Cover of book: Einschränkung der Mehrheitsdemokratie?
Buy in shop
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Book Titles No access

Einschränkung der Mehrheitsdemokratie?

Institutioneller Wandel und Stabilität von Vetopunkten
Authors:
Publisher:
 28.02.2017

Bibliographic data

Copyright year
2017
Publication date
28.02.2017
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-3834-2
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-8162-9
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Comparative Politics - Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft
Volume
9
Language
German
Pages
488
Product type
Book Titles

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access 1 - 20
  2. Abkürzungsverzeichnis No access 21 - 24
    1. 1.1 Die italienische Senatsreform No access
    2. 1.2 Fragestellung und theoretisches Argument No access
    3. 1.3 Forschungslücke und Beitrag der Arbeit No access
      1. 1.4.1 Theoriebildung No access
      2. 1.4.2 Empirische Analyse No access
      3. 1.4.3 Ergebnisse No access
    5. 1.5 Relevanz No access
    6. 1.6 Gliederung der Arbeit No access
    1. 2.1 Einleitung No access
    2. 2.2 Verortung der Forschungsfrage in der Literatur No access
    3. 2.3 Anknüpfungspunkte in der Literatur No access
        1. 2.4.1.1 Grundsätzliche Überlegungen No access
        2. 2.4.1.2 Legislative Vetopunkte No access
        3. 2.4.1.3 Wirkung der Vetopunkte No access
        4. 2.4.1.4 Institutionelle Eigenschaften und ihre Reformanreize No access
        1. 2.4.2.1 Parlamentarische Akteure No access
        2. 2.4.2.2 Außerparlamentarische Akteure No access
          1. 2.4.2.3.1 Einschränkung der Mehrheit No access
          2. 2.4.2.3.2 Konservative Wirkung No access
          3. 2.4.2.3.3 Zeithorizonte No access
        4. 2.4.2.4 Zusammenfassung Akteurs- und Präferenzannahmen No access
        1. 2.4.3.1 Verfassungsrigidität No access
        2. 2.4.3.2 Institutionelle Legitimität No access
        3. 2.4.3.3 Zusammenfassung Hürden im Reformprozess No access
    5. 2.5 Schlussfolgerungen und Überleitung No access
    1. 3.1 Einleitung No access
    2. 3.2 Intuition des Arguments No access
      1. 3.3.1 Institutionelle Legitimität No access
      2. 3.3.2 Funktional-institutionelle Legitimität legislativer Vetopunkte No access
      3. 3.3.3 Demokratische Wahlen der Vetoakteure No access
      4. 3.3.4 Das Zusammenspiel der institutionellen Eigenschaften der Vetopunkte No access
      1. 3.4.1 Gesetzgebungsspiel No access
      2. 3.4.2 Reformspiel No access
        1. 3.5.1.1 Rahmenbedingungen No access
        2. 3.5.1.2 Hintergrundbedingungen für die Wirksamkeit des Mechanismus No access
        3. 3.5.1.3 Überlagerung von Reformpräferenzen No access
        4. 3.5.1.4 Interpretation von Reformversuchen No access
      2. 3.5.2 Implikationen und empirische Überprüfung No access
    6. 3.6 Zusammenfassung No access
    1. 4.1 Intention und Ziel der Analyse No access
    2. 4.2 Begründung der Methode No access
        1. 4.3.1.1 Länderauswahl No access
          1. 4.3.1.2.1 Konzept der legislativen Vetopunkte No access
            1. 4.3.1.2.2.1 Trennung legislativer Institutionen und Akteure No access
            2. 4.3.1.2.2.2 Problem der Additivität und Perspektivwechsel – vom Gesamtsystem zur einzelnen Institution No access
            3. 4.3.1.2.2.3 Verschiedene VP-Typen als funktionale Äquivalente No access
          3. 4.3.1.2.3 Identifizierung der Vetopunkte im Datensatz No access
          4. 4.3.1.2.4 Empirische Typen von Vetopunkten No access
      2. 4.3.2 Entwicklungstrends der Vetostärke No access
      1. 4.4.1 Analyse notwendiger Bedingungen No access
      2. 4.4.2 Analyse hinreichender Bedingungen No access
      3. 4.4.3 Zusammenfassung der Ergebnisse No access
        1. 4.4.4.1 Fallauswahl No access
        2. 4.4.4.2 Konsistenzniveau und Fallzahl No access
        3. 4.4.4.3 Omitted Variables und kausale Inferenz No access
        4. 4.4.4.4 Kalibrierung der Set-Membership-Werte No access
        5. 4.4.4.5 Messfehler und Signifikanz No access
      1. 4.5.1 Kalibrierung des Crisp-Sets „hohe Verfassungsrigidität“ No access
      2. 4.5.2 Analyse notwendiger Bedingungen No access
      3. 4.5.3 Analyse hinreichender Bedingungen No access
      4. 4.5.4 Identifikation passender und widersprechender Fälle No access
    6. 4.6 Zusammenfassung No access
      1. 5.1.1 Inhalt der Fallstudien No access
      2. 5.1.2 Fallauswahl No access
      1. 5.2.1 Einleitung No access
        1. 5.2.2.1 Entstehung der Vetopunkte No access
          1. 5.2.2.2.1 Formale Macht No access
          2. 5.2.2.2.2 Inkongruenz No access
          3. 5.2.2.2.3 Legitimität und direkte Wahl No access
          4. 5.2.2.2.4 Das Ergebnis: Institutioneller Wandel No access
          1. 5.2.2.3.1 Formale Macht No access
          2. 5.2.2.3.2 Inkongruenz No access
          3. 5.2.2.3.3 Legitimität und demokratische Wahl No access
          4. 5.2.2.3.4 Das Ergebnis: Institutioneller Wandel No access
          1. 5.2.3.1.1 Wer profitierte vom Vetorecht? No access
          2. 5.2.3.1.2 Inhaltliche Bereiche der Vetonutzung No access
          3. 5.2.3.1.3 Bewertung der Wirkung auf die finnische Demokratie No access
        2. 5.2.3.2 Präsidentielles Vetorecht No access
        1. 5.2.4.1 Reformdiskussionen der 1970er und 1980er Jahre No access
          1. 5.2.4.2.1 Reformen des Minderheitenvetos No access
          2. 5.2.4.2.2 Reform des präsidentiellen Vetos No access
      5. 5.2.5 Zusammenfassung No access
      1. 5.3.1 Einleitung No access
        1. 5.3.2.1 Formale Macht No access
        2. 5.3.2.2 Inkongruenz No access
        3. 5.3.2.3 Legitimität No access
        1. 5.3.3.1 Phasen von De-facto-Kongruenz und -Inkongruenz No access
        2. 5.3.3.2 Parteiliche Obstruktionspolitik No access
        3. 5.3.3.3 Die Überstimmbarkeit des Vetos No access
          1. 5.3.4.1.1 Kommission zur Verfassungsänderung (2000-2005) No access
        2. 5.3.4.2 Ausbleiben einer Reform No access
      5. 5.3.5 Zusammenfassung No access
      1. 5.4.1 Einleitung No access
        1. 5.4.2.1 Formale Macht No access
        2. 5.4.2.2 Inkongruenz No access
        3. 5.4.2.3 Legitimität No access
      3. 5.4.3 Mehrheitsbeschränkende Wirkung des Senats (vor und nach 1949) No access
      4. 5.4.4 Ursprung und mögliche Grenzen der institutionellen Legitimität des Senats No access
        1. 5.4.5.1 Einführung der Verhältniswahl 1948 No access
          1. 5.4.5.2.1 Reformpräferenzen und -versuche No access
          2. 5.4.5.2.2 Hürden No access
      6. 5.4.6 Zusammenfassung No access
      1. 5.5.1 Einleitung No access
        1. 5.5.2.1 Formale Macht No access
        2. 5.5.2.2 Inkongruenz No access
        3. 5.5.2.3 Legitimität und Selbstbeschränkung No access
        4. 5.5.2.4 Institutioneller Wandel No access
      3. 5.5.3 Wirkung des VP No access
      4. 5.5.4 Reformumsetzung No access
      5. 5.5.5 Zusammenfassung No access
      1. 5.6.1 Einleitung No access
        1. 5.6.2.1 Senat No access
        2. 5.6.2.2 Referendum No access
      3. 5.6.3 Reformen von 1928 No access
      4. 5.6.4 Abschaffung und Wiedereinführung des Senats No access
      5. 5.6.5 Zusammenfassung No access
    7. 5.7 Zusammenfassung der Fallstudien No access
    1. 6.1 Rekapitulation des theoretischen Arguments No access
    2. 6.2 Ergebnisse No access
    3. 6.3 Diskussion der Ergebnisse No access
    4. 6.4 Ausblick No access
    5. 6.5 Praktische Konsequenzen für das Demokratiedesign No access
      1. A: 1.1 Die institutionellen Eigenschaften der Vetopunkte No access
      2. A: 1.1.1 Die zwei Dimensionen der Vetostärke: formale Macht und Inkongruenz No access
      3. A: 1.1.1.1 Formale Macht No access
      4. A: 1.1.1.2 Inkongruenz No access
      5. A: 1.1.2 Funktionale institutionelle Legitimität No access
      6. A: 1.1.3 Selbstbeschränkungsmöglichkeit durch fehlende Wahl No access
      7. A: 1.2 Institutioneller Wandel als Explanandum No access
    2. A: 2 Datenquelle No access
      1. A: 3.1 Legitimitätshypothese: Analysen notwendiger Bedingungen No access
      2. A: 3.2 Legitimitätshypothese: Analysen hinreichender Bedingungen No access
      3. A: 3.3 Verfassungsrigiditätshypothese: Analysen notwendiger Bedingungen No access
      4. A: 3.4 Verfassungsrigiditätshypothese: Analysen hinreichender Bedingungen No access
      5. A: 3.4.1 Gesamtsample No access
      6. A: 3.4.2 Lorenz-Sample No access
      7. A: 3.5 Wahrheitstafeln mit Fällen No access
    1. B: 1 Vetopunktindex No access
  11. Literaturverzeichnis No access 455 - 488

Bibliography (542)

  1. Literaturverzeichnis Open Google Scholar
  2. Aguiar-Conraria, Luís/Pedro C. Magalhães. 2010a. "How quorum rules distort referendum outcomes: Evidence from a pivotal voter model." European Journal of Political Economy 26 (4): 541-557. Open Google Scholar
  3. Aguiar-Conraria, Luís/Pedro C. Magalhães. 2010b. "Referendum design, quorum rules and turnout." Public Choice 144 (1-2): 63-81. Open Google Scholar
  4. Alivizatos, Nikos. 1990. "The difficulties of 'rationalization' in a polarized political system: the Greek Chamber of Deputies." In: Ulrike Liebert/Maurizio Cotta (Hg.) Parliament and Democratic Consolidation in Southern Europe: Greece, Italy, Portugal, Spain and Turkey. London, New York: Pinter Publishers: 131-153. Open Google Scholar
  5. Alivizatos, Nikos. 1995. "Judges as Veto Players." In: Herbert Döring (Hg.) Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe. Frankfurt am Main: Campus: 566-589. Open Google Scholar
  6. Altman, David. 2011. Direct democracy worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  7. Anckar, Dag. 1984. "Presidential Elections in Finland: A Plea for Approval." Electoral Studies 3 (2): 125-138. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/0261-3794(84)90030-1
  8. Anckar, Dag. 1992. "Finland: Dualism and Consensual Rule." In: Erik Damgaard/Dag Anckar/Hilmar Rommetvedt/Anders Sannerstedt/Mats Sjölin (Hg.) Parliamentary Change in the Nordic Countries. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press: 151-190. Open Google Scholar
  9. Andeweg, Rudy B. 2000. "Consociational Democracy." Annual Review of Political Science 3: 509-536. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.509
  10. Andrews, Josephine T./Robert W. Jackman. 2005. "Strategic Fools: Electoral Rule Choice Under Extreme Uncertainty." Electoral Studies 24 (1): 65-84. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2004.03.002
  11. AP News Archive. 1986. "Parliament votes to lessen president's powers." 07.03.1986. http://www.apnewsarchive.com/1986/Parliament-Votes-to-Lessen-Pres, Zugriff am 29.06.2015. Open Google Scholar
  12. Arter, David. 1991. "One Ting Too Many: The Shift to Unicameralism in Denmark." In: Lawrence D. Longley/David M. Olson (Hg.) Two into One. The Politics and Processes of National Legislative Cameral Change. Boulder, Oxford: Westview Press: 77-142. Open Google Scholar
  13. Arter, David. 1999. "Finland." In: Robert Elgie (Hg.) Semi-Presidentialism in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 48-66. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/0198293860.003.0003
  14. Arter, David. 2006. Democracy in Scandinavia. Consensual, majoritarian or mixed? Manchester, New York: Manchester University Press. Open Google Scholar
  15. Arter, David. 2009. "From a Contingent Party System to Party System Convergence? Mapping Party System Change in Postwar Finland." Scandinavian Political Studies 32 (2): 221-239. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2008.00229.x
  16. Ashe, Stewart. 2006. "Reform of the Senate Committee System: Evolving back to the past?" Australasian Parliamentary Review 21 (2): 50-59. Open Google Scholar
  17. Atkinson, Michael/David C. Docherty. 2004. "Parliament and Political Success in Canada." In: Michael Whitington/Glen Williams (Hg.) Canadian Politics in the 21st Century. 6. Auflage. Toronto: Thomson/Nelson: 5-29. Open Google Scholar
  18. Auffermann, Burkhard. 1997. "Das politische System Finnlands." In: Wolfgang Ismayr (Hg.) Die politischen Systeme Westeuropas. Opladen: Leske und Budrich: 179-211. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-95712-2_6
  19. Auffermann, Burkhard/Seppo Laakso. 2008. "Gesetzgebung im politischen System Finnlands." In: Wolfgang Ismayr (Hg.) Gesetzgebung in Westeuropa. EU-Staaten und Europäische Union. Opladen: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften: 65-98. Open Google Scholar
  20. australianpolitics.com. o. J. Double Dissolutions of the Australian Parliament. http://australianpolitics.com/parliament-federal/deadlocks/double-dissolutions, Zugriff am 11.07.2015. Open Google Scholar
  21. Bundes-Verfassungsgesetz (B-VG) Österreich. Stand 01.01.2015. o. O. http://www.bka.gv.at/DocView.axd?CobId=52166, Zugriff am 17.04.2015. Open Google Scholar
  22. Bach, Stanley. 2003. Platypus and Parliament: The Australian Senate in Theory and Practice. Canberra: Department of the Senate. Open Google Scholar
  23. Bach, Stanley. 2008. "Senate Amendments and Legislative Outcomes in Australia, 1996-2007." Australian Journal of Political Science 43 (3): 395-423. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/10361140802267225
  24. Baird, Vanessa A. 2001. "Building institutional legitimacy: The role of procedural justice." Political Research Quarterly 54 (2): 333-354. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/449160
  25. Baldini, Gianfranco. 2011. "The Different Trajectories of Italian Electoral Reforms." West European Politics 34 (3): 644-663. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2011.555988
  26. Ballinger, Chris. 2011. "Hedging and Ditching: The Parliament Act 1911." Parliamentary History 30 (1): 19-32. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-0206.2010.00239.x
  27. Barker, Rodney S. 1990. Political Legitimacy and the State. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198274957.003.0002
  28. Barnes, Andre/Michel Bédard/Caroline Hyslop/Sebastian Spano/Jean-Rodrigue Paré/James R. Robertson. 2011. Reforming the Senate of Canada: Frequently Asked Questions. No. 2011- 83 - E. Ottawa: Library of Parliament. Open Google Scholar
  29. Beck, Thorsten/George Clarke/Alberto Groff/Philip Keefer/Patrick Walsh. 2001. "New Tools in Comparative Political Economy: The Database of Political Institutions." The World Bank Economic Review 15 (1): 165-176. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/wber/15.1.165
  30. Beetham, David. 1991. The Legitimation of Power. New York: Palgrave. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21599-7
  31. Beetham, David/Christopher Lord. 1998. Legitimacy and the EU. London [u. a.]: Longman. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.4324/9780203177198_chapter_2
  32. Behnke, Nathalie. 2010. "Föderalismusreform in Deutschland, der Schweiz und Österreich." In: Julia von Blumenthal/Stephan Bröchler (Hg.) Föderalismusreform in Deutschland, Bilanz und Perspektiven im internationalen Vergleich. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften: 37-58. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92518-9_3
  33. Benoit, Kenneth. 2004. "Models of electoral system change." Electoral Studies 23: 363-389. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3794(03)00020-9
  34. Berg-Schlosser, Dirk/Gisèle De Meur/Benoît Rihoux/Charles C. Ragin. 2009. "Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) as an Approach." In: Benoît Rihoux/Charles Ragin (Hg.) Configurational Comparative Methods. Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage: 1-16. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.4135/9781452226569.n1
  35. Berndt, Uwe. 2010. "Zwischen Selbstbeschränkung und Parteipolitik: die "Erste Kammer" der Niederlande." In: Gisela Riescher/Sabine Ruß/Christoph M. Haas (Hg.) Zweite Kammern. 2. Auflage. München: Oldenbourg: 389-405. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1524/9783486710106.389
