Cover des Buchs: Romantische parasoziale Interaktionen und Beziehungen mit Mediencharakteren
Im Shop erwerben
, um zu prüfen, ob Sie einen Vollzugriff auf diese Publikation haben.
Monographie Kein Zugriff

Romantische parasoziale Interaktionen und Beziehungen mit Mediencharakteren

Ein theoretischer und empirischer Beitrag
Autor:innen:
Verlag:
 2021

Zusammenfassung

Romantische parasoziale Interaktionen und Beziehungen sind aus dem Alltag vieler MediennutzerInnen nicht wegzudenken. Dennoch wurden sie bislang kaum untersucht. Dieses Buch begegnet dem Defizit, indem es sich zunächst mit der Definition und Entwicklung romantischer parasozialer Interaktionen und Beziehungen sowie deren Implikationen und Einflussfaktoren aus theoretischer Sicht auseinandersetzt. Im Anschluss werden drei empirische Studien zur ihrer Entwicklung und den Implikationen vorgestellt. Eine differenzierte Diskussion schließt das Buch. Somit erleichtert dieses Buch sowohl den Einstieg für Studierende als auch die fortgeschrittene wissenschaftliche Arbeit im Kontext romantischer parasozialer Phänomene.

Schlagworte

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Copyrightjahr
2021
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-8215-4
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-2637-5
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe
Reihe Rezeptionsforschung
Band
43
Sprache
Deutsch
Seiten
384
Produkttyp
Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Kein Zugriff 1 - 20
    1. 1.1 Romantische parasoziale Phänomene in der kommunikationswissenschaftlichen und medienpsychologischen Forschung Kein Zugriff
    2. 1.2 Ziel und Aufbau der Arbeit Kein Zugriff
      1. 2.1.1 Die Entwicklung des Konzepts der parasozialen Phänomene durch Horton und Wohl Kein Zugriff
      2. 2.1.2 Die weitere Entwicklung des Konzepts als freundschaftliche parasoziale Interaktionen und Beziehungen Kein Zugriff
      3. 2.1.3 Die Entwicklung hin zur Einbeziehung romantischer Facetten parasozialer Phänomene Kein Zugriff
      1. 2.2.1 Definition romantischer Zuneigung Kein Zugriff
      2. 2.2.2 Definition parasozialer Interaktionen Kein Zugriff
      3. 2.2.3 Spezifizierung romantischer parasozialer Interaktionen Kein Zugriff
      1. 2.3.1 Definition parasozialer Beziehungen Kein Zugriff
      2. 2.3.2 Spezifizierung romantischer parasozialer Beziehungen Kein Zugriff
      3. 2.3.3 Abgrenzung romantischer parasozialer Beziehungen vom Celebrity-Worship Kein Zugriff
      1. 2.4.1 Gemeinsamkeiten orthosozialer und parasozialer romantischer Interaktionen und Beziehungen Kein Zugriff
      2. 2.4.2 Unterschiede orthosozialer und parasozialer romantischer Interaktionen und Beziehungen Kein Zugriff
      1. 3.1.1 Die Illusion der Interaktion Kein Zugriff
      2. 3.1.2 Parasoziale Interaktionen im Rahmen des Zwei-Ebenen-Modells Kein Zugriff
      3. 3.1.3 Fazit: Die Entstehung romantischer parasozialer Interaktionen Kein Zugriff
      1. 3.2.1 Das Kreis-Prozess-Modell Kein Zugriff
      2. 3.2.2 Das Stufenmodell Kein Zugriff
      3. 3.2.3 Das multidimensionale Modell romantischer parasozialer Bindungen bei Jugendlichen Kein Zugriff
      4. 3.2.4 Das retrospektive imaginative Involvement mit Mediencharakteren Kein Zugriff
      5. 3.2.5 Fazit: Die Entstehung romantischer parasozialer Beziehungen Kein Zugriff
      1. 4.1.1 Romantische parasoziale Phänomene und beziehungsrelevante Skripte Kein Zugriff
      2. 4.1.2 Romantische parasoziale Phänomene und die eigene sexuelle Identität und Beziehungen Kein Zugriff
      1. 4.2.1 Begriffserklärung des psychologischen Wohlbefindens Kein Zugriff
      2. 4.2.2 Psychologisches Wohlbefinden als eudaimonisches Unterhaltungserleben Kein Zugriff
      3. 4.2.3 Romantische parasoziale Phänomene und das eudaimonische Unterhaltungserleben Kein Zugriff
      1. 5.1.1 Die Eigenschaften des Mediencharakters als Prädiktoren für romantische parasoziale Phänomene Kein Zugriff
      2. 5.1.2 Die Eigenschaften der Narration als Prädiktoren für romantische parasoziale Phänomene Kein Zugriff
      3. 5.1.3 Die Eigenschaften des medialen Kanals der Narration als Prädiktoren für romantische parasoziale Phänomene Kein Zugriff
      1. 5.2.1 Die Fähigkeit versus das Bedürfnis, parasoziale Phänomene zu entwickeln Kein Zugriff
      2. 5.2.2 Die Dunkle Triade und das Bedürfnis, romantische parasoziale Phänomene zu entwickeln Kein Zugriff
      3. 5.2.3 Die Fantasiefähigkeit und die Fähigkeit, romantische parasoziale Phänomene zu entwickeln Kein Zugriff
    1. 6.1 Forschungslücken und Forschungsvorhaben Kein Zugriff
    2. 6.2 Die Dunkle Triade als Prädiktor für romantische parasoziale Phänomene Kein Zugriff
    3. 6.3 Die Fantasiefähigkeit als Prädiktor für romantische parasoziale Phänomene Kein Zugriff
    4. 6.4 Die Wechselwirkung von Fantasiefähigkeit und Dunkler Triade in der Entwicklung romantischer parasozialer Phänomene Kein Zugriff
    5. 6.5 Das Zusammenspiel romantischer parasozialer Interaktionen und Beziehungen Kein Zugriff
    6. 6.6 Romantische parasoziale Phänomene und das eudaimonische Unterhaltungserleben Kein Zugriff
    7. 6.7 Zusammenfassung und Übersicht der Annahmen Kein Zugriff
    1. 7.1 Ziele der Studie I Kein Zugriff
      1. 7.2.1 Untersuchungsanlage und Studienablauf Kein Zugriff
      2. 7.2.2 Stimuli Kein Zugriff
      3. 7.2.3 Stichprobe Kein Zugriff
      4. 7.2.4 Messung der Variablen Kein Zugriff
      1. 7.3.1 Manipulation-Check Kein Zugriff
      2. 7.3.2 Ergebnisse zum Einfluss der Dunklen Triade auf die romantische PSI Kein Zugriff
      3. 7.3.3 Ergebnisse zum Einfluss der romantischen PSI auf das eudaimonische Unterhaltungserleben Kein Zugriff
      1. 7.4.1 Zentrale Erkenntnisse Kein Zugriff
      2. 7.4.2 Limitationen Kein Zugriff
      3. 7.4.3 Fazit Kein Zugriff
    1. 8.1 Ziele der Studie II Kein Zugriff
      1. 8.2.1 Untersuchungsanlage und Studienablauf Kein Zugriff
      2. 8.2.2 Stimuli Kein Zugriff
      3. 8.2.3 Stichprobe Kein Zugriff
      4. 8.2.4 Messung der Variablen Kein Zugriff
      1. 8.3.1 Ergebnisse zum Zusammenhang zwischen der Fantasiefähigkeit und der romantischen PSI Kein Zugriff
      2. 8.3.2 Ergebnisse zum Zusammenhang zwischen der Fantasiefähigkeit, dem RII und der romantischen PSB Kein Zugriff
      3. 8.3.3 Ergebnisse zum Zusammenhang zwischen der romantischen PSI, dem RII und der romantischen PSB Kein Zugriff
      1. 8.4.1 Zentrale Erkenntnisse Kein Zugriff
      2. 8.4.2 Limitationen Kein Zugriff
      3. 8.4.3 Fazit Kein Zugriff
    1. 9.1 Ziele der Studie III Kein Zugriff
      1. 9.2.1 Untersuchungsanlage und Studienablauf Kein Zugriff
      2. 9.2.2 Stimulus Kein Zugriff
      3. 9.2.3 Stichprobe Kein Zugriff
      4. 9.2.4 Messung der Variablen Kein Zugriff
      1. 9.3.1 Ergebnisse zum Einfluss der Merkmale der Dunklen Triade auf die Entwicklung romantischer parasozialer Phänomene Kein Zugriff
      2. 9.3.2 Ergebnisse zum Einfluss der Fantasiefähigkeit auf die Entwicklung romantischer parasozialer Phänomene Kein Zugriff
      3. 9.3.3 Ergebnisse zur Wechselwirkung der Merkmale der Dunklen Triade und der Fantasiefähigkeit in der Entwicklung romantischer parasozialer Phänomene Kein Zugriff
      4. 9.3.4 Ergebnisse zum Zusammenhang zwischen der romantischen PSI, dem RII und der romantischen PSB Kein Zugriff
      5. 9.3.5 Ergebnisse zum Einfluss romantischer parasozialer Phänomene auf das eudaimonische Unterhaltungserleben Kein Zugriff
      1. 9.4.1 Zentrale Erkenntnisse Kein Zugriff
      2. 9.4.2 Limitationen Kein Zugriff
      3. 9.4.3 Fazit Kein Zugriff
      1. 10.1.1 Die Dunkle Triade und die Fantasiefähigkeit als Prädiktoren für romantische parasoziale Phänomene Kein Zugriff
      2. 10.1.2 Die dynamische Entwicklung romantischer parasozialer Phänomene unter Einbezug des retrospektiven imaginativen Involvements Kein Zugriff
      3. 10.1.3 Implikationen romantischer parasozialer Phänomene für das eudaimonische Unterhaltungserleben Kein Zugriff
      1. 10.2.1 Bewertung des studienübergreifenden methodischen Vorgehens Kein Zugriff
      2. 10.2.2 Kritische Bemerkung zur Annahme kausaler Wirkzusammenhänge Kein Zugriff
      3. 10.2.3 Limitationen hinsichtlich der Generalisierbarkeit Kein Zugriff
      4. 10.2.4 Bewertung der gewählten Forschungsvorhaben Kein Zugriff
      1. 10.3.1 Erfassung romantischer parasozialer Phänomene Kein Zugriff
      2. 10.3.2 Persönliche Dispositionen und romantische parasoziale Phänomene Kein Zugriff
      3. 10.3.3 Romantische PSI und das Rezeptionserleben Kein Zugriff
      4. 10.3.4 Postrezeptive Prozesse in der Entwicklung romantischer parasozialer Phänomene Kein Zugriff
      5. 10.3.5 Romantische parasoziale Phänomene und Wohlbefinden Kein Zugriff
      6. 10.3.6 Romantische parasoziale Phänomene jenseits der narrativen Unterhaltungsmedien Kein Zugriff
      1. 10.4.1 Implikationen für die Wissenschaft Kein Zugriff
      2. 10.4.2 Implikationen für die Praxis Kein Zugriff
      3. 10.4.3 Fazit und Ausblick Kein Zugriff
  12. Literaturverzeichnis Kein Zugriff 315 - 338
    1. A1 Übersicht der verwendeten Items Kein Zugriff
      1. A2.1 Teilnehmerinformation Studie I Kein Zugriff
      2. A2.2 Einverständniserklärung Studie I Kein Zugriff
      3. A2.3 Ergebnisse des Pretests von Studie I Kein Zugriff
      4. A2.4 Inhaltliche Zusammenfassung der in Studie I verwendeten Filme Kein Zugriff
      1. A3.1 Teilnehmerinformation Studie II Kein Zugriff
      2. A3.2 Einverständniserklärung Studie II Kein Zugriff
      3. A3.3 Inhaltliche Zusammenfassung der in Studie II verwendeten Filmausschnitte Kein Zugriff
      4. A3.4 Verwendete Stimuli in der Bedingung der Rezeption eines Textausschnittes Kein Zugriff
      5. A3.5 Explorative Faktorenanalyse zum postrezeptiven Involvement bestehend aus RII und romantischen PSB Kein Zugriff
      1. A4.1 Inhaltliche Zusammenfassung der in Studie III verwendeten Folgen der Serie White Collar Kein Zugriff

Literaturverzeichnis (332)

  1. Abell, L. & Brewer, G. (2014). Machiavellianism, self-monitoring, self-promotion and relational aggression on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 258–262. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.076 Google Scholar öffnen
  2. Adam, A. & Sizemore, B. (2013). Parasocial romance: A social exchange perspective. Interpersona, 7, 12–25. DOI: 10.5964/ijpr.v7i1.106 Google Scholar öffnen
  3. Adams-Price, C. & Greene, A. L. (1990). Secondary attachments and adolescent self concept. Sex Roles, 22, 187–198. DOI: 10.1007/BF00288191 Google Scholar öffnen
  4. Aguilar, M., Miller, J. & Levy, S. (Produzent*innen). & Vaughan, T. (Regisseur*in) (2008). Love Vegas. USA: Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation. Google Scholar öffnen
  5. Ahern, C. (2014). Love Rosie – Für immer vielleicht. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Taschenbuch. Google Scholar öffnen
  6. Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E. & Walls, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. New York: Erlbaum. Google Scholar öffnen
  7. Antonucci, T. C., Lansford, J. E. & Akiyama, H. (2001). Impact of positive and negative aspects of marital relationships and friendships on well-being of older adults. Applied Developmental Science, 5, 68–75. DOI: 10.1207/S1532480XADS0502_2 Google Scholar öffnen
  8. Appel, M., Koch, E., Schreier, M. & Groeben, N. (2002). Aspekte des Leseerlebens: Skalenentwicklung. Zeitschrift für Medienpsychologie, 14, 149–154. DOI: 10.1026//1617–6383.14.4.149 Google Scholar öffnen
  9. Appel, M., Slater, M. D. & Oliver, M. B. (2019). Repelled by virtue? The dark triad and eudaimonic narratives. Media Psychology, 22, 769–794. DOI: 10.1080/15213269.2018.1523014 Google Scholar öffnen
  10. Asendorpf, J. B. & Wilpers, S. (1998). Personality effects on social relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1531–1544. DOI: 10.1037/0022–3514.74.6.1531 Google Scholar öffnen
  11. Ashe, D., Maltby, J. & McCutcheon, L. E. (2005). Are celebrity-worshippers more prone to narcissism? A brief report. North American Journal of Psychology, 7, 239–246. Google Scholar öffnen
  12. Ashe, D. D. & McCutcheon, L. E. (2001). Shyness, loneliness, and attitude toward celebrities. Current Research in Social Psychology, 6, 124–132. Google Scholar öffnen
  13. Ashton-James, C. E. & Levordashka, A. (2013). When the wolf wears sheep’s clothing: Individual differences in the desire to be liked influence nonconscious mimicry. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 643–648. DOI: 10.1177/1948550613476097 Google Scholar öffnen
  14. Aube, J. & Koestner, R. (1995). Gender characteristics and relationship adjustment: another look at similarity-complementarity hypotheses. Journal of Personality, 63, 879–904. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467 – 6494.1995.tb00319.x Google Scholar öffnen
  15. Aubrey, J. S., Click, M. & Behm-Morawitz, E. (2018). The twilight of youth: Understanding feminism and romance in Twilight moms' connection to the young-adult vampire series. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 7, 61–71. DOI: 10.1037/ppm0000127 Google Scholar öffnen
  16. Auter, P. J. & Moore, R. L. (1993). Buying from a friend: A content analysis of two teleshopping programs. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 70, 425–436. DOI: 10.1177/107769909307000217 Google Scholar öffnen
  17. Auter, P. J. & Palmgreen, P. (2000). Development and validation of a parasocial interaction measure: The audience-persona interaction scale. Communication Research Reports, 17, 79–89. DOI: 10.1080/08824090009388753 Google Scholar öffnen
  18. Ayres, J. (1983). Strategies to maintain relationships: Their identification and perceived usage. Communication Quarterly, 31, 62–67. DOI: 10.1080/01463378309369487 Google Scholar öffnen
  19. Back, M. D., Schmukle, S. C. & Egloff, B. (2010). Why are narcissists so charming at first sight? Decoding the narcissism-popularity link at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 132–145. DOI: 10.1037/a0016338 Google Scholar öffnen
  20. Baek, Y. M., Bae, Y. & Jang, H. (2013). Social and parasocial relationships on social network sites and their differential relationships with users' psychological well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16, 512–517. DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0510 Google Scholar öffnen
  21. Baeßler, B. (2009). Medienpersonen als parasoziale Beziehungspartner. Ein theoretischer und empirischer Beitrag zu personazentrierter Rezeption. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft. Google Scholar öffnen
  22. Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. & van IJzendoora, M. H. (1997). Adult attachment and the break-up of romantic relationships. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 27, 121–139. DOI: 10.1300/J087v27n03_08 Google Scholar öffnen
  23. Baldwin, M. W. (1992). Relational schemas and the processing of social information. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 461–484. DOI: 10.1037/0033–2909.112.3.461 Google Scholar öffnen
  24. Bandura, A. (2001). Social Cognitive Theory of Mass Communication. Media Psychology, 3, 265–299. DOI: 10.1207/S1532785XMEP0303_03 Google Scholar öffnen
  25. Barber, G., Birnbaum, R., Taublieb, P. & Glickman, J. (Produzent*innen). & Sucsy, M. (Regisseur*in) (2012). Für immer Liebe. USA: Spyglass Entertainment. Google Scholar öffnen
  26. Barrett, D. (1992). Fantasizers and dissociaters: An empirically based schema of two types of deep trance subjects. Psychological Reports, 71, 1011–1014. DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1992.71.3.1011 Google Scholar öffnen
  27. Baumeister, R. F. & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529. DOI: 10.1037/0033–2909.117.3.497 Google Scholar öffnen
  28. Beentjes, J. W. J. & van der Voort, T. H. A. (1993). Television viewing versus reading: Mental effort, retention, and inferential learning. Communication Education, 42, 191–205. DOI: 10.1080/03634529309378927 Google Scholar öffnen
  29. Berger, A. & Yerxa, R. (Produzent*innen). & Gordon, J. & Speck, W. (Regisseur*innen) (2010). Umständlich verliebt. USA: Lionsgate. Google Scholar öffnen
  30. Berscheid, E. & Hatfield, E. (1974). A little bit about love. In T. L. Huston (Hrsg.), Foundations of interpersonal attraction (S. 356–381). New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  31. Bilandzic, H., Sukalla, F., Schnell, C., Hastall, M. R. & Busselle, R. W. (2019). The Narrative Engageability Scale: A multidimensional trait measure for the propensity to become engaged in a story. International Journal of Communication, 13, 801–832. Google Scholar öffnen
  32. Bilandzic, H. & Busselle, R. W. (2008). Transportation and transportability in the cultivation of genre-consistent attitudes and estimates. Journal of Communication, 58, 508–529. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460 – 2466.2008.00397.x Google Scholar öffnen
  33. Birditt, K. S. & Antonucci, T. C. (2007). Relationship quality profiles and well-being among married adults. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 595–604. DOI: 10.1037/0893–3200.21.4.595 Google Scholar öffnen
  34. Blumler, J. & Katz, E. (1974). The uses of mass communications. Current perspectives on gratifications research. Beverly Hills, California: Sage. Google Scholar öffnen
  35. Bocarnea, M. C. & Brown, W. J. (2007). Celebrity-persona parasocial interaction scale. In R. A. Reynolds, R. Woods & J. D. Baker (Hrsg.), Handbook of research on electronic surveys and measurements (S. 309–312). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Reference. Google Scholar öffnen
  36. Bohner, G., Moskowitz, G. B. & Chaiken, S. (1995). The interplay of heuristic and systematic processing of social information. European Review of Social Psychology, 6, 33–68. DOI: 10.1080/14792779443000003 Google Scholar öffnen
  37. Bond, B. J. & Calvert, S. L. (2014). Parasocial breakup among young children in the United States. Journal of Children and Media, 8, 474–490. DOI: 10.1080/17482798.2014.953559 Google Scholar öffnen
  38. Bond, B. J. (2018). Parasocial relationships with media personae: Why they matter and how they differ among heterosexual, lesbian, gay, and bisexual adolescents. Media Psychology, 21, 457–485. DOI: 10.1080/15213269.2017.1416295 Google Scholar öffnen
  39. Bond, B. J. (2020). The development and influence of parasocial relationships with television characters: A longitudinal experimental test of prejudice reduction through parasocial contact. Communication Research, 48, 573–593. DOI: 10.1177/0093650219900632 Google Scholar öffnen
  40. Boot, I., Peter, J. & van Oosten, J. M. F. (2016). Liking a sexual character affects willingness to have casual sex. Journal of Media Psychology, 28, 51–64. DOI: 10.1027/1864–1105/a000145 Google Scholar öffnen
  41. Borchers, N. S. (2019). Social media influencers in strategic communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 13, 255–260. DOI: 10.1080/1553118X.2019.1634075 Google Scholar öffnen
  42. Bortz, J. & Schuster, C. (2010). Statistik für Human- und Sozialwissenschaften (7. Aufl.). Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen
  43. Bowen, M., Godfrey, W., Kavanaugh, R. & Sparks, N. (Produzent*innen). & Hallström, L. (Regisseur*in) (2013). Safe Haven – Wie ein Licht in der Nacht. USA: Relativity Media, Temple Hill Entertainment & Nicholas Sparks Productions. Google Scholar öffnen
  44. Bowman, N. D., Schultheiss, D. & Schumann, C. (2012). "I'm attached, and I'm a good guy/gal!": How character attachment influences pro- and anti-social motivations to play massively multiplayer online role-playing games. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15, 1–6. DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2011.0311 Google Scholar öffnen
  45. Breunig, C., Handel, M. & Kassler, B. (2020). Massenkommunikation 1964–2020: Mediennutzung im Langzeitvergleich. Media Perspektiven, 7–8, 410–432. Google Scholar öffnen
  46. Breves, P. L., Liebers, N., Abt, M. & Kunze, A. (2019). The perceived fit between Instagram influencers and the endorsed brand. Journal of Advertising Research, 59, 440–454. DOI: 10.2501/JAR-2019–030 Google Scholar öffnen
  47. Broadbent, G. & Czernin, P. (Produzent*innen). & Parker, O. (Regisseur*in) (2012). Jeder Moment zählt. Großbritannien: BBC Films. Google Scholar öffnen
  48. Brodie, Z. & Ingram, J. (2021). The dark triad of personality and hero/villain status as predictors of parasocial relationships with comic book characters. Psychology of Popular Media, 10, 230–242. DOI: 10.1037/ppm0000323 Google Scholar öffnen
  49. Brooks, S., Kulzer, R. (Produzent*innen). & Ditter. C. (Regisseur*in) (2014). Love Rosie – Für immer vielleicht. Deutschland, Großbritannien: Constantin Film, Canyon Creek Films & RD Film Productions. Google Scholar öffnen
  50. Brooks, P. & Josephson, B. (Produzent*innen). & Berlanti, G. (Regisseur*in) (2010). So spielt das Leben. USA: Village Roadshow Pictures. Google Scholar öffnen
  51. Brown, W. J. & De Matviuk, M. A. C. (2010). Sports celebrities and public health: Diego Maradona's influence on drug use prevention. Journal of Health Communication, 15, 358–373. DOI: 10.1080/10810730903460575 Google Scholar öffnen
  52. Buote, V. M., Pancer, S. M., Pratt, M. W., Adams, G., Birnie-Lefcovitch, S., Polivy, J. et al. (2007). The importance of friends: Friendship and adjustment among 1st-year university students. Journal of Adolescent Research, 22, 665–689. DOI: 10.1177/0743558407306344 Google Scholar öffnen
  53. Burleson, B. R., Kunkel, A. W. & Birch, J. D. (1994). Thoughts about talk in romantic relationships: Similarity makes for attraction (and happiness, too). Communication Quarterly, 42, 259–273. DOI: 10.1080/01463379409369933 Google Scholar öffnen
  54. Burnett, A. & Beto, R. R. (2000). Reading romance novels: An application of parasocial relationship theory. North Dakota Journal of Speech & Theatre, 13, 28–39. Google Scholar öffnen
  55. Bushman, B. J. & Baumeister, R. F. (1998). Threatened egotism, narcissism, self-esteem, and direct and displaced aggression: Does self-love or self-hate lead to violence? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 219–229. DOI: 10.1037/0022–3514.75.1.219 Google Scholar öffnen
  56. Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–14. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X00023992 Google Scholar öffnen
  57. Busselle, R. & Bilandzic, H. (2009). Measuring Narrative Engagement. Media Psychology, 12, 321–347. DOI: 10.1080/15213260903287259 Google Scholar öffnen
  58. Calvert, S. L., Richards, M. N. & Kent, C. C. (2014). Personalized interactive characters for toddlers' learning of seriation from a video presentation. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 35, 148–155. DOI: 10.1016/j.appdev.2014.03.004 Google Scholar öffnen
  59. Carpenter, L. M. (1998). From girls into women: Scripts for sexuality and romance in seventeen magazine, 1974–1994. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 158–168. DOI: 10.1080/00224499809551929 Google Scholar öffnen
  60. Cavanagh, S. E. (2007). The social construction of romantic relationships in adolescence: Examining the role of peer networks, gender, and race. Sociological Inquiry, 77, 572–600. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475 – 682X.2007.00207.x Google Scholar öffnen
  61. Cellini, N., Canale, N., Mioni, G. & Costa, S. (2020). Changes in sleep pattern, sense of time and digital media use during COVID-19 lockdown in Italy. Journal of Sleep Research, 29. DOI: 10.1111/jsr.13074 Google Scholar öffnen
  62. Chadborn, D., Edwards, P. & Reysen, S. (2017). Displaying fan identity to make friends. Intensities: The Journal of Cult Media, 9, 87–97. Google Scholar öffnen
  63. Chandola, T., Marmot, M. & Siegrist, J. (2007). Failed reciprocity in close social relationships and health: Findings from the Whitehall II study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 63, 403–411. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.07.012 Google Scholar öffnen
  64. Chen, T. (2015). The persuasive effectiveness of mini-films: Narrative transportation and fantasy proneness. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 14, 21–27. DOI: 10.1002/cb.1494 Google Scholar öffnen
  65. Choi, B., Huang, J., Jeffrey, A. & Baek, Y. (2013). Development of a scale for fantasy state in digital games. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1980–1986. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.04.007 Google Scholar öffnen
  66. Chory-Assad, R. M. & Yanen, A. (2005). Hopelessness and loneliness as predictors of older adults' involvement with favorite television performers. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49, 182–201. DOI: 10.1207/s15506878jobem4902_3 Google Scholar öffnen
  67. Christie, R. & Geis, F. L. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  68. Chung, S. & Cho, H. (2017). Fostering parasocial relationships with celebrities on social media: Implications for celebrity endorsement. Psychology & Marketing, 34, 481–495. DOI: 10.1002/mar.21001 Google Scholar öffnen
  69. Cialdini, R. B. & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591–621. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015 Google Scholar öffnen
  70. Cleckley, H. (1976). The mask of sanity (5. Aufl.). Oxford, England: Mosby. Google Scholar öffnen
  71. Clogg, C. C., Petkova, E. & Haritou, A. (1995). Statistical methods for comparing regression coefficients between models. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 1261–1293. DOI: 10.1086/230638 Google Scholar öffnen
  72. Cohen, E. L. (2010). Expectancy violations in relationships with friends and media figures. Communication Research Reports, 27, 97–111. DOI: 10.1080/08824091003737836 Google Scholar öffnen
  73. Cohen, J. (1997). Parasocial relations and romantic attraction: Gender and dating status differences. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 41, 516–529. DOI: 10.1080/08838159709364424 Google Scholar öffnen
  74. Cohen, J. (2003). Parasocial breakups: Measuring individual differences in responses to the dissolution of parasocial relationships. Mass Communication and Society, 6, 191–202. DOI: 10.1207/S15327825MCS0602_5 Google Scholar öffnen
  75. Cohen, J. (2004). Parasocial break-up from favorite television characters: The role of attachment styles and relationship intensity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 187–202. DOI: 10.1177/0265407504041374 Google Scholar öffnen
  76. Collins, W. A. (2003). More than myth: The developmental significance of romantic relationships during adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 13, 1–24. DOI: 10.1111/1532–7795.1301001 Google Scholar öffnen
  77. Connolly, J., Furman, W. & Konarski, R. (2000). The role of peers in the emergence of heterosexual romantic relationships in adolescence. Child Development, 71, 1395–1408. DOI: 10.1111/1467–8624.00235 Google Scholar öffnen
  78. Corry, N., Merritt, R. D., Mrug, S. & Pamp, B. (2008). The factor structure of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90, 593–600. DOI: 10.1080/00223890802388590 Google Scholar öffnen
  79. Coyne, S. M., Nelson, D. A., Graham-Kevan, N., Keister, E. & Grant, D. M. (2010). Mean on the screen: Psychopathy, relationship aggression, and aggression in the media. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 288–293. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.10.018 Google Scholar öffnen
  80. Critelli, J. W. & Waid, L. R. (1980). Physical attractiveness, romantic love, and equity restoration in dating relationships. Journal of Personality Assessment, 44, 624–629. DOI: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4406_10 Google Scholar öffnen
  81. Cropley, A. J. (2011). Definitions of creativity. In M. A. Runo & S. R. Pritzker (Hrsg.), Encyclopedia of creativity (S. 358–368). Munich: Elsevier. Google Scholar öffnen
  82. Cumming, G. (2009). Inference by eye: Reading the overlap of independent confidence intervals. Statistics in Medicine, 28, 205–220. DOI: 10.1002/sim.3471 Google Scholar öffnen
  83. Davenport, S. W., Bergman, S. M., Bergman, J. Z. & Fearrington, M. E. (2014). Twitter versus Facebook: Exploring the role of narcissism in the motives and usage of different social media platforms. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 212–220. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.011 Google Scholar öffnen
  84. Davis, M. H. & Oathout, H. A. (1987). Maintenance of satisfaction in romantic relationships: Empathy and relational competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 397–410. DOI: 10.1037/0022–3514.53.2.397 Google Scholar öffnen
  85. De Cervantes, M. (1547–1616). Alles, worauf die Liebe wartet, ist die Gelegenheit. Undatiertes Zitat des Autors. Abgerufen von: https://www.zitate.eu/autor/miguel-de-cervantes-saavedra-zitate/64302 Google Scholar öffnen
  86. Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., Gagné, M., Leone, D. R., Usunov, J. & Kornazheva, B. P. (2001). Need satisfaction, motivation, and well-being in the work organizations of a former Eastern bloc country: A cross-cultural study of self-determination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 930–942. DOI: 10.1177/0146167201278002 Google Scholar öffnen
  87. Demir, M. (2008). Sweetheart, you really make me happy. Romantic relationship quality and personality as predictors of happiness among emerging adults. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 257–277. DOI: 10.1007/s10902–007–9051–8 Google Scholar öffnen
  88. Demir, M. (2010). Close relationships and happiness among emerging adults. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 293–313. DOI: 10.1007/s10902–009–9141-x Google Scholar öffnen
  89. Denissen, J. J. A., Penke, L., Schmitt, D. P. & van Aken, M. A. G. (2008). Self-esteem reactions to social interactions: Evidence for sociometer mechanisms across days, people, and nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 181–196. DOI: 10.1037/0022–3514.95.1.181 Google Scholar öffnen
  90. Derrick, J. L., Gabriel, S. & Tippin, B. (2008). Parasocial relationships and self-discrepancies: Faux relationships have benefits for low self-esteem individuals. Personal Relationships, 15, 261–280. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.12.003 Google Scholar öffnen
  91. Derrick, J. L., Gabriel, S. & Hugenberg, K. (2009). Social surrogacy: How favored television programs provide the experience of belonging. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 352–362. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.12.003 Google Scholar öffnen
  92. Devlin, M. B., Chambers, L. T. & Callison, C. (2011). Targeting mood: Using comedy or serious movie trailers. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 55, 581–595. DOI: 10.1080/08838151.2011.620668 Google Scholar öffnen
  93. Di Novi, D. & Lowry, H. (Produzent*innen). & Shankman, A. (Regisseur*in) (2002). Nur mit dir. USA: Warner Bros. Pictures. Google Scholar öffnen
  94. Dibble, J. L., Hartmann, T. & Rosaen, S. F. (2016). Parasocial interaction and parasocial relationship: Conceptual clarification and a critical assessment of measures. Human Communication Research, 42, 21–44. DOI: 10.1111/hcre.12063 Google Scholar öffnen
  95. Dibble, J. L. & Rosaen, S. F. (2011). Parasocial interaction as more than friendship. Evidence for parasocial interactions with disliked media figures. Journal of Media Psychology, 23, 122–132. DOI: 10.1027/1864–1105/a000044 Google Scholar öffnen
  96. Diggins, C. & Olson, P. (Produzent*innen). & Mooney, D. (Regisseur*in) (2013). Love and Honor. USA: Lighting Entertainment. Google Scholar öffnen
  97. Driesmans, K., Vandenbosch, L. & Eggermont, S. (2016). True love lasts forever: The influence of a popular teenage movie on Belgian girls' romantic beliefs. Journal of Children and Media, 10, 304–320. DOI: 10.1080/17482798.2016.1157501 Google Scholar öffnen
  98. Dryer, D. C. & Horowitz, L. M. (1997). When do opposites attract? Interpersonal complementarity versus similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 592–603. DOI: 10.1037/0022–3514.72.3.592 Google Scholar öffnen
  99. Dubé, E. M. & Savin-Williams, R. C. (1999). Sexual identity development among ethnic sexual-minority male youths. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1389–1398. DOI: 10.1037/0012–1649.35.6.1389 Google Scholar öffnen
  100. Dunlop, W. L., Hanley, G. E., McCoy, T. P. & Harake, N. (2017). Sticking to the (romantic) script: An examination of love life scripts, stories, and self-reports of normality. Memory, 25, 1444–1454. DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2017.1316509 Google Scholar öffnen
  101. Dush, C. M. K. & Amato, P. R. (2005). Consequences of relationship status and quality for subjective well-being. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 607–627. DOI: 10.1177/0265407505056438 Google Scholar öffnen
  102. Eastin, J. (Produzent*in), Abraham, P. & Arkush, A. (Regisseur*innen) (2009). White Collar. USA: Fox Television Studios. Google Scholar öffnen
  103. Edwards, L. M. & Lopez, S. J. (2006). Perceived family support, acculturation, and life satisfaction in mexican american youth: A mixed-methods exploration. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 279–287. DOI: 10.1037/0022–0167.53.3.279 Google Scholar öffnen
  104. Eggermont, S. & Vandebosch, H. (2001). Television as a substitute: Loneliness, need intensity, mobility, life-satisfaction and the elderly television viewer. Communicatio, 27, 10–18. DOI: 10.1080/02500160108537902 Google Scholar öffnen
  105. Erickson, S. E. & Dal Cin, S. (2018). Romantic parasocial attachments and the development of romantic scripts, schemas and beliefs among adolescents. Media Psychology, 21, 111–136. DOI: 10.1080/15213269.2017.1305281 Google Scholar öffnen
  106. Erickson, S. E., Dal Cin, S. & Byl, H. (2019). An experimental examination of binge watching and narrative engagement. Social Sciences, 8, 1–9. DOI: 10.3390/socsci8010019 Google Scholar öffnen
  107. Erickson, S. E., Harrison, K. & Dal Cin, S. (2018). Toward a multi-dimensional model of adolescent romantic parasocial attachment. Communication Theory, 28, 376–399. DOI: 10.1093/ct/qtx006 Google Scholar öffnen
  108. Eyal, K. & Cohen, J. (2006). When good friends say goodbye: A parasocial breakup study. Journal of Broadcasting and Media, 50, 502–523. DOI: 10.1207/s15506878jobem5003_9 Google Scholar öffnen
  109. Eyal, K. & Rubin, A. M. (2003). Viewer aggression and homophily, identification, and parasocial relationships with television characters. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 47, 77–98. DOI: 10.1207/s15506878jobem4701_5 Google Scholar öffnen
  110. Fabian, T. (1993). Fernsehen und Einsamkeit im Alter. Eine empirische Untersuchung zu parasozialer Interaktion. Münster: LIT. Google Scholar öffnen
  111. Fardouly, J., Diedrichs, P. C., Vartanian, L. R. & Halliwell, E. (2015). Social comparisons on social media: The impact of Facebook on young women's body image concerns and mood. Body Image, 13, 38–45. DOI: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.12.002 Google Scholar öffnen
  112. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A. & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149 Google Scholar öffnen
  113. Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4.). London: Sage. Google Scholar öffnen
  114. Figueredo, A. J., Sefcek, J. A. & Jones, D. N. (2006). The ideal romantic partner personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 431–441. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2006.02.004 Google Scholar öffnen
  115. Flynn, B. & Vinson, T. (Produzent*innen). & Mylod, M. (Regisseur*in) (2011). Der perfekte Ex. USA: Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation. Google Scholar öffnen
  116. Foster, J. D., Shrira, I. & Campbell, W. K. (2006). Theoretical models of narcissism, sexuality, and relationship commitment. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23(3), 367–386. DOI: 10.1177/0265407506064204 Google Scholar öffnen
  117. Fox, J. & Rooney, M. C. (2015). The Dark Triad and trait self-objectification as predictors of men’s use and self-presentation behaviors on social networking sites. Personality and Individual Differences, 76, 161–165. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.12.017 Google Scholar öffnen
  118. Fredriksen-Goldsen, K. I. & Muraco, A. (2010). Aging and sexual orientation: A 25-year review of the literature. Research on Aging, 32, 372–413. DOI: 10.1177/0164027509360355 Google Scholar öffnen
  119. Friedkin, N. E. & Johnsen, E. C. (1990). Social influence and opinions. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 15, 193–206. DOI: 10.1080/0022250X.1990.9990069 Google Scholar öffnen
  120. Furnham, A., Richards, S. C. & Paulhus, D. L. (2013). The dark triad of personality: A 10 year review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 199–216. DOI: 10.1111/spc3.12018 Google Scholar öffnen
  121. Gehrau, V., Döveling, K., Sommer, D. & Dunlop, S. (2014). Antagonistic and synergetic impacts of conversation on nonpersuasive media effects. Communication Research, 41, 578–602. DOI: 10.1177/0093650212445480 Google Scholar öffnen
  122. Gibgot, J., Shankman, A. & Cyrus, L. T. (Produzent*innen). & Robinson, J. A. (Regisseur*in) (2010). Mit Dir an meiner Seite. USA: Touchstone Pictures. Google Scholar öffnen
  123. Giles, D. C. (2002). Parasocial interaction: A review of the literature and a model for future research. Media Psychology, 4, 279–305. DOI: 10.1207/S1532785XMEP0403_04 Google Scholar öffnen
  124. Gleich, U. (1997). Parasoziale Interaktionen und Beziehungen von Fernsehzuschauern mit Personen auf dem Bildschirm: Ein theoretischer und empirischer Beitrag zum Konzept des aktiven Rezipienten. Landau: Verlag Empirische Pädagogik. Google Scholar öffnen
  125. Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative "description of personality": The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229. DOI: 10.1037/0022–3514.59.6.1216 Google Scholar öffnen
  126. Goodboy, A. K. & Martin, M. M. (2015). The personality profile of a cyberbully: Examining the Dark Triad. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 1–4. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.052 Google Scholar öffnen
  127. Grant, S., Langan-Fox, J. & Anglim, J. (2009). The big five traits as predictors of subjective and psychological well-being. Psychological Reports, 105, 205–231. DOI: 10.2466/PR0.105.1.205 – 231 Google Scholar öffnen
  128. Green, M. C., Brock, T. C. & Kaufman, G. F. (2004). Understanding media enjoyment: The role of transportation into narrative worlds. Communication Theory, 14, 311–327. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468 – 2885.2004.tb00317.x Google Scholar öffnen
  129. Greenwood, D. N. (2009). Idealized TV friends and young women's body concerns. Body Image, 6, 97–104. DOI: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2008.12.001 Google Scholar öffnen
  130. Greenwood, D. N. & Long, C. R. (2009). Psychological predictors of media involvement: Solitude experiences and the need to belong. Communication Research, 36, 637–654. DOI: 10.1177/0093650209338906 Google Scholar öffnen
  131. Greenwood, D. N. & Long, C. R. (2011). Attachment, belongingness needs, and relationship status predict imagined intimacy with media figures. Communication Research, 38, 278–297. DOI: 10.1177/0093650210362687 Google Scholar öffnen
  132. Greenwood, D., McCutcheon, L. E., Collisson, B. & Wong, M. (2018). What's fame got to do with it? Clarifying links among celebrity attitudes, fame appeal, and narcissistic subtypes. Personality and Individual Differences, 131, 238–243. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2018.04.032 Google Scholar öffnen
  133. Greitemeyer, T. (2015). Everyday sadism predicts violent video game preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 75, 19–23. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.10.049 Google Scholar öffnen
  134. Grijalva, E., Harms, P. D., Newman, D. A., Gaddis, B. H. & Fraley, R. C. (2015). Narcissism and leadership: A meta-analytic review of linear and nonlinear relationships. Personnel Psychology, 68(1), 1–47. DOI: 10.1111/peps.12072 Google Scholar öffnen
  135. Guerrero, L. K. & Mongeau, P. A. (2018). On becoming "more than friends": The transition from friendship to romantic relationship. In S. Sprecher, A. Wenzel & j. Harvey (Hrsg.), Handbook of relationship initiation (S. 175–194). New York: Psychology Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  136. Hall, J. R. & Benning, S. D. (2006). The "successful" psychopath: Adaptive and subclinical manifestations of psychopathy in the general population. In C. J. Patrick (Hrsg.), Handbook of psychopathy (S. 459–478). New York: Guilford. Google Scholar öffnen
  137. Hamann, S. B. (1990). Level-of-processing effects in conceptually driven implicit tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 16, 970–977. DOI: 10.1037/0278–7393.16.6.970 Google Scholar öffnen
  138. Hartmann, T. (2008). Parasocial interactions and paracommunication with new media characters. In E. A. Konijin, S. Utz, M. Tanis & S. Barnes (Hrsg.), Mediated interpersonal communication (S. 177–199). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar öffnen
  139. Hartmann, T. (2016). Parasocial interaction, parasocial relationships, and well-being. In L. Reinecke & M. B. Oliver (Hrsg.), The Routledge handbook of media use and well-being: International perspectives on theory and research on positive media effects (S. 131–144). New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
  140. Hartmann, T. & Goldhoorn, C. (2011). Horton and Wohl revisited: Exploring Viewers' experience of parasocial interaction. Journal of Communication, 61, 1104–1121. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460 – 2466.2011.01595.x Google Scholar öffnen
  141. Hartmann, T. & Klimmt, C. (2005). Ursachen und Effekte Parasozialer Interaktionen im Rezeptionsprozess: Eine Fragebogenstudie auf der Basis des PSI-Zwei-Ebenen-Modells. Zeitschrift für Medienpsychologie, 17, 88–98. DOI: 10.1026/1617–6383.17.3.88 Google Scholar öffnen
  142. Hartmann, T., Schramm, H. & Klimmt, C. (2004). Personenorientierte Medienrezeption: Ein Zwei-Ebenen-Modell parasozialer Interaktionen. Publizistik, 49, 25–47. Google Scholar öffnen
  143. Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2. Aufl.). New York: Guilford Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  144. Hendrick, C. & Hendrick, S. (1986). A theory and method of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 392–402. DOI: 10.1037/0022–3514.50.2.392 Google Scholar öffnen
  145. Henningsen, D. D., Braz, M. & Davies, E. (2008). Why do we flirt? Flirting motivations and sex differences in working and social contexts. Journal of Business Communication, 45, 483–502. DOI: 10.1177/0021943608319390 Google Scholar öffnen
  146. Herget, A.-K. (2021). Well-known and unknown music as an emotionalizing carrier of meaning in film. Media Psychology, 24, 385–412. DOI: 10.1080/15213269.2020.1713164 Google Scholar öffnen
  147. Herschbach, M. (2015). Direct social perception and dual process theories of mindreading. Consciousness and Cognition, 36, 483–497. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.04.001 Google Scholar öffnen
  148. Hilgard, E. R. (1980). The trilogy of mind: Cognition, affection, and conation. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 16, 107–117. DOI: 10.1002/1520–6696(198004)16:2<107::AID-JHBS2300160202>3.0.CO;2-Y Google Scholar öffnen
  149. Hoberman, D. & Lieberman, T. (Produzent*innen). & Fletcher, A. (Regisseur*in) (2009). Selbst ist die Braut. USA: Touchstone Pictures. Google Scholar öffnen
  150. Hoffner, C. (1996). Children's wishful identification and parasocial interaction with favorite television characters. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 40, 389–402. DOI: 10.1080/08838159609364360 Google Scholar öffnen
  151. Holmberg, D. & MacKenzie, S. (2002). So far, so good: Scripts for romantic relationship development as predictors of relational well-being. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 777–796. DOI: 10.1177/0265407502196003 Google Scholar öffnen
  152. Horton, D. & Strauss, A. (1957). Interaction in audience-participation shows. American Journal of Sociology, 62, 579–587. DOI: 10.1086/222106 Google Scholar öffnen
  153. Horton, D. & Wohl, R. R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19, 188–211. DOI: 10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049 Google Scholar öffnen
  154. Hu, M. (2016). The Influence of a scandal on parasocial relationship, parasocial interaction, and parasocial breakup. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5, 217–231. DOI: 10.1037/ppm0000068 Google Scholar öffnen
  155. Hughes, S. M., Dispenza, F. & Gallup, G. G. (2004). Ratings of voice attractiveness predict sexual behavior and body configuration. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 295–304. DOI: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.06.001 Google Scholar öffnen
  156. Jeffres, L. W., Bracken, C. C., Atkin, D. & Neuendorf, K. (2010). Moving from theorizing to application: Predicting audience enjoyment of TV formats. American Journal of Media Psychology, 3, 156–179. Google Scholar öffnen
  157. Jonason, P. K., Valentine, K. A., Li, N. P. & Harbeson, C. L. (2011). Mate-selection and the Dark Triad: Facilitating a short-term mating strategy and creating a volatile environment. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 759–763. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.06.025 Google Scholar öffnen
  158. Jones, D. N. & Paulhus, D. L. (2011). Differentiating in the Dark Triad within the interpersonal circumplex. In L. M. Horowitz & S. Strack (Hrsg.), Handbook of interpersonal psychology: Theory, research, assessment, and therapeutic interventions (S. 249–269). New York: Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar öffnen
  159. Jones, D. N. & Paulhus, D. L. (2014). Introducing the short Dark Triad (SD3). A brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment, 21, 28–41. DOI: 10.1177/1073191113514105 Google Scholar öffnen
  160. Jordan, J. M. & Bahk, C. M. (2001). The cognitive bases and social consequences of communication involvement. Communication Research Reports, 18, 11–25. DOI: 10.1080/08824090109384778 Google Scholar öffnen
  161. Kahnemann, D., Diener, E. & Schwarz, N. (Hrsg.). (1999). Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Google Scholar öffnen
  162. Kaiser, H. F. & Rice, J. (1974). Little jiffy, mark 4. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34, 111–117. Google Scholar öffnen
  163. Kawamura, Y., Ivankova, N. V., Kohler, C. L. & Perumean-Chaney, S. (2009). Utilizing mixed methods to assess parasocial interaction of an entertainment-education program audience. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 3, 88–104. DOI: 10.5172/mra.455.3.1.88 Google Scholar öffnen
  164. Keesler, M. E. & DeMatteo, D. (2017). How media exposure relates to laypersons' understanding of psychopathy. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 62, 1522–1533. DOI: 10.1111/1556–4029.13485 Google Scholar öffnen
  165. Kernberg, O. (1975). Borderline conditions and pathological narcissism. New York: Jason Aronson. Google Scholar öffnen
  166. Kim, J. & Rubin, A. M. (1997). The variable influence of audience activity on media effects. Communication Research, 24, 107–135. DOI: 10.1177/009365097024002001 Google Scholar öffnen
  167. Kim, J. L., Sorsoli, C. L., Collins, K., Zylbergold, B. A., Schooler, D. & Tolman, D. L. (2007). From sex to sexuality: Exposing the heterosexual script on primetime network television. Journal of Sex Research, 44, 145–157. DOI: 10.1080/00224490701263660 Google Scholar öffnen
  168. Klimmt, C., Hartmann, T. & Schramm, H. (2006). Parasocial interactions and relationships. In B. Jennings & P. Vorderer (Hrsg.), Psychology of entertainment (S. 291–314). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. Google Scholar öffnen
  169. Klimmt, C. & Vorderer, P. (2002). "Lara ist mein Medium". Parasoziale Interaktionen mit Lara Croft im Vergleich zur Lieblingsfigur aus Film und Fernsehen. In P. Rössler, S. Kubisch & V. Gehrau (Hrsg.), Empirische Perspektiven der Rezeptionsforschung (S. 177–192). München: Fischer. Google Scholar öffnen
  170. Klohnen, E. C. & Luo, S. (2003). Interpersonal attraction and personality: What is attractive-self similarity, ideal similarity, complementarity or attachment security? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 709–722. DOI: 10.1037/0022–3514.85.4.709 Google Scholar öffnen
  171. Knapp, M. L. (1978). Social intercourse: From greeting to goodbye. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, Incorporated. Google Scholar öffnen
  172. Knobloch, S. & Zillmann, D. (2002). Mood management via the digital jukebox. Journal of Communication, 52, 351–366. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460 – 2466.2002.tb02549.x Google Scholar öffnen
  173. Knoll, J., Schramm, H., Schallhorn, C. & Wynistorf, S. (2015). Good guy vs. bad guy – The influence of parasocial interactions with media characters on brand placement effects. International Journal of Advertising: The Review of Marketing Communications, 34, 720–743. DOI: 10.1080/02650487.2015.1009350 Google Scholar öffnen
  174. Kosslyn, S. M., Ganis, G. & Thompson, W. L. (2001). Neural foundations of imagery. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 635–642. DOI: 10.1038/35090055 Google Scholar öffnen
  175. Krannich, B. M. (2012). RTL ändert den Seriendonnerstag, wirft White Collar raus. Abgerufen von: https://www.serienjunkies.de/news/rtl-aendert-seriendonnerstag-wirft-white-44440.html Google Scholar öffnen
  176. Kronewald, E. (2008). Fernsehnutzung von Singles und Liierten: Die Relevanz des Merkmals Beziehungsstand für Fernsehnutzungsmotive und parasoziale Beziehungen. München: Verlag Reinhard Fischer. Google Scholar öffnen
  177. Kurilla, B. P. & Westerman, D. L. (2008). Processing fluency affects subjective claims of recollection. Memory & Cognition, 36, 82–92. DOI: 10.3758/MC.36.1.82 Google Scholar öffnen
  178. Lee, E.-J. & Shin, S. Y. (2014). When the medium is the message: How transportability moderates the effects of politicians' twitter communication. Communication Research, 41, 1088–1110. Google Scholar öffnen
  179. Lee, S. A., Guajardo, N. R., Short, S. D. & King, W. (2010). Individual differences in ocular level empathic accuracy ability: The predictive power of fantasy empathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 68–71. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.016 Google Scholar öffnen
  180. Lemay, E. P., Clark, M. S. & Greenberg, A. (2010). What is beautiful is good because what is beautiful is desired: Physical attractiveness stereotyping as projection of interpersonal goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 339–353. DOI: 10.1177/0146167209359700 Google Scholar öffnen
  181. Levy, M. R. (1979). Watching TV news as parasocial interaction. Journal of Broadcasting, 23, 177–187. DOI: 10.1080/08838157909363919 Google Scholar öffnen
  182. Liebers, N. (2018). Love triangles: Effects of relationship status, reception partners, and interpersonal communication on romantic parasocial interactions, Washington, DC. Google Scholar öffnen
  183. Liebers, N. & Schramm, H. (2017). Friends in books: The influence of character attributes and the reading experience on parasocial relationships and romances. Poetics, 65, 12–23. DOI: 10.1016/j.poetic.2017.10.001 Google Scholar öffnen
  184. Liebers, N. & Schramm, H. (2019). Parasocial interactions and relationships with media characters – An inventory of 60 years of research. Communication Research Trends, 38, 4–31. Google Scholar öffnen
  185. Lim, C. M. & Kim, Y.-K. (2011). Older consumers' TV home shopping: Loneliness, parasocial interaction, and perceived convenience. Psychology & Marketing, 28, 763–780. DOI: 10.1002/mar.20411 Google Scholar öffnen
  186. Lombard, M., Reich, R. D., Grabe, M. E., Bracken, C. C. & Ditton, T. B. (2000). Presence and television. The role of screen size. Human Communication Research, 26, 75–98. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468 – 2958.2000.tb00750.x Google Scholar öffnen
  187. Love, A. B. & Holder, M. D. (2014). Psychopathy and subjective well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 66, 112–117. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.03.033 Google Scholar öffnen
  188. Love, A. B. & Holder, M. D. (2016). Can romantic relationship quality mediate the relation between psychopathy and subjective well-being? Journal of Happiness Studies, 17, 2407–2429. DOI: 10.1007/s10902–015–9700–2 Google Scholar öffnen
  189. Lynn, S. J. & Rhue, J. W. (1986). The fantasy-prone person: Hypnosis, imagination, and creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 404–408. DOI: 10.1037/0022–3514.51.2.404 Google Scholar öffnen
  190. Madison, T. P. & Porter, L. V. (2016). Cognitive and imagery attributes of parasocial relationships. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 35, 359–379. DOI: 10.1177/0276236615599340 Google Scholar öffnen
  191. Mahl, D. (2001). The influence of parental divorce on the romantic relationship beliefs of young adults. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 34, 89–118. DOI: 10.1300/J087v34n03_06 Google Scholar öffnen
  192. Malle, B. F. & Hodges, S. (2005). Other minds: How humans bridge the divide between self and other. New York: Guilford Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  193. Maltby, J., Giles, D. C., Barber, L. & McCutcheon, L. E. (2005). Intense personal celebrity worship and body image: Evidence of a link among female adolescents. British journal of health psychology, 10, 17–32. DOI: 10.1348/135910704X15257 Google Scholar öffnen
  194. Maltby, J., Houran, J. & McCutcheon, L. E. (2003). A clinical interpretation of attitudes and behaviors associated with celebrity worship. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 191, 25–29. DOI: 10.1097/00005053–200301000–00005 Google Scholar öffnen
  195. Maltby, J., Day, L., McCutcheon, L. E., Houran, J. & Ashe, D. (2006). Extreme celebrity worship, fantasy proneness and dissociation: Developing the measurement and understanding of celebrity worship within a clinical personality context. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 273–283. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.07.004 Google Scholar öffnen
  196. March, E. & Wagstaff, D. L. (2017). Sending nudes: Sex, self-rated mate value, and trait Machiavellianism predict sending unsolicited explicit images. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2210. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02210 Google Scholar öffnen
  197. Marston, P. J., Hecht, M. L. & Robers, T. (1987). `True love ways': The subjective experience and communication of romantic love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4, 387–407. DOI: 10.1177/0265407587044001 Google Scholar öffnen
  198. Matrix, S. (2014). The Netflix effect: Teens, binge watching, and on-demand digital media trends. Jeunesse: Young People, Texts, Cultures, 6, 119–138. DOI: 10.1353/jeu.2014.0002 Google Scholar öffnen
  199. McCain, J. L. & Campbell, W. K. (2018). Narcissism and social media use: A meta-analytic review. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 7, 308–327. DOI: 10.1037/ppm0000137 Google Scholar öffnen
  200. McCourt, A. & Fitzpatrick, J. (2001). The role of personal characteristics and romantic characteristics in parasocial relationships: A pilot study. Journal of Mundane Behavior, 2, 42–58. Google Scholar öffnen
  201. McCutcheon, L. E., Ashe, D. D., Houran, J. & Maltby, J. (2003). A cognitive profile of individuals who tend to worship celebrities. The Journal of Psychology, 137, 309–322. DOI: 10.1080/00223980309600616 Google Scholar öffnen
  202. McCutcheon, L. E., Lange, R. & Houran, J. (2002). Conceptualization and measurement of celebrity worship. British Journal of Psychology, 93, 67–87. DOI: 10.1348/000712602162454 Google Scholar öffnen
  203. McNulty, J. K., Neff, L. A. & Karney, B. R. (2008). Beyond initial attraction: Physical attractiveness in newlywed marriage. Journal of Family Psychology, 22, 135–143. DOI: 10.1037/0893–3200.22.1.135 Google Scholar öffnen
  204. Meier, A. & Allen, G. (2009). Romantic relationships from adolescence to young adulthood: Evidence from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Sociological Quarterly, 50, 308–335. DOI: 10.1111/j.1533 – 8525.2009.01142.x Google Scholar öffnen
  205. Merikivi, J., Bragge, J., Scornavacca, E. & Verhagen, T. (2020). Binge-watching serialized video content: A transdisciplinary review. Television & New Media, 21, 697–711. DOI: 10.1177/1527476419848578 Google Scholar öffnen
  206. Moss, B. F. & Schwebel, A. I. (1993). Defining intimacy in romantic relationships. Family Relations, 42, 31–37. DOI: 10.2307/584918 Google Scholar öffnen
  207. Moss, P. & Higgins, C. (1984). Radio voices. Media, Culture & Society, 6, 353–375. DOI: 10.1177/016344378400600404 Google Scholar öffnen
  208. Moyer-Gusé, E. (2008). Toward a theory of entertainment persuasion: Explaining the persuasive effects of entertainment-education messages. Communication Theory, 18, 407–425. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468 – 2885.2008.00328.x Google Scholar öffnen
  209. Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G. & Griffin, D. W. (1996). The self-fulfilling nature of positive illusions in romantic relationships: Love is not blind, but prescient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1155–1180. DOI: 10.1037/0022–3514.71.6.1155 Google Scholar öffnen
  210. Nabi, R. L., Stitt, C. R., Halford, J. & Finnerty, K. L. (2006). Emotional and cognitive predictors of the enjoyment and reality-based and fictional television programming: An elaboration of the Uses and Gratifications perspective. Media Psychology, 8, 421–447. DOI: 10.1207/s1532785xmep0804_5 Google Scholar öffnen
  211. Nelson, M. R. & Paek, H.-J. (2008). Nudity of female and male models in primetime TV advertising across seven countries. International Journal of Advertising, 27, 715–744. DOI: 10.2501/S0265048708080281 Google Scholar öffnen
  212. Niehuis, S., Lee, K.-H., Reifman, A., Swenson, A. & Hunsaker, S. (2011). Idealization and disillusionment in intimate relationships: A review of theory, method, and research. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 3, 273–302. DOI: 10.1111/j.1756 – 2589.2011.00100.x Google Scholar öffnen
  213. Nordlund, J. E. (1978). Media interaction. Communication Research, 5, 150–175. DOI: 10.1177/009365027800500202 Google Scholar öffnen
  214. Oliver, M. B. & Bartsch, A. (2011). Appreciation of entertainment: The importance of meaningfulness via virtue and wisdom. Journal of Media Psychology, 23, 29–33. DOI: 10.1027/1864–1105/a000029 Google Scholar öffnen
  215. Oliver, M. B. & Raney, A. A. (2011). Entertainment as pleasurable and meaningful: Identifying hedonic and eudaimonic motivations for entertainment consumption. Journal of Communication, 61, 984–1004. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460 – 2466.2011.01585.x Google Scholar öffnen
  216. Ortiz-Ospina, E. (2019). The rise of living alone: how one-person households are becoming increasingly common around the world. Verfügbar unter: https://ourworldindata.org/living-alone Google Scholar öffnen
  217. Paccagnella, O. (2006). Centering or not centering in multilevel models? The role of the group mean and the assessment of group effects. Evaluation Review, 30, 66–85. DOI: 10.1177/0193841X05275649 Google Scholar öffnen
  218. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  219. Paul, B. & Shim, J. W. (2008). Gender, sexual affect, and motivations for internet pornography use. International Journal of Sexual Health, 20, 187–199. DOI: 10.1080/19317610802240154 Google Scholar öffnen
  220. Paulhus, D. L. & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556–563. DOI: 10.1016/S0092–6566(02)00505–6 Google Scholar öffnen
  221. Pavot, W., Diener, E. & Fujita, F. (1990). Extraversion and happiness. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 1299–1306. DOI: 10.1016/0191–8869(90)90157-M Google Scholar öffnen
  222. Perloff, R. M. & Krevans, J. (1987). Tracking the psychosocial predictors of older individuals' television uses. The Journal of Psychology, 121, 365–372. DOI: 10.1080/00223980.1987.9712677 Google Scholar öffnen
  223. Perse, E. M. & Rubin, R. B. (1989). Attribution in social and parasocial relationships. Communication Research, 16, 59–77. DOI: 10.1177/009365089016001003 Google Scholar öffnen
  224. Petty, R. E. & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion. New York: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen
  225. Pewresearch.org (2019). Social media fact sheet. Abgerufen von: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/social-media/ Google Scholar öffnen
  226. Phua, J. (2016). The effects of similarity, parasocial identification, and source credibility in obesity public service announcements on diet and exercise self-efficacy. Journal of Health Psychology, 21, 699–708. DOI: 10.1177/1359105314536452 Google Scholar öffnen
  227. Pierce, C. A. (1996). Body height and romantic attraction: A meta-analytic test of the male-taller norm. Social Behavior and Personality, 24, 143–149. DOI: 10.2224/sbp.1996.24.2.143 Google Scholar öffnen
  228. Pinquart, M. & Sörensen, S. (2000). Influences of socioeconomic status, social network, and competence on subjective well-being in later life: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 15, 187–224. DOI: 10.1037/0882–7974.15.2.187 Google Scholar öffnen
  229. Plante, C. N., Reysen, S., Groves, C. L., Roberts, S. E. & Gerbasi, K. (2017). The Fantasy Engagement Scale: A flexible measure of positive and negative fantasy engagement. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 39, 127–152. DOI: 10.1080/01973533.2017.1293538 Google Scholar öffnen
  230. Raskin, R. N. & Hall, C. S. (1979). A narcissistic personality inventory. Psychological Reports, 45, 590. DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1979.45.2.590 Google Scholar öffnen
  231. Rauschenberger, S. L. & Lynn, S. J. (1995). Fantasy proneness, DSM-II--R Axis 1 psychopatholoy, and dissociation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104, 373–380. DOI: 10.1037/0021–843X.104.2.373 Google Scholar öffnen
  232. Rauthmann, J. F. (2012). The dark triad and interpersonal perception: Similarities and differences in the social consequences of narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 487–496. DOI: 10.1177/1948550611427608 Google Scholar öffnen
  233. Regan, P. C. & Berscheid, E. (1997). Gender differences in characteristics desired in a potential sexual and marriage partner. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 9, 25–37. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475 – 6811.1995.tb00097.x Google Scholar öffnen
  234. Reinecke, L., Tamborini, R., Grizzard, M., Lewis, R., Eden, A. & David Bowman, N. (2012). Characterizing mood management as need satisfaction: The effects of intrinsic needs on selective exposure and mood repair. Journal of Communication, 62, 437–453. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460 – 2466.2012.01649.x Google Scholar öffnen
  235. Reis, H. T., Sheldon, K. M., Gable, S. L., Roscoe, J. & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Daily well-being: The role of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 419–435. DOI: 10.1177/0146167200266002 Google Scholar öffnen
  236. Rieger, D., Wulf, T., Kneer, J., Frischlich, L. & Bente, G. (2014). The winner takes it all: The effect of in-game success and need satisfaction on mood repair and enjoyment. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 281–286. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.037 Google Scholar öffnen
  237. Rosaen, S. F. & Dibble, J. L. (2016). Clarifying the role of attachment and social compensation on parasocial relationships with television characters. Communication Studies, 67, 147–162. Google Scholar öffnen
  238. Rosario, M., Schrimshaw, E. W., Hunter, J. & Braun, L. (2006). Sexual identity development among gay, lesbian, and bisexual youths: consistency and change over time. Journal of Sex Research, 43, 46–58. DOI: 10.1080/00224490609552298 Google Scholar öffnen
  239. Rosenberg, T. & Lucchesi, G. (Produzent*innen) & Luketic, R. (Regisseur*in) (2009). Die nackte Wahrheit. USA: Columbia Pictures. Google Scholar öffnen
  240. Rosengren, K. E. (1994). Media use under structural change. In K. E. Rosengren (Hrsg.), Media effects and beyond: Culture, socialization, and lifestyles (S. 49–75). London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
  241. Rosengren, K. E. & Windahl, S. (1972). Mass media consumption as a functional alternative. In D. McQuail (Hrsg.), Sociology of mass communications (S. 166–194). Hamondsworth: Penguin. Google Scholar öffnen
  242. Rubenking, B. & Bracken, C. C. (2018). Binge-watching: A suspenseful, emotional, habit. Communication Research Reports, 35, 381–391. DOI: 10.1080/08824096.2018.1525346 Google Scholar öffnen
  243. Rubin, A. M. & Perse, E. M. (1987). Audience activity and soap opera involvement: A uses and effects investigation. Human Communication Research, 14, 246–292. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468 – 2958.1987.tb00129.x Google Scholar öffnen
  244. Rubin, A. M., Perse, E. M. & Powell, R. A. (1985). Loneliness, parasocial interaction, and local television news viewing. Human Communication Research, 12, 155–180. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468 – 2958.1985.tb00071.x Google Scholar öffnen
  245. Rubin, A. M. & Step, M. M. (2000). Impact of motivation, attraction, and parasocial interaction on talk radio listening. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44, 635–654. DOI: 10.1207/s15506878jobem4404_7 Google Scholar öffnen
  246. Rupp, H. A. & Wallen, K. (2008). Sex differences in response to visual sexual stimuli: A review. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 206–218. DOI: 10.1007/s10508–007–9217–9 Google Scholar öffnen
  247. Russell, C. A. & Stern, B. B. (2006). Consumers, characters, and products: A balance model of sitcom product placement effects. Journal of Advertising, 35, 7–21. DOI: 10.2753/JOA0091–3367350101 Google Scholar öffnen
  248. Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78. DOI: 10.1037/0003–066X.55.1.68 Google Scholar öffnen
  249. Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141 Google Scholar öffnen
  250. Ryan, R. M., Huta, V. & Deci, E. L. (2008). Living well: A self-determination theory perspective on eudaimonia. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 139–170. DOI: 10.1007/s10902–006–9023–4 Google Scholar öffnen
  251. Ryff, C. D. & Singer, B. H. (2006). Best news yet on the six-factor model of well-being. Social Science Research, 35, 1103–1119. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.01.002 Google Scholar öffnen
  252. Salmela-Aro, K., Aunola, K. & Nurmi, J.-E. (2007). Personal goals during emerging adulthood. Journal of Adolescent Research, 22, 690–715. DOI: 10.1177/0743558407303978 Google Scholar öffnen
  253. Salomon, G. (1984). Television is "easy" and print is "tough". The differential investment of mental effort in learning as a function of perceptions and attributions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 647–658. DOI: 10.1037/0022–0663.76.4.647 Google Scholar öffnen
  254. Salvaggio, A. N., Streich, M., Hopper, J. & Pierce, C. A. (2011). Why do fools fall in love (at work)? Factors associated with the incidence of workplace romance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41, 906–937. DOI: 10.1111/j.1559 – 1816.2011.00741.x Google Scholar öffnen
  255. Sangrador, J. L. & Yela, C. (2000). 'What is beautiful is loved': Physical attractiveness in love relationships in a representative sample. Social Behavior and Personality, 28, 207–218. DOI: 10.2224/sbp.2000.28.3.207 Google Scholar öffnen
  256. Schallow, J. R. & McIlwraith, R. D. (1986). Is television viewing really bad for your imagination?: Content and process of TV viewing and imaginal styles. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 6, 25–42. DOI: 10.2190/1L5Y-TNYL-X5QK-NUVT Google Scholar öffnen
  257. Schiappa, E., Gregg, P. B. & Hewes, D. E. (2006). Can one TV show make a difference? Will & Grace and the parasocial contact hypothesis. Journal of Homosexuality, 51, 15–37. DOI: 10.1300/J082v51n04_02 Google Scholar öffnen
  258. Schnarre, P. & Adam, A. (2018). Parasocial romances as infidelity: Comparing perceptions of real-life, online, and parasocial extradyadic relationships. Journal of Indiana Academy of the Social Sciences, 20(1), 1–13. Google Scholar öffnen
  259. Schnotz, W. (2005). An integrated model of text and picture comprehension. In R. E. Mayer (Hrsg.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (S. 49–70). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  260. Schönbach, K. & Früh, W. (1991). Der dynamisch-transaktionale Ansatz II: Konsequenzen. In W. Früh (Hrsg.), Medienwirkungen: Das dynamisch-transaktionale Modell. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. DOI: 10.1007/978–3–663–10777–4_3 Google Scholar öffnen
  261. Schramm, H. (2008). Parasocial interactions and relationships. In W. Donsbach (Hrsg.), The Blackwell Internation Encyclopedia of Communication (S. 3501–3506). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen
  262. Schramm, H. & Hartmann, T. (2008). Die Messung von parasozialen Interaktionen als mehrdimensionales Konstrukt. Entwicklung und Validierung von PSI-Prozess-Skalen auf Basis des Zwei-Ebenen-Modells parasozialer Interaktionen. In J. Matthes, W. Wirth, G. Daschmann & A. Fahr (Hrsg.), Methoden und Forschungslogik der Kommunikationswissenschaft. Die Brücke zwischen Theorie und Empirie – Operationalisierung, Messung und Validierung in der Kommunikationswissenschaft (S. 48–69). Köln: Herbert von Halem Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
  263. Schramm, H. & Wirth, W. (2008). A case for an integrative view on affect regulation through media usage. Communications, 33, 27–46. DOI: 10.1515/COMMUN.2008.002 Google Scholar öffnen
  264. Scott, M. A., Simonoff, J. S. & Marx, B. D. (2013). The SAGE handbook of multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Google Scholar öffnen
  265. Seabrook, R. C., Ward, L. M., Reed, L., Manago, A., Giaccardi, S. & Lippman, J. R. (2016). Our scripted sexuality: The development and validation of a measure of the heterosexual script and its relation to television consumption. Emerging Adulthood, 4, 338–355. DOI: 10.1177/2167696815623686 Google Scholar öffnen
  266. Seal, D. W. & Ehrhardt, A. A. (2003). Masculinity and urban men: Perceived scripts for courtship, romantic, and sexual interactions with women. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 5, 295–319. DOI: 10.1080/136910501171698 Google Scholar öffnen
  267. Silver, N. & Slater, M. D. (2019). A safe space for self-expansion: Attachment and motivation to engage and interact with the story world. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36, 3492–3514. DOI: 10.1177/0265407519826345 Google Scholar öffnen
  268. Slater, M. D., Ewoldsen, D. R. & Woods, K. W. (2018). Extending conceptualization and measurement of narrative engagement after-the-fact: Parasocial relationship and retrospective imaginative involvement. Media Psychology, 21, 329–351. DOI: 10.1080/15213269.2017.1328313 Google Scholar öffnen
  269. Slater, M. D., Oliver, M. B., Appel, M., Tchernev, J. M. & Silver, N. A. (2018). Mediated wisdom of experience revisited: Delay discounting, acceptance of death, and closeness to future self. Human Communication Research, 44, 80–101. DOI: 10.1093/hcr/hqx004 Google Scholar öffnen
  270. Snijders, T. A. B. & Bosker, R. (2011). Multilevel analysis. An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling (2. Aufl.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Google Scholar öffnen
  271. Song, W. & Fox, J. (2016). Playing for love in a romantic video game: Avatar identification, parasocial relationship, and Chinese women's romantic beliefs. Mass Communication and Society, 19, 197–215. DOI: 10.1080/15205436.2015.1077972 Google Scholar öffnen
  272. Sparks, N. (2013). Safe Haven – Wie ein Licht in der Nacht. München: Heyne. Google Scholar öffnen
  273. Spencer, S. (1985). Endlose Liebe. Hamburg: Hoffmann und Campe Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
  274. Spinda, J. S., Earnheardt, A. C. & Hugenberg, L. W. (2009). Checkered flags and mediated friendships: Parasocial interaction among NASCAR fans. Journal of Sports Media, 4, 31–55. DOI: 10.1353/jsm.0.0041 Google Scholar öffnen
  275. Spitzberg, B. H. & Cupach, W. R. (2008). Fanning the flames of fandom: Celebrity worship, parasocial interaction, and stalking. In J. R. Meloy, L. Sheridan & J. Hoffmann (Hrsg.), Stalking, threatening and attacking public figures: A psychological and behavioral analysis (S. 287–321). New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  276. Sprecher, S., Aron, A., Hatfield, E., Cortese, A., Potapova, E. & Levitskaya, A. (1994). Love: Amercian style, Russian style, and Japanese style. Personal Relationships, 1, 349–369. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475 – 6811.1994.tb00070.x Google Scholar öffnen
  277. Sprecher, S. & Metts, S. (1989). Development of the `Romantic Beliefs Scale' and examination of the effects of gender and gender-role orientation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6, 387–411. DOI: 10.1177/0265407589064001 Google Scholar öffnen
  278. Sprecher, S. & Metts, S. (1999). Romantic beliefs: Their influence on relationships and patterns of change over time. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16, 834–851. DOI: 10.1177/0265407599166009 Google Scholar öffnen
  279. Stanton, S. C. E., Campbell, L. & Loving, T. J. (2014). Energized by love: Thinking about romantic relationships increases positive affect and blood glucose levels. Psychophysiology, 51, 990–995. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12249 Google Scholar öffnen
  280. Statista.com. (2015). Umfrage in Deutschland zur eigenen sexuellen Orientierung 2015. Abgerufen von: https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/479510/umfrage/umfrage-in-deutschland-zur-eigenen-sexuellen-orientierung/ Google Scholar öffnen
  281. Statista.com (2018). Umfrage in Deutschland zur sexuellen Orientierung im Geschlechtervergleich 2016. Abgerufen von: https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/823538/umfrage/umfrage-in-deutschland-zur-sexuellen-orientierung-im-geschlechtervergleich/ Google Scholar öffnen
  282. Statista.com (2019). Umfrage zur Nutzung von Büchern und E-Books in Deutschland bis 2019. Abgerufen von: https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/277971/umfrage/nutzung-von-buechern-und-e-books-deutschland/ Google Scholar öffnen
  283. Stehr, P., Rössler, P., Schönhardt, F. & Leißner, L. (2015). Parasocial opinion leadership: Media personalities' influence within parasocial relations: Theoretical conceptualization and preliminary results. International Journal of Communication, 9, 982–1001. Google Scholar öffnen
  284. Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93, 119–135. DOI: 10.1037/0033–295X.93.2.119 Google Scholar öffnen
  285. Stever, G. S. (2011). Fan behavior and lifespan development theory: Explaining para-social and social attachment to celebrities. Journal of Adult Development, 18, 1–7. DOI: 10.1007/s10804–010–9100–0 Google Scholar öffnen
  286. Strauss, A. L. (1958). In Memoriam: R. Richard Wohl, 1921–1957. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 533–534. DOI: 10.1086/222304 Google Scholar öffnen
  287. Streiner, D. L. (2003). Starting at the beginning: An introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80, 99–103. DOI: 10.1207/S15327752JPA8001_18 Google Scholar öffnen
  288. Striepe, M. I. & Tolman, D. L. (2003). Mom, dad, I'm straight: The coming out of gender ideologies in adolescent sexual-identity development. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 32, 523–530. DOI: 10.1207/S15374424JCCP3204_4 Google Scholar öffnen
  289. Stuber, S., Abdy, P., Schwartz, J., Savage, S. (Produzent*innen). & Feste, S. (Regisseur*in) (2014). Endless Love. Großbritannien: Universal Studios. Google Scholar öffnen
  290. Sumter, S. R., Vandenbosch, L. & Ligtenberg, L. (2017). Love me Tinder: Untangling emerging adults’ motivations for using the dating application Tinder. Telematics and Informatics, 34, 67–78. DOI: 10.1016/j.tele.2016.04.009 Google Scholar öffnen
  291. Tamborini, R., Stiff, J. & Zillmann, D. (1987). Preference for Graphic Horror Featuring Male Versus Female Victimization. Human Communication Research, 13, 529–552. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468 – 2958.1987.tb00117.x Google Scholar öffnen
  292. Tamborini, R., Bowman, N. D., Eden, A., Grizzard, M. & Organ, A. (2010). Defining media enjoyment as the satisfaction of intrinsic needs. Journal of Communication, 60, 758–777. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460 – 2466.2010.01513.x Google Scholar öffnen
  293. Thallmair, A. & Rössler, P. (2001). Parasoziale Interaktion bei der Rezeption von Daily Talk shows. Eine Befragung von älteren Talk-Zuschauern. In C. Schneiderbauer (Hrsg.), Daily Talkshows unter der Lupe (S. 179–208). München: Fischer. Google Scholar öffnen
  294. Tian, Q. & Hoffner, C. A. (2010). Parasocial interaction with liked, neutral, and disliked characters on a popular TV series. Mass Communication and Society, 13, 250–269. DOI: 10.1080/15205430903296051 Google Scholar öffnen
  295. Todorov, A. & Porter, J. M. (2014). Misleading first impressions: Different for different facial images of the same person. Psychological Science, 25, 1404–1417. DOI: 10.1177/0956797614532474 Google Scholar öffnen
  296. Toepoel, V. (2013). Ageing, leisure, and social connectedness: How could leisure help reduce social isolation of older people? Social Indicators Research, 113, 355–372. DOI: 10.1007/s11205–012–0097–6 Google Scholar öffnen
  297. Toma, C. L. & Hancock, J. T. (2010). Looks and lies: The role of physical attractiveness in online dating self-presentation and deception. Communication Research, 37, 335–351. DOI: 10.1177/0093650209356437 Google Scholar öffnen
  298. Tsao, J. (1996). Compensatory media use: An exploration of two paradigms. Communication Studies, 47, 89–109. DOI: 10.1080/10510979609368466 Google Scholar öffnen
  299. Tsay, M. & Bodine, B. M. (2012). Exploring parasocial interaction in college students as a multidimensional construct: Do personality, interpersonal need, and television motive predict their relationships with media characters? Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 1, 185–200. DOI: 10.1037/a0028120 Google Scholar öffnen
  300. Tukachinsky, R. (2010). Para-romantic love and para-friendships: Development and assessment of a multiple-parasocial relationships scale. American Journal of Media Psychology, 3, 73–94. Google Scholar öffnen
  301. Tukachinsky, R. & Dorros, S. M. (2018). Parasocial romantic relationships, romantic beliefs, and relationship outcomes in USA adolescents: rehearsing love or setting oneself up to fail? Journal of Children and Media, 12, 329–345. DOI: 10.1080/17482798.2018.1463917 Google Scholar öffnen
  302. Tukachinsky, R. & Stever, G. S. (2019). Theorizing development of parasocial engagement. Communication Theory, 29, 297–318. DOI: 10.1093/ct/qty032 Google Scholar öffnen
  303. Turner, A. (2020). Smartphone addiction facts & phone usage statistics: The definitive guide (2019–2020 update). Verfügbar unter: https://www.bankmycell.com/blog/smartphone-addiction/#chapter1 Google Scholar öffnen
  304. Turner, J. R. (1993). Interpersonal and psychological predictors of parasocial interaction with different television performers. Communication Quarterly, 41, 443–453. DOI: 10.1080/01463379309369904 Google Scholar öffnen
  305. Valentine, K. A., Li, N. P., Meltzer, A. L. & Tsai, M.-H. (2020). Mate preferences for warmth-trustworthiness predict romantic attraction in the early stages of mate selection and satisfaction in ongoing relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46, 298–311. DOI: 10.1177/0146167219855048 Google Scholar öffnen
  306. Valkenburg, P. M. & Peter, J. (2006). Fantasy and imagination. In J. Bryant & P. Vorderer (Hrsg.), Psychology of entertainment (S. 105–117). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar öffnen
  307. Van Reijmersdal, E. A., Jansz, J., Peters, O. & van Noort, G. (2010). The effects of interactive brand placements in online games on children’s cognitive, affective, and conative brand responses. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1787–1794. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.006 Google Scholar öffnen
  308. Vinney, C. & Dill-Shackleford, K. E. (2018). Fan fiction as a vehicle for meaning making: Eudaimonic appreciation, hedonic enjoyment, and other perspectives on fan engagement with television. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 7, 18–32. DOI: 10.1037/ppm0000106 Google Scholar öffnen
  309. Visscher, A. & Vorderer, P. (1998). Freunde in guten und schlechten Zeiten. Parasoziale Beziehungen von Vielsehern zu Charakteren einer Daily Soap. In H. Wilhelms & M. Jurga (Hrsg.), Inszenierungsgesellschaft (S. 453–469). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
  310. Vorderer, P. (Hrsg.). (1996). Fernsehen als "Beziehungskiste": Parasoziale Beziehungen und Interaktionen mit TV-Personen. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
  311. Vorderer, P. & Knobloch, S. (1996). Parasoziale Beziehungen zu Serienfiguren: Ergänzung oder Ersatz? Zeitschrift für Medienpsychologie, 8, 201–216. Google Scholar öffnen
  312. Vorderer, P. (2011). What’s next? Remarks on the current vitalization of entertainment theory. Journal of Media Psychology, 23, 60–63. DOI: 10.1027/1864–1105/a000034 Google Scholar öffnen
  313. Vorderer, P. & Reinecke, L. (2015). From mood to meaning: The changing model of the user in entertainment research. Communication Theory, 25, 447–453. DOI: 10.1111/comt.12082 Google Scholar öffnen
  314. Vujeva, H. M. & Furman, W. (2011). Depressive symptoms and romantic relationship qualities from adolescence through emerging adulthood: a longitudinal examination of influences. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 40, 123–135. DOI: 10.1080/15374416.2011.533414 Google Scholar öffnen
  315. Walster, E., Aronson, V., Abrahams, D. & Rottman, L. (1966). Importance of physical attractiveness in dating behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 508–516. DOI: 10.1037/h0021188 Google Scholar öffnen
  316. Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 678–691. DOI: 10.1037/0022–3514.64.4.678 Google Scholar öffnen
  317. Watson, D., Clark, L. A. & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070. DOI: 10.1037/0022–3514.54.6.1063 Google Scholar öffnen
  318. Weibel, D., Martarelli, C. S., Häberli, D. & Mast, F. W. (2018). The Fantasy Questionnaire: A measure to assess creative and imaginative fantasy. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100, 431–443. DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2017.1331913 Google Scholar öffnen
  319. Welch, S.‐A. & Rubin, R. B. (2002). Development of relationship stage measures. Communication Quarterly, 50, 24–40. DOI: 10.1080/01463370209385644 Google Scholar öffnen
  320. Wenner, L. A. (1983). Political news on television: A reconsideration of audience orientations. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 47, 380–395. DOI: 10.1080/10570318309374132 Google Scholar öffnen
  321. Whitebread, D. & O'Sullivan, L. (2012). Preschool children's social pretend play: Supporting the development of metacommunication, metacognition and self-regulation. International Journal of Play, 1, 197–213. DOI: 10.1080/21594937.2012.693384 Google Scholar öffnen
  322. Wiederman, M. W. (2005). The gendered nature of sexual scripts. The Family Journal, 13, 496–502. DOI: 10.1177/1066480705278729 Google Scholar öffnen
  323. Wirth, W., Hofer, M. & Schramm, H. (2012). Beyond pleasure: Exploring the eudaimonic entertainment experience. Human Communication Research, 38, 406–428. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468 – 2958.2012.01434.x Google Scholar öffnen
  324. Wood, W. (2000). Attitude change: persuasion and social influence. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 539–570. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.539 Google Scholar öffnen
  325. Wright, A. G. C., Lukowitsky, M. R., Pincus, A. L. & Conroy, D. E. (2010). The higher order factor structure and gender invariance of the Pathological Narcissism Inventory. Assessment, 17, 467–483. DOI: 10.1177/1073191110373227 Google Scholar öffnen
  326. Yamada, M., Lamm, C. & Decety, J. (2011). Pleasing frowns, disappointing smiles: An ERP investigation of counterempathy. Emotion, 11, 1336–1345. DOI: 10.1037/a0023854 Google Scholar öffnen
  327. Young, A. F., Gabriel, S. & Sechrist, G. B. (2012). The skinny on celebrities: Parasocial relationships moderate the effects of thin media figures on women's body image. Social Psychology and Personality Science, 3, 659–666. DOI: 10.1177/1948550611434785 Google Scholar öffnen
  328. Zillmann, D. (1988). Mood management through communication choices. American Behavioral Scientist, 31, 327–340. DOI: 10.1177/000276488031003005 Google Scholar öffnen
  329. Zillmann, D. (1996). The psychology of suspense in dramatic exposition. In P. Vorderer, H. J. Wulff & M. Friedrichsen (Hrsg.), Suspense: Conseptualizations, theoretical analyses, and empirical explorations (S. 199–231). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar öffnen
  330. Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J. & Petherick, J. (2006). Intimacy dating goals and relationship satisfaction during adolescence and emerging adulthood: Identity formation, age and sex as moderators. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30, 167–177. DOI: 10.1177/0165025406063636 Google Scholar öffnen
  331. Zuckerman, M., Miyake, K. & Elkin, C. S. (1995). Effects of attractiveness and maturity of face and voice on interpersonal impressions. Journal of Research in Personality, 29, 253–272. DOI: 10.1006/jrpe.1995.1015 Google Scholar öffnen
  332. Zwick, E., Stuber, S., Herskovitz, M., Randolph, C. & Brugge, P. J. (Produzent*innen). & Zwick, E. (Regisseur*in). Love and other Drugs. USA: Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation Google Scholar öffnen

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus dem Schwerpunkt "Film & Fernsehen & Kino", "Medienwirkungsforschung & Mediennutzungsforschung", "Medienwissenschaft, Kommunikationsforschung"
Cover des Buchs: Israel in deutschen Medien
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Jonas Hessenauer, Lukas Uwira
Israel in deutschen Medien
Cover des Buchs: Medienmanagement
Lehrbuch Kein Zugriff
Ingo Knuth, Thomas Kilian
Medienmanagement
Cover des Buchs: Konstruktiver Journalismus
Monographie Vollzugriff
Julia Faltermeier
Konstruktiver Journalismus
Cover des Buchs: Trennen – Verbinden – Takten
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Patrick Wöhrle, Stephan Hein, Stefan Meißner
Trennen – Verbinden – Takten
Cover des Buchs: Neuere Forschung zu parasozialen Interaktionen und Beziehungen
Monographie Teilzugriff
Holger Schramm, Nicole Liebers, Laurenz Biniak, Franca Dettmar
Neuere Forschung zu parasozialen Interaktionen und Beziehungen

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Feedback geben

Wir freuen uns über Ihr Feedback zu Inhalten und Funktionen. Ihre Nachricht hilft uns, unseren Service stetig zu verbessern.

Bewertung
Bild anhängen
oder hier ablegen
PNG oder JPG (max. 3 MB)

Anmelden

Passwort vergessen?
Login via Open Athens
Noch kein Benutzerkonto?
Jetzt registrieren

Publikation zitieren

Download: RIS BibTex