Cover of book: The Cradle of Laws
Buy in shop
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Edited Book No access

The Cradle of Laws

Drafting and Negotiating Bills within the Executives in Central Europe
Editors:
Publisher:
 2020

Summary

In fast allen Staaten sind Gesetze die wichtigsten Instrumente, um soziale, wirtschaftliche oder institutionelle Veränderungen herbeizuführen. Traditionell werden zwar die Parlamente als der Ort der Gesetzgebung betrachtet, doch es ist oft die Exekutive, die die Ergebnisse des legislativen Spiels stärker beeinflusst. Statistische Daten zeigen, dass die von der Regierung eingebrachten Gesetzentwürfe in den meisten Fällen unverändert verabschiedet werden.

Das Werk untersucht im Detail, wie Gesetzesvorlagen innerhalb der Exekutive vorbereitet werden. Für diese genaue Analyse wurden sechs mitteleuropäische Länder ausgewählt (Österreich, Tschechische Republik, Deutschland, Ungarn, Polen, Slowakei).

Bibliographic data

Edition
1/2020
Copyright Year
2020
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-6465-5
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-0589-9
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
International Association of Legislation (IAL) / Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesetzgebung (DGG)
Volume
20
Language
English
Pages
155
Product Type
Edited Book

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access 1 - 6
  2. Introduction: The role of governments in drafting and negotiating bills No access 7 - 16
    Authors:
  3. Authors:
    1. Models for drafting legislation No access
      Authors:
    2. Centralised v decentralised drafting No access
      Authors:
    3. Prioritising Legislation No access
      Authors:
    4. Quality and harmonisation of legislative expression No access
      Authors:
    5. Professionalism in drafting No access
      Authors:
    6. Drafting and policy-making No access
      Authors:
    7. Main legislative actors No access
      Authors:
    8. Cross-cutting issues No access
      Authors:
    9. Conclusions: What is best? No access
      Authors:
  4. Authors:
    1. Introduction No access
      Authors:
    2. Authors:
      1. The negligible role of the Austrian president No access
        Authors:
      2. The informal powers of the Austrian Länder No access
        Authors:
      3. Austria’s consociationalist and neo-corporatist tradition No access
        Authors:
      4. The shadow of the Constitutional Court No access
        Authors:
    3. The legal framework for preparing governmental bills No access
      Authors:
    4. Authors:
      1. Administration-government relations No access
        Authors:
      2. Intra-governmental coordination No access
        Authors:
    5. The fate of governmental bills No access
      Authors:
    6. Conclusion No access
      Authors:
  5. Authors:
    1. Introduction No access
      Authors:
    2. Overview of the constitutional and political system No access
      Authors:
    3. Legal and institutional framework of the law-making process No access
      Authors:
    4. Authors:
      1. Initiation stage No access
        Authors:
      2. Drafting and negotiating stage No access
        Authors:
    5. Governmental bills in the parliamentary phase No access
      Authors:
    6. Conclusion No access
      Authors:
  6. Authors:
    1. Introduction No access
      Authors:
    2. Overview of the German constitutional and political system No access
      Authors:
    3. The basic framework of the legislative process No access
      Authors:
    4. The practice of drafting and negotiating governmental bills in Germany No access
      Authors:
    5. The fate of governmental bills in the parliament No access
      Authors:
    6. Conclusion No access
      Authors:
  7. Authors:
    1. Introduction No access
      Authors:
    2. Overview of the constitutional and political system No access
      Authors:
    3. Authors:
      1. Sources of law and their role in the legal system No access
        Authors:
      2. Legal sources on legislative drafting No access
        Authors:
    4. Analysis of practical functioning of the preparatory process No access
      Authors:
    5. Cabinet bills in the parliamentary phase No access
      Authors:
    6. Conclusions No access
      Authors:
  8. Authors:
    1. Introduction: Polish political system and its path dependency No access
      Authors:
    2. Authors:
      1. Legislative planning No access
        Authors:
      2. The drafting process No access
        Authors:
      3. Consultation No access
        Authors:
      4. Final drafting, legal editing No access
        Authors:
      5. Regulatory impact assessment No access
        Authors:
    3. The practice of drafting and its political context No access
      Authors:
    4. Conclusion No access
      Authors:
  9. Authors:
    1. Introduction No access
      Authors:
    2. The Slovak political and constitutional system and its effects on law-making No access
      Authors:
    3. Preparation of draft bills at the executive level – legal and institutional framework No access
      Authors:
    4. Assesses the compliance of discussed bills with the EU law and international treaties with which the Slovak Republic is bound. No access
      Authors:
    5. Practical functioning of the drafting and negotiating process No access
      Authors:
    6. The fate of governmental bills in the parliament No access
      Authors:
    7. Conclusion No access
      Authors:
  10. Epilogue: Steppingstones for further research No access 137 - 140
    Authors:
  11. Secondary sources cited in the book No access 141 - 150
  12. List of contributors No access 151 - 154
  13. Summary No access 155 - 155

Bibliography (193)

  1. Secondary sources cited in the book Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  2. Altman D, Citizenship and Contemporary Direct Democracy (Cambridge University Press 2018). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  3. Andree A et al, ‘Trust Is Good, Control Is Better: Multiparty Government and Legislative Organization’ 69 (2016) Political Research Quarterly 108. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  4. Aristotle, Nichomachean Ethics (D. Ross trans. 1980). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  5. Badura P, Staatsrecht: systematische Erläuterung des Grundgesetzes für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C.H. Beck 2003). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  6. Balog B and A Bonko, ‘Legislatívne nič a ústavný súd‘ (2012) Notitiae ex Academia Bratislavensi Iurisprudentiae 4. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  7. Balog B, ‘Jazdci v legislatíve I - všeobecná charakteristika’ (2001) Notitiae ex Academia Bratislavensi Iurisprudentiae 4. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  8. Balog B, Umenie tvoriť zákony, Schvaľovanie zákonov v Slovenskej republike (Wolters Kluwer 2019). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  9. Baraník K, ‘Legislatívny proces v Slovenskej republike a jeho digitalizácia’ in E Žatecká et al (eds), Cofola: conference proceedings (Masarykova univerzita 2011) 1572. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  10. Bates SJ, ‘United Kingdom’ in U Karpen (ed), Legislation in European Countries (Nomos 1997) 431. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  11. Beetham D, Parliament and democracy in the twenty – first century, a guide to good practice (Inter-parliamentary Union 2006). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  12. Berek M, Rada Ministrów jako organ inicjujący postępowanie ustawodawcze (C.H. Beck 2017). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  13. Bergeal B, Rédiger un texte normatif (Berger-Levrault 2012). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  14. Biegelbauer P and PE Grießler, ‘Politische Praktiken von Ministerialbeamt Innen im österreichischen Gesetzgebungsprozess’ (2009) 38 Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 61. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  15. Biegelbauer, P and S Mayer, ‘Regulatory impact assessment in Austria: promising regulations, disappointing practices’ (2008) 2 Critical Policy Analysis 123. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  16. Birungi Kamugundu O, ‘Prioritizing Legislation in the Policy Process’ in H Xanthaki (ed), Enhancing Legislative Drafting in the Commonwealth (Routledge 2015) 85. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  17. Blondel J, Comparative Government: An Introduction (Philip Allan 1990). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  18. Bohadlo D et al (eds), Legislativní proces (teorie a praxe) (Ministerstvo vnitra 2011). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  19. Bröstl A et al, Ústavné právo Slovenskej republiky (Aleš Čeněk 2010). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  20. Bröstl A, ‘Slova, slova, slova...’ in A Gerloch and J Kysela, Tvorba práva v České republice po vstupu do Evropské unie (Wolters Kluwer 2007) 49. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  21. Buckland W and AD McNair, Roman Law and Common Law: A Comparison in Outline (Cambridge University Press 1952). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  22. Burch M, ‘Organizing the Flow of Business in Western European Cabinets’ in J Blondel and F Müller-Rommel (eds), Governing Together (Macmillan 1993) 99. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  23. Burkhart S and M Lehnert, ‘Between Consensus and Conflict: Law-Making Processes in Germany’ (2008) 17 German Politics 223. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  24. Bußjäger P, ‘Föderalismus durch Macht im Schatten? Österreich und die Landeshauptmännerkonferenz’ in Jahrbuch des Föderalismus 2003. Föderalismus, Subsidiarität und Regionen in Europa (Nomos 2003) 79. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  25. Cibulka L et al, Ústavné právo, Ústavný systém Slovenskej republiky (Univerzita Komenského 2014). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  26. Cisko L, ‘Niekoľko úvah k tvorbe právnych predpisov v Slovenskej republike’ in SK Bostan, RM Maksakova and TE Leonenko (eds), Aktuaľni problemy deržavno-pravovoho rozvytku Ukrajiny v konteksti intehracijnych procesiv (LIRA 2018) 17 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  27. Clarence-Smith JA, ‘Legislative drafting: English and Continental’ (1980) 1 Statute Law Review 21. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  28. Costain WD and AN Costain, ‘Interest Groups as Policy Aggregators in the Legislative Process’ (1981) 14 Polity 249. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  29. Cox G and M McCubbins, Setting the Agenda. Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives (Cambridge University Press 2005). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  30. Crabbe V, ‘Drafting in developing countries: the problems of importing expertise (1992) 4 African Journal of International and Comparative Law 645. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  31. Crain M et al, ‘Monopoly Aspects of Political Parties’ (1979) 7 Atlantic Economic Journal 542. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  32. Cvrček F et al., Legislativa: Teoretická východiska a problémy (Aleš Čeněk 2017). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  33. David R, Lustration and Transitional Justice. Personnel Systems in the Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland (University of Pennsylvania Press 2011). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  34. Dickson B, Introduction to French Law (Pitman Publishing 1994). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  35. Dimitrov V et al, Governing after Communism: Institutions and Policymaking (Rowman & Littlefield 2006). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  36. Döring H, ‘Time as a Scarce Resource: Government Control of the Agenda’ in H Döring (ed) Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe (Campus/St. Martin’s Press 1995) 223. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  37. Drgonec J, Ústava Slovenskej republiky, Teória a prax (C. H. Beck 2015). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  38. Drinóczi T, Minőségi jogalkotás és adminisztratív terhek csökkentése Európában (HVG-ORAC 2010). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  39. Drinózci, T, ‘Legislative Process’ in U Karpen and H Xanthaki (eds), Legislation in Europe: A Comprehensive Guide for Scholars and Practitioners (Hart, 2017) 33. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  40. Dunlop C and C Radaelli (eds), Handbook of Regulatory Impact Assessment (Edward Elgar 2016). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  41. Dzieciuch M, ‘Ocena polskiego procesu legislacyjnego na przykładzie ostatnich zmian w prawie rynków finansowych’ (2018) 7 Internetowy Kwartalnik Antymonopolowy i Regulacyjny 8. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  42. Editorial Review (1903) 22 Canadian Law Times 437. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  43. Engle E, ‘Aristotle, Law and Justice: The Tragic Hero’ (2008) 35 Northern Kentucky Law Review 4. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  44. Erk J, ‘Austria: A Federation without Federalism’ (2004) 34 Publius - The Journal of Federalism 1. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  45. Escobar O, ‘Pluralism and Democratic Participation: What Kind of Citizen are Citizens Invited to Be?’ (2017) 14 Contemporary Pragmatism 416. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  46. Evans C, Addresses and Papers of Charles Evans Hughes, Governor of NY, 1906-1908 (Wentworth Press 2016). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  47. Ewens J,‘Legislative Draftsmen: Their Recruitment and Training’ (1983) 57 Australian Law Journal 567. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  48. Fábry B, Teoretické problémy tvorby práva (A-Medi management 2018). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  49. Fallend F, ‘Austria: From Consensus to Competition and Participation?‘ in J Loughlin, F Hendriks and A Lidström (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Local and Regional Democracy in Europe (Oxford University Press 2010) 173. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  50. Federal Ministry of Justice (ed), Manual for Drafting Legislation (Berlin 2008). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  51. Filip J, ‘K postavení Legislativní rady vlády České republiky’ (2007) 15 Časopis pro právní vědu a praxi 203. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  52. Filip J, Vybrané kapitoly ke studiu ústavního práva (Masarykova univerzita 2001). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  53. Franczel R, ‘Kormányzati döntéshozatal 2010-2014 között’ (2015) Kodifikáció és Közigazgatás 5. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  54. Gajduschek G, ‘A közpolitikai célok megjelenése a jogban’ in J Szerk and G Gajduschek (eds), A magyar jogrendszer állapota (MTA TK 2016) 43 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  55. Gajduschek G, ‘Előkészítetlenség és utólagos hatásvizsgálat hiánya’ in J Szerk and G Gajduschek (eds), A magyar jogrendszer állapota (MTA TK 2016) 796. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  56. Giba M et al, Ústavné pravo (Wolters Kluwer 2019). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  57. Goetz KH and R Zubek, ‘Government, Parliament and Law-making in Poland’ (2007) 13 The Journal of Legislative Studies 517. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  58. Górniak J (ed), Ocena wpływu oparta na dowodach. Model dla Polski (Akademia Leona Koźmińskiego 2015). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  59. Grodeland A and W Miller, European Legal Cultures in Transition (Cambridge University Press 2015). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  60. Gyűrű A, ‘A jogszabályok és a stratégiai tervek környezeti hatásvizsgálatának gyakorlata’ (2012) Pro Futuro 85. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  61. Haibo Y and Q Qianhong, ‘Reservation of Law, Legislation and Human Rights Protection’ 2 (2014) China Legal Science 92. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  62. Hodás M, Dopady normotvorby Európskej únie na normotvorbu členského štátu z hľadiska legislatívnej techniky a normotvorných procesov (Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave 2018). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  63. Hoyt MM, ‘Education, Training and Retention of Legislative Draftsmen in Canada’ (1979) 5 Commonwealth Law Bulletin 273. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  64. Huber J and Ch Shipan, Deliberate Discretion?: The Institutional Foundations of Bureaucratic Autonomy (Cambridge University Press 2002). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  65. Hull D, ‘Commonwealth Survey of Terms and Conditions of Service of Legislative Draftsmen’ (1984) 10 Commonwealth Law Bulletin 1359. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  66. Ilonszki G and K Jager ‘Hungary: Changing government advantages – Challenging a dominant executive’ in E Rasch and G Tsebelis (eds), Role of the governments in legislative agenda-setting (Routledge 2011) 95. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  67. Ilonszki G, ‘From minimum to subordinate: A final Verdict? The Hungarian parliament, 1990–2010’ (2011) 13 Journal of Legislative Studies 38. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  68. Jugovits K, ‘A jogalkotás tartalmi megalapozottsága a jogi oktatás tükrében’ (2016) Pro Publico Bono – Magyar Közigazgatás 36. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  69. Karlhofer F, ‘A federation without federalism? Zur Realverfassung der Bund-Länder- Beziehungen’ in P Bußjäger (ed), Kooperativer Föderalismus in Österreich. Beiträge zur Verflechtung von Bund und Ländern (Braumüller 2009) 131. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  70. Karpen U and H Xanthaki (eds), Legislation in Europe: A Comprehensive Guide for Scholars and Practitioners (Hart, 2017). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  71. Karpen U, ‘Civil Service in Germany’ (2019) 29 European Review of Public Law 1. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  72. Karpen U, ‘Comparative Law: Perspectives of Legislation’ (2012) 6 Legisprudence 149. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  73. Karpen U, ‘Efficacy, Effectiveness, Efficiency’ in K Meßerschmidt and AD Oliver-Lalana (eds), Rational Lawmaking under Review, Legisprudence According to the German Federal Constitutional Court (Springer 2016) 304. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  74. Karpen U, ‘Introduction’ in U Karpen and H Xanthaki (eds), Legislation in Europe: A Comprehensive Guide for Scholars and Practitioners (Hart, 2017) 1. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  75. Karpen U, ‘Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA): Current Situation and Prospects in the German Parliament’ (2015) 101 Amicus Curiae 14. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  76. Karpen U, I Breutz and A Nünke, Die Gesetzgebung der Großen Koalition in der ersten Hälfte der Legislaturperiode des 16. Deutschen Bundestages (2005-2007) (FHM Verlag 2008). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  77. Khan-Freund O, C Lévy and B Rudden (eds), A Source-book on French Law (Clarendon Press 1990). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  78. Kitschelt, H, Z Mansfeldova, R Markowski and G Toka, Post-Communist Party Systems, Competition, Representation, and Inter-Party Cooperation (Cambridge University Press 1999). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  79. Kokeš M, ‘Teorie zákonodárství aneb pokus čelit nezájmu právní teorie a politologie o legislativní tvorbu práva v ČR’ (2016) 49 Správní právo (Legislativní příloha) I. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  80. Kolář P, J Kysela, J Syllová, J Georgiev and J Pecháček, Parlament České republiky (Leges 2013). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  81. Kopińska G, ‘Rządowy proces legislacyjny’ (2015) Analiza Programu Odpowiedzialne Panstwo 1. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  82. Korn F, Objektívne právo ako spoločenský normatívny system (Tribun EU 2019). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  83. Kukliš P, ‘Právní normotvorba na Slovensku – vybrané problémy’ in F Cvrček and F Novák (eds), Legislativa: právní a teoretické problémy (Aleš Čeněk 2017) 172. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  84. Kysela J and M Kokeš, ‘Role vlády v procesu právotvorby v České republice se zřetelem k efektivitě vládnutí’ (2018) 51 Správní právo (Legislativní příloha) XC. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  85. Kysela J, ‘Moc výkonná jako činitel právotvorby. Přehled rolí a problémů’ (2018) 51 Správní právo (Legislativní příloha) II. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  86. Kysela J, ‘The Influence of the Constitutional Court on the Rules of Legislative Process in the Czech Republic’ (2014) Prague Law Working Papers Series II/4 1. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  87. Kysela J, ‘Tvorba práva v ČR: truchlohra se šťastným koncem?’ (2006) 7 Právní zpravodaj 8. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  88. Kysela J, Dvoukomorové systémy: teorie, historie a srovnání dvoukomorových parlamentů (Eurolex Bohemia 2004). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  89. Ľalík T, ‘Všeobecné a individuálne účinky derogačných nálezov Ústavného súdu SR’ (2018) 70 Justičná revue 711. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  90. Lando O, ‘On legislative style and structure’ (2006) 4 European Review of Private Law 476. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  91. Laver M and KM Shepsle, Making and Breaking Governments (Cambridge University Press 1996). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  92. Lehmbruch G, ‘Sozialpartnerschaft in der vergleichenden Politikforschung’ in P Gerlich, E Grande and WC Müller (eds), Sozialpartnerschaft in der Krise (Böhlau 2003) 129. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  93. Liegl B and WC Müller, ‘Senior Officials in Austria’, in EC Page and V Wright (eds), Bureaucratic Élites in Western European States (Oxford University Press 1999) 100. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  94. Lijphart A, Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-six Countries (Yale University Press 1999). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  95. Lindblom C and D Cohen, Usable Knowledge - Social Science and Social Problem Solving (Yale University Press 1979). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  96. Lortie S, ‘Providing Technical Assistance on Law Drafting’ (2010) 31 Statute Law Review 17. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  97. Luther KR and WC Müller, ‘Consociationalism and the Austrian political system’ (1992) 15 West European Politics 1. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  98. Maasen HG, ‘Gesetzesinitiativen der Bundesregierung’ in W Kluth and S Krings (eds), Gesetzgebung: Rechtsetzung durch Parlamente und Verwaltungen sowie ihre gerichtliche Kontrolle (C.F. Müller 2015) 191. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  99. Magurová H, ‘Vybrané problémy tvorby práva v Slovenskej republike’ in K Lenhartová and L Dufalová (eds), Míľniky práva v stredoeurópskom priestore (Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave 2012) 156. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  100. Mamojka M, ‘Normotvorná a aplikačná stránka zákonnosti ako sinergia právneho štátu’ in M Turošík and A Ševčiková (eds), Banskobystrické dni práva na tému „Kvalita normotvornej a aplikačnej stránky zákonnosti ako determinant právneho štátu (Belianum 2017) 5. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  101. Markesinis B, H Unberath and A Johnston, The German Law of Contract, A Comparative Treatise (Hart Publishing 2006). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  102. Markowska A and A Waszyńska, Rządowy proces legislacyjny – opis procedur (Rządowe Centrum Legislacji 2014). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  103. Martin L and G Vanberg, Parliaments and Coalitions: The Role of Legislative Institutions in Multiparty Governance (Oxford University Press 2011). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  104. Martin S et al (eds). The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies (Oxford University Press 2014). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  105. Matyja R and B Sajduk, Polska elita polityczna 2013 (WSE Kraków 2014). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  106. McCubbins M and T Schwartz, ‘Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols versus Fire Alarms’ (1984) 28 American Journal of Political Science 165. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  107. Millet T, ‘A comparison of French and British drafting (with particular reference to their respective nationality laws)’ (1986) 7 Statute Law Review 153. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  108. Müller WC and M Jenny ‘Business as usual- mit getauschten Rollen oder Konflikt-statt Konsensdemokratie? Parlamentarische Beziehungen unter der ÖVP-FPÖ-Koalition’ (2004) 33 Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 309. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  109. Müller WC, ‘Austria. Tight Coalitions and Stable Government’ in WC Müller and K Strøm (eds), Coalition Governments in Western Europe (Oxford University Press 2000) 86. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  110. Müller WC, ‘Austria: A Complex Electoral System with Subtle Effects’ in M Gallagher and P Mitchell (eds), The Politics of Electoral Systems (Oxford University Press 2008) 397. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  111. Müller WC, ‘Das Regierungssystem’ in H Dachs et al (eds), Politik in Österreich. Das Handbuch (Manz 2006) 105. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  112. Müller WC, ‘Koalitionsabkommen in der österreichischen Politik’ in G Becker, F Lachmayer and W Oberleitner (eds), Gesetzgebung zwischen Politik und Bürokratie (Österreichischer Bundesverlag 1994) 14. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  113. Müller WC, ‘Party Patronage and Party Colonization of the State’ in W Crotty and RS Katz (eds), Handbook of Party Politics (Sage 2006) 175. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  114. Müller WC, ‘Party Patronage in Austria: Theoretical Considerations and Empirical Findings‘ in A Pelinka and F Plasser (eds), The Austrian Party System (Westview 1989) 327 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  115. Naurin E et al (eds), Party Mandates and Democracy: Making, Breaking, and Keeping Election Pledges in Twelve Countries (University of Michigan Press 2019). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  116. Nikolenyi C and C Friedberg (2019) Vehicles of opposition influence or agents of the governing majority? Legislative committees and private members’ bills in the Hungarian Országgyűlés and the Israeli Knesset (2019) 25 The Journal of Legislative Studies 358. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  117. Norton P, Parliaments in Western Europe (Frank Cass 1990). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  118. Nutting C, ‘Legislative Drafting: A Review’ (1955) 41 American Bar Association Journal 76. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  119. Nzerem N, ‘Prioritising Legislative Proposals in the Legislative Process’ in A Zammit Borda (ed), Legislative Drafting (Routledge 2011) 57. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  120. Ober J and Ch Hedrick, Démokratia, a conversation on democracies, ancient and modern (Princeton University Press 1996). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  121. Obler R, ‘Legislatures and the Survival of Political Systems: A Review Article’ (1981) 96 Political Science Quarterly 127. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  122. Ociepki T et al (eds), Rząd pod lupą. Ranking polityk publicznych 2018 (Klub Jagiellonski 2019). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  123. OECD, OECD Regulatory Compliance Cost Assessment Guide (Paris 2016). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  124. Olson D and DM Norton, ‘Legislatures in Democratic Transition’ in D Olson and DM Norton (eds), The New Parliaments of Central and Eastern Europe (Frank Cass 1996) 1. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  125. Olson D, The legislative process: A comparative approach (Harper and Row 1980). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  126. Ost F. and M van de Kerchove, Jalons pour une Theorie Critique du Droit (Publications des Facultés universitaires Saint-Louis 1987). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  127. Paczocha J, Partia w Państwie: Bezprecedensowa wymiana kadr w administracji rządowej i jej legislacyjne podstawy (FOR 2018). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  128. Page E, Policy Without Politicians: Bureaucratic Influence in Comparative Perspective (Oxford University Press 2012). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  129. Pelinka A, ‘Gesetzgebung in politischen System Österreichs’ in W Ismayr (ed), Gesetzgebung in Westeuropa. EU-Staaten und Europäische Union (VS-Verlag 2008) 446. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  130. Pestalozza C, ‘Gesetzgebung im Rechtsstaat’ (1981) 39 Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 2084. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  131. Pesti S and R Anikó-Franczel, ‘A kormány működési és szervezeti rendje (1990–2014)’ in A Körösényi (ed), A magyar politikai rendszer – negyedszázad után (Osiris 2015) 109. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  132. Pesti S, ‘Közpolitikai döntéshozatal Magyarországon’ in G Gajduschek and T Rossiter (eds), A közpolitika formálásának gyakorlata a brit és a magyar közigazgatásban (Magyar Közigazgatási Intézet 2002) 153. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  133. Pigeon LP, Drafting and Interpreting Legislation (Carlswell 1988). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  134. Pigeon LP, Rédaction et interprétation des lois (Gouvernement du Québec 1986). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  135. Piris JC, ‘The legal orders of the European Union and of the Member States: peculiarities and influences in drafting’ (2006) 8 European Journal of Law Reform 1. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  136. Plichtová J, ‘Občianska deliberatívna demokracia a podpora jej cieľov na Slovensku’ (2010) 42 Sociológia 516. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  137. Power T, ‘Time and Legislative Development in New Democracies: Is Executive Dominance Always Irreversible?’ in R Pelizzo et al (eds), Trends in Parliamentary Oversight (World Bank Institute 2004) 47. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  138. Rasch BE and G Tsebelis (eds), The Role of Governments in Legislative Agenda Setting (Routledge, 2011). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  139. Roman C et al, Analýza, monitor merania administratívneho a regulačného zaťaženia podnikania (Centrum vzdelávania MPSVR SR 2014). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  140. Rybář M, ‘Powered by the State: The Role of Public Resources in Party-Building in Slovakia’ (2006) 22 Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 320. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  141. Saiegh SM, ‘Lawmaking’ in S Martin, T Saalfeld and KW Ström (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies (OUP 2014) 481. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  142. Saiegh SM, ‘Political Prowess or “Lady Luck”? Evaluating Chief Executives’ Legislative Success Rates’ (2009) 71 The Journal of Politics 1342. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  143. Salgó LP, Az Igazságügyi Minisztérium szerepe a kormányzati jogszabály-előkészítésben (Fontes Iuris 2017). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  144. Sartori G, ‘Compare Why and How. Comparing, Miscomparing and the Comparative Method.’ in M Dogan and A Kazancigil (eds), Comparing Nations: Concepts, Strategies, Substance (Blackwell 1994) 16. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  145. Schaden M, ‘Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit’ in H. Dachs et al. (eds), Politik in Österreich. Das Handbuch (Manz 2006) 213. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  146. Scharffs BG, ‘Law as Craft’ (2001) 45 Vanderbilt Law Review 2339. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  147. Schefbeck G, ‘Das Parlament‘ in H Dachs et al (eds), Politik in Österreich (Manz Verlag 2006) 152. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  148. Schneider H, Gesetzgebung: ein Lehr- und Handbuch (C.F. Müller 2002). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  149. Schultze RO, ‘Föderalismus’ in D Nohlen (ed), Lexikon der Politik, Vol. 3: Die westlichen Länder (1992 Beck Verlag) 108. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  150. Schwarz J and E Shaw, The United States Congress in Comparative Perspective (Dryden Press 1976). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  151. Seidman AW, RB Seidman and N Abeyeskere, Legislative Drafting for Democratic Social Change: Manual for Drafters (Kluwer Law 2001). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  152. Shepshle K, ‘Rational Choice Institutionalism’ in S Binder et al (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions (Oxford University Press 2008). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  153. Sickinger H, ‘Parlamentarismus’ in E Talos (ed), Schwarz-Blau. Eine Bilanz des Neu-Regierens (LIT Verlag 2006) 76. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  154. Škop M and B Vacková, ‘Být legislativcem: Empirická šetření v administrativních fázích legislativy’ (2019) 27 Časopis pro právní vědu a praxi 5. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  155. Smuk P, ‘Az Országgyűlés’ in J Szerk and G Gajduschek, A magyar jogrendszer állapota (MTA TK 2016) 631. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  156. Somolányi S, ‘Slovakia: From a Difficult Case of Transition to a Consolidated Central European Democracy’ in T Hayashi (ed), Democracy and Market Economics in Central and Eastern Europe: Are New Institutions Being Consolidated? (SRC 2004) 149. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  157. Šramel B, Ústavné súdnictvo (Občianske združenie FSV 2015). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  158. Stark J, ‘Should the Main Goal of Statutory Drafting Be Accuracy or Clarity?’ (1994) 15 Statute Law Review 207. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  159. Stark, J ‘The Proper Degree of Generality for Statutes’ (2004) 25 Statute Law Review 77. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  160. Staroňová K and L Malíková, ‘The view of political science on the phenomenon of corruption‘ (2007) 39 Sociológia 287. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  161. Staroňová K, ‘Regulatory Impact Assessment: Formal Institutionalization and Practice’ (2010) 30 Journal of Public Policy 1202. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  162. Stefanou C, ‘Comparative Legislative Drafting: Comparing Across Legal Systems’ (2016) 18 European Journal of Law Reform 123. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  163. Stefanou C, ‘Drafters, Drafting and the Policy Process’ in C Stefanou and H Xanthaki (eds) Drafting legislation: a modern approach (Ashgate 2008) 321. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  164. Strom K et al. (eds), Cabinets and Coalition Bargaining: The Democratic Life Cycle in Western Europe (Oxford University Press 2008). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  165. Svák J and B Balog, ‘Legislatívna kultúra’ (2018) 101 Právny obzor 345. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  166. Svák J et a., Teória a prax legislatívy (Eurokódex 2012). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  167. Svák J, Ž Surmajová and B Balog, Zákon o tvorbe právnych predpisov a o Zbierke zákonov Slovenskej republiky: Komentár (Wolters Kluwer 2017). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  168. Szabó Z, ‘Hozzáadott érték benyújtás és elfogadás között: viták és módosító javaslatok az Országgyűlésben 2006–2016 között’ (2017) Parlamenti Szemle 25. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  169. Tálos E and B Kittel, Gesetzgebung in Österreich. Netzwerke, Akteure und Interaktionen in politischen Entscheidungsprozessen (WUW 2001). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  170. Tálos E, ‘Sozialpartnerschaft. Austrokorporatismus am Ende?’ in H Dachs et al. (eds), Politik in Österreich. Das Handbuch (Manz 2006) 425. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  171. Tetley W, Marine Cargo Claims (Les Éditions Yvon Blais 1988). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  172. Treib O, ‘Party Patronage in Austria: From Reward to Control in P. Kopecky, P Mair and M Spirova (eds), Party Patronage and Party Government in European Democracies (Oxford University Press 2012) 31. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  173. Tsebelis G, Veto Players. How Political Institutions Work (Princeton University Press 2002). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  174. Večeřa M, ‘Diversita a jednota v právu’ in Zborník z medzinárodnej vedeckej konferencie Dny práva (Masarykova univerzita 2008). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  175. Vedral J, ‘K příčinám nynějšího stavu právního řádu a k možnostem vlády při jeho (re)formování’ in A Gerloch and J Kysela (eds), Tvorba práva v České republice po vstupu do Evropské unie (ASPI 2007) 87. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  176. Voermans W et al (eds), Legislative Process in Transition (Leiden University Press 2012). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  177. Voermars W, ‘Legislation and Regulation’ in U Karpen and H Xanthaki (eds), Legislation in Europe: A Comprehensive Guide for Scholars and Practitioners (Hart 2017) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  178. von Kirchmann SU, Die Werlosigkeit der Jursprudenz als Wissenschaft (Verlage von Julius Springer 1848). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  179. Voermans W, ‘Styles of Legislation and Their Effects’ (2011) 32 Statute Law Review 38. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  180. Watts L, Comparing Federal Systems (McGill Queen’s University Press 1999). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  181. Wilfling P, Zákon o slobodnom prístupe k informáciám, komentár, problémy z praxe, rozhodnutia súdov (Via Iuris 2015). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  182. Wineroither D, Kanzlermacht-Machtkanzler?: Die Regierung Schüssel im historischen und internationalen Vergleich (LIT Verlag 2009). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  183. Wintr J, Česká parlamentní kultura (Auditorium 2010). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  184. Wołek A, Rząd do remontu, Raport Centrum Analiz Klubu Jagiellońskiego (Klub Jagiellonski 2015). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  185. Xanthaki H, ‘EU Legislative quality post-Lisbon: the challenges of Smart Regulation’ (2014) 35 Statute Law Review 66. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  186. Xanthaki H, ‘On transferability of legislative solutions: the functionality test’ in C Stefanou and H Xanthaki (eds), Drafting Legislation: A Modern Approach – in Memoriam of Sir William Dale (Aldershot 2008) 1. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  187. Xanthaki H, Drafting Legislation: Art and Technology of Rules for Regulation (Hart 2014). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  188. Zander M, The Law-Making Process (Hart 2015). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  189. Zbíral R, ‘Legislative process in the Czech Republic’ in H Xanthaki and U Karpen (eds) Legislation in European Countries (Hart, in print). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  190. Zubek R, ‘Negative Agenda Control and Executive–Legislative Relations in East Central Europe, 1997–2008’ (2011) 17 The Journal of Legislative Studies 172. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  191. Zubek R, H Klüver, ‘Legislative pledges and coalition government’ 21 (2015) Party Politics 603. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  192. Žuffová M, Slovenská republika: špeciálna hodnotiaca správa 2014 – 2015 (Iniciativa pro otvorené vládnutí 2016). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899
  193. Zweigert K and H Kötz, An Introduction to Comparative Law (Oxford University Press 1998). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748905899

Similar publications

from the series "International Association of Legislation (IAL) / Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesetzgebung (DGG)"
Cover of book: Gesetzgebungsrelevante Tatsachen und ihre Kontrolle durch den Europäischen Gerichtshof und das Bundesverfassungsgericht
Monograph No access
Christian von Hesler
Gesetzgebungsrelevante Tatsachen und ihre Kontrolle durch den Europäischen Gerichtshof und das Bundesverfassungsgericht
Cover of book: The crisis of confidence in legislation
Edited Book No access
Maria De Benedetto, Nicola Lupo, Nicoletta Rangone
The crisis of confidence in legislation
Cover of book: Lawmaking in Multi-level Settings
Edited Book No access
Patricia Popelier, Helen Xanthaki, William Robinson, João Tiago Silveira, Felix Uhlmann
Lawmaking in Multi-level Settings
Cover of book: Regulatory Reforms - Implementation and Compliance
Edited Book No access
Sergey Kabyshev, Luzius Mader
Regulatory Reforms - Implementation and Compliance
Cover of book: Quality of Legislation - Principles and Instruments
Edited Book No access
Luzius Mader, Marta Tavares de Almeida
Quality of Legislation - Principles and Instruments

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via your Institution (SSO, Shibboleth, OpenAthens)
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex