Cover of book: Romantische parasoziale Interaktionen und Beziehungen mit Mediencharakteren
Buy in shop
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Book Titles No access

Romantische parasoziale Interaktionen und Beziehungen mit Mediencharakteren

Ein theoretischer und empirischer Beitrag
Authors:
Series:
Reihe Rezeptionsforschung, Volume 43
Publisher:
 2021

Summary

Romantic parasocial interactions and relationships are an essential part of media users’ everyday lives. However, they have rarely been studied up to now. This book aims to redress this gap in research by providing theoretical insights into the definition, development, implications and predictors of romantic parasocial phenomena. It presents three empirical studies on their development and implications, and closes with a detailed discussion of their findings. Accordingly, this book provides students with a smooth introduction to this subject and facilitates advanced academic research into the field of romantic parasocial phenomena.

Keywords

Bibliographic data

Copyright year
2021
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-8215-4
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-2637-5
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Reihe Rezeptionsforschung
Volume
43
Language
German
Pages
384
Product type
Book Titles

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access 1 - 20
    1. 1.1 Romantische parasoziale Phänomene in der kommunikationswissenschaftlichen und medienpsychologischen Forschung No access
    2. 1.2 Ziel und Aufbau der Arbeit No access
      1. 2.1.1 Die Entwicklung des Konzepts der parasozialen Phänomene durch Horton und Wohl No access
      2. 2.1.2 Die weitere Entwicklung des Konzepts als freundschaftliche parasoziale Interaktionen und Beziehungen No access
      3. 2.1.3 Die Entwicklung hin zur Einbeziehung romantischer Facetten parasozialer Phänomene No access
      1. 2.2.1 Definition romantischer Zuneigung No access
      2. 2.2.2 Definition parasozialer Interaktionen No access
      3. 2.2.3 Spezifizierung romantischer parasozialer Interaktionen No access
      1. 2.3.1 Definition parasozialer Beziehungen No access
      2. 2.3.2 Spezifizierung romantischer parasozialer Beziehungen No access
      3. 2.3.3 Abgrenzung romantischer parasozialer Beziehungen vom Celebrity-Worship No access
      1. 2.4.1 Gemeinsamkeiten orthosozialer und parasozialer romantischer Interaktionen und Beziehungen No access
      2. 2.4.2 Unterschiede orthosozialer und parasozialer romantischer Interaktionen und Beziehungen No access
      1. 3.1.1 Die Illusion der Interaktion No access
      2. 3.1.2 Parasoziale Interaktionen im Rahmen des Zwei-Ebenen-Modells No access
      3. 3.1.3 Fazit: Die Entstehung romantischer parasozialer Interaktionen No access
      1. 3.2.1 Das Kreis-Prozess-Modell No access
      2. 3.2.2 Das Stufenmodell No access
      3. 3.2.3 Das multidimensionale Modell romantischer parasozialer Bindungen bei Jugendlichen No access
      4. 3.2.4 Das retrospektive imaginative Involvement mit Mediencharakteren No access
      5. 3.2.5 Fazit: Die Entstehung romantischer parasozialer Beziehungen No access
      1. 4.1.1 Romantische parasoziale Phänomene und beziehungsrelevante Skripte No access
      2. 4.1.2 Romantische parasoziale Phänomene und die eigene sexuelle Identität und Beziehungen No access
      1. 4.2.1 Begriffserklärung des psychologischen Wohlbefindens No access
      2. 4.2.2 Psychologisches Wohlbefinden als eudaimonisches Unterhaltungserleben No access
      3. 4.2.3 Romantische parasoziale Phänomene und das eudaimonische Unterhaltungserleben No access
      1. 5.1.1 Die Eigenschaften des Mediencharakters als Prädiktoren für romantische parasoziale Phänomene No access
      2. 5.1.2 Die Eigenschaften der Narration als Prädiktoren für romantische parasoziale Phänomene No access
      3. 5.1.3 Die Eigenschaften des medialen Kanals der Narration als Prädiktoren für romantische parasoziale Phänomene No access
      1. 5.2.1 Die Fähigkeit versus das Bedürfnis, parasoziale Phänomene zu entwickeln No access
      2. 5.2.2 Die Dunkle Triade und das Bedürfnis, romantische parasoziale Phänomene zu entwickeln No access
      3. 5.2.3 Die Fantasiefähigkeit und die Fähigkeit, romantische parasoziale Phänomene zu entwickeln No access
    1. 6.1 Forschungslücken und Forschungsvorhaben No access
    2. 6.2 Die Dunkle Triade als Prädiktor für romantische parasoziale Phänomene No access
    3. 6.3 Die Fantasiefähigkeit als Prädiktor für romantische parasoziale Phänomene No access
    4. 6.4 Die Wechselwirkung von Fantasiefähigkeit und Dunkler Triade in der Entwicklung romantischer parasozialer Phänomene No access
    5. 6.5 Das Zusammenspiel romantischer parasozialer Interaktionen und Beziehungen No access
    6. 6.6 Romantische parasoziale Phänomene und das eudaimonische Unterhaltungserleben No access
    7. 6.7 Zusammenfassung und Übersicht der Annahmen No access
    1. 7.1 Ziele der Studie I No access
      1. 7.2.1 Untersuchungsanlage und Studienablauf No access
      2. 7.2.2 Stimuli No access
      3. 7.2.3 Stichprobe No access
      4. 7.2.4 Messung der Variablen No access
      1. 7.3.1 Manipulation-Check No access
      2. 7.3.2 Ergebnisse zum Einfluss der Dunklen Triade auf die romantische PSI No access
      3. 7.3.3 Ergebnisse zum Einfluss der romantischen PSI auf das eudaimonische Unterhaltungserleben No access
      1. 7.4.1 Zentrale Erkenntnisse No access
      2. 7.4.2 Limitationen No access
      3. 7.4.3 Fazit No access
    1. 8.1 Ziele der Studie II No access
      1. 8.2.1 Untersuchungsanlage und Studienablauf No access
      2. 8.2.2 Stimuli No access
      3. 8.2.3 Stichprobe No access
      4. 8.2.4 Messung der Variablen No access
      1. 8.3.1 Ergebnisse zum Zusammenhang zwischen der Fantasiefähigkeit und der romantischen PSI No access
      2. 8.3.2 Ergebnisse zum Zusammenhang zwischen der Fantasiefähigkeit, dem RII und der romantischen PSB No access
      3. 8.3.3 Ergebnisse zum Zusammenhang zwischen der romantischen PSI, dem RII und der romantischen PSB No access
      1. 8.4.1 Zentrale Erkenntnisse No access
      2. 8.4.2 Limitationen No access
      3. 8.4.3 Fazit No access
    1. 9.1 Ziele der Studie III No access
      1. 9.2.1 Untersuchungsanlage und Studienablauf No access
      2. 9.2.2 Stimulus No access
      3. 9.2.3 Stichprobe No access
      4. 9.2.4 Messung der Variablen No access
      1. 9.3.1 Ergebnisse zum Einfluss der Merkmale der Dunklen Triade auf die Entwicklung romantischer parasozialer Phänomene No access
      2. 9.3.2 Ergebnisse zum Einfluss der Fantasiefähigkeit auf die Entwicklung romantischer parasozialer Phänomene No access
      3. 9.3.3 Ergebnisse zur Wechselwirkung der Merkmale der Dunklen Triade und der Fantasiefähigkeit in der Entwicklung romantischer parasozialer Phänomene No access
      4. 9.3.4 Ergebnisse zum Zusammenhang zwischen der romantischen PSI, dem RII und der romantischen PSB No access
      5. 9.3.5 Ergebnisse zum Einfluss romantischer parasozialer Phänomene auf das eudaimonische Unterhaltungserleben No access
      1. 9.4.1 Zentrale Erkenntnisse No access
      2. 9.4.2 Limitationen No access
      3. 9.4.3 Fazit No access
      1. 10.1.1 Die Dunkle Triade und die Fantasiefähigkeit als Prädiktoren für romantische parasoziale Phänomene No access
      2. 10.1.2 Die dynamische Entwicklung romantischer parasozialer Phänomene unter Einbezug des retrospektiven imaginativen Involvements No access
      3. 10.1.3 Implikationen romantischer parasozialer Phänomene für das eudaimonische Unterhaltungserleben No access
      1. 10.2.1 Bewertung des studienübergreifenden methodischen Vorgehens No access
      2. 10.2.2 Kritische Bemerkung zur Annahme kausaler Wirkzusammenhänge No access
      3. 10.2.3 Limitationen hinsichtlich der Generalisierbarkeit No access
      4. 10.2.4 Bewertung der gewählten Forschungsvorhaben No access
      1. 10.3.1 Erfassung romantischer parasozialer Phänomene No access
      2. 10.3.2 Persönliche Dispositionen und romantische parasoziale Phänomene No access
      3. 10.3.3 Romantische PSI und das Rezeptionserleben No access
      4. 10.3.4 Postrezeptive Prozesse in der Entwicklung romantischer parasozialer Phänomene No access
      5. 10.3.5 Romantische parasoziale Phänomene und Wohlbefinden No access
      6. 10.3.6 Romantische parasoziale Phänomene jenseits der narrativen Unterhaltungsmedien No access
      1. 10.4.1 Implikationen für die Wissenschaft No access
      2. 10.4.2 Implikationen für die Praxis No access
      3. 10.4.3 Fazit und Ausblick No access
  12. Literaturverzeichnis No access 315 - 338
    1. A1 Übersicht der verwendeten Items No access
      1. A2.1 Teilnehmerinformation Studie I No access
      2. A2.2 Einverständniserklärung Studie I No access
      3. A2.3 Ergebnisse des Pretests von Studie I No access
      4. A2.4 Inhaltliche Zusammenfassung der in Studie I verwendeten Filme No access
      1. A3.1 Teilnehmerinformation Studie II No access
      2. A3.2 Einverständniserklärung Studie II No access
      3. A3.3 Inhaltliche Zusammenfassung der in Studie II verwendeten Filmausschnitte No access
      4. A3.4 Verwendete Stimuli in der Bedingung der Rezeption eines Textausschnittes No access
      5. A3.5 Explorative Faktorenanalyse zum postrezeptiven Involvement bestehend aus RII und romantischen PSB No access
      1. A4.1 Inhaltliche Zusammenfassung der in Studie III verwendeten Folgen der Serie White Collar No access

Bibliography (332)

  1. Abell, L. & Brewer, G. (2014). Machiavellianism, self-monitoring, self-promotion and relational aggression on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 258–262. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.076 Open Google Scholar
  2. Adam, A. & Sizemore, B. (2013). Parasocial romance: A social exchange perspective. Interpersona, 7, 12–25. DOI: 10.5964/ijpr.v7i1.106 Open Google Scholar
  3. Adams-Price, C. & Greene, A. L. (1990). Secondary attachments and adolescent self concept. Sex Roles, 22, 187–198. DOI: 10.1007/BF00288191 Open Google Scholar
  4. Aguilar, M., Miller, J. & Levy, S. (Produzent*innen). & Vaughan, T. (Regisseur*in) (2008). Love Vegas. USA: Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation. Open Google Scholar
  5. Ahern, C. (2014). Love Rosie – Für immer vielleicht. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Taschenbuch. Open Google Scholar
  6. Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E. & Walls, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. New York: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar
  7. Antonucci, T. C., Lansford, J. E. & Akiyama, H. (2001). Impact of positive and negative aspects of marital relationships and friendships on well-being of older adults. Applied Developmental Science, 5, 68–75. DOI: 10.1207/S1532480XADS0502_2 Open Google Scholar
  8. Appel, M., Koch, E., Schreier, M. & Groeben, N. (2002). Aspekte des Leseerlebens: Skalenentwicklung. Zeitschrift für Medienpsychologie, 14, 149–154. DOI: 10.1026//1617–6383.14.4.149 Open Google Scholar
  9. Appel, M., Slater, M. D. & Oliver, M. B. (2019). Repelled by virtue? The dark triad and eudaimonic narratives. Media Psychology, 22, 769–794. DOI: 10.1080/15213269.2018.1523014 Open Google Scholar
  10. Asendorpf, J. B. & Wilpers, S. (1998). Personality effects on social relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1531–1544. DOI: 10.1037/0022–3514.74.6.1531 Open Google Scholar
  11. Ashe, D., Maltby, J. & McCutcheon, L. E. (2005). Are celebrity-worshippers more prone to narcissism? A brief report. North American Journal of Psychology, 7, 239–246. Open Google Scholar
  12. Ashe, D. D. & McCutcheon, L. E. (2001). Shyness, loneliness, and attitude toward celebrities. Current Research in Social Psychology, 6, 124–132. Open Google Scholar
  13. Ashton-James, C. E. & Levordashka, A. (2013). When the wolf wears sheep’s clothing: Individual differences in the desire to be liked influence nonconscious mimicry. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 643–648. DOI: 10.1177/1948550613476097 Open Google Scholar
  14. Aube, J. & Koestner, R. (1995). Gender characteristics and relationship adjustment: another look at similarity-complementarity hypotheses. Journal of Personality, 63, 879–904. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467 – 6494.1995.tb00319.x Open Google Scholar
  15. Aubrey, J. S., Click, M. & Behm-Morawitz, E. (2018). The twilight of youth: Understanding feminism and romance in Twilight moms' connection to the young-adult vampire series. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 7, 61–71. DOI: 10.1037/ppm0000127 Open Google Scholar
  16. Auter, P. J. & Moore, R. L. (1993). Buying from a friend: A content analysis of two teleshopping programs. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 70, 425–436. DOI: 10.1177/107769909307000217 Open Google Scholar
  17. Auter, P. J. & Palmgreen, P. (2000). Development and validation of a parasocial interaction measure: The audience-persona interaction scale. Communication Research Reports, 17, 79–89. DOI: 10.1080/08824090009388753 Open Google Scholar
  18. Ayres, J. (1983). Strategies to maintain relationships: Their identification and perceived usage. Communication Quarterly, 31, 62–67. DOI: 10.1080/01463378309369487 Open Google Scholar
  19. Back, M. D., Schmukle, S. C. & Egloff, B. (2010). Why are narcissists so charming at first sight? Decoding the narcissism-popularity link at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 132–145. DOI: 10.1037/a0016338 Open Google Scholar
  20. Baek, Y. M., Bae, Y. & Jang, H. (2013). Social and parasocial relationships on social network sites and their differential relationships with users' psychological well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16, 512–517. DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0510 Open Google Scholar
  21. Baeßler, B. (2009). Medienpersonen als parasoziale Beziehungspartner. Ein theoretischer und empirischer Beitrag zu personazentrierter Rezeption. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft. Open Google Scholar
  22. Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. & van IJzendoora, M. H. (1997). Adult attachment and the break-up of romantic relationships. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 27, 121–139. DOI: 10.1300/J087v27n03_08 Open Google Scholar
  23. Baldwin, M. W. (1992). Relational schemas and the processing of social information. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 461–484. DOI: 10.1037/0033–2909.112.3.461 Open Google Scholar
  24. Bandura, A. (2001). Social Cognitive Theory of Mass Communication. Media Psychology, 3, 265–299. DOI: 10.1207/S1532785XMEP0303_03 Open Google Scholar
  25. Barber, G., Birnbaum, R., Taublieb, P. & Glickman, J. (Produzent*innen). & Sucsy, M. (Regisseur*in) (2012). Für immer Liebe. USA: Spyglass Entertainment. Open Google Scholar
  26. Barrett, D. (1992). Fantasizers and dissociaters: An empirically based schema of two types of deep trance subjects. Psychological Reports, 71, 1011–1014. DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1992.71.3.1011 Open Google Scholar
  27. Baumeister, R. F. & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529. DOI: 10.1037/0033–2909.117.3.497 Open Google Scholar
  28. Beentjes, J. W. J. & van der Voort, T. H. A. (1993). Television viewing versus reading: Mental effort, retention, and inferential learning. Communication Education, 42, 191–205. DOI: 10.1080/03634529309378927 Open Google Scholar
  29. Berger, A. & Yerxa, R. (Produzent*innen). & Gordon, J. & Speck, W. (Regisseur*innen) (2010). Umständlich verliebt. USA: Lionsgate. Open Google Scholar
  30. Berscheid, E. & Hatfield, E. (1974). A little bit about love. In T. L. Huston (Hrsg.), Foundations of interpersonal attraction (S. 356–381). New York: Academic Press. Open Google Scholar
  31. Bilandzic, H., Sukalla, F., Schnell, C., Hastall, M. R. & Busselle, R. W. (2019). The Narrative Engageability Scale: A multidimensional trait measure for the propensity to become engaged in a story. International Journal of Communication, 13, 801–832. Open Google Scholar
  32. Bilandzic, H. & Busselle, R. W. (2008). Transportation and transportability in the cultivation of genre-consistent attitudes and estimates. Journal of Communication, 58, 508–529. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460 – 2466.2008.00397.x Open Google Scholar
  33. Birditt, K. S. & Antonucci, T. C. (2007). Relationship quality profiles and well-being among married adults. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 595–604. DOI: 10.1037/0893–3200.21.4.595 Open Google Scholar
  34. Blumler, J. & Katz, E. (1974). The uses of mass communications. Current perspectives on gratifications research. Beverly Hills, California: Sage. Open Google Scholar
  35. Bocarnea, M. C. & Brown, W. J. (2007). Celebrity-persona parasocial interaction scale. In R. A. Reynolds, R. Woods & J. D. Baker (Hrsg.), Handbook of research on electronic surveys and measurements (S. 309–312). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Reference. Open Google Scholar
  36. Bohner, G., Moskowitz, G. B. & Chaiken, S. (1995). The interplay of heuristic and systematic processing of social information. European Review of Social Psychology, 6, 33–68. DOI: 10.1080/14792779443000003 Open Google Scholar
  37. Bond, B. J. & Calvert, S. L. (2014). Parasocial breakup among young children in the United States. Journal of Children and Media, 8, 474–490. DOI: 10.1080/17482798.2014.953559 Open Google Scholar
  38. Bond, B. J. (2018). Parasocial relationships with media personae: Why they matter and how they differ among heterosexual, lesbian, gay, and bisexual adolescents. Media Psychology, 21, 457–485. DOI: 10.1080/15213269.2017.1416295 Open Google Scholar
  39. Bond, B. J. (2020). The development and influence of parasocial relationships with television characters: A longitudinal experimental test of prejudice reduction through parasocial contact. Communication Research, 48, 573–593. DOI: 10.1177/0093650219900632 Open Google Scholar
  40. Boot, I., Peter, J. & van Oosten, J. M. F. (2016). Liking a sexual character affects willingness to have casual sex. Journal of Media Psychology, 28, 51–64. DOI: 10.1027/1864–1105/a000145 Open Google Scholar
  41. Borchers, N. S. (2019). Social media influencers in strategic communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 13, 255–260. DOI: 10.1080/1553118X.2019.1634075 Open Google Scholar
  42. Bortz, J. & Schuster, C. (2010). Statistik für Human- und Sozialwissenschaften (7. Aufl.). Berlin: Springer. Open Google Scholar
  43. Bowen, M., Godfrey, W., Kavanaugh, R. & Sparks, N. (Produzent*innen). & Hallström, L. (Regisseur*in) (2013). Safe Haven – Wie ein Licht in der Nacht. USA: Relativity Media, Temple Hill Entertainment & Nicholas Sparks Productions. Open Google Scholar
  44. Bowman, N. D., Schultheiss, D. & Schumann, C. (2012). "I'm attached, and I'm a good guy/gal!": How character attachment influences pro- and anti-social motivations to play massively multiplayer online role-playing games. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15, 1–6. DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2011.0311 Open Google Scholar
  45. Breunig, C., Handel, M. & Kassler, B. (2020). Massenkommunikation 1964–2020: Mediennutzung im Langzeitvergleich. Media Perspektiven, 7–8, 410–432. Open Google Scholar
  46. Breves, P. L., Liebers, N., Abt, M. & Kunze, A. (2019). The perceived fit between Instagram influencers and the endorsed brand. Journal of Advertising Research, 59, 440–454. DOI: 10.2501/JAR-2019–030 Open Google Scholar
  47. Broadbent, G. & Czernin, P. (Produzent*innen). & Parker, O. (Regisseur*in) (2012). Jeder Moment zählt. Großbritannien: BBC Films. Open Google Scholar
  48. Brodie, Z. & Ingram, J. (2021). The dark triad of personality and hero/villain status as predictors of parasocial relationships with comic book characters. Psychology of Popular Media, 10, 230–242. DOI: 10.1037/ppm0000323 Open Google Scholar
  49. Brooks, S., Kulzer, R. (Produzent*innen). & Ditter. C. (Regisseur*in) (2014). Love Rosie – Für immer vielleicht. Deutschland, Großbritannien: Constantin Film, Canyon Creek Films & RD Film Productions. Open Google Scholar
  50. Brooks, P. & Josephson, B. (Produzent*innen). & Berlanti, G. (Regisseur*in) (2010). So spielt das Leben. USA: Village Roadshow Pictures. Open Google Scholar
  51. Brown, W. J. & De Matviuk, M. A. C. (2010). Sports celebrities and public health: Diego Maradona's influence on drug use prevention. Journal of Health Communication, 15, 358–373. DOI: 10.1080/10810730903460575 Open Google Scholar
  52. Buote, V. M., Pancer, S. M., Pratt, M. W., Adams, G., Birnie-Lefcovitch, S., Polivy, J. et al. (2007). The importance of friends: Friendship and adjustment among 1st-year university students. Journal of Adolescent Research, 22, 665–689. DOI: 10.1177/0743558407306344 Open Google Scholar
  53. Burleson, B. R., Kunkel, A. W. & Birch, J. D. (1994). Thoughts about talk in romantic relationships: Similarity makes for attraction (and happiness, too). Communication Quarterly, 42, 259–273. DOI: 10.1080/01463379409369933 Open Google Scholar
  54. Burnett, A. & Beto, R. R. (2000). Reading romance novels: An application of parasocial relationship theory. North Dakota Journal of Speech & Theatre, 13, 28–39. Open Google Scholar
  55. Bushman, B. J. & Baumeister, R. F. (1998). Threatened egotism, narcissism, self-esteem, and direct and displaced aggression: Does self-love or self-hate lead to violence? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 219–229. DOI: 10.1037/0022–3514.75.1.219 Open Google Scholar
  56. Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–14. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X00023992 Open Google Scholar
  57. Busselle, R. & Bilandzic, H. (2009). Measuring Narrative Engagement. Media Psychology, 12, 321–347. DOI: 10.1080/15213260903287259 Open Google Scholar
  58. Calvert, S. L., Richards, M. N. & Kent, C. C. (2014). Personalized interactive characters for toddlers' learning of seriation from a video presentation. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 35, 148–155. DOI: 10.1016/j.appdev.2014.03.004 Open Google Scholar
  59. Carpenter, L. M. (1998). From girls into women: Scripts for sexuality and romance in seventeen magazine, 1974–1994. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 158–168. DOI: 10.1080/00224499809551929 Open Google Scholar
  60. Cavanagh, S. E. (2007). The social construction of romantic relationships in adolescence: Examining the role of peer networks, gender, and race. Sociological Inquiry, 77, 572–600. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475 – 682X.2007.00207.x Open Google Scholar
  61. Cellini, N., Canale, N., Mioni, G. & Costa, S. (2020). Changes in sleep pattern, sense of time and digital media use during COVID-19 lockdown in Italy. Journal of Sleep Research, 29. DOI: 10.1111/jsr.13074 Open Google Scholar
  62. Chadborn, D., Edwards, P. & Reysen, S. (2017). Displaying fan identity to make friends. Intensities: The Journal of Cult Media, 9, 87–97. Open Google Scholar
  63. Chandola, T., Marmot, M. & Siegrist, J. (2007). Failed reciprocity in close social relationships and health: Findings from the Whitehall II study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 63, 403–411. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.07.012 Open Google Scholar
  64. Chen, T. (2015). The persuasive effectiveness of mini-films: Narrative transportation and fantasy proneness. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 14, 21–27. DOI: 10.1002/cb.1494 Open Google Scholar
  65. Choi, B., Huang, J., Jeffrey, A. & Baek, Y. (2013). Development of a scale for fantasy state in digital games. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1980–1986. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.04.007 Open Google Scholar
  66. Chory-Assad, R. M. & Yanen, A. (2005). Hopelessness and loneliness as predictors of older adults' involvement with favorite television performers. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49, 182–201. DOI: 10.1207/s15506878jobem4902_3 Open Google Scholar
  67. Christie, R. & Geis, F. L. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press. Open Google Scholar
  68. Chung, S. & Cho, H. (2017). Fostering parasocial relationships with celebrities on social media: Implications for celebrity endorsement. Psychology & Marketing, 34, 481–495. DOI: 10.1002/mar.21001 Open Google Scholar
  69. Cialdini, R. B. & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591–621. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015 Open Google Scholar
  70. Cleckley, H. (1976). The mask of sanity (5. Aufl.). Oxford, England: Mosby. Open Google Scholar
  71. Clogg, C. C., Petkova, E. & Haritou, A. (1995). Statistical methods for comparing regression coefficients between models. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 1261–1293. DOI: 10.1086/230638 Open Google Scholar
  72. Cohen, E. L. (2010). Expectancy violations in relationships with friends and media figures. Communication Research Reports, 27, 97–111. DOI: 10.1080/08824091003737836 Open Google Scholar
  73. Cohen, J. (1997). Parasocial relations and romantic attraction: Gender and dating status differences. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 41, 516–529. DOI: 10.1080/08838159709364424 Open Google Scholar
  74. Cohen, J. (2003). Parasocial breakups: Measuring individual differences in responses to the dissolution of parasocial relationships. Mass Communication and Society, 6, 191–202. DOI: 10.1207/S15327825MCS0602_5 Open Google Scholar
  75. Cohen, J. (2004). Parasocial break-up from favorite television characters: The role of attachment styles and relationship intensity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 187–202. DOI: 10.1177/0265407504041374 Open Google Scholar
  76. Collins, W. A. (2003). More than myth: The developmental significance of romantic relationships during adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 13, 1–24. DOI: 10.1111/1532–7795.1301001 Open Google Scholar
  77. Connolly, J., Furman, W. & Konarski, R. (2000). The role of peers in the emergence of heterosexual romantic relationships in adolescence. Child Development, 71, 1395–1408. DOI: 10.1111/1467–8624.00235 Open Google Scholar
  78. Corry, N., Merritt, R. D., Mrug, S. & Pamp, B. (2008). The factor structure of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90, 593–600. DOI: 10.1080/00223890802388590 Open Google Scholar
  79. Coyne, S. M., Nelson, D. A., Graham-Kevan, N., Keister, E. & Grant, D. M. (2010). Mean on the screen: Psychopathy, relationship aggression, and aggression in the media. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 288–293. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.10.018 Open Google Scholar
  80. Critelli, J. W. & Waid, L. R. (1980). Physical attractiveness, romantic love, and equity restoration in dating relationships. Journal of Personality Assessment, 44, 624–629. DOI: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4406_10 Open Google Scholar
  81. Cropley, A. J. (2011). Definitions of creativity. In M. A. Runo & S. R. Pritzker (Hrsg.), Encyclopedia of creativity (S. 358–368). Munich: Elsevier. Open Google Scholar
  82. Cumming, G. (2009). Inference by eye: Reading the overlap of independent confidence intervals. Statistics in Medicine, 28, 205–220. DOI: 10.1002/sim.3471 Open Google Scholar
  83. Davenport, S. W., Bergman, S. M., Bergman, J. Z. & Fearrington, M. E. (2014). Twitter versus Facebook: Exploring the role of narcissism in the motives and usage of different social media platforms. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 212–220. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.011 Open Google Scholar
  84. Davis, M. H. & Oathout, H. A. (1987). Maintenance of satisfaction in romantic relationships: Empathy and relational competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 397–410. DOI: 10.1037/0022–3514.53.2.397 Open Google Scholar
  85. De Cervantes, M. (1547–1616). Alles, worauf die Liebe wartet, ist die Gelegenheit. Undatiertes Zitat des Autors. Abgerufen von: https://www.zitate.eu/autor/miguel-de-cervantes-saavedra-zitate/64302 Open Google Scholar
  86. Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., Gagné, M., Leone, D. R., Usunov, J. & Kornazheva, B. P. (2001). Need satisfaction, motivation, and well-being in the work organizations of a former Eastern bloc country: A cross-cultural study of self-determination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 930–942. DOI: 10.1177/0146167201278002 Open Google Scholar
  87. Demir, M. (2008). Sweetheart, you really make me happy. Romantic relationship quality and personality as predictors of happiness among emerging adults. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 257–277. DOI: 10.1007/s10902–007–9051–8 Open Google Scholar
  88. Demir, M. (2010). Close relationships and happiness among emerging adults. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 293–313. DOI: 10.1007/s10902–009–9141-x Open Google Scholar
  89. Denissen, J. J. A., Penke, L., Schmitt, D. P. & van Aken, M. A. G. (2008). Self-esteem reactions to social interactions: Evidence for sociometer mechanisms across days, people, and nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 181–196. DOI: 10.1037/0022–3514.95.1.181 Open Google Scholar
  90. Derrick, J. L., Gabriel, S. & Tippin, B. (2008). Parasocial relationships and self-discrepancies: Faux relationships have benefits for low self-esteem individuals. Personal Relationships, 15, 261–280. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.12.003 Open Google Scholar
  91. Derrick, J. L., Gabriel, S. & Hugenberg, K. (2009). Social surrogacy: How favored television programs provide the experience of belonging. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 352–362. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.12.003 Open Google Scholar
  92. Devlin, M. B., Chambers, L. T. & Callison, C. (2011). Targeting mood: Using comedy or serious movie trailers. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 55, 581–595. DOI: 10.1080/08838151.2011.620668 Open Google Scholar
  93. Di Novi, D. & Lowry, H. (Produzent*innen). & Shankman, A. (Regisseur*in) (2002). Nur mit dir. USA: Warner Bros. Pictures. Open Google Scholar
  94. Dibble, J. L., Hartmann, T. & Rosaen, S. F. (2016). Parasocial interaction and parasocial relationship: Conceptual clarification and a critical assessment of measures. Human Communication Research, 42, 21–44. DOI: 10.1111/hcre.12063 Open Google Scholar
  95. Dibble, J. L. & Rosaen, S. F. (2011). Parasocial interaction as more than friendship. Evidence for parasocial interactions with disliked media figures. Journal of Media Psychology, 23, 122–132. DOI: 10.1027/1864–1105/a000044 Open Google Scholar
  96. Diggins, C. & Olson, P. (Produzent*innen). & Mooney, D. (Regisseur*in) (2013). Love and Honor. USA: Lighting Entertainment. Open Google Scholar
  97. Driesmans, K., Vandenbosch, L. & Eggermont, S. (2016). True love lasts forever: The influence of a popular teenage movie on Belgian girls' romantic beliefs. Journal of Children and Media, 10, 304–320. DOI: 10.1080/17482798.2016.1157501 Open Google Scholar
  98. Dryer, D. C. & Horowitz, L. M. (1997). When do opposites attract? Interpersonal complementarity versus similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 592–603. DOI: 10.1037/0022–3514.72.3.592 Open Google Scholar
  99. Dubé, E. M. & Savin-Williams, R. C. (1999). Sexual identity development among ethnic sexual-minority male youths. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1389–1398. DOI: 10.1037/0012–1649.35.6.1389 Open Google Scholar
  100. Dunlop, W. L., Hanley, G. E., McCoy, T. P. & Harake, N. (2017). Sticking to the (romantic) script: An examination of love life scripts, stories, and self-reports of normality. Memory, 25, 1444–1454. DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2017.1316509 Open Google Scholar
  101. Dush, C. M. K. & Amato, P. R. (2005). Consequences of relationship status and quality for subjective well-being. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 607–627. DOI: 10.1177/0265407505056438 Open Google Scholar
  102. Eastin, J. (Produzent*in), Abraham, P. & Arkush, A. (Regisseur*innen) (2009). White Collar. USA: Fox Television Studios. Open Google Scholar
  103. Edwards, L. M. & Lopez, S. J. (2006). Perceived family support, acculturation, and life satisfaction in mexican american youth: A mixed-methods exploration. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 279–287. DOI: 10.1037/0022–0167.53.3.279 Open Google Scholar
  104. Eggermont, S. & Vandebosch, H. (2001). Television as a substitute: Loneliness, need intensity, mobility, life-satisfaction and the elderly television viewer. Communicatio, 27, 10–18. DOI: 10.1080/02500160108537902 Open Google Scholar
  105. Erickson, S. E. & Dal Cin, S. (2018). Romantic parasocial attachments and the development of romantic scripts, schemas and beliefs among adolescents. Media Psychology, 21, 111–136. DOI: 10.1080/15213269.2017.1305281 Open Google Scholar
  106. Erickson, S. E., Dal Cin, S. & Byl, H. (2019). An experimental examination of binge watching and narrative engagement. Social Sciences, 8, 1–9. DOI: 10.3390/socsci8010019 Open Google Scholar
  107. Erickson, S. E., Harrison, K. & Dal Cin, S. (2018). Toward a multi-dimensional model of adolescent romantic parasocial attachment. Communication Theory, 28, 376–399. DOI: 10.1093/ct/qtx006 Open Google Scholar
  108. Eyal, K. & Cohen, J. (2006). When good friends say goodbye: A parasocial breakup study. Journal of Broadcasting and Media, 50, 502–523. DOI: 10.1207/s15506878jobem5003_9 Open Google Scholar
  109. Eyal, K. & Rubin, A. M. (2003). Viewer aggression and homophily, identification, and parasocial relationships with television characters. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 47, 77–98. DOI: 10.1207/s15506878jobem4701_5 Open Google Scholar
  110. Fabian, T. (1993). Fernsehen und Einsamkeit im Alter. Eine empirische Untersuchung zu parasozialer Interaktion. Münster: LIT. Open Google Scholar
  111. Fardouly, J., Diedrichs, P. C., Vartanian, L. R. & Halliwell, E. (2015). Social comparisons on social media: The impact of Facebook on young women's body image concerns and mood. Body Image, 13, 38–45. DOI: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.12.002 Open Google Scholar
  112. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A. & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149 Open Google Scholar
  113. Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4.). London: Sage. Open Google Scholar
  114. Figueredo, A. J., Sefcek, J. A. & Jones, D. N. (2006). The ideal romantic partner personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 431–441. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2006.02.004 Open Google Scholar
  115. Flynn, B. & Vinson, T. (Produzent*innen). & Mylod, M. (Regisseur*in) (2011). Der perfekte Ex. USA: Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation. Open Google Scholar
  116. Foster, J. D., Shrira, I. & Campbell, W. K. (2006). Theoretical models of narcissism, sexuality, and relationship commitment. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23(3), 367–386. DOI: 10.1177/0265407506064204 Open Google Scholar
  117. Fox, J. & Rooney, M. C. (2015). The Dark Triad and trait self-objectification as predictors of men’s use and self-presentation behaviors on social networking sites. Personality and Individual Differences, 76, 161–165. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.12.017 Open Google Scholar
  118. Fredriksen-Goldsen, K. I. & Muraco, A. (2010). Aging and sexual orientation: A 25-year review of the literature. Research on Aging, 32, 372–413. DOI: 10.1177/0164027509360355 Open Google Scholar
  119. Friedkin, N. E. & Johnsen, E. C. (1990). Social influence and opinions. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 15, 193–206. DOI: 10.1080/0022250X.1990.9990069 Open Google Scholar
  120. Furnham, A., Richards, S. C. & Paulhus, D. L. (2013). The dark triad of personality: A 10 year review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 199–216. DOI: 10.1111/spc3.12018 Open Google Scholar
  121. Gehrau, V., Döveling, K., Sommer, D. & Dunlop, S. (2014). Antagonistic and synergetic impacts of conversation on nonpersuasive media effects. Communication Research, 41, 578–602. DOI: 10.1177/0093650212445480 Open Google Scholar
  122. Gibgot, J., Shankman, A. & Cyrus, L. T. (Produzent*innen). & Robinson, J. A. (Regisseur*in) (2010). Mit Dir an meiner Seite. USA: Touchstone Pictures. Open Google Scholar
  123. Giles, D. C. (2002). Parasocial interaction: A review of the literature and a model for future research. Media Psychology, 4, 279–305. DOI: 10.1207/S1532785XMEP0403_04 Open Google Scholar
  124. Gleich, U. (1997). Parasoziale Interaktionen und Beziehungen von Fernsehzuschauern mit Personen auf dem Bildschirm: Ein theoretischer und empirischer Beitrag zum Konzept des aktiven Rezipienten. Landau: Verlag Empirische Pädagogik. Open Google Scholar
  125. Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative "description of personality": The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229. DOI: 10.1037/0022–3514.59.6.1216 Open Google Scholar
  126. Goodboy, A. K. & Martin, M. M. (2015). The personality profile of a cyberbully: Examining the Dark Triad. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 1–4. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.052 Open Google Scholar
  127. Grant, S., Langan-Fox, J. & Anglim, J. (2009). The big five traits as predictors of subjective and psychological well-being. Psychological Reports, 105, 205–231. DOI: 10.2466/PR0.105.1.205 – 231 Open Google Scholar
  128. Green, M. C., Brock, T. C. & Kaufman, G. F. (2004). Understanding media enjoyment: The role of transportation into narrative worlds. Communication Theory, 14, 311–327. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468 – 2885.2004.tb00317.x Open Google Scholar
  129. Greenwood, D. N. (2009). Idealized TV friends and young women's body concerns. Body Image, 6, 97–104. DOI: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2008.12.001 Open Google Scholar
  130. Greenwood, D. N. & Long, C. R. (2009). Psychological predictors of media involvement: Solitude experiences and the need to belong. Communication Research, 36, 637–654. DOI: 10.1177/0093650209338906 Open Google Scholar
  131. Greenwood, D. N. & Long, C. R. (2011). Attachment, belongingness needs, and relationship status predict imagined intimacy with media figures. Communication Research, 38, 278–297. DOI: 10.1177/0093650210362687 Open Google Scholar
  132. Greenwood, D., McCutcheon, L. E., Collisson, B. & Wong, M. (2018). What's fame got to do with it? Clarifying links among celebrity attitudes, fame appeal, and narcissistic subtypes. Personality and Individual Differences, 131, 238–243. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2018.04.032 Open Google Scholar
  133. Greitemeyer, T. (2015). Everyday sadism predicts violent video game preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 75, 19–23. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.10.049 Open Google Scholar
  134. Grijalva, E., Harms, P. D., Newman, D. A., Gaddis, B. H. & Fraley, R. C. (2015). Narcissism and leadership: A meta-analytic review of linear and nonlinear relationships. Personnel Psychology, 68(1), 1–47. DOI: 10.1111/peps.12072 Open Google Scholar
  135. Guerrero, L. K. & Mongeau, P. A. (2018). On becoming "more than friends": The transition from friendship to romantic relationship. In S. Sprecher, A. Wenzel & j. Harvey (Hrsg.), Handbook of relationship initiation (S. 175–194). New York: Psychology Press. Open Google Scholar
  136. Hall, J. R. & Benning, S. D. (2006). The "successful" psychopath: Adaptive and subclinical manifestations of psychopathy in the general population. In C. J. Patrick (Hrsg.), Handbook of psychopathy (S. 459–478). New York: Guilford. Open Google Scholar
  137. Hamann, S. B. (1990). Level-of-processing effects in conceptually driven implicit tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 16, 970–977. DOI: 10.1037/0278–7393.16.6.970 Open Google Scholar
  138. Hartmann, T. (2008). Parasocial interactions and paracommunication with new media characters. In E. A. Konijin, S. Utz, M. Tanis & S. Barnes (Hrsg.), Mediated interpersonal communication (S. 177–199). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Open Google Scholar
  139. Hartmann, T. (2016). Parasocial interaction, parasocial relationships, and well-being. In L. Reinecke & M. B. Oliver (Hrsg.), The Routledge handbook of media use and well-being: International perspectives on theory and research on positive media effects (S. 131–144). New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  140. Hartmann, T. & Goldhoorn, C. (2011). Horton and Wohl revisited: Exploring Viewers' experience of parasocial interaction. Journal of Communication, 61, 1104–1121. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460 – 2466.2011.01595.x Open Google Scholar
  141. Hartmann, T. & Klimmt, C. (2005). Ursachen und Effekte Parasozialer Interaktionen im Rezeptionsprozess: Eine Fragebogenstudie auf der Basis des PSI-Zwei-Ebenen-Modells. Zeitschrift für Medienpsychologie, 17, 88–98. DOI: 10.1026/1617–6383.17.3.88 Open Google Scholar
  142. Hartmann, T., Schramm, H. & Klimmt, C. (2004). Personenorientierte Medienrezeption: Ein Zwei-Ebenen-Modell parasozialer Interaktionen. Publizistik, 49, 25–47. Open Google Scholar
  143. Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2. Aufl.). New York: Guilford Press. Open Google Scholar
  144. Hendrick, C. & Hendrick, S. (1986). A theory and method of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 392–402. DOI: 10.1037/0022–3514.50.2.392 Open Google Scholar
  145. Henningsen, D. D., Braz, M. & Davies, E. (2008). Why do we flirt? Flirting motivations and sex differences in working and social contexts. Journal of Business Communication, 45, 483–502. DOI: 10.1177/0021943608319390 Open Google Scholar
  146. Herget, A.-K. (2021). Well-known and unknown music as an emotionalizing carrier of meaning in film. Media Psychology, 24, 385–412. DOI: 10.1080/15213269.2020.1713164 Open Google Scholar
  147. Herschbach, M. (2015). Direct social perception and dual process theories of mindreading. Consciousness and Cognition, 36, 483–497. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.04.001 Open Google Scholar
  148. Hilgard, E. R. (1980). The trilogy of mind: Cognition, affection, and conation. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 16, 107–117. DOI: 10.1002/1520–6696(198004)16:2<107::AID-JHBS2300160202>3.0.CO;2-Y Open Google Scholar
  149. Hoberman, D. & Lieberman, T. (Produzent*innen). & Fletcher, A. (Regisseur*in) (2009). Selbst ist die Braut. USA: Touchstone Pictures. Open Google Scholar
  150. Hoffner, C. (1996). Children's wishful identification and parasocial interaction with favorite television characters. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 40, 389–402. DOI: 10.1080/08838159609364360 Open Google Scholar
  151. Holmberg, D. & MacKenzie, S. (2002). So far, so good: Scripts for romantic relationship development as predictors of relational well-being. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 777–796. DOI: 10.1177/0265407502196003 Open Google Scholar
  152. Horton, D. & Strauss, A. (1957). Interaction in audience-participation shows. American Journal of Sociology, 62, 579–587. DOI: 10.1086/222106 Open Google Scholar
  153. Horton, D. & Wohl, R. R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19, 188–211. DOI: 10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049 Open Google Scholar
  154. Hu, M. (2016). The Influence of a scandal on parasocial relationship, parasocial interaction, and parasocial breakup. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5, 217–231. DOI: 10.1037/ppm0000068 Open Google Scholar
  155. Hughes, S. M., Dispenza, F. & Gallup, G. G. (2004). Ratings of voice attractiveness predict sexual behavior and body configuration. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 295–304. DOI: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.06.001 Open Google Scholar
  156. Jeffres, L. W., Bracken, C. C., Atkin, D. & Neuendorf, K. (2010). Moving from theorizing to application: Predicting audience enjoyment of TV formats. American Journal of Media Psychology, 3, 156–179. Open Google Scholar
  157. Jonason, P. K., Valentine, K. A., Li, N. P. & Harbeson, C. L. (2011). Mate-selection and the Dark Triad: Facilitating a short-term mating strategy and creating a volatile environment. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 759–763. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.06.025 Open Google Scholar
  158. Jones, D. N. & Paulhus, D. L. (2011). Differentiating in the Dark Triad within the interpersonal circumplex. In L. M. Horowitz & S. Strack (Hrsg.), Handbook of interpersonal psychology: Theory, research, assessment, and therapeutic interventions (S. 249–269). New York: Wiley & Sons. Open Google Scholar
  159. Jones, D. N. & Paulhus, D. L. (2014). Introducing the short Dark Triad (SD3). A brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment, 21, 28–41. DOI: 10.1177/1073191113514105 Open Google Scholar
  160. Jordan, J. M. & Bahk, C. M. (2001). The cognitive bases and social consequences of communication involvement. Communication Research Reports, 18, 11–25. DOI: 10.1080/08824090109384778 Open Google Scholar
  161. Kahnemann, D., Diener, E. & Schwarz, N. (Hrsg.). (1999). Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Open Google Scholar
  162. Kaiser, H. F. & Rice, J. (1974). Little jiffy, mark 4. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34, 111–117. Open Google Scholar
  163. Kawamura, Y., Ivankova, N. V., Kohler, C. L. & Perumean-Chaney, S. (2009). Utilizing mixed methods to assess parasocial interaction of an entertainment-education program audience. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 3, 88–104. DOI: 10.5172/mra.455.3.1.88 Open Google Scholar
  164. Keesler, M. E. & DeMatteo, D. (2017). How media exposure relates to laypersons' understanding of psychopathy. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 62, 1522–1533. DOI: 10.1111/1556–4029.13485 Open Google Scholar
  165. Kernberg, O. (1975). Borderline conditions and pathological narcissism. New York: Jason Aronson. Open Google Scholar
  166. Kim, J. & Rubin, A. M. (1997). The variable influence of audience activity on media effects. Communication Research, 24, 107–135. DOI: 10.1177/009365097024002001 Open Google Scholar
  167. Kim, J. L., Sorsoli, C. L., Collins, K., Zylbergold, B. A., Schooler, D. & Tolman, D. L. (2007). From sex to sexuality: Exposing the heterosexual script on primetime network television. Journal of Sex Research, 44, 145–157. DOI: 10.1080/00224490701263660 Open Google Scholar
  168. Klimmt, C., Hartmann, T. & Schramm, H. (2006). Parasocial interactions and relationships. In B. Jennings & P. Vorderer (Hrsg.), Psychology of entertainment (S. 291–314). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. Open Google Scholar
  169. Klimmt, C. & Vorderer, P. (2002). "Lara ist mein Medium". Parasoziale Interaktionen mit Lara Croft im Vergleich zur Lieblingsfigur aus Film und Fernsehen. In P. Rössler, S. Kubisch & V. Gehrau (Hrsg.), Empirische Perspektiven der Rezeptionsforschung (S. 177–192). München: Fischer. Open Google Scholar
  170. Klohnen, E. C. & Luo, S. (2003). Interpersonal attraction and personality: What is attractive-self similarity, ideal similarity, complementarity or attachment security? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 709–722. DOI: 10.1037/0022–3514.85.4.709 Open Google Scholar
  171. Knapp, M. L. (1978). Social intercourse: From greeting to goodbye. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, Incorporated. Open Google Scholar
  172. Knobloch, S. & Zillmann, D. (2002). Mood management via the digital jukebox. Journal of Communication, 52, 351–366. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460 – 2466.2002.tb02549.x Open Google Scholar
  173. Knoll, J., Schramm, H., Schallhorn, C. & Wynistorf, S. (2015). Good guy vs. bad guy – The influence of parasocial interactions with media characters on brand placement effects. International Journal of Advertising: The Review of Marketing Communications, 34, 720–743. DOI: 10.1080/02650487.2015.1009350 Open Google Scholar
  174. Kosslyn, S. M., Ganis, G. & Thompson, W. L. (2001). Neural foundations of imagery. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 635–642. DOI: 10.1038/35090055 Open Google Scholar
  175. Krannich, B. M. (2012). RTL ändert den Seriendonnerstag, wirft White Collar raus. Abgerufen von: https://www.serienjunkies.de/news/rtl-aendert-seriendonnerstag-wirft-white-44440.html Open Google Scholar
  176. Kronewald, E. (2008). Fernsehnutzung von Singles und Liierten: Die Relevanz des Merkmals Beziehungsstand für Fernsehnutzungsmotive und parasoziale Beziehungen. München: Verlag Reinhard Fischer. Open Google Scholar
  177. Kurilla, B. P. & Westerman, D. L. (2008). Processing fluency affects subjective claims of recollection. Memory & Cognition, 36, 82–92. DOI: 10.3758/MC.36.1.82 Open Google Scholar
  178. Lee, E.-J. & Shin, S. Y. (2014). When the medium is the message: How transportability moderates the effects of politicians' twitter communication. Communication Research, 41, 1088–1110. Open Google Scholar
  179. Lee, S. A., Guajardo, N. R., Short, S. D. & King, W. (2010). Individual differences in ocular level empathic accuracy ability: The predictive power of fantasy empathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 68–71. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.016 Open Google Scholar
  180. Lemay, E. P., Clark, M. S. & Greenberg, A. (2010). What is beautiful is good because what is beautiful is desired: Physical attractiveness stereotyping as projection of interpersonal goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 339–353. DOI: 10.1177/0146167209359700 Open Google Scholar
  181. Levy, M. R. (1979). Watching TV news as parasocial interaction. Journal of Broadcasting, 23, 177–187. DOI: 10.1080/08838157909363919 Open Google Scholar
  182. Liebers, N. (2018). Love triangles: Effects of relationship status, reception partners, and interpersonal communication on romantic parasocial interactions, Washington, DC. Open Google Scholar
  183. Liebers, N. & Schramm, H. (2017). Friends in books: The influence of character attributes and the reading experience on parasocial relationships and romances. Poetics, 65, 12–23. DOI: 10.1016/j.poetic.2017.10.001 Open Google Scholar
  184. Liebers, N. & Schramm, H. (2019). Parasocial interactions and relationships with media characters – An inventory of 60 years of research. Communication Research Trends, 38, 4–31. Open Google Scholar
  185. Lim, C. M. & Kim, Y.-K. (2011). Older consumers' TV home shopping: Loneliness, parasocial interaction, and perceived convenience. Psychology & Marketing, 28, 763–780. DOI: 10.1002/mar.20411 Open Google Scholar
  186. Lombard, M., Reich, R. D., Grabe, M. E., Bracken, C. C. & Ditton, T. B. (2000). Presence and television. The role of screen size. Human Communication Research, 26, 75–98. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468 – 2958.2000.tb00750.x Open Google Scholar
  187. Love, A. B. & Holder, M. D. (2014). Psychopathy and subjective well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 66, 112–117. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.03.033 Open Google Scholar
  188. Love, A. B. & Holder, M. D. (2016). Can romantic relationship quality mediate the relation between psychopathy and subjective well-being? Journal of Happiness Studies, 17, 2407–2429. DOI: 10.1007/s10902–015–9700–2 Open Google Scholar
  189. Lynn, S. J. & Rhue, J. W. (1986). The fantasy-prone person: Hypnosis, imagination, and creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 404–408. DOI: 10.1037/0022–3514.51.2.404 Open Google Scholar
  190. Madison, T. P. & Porter, L. V. (2016). Cognitive and imagery attributes of parasocial relationships. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 35, 359–379. DOI: 10.1177/0276236615599340 Open Google Scholar
  191. Mahl, D. (2001). The influence of parental divorce on the romantic relationship beliefs of young adults. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 34, 89–118. DOI: 10.1300/J087v34n03_06 Open Google Scholar
  192. Malle, B. F. & Hodges, S. (2005). Other minds: How humans bridge the divide between self and other. New York: Guilford Press. Open Google Scholar
  193. Maltby, J., Giles, D. C., Barber, L. & McCutcheon, L. E. (2005). Intense personal celebrity worship and body image: Evidence of a link among female adolescents. British journal of health psychology, 10, 17–32. DOI: 10.1348/135910704X15257 Open Google Scholar
  194. Maltby, J., Houran, J. & McCutcheon, L. E. (2003). A clinical interpretation of attitudes and behaviors associated with celebrity worship. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 191, 25–29. DOI: 10.1097/00005053–200301000–00005 Open Google Scholar
  195. Maltby, J., Day, L., McCutcheon, L. E., Houran, J. & Ashe, D. (2006). Extreme celebrity worship, fantasy proneness and dissociation: Developing the measurement and understanding of celebrity worship within a clinical personality context. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 273–283. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.07.004 Open Google Scholar
  196. March, E. & Wagstaff, D. L. (2017). Sending nudes: Sex, self-rated mate value, and trait Machiavellianism predict sending unsolicited explicit images. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2210. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02210 Open Google Scholar
  197. Marston, P. J., Hecht, M. L. & Robers, T. (1987). `True love ways': The subjective experience and communication of romantic love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4, 387–407. DOI: 10.1177/0265407587044001 Open Google Scholar
  198. Matrix, S. (2014). The Netflix effect: Teens, binge watching, and on-demand digital media trends. Jeunesse: Young People, Texts, Cultures, 6, 119–138. DOI: 10.1353/jeu.2014.0002 Open Google Scholar
  199. McCain, J. L. & Campbell, W. K. (2018). Narcissism and social media use: A meta-analytic review. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 7, 308–327. DOI: 10.1037/ppm0000137 Open Google Scholar
  200. McCourt, A. & Fitzpatrick, J. (2001). The role of personal characteristics and romantic characteristics in parasocial relationships: A pilot study. Journal of Mundane Behavior, 2, 42–58. Open Google Scholar
  201. McCutcheon, L. E., Ashe, D. D., Houran, J. & Maltby, J. (2003). A cognitive profile of individuals who tend to worship celebrities. The Journal of Psychology, 137, 309–322. DOI: 10.1080/00223980309600616 Open Google Scholar
  202. McCutcheon, L. E., Lange, R. & Houran, J. (2002). Conceptualization and measurement of celebrity worship. British Journal of Psychology, 93, 67–87. DOI: 10.1348/000712602162454 Open Google Scholar
  203. McNulty, J. K., Neff, L. A. & Karney, B. R. (2008). Beyond initial attraction: Physical attractiveness in newlywed marriage. Journal of Family Psychology, 22, 135–143. DOI: 10.1037/0893–3200.22.1.135 Open Google Scholar
  204. Meier, A. & Allen, G. (2009). Romantic relationships from adolescence to young adulthood: Evidence from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Sociological Quarterly, 50, 308–335. DOI: 10.1111/j.1533 – 8525.2009.01142.x Open Google Scholar
  205. Merikivi, J., Bragge, J., Scornavacca, E. & Verhagen, T. (2020). Binge-watching serialized video content: A transdisciplinary review. Television & New Media, 21, 697–711. DOI: 10.1177/1527476419848578 Open Google Scholar
  206. Moss, B. F. & Schwebel, A. I. (1993). Defining intimacy in romantic relationships. Family Relations, 42, 31–37. DOI: 10.2307/584918 Open Google Scholar
  207. Moss, P. & Higgins, C. (1984). Radio voices. Media, Culture & Society, 6, 353–375. DOI: 10.1177/016344378400600404 Open Google Scholar
  208. Moyer-Gusé, E. (2008). Toward a theory of entertainment persuasion: Explaining the persuasive effects of entertainment-education messages. Communication Theory, 18, 407–425. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468 – 2885.2008.00328.x Open Google Scholar
  209. Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G. & Griffin, D. W. (1996). The self-fulfilling nature of positive illusions in romantic relationships: Love is not blind, but prescient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1155–1180. DOI: 10.1037/0022–3514.71.6.1155 Open Google Scholar
  210. Nabi, R. L., Stitt, C. R., Halford, J. & Finnerty, K. L. (2006). Emotional and cognitive predictors of the enjoyment and reality-based and fictional television programming: An elaboration of the Uses and Gratifications perspective. Media Psychology, 8, 421–447. DOI: 10.1207/s1532785xmep0804_5 Open Google Scholar
  211. Nelson, M. R. & Paek, H.-J. (2008). Nudity of female and male models in primetime TV advertising across seven countries. International Journal of Advertising, 27, 715–744. DOI: 10.2501/S0265048708080281 Open Google Scholar
  212. Niehuis, S., Lee, K.-H., Reifman, A., Swenson, A. & Hunsaker, S. (2011). Idealization and disillusionment in intimate relationships: A review of theory, method, and research. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 3, 273–302. DOI: 10.1111/j.1756 – 2589.2011.00100.x Open Google Scholar
  213. Nordlund, J. E. (1978). Media interaction. Communication Research, 5, 150–175. DOI: 10.1177/009365027800500202 Open Google Scholar
  214. Oliver, M. B. & Bartsch, A. (2011). Appreciation of entertainment: The importance of meaningfulness via virtue and wisdom. Journal of Media Psychology, 23, 29–33. DOI: 10.1027/1864–1105/a000029 Open Google Scholar
  215. Oliver, M. B. & Raney, A. A. (2011). Entertainment as pleasurable and meaningful: Identifying hedonic and eudaimonic motivations for entertainment consumption. Journal of Communication, 61, 984–1004. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460 – 2466.2011.01585.x Open Google Scholar
  216. Ortiz-Ospina, E. (2019). The rise of living alone: how one-person households are becoming increasingly common around the world. Verfügbar unter: https://ourworldindata.org/living-alone Open Google Scholar
  217. Paccagnella, O. (2006). Centering or not centering in multilevel models? The role of the group mean and the assessment of group effects. Evaluation Review, 30, 66–85. DOI: 10.1177/0193841X05275649 Open Google Scholar
  218. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  219. Paul, B. & Shim, J. W. (2008). Gender, sexual affect, and motivations for internet pornography use. International Journal of Sexual Health, 20, 187–199. DOI: 10.1080/19317610802240154 Open Google Scholar
  220. Paulhus, D. L. & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556–563. DOI: 10.1016/S0092–6566(02)00505–6 Open Google Scholar
  221. Pavot, W., Diener, E. & Fujita, F. (1990). Extraversion and happiness. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 1299–1306. DOI: 10.1016/0191–8869(90)90157-M Open Google Scholar
  222. Perloff, R. M. & Krevans, J. (1987). Tracking the psychosocial predictors of older individuals' television uses. The Journal of Psychology, 121, 365–372. DOI: 10.1080/00223980.1987.9712677 Open Google Scholar
  223. Perse, E. M. & Rubin, R. B. (1989). Attribution in social and parasocial relationships. Communication Research, 16, 59–77. DOI: 10.1177/009365089016001003 Open Google Scholar
  224. Petty, R. E. & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion. New York: Springer. Open Google Scholar
  225. Pewresearch.org (2019). Social media fact sheet. Abgerufen von: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/social-media/ Open Google Scholar
  226. Phua, J. (2016). The effects of similarity, parasocial identification, and source credibility in obesity public service announcements on diet and exercise self-efficacy. Journal of Health Psychology, 21, 699–708. DOI: 10.1177/1359105314536452 Open Google Scholar
  227. Pierce, C. A. (1996). Body height and romantic attraction: A meta-analytic test of the male-taller norm. Social Behavior and Personality, 24, 143–149. DOI: 10.2224/sbp.1996.24.2.143 Open Google Scholar
  228. Pinquart, M. & Sörensen, S. (2000). Influences of socioeconomic status, social network, and competence on subjective well-being in later life: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 15, 187–224. DOI: 10.1037/0882–7974.15.2.187 Open Google Scholar
  229. Plante, C. N., Reysen, S., Groves, C. L., Roberts, S. E. & Gerbasi, K. (2017). The Fantasy Engagement Scale: A flexible measure of positive and negative fantasy engagement. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 39, 127–152. DOI: 10.1080/01973533.2017.1293538 Open Google Scholar
  230. Raskin, R. N. & Hall, C. S. (1979). A narcissistic personality inventory. Psychological Reports, 45, 590. DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1979.45.2.590 Open Google Scholar
  231. Rauschenberger, S. L. & Lynn, S. J. (1995). Fantasy proneness, DSM-II--R Axis 1 psychopatholoy, and dissociation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104, 373–380. DOI: 10.1037/0021–843X.104.2.373 Open Google Scholar
  232. Rauthmann, J. F. (2012). The dark triad and interpersonal perception: Similarities and differences in the social consequences of narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 487–496. DOI: 10.1177/1948550611427608 Open Google Scholar
  233. Regan, P. C. & Berscheid, E. (1997). Gender differences in characteristics desired in a potential sexual and marriage partner. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 9, 25–37. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475 – 6811.1995.tb00097.x Open Google Scholar
  234. Reinecke, L., Tamborini, R., Grizzard, M., Lewis, R., Eden, A. & David Bowman, N. (2012). Characterizing mood management as need satisfaction: The effects of intrinsic needs on selective exposure and mood repair. Journal of Communication, 62, 437–453. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460 – 2466.2012.01649.x Open Google Scholar
  235. Reis, H. T., Sheldon, K. M., Gable, S. L., Roscoe, J. & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Daily well-being: The role of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 419–435. DOI: 10.1177/0146167200266002 Open Google Scholar
  236. Rieger, D., Wulf, T., Kneer, J., Frischlich, L. & Bente, G. (2014). The winner takes it all: The effect of in-game success and need satisfaction on mood repair and enjoyment. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 281–286. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.037 Open Google Scholar
  237. Rosaen, S. F. & Dibble, J. L. (2016). Clarifying the role of attachment and social compensation on parasocial relationships with television characters. Communication Studies, 67, 147–162. Open Google Scholar
  238. Rosario, M., Schrimshaw, E. W., Hunter, J. & Braun, L. (2006). Sexual identity development among gay, lesbian, and bisexual youths: consistency and change over time. Journal of Sex Research, 43, 46–58. DOI: 10.1080/00224490609552298 Open Google Scholar
  239. Rosenberg, T. & Lucchesi, G. (Produzent*innen) & Luketic, R. (Regisseur*in) (2009). Die nackte Wahrheit. USA: Columbia Pictures. Open Google Scholar
  240. Rosengren, K. E. (1994). Media use under structural change. In K. E. Rosengren (Hrsg.), Media effects and beyond: Culture, socialization, and lifestyles (S. 49–75). London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  241. Rosengren, K. E. & Windahl, S. (1972). Mass media consumption as a functional alternative. In D. McQuail (Hrsg.), Sociology of mass communications (S. 166–194). Hamondsworth: Penguin. Open Google Scholar
  242. Rubenking, B. & Bracken, C. C. (2018). Binge-watching: A suspenseful, emotional, habit. Communication Research Reports, 35, 381–391. DOI: 10.1080/08824096.2018.1525346 Open Google Scholar
  243. Rubin, A. M. & Perse, E. M. (1987). Audience activity and soap opera involvement: A uses and effects investigation. Human Communication Research, 14, 246–292. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468 – 2958.1987.tb00129.x Open Google Scholar
  244. Rubin, A. M., Perse, E. M. & Powell, R. A. (1985). Loneliness, parasocial interaction, and local television news viewing. Human Communication Research, 12, 155–180. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468 – 2958.1985.tb00071.x Open Google Scholar
  245. Rubin, A. M. & Step, M. M. (2000). Impact of motivation, attraction, and parasocial interaction on talk radio listening. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44, 635–654. DOI: 10.1207/s15506878jobem4404_7 Open Google Scholar
  246. Rupp, H. A. & Wallen, K. (2008). Sex differences in response to visual sexual stimuli: A review. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 206–218. DOI: 10.1007/s10508–007–9217–9 Open Google Scholar
  247. Russell, C. A. & Stern, B. B. (2006). Consumers, characters, and products: A balance model of sitcom product placement effects. Journal of Advertising, 35, 7–21. DOI: 10.2753/JOA0091–3367350101 Open Google Scholar
  248. Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78. DOI: 10.1037/0003–066X.55.1.68 Open Google Scholar
  249. Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141 Open Google Scholar
  250. Ryan, R. M., Huta, V. & Deci, E. L. (2008). Living well: A self-determination theory perspective on eudaimonia. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 139–170. DOI: 10.1007/s10902–006–9023–4 Open Google Scholar
  251. Ryff, C. D. & Singer, B. H. (2006). Best news yet on the six-factor model of well-being. Social Science Research, 35, 1103–1119. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.01.002 Open Google Scholar
  252. Salmela-Aro, K., Aunola, K. & Nurmi, J.-E. (2007). Personal goals during emerging adulthood. Journal of Adolescent Research, 22, 690–715. DOI: 10.1177/0743558407303978 Open Google Scholar
  253. Salomon, G. (1984). Television is "easy" and print is "tough". The differential investment of mental effort in learning as a function of perceptions and attributions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 647–658. DOI: 10.1037/0022–0663.76.4.647 Open Google Scholar
  254. Salvaggio, A. N., Streich, M., Hopper, J. & Pierce, C. A. (2011). Why do fools fall in love (at work)? Factors associated with the incidence of workplace romance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41, 906–937. DOI: 10.1111/j.1559 – 1816.2011.00741.x Open Google Scholar
  255. Sangrador, J. L. & Yela, C. (2000). 'What is beautiful is loved': Physical attractiveness in love relationships in a representative sample. Social Behavior and Personality, 28, 207–218. DOI: 10.2224/sbp.2000.28.3.207 Open Google Scholar
  256. Schallow, J. R. & McIlwraith, R. D. (1986). Is television viewing really bad for your imagination?: Content and process of TV viewing and imaginal styles. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 6, 25–42. DOI: 10.2190/1L5Y-TNYL-X5QK-NUVT Open Google Scholar
  257. Schiappa, E., Gregg, P. B. & Hewes, D. E. (2006). Can one TV show make a difference? Will & Grace and the parasocial contact hypothesis. Journal of Homosexuality, 51, 15–37. DOI: 10.1300/J082v51n04_02 Open Google Scholar
  258. Schnarre, P. & Adam, A. (2018). Parasocial romances as infidelity: Comparing perceptions of real-life, online, and parasocial extradyadic relationships. Journal of Indiana Academy of the Social Sciences, 20(1), 1–13. Open Google Scholar
  259. Schnotz, W. (2005). An integrated model of text and picture comprehension. In R. E. Mayer (Hrsg.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (S. 49–70). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  260. Schönbach, K. & Früh, W. (1991). Der dynamisch-transaktionale Ansatz II: Konsequenzen. In W. Früh (Hrsg.), Medienwirkungen: Das dynamisch-transaktionale Modell. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. DOI: 10.1007/978–3–663–10777–4_3 Open Google Scholar
  261. Schramm, H. (2008). Parasocial interactions and relationships. In W. Donsbach (Hrsg.), The Blackwell Internation Encyclopedia of Communication (S. 3501–3506). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. Open Google Scholar
  262. Schramm, H. & Hartmann, T. (2008). Die Messung von parasozialen Interaktionen als mehrdimensionales Konstrukt. Entwicklung und Validierung von PSI-Prozess-Skalen auf Basis des Zwei-Ebenen-Modells parasozialer Interaktionen. In J. Matthes, W. Wirth, G. Daschmann & A. Fahr (Hrsg.), Methoden und Forschungslogik der Kommunikationswissenschaft. Die Brücke zwischen Theorie und Empirie – Operationalisierung, Messung und Validierung in der Kommunikationswissenschaft (S. 48–69). Köln: Herbert von Halem Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  263. Schramm, H. & Wirth, W. (2008). A case for an integrative view on affect regulation through media usage. Communications, 33, 27–46. DOI: 10.1515/COMMUN.2008.002 Open Google Scholar
  264. Scott, M. A., Simonoff, J. S. & Marx, B. D. (2013). The SAGE handbook of multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Open Google Scholar
  265. Seabrook, R. C., Ward, L. M., Reed, L., Manago, A., Giaccardi, S. & Lippman, J. R. (2016). Our scripted sexuality: The development and validation of a measure of the heterosexual script and its relation to television consumption. Emerging Adulthood, 4, 338–355. DOI: 10.1177/2167696815623686 Open Google Scholar
  266. Seal, D. W. & Ehrhardt, A. A. (2003). Masculinity and urban men: Perceived scripts for courtship, romantic, and sexual interactions with women. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 5, 295–319. DOI: 10.1080/136910501171698 Open Google Scholar
  267. Silver, N. & Slater, M. D. (2019). A safe space for self-expansion: Attachment and motivation to engage and interact with the story world. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36, 3492–3514. DOI: 10.1177/0265407519826345 Open Google Scholar
  268. Slater, M. D., Ewoldsen, D. R. & Woods, K. W. (2018). Extending conceptualization and measurement of narrative engagement after-the-fact: Parasocial relationship and retrospective imaginative involvement. Media Psychology, 21, 329–351. DOI: 10.1080/15213269.2017.1328313 Open Google Scholar
  269. Slater, M. D., Oliver, M. B., Appel, M., Tchernev, J. M. & Silver, N. A. (2018). Mediated wisdom of experience revisited: Delay discounting, acceptance of death, and closeness to future self. Human Communication Research, 44, 80–101. DOI: 10.1093/hcr/hqx004 Open Google Scholar
  270. Snijders, T. A. B. & Bosker, R. (2011). Multilevel analysis. An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling (2. Aufl.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Open Google Scholar
  271. Song, W. & Fox, J. (2016). Playing for love in a romantic video game: Avatar identification, parasocial relationship, and Chinese women's romantic beliefs. Mass Communication and Society, 19, 197–215. DOI: 10.1080/15205436.2015.1077972 Open Google Scholar
  272. Sparks, N. (2013). Safe Haven – Wie ein Licht in der Nacht. München: Heyne. Open Google Scholar
  273. Spencer, S. (1985). Endlose Liebe. Hamburg: Hoffmann und Campe Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  274. Spinda, J. S., Earnheardt, A. C. & Hugenberg, L. W. (2009). Checkered flags and mediated friendships: Parasocial interaction among NASCAR fans. Journal of Sports Media, 4, 31–55. DOI: 10.1353/jsm.0.0041 Open Google Scholar
  275. Spitzberg, B. H. & Cupach, W. R. (2008). Fanning the flames of fandom: Celebrity worship, parasocial interaction, and stalking. In J. R. Meloy, L. Sheridan & J. Hoffmann (Hrsg.), Stalking, threatening and attacking public figures: A psychological and behavioral analysis (S. 287–321). New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  276. Sprecher, S., Aron, A., Hatfield, E., Cortese, A., Potapova, E. & Levitskaya, A. (1994). Love: Amercian style, Russian style, and Japanese style. Personal Relationships, 1, 349–369. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475 – 6811.1994.tb00070.x Open Google Scholar
  277. Sprecher, S. & Metts, S. (1989). Development of the `Romantic Beliefs Scale' and examination of the effects of gender and gender-role orientation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6, 387–411. DOI: 10.1177/0265407589064001 Open Google Scholar
  278. Sprecher, S. & Metts, S. (1999). Romantic beliefs: Their influence on relationships and patterns of change over time. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16, 834–851. DOI: 10.1177/0265407599166009 Open Google Scholar
  279. Stanton, S. C. E., Campbell, L. & Loving, T. J. (2014). Energized by love: Thinking about romantic relationships increases positive affect and blood glucose levels. Psychophysiology, 51, 990–995. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12249 Open Google Scholar
  280. Statista.com. (2015). Umfrage in Deutschland zur eigenen sexuellen Orientierung 2015. Abgerufen von: https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/479510/umfrage/umfrage-in-deutschland-zur-eigenen-sexuellen-orientierung/ Open Google Scholar
  281. Statista.com (2018). Umfrage in Deutschland zur sexuellen Orientierung im Geschlechtervergleich 2016. Abgerufen von: https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/823538/umfrage/umfrage-in-deutschland-zur-sexuellen-orientierung-im-geschlechtervergleich/ Open Google Scholar
  282. Statista.com (2019). Umfrage zur Nutzung von Büchern und E-Books in Deutschland bis 2019. Abgerufen von: https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/277971/umfrage/nutzung-von-buechern-und-e-books-deutschland/ Open Google Scholar
  283. Stehr, P., Rössler, P., Schönhardt, F. & Leißner, L. (2015). Parasocial opinion leadership: Media personalities' influence within parasocial relations: Theoretical conceptualization and preliminary results. International Journal of Communication, 9, 982–1001. Open Google Scholar
  284. Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93, 119–135. DOI: 10.1037/0033–295X.93.2.119 Open Google Scholar
  285. Stever, G. S. (2011). Fan behavior and lifespan development theory: Explaining para-social and social attachment to celebrities. Journal of Adult Development, 18, 1–7. DOI: 10.1007/s10804–010–9100–0 Open Google Scholar
  286. Strauss, A. L. (1958). In Memoriam: R. Richard Wohl, 1921–1957. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 533–534. DOI: 10.1086/222304 Open Google Scholar
  287. Streiner, D. L. (2003). Starting at the beginning: An introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80, 99–103. DOI: 10.1207/S15327752JPA8001_18 Open Google Scholar
  288. Striepe, M. I. & Tolman, D. L. (2003). Mom, dad, I'm straight: The coming out of gender ideologies in adolescent sexual-identity development. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 32, 523–530. DOI: 10.1207/S15374424JCCP3204_4 Open Google Scholar
  289. Stuber, S., Abdy, P., Schwartz, J., Savage, S. (Produzent*innen). & Feste, S. (Regisseur*in) (2014). Endless Love. Großbritannien: Universal Studios. Open Google Scholar
  290. Sumter, S. R., Vandenbosch, L. & Ligtenberg, L. (2017). Love me Tinder: Untangling emerging adults’ motivations for using the dating application Tinder. Telematics and Informatics, 34, 67–78. DOI: 10.1016/j.tele.2016.04.009 Open Google Scholar
  291. Tamborini, R., Stiff, J. & Zillmann, D. (1987). Preference for Graphic Horror Featuring Male Versus Female Victimization. Human Communication Research, 13, 529–552. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468 – 2958.1987.tb00117.x Open Google Scholar
  292. Tamborini, R., Bowman, N. D., Eden, A., Grizzard, M. & Organ, A. (2010). Defining media enjoyment as the satisfaction of intrinsic needs. Journal of Communication, 60, 758–777. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460 – 2466.2010.01513.x Open Google Scholar
  293. Thallmair, A. & Rössler, P. (2001). Parasoziale Interaktion bei der Rezeption von Daily Talk shows. Eine Befragung von älteren Talk-Zuschauern. In C. Schneiderbauer (Hrsg.), Daily Talkshows unter der Lupe (S. 179–208). München: Fischer. Open Google Scholar
  294. Tian, Q. & Hoffner, C. A. (2010). Parasocial interaction with liked, neutral, and disliked characters on a popular TV series. Mass Communication and Society, 13, 250–269. DOI: 10.1080/15205430903296051 Open Google Scholar
  295. Todorov, A. & Porter, J. M. (2014). Misleading first impressions: Different for different facial images of the same person. Psychological Science, 25, 1404–1417. DOI: 10.1177/0956797614532474 Open Google Scholar
  296. Toepoel, V. (2013). Ageing, leisure, and social connectedness: How could leisure help reduce social isolation of older people? Social Indicators Research, 113, 355–372. DOI: 10.1007/s11205–012–0097–6 Open Google Scholar
  297. Toma, C. L. & Hancock, J. T. (2010). Looks and lies: The role of physical attractiveness in online dating self-presentation and deception. Communication Research, 37, 335–351. DOI: 10.1177/0093650209356437 Open Google Scholar
  298. Tsao, J. (1996). Compensatory media use: An exploration of two paradigms. Communication Studies, 47, 89–109. DOI: 10.1080/10510979609368466 Open Google Scholar
  299. Tsay, M. & Bodine, B. M. (2012). Exploring parasocial interaction in college students as a multidimensional construct: Do personality, interpersonal need, and television motive predict their relationships with media characters? Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 1, 185–200. DOI: 10.1037/a0028120 Open Google Scholar
  300. Tukachinsky, R. (2010). Para-romantic love and para-friendships: Development and assessment of a multiple-parasocial relationships scale. American Journal of Media Psychology, 3, 73–94. Open Google Scholar
  301. Tukachinsky, R. & Dorros, S. M. (2018). Parasocial romantic relationships, romantic beliefs, and relationship outcomes in USA adolescents: rehearsing love or setting oneself up to fail? Journal of Children and Media, 12, 329–345. DOI: 10.1080/17482798.2018.1463917 Open Google Scholar
  302. Tukachinsky, R. & Stever, G. S. (2019). Theorizing development of parasocial engagement. Communication Theory, 29, 297–318. DOI: 10.1093/ct/qty032 Open Google Scholar
  303. Turner, A. (2020). Smartphone addiction facts & phone usage statistics: The definitive guide (2019–2020 update). Verfügbar unter: https://www.bankmycell.com/blog/smartphone-addiction/#chapter1 Open Google Scholar
  304. Turner, J. R. (1993). Interpersonal and psychological predictors of parasocial interaction with different television performers. Communication Quarterly, 41, 443–453. DOI: 10.1080/01463379309369904 Open Google Scholar
  305. Valentine, K. A., Li, N. P., Meltzer, A. L. & Tsai, M.-H. (2020). Mate preferences for warmth-trustworthiness predict romantic attraction in the early stages of mate selection and satisfaction in ongoing relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46, 298–311. DOI: 10.1177/0146167219855048 Open Google Scholar
  306. Valkenburg, P. M. & Peter, J. (2006). Fantasy and imagination. In J. Bryant & P. Vorderer (Hrsg.), Psychology of entertainment (S. 105–117). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Open Google Scholar
  307. Van Reijmersdal, E. A., Jansz, J., Peters, O. & van Noort, G. (2010). The effects of interactive brand placements in online games on children’s cognitive, affective, and conative brand responses. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1787–1794. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.006 Open Google Scholar
  308. Vinney, C. & Dill-Shackleford, K. E. (2018). Fan fiction as a vehicle for meaning making: Eudaimonic appreciation, hedonic enjoyment, and other perspectives on fan engagement with television. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 7, 18–32. DOI: 10.1037/ppm0000106 Open Google Scholar
  309. Visscher, A. & Vorderer, P. (1998). Freunde in guten und schlechten Zeiten. Parasoziale Beziehungen von Vielsehern zu Charakteren einer Daily Soap. In H. Wilhelms & M. Jurga (Hrsg.), Inszenierungsgesellschaft (S. 453–469). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  310. Vorderer, P. (Hrsg.). (1996). Fernsehen als "Beziehungskiste": Parasoziale Beziehungen und Interaktionen mit TV-Personen. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  311. Vorderer, P. & Knobloch, S. (1996). Parasoziale Beziehungen zu Serienfiguren: Ergänzung oder Ersatz? Zeitschrift für Medienpsychologie, 8, 201–216. Open Google Scholar
  312. Vorderer, P. (2011). What’s next? Remarks on the current vitalization of entertainment theory. Journal of Media Psychology, 23, 60–63. DOI: 10.1027/1864–1105/a000034 Open Google Scholar
  313. Vorderer, P. & Reinecke, L. (2015). From mood to meaning: The changing model of the user in entertainment research. Communication Theory, 25, 447–453. DOI: 10.1111/comt.12082 Open Google Scholar
  314. Vujeva, H. M. & Furman, W. (2011). Depressive symptoms and romantic relationship qualities from adolescence through emerging adulthood: a longitudinal examination of influences. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 40, 123–135. DOI: 10.1080/15374416.2011.533414 Open Google Scholar
  315. Walster, E., Aronson, V., Abrahams, D. & Rottman, L. (1966). Importance of physical attractiveness in dating behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 508–516. DOI: 10.1037/h0021188 Open Google Scholar
  316. Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 678–691. DOI: 10.1037/0022–3514.64.4.678 Open Google Scholar
  317. Watson, D., Clark, L. A. & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070. DOI: 10.1037/0022–3514.54.6.1063 Open Google Scholar
  318. Weibel, D., Martarelli, C. S., Häberli, D. & Mast, F. W. (2018). The Fantasy Questionnaire: A measure to assess creative and imaginative fantasy. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100, 431–443. DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2017.1331913 Open Google Scholar
  319. Welch, S.‐A. & Rubin, R. B. (2002). Development of relationship stage measures. Communication Quarterly, 50, 24–40. DOI: 10.1080/01463370209385644 Open Google Scholar
  320. Wenner, L. A. (1983). Political news on television: A reconsideration of audience orientations. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 47, 380–395. DOI: 10.1080/10570318309374132 Open Google Scholar
  321. Whitebread, D. & O'Sullivan, L. (2012). Preschool children's social pretend play: Supporting the development of metacommunication, metacognition and self-regulation. International Journal of Play, 1, 197–213. DOI: 10.1080/21594937.2012.693384 Open Google Scholar
  322. Wiederman, M. W. (2005). The gendered nature of sexual scripts. The Family Journal, 13, 496–502. DOI: 10.1177/1066480705278729 Open Google Scholar
  323. Wirth, W., Hofer, M. & Schramm, H. (2012). Beyond pleasure: Exploring the eudaimonic entertainment experience. Human Communication Research, 38, 406–428. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468 – 2958.2012.01434.x Open Google Scholar
  324. Wood, W. (2000). Attitude change: persuasion and social influence. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 539–570. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.539 Open Google Scholar
  325. Wright, A. G. C., Lukowitsky, M. R., Pincus, A. L. & Conroy, D. E. (2010). The higher order factor structure and gender invariance of the Pathological Narcissism Inventory. Assessment, 17, 467–483. DOI: 10.1177/1073191110373227 Open Google Scholar
  326. Yamada, M., Lamm, C. & Decety, J. (2011). Pleasing frowns, disappointing smiles: An ERP investigation of counterempathy. Emotion, 11, 1336–1345. DOI: 10.1037/a0023854 Open Google Scholar
  327. Young, A. F., Gabriel, S. & Sechrist, G. B. (2012). The skinny on celebrities: Parasocial relationships moderate the effects of thin media figures on women's body image. Social Psychology and Personality Science, 3, 659–666. DOI: 10.1177/1948550611434785 Open Google Scholar
  328. Zillmann, D. (1988). Mood management through communication choices. American Behavioral Scientist, 31, 327–340. DOI: 10.1177/000276488031003005 Open Google Scholar
  329. Zillmann, D. (1996). The psychology of suspense in dramatic exposition. In P. Vorderer, H. J. Wulff & M. Friedrichsen (Hrsg.), Suspense: Conseptualizations, theoretical analyses, and empirical explorations (S. 199–231). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar
  330. Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J. & Petherick, J. (2006). Intimacy dating goals and relationship satisfaction during adolescence and emerging adulthood: Identity formation, age and sex as moderators. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30, 167–177. DOI: 10.1177/0165025406063636 Open Google Scholar
  331. Zuckerman, M., Miyake, K. & Elkin, C. S. (1995). Effects of attractiveness and maturity of face and voice on interpersonal impressions. Journal of Research in Personality, 29, 253–272. DOI: 10.1006/jrpe.1995.1015 Open Google Scholar
  332. Zwick, E., Stuber, S., Herskovitz, M., Randolph, C. & Brugge, P. J. (Produzent*innen). & Zwick, E. (Regisseur*in). Love and other Drugs. USA: Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation Open Google Scholar

Similar publications

from the topics "Film & Television & Cinema", "Media Effects Research & Media Usage Research", "Media Science, Communication Research"
Cover of book: Israel in deutschen Medien
Book Titles No access
Jonas Hessenauer, Lukas Uwira
Israel in deutschen Medien
Cover of book: Medienmanagement
Educational Book No access
Ingo Knuth, Thomas Kilian
Medienmanagement
Cover of book: Konstruktiver Journalismus
Book Titles Full access
Julia Faltermeier
Konstruktiver Journalismus
Cover of book: Trennen – Verbinden – Takten
Book Titles No access
Patrick Wöhrle, Stephan Hein, Stefan Meißner
Trennen – Verbinden – Takten
Cover of book: Neuere Forschung zu parasozialen Interaktionen und Beziehungen
Book Titles Partial access
Holger Schramm, Nicole Liebers, Laurenz Biniak, Franca Dettmar
Neuere Forschung zu parasozialen Interaktionen und Beziehungen

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via Open Athens
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex