The Freedom of Peaceful Assembly in Europe
- Editors:
- |
- Series:
- Beiträge zum ausländischen und vergleichenden öffentlichen Recht, Volume 35
- Publisher:
- 2016
Summary
This volume presents an accessible overview over the current state of the legislation on the freedom of assembly in eleven selected member states of the Venice Commission: the UK, France, the US, Belgium, Germany, Turkey, the Russian Federation, the Ukraine, Poland, Hungary and Tunisia. The volume may serve as a work of reference for the researcher or practitioner who seeks specific information on the legal bases, restrictions, or implementation of the freedom of assembly in a specific country or on more recent themes such as the legal implications of flashmobs. It is also a helpful starting point for anyone interested in comparing the state of assembly legislation in Europe and beyond. Next to information on details of the domestic regulation of assemblies, each study contains information on recent events, changes and debates on the laws on assemblies. Examples are the handling of the Arab spring in Tunisia, freedom of assembly-implications and management of the Gezi Park protests in Turkey, or the constitutional upheavals in the Ukraine.
<b>With contributions by:</b>
Anne Peters, Isbelle Ley, Elif Askin, Melina Garcin, Rainer Grote, Jannika Jahn, Steven Less, Halyna Perepelyuk, Orsolya Salát, Maria Stozek, Evgeniya Yushkova, Friederike Ziemer
Search publication
Bibliographic data
- Edition
- 1/2016
- Copyright Year
- 2016
- ISBN-Print
- 978-3-8487-2449-9
- ISBN-Online
- 978-3-8452-6608-4
- Publisher
- Nomos, Baden-Baden
- Series
- Beiträge zum ausländischen und vergleichenden öffentlichen Recht
- Volume
- 35
- Language
- English
- Pages
- 342
- Product Type
- Edited Book
Table of contents
- Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access Pages 1 - 8
- Authors: |
- 1. State of research No accessAuthors: |
- 2. History No accessAuthors: |
- 3. Rationale No accessAuthors: |
- 4. Legal bases No accessAuthors: |
- 5. Current challenges No accessAuthors: |
- 6. Organisation of the book No accessAuthors: |
- Authors:
- Abstract No accessAuthors:
- 1. Legal bases and scope of the guarantee No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 2.1 Targeted statutory powers No accessAuthors:
- 2.2 Public order (criminal) offences No accessAuthors:
- 2.3 Non-targeted statutory powers and offences No accessAuthors:
- 2.4 By-laws No accessAuthors:
- 2.5 Common law powers No accessAuthors:
- 3. Implementing the constitutional guarantee and freedom of assembly legislation No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 4.1 Judicial review and the responsiveness of the democratic process No accessAuthors:
- 4.2 The Independent Police Complaints Commission and other types of review No accessAuthors:
- 5. Conclusions and outlook No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- Abstract No accessAuthors:
- 1. Legal bases No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 2.1 Case law No accessAuthors:
- 2.2 Flashmobs No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 3.1 Place and time restrictions No accessAuthors:
- 3.2 Manner restrictions No accessAuthors:
- 3.3 Sight and sound restrictions No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 4.1 Notification and authorisation No accessAuthors:
- 4.2 Decision-making No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 5.1 Spontaneous assemblies No accessAuthors:
- 5.2 Assemblies gathered by means of new technologies No accessAuthors:
- 5.3 Assemblies taking place on public property No accessAuthors:
- 5.4 Counter-demonstrations No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 6.1 Pre-event planning No accessAuthors:
- 6.2 Costs No accessAuthors:
- 6.3 Use of force No accessAuthors:
- 6.4 Liability of organisers No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 7.1 Review and appeal No accessAuthors:
- 7.2 Liability and accountability of law enforcement personnel No accessAuthors:
- 7.3 Monitoring No accessAuthors:
- 7.4 Media access No accessAuthors:
- 8. Conclusions and outlook No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- Abstract No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 1.1 Constitutional right to assemble No accessAuthors:
- 1.2 Scope of the guarantee No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 2.1 Assemblies on public property No accessAuthors:
- 2.2 Assemblies on private property No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 3.1 Content-based restrictions No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- Place restrictions: restricted zones No accessAuthors:
- 3.3 Vagueness and overbreadth No accessAuthors:
- 3.4 Prior restraints No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 4.1 Notification and spontaneous assemblies No accessAuthors:
- 4.2 Decision-making No accessAuthors:
- 4.3 Review of denial of permits No accessAuthors:
- 4.4 Implementation costs No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 5.1 Use of force by the police No accessAuthors:
- 5.2 Liability of assemblers No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 6.1 Liability of law enforcement authorities No accessAuthors:
- 6.2 Monitoring No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 7.1 Law enforcement policy and technology No accessAuthors:
- 7.2 Prohibited and controlled equipment and the problem of militarised policing No accessAuthors:
- 7.3 Body-worn cameras (BWC) and police accountability No accessAuthors:
- 7.4 Police interference with wireless communications and social media No accessAuthors:
- 7.5 Police surveillance and unmanned aerial systems (UAS) No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- Abstract No accessAuthors:
- 1. Legal bases No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 2.2 No specific laws on flashmobs No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 3.1 Place and time restrictions No accessAuthors:
- 3.2 Manner restrictions No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 4.1 Authorisation No accessAuthors:
- 4.2 Decision-making No accessAuthors:
- 4.3 Review and appeal No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 5.1 Assemblies gathered by means of new technologies (such as social networks) No accessAuthors:
- 5.2 Spontaneous assemblies No accessAuthors:
- 5.3 Assemblies taking place on public property No accessAuthors:
- 5.4 Counter-demonstrations No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 6.1 Pre-event planning No accessAuthors:
- 6.2 Costs No accessAuthors:
- 6.3 Use of force by the police No accessAuthors:
- 6.4 Liability of organisers No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 7.1 Liability and accountability of law enforcement personnel No accessAuthors:
- 7.3 Media access No accessAuthors:
- 8. Conclusions and outlook No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- Abstract No accessAuthors:
- 1. Legal bases No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 2.1 Ratione personae No accessAuthors:
- 2.2 Ratione materiae No accessAuthors:
- 2.3 Peaceful character of assembly No accessAuthors:
- 2.4 Protected activities No accessAuthors:
- 3. Restrictions No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 4.1 Indoor assemblies No accessAuthors:
- 4.2 Outdoor assemblies No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 5.1 General provisions concerning liability, costs, and the like No accessAuthors:
- 5.2 The recent Assembly Acts of the states (Länder) No accessAuthors:
- 6. Conclusions and outlook No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- Abstract No accessAuthors:
- 1. Introduction No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- Post-Gezi amendments to the Law on Demonstrations No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- Authors:
- Specific legal restrictions for assemblies in public space No accessAuthors:
- Protests around Taksim Square No accessAuthors:
- Place restrictions concerning Cyprus and the “Green Line” No accessAuthors:
- Manner No accessAuthors:
- 3.2 Counter-terrorism restrictions No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 4.1 Advance notification No accessAuthors:
- 4.2 Decision-making No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 5.1 Flashmobs No accessAuthors:
- 5.2 Assemblies gathered by means of new technologies, especially social media No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- Authors:
- The use of “less lethal” weapons: tear gas and pepper spray No accessAuthors:
- Stop and search powers of the police No accessAuthors:
- 6.2 “Security Package” of 2015: restraining the right to freedom of assembly No accessAuthors:
- 6.3 Reprisals against peaceful protestors No accessAuthors:
- 6.4 Liability of organisers No accessAuthors:
- 6.5 Liability of specific groups supporting assemblies No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- Authors:
- Independent complaints mechanism No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- Civil society No accessAuthors:
- Ombudsman No accessAuthors:
- 7.3 Media access No accessAuthors:
- 8. Conclusions and outlook No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- Abstract No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 1.1 Constitutional guarantee No accessAuthors:
- 1.2 Primary legislation No accessAuthors:
- 1.3 Secondary legislation No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 2.1 Case law No accessAuthors:
- 2.2 Experiences with flashmobs No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 3.1 Legitimate grounds for restrictions No accessAuthors:
- 3.2 Refusal to agree No accessAuthors:
- 3.3 Suspension and termination No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- Place No accessAuthors:
- Time No accessAuthors:
- Manner No accessAuthors:
- “Sight and sound” No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 4.1 Notification No accessAuthors:
- 4.2 Decision-making No accessAuthors:
- 4.3 Review and appeal No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 5.1 Spontaneous assemblies No accessAuthors:
- 5.2 Assemblies gathered by means of new technologies No accessAuthors:
- 5.3 Counter-demonstrations No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 6.1 Pre-event planning No accessAuthors:
- 6.2 Costs No accessAuthors:
- 6.3 Use of force by the police No accessAuthors:
- 6.4 Liability of organisers No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 7.1 Liability and accountability of law enforcement personnel No accessAuthors:
- 7.2 Monitoring No accessAuthors:
- 7.3 Media access No accessAuthors:
- 8. Conclusions and outlook No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- Abstract No accessAuthors:
- 1. Legal bases and scope of the guarantee No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 2.1 Time No accessAuthors:
- 2.2 Place No accessAuthors:
- 2.3 Sight and Sound No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 3.1 Notification No accessAuthors:
- 3.2 Decision-making No accessAuthors:
- 3.3 Review and appeal No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 4.1 Spontaneous assemblies No accessAuthors:
- 4.2 Assemblies organised by means of new technologies No accessAuthors:
- 4.3 Assemblies taking place on public properties No accessAuthors:
- 4.4 Counter-demonstrations No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 5.1 Pre-event planning No accessAuthors:
- 5.2 Costs No accessAuthors:
- 5.3 Use of force by the police No accessAuthors:
- 5.4 The use of drones during demonstrations No accessAuthors:
- 5.5 Liability of organisers No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 6.1 Liability and accountability of law enforcement personnel No accessAuthors:
- 6.2 Monitoring No accessAuthors:
- 6.3 Media access No accessAuthors:
- 7. Conclusions and outlook No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- Abstract No accessAuthors:
- 1. Legal bases No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 2.1 Experiences with flashmobs No accessAuthors:
- 3. Restrictions No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 4.1 Notification No accessAuthors:
- 4.2 Decision-making No accessAuthors:
- 4.3 Review and appeal No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 5.1 Spontaneous assemblies No accessAuthors:
- 5.2 Assemblies gathered by means of new technologies No accessAuthors:
- 5.3 Counter-demonstrations No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 6.1 Pre-event planning No accessAuthors:
- 6.2 Costs No accessAuthors:
- 6.3 No strict liability of the organisers No accessAuthors:
- 6.4 Use of force by police No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 7.1 Liability and accountability of law enforcement personnel No accessAuthors:
- 7.2 Monitoring No accessAuthors:
- 7.3 Media access No accessAuthors:
- 8. Conclusions and outlook No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- Abstract No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 1.1 Changing constitutional context No accessAuthors:
- 1.2 The Act on the Right to Assembly No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 2.1 Peacefulness No accessAuthors:
- 2.2 Narrow (or enlarged) notion of assembly No accessAuthors:
- 2.3 Choice of place, time, and circumstances No accessAuthors:
- 2.4 Types of assemblies protected No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 3.1 Legitimate grounds for restrictions No accessAuthors:
- 3.2 Specific place and time restrictions No accessAuthors:
- 3.3 Manner restrictions No accessAuthors:
- 3.4 Sight and sound restrictions No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 4.1 Notification No accessAuthors:
- 4.2 Spontaneous assemblies No accessAuthors:
- 4.3 Assemblies gathered by means of new technologies No accessAuthors:
- 4.4 Decision-making No accessAuthors:
- 4.5 Review and appeal No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 5.1 Counter-demonstrations are not regulated No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 6.1 Pre-event planning No accessAuthors:
- 6.2 Costs No accessAuthors:
- 6.3 Liability of organisers No accessAuthors:
- 6.4 Use of force by the police No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 7.1 Liability and accountability of law enforcement personnel No accessAuthors:
- 7.2 Monitoring No accessAuthors:
- 7.3 Media access No accessAuthors:
- 8. Conclusions and outlook No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- Abstract No accessAuthors:
- 1. Legal bases No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 2.1 Comments on the final draft No accessAuthors:
- 2.2 Experiences with flashmobs No accessAuthors:
- 3. Restrictions No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 4.1 Notification and authorisation No accessAuthors:
- 4.2 Decision-making No accessAuthors:
- 4.3 Review and appeal No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 5.1 Spontaneous assemblies No accessAuthors:
- 5.2 Assemblies gathered by means of new technologies No accessAuthors:
- 5.3 Assemblies taking place on public property No accessAuthors:
- 5.4 Counter-demonstrations No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 6.1 Pre-event planning No accessAuthors:
- 6.2 Costs No accessAuthors:
- 6.3 Use of force by the police No accessAuthors:
- 6.4 Liability and accountability of organisers No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 7.1 Liability and accountability of law enforcement personnel No accessAuthors:
- 7.2 Monitoring No accessAuthors:
- 7.3 Media access No accessAuthors:
- 8. Conclusions and outlook No accessAuthors:
- Authors: |
- Authors: |
- 1.1 Wording No accessAuthors: |
- Authors: |
- Ratione personae No accessAuthors: |
- Ratione materiae No accessAuthors: |
- 1.3 Flashmobs No accessAuthors: |
- 1.4 Federal states No accessAuthors: |
- Authors: |
- 2.1 Private space No accessAuthors: |
- 2.2 Prohibition, bans, and dispersals of assemblies No accessAuthors: |
- 2.3 Time, place, and manner restrictions No accessAuthors: |
- 2.4 Place restrictions: specifically designated areas No accessAuthors: |
- 2.5 Time restrictions No accessAuthors: |
- 2.6 Sound restrictions No accessAuthors: |
- 2.7 Anonymity of participants No accessAuthors: |
- 2.8 Fringe areas and other restricted zones No accessAuthors: |
- 2.9 Use of force by the police No accessAuthors: |
- 2.10 State of emergency No accessAuthors: |
- 2.11 Anti-terrorism legislation No accessAuthors: |
- Authors: |
- 3.1 Notification or authorisation requirement No accessAuthors: |
- 3.2 Pre-event planning by law enforcement officials with the organiser No accessAuthors: |
- 3.3 Spontaneous assemblies No accessAuthors: |
- 3.4 Decision-making No accessAuthors: |
- 3.5 Review and appeal No accessAuthors: |
- Authors: |
- 4.1 Same sex pride parades No accessAuthors: |
- 4.2 Use of force No accessAuthors: |
- 4.3 Liability and accountability of law enforcement personnel No accessAuthors: |
- 4.4 Liability of organisers No accessAuthors: |
- 4.5 Media access and documentation No accessAuthors: |
- 4.6 Monitoring No accessAuthors: |
- 5. Compact assessment No accessAuthors: |
- 6. Convergence and divergence in protecting freedom of assembly No accessAuthors: |
- Table of ECtHR and ECmHR Cases No access Pages 329 - 332
- Bibliography No access Pages 333 - 338
- Contributors No access Pages 339 - 342
Bibliography (99 entries)
No match found. Try another term.
- Newman, Christopher, ‘Section 5 of the Public Order Act 1986: The Threshold of Extreme Protest’, Journal of Criminal Law 76 (2012), 105–109. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Preuß, Ulrich K., ‘Associative Rights (the Rights to the Freedom of Petition, Assembly, and Association)’, in Michel Rosenfeld/András Sajó (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012), 948–966. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Pieters, Danny, ‘Belgien’, in Eberhard Grabitz (ed.), Grundrechte in Europa und USA, vol. I (Kehl: Engel 1986), 1–84. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Phillipps, Zachary J., ‘The Unavoidable Implication of McCullen v. Coakley: Protection Against Unwelcome Speech is not a Sufficient Justification for Restricting Speech in Traditional Public Fora’, Connecticut Law Review 47 (2015), 937–969. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Peters, Anne/Schwenke, Heiner, ‘Comparative Law beyond Post-modernism’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 49 (2000), 800–834. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Peters, Anne, ‘The Globalization of State Constitutions’, in Janne Nijman/André Nollkaemper (eds), New Perspectives on the Divide Between National and International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2007), 251–308. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Peters, Anne/Preuß, Ulrich K., ‘International Relations and International Law’, in Mark Tushnet/Thomas Fleiner/Cheryl Saunders (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Constitutional Law (London: Routledge 2013), 33–44. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Pasqualucci, Jo M., ‘The Harmonization of Human Rights Law: Guaranteeing the Plurality of Individual Rights’, in Larry Catá Backer (ed.), Harmonizing Law in an Era of Globalization (Durham: Carolina Academic Press 2007), 35–54. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Özbudun, Ergun/Türkmen, Füsün, ‘Impact of the ECtHR Rulings on Turkey`s Democratisation: An Evaluation’, Human Rights Quarterly, 35 (2013), 985–1008. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Özbudun, Ergün, ‘Turkey’s Search for a New Constitution’, Insight Turkey 14 (2012), 39–50. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Ott, Sieghart/Wächtler Hartmut/Heinold, Hubert, Gesetz über Versammlungen und Aufzüge (Stuttgart: Boorberg 7th edn 2010). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Orban, Oscar, Le droit constitutionnel de la Belgique (Liège: Dessain 1911). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Olgun, Akbulut, ‘Toplantı ve Örgütlenme Özgürlükleri’, in Sibel İnceoğlu (ed.), Insan Hakları Avrupa Sözleşmesi ve Anayasa. Anayasa Mahkemesine Bireysel Başvuru Kapsamında Bir İnceleme (Istanbul: Beta Yayınları 3rd edn 2013), 381–424. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Ripke, Stefan, Europäische Versammlungsfreiheit (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2012). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Neumann, Conrad, ‘Flasmobs, Smartmobs, Massenpartys – Die rechtliche Beurteilung moderner Kommunikations- und Interaktionsformen’, Neue Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsrecht (2011), 1171–1177. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Miller, Russell A., An Introduction to German Law and Legal Culture: Text and Materials (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press forthcoming 2016). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Miller, Lindsay/Toliver, Jessica/Police Executive Research Forum (PERF), Implementing a Body-Worn Camera Program: Recommendations and Lessons Learned (Washington, D.C.: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services 2014). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Menanteau, Maurice, Les nouveaux aspects de la liberté de réunion (Paris: Librairie technique et économique 1937). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Mead, David, ‘A Chill Through the Back Door? The Privatised Regulation of Peaceful Protest’, Public Law 57 (2013), 10–118. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- McAllister, Stephen R., ‘Picketing Laws and Free Speech’, University of Kansas Law Review 55 (2006–2007), 575–627. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Mazzone, Jason, ‘Freedom’s Associations’, in Margaret M. Russell (ed.), Freedom of Assembly and Petition (The First Amendment): Its Constitutional History and the Contemporary Debate (New York: Prometheus Books 2010), 26–31. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Lepsius, Oliver, ‘Versammlungsrecht und gesellschaftliche Integrationʼ, in Anselm Doering-Manteufel/Bernd Greiner/Oliver Lepsius (eds), Der Brokdorf-Beschluss (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2015), 113–165. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Legrand, Pierre, ‘European Legal Systems are not Converging’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 45 (1996), 52–81. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Legrand, Pierre, ‘Antivonbar’, Journal of Comparative Law 1 (2006), 13–40. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Law, David S., ‘Generic Constitutional Law’, Minnesota Law Review 89 (2004–2005), 652–742. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Spielman, Dean, ‘Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights and the Constitutional Systems of Europe’, in Michel Rosenfeld/András Sajó (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012), 1231–1252. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Zaichuk, Oleg/Onishchenko, Natalya, Theory of State and Law: Academic Course (Kiev: Inter Yurinkom 2006). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Wölker, Ulrich, Zu Freiheit und Grenzen der politischen Betätigung von Ausländern (Berlin: Springer 1987). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Wigny, Pierre, Cours de droit constitutionnel (Brussels: Bruylant 1973). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Werhan, Keith, Freedom of Speech: A Reference Guide to the United States Constitution (Westport, Connecticut: Praeger Publishers 2004). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Weaver, Russell L./Lively, Donald E., Understanding the First Amendment (Newark: Matthew Bender/LexisNexis Group 2003). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Volokh, Eugene, ‘Gruesome Speech’, Cornell Law Review 100 (2015), 901–952. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Versteeg, Mila/Goderis, Benedikt, ‘The Diffusion of Constitutional Rights’, International Review of Law and Economics 39 (2015), 1–19. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Ulrich, Norbert, Das Demonstrationsrecht im Spannungsfeld von Meinungsfreiheit, Versammlungsfreiheit und öffentlicher Sicherheit (Baden-Baden: Nomos 2015). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- The Law Commission, ‘Criminal Law: Offences Relating to Public Order (Law Com. No. 123)’, The Modern Law Review 47 (1984), 324–333. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Sztente, Zoltán, ‘The Decline of Constitutional Review in Hungary: Towards a Partisan Constitutional Court?’, in Zoltán Szente/Fanni Mandák/Zsuzsanna Fejes (eds), Challenges and Pitfalls in the Recent Hungarian Constitutional Development. Discussing the New Fundamental Law of Hungary (Paris: L’Harmattan 2015), 185–210. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Stone, Richard, Civil Liberties and Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press 9th edn 2012). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Stone, Richard, ‘Breach of the Peace: the Case for Abolition’, Web Journal of Current Legal issues 2 (2001). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Lavalleye, Paul, ‘Les droits de l’homme et les libertés fondamentales en Belgique’, in Pelloux, Robert (ed.), Essais sur les droits de l’homme en Europe (Paris: Bibliothèque Européenne 1959), 19–42. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Smilov, Daniel, ‘The Power of the Assembled People: The Right to Assembly and Political Representation’, in András Sajó (ed.), Free to Protest: Constituent Power and Street Demonstrations (Utrecht: Eleven 2009), 87–104. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Schulze-Fielitz, Helmuth, ‘Artikel 8 – Versammlungsfreiheit’, in Horst Dreier (ed.), Grundgesetz-Kommentar, Band I (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 3rd edn 2013), 1022–1077. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Schmitt, Carl, Die geistesgeschichtliche Lage des heutigen Parlamentarismus (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot 2nd edn 1926, Reprint 2010). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Schmitt, Carl, The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy, translated by Ellen Kennedy (Boston: MIT Press 1988). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Salát, Orsolya, ‘Comparative Freedom of Assembly and the Fragmentation of International Human Rights’, Nordic Journal of Human Rights 32 (2014), 140–156. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Salát, Orsolya, The Right to Freedom of Assembly: A Comparative Study (Oxford: Hart 2015). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Sajó, András (ed.), Free to Protest: Constituent Power and Street Demonstrations (Utrecht: Eleven 2009). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Russell, Margaret M., ‘Editor’s Note, Part III’, in Margaret M. Russell (ed.), Freedom of Assembly and Petition (The First Amendment): Its Constitutional History and the Contemporary Debate (New York: Prometheus Books 2010), 185–188. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Russell, Margaret M., ‘Editor’s Introduction’ and ‘Editor’s Note, Part II’, in Margaret M. Russell (ed.), Freedom of Assembly and Petition (The First Amendment): Its Constitutional History and the Contemporary Debate (New York: Prometheus Books 2010), 21–23; 43–46. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Roellecke, Gerd, ʻVersammlungsfreiheitʼ in Görres-Gesellschaft (ed.), Staatslexikon: Recht, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft (Freiburg: Herder Verlag 7th edn 1989), vol. V, Column 707–711. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Rodríguez, Carmen/Ávalos, Antonio/Yılmaz, Hakan/Planet, Ana I., ‘Democratisation Processes in Defective Democracies. The Case of Turkey’, in Carmen Rodríguez et al. (eds), Turkey’s Democratisation Process (London/New York: Routledge 2014), 3–15. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Bodnar, Adam, ‘Shaping the Freedom of Assembly: Counter-Productive Effects of the Polish Road towards Illiberal Democracy’, in András Sajó (ed.), Free to Protest: Constituent Power and Street Demonstration (Utrecht: Eleven International Publishing 2009), 165–188. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Dupriez, Léon, La liberté de réunion (Brussels: Lesigne 1887). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Duffar, Jean, Les libertés collectives (Paris: Montchrestien 1996). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Delpérée, Francis, Le droit constitutionnel de la Belgique (Brussels: Bruylant 2000). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- de Meyer, Jan, Staatsrecht (Leuven: Wouters 4th edn 1963). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Colliard, Claude-Albert, Libertés publiques (Paris: Dalloz 8th edn 2005). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Cole, David, ‘Hanging with the Wrong Crowd: Of Gangs, Terrorists, and the Right of Association’, in Margaret M. Russell (ed.), Freedom of Assembly and Petition (The First Amendment): Its Constitutional History and the Contemporary Debate (New York: Prometheus Books 2010), 207–216. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Choudhry, Sujit (ed.), The Migration of Constitutional Ideas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2006). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Chang, Wen-Chen/Yeh, Jiunn-Rong, ‘Internationalization of Constitutional Law’, in Michel Rosenfeld/András Sajó (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012), 1165–1184. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Bullock, Karen/Johnson, Paul, ‘The Impact of the Human Rights Act 1998 on Policing in England and Wales’, The British Journal of Criminology 52 (2011), 1–21. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Bröhmer, Jürgen, ‘Versammlungs- und Vereinigungsfreiheit’, in Oliver Dörr/Rainer Grote/Thilo Marauhn (eds), EMRK/GG – Konkordanzkommentar zum europäischen und deutschen Grundrechtsschutz (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2nd edn 2013), 1161–1232. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Bonner, David/Stone, Richard, ‘The Public Order Act 1986 – Steps in the Wrong Direction’, Public Law 31 (1987), 202–230. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- von Bogdandy, Armin, ‘Comparative Constitutional Law: A Continental Perspective’, in Michel Rosenfeld/András Sajó (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012), 25–37. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Erkoc, Taptuk, ‘Taksim Gezi Park Protests: Birth and Backlash of a Political Sphere’, in Bülent Gökay and Ilia Xypolia (eds), Reflections on Taksim – Gezi Park Protests in Turkey (Keele: A Journal of Global Faultlines Publication 2013), 43–46. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Blanke, Thomas/Sterzel, Dieter, ʻGeschichte und demokratische Funktion der Demonstrationsfreiheitʼ, Kritische Justiz 14 (1981), 347–369. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Benda, Ernst, ʻArtikel 8 – Versammlungsfreiheitʼ, in Wolfgang Kahl/Christian Waldhoff/Christian Walter (eds), Bonner Kommentar zum Grundgesetz, Volume 3 (Heidelberg: C.F. Müller 73rd Batch 1995). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Bartlett, Jamie et al., Populism in Europe: Hungary – The Rise of Populism in Europe Can Be Traced Through Online Behaviour (London: Demos 2013). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Bartlett, Jamie et al., New Political Actors in Europe: New Opposition Movements in Hungary (London: Demos 2013). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Bakhama, Michael, ‘Building Picket Fences: Maryland’s Funeral Picketing Law After Snyder v. Phelps’, Maryland Law Review 71 (2012), 1231–1257. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Aziz, Miriam, The Impact of European Rights on National Legal Cultures (Oxford: Hart 2004). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Aydın-Düzgit, Senem, ‘Human Rights in Turkey’, in Carmen Rodríguez et al. (eds), Turkey’s Democratisation Process (London/New York: Routledge 2014), 312–329. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Ayata, Gökçeçiçek et al., Gezi Parkı Olayları: Gezi Parkı Olayları İnsan Hakları Hukuku ve Siyasi Söylem Işığında bir İnceleme (Istanbul: Istanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları 2013). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Arbeitskreis Versammlungsrecht (Mathias Hong/Christoph Enders/Wolfgang Hoffmann-Riem/Michael Kniesel/Ralf Poscher/Helmuth Schulze-Fielitz), Musterentwurf eines Versammlungsgesetzes (München: C.H. Beck 2011). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Ajevski, Marjan, ‘Fragmentation in International Human Rights Law: Beyond Conflict of Laws’, Nordic Journal of Human Rights 32 (2014), 87–98. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Abu El-Haj, Tabatha, ‘The Neglected Right of Assembly’, UCLA Law Review 56 (2009), 543–589. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Hajas, Barnabás, A gyülekezési jog egyes aktuális elméleti és gyakorlati kérdései, doktori értekezés [Some Actual Theoretical and Practical Problems of the Right to Assembly], Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pécs, 2012. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Kellum, Nathan W., ‘If it Looks Like a Duck … Traditional Public Forum Status of Open Areas of Public University Campuses’, Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterley 33 (2005–2006) 1–45. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Kant, Immanuel, ʻOn the Old Saw – That May be Right in Theory but It Won’t Work in Practiceʼ, in Hans Reiss (ed.): Kant’s Political Writings, translated by Hugh Barry Nisbet (Cambridge Cambridge University Press 1970). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Kant, Immanuel, ʻÜber den Gemeinspruch: Das mag in der Theorie richtig sein, taugt aber nicht für die Praxis, Section II – Vom Verhältnis der Theorie zur Praxis im Staatsrechtʼ, in Immanuel Kant, Werke in 12 Bänden, edited by Wilhelm Weischedel, vol. 11 (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp 1977). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Kanovitz, Jacqueline R./Kanovitz, Michael I., Constitutional Law (Newark: Matthew Bender/LexisNexis Group 11th edn 2008). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Kanovitz, Jacqueline, Constitutional Law for Criminal Justice (New York: Routledge 2015). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- International Center for Not-for-Profit Law, ‘Arab Spring: An Opportunity for Greater Freedom of Association and Assembly in Tunisia and Egypt?’, 3 Global Trends in NGO Law (2011), issue 1. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Inazu, John D., ‘The Forgotten Freedom of Assembly’, Tulane Law Review 84 (2010), 565–612. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Inazu, John D., Liberty’s Refuge: The Forgotten Freedom of Assembly (New Haven: Yale University Press 2012). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Iancu, Alexandra, ‘“Europeanization” versus “New Localism” in Shaping Fundamental Rights: “Free Speech” Definitions, Limitations, and Deadlocks in new Democracies’, in Manuel Gutan/Bianca Selejan Gutan (eds), Europeanization and Judicial Culture in Contemporary Democracies (Bukarest: Hamangiu 2014), 148–177. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Hoffmann-Riem, Wolfgang, ʻStandards für die Verwirklichung der Versammlungsfreiheit in Europaʼ, in Wolfgang Durner/Franz-Joseph Peine/Fouroud Shirvani (eds), Freiheit und Sicherheit in Deutschland und Europa (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot 2013), 267–287. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Hajas, Barnabás, Gyülekezési jogi projekt [Project on the right to assembly] (Budapest: Országgyűlési Biztos Hivatala 2009). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Abu El-Haj, Tabatha, ‘The Neglected Right of Assembly’, in Margaret M. Russell (ed.), Freedom of Assembly and Petition (The First Amendment): Its Constitutional History and the Contemporary Debate (New York: Prometheus Books 2010), 255–257. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Györfi, Tamás, ‘The Importance of Freedom of Assembly: Three Models of Justification’, in András Sajó (ed.), Free to Protest: Constituent Power and Street Demonstrations (Utrecht: Eleven 2009), 1–16. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Gruszczynska, Anna, ‘Living La Vida Internet. Some Notes on the Cyberization of Polish LGBT Community’, in Roman Kuhar and Judit Takacs (eds), Beyond the Pink Curtain: Everyday Life of LGBT People in Eastern Europe (Ljubljana: Mirovni Peace Institute 2006), 95–115. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Graff, Agnieszka, ‘We Are (Not All) Homophobes: A Report from Poland’, Feminist Studies 32 (2006), 434–449. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Gönenç, Levent, ‘The 2001 Amendments to the 1982 Constitution of Turkey’, Ankara Law Review 1 (2004), 89–109. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Gökay, Bülent/Xypolia, Ilia, ‘Editorial’, in Bülent Gökay and Ilia Xypolia (eds), Reflections on Taksim – Gezi Park Protests in Turkey (Keele: A Journal of Global Faultlines Publication 2013), 1–2. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Gargarella, Robert, ‘A Dialogue on Law and Social Protest’, in András Sajó (ed.), Free to Protest: Constituent Power and Street Demonstrations (Utrecht: Eleven 2009), 61–86. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Gardbaum, Stephen, ‘The Structure and Scope of Constitutional Rights’, in Tom Ginsburg/Rosalind Dixon (eds), Comparative Constitutional Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing 2011), 387–405. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Frowein, Jochen A., ‘The Transformation of Constitutional Law through the European Convention on Human Rights’, Human Rights Journal 35 (2015), 1–8. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Foster, Steve, Human Rights and Civil Liberties (London: Longman 3rd edn 2011). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Fenwick, Helen, ‘Marginalising Human Rights: Breach of the Peace, “Kettling”, the Human Rights Act and Public Protest’, Public Law 53 (2009), 737–765. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084
- Farber, Daniel A., The First Amendment (New York: The Foundation Press 2nd edn 2003). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845266084





