniques sur l’Union européenne, April 2017, <http://www.europarl.europa.eu/ftu/pdf/fr/FTU_1.3.1.pdf> accessed 17 July 2017 Google Scholar öffnen
  592. CURTIN D and LEINO-SANDBERG P, Openness, Transparency and the Right of Access to Documents in the EU. In-depth analysis for the PETI committee (European Parliament DG for Internal Policies, Policy Department C: Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs, 2016) Google Scholar öffnen
  593. EDWARD DOA, Oral Evidence Taken before the European Scrutiny Committee on Wednesday 17 November 2004, uncorrected transcript available at https://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmselect/cmeuleg/uc1064-ii/uc106402.htm (accessed 18 April 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  594. EU Network of Independent Experts on Fundamental Rights, ‘Commentary of the Charter’’ <http://ec.europa.eu/justice/fundamental-rights/files/networkcommentaryfinal_en.pdf> accessed 9 October 2015 Google Scholar öffnen
  595. European Commission, ‘Judicial Redress – Collective Redress’, June 2013, < http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/solving_consumer_disputes/judicial_redress/index_en.htm> accessed 3 August 2017 Google Scholar öffnen
  596. European Commission, Consultation paper for discussion on the follow-up to the Green Paper on consumer collective redress, May-July 2009, <http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/archive/redress_cons/docs/consultation_paper2009.pdf > accessed 3 August 2017 Google Scholar öffnen
  597. HEY C, ‘EU Environmental Policies: a short history of the policy strategies’ European Environmental Bureau, 2005 <http://www.eeb.org/publication/chapter-3.pdf> accessed 2 March 2017 Google Scholar öffnen
  598. LADENBURGER C, ‘European Institutional Report’ in LAFFRANQUE J (ed) The Protection of Fundamental Rights Post-Lisbon: The Interaction between the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, the European Convention on Human Rights and National Constitutions (Reports of the XXC FIDE Congress, Tallinn, 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  599. PINAULT M, Rapport de la délégation française (8ème colloque de l'Association des Conseils d'Etat et des Juridictions administratives suprêmes de l'Union européenne, du 12 au 15 mai 1982, Copenhague - "La notion de l'intérêt en contentieux administratif (intérêt personnel, intérêt collectif, l'action populaire) notamment en matière d'environnement", 1982) Google Scholar öffnen
  600. SCHEUER S, ‘EU Environmental Policy Handbook. A Critical Analysis of EU Environmental Legislation’ European Environmental Bureau, 2005 <http://www.eeb.org/?LinkServID=3E1E422E-AAB4-A68D-221A63343325A81B> accessed 6 March 2017 Google Scholar öffnen
  601. SHEATE W and others, The Relationship between the EIA and SEA Directives (Imperial College London Consultants, Final Report to the European Commission, 2005) <http://ec.europa.eu/environment/archives/eia/pdf/final_report_0508.pdf> accessed 29 April 2017 Google Scholar öffnen
  602. UIBO L, ‘Defending Estonia's interests in the Court of Justice of the European Union’ Estonian Ministry of Foreign Affairs Yearbook 2010 <http://www.vm.ee/en/yearbook-2010> accessed 14 February 2017 Google Scholar öffnen
  603. Conference and seminar interventions, conference papers and interviews Google Scholar öffnen
  604. AZOULAI L, ‘Le droit de l'Union européenne comme mode de vie’ (Université d'Aix-Marseille, Marseille, 27 May 2017), video available at https://blogdroiteuropeen.com/2017/06/12/le-droit-de-lunion-europeenne-comme-mode-de-vie-projet-de-recherche-du-prof-loic-azoulay/ accessed 3 August 2017 Google Scholar öffnen
  605. BLANCHET T, ‘Evolution of EU citizenship and the rights attached to it’ (Conference - EU Citizenship and Justice, Luxembourg, 14th and 15th September 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  606. CESPEDES R, ‘Hohfeld’s Taxonomy Revisited: an Update from the Theory of Rights and Modern Public Law, Family Law and Human Rights Law’ ’Tis Forty Years Since: Britain & Ireland in Europe, Europe in Britain & Ireland’ The changing landscape of theory and practice, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh Law School, 2-3 September 2013 Google Scholar öffnen
  607. COLE M, HOFMANN HCH and SCHILTZ J-L, ‘The Future of Data Transfers outside of the European Union’ (Seminar at the University of Luxembourg, 20 April 2016) Google Scholar öffnen
  608. DELAPORTE F, ‘Droit luxembourgeois et droits européens’, Interview by WARIN C, (blogdroiteuropéen, 2016) <https://blogdroiteuropeen.com/2016/11/10/droit-luxembourgeois-et-droits-europeens-interview-de-francis-delaporte-partie-2/> accessed 20 March 2017 Google Scholar öffnen
  609. KOMBILA-IBOUANGA H, ‘La proportionnalité en tant que principe du droit de l’Union’ (VIIIe Congrès mondial de droit constitutionnel, Mexico, 6-10 December 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  610. LAPOINTE U, ‘Boyle, Martin. 2001. ‘’Chapitre I: Legal legitimacy and the Principles of Private and Public Autonomy’’, Towards Justice and Validity: An Investigation into Habermas’ Theory of Legitimacy, Mémoire de maîtrise, Carleton University, pp. 6-45’, in FLEURY G, LAPOINTE U, ROCH L, DEMERS V, 'Légitimité et gouvernance dans les oeuvres de Jürgen Habermas (Raison et légitimité et Droit et démocratie)’ Chaire de responsabilité sociale et de développement durable ESG-UQAM, Recueil de textes CEH/RT-34-2005, Deuxième séminaire de la série annuelle 2004-2005 sur la gouvernance, 6 octobre 2005 Google Scholar öffnen
  611. LAW S, ‘The Rationales, Reasoning and Methodology Underpinning the Judicial Recognition of Principles of Union Law’ (Cahiers de Droit européen - Les principes généraux du droit de l'Union européenne, Bruxelles, 10 September 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  612. LENAERTS K, ‘EU citizenship in the light of the case law of the CJEU’ (Conference - EU Citizenship and Justice, Luxembourg, 14th and 15th September 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  613. LENAERTS K, ‘Les défis actuels de la Cour de justice’, Interview by TAMBOU O, (blogdroiteuropéen, 2016) <https://blogdroiteuropeen.com/2016/04/01/interview-du-president-koen-lenaerts-partie-2-les-defis-actuels-de-la-cjue/> accessed 6 July 2016 Google Scholar öffnen
  614. MIETTINEN S and KETTUNEN M, ‘Travaux to the Treaties: Treasures or trivia?’ (European Studies Association conference, Boston 5 March 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  615. ORTINO M, ‘A Reading of the EU Constitutional Legal System Through the Principle of Effectiveness’ (Cahiers de droit européen - Les principes généraux du droit de l'Union européenne, Brussels, 10 September 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  616. E. Poillot, ‘Gutiérrez Naranjo and Others’ (PhD Seminar Recent Developments in Theory and Practice of EU Law, University of Luxembourg, 27 June 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  617. POTVIN-SOLIS, ‘Principe général de non-discrimination et situation purement interne’ (Cahiers de droit européen - Les principes généraux du droit de l'Union européenne, Brussels, 10 September 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  618. PRECHAL S, ‘The relation between the rights arising from the Charter and general principles of law’ (The protection of fundamental rights in the EU: future challenges, Luxembourg, 22 October 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  619. RAPOPORT C, ‘L’opposabilité des ‘droits-créances’ constitutionnels en droit public français’ (Communication présentée aux journées de l’association française de droit constitutionnel, www.droitconstitutionnel.org/congresParis/comC8/RapoportTXTpdf, accessed 20 March 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  620. RODRÍGUEZ PM, ‘The principle of legal certainty and the limits to the application of EU law’ (Cahiers de droit européen - Les principes généraux du droit de l'Union européenne, Brussels, 10 September 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  621. ROTOLO A and SARTOR G, ‘Deontic Logic. Introductory materials’, Summer School on Law and Logic, European University Institute and Harvard Law School 2015 <http://lawandlogic.org/coursebasic/session-5-2-2/> accessed 25 August 2015 Google Scholar öffnen
  622. SAFJAN M, ‘A Union of Effective Judicial Protection. Addressing a multi-level challenge through the lens of Article 47 CFREU’ (King's College London, February 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  623. SEVER S, ‘General Principles of Law and the Charter of Fundamental Rights’ (Cahiers de droit européen - Les principes généraux du droit de l'Union européenne, Brussels, 10 September 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  624. SIKORA A, ‘The Principle of High Environmental Protection as a Source of Enforceable Rights’ (Cahiers de droit européen - Les principes généraux du droit de l'Union européenne, Brussels, 10 September 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  625. TURGIS S, ‘Notions autonomes et concurrence des juges’ (La concurrence des juges en Europe Le dialogue en question(s), Faculté de Droit de Tours, 25-26-27 November 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  626. VAN MEERBEECK J, ‘Le mode opératoire des principes généraux : de la généralité in abstracto à l'effet direct in concreto’ (Cahiers de droit européen - Les principes généraux du droit de l'Union européenne, Brussels, 10 September 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  627. VITORINO, Speaking points European Convention, 29 October 2002, Brussels, SPEECH/02/531 Google Scholar öffnen
  628. ZETTERQUIST O, ‘Fundamental Rights and the Fundamentals of the European Constitution’ (Seminar at the University of Luxembourg, 26 June 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  629. Journalistic and literary works Google Scholar öffnen
  630. RIVAIS R, ‘Strasbourg garantit le droit au logement opposable’ SOS Conso, Le Monde <http://sosconso.blog.lemonde.fr/2015/04/17/strasbourg-garantit-le-droit-au-logement-opposable/> accessed 17 April 2015 Google Scholar öffnen
  631. VOLTAIRE, ‘Onzième lettre écrite par le proposant à M. Covelle’, Œuvres complètes de Voltaire, Tome 46 (1784 La Société littéraire-typographique) 447. Google Scholar öffnen
  632. WAHNICH S, ‘Sauver ceux qui pleurent’, Chronique ‘Historiques’, Libération 8 February 2017 <http://www.liberation.fr/debats/2017/02/08/sauver-ceux-qui-pleurent_1547222> accessed 22 July 2017 Google Scholar öffnen
  633. WITTGENSTEIN L, Recherches philosophiques (Gallimard 2014) Google Scholar öffnen

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus dem Schwerpunkt "Europarecht & Internationales Recht & Rechtsvergleichung"
Cover des Buchs: Der Volkseinwand
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Florian Feigl
Der Volkseinwand
Cover des Buchs: Wie fördert die EU Menschenrechte in Drittstaaten?
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Dennis Traudt
Wie fördert die EU Menschenrechte in Drittstaaten?
Cover des Buchs: Future-Proofing in Public Law
Sammelband Kein Zugriff
Nicole Koblenz LL.M., Nicholas Otto, Gernot Sydow
Future-Proofing in Public Law
Cover des Buchs: Das Weltraumrecht und seine Eignung für den Rohstoffabbau durch Privatakteure
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Justus Schmidt
Das Weltraumrecht und seine Eignung für den Rohstoffabbau durch Privatakteure
Cover des Buchs: From Outlaws to Equal Players – Rebel Courts in International Law
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Isabella Poewe
From Outlaws to Equal Players – Rebel Courts in International Law

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Feedback geben

Wir freuen uns über Ihr Feedback zu Inhalten und Funktionen. Ihre Nachricht hilft uns, unseren Service stetig zu verbessern.

Bewertung
Bild anhängen
oder hier ablegen
PNG oder JPG (max. 3 MB)

Anmelden

Passwort vergessen?
Login via Open Athens
Noch kein Benutzerkonto?
Jetzt registrieren

Publikation zitieren

Download: RIS BibTex