  36. Binnie, Isla/James Mackenzie. 2015. "Italy's Renzi defies opposition over Senate reform." Reuters 15.02.2015. Rom. http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/02/15/us-italy-politics-idUSKBN0LJ11220150215, Zugriff am 15.06.2015. Open Google Scholar
  37. Biondi, Paolo. 2013. "Berlusconi U-turn secures Italian government survival." Reuters 04.12.2013. http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/10/02/us-italy-politics-idUSBRE9910A520131002, Zugriff am 15.06.2015. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1002/pssc.201200607
  38. Birchfield, Vicki/Markus M.L. Crepaz. 1998. "The impact of constitutional structures and collective and competitive veto points on income inequality in industrialized democracies." European Journal of Political Research 34 (2): 175-200. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00404
  39. Blais, André/Louis Massicotte. 1997. "Electoral formulas: A macroscopic perspective." European Journal of Political Research 32 (1): 107-129. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00334
  40. Blaschke, Sonja. 2014. "Verfassungsänderung: Japans Premier verabschiedet sich vom Frieden." Die Welt 01.07.2014. http://www.welt.de/politik/ausland/article129678041/Japans-Premier-verabschiedet-sich-vom-Frieden.html, Zugriff am 22.03.2015. Open Google Scholar
  41. Bochsler, Daniel/Simon Hug. 2009. "How minorities fare under referendums. A cross-national study." ECPR General Conference. Potsdam. 10.-12. September. Open Google Scholar
  42. Bodansky, Daniel. 1999. "The legitimacy of international governance: A coming challenge for international environmental law?" The American Journal of International Law 93 (3): 596-624. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2555262
  43. Boix, Carles. 1999. "Setting the Rules of the Game: The Choice of Electoral Systems in Advanced Democracies." American Political Science Review 93: 609-624. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2585577
  44. Bolliger, Christian/Regula Zürcher. 2004. "Deblockierung durch Kooptation? Eine Fallstudie zur Aufnahme der Katholisch-Konservativen in die schweizerische Landesregierung 1891." Swiss Political Science Review 10 (4): 59-92. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1002/j.1662-6370.2004.tb00041.x
  45. Boston, Jonathan/David Bullock. 2010. "Multi-party governance: Managing the unity-distinctiveness dilemma in executive coalitions." Party Politics: 1-20. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/1354068810382937
  46. Bowler, Shaun/David Denemark. 1993. "Split ticket voting in Australia: Dealignment and inconsistent votes reconsidered." Australian Journal of Political Science 28 (1): 19-37. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/00323269308402223
  47. Bowler, Shaun/Todd Donovan/Jeffrey A. Karp. 2006. "Why Politicians Like Electoral Institutions: Self-Interest, Values, or Ideology?" The Journal of Politics 68 (2): 434-446. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00418.x
  48. Braumoeller, Bear F. 2015. "Guarding Against False Positives in Qualitative Comparative Analysis." Political Analysis Adavance Access: 1-17. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpv017
  49. Braumoeller, Bear F./Gary Goertz. 2000. "The Methodology of Necessary Conditions." American Journal of Political Science 44 (4): 844-858. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2669285
  50. Braune, Florian. 2010. "Seanad Éireann - Die Zweite Kammer Irlands." In: Gisela Riescher/Sabine Ruß/Christoph M. Haas (Hg.) Zweite Kammern. 2. Auflage. München: Oldenbourg: 433-450. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1524/9783486710106.433
  51. Brede, Falko/Rainer-Olaf Schultze. 2010. "Das politische System Kanadas." In: Klaus Stüwe/Stefan Rinke (Hg.) Die politischen Systeme in Nord- und Lateinamerika. Eine Einführung. Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung: 314-340. Open Google Scholar
  52. Bull, Martin/Gianfranco Pasquino. 2007. "A Long Quest in Vain: Institutional Reforms in Italy." West European Politics 30 (4): 670-691. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/01402380701500223
  53. Bulmer, W. Elliot 2011. "Minority-Veto Referendums: An Alternative to Bicameralism." Politics 31 (3): 107-120. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9256.2011.01410.x
  54. Bunce, Valerie. 1997. "Presidents and the Transition in Eastern Europe." In: Kurt von Mettenheim (Hg.) Presidential Institutions and Democratic Politics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press: 161-176. Open Google Scholar
  55. Burkhart, Simone/Philip Manow. 2006. "Kompromiss und Konflikt im parteipolitisierten Föderalismus der Bundesrepublik Deutschland." Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 16 (3): 807-824. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1430-6387-2006-3-807
  56. Butler, David/Austin Ranney. 1994. Referendums Around the World: The growing Use of Direct Democracy. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25646-4_1
  57. C2D - Centre for Research on Direct Democracy. o. J. Direct Democracy Databases. http://www.c2d.ch/inner.php?countryinst=216&stateinst=&yearrr=&fromyear=2015&toyear=2015&speyear[]=2015&terms=&igroup[]=0&table=institutions&sub=Submit_Query#1389, Zugriff am 11.05.2015. Open Google Scholar
  58. Caciagli, Mario. 2010. "Italy." In: Dieter Nohlen/Philip Stöver (Hg.) Elections in Europe. A Data Handbook. Baden-Baden: Nomos: 1027-1100. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845223414-1027
  59. Cain, Bruce E./John A. Ferejohn/Morris P. Fiorina. 1984. "The Constituency Service Basis of the Personal Vote for U.S. Representatives and British Members of Parliament." The American Political Science Review 78 (1): 110-125. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/1961252
  60. Carey, John M. 2007. "Competing Principals, Political Institutions, and Party Unity in Legislative Voting." American Journal of Political Science 51 (1): 92-107. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00239.x
  61. Cheibub, José A. 2006. "Presidentialism, Electoral Identifiability, and Budget Balances in Democratic Systems." American Political Science Review 100 (3): 353-368. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S000305540606223X
  62. Cheibub, José A./Jennifer Gandhi/James R. Vreeland. 2010. "Democracy and dictatorship revisited." Public Choice 143 (1-2): 67-101. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s11127-009-9491-2
  63. Christiano, Thomas. 1996. The Rule of the Many. Fundamental Issues in Democratic Theory. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Open Google Scholar
  64. Chubb, Basil (Hg.). 1983. A Source Book of Irish Government. Dublin: Institute of Public Administration. Open Google Scholar
  65. Chubb, Basil. 1991. The Politics of the Irish Constitution. Dublin: Institute of Public Administration. Open Google Scholar
  66. Clark, William R./Michael J. Gilligan/Matt Golder. 2006. "A simple multivariate test for asymmetric hypotheses." Political Analysis 14 (311-331). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpj018
  67. Clarke, Kevin A. 2007. "The Necessity of Being Comparative. Theory Confirmation in Quantitative Political Science." Comparative Political Studies 40 (7): 886-908. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0010414006296518
  68. Clarke, Kevin A./David M. Primo. 2012. A model discipline: Political science and the logic of representations. New York [u. a.]: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195382198.003.0001
  69. Clemens, Elisabeth S./James M. Cook. 1999. "Politics and Institutionalism: Explaining Durability and Change." Annual Review of Sociology 25: 441-466. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.441
  70. Clive, Nigel. 1985. "The 1985 Greek Election and its Background." Government and Opposition 20: 488-503. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.1985.tb01100.x
  71. Colla, Emmanuel/Jean-Claude Scholsem. 1994. "La réforme du système bicaméral belge de 1993." Administration publique 18: 205-222. Open Google Scholar
  72. Colomer, Josep M. 1996. "Introduction." In: Josep M. Colomer (Hg.) Political Institutions in Europe. London: Routledge: 1-17. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.4324/9780203202227
  73. Colomer, Josep M. 2005. "It’s Parties That Choose Electoral Systems (or, Duverger’s Laws Upside Down)." Political Studies 53: 1-21. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00514.x
  74. Coonan, Helen. 1999. "'Survival of the Fittest': Future Directions of the Senate." In: Marian Sawer/Sarah Miskin (Hg.) Papers on Parliament 34 - Representation and Institutional Change: 50 Years of Proportional Representation in the Senate. Online publication. Canberra: Research Section of the Procedure Office of the Department of the Senate. http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Senate/Research_and_Education/~/~/link.aspx?_id=2B1DE8504D1943DDBCAA4A06C9D5FFE5&_z=z. Open Google Scholar
  75. Cotta, Maurizio/Luca Verzichelli. 2007. Political Institutions in Italy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  76. Cox, Gary W./Mikitaka Masuyama/Mathew D. McCubbins. 2000. "Agenda Power in the Japanese House of Representatives." Japanese Journal of Political Science 1 (1): 1-21. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S1468109900000116
  77. Crepaz, Markus M. L./Ann W. Moser. 2004. "The Impact of Collective and Competitive Veto Points on Public Expenditures in the Global Age." Comparative Political Studies 37 (3): 259-285. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0010414003262067
  78. Culic, Irina. 2001. "Romania." In: Andreas Auer/Michael Bützer (Hg.) Direct Democracy: The Eastern and Central European Experience. Aldershot [u. a.]: Ashgate: 141-154. Open Google Scholar
  79. De Winter, Lieven/Marc Swyngedouw/Patrick Dumont. 2006. "Party system(s) and electoral behaviour in Belgium: From stability to balkanisation." West European Politics 29 (5): 933-956. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/01402380600968836
  80. Degener, Ursula. 2010a. "Der dänische Landsting - nur von historischem Interesse?" In: Gisela Riescher/Sabine Ruß/Christoph M. Haas (Hg.) Zweite Kammern. 2. Auflage. München: Oldenbourg: 469-485. Open Google Scholar
  81. Degener, Ursula. 2010b. "Die Abschaffung des Zweikammerreichstags in Schweden." In: Gisela Riescher/Sabine Ruß/Christoph M. Haas (Hg.) Zweite Kammern. 2. Auflage. München: Oldenbourg: 487-504. Open Google Scholar
  82. Depauw, Sam/Shane Martin. 2009. "Legislative party discipline and cohesion in comparative perspective." In: Daniela Giannetti/Kenneth Benoit (Hg.) Intra-Party Politics and Coalition Governments. London: Routledge: 103-120. Open Google Scholar
  83. Deszõ, Márta/András Bragyova. 2001. "Hungary." In: Andreas Auer/Michael Bützer (Hg.) Direct Democracy: The Eastern and Central European Experience. Aldershot [u. a.]: Ashgate: 63-93. Open Google Scholar
  84. Diermeier, Daniel. 2014. "Formal Models of Legislatures." In: Shane Martin/Thomas Saalfeld/Kaare W. Strøm (Hg.) The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 29-56. Open Google Scholar
  85. Dietrich, Alexander. 2011. "Der Polity IV-Datensatz: Empirisches Instrument zur Überprüfung des Dahl'schen Polyarchie-Konzepts?" Konstanzer Journal für Politik und Verwaltung 1 (1): 1-13. Open Google Scholar
  86. Dion, Douglas. 1997. Turning the legislative thumbscrew: minority rights and procedural change in legislative politics. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.3998/mpub.14912
  87. Dion, Douglas. 1998. "Evidence and Inference in the Comparative Case Study." Comparative Politics 30 (2): 127-145. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/422284
  88. Dogan, Mattei. 1995. "Testing concepts of legitimacy and trust." In: Houchang E. Chehabi/Alfred Stepan (Hg.) Politics, society and democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press: 57-71. Open Google Scholar
  89. Donovan, Mark/David Broughton. 1999. "Party System Change in Western Europe: Positively Political." In: David Broughton/Mark Donovan (Hg.) Changing Party Systems in Western Europe. London, New York: Pinter: 255-274. Open Google Scholar
  90. Druckman, James N./Lanny W. Martin/Michael F. Thies. 2005. "Influence without Confidence: Upper Chambers and Government Formation." Legislative Studies Quarterly 30 (4): 529-548. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.3162/036298005X201662
  91. Druckman, James N./Michael F. Thies. 2002. "The Importance of Concurrence: The Impact of Bicameralism on Government Formation and Duration." American Journal of Political Science 46 (4): 760-771. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/3088432
  92. Durr, Robert H./Andrew D. Martin/Christina Wolbrecht. 2000. "Ideological Divergence and Public Support for the Supreme Court." American Journal of Political Science 44 (4): 768-776. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2669280
  93. Duverger, Maurice. 1954. Political Parties. London: Methuen. Open Google Scholar
  94. Duverger, Maurice. 1980. "A New Political System Model: Semi-Presidential Government." European Journal of Political Research 8 (2): 165-187. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1980.tb00569.x
  95. Easton, David. 1965. A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: Wiley. Open Google Scholar
  96. Eduskunta (Finnish Parliament). 2007. RP 234/1991 rd Behandlingsinfo Regeringens proposition till riksdagen med förslag till lag om ändring av riksdagsordningen (Report of the Parliamentary Treatment of the Government Proposal RP 234/1991 of a Change in the Parliament Act). http://www.eduskunta.fi/triphome/bin/vexhaku.sh?lyh=%27%27?kieli=ru?lomake=vex/vex3000_ru, Zugriff am 01.08.2010. Open Google Scholar
  97. Elder, Neil. 1956. "The Swedish Riksdag." Parliamentary Affairs 10 (3): 288-295. Open Google Scholar
  98. Elgie, Robert. 1999. "The Politics of Semi-Presidentialism." In: Robert Elgie (Hg.) Semi-Presidentialism in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 1-22. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/0198293860.003.0001
  99. Elgie, Robert/Sophia Moestrup (Hg.). 2007. Semi-Presidentialism Outside Europe. London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  100. Elgie, Robert/Sophia Moestrup (Hg.). 2008. Semi-Presidentialism in Central and Eastern Europe. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Open Google Scholar
  101. Encyclopaedia Britannica. o. J. Blueshirt. http://www.britannica.com/topic/Blueshirt, Zugriff am 03.09.2015. Open Google Scholar
  102. Endemann, Helen. 1998. Das Regierungssystem Finnlands. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. Open Google Scholar
  103. Eppner, Sebastian. 2013. Der Einfluss legislativer Vetopunkte auf die Regierungsbildung. Dissertation. Potsdam. Open Google Scholar
  104. Eppner, Sebastian/Steffen Ganghof. 2016. "Institutional Veto Players and Cabinet Formation: The Veto Control Hypothesis Reconsidered." European Journal of Political Research doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12172. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12172
  105. Evans, Harry. 1999. "Accountability Versus Government Control: the Effect of Proportional Representation." In: Marian Sawer/Sarah Miskin (Hg.) Papers on Parliament 34 - Representation and Institutional Change: 50 Years of Proportional Representation in the Senate. Online publication. Canberra: Research Section of the Procedure Office of the Department of the Senate. http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Senate/Research_and_Education/~/~/link.aspx?_id=2B1DE8504D1943DDBCAA4A06C9D5FFE5&_z=z. Open Google Scholar
  106. Evans, Harry. 2009. "Having the Numbers Means Not Having to Explain: The Effect of the Government Majority in the Senate." In: Research Section of the Procedure Office of the Department of the Senate (Hg.) Papers on Parliament POP 52 - Harry Evans: Selected Writings. Canberra: Parliament of Australia: 151-163. http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Senate/Research_and_Education/~/~/link.aspx?_id=82348D5DB98343909CBEE152874E5435&_z=z. Open Google Scholar
  107. Fackler, Martin. 2013. "Election Win by Ruling Party Signals Change in Japan." The New York Times 21.07.2013. New York. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/22/world/asia/governing-party-appears-headed-to-lead-japanese-parliament.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0, Zugriff am 11.12.2013. Open Google Scholar
  108. Faulkner, John. 1999. "A Labor Perspective on Senate Reform." In: Marian Sawer/Sarah Miskin (Hg.) Papers on Parliament 34 - Representation and Institutional Change: 50 Years of Proportional Representation in the Senate. Online publication. Canberra: Research Section of the Procedure Office of the Department of the Senate. http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Senate/Research_and_Education/~/~/link.aspx?_id=2B1DE8504D1943DDBCAA4A06C9D5FFE5&_z=z. Open Google Scholar
  109. FAZ. 2014. "Italiens Senat schafft sich ab." Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. 09.08.2014: 6. Open Google Scholar
  110. Ferrara, Federico/J. Timo Weishaupt. 2004. "Get your Act Together: Party Performance in European Parliament Elections." European Union Politics 5 (3): 283-306. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/1465116504045154
  111. Forestiere, Carolyn. 2008. "New Institutionalism and Minority Protection in the National Legislatures of Finland and Denmark." Scandinavian Political Studies 31 (4): 448-468. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2008.00221.x
  112. Franklin, Mark N. 2002. "Learning from the Danish case: A comment on Palle Svensson’s critique of the Franklin thesis." European Journal of Political Research 41 (6): 751-757. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00029
  113. Franklin, Mark N./Cees van der Eijk/Michael Marsh. 1995. "Referendum Outcomes and Trust in Government: Public Support For Europe in The Wake of Maastricht." West European Politics 18 (3): 101-117. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/01402389508425093
  114. Franklin, Mark N./Michael Marsh/Christopher Wlezien. 1994. "Attitudes Toward Europe and Referendum Votes - A Response to Siune and Svensson." Electoral Studies 13 (2): 117-121. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/0261-3794(94)90029-9
  115. Franks, Charles E.S. 1999. "Not Dead Yet, But Should it be Resurrected? The Canadian Senate." In: Samuel C. Patterson/Anthony Mughan (Hg.) Senates. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University Press: 120-161. Open Google Scholar
  116. Französische Botschaft. 2015. Volksabstimmung in Frankreich. http://www.ambafrance-de.org/Volksabstimmung, Zugriff am 28.07.2015. Open Google Scholar
  117. Gabanyi, Anneli U. 2010. "Das politische System Rumäniens." In: Wolfgang Ismayr (Hg.) Die politischen Systeme Osteuropas. 3. Auflage. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften: 627-675. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91997-3_13
  118. Gallagher, Michael. 1991. "Proportionality, Disproportionality and Electoral Systems." Electoral Studies 10 (1): 33-51. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/0261-3794(91)90004-C
  119. Gallagher, Michael. 1996. "Conclusion." In: Michael Gallagher/Pier V. Uleri (Hg.) The Referendum Experience in Europe. London: Macmillan: 226-252. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24796-7_14
  120. Gallagher, Michael. 2010. "The Oireachtas. President and parliament." In: John Coakley/Michael Gallagher (Hg.) Politics in the Republic of Ireland. 5. Auflage. London [u. a.]: Routledge: 198 - 229. Open Google Scholar
  121. Galligan, Brian. 1990. "The 1988 Referendums and Australia's Record on Constitutional Change." Parliamentary Affairs 43 (4): 497-506. Open Google Scholar
  122. Galligan, Brian/John Uhr. 1990. "Australian Federal Democracy and the Senate." Public Law Review 1: 309-328. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/3330292
  123. Ganghof, Steffen. 2005a. "Normative Modelle, institutionelle Typen und beobachtbare Verhaltensmuster. Ein Vorschlag zum Vergleich parlamentarischer Demokratien." PVS Politische Vierteljahresschrift 46 (3): 406-431. Open Google Scholar
  124. Ganghof, Steffen. 2005b. "Politische Gleichheit und echte Mehrheitsdemokratie. Über die normativen Grundlagen institutioneller Arrangements." Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 15 (3): 741-763. Open Google Scholar
  125. Ganghof, Steffen. 2010a. "Democratic Inclusiveness: A Reinterpretation of Lijphart’s Patterns of Democracy." British Journal of Political Science 40 (3): 679-692. Open Google Scholar
  126. Ganghof, Steffen. 2010b. "Resiliente Demokratietypen. Eine vergleichende Analyse." Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaften 4 (1): 5-27. Open Google Scholar
  127. Ganghof, Steffen. 2011. "Coordination and Change in (Non-Presidential) Democracies." ECPR General Conference. Reykjavik. 24.-27. August. Open Google Scholar
  128. Ganghof, Steffen. 2014. "Bicameralism As a Form of Government (Or: Why Australia and Japan Do Not Have a Parliamentary System)." Parliamentary Affairs 67 (3): 647-663. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/pa/gss081
  129. Ganghof, Steffen. 2015. "Forschungsdesigns in der Politikwissenschaft: Kausale Perspektiven und kontrastive Theorietests." Potsdam: unveröffentlichtes Manuskript. Open Google Scholar
  130. Ganghof, Steffen. 2016. "Das Regierungssystem Trilemma: Zur Beziehung zwischen Exekutive und Legislative in fortgeschrittenen Demokratien." PVS Politische Vierteljahresschrift 57 (1): 27-52. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0032-3470-2016-1-27
  131. Ganghof, Steffen/Sebastian Eppner. 2016. "Equilibrium Veto Players. Veto Institutions, Cabinet Formation and Institutional Change." Potsdam: unveröffentlichtes Manuskript. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12172
  132. Ganghof, Steffen/Kai Schulze. 2015. "Vetospieler und Institutionen." In: Georg Wenzelburger/Reimut Zohlnhöfer (Hg.) Handbuch Policy-Forschung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS: 113-148. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-01968-6_5
  133. Garry, John/Michael Marsh/Richard Sinnott. 2005. " ’Second-order’ versus ’Issue-voting’ effects in EU referendums - Evidence from the Irish Nice Treaty Referendums." European Union Politics 6 (2): 201-221. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/1465116505051983
  134. Gebethner, Stanislaw. 2001. "Poland." In: Andreas Auer/Michael Bützer (Hg.) Direct Democracy: The Eastern and Central European Experience. Aldershot [u. a.]: Ashgate: 129-140. Open Google Scholar
  135. Gerber, Elisabeth R. 1996. "Legislative response to the threat of popular initiatives." American Journal of Political Science 40 (1): 99-128. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2111696
  136. Gerber, Elisabeth R. 1999. The Populist Paradox: Interest Group Influence and the Promise of Direct Legislation. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  137. Gerber, Elisabeth R./Simon Hug. 2001. "Minority rights and direct legislation: Theory, methods, and evidence." Working Paper: University of California at San Diego: Department of Political Science. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1057/9781403900968_5
  138. Gerring, John/Strom C. Thacker. 2008. A Centripetal Theory of Democratic Governance. New York: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511756054
  139. Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland (GG). Stand 23.12.2014. Bonn. https://www.bundestag.de/grundgesetz, Zugriff am 15.01.2015. Open Google Scholar
  140. Grundgesetz des Reiches Dänemark vom 5. Juni 1915 (GG Dänemark 1915). Aufgehoben am 5. Juni 1953. http://www.verfassungen.eu/dk/verf15-i.htm, Zugriff am 29.06.2014. Open Google Scholar
  141. Grundgesetz Ungarns. Stand 25.04.2011. http://www.verfassungen.eu/hu/index.htm, Zugriff am 13.06.2014. Open Google Scholar
  142. Ghazarian, Zareh. 2012. "The Changing Type of Minor Party Elected to Parliament: The Case of the Australian Senate from 1949 to 2010." Australian Journal of Political Science 47 (3): 441-454. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2012.704007
  143. Gibson, James L. 2010. "Public Images and Understandings of Courts." In: Peter Cane/Herbert M. Kritzer (Hg.) The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research. New York: Oxford University Press: 828-853. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199542475.013.0035
  144. Gibson, James L./Gregory A. Caldeira/Lester K. Spence. 2003a. "Measuring Attitudes toward the United States Supreme Court." American Journal of Political Science 47 (2): 354-367. Open Google Scholar
  145. Gibson, James L./Gregory A. Caldeira/Lester K. Spence. 2003b. "The Supreme Court and the US Presidential Election of 2000: Wounds, Self-Inflicted or Otherwise?" British Journal of Political Science 33 (04): 535-556. Open Google Scholar
  146. Gibson, James L./Gregory A. Caldeira/Lester K. Spence. 2005. "Why Do People Accept Public Policies They Oppose? Testing Legitimacy Theory with a Survey-Based Experiment." Political Research Quarterly 58 (2): 187-201. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/106591290505800201
  147. Ginsburg, Tom/James Melton. 2014. "Does the Constitutional Amendment Rule Matter at All? Amendment Cultures and the Challenges of Measuring Amendment Difficulty." Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Working Paper. No. 682. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2432520
  148. Glasgow, Garrett/Matt Golder/Sona N. Golder. 2012. "New Empirical Strategies for the Study of Parliamentary Government Formation." Political Analysis 20 (2): 248-270. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpr058
  149. Goertz, Gary. 2006. "Assessing the Trivialness, Relevance, and Relative Importance of Necessary or Sufficient Conditions in Social Science." Studies in Comparative International Development 41 (2): 88-109. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/BF02686312
  150. Goot, Murray. 1999. "Whose Mandate? Policy Promises, Strong Bicameralism and Polled Opinion." Australian Journal of Political Science 34 (3): 327-352. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/10361149950263
  151. Government Information Office. 2009. Politisches System. http://www.taiwanembassy.org/glance/de/ch4.htm, Zugriff am 24.03.2014. Open Google Scholar
  152. Grasse, Alexander/Francesca Gelli. 2012. "Zentralismus - regionale Autonomie - Föderalismus." In: Karoline Rörig/Ulrich Glassmann/Stefan Köppl (Hg.) Länderbericht Italien. Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung: 186–214. Open Google Scholar
  153. Verfassung der Griechischen Republik (Griechische Verf.). Stand 16. April 2001. o. O. http://www.verfassungen.eu/griech/, Zugriff am 22.06.2015. Open Google Scholar
  154. Grofman, Bernard. 1990. Political Gerrymandering and the Courts. New York: Agathon Press. Open Google Scholar
  155. Grumm, John G. 1958. "Theories of Electoral Systems." Midwest Journal of Political Science 2 (4): 357-376. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2108721
  156. Verfassung Finnlands (Grundgesetz Finnlands) vom 11. Juni 1999. Stand 24.08.2007. http://www.verfassungen.eu/fin/verf99-i.htm, Zugriff am 20.06.2015. Open Google Scholar
  157. Gunning, James P. 1997. Taiwan's Branches of Government. http://www.constitution.org/pd/gunning/taiwan/branches.htm, Zugriff am 12.05.2015. Open Google Scholar
  158. Haas, Christoph M. 2010. "Australiens Senat im "Washminster"-System." In: Gisela Riescher/Sabine Ruß/Christoph M. Haas (Hg.) Zweite Kammern. 2. Auflage. München: Oldenbourg: 77-96. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1524/9783486710106.77
  159. Hardarson, Ólafur Th./Gunnar H. Kristinsson. 2011. "Iceland." European Journal of Political Research 50 (7-8): 999-1003. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.02025.x
  160. Heeß, Katja. 2012. "Towards Majority Rule? Institutional Change in Parliamentary Democracies." ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops. Antwerpen. 10.-15. April. Open Google Scholar
  161. Heeß, Katja/Christoph Hönnige. 2009. "Risiken und Nebenwirkungen von Vetospielerreferenden - Warum Chirac das Verfassungsreferendum verloren hat." Jahrbuch für Handlungs- und Entscheidungstheorie: 119-147. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91403-9_5
  162. Helander, Voitto. 1990. Lepäämäänjättämismekanismi. Tutkimus VJ 66.7 §:n käytöstä itsenäisyyden aikana [Das Aussetzungsverfahren nach § 66 Abs. 7 Reichstagsordnung]. Turku. Open Google Scholar
  163. Heller, William B. 1997. "Bicameralism and Budget Deficits: The Effect of Parliamentary Structure on Government Spending." Legislative Studies Quarterly 22 (4): 485-516. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/440340
  164. Heller, William B. 2001. "Political Denials: The Policy Effect of Intercameral Partisan Differences in Bicameral Parliamentary Systems." Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 17 (1): 34-61. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/jleo/17.1.34
  165. Heller, William B. 2007. "Divided Politics: Bicameralism, Parties, and Policy in Democratic Legislatures." Annual Review of Political Science 10: 245-269. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.071105.112758
  166. Heller, William B./Diana Branduse. 2014. "The Politics of Bicameralism." In: Shane Martin/Thomas Saalfeld/Kaare W. Strøm (Hg.) The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 332-351. Open Google Scholar
  167. Hempel, Yvonne. 2006. Der belgische Senat als Reflexions- und territoriales Repräsentationsorgan. Eine Untersuchung der politischen Rolle der Zweiten Kammer Belgiens nach der Verfassungsreform von 1993. Hamburg: Kovač. Open Google Scholar
  168. Henisz, Witold J. 2000. "The Institutional Environment for Economic Growth." Economics & Politics 12 (1): 1-31. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/1468-0343.00066
  169. Hibbing, John R./Elizabeth Theiss-Morse. 1995. Congress as Public Enemy: Public Attitudes Toward American Political Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174466
  170. Holland, Ian. 2009. "Senate Committees and the Legislative Process." Parliamentary Studies Paper. 7. Canberra: Crawford School of Economics and Government, Australian National University. Open Google Scholar
  171. Hönnige, Christoph. 2007. Verfassungsgericht, Regierung und Opposition: die vergleichende Analyse eines Spannungsdreiecks. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90518-1
  172. Hönnige, Christoph/Thomas Gschwend. 2010. "Das Bundesverfassungsgericht im politischen System der BRD - ein unbekanntes Wesen?" PVS Politische Vierteljahresschrift 51 (3): 507-530. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s11615-010-0030-z
  173. Hooghe, Marc/Kris Deschouwer. 2011. "Veto Players and Electoral Reform in Belgium." West European Politics 34 (3): 626-643. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2011.555987
  174. Hornig, Eike-Christian. 2010. "Der Senat in Italien - Eine Zweite Kammer mit föderaler Zukunft?" In: Gisela Riescher/Sabine Ruß/Christoph M. Haas (Hg.) Zweite Kammern. 2. Auflage. München: Oldenbourg: 267-289. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1524/9783486710106.265
  175. Huber, Evelyne/Charles Ragin/John D. Stephens. 1993. "Social Democracy, Christian Democracy, Constitutional Structure, and the Welfare State." The American Journal of Sociology 99 (3): 711-749. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/230321
  176. Hug, Simon. 2004. "Occurrence and policy consequences of referendums." Journal of Theoretical Politics 16 (3): 321-356. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0951629804043205
  177. Hug, Simon. 2013. "Qualitative Comparative Analysis: How Inductive Use and Measurement Error Lead to Problematic Inference." Political Analysis 21: 252-265. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/pan/mps061
  178. Hug, Simon/George Tsebelis. 2002. "Veto players and referendums around the world." Journal of Theoretical Politics 14: 465-515. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/095162902774006831
  179. ICL. o. J. ICL - International Constitutional Law. http://www.verfassungsvergleich.de/, Zugriff am 08.04.2015. Open Google Scholar
  180. Igarashi, Yumi/Patrick Köllner. 2010. "Oberhauswahl in Japan: Frisches Mandat für die Regierung oder politischer Stillstand?" GIGA Focus Asien (6): 1-8. Open Google Scholar
  181. Il Post. 2015. "A che punto siamo con il nuovo Senato. Guida a cosa prevede la riforma al momento, a chi la deve votare, a cosa può succedere." 10.05.2015. http://www.ilpost.it/2015/05/10/riforma-del-senato/, Zugriff am 11.08.2015. Open Google Scholar
  182. Immergut, Ellen M. 1990. "Institutions, Veto Points, and Policy Results: A Comparative Analysis of Health Care." Journal of Public Policy 10 (4): 391-416. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X00006061
  183. Immergut, Ellen M. 1992a. Health Politics. Interests and Institutions in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  184. Immergut, Ellen M. 1992b. "The rules of the game: The logic of health policy-making in France, Switzerland, and Sweden." In: Sven Steinmo/Kathleen Thelen/Frank Longstreth (Hg.) Structuring Politics. Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis. Cambridge [u. a.]: Cambridge University Press: 57-89. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511528125.004
  185. Immergut, Ellen M./Karen M. Andersen. 2007. "Editors' Introduction: The Dynamics of Pension Politics." In: Ellen M. Immergut/Karen M. Anderson/Isabelle Schulze (Hg.) The Handbook of West European Pension Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 1-45. Open Google Scholar
  186. IPU, Inter-parliamentary Union. o. J.-a. PARLINE database. http://www.ipu.org/parline-e/parlinesearch.asp, Zugriff am 10.06.2015. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.18356/9266a054-en
  187. IPU, Inter-parliamentary Union. o. J.-b. Parline database on national parliaments. Ireland - Dáil Éireann (House of Representatives). Electoral System. http://www.ipu.org/parline-e/reports/2153_B.htm, Zugriff am 01.09.2015. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.18356/f85c1ea3-en
  188. IPU, Inter-parliamentary Union. o. J.-c. Parline database on national parliaments. Japan. Sangiin (House of Councillors). Electoral System. http://www.ipu.org/parline-e/reports/2162_B.htm, Zugriff am 06.02.2015. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.18356/f85c1ea3-en
  189. IPU, Inter-parliamentary Union. o. J.-d. Parline database on national parliaments. Poland - Sejm. Electoral System. http://www.ipu.org/parline-e/reports/2255_B.htm, Zugriff am 01.08.2015. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.18356/f85c1ea3-en
  190. IPU, Inter-parliamentary Union. o. J.-e. Parline database on national parliaments. Romania - Senatul (Senate). Electoral System. http://www.ipu.org/parline-e/reports/2262_B.htm, Zugriff am 24.06.2014. Open Google Scholar
  191. IPU, Inter-parliamentary Union. o. J.-f. Parline database on national parliaments. Slovenia - Drzavni Svet (National Council). Electoral System. http://www.ipu.org/parline-e/reports/2288_B.htm, Zugriff am 10.07.2014. Open Google Scholar
  192. Ismayr, Wolfgang (Hg.). 2008. Gesetzgebung in Westeuropa: EU-Staaten und Europäische Union. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar
  193. Ismayr, Wolfgang (Hg.). 2009. Die politischen Systeme Westeuropas. 4. Auflage. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar
  194. Ismayr, Wolfgang (Hg.). 2010. Die politischen Systeme Osteuropas. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91997-3_1
  195. Jahn, Detlef. 2010. "The Veto Player Approach in Macro-Comparative Politics: Concepts and Measurement." In: Thomas König/George Tsebelis/Marc Debus (Hg.) Reform Processes and Policy Change. Veto Players and Decision-Making in Modern Democracies. New York: Springer: 43-68. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5809-9_3
  196. Japan Echo. 2008. "Drama in the Upper House." 35. 04.08.2008. http://www.japanecho.com/sum/2008/350403.html, Zugriff am 16.01.2015. Open Google Scholar
  197. Japan Times. 2013. "Reforming the Upper House." The Japan Times 01.09.2013. http://www.japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2013/09/01/editorials/reforming-the-upper-house/#.VM9qAy70-Cg, Zugriff am 10.12.2013. Open Google Scholar
  198. Jungar, Ann-Cathrine. 2000. Surplus Majority Government. A Comparative Study of Italy and Finland. Uppsala: Uppsala University Library. Open Google Scholar
  199. Jungar, Ann-Cathrine. 2002. "A Case of a Surplus Majority Government: The Finnish Rainbow Coalition." Scandinavian Political Studies 25 (1): 57-83. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.00063
  200. Jungar, Ann-Cathrine. 2011. "The Rainbow Coalition. A surplus majority coalition in Finland." In: Rudy B. Andeweg/Lieven De Winter/Patrick Dumont (Hg.) Puzzles of Government Formation. Coalition theory and deviant cases. London [u. a.]: Routledge: 129-146. Open Google Scholar
  201. Jussila, Osmo/Seppo Hentilä/Jukka Nevakivi. 1999. Politische Geschichte Finnlands seit 1809: Vom Großfürstentum zur Europäischen Union. Berlin: Berlin Verlag Arno Spitz. Open Google Scholar
  202. Jyränki, Antero. 2001. "Die neue Verfassung Finnlands." Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht 56 (1): 113-127. Open Google Scholar
  203. Jyränki, Antero. 2007. "Presidential Elements in Government: Finland: Foreign Affairs as the Last Stronghold of the Presidency." European Constitutional Law Review 3 (2): 285-306. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S1574019607002854
  204. Kailitz, Steffen. 2008a. "Ein Unterschied wie Tag und Nacht? Fraktionsgeschlossenheit in Parlamentarismus und Präsidentialismus." Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 18 (3): 291-324. Open Google Scholar
  205. Kailitz, Steffen. 2008b. "Zwei Seiten der gleichen Medaille? Zum theoretischen und empirischen Zusammenhang zwischen der Regierungsform und der Ausgestaltung von Zweikammersystemen." Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 39 (2): 387-414. Open Google Scholar
  206. Kaiser, André. 1998a. "Institutional Regimes." In: Jan W. van Deth (Hg.) Comparative Politics. The Problem of Equivalence. London: Routledge: 205-221. Open Google Scholar
  207. Kaiser, André. 1998b. "Vetopunkte der Demokratie. Eine Kritik neuerer Ansätze der Demokratietypologie." Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen (3): 525-541. Open Google Scholar
  208. Kaiser, André. 2000. "Die Zweite Kammer in Neuseeland. Funktionsprobleme, Auflösung und Folgewirkungen." In: Gisela Riescher/Sabine Ruß/Christoph M. Haas (Hg.) Zweite Kammern. München: Oldenbourg: 368-380. Open Google Scholar
  209. Kaiser, André. 2002. Mehrheitsdemokratie und Institutionenreform. Verfassungspolitischer Wandel in Australien, Großbritannien, Kanada und Neuseeland im Vergleich. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  210. Kangas, Olli. 2007. "Finland: Labor markets against politics." In: Ellen M. Immergut/Karen M. Anderson/Isabelle Schulze (Hg.) The Handbook of West European Pension Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 248-296. Open Google Scholar
  211. Kangas, Olli/Urban Lundberg/Niels Ploug. 2010. "Three routes to a pension reform: Politics and institutions in reforming pensions in Denmark, Finland and Sweden." Social Policy & Administration 44 (3): 265-284. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2010.00713.x
  212. Kangas, Olli/Juho Saari. 2008. "Krisenbewältigung mit Langzeitfolgen? Der finnische Wohlfahrtsstaat." In: Klaus Schubert/Simon Hegelich/Ursula Bazant (Hg.) Europäische Wohlfahrtssysteme. Ein Handbuch. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften: 239-262. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90852-6_11
  213. Katsoudas, Dimitrios K. 1987. "The Constitutional Framework." In: Kevin Featherstone/Dimitrios K. Katsoudas (Hg.) Political Change in Greece. Before and After The Colonels. New York: St. Martin's Press: 14-33. Open Google Scholar
  214. Katz, Richard S. 2006. "Why Are There So Many (or So Few) Electoral Reforms?" In: Michael Gallagher/Paul Mitchell (Hg.) The Politics of Electoral Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 57-76. Open Google Scholar
  215. Kellner, Peter. 1995. "Electoral Reform: Principle or Self-Interest." Representation 33 (2): 23-27. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/00344899508523357
  216. Kensuke, Takayasu. 2014. "The Pressures of Change: The Office of Prime Minister in the United Kingdom and Japan." nippon.com 21.05.2014. http://www.nippon.com/en/features/c00410/, Zugriff am 16.01.2015. Open Google Scholar
  217. Kernell, Samuel. 1986. Going Public: New Strategies of Presidential Leadership. Washington, DC: CQ Press. Open Google Scholar
  218. Kernot, Cheryl. 1997. "Balancing acts - wielding the balance of power." Australian Journal of Public Administration 56 (2): 32-39. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.1997.tb01544.x
  219. Kingston, Christopher/Gonzalo Caballero. 2009. "Comparing theories of institutional change." Journal of Institutional Economics 5 (02): 151-180. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S1744137409001283
  220. Kipke, Rüdiger. 2010. "Das politische System der Slowakei." In: Wolfgang Ismayr (Hg.) Die politischen Systeme Osteuropas. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften: 317-356. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91997-3_7
  221. Kitaoka, Shinichi. 2012. "Breaking Political Deadlock with Bold Reforms." Politics in Perspective 19.01.2012. http://www.tokyofoundation.org/en/topics/politics-in-persepctive/bold-reforms, Zugriff am 10.01.2015. Open Google Scholar
  222. Kitschelt, Herbert. 2003. "Accounting for Postcommunist Regime Diversity. What Counts as a Good Cause?" In: Grzegorz Ekiert/Stephen E. Hanson (Hg.) Capitalism and Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe. Assessing the Legacy of Communist Rule. Cambridge [u. a.]: Cambridge University Press: 49-86. Open Google Scholar
  223. Verfassungsgesetz über die gegenseitigen Beziehungen zwischen der gesetzgebenden und der vollziehenden Gewalt der Republik Polen und über die örtliche Selbstverwaltung (Kleine Verfassung Polen). Aufgehoben am 02.04.1997. http://www.verfassungen.eu/pl/verf92-i.htm, Zugriff am 26.02.2014. Open Google Scholar
  224. Kneip, Sascha. 2011. "Gegenspieler, Vetospieler oder was? Demokratiefunktionales Agieren des Bundesverfassungsgerichts 1951-2005." PVS Politische Vierteljahresschrift 52 (2): 220-247. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0032-3470-2011-2-220
  225. Köllner, Patrick. 2001. "Oberhauswahlen und die Macht der "organisierten Stimme"." Japan aktuell (5/2001): 474-485. Open Google Scholar
  226. Köllner, Patrick. 2007. "Die Oberhauswahl vom Juli 2007: Ergebnis, Erklärungen und Konsequenzen." Japan aktuell (5/2007): 31-42. Open Google Scholar
  227. Köllner, Patrick. 2008. "10 Jahre DPJ: Von der "dritten Kraft" zur Regierungspartei?" Japan aktuell (2/2008): 75-92. Open Google Scholar
  228. Köllner, Patrick. 2009. "Erdrutschsieg der Opposition in Japan: Hintergründe und Perspektiven." GIGA Focus Asien (9/2009): 1-7. Open Google Scholar
  229. Krehbiel, Keith. 1991. Information and Legislative Organisation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Open Google Scholar
  230. Kristjánsson, Svanur. 2003. "Iceland: A Parliamentary Democracy with a Semi-presidential Constitution." In: Kaare Strøm/Wolfgang C. Müller/Torbjörn Bergman (Hg.) Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press: 399-417. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/019829784X.003.0012
  231. Krupavičius, Algis/Giedrius Zvaliauskas. 2001. "Lithuania." In: Andreas Auer/Michael Bützer (Hg.) Direct Democracy: The Eastern and Central European Experience. Aldershot [u. a.]: Ashgate: 109-128. Open Google Scholar
  232. Kuehn, David. 2013. "Combining game theory models and process tracing: potential and limits." European Political Science 12: 52-63. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1057/eps.2012.9
  233. Kyrkos, Charalampis/Goergia Makropoulu. 2014. "Referendum: A challenge for democratic self-determination." World Congress of Constitutional Law 2014 - Congrès mondial de droit constitutionnel. Oslo. 16.-20.06.2014. https://www.jus.uio.no/english/research/news-and-events/events/conferences/2014/wccl-cmdc/wccl/papers/workshop16.html, Zugriff am 07.03.2015. Open Google Scholar
  234. La Stampa. 2016. "Via libera definitivo alle riforma costituzionale. Ora l’ultima parola ai cittadini con il referendum." 12.04.2016. http://www.lastampa.it/2016/04/12/italia/politica/rush-finale-per-la-riforma-costituzionale-le-opposizioni-non-voteranno-BpWSbGzC3NRab0wJGo49GO/pagina.html, Zugriff am 29.06.2016. Open Google Scholar
  235. Laakso, Markku/Rein Taagepera. 1979. "'Effective' Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe." Comparative Political Studies 12: 3-27. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/001041407901200101
  236. Lamare, James W./Jack Vowles. 1996. "Party Interests, Public Opinion and Institutional Preferences: Electoral System Change in New Zealand." Australian Journal of Political Science 31 (3): 321-346. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/10361149651085
  237. Landes, William/Richard Posner. 1975. "The Independent Judiciary in an Interest Group Perspective." Journal of Law and Economics 18 (875-901). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/466849
  238. Lane, Jan-Erik. 1991. Politics and Society in Western Europe. London: Sage. Open Google Scholar
  239. Laver, Michael J./Norman Schofield. 1990. Multiparty Government: The Politics of Coalition in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  240. Laver, Michael/Kenneth. A. Shepsle. 1996. Making and Breaking Governments: Cabinets and Legislatures in Parliamentary Democracies. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625671
  241. LeDuc, Lawrence. 2003. The Politics of Direct Democracy: Referendums in Global Perspective. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press. Open Google Scholar
  242. LeDuc, Lawrence. 2011. "Electoral Reform and Direct Democracy in Canada: When Citizens Become Involved." West European Politics 34 (3): 551-567. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2011.555983
  243. Lehner, Franz. 1984. "Consociational Democracy and Corporatism in Switzerland: A Political-Economic Explanation and Some Empirical Evidence." European Journal of Political Research 12 (1): 25-42. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1984.tb00077.x
  244. Lijphart, Arend. 1984. Democracies. Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries. New Haven, London. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1ww3w2t
  245. Lijphart, Arend. 1999a. "Australian Democracy: Modifying Majoritarianism?" Australian Journal of Political Science 34 (3): 313-326. Open Google Scholar
  246. Lijphart, Arend. 1999b. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press. Open Google Scholar
  247. Lijphart, Arend. 2012. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. 2. Auflage. New Haven: Yale University Press. Open Google Scholar
  248. Linz, Juan J. 1994. "Presidential or Parliamentary Democracy: Does It Make a Difference?" In: Juan J. Linz/Arturo Valenzuela (Hg.) The Failure of Presidential Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Open Google Scholar
  249. Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1959. "Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy." The American Political Science Review 53 (1): 69-105. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/1951731
  250. Longley, Lawrence D./David M. Olson (Hg.). 1991. Two into One: The Politics and Processes of National Legislative Cameral Change. Boulder, CO: West View Press. Open Google Scholar
  251. Lorenz, Astrid. 2005. "How to Measure Constitutional Rigidity." Journal of Theoretical Politics 17 (3): 339-361. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0951629805052883
  252. Lorenz, Astrid. 2008. Verfassungsänderungen in etablierten Demokratien. Motivlagen und Aushandlungsmuster. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar
  253. Lupia, Arthur/John G. Matsusaka. 2004. "Direct Democracy: New Approaches to Old Questions." Annual Review of Political Science 7: 463-482. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.012003.104730
  254. Luthardt, Wolfgang. 1994. Direkte Demokratie: Ein Vergleich in Westeuropa. Baden-Baden: Nomos-Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  255. Lütticken, Florian/Florian Pfeil. 2003. "Finnlands neue Verfassung: Abschied vom semi-präsidentiellen System." Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 34 (2): 296 - 310. Open Google Scholar
  256. Lutz, Donald S. 1994. "Toward a Theory of Constitutional Amendment." The American Political Science Review 88 (2): 355-370. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2944709
  257. Määräenemmistötoimikunnan. 1978. Määräenemmistötoimikunnan Mietintö: Betänkande av Kommissionen för Majoritetsstadgandena [Bericht des Komitees für qualifizierte Mehrheiten]. Helsinki. Open Google Scholar
  258. Majone, Giandomenico. 1998. "Europe’s ‘democratic deficit’: The question of standards." European Law Journal 4 (1): 5-28. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/1468-0386.00040
  259. Malcolm, Andrew H. 1977. "Fukuda Party Keeps Upper House Control. Loses Majority in Japan's Voting, Then Enlists 3 Independents." The New York Times. 12.07.1977: 56. Open Google Scholar
  260. Manning, Maurice. 2010. "The Senate." In: Muiris MacCarthaigh/Maurice Manning (Hg.) The Houses of the Oireachtas. Parliament in Ireland. Dublin: Institute of Public Administration: 153-166. Open Google Scholar
  261. Manow, Philip/Simone Burkhart. 2007. "Legislative Self-Restraint Under Divided Government In Germany, 1976-2002." Legislative Studies Quarterly 32 (2): 167-191. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.3162/036298007780907941
  262. Martin, Lanny W./Randolph T. Stevenson. 2001. "Government Formation in Parliamentary Democracies." American Journal of Political Science 45 (1): 33-50. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2669358
  263. Martin, Lanny W./Georg Vanberg. 2004. "Policing the Bargain: Coalition Government and Parliamentary Scrutiny." American Journal of Political Science 48 (1): 13-27. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00053.x
  264. Marx, Axel. 2010. "Crisp-set qualitative comparative analysis (csQCA) and model specification: Benchmarks for future csQCA applications." International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches 4 (2): 138-158. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5172/mra.2010.4.2.138
  265. Marx, Axel/Adrian Dusa. 2011. "Crisp-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (csQCA), Contradictions and Consistency Benchmarks for Model Specification." Methodological Innovations Online 6 (2): 103-148. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.4256/mio.2010.0037
  266. Massicotte, Louis. 2001. "Legislative Unicameralism: A Global Survey and a Few Case Studies." Journal of Legislative Studies 7 (1): 151 - 170. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/714003865
  267. Mastias, Jean/Jean Grangé. 1987. Les Secondes Chambres du Parlement en Europe Occidentale. Paris: Economia. Open Google Scholar
  268. Matsusaka, John G. 2000. "Fiscal Effects of the Voter Initiative in the First Half of the 20th Century." Journal of Law and Economics 43: 619-648. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/467467
  269. Matsusaka, John G. 2004. For the many or the few. The initiative, public policy, and American democracy. Chicago: Chicago University Press. Open Google Scholar
  270. Matsusaka, John G. 2005. "The eclipse of legislatures: Direct democracy in the 21st century." Public Choice 124 (1-2): 157-177. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s11127-005-4760-1
  271. Mattila, Mikko. 1997. "From Qualified Majority to Simple Majority: The Effects of the 1992 Change in the Finnish Constitution " Scandinavian Political Studies 20 (4): 331-345. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.1997.tb00198.x
  272. McGann, Anthony. 2006a. The logic of democracy: reconciling equality, deliberation, and minority protection. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press. Open Google Scholar
  273. McGann, Anthony. 2006b. "Social Choice and comparing legislatures: Constitutional versus institutional constraints." The Journal of Legislative Studies 12 (3-4): 443-461. Open Google Scholar
  274. McGee, Harry. 2013. "Ten reasons voters rejected the abolition of the Seanad." Irish Times 06.10.2013. http://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/ten-reasons-voters-rejected-the-abolition-of-the-seanad-1.1551909, Zugriff am 15.11.2013. Open Google Scholar
  275. McMillan, John. 1991. "Constitutional Reform in Australia." In: Parliament of Australia (Hg.) Papers on Parliament 13. Canberra. http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Senate/Research_and_Education/pops/~/link.aspx?_id=042958A33D7D4CD985246D0974B643AA&_z=z. Open Google Scholar
  276. Metcalf, Lee K. 2000. "Measuring Presidential Power." Comparative Political Studies 33 (5): 660-685. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0010414000033005004
  277. Metcalf, Lee K. 2002. "Sailing between Scylla and Charybdis: Presidential Power in East Central Europe." Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. Boston. 28.08.2002. Open Google Scholar
  278. Mezey, Michael L. 1979. Comparative Legislatures. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Open Google Scholar
  279. Mezey, Michael L. 1994. "Review: New Perspectives on Parliamentary Systems: A Review Article." Legislative Studies Quarterly 19 (3): 429-441. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/440141
  280. Mill, John Stuart. 1862. "Of a Second Chamber." In: John Stuart Mill (Hg.) Considerations on representative government. New York, NY: Harper & Brothers: 249-260. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1037/12186-013
  281. Mondak, Jeffery J./Shannon I. Smithey. 1997. "The dynamics of Public Support for the Supreme Court." Journal of Politics 59 (4): 1114-1142. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2998595
  282. Mulgan, Richard. 1996. "The Australian Senate as a 'House of Review'." Australian Journal of Political Science 31 (2): 191-204. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/10361149651184
  283. Müller, Wolfgang C./Torbjörn Bergman/Kaare Strøm. 2003. "Parliamentary Democracy: Promise and Problems." In: Wolfgang C. Müller/Torbjörn Bergman/Kaare Strøm (Hg.) Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/019829784X.003.0001
  284. Munck, Gerardo L. 2014. "What is democracy? A reconceptualization of the quality of democracy." Democratization Online first, 27 June: 1-26. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2014.918104
  285. Munck, Gerardo L./Jay Verkuilen. 2002. "Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy: Evaluating Alternative Indices." Comparative Political Studies 35 (1): 5-34. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/001041400203500101
  286. Munkh-Erdene, Lhamsuren. 2010. "The Transformation of Mongolia's Political System: From Semi-parliamentary to Parliamentary?" Asian Survey 50 (2): 311-334. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1525/as.2010.50.2.311
  287. Nannestad, Peter. 2009. "Das politische System Dänemarks." In: Wolfgang Ismayr (Hg.) Die politischen Systeme Westeuropas. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften: 65-106. Open Google Scholar
  288. Neidhart, Leonhard. 1970. Plebiszit und pluralitäre Demokratie. Eine Analyse der Funktion des schweizerischen Gesetzesreferendums. Bern: Francke. Open Google Scholar
  289. Neto, Octavio A. 2006. "Portugal: Changing Patterns of Delegation and Accountability under the President’s Watchful Eyes." In: Kaare Strøm/Wolfgang C. Müller/Torbjörn Bergman (Hg.) Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press: 552 -572. Open Google Scholar
  290. Neukirch, Claus. 2010. "Moldova." In: Dieter Nohlen/Philip Stöver (Hg.) Elections in Europe. A Data Handbook. Baden-Baden: Nomos: 1313-1348. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845223414-1313
  291. Nikolenyi, Csaba. 2011. "When Electoral Reform Fails: The Stability of Proportional Representation in Post-Communist Democracies." West European Politics 34 (3): 607-625. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2011.555986
  292. Nohlen, Dieter. 1969. "Irland." In: Dolf Sternberger und Bernhard Vogel (Hg.) Die Wahl der Parlamente und anderer Staatsorgane: ein Handbuch. Bd. 1,1. Europa. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co: 651-694. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/9783110897449.651
  293. Nohlen, Dieter (Hg.). 2005. Elections in the Americas: a data handbook. Oxford [u. a.]: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  294. Nohlen, Dieter/Florian Grotz (Hg.). 2001. Elections in Asia and the Pacific: a data handbook. Oxford [u. a.]: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/0199249598.001.0001
  295. Nohlen, Dieter/Philip Stöver (Hg.). 2010. Elections in Europe: a data handbook. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845223414-2061
  296. Norris, Pippa. 1995. "Introduction: The Politics of Electoral Reform." International Political Science Review 16 (1): 3-8. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/019251219501600101
  297. Nousiainen, Jaakko. 2000. "Finland. The Consolidation of Parliamentary Governance." In: Wolfgang C. Müller/Kaare Strøm (Hg.) Coalition Governments in Western Europe. Oxford [u. a.]: Oxford University Press: 264-299. Open Google Scholar
  298. Nousiainen, Jaakko. 2001. "From Semi-presidentialism to Parliamentary Government: Political and Constitutional Developments in Finland." Scandinavian Political Studies 24 (2): 95-109. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.00048
  299. Nousiainen, Jaakko. 2007. The Finnish System of Government: From a Mixed Constitution to Parliamentarism. Helsinki: Finnish Ministry of Justice. http://oikeusministerio.fi/material/attachments/om/toiminta/laitjalainvalmistelunkehittaminen/6HC1ymikp/Nousiainen_english.pdf, Zugriff am 15.06.2014. Open Google Scholar
  300. Ojanen, Tuomas. 2013. "Constitutional amendment in Finland." In: Xenophon Contiades (Hg.) Engineering constitutional change: a comparative perspective on Europe, Canada, and the USA. London [u. a.]: Routledge: 93-113. Open Google Scholar
  301. Olt, Reinhard. 2011. "Ungarns neue Verfassung. Ein Glaubensbekenntnis für die Ungarn." Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung 19.04.2011. http://www.faz.net/-gq5-yu1m, Zugriff am 13.06.2014. Open Google Scholar
  302. Paine, Jack. 2015. "Set-Theoretic Comparative Methods: Less Distinctive Than Claimed." Comparative Political Studies first published on January 18, 2015: 1-39. Open Google Scholar
  303. Pajala, Antti. 2010. "Plenary Votes and Voting Cohesion in Eduskunta: A Descriptive Analysis of the 1991-2006 Parliamentary Years." Acta Politica Aboensia B2. Open Google Scholar
  304. Paloheimo, Heikki. 2001. "Divided Government in Finland: From a Semi-Presidential to a Parliamentary Democracy." In: Robert Elgie (Hg.) Divided Government in Comparative Perspective. Oxford [u. a.]: Oxford University Press: 86-105. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/0198295650.003.0005
  305. Paloheimo, Heikki. 2003. "The Rising Power of the Prime Minister in Finland." Scandinavian Political Studies 26 (3): 219-243. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.00086
  306. Paloheimo, Heikki. 2007. "Finland: Let the Force Be with the Leader - But Who is the Leader?" In: Thomas Poguntke/Paul Webb (Hg.) The Presidentialization of Politics. A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 246-268. Open Google Scholar
  307. Pantelis, Antonis/Stephanos Koutsoubinas/George Gerapetritis. 2010. "Greece." In: Dieter Nohlen/Philip Stöver (Hg.) Elections in Europe. A Data Handbook. Baden-Baden: Nomos: 807-872. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845223414-807
  308. Papadopoulos, Yannis/Philippe Warin. 2007. "Are innovative, participatory and deliberative procedures in policy making democratic and effective?" European Journal of Political Research 46 (4): 445-472. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2007.00696.x
  309. Parliamentary Education Office. o. J. Constitutional Solutions: Double Dissolutions, Joint Sittings and Reserve Powers. www.peo.gov.au. http://australianpolitics.com/downloads/peo/double-dissolutions-joint-sittings-and-reserve-powers_peo.pdf, Zugriff am 28.12.2014. Open Google Scholar
  310. Patterson, Samuel C./Anthony Mughan. 1999. "Senates and the theory of bicameralism." In: Samuel C. Patterson/Anthony Mughan (Hg.) Senates: Bicameralism in the contemporary world. Columbus: Ohio State University Press: 1-31. Open Google Scholar
  311. Pesonen, Pertti/Olavi Riihinen. 2002. Dynamic Finland. The Political System and the Welfare State. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.21435/sfh.3
  312. Pierson, Paul. 2004. Politics in time. History, institutions and social analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  313. Pilet, Jean-Benoit. 2008. "The Future is Imagination, the Present is Reality: Why do Big Ruling Parties Oppose Majority Systems? A Belgian Case Study." Representation 44 (1): 41-50. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/00344890701869108
  314. Pilet, Jean-Benoit/Damien Bol. 2011. "Party Preferences and Electoral Reform: How Time in Government Affects the Likelihood of Supporting Electoral Change." West European Politics 34 (3): 568-586. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2011.555984
  315. Piller, Tobias. 2014. "Der Hindernislauf des Matteo Renzi." Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. 20.08.2014: 6. Open Google Scholar
  316. Powell, G. Bingham. 2000. Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven: Yale University Press. Open Google Scholar
  317. Protsyk, Oleh. 2005. "Politics of Intraexecutive Conflict in Semipresidential Regimes in Eastern Europe." East European Politics and Societies 19: 135-160. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0888325404270672
  318. Przeworski, Adam. 2004. "Institutions Matter?" Government and Opposition 39 (2): 527-540. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00134.x
  319. Qvortrup, Mads. 2000. "Checks and balances in a unicameral parliament: The case of the Danish minority referendum." The Journal of Legislative Studies 6 (3): 15-28. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/13572330008420629
  320. Qvortrup, Mads. 2005. A Comparative Study of Referendums. Government of the People. 2. Auflage. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Open Google Scholar
  321. Ragin, Charles C. 1987. The Comparative Method. Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley [u. a.]: University of California Press. Open Google Scholar
  322. Ragin, Charles C. 2000. Fuzzy-set social science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  323. Ragin, Charles C. 2006. "Set Relations in Social Research: Evaluating Their Consistency and Coverage." Political Analysis 14 (3): 291-310. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpj019
  324. Ragin, Charles C. 2007. "Vorwort." In: Carsten Q. Schneider/Claudius Wagemann (Hg.) Qualitative Comparative Analysis und Fuzzy Sets. Ein Lehrbuch für Anwender und jene, die es werden wollen. Opladen, Farmington Hills: Verlag Barbara Budrich: 13-18. Open Google Scholar
  325. Ragin, Charles C. 2008. Redesigning Social Inquiry. Fuzzy Sets and Beyond Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226702797.001.0001
  326. Rahat, Gideon. 2004. "The Study of the Politics of Electoral Reform in the 1990s: Theoretical and Methodological Lessons." Comparative Politics 36 (4): 461-479. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/4150171
  327. Rahat, Gideon/Reuven Y. Hazan. 2011. "The Barriers to Electoral System Reform: A Synthesis of Alternative Approaches." West European Politics 34 (3): 478-494. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2011.555976
  328. Ramseyer, J. Mark. 1994. "The Puzzling (In)Dependence of Courts: A Comparative Approach." The Journal of Legal Studies 23 (2): 721-747. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/467943
  329. Rasch, Bjørn E. 2008. "Foundations of Constitutional Stability: Veto Points, Qualified Majorities, and Agenda-Setting Rules in Amendment Procedures." ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops. Rennes, France. 11.-16. April. Open Google Scholar
  330. Raunio, Tapio. 2011a. "Finland. Moving in the Opposite Direction." In: Torbjörn Bergman/Kaare Strøm (Hg.) The Madisonian Turn. Political Parties and Parliamentary Democracy in Nordic Europe. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press: 112-157. Open Google Scholar
  331. Raunio, Tapio. 2011c. "Semi-presidentialism and European integration: lessons from Finland for constitutional design." Journal of European Public Policy 19 (4): 567-584. Open Google Scholar
  332. Raunio, Tapio/Matti Wiberg. 2003. "Finland: Polarized Pluralism in the Shadow of a Strong President " In: Kaare Strøm/Wolfgang C. Müller/Torbjörn Bergman (Hg.) Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 301-325. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/019829784X.003.0008
  333. Raunio, Tapio/Matti Wiberg. 2008. "The Eduskunta and the Parliamentarisation of Finnish Politics: Formally Stronger, Politically Still Weak?" West European Politics 31 (3): 581 - 599. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/01402380801939842
  334. Reed, Steven R. 2002. "Evaluating Political Reform in Japan: A Midterm Report." Japanese Journal of Political Science 3 (2): 243-263. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S1468109902002050
  335. Reed, Steven R. 2004. "The Two-Party System Meets a House of Councillors Election." Japanese Journal of Political Science 5 (2): 323-325. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S1468109904001549
  336. Reed, Steven R. 2005. "Japan: Haltingly Towards a Two-Party System." In: Michael Gallagher/Paul Mitchell (Hg.) The Politics of Electoral Systems. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press: 277-293. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/0199257566.003.0013
  337. Verfassung Finnlands (Regierungsform). Aufgehoben am 1.03.2000. Helsinki. http://www.verfassungen.eu/fin/finnland19-index.htm, Zugriff am 22.06.2015. Open Google Scholar
  338. Reichstagsordnung Finnische Republik vom 13. Januar 1928. Aufgehoben am 01.03.2000. Helsinki. http://www.verfassungen.eu/fin/reichstagsordung28-index.htm, Zugriff am 22.06.2015. Open Google Scholar
  339. Reiss, Julian. 2015. "A Pragmatist Theory of Evidence." Philosophy of Science 82: 341-362. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/681643
  340. Renwick, Alan. 2010. The Politics of Electoral Reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  341. Research Comission on the Constitution. 2005. "Final Report of the Research Comission on the Constitution. The House of Representatives." Tokyo. http://www.shugiin.go.jp/internet/itdb_kenpou.nsf/html/kenpou/chosa/en/report.htm, Zugriff am 26.01.2015. Open Google Scholar
  342. Riedel, Sabine. 2010. "Das politische System Bulgariens." In: Wolfgang Ismayr (Hg.) Die politischen Systeme Osteuropas. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften: 677-728. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91997-3_14
  343. Rieger, Elmar. 1995. "Die Europäische Gemeinschaft aus institutionentheoretischer Perspektive." In: Birgitta Nedelmann (Hg.) Politische Institutionen im Wandel. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie. Sonderheft, 35. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag: 349-367. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-97068-8_15
  344. Rihoux, Benoît. 2009. "Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and related techniques." In: Susanne Pickel/Gert Pickel/Hans-Joachim Lauth/Detlef Jahn (Hg.) Methoden der vergleichenden Politik- und Sozialwissenschaft. Neue Entwicklungen und Anwendungen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften: 365-385. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91826-6_18
  345. Riker, William H. 1982. "The Two-Party System and Duverger's Law: An Essay on the History of Political Science." The American Political Science Review 76 (4): 753-766. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0003055400189580
  346. Riker, William H. 1984. "Electoral Systems and Constitutional Constraints." In: Arend Lijphart/Bernard Grofman (Hg.) Choosing an Electoral System: Issues and Alternatives. Westport, CT: Praeger: 103-110. Open Google Scholar
  347. Riker, William H. 1992. "The Justification of Bicameralism." International Political Science Review 13 (1): 101-116. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/019251219201300107
  348. Rinza, Marianne. 2004. "Taiwan (Republic of China)." In: Dieter Nohlen/Florian Grotz/Christof Hartmann (Hg.) Elections in Asia and the Pacific. A Data Handbook. Vol. II South East Asia, East Asia, and the South Pacific. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press: 525-570. Open Google Scholar
  349. Risse, Horst. 2007. "Zur Entwicklung der Zustimmungsbedürftigkeit von Bundesgesetzen nach der Föderalismusreform 2006." Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 38 (4): 707-711. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0340-1758-2007-4-707
  350. Rohlfing, Ingo. 2012. Case Studies and Causal Inference. An Integrative Framework. Basingstoke [u. a.]: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1057/9781137271327_5
  351. Rohlfing, Ingo. 2013. "Varieties of process tracing and ways to answer why-questions." European Political Science 12 (1): 31-39. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1057/eps.2012.7
  352. Rokkan, Stein. 1970. Citizens, Elections, Parties: Approaches to the Comparative Study of the Processes of Development. New York: McKay. Open Google Scholar
  353. Rosenbluth, Frances M./Michael F. Thies. 2010. Japan transformed: Political change and economic restructuring. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  354. Rosenzweig, Beate. 2010. "Das japanische Oberhaus - Die "Kammer der Berater"." In: Gisela Riescher/Sabine Ruß/Christoph M. Haas (Hg.) Zweite Kammern. 2. Auflage. München: Oldenbourg: 291-310. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1524/9783486710106.291
  355. Rothermund, Dietmar. 1995. "Parlamentarische Demokratie und Föderalismus." In: Dietmar Rothermund (Hg.) Indien - Kultur, Geschichte, Politik, Wirtschaft, Umwelt. Ein Handbuch. München: Beck: 389-408. Open Google Scholar
  356. Ruiz-Rufino, Rubén. 2007. "Aggregated threshold functions or how to measure the performance of an electoral system." Electoral Studies 26 (2007): 492-502. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2006.10.015
  357. Ruiz-Rufino, Rubén. 2011. "Characterising Electoral Systems: An Empirical Application of Aggregated Threshold Functions." West European Politics 34 (2): 256-281. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2011.546570
  358. Rush, Michael. 2001. The Role of the Member of Parliament Since 1868: From Gentlemen to Players. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198275770.003.0008
  359. Russell, Meg. 2000. Reforming the House of Lords: Lessons from overseas. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198298311.003.0002
  360. Russell, Meg. 2001a. "The Territorial Role of Second Chambers." Journal of Legislative Studies 7 (1): 105 - 118. Open Google Scholar
  361. Russell, Meg. 2001b. "Upper House Reform in the United Kingdom and Australia." Australian Journal of Political Science 36 (1): 27-44. Open Google Scholar
  362. Russell, Meg. 2009. "House of Lords Reform: Are We Nearly There Yet?" The Political Quarterly 80 (1): 119-125. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.2009.01968.x
  363. Russell, Meg. 2010. "A Stronger Second Chamber? Assessing the Impact of House of Lords Reform in 1999 and the Lessons for Bicameralism." Political Studies 58 (5): 866-885. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2009.00810.x
  364. Russell, Meg. 2013a. The contemporary House of Lords: Westminster bicameralism revived. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  365. Russell, Meg. 2013b. "Rethinking Bicameral Strength: A Three-Dimensional Approach." The Journal of Legislative Studies 19 (3): 370-391. Open Google Scholar
  366. Russell, Meg/Meghan Benton. 2010. "(Re)assessing Parliamentary Policy Impact: The Case of the Australian Senate." Australian Journal of Political Science 45 (2): 159-174. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/10361141003736117
  367. Russell, Meg/Maria Sciara. 2006. "Legitimacy and Bicameral Strength: A Case Study of the House of Lords." PSA Parliaments and Legislatures Specialist Group Conference. University of Sheffield. 16.06.2006. http://www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit/research/parliament/house-of-lords/tabs/legitimacy_bicameral_strength.pdf. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1057/9780230598157_9
  368. Saito, Jun. 2013. "The Ghost of the Second Republic? The Structural Weakness of Parliamentary Bicameralism in Japan." In: Bong Youngshik (Hg.) Japan in crisis: what will it take for Japan to rise again? New York: Palgrave Macmillan: 135-158. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1057/9781137350718.0011
  369. Sakaki, Alexandra/Kenichi Shimizu. 2012. "Japan nach den Wahlen. Kein Ende des Reformstaus." SWP-Aktuell 76 (Dezember): 1-4. Open Google Scholar
  370. Sakamoto, Takayuki. 1999. "Explaining Electoral Reform: Japan versus Italy and New Zealand." Party Politics 5 (4): 419-438. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/1354068899005004001
  371. Samuels, David. 2007. "Separation of Powers." In: Carles Boix/Susan C. Stokes (Hg.) The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 703-726. Open Google Scholar
  372. Samuels, David/Matthew S. Shugart. 2003. "Presidentialism, Elections and Representation." Journal of Theoretical Politics 15 (1): 33-60. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0951692803151002
  373. Samuels, David/Richard Snyder. 2001. "The Value of a Vote: Malapportionment in Comparative Perspective." British Journal of Political Science 31 (04): 651-671. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0007123401000254
  374. Saraviita, Ilkka. 1971. Lakiehdotuksen Lepäämään Jättäminen [Die Aussetzung eines Gesetzesentwurfs]. Helsinki. Open Google Scholar
  375. Saraviita, Ilkka. 1978. "The Planned Constitutional Reform in Finland." Scandinavian Studies in Law 22: 135-147. Open Google Scholar
  376. Saraviita, Ilkka. 2012. Constitutional Law in Finland. Alphen aan den Rijn [u. a.]: Kluwer Law International [u. a.]. Open Google Scholar
  377. Sartori, Giovanni. 1986. "The Influence of Electoral Systems: Faulty Laws or Faulty Method?" In: Bernard Grofman/Arend Lijphart (Hg.) Electoral Laws and Their Political Consequences. New York: Agathon Press: 43-68. Open Google Scholar
  378. Sartori, Giovanni. 1997. Comparative Constitutional Engineering. An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives and Outcomes. New York: New York University Press. Open Google Scholar
  379. Saunders, Cheryl. 1994. "The Australian Experience with Constitutional Review." The Australian Quarterly 66 (3): 49-66. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/20635781
  380. Schäfer, Armin/Harald Schoen. 2013. "Mehr Demokratie, aber nur für wenige?" Leviathan 41 (1): 94-120. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0340-0425-2013-1-94
  381. Scharpf, Fritz W. 1999. Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198295457.003.0001
  382. Scharpf, Fritz W. 2006. "Föderalismusreform: Weshalb wurde so wenig erreicht?" Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte 50: 6-9. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90029-2_6
  383. Schmidt, Manfred G. 1996. "When Parties Matter. A Review of the Possibilities and Limits of Partisan Influence on Public Policy." European Journal of Political Research 30 (2): 155-183. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1996.tb00673.x
  384. Schmidt, Manfred G. 1997. "Parteien und Staatstätigkeit." In: Oscar W. Gabriel/Oskar Niedermayer/Richard Stöss (Hg.) Parteiendemokratie in Deutschland. Opladen: 537-558. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-95609-5_25
  385. Schmidt, Vivien A. 2013. "Democracy and Legitimacy in the European Union Revisited: Input, Output and ‘Throughput’." Political Studies 61 (1): 2-22. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00962.x
  386. Schneider, Carsten Q./Ingo Rohlfing. 2013. "Combining QCA and Process Tracing in Set-Theoretic Multi-Method Research." Sociological Methods & Research 42 (4): 559-597. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0049124113481341
  387. Schneider, Carsten Q./Ingo Rohlfing. 2014. "Case Studies Nested in Fuzzy-Set QCA on Sufficiency: Formalizing Case Selection and Causal Inference." Sociological Methods & Research Online first, May 26: 1-43. Open Google Scholar
  388. Schneider, Carsten Q./Claudius Wagemann. 2006. "Reducing complexity in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): Remote and proximate factors and the consolidation of democracy." European Journal of Political Research 45 (5): 751-786. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00635.x
  389. Schneider, Carsten Q./Claudius Wagemann. 2012. Set Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences. A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139004244.016
  390. Schoettli, Urs. 2008. "Japans Politiker im Stresstest. Heftige Grabenkämpfe zwischen Regierung und Opposition." Neue Zürcher Zeitung 23.01.2008. http://www.nzz.ch/aktuell/startseite/japans-politiker-im-stresstest-1.656089, Zugriff am 02.02.2015. Open Google Scholar
  391. Schwartzberg, Melissa. 2009. "Supermajority Rules, Arbitrariness, and Democratic Legitimacy." American Political Science Association 2009 Annual Meeting. Toronto, ON. 3.-6.09.2009. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1449600. Open Google Scholar
  392. Schwartzberg, Melissa. 2010. "The Arbitrariness of Supermajority Rules." Social Science Information 49 (1): 61-82. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0539018409354474
  393. Schwartzberg, Melissa. 2014. Counting the Many: The Origins and Limits of Supermajority Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  394. Seawright, Jason. 2005. "Qualitative Comparative Analysis vis-à-vis Regression." Studies in Comparative International Development 40 (1): 3-26. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/BF02686284
  395. Sénat. o. J. Das Wahlsystem. http://www.senat.fr/lng/de/die_senatoren/das_wahlsystem.html, Zugriff am 28.07.2015. Open Google Scholar
  396. Setälä, Maija. 1999. "Referendums in western Europe - a wave of direct democracy?" Scandinavian Political Studies 22 (4): 327-340. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1057/9780333982822_3
  397. Setälä, Maija. 2006. "On the problems of responsibility and accountability in referendums." European Journal of Political Research 45 (4): 699-721. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00630.x
  398. Shapiro, Martin. 1981. Courts. A Comparative Political Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  399. Sharman, Campbell. 1977. "The Australian Senate as a States' House." In: Dean Jaensch (Hg.) The Politics of 'New Federalism'. Adelaide: APSA: 64-75. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/00323267708401617
  400. Sharman, Campbell. 1988. "Constitutional Politics in Australia (1900)." In: Vernon Bogdanor (Hg.) Constitutions in Democratic Politics. Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing: 105-127. Open Google Scholar
  401. Sharman, Campbell. 1990. "Parliamentary Federations and Limited Government: Constitutional Design and Redesign in Australia and Canada." Journal of Theoretical Politics 2 (2): 205-230. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0951692890002002004
  402. Sharman, Campbell. 1997. "Defining Executive Power: Constitutional Reform for Grown-Ups." Australian Journal of Public Administration 56 (2): 107-114. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.1997.tb01550.x
  403. Sharman, Campbell. 1999. "The Representation of Small Parties and Independents in the Senate." Australian Journal of Political Science 34 (3): 353-361. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/10361149950272
  404. Shell, Donald. 2000. "Labour and the House of Lords: a case study in constitutional reform." Parliamentary Affairs 53 (2): 290-310. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/pa/53.2.290
  405. Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1988. "Institutional Equilibrium and Equilibrium Institutions." In: Herbert Weisberg (Hg.) Political Science: The Science of Politics. New York: Agathon Press: 51-81. Open Google Scholar
  406. Shepsle, Kenneth A./Mark S. Bonchek. 1997. Analyzing politics: rationality, behavior, and institutions. New York, NY [u. a.]: Norton. Open Google Scholar
  407. Shugart, Matthew S. 2001. ""Extreme" Electoral Systems and the Appeal of the Mixed-Member Alternative." In: Matthew S. Shugart/Martin P. Wattenberg (Hg.) Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds? Oxford: Oxford University Press: 25-51. Open Google Scholar
  408. Shugart, Matthew S. 2008. "Inherent and Contingent Factors in Reform Initiation in Plurality Systems." In: André Blais (Hg.) To Keep or to Change First Past the Post? Oxford: Oxford University Press: 7-60. Open Google Scholar
  409. Shugart, Matthew S./John M. Carey. 1992. Presidents and Assemblies. Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173988
  410. Shugart, Matthew S./Martin P. Wattenberg. 2001. "Conclusion: Are Mixed-Member Electoral Systems the Best of Both Worlds?" In: Matthew S. Shugart/Martin P. Wattenberg (Hg.) Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds? Oxford: Oxford University Press: 571-596. Open Google Scholar
  411. Shvetsova, Olga. 2003. "Endogenous Selection of Institutions and Their Exogenous Effects." Constitutional Political Economy 14 (3): 191-212. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1023/A:1024702528927
  412. Siaroff, Alan. 2003. "Comparative presidencies: The inadequacy of the presidential, semi-presidential and parliamentary distinction." European Journal of Political Research 42 (3): 287-312. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00084
  413. Sieberer, Ulrich. 2006. "Party unity in parliamentary democracies: A comparative analysis." The Journal of Legislative Studies 12 (2): 150-178. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/13572330600739413
  414. Sieberer, Ulrich/Peter Meißner/Julia F. Keh/Wolfgang C. Müller. 2014. "Konzeptionalisierung und Messung formalen Institutionenwandels - Das Beispiel parlamentarischer Regeln." Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft 8 (3): 237-262. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s12286-014-0216-7
  415. Sieberer, Ulrich/Wolfgang C. Müller. 2015. "Explaining Reforms of Parliamentary Minority Rights: A Theoretical Framework with Case Study Application." West European Politics 38 (5): 997-1019. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2015.1045321
  416. Sieberer, Ulrich/Wolfgang C. Müller/Maiko I. Heller. 2011. "Reforming the Rules of the Parliamentary Game: Measuring and Explainig Changes in Parliamentary Rules in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland, 1945-2010." West European Politics 34 (5): 948-975. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2011.591079
  417. Sieg, Linda/Tetsushi Kajimoto. 2014. "Abe coalition secures big Japan election win with record low turnout." Reuters. 15.12.2014. http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/12/15/us-japan-election-idUSKBN0JR0N920141215, Zugriff am 12.01.2015. Open Google Scholar
  418. Sinnott, Richard. 1995. Irish Voters Decide: Voting Behaviour in Elections and Referendums Since 1918. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Open Google Scholar
  419. Skaaning, Svend-Erik. 2011. "Assessing the Robustness of Crisp-set and Fuzzy-set QCA Results." Sociological Methods & Research 40 (2): 391-408. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0049124111404818
  420. Spyropoulus, Philippos C./Theodore P. Fortsakis. 2013. Constitutional Law in Greece. Alphen aan den Rijn [u. a.]: Kluwer Law International. Open Google Scholar
  421. Steffek, Jens. 2003. "The Legitimation of International Governance: A Discourse Approach." European Journal of International Relations 9 (2): 249-275. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/1354066103009002004
  422. Stockwin, James A. A. 2008. Governing Japan. Divided Politics in a Resurgent Economy. 4. Auflage. Malden, MA [u. a.]: Blackwell Publishing. Open Google Scholar
  423. Stoiber, Michael. 2009. "Griechenland im Vergleich politischer Systeme. Eine Bestandsaufnahme mit Hilfe der Vetospielertheorie." In: Björn Egner/Georgios Terizakis (Hg.) Das politische System Griechenlands: Strukturen, Akteure, Politikfelder. Baden-Baden: Nomos: 19-38. Open Google Scholar
  424. Stone, Alec. 1992a. The birth of judicial politics in France. The constitutional council in comparative perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  425. Stone, Alec. 1992b. "Where judicial politics are legislative politics: The French constitutional council." West European Politics 15 (2): 29-49. Open Google Scholar
  426. Stone, Bruce. 1998. "Small Parties and the Senate Revisited: The Consequences of the Enlargement of the Senate 1984." Australian Journal of Political Science 33 (2): 211-218. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/10361149850615
  427. Stone Sweet, Alec. 2000. Governing with Judges. Constitutional Politics in Europe. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/0198297718.003.0007
  428. Storing, James A. 1963. "Unique Features of the Norwegian Storting." The Western Political Quarterly 16 (1): 161-166. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/445965
  429. Strøm, Kaare/Hanne M. Narud. 2006. "Norway: Virtual Parliamentarism." In: Kaare Strøm/Wolfgang C. Müller/Torbjörn Bergman (Hg.) Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press: 523-551. Open Google Scholar
  430. Suksi, Markku. 1993. Bringing in the People. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhof. Open Google Scholar
  431. Sundberg, Jan. 1992. "Finland." European Journal of Political Research 22 (4): 391-399. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1992.tb00324.x
  432. Sundberg, Jan. 1993. "Finland." European Journal of Political Research 24 (4): 419-423. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1993.tb00392.x
  433. Sundberg, Jan. 1995. "Finland." European Journal of Political Research 28 (3-4): 323-331. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1995.tb00497.x
  434. Sundberg, Jan. 2002. "The Electoral System of Finland: Old and Working Well." In: Bernard Grofman/Arend Lijphart (Hg.) The Evolution of Electoral and Party Systems in the Nordic Countries. New York: Agathon Press: 67-99. Open Google Scholar
  435. Swenden, Wilfried. 2004. Federalism and Second Chambers. Regional Representation in Parliamentary Federations: The Australian Senate and German Bundesrat Compared. Brussels: P.I.E. - Peter Lang. Open Google Scholar
  436. Swenden, Wilfried/Maarten T. Jans. 2006. "‘Will it stay or will it go?’ Federalism and the sustainability of Belgium." West European Politics 29 (5): 877-894. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/01402380600968745
  437. Taagapera, Rein. 2002. "Designing Electoral Rules and Waiting for an Electoral System to Evolve." In: Andrew Reynolds (Hg.) The Architecture of Democracy: Institutional Design, Conflict Management, and Democracy in the Late Twentieth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 248-264. Open Google Scholar
  438. Taagepera, Rein. 1998. "Effective Magnitude and Effective Threshold." Electoral Studies 17 (4): 393-404. Open Google Scholar
  439. Taagepera, Rein. 2002. "Nationwide threshold of representation." Electoral Studies 21 (3): 383-401. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3794(00)00045-7
  440. Takayasu, Kensuke. 2015. "Is The Prime Minister Too Weak or Too Strong? An Institutional Analysis " Political Studies Association Annual Conference. Sheffield. 30.03.2015. Open Google Scholar
  441. Takenaka, Harukata. 2010. "Rethinking the House of Councillors." Discuss Japan. Japan Foreign Policy Forum 02.06.2010. http://www.japanpolicyforum.jp/archives/politics/pt20100602111418.html, Zugriff am 18.12.2013. Open Google Scholar
  442. Takenaka, Harukata. 2012. "Why Japanese Politics Is at a Standstill." nippon.com 02.07.2012. http://www.nippon.com/en/currents/d00038/, Zugriff am 16.01.2015. Open Google Scholar
  443. Takenaka, Harukata. 2013. "Japan in Pursuit of Westminster Democracy." nippon.com 25.09.2013. http://www.nippon.com/en/in-depth/a02301/, Zugriff am 10.01.2015. Open Google Scholar
  444. Taniguchi, Masaki/Shirō Sakaiya/Chihiro Ōkawa/Hideaki Uenohara. 2010. "Upper House Election 2010: What Does it Mean For the DPJ?" Discuss Japan. Japan Foreign Policy Forum 05.10.2010. http://www.japanpolicyforum.jp/en/archives/politics/pt20101005174435.html, Zugriff am 12.03.2015. Open Google Scholar
  445. Tauber, Joachim. 2010. "Das politische System Litauens." In: Wolfgang Ismayr (Hg.) Die politischen Systeme Osteuropas. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften: 171-208. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91997-3_4
  446. Tavits, Margit. 2009a. "Direct Presidential Elections and Turnout in Parliamentary Contests." Political Research Quarterly 62 (1): 42-54. Open Google Scholar
  447. Tavits, Margit. 2009b. Presidents with Prime Ministers. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  448. The Economist. 2011a. "Electoral reform in Japan: Breaking the backs of farmers." 27.01.2011. http://www.economist.com/node/18014097/, Zugriff am 16.01.2015. Open Google Scholar
  449. The Economist. 2011b. "Politics has continued to obstruct fiscal policy." Intelligence Unit. 07.06.2011. http://country.eiu.com/article.aspx?articleid=1918161176&Country=Japan&topic=Economy&subtopic=Current+policy&subsubtopic=Economic+policy:+Politics+has+continued+to+obstruct+fiscal+policy, Zugriff am 16.01.2015. Open Google Scholar
  450. The Economist. 2012. "Japanese politics: Popular frustration with the mainstream boosts a political maverick." 15.09.2012. http://www.economist.com/node/21562983, Zugriff am 16.01.2015. Open Google Scholar
  451. The Economist. 2013a. "Electoral reform in Japan: Where it counts." 06.07.2013. http://www.economist.com/news/asia/21580488-long-standing-unfairness-electoral-system-undermines-prime-ministers-promised-economic, Zugriff am 16.01.2015. Open Google Scholar
  452. The Economist. 2013b. "Japan's upper-house election. Back on top." 22.07.2013. http://www.economist.com/node/21582151/print, Zugriff am 11.12.2013. Open Google Scholar
  453. The Economist. 2013c. "Japan's upper-house election: Redemption. Shinzo Abe's victory should be good for reform." 27.07.2013. www.economist.com/node/21582289/print, Zugriff am 11.12.2013. Open Google Scholar
  454. The Economist. 2014a. "Italian reform. Renzi`s tricky bargain." 25.01.2014. http://www.economist.com/node/21595054/print, Zugriff am 10.03.2015. Open Google Scholar
  455. The Economist. 2014b. "Japanese politics: Flaming out. The decline of Toru Hashimoto." 22.03.2014. http://www.economist.com/news/asia/21599401-decline-toru-hashimoto-flaming-out, Zugriff am 16.01.2015. Open Google Scholar
  456. The Economist. 2016. "Italy's referendum. A great big reform package." 08.10.2016. http://www.economist.com/node/21708253/print, Zugriff am 08.10.2016. Open Google Scholar
  457. The House of Representatives. 2014. Commission on the Constitution. The House of Representatives. Tokyo, Japan. http://www.shugiin.go.jp/internet/itdb_kenpou.nsf/html/kenpou/en/index_e.htm, Zugriff am 26.01.2015. Open Google Scholar
  458. The Japan Times. 2004. "Upper House in need of reform." 19.02.2004. http://www.japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2004/02/19/editorials/upper-house-in-need-of-reform/#.VMuIGy70-Cg, Zugriff am 10.12.2013. Open Google Scholar
  459. The Manchester Guardian. 1928. "Altering Irish Constitution: Referendum to Go. Cosgrave's Duel wit De Valera." 9.07.1928: 10. Open Google Scholar
  460. The Navigator to Direct Democracy. The Navigator to Direct Democracy. http://www.direct-democracy-navigator.org/, Zugriff am 10.03 2015. Open Google Scholar
  461. Thiem, Alrik/Michael Baumgartner/Damien Bol. 2015. "Still lost in Translation! A Correction of Three Misunderstandings Between Configurational Comparativists and Regressional Analysts." Comparative Political Studies Online first, March 16: 1-33. Open Google Scholar
  462. Thiem, Alrik/Adrian Duşa. 2013. "QCA: A Package for Qualitative Comparative Analysis." The R Journal 5 (1): 87-97. Open Google Scholar
  463. Thies, Michael F./Yuki Yanai. 2013. "Governance with a Twist: How Bicameralism Affects Japanese Lawmaking." In: Robert Pekkanen/Steven R. Reed/Ethan Scheiner (Hg.) Japan Decides 2012. The Japanese General Election. New York: Palgrave Macmillan: 225-244. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1057/9781137346124_19
  464. Thode, Anna Ch. 2015. "Senatsreform in Italien. Symbolpolitik, Machtdemonstration oder Umbruch?" Welttrends (100): 12-17. Open Google Scholar
  465. Tomoaki, Ikeya. 2013. "Why Do Japan and Italy Change Prime Ministers so Often?" nippon.com 06.09.2013. http://www.nippon.com/en/in-depth/a02302/, Zugriff am 16.01.2015. Open Google Scholar
  466. Trantas, Georgios/Paraskevi Zagoriti/Torbjörn Bergman/Wolfgang C. Müller/Kaare Strøm. 2008. "Greece: ‘Rationalizing’ Constitutional Powers in a Post-dictatorial Country." In: Kaare Strøm/Wolfgang C. Müller/Torbjörn Bergman (Hg.) Delegation and accountability in parliamentary democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 376-398. Open Google Scholar
  467. Tsebelis, George. 1990. Nested games: rational choice in comparative politics. Berkeley: University of California Press. Open Google Scholar
  468. Tsebelis, George. 1995. "Decision Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism and Multipartyism." British Journal of Political Science 25 (3): 289-325. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400007225
  469. Tsebelis, George. 2002. Veto players: how political institutions work. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/9781400831456
  470. Tsebelis, George/Jeannette Money. 1997. Bicameralism. Cambridge, UK, New York: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609350
  471. Tyler, Tom R./Kenneth Rasinski. 1991. "Procedural Justice, Institutional Legitimacy, and the Acceptance of Unpopular U.S. Supreme Court Decisions: A Reply to Gibson." Law & Society Review 25 (3): 621-630. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/3053729
  472. Tzermias, Pavlos. 1997. Politik im neuen Hellas. Strukturen, Theorien und Parteien im Wandel. Tübingen: A. Francke Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  473. Uhr, John. 1999a. "Generating Divided Government." In: Samuel C. Patterson/Anthony Mughan (Hg.) Senates: Bicameralism in the Contemporary World. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press: 93-119. Open Google Scholar
  474. Uhr, John. 1999b. "Why We Chose Proportional Represenation." In: Marian Sawer/Sarah Miskin (Hg.) Papers on Parliament 34 - Representation and Institutional Change: 50 Years of Proportional Representation in the Senate. Online publication. Canberra: Research Section of the Procedure Office of the Department of the Senate. http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Senate/Research_and_Education/pops/~/link.aspx?_id=DB8FD989ADD34452AF9F0792790FF7DF&_z=z. Open Google Scholar
  475. Uhr, John. 2002. "Explicating the Australian Senate." The Journal of Legislative Studies 8 (3): 3-26. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/714003923
  476. Uleri, Pier V. 1996. "Introduction." In: Michael Gallagher/Pier V. Uleri (Hg.) The Referendum Experience in Europe. London, New York: Macmillan: 1-19. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24796-7_1
  477. Valtiosäännön tarkistamiskomitea. 1983. Valtiosäännön tarkistamiskomitean mietintö: Betänkande avgivet av Revisionskommittén för statsförfattningen [Bericht des Verfassungsprüfungsausschusses]. Helsinki. Open Google Scholar
  478. van der Kolk, Henk. 2007. "Electoral System Change in the Netherlands: The Road from PR to PR (1917-2006)." Representation 43 (4): 271-287. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/00344890701574914
  479. Vanberg, Georg. 2001. "Legislative-Judicial Relations: A Game-Theoretic Approach to Constitutional Review." American Journal of Political Science 45: 346-361. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2669345
  480. Vanberg, Georg. 2005a. The Politics of Constitutional Review in Germany. Cambridge, UK [u. a.]: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  481. Vanberg, Georg. 2005b. "Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit und Gesetzgebung: Zum politischen Spielraum des Bundesverfassungsgerichtes." In: Steffen Ganghof/Philip Manow (Hg.) Mechanismen der Politik. Strategische Interaktion im deutschen Regierungssystem. Frankfurt am Main, New York: Campus: 183-213. Open Google Scholar
  482. Vatter, Adrian. 2002. "Politische Institutionen und ihre Leistungsfähigkeit. Der Fall des Bikameralismus im internationalen Vergleich." Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 33 (1): 125-133. Open Google Scholar
  483. Vatter, Adrian/Julian Bernauer. 2009. "The Missing Dimension of Democracy: Institutional Patterns in 25 EU Member States Between 1997 and 2006." European Union Politics 10 (3): 335-359. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/1465116509337828
  484. Venizelos, Evangelos. 1999. "The Consensual and Corrobarative Revision of the Hellenic Constitution." Jahrbuch des Öffentlichen Rechts der Gegenwart 47: 99-108. Open Google Scholar
  485. Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (Verf. Australien). Stand Oktober 2010. o. O. http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Senate/Powers_practice_n_procedures/Constitution, Zugriff am 10.09.2015. Open Google Scholar
  486. Verfassung Belgiens vom 7. Februar 1831 (Verf. Belgien). Stand 08.05.2007. o. O. http://www.verfassungen.eu/b/, Zugriff am 19.02.2014. Open Google Scholar
  487. Verfassung der Republik Bulgarien vom 12. Juli 1991 (Verf. Bulgarien). Stand 06.02.2007. o. O. http://www.verfassungen.eu/bg/verf91-i.htm, Zugriff am 07.07.2014. Open Google Scholar
  488. Grundgesetz des Reiches Dänemark vom 5. Juni 1953 (Verf. Dänemark). Stand 2005. o. O. http://www.verfassungen.eu/dk/, Zugriff am 17.05.2015. Open Google Scholar
  489. Verfassung der Französischen Republik (Verf. Frankreich). Stand 23.07.2008. o. O. http://www.verfassungen.eu/f/, Zugriff am 30.06.2014. Open Google Scholar
  490. Verfassung der Republik Indien (Verf. Indien). Stand 21.12.2006. o. O. http://www.verfassungen.net/in/verf49-i.htm, Zugriff am 23.06.2014. Open Google Scholar
  491. Verfassung des Irischen Freistaates (Verf. Irischer Freistaat). Aufgehoben am 1. Juli 1937. o. O. http://www.verfassungen.eu/irl/verf22-i.htm, Zugriff am 10.09.2015. Open Google Scholar
  492. Verfassung Irlands (Verf. Irland). Stand 24.06.2004. o. O. http://www.verfassungen.eu/irl/, Zugriff am 30.06.2014. Open Google Scholar
  493. Verfassung der Republik Island (Verf. Island). Stand 1.07.1999. o. O. http://www.verfassungen.eu/is/index.htm, Zugriff am 30.06.2014. Open Google Scholar
  494. Verfassung der Italienischen Republik (Verf. Italien) Stand 02.10.2007. Rom. http://www.verfassungen.eu/it/, Zugriff am 01.07.2014. Open Google Scholar
  495. The Jamaica (Constitution) Order in Council 1962 (Verf. Jamaika). 09.07.2011. o. O. http://pdba.georgetown.edu/Constitutions/Jamaica/jam62.html, Zugriff am 25.06.2014. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v32n1.39613
  496. Verfassung des Kaiserreiches Japan (Verf. Japan). Stand 22.06.2006, bisher unverändert. o. O. http://www.verfassungen.net/jp/verf47-i.htm, Zugriff am 22.06.2015. Open Google Scholar
  497. Grundgesetz der Republik Lettland (Verf. Lettland). 03.05.2007. o. O. http://www.verfassungen.eu/lv/, Zugriff am 17.06.2014. Open Google Scholar
  498. Verfassung der Republik Litauen (Verf. Litauen). 29.04.2006. o. O. http://www.verfassungen.eu/lt/index.htm, Zugriff am 15.03.2014. Open Google Scholar
  499. Constitution of the Republic of Mauritius (Verf. Mauritius). Stand 2008. o. O. http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text.jsp?file_id=189309, Zugriff am 01.08.2015. Open Google Scholar
  500. Constitution of the Republic of Moldova (Verf. Moldawien). 14.07.2006. o. O. http://www.constcourt.md/public/files/file/Actele%20Curtii/acte_en/MDA_Constitution_EN.pdf, Zugriff am 01.09.2015. Open Google Scholar
  501. Constitution of Mongolia (Verf. Mongolei). Stand 2001. o. O. http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text.jsp?file_id=183021, Zugriff am 14.03.2015. Open Google Scholar
  502. Verfassung des Königreiches der Niederlande (Verf. Niederlande). In der Fassung der Neubekanntmachung vom 17. Februar 1983, mit Änderungen bis 2002. o. O. http://www.verfassungen.eu/nl/, Zugriff am 05.06.2015. Open Google Scholar
  503. Verfassung des Königreichs Norwegen (Verf. Norwegen). Stand 23.07.1995. Eidsvoll. http://www.verfassungen.eu/n/index.htm, Zugriff am 29.10.2013. Open Google Scholar
  504. Verfassung der Polnischen Republik (Verf. Polen). Stand 26.03.2001. o. O. http://www.verfassungen.eu/pl/verf97-i.htm, Zugriff am 26.02.2014. Open Google Scholar
  505. Verfassung der Portugiesischen Republik (Verf. Portugal). 12.12.2001. o. O. http://www.verfassungen.eu/p/verf01-i.htm, Zugriff am 02.07.2014. Open Google Scholar
  506. Verfassung Rumäniens (Verf. Rumänien). Stand 21.11.1991. o. O. http://www.verfassungen.eu/ro/index.htm, Zugriff am 25.06.2014. Open Google Scholar
  507. Verfassung Rumäniens (Verf. Rumänien). Stand 29.10.2003. o. O. http://www.cdep.ro/pls/dic/site.page?den=act2_2&par1=3#t3c1s3, Zugriff am 25.06.2014. Open Google Scholar
  508. Verfassung der Slowakischen Republik (Verf. Slowakei). 01.04.2002. o. O. http://www.verfassungen.eu/sk/index.htm, Zugriff am 14.05.2015. Open Google Scholar
  509. Verfassung der Republik Slowenien (Verf. Slowenien). 24.05.2013. Ljubljana. http://www.verfassungen.eu/sl/verf91-i.htm, Zugriff am 10.07.2014. Open Google Scholar
  510. Verfassung des Königreiches Spanien (Verf. Spanien). Stand 27.08.1992. o. O. http://www.verfassungen.eu/es/verf78-index.htm, Zugriff am 02.07.2014. Open Google Scholar
  511. Constitution of the Republic of China (Verf. Taiwan). Stand 28. Juli 1994. o. O. http://www.servat.unibe.ch/icl/tw00000_.html, Zugriff am 12.06.2015. Open Google Scholar
  512. Verfassungsgesetz des Tschechischen Nationalrates vom 16. Dezember 1992 (Verf. Tschechien). Stand März 2003. o. O. http://www.verfassungen.eu/cz/index.htm, Zugriff am 07.07.2014. Open Google Scholar
  513. Constitution of The Republic of Trinidad and Tobago (Verf. Trinidad und Tobago). 31.12.2014. o. O. http://rgd.legalaffairs.gov.tt/Laws2/Constitution.pdf, Zugriff am 17.02.2015. Open Google Scholar
  514. Verfassung der Republik Türkei (Verf. Türkei). Stand 10.05.2007. o. O. http://www.verfassungen.eu/tr/tuerkei82-index.htm, Zugriff am 23.06.2014. Open Google Scholar
  515. Verfassung der Republik Türkei (Verf. Türkei). 1.11.2014. o. O. http://www.tuerkei-recht.de/downloads/verfassung.pdf, Zugriff am 20.06.2015. Open Google Scholar
  516. Verfassung der Ungarischen Republik vom 20. August 1949 in der Fassung der Bekanntmachung vom 24. August 1990 (Verf. Ungarn). Aufgehoben am 25.04.2011. o. O. http://www.verfassungen.eu/hu/verf49-90-i.htm, Zugriff am 13.06.2014. Open Google Scholar
  517. Verfassung der Volksrepublik Polen (Verf. VR Polen). Größtenteils aufgehoben am 17.10.1992, faktisch vollständig aufgehoben am 02.04.1997. o. O. http://www.verfassungen.eu/pl/verf76-i.htm, Zugriff am 26.02.2014. Open Google Scholar
  518. Verfassungen der Welt. o. J. Verfassungen der Welt. Gegenwärtige und historische nationale und internationale Verfassungstexte. http://www.verfassungen.eu/, Zugriff am 22.06. 2015. Open Google Scholar
  519. Constitution (Amendment No. 10) Act, 1928. (Verfassungsgesetz Ergänzung Nr. 10). 12. Juli 1928. http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/1928/act/8/enacted/en/print, Zugriff am 12.05.2015. Open Google Scholar
  520. Vibert, Frank. 2007. The rise of the unelected: democracy and the new separation of powers. Cambridge [u. a]: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491160
  521. Volcansek, Mary L. 2001. "Constitutional Courts as Veto Players: Divorce and Decrees in Italy." European Journal of Political Research 39 (3): 347-372. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00580
  522. Electoral Code Republic of Moldova (Wahlgesetz Moldawien) 21.11.1997. o. O. http://www.e-democracy.md/en/legislation/electoralcode/, Zugriff am 11.05.2015. Open Google Scholar
  523. The Saeima Election Law (Wahlgesetz Parlament Lettland). 26.02.2009. o. O. http://www.saeima.lv/en/about-saeima/saeimas-velesanas-1/saeimas-velesanu-likums-1, Zugriff am 27.05.2014. Open Google Scholar
  524. Wasmeier, Claudia. 2009. Erfolgskriterien föderaler Transition. Eine vergleichende akteursbasierte Prozessanalyse anhand Spaniens, Belgiens und Russlands. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91612-5_6
  525. Wawro, Gregory J./Eric Schickler. 2006. Filibuster. Obstruction and Lawmaking in the U.S. Senate. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  526. Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and Society. Berkeley: University of California Press. Open Google Scholar
  527. Weiss, Jürgen. 2006. "Die rechtliche und faktische Stellung des Bundesrates." Journal für Rechtspolitik JRP 14 (4): 272f. Open Google Scholar
  528. Weyland, Kurt. 2009. "Institutional Change in Latin America: External Models and their Unintended Consequences." Journal of Politics in Latin America (1): 37-66. Open Google Scholar
  529. Wolf, Klaus D. 1999. "The New Raison d'État as a Problem for Democracy in World Society." European Journal of International Relations 5 (3): 333-363. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/1354066199005003003
  530. Wolf, Klaus D. 2000. Die neue Staatsräson. Zwischenstaatliche Kooperation als Demokratieproblem in der Weltgesellschaft; Plädoyer für eine geordnete Entstaatlichung des Regierens jenseits des Staates. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar
  531. Wrbka, Stefan. 2006. "The Research Commission on the Constitution and the Upper House Issue." Journal of Japanese Law 21 (105-130). Open Google Scholar
  532. Wu, Ming-shan/Chun-ta Lee. 2011. "A Study of Komeito as a Critical Minority Party in Japanese Coalition Regimes." Asian Social Science 7 (9): 9-18. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5539/ass.v7n9p9
  533. Yakushiji, Katsuyuki. 2013. "Japan's Endangered Opposition. Ruling Coalition Scores Upper House Election Landslide." Politics in Perspective 21.08.2013. http://www.tokyofoundation.org/en/articles/2013/japans-endangered-opposition, Zugriff am 12.01.2015. Open Google Scholar
  534. Yōichi, Masuzoe. 2012. "Overcoming Political Dysfunction in Japan." nippon.com 07.06.2012. http://www.nippon.com/en/column/g00034/, Zugriff am 12.02.2015. Open Google Scholar
  535. Young, Liz. 1999. "Minor Parties and the Legislative Process in the Australian Senate: A Study of the 1993 Budget." Australian Journal of Political Science 34 (1): 7-27. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/10361149950434
  536. Zacharakis, Zacharias. 2015. "Alexis Tsipras: Referendum, was soll das nun wieder?". Zeit Online. 27.06.2015. http://www.zeit.de/wirtschaft/2015-06/alexis-tsipras-griechenland-referendum-macht, Zugriff am 11.09.2015. Open Google Scholar
  537. Zervakis, Peter. 1995. "Das griechische Parlament. Kontinuität und Wandel seit 1974." Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen (Sonderband 1/95): 232-261. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-93517-5_12
  538. Zielcke, Andreas. 2011. "Neue Verfassung für Ungarn. Ein europäischer Skandal." Süddeutsche.de. 18.04.2011. http://www.sueddeutsche.de/politik/2.220/neue-verfassung-fuer-ungarn... Zugriff am 13.06.2014. Open Google Scholar
  539. Ziemer, Klaus/Claudia-Yvette Matthes. 2010. "Das politische System Polens." In: Wolfgang Ismayr (Hg.) Die politischen Systeme Osteuropas. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften: 209-273. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91997-3_5
  540. Zink, Wolfgang. 2010. "Der belgische Senat - Institution unter Denkmalschutz?" In: Gisela Riescher/Sabine Ruß/Christoph M. Haas (Hg.) Zweite Kammern. 2. Auflage. München: Oldenbourg. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1524/9783486710106.211
  541. Zinterer, Tanja. 2010. "Der kanadische Senat: Ungeliebt, undemokratisch, unreformierbar?" In: Gisela Riescher/Sabine Ruß/Christoph M. Haas (Hg.) Zweite Kammern. 2. Auflage. München: Oldenbourg: 245-263. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1524/9783486710106.245
  542. Zucchini, Francesco. 2009. "Dividing Parliament? Italian Bicameralism in the Legislative Process (1987-2006)." South European Society and Politics 13 (1): 11-34. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/13608740802005710

Similar publications

from the topics "Comparative Political Research & Country Studies", "Legal Sociology", "Parliamentarism"
Cover of book: Die politische Rechte in Lateinamerika
Edited Book Full access
Nadja Ahmad, Hans-Jürgen Burchardt, Kristina Dietz, Hannes Warnecke-Berger, Jonas Wolff
Die politische Rechte in Lateinamerika
Cover of book: Law & Critique | Recht & Kritik
Edited Book Full access
Greta Olson, Christian Schmidt, Benno Zabel, Jochen Bung, Franziska Martinsen, Hanna Meißner
Law & Critique | Recht & Kritik
Cover of book: Kirche und Demokratie
Book Titles No access
Deborah Geiger
Kirche und Demokratie
Cover of book: Ansehen und Absetzen
Book Titles No access
Jonathan Schramm
Ansehen und Absetzen
Cover of book: Geschichte des Parlamentarismus
Book Titles No access
Werner J. Patzelt
Geschichte des Parlamentarismus

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via Open Athens
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex