Cover of book: Emotionale Framing-Effekte auf Einstellungen
Buy in shop
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Monograph No access

Emotionale Framing-Effekte auf Einstellungen

Eine theoretische Modellierung und empirische Überprüfung der Wirkungsmechanismen
Authors:
Series:
Reihe Rezeptionsforschung, Volume 33
Publisher:
 2015

Bibliographic data

Edition
1/2015
Copyright Year
2015
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-1873-3
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-5938-3
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Reihe Rezeptionsforschung
Volume
33
Language
German
Pages
417
Product Type
Monograph

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access 1 - 10
  2. Einleitung No access 11 - 23
  3. Begriffsbestimmungen No access 24 - 39
  4. Kognitive Framing-Prozesse No access 40 - 83
  5. Emotionale Framing-Prozesse No access 84 - 136
  6. Ein Modell kognitiver und emotionaler Framing-Effekte No access 137 - 190
  7. Experimentelle Überprüfung emotionaler Framing-Effekte No access 191 - 265
  8. Emotionale Framing-Effekte in einer öffentlichen Debatte No access 266 - 338
  9. Schlussdiskussion No access 339 - 353
  10. Literaturverzeichnis No access 354 - 387
  11. Anhang No access 388 - 417

Bibliography (538)

  1. van Gorp, B. (2007). The constructionist approach to framing. Bringing culture back in. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 60–78. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  2. Williams, P. & Aaker, J. L. (2002). Can mixed emotions peacfully coexist? Journal of Consumer Research, 28(4). 636–649 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  3. Williams, J. & MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Resampling and distribution of the product methods for testing indirect effects in complex models. Structural Equation Modeling, 15(1), 23–51. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  4. Wilkowski, B. M., Robinson, M. D., Gordon, R. D. & Troop-Gordon, W. (2007). Tracking the evil eye: Trait anger and selective attention within ambiguously hostile scenes. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(3), 650–666. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  5. Wildt, A. T. & Ahtola, O. (1978). Analysis of covariance. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  6. Wettstein, M. (2012). Angrist: Dokumentation und Anleitung für die Programmierung des Codierer-Interface. Manuskript, Universität Zürich. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  7. Weiss, W. & Fine, B. J. (1956). The effect of induced aggressiveness on opinion change. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52(1), 109–114. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  8. Weiner, B. (1995). Judgments of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  9. Way, B. M. & Masters, R. D. (1996). Political attitudes: Interactions of cognition and affect. Motivation and Emotion, 20(3), 205–236. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  10. Vliegenthart, R. & van Zoonen, L. (2011). Power to the frame: Bringing sociology back to frame analysis. European Journal of Communication, 26(2), 101–115. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  11. van Mechelen, I. & Hennes, K. (2009). The appraisal basis of anger occurence and intensity revisited. Cognition and Emotion, 23(7), 1273–1388. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  12. Wirth, W. (2001). Der Codierprozess als gelenkte Rezeption: Bausteine für eine Theorie des Codierens. In W. Wirth & E. Lauf (Hrsg.), Inhaltsanalyse. Perspektiven, Probleme, Potentiale (S. 157–182). Köln: Herbert von Halem Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  13. van Gorp, B. (2005). Where is the frame? Victims and intruders in the Belgian press coverage of the asylum issue. European Journal of Communication, 20(4), 484–507. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  14. Valkenburg, P. M., Semetko, H. A. & de Vreese, C. H. de. (1999). The effects of news frames on readers' thoughts and recall. Communication Research, 26(5), 550–569. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  15. Valkenburg, P. M. & Peter, J. (2013). The differential susceptibility to media effects model. Journal of Communication, 63(2), 221–243. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  16. Valenzuela, S. (2009). Variations in media priming: The moderating role of knowledge, interest, news attention, and discussion. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 86(4), 756–774. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  17. Valentino, N. A., Hutchings, V. L. & White, I. K. (2002). Cues that matter: How political ads prime racial attitudes during campaigns. American Political Science Review, 96(1), 75–90. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  18. Valentino, N. A., Hutchings, V. L., Banks, A. J. & Davis, A. K. (2008). Is a worried citizen a good citizen? Emotions, political information seeking, and learning via the internet. Political Psychology, 29(2), 247–273. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  19. Valentino, N. A., Brader, T., Groenendyk, E. W., Gregorowicz, K. & Hutchings, V. L. (2011). Election night’s alright for fighting: The role of emotions in political participation. The Journal of Politics, 73(1), 156–170. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  20. Uribe, R. & Gunter, B. (2007). Are 'sensational' news stories more likely to trigger viewers' emotions than non-sensational news stories? A content analysis of British TV news. European Journal of Communication, 22(2), 207–228. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  21. Urban, D. (2000). Längsschnittanalysen mit latenten Wachstumskurvenmodellen in der politischen Sozialisationsforschung. Schriftenreihe des Instituts für Sozialwissenschaften der Universität Stuttgart. Stuttgart: Universität Stuttgart. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  22. Ulich, D. & Mayring, P. (2003). Psychologie der Emotionen (2. überarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage). Grundriss der Psychologie: Band 5. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  23. Wolling, J. (2002). Methodenkombination in der Medienwirkungsforschung: Der Entscheidungsprozess bei der Verknüpfung von Umfrage- und Inhaltsanalysedaten. ZUMA-Nachrichten, 26, 54–85. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  24. Zanna, M. P. & Rempel, J. K. (1988). Attitudes: A new look at an old concept. In D. Bar-Tal & A. W. Kruglanski (Hrsg.), The social psychology of knowledge (S. 315–334). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  25. Zajonc, R. B. (1998). Emotions. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske & G. Lindzey (Hrsg.), The handbook of social psychology (4. Auflage, S. 591–632). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  26. Zajonc, R. B. (1984). On the primacy of affect. American Psychologist, 39(2), 117–123. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  27. Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35(2), 151–175. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  28. Yates, F. J. (2007). Emotion appraisal tendencies and carryover: How, why, and … therefore? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(3), 179–183. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  29. Yang, Y. & Green, S. B. (2011). Coefficient alpha: A reliability coefficient for the 21st century? Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29(4), 377–392. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  30. Yan, C., Dillard, J. P. & Shen, F. (2012). Emotion, motivation, and the persuasive effects of message framing. Journal of Communication, 62(4), 682–700. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  31. Yan, C., Dillard, J. P. & Shen, F. (2010). The effects of mood, message framing, and behavioral advocacy on persuasion. Journal of Communication, 60(2), 344–363. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  32. Wothke, W. (2000). Longitudinal and multi-group modeling with missing data. In T. D. Little, K. U. Schnabel & J. Baumert (Hrsg.), Modeling longitudinal and multilevel data. Practical issues, applied approaches, and specific examples (S. 219–240). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  33. Wolling, J. & Wirth, W. (2012). Die Verknüpfung von Umfrage- und Inhaltsanalysedaten in der Medienwirkungsforschung. In W. Loosen & A. Scholl (Hrsg.), Methodenkombinationen in der Kommunikationswissenschaft. Methodologische Herausforderungen und empirische Praxis (S. 68–88). Köln: Herbert von Halem Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  34. Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 207–232. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  35. Wirth, W., Wettstein, M., Reichel, K. & Kühne, R. (2012). Codebuch: Changing processes and strategies of political participation and representation. Manuskript, Universität Zürich. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  36. Wirth, W. & Wettstein, M. (2012). Final report: Content analysis NCCR II Module IV. Manuskript, Universität Zürich. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  37. Wirth, W. & Schramm, H. (2007b). Emotionen und Emotionsregulation bei der Medienrezeption aus appraisaltheoretischer Perspektive. In S. Trepte & E. H. Witte (Hrsg.), Sozialpsychologie und Medien – Beiträge des 22. Hamburger Symposions zur Methodologie der Sozialpsychologie (S. 35-59). Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  38. Wirth, W. & Schramm, H. (2007a). Emotionen, Metaemotionen und Regulationsstrategien bei der Medienrezeption: Ein integratives Modell. In W. Wirth, H.-J. Stiehler & C. Wünsch (Hrsg.), Dynamisch-transaktional denken. Theorie und Empirie der Kommunikationswissenschaft (S. 153–184). Köln: Herbert von Halem Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  39. Wirth, W. & Schramm, H. (2005). Media and emotions. Communication Research Trends, 24(3), 3–39. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  40. Wirth, W., Matthes, J., Schemer, C., Wettstein, M., Friemel, T., Hänggli, R. & Siegert, G. (2010). Agenda building and setting in a referendum campaign: Investigating the flow of arguments among campaigners, the media, and the public. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 87(2), 328–345. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  41. Wirth, W. & Kühne, R. (2013). Grundlagen der Persuasionsforschung: Konzepte, Theorien und zentrale Einflussfaktoren. In W. Schweiger & A. Fahr (Hrsg.), Handbuch Medienwirkungsforschung (S. 313–332). Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  42. Wirth, W. (2013b). Grundlagen emotionaler Medienwirkungen. In W. Schweiger & A. Fahr (Hrsg.), Handbuch Medienwirkungsforschung (S. 227–246). Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  43. Wirth, W. (2013a). Emotion. In C. Wünsch, H. Schramm, V. Gehrau & H. Bilandzic (Hrsg.), Handbuch Medienrezeption. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  44. Slater, M. D. & Rouner, D. (2002). Entertainment-education and elaboration likelihood: Understanding the processing of narrative persuasion. Communication Theory, 12(2), 173–191. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  45. Smith, C. A. & Lazarus, R. S. (1990). Emotion and adaptation. In L. A. Pervin (Hrsg.), Handbook of personality. Theory and research (S. 609–637). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  46. Smith, C. A. & Kirby, L. D. (2009). Putting appraisal in context: Toward a relational model of appraisal and emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 23(7), 1352–1372. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  47. Smith, C. A. & Kirby, L. D. (2001b). Toward delivering on the promise of appraisal theory. In K. R. Scherer, A. Schorr & T. Johnstone (Hrsg.), Appraisal processes in emotion. Theory, methods, research (S. 121–138). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  48. Smith, C. A. & Kirby, L. D. (2001a). Affect and cognitive appraisal processes. In J. P. Forgas (Hrsg.), Handbook of affect and social cognition (S. 75–92). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  49. Smith, C. A. & Kirby, L. D. (2000). Consequences require antecedents: Toward a process model of emotion elicitation. In J. P. Forgas (Hrsg.), Feeling and thinking. The role of affect in social cognition (S. 83-106). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  50. Smith, C. A. & Ellsworth, P. C. (1985). Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(4), 813–838. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  51. Small, D. A., Lerner, J. S. & Fischhoff, B. (2006). Emotion priming and attributions for terrorism: Americans' reactions in a national field experiment. Political Psychology, 27(2), 289–298. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  52. Small, D. A. & Lerner, J. S. (2008). Emotional policy: Personal sadness and anger shape judgments about a welfare case. Political Psychology, 29(2), 149–168. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  53. Slothuus, R. (2008). More than weighting cognitive importance: A dual-process model of issue framing effects. Political Psychology, 29(1), 1–28. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  54. Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 3–22. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  55. Smith, E. R. & DeCoster, J. (2000). Dual-process models in social and cognitive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(2), 108–131. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  56. Skitka, L. J. & Tetlock, P. E. (1993). Providing public assistance: Cognitive and motivational processes underlying liberal and conservative policy preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(6), 1205–1223. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  57. Simon, A. & Xenos, M. (2000). Media framing and effective public deliberation. Political Communication, 17(4), 363–376. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  58. Siemer, M., Mauss, I. & Gross, J. J. (2007). Same situation – different emotions: How appraisals shape our emotions. Emotion, 7(3), 592–600. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  59. Siegert, G. & von Rimscha, B. (2013). Economic bases of communication. In P. Cobley & P. J. Schulz (Hrsg.), Theories and models of communication (S. 123–146). Berlin: De Gruyter. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  60. Shoemaker, P. J., Eichholz, M., Kim, E. & Wrigley, B. (2001). Individual and Routine Forces in gatekeeping. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 78(2), 233–246. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  61. Shiv, B. (2007). Emotions, decisions, and the brain. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(3), 174–178. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  62. Shen, F., Lee, S. Y., Sipes, C. & Hu, F. (2012). Effects of media framing of obesity among adolescents. Communication Research Reports, 29(1), 26–33. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  63. Shen, L. & Dillard, J. P. (2007). The influence of behavioral inhibition/approach systems and message framing on the processing of persuasive health messages. Communication Research, 34(4), 433–467. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  64. Shen, F. (2004). Chronic accessibility and individual cognitions: Examining the effects of message frames in political advertisements. Journal of Communication, 54(1), 123–137. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  65. Sheafer, T. (2007). How to evaluate it: The role of story-evaluative tone in agenda setting and priming. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 21–39. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  66. Steinmetz, H., Schmidt, P., Tinah-Booh, A., Wieczorek, S. & Schwartz, S. H. (2009). Testing measurement invariance using multigroup CFA: Differences between educational groups in human values measurement. Quality & Quantity, 43(4), 599–616. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  67. Trepte, S. & Wirth, W. (2004). Kommunikationswissenschaftliche Experimentalforschung im Spannungsverhältnis zwischen interner und externer Validität. In W. Wirth, E. Lauf & A. Fahr (Hrsg.), Forschungslogik und -design in der Kommunikationswissenschaft. Einführung, Problematisierung und Aspekte der Methodenlogik aus kommunikationswissenschaftlicher Perspektive (S. 60–87). Köln: Herbert von Halem Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  68. Tong, E. M. W. (2010). The sufficiency and necessity of appraisals for negative emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 24(4), 692–701. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  69. Tiedens, L. Z. & Linton, S. (2001). Judgment under emotional certainty and uncertainty: The effects of specific emotions on information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 973–988. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  70. Thurstone, L. L. (1928). Attitudes can be measured. The American Journal of Sociology, 33(4), 529–554. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  71. Thompson, S. & Hoggett, P. (2001). The emotional dynamics of deliberative democracy. Policy & Politics, 29(3), 351–364. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  72. Tewksbury, D., Jones, J., Peske, M. W., Raymond, A. & Vig, W. (2000). The interaction of news and advocate frames: Manipulating audience perceptions of a local public policy issue. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(4), 804–829. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  73. Taylor-Gooby, P. (2012). Root and branch restructuring to achieve major cuts: The social policy programme of the 2010 UK coalition government. Social Policy & Administration, 46(1), 61–82. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  74. Tankard, J. W. (2001). The empirical approach to the study of media framing. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy & A. E. Grant (Hrsg.), Framing public life. Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (S. 95–106). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  75. Takeshita, T. (2006). Current critical problems in agenda-setting research. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18(3), 275–296. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  76. Strack, F. & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(3), 220–247. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  77. Semetko, H. A. & Valkenburg, P. M. (2000). Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 93–109. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  78. Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M. & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(1), 78–90. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  79. Steenbergen, M. R., Bächtiger, A., Spörndli, M. & Steiner, J. (2003). Measuring political deliberation: A discourse quality index. Comparative European Politics, 1(1), 21–48. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  80. Stapel, D. A., Koomen, W. & Zeelenberg, M. (1998). The impact of accuracy motivation on interpretation, comparison, and correction processes: Accuracy × knowledge accessibility effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(4), 878–893. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  81. Stangor, C. (1990). Arousal, accessibility of trait constructs and person perception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26(4), 305–321. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  82. Spence, L. K. (2010). Episodic frames, HIV/AIDS, and African American public opinion. Political Research Quarterly, 63(2), 257–268. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  83. Snow, D. A. & Benford, R. D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participation mobilization. In B. Klandermans, H. Kriesi & S. Tarrow (Hrsg.), International social movement research. A research annual (Band 1, S. 197–217). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  84. Sniderman, P. M. & Theriault, S. M. (2004). The structure of political argument and the logic of issue framing. In W. E. Saris & P. M. Sniderman (Hrsg.), Studies in public opinion. Attitudes, nonattitudes, measurement error, and change (S. 133–165). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  85. Smith, T. W., Glazer, K., Ruiz, J. M. & Gallo, L. C. (2004). Hostility, anger, aggressiveness, and coronary heart disease: An interpersonal perspective on personality, emotion, and health. Journal of Personality, 72(6), 1217–1270. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  86. Smith, E. R. & Neumann, R. (2005). Emotion processes considered from the perspective of dual-process models. In L. Feldman Barrett, P. M. Niedenthal & P. Winkielman (Hrsg.), Emotion and consciousness (S. 287–311). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  87. Aarøe, L. (2011). Investigating frame strength: The case of episodic and thematic frames. Political Communication, 28(2), 207–226. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  88. Abele-Brehm, A. & Brehm, W. (1986). Zur Konzeptualisierung und Messung von Befindlichkeit: Die Entwicklung der "Befindlichkeitsskalen" (BFS). Diagnostica, 32(3), 209–228. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  89. Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  90. Albarracín, D. & Kumkale, T. G. (2003). Affect as information in persuasion: A model of affect identification and discounting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 453–469. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  91. Anderson, C. A. (1997). Effects of violent movies and trait hostility on hostile feelings and aggressive thoughts. Aggressive Behavior, 23(3), 161–178. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  92. Anderson, J. C. & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  93. Appel, M. (2008). Manche mögen’s heiss: Ergebnisse der deutschsprachigen Version eines Instruments zur Erfassung des Emotionsmotivs (need for emotion/need for affect). Diagnostica, 54(1), 2–15. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  94. Arbuckle, J. L. (2012). IBM SPSS Amos 21 User’s Guide. Chicago, IL: IBM Software Group. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  95. Arnold, M. B. (1960). Emotion and personality. Volume 1: psychological aspects. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  96. Avnet, T., Pham, M. T. & Stephen, A. T. (2012). Consumers’ trust in feelings as information. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 720–735. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  97. Baden, C. (2010). Communication, contextualization, & cognition: Patterns & processes of frames' influence on people's interpretations of the EU constitution. Delft: Eburon Academic Publishers. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  98. Baden, C. & Lecheler, S. (2012). Fleeting, fading, or far-reaching? A knowledge-based model of the persistence of framing effects. Communication Theory, 22(4), 359–382. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  99. Balmas, M. & Sheafer, T. (2010). Candidate image in election campaigns: Attribute agenda setting, affective priming, and voting intentions. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 22(2), 204–229. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  100. Bantimaroudis, P. & Ban, H. (2001). Covering the crisis in Somalia: Framing choices by the New York Times and the Manchester Guardian. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy & A. E. Grant (Hrsg.), Framing public life. Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (S. 175–184). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  101. Barnett, B. (2005). Feminists shaping news: A framing analysis of news releases from the national organization for women. Journal of Public Relations Research, 17(4), 341–362. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  102. Bartsch, A., Vorderer, P., Mangold, R. & Viehoff, R. (2008). Appraisal of emotions in media use: Toward a process model of meta-emotion and emotion regulation. Media Psychology, 11(1), 7–27. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  103. Baumann, K., Kessler, H. & Linden, M. (2005). Die Messung von Emotionen. Verhaltenstherapie und Verhaltensmedizin, 26(2), 169–197. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  104. Benford, R. D. & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–639. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  105. Berger, C. R., Roloff, M. E. & Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R. (2010). What is communication science? In C. R. Berger, M. E. Roloff & D. R. Roskos-Ewoldsen (Hrsg.), The handbook of communication science (2. Auflage, S. 3–20). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  106. Berkowitz, L. & Harmon-Jones, E. (2004). Toward an understanding of the determinants of anger. Emotion, 4(2), 107–130. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  107. Berry, W. D. (1993). Understanding regression assumptions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  108. Betancourt, H. & Blair, I. (1992). A cognition (attribution)-emotion model of violence in conflict situations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(3), 343–350. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  109. Bilandzic, H. & Busselle, R. (2013). Narrative persuasion. In J. P. Dillard & L. Shen (Hrsg.), The SAGE handbook of persuasion. Developments in theory and practice (2. Auflage, S. 200–219). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  110. Bizer, G. Y. & Krosnick, J. A. (2001). Exploring the structure of strength-related attitude features: The relation between attitude importance and attitude accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(4), 566–586. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  111. Blanchette, I. & Richards, A. (2010). The influence of affect on higher level cognition: A review of research on interpretation, judgment, decision making and reasoning. Cognition and Emotion, 24(4), 561–595. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  112. Bless, H., Mackie, D. M. & Schwarz, N. (1992). Mood effects on attitude judgments: Independent effects of mood before and after message elaboration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 585–595. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  113. Blumler, J. G. & Kavanagh, D. (1999). The third age of political communication: Influences and features. Political Communication, 16(3), 209–230. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  114. Böcking, S. (2008). Grenzen der Fiktion? Von Suspension of Disbelief zu einer Toleranztheorie für die Filmrezeption. Köln: Herbert von Halem Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  115. Böcking, T. (2009). Strategisches Framing: Gesellschaftliche Akteure und ihre Einflussnahmeversuche auf die mediale Debatte über die embryonale Stammzellforschung in Deutschland. Köln: Herbert von Halem Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  116. Bodenhausen, G. V. (1992). Information-processing functions of generic knowledge structures and their role in context effects in social judgment. In N. Schwarz & S. Sudman (Hrsg.), Context effects in social and psychological research (S. 267–277). New York, NY: Springer. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  117. Bodenhausen, G. V., Macrae, C. N. & Hugenberg, K. (2003). Social cognition. In T. Millon, M. J. Lerner & I. B. Weiner (Hrsg.), Handbook of psychology. Personality and social psychology (S. 257–282). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  118. Bodenhausen, G. V., Mussweiler, T., Gabriel, S. & Moreno, K. N. (2001). Affective influences on stereotyping and intergroup relations. In J. P. Forgas (Hrsg.), Handbook of affect and social cognition (S. 319–343). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  119. Bodenhausen, G. V., Sheppard, L. A. & Kramer, G. P. (1994). Negative affect and social judgment: The differential impact of anger and sadness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24(1), 45–62. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  120. Bohner, G. & Dickel, N. (2011). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 391–417. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  121. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  122. Booth-Butterfield, M. & Booth-Butterfield, S. (1990). Conceptualizing affect as information in communication production. Human Communication Research, 16(4), 451–476. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  123. Booth‐Butterfield, M. & Booth-Butterfield, S. (1994). The affective orientation to communication: Conceptual and empirical distinctions. Communication Quarterly, 42(4), 331–344. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  124. Borah, P. (2011). Conceptual issues in framing theory: A systematic examination of a decade's literature. Journal of Communication, 61(2), 246–263. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  125. Bortz, J. & Döring, N. (2006). Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler (4. Auflage). Heidelberg: Springer. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  126. Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36(2), 129–148. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  127. Brader, T. (2005). Striking a responsive chord: How political ads motivate and persuade voters by appealing to emotions. American Journal of Political Science, 49(2), 388–405. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  128. Bradley, B. P., Mogg, K. & Lee, S. C. (1997). Attentional biases for negative information in induced and naturally occurring dysphoria. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35(10), 911–927. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  129. Brambor, T., Clark, W. R. & Golder, M. (2006). Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis, 14(1), 63–82. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  130. Breckler, S. J. (1984). Empirical validation of affect, behavior, and cognition as distinct components of attitude. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(6), 1191–1205. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  131. Brewer, P. R. (2001). Value words and lizard brains: Do citizens deliberate about appeals to their core values? Political Psychology, 22(1), 45–64. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  132. Brewer, P. R., Graf, J. & Willnat, L. (2003). Priming or framing: Media influence on attitudes toward foreign countries. Gazette: The International Journal for Communication Studies, 65(6), 493–508. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  133. Brewer, P. R. & Gross, K. (2001). Studying the effects of framing on public opinion about policy issues: Does what we see depend on how we look? In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy & A. E. Grant (Hrsg.), Framing public life. Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (S. 159–186). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  134. British general election of 2010 (2013). In Encyclopædia Britannica. Abgerufen von http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/1664742/British-general-election-of-2010 (21.12.13). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  135. Brosius, H.-B. & Eps, P. (1993). Verändern Schlüsselereignisse journalistische Selektionskriterien? Framing am Beispiel der Berichterstattung über Anschläge gegen Ausländer und Asylanten. Rundfunk und Fernsehen, 41(4), 512–530. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  136. Brosius, H.-B. & Rossmann, C. (2012). Experiment und Inhaltsanalyse: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen ihrer Kombination. In W. Loosen & A. Scholl (Hrsg.), Methodenkombinationen in der Kommunikationswissenschaft. Methodologische Herausforderungen und empirische Praxis (S. 246–261). Köln: Herbert von Halem Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  137. Brosius, H.-B. & Weimann, G. (1996). Who sets the agenda? Agenda-setting as a two-step flow. Communication Research, 23(5), 561–580. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  138. Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  139. Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  140. Bulkow, K. & Schweiger, W. (2013). Agenda Setting: Zwischen gesellschaftlichem Phänomen und individuellem Prozess. In W. Schweiger & A. Fahr (Hrsg.), Handbuch Medienwirkungsforschung (S. 171–190). Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  141. Bulkow, K., Urban, J. & Schweiger, W. (2013). The duality of agenda-setting: The role of information processing. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25(1), 43–63. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  142. Burdein, I., Lodge, M. & Taber, C. (2006). Experiments on the Automaticity of Political Beliefs and Attitudes. Political Psychology, 27(3), 359–371. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  143. Burkholder, G. J. & Harlow, L. L. (2003). An illustration of a longitudinal cross-lagged design for larger structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 10(3), 465–486. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  144. Bushman, B. J. (1998). Priming effects of media violence on the accessibility of aggressive constructs in memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(5), 537–545. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  145. Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2. Auflage). New York, NY: Routledge. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  146. Callaghan, K. & Schnell, F. (2001). Assessing the democratic debate: How the news media frame elite policy discourse. Political Communication, 18(2), 183–213. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  147. Cappella, J. N. & Jamieson, K. H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  148. Carrera, P. & Oceja, L. (2007). Drawing mixed emotions: Sequential or simultaneous experiences? Cognition & Emotion, 21(2), 422–441. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  149. Cavanaugh, L. A., Bettman, J. R., Luce, M. F. & Payne, J. W. (2007). Appraising the appraisal-tendency framework. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(3), 169–173. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  150. Ceulemans, E., Kuppens, P. & van Mechelen, I. (2012). Capturing the structure of distinct types of individual differences in the situation-specific experience of emotions: The case of anger. European Journal of Personality, 26(5), 484–495. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  151. Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 752–766. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  152. Chaiken, S. & Stangor, C. (1987). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 575–630. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  153. Chang, C. (2008). Ad framing effects for consumption products: An affect priming process. Psychology and Marketing, 25(1), 24–46. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  154. Chen, F. F. (2008). What happens if we compare chopsticks with forks? The impact of making inappropriate comparisons in cross-cultural research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(5), 1005–1018. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  155. Chen, S. & Chaiken, S. (1999). The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Hrsg.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (S. 73–96). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  156. Cheung, G. W. & Rensvold, R. B. (1999). Testing factorial invariance across groups: A reconceptualization and proposed new method. Journal of Management, 25(1), 1–27. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  157. Cho, H. & Boster, F. J. (2008). Effects of gain versus loss frame antidrug ads on adolescents. Journal of Communication, 58(3), 428–446. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  158. Cho, J., Boyle, M. P., Keum, H., Shevy, M. D., McLeod, D. M., Shah, D. V. & Pan, Z. (2003). Media, terrorism, and emotionality: Emotional differences in media content and public reactions to the September 11th terrorist attacks. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 47(3), 309–327. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  159. Chong, D. & Druckman, J. N. (2007a). A theory of framing and opinion formation in competitive elite environments. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 99–118. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  160. Chong, D. & Druckman, J. N. (2007b). Framing public opinion in competitive democracies. American Political Science Review, 101(4), 637–655. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  161. Chong, D. & Druckman, J. N. (2007c). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 103–126. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  162. Christians, C. G., Glasser, T. L., McQuail, D., Nordenstreng, K. & White, R. A. (2009). Normative theories of the media: Journalism in democratic societies. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  163. Cialdini, R. B. & Kenrick, D. T. (1976). Altruism as hedonism: A social development perspective on the relationship of negative mood state and helping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(5), 907–914. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  164. Clark, M. S. (1982). A role for arousal in the link between feeling states, judgments, and behavior. In M. S. Clark & S. T. Fiske (Hrsg.), Affect and cognition. The seventeenth annual Carnegie Symposium on cognition (S. 263–289). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  165. Clore, G. L. & Colcombe, S. (2003). The parallel worlds of affective concepts and feelings. In J. Musch & K. C. Klauer (Hrsg.), The psychology of evaluation. Affective processes in cognition and emotion (S. 335–369). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  166. Clore, G. L. & Huntsinger, J. R. (2009). How the object of affect guides its impact. Emotion Review, 1(1), 39–54. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  167. Clore, G. L. & Schnall, S. (2005). The influence of affect on attitude. In D. Albarracín, B. T. Johnson & M. P. Zanna (Hrsg.), The handbook of attitudes (S. 437–489). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  168. Cobb, M. D. (2005). Framing effects on public opinion about nanotechnology. Science Communication, 27(2), 221–239. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  169. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G. & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3. Auflage). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  170. Cole, D. A. & Maxwell, S. E. (2003). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(4), 558–577. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  171. Coleman, R., Thorson, E., & Wilkins, L. (2011). Testing the effect of framing and sourcing in health news stories. Journal of Health Communication, 16(9), 941–954. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  172. Collins, A. M. & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82(6), 407–428. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  173. Coxe, S., West, S. G. & Aiken, L. S. (2009). The analysis of count data: A gentle introduction to poisson regression and its alternatives. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(2), 121–136. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  174. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  175. Cunningham, F. (2002). Theories of democracy: A critical introduction. London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  176. Curran, P. J., West, S. G. & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 16–29. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  177. Dahinden, U. (2006). Framing: Eine integrative Theorie der Massenkommunikation. Konstanz: UVK. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  178. Dalbert, C. (1992). Subjektives Wohlbefinden junger Erwachsener: Theoretische und empirische Analysen der Struktur und Stabilität. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 13(4), 207–220. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  179. Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes' error. New York, NY: Putnam's Sons. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  180. D'Angelo, P. (2002). News framing as a multiparadigmatic research program: A response to Entman. Journal of Communication, 52(4), 870–888. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  181. D'Angelo, P. (2012). Studying framing in political communication with an integrative approach. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(3), 353–364. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  182. Das, E., Bushman, B. J., Bezemer, M. D., Kerkhof, P. & Vermeulen, I. E. (2009). How terrorism news reports increase prejudice against outgroups: A terror management account. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(3), 453–459. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  183. de Vreese, C. H. (2003). Framing Europe: Television news and European integration. Amsterdam: Aksant Academic Publishers. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  184. de Vreese, C. H. (2005). News framing: Theory and typology. Information Design Journal + Document Design, 13(1), 51–62. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  185. de Vreese, C. H., Boomgaarden, H. G. & Semetko, H. A. (2011). (In)direct framing effects: The effects of news media framing on public support for Turkish membership in the European Union. Communication Research, 38(2), 179–205. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  186. de Vreese, C. & Boomgaarden, H. (2003). Valenced news frames and public support for the EU. Communications, 28(4), 361–381. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  187. de Vreese, C. & Elenbaas, M. (2008). Media in the game of politics: Strategic metacoverage on political cynicism. International Journal of Press/Politics, 13(3), 285–309. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  188. de Wied, M., Zillmann, D. & Ordman, V. (1995). The role of empathic distress in the enjoyment of cinematic tragedy. Poetics, 23(1–2), 91–106. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  189. Dernbach, B. (2000). Themen der Publizistik — Wie entsteht die Agenda öffentlicher Kommunikation? Publizistik, 45(1), 38–50. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  190. DeSteno, D., Petty, R. E., Rucker, D. D., Wegener, D. T. & Braverman, J. (2004). Discrete emotions and persuasion: The role of emotion-induced expectancies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(1), 43–56. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  191. Dimitrova, D. V. & Strömbäck, J. (2005). Mission accomplished? Framing of the Iraq war in the elite newspapers in Sweden and the United States. International Communication Gazette, 67(5), 399–417. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  192. Domke, D., Shah, D. V. & Wackman, D. B. (1998). Media priming effects: Accessibility, association, and activation. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 10(1), 51–74. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  193. Döveling, K. & Sommer, D. (2008). Social Appraisal in der dynamischen Transaktion: Emotionale Aushandlungsprozesse und ihre komplexe Dynamik. In C. Wünsch, W. Früh & V. Gehrau (Hrsg.), Integrative Modelle in der Rezeptions- und Wirkungsforschung. Dynamische und transaktionale Perspektiven. Reihe Rezeptionsforschung Band 14 (S. 173–196). München: Verlag Reinhard Fischer. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  194. Druckman, J. N. (2001a). On the limits of framing effects: Who can frame? The Journal of Politics, 63(4), 1041–1066. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  195. Druckman, J. N. (2001b). The implications of framing effects for citizen competence. Political Behavior, 23(3), 225–256. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  196. Druckman, J. N. (2004). Political preference formation: Competition, deliberation, and the (ir)relevance of framing effects. American Political Science Review, 98(4), 671–686. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  197. Druckman, J. N. & McDermott, R. (2008). Emotion and the framing of risky choice. Political Behavior, 30(3), 297–321. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  198. Druckman, J. N. & Nelson, K. R. (2003). Framing and deliberation: How citizens' conversations limit elite influence. American Journal of Political Science, 47(4), 729–745. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  199. Eagly, A. H. & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  200. Eagly, A. H. & Chaiken, S. (2007). The advantages of an inclusive definition of attitude. Social Cognition, 25(5), 582–602. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  201. Edelstein, A. S. (1993). Thinking about the criterion variable in agenda-setting research. Journal of Communication, 43(2), 85–99. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  202. Edy, J. A. & Meirick, P. C. (2007). Wanted, dead or alive: Media frames, frame adoption, and support for the war in Afghanistan. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 119–141. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  203. Eichhorn, W. (2005). Agenda-Setting-Prozesse: Eine theoretische Analyse individueller und gesellschaftlicher Themenstrukturierung (2. Auflage). München: Verlag Reinhard Fischer. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  204. Eid, M. & Diener, E. (2001). Norms for experiencing emotions in different cultures: Inter- and intranational differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(5), 869–885. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  205. Eilders, C. (1997). Nachrichtenfaktoren und Rezeption: Eine empirische Analyse zur Auswahl und Verarbeitung politischer Information. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  206. Elenbaas, M. & de Vreese, C. (2008). The effects of strategic news on political cynicism and vote choice among young voters. Journal of Communication, 58(3), 550–567. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  207. Ellsworth, P. C. & Scherer, K. R. (2003). Appraisal processes in emotion. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer & H. H. Goldsmith (Hrsg.), Handbook of affective sciences (S. 572–595). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  208. Enders, C. K. (2001). A Primer on maximum likelihood algorithms available for use with missing data. Structural Equation Modeling, 8(1), 128–141. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  209. Enders, C. K. & Bandalos, D. L. (2001). The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 8(3), 430–457. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  210. Engelmann, I. (2009). Frames und Positionen zur EU-Osterweiterung: Eine Argument- und Framing-Analyse ausgewählter EU-Beitritte. Publizistik, 54(1), 82–102. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  211. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  212. Entman, R. M. (2003). Cascading activation: Contesting the White House's frame after 9/11. Political Communication, 20(4), 415–432. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  213. Entman, R. M. (2004). Projections of power: Framing news, public opinion, and U.S. foreign policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  214. Entman, R. M. (2007). Framing bias: Media in the distribution of power. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 163–173. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  215. Entman, R. M., Matthes, J. & Pellicano, L. (2009). Nature, sources, and effects of news framing. In K. Wahl-Jorgensen & T. Hanitzsch (Hrsg.), The Handbook of Journalism Studies (S. 175–190). New York, NY: Routledge. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  216. Epstein, S. (1990). Cognitive-experiential self-theory. In L. A. Pervin (Hrsg.), Handbook of personality. Theory and research (S. 165–192). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  217. Eysenck, M. W. & Keane, M. T. (2010). Cognitive psychology: A student's handbook (6. Auflage). Hove: Psychology Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  218. Fabrigar, L. R., MacDonald, T. K. & Wegener, D. T. (2005). The structure of attitudes. In D. Albarracín, B. T. Johnson & M. P. Zanna (Hrsg.), The handbook of attitudes (S. 79–124). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  219. Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C. & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  220. Fahr, A. & Hofer, M. (2013). Psychophysiologische Messmethoden. In W. Möhring & D. Schlütz (Hrsg.), Handbuch standardisierte Erhebungsverfahren in der Kommunikationswissenschaft (S. 347–365). Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  221. Fazio, R. H. (2001). On the automatic activation of associated evaluations: An overview. Cognition and Emotion, 15(2), 115–141. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  222. Fazio, R. H. & Olson, M. A. (2003). Attitudes: Foundations, functions, and consequences. In M. Hogg & J. M. Cooper (Hrsg.), The Sage handbook of social psychology (S. 139–160). London: Sage. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  223. Ferree, M. M., Gamson, W. A., Gerhards, J. & Rucht, D. (2002). Four models of the public sphere in modern democracies. Theory and Society, 31(3), 289–324. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  224. Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4. Auflage). London: Sage. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  225. Finch, J. F., West, S. G. & MacKinnon, D. P. (1997). Effects of sample size and nonnormality on the estimation of mediated effects in latent variable models. Structural Equation Modeling, 4(2), 87–107. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  226. Finkel, S. E. (1995). Causal analysis with panel data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  227. Fischhoff, B., Gonzalez, R. M., Lerner, J. S. & Small, D. A. (2005). Evolving judgments of terror risks: Foresight, hindsight, and emotion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11(2), 124–139. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  228. Forgas, J. P. (1983). What is social about social cognition? British Journal of Social Psychology, 22(2), 129–144. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  229. Forgas, J. P. (1995). Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin, 117(1), 39–66. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  230. Frazier, P. A., Tix, A. P. & Barron, K. E. (2004). Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51(1), 115–134. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  231. Frick, R. W. (1998). Interpreting statistical testing: Process and propensity, not population and random sampling. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 30(3), 527–535. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  232. Frijda, N. H. (1988). The laws of emotion. American Psychologist, 43(5), 349–358. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  233. Frijda, N. H. (1993). Moods, emotion episodes, and emotions. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland (Hrsg.), Handbook of emotions (S. 381–403). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  234. Frijda, N. H. & Mesquita, B. (2000). Beliefs through emotions. In N. H. Frijda, A. S. R. Manstead & S. Bem (Hrsg.), Emotions and beliefs. How feelings influence thoughts (S. 45–77). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  235. Früh, W. (2007). Inhaltsanalyse: Theorie und Praxis (6. Auflage). Konstanz: UVK. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  236. Galtung, J. & Ruge, M. H. (1965). The structure of foreign news: The presentation of the Congo, Cuba and Cyprus crises in four Norwegian newspapers. Journal of Peace Research, 2(1), 64–90. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  237. Gamson, W. A. & Modigliani, A. (1987). The changing culture of affirmative action. In R. G. Braungart & M. M. Braungart (Hrsg.), Research in political sociology. A research annual (Band 3, S. 137–177). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  238. Gault, B. A. & Sabini, J. (2000). The roles of empathy, anger, and gender in predicting attitudes towards punitive, reparative, and preventative public policies. Cognition and Emotion, 14(4), 495–520. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  239. Gawronski, B. & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 692–731. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  240. Gawronski, B. & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2007). Unraveling the processes underlying evaluation: Attitudes from the pespective of the APE model. Social Cognition, 25(5), 687–717. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  241. Gearhart, S., Craig, C. & Steed, C. (2012). Network news coverage of obesity in two time periods: An analysis of issues, sources, and frames. Health Communication, 27(7), 653–662. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  242. Geiser, C. (2011). Datenanalyse mit Mplus: Ein anwendungsorientierte Einführung (2. Auflage). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  243. Geneva Emotion Research Group. (2002). Genfer Appraisal Fragebogen (GAF): Format, Entwicklung und Einsatzmöglichkeiten. Genf: Universität Genf. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  244. Gerbner, G. & Gross, L. (1976). Living with television: The violence profile. Journal of Communication, 26(2), 172–194. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  245. Gerhards, J. (1997). Diskursive versus liberale Öffentlichkeit: Eine empirische Auseinandersetzung mit Jürgen Habermas. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 49(1), 1–34. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  246. Gerhards, J. & Neidhardt, F. (1990). Strukturen und Funktionen moderner Öffentlichkeit: Fragestellungen und Ansätze. Discussion Paper FS III 90–101, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  247. Gerhards, J. & Rucht, D. (1992). Mesomobilization: Organizing and framing in two protest campaigns in West Germany. American Journal of Sociology, 98(3), 555–595. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  248. Gerth, M. A. & Siegert, G. (2012). Patterns of consistence and constriction: How news media frame the coverage of direct democratic campaigns. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(3), 279–299. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  249. Giner-Sorolla, R. (1999). Affect in attitude: Immediate and deliberative perspectives. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Hrsg.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (S. 441–461). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  250. Girden, E. R. (1992). ANOVA: Repeated measures. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  251. Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making & unmaking of the new left. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  252. Gladstein, G. A. (1983). Understanding empathy: Integrating counseling, developmental, and social psychology perspectives. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 30(4), 467–482. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  253. Glass, G. V., Peckham, P. D. & Sanders, J. R. (1972). Consequences of failure to meet assumptions underlying the fixed effects analyses of variance and covariance. Review of Educational Research, 42(3), 237–288. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  254. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  255. Golan, G. & Wanta, W. (2001). Second-level agenda setting in the New Hampshire primary: A comparison of coverage in three newspapers and public perceptions of candidates. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 78(2), 247–259. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  256. Goldberg, J. H., Lerner, J. S. & Tetlock, P. E. (1999). Rage and reason: The psychology of the intuitive prosecutor. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29(5-6), 781–795. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  257. Goodall, C. E., Slater, M. D. & Myers, T. A. (2013). Fear and anger responses to local news coverage of alcohol-related crimes, accidents, and injuries: Explaining news effects on policy support using a representative sample of messages and people. Journal of Communication, 63(2), 373–392. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  258. Graham, J. M. (2006). Congeneric and (essentially) tau-equivalent estimates of score reliability: What they are and how to use them. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(6), 930–944. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  259. Gray, J. A. (1990). Brain systems that mediate both emotion and cognition. Cognition and Emotion, 4(3), 269–288. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  260. Greenwald, A. G., Banaji, M. R., Rudman, L. A., Farnham, S. D., Nosek, B. A. & Mellott, D. S. (2002). A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychological Review, 109(1), 3–25. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  261. Griskevicius, V., Shiota, M. N. & Neufeld, S. L. (2010). Influence of different positive emotions on persuasion processing: A functional evolutionary approach. Emotion, 10(2), 190–206. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  262. Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 271–299. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  263. Gross, K. (2008). Framing persuasive appeals: Episodic and thematic framing, emotional response, and policy opinion. Political Psychology, 29(2), 169–192. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  264. Gross, K. & Brewer, P. R. (2007). Sore losers: News frames, policy debates, and emotions. Press/Politics, 12(1), 122–133. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  265. Gross, K. & D'Ambrosio, L. (2004). Framing emotional response. Political Psychology, 25(1), 1–29. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  266. Habermas, J. (1998). Faktizität und Geltung: Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  267. Habermas, J. (1999). Die Einbeziehung des Anderen. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  268. Haddock, G. & Huskinson, T. L. H. (2004). Individual differences in attitude structure. In G. Haddock & G. R. Maio (Hrsg.), Contemporary perspectives on the psychology of attitudes (S. 36–56). Hove: Psychology Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  269. Hall, C. (2007). Recognizing the passion in deliberation: Toward a more democratic theory of deliberative democracy. Hypatia, 22(4), 81–95. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  270. Hänggli, R. (2012). Key factors in frame building. In H. Kriesi (Hrsg.), Political communication in direct democratic campaigns. Enlightening or manipulating? (S. 125–142). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  271. Hänggli, R., Bernhard, L. & Kriesi, H. (2012). Construction of frames. In H. Kriesi (Hrsg.), Political communication in direct democratic campaigns. Enlightening or manipulating? (S. 69–81). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  272. Han, S., Lerner, J. S. & Keltner, D. (2007). Feelings and consumer decision making: The appraisal-tendency-framework. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(3), 158–168. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  273. Harden, L. (2002). Rahmen der Orientierung: Eine Längsschnittanalyse von Frames in der Philosophieberichterstattung deutscher Qualitätsmedien. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  274. Harmon-Jones, E., Harmon-Jones, C., Amodio, D. M. & Gable, P. A. (2011). Attitudes toward emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(6), 1332–1350. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  275. Hart, P. S. (2011). One or many? The influence of episodic and thematic climate change frames on policy preferences and individual behavior change. Science Communication, 33(1), 28–51. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  276. Ha, S. (2011). Attribute priming effects and presidential candidate evaluation: The conditionality of political sophistication. Mass Communication and Society, 14(3), 315–342. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  277. Hastie, R. & Park, B. (1986). The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line. Psychological Review, 93(3), 258–268. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  278. Hayes, A. F. (2005). Statistical methods for communication science. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  279. Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millenium. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 408–420. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  280. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  281. Hayes, A. F. & Cai, L. (2007). Using heteroskedasticity-consistent standard error estimators in OLS regression: An introduction and software estimation. Behavior Research Methods, 39(4), 709–722. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  282. Hayes, A. F., Glynn, C. J. & Huge, M. E. (2012). Cautions regarding the interpretation of regression coefficients and hypothesis tests in linear models with interactions. Communication Methods and Measures, 6(1), 1–11. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  283. Hofer, M. & Wirth, W. (2012). It’s right to be sad: The role of meta-appraisals in the sad-film paradox - a multiple mediator model. Journal of Media Psychology, 24(2), 43–54. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  284. Hoggett, P. & Thompson, S. (2002). Toward a democracy of the emotions. Constellations, 9(1), 106–126. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  285. Holbert, R. L. & Stephenson, M. T. (2001). The importance of indirect effects on media effects research: Testing for mediation in structural equation modeling. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 47(4), 556–572. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  286. Holbert, R. L. & Stephenson, M. T. (2008). Commentary on the uses and misuses of structural equation modeling in communication research. In A. F. Hayes, M. D. Slater & L. B. Snyder (Hrsg.), The Sage sourcebook of advanced data analysis methods for communication research (S. 185–218). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  287. Holt, L. F. & Major, L. H. (2010). Frame and blame: An analysis of how national and local newspapers framed the Jena Six controversy. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 87(3–4), 582–597. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  288. Hove, T., Paek, H.-J., Isaacson, T. & Cole, R. T. (2013). Newspaper portrayals of child abuse: Frequency of coverage and frames of the issue. Mass Communication and Society, 16(1), 89–108. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  289. Hu, L. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  290. Hu, L.-t. & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  291. Igartua, J.-J., Moral-Toranzo, F. & Fernández, I. (2011). Cognitive, attitudinal, and emotional effects of news frame and group cues, on processing news about immigration. Journal of Media Psychology, 23(4), 174–185. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  292. Innes-Ker, Å. & Niedenthal, P. M. (2002). Emotion concepts and emotional states in social judgment and categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(4), 804–816. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  293. Iyengar, S. (1990). The accessibility bias in politics: Television news and public opinion. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 2(1), 1–15. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  294. Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  295. Iyengar, S. (1996). Framing responsibility for political issues. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 546(1), 59–70. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  296. Iyengar, S. & Kinder, D. R. (1987). News that matters: Television and American opinion. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  297. Iyengar, S., Kinder, D. R., Peters, M. D. & Krosnick, J. A. (1984). The evening news and presidential evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(4), 778–787. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  298. Iyengar, S. & Simon, A. (1993). News coverage of the gulf crisis and public opinion: A study of agenda-Setting, priming, and framing. Communication Research, 20(3), 365–383. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  299. Izard, C. E. (1993). Four systems for emotion activation: Cognitive and noncognitive processes. Psychological Review, 100(1), 68–90. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  300. Izard, C. E. (2009). Emotion theory and research: Highlights, unanswered questions, and emerging issues. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 1–25. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  301. Jackson, S. & Jacobs, S. (1983). Generalizing about messages: Suggestions for design and analysis of experiments. Human Communication Research, 9(2), 169–191. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  302. Jarvis, W. B. G. & Petty, R. E. (1996). The need to evaluate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(1), 172–194. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  303. Jonides, J., Lewis, R. L., Nee, D. E., Lustig, C. A., Berman, M. G. & Moore, K. S. (2008). The mind and brain of short-term memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 193–224. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  304. Joormann, J. & Gotlib, I. H. (2007). Selective attention to emotional faces following recovery from depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 116(1), 80–85. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  305. Keltner, D., Ellsworth, P. C. & Edwards, K. (1993). Beyond simple pessimism: Effects of sadness and anger on social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(5), 740–752. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  306. Kepplinger, H. M. (2001). Der Ereignisbegriff in der Publizistikwissenschaft. Publizistik, 46(2), 117–139. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  307. Kepplinger, H. M., Brosius, H.-B. & Staab, J. F. (1991). Opinion formation in mediated conflicts and crises: A theory of cognitive-affective media effects. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 3(2), 132–156. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  308. Kepplinger, H. M., Geiss, S. & Siebert, S. (2012). Framing scandals: Cognitive and emotional media effects. Journal of Communication, 62(4), 659–681. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  309. Kepplinger, H. M. & Maurer, M. (2001). Saldo oder Mittelwert? Eine vorläufige Antwort auf eine ungestellte Frage. In F. Marcinkowski (Hrsg.), Die Politik der Massenmedien. Heribert Schatz zum 65. Geburtstag (S. 166–180). Köln: Herbert von Halem Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  310. Kim, H. J. & Cameron, G. T. (2011). Emotions matter in crisis: The role of anger and sadness in the publics' response to crisis news framing and corporate crisis response. Communication Research, 38(6), 826–855. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  311. Kim, S.-H., Han, M. & Scheufele, D. A. (2010). Thinking about him this way: Priming, news media, and South Koreans' evaluation of the president. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 22(3), 299–319. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  312. Kincaid, D. L. (2002). Drama, emotion, and cultural convergence. Communication Theory, 12(2), 136–152. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  313. Kinder, D. R. (1998). Opinion and action in the realm of politics. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske & G. Lindzey (Hrsg.), The handbook of social psychology (4. Auflage, Band 2, S. 778–867). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  314. Kinder, D. R. (2007). Curmudgeonly advice. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 155–162. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  315. Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–182. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  316. Kiousis, S., Bantimaroudis, P. & Ban, H. (1999). Candidate image attributes: Experiments on the substantive dimension of second level agenda setting. Communication Research, 26(4), 414–428. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  317. Klapper, J. T. (1969). The effects of mass communication (10. Auflage). New York, NY: The Free Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  318. Kleinginna, P. R. & Kleinginna, A. M. (1981). A categorized list of emotion definitions, with suggestions for a consensual definition. Motivation and Emotion, 5(4), 345–379. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  319. Klimmt, C. & Weber, R. (2013). Das Experiment in der Kommunikationswissenschaft. In W. Möhring & D. Schlütz (Hrsg.), Handbuch standardisierte Erhebungsverfahren in der Kommunikationswissenschaft (S. 125–144). Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  320. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3. Auflage). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  321. Knobloch, S., Patzig, G., Mende, A.-M. & Hastall, M. (2004). Affective news: Effects of discourse structure in narratives on suspense, curiosity, and enjoyment while reading news and novels. Communication Research, 31(3), 259–287. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  322. Kriesi, H. (2012). Political communication: An integrated approach. In H. Kriesi (Hrsg.), Political communication in direct democratic campaigns. Enlightening or manipulating? (S. 1–16). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  323. Kromrey, H. (1998). Empirische Sozialforschung: Modelle und Methoden der Datenerhebung und Datenauswertung (8. Auflage). Opladen: Leske + Budrich. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  324. Kromrey, H. (2009). Empirische Sozialforschung: Modelle und Methoden der standardisierten Datenerhebung und Datenauswertung (12. Auflage). Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  325. Krosnick, J. A. & Brannon, L. A. (1993). The impact of the Gulf War on the ingredients of presidential evaluations: Multidimensional effects of political involvement. American Political Science Review, 87(4), 963–975. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  326. Krosnick, J. A., Judd, C. M. & Wittenbrink, B. (2005). The measurement of attitudes. In D. Albarracín, B. T. Johnson & M. P. Zanna (Hrsg.), The handbook of attitudes (S. 21–76). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  327. Krosnick, J. A. & Kinder, D. R. (1990). Altering the foundations of support for the president through priming. American Political Science Review, 84(2), 497–512. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  328. Kuhlmann, C. (2007). Die vieldimensionale Welt: Themenanalysen und das Problem der Kommunikationswissenschaft mit der Realität. In W. Wirth, H.-J. Stiehler & C. Wünsch (Hrsg.), Dynamisch-transaktional denken. Theorie und Empirie der Kommunikationswissenschaft (S. 126–152). Köln: Herbert von Halem Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  329. Kühne, R. (2010). Dem Zufall auf der Spur: Zur Verwendung statistischer Testverfahren bei Convenience-Samples und Vollerhebungen. In N. Jackob, T. Zerback, O. Jandura & M. Maurer (Hrsg.), Das Internet als Forschungsinstrument und -gegenstand in der Kommunikationswissenschaft (S. 227–245). Köln: Herbert von Halem Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  330. Kühne, R. (2012). Media-induced affects and opinion formation: How related and unrelated affects influence political opinions. Living Reviews in Democracy, 3. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  331. Kühne, R. (2013a). Emotionale Framing-Effekte auf Einstellungen: Ein integratives Modell. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 61(1), 5–20. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  332. Kühne, R. (2013b). Konzeptspezifikation und Messung. In W. Möhring & D. Schlütz (Hrsg.), Handbuch standardisierte Erhebungsverfahren in der Kommunikationswissenschaft (S. 23–40). Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  333. Kühne, R. (2013c). Testing measurement invariance in media psychological research. Journal of Media Psychology, 25(4), 153–159. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  334. Kühne, R. (2014). Emotionale Wirkungen von Kommunikatoren- und Journalisten-Frames. In W. Loosen & M. Dohle (Hrsg.), Journalismus und (sein) Publikum. Schnittstellen zwischen Journalismusforschung und Rezeptions- und Wirkungsforschung (S. 301–316). Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  335. Kühne, R. & Schemer, C. (2013). The emotional effects of news frames on information processing and opinion formation. Communication Research. Advance online publication. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  336. Kühne, R., Schemer, C. & Matthes, J. (2012). Messinvarianz in der komparativen Forschung: Eine Bestandsaufnahme. In B. Stark, M. Magin, O. Jandura & M. Maurer (Hrsg.), Methodische Herausforderungen komparativer Forschungsansätze (S. 238–257). Köln: Herbert von Halem Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  337. Kühne, R., Schemer, C., Matthes, J. & Wirth, W. (2011). Affective priming in political campaigns: How campaign-induced emotions prime political opinions. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 23(4), 485–507. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  338. Kühne, R., Sommer, K. & Weber, P. (in Druck). Kognitive und emotionale Framing-Effekte auf Einstellungen: Überlegungen zur Relevanz der Untersuchung von Mediationsprozessen und eine empirische Überprüfung. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  339. Kühne, R., Weber, P. & Sommer, K. (in Druck). Beyond cognitive framing processes: Anger mediates the effects of responsibility framing on the preference for punitive measures. Journal of Communication. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  340. Kuppens, P. & Tong, E. M. W. (2010). An appraisal account of individual differences in emotional experience. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(12), 1138–1150. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  341. Kuppens, P., van Mechelen, I., Smits, D. J. M. & De Boeck, P. (2003). The appraisal basis of anger: Specificity, necessity, and sufficiency of components. Emotion, 2(3), 254–269. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  342. Lang, A. (2013). Discipline in crisis? The shifting paradigm of mass communication research. Communication Theory, 23(1), 10–24. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  343. Lang, A., Bolls, P., Potter, R. F. & Kawahara, K. (1999). The effects of production pacing and arousing content on the information processing of television messages. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 43(4), 451–475. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  344. Lang, A. & Ewoldsen, D. R. (2011). The measurement of positive and negative affect in media research. In K. Döveling, C. von Scheve & E. A. Konijn (Hrsg.), The Routledge handbook of emotions and mass media (S. 79–98). London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  345. Lang, A., Zhou, S., Schwartz, N., Bolls, P. D. & Potter, R. F. (2000). The effects of edits on arousal, attention, and memory for television messages: When an edit is an edit can an edit be too much? Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(1), 94–109. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  346. Lau, R. R., Smith, R. A. & Fiske, S. T. (1991). Political beliefs, policy interpretations, and political persuasion. The Journal of Politics, 53(3), 644–675. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  347. Laurent, S. M., Clark, B. A. M., Walker, S. & Wiseman, K. D. (2014). Punishing hypocrisy: The roles of hypocrisy and moral emotions in deciding culpability and punishment of criminal and civil moral transgressors. Cognition & Emotion, 28(1), 59–83. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  348. Laux, L., Glanzmann, P., Schaffner, P. & Spielberger, C. D. (1981). Das State-Trait-Angstinventar: Theoretische Grundlagen und Handanweisung. Weinheim: Beltz Test. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  349. Lazarus, R. S. (1984). On the primacy of cognition. American Psychologist, 39(2), 124–129. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  350. Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion & adaptation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  351. Lecheler, S. & de Vreese, C. H. (2010). Framing Serbia: The effects of news framing on public support for EU enlargement. European Political Science Review, 2(1), 73–93. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  352. Lecheler, S. & de Vreese, C. H. (2012). News framing and public opinion: A mediation analysis of framing effects on political attitudes. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 89(2), 185–204. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  353. Lecheler, S., de Vreese, C. & Slothuus, R. (2009). Issue importance as a moderator of framing effects. Communication Research, 36(3), 400–425. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  354. Lecheler, S., Schuck, A. R. T. & de Vreese, C. H. (2013). Dealing with feelings: Positive and negative discrete emotions as mediators of news framing effects. Communications, 38(2), 189–209. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  355. Lecheler, S., Schuck, A. R. T., de Vreese, C. H., Nelson, T. E. & de Lange, M. (2012). Happy go lucky: Mood as moderator of political news framing effects. Paper presented at the 2012 annual meetings of the International Communication Association (ICA), Phoenix, AZ, Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  356. LeDoux, J. E. (1999). The emotional brain: The mysterious underpinnings of emotional life. London: Phoenix. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  357. Lench, H. C., Flores, S. A. & Bench, S. W. (2011). Discrete emotions predict changes in cognition, judgment, experience, behavior, and physiology: A meta-analysis of experimental emotion elicitations. Psychological Bulletin, 137(5), 834–855. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  358. Leonarz, M. (2006). Gentechnik im Fernsehen: Eine Framing-Analyse. Konstanz: UVK. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  359. Lerner, J. S., Goldberg, J. H. & Tetlock, P. E. (1998). Sober second thought: The effects of accountability, anger, and authoritarianism on attributions of responsibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(6), 563–574. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  360. Lerner, J. S., Gonzalez, R. M., Small, D. A. & Fischhoff, B. (2003). Effects of fear and anger on perceived risks of terrorism: A national field experiment. Psychological Science, 14(2), 144–150. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  361. Lerner, J. S., Han, S. & Keltner, D. (2007). Feelings and consumer decision making: Extending the appraisal-tendency framework. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(3), 181–187. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  362. Lerner, J. S. & Keltner, D. (2000). Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgment and choice. Cognition and Emotion, 14(4), 473–493. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  363. Lerner, J. S. & Keltner, D. (2001). Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 146–159. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  364. Lerner, J. S. & Tiedens, L. Z. (2006). Portrait of the angry decision maker: How appraisal tendencies shape anger's influence on cognition. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19(2), 115–137. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  365. Leventhal, H. (1982). A perceptual motor theory of emotion. Social Science Information, 21(6), 819–845. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  366. Leventhal, H. (1984). A perceptual-motor theory of emotion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 117–182. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  367. Leventhal, H. & Scherer, K. (1987). The relationship of emotion to cognition: A functional approach to a semantic controversy. Cognition and Emotion, 1(1), 3–28. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  368. Lewis, S. C. & Reese, S. D. (2009). What is the war on terror? Framing through the eyes of journalists. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 86(1), 85–102. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  369. Lieberman, M. D., Gaunt, R., Gilbert, D. T. & Trope, Y. (2002). Reflexion and reflection: A social cognitive neuroscience approach to attributional inference. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 199–249. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  370. Lieberman, M. D., Schreiber, D. & Ochsner, K. N. (2003). Is political cognition like riding a bicycle? How cognitive neuroscience can inform research on political thinking. Political Psychology, 24(4), 681–704. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  371. Loewenstein, G. (1996). Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65(3), 272–292. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  372. Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J. & Bracken, C. C. (2002). Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research, 28(4), 587–604. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  373. Lucas, J. W. (2003). Theory-testing, generalization, and the problem of external validity. Sociological Theory, 21(3), 236–253. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  374. MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S. & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4(1), 84–99. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  375. MacKinnon, D. P., Krull, J. L. & Lockwood, C. M. (2000). Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect. Prevention Science, 1(4), 173–181. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  376. MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M. & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(1), 99–128. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  377. Macrae, C. N. & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2000). Social cognition: Thinking categorically about others. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 93–120. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  378. Maio, G. R. & Esses, V. M. (2001). The need for affect: Individual differences in the motivation to approach or avoid emotions. Journal of Personality, 69(4), 583–615. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  379. Major, L. H. (2009). Break it to me harshly: The effects of intersecting news frames in lung cancer and obesity coverage. Journal of Health Communication, 14(2), 174–188. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  380. Major, L. H. (2011). The mediating role of emotions in the relationship between frames and attribution of responsibility for health problems. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 88(3), 502–522. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  381. Mangold, R., Unz, D. & Winterhoff-Spurk, P. (2001). Zur Erklärung emotionaler Medienwirkungen: Leistungsfähigkeit, empirische Überprüfung und Fortentwicklung theoretischer Ansätze. In P. Rössler, U. Hasebrink & M. Jäckel (Hrsg.), Theoretische Perspektiven der Rezeptionsforschung (S. 163–180). München: Verlag Reinhard Fischer. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  382. Manucia, G. K., Baumann, D. J. & Cialdini, R. B. (1984). Mood influences on helping: Direct effects or side effects? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(2), 357–364. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  383. Marcus, G. E. (2002). The sentimental citizen: Emotion in democratic politics. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  384. Marcus, G. E. & MacKuen, M. B. (1993). Anxiety, enthusiasm, and the vote: The emotional underpinnings of learning and involvement during presidential campaigns. The American Political Science Review, 87(3), 672–685. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  385. Martin, J. P. & Grubb, D. (2001). What works and for whom: A review of OECD countries' experiences with active labour market policies. Swedish Economic Policy Review, 8(2), 9–56. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  386. Martin, R., Watson, D. & Wan, C. K. (2000). A three-factor model of trait anger: Dimensions of affect, behavior, and cognition. Journal of Personality, 68(5), 869–897. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  387. Martinsen, R. (2009). Öffentlichkeit in der "Mediendemokratie" aus der Perspektive konkurrierender Demokratietheorien. In F. Marcinkowski & B. Pfetsch (Hrsg.), Politische Viertelsjahresschrift. Politik in der Mediendemokratie (S. 37–59). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  388. Matthes, J. (2004). Die Schema-Theorie in der Medienwirkungsforschung: Ein unscharfer Blick in die "Black Box"? Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 52(4), 545–568. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  389. Matthes, J. (2007a). Beyond accessibility? Toward an on-line and memory-based model of framing effects. Communications, 32(1), 51–78. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  390. Matthes, J. (2007b). Framing-Effekte: Zum Einfluss der Politikberichterstattung auf die Einstellungen der Rezipienten. Reihe Rezeptionsforschung Band 13. München: Verlag Reinhard Fischer. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  391. Matthes, J. (2008a). Medien-Frames inhaltsynalytisch (be)greifen: Eine Analyse von 135 nationalen und internationalen Fachzeitschriftenaufsätzen, 1990–2005. In J. Matthes, W. Wirth, G. Daschmann & A. Fahr (Hrsg.), Methoden und Forschungslogik der Kommunikationswissenschaft. Band 3: Die Brücke zwischen Theorie und Empirie. Operationalisierung, Messung und Validierung in der Kommunikationswissenschaft (S. 157–177). Köln: Herbert von Halem Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  392. Matthes, J. (2008b). Need for orientation as a predictor of agenda-setting effects: Causal evidence from a two-wave panel study. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 20(4), 440–453. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  393. Matthes, J. (2009a). Framing responsibility for political issues: The preference for dispositional attributions and the effects of news frames. Communication Research Reports, 26(1), 82–86. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  394. Matthes, J. (2009b). What's in a frame? A content analysis of media framing studies in the world's leading communication journals, 1990–2005. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 86(2), 349–367. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  395. Matthes, J. (2012). Framing Politics: An Integrative Approach. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(3), 247–259. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  396. Matthes, J. & Kohring, M. (2003). Operationalisierung von Vertrauen in Journalismus. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 51(1), 5–23. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  397. Matthes, J. & Kohring, M. (2004). Die empirische Erfassung von Medien-Frames. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 52(1), 56–75. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  398. Matthes, J. & Kohring, M. (2008). The content analysis of media frames: Toward improving reliability and validity. Journal of Communication, 58(2), 258–279. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  399. Maurer, M. (2012). Die Kombination von Inhaltsanalyse- und Befragungsdaten in der Medienwirkungsforschung: Theoretische Überlegungen und methodische Entscheidungs-prozesse. In W. Loosen & A. Scholl (Hrsg.), Methodenkombinationen in der Kommunikationswissenschaft. Methodologische Herausforderungen und empirische Praxis (S. 89–101). Köln: Herbert von Halem Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  400. Mazzoleni, G. & Schulz, W. (1999). "Mediatization" of politics: A challenge for democracy? Political Communication, 16(3), 247–261. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  401. McCombs, M. (2004). Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion. Cambridge: Polity Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  402. McCombs, M. E. & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  403. McCombs, M. & Ghanem, S. I. (2001). The convergence of agenda setting and framing. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy & A. E. Grant (Hrsg.), Framing public life. Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (S. 67–81). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  404. McCombs, M., Llamas, J. P., Lopez-Escobar, E. & Rey, F. (1997). Candidate images in Spanish elections: Second-level agenda-setting effects. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 74(4), 703–717. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  405. McCombs, M., Lopez-Escobar, E. & Llamas, J. P. (2000). Setting the agenda of attributes in the 1996 Spanish general election. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 77–92. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  406. McCombs, M., Shaw, D. L. & Weaver, D. (Hrsg.). (1997). Communication and democracy: Exploring the intellectual frontiers in agenda-setting theory. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  407. McDermott, R. (2004). The feeling of rationality: The meaning of neuroscientific advances for political science. Perspectives on Politics, 2(4), 691–706. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  408. McKay, A., Campbell, J., Thomson, E. & Ross, S. (2013). Economic recession and recovery in the UK: What's gender got to do with it? Feminist Economics, 19(3), 108–123. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  409. McLeod, J. M., Becker, L. B. & Byrnes, J. E. (1974). Another Look At the Agenda-Setting Function of the Press. Communication Research, 1(2), 131–166. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  410. McNemar, Q. (1946). Opinion-attitude methodology. Psychological Bulletin, 43(4), 289–374. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  411. Meijnders, A. L., Midden, C. J. H. & Wilke, H. A. M. (2001). Role of negative emotion in communication about CO2 risks. Risk Analysis, 21(5), 955–966. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  412. Meyer, W.-U., Reisenzein, R. & Schützwohl, A. (1997). Toward a process analysis of emotions: The case of surprise. Motivation and Emotion, 21(3), 251–274. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  413. Millar, M. G. & Millar, K. U. (1990). Attitude change as a function of attitude type and argument type. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(2), 217–228. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  414. Miller, A. H., Goldenberg, E. N. & Erbrbing, L. (1979). Type-set politics: Impact of newspapers on public confidence. The American Political Science Review, 73(1), 67–84. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  415. Miller, J. M. (2007). Examining the mediators of agenda setting: A new experimental paradigm reveals the role of emotions. Political Psychology, 28(6), 689–717. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  416. Miller, J. M. & Krosnick, J. A. (2000). News media impact on the ingredients of presidential evaluations: Politically knowledgeable citizens are guided by a trusted source. American Journal of Political Science, 44(2), 295–309. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  417. Miller, M. M., Andsager, J. L. & Riechert, B. P. (1998). Framing the candidates in presidential primaries: Issues and images in press releases and news coverage. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 75(2), 312–324. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  418. Mitchell, M. M., Brown, K. M., Morris-Villagran, M. & Villagran, P. D. (2001). The effects of anger, sadness and happiness on persuasive message processing: A test of the negative state relief model. Communication Monographs, 68(4), 347–359. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  419. Monahan, J. L., Shtrulis, I. & Givens, S. B. (2005). Priming Welfare Queens and Other Stereotypes: The Transference of Media Images into Interpersonal Contexts A previous version of this manuscript was presented at the 48th annual meeting of the International Communication Association, San Diego (2004). Communication Research Reports, 22(3), 199–205. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  420. Moors, A. (2009). Theories of emotion causation: A review. Cognition and Emotion, 23(4), 625–662. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  421. Moors, A. (2013). On the causal role of appraisal in emotion. Emotion Review, 5(2), 132–140. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  422. Moors, A., Ellsworth, P. C., Scherer, K. R. & Frijda, N. H. (2013). Appraisal theories of emotion: State of the art and future development. Emotion Review, 5(2), 119–124. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  423. Murray, M. & Millar, R. (1992). Lay explanations of and solutions to unemployment in Northern Ireland. Work & Stress, 6(4), 367–378. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  424. Nabi, R. L. (1999). A cognitive-functional model for the effects of discrete negative emotions on information processing, attitude change, and recall. Communication Theory, 9(3), 292–320. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  425. Nabi, R. L. (2002). Anger, fear, uncertainty, and attitudes: A test of the cognitive-functional model. Communication Monographs, 69(3), 204–216. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  426. Nabi, R. L. (2003). Exploring the framing effects of emotion: Do discrete emotions differently influence information accessibility, information seeking, and policy preference. Communication Research, 30(2), 224–247. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  427. Nabi, R. L. (2007). Emotion and persuasion: A social-cognitive perspective. In D. R. Roskos-Ewoldsen & J. L. Monahan (Hrsg.), Communication and social cognition. Theories and methods (S. 377–398). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  428. Nabi, R. L. (2009). Emotion and media effects. In R. L. Nabi & M. B. Oliver (Hrsg.), The SAGE handbook of media processes and effects (S. 205–221). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  429. Nabi, R. L. (2010). The case for emphasizing discrete emotions in communication research. Communication Monographs, 77(2), 153–159. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  430. Neidhardt, F. (1994). Öffentlichkeit, öffentliche Meinung, soziale Bewegungen. In F. Neidhardt (Hrsg.), Öffentlichkeit, öffentliche Meinung, soziale Bewegungen (S. 7–41). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  431. Nelson, T. E., Clawson, R. A. & Oxley, Z. M. (1997). Media framing of a civil liberties conflict and its effect on tolerance. American Political Science Review, 91(3), 567–583. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  432. Nelson, T. E. & Kinder, D. R. (1996). Issue frames and group-centrism in American public opinion. The Journal of Politics, 58(4), 1055–1078. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  433. Nelson, T. E. & Oxley, Z. M. (1999). Issue framing effects on belief importance and opinion. The Journal of Politics, 61(4), 1040–1067. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  434. Nelson, T. E., Oxley, Z. M. & Clawson, R. A. (1997). Toward a psychology of framing effects. Political Behavior, 19(3), 221–246. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  435. Nelson, T. E. & Willey, E. A. (2001). Issue frames that strike a value balance: A political psychology perspective. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy & A. E. Grant (Hrsg.), Framing public life. Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (S. 245–266). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  436. Nerb, J. (2000). Die Bewertung von Umweltschäden: Kognitive und emotionale Folgen von Medienmeldungen. Bern: Hans Huber. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  437. Nerb, J. & Spada, H. (2001). Evaluation of environmental problems: A coherence model of cognition and emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 15(4), 521–551. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  438. Nerb, J., Spada, H. & Lay, K. (2001). Environmental risk in the media: Modeling the reactions of the audience. Research in Social Problems and Public Policy, 9, 57–85. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  439. Nerb, J., Spada, H. & Wahl, S. (1998). Kognition und Emotion bei der Bewertung von Umweltschadensfällen: Modellierung und Empirie. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 45(4), 251–269. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  440. Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  441. Neuman, W. R., Just, M. R. & Crigler, A. N. (1992). Common knowledge: News and the construction of political meaning. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  442. Nickel-Bacon, I., Groeben, N. & Schreier, M. (2000). Fiktionssignale pragmatisch: Ein medienübergreifendes Modell zur Unterscheidung von Fiktion(en) und Realität(en), 32(3–4), 267–299. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  443. Nickell, S. (1997). Unemployment and labor market rigidities: Europe versus North America. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(3), 55–74. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  444. Oatley, K. & Jenkins, J. M. (1996). Understanding emotions. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  445. Oatley, K. & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1987). Towards a cognitive theory of emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 1(1), 29–50. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  446. O'Keefe, D. J. (2003). Message properties, mediating states, and manipulation checks: Claims, evidence, and data analysis in experimental persuasive message effects research. Communication Theory, 13(3), 251–274. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  447. O'Keefe, D. J. (2009). Theories of persuasion. In R. L. Nabi & M. B. Oliver (Hrsg.), The SAGE handbook of media processes and effects (S. 269–282). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  448. Oliver, M. B. (1993). Exploring the paradox of the enjoyment of sad films. Human Communication Research, 19(3), 315–342. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  449. Oliver, M. B. & Bartsch, A. (2010). Appreciation as audience response: Exploring entertainment gratifications beyond hedonism. Human Communication Research, 36(1), 53–81. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  450. Ortony, A., Clore, G. L. & Collins, A. (1988). The cognitive structure of emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  451. Ostrom, T. M. (1969). The relationship between the affective, behavioral, and cognitive components of attitude. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 5(1), 12–30. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  452. Otto, J. H., Euler, H. A. & Mandl, H. (2000a). Begriffsbestimmungen. In J. H. Otto, H. A. Euler & H. Mandl (Hrsg.), Emotionspsychologie. Ein Handbuch (S. 11–18). Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  453. Otto, J. H., Euler, H. A. & Mandl, H. (Hrsg.) (2000b). Emotionspsychologie: Ein Handbuch. Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  454. Palazzolo, K. E. & Roberto, A. J. (2011). Media representations of intimate partner violence and punishment preferences: Exploring the role of attributions and emotions. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 39(1), 1–18. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  455. Pan, Z. & Kosicki, G. M. (1993). Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication, 10(1), 55–75. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  456. Pan, Z. & Kosicki, G. M. (1997). Priming and media impact on the evaluations of the president's performance. Communication Research, 24(1), 3–30. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  457. Pan, Z. & Kosicki, G. M. (2001). Framing as a strategic action in public deliberation. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy & A. E. Grant (Hrsg.), Framing public life. Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (S. 35–65). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  458. Pan, Z. & Kosicki, G. M. (2005). Framing and the understanding of citizenship. In S. Dunwoody, L. B. Becker, D. M. McLeod & G. M. Kosicki (Hrsg.), The evolution of key mass communication concepts. Honoring Jack M. McLeod (S. 165–204). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  459. Parmelee, J. (2002). Presidential primary videocassettes: How candidates in the 2000 U.S. presidential primary elections framed their early campaigns. Political Communication, 19(3), 317–331. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  460. Patterson, T. E. (1993). Out of order. New York, NY: Vintage Books. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  461. Peter, J. (2002). Medien-Priming: Grundlagen, Befunde und Forschungstendenzen. Publizistik, 47(1), 21–44. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  462. Peters, B. (1994). Der Sinn von Öffentlichkeit. In F. Neidhardt (Hrsg.), Öffentlichkeit, öffentliche Meinung, soziale Bewegungen (S. 42–76). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  463. Peterson, R. A. & Kim, Y. (2013). On the relationship between coefficient alpha and composite reliability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(1), 194–198. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  464. Petty, R. E. & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approach. Dubuque, IA: Brown. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  465. Petty, R. E. & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123–205. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  466. Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T. & Kasmer, J. A. (1988). The role of affect in the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Donohew, H. E. Sypher & T. E. Higgins (Hrsg.), Communication, social cognition, and affect (S. 117–146). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  467. Petty, R. E., DeSteno, D. & Rucker, D. D. (2001). The role of affect in attitude change. In J. P. Forgas (Hrsg.), Handbook of affect and social cognition (S. 212–233). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  468. Petty, R. E., Gleicher, F. & Baker, S. M. (1991). Multiple roles for affect in persuasion. In J. P. Forgas (Hrsg.), Emotion and social judgments (S. 181–200). Oxford: Pergamon Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  469. Petty, R. E., Schumann, D. W., Richman, S. A. & Strathman, A. J. (1993). Positive mood and persuasion: Different roles for affect under high- and low-elaboration conditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(1), 5–20. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  470. Petty, R. E., Wegener, D. T. & Fabrigar, L. R. (1997). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 609–647. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  471. Pfeiffer, T., Manz, S. & Nerb, J. (2005). Wer den Schaden macht, hat auch das Wissen: Kohärenzeffekte der kognitiven und emotionalen Bewertung von Umweltschäden. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 213(1), 44–58. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  472. Pham, M. T. (2007). Emotion and rationality: A critical review and interpretation of empirical evidence. Review of General Psychology, 11(2), 155–178. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  473. Ping, R. A. (2009). Estimating endogenous interactions. Abgerufen von www.wright.edu/ ~robert.ping/endog_ints2.doc (21.12.13) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  474. Potthoff, M. (2012). Medien-Frames und ihre Entstehung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  475. Preacher, K. J. & Hayes, A. F. (2008a). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  476. Preacher, K. J. & Hayes, A. F. (2008b). Contemporary approaches to assessing mediation in communication research. In A. F. Hayes, M. D. Slater & L. B. Snyder (Hrsg.), The Sage sourcebook of advanced data analysis methods for communication research (S. 13–54). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  477. Preston, S. D. & de Waal, F. B. M. (2001). Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25(1), 1–72. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  478. Price, V. & Tewksbury, D. (1997). News values and public opinion: A theoretical account of media priming and framing. In G. A. Barnett & F. J. Boster (Hrsg.), Progress in Communication Sciences: Band 13. Advances in Persuasion (S. 173–212). Greenwich, CT: Ablex Publishing Corporation. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  479. Price, V., Tewksbury, D. & Powers, E. (1997). Switching trains of thought: The impact of news frames on readers' cognitive responses. Communication Research, 24(5), 481–506. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  480. Raghunathan, R. & Pham, M. T. (1999). All negative moods are not equal: Motivational influences of anxiety and sadness on decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79(1), 56–77. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  481. Raghunathan, R., Pham, M. T. & Corfman, K. P. (2006). Informational properties of anxiety and sadness, and displaced coping. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(4), 596–601. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  482. Raykov, T. (1997). Scale reliability, Cronbach's coefficient alpha, and violations of essential tau-equivalence with fixed congeneric components. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32(4), 329–353. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  483. Reese, S. D. (2001). Prologue – Framing public life: A bridging model for media research. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy & A. E. Grant (Hrsg.), Framing public life. Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (S. 7–31). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  484. Reese, S. D. (2007). The framing project: A bridging model for media research revisited. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 148–154. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  485. Reinecke, J. (2005). Strukturgleichungsmodelle in den Sozialwissenschaften. München: Oldenbourg. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  486. Reisenzein, R. (2000). Einschätzungstheoretische Ansätze. In J. H. Otto, H. A. Euler & H. Mandl (Hrsg.), Emotionspsychologie. Ein Handbuch (S. 117–138). Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  487. Roseman, I. J. (2001). A model of appraisal in the emotion system: Integrating research, theory, and applications. In K. R. Scherer, A. Schorr & T. Johnstone (Hrsg.), Appraisal processes in emotion. Theory, methods, research (S. 68–91). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  488. Roseman, I. J. (2013). Appraisal in the emotion system: Coherence in strategies for coping. Emotion Review, 5(2), 141–149. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  489. Roseman, I. J. & Smith, C. A. (2001). Appraisal theory: Overview, assumptions, varieties, controversies. In K. R. Scherer, A. Schorr & T. Johnstone (Hrsg.), Appraisal processes in emotion. Theory, methods, research (S. 3–19). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  490. Roseman, I. J., Spindel, M. S. & Jose, P. E. (1990). Appraisals of emotion-eliciting events: Testing a theory of discrete emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(5), 899–915. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  491. Roseman, I. J., Wiest, C. & Swartz, T. S. (1994). Phenomenology, behaviors, and goals differentiate discrete emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(2), 206–221. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  492. Rosenberg, M. J. (1956). Cognitive structure and attitudinal affect. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 53(3), 367–372. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  493. Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., Roskos-Ewoldsen, B. & Carpentier, F. D. (2009). Media Priming: An updated synthesis. In J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Hrsg.), Media effects. Advances in theory and research (3. Auflage, S. 74–93). New York, NY: Routledge. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  494. Rössler, P. (1999). The individual agenda-designing process: How interpersonal communication, egocentric networks, and mass media shape the perception of political issues by individuals. Communication Research, 26(6), 666–700. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  495. Rössler, P. (2005). Inhaltsanalyse. Konstanz: UTB. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  496. Rössler, P. (2006). Zur Logik der Agenda-Setting-Forschung. In W. Wirth, A. Fahr & E. Lauf (Hrsg.), Forschungslogik und -design in der Kommunikationswissenschaft. Anwendungsfelder in der Kommunikationswissenschaft (Band 2, S. 139–167). Köln: Herbert von Halem Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  497. Rössler, P. & Schenk, M. (2000). Cognitive bonding and the German reunification: Agenda-setting and persuasion effects of mass media. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 12(1), 29–47. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  498. Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: Building blocks of cognition. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce & W. F. Brewer (Hrsg.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Perspectives from cognitive psychology, linguistics, artificial intelligence, and education (S. 33–58). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  499. Sawyer, M. (2012). The tragedy of UK fiscal policy in the aftermath of the financial crisis. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 36(1), 205–221. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  500. Saxer, U. & Märki-Koepp, M. (1992). Medien-Gefühlskultur: Zielgruppenspezifische Gefühlsdramaturgie als journalistische Produktionsroutine. München: Ölschläger. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  501. Schaal, G. S. & Heidenreich, F. (2013). Politik der Gefühle: Zur Rolle von Emotionen in der Demokratie. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 63(32–33), 3–11. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  502. Schemer, C. (2009). Politische Kampagnen für Herz und Verstand: Affektive und kognitive Einflüsse der Massenmedien auf politische Einstellungen. Reihe Rezeptionsforschung Band 19. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  503. Schemer, C. (2013). Priming, Framing, Stereotype. In W. Schweiger & A. Fahr (Hrsg.), Handbuch Medienwirkungsforschung (S. 153–169). Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  504. Schemer, C. & Wirth, W. (2013). Methods report for the cross-national survey project "The strategies and processes of attitude formation and public participation in comparative perspective". Manuskript, Universität Zürich. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  505. Schemer, C., Wirth, W. & Matthes, J. (2012). Value resonance and value framing effects on voting intentions in direct-democratic campaigns. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(3), 334–352. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  506. Schenk, M. (2007). Medienwirkungsforschung (3. Auflage). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  507. Scherer, K. R. (1987). Toward a dynamic theory of emotion: The component process model of affective states. Geneva Studies in Emotion and Communication, 1(1), 1–98. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  508. Scherer, K. R. (2001a). Appraisal considered as a process of multilevel sequential checking. In K. R. Scherer, A. Schorr & T. Johnstone (Hrsg.), Appraisal processes in emotion. Theory, methods, research (S. 92–120). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  509. Scherer, K. R. (2001b). The nature and study of appraisal: A review of the issues. In K. R. Scherer, A. Schorr & T. Johnstone (Hrsg.), Appraisal processes in emotion. Theory, methods, research (S. 369–391). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  510. Scherer, K. R. (2004). Feelings integrate the central representation of appraisal-driven response organization. In A. S. R. Manstead, N. H. Frijda & A. H. Fischer (Hrsg.), Feelings and emotions. The Amsterdam symposium (S. 136–157). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  511. Scherer, K. R. (2005). What are emotions? And how can they be measured? Social Science Information, 44(4), 695–729. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  512. Scherer, K. R. (2009a). Emotions are emergent processes: They require a dynamic computational architecture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 364(1535), 3459–3474. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  513. Scherer, K. R. (2009b). The dynamic architecture of emotion: Evidence for the component process model. Cognition and Emotion, 23(7), 1307–1351. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  514. Schermelleh-Engel, K. & Moosbrugger, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23–74. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  515. Scheufele, B. (2003). Frames – Framing – Framing-Effekte: Theoretische und methodische Grundlegung des Framing-Ansatzes sowie empirische Befunde zur Nachrichtenproduktion. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  516. Scheufele, B. (2004a). Framing-effects approach: A theoretical and methodological critique. Communications, 29(4), 401–428. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  517. Scheufele, B. (2004b). Framing-Effekte auf dem Prüfstand: Eine theoretische, methodische und empirische Auseinandersetzung mit der Wirkungsperspektive des Framing-Ansatzes. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 52(1), 30–55. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  518. Scheufele, B. (2004c). Kurzfristige Effekte inhaltlicher Medien-Frames. Zeitschrift für Medienpsychologie, 16(4), 135–141. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  519. Scheufele, B. (2010). Verknüpfen und Urteilen: Ein Experiment zur Wirkung medialer Value-Frames, 58(1), 26–44. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  520. Scheufele, B. & Gasteiger, C. (2007). Berichterstattung, Emotionen und politische Legitimierung: Eine experimentelle Untersuchung zum Einfluss der Politikbericherstattung auf die Legitimierung politischer Entscheidungen am Beispiel von Bundeswehreinsätzen. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 55(4), 534–554. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  521. Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49(1), 103–122. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  522. Scheufele, D. A. (2000). Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Communication and Society, 3(2&3), 297–316. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  523. Scheufele, D. A. & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9–20. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  524. Schlomer, G. L., Bauman, S. & Card, N. A. (2010). Best practices for missing data management in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57(1), 1–10. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  525. Schlueter, E., Davidov, E. & Schmidt, P. (2006). Applying autoregressive cross-Lagged and latent growth curve models to a three-wave panel study. In K. Montfort, H. Oud & A. Satorra (Hrsg.), Longitudinal models in the behavioral and related sciences (S. 315–336). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  526. Schmitt, A. & Mees, U. (2000). Trauer. In J. H. Otto, H. A. Euler & H. Mandl (Hrsg.), Emotionspsychologie. Ein Handbuch (S. 209–220). Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  527. Schnell, R., Hill, P. B. & Esser, E. (1999). Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung (6. Auflage). München: Oldenbourg. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  528. Schorr, A. (2001). Appraisal: The evolution of an idea. In K. R. Scherer, A. Schorr & T. Johnstone (Hrsg.), Appraisal processes in emotion. Theory, methods, research (S. 20–34). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  529. Schramm, H. & Wirth, W. (2008). A case for an integrative view on affect regulation through media usage. Communications, 33(1), 27–46. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  530. Schroeder, L. D., Sjoquist, D. L. & Stephan, P. D. (1986). Understanding regression analysis: An introductory guide. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  531. Schuck, A. R. T. & de Vreese, C. H. (2006). Between risk and opportunity: News framing and its effects on public support for EU enlargement. European Journal of Communication, 21(1), 5–32. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  532. Schuck, A. R. T. & Vreese, C. H. de. (2012). When good news is bad news: Explicating the moderated mediation dynamic behind the reversed mobilization effect. Journal of Communication, 62(1), 57–77. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  533. Schultheiss, B. M. & Jenzowsky, S. A. (2000). Infotainment: Der Einfluss emotionalisierend-affekt-orientierter Darstellung auf die Glaubwürdigkeit. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 48(1), 63–84. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  534. Schulz, W. (1990). Die Konstruktion von Realität in den Nachrichtenmedien: Analyse der aktuellen Berichterstattung (2. Auflage): Verlag Karl Alber. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  535. Schulz, W. (2007). Inhaltsanalyse plus: Ansätze zur Integration von Mitteilungs- und Rezipientendaten. In W. Wirth, H.-J. Stiehler & C. Wünsch (Hrsg.), Dynamisch-transaktional denken. Theorie und Empirie der Kommunikationswissenschaft (S. 108–125). Köln: Herbert von Halem Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  536. Schwarz, N. (1990). Feelings as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states. In E. T. Higgins & R. M. Sorrentino (Hrsg.), Handbook of motivation and cognition. Foundations of social behavior (S. 527–561). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  537. Schwarz, N. (2007). Attitude construction: Evaluation in context. Social Cognition, 25(5), 638–656. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383
  538. Schwenkmezger, P., Hodapp, V. & Spielberger, C. D. (1992). Das State-Trait-Ärgerausdrucks-Inventar STAXI. Bern: Hans Huber. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845259383

Similar publications

from the series "Reihe Rezeptionsforschung"
Cover of book: Neuere Forschung zu parasozialen Interaktionen und Beziehungen
Monograph Partial access
Holger Schramm, Nicole Liebers, Laurenz Biniak, Franca Dettmar
Neuere Forschung zu parasozialen Interaktionen und Beziehungen
Cover of book: Nachhaltigkeit als Gegenstand und Zielgröße der Rezeptions- und Wirkungsforschung
Edited Book No access
Anna Sophie Kümpel, Christina Peter, Anna Schnauber-Stockmann, Frank Mangold
Nachhaltigkeit als Gegenstand und Zielgröße der Rezeptions- und Wirkungsforschung
Cover of book: Romantische parasoziale Interaktionen und Beziehungen mit Mediencharakteren
Monograph No access
Nicole Liebers
Romantische parasoziale Interaktionen und Beziehungen mit Mediencharakteren
Cover of book: Living with Cultivating Messages
Monograph No access
Elena Pelzer
Living with Cultivating Messages
Cover of book: Informationsselektion mit Suchmaschinen
Monograph No access
Julian Unkel
Informationsselektion mit Suchmaschinen

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via your Institution (SSO, Shibboleth, OpenAthens)
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex