The Freedom of Peaceful Assembly in Europe
- Editors:
- |
- Series:
- Beiträge zum ausländischen und vergleichenden öffentlichen Recht, Volume 35
- Publisher:
- 2016
Summary
This volume presents an accessible overview over the current state of the legislation on the freedom of assembly in eleven selected member states of the Venice Commission: the UK, France, the US, Belgium, Germany, Turkey, the Russian Federation, the Ukraine, Poland, Hungary and Tunisia. The volume may serve as a work of reference for the researcher or practitioner who seeks specific information on the legal bases, restrictions, or implementation of the freedom of assembly in a specific country or on more recent themes such as the legal implications of flashmobs. It is also a helpful starting point for anyone interested in comparing the state of assembly legislation in Europe and beyond. Next to information on details of the domestic regulation of assemblies, each study contains information on recent events, changes and debates on the laws on assemblies. Examples are the handling of the Arab spring in Tunisia, freedom of assembly-implications and management of the Gezi Park protests in Turkey, or the constitutional upheavals in the Ukraine.
<b>With contributions by:</b>
Anne Peters, Isbelle Ley, Elif Askin, Melina Garcin, Rainer Grote, Jannika Jahn, Steven Less, Halyna Perepelyuk, Orsolya Salát, Maria Stozek, Evgeniya Yushkova, Friederike Ziemer
Search publication
Bibliographic data
- Copyright year
- 2016
- ISBN-Print
- 978-3-8487-2449-9
- ISBN-Online
- 978-3-8452-6608-4
- Publisher
- Nomos, Baden-Baden
- Series
- Beiträge zum ausländischen und vergleichenden öffentlichen Recht
- Volume
- 35
- Language
- English
- Pages
- 342
- Product type
- Edited Book
Table of contents
- Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access Pages 1 - 8
- Anne Peters, Isabelle Ley
- 1. State of research No access Anne Peters, Isabelle Ley
- 2. History No access Anne Peters, Isabelle Ley
- 3. Rationale No access Anne Peters, Isabelle Ley
- 4. Legal bases No access Anne Peters, Isabelle Ley
- 5. Current challenges No access Anne Peters, Isabelle Ley
- 6. Organisation of the book No access Anne Peters, Isabelle Ley
- Jannika Jahn
- Abstract No access Jannika Jahn
- 1. Legal bases and scope of the guarantee No access Jannika Jahn
- Jannika Jahn
- 2.1 Targeted statutory powers No access Jannika Jahn
- 2.2 Public order (criminal) offences No access Jannika Jahn
- 2.3 Non-targeted statutory powers and offences No access Jannika Jahn
- 2.4 By-laws No access Jannika Jahn
- 2.5 Common law powers No access Jannika Jahn
- 3. Implementing the constitutional guarantee and freedom of assembly legislation No access Jannika Jahn
- Jannika Jahn
- 4.1 Judicial review and the responsiveness of the democratic process No access Jannika Jahn
- 4.2 The Independent Police Complaints Commission and other types of review No access Jannika Jahn
- 5. Conclusions and outlook No access Jannika Jahn
- Melina Garcin
- Abstract No access Melina Garcin
- 1. Legal bases No access Melina Garcin
- Melina Garcin
- 2.1 Case law No access Melina Garcin
- 2.2 Flashmobs No access Melina Garcin
- Melina Garcin
- 3.1 Place and time restrictions No access Melina Garcin
- 3.2 Manner restrictions No access Melina Garcin
- 3.3 Sight and sound restrictions No access Melina Garcin
- Melina Garcin
- 4.1 Notification and authorisation No access Melina Garcin
- 4.2 Decision-making No access Melina Garcin
- Melina Garcin
- 5.1 Spontaneous assemblies No access Melina Garcin
- 5.2 Assemblies gathered by means of new technologies No access Melina Garcin
- 5.3 Assemblies taking place on public property No access Melina Garcin
- 5.4 Counter-demonstrations No access Melina Garcin
- Melina Garcin
- 6.1 Pre-event planning No access Melina Garcin
- 6.2 Costs No access Melina Garcin
- 6.3 Use of force No access Melina Garcin
- 6.4 Liability of organisers No access Melina Garcin
- Melina Garcin
- 7.1 Review and appeal No access Melina Garcin
- 7.2 Liability and accountability of law enforcement personnel No access Melina Garcin
- 7.3 Monitoring No access Melina Garcin
- 7.4 Media access No access Melina Garcin
- 8. Conclusions and outlook No access Melina Garcin
- Steven Less
- Abstract No access Steven Less
- Steven Less
- 1.1 Constitutional right to assemble No access Steven Less
- 1.2 Scope of the guarantee No access Steven Less
- Steven Less
- 2.1 Assemblies on public property No access Steven Less
- 2.2 Assemblies on private property No access Steven Less
- Steven Less
- 3.1 Content-based restrictions No access Steven Less
- Steven Less
- Place restrictions: restricted zones No access Steven Less
- 3.3 Vagueness and overbreadth No access Steven Less
- 3.4 Prior restraints No access Steven Less
- Steven Less
- 4.1 Notification and spontaneous assemblies No access Steven Less
- 4.2 Decision-making No access Steven Less
- 4.3 Review of denial of permits No access Steven Less
- 4.4 Implementation costs No access Steven Less
- Steven Less
- 5.1 Use of force by the police No access Steven Less
- 5.2 Liability of assemblers No access Steven Less
- Steven Less
- 6.1 Liability of law enforcement authorities No access Steven Less
- 6.2 Monitoring No access Steven Less
- Steven Less
- 7.1 Law enforcement policy and technology No access Steven Less
- 7.2 Prohibited and controlled equipment and the problem of militarised policing No access Steven Less
- 7.3 Body-worn cameras (BWC) and police accountability No access Steven Less
- 7.4 Police interference with wireless communications and social media No access Steven Less
- 7.5 Police surveillance and unmanned aerial systems (UAS) No access Steven Less
- Melina Garcin
- Abstract No access Melina Garcin
- 1. Legal bases No access Melina Garcin
- Melina Garcin
- 2.2 No specific laws on flashmobs No access Melina Garcin
- Melina Garcin
- 3.1 Place and time restrictions No access Melina Garcin
- 3.2 Manner restrictions No access Melina Garcin
- Melina Garcin
- 4.1 Authorisation No access Melina Garcin
- 4.2 Decision-making No access Melina Garcin
- 4.3 Review and appeal No access Melina Garcin
- Melina Garcin
- 5.1 Assemblies gathered by means of new technologies (such as social networks) No access Melina Garcin
- 5.2 Spontaneous assemblies No access Melina Garcin
- 5.3 Assemblies taking place on public property No access Melina Garcin
- 5.4 Counter-demonstrations No access Melina Garcin
- Melina Garcin
- 6.1 Pre-event planning No access Melina Garcin
- 6.2 Costs No access Melina Garcin
- 6.3 Use of force by the police No access Melina Garcin
- 6.4 Liability of organisers No access Melina Garcin
- Melina Garcin
- 7.1 Liability and accountability of law enforcement personnel No access Melina Garcin
- 7.3 Media access No access Melina Garcin
- 8. Conclusions and outlook No access Melina Garcin
- Rainer Grote
- Abstract No access Rainer Grote
- 1. Legal bases No access Rainer Grote
- Rainer Grote
- 2.1 Ratione personae No access Rainer Grote
- 2.2 Ratione materiae No access Rainer Grote
- 2.3 Peaceful character of assembly No access Rainer Grote
- 2.4 Protected activities No access Rainer Grote
- 3. Restrictions No access Rainer Grote
- Rainer Grote
- 4.1 Indoor assemblies No access Rainer Grote
- 4.2 Outdoor assemblies No access Rainer Grote
- Rainer Grote
- 5.1 General provisions concerning liability, costs, and the like No access Rainer Grote
- 5.2 The recent Assembly Acts of the states (Länder) No access Rainer Grote
- 6. Conclusions and outlook No access Rainer Grote
- Elif Askin
- Abstract No access Elif Askin
- 1. Introduction No access Elif Askin
- Elif Askin
- Post-Gezi amendments to the Law on Demonstrations No access Elif Askin
- Elif Askin
- Elif Askin
- Specific legal restrictions for assemblies in public space No access Elif Askin
- Protests around Taksim Square No access Elif Askin
- Place restrictions concerning Cyprus and the “Green Line” No access Elif Askin
- Manner No access Elif Askin
- 3.2 Counter-terrorism restrictions No access Elif Askin
- Elif Askin
- 4.1 Advance notification No access Elif Askin
- 4.2 Decision-making No access Elif Askin
- Elif Askin
- 5.1 Flashmobs No access Elif Askin
- 5.2 Assemblies gathered by means of new technologies, especially social media No access Elif Askin
- Elif Askin
- Elif Askin
- The use of “less lethal” weapons: tear gas and pepper spray No access Elif Askin
- Stop and search powers of the police No access Elif Askin
- 6.2 “Security Package” of 2015: restraining the right to freedom of assembly No access Elif Askin
- 6.3 Reprisals against peaceful protestors No access Elif Askin
- 6.4 Liability of organisers No access Elif Askin
- 6.5 Liability of specific groups supporting assemblies No access Elif Askin
- Elif Askin
- Elif Askin
- Independent complaints mechanism No access Elif Askin
- Elif Askin
- Civil society No access Elif Askin
- Ombudsman No access Elif Askin
- 7.3 Media access No access Elif Askin
- 8. Conclusions and outlook No access Elif Askin
- Evgeniya Yushkova
- Abstract No access Evgeniya Yushkova
- Evgeniya Yushkova
- 1.1 Constitutional guarantee No access Evgeniya Yushkova
- 1.2 Primary legislation No access Evgeniya Yushkova
- 1.3 Secondary legislation No access Evgeniya Yushkova
- Evgeniya Yushkova
- 2.1 Case law No access Evgeniya Yushkova
- 2.2 Experiences with flashmobs No access Evgeniya Yushkova
- Evgeniya Yushkova
- 3.1 Legitimate grounds for restrictions No access Evgeniya Yushkova
- 3.2 Refusal to agree No access Evgeniya Yushkova
- 3.3 Suspension and termination No access Evgeniya Yushkova
- Evgeniya Yushkova
- Place No access Evgeniya Yushkova
- Time No access Evgeniya Yushkova
- Manner No access Evgeniya Yushkova
- “Sight and sound” No access Evgeniya Yushkova
- Evgeniya Yushkova
- 4.1 Notification No access Evgeniya Yushkova
- 4.2 Decision-making No access Evgeniya Yushkova
- 4.3 Review and appeal No access Evgeniya Yushkova
- Evgeniya Yushkova
- 5.1 Spontaneous assemblies No access Evgeniya Yushkova
- 5.2 Assemblies gathered by means of new technologies No access Evgeniya Yushkova
- 5.3 Counter-demonstrations No access Evgeniya Yushkova
- Evgeniya Yushkova
- 6.1 Pre-event planning No access Evgeniya Yushkova
- 6.2 Costs No access Evgeniya Yushkova
- 6.3 Use of force by the police No access Evgeniya Yushkova
- 6.4 Liability of organisers No access Evgeniya Yushkova
- Evgeniya Yushkova
- 7.1 Liability and accountability of law enforcement personnel No access Evgeniya Yushkova
- 7.2 Monitoring No access Evgeniya Yushkova
- 7.3 Media access No access Evgeniya Yushkova
- 8. Conclusions and outlook No access Evgeniya Yushkova
- Halyna Perepelyuk
- Abstract No access Halyna Perepelyuk
- 1. Legal bases and scope of the guarantee No access Halyna Perepelyuk
- Halyna Perepelyuk
- 2.1 Time No access Halyna Perepelyuk
- 2.2 Place No access Halyna Perepelyuk
- 2.3 Sight and Sound No access Halyna Perepelyuk
- Halyna Perepelyuk
- 3.1 Notification No access Halyna Perepelyuk
- 3.2 Decision-making No access Halyna Perepelyuk
- 3.3 Review and appeal No access Halyna Perepelyuk
- Halyna Perepelyuk
- 4.1 Spontaneous assemblies No access Halyna Perepelyuk
- 4.2 Assemblies organised by means of new technologies No access Halyna Perepelyuk
- 4.3 Assemblies taking place on public properties No access Halyna Perepelyuk
- 4.4 Counter-demonstrations No access Halyna Perepelyuk
- Halyna Perepelyuk
- 5.1 Pre-event planning No access Halyna Perepelyuk
- 5.2 Costs No access Halyna Perepelyuk
- 5.3 Use of force by the police No access Halyna Perepelyuk
- 5.4 The use of drones during demonstrations No access Halyna Perepelyuk
- 5.5 Liability of organisers No access Halyna Perepelyuk
- Halyna Perepelyuk
- 6.1 Liability and accountability of law enforcement personnel No access Halyna Perepelyuk
- 6.2 Monitoring No access Halyna Perepelyuk
- 6.3 Media access No access Halyna Perepelyuk
- 7. Conclusions and outlook No access Halyna Perepelyuk
- Maria Stożek
- Abstract No access Maria Stożek
- 1. Legal bases No access Maria Stożek
- Maria Stożek
- 2.1 Experiences with flashmobs No access Maria Stożek
- 3. Restrictions No access Maria Stożek
- Maria Stożek
- 4.1 Notification No access Maria Stożek
- 4.2 Decision-making No access Maria Stożek
- 4.3 Review and appeal No access Maria Stożek
- Maria Stożek
- 5.1 Spontaneous assemblies No access Maria Stożek
- 5.2 Assemblies gathered by means of new technologies No access Maria Stożek
- 5.3 Counter-demonstrations No access Maria Stożek
- Maria Stożek
- 6.1 Pre-event planning No access Maria Stożek
- 6.2 Costs No access Maria Stożek
- 6.3 No strict liability of the organisers No access Maria Stożek
- 6.4 Use of force by police No access Maria Stożek
- Maria Stożek
- 7.1 Liability and accountability of law enforcement personnel No access Maria Stożek
- 7.2 Monitoring No access Maria Stożek
- 7.3 Media access No access Maria Stożek
- 8. Conclusions and outlook No access Maria Stożek
- Orsolya Salát
- Abstract No access Orsolya Salát
- Orsolya Salát
- 1.1 Changing constitutional context No access Orsolya Salát
- 1.2 The Act on the Right to Assembly No access Orsolya Salát
- Orsolya Salát
- 2.1 Peacefulness No access Orsolya Salát
- 2.2 Narrow (or enlarged) notion of assembly No access Orsolya Salát
- 2.3 Choice of place, time, and circumstances No access Orsolya Salát
- 2.4 Types of assemblies protected No access Orsolya Salát
- Orsolya Salát
- 3.1 Legitimate grounds for restrictions No access Orsolya Salát
- 3.2 Specific place and time restrictions No access Orsolya Salát
- 3.3 Manner restrictions No access Orsolya Salát
- 3.4 Sight and sound restrictions No access Orsolya Salát
- Orsolya Salát
- 4.1 Notification No access Orsolya Salát
- 4.2 Spontaneous assemblies No access Orsolya Salát
- 4.3 Assemblies gathered by means of new technologies No access Orsolya Salát
- 4.4 Decision-making No access Orsolya Salát
- 4.5 Review and appeal No access Orsolya Salát
- Orsolya Salát
- 5.1 Counter-demonstrations are not regulated No access Orsolya Salát
- Orsolya Salát
- 6.1 Pre-event planning No access Orsolya Salát
- 6.2 Costs No access Orsolya Salát
- 6.3 Liability of organisers No access Orsolya Salát
- 6.4 Use of force by the police No access Orsolya Salát
- Orsolya Salát
- 7.1 Liability and accountability of law enforcement personnel No access Orsolya Salát
- 7.2 Monitoring No access Orsolya Salát
- 7.3 Media access No access Orsolya Salát
- 8. Conclusions and outlook No access Orsolya Salát
- Melina Garcin
- Abstract No access Melina Garcin
- 1. Legal bases No access Melina Garcin
- Melina Garcin
- 2.1 Comments on the final draft No access Melina Garcin
- 2.2 Experiences with flashmobs No access Melina Garcin
- 3. Restrictions No access Melina Garcin
- Melina Garcin
- 4.1 Notification and authorisation No access Melina Garcin
- 4.2 Decision-making No access Melina Garcin
- 4.3 Review and appeal No access Melina Garcin
- Melina Garcin
- 5.1 Spontaneous assemblies No access Melina Garcin
- 5.2 Assemblies gathered by means of new technologies No access Melina Garcin
- 5.3 Assemblies taking place on public property No access Melina Garcin
- 5.4 Counter-demonstrations No access Melina Garcin
- Melina Garcin
- 6.1 Pre-event planning No access Melina Garcin
- 6.2 Costs No access Melina Garcin
- 6.3 Use of force by the police No access Melina Garcin
- 6.4 Liability and accountability of organisers No access Melina Garcin
- Melina Garcin
- 7.1 Liability and accountability of law enforcement personnel No access Melina Garcin
- 7.2 Monitoring No access Melina Garcin
- 7.3 Media access No access Melina Garcin
- 8. Conclusions and outlook No access Melina Garcin
- Isabelle Ley, Anne Peters
- Isabelle Ley, Anne Peters
- 1.1 Wording No access Isabelle Ley, Anne Peters
- Isabelle Ley, Anne Peters
- Ratione personae No access Isabelle Ley, Anne Peters
- Ratione materiae No access Isabelle Ley, Anne Peters
- 1.3 Flashmobs No access Isabelle Ley, Anne Peters
- 1.4 Federal states No access Isabelle Ley, Anne Peters
- Isabelle Ley, Anne Peters
- 2.1 Private space No access Isabelle Ley, Anne Peters
- 2.2 Prohibition, bans, and dispersals of assemblies No access Isabelle Ley, Anne Peters
- 2.3 Time, place, and manner restrictions No access Isabelle Ley, Anne Peters
- 2.4 Place restrictions: specifically designated areas No access Isabelle Ley, Anne Peters
- 2.5 Time restrictions No access Isabelle Ley, Anne Peters
- 2.6 Sound restrictions No access Isabelle Ley, Anne Peters
- 2.7 Anonymity of participants No access Isabelle Ley, Anne Peters
- 2.8 Fringe areas and other restricted zones No access Isabelle Ley, Anne Peters
- 2.9 Use of force by the police No access Isabelle Ley, Anne Peters
- 2.10 State of emergency No access Isabelle Ley, Anne Peters
- 2.11 Anti-terrorism legislation No access Isabelle Ley, Anne Peters
- Isabelle Ley, Anne Peters
- 3.1 Notification or authorisation requirement No access Isabelle Ley, Anne Peters
- 3.2 Pre-event planning by law enforcement officials with the organiser No access Isabelle Ley, Anne Peters
- 3.3 Spontaneous assemblies No access Isabelle Ley, Anne Peters
- 3.4 Decision-making No access Isabelle Ley, Anne Peters
- 3.5 Review and appeal No access Isabelle Ley, Anne Peters
- Isabelle Ley, Anne Peters
- 4.1 Same sex pride parades No access Isabelle Ley, Anne Peters
- 4.2 Use of force No access Isabelle Ley, Anne Peters
- 4.3 Liability and accountability of law enforcement personnel No access Isabelle Ley, Anne Peters
- 4.4 Liability of organisers No access Isabelle Ley, Anne Peters
- 4.5 Media access and documentation No access Isabelle Ley, Anne Peters
- 4.6 Monitoring No access Isabelle Ley, Anne Peters
- 5. Compact assessment No access Isabelle Ley, Anne Peters
- 6. Convergence and divergence in protecting freedom of assembly No access Isabelle Ley, Anne Peters
- Table of ECtHR and ECmHR Cases No access Pages 329 - 332
- Bibliography No access Pages 333 - 338
- Contributors No access Pages 339 - 342
Bibliography (99 entries)
No match found. Try another term.
- Abu El-Haj, Tabatha, ‘The Neglected Right of Assembly’, in Margaret M. Russell (ed.), Freedom of Assembly and Petition (The First Amendment): Its Constitutional History and the Contemporary Debate (New York: Prometheus Books 2010), 255–257. Open Google Scholar
- Abu El-Haj, Tabatha, ‘The Neglected Right of Assembly’, UCLA Law Review 56 (2009), 543–589. Open Google Scholar
- Ajevski, Marjan, ‘Fragmentation in International Human Rights Law: Beyond Conflict of Laws’, Nordic Journal of Human Rights 32 (2014), 87–98. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/18918131.2014.897795
- Arbeitskreis Versammlungsrecht (Mathias Hong/Christoph Enders/Wolfgang Hoffmann-Riem/Michael Kniesel/Ralf Poscher/Helmuth Schulze-Fielitz), Musterentwurf eines Versammlungsgesetzes (München: C.H. Beck 2011). Open Google Scholar
- Ayata, Gökçeçiçek et al., Gezi Parkı Olayları: Gezi Parkı Olayları İnsan Hakları Hukuku ve Siyasi Söylem Işığında bir İnceleme (Istanbul: Istanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları 2013). Open Google Scholar
- Aydın-Düzgit, Senem, ‘Human Rights in Turkey’, in Carmen Rodríguez et al. (eds), Turkey’s Democratisation Process (London/New York: Routledge 2014), 312–329. Open Google Scholar
- Aziz, Miriam, The Impact of European Rights on National Legal Cultures (Oxford: Hart 2004). Open Google Scholar
- Bakhama, Michael, ‘Building Picket Fences: Maryland’s Funeral Picketing Law After Snyder v. Phelps’, Maryland Law Review 71 (2012), 1231–1257. Open Google Scholar
- Bartlett, Jamie et al., New Political Actors in Europe: New Opposition Movements in Hungary (London: Demos 2013). Open Google Scholar
- Bartlett, Jamie et al., Populism in Europe: Hungary – The Rise of Populism in Europe Can Be Traced Through Online Behaviour (London: Demos 2013). Open Google Scholar
- Benda, Ernst, ʻArtikel 8 – Versammlungsfreiheitʼ, in Wolfgang Kahl/Christian Waldhoff/Christian Walter (eds), Bonner Kommentar zum Grundgesetz, Volume 3 (Heidelberg: C.F. Müller 73rd Batch 1995). Open Google Scholar
- Blanke, Thomas/Sterzel, Dieter, ʻGeschichte und demokratische Funktion der Demonstrationsfreiheitʼ, Kritische Justiz 14 (1981), 347–369. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0023-4834-1981-4-347
- Bodnar, Adam, ‘Shaping the Freedom of Assembly: Counter-Productive Effects of the Polish Road towards Illiberal Democracy’, in András Sajó (ed.), Free to Protest: Constituent Power and Street Demonstration (Utrecht: Eleven International Publishing 2009), 165–188. Open Google Scholar
- von Bogdandy, Armin, ‘Comparative Constitutional Law: A Continental Perspective’, in Michel Rosenfeld/András Sajó (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012), 25–37. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199578610.003.0001
- Bonner, David/Stone, Richard, ‘The Public Order Act 1986 – Steps in the Wrong Direction’, Public Law 31 (1987), 202–230. Open Google Scholar
- Bröhmer, Jürgen, ‘Versammlungs- und Vereinigungsfreiheit’, in Oliver Dörr/Rainer Grote/Thilo Marauhn (eds), EMRK/GG – Konkordanzkommentar zum europäischen und deutschen Grundrechtsschutz (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2nd edn 2013), 1161–1232. Open Google Scholar
- Bullock, Karen/Johnson, Paul, ‘The Impact of the Human Rights Act 1998 on Policing in England and Wales’, The British Journal of Criminology 52 (2011), 1–21. Open Google Scholar
- Chang, Wen-Chen/Yeh, Jiunn-Rong, ‘Internationalization of Constitutional Law’, in Michel Rosenfeld/András Sajó (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012), 1165–1184. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199578610.013.0058
- Choudhry, Sujit (ed.), The Migration of Constitutional Ideas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2006). Open Google Scholar
- Cole, David, ‘Hanging with the Wrong Crowd: Of Gangs, Terrorists, and the Right of Association’, in Margaret M. Russell (ed.), Freedom of Assembly and Petition (The First Amendment): Its Constitutional History and the Contemporary Debate (New York: Prometheus Books 2010), 207–216. Open Google Scholar
- Colliard, Claude-Albert, Libertés publiques (Paris: Dalloz 8th edn 2005). Open Google Scholar
- de Meyer, Jan, Staatsrecht (Leuven: Wouters 4th edn 1963). Open Google Scholar
- Delpérée, Francis, Le droit constitutionnel de la Belgique (Brussels: Bruylant 2000). Open Google Scholar
- Duffar, Jean, Les libertés collectives (Paris: Montchrestien 1996). Open Google Scholar
- Dupriez, Léon, La liberté de réunion (Brussels: Lesigne 1887). Open Google Scholar
- Erkoc, Taptuk, ‘Taksim Gezi Park Protests: Birth and Backlash of a Political Sphere’, in Bülent Gökay and Ilia Xypolia (eds), Reflections on Taksim – Gezi Park Protests in Turkey (Keele: A Journal of Global Faultlines Publication 2013), 43–46. Open Google Scholar
- Farber, Daniel A., The First Amendment (New York: The Foundation Press 2nd edn 2003). Open Google Scholar
- Fenwick, Helen, ‘Marginalising Human Rights: Breach of the Peace, “Kettling”, the Human Rights Act and Public Protest’, Public Law 53 (2009), 737–765. Open Google Scholar
- Foster, Steve, Human Rights and Civil Liberties (London: Longman 3rd edn 2011). Open Google Scholar
- Frowein, Jochen A., ‘The Transformation of Constitutional Law through the European Convention on Human Rights’, Human Rights Journal 35 (2015), 1–8. Open Google Scholar
- Gardbaum, Stephen, ‘The Structure and Scope of Constitutional Rights’, in Tom Ginsburg/Rosalind Dixon (eds), Comparative Constitutional Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing 2011), 387–405. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.4337/9780857931214.00030
- Gargarella, Robert, ‘A Dialogue on Law and Social Protest’, in András Sajó (ed.), Free to Protest: Constituent Power and Street Demonstrations (Utrecht: Eleven 2009), 61–86. Open Google Scholar
- Gökay, Bülent/Xypolia, Ilia, ‘Editorial’, in Bülent Gökay and Ilia Xypolia (eds), Reflections on Taksim – Gezi Park Protests in Turkey (Keele: A Journal of Global Faultlines Publication 2013), 1–2. Open Google Scholar
- Gönenç, Levent, ‘The 2001 Amendments to the 1982 Constitution of Turkey’, Ankara Law Review 1 (2004), 89–109. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1501/Lawrev_0000000007
- Graff, Agnieszka, ‘We Are (Not All) Homophobes: A Report from Poland’, Feminist Studies 32 (2006), 434–449. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/20459096
- Gruszczynska, Anna, ‘Living La Vida Internet. Some Notes on the Cyberization of Polish LGBT Community’, in Roman Kuhar and Judit Takacs (eds), Beyond the Pink Curtain: Everyday Life of LGBT People in Eastern Europe (Ljubljana: Mirovni Peace Institute 2006), 95–115. Open Google Scholar
- Györfi, Tamás, ‘The Importance of Freedom of Assembly: Three Models of Justification’, in András Sajó (ed.), Free to Protest: Constituent Power and Street Demonstrations (Utrecht: Eleven 2009), 1–16. Open Google Scholar
- Hajas, Barnabás, A gyülekezési jog egyes aktuális elméleti és gyakorlati kérdései, doktori értekezés [Some Actual Theoretical and Practical Problems of the Right to Assembly], Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pécs, 2012. Open Google Scholar
- Hajas, Barnabás, Gyülekezési jogi projekt [Project on the right to assembly] (Budapest: Országgyűlési Biztos Hivatala 2009). Open Google Scholar
- Hoffmann-Riem, Wolfgang, ʻStandards für die Verwirklichung der Versammlungsfreiheit in Europaʼ, in Wolfgang Durner/Franz-Joseph Peine/Fouroud Shirvani (eds), Freiheit und Sicherheit in Deutschland und Europa (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot 2013), 267–287. Open Google Scholar
- Iancu, Alexandra, ‘“Europeanization” versus “New Localism” in Shaping Fundamental Rights: “Free Speech” Definitions, Limitations, and Deadlocks in new Democracies’, in Manuel Gutan/Bianca Selejan Gutan (eds), Europeanization and Judicial Culture in Contemporary Democracies (Bukarest: Hamangiu 2014), 148–177. Open Google Scholar
- Inazu, John D., Liberty’s Refuge: The Forgotten Freedom of Assembly (New Haven: Yale University Press 2012). Open Google Scholar
- Inazu, John D., ‘The Forgotten Freedom of Assembly’, Tulane Law Review 84 (2010), 565–612. Open Google Scholar
- International Center for Not-for-Profit Law, ‘Arab Spring: An Opportunity for Greater Freedom of Association and Assembly in Tunisia and Egypt?’, 3 Global Trends in NGO Law (2011), issue 1. Open Google Scholar
- Kanovitz, Jacqueline, Constitutional Law for Criminal Justice (New York: Routledge 2015). Open Google Scholar
- Kanovitz, Jacqueline R./Kanovitz, Michael I., Constitutional Law (Newark: Matthew Bender/LexisNexis Group 11th edn 2008). Open Google Scholar
- Kant, Immanuel, ʻÜber den Gemeinspruch: Das mag in der Theorie richtig sein, taugt aber nicht für die Praxis, Section II – Vom Verhältnis der Theorie zur Praxis im Staatsrechtʼ, in Immanuel Kant, Werke in 12 Bänden, edited by Wilhelm Weischedel, vol. 11 (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp 1977). Open Google Scholar
- Kant, Immanuel, ʻOn the Old Saw – That May be Right in Theory but It Won’t Work in Practiceʼ, in Hans Reiss (ed.): Kant’s Political Writings, translated by Hugh Barry Nisbet (Cambridge Cambridge University Press 1970). Open Google Scholar
- Kellum, Nathan W., ‘If it Looks Like a Duck … Traditional Public Forum Status of Open Areas of Public University Campuses’, Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterley 33 (2005–2006) 1–45. Open Google Scholar
- Lavalleye, Paul, ‘Les droits de l’homme et les libertés fondamentales en Belgique’, in Pelloux, Robert (ed.), Essais sur les droits de l’homme en Europe (Paris: Bibliothèque Européenne 1959), 19–42. Open Google Scholar
- Law, David S., ‘Generic Constitutional Law’, Minnesota Law Review 89 (2004–2005), 652–742. Open Google Scholar
- Legrand, Pierre, ‘Antivonbar’, Journal of Comparative Law 1 (2006), 13–40. Open Google Scholar
- Legrand, Pierre, ‘European Legal Systems are not Converging’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 45 (1996), 52–81. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0020589300058656
- Lepsius, Oliver, ‘Versammlungsrecht und gesellschaftliche Integrationʼ, in Anselm Doering-Manteufel/Bernd Greiner/Oliver Lepsius (eds), Der Brokdorf-Beschluss (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2015), 113–165. Open Google Scholar
- Mazzone, Jason, ‘Freedom’s Associations’, in Margaret M. Russell (ed.), Freedom of Assembly and Petition (The First Amendment): Its Constitutional History and the Contemporary Debate (New York: Prometheus Books 2010), 26–31. Open Google Scholar
- McAllister, Stephen R., ‘Picketing Laws and Free Speech’, University of Kansas Law Review 55 (2006–2007), 575–627. Open Google Scholar
- Mead, David, ‘A Chill Through the Back Door? The Privatised Regulation of Peaceful Protest’, Public Law 57 (2013), 10–118. Open Google Scholar
- Menanteau, Maurice, Les nouveaux aspects de la liberté de réunion (Paris: Librairie technique et économique 1937). Open Google Scholar
- Miller, Lindsay/Toliver, Jessica/Police Executive Research Forum (PERF), Implementing a Body-Worn Camera Program: Recommendations and Lessons Learned (Washington, D.C.: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services 2014). Open Google Scholar
- Miller, Russell A., An Introduction to German Law and Legal Culture: Text and Materials (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press forthcoming 2016). Open Google Scholar
- Neumann, Conrad, ‘Flasmobs, Smartmobs, Massenpartys – Die rechtliche Beurteilung moderner Kommunikations- und Interaktionsformen’, Neue Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsrecht (2011), 1171–1177. Open Google Scholar
- Newman, Christopher, ‘Section 5 of the Public Order Act 1986: The Threshold of Extreme Protest’, Journal of Criminal Law 76 (2012), 105–109. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1350/jcla.2012.76.2.755
- Olgun, Akbulut, ‘Toplantı ve Örgütlenme Özgürlükleri’, in Sibel İnceoğlu (ed.), Insan Hakları Avrupa Sözleşmesi ve Anayasa. Anayasa Mahkemesine Bireysel Başvuru Kapsamında Bir İnceleme (Istanbul: Beta Yayınları 3rd edn 2013), 381–424. Open Google Scholar
- Orban, Oscar, Le droit constitutionnel de la Belgique (Liège: Dessain 1911). Open Google Scholar
- Ott, Sieghart/Wächtler Hartmut/Heinold, Hubert, Gesetz über Versammlungen und Aufzüge (Stuttgart: Boorberg 7th edn 2010). Open Google Scholar
- Özbudun, Ergün, ‘Turkey’s Search for a New Constitution’, Insight Turkey 14 (2012), 39–50. Open Google Scholar
- Özbudun, Ergun/Türkmen, Füsün, ‘Impact of the ECtHR Rulings on Turkey`s Democratisation: An Evaluation’, Human Rights Quarterly, 35 (2013), 985–1008. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2013.0054
- Pasqualucci, Jo M., ‘The Harmonization of Human Rights Law: Guaranteeing the Plurality of Individual Rights’, in Larry Catá Backer (ed.), Harmonizing Law in an Era of Globalization (Durham: Carolina Academic Press 2007), 35–54. Open Google Scholar
- Peters, Anne/Preuß, Ulrich K., ‘International Relations and International Law’, in Mark Tushnet/Thomas Fleiner/Cheryl Saunders (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Constitutional Law (London: Routledge 2013), 33–44. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.4324/9780203072578.ch3
- Peters, Anne, ‘The Globalization of State Constitutions’, in Janne Nijman/André Nollkaemper (eds), New Perspectives on the Divide Between National and International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2007), 251–308. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199231942.003.0011
- Peters, Anne/Schwenke, Heiner, ‘Comparative Law beyond Post-modernism’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 49 (2000), 800–834. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0020589300064666
- Phillipps, Zachary J., ‘The Unavoidable Implication of McCullen v. Coakley: Protection Against Unwelcome Speech is not a Sufficient Justification for Restricting Speech in Traditional Public Fora’, Connecticut Law Review 47 (2015), 937–969. Open Google Scholar
- Pieters, Danny, ‘Belgien’, in Eberhard Grabitz (ed.), Grundrechte in Europa und USA, vol. I (Kehl: Engel 1986), 1–84. Open Google Scholar
- Preuß, Ulrich K., ‘Associative Rights (the Rights to the Freedom of Petition, Assembly, and Association)’, in Michel Rosenfeld/András Sajó (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012), 948–966. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199578610.013.0047
- Ripke, Stefan, Europäische Versammlungsfreiheit (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2012). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1628/978-3-16-152094-5
- Rodríguez, Carmen/Ávalos, Antonio/Yılmaz, Hakan/Planet, Ana I., ‘Democratisation Processes in Defective Democracies. The Case of Turkey’, in Carmen Rodríguez et al. (eds), Turkey’s Democratisation Process (London/New York: Routledge 2014), 3–15. Open Google Scholar
- Roellecke, Gerd, ʻVersammlungsfreiheitʼ in Görres-Gesellschaft (ed.), Staatslexikon: Recht, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft (Freiburg: Herder Verlag 7th edn 1989), vol. V, Column 707–711. Open Google Scholar
- Russell, Margaret M., ‘Editor’s Introduction’ and ‘Editor’s Note, Part II’, in Margaret M. Russell (ed.), Freedom of Assembly and Petition (The First Amendment): Its Constitutional History and the Contemporary Debate (New York: Prometheus Books 2010), 21–23; 43–46. Open Google Scholar
- Russell, Margaret M., ‘Editor’s Note, Part III’, in Margaret M. Russell (ed.), Freedom of Assembly and Petition (The First Amendment): Its Constitutional History and the Contemporary Debate (New York: Prometheus Books 2010), 185–188. Open Google Scholar
- Sajó, András (ed.), Free to Protest: Constituent Power and Street Demonstrations (Utrecht: Eleven 2009). Open Google Scholar
- Salát, Orsolya, The Right to Freedom of Assembly: A Comparative Study (Oxford: Hart 2015). Open Google Scholar
- Salát, Orsolya, ‘Comparative Freedom of Assembly and the Fragmentation of International Human Rights’, Nordic Journal of Human Rights 32 (2014), 140–156. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/18918131.2014.896971
- Schmitt, Carl, The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy, translated by Ellen Kennedy (Boston: MIT Press 1988). Open Google Scholar
- Schmitt, Carl, Die geistesgeschichtliche Lage des heutigen Parlamentarismus (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot 2nd edn 1926, Reprint 2010). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.3790/978-3-428-48839-1
- Schulze-Fielitz, Helmuth, ‘Artikel 8 – Versammlungsfreiheit’, in Horst Dreier (ed.), Grundgesetz-Kommentar, Band I (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 3rd edn 2013), 1022–1077. Open Google Scholar
- Smilov, Daniel, ‘The Power of the Assembled People: The Right to Assembly and Political Representation’, in András Sajó (ed.), Free to Protest: Constituent Power and Street Demonstrations (Utrecht: Eleven 2009), 87–104. Open Google Scholar
- Spielman, Dean, ‘Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights and the Constitutional Systems of Europe’, in Michel Rosenfeld/András Sajó (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012), 1231–1252. Open Google Scholar
- Stone, Richard, ‘Breach of the Peace: the Case for Abolition’, Web Journal of Current Legal issues 2 (2001). Open Google Scholar
- Stone, Richard, Civil Liberties and Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press 9th edn 2012). Open Google Scholar
- Sztente, Zoltán, ‘The Decline of Constitutional Review in Hungary: Towards a Partisan Constitutional Court?’, in Zoltán Szente/Fanni Mandák/Zsuzsanna Fejes (eds), Challenges and Pitfalls in the Recent Hungarian Constitutional Development. Discussing the New Fundamental Law of Hungary (Paris: L’Harmattan 2015), 185–210. Open Google Scholar
- The Law Commission, ‘Criminal Law: Offences Relating to Public Order (Law Com. No. 123)’, The Modern Law Review 47 (1984), 324–333. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1984.tb01655.x
- Ulrich, Norbert, Das Demonstrationsrecht im Spannungsfeld von Meinungsfreiheit, Versammlungsfreiheit und öffentlicher Sicherheit (Baden-Baden: Nomos 2015). Open Google Scholar
- Versteeg, Mila/Goderis, Benedikt, ‘The Diffusion of Constitutional Rights’, International Review of Law and Economics 39 (2015), 1–19. Open Google Scholar
- Volokh, Eugene, ‘Gruesome Speech’, Cornell Law Review 100 (2015), 901–952. Open Google Scholar
- Weaver, Russell L./Lively, Donald E., Understanding the First Amendment (Newark: Matthew Bender/LexisNexis Group 2003). Open Google Scholar
- Werhan, Keith, Freedom of Speech: A Reference Guide to the United States Constitution (Westport, Connecticut: Praeger Publishers 2004). Open Google Scholar
- Wigny, Pierre, Cours de droit constitutionnel (Brussels: Bruylant 1973). Open Google Scholar
- Wölker, Ulrich, Zu Freiheit und Grenzen der politischen Betätigung von Ausländern (Berlin: Springer 1987). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-95551-8_13
- Zaichuk, Oleg/Onishchenko, Natalya, Theory of State and Law: Academic Course (Kiev: Inter Yurinkom 2006). Open Google Scholar





