Sufficiency as Policy: Necessity, Possibilities and Limitations

Dr. Laura Spengler

doi:10.5771/9783845284743

Summary

Can technology solve all our environmental problems, or do we also have to reduce our consumption? This question has been debated for a long time within environmental science circles and can, with regard to at least some environmental problems, be answered in the affirmative today. However, it is not enough if only some individuals reduce their use of environmentally relevant goods voluntarily (which is known as “sufficiency”) to achieve overall sustainable consumption patterns. Sufficiency has to become an issue on a political level, too. There are, however, doubts about the possibility of reducing consumption by means of politics in a liberal state because of the potential restrictions to freedom involved. This book shows the necessity and ways of legitimating a sufficiency policy within liberal-democratic, wealthy states from a political and philosophical perspective. Furthermore, it discusses ways of implementing such a policy as well as their limitations. Finally, the author proposes a concept for a sufficiency policy.

Search publication

Bibliographic data

Edition: 1/2018
Copyright Year: 2018
ISBN-Print: 978-3-8487-4205-9
ISBN-Online: 978-3-8452-8474-3
Publisher: Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series: Umweltsoziologie
Volume: 5
Language: English
Pages: 328
Product Type: Monograph

Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access Pages 1 - 16
1. Aim and framework of this study No access
2. Status quo regarding selected environmental issues and their potential harmful consequences No access
3. Greenhouse gas emissions and climate change No access
4. Use of natural resources No access
5. Biodiversity loss No access
6. Structure of the study No access
1. Introduction No access
2. 1. 2.1.1 Liberty No access
  2. 2.1.2 Equality No access
  3. 2.1.3 Liberalism and neutrality towards the good No access
  4. 2.1.4 Categories of liberalism No access
  5. 2.1.5 Liberalism and Green Political Theory No access
3. 1. 2.2.1 Democracy and Liberalism No access
  2. 2.2.2 Empirical characteristics and theories of the democratic state No access
  3. 2.2.3 Deliberative democracy No access
  4. 2.2.4 Democracy and Green Political Theory No access
4. 1. 1. Dimensions and “Three Pillars Model” No access
    2. Other models and theories of sustainability No access
    3. An objective or normative concept? No access
    4. Relevant aspects of sustainability No access
  2. 2.3.2 Anthropocentrism and physiocentrism No access
  3. 1. Comparative and absolute standards No access
    2. Particular challenges of global justice No access
    3. Particular challenges of intergenerational justice No access
    4. A just distribution pattern internationally and towards the future No access
    5. Synthesis No access
  4. 1. “Critical” sustainability No access
    2. Planetary boundaries No access
  5. 1. Development No access
    2. Economic growth No access
    3. Compatibility of sustainability and different paths of economic development No access
    4. Synthesis No access
5. 2.4 Interim summary No access
1. Introduction No access
2. 1. 3.1.1 Technology in environmental discourse No access
  2. 3.1.2 The term “technology” No access
  3. 3.1.3 Technical solutions: efficiency and environmentally adapted technologies No access
  4. 1. Scale No access
    2. No sustainable and no 100% environmentally sound technologies No access
    3. Rebound effect No access
    4. “No technical solution problems” No access
    5. Available time and the cost involved No access
  5. 1. Ecological Modernisation No access
    2. Industrial Ecology No access
    3. Political programmes with a focus on technology No access
    4. Inclusion of organisational aspects and “social innovations” No access
3. 1. 3.2.1 History of the idea No access
  2. 1. Positive versus negative understanding No access
    2. Narrow and broad meaning No access
    3. Motivation: environmental carrying capacity and the good life No access
    4. “Enough” as an upper and lower threshold No access
    5. The macro and the micro perspectives No access
    6. The absolute versus the relative No access
    7. Voluntariness and dependence on external structures No access
    8. Reducing not only consumption but also population size? No access
    9. How to distinguish sufficiency from technical sustainability strategies? No access
  3. 3.2.3 Sufficiency in this study No access
  4. 1. Macroeconomic rebound effects No access
    2. Acceptance and other obstacles No access
  5. 1. Sufficiency as a notion in justice theory No access
    2. Satisficing No access
    3. Consumption research and sustainable consumption No access
    4. Social innovations No access
4. 3.3 Interim summary No access
1. Introduction No access
2. “Individual” and “political” No access
3. 1. 1. Potential No access
    2. Limitations No access
  2. 1. Potential role and functions of a sufficiency policy No access
    2. Concerns about the impact of a sufficiency policy on liberty and according responses No access
    3. Practical concerns No access
  3. 4.1.3 Interdependence between the individual and collective levels No access
  4. 4.1.4 Individual and collective responsibility for sustainability No access
  5. 4.1.5 The alternative: moralising individually harmless acts? No access
4. 1. 4.2.1 Justifications of political interventions in a liberal society—the harm principle No access
  2. 1. Problems related to accumulative harm No access
    2. Typical excuses to the principle and lines of critique No access
    3. Conclusion on accumulative environmental harm No access
5. 1. 4.3.1 Consumption levels as the cause of accumulative harm? No access
  2. 1. Production, consumption, and liberty No access
    2. Technical strategies, sufficiency, and liberty No access
  3. 4.3.3 When is consumption “excessive”? No access
  4. 4.3.4 Can the excessive use of resources cause harm to others? No access
  5. 4.3.5 What degree of interference is legitimate with regard to excessive consumption? No access
  6. 1. Targeting harmful pollutants and scarce resources No access
    2. Targeting individuals No access
    3. Targeting certain activities or consumption goods No access
6. 1. 4.4.1 “Sufficiency policies violate the neutrality principle” No access
  2. 4.4.2 “What is at stake is too important” No access
  3. 4.4.3 “Without any foundation in an account of the good life sufficiency policy remains ineffective” No access
  4. 4.4.4 “In a democracy, sufficiency will never be adopted as policy” No access
7. 4.5 Interim summary No access
1. 1. 5.1.1 Categories and assessment criteria No access
  2. 5.1.2 Policy proposals in the literature No access
  3. 1. Regulatory law No access
    2. Planning No access
    3. Economic instruments No access
    4. Nudging No access
    5. Cooperation No access
    6. Information No access
2. 1. 5.2.1 Environmental taxes on resources and emissions No access
  2. 5.2.2 Personal carbon trading No access
  3. 5.2.3 Planning instruments for urban transport infrastructure No access
  4. 5.2.4 Conclusions from the policy examples No access
3. 1. 1. Area of application and normative basis No access
    2. Characterisation of sufficiency as policy No access
    3. Justification No access
    4. Environmental carrying capacity and critical limits No access
    5. Practical suggestions for sufficiency policies No access
  2. 5.3.2 Open questions and limitations of the conception No access
6. Summary and conclusions No access Pages 284 - 290
References No access Pages 291 - 328

Bibliography (630 entries)

Wall, S. and Klosko, G., eds., 2003. Perfectionism and Neutrality: Essays in Liberal Theory. Lanham (etc.): Rowman and Littlefield. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Weizsäcker, E.U. v., Lovins, A.B., and Lovins, L.H., 1995. Faktor Vier: Doppelter Wohlstand—halbierter Naturverbrauch. München: Droemer Knaur. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Weizsäcker, E.U. v., Hargroves, K., Smith, M., Deisha, C., and Stasinopoulos, P., 2009. Factor Five. Transforming the Global Economy through 80% Improvements in Resource Productivity. London: Earthscan. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Weinstock, D.M., 2003. Miller on Distributive Justice. In: D.A. Bell and A. de-Shalit, eds. Forms of Justice: Critical Perspectives on David Miller’s Political Philosophy. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 269–286. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Weber, M., 1992 [1919]. Politik als Beruf. Stuttgart: Reclam. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Weaver, P., Jansen, L., Van Grootveld, G., Van Spiegel, E., and Vergragt, P., 2000. Sustainable Technology Development. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development), 1987. Our Common Future. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Oslo. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
WBGU (Wissenschaftlicher Beirat der Bundesregierung Globale Umweltveränderungen), 1998. Strategien zur Bewältigung Globaler Umweltrisiken. Jahresgutachten 1998. Berlin (etc.): Springer. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Waschkuhn, A., 1998. Demokratietheorien—Politiktheoretische und ideengeschichtliche Grundzüge. München, Wien: R. Oldenbourg Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Ware, A. and Goodin, R.E., eds., 1990. Needs and Welfare. London (etc.): Sage Publications. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Wall, S., 2012. Perfectionism in Moral and Political Philosophy. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2012 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/perfectionism-moral/ (last accessed June 2013). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Wall, S., 2003. Just Savings and the Difference Principle. Philosophical Studies, 116, 79–102. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Wells, P. and Zapata, C., 2012. Renewable Eco-industrial Development: A New Frontier for Industrial Ecology? Journal of Industrial Ecology, 16 (5), 665–668. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Waldron, J., 1989. Legislation and Moral Neutrality. In: R.E. Goodin and A. Reeve, eds. Liberal Neutrality. London, New York: Routledge, 61–83. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Voget, L., 2009. Suffizienz als politische Frage. In: T. v. Egan-Krieger, J. Schultz, P.P. Thapa, and L. Voget, eds. Die Greifswalder Theorie starker Nachhaltigkeit. Ausbau, Anwendung und Kritik. Marburg: Metropolis, 209–224. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Voget-Kleschin, L., 2012. Sustainable Food Consumption? Claims for Sustainable Lifestyles in between Normative and Eudaimonistic Issues: The Example of Food Production and Consumption. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Vincent, A., 1998. Liberalism and the environment. Environmental Values, 7 (4), 443–459. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Verstreng, V., Myhre, G., Fagerli, H., Reis, S., and Tarrasón, L., 2007. Twenty-five years of continuous sulphur dioxide emission reduction in Europe. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 7, 3663–3681. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Veblen, T., 1961 [1899]. The theory of the leisure class: An economic study of institutions. New York: Random House. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Vanner, R., 2006. Ex-post estimates of costs to business of EU environmental policies: A case study looking at Ozone Depleting Substances. European Commission. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
van den Bergh, J.C.J.M., 2011. Environment versus growth—A criticism of ‘degrowth’ and a plea for ‘a-growth’. Ecological Economics, 70 (5), 881–890. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
UNWSSD (United Nations World Summit on Sustainable Development), 2002b. Plan of Implementation of the World Summit on Sustainable Development. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
UNWSSD (United Nations World Summit on Sustainable Development), 2002a. Johannesburg Declaration on Sustainable Development. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Unseld, G., 1991. ‘Für oder gegen Technik?’ Die Streitfrage um unsere Zukunft. Scheidewege, 21, 59–82. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Wissenburg, M., 2001b. Sustainability and the Limits of Liberalism. In: J. Barry and M. Wissenburg, eds. Sustaining liberal democracy. Ecological challenges and opportunities. New York (etc.): Palgrave, 192–204. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Zapf, W., 1989. Über soziale Innovationen. Soziale Welt, 40 (1/2), 170–183. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Young, I.M., 2011. Responsibility for Justice. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Young, I.M., 2006. Responsibility and Global Justice: A Social Connection Model. Social Philosophy and Policy, 23 (1), 102–130. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Young, I.M., 2004. Responsibility and Global Labor Justice. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 12 (4), 365–388. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Xenos, N., 1987. Liberalism and the Postulate of Scarcity. Political Theory, 15 (2), 225–243. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Wynne, B., 1992. Uncertainty and environmental learning: Reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm. Global Environmental Change, 2 (2), 111–127. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
WWF, 2014b. Fleisch frisst Land. Berlin. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
WWF, 2014a. Living Planet Report 2014: Species and spaces, people and places. Gland, Switzerland. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Withers, H., 1920. The Consumer’s Responsibility. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 87, 225–232. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Wissenburg, M., 2006b. Liberalism. In: A. Dobson and R. Eckersley, eds. Political Theory and the Ecological Challenge. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 20–34. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Wissenburg, M., 2006a. Ecological Neutrality and Liberal Survivalism—How (not) to Discuss the Compatibility of Liberalism and Ecologism. Analyse & Kritik, 28, 125–145. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change), 2015. Adoption of the Paris Agreement; Conference of the Parties, Twenty-first session. Paris, No. FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.1. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Wissenburg, M., 2001a. Liberalism is Always Green on the Other Side of the Mill. A Reply to Piers Stephens. Environmental Politics, 10 (3), 23–42. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Wissenburg, M., 1998. Green liberalism. The free and the green society. London (etc.): UCL Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Winterfeld, U. v., 2007. Keine Nachhaltigkeit ohne Suffizienz. Fünf Thesen und Folgerungen. vorgänge, (3), 46–54. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Winterfeld, U. v., 2002. Reflexionen zur Suffizienz als politischer Angelegenheit in sieben Etappen. In: M. Linz, P. Bartelmus, P. Hennicke, R. Jungkeit, W. Sachs, G. Scherhorn, G. Wilke, and U. v. Winterfeld, eds. Von nichts zu viel—Suffizienz gehört zur Zukunftsfähigkeit. 27–37. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Winterfeld, U. v., 1993. Über die Kunst des richtigen Verhaltens. Politische Ökologie, (Special Sept./Okt. ’93), 45–47. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Wieland, W., 1999. Verantwortung—Prinzip der Ethik? Vorgetragen am 28. Juni 1997. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag C. Winter. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Wiebe, K.S., Bruckner, M., Giljum, S., Lutz, C., and Polzin, C., 2012. Carbon and Materials Embodied in the International Trade of Emerging Economies: A Multiregional Input-Output Assessment of Trends Between 1995 and 2005. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 16 (4), 636–646. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
White, S., 2008. Social Minimum. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/social-minimum/ (last accessed September 2014). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
White, D.F., 2002. A Green Industrial Revolution? Sustainable Technological Innovation in a Global Age. Environmental Politics, 11 (2), 1–26. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Westra, L. and Werhane, P.H., eds., 1998. The Business of Consumption: Environmental Ethics and the Global Economy. Lanham (etc.): Rowman and Littlefield. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Wenar, L., 2011. Rights. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2011 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/rights/ (last accessed October 2014). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Stephens, P.H.G., 2001b. The Green only Blooms amid the Millian Flowers. A Reply to Marcel Wissenburg. Environmental Politics, 10 (3), 43–47. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Tertoolen, G., van Kreveld, D., and Verstraten, B., 1998. Psychological Resistance Against Attempts to Reduce Private Car Use. Transportation Research Part A, 32 (3), 171–181. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Temkin, L.S., 2003b. Egalitarianism Defended. Ethics, 113, 764–782. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Temkin, L.S., 2003a. Equality, Priority or What? Economics and Philosophy, 19 (1), 61–87. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Talisse, R.B., 2005. Democracy after Liberalism. Pragmatism and Deliberative P⁠o⁠l⁠i⁠t⁠i⁠c⁠s. New York, London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Sustainable Development Commission, 2009. A Sustainable New Deal—A stimulus package for economic, social and ecological recovery. London. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Sunstein, C.R., 2005. Laws of Fear: Beyond the Precautionary Principle. Cambridge (etc.): Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Sunstein, C.R. and Reisch, L.A., 2014. Automatically Green: Behavioural Economics and Environmental Protection. Harvard Environmental Law Review, 38, 127–158. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Stokes, S., 1998. Pathologies of Deliberation. In: J. Elster, ed. Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge (u.a.): Cambridge University Press, 123–139. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Stiglitz, J.E., Sen, A., and Fitoussi, J.-P., 2009. Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Stern, P.C., 1997. Toward a Working Definition of Consumption for Environmental Research and Policy. In: P.C. Stern, T. Dietz, V.W. Ruttan, R.H. Socolow, and J.L. Sweeney, eds. Environmentally Significant Consumption: Research Directions. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 12–25. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Stern, 2013. FDP-Abgeordneter reizt Grüne mit Nazi-Plakat, 6 Aug. http://www.stern.de/politik/deutschland/kritik-am-veggie-day-fdp-abgeordneter-reizt-gruene-mit-nazi-plakat-3368892.html (last accessed August 2013). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Thaler, R.H. and Sunstein, C.R., 2008. Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Stephens, P.H.G., 2001a. Green Liberalisms: Nature, Agency and the Good. Environmental Politics, 10 (3), 1–22. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Stengel, O., 2011. Suffizienz—die Konsumgesellschaft in der ökologischen Krise. München: oekom Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Steinberger, J.K., Krausmann, F., Getzner, M., Schandl, H., and West, J., 2013. Development and Dematerialization: An International Study. PLoS ONE, 8 (10), e70385. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Steffen, W., Sanderson, A., Tyson, P., Jäger, J., Matson, P., Moore III, B., Oldfield, F., Richardson, K., Schellnhuber, H.J., Turner, B.L.I., and Wasson, R.J., 2004. Global Change and the Earth System: A Planet Under Pressure. Berlin (etc.): Springer. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., Cornell, S.E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E.M., Biggs, R., Carpenter, S.R., de Vries, W., de Wit, C.A., Folke, C., Gerten, D., Heinke, J., Mace, G.M., Persson, L.M., Ramanathan, V., Reyers, B., and Sörlin, S., 2015. Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347 (6223). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Steen-Olsen, K., Weinzettel, J., Cranston, G., Ercin, A.E., and Hertwich, E.G., 2012. Carbon, Land, and Water Footprint Accounts for the European Union: Consumption, Production, and Displacements through International Trade. Environmental Science & Technology, 46, 10883–10891. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Starkey, R., 2012b. Personal carbon trading: A critical survey. Part 2: Efficiency and effectiveness. Ecological Economics, 73, 19–28. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Starkey, R., 2012a. Personal carbon trading: A critical survey. Part 1: Equity. Ecological Economics, 73, 7–18. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
SRU (Sachverständigenrat für Umweltfragen), 2012. Umweltgutachten 2012—Verantwortung in einer begrenzten Welt. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
SRU (Sachverständigenrat für Umweltfragen), 2002. Für eine neue Vorreiterrolle—Umweltgutachten 2002 des Rates von Sachverständigen für Umweltfragen. Berlin, Bundestags-Drucksache 14/8792. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Spitznagel, E., 2007. Wirtschaftswachstum als Beschäftigungsgarant? In: S. Rudolph, ed. Wachstum, Wachstum über alles? Ein ökonomisches Leitbild auf dem Prüfstand von Umwelt und Gerechtigkeit. Marburg: Metropolis, 53–73. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
UN (United Nations), 1992. Convention on Biological Diversity. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme), 2014b. Assessing Global Land Use: Balancing Consumption with Sustainable Supply. A Report of the Working Group on Land and Soils of the International Resource Panel. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme), 2014a. Decoupling 2: Technologies, Opportunities and Policy Options. A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme), 2012. GEO 5—Global Environmental Outlook. Environment for the future we want. Nairobi. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme), 2011b. Towards a Green Economy: Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme), 2011a. Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth. A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Nairobi. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme), 2009. Global Green New Deal Policy Brief. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
UNCTAD (United Nations Commission on Trade and Development) and UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme), 1974. Cocoyoc Declaration. Cocoyoc. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
UNCED (United Nations Conference on Environment & Development), 1992b. Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
UNCED (United Nations Conference on Environment & Development), 1992a. Agenda 21. Rio de Janeiro. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
UN (United Nations), 2015a. The Millennium Development Goals Report. New York. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
UN (United Nations), 2015. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. No. A/RES/70/1. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Spiegel Online, 2013. Heftiger Widerstand gegen ‘Veggie Day’ der Grünen, 5 Aug. http://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/fleischloser-tag-widerstand-gegen-veggie-day-der-gruenen-a-914949.html (last accessed August 2013). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Ullmann-Margalit, E., 1976. The generalization argument: Where does the obligation lie? Journal of Philosophy, 73 (15), 511–522. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
UBA (Umweltbundesamt), ed., 2014b. Klimaneutral leben: Verbraucher starten durch beim Klimaschutz. Dessau-Roßlau. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
UBA (Umweltbundesamt), ed., 2014a. Soziale Innovationen im Aufwind: Ein Leitfaden zur Förderung sozialer Innovationen für nachhaltigen Konsum. Dessau-Roßlau. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
UBA (Umweltbundesamt), ed., 2012. Glossar zum Ressourcenschutz. Dessau-Roßlau. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Turner, G.M., 2014. Is Global Collapse Imminent? Melbourne Sustainable Society Institute, The University of Melbourne. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Tukker, A., Eder, P., and Suh, S., 2006. Environmental Impacts of Products: Policy Relevant Information and Data Challenges. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 10 (3), 183–198. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Tukker, A., Cohen, M.J., Hubacek, K., and Mont, O., 2010. The Impacts of Household Consumption and Options for Change. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 14 (1), 13–30. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Tribe, L.H., 1980. Was spricht gegen Plastikbäume? In: D. Birnbacher, ed. Ökologie und Ethik. Stuttgart: Reclam, 20–71. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Tremmel, J., 2008. A Theory of Intergenerational Justice. Düsseldorf. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Thoreau, H.D., 2010 [1854]. Walden. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Achterberg, W., 1993. Can liberal democracy survive the environmental crisis? Sustainability, liberal neutrality and overlapping consensus. In: A. Dobson and P. Lucardie, eds. The politics of nature: explorations in green political theory. London, New York: Routledge, 81–101. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Alcott, B., 2005. Jevons’ paradox. Ecological Economics, 54 (1), 9–21. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Alcott, B., 2008. The sufficiency strategy: Would rich-world frugality lower environmental impact? Ecological Economics, 64 (4), 770–786. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Alexander, S., 2012. Living Better on Less? Toward an Economics of Sufficiency. Simplicity Institute, Simplicity Institute Report No. 12c. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Anderson, E.S., 1999. What Is the Point of Equality? Ethics, 109 (2), 287–337. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Anderson, S., 2014. Coercion. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2014 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/coercion/ (last accessed March 2014). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
AnimalAid, no date. Eating Meat: Wrecking The Planet And Creating A Global Food Shortage. http://www.animalaid.org.uk/images/pdf/factfiles/wreck.pdf (last accessed October 2015). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Arneson, R., 1989. Equality and Equal Opportunity for Welfare. Philosophical Studies, 56, 77–93. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Arneson, R., 2006. Distributive Justice and Basic Capability Equality: ‘Good Enough’ is not Good Enough. In: A. Kaufman, ed. Capabilities Equality: Basic Issues and Problems. New York: Routledge, 17–43. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Arneson, R., 2013. Egalitarianism. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2013 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2013/entries/egalitarianism/ (last accessed September 2013). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Arneson, R.J., 2003. Liberal Neutrality on the Good: An Autopsy. In: S. Wall and G. Klosko, eds. Perfectionism and Neutrality: Essays in Liberal Theory. Lanham (etc.): Rowman and Littlefield, 191–218. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Arneson, R.J., 2004. Democracy is not intrinsically just. In: K. Dowding, R.E. Goodin, and C. Pateman, eds. Justice and Democracy: Essays for Brian Barry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 40–58. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Arrow, K., Bolin, B., Costanza, R., Dasgupta, P., Folke, C., Holling, C.S., Jansson, B.-O., Levin, S., Mäler, K.-G., Perrings, C., and Pimentel, D., 1995. Economic Growth, Carrying Capacity, and the Environment. Science, 268, 520–521. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Arrow, K., Dasgupta, P., Goulder, L.H., Daily, G., Ehrlich, P.R., Heal, G., Levin, S., Mäler, K.-G., Schneider, S., Starrett, D., and Walker, B., 2004. Are we consuming too much? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18 (3), 147–172. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Avnon, D. and de-Shalit, A., 1999. Introduction: Liberalism between promise and practice. In: D. Avnon and A. de-Shalit, eds. Liberalism and its Practice. London, New York: Routledge, 1–15. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Ayres, R.U. and Ayres, L.W., eds., 2002. A Handbook of Industrial Ecology. Cheltenham (etc.): Edward Elgar. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Ayres, R.U., 2007. On the practical limits to substitution. Ecological Economics, 61 (1), 115–128. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Baatz, C., 2014. Climate Change and Individual Responsibility to Reduce GHG Emissions. Ethics, Policy & Environment, 17 (1), 1–19. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Bailey, I., 2002. European Environmental Taxes and Charges: Economic Theory and Policy Practice. Applied Geography, 22, 235–251. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Balabanian, N., 1980. Presumed Neutrality of Technology. Society, 17 (3), 7–14. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Ball, T., 2006. Democracy. In: A. Dobson and R. Eckersley, eds. Political Theory and the Ecological Challenge. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 131–147. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Barker, T., Dagoumas, A., and Rubin, J., 2009. The macroeconomic rebound effect and the world economy. Energy Efficiency, 2, 411–427. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Barry, B., 1996. Circumstances of Justice and Future Generations. In: R.I. Sikora and B. Barry, eds. Obligations to future generations. Cambridge: White Horse Press, 204–248. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Barry, B., 1999. Sustainability and Intergenerational Justice. In: A. Dobson, ed. Fairness and Futurity—Essays on Environmental Sustainability and Social Justice. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 93–117. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Barry, J. and Doran, P., 2006. Refining Green Political Economy: From Ecological Modernisation to Economic Security and Sufficiency. Analyse & Kritik, 28, 250–275. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Barry, J., 1996. Sustainability, Political Judgement and Citizenship—Connecting green politics and democracy. In: B. Doherty and M. de Geus, eds. Democracy and Green Political Thought—Sustainability, rights and citizenship. London, New York: Routledge, 115–131. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Barry, J., 2001. Greening Liberal Democracy: Practice, Theory, and Political Economy. In: J. Barry and M. Wissenburg, eds. Sustaining liberal democracy. Ecological challenges and opportunities. New York (etc.): Palgrave, 59–80. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Bartelmus, P., 2002. Suffizienz und Nachhaltigkeit. In: M. Linz, P. Bartelmus, P. Hennicke, R. Jungkeit, W. Sachs, G. Scherhorn, G. Wilke, and U. v. Winterfeld, eds. Von nichts zu viel—Suffizienz gehört zur Zukunftsfähigkeit. 39–48. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Baumgärtner, S., Becker, C., Faber, M., and Manstetten, R., 2006. Relative and absolute scarcity of nature. Assessing the roles of economics and ecology for biodiversity conservation. Ecological Economics, 59, 487–498. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Baxter, B., 2006. Political Liberalism, the Non-Human Biotic and the Abiotic: A Response to Simon Hailwood. Analyse & Kritik, 28, 190–205. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Beckerman, W., 1999. Sustainable Development and our Obligations to Future Generations. In: A. Dobson, ed. Fairness and Futurity—Essays on Environmental Sustainability and Social Justice. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 71–92. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Beemsterboer, S. and Kemp, R., 2016. Sustainability Assessment of Technologies. In: H. Heinrichs, P. Martens, G. Michelsen, and A. Wiek, eds. Sustainability Science: An Introduction. Heidelberg, New York, London: Springer, 71–83. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Bell, D.R., 2002. How can Political Liberals be Environmentalists? Political Studies, 50, 703–724. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Bell, D.R., 2006. Political Liberalism and Ecological Justice. Analyse & Kritik, 28, 206–222. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Berglund, C. and Matti, S., 2006. Citizen and consumer: the dual role of individuals in environmental policy. Environmental Politics, 15 (4), 550–571. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Berlin, I., 1969. Two Concepts of Liberty. In: Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 118–172. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Bilharz, M. and Fricke, V., 2011. Konsum und gesellschaftlicher Wandel: Das ‘Großgedruckte’ beachten. Zeitschrift für internationale Bildungsforschung und En⁠twicklungspädagogik, (4), 9–12. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Bilharz, M., Fricke, V., and Schrader, U., 2011. Wider die Bagatellisierung der Konsumentenverantwortung. GAIA, 20 (1), 9–13. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Binswanger, H.C., 2006. Die Wachstumsspirale. Marburg: Metropolis. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Binswanger, H.C., 2009. Vorwärts zur Mäßigung. Perspektiven einer nachhaltigen Wirtschaft. Hamburg: Murmann. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Birnbacher, D., 1977. Rawls’ ‘Theorie der Gerechtigkeit’ und das Problem der Gerechtigkeit Zwischen den Generationen. Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung, 31 (3), 385–401. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Birnbacher, D., 1988. Verantwortung für zukünftige Generationen. Stuttgart: Reclam. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Blake, M. and Smith, P.T., 2013. International Distributive Justice. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2013 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2013/entries/international-justice (last accessed November 2014). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
BMU (Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit), 2008. Die Dritte industrielle Revolution—Aufbruch in ein ökologisches Jahrhundert. Dimensionen und Herausforderungen des industriellen und gesellschaftlichen Wandels. Berlin. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Boardman, B., 2010. Fixing Fuel Poverty: Challenges and Solutions. Oxon, New York: Earthscan. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Bohman, J. and Richardson, H.S., 2009. Liberalism, Deliberative Democracy, and "Reasons that All Can Accept”. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 17 (3), 253–274. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Bookchin, M., 1989. Death of a small planet—It’s growth that’s killing us. The Progressive, 19–23. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Bosquet, B., 2000. Environmental tax reform: does it work? A survey of the empirical evidence. Environmental Economics, 34 (1), 19–32. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Boulanger, P.-M., 2010. Three strategies for sustainable consumption. S.A.P.I.EN.S., 3 (2). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Bracke, R., Albrecht, and De Clercq, 2006. The use of negotiated environmental agreements: from gentlemen’s agreements to binding contracts. Ghent University, Working Paper No. 2006/415. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Brand, F., 2009. Critical natural capital revisited: Ecological resilience and sustainable development. Ecological Economics, 68 (3), 605–612. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Brand, K.-W. and Jochum, G., 2000. Der Deutsche Diskurs zu nachhaltiger Entwicklung. Abschlussbericht eines DFG-Projekts zum Thema „Sustainable Development/Nachhaltige Entwicklung—Zur sozialen Konstruktion globaler Handlungskonzepte im Umweltdiskurs“. München, MPS-Texte No. 1/2000. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Brand, U., 2012. Green Economy—the Next Oxymoron? No Lessons Learned from Failures of Implementing Sustainable Development. GAIA, 21 (1), 28–32. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Brink, D., 2008. Mill’s Moral and Political Philosophy. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/mill-moral-political/ (last accessed August 2013). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Brischke, L.-A. and Spengler, L., 2011. Effizienz und Suffizienz—Ein Fall für zwei. Politische Ökologie, 126, 86–93. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Brischke, L.-A., Pehnt, M., and Jacobsen, S., 2011. Verankerung von Suffizienz im energiepolitischen Instrumentarium am Beispiel des Stromverbrauchs. Unpublished Paper, Heidelberg. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Bristow, A.L., Wardman, M., Zanni, A.M., and Chintakayala, P.K., 2010. Public acceptability of personal carbon trading and carbon tax. Ecological Economics, 69, 1824–1837. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Brook, B.W. and Bradshaw, C.J.A., 2012. Strange bedfellows? Techno-fixes to solve the big conservation issues in southern Asia. Biological Conservation, 151, 7–10. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Brown, P.M. and Cameron, L.D., 2000. What can be done to reduce overconsumption? Ecological Economics, 32, 27–41. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
BUND (Bund für Umwelt und Naturschutz Deutschland), Brot für die Welt, and Evangelischer Entwicklungsdienst, eds., 2008. Zukunftsfähiges Deutschland in einer globalisierten Welt. Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Bundesregierung, 2002. Perspectives for Germany. Our Strategy for Sustainable Development. Berlin. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Bundesregierung, 2009. Nationaler Entwicklungsplan Elektromobilität. http://www.bmvi.de/SharedDocs/DE/Anlage/VerkehrUndMobilitaet/nationaler-entwicklungsplan-elektromobilitaet.pdf?__blob=publicationFile (last accessed November 2015). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Bundesregierung, 2016. Nationales Programm für nachhaltigen Konsum. http://www.bmub.bund.de/fileadmin/Daten_BMU/Download_PDF/Produkte_und_Umwelt/nat_programm_konsum_bf.pdf (last accessed March 2016). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Bündnis 90/Die Grünen, 2013. Zeit für den grünen Wandel. Teilhaben. Einmischen. Zukunft schaffen. Bundestagswahlprogramm 2013. Berlin. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Byron, M., 2004. Introduction. In: M. Byron, ed. Satisficing and Maximizing: Moral Theorists on Practical Reason. Cambridge (etc.): Cambridge University Press, 1–13. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Cairns, S., Sloman, L., Newson, C., Anable, J., Kirkbride, A., and Goodwin, P., 2008. Smarter Choices: Assessing the Potential to Achieve Traffic Reduction Using ‘Soft Measures’. Transport Reviews, 28 (5), 593–618. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Calder, G. and McKinnon, C., 2011. Introduction: Climate change and liberal priorities. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 14 (2), 91–97. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Campbell, C., 1994. Consuming goods and the good of consuming. Critical Review, 8 (4), 503–520. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Caney, S., 2003. Entitlements, Obligations, and Distributive Justice—The Global Level. In: D.A. Bell and A. de-Shalit, eds. Forms of Justice: Critical Perspectives on David Miller’s Political Philosophy. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 287–313. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Caney, S., 2005. Cosmopolitan justice, responsibility, and global climate change. Leiden Journal of International Law, 18 (4), 747–775. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Caney, S., 2009. Justice and the distribution of greenhouse gas emissions. Journal of Global Ethics, 5 (2), 125–146. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Caney, S., 2010. Climate Change, Human Rights, and Moral Thresholds. In: S.M. Gardiner, S. Caney, D. Jamieson, and H. Shue, eds. Climate Ethics—Essential Readings. Oxford (etc.): Oxford University Press, 163–172. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Carter, I., 2012. Positive and Negative Liberty. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2012 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2012/entries/liberty-positive-negative/ (last accessed August 2013). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Casal, P., 2007. Why sufficiency is not enough. Ethics, 117 (2), 296–326. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Christen, M. and Schmidt, S., 2011. A Formal Framework for Conceptions of Sustainability—A Theoretical Contribution to the Discourse in Sustainable Development. Sustainable Development (online edition). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Christiano, T., 2008. Democracy. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/democracy/ (last accessed June 2013). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Christiano, T., ed., 2003. Philosophy and Democracy: An Anthology. Oxford (etc.): Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Christman, J. and Anderson, J., eds., 2005. Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism—New Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Ciriacy-Wantrup, S. v., 1952. Resource Conservation: Economics and Policies. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
City of Copenhagen, 2015. Copenhagen—City of Cyclists. The Bicycle Account 2014. Copenhagen. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Clark, W.C., 2007. Sustainability Science: A room of its own. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104 (6), 1737–1738. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Clark, W.C., Crutzen, P.J., and Schellnhuber, H.J., 2004. Science for Global Sustainability—Toward a New Paradigm. In: H.J. Schellnhuber, P.J. Crutzen, and W.C. Clark, eds. Earth System Analysis for Sustainability. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press, 1–28. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Coglianese, C., 1998. Implications of Liberal Neutrality for Environmental Policy. Environmental Ethics, 20 (1), 41–59. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Cohen, G.A., 1989. On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice. Ethics, 99 (4), 906–944. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Cohen, G.A., 2008. Rescuing Justice and Equality. Cambridge (etc.): Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Cohen, G.A., 2009. Why not socialism? Princeton, New Jersey (etc.): Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Cohen, J. and Sabel, C., 2006. Extra Republicam Nulla Justitia? Philosophy & Public Affairs, 34 (2), 147–175. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Cohen, J., 2003. Procedure and Substance in Deliberative Democracy. In: T. Christiano, ed. Philosophy and Democracy: An Anthology. Oxford (etc.): Oxford University Press, 17–38. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Cohen, M.J., 2011. Is the UK preparing for ‘war’? Military metaphors, personal carbon allowances, and consumption rationing in historical perspective. Climatic Change, 104 (2), 199–222. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Costanza, R., Alperovitz, G., Daly, H.E., Farley, J., Franco, C., Jackson, T., Kubiszewski, I., Schor, J., and Victor, P., 2012. Building a Sustainable and Desirable Economy-in-Society-in-Nature. New York: United Nations Division for Sustainable Development. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O’Neill, R.V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R.G., Sutton, P., and van den Belt, M., 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253–260. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Council of the European Union, 2006. Review of the EU Sustainable Development Strategy (EU SDS)—Renewed Strategy, 10917/06. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Cranor, C.F., 1985. Collective and individual duties to protect the environment. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 2 (2), 243–259. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Cripps, E., 2011. Climate change, collective harm and legitimate coercion. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 14 (2), 171–193. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Crisp, R., 2003. Equality, Priority, and Compassion. Ethics, 113 (4), 745–763. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Croson, R. and Treich, N., 2014. Behavioral Environmental Economics: Promises and Challenges. Environmental and Resource Economics, 58 (3), 335–351. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Dahl, J., 1991. Zwölfzylinder, schadstoffarm. Von den Aporien des sogenannten Umweltschutzes. Scheidewege, 21, 228–245. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Dahmus, J.B., 2014. Can Efficiency Improvements Reduce Resource Consumption? A Historical Analysis of Ten Activities. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 18 (6), 883–897. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Daly, H.E., 1977. Steady-State Economics. The Economics of Biophysical Equilibrium and Moral Growth. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Daly, H.E., 1991. Steady-state economics. 2nd edn, with new essays. Washington, DC (etc.): Island Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Daly, H.E., 1993. The Steady-State Economy: Toward a Political Economy of Biophysical Equilibrium and Moral Growth. In: H.E. Daly and K.N. Townsend, eds. Valuing the earth: economics, ecology, ethics. Cambridge, MA (etc.): MIT Press, 325–363. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Daly, H.E., 1996. Beyond Growth: the economics of sustainable development. Boston (Mass.): Beacon Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Daly, H.E., Czech, B., Trauger, D.L., Rees, W.E., Grover, M., Dobson, T., and Trombulak, S.C., 2007. Are We Consuming Too Much—for What? Conservation Biology, 21 (5), 1359–1362. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Daniels, N., 1990. Equality of What: Welfare, Resources, or Capabilities? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 50, 273–296. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Darby, S., 2007. Enough is as good as a feast—sufficiency as policy. In: S. Attali and K. Tillerson, eds. Saving Energy—Just do it! ECEEE 2007 Summer Study. Stockholm, 111–119. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Dauvergne, P., 2010. The Problem of Consumption. Global Environmental Politics, 10 (2), 1–10. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
de Geus, M., 2001. Sustainability, Liberal Democracy, Liberalism. In: J. Barry and M. Wissenburg, eds. Sustaining liberal democracy. Ecological challenges and opportunities. New York (etc.): Palgrave, 19–36. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
de Geus, M., 2004. The environment versus individual freedom and convenience. In: M. Wissenburg and Y. Levy, eds. Liberal democracy and environmentalism: The end of environmentalism? London, New York: Routledge, 87–99. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
De Groot, R., Van der Perk, J., Chiesura, A., and van Vliet, A., 2003. Importance and threat as determining factors for criticality of natural capital. Ecological Economics, 44 (2–3), 187–204. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
de-Shalit, A., 1995. Is Liberalism Environment-Friendly? Social Theory and Practice, 21 (2), 287–314. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
de-Shalit, A., 1997. Environmentalism for Europe—One Model? Journal of Applied Philosophy, 14 (2), 177–186. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
de-Shalit, A., 2000. The Environment: Between Theory and Practice. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Defra (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs), 2008. An assessment of the potential effectiveness and strategic fit of personal carbon trading. London: Defra. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Delmas, M.A., Fischlein, M., and Asensio, O.I., 2013. Information strategies and energy conservation behavior: A meta-analysis of experimental studies from 1975 to 2012. Energy Policy, 61, 729–739. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Deutscher Bundestag, 2013. Schlussbericht der Enquete-Kommission „Wachstum, Wohlstand, Lebensqualität—Wege zu nachhaltigem Wirtschaften und gesellschaftlichem Fortschritt in der Sozialen Marktwirtschaft“. Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Diefenbacher, H. and Habicht-Erenler, S., eds., 1991. Wachstum und Wohlstand: neuere Konzepte zur Erfassung der Sozial- und Umweltverträglichkeit. Marburg: Metropolis. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Diefenbacher, H., 2007. Wirtschaftswachstum als Statistik-Phantom. In: S. Rudolph, ed. Wachstum, Wachstum über alles? Ein ökonomisches Leitbild auf dem Prüfstand von Umwelt und Gerechtigkeit. Marburg: Metropolis, 31–51. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Diefenbacher, H., 2008. Eine Dritte industrielle Revolution—Die große schöne Lösung für das 21. Jahrhundert? In: BMU (Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit), ed. Die Dritte industrielle Revolution—Aufbruch in ein ökologisches Jahrhundert. Dimensionen und Herausforderungen des industriellen und gesellschaftlichen Wandels. Berlin, 130–132. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Diefenbacher, H., Zieschank, R., and Rodenhäuser, D., 2010. Measuring Welfare in Germany: A suggestion for a new welfare index. Dessau-Roßlau: Umweltbund⁠e⁠samt, UBA Texte No. 03/2010. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Diekmann, J., 1999. Zwischen Effizienz und Suffizienz. Ökologisches Wirtschaften, 3/1999, 25–26. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
DiLorenzo, T., 2011. The Trojan Horse of ‘Happiness Research’. https://mises.org/library/trojan-horse-happiness-research (last accessed May 2015). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Dinda, S., 2004. Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: A Survey. Ecological Economics, 49, 431–455. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Dobson, A. and Lucardie, P., eds., 1993. The politics of nature: explorations in green political theory. London, New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Dobson, A., 1996a. Democratising Green Theory—Preconditions and principles. In: B. Doherty and M. de Geus, eds. Democracy and Green Political Thought—Sustainability, rights and citizenship. London, New York: Routledge, 132–148. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Dobson, A., 1996b. Environmental Sustainabilities: An Analysis and a Typology. Environmental Politics, 5 (3), 401–428. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Dobson, A., 2007. Green Political Thought. 4. ed. London, New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Dobson, A., 2010. Environmental citizenship and pro-environmental behaviour. London: Sustainable Development Research Network. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Doherty, B. and de Geus, M., eds., 1996. Democracy and Green Political Thought—Sustainability, rights and citizenship. London, New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Donaldson, S. and Kymlicka, W., 2011. Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Dowding, K., Goodin, R.E., and Pateman, C., eds., 2004. Justice and Democracy: Essays for Brian Barry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Doyal, L. and Gough, I., 1991. A Theory of Human Need. Basingstoke, Hampshire (etc.): Macmillan. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Dryzek, J.S. and Dunleavy, P., 2009. Theories of the Democratic State. Basingstoke, Hampshire (etc.): Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Dryzek, J.S., 1992. Ecology and discursive democracy: Beyond liberal capitalism and the administrative state. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, 3 (2), 18–42. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Dryzek, J.S., 2005. The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses. 2nd edn Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Durning, A.T., 1992. How much is enough? The consumer society and the future of the Earth. London: Earthscan. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Dworkin, G., 2010. Paternalism. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2010 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2010/entries/paternalism/ (last accessed August 2013). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Dworkin, R., 1978. Liberalism. In: S. Hampshire, ed. Public and Private Morality. Cambridge (etc.): Cambridge University Press, 113–143. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Dworkin, R., 1981a. What is Equality? Part 1: Equality of Welfare. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 10 (3), 185–246. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Dworkin, R., 1981b. What is Equality? Part 2: Equality of Resources. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 10 (4), 283–345. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Dworkin, R., 1987. What is Equality? Part 3: The Place of Liberty. Iowa Law Review, 73 (1), 1–54. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Dworkin, R., 2011. Justice for Hedgehogs. Cambridge (Mass.) (etc.): Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Easterlin, R.A., 2001. Income and Happiness: Towards a Unified Theory. The Economic Journal, 111 (473), 465–484. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
EC (European Commission), 2000. Communication from the Commission on the precautionary principle, COM(2000) 1 final. Brussels. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
EC (European Commission), 2001. Communication from the Commission: A Sustainable Europe for a Better World: A European Union Strategy for Sustainable Development, COM(2001)264 final. Brussels. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
EC (European Commission), 2005. Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Thematic Strategy on the sustainable use of natural resources, COM(2005) 670 final. Brussels. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
EC (European Commission), 2008. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the Sustainable Consumption and Production and Sustainable Industrial Policy Action Plan, COM(2008) 397 final. Brussels. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
EC (European Commission), 2010. Communication from the Commission—EUROPE 2020: A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, COM(2010) 2020 final. Brussels. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
EC (European Commission), 2015. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Closing the loop—An EU action plan for the Circular Economy, COM(2015) 614 final. Brussels. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
EC (European Commission), 2016. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: A European agenda for the collaborative economy, COM(2016) 356 final. Brussels. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Eckersley, R., 1996. Greening Liberal Democracy—The rights discourse revisited. In: B. Doherty and M. de Geus, eds. Democracy and Green Political Thought—Sustainability, rights and citizenship. London, New York: Routledge, 212–236. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
EEA (European Environment Agency), 2010. The European Environment—State and Outlook 2010: Consumption and the Environment. Copenhagen. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
EEA (European Environment Agency), 2012a. Environmental Indicator Report 2012—Ecosystem Resilience and Resource Efficiency in a Green Economy in Europe. Copenhagen. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
EEA (European Environment Agency), 2012b. The European Environment State and Outlook 2010—Consumption and Environment 2012 Update. Copenhagen. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
EEA (European Environment Agency), 2013a. Environmental pressures from European consumption and production—A study in integrated environmental and economic analysis. EEA Technical report No. 2/2013, Copenhagen. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
EEA (European Environment Agency), 2013b. A closer look at urban transport. TERM 2013: transport indicators tracking progress towards environmental targets in Europe. EEA Report No. 11/2013, Copenhagen. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
EEA (European Environment Agency), 2014. Environmental Indicator Report 2014—Environmental Impacts of Production-Consumption Systems in Europe. Copenhagen. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
EEA (European Environment Agency), 2015. The European Environment—State and Outlook 2015: Synthesis Report. Copenhagen. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Ehrlich, P.R. and Goulder, L.H., 2007. Is Current Consumption Excessive? A General Framework and Some Indications for the United States. Conservation Biology, 21 (5), 1145–1154. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Ehrlich, P.R. and Holdren, J.P., 1971. Impact of Population Growth. Science, 171 (3977), 1212–1217. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Ekardt, F., 2016. Suffizienz: Politikinstrumente, Grenzen von Technik und Wachstum und die schwierige Rolle des guten Lebens. Soziologie und Nachhaltigkeit, (04/2016), 1–25. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Ekins, P. and Speck, S., 2000. Proposals of environmental fiscal reforms and the obstacles to their implementation. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 2 (2), 93–114. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Ekins, P., 1993. ‘Limits to growth’ and ‘sustainable development’: grappling with ecological realities. Ecological Economics, 8, 269–288. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Ekins, P., 1999. European Environmental Taxes and Charges: Recent Experience, Issues and Trends. Ecological Economics, 31, 39–62. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Ekins, P., 2003. Identifying critical natural capital—Conclusions about critical natural capital. Ecological Economics, 44 (2–3), 277–292. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Ekins, P., Simon, S., Deutsch, L., Folke, C., and De Groot, R., 2003. A framework for the practical application of the concepts of critical natural capital and strong sustainability. Ecological Economics, 44 (2–3), 165–185. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Elgin, D. and Mitchell, A., 1977. Voluntary Simplicity. The Co-Evolution Quarterly, Summer 1977. http://www.duaneelgin.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/voluntary_simplicity.pdf (last accessed October 2012). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Elkington, J., 1997. Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business. Chichester: Capstone Pub. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Elster, J., 1986. The market and the forum: three varieties of political theory. In: J. Elster and A. Hylland, eds. Foundations of Social Choice Theory. Cambridge (etc.): Cambridge University Press, 103–132. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Elster, J., 1998. Introduction. In: J. Elster, ed. Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge (etc.): Cambridge University Press, 1–18. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Enquete-Kommission, 1994. Die Industriegesellschaft gestalten—Perspektiven für einen nachhaltigen Umgang mit Stoff- und Materialströmen. Bericht der Enquete-Kommission ‘Schutz des Menschen und der Umwelt—Bewertungskriterien und Perspektiven für umweltverträgliche Stoffkreisläufe in der Industriegesellschaft’. Bonn. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Enquete-Kommission, 1998. Konzept Nachhaltigkeit: vom Leitbild zur Umsetzung. Abschlussbericht der Enquete-Kommission ‘Schutz des Menschen und der Umwelt—Ziele und Rahmenbedingungen einer nachhaltig zukunftsverträglichen Entwicklung’. Bonn. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
EPA Network (Network of Heads of European Environment Protection Agencies), 2006. Delivering the sustainable use of natural resources: A contribution from the following members of the Network of Heads of European Environment Protection Agencies on the Thematic Strategy on the Sustainable Use of Natural Resources. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Eshel, G., Shepon, A., Makov, T., and Milo, R., 2014. Land, irrigation water, greenhouse gas, and reactive nitrogen burdens of meat, eggs, and dairy production in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PNAS Early Edition. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Eshleman, A., 2009. Moral Responsibility. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2009 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2009/entries/moral-responsibility/ (last accessed January 2013). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), 2014. The State of the World Fisheries and Aquaculture—Opportunities and Challenges. Rome: FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Fawcett, T., 2010. Personal carbon trading: A policy ahead of its time? Energy Policy, 38, 6868–6876. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Fawcett, T., Bottrill, C., Boardman, B., and Lye, G., 2007. Trialling personal carbon allowances. London: UK Energy Research Centre. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Feinberg, J., 1984. Harm to Others—The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Felder, S. and Schleiniger, R., 2002. Environmental Tax Reform: Efficiency and Political Feasibility. Ecological Economics, 42, 107–116. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Fischer, C. and Grießhammer, R., 2013. Mehr als nur weniger—Suffizienz: Begriff, Begründung und Potenziale. Öko-Institut, Öko-Institut Working Paper No. 2/2013. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Fishman, E., Washington, S., and Haworth, N., 2014. Bike share’s impact on car use: Evidence from the United States, Great Britain, and Australia. Transportation Research Part D, 31, 13–20. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Focus Online, 2013. Arrogante „Verbotsmentalität“ ärgert selbst Ur-Grüne, 5 Aug. http://www.focus.de/politik/deutschland/tid-32754/die-lizenz-zum-vorschreiben-veggie-tag-tueten-abgabe-tempolimit-die-bevormundungs-wut-der-gruenen_aid_1063304.html (last accessed August 2013). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
FoEE (Friends of the Earth Europe), ed., 1995. Towards Sustainable Europe—The Study. Brussels. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, L., and Holling, C.S., 2004. Regime shifts, resilience and biodiversity in ecosystem management. Annual Review in Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 35, 557–581. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Fraenkel, E., 1973. Deutschland und die westlichen Demokratien. Stuttgart (etc.): Verlag W. Kohlhammer. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Frankfurt, H., 1987. Equality as a Moral Ideal. Ethics, 98 (1), 21–43. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Frankfurt, H., 1997. Equality and Respect. Social Research, 64 (1), 3–15. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Frankfurt, H.G., 1984. Necessity and Desire. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 45 (1), 1–13. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Freeden, M., 2008. European Liberalisms: An Essay in Comparative Political Thought. European Journal of Political Theory, 7 (1), 9–30. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Freedom House, 2015a. Freedom in the World 2015—Discarding Democracy: Return to the Iron Fist. Washington, New York: Freedom House. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Freedom House, 2015b. Freedom in the World 2015 Methodology. Washington, New York: Freedom House. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Frevel, B., 2004. Demokratie: Entwicklung, Gestaltung, Problematisierung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Frey, B.S. and Stutzer, A., 2002. Happiness and Economics. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Fromm, E., 1976. Haben oder Sein: Die seelischen Grundlagen einer neuen Gesellschaft. Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Fudge, S. and Peters, M., 2011. Behaviour Change in the UK Climate Debate: An Assessment of Responsibility, Agency and Political Dimensions. Sustainability, 3, 789–808. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Galbraith, J.K., 1958a. The Affluent Society. London: Hamilton. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Galbraith, J.K., 1958b. How Much Should a Country Consume? In: H. Jarrett, ed. Perspectives on Conservation—Essays on America’s Natural Resources. Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins Press, 89–99. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Galston, W.A., 2007. Why the new liberalism isn’t all that new, and why the old liberalism isn’t what we thought it was. Social Philosophy and Policy, 24 (1), 289–305. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Gärling, T. and Schuitema, G., 2007. Travel Demand Management Targeting Reduced Private Car Use: Effectiveness, Public Acceptability and Political Feasibility. Journal of Social Issues, 63 (1), 139–153. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Gaus, G. and Courtland, S.D., 2010. Liberalism. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/liberalism/ (last accessed April 2013). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Gaus, G., 2005. The Place of Autonomy within Liberalism. In: J. Christman and J. Anderson, eds. Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism—New Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 272–306. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Georgescu-Roegen, N., 1975. Energy and Economic Myths. Southern Economic Journal, 41 (3), 347–381. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Getzner, M., 2009. Wirtschaftswachstum und Umweltverbrauch: Über die Zusammenhänge von Energie- und Ressourcenverbrauch, Emissionen und BIP in Österr⁠e⁠i⁠c⁠h. Wissenschaft & Umwelt Interdisziplinär, 13, 22–31. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Giddens, A., 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge (UK): Polity Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Gillingham, K., Kotchen, M.J., Rapson, D.S., and Wagner, G., 2013. Energy policy: The rebound effect is overplayed. Nature, 493 (7433), 475–476. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Golub, A., 2016. Mobility and Sustainability. In: H. Heinrichs, P. Martens, G. Michelsen, and A. Wiek, eds. Sustainability Science: An Introduction. Heidelberg, New York, London: Springer, 261–272. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Goodin, R.E. and Reeve, A., eds., 1989. Liberal Neutrality. London, New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Goodin, R.E., 1988. Reasons for Welfare: The Political Theory of the Welfare State. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Goodin, R.E., 1990. Relative Needs. In: A. Ware and R.E. Goodin, eds. Needs and Welfare. London (etc.): Sage Publications, 12–33. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Goodin, R.E., 1992. Green Political Theory. Cambridge, Oxford: Polity Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Goodin, R.E., 1995. Utilitarianism as a Public Philosophy. Cambridge (etc.): Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Goodland, R. and Daly, H.E., 1996. Environmental Sustainability: Universal and Non-Negotiable. Ecological Applications, Vol. 6 (No. 4), 1002–1017. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Gosepath, S., 2003. Verteidigung egalitärer Gerechtigkeit. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 51 (2), 257–297. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Gosepath, S., 2011. Equality. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2011 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2011/entries/equality/ (last accessed August 2013). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Gössling, S. and Choi, A.S., 2015. Transport transitions in Copenhagen: Comparing the cost of cars and bicycles. Ecological Economics, 113, 106–113. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Gray, J., 1996. Mill on Liberty: A Defence. Second Edition. London, New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Gray, J., 2004. Back to Mill: Review of ‘The snake that swallowed its tail: some contradictions in modern liberalism’ by Mark Garnett. The New Statesman, 15 Nov. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Gregg, R.B., 1936. The Value Of Voluntary Simplicity. Wallingford, Pennsylvania: Pendle Hill. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Grober, U., 2002. Tiefe Wurzeln: Eine kleine Begriffsgeschichte von ‘Sustainable Development’—Nachhaltigkeit. Natur und Kultur, 3 (1), 116–128. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Grober, U., 2010. Die Entdeckung der Nachhaltigkeit: Kulturgeschichte eines Begriffs. München: Kunstmann. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Grunwald, A., 2004. Nachhaltigkeit begreifen: Zwischen Leitbild und Trugbild. GAIA, 13 (1). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Grunwald, A., 2006. Technikfolgenabschätzung als Nachhaltigkeitsbewertung—Konzeptionelle Herausforderungen und methodische Probleme. In: J. Kopfmüller, ed. Ein Konzept auf dem Prüfstand—Das integrative Nachhaltigkeitskonzept in der Forschungspraxis. Berlin: Edition Sigma, 39–61. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Grunwald, A., 2008. Technik und Politikberatung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Grunwald, A., 2010. Wider die Privatisierung der Nachhaltigkeit. Warum ökologisch korrekter Konsum die Umwelt nicht retten kann. GAIA, 19 (3), 178–182. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Grunwald, A., 2011. Statt Privatisierung: Politisierung der Nachhaltigkeit. GAIA, 20 (1), 17–19. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Gutmann, A. and Thompson, D., 2004. Why deliberative democracy? Princeton, New Jersey (etc.): Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Habermas, J., 1996. Drei normative Modelle der Demokratie. In: Die Einbeziehung des Anderen. Studien zur politischen Theorie. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Hailwood, S., 2004. How to be a Green Liberal—Nature, Value and Liberal Philosophy. Chesham: Acumen. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Hamilton, L.A., 2003. The Political Philosophy of Needs. Cambridge (etc.): Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Hammitt, J.K., 2000. Are The Costs of Proposed Environmental Regulations Overestimated? Evidence from the CFC Phaseout. Environmental and Resource Economics, 16 (3), 281–301. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Hannis, M., 2005. Public Provision of Environmental Goods: Neutrality or Sustainability? A Reply to David Miller. Environmental Politics, 14 (5), 577–595. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Hardin, G., 1968. The Tragedy of the Commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Hardin, R., 1993. Liberalism: Political and Economic. Social Philosophy and Policy, 10 (2), 121–144. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Hawken, P., Lovins, A.B., and Lovins, L.H., 1999. Natural Capitalism: Creating the Next Industrial Revolution. Boston (Mass.): Little, Brown and Co. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Hawkes, J., 2001. The Fourth Pillar of Sustainability—Culture’s essential role in public planning. Cultural Development Network Victoria, Australia. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Hayek, F.A., 1960. The Constitution of Liberty. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Hayward, T., 1994. Ecological Thought. An Introduction. Cambridge (UK): Polity Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Hayward, T., 1998. Political Theory and Ecological Values. New York: St. Martin’s Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Hayward, T., 2007. Human Rights Versus Emissions Rights: Climate Justice and the Equitable Distribution of Ecological Space. Ethics & International Affairs, 21 (4), 431–450. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Heath, J., 2005. Liberal Autonomy and Consumer Sovereignty. In: J. Christman and J. Anderson, eds. Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism—New Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 204–225. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Heidbrink, L. and Reidel, J., 2011. Nachhaltiger Konsum durch politische Selbstbindung. GAIA, 20 (3), 152–156. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Heidbrink, L. and Schmidt, I., 2011. Das Prinzip der Konsumentenverantwortung—Grundlagen, Bedingungen und Umsetzungen verantwortlichen Konsums. In: L. Heidbrink, I. Schmidt, and B. Ahaus, eds. Die Verantwortung des Konsumenten. Über das Verhältnis von Markt, Moral und Konsum. Frankfurt, New York: Campus Verlag, 25–56. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Heidbrink, L., Schmidt, I., and Ahaus, B., eds., 2011. Die Verantwortung des Konsumenten. Über das Verhältnis von Markt, Moral und Konsum. Frankfurt, New York: Campus Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung, ed., 2009. Auf dem Weg zu einem Green New Deal—Die Klima- und die Wirtschaftskrise als transatlantische Herausforderungen. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Heinrichs, H., 2013a. Nachhaltigkeitspolitik: Neuer Kontext für Entscheidungen unter Unsicherheit und Risiko. In: R. von Detten, F. Faber, and M. Bemmann, eds. Unberechenbare Umwelt—Zum Umgang mit Unsicherheit und Nicht-Wissen. Wiesbaden: Springer, 219–252. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Heinrichs, H., 2013b. Sharing Economy: A Potential New Pathway to Sustainability. GAIA, 22 (4), 228–231. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Heinrichs, H., Martens, P., Michelsen, G., and Wiek, A., eds., 2016. Sustainability Science: An Introduction. Heidelberg, New York, London: Springer. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Hellmann, K.-U., 2011. Der Eigensinn der Konsumenten—Zur Frage der Verantwortung bei der Zurechnung von Konsumentenverantwortung. In: L. Heidbrink, I. Schmidt, and B. Ahaus, eds. Die Verantwortung des Konsumenten. Über das Verhältnis von Markt, Moral und Konsum. Frankfurt, New York: Campus Verlag, 269–283. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Hennicke, P., 2002. Effizienz und Suffizienz in einem System nachhaltiger Energienutzung. In: M. Linz, P. Bartelmus, P. Hennicke, R. Jungkeit, W. Sachs, G. Scherhorn, G. Wilke, and U. v. Winterfeld, eds. Von nichts zu viel—Suffizienz gehört zur Zukunftsfähigkeit. 57–70. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Hertwich, E.G., 2005. Consumption and Industrial Ecology. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9 (1-2), 1–6. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Heyen, D.A., Fischer, C., Barth, R., Brunn, C., Grießhammer, R., Keimeyer, F., and Wolff, F., 2013. Mehr als nur weniger—Suffizienz: Notwendigkeit und Optionen politischer Gestaltung. Öko-Institut, Working Paper No. 3/2013. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Hoeschele, W., 2007. Scarcity. Encyclopedia of Environment and Society. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Holzinger, H., 2010. Wirtschaften jenseits von Wachstum? Befunde und Ausblicke. Wien: Österreichisches Lebensministerium. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Höpflinger, F., 2010. Alterssicherungssysteme: Doppelte Herausforderung von demografischer Alterung und Postwachstum. In: I. Seidl and A. Zahrnt, eds. Postwachstumsgesellschaft. Konzepte für die Zukunft. Marburg: Metropolis, 53–63. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Hopwood, B., Mellor, M., and O’Brien, G., 2005. Sustainable Development: Mapping Different Approaches. Sustainable Development, 13 (1), 38–52. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Horstkötter, D., 2004. Sustainability and plurality: From the moderate end of the liberal equilibrium to the open end of a situated liberal neutrality. In: M. Wissenburg and Y. Levy, eds. Liberal democracy and environmentalism: The end of environmentalism? London, New York: Routledge, 155–166. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Hösle, V., 1991. Philosophie der ökologischen Krise. München: Beck. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Howaldt, J. and Schwarz, M., 2010. Soziale Innovation im Fokus: Skizze eines gesellschaftstheoretisch inspirierten Forschungskonzepts. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Huber, J., 1995a. Nachhaltige Entwicklung. Strategien für eine ökologische und soziale Erdpolitik. Berlin: Edition Sigma. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Huber, J., 1995b. Nachhaltige Entwicklung durch Suffizienz, Effizienz und Konsistenz. In: P. Fritz, J. Huber, and H.W. Levi, eds. Nachhaltigkeit in naturwissenschaftlicher und sozialwissenschaftlicher Perspektive. Stuttgart: Hirzel, 31–46. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Huber, J., 1999. Industrielle Ökologie. Konsistenz, Effizienz und Suffizienz in zyklusanalytischer Betrachtung. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Huber, J., 2000. Towards industrial ecology: sustainable development as a concept of ecological modernization. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 2 (4), 269–285. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Huber, J., 2008. Technological Environmental Innovations (TEIs) in a Chain-Analytical and Life-Cycle-Analytical Perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16 (18), 1980–1986. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Huber, J., 2011. Ökologische Modernisierung und Umweltinnovation. In: M. Groß, ed. Handbuch Umweltsoziologie. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 279–302. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Hubin, D.C., 1989. Scarcity and the Demands of Justice. Capital University Law Review, 18, 185–199. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Hueting, R. and Reijnders, L., 1998. Sustainability is an objective concept. Ecological Economics, 27, 139–147. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Hueting, R., 1980. New Scarcity and Economic Growth. More Welfare through Less Production? Amsterdam (etc.): North-Holland Publishing Company. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Humphrey, M., 2002. Preservation Versus the People? Nature, Humanity, and Political Philosophy. Oxford (etc.): Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Humphrey, M., 2003. Nonbasic Environmental Goods and Social Justice. In: D.A. Bell and A. de-Shalit, eds. Forms of Justice: Critical Perspectives on David Miller’s Political Philosophy. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 331–346. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Hyams, K., 2009. A Just Response to Climate Change: Personal Carbon Allowances and the Normal-Functioning Approach. Journal of Social Philosophy, 40 (2), 237–256. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Illich, I., 1973. Tools for conviviality. New York (etc.): Harper & Row. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), 2014. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva: IPCC. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Jackson, T., 2005. Live Better by Consuming Less? Is There a ‘Double Dividend’ in Sustainable Consumption? Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9 (1‐2), 19–36. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Jackson, T., 2007. Sustainable Consumption. In: G. Atkinson, S. Dietz, and E. Neumayer, eds. Handbook of Sustainable Development. Cheltenham (etc.): Edward Elgar, 254–268. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Jackson, T., 2009. Prosperity without growth. London (etc.): Earthscan. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Jaeger, C.C., Paroussos, L., Mangalagiu, D., Kupers, R., Mandel, A., Tàbara, J.D., Meißner, F., and Lass, W., 2011. A New Growth Path for Europe. Generating Prosperity and Jobs in the Low-Carbon Economy. Final Report. A study commissioned by the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety. Potsdam: European Climate Forum e.V. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Jänicke, M., 1996. Erfolgsbedingungen von Umweltpolitik. In: M. Jänicke, ed. Umweltpolitik der Industrieländer. Entwicklung, Bilanz, Erfolgsbedingungen. Berlin: Edition Sigma, 9–28. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Jänicke, M., 2003. Umweltpolitik. In: M. Jänicke, P. Kunig, and M. Stitzel, eds. Umweltpolitik. Politik, Recht und Management des Umweltschutzes in Staat und Unternehmen. Bonn: Dietz, 30–157. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Jänicke, M., 2009. On ecological and political modernization. In: A.P.J. Mol, D.A. Sonnenfeld, and G. Spaargaren, eds. The ecological modernisation reader: environmental reform in theory and practice. London, New York: Routledge, 28–41. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Jänicke, M., 2011. ‘Green Growth’: From a growing eco-industry to a sustainable economy. Berlin: Freie Universität, Environmental Policy Research Centre, No. FFU-Report 09-2011. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Jänicke, M. and Jacob, K., 2009. A Third Industrial Revolution? Solutions to the crisis of resource-intensive growth. Berlin: Freie Universität, Environmental Policy Research Centre, FFU-report No. 02-2009. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Jänicke, M. and Jörgens, H., 2009. New Approaches to Environmental Governance. In: A.P.J. Mol, D.A. Sonnenfeld, and G. Spaargaren, eds. The ecological modernisation reader: environmental reform in theory and practice. London, New York: Routledge, 156–189. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Jenkins, J., Nordhaus, T., and Shellenberger, M., 2011. Energy Emergence: Rebound & Backfire as emergent Phenomena. Oakland (CA): Breakthrough Institute. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Jensen, P.D., Basson, L., and Leach, M., 2011. Reinterpreting Industrial Ecology. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 15 (5), 680–692. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Johnson, B.L., 2003. Ethical obligations in a tragedy of the commons. Environmental Values, 12 (3), 271–287. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Jonas, H., 1979. Das Prinzip Verantwortung: Versuch einer Ethik für die technologis⁠c⁠h⁠e Zivilisation. Frankfurt am Main: Insel-Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Kassenboehmer, S.C. and Schmidt, C.M., 2011. Beyond GDP and Back: What is the Value-Added by Additional Components of Welfare Measurement? Berlin. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Kates, R.W., Clark, W.C., Corell, R., Hall, J.M., Jaeger, C.C., Lowe, I., McCarthy, J.J., Schellnhuber, H.J., Bolin, B., Dickson, N.M., Faucheux, S., Gallopin, G.C., Grübler, A., Huntley, B., Jäger, J., Jodha, N.S., Kasperson, R.E., Mabogunje, A., Matson, P., Mooney, H., III, B.M., O’Riordan, T., and Svedin, U., 2001. Sustainability Science. Science, 292 (5517), 641–642. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Kates, R.W., Parris, T.M., and Leiserowitz, A.A., 2005. What Is Sustainable Development? Goals, Indicators, Values, and Practice. Environment, 47 (3), 9–21. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Keesing, F., Belden, L.K., Daszak, P., Dobson, A., Harvell, C.D., Holt, R.D., Hudson, P., Jolles, A., Jones, K.E., Mitchell, C.E., Myers, S.S., Bogich, T., and Ostfeld, R.S., 2010. Impacts of biodiversity on the emergence and transmission of infectious diseases. Nature, 468, 647–652. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Kelly, P., 2005. Liberalism. Cambridge (etc.): Polity Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Kemp, R., 1997. Environmental Policy and Technical Change. A Comparison of the Technological Impact of Policy Instruments. Cheltenham (etc.): Edward Elgar. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Kemp, R., 2010. Sustainable technologies do not exist! Ekonomiaz, 3 (75), 2–17. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Kernohan, A., 1993. Accumulative Harms and the Interpretation of the Harm Principle. Social Theory and Practice, 19 (1), 51–72. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Kernohan, A., 1998. Liberalism, Equality, and Cultural Oppression. Cambridge (etc.): Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Kernohan, A., 2000. Individual Acts and Accumulative Consequences. Philosophical Studies, 97 (3), 343–366. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Keynes, J.M., 1930. Economic Possibilities for our Grandchildren. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Kleinhückelkotten, S., 2005. Suffizienz und Lebensstile : Ansätze für eine milieuorientierte Nachhaltigkeitskommunikation. Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Kollmuss, A. and Agyeman, J., 2002. Mind the Gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8 (3), 239–260. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Kopfmüller, J., 2006. Das integrative Konzept nachhaltiger Entwicklung: Motivation, Architektur, Perspektiven. In: J. Kopfmüller, ed. Ein Konzept auf dem Prüfstand—Das integrative Nachhaltigkeitskonzept in der Forschungspraxis. Berlin: Edition Sigma, 23–37. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Kopfmüller, J., Brandl, V., Jörissen, J., Paetau, M., Banse, G., Coenen, R., and Grunwald, A., 2001. Nachhaltige Entwicklung integrativ betrachtet: konstitutive Elemente, Regeln, Indikatoren. Berlin: Edition Sigma. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Kraemer, K., 1997. Nachhaltigkeit durch Konsumverzicht? „Sustainable Development“—eine soziologische Betrachtung. Zeitschrift für angewandte Umweltforschung, 10 (2), 198–209. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Kraftfahrt-Bundesamt, 2015. Pressemitteilung Nr. 5/2015: Der Fahrzeugbestand am 1. Januar 2015. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Krausmann, F., Gingrich, S., Eisenmenger, N., Erb, K.-H., Haberl, H., and Fischer-Kowalski, M., 2009. Growth in global materials use, GDP and population during the 20th century. Ecological Economics, 68 (10), 2696–2705. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Krebs, A., 2001. Wieviel Natur schulden wir der Zukunft? Eine Kritik am zukun⁠f⁠t⁠sethischen Egalitarismus. In: D. Birnbacher and G. Brudermüller, eds. Zukunftsverantwortung und Generationensolidarität. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 157–183. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Krebs, A., 2003. Warum Gerechtigkeit nicht als Gleichheit zu begreifen ist. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 51 (2), 235–253. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Krebs, A., ed., 2000. Gleichheit oder Gerechtigkeit. Texte der neuen Egalitarismuskritik. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Kroes, P., 1998. Philosophy of Technology. In: E. Craig, ed. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. London, New York: Routledge, 284–288. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Kuhn, K., 2006. Zur kulturellen Dimension nachhaltiger Entwicklung—Eine metatheoretische und diskursanalytische Bestandsaufnahme. INFU-Diskussionsbeiträge 28/06. Lüneburg. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Kuhnimhof, T., Armoogum, J., Buehler, R., Dargay, J., Denstadli, J.M., and Yamamoto, T., 2012. Men Shape a Downward Trend in Car Use among Young Adults—Evidence from Six Industrialized Countries. Transport Reviews, 32 (6), 761–779. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Kunig, P., 2003. Umweltrecht. In: M. Jänicke, P. Kunig, and M. Stitzel, eds. Umweltpolitik. Politik, Recht und Management des Umweltschutzes in Staat und Unternehmen. Bonn: Dietz, 159–288. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Kurz, R., 2007. Wirtschaftswachstum als Ausweg aus der ökologisch-sozialen Krise? In: S. Rudolph, ed. Wachstum, Wachstum über alles? Ein ökonomisches Leitbild auf dem Prüfstand von Umwelt und Gerechtigkeit. Marburg: Metropolis, 17–30. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Kutz, C., 2000. Complicity: Ethics and Law for a Collective Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Kymlicka, W., 1989. Liberal Individualism and Liberal Neutrality. Ethics, 99, 883–905. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Langhelle, O., 2000. Why ecological modernization and sustainable development should not be conflated. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 2 (4), 303–322. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Larmore, C., 2003. Patterns of Moral Complexity. Reprinted excerpts from the original by Cambridge University Press (1987). In: S. Wall and G. Klosko, eds. Perfectionism and Neutrality: Essays in Liberal Theory. Lanham (etc.): Rowman and Littlefield, 47–60. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Latouche, S., 2009. Farewell to growth. Cambridge (etc.): Polity Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Layard, R., 2005. Die glückliche Gesellschaft. Frankfurt/Main, New York: Campus-Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Leahy, E., Lyons, S., and Tol, R.S.J., 2010. An estimate of the number of vegetarians in the world. ESRI working paper No. 340. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Leipert, C., 1991. Die andere Seite der Wachstumsmedaille: Ökologische und soziale Folgekosten des Wirtschaftens in der Industriegesellschaft. In: H. Diefenbacher and S. Habicht-Erenler, eds. Wachstum und Wohlstand: neuere Konzepte zur Erfassung der Sozial- und Umweltverträglichkeit. Marburg: Metropolis, 21–41. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Lerch, A. and Nutzinger, H.G., 2002. Sustainability: Economic Approaches and Ethical Implications. Journal of Economic and Social Policy, 6 (2). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Lerch, A., 2006. Kann man Nachhaltigkeit ökonomisch begründen? In: F. Ekardt, ed. Generationengerechtigkeit und Zukunftsfähigkeit. Philosophische, juristische, ökonomische, politologische und theologische Neuansätze. Hamburg: Lit Verlag, 108–128. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Levin, S.A. and Clark, W.C., 2010. Toward a Science of Sustainability: Report from Toward a Science of Sustainability Conference November 29, 2009 - December 2, 2009. Warrenton, Virginia: The National Science Foundation. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Lifset, R., 1998. Setting the Boundaries? Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2 (2), 1–2. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Lin, A.C., 2006. The Unifying Role of Harm in Environmental Law. Wisconsin Law Review, 897–985. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Linklater, A., 2011. The Problem of Harm in World Politics—Theoretical Investigations. Cambridge (etc.): Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Linz, M. and Kristof, K., 2007. Suffizienz, nicht Wachstum, ist der Schlüssel für mehr Lebensqualität. In: S. Rudolph, ed. Wachstum, Wachstum über alles? Ein ökonomisches Leitbild auf dem Prüfstand von Umwelt und Gerechtigkeit. Marburg: Metropolis, 177–191. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Linz, M. and Scherhorn, G., 2011. Für eine Politik der Energie-Suffizienz. Wuppertal: Wuppertal Institut. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Linz, M., 2002. Warum Suffizienz unentbehrlich ist. In: M. Linz, P. Bartelmus, P. Hennicke, R. Jungkeit, W. Sachs, G. Scherhorn, G. Wilke, and U. v. Winterfeld, eds. Von nichts zu viel—Suffizienz gehört zur Zukunftsfähigkeit. 7–14. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Linz, M., 2004. Weder Mangel noch Übermaß. Über Suffizienz und Suffizienzforschung. Wuppertal Paper Nr. 145. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Linz, M., 2006. Was wird dann aus der Wirtschaft? Über Suffizienz, Wirtschaftswachstum und Arbeitslosigkeit. Wuppertal Paper Nr. 157. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Linz, M., 2012a. Suffizienz als Überlebensfrage. Umwelt aktuell, 2–3. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Linz, M., 2012b. Weder Mangel noch Übermaß—Warum Suffizienz unentbehrlich ist. München: oekom Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Linz, M., 2015. Suffizienz als politische Praxis—Ein Katalog. Wuppertal, Wuppertal Spezial 49. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Linz, M., 2017. Wie Suffizienzpolitiken gelingen. Wuppertal, Wuppertal Spezial 52. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Linz, M., Bartelmus, P., Hennicke, P., Jungkeit, R., Sachs, W., Scherhorn, G., Wilke, G., and Winterfeld, U. v., 2002. Von nichts zu viel—Suffizienz gehört zur Z⁠u⁠k⁠u⁠n⁠f⁠t⁠sfähigkeit. Wuppertal Paper Nr. 125. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Luks, F., 1999. Der steady-state als Grundlage eines sustainable development. Hamburg: Hamburger Universität für Wirtschaft und Politik. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Luks, F., 2001. Die Zukunft des Wachstums: Theoriegeschichte, Nachhaltigkeit und die Perspektiven einer neuen Wirtschaft. Marburg: Metropolis. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Luks, F., 2007. Jenseits des Ökonomischen das Nachhaltige suchen. Ökologisches Wirtschaften, (1/2007), 27–29. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
MacCallum, G.C., 1967. Negative and Positive Freedom. The Philosophical Review, 76 (3), 312–334. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Macmillan, A., Connor, J., Witten, K., Kearns, R., Rees, D., and Woodward, A., 2014. The Societal Costs and Benefits of Commuter Bicycling: Simulating the Effects of Specific Policies Using System Dynamics Modeling. Environmental Health Perspectives, 122 (4), 335–344. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Maniates, M., 2002. Individualization: Plant a tree, buy a bike, save the world? In: T. Princen, M. Maniates, and K. Conca, eds. Confronting Consumption. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press, 43–66. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Margalit, A., 1997. Decent Equality and Freedom: A Postscript. Social Research, 64 (1), 147–160. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Martin, R., 1998. Rights. In: E. Craig, ed. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. London, New York: Routledge, 325–331. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Martínez-Alier, J., Pascual, U., Vivien, F.-D., and Zaccai, E., 2010. Sustainable de-growth: Mapping the context, criticisms and future prospects of an emergent paradigm. Ecological Economics, 69 (9), 1741–1747. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Max-Neef, M.A., Elizalde, A., and Hopenhayn, M., 1991. Development and Human Needs. In: M.A. Max-Neef, ed. Human Scale Development: Conception, Application, and Further Reflections. New York, London: The Apex Press, 13–54. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Maxwell, D., Owen, P., McAndrew, L., Muehmel, K., and Neubauer, A., 2011. Addressing the Rebound Effect. A report for the European Commission DG Environment. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Mayntz, R., 1987. Politische Steuerung und gesellschaftliche Steuerungsprobleme: Anmerkungen zu einem theoretischen Paradigma. In: Jahrbuch zur Staats- und Verwaltungswissenschaft. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 89–110. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Mayntz, R., 2004. Governance Theory als fortentwickelte Steuerungstheorie? Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
McDonough, W. and Braungart, M., 1998. The NEXT Industrial Revolution. The Atlantic Monthly, 282 (4), 82–92. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
McDonough, W. and Braungart, M., 2002. Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things. New York: North Point Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
McDonough, W., 1998. A Boat for Thoreau: A Discourse on Ecology, Ethics, and the Making of Things. In: L. Westra and P.H. Werhane, eds. The Business of Consumption: Environmental Ethics and the Global Economy. Lanham (etc.): Rowman and Littlefield, 297–317. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
McLaren, D., 2003. Environmental Space, Equity and the Ecological Debt. In: J. Agyeman, R.D. Bullard, and B. Evans, eds. Just sustainabilities: development in an unequal world. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press, 19–37. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
McLean, I. and McMillan, A., eds., 2009. The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
McNeill, J., 2005. Blue Planet—Die Geschichte der Umwelt im 20. Jahrhundert. Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Meadows, D.H., Randers, J., and Meadows, D.L., 2004. Limits to Growth: The 30-year Update. White River Junction: Chelsea Green Publishing Company. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Meadows, D.L., Meadows, D.H., Randers, J., and Behrens, W.W., 1972. The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. New York: Universe Books. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Meyer, J.M., 2011. We have never been liberal: the environmentalist turn to liberalism and the possibilities for social criticism. Environmental Politics, 20 (3), 356–373. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Meyer, L., 2008. Intergenerational Justice. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2010/entries/justice-intergenerational/ (last accessed October 2012). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Meyer, L.H., 2009. Intergenerationelle Suffizienzgerechtigkeit. In: N. Goldschmidt, ed. Generationengerechtigkeit: Ordnungsökonomische Konzepte. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 281–322. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Michelsen, G. and Adomßent, M., 2014. Nachhaltige Entwicklung: Hintergründe und Zusammenhänge. In: H. Heinrichs and G. Michelsen, eds. Nachhaltigkeitswissenschaften. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 3–59. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Midden, C.J.H., Kaiser, F.G., and McCalley, L.T., 2007. Technology’s Four Roles in Understanding Individuals’ Conservation of Natural Resources. Journal of Social Issues, 63 (1), 155–174. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Miegel, M., 2010. Exit. Berlin: Propyläen. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Mill, J.S., 1909 [1848]. Principles of Political Economy with some of their Applications to Social Philosophy. Library of Economics and Liberty. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Mill, J.S., 2009 [1859]. On Liberty / Über die Freiheit. Stuttgart: Reclam. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC.: Island Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Miller, D., 1976. Social Justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Miller, D., 1999a. Social Justice and Environmental Goods. In: A. Dobson, ed. Fairness and Futurity—Essays on Environmental Sustainability and Social Justice. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 151–172. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Miller, D., 1999b. Justice and Global Inequality. In: A. Hurrell and N. Woods, eds. Inequality, Globalization, and World Politics. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 187–210. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Miller, D., 2004. Justice, democracy and public goods. In: K. Dowding, R.E. Goodin, and C. Pateman, eds. Justice and Democracy: Essays for Brian Barry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 127–149. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Miller, D., 2008. Global Justice and Climate Change: How Should Responsibilities Be Distributed? The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, 119–156. http://www.tannerlectures.utah.edu/lectures/documents/Miller_08.pdf (last accessed March 2013). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Miller, D., 2012. Consumption and its consequences. Cambridge (etc.): Polity Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Mol, A.P.J. and Jänicke, M., 2009. The origins and theoretical foundations of ecological modernisation theory. In: A.P.J. Mol, D.A. Sonnenfeld, and G. Spaargaren, eds. The ecological modernisation reader: environmental reform in theory and practice. London, New York: Routledge, 17–27. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Mol, A.P.J. and Spaargaren, G., 2000. Ecological Modernisation Theory in Debate: A Review. In: A.P.J. Mol and D.A. Sonnenfeld, eds. Ecological Modernisation around the world: perspectives and critical debates. London: Frank Cass Publishers, 17–49. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Mol, A.P.J., Sonnenfeld, D.A., and Spaargaren, G., eds., 2009. The ecological modernisation reader: environmental reform in theory and practice. London, New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Molenbroek, E., Smith, M., Groenenberg, H., Waide, P., Attali, S., Fischer, C., Krivošik, J., Fonseca, P., Santos, B., and Fong, J., 2014. Final technical report: Evaluation of the Energy Labelling Directive and specific aspects of the Ecodesign Directive. Utrecht: Ecofys, No. ENER/C3/2012 - 523. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Morley, B., 2012. Empirical Evidence on the Effectiveness of Environmental Taxes. Applied Economics Letters, 19 (18), 1817–1820. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Müller, A., 2009. Sufficiency—does energy consumption become a moral issue? In: C. Broussous and C. Jover, eds. Act! Innovate! Deliver! Reducing Energy Demand Sustainably. ECEEE 2009 Summer Study, Stockholm, 83–90. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Müller, O.L., 2011. Eine faire Lösung des Klimaproblems. Information Philosophie, 39 (2), 91–98. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Muraca, B., 2009. Nachhaltigkeit ohne Wachstum? Auf dem Weg zur Décroissance. In: T. v. Egan-Krieger, J. Schultz, P.P. Thapa, and L. Voget, eds. Die Greifswalder Theorie starker Nachhaltigkeit. Ausbau, Anwendung und Kritik. Marburg: Metropolis, 241–259. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Nagel, T., 2005. The Problem of Global Justice. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 33 (2), 113–147. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Neumayer, E., 1999. Weak versus strong sustainability: exploring the limits of two opposing paradigms. Cheltenham (etc.): Elgar. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Neumayer, E., 2000. Nicht Schuldig! Politische Ökologie, (66), 20–23. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Newig, J., 2007. Symbolic environmental legislation and societal self-deception. Environmental Politics, 16 (2), 276–296. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Nida-Rümelin, J., 2006. Demokratie und Wahrheit. München: Verlag C.H.Beck. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Nida-Rümelin, J., 2007. Politische Verantwortung. In: L. Heidbrink and A. Hirsch, eds. Staat ohne Verantwortung? Zum Wandel der Aufgaben von Staat und Politik. Frankfurt, New York: Campus Verlag, 55–85. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Nozick, R., 1969. Coercion. In: S. Morgenbesser, P. Suppes, and M. White, eds. Philosophy, Science, and Method: Essays in Honor of Ernest Nagel. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 440–472. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Nozick, R., 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Nussbaum, M.C., 2011. Creating Capabilities. The Human Development Approach. Cambridge, London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Nutzinger, H.G., 2006. Starke versus schwache Nachhaltigkeit. In: F. Ekardt, ed. Gen⁠erationengerechtigkeit und Zukunftsfähigkeit. Philosophische, juristische, ökonomische, politologische und theologische Neuansätze. Hamburg: Lit Verlag, 186–200. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
O’Neill, D., Dietz, R., and Jones, N., 2010. Enough is Enough: Ideas for a Sustainable Economy in a World of Finite Resources. The Report of the Steady State Economy Conference. Leeds, UK: Center for the Advancement of the Steady State Economy and Economic Justice for All. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
O’Neill, J., 2011. The overshadowing of needs. In: F. Rauschmayer, I. Omann, and J. Frühmann, eds. Sustainable Development: Capabilities, needs, and well-being. Oxon, New York: Routledge, 25–42. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), 2002a. Towards Sustainable Household Consumption? Trends and Policies in OECD Countries. OECD Policy Brief. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), 2002b. Policy Case Study Series—Policies to Promote Sustainable Consumption: An Overview. ENV/EPOC/WPNEP(2001)18/FINAL. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), 2003. Voluntary Approaches for Environmental Policy: Effectiveness, Efficiency and Usage in Policy Mixes. Paris: OECD Publishing. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), 2008. Promoting Sustainable Consumption: Good Practices in OECD Countries. Paris: OECD Publishing. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), 2011a. Greening Household Behaviour: The Role of Public Policy. OECD Publishing. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), 2011b. Towards Green Growth. OECD Publishing. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
oekom, ed., 2013. Vom rechten Maß—Suffizienz als Schlüssel zu mehr Lebensglück und Umweltschutz. Politische Ökologie, 134. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Ölander, F. and Thøgersen, J., 2014. Informing Versus Nudging in Environmental Policy. Journal of Consumer Policy, 37, 341–356. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Ostrom, E., 1990. Governing the Commons. The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge (etc.): Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Ott, K. and Döring, R., 2004. Theorie und Praxis starker Nachhaltigkeit. Marburg: Metropolis. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Ott, K. and Döring, R., 2007. Soziale Nachhaltigkeit: Suffizienz zwischen Lebensstilen und politischer Ökonomie. In: F. Beckenbach, U. Hampicke, C. Leipert, G. Meran, J. Minsch, H.G. Nutzinger, R. Pfriem, J. Weimann, F. Wirl, and U. Witt, eds. Soziale Nachhaltigkeit. Marburg: Metropolis, 35–71. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Ott, K. and Voget, L., 2007. Suffizienz: Umweltethik und Lebensstilfragen. http://www.boell.de/downloads/oekologie/Vortrag_Suffizienz_Ende_Konrad_Ott_100607.pdf (last accessed October 2012). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Ott, K., 2004. Theoriebildung statt Definitionswirrwarr. GAIA, 13 (1), 38–39. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Oxfam, 2008. Another Inconvenient Truth: How biofuel policies are deepening poverty and accelerating climate change. Oxford. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Pacala, S. and Socolow, R., 2004. Stabilization Wedges: Solving the Climate Problem for the Next 50 Years with Current Technologies. Science, 305 (5686), 968–972. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Paech, N., 2009. Unternehmerische Nachhaltigkeit, Suffizienz und Zeitknappheit. In: I. Antoni-Komar, M. Beermann, C. Lautermann, J. Müller, N. Paech, H. Schattke, U. Schneidewind, and R. Schulz, eds. Neue Konzepte der Ökonomik: Unternehmen zwischen Nachhaltigkeit, Kultur und Ethik. Festschrift für Reinhard Pfriem zum 60. Geburtstag. Marburg: Metropolis, 61–83. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Paech, N., 2011. Adiós Konsumwohlstand: Vom Desaster der Nachhaltigkeitskommunikation und den Möglichkeiten der Suffizienz. In: L. Heidbrink, I. Schmidt, and B. Ahaus, eds. Die Verantwortung des Konsumenten. Über das Verhältnis von Markt, Moral und Konsum. Frankfurt, New York: Campus Verlag, 285–304. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Page, E.A., 2007a. Justice Between Generations: Investigating a Sufficientarian Approach. Journal of Global Ethics, 3 (1), 3–20. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Page, E.A., 2007b. Intergenerational justice of what: Welfare, resources or capabilities? Environmental Politics, 16 (3), 453–469. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Paqué, K.-H., 2010. Wachstum! Die Zukunft des globalen Kapitalismus. München: Carl Hanser Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Parfit, D., 1982. Future Generations: Further Problems. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 11 (2), 113–172. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Parfit, D., 1997. Equality and Priority. Ratio, 10 (3), 202–221. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Parris, T.M. and Kates, R.W., 2003. Characterizing and Measuring Sustainable Development. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 28, 559–586. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Parry, I.W.H., 2002. Comparing the efficiency of alternative policies for reducing traffic congestion. Journal of Public Economics, 85 (3), 333–362. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Pearce, D., 1988. Economics, equity and sustainable development. Futures, 20 (6), 598–605. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Pearce, D., 1990. Economics and the Global Environmental Challenge. Journal of International Studies, 19 (3), 365–387. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Pearce, D., 1993. Blueprint 3: Measuring Sustainable Development. London: Earthscan. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Pearce, D., 1997. Substitution and sustainability: some reflections on Georgescu-Roegen. Ecological Economics, 22, 295–297. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Pearce, D.W. and Turner, R.K., 1990. Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment. New York (etc.): Harvester Wheatsheaf. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Pellizzoni, L., 2010. Environmental Knowledge and Deliberative Democracy. In: M. Groß and H. Heinrichs, eds. Environmental Sociology European Perspectives and Interdisciplinary Challenges. New York (etc.): Springer, 159–182. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Peters, G.P. and Hertwich, E.G., 2006. The Importance of Imports for Household Environmental Impacts. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 10 (3), 89–109. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Peters, G.P., Minx, J.C., Weber, C.L., and Edenhofer, O., 2011. Growth in emission transfers via international trade from 1990 to 2008. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108 (21), 8903–8908. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Petersen, T. and Schiller, J., 2011. Politische Verantwortung für Nachhaltigkeit und Konsumentensouveränität. GAIA, 20 (3), 157–161. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Petschow, U., 2007. Nachhaltigkeit und Innovation im Brundtland-Bericht—Harmonische Konflikte um die Zukunft des Wirtschaftens. Ökologisches Wirtschaften, (1/2007), 25–26. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Pogge, T., 2005. Real World Justice. Ethics, 9, 29–53. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Pogge, T.W., 2004. ‘Assisting’ the global poor. In: D.K. Chatterjee, ed. The ethics of assistance: Morality and the distant needy. Cambridge (etc.): Cambridge University Press, 260–288. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Princen, T., 1999. Consumption and environment: some conceptual issues. Ecological Economics, 31 (3), 347–363. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Princen, T., 2002. Consumption and its externalities: where economy meets ecology. In: T. Princen, M. Maniates, and K. Conca, eds. Confronting Consumption. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press, 23–42. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Princen, T., 2005. The logic of sufficiency. Cambridge (Mass.) (etc.): MIT Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Princen, T., Maniates, M., and Conca, K., eds., 2002. Confronting Consumption. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Radkau, J., 2008. Technik in Deutschland vom 18. Jahrhundert bis heute. Frankfurt, New York: Campus Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Radkau, J., 2011. Die Ära der Ökologie—Eine Weltgeschichte. München: Verlag C.H.Beck. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Rauschmayer, F., Omann, I., and Frühmann, J., 2011. Needs, capabilities and quality of life—Refocusing sustainable development. In: F. Rauschmayer, I. Omann, and J. Frühmann, eds. Sustainable Development: Capabilities, needs, and well-being. Oxon, New York: Routledge, 1–24. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Rawls, J., 1972. A Theory of Justice. London (etc.): Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Rawls, J., 1998. Politischer Liberalismus. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Rawls, J., 1999a. A Theory of Justice—Revised Edition. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Rawls, J., 1999b. The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, London: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Raworth, K., 2012. A safe and just space for humanity: Can we live within the Doughnut? Oxfam. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Raz, J., 1986. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Rees, W.E. and Westra, L., 2003. When consumption does violence: can there be sustainability and environmental justice in a resource-limited world? In: J. Agyeman, R.D. Bullard, and B. Evans, eds. Just sustainabilities: development in an unequal world. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press, 99–124. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Reichel, A., Goll, F., and Scheiber, L., 2009. Linking Sufficiency and Business: Utility Systems Engineering in Producer-Consumer Networks. Presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Reisch, L.A. and Hagen, K., 2011. Kann der Konsumwandel gelingen? Chancen und Grenzen einer verhaltensökonomisch basierten sozialen Regulierung. In: L. Heidbrink, I. Schmidt, and B. Ahaus, eds. Die Verantwortung des Konsumenten. Über das Verhältnis von Markt, Moral und Konsum. Frankfurt, New York: Campus Verlag, 221–243. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Reisch, L.A. and Sandrini, J., 2015. Nudging in der Verbraucherpolitik. Ansätze verhaltensbasierter Regulierung. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Renn, O., 2008. Risk Governance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World. London (etc.): Earthscan. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Reusswig, F. and Battaglini, A., 2006. Lifestyle Dynamics as a Catalyst of a Sustainable Energy Transition. Presented at the KyotoPlus, Berlin. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Rietveld, P. and Daniel, V., 2004. Determinants of Bicycle Use: Do Municipal Policies Matter? Transportation Research Part A, 38, 531–550. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Rifkin, J., 2011. The Third Industrial Revolution: How Lateral Power is Transforming Energy, the Economy, and the World. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Risse, M., 2012. On Global Justice. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Röckseisen, S., 1998. Kriterien zur Beurteilung der Leistungsfähigkeit umweltpolitis⁠c⁠h⁠e⁠r Instrumente. In: M. Kotulla, H. Ristau, and U. Smeddinck, eds. Heidelberg: Physica, 171–183. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F.S., Lambin, E.F., Lenton, T.M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H.J., Nykvist, B., Wit, C.A. de, Hughes, T., Leeuw, S. van der, Rodhe, H., Sörlin, S., Snyder, P.K., Costanza, R., Svedin, U., Falkenmark, M., Karlberg, L., Corell, R.W., Fabry, V.J., Hansen, J., Walker, B., Liverman, D., Richardson, K., Crutzen, P., and Foley, J.A., 2009a. Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society, 14 (2), 32. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F.S., Lambin, E.F., Lenton, T.M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H.J., Nykvist, B., Wit, C.A. de, Hughes, T., Leeuw, S. van der, Rodhe, H., Sörlin, S., Snyder, P.K., Costanza, R., Svedin, U., Falkenmark, M., Karlberg, L., Corell, R.W., Fabry, V.J., Hansen, J., Walker, B., Liverman, D., Richardson, K., Crutzen, P., and Foley, J.A., 2009b. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461, 472–475. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Røpke, I., 1999. The dynamics of willingness to consume. Ecological Economics, 28 (3), 399–420. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Røpke, I., 2010. Konsum: Der Kern des Wachstumsmotors. In: I. Seidl and A. Zahrnt, eds. Postwachstumsgesellschaft. Konzepte für die Zukunft. Marburg: Metropolis, 103–115. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Rosa, H., 2011. Über die Verwechslung von Kauf und Konsum: Paradoxien der spätmodernen Konsumkultur. In: L. Heidbrink, I. Schmidt, and B. Ahaus, eds. Die Verantwortung des Konsumenten. Über das Verhältnis von Markt, Moral und Konsum. Frankfurt, New York: Campus Verlag, 115–132. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Rosenberg, A., 1995. Equality, Sufficiency, and Opportunity in the Just Society. Social Philosophy and Policy, 12 (2), 54–71. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Rubik, F., Scholl, G., Biedenkopf, K., Kalimo, H., Mohaupt, F., Söebech, Ó., Stø, E., Strandbakken, P., and Turnheim, B., 2009. Innovative Approaches in European Sustainable Consumption Policies. Assessing the potential of various instruments for sustainable consumption practises and greening of the market (ASCEE). Berlin: IÖW. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Rückert-John, J., Jaeger-Erben, M., Schäfer, M., Aderhold, J., and John, R., 2013. Soziale Innovationen für nachhaltigen Konsum: Kriterien zur Analyse und System⁠atisierung. Berlin: Institut für Sozialinnovation. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Rudolph, S., ed., 2007. Wachstum, Wachstum über alles? Ein ökonomisches Leitbild auf dem Prüfstand von Umwelt und Gerechtigkeit. Marburg: Metropolis. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Sachs, J.D., 2015. The Age of Sustainable Development. New York (u.a.): Columbia University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Sachs, W., 1993. Die vier E’s. Politische Ökologie (Special Sept./Okt. ’93), 69–72. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Sachs, W., 2009. Anders! Weniger! Besser! Konturen eines zukunftsfähigen Wirtschaftsmodells. Politische Ökologie, (118), 37–40. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Sagoff, M., 1988. The economy of the earth: Philosophy, law, and the environment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Sagoff, M., 1997. Do we consume too much? The Atlantic Monthly, 279 (6), 80–96. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Sanne, C., 2002. Willing consumers—or locked-in? Policies for a sustainable consumption. Ecological Economics, 42 (1-2), 273–287. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Satz, D., 2003. International Economic Justice. In: H. LaFollette, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Practical Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 620–642. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Saward, M., 1993. Green democracy? In: A. Dobson and P. Lucardie, eds. The politics of nature: explorations in green political theory. London, New York: Routledge, 63–80. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Saward, M., 1996. Must democrats be environmentalists? In: B. Doherty and M. de Geus, eds. Democracy and Green Political Thought—Sustainability, rights and citizenship. London, New York: Routledge, 79–96. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Scanlon, T.M., 2003. The Diversity of Objections to Inequality. In: T.M. Scanlon, ed. The Difficulty of Tolerance: Essays in Political Philosophy. Cambridge (UK) (etc.): Cambridge University Press, 202–218. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Schefczyk, M., 2011. Das John-Stuart-Mill-Problem. In: F. Höntzsch, ed. John Stuart Mill und der sozialliberale Staatsbegriff. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 27–42. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Scherhorn, G., 1994. Die Unersättlichkeit der Bedürfnisse und der kalte Stern der Knappheit. In: B. Biervert and M. Held, eds. Das Naturverständnis der Ökonomik. Beiträge zur Ethikdebatte in den Wirtschaftswissenschaften. Frankfurt, New York: Campus Verlag, 224–238. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Scherhorn, G., 2002. Die Logik der Suffizienz. In: M. Linz, P. Bartelmus, P. Hennicke, R. Jungkeit, W. Sachs, G. Scherhorn, G. Wilke, and U. v. Winterfeld, eds. Von nichts zu viel—Suffizienz gehört zur Zukunftsfähigkeit. 15–26. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Scherhorn, G., 2008. Über Effizienz hinaus. In: S. Hartard, A. Schaffer, and J. Giegrich, eds. Ressourceneffizienz im Kontext der Nachhaltigkeitsdebatte. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Schmidt-Bleek, F., 1998. Das MIPS-Konzept. Weniger Naturverbrauch—mehr Leb⁠e⁠n⁠squalität durch Faktor 10. München: Droemer Knaur. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Schmidt, M.G., 2004. Wörterbuch zur Politik. Stuttgart: A. Kröner Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Schmidtz, D., 2004. Satisficing as a Humanly Rational Strategy. In: M. Byron, ed. Satisficing and Maximizing: Moral Theorists on Practical Reason. Cambridge (etc.): Cambridge University Press, 30–58. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Schmitt, C., 1991 [1932]. Der Begriff des Politischen. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Schneidewind, U. and Palzkill-Vorbeck, A., 2011. Suffizienz als Business Case: Nachhaltiges Ressourcenmanagement als Gegenstand einer transdisziplinären Be⁠t⁠r⁠i⁠e⁠b⁠swirtschaftslehre. Wuppertal. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Schneidewind, U. and Zahrnt, A., 2014. The Politics of Sufficiency: Making it easier to live the Good Life. München: oekom Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Schor, J.B., 2005a. Prices and quantities: Unsustainable consumption and the global economy. Ecological Economics, 55 (3), 309–320. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Schor, J.B., 2005b. Sustainable Consumption and Worktime Reduction. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9 (1-2), 37–50. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Schor, J.B., 2010. Plenitude—The New Economics of True Wealth. New York: Penguin Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Schrader, U., 2011. Verbraucherrechte und Verbraucherverantwortung für nachhaltigen Konsum. In: L. Heidbrink, I. Schmidt, and B. Ahaus, eds. Die Verantwortung des Konsumenten. Über das Verhältnis von Markt, Moral und Konsum. Frankfurt, New York: Campus Verlag, 75–92. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Schramme, T., 1999. Verteilungsgerechtigkeit ohne Verteilungsgleichheit. Analyse & Kritik, 21, 171–191. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Schramme, T., 2003. Die Anmaßung der Gleichheitsvoraussetzung. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 51 (2), 255–273. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Schramme, T., 2004. Zur Währungskrise der egalitären Gerechtigkeit (Teil 2). Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, 58 (1), 129–141. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Schramme, T., 2006. Is Rawlsian Justice Bad for the Environment? Analyse & Kritik, 28, 146–157. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Schramme, T., 2011. When consumers make environmentally unfriendly choices. Environmental Politics, 20 (3), 340–355. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Schultz, J., Brand, F., Kopfmüller, J., and Ott, K., 2008. Building a ‘theory of sustainable development’: two salient conceptions within the German discourse. International Journal for Environment and Sustainable Development, 7 (4), 465–482. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Schumacher, E.F., 1973. Small is Beautiful: Economics as if People Mattered. London: Blond & Briggs. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Schwenkenbecher, A., 2013. Joint Duties and Global Moral Obligations. Ratio, 26 (3), 310–328. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Seidl, I. and Zahrnt, A., 2012. Suffizienzpolitik—Damit einfacher leben einfacher wird. Umwelt aktuell, 2–3. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Seidl, I. and Zahrnt, A., eds., 2010. Postwachstumsgesellschaft. Konzepte für die Zukunft. Marburg: Metropolis. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Sellke, P. and Renn, O., 2010. Risk, Society and Environmental Policy: Risk Governance in a Complex World. In: M. Groß and H. Heinrichs, eds. Environmental Sociology: European Perspectives and Interdisciplinary Challenges. New York (u.a.): Springer, 295–321. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Sen, A., 1979. Equality of What? The Tanner Lectures on Human Values. http://tannerlectures.utah.edu/_documents/a-to-z/s/sen80.pdf (last accessed August 2013). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Sen, A., 1992. Inequality Reexamined. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Sen, A.K., 1999. Democracy as a Universal Value. Journal of Democracy, 10 (3), 3–17. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Seyfang, G., Lorenzoni, I., and Nye, M., 2009. Personal Carbon Trading: a critical examination of proposals for the UK. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Shaheen, S.A. and Cohen, A.P., 2013. Carsharing and Personal Vehicle Services: Worldwide Market Developments and Emerging Trends. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 7 (1), 5–34. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Shove, E. and Warde, A., 1998. Inconspicuous consumption: the sociology of consumption and the environment. http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fass/sociology/papers/shove-warde-inconspicuous-consumption.pdf (last accessed June 2014). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Shove, E., 2003. Converging Conventions of Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience. Journal of Consumer Policy, 26, 395–418. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Shrader-Frechette, K., 1991. Risk and Rationality—Philosophical Foundations for Populist Reforms. Berkeley (etc.): University of California Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Shrader-Frechette, K., 1998. Risk. In: E. Craig, ed. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. London, New York: Routledge, 331–334. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Shue, H., 1993. Substistence Emissions and Luxury Emissions. Law & Policy, 15 (1), 39–59. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Shue, H., 1999. Global Environment and International Inequality. International Affairs, 75 (3), 531–545. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Siebenhüner, B., 2011. Kann die Politik es richten? Konsument(inn)en als politische Akteure. GAIA, 20 (1), 14–16. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Simon, H.A., 1955. A Behavioural Model of Rational Choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69 (1), 99–118. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Simon, H.A., 1965. Administrative Behaviour: A Study of Decision-Making Process in Administrative Organization. New York: The Free Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Simon, J.L., 1998. Scarcity or Abundance? In: L. Westra and P.H. Werhane, eds. The Business of Consumption: Environmental Ethics and the Global Economy. Lanham (etc.): Rowman and Littlefield, 237–245. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Singer, P., 2004. Outsiders: our obligations to those beyond our borders. In: D.K. Chatterjee, ed. The ethics of assistance: Morality and the distant needy. Cambridge (etc.): Cambridge University Press, 11–32. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Sinnott-Armstrong, W., 2010. It’s Not My Fault. In: S.M. Gardiner, S. Caney, D. Jamieson, and H. Shue, eds. Climate Ethics—Essential Readings. Oxford (etc.): Oxford University Press, 332–344. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Skidelsky, R. and Skidelsky, E., 2012. How much is enough? Money and the good life. New York: Other Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Slote, M., 2004. Two views of Satisficing. In: M. Byron, ed. Satisficing and Maximizing: Moral Theorists on Practical Reason. Cambridge (etc.): Cambridge University Press, 14–29. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Sloterdijk, P., 2010. How big is ‘big’? http://www.collegium-international.org/index.php/en/contributions/127-how-big-is-big (last accessed September 2014). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Smeddinck, U., 2011. Regulieren durch ‘Anstoßen’—Nachhaltiger Konsum durch gemeinwohlverträgliche Gestaltung von Entscheidungssituationen? Die Verwaltung, 44 (3), 375–395. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Smiley, M., 2011. Collective Responsibility. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2011 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/collective-responsibility/ (last accessed January 2013). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Smith, A., 2005 [1776]. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Socolow, R.H., 1994. Six Perspectives from Industrial Ecology. In: R.H. Socolow, C. Andrews, F. Berkhout, and V. Thomas, eds. Industrial Ecology and Global Change. Cambridge (etc.): Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Solow, R.M., 1974. The Economics of Resources or the Resources of Economics. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings of the Eighty-sixth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association (May, 1974), 64 (2), 1–14. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Soper, K. and Trentmann, F., eds., 2008. Citizenship and Consumption. Basingstoke, Hampshire (etc.): Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Soper, K., 2006. Conceptualizing needs in the context of consumer politics. Journal of Consumer Policy, 29 (4), 355–372. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Soper, K., 2007. Re-thinking the ‘Good Life’—The citizenship dimension of consumer disaffection with consumerism. Journal of Consumer Culture, 7 (2), 205–229. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Soper, K., 2008a. Alternative Hedonism, Cultural Theory and the Role of Aesthetic Revisioning. Cultural Studies, 22 (5), 567–587. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Soper, K., 2008b. ‘Alternative Hedonism’ and the Citizen-Consumer. In: K. Soper and F. Trentmann, eds. Citizenship and Consumption. Basingstoke, Hampshire (etc.): Palgrave Macmillan, 191–205. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Spaargaren, G. and Cohen, M.J., 2009. Greening lifecycles and lifestyles: Sociotechnical innovations in consumption and production as core concerns of ecological modernisation theory. In: A.P.J. Mol, D.A. Sonnenfeld, and G. Spaargaren, eds. The ecological modernisation reader: environmental reform in theory and practice. London, New York: Routledge, 257–274. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Spaargaren, G. and Vliet, B. van, 2000. Lifestyles, Consumption and the Environment: The Ecological Modernisation of Domestic Consumption. In: A.P.J. Mol and D.A. Sonnenfeld, eds. Ecological Modernisation around the world: perspectives and critical debates. London: Frank Cass Publishers, 50–76. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Spaargaren, G., 2000. Ecological modernization theory and domestic consumption. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 2 (4), 323–335. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Spaargaren, G., 2009. Sustainable consumption: A theoretical and environmental policy perspective. In: A.P.J. Mol, D.A. Sonnenfeld, and G. Spaargaren, eds. The ecological modernisation reader: environmental reform in theory and practice. London, New York: Routledge, 318–333. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Spaemann, R., 2007. Grenzen der Verantwortung. In: L. Heidbrink and A. Hirsch, eds. Staat ohne Verantwortung? Zum Wandel der Aufgaben von Staat und Politik. Frankfurt, New York: Campus Verlag, 37–53. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Spector, H., 2010. Four Conceptions of Freedom. Political Theory, 38 (6), 780–808. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Spengler, L., 2013. Suffizienzpolitik—Eine heikle Mission. Politische Ökologie, (134), 45–50. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Spengler, L., 2016a. Two types of ‘enough’: Sufficiency as minimum and maximum. Environmental Politics, 25 (5), 921–940. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Spengler, L., 2016b. Ökodesignanforderungen—von der Energie- zur Ressourceneffizienz? In: F. Reimer, ed. Ressourceneffizienz—Leitbild für das Umweltrecht? Baden-Baden: Nomos, 229–241. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743
Spengler, L. and Dick, D., 2007. Selbstverpflichtungen der Wirtschaft: Anmerkungen zu einem überschätzten Instrument. UfU Rundbriefe, 62 (1/2007), 20–25. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845284743