European Law and National Organisation of Civil Justice

Univ.-Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Hau; Prof. Dr. Bart Krans; Prof. Dr. Anna Nylund

doi:10.5771/9783748916680

Summary

The book deals with the relationship between European law and the organisation of civil justice in the Member States: From different perspectives, the authors examine the extent to which primary and secondary EU law and the case law of the ECJ and the ECHR influence not only national civil procedural law, but increasingly also national court systems. The focus is on the European framework conditions for the independence of the courts, but also on what European law understands by a court or a court decision, which decisions may only be entrusted to genuine courts and to what extent appeals must be made available. With contributions byProf. Dr. Aleš Galič | Prof. Dr. Anna W. Ghavanini | Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Hau | Laura van Kessel | Prof. Dr. Bart Krans | Prof. Dr. Jordi Nieva-Fenoll | Prof. Dr. Anna Nylund | Prof. Dr. Piet Taelman | Jarich Werbrouck

Keywords

Search publication

Bibliographic data

Copyright year: 2024
ISBN-Print: 978-3-7560-0922-0
ISBN-Online: 978-3-7489-1668-0
Publisher: Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series: Streitbeilegung und Streitvermeidung im Zivilrecht - Schriftenreihe des Munich Center for Dispute Resolution
Volume: 19
Language: English
Pages: 175
Product type: Edited Book

Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access Pages 1 - 16
Chapter 1 Introduction No access Pages 17 - 22 Wolfgang Hau, Bart Krans, Anna Nylund
Anna Nylund
1. I. Introduction – from what to when No access
2. 1. 1. Introduction No access
  2. 2. Institutional criteria No access
  3. 3. Functional criteria No access
  4. 4. Procedural criteria No access
  5. 5. Concluding remarks on “courts” and preliminary rulings No access
3. III. The right to effective judicial protection No access
4. 1. 1. Introduction No access
  2. 2. Institutional criteria No access
  3. 3. Procedural criteria No access
  4. 4. Procedural implications beyond Article 45 No access
5. V. European small claims, payment order, and enforcement order procedures No access
6. VI. Conclusion No access
Aleš Galič
1. I. Introduction No access
2. II. The concept of a “judgment” in EU primary law No access
3. III. The definition of a “judgment” in the Brussels I Regulation No access
4. IV. European Order for Payment Regulation No access
5. 1. 1. The Brussels II ter Regulation No access
  2. 2.The Succession Regulation No access
6. VI. Conclusion No access
Wolfgang Hau
1. I. Introduction No access
2. II. Prerogative clauses: illustrations taken from criminal law No access
3. III. Prerogative clauses in civil and commercial matters No access
4. 1. 1. No delegation to out-of-court bodies No access
  2. 2. No delegation to non-judicial court personnel No access
5. V. Conclusion No access
Anna W Ghavanini
1. I. Introduction No access
2. II. The uneasy relationship between the ECJ and national higher courts No access
3. 1. 1. Statutory right of appeal No access
  2. 2. Appeal and the requirement of service No access
  3. 3. Appeal and the right to a reasoned judgment No access
4. 1. 1. Right of appeal as a corollary to the right to reasons No access
  2. 2. Right of appeal as a “machinery” to ensure legal certainty No access
5. V. Conclusion No access
Piet Taelman, Jarich Werbrouck
1. I. Overview No access
2. II. Introduction No access
3. III. Conceptualisation of Judicial Independence and Legal Bases No access
4. IV. Multilayered Character of Judicial Independence No access
5. 1. 1. Safeguarding judicial independence by means of prevention No access
  2. 2. Safeguarding judicial independence by means of cure No access
6. VI. Conclusion No access
Jordi Nieva-Fenoll
1. I. Introduction No access
2. II. International standards No access
3. III. Case law and its raison d’être No access
4. IV. Salary No access
5. V. Demotion, retirement and transfer No access
6. VI. Conclusion No access
Laura van Kessel, Bart Krans
1. I. Limited liability and judicial independence No access
2. II. Structure of this contribution No access
3. 1. 1. Privileges and immunities in the light of the right of access to a court No access
  2. 2. Value of the independence argument within the legitimate aim review No access
  3. 3. Proportionality of the restriction in the particular circumstances of the case and the value of the (legitimate) independence argument in that consideration No access
  4. 4. Interim conclusion No access
4. 1. 1. The picture is not yet complete No access
  2. 2. An example No access
  3. 3. Another example No access
  4. 4. Interim conclusion No access
5. V. Conclusion No access