Cover of book: Sufficiency as Policy
Buy in shop
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Book Titles No access

Sufficiency as Policy

Necessity, Possibilities and Limitations
Authors:
Series:
Umweltsoziologie, Volume 5
Publisher:
 2018

Summary

Can technology solve all our environmental problems, or do we also have to reduce our consumption? This question has been debated for a long time within environmental science circles and can, with regard to at least some environmental problems, be answered in the affirmative today. However, it is not enough if only some individuals reduce their use of environmentally relevant goods voluntarily (which is known as “sufficiency”) to achieve overall sustainable consumption patterns. Sufficiency has to become an issue on a political level, too. There are, however, doubts about the possibility of reducing consumption by means of politics in a liberal state because of the potential restrictions to freedom involved. This book shows the necessity and ways of legitimating a sufficiency policy within liberal-democratic, wealthy states from a political and philosophical perspective. Furthermore, it discusses ways of implementing such a policy as well as their limitations. Finally, the author proposes a concept for a sufficiency policy.

Bibliographic data

Copyright year
2018
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-4205-9
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-8474-3
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Umweltsoziologie
Volume
5
Language
English
Pages
328
Product type
Book Titles

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access 1 - 16
    1. Aim and framework of this study No access
    2. Status quo regarding selected environmental issues and their potential harmful consequences No access
    3. Greenhouse gas emissions and climate change No access
    4. Use of natural resources No access
    5. Biodiversity loss No access
    6. Structure of the study No access
    1. Introduction No access
      1. 2.1.1 Liberty No access
      2. 2.1.2 Equality No access
      3. 2.1.3 Liberalism and neutrality towards the good No access
      4. 2.1.4 Categories of liberalism No access
      5. 2.1.5 Liberalism and Green Political Theory No access
      1. 2.2.1 Democracy and Liberalism No access
      2. 2.2.2 Empirical characteristics and theories of the democratic state No access
      3. 2.2.3 Deliberative democracy No access
      4. 2.2.4 Democracy and Green Political Theory No access
        1. Dimensions and “Three Pillars Model” No access
        2. Other models and theories of sustainability No access
        3. An objective or normative concept? No access
        4. Relevant aspects of sustainability No access
      2. 2.3.2 Anthropocentrism and physiocentrism No access
        1. Comparative and absolute standards No access
        2. Particular challenges of global justice No access
        3. Particular challenges of intergenerational justice No access
        4. A just distribution pattern internationally and towards the future No access
        5. Synthesis No access
        1. “Critical” sustainability No access
        2. Planetary boundaries No access
        1. Development No access
        2. Economic growth No access
        3. Compatibility of sustainability and different paths of economic development No access
        4. Synthesis No access
    5. 2.4 Interim summary No access
    1. Introduction No access
      1. 3.1.1 Technology in environmental discourse No access
      2. 3.1.2 The term “technology” No access
      3. 3.1.3 Technical solutions: efficiency and environmentally adapted technologies No access
        1. Scale No access
        2. No sustainable and no 100% environmentally sound technologies No access
        3. Rebound effect No access
        4. “No technical solution problems” No access
        5. Available time and the cost involved No access
        1. Ecological Modernisation No access
        2. Industrial Ecology No access
        3. Political programmes with a focus on technology No access
        4. Inclusion of organisational aspects and “social innovations” No access
      1. 3.2.1 History of the idea No access
        1. Positive versus negative understanding No access
        2. Narrow and broad meaning No access
        3. Motivation: environmental carrying capacity and the good life No access
        4. “Enough” as an upper and lower threshold No access
        5. The macro and the micro perspectives No access
        6. The absolute versus the relative No access
        7. Voluntariness and dependence on external structures No access
        8. Reducing not only consumption but also population size? No access
        9. How to distinguish sufficiency from technical sustainability strategies? No access
      3. 3.2.3 Sufficiency in this study No access
        1. Macroeconomic rebound effects No access
        2. Acceptance and other obstacles No access
        1. Sufficiency as a notion in justice theory No access
        2. Satisficing No access
        3. Consumption research and sustainable consumption No access
        4. Social innovations No access
    4. 3.3 Interim summary No access
    1. Introduction No access
    2. “Individual” and “political” No access
        1. Potential No access
        2. Limitations No access
        1. Potential role and functions of a sufficiency policy No access
        2. Concerns about the impact of a sufficiency policy on liberty and according responses No access
        3. Practical concerns No access
      3. 4.1.3 Interdependence between the individual and collective levels No access
      4. 4.1.4 Individual and collective responsibility for sustainability No access
      5. 4.1.5 The alternative: moralising individually harmless acts? No access
      1. 4.2.1 Justifications of political interventions in a liberal society—the harm principle No access
        1. Problems related to accumulative harm No access
        2. Typical excuses to the principle and lines of critique No access
        3. Conclusion on accumulative environmental harm No access
      1. 4.3.1 Consumption levels as the cause of accumulative harm? No access
        1. Production, consumption, and liberty No access
        2. Technical strategies, sufficiency, and liberty No access
      3. 4.3.3 When is consumption “excessive”? No access
      4. 4.3.4 Can the excessive use of resources cause harm to others? No access
      5. 4.3.5 What degree of interference is legitimate with regard to excessive consumption? No access
        1. Targeting harmful pollutants and scarce resources No access
        2. Targeting individuals No access
        3. Targeting certain activities or consumption goods No access
      1. 4.4.1 “Sufficiency policies violate the neutrality principle” No access
      2. 4.4.2 “What is at stake is too important” No access
      3. 4.4.3 “Without any foundation in an account of the good life sufficiency policy remains ineffective” No access
      4. 4.4.4 “In a democracy, sufficiency will never be adopted as policy” No access
    7. 4.5 Interim summary No access
      1. 5.1.1 Categories and assessment criteria No access
      2. 5.1.2 Policy proposals in the literature No access
        1. Regulatory law No access
        2. Planning No access
        3. Economic instruments No access
        4. Nudging No access
        5. Cooperation No access
        6. Information No access
      1. 5.2.1 Environmental taxes on resources and emissions No access
      2. 5.2.2 Personal carbon trading No access
      3. 5.2.3 Planning instruments for urban transport infrastructure No access
      4. 5.2.4 Conclusions from the policy examples No access
        1. Area of application and normative basis No access
        2. Characterisation of sufficiency as policy No access
        3. Justification No access
        4. Environmental carrying capacity and critical limits No access
        5. Practical suggestions for sufficiency policies No access
      2. 5.3.2 Open questions and limitations of the conception No access
  7. 6. Summary and conclusions No access 284 - 290
  8. References No access 291 - 328

Bibliography (630)

  1. Achterberg, W., 1993. Can liberal democracy survive the environmental crisis? Sustainability, liberal neutrality and overlapping consensus. In: A. Dobson and P. Lucardie, eds. The politics of nature: explorations in green political theory. London, New York: Routledge, 81–101. Open Google Scholar
  2. Alcott, B., 2005. Jevons’ paradox. Ecological Economics, 54 (1), 9–21. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.03.020
  3. Alcott, B., 2008. The sufficiency strategy: Would rich-world frugality lower environmental impact? Ecological Economics, 64 (4), 770–786. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.04.015
  4. Alexander, S., 2012. Living Better on Less? Toward an Economics of Sufficiency. Simplicity Institute, Simplicity Institute Report No. 12c. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2060205
  5. Anderson, E.S., 1999. What Is the Point of Equality? Ethics, 109 (2), 287–337. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/233897
  6. Anderson, S., 2014. Coercion. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2014 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/coercion/ (last accessed March 2014). Open Google Scholar
  7. AnimalAid, no date. Eating Meat: Wrecking The Planet And Creating A Global Food Shortage. http://www.animalaid.org.uk/images/pdf/factfiles/wreck.pdf (last accessed October 2015). Open Google Scholar
  8. Arneson, R., 1989. Equality and Equal Opportunity for Welfare. Philosophical Studies, 56, 77–93. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/BF00646210
  9. Arneson, R., 2006. Distributive Justice and Basic Capability Equality: ‘Good Enough’ is not Good Enough. In: A. Kaufman, ed. Capabilities Equality: Basic Issues and Problems. New York: Routledge, 17–43. Open Google Scholar
  10. Arneson, R., 2013. Egalitarianism. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2013 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2013/entries/egalitarianism/ (last accessed September 2013). Open Google Scholar
  11. Arneson, R.J., 2003. Liberal Neutrality on the Good: An Autopsy. In: S. Wall and G. Klosko, eds. Perfectionism and Neutrality: Essays in Liberal Theory. Lanham (etc.): Rowman and Littlefield, 191–218. Open Google Scholar
  12. Arneson, R.J., 2004. Democracy is not intrinsically just. In: K. Dowding, R.E. Goodin, and C. Pateman, eds. Justice and Democracy: Essays for Brian Barry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 40–58. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490217.003
  13. Arrow, K., Bolin, B., Costanza, R., Dasgupta, P., Folke, C., Holling, C.S., Jansson, B.-O., Levin, S., Mäler, K.-G., Perrings, C., and Pimentel, D., 1995. Economic Growth, Carrying Capacity, and the Environment. Science, 268, 520–521. Open Google Scholar
  14. Arrow, K., Dasgupta, P., Goulder, L.H., Daily, G., Ehrlich, P.R., Heal, G., Levin, S., Mäler, K.-G., Schneider, S., Starrett, D., and Walker, B., 2004. Are we consuming too much? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18 (3), 147–172. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1257/0895330042162377
  15. Avnon, D. and de-Shalit, A., 1999. Introduction: Liberalism between promise and practice. In: D. Avnon and A. de-Shalit, eds. Liberalism and its Practice. London, New York: Routledge, 1–15. Open Google Scholar
  16. Ayres, R.U. and Ayres, L.W., eds., 2002. A Handbook of Industrial Ecology. Cheltenham (etc.): Edward Elgar. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.4337/9781843765479.00013
  17. Ayres, R.U., 2007. On the practical limits to substitution. Ecological Economics, 61 (1), 115–128. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.02.011
  18. Baatz, C., 2014. Climate Change and Individual Responsibility to Reduce GHG Emissions. Ethics, Policy & Environment, 17 (1), 1–19. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2014.885406
  19. Bailey, I., 2002. European Environmental Taxes and Charges: Economic Theory and Policy Practice. Applied Geography, 22, 235–251. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/S0143-6228(02)00011-5
  20. Balabanian, N., 1980. Presumed Neutrality of Technology. Society, 17 (3), 7–14. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/BF02694623
  21. Ball, T., 2006. Democracy. In: A. Dobson and R. Eckersley, eds. Political Theory and the Ecological Challenge. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 131–147. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617805.009
  22. Barker, T., Dagoumas, A., and Rubin, J., 2009. The macroeconomic rebound effect and the world economy. Energy Efficiency, 2, 411–427. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s12053-009-9053-y
  23. Barry, B., 1996. Circumstances of Justice and Future Generations. In: R.I. Sikora and B. Barry, eds. Obligations to future generations. Cambridge: White Horse Press, 204–248. Open Google Scholar
  24. Barry, B., 1999. Sustainability and Intergenerational Justice. In: A. Dobson, ed. Fairness and Futurity—Essays on Environmental Sustainability and Social Justice. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 93–117. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/0198294891.003.0005
  25. Barry, J. and Doran, P., 2006. Refining Green Political Economy: From Ecological Modernisation to Economic Security and Sufficiency. Analyse & Kritik, 28, 250–275. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/auk-2006-0208
  26. Barry, J., 1996. Sustainability, Political Judgement and Citizenship—Connecting green politics and democracy. In: B. Doherty and M. de Geus, eds. Democracy and Green Political Thought—Sustainability, rights and citizenship. London, New York: Routledge, 115–131. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.4324/9780203449554_chapter_6
  27. Barry, J., 2001. Greening Liberal Democracy: Practice, Theory, and Political Economy. In: J. Barry and M. Wissenburg, eds. Sustaining liberal democracy. Ecological challenges and opportunities. New York (etc.): Palgrave, 59–80. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1057/9781403900791_4
  28. Bartelmus, P., 2002. Suffizienz und Nachhaltigkeit. In: M. Linz, P. Bartelmus, P. Hennicke, R. Jungkeit, W. Sachs, G. Scherhorn, G. Wilke, and U. v. Winterfeld, eds. Von nichts zu viel—Suffizienz gehört zur Zukunftsfähigkeit. 39–48. Open Google Scholar
  29. Baumgärtner, S., Becker, C., Faber, M., and Manstetten, R., 2006. Relative and absolute scarcity of nature. Assessing the roles of economics and ecology for biodiversity conservation. Ecological Economics, 59, 487–498. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.11.012
  30. Baxter, B., 2006. Political Liberalism, the Non-Human Biotic and the Abiotic: A Response to Simon Hailwood. Analyse & Kritik, 28, 190–205. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/auk-2006-0205
  31. Beckerman, W., 1999. Sustainable Development and our Obligations to Future Generations. In: A. Dobson, ed. Fairness and Futurity—Essays on Environmental Sustainability and Social Justice. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 71–92. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/0198294891.003.0004
  32. Beemsterboer, S. and Kemp, R., 2016. Sustainability Assessment of Technologies. In: H. Heinrichs, P. Martens, G. Michelsen, and A. Wiek, eds. Sustainability Science: An Introduction. Heidelberg, New York, London: Springer, 71–83. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7242-6_6
  33. Bell, D.R., 2002. How can Political Liberals be Environmentalists? Political Studies, 50, 703–724. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00003
  34. Bell, D.R., 2006. Political Liberalism and Ecological Justice. Analyse & Kritik, 28, 206–222. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/auk-2006-0206
  35. Berglund, C. and Matti, S., 2006. Citizen and consumer: the dual role of individuals in environmental policy. Environmental Politics, 15 (4), 550–571. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/09644010600785176
  36. Berlin, I., 1969. Two Concepts of Liberty. In: Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 118–172. Open Google Scholar
  37. Bilharz, M. and Fricke, V., 2011. Konsum und gesellschaftlicher Wandel: Das ‘Großgedruckte’ beachten. Zeitschrift für internationale Bildungsforschung und En⁠twicklungspädagogik, (4), 9–12. Open Google Scholar
  38. Bilharz, M., Fricke, V., and Schrader, U., 2011. Wider die Bagatellisierung der Konsumentenverantwortung. GAIA, 20 (1), 9–13. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.14512/gaia.20.1.3
  39. Binswanger, H.C., 2006. Die Wachstumsspirale. Marburg: Metropolis. Open Google Scholar
  40. Binswanger, H.C., 2009. Vorwärts zur Mäßigung. Perspektiven einer nachhaltigen Wirtschaft. Hamburg: Murmann. Open Google Scholar
  41. Birnbacher, D., 1977. Rawls’ ‘Theorie der Gerechtigkeit’ und das Problem der Gerechtigkeit Zwischen den Generationen. Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung, 31 (3), 385–401. Open Google Scholar
  42. Birnbacher, D., 1988. Verantwortung für zukünftige Generationen. Stuttgart: Reclam. Open Google Scholar
  43. Blake, M. and Smith, P.T., 2013. International Distributive Justice. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2013 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2013/entries/international-justice (last accessed November 2014). Open Google Scholar
  44. BMU (Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit), 2008. Die Dritte industrielle Revolution—Aufbruch in ein ökologisches Jahrhundert. Dimensionen und Herausforderungen des industriellen und gesellschaftlichen Wandels. Berlin. Open Google Scholar
  45. Boardman, B., 2010. Fixing Fuel Poverty: Challenges and Solutions. Oxon, New York: Earthscan. Open Google Scholar
  46. Bohman, J. and Richardson, H.S., 2009. Liberalism, Deliberative Democracy, and "Reasons that All Can Accept”. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 17 (3), 253–274. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2008.00330.x
  47. Bookchin, M., 1989. Death of a small planet—It’s growth that’s killing us. The Progressive, 19–23. Open Google Scholar
  48. Bosquet, B., 2000. Environmental tax reform: does it work? A survey of the empirical evidence. Environmental Economics, 34 (1), 19–32. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00173-7
  49. Boulanger, P.-M., 2010. Three strategies for sustainable consumption. S.A.P.I.EN.S., 3 (2). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2202/1932-0183.1179
  50. Bracke, R., Albrecht, and De Clercq, 2006. The use of negotiated environmental agreements: from gentlemen’s agreements to binding contracts. Ghent University, Working Paper No. 2006/415. Open Google Scholar
  51. Brand, F., 2009. Critical natural capital revisited: Ecological resilience and sustainable development. Ecological Economics, 68 (3), 605–612. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.013
  52. Brand, K.-W. and Jochum, G., 2000. Der Deutsche Diskurs zu nachhaltiger Entwicklung. Abschlussbericht eines DFG-Projekts zum Thema „Sustainable Development/Nachhaltige Entwicklung—Zur sozialen Konstruktion globaler Handlungskonzepte im Umweltdiskurs“. München, MPS-Texte No. 1/2000. Open Google Scholar
  53. Brand, U., 2012. Green Economy—the Next Oxymoron? No Lessons Learned from Failures of Implementing Sustainable Development. GAIA, 21 (1), 28–32. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.14512/gaia.21.1.9
  54. Brink, D., 2008. Mill’s Moral and Political Philosophy. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/mill-moral-political/ (last accessed August 2013). Open Google Scholar
  55. Brischke, L.-A. and Spengler, L., 2011. Effizienz und Suffizienz—Ein Fall für zwei. Politische Ökologie, 126, 86–93. Open Google Scholar
  56. Brischke, L.-A., Pehnt, M., and Jacobsen, S., 2011. Verankerung von Suffizienz im energiepolitischen Instrumentarium am Beispiel des Stromverbrauchs. Unpublished Paper, Heidelberg. Open Google Scholar
  57. Bristow, A.L., Wardman, M., Zanni, A.M., and Chintakayala, P.K., 2010. Public acceptability of personal carbon trading and carbon tax. Ecological Economics, 69, 1824–1837. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.021
  58. Brook, B.W. and Bradshaw, C.J.A., 2012. Strange bedfellows? Techno-fixes to solve the big conservation issues in southern Asia. Biological Conservation, 151, 7–10. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.10.007
  59. Brown, P.M. and Cameron, L.D., 2000. What can be done to reduce overconsumption? Ecological Economics, 32, 27–41. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00093-2
  60. BUND (Bund für Umwelt und Naturschutz Deutschland), Brot für die Welt, and Evangelischer Entwicklungsdienst, eds., 2008. Zukunftsfähiges Deutschland in einer globalisierten Welt. Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung. Open Google Scholar
  61. Bundesregierung, 2002. Perspectives for Germany. Our Strategy for Sustainable Development. Berlin. Open Google Scholar
  62. Bundesregierung, 2009. Nationaler Entwicklungsplan Elektromobilität. http://www.bmvi.de/SharedDocs/DE/Anlage/VerkehrUndMobilitaet/nationaler-entwicklungsplan-elektromobilitaet.pdf?__blob=publicationFile (last accessed November 2015). Open Google Scholar
  63. Bundesregierung, 2016. Nationales Programm für nachhaltigen Konsum. http://www.bmub.bund.de/fileadmin/Daten_BMU/Download_PDF/Produkte_und_Umwelt/nat_programm_konsum_bf.pdf (last accessed March 2016). Open Google Scholar
  64. Bündnis 90/Die Grünen, 2013. Zeit für den grünen Wandel. Teilhaben. Einmischen. Zukunft schaffen. Bundestagswahlprogramm 2013. Berlin. Open Google Scholar
  65. Byron, M., 2004. Introduction. In: M. Byron, ed. Satisficing and Maximizing: Moral Theorists on Practical Reason. Cambridge (etc.): Cambridge University Press, 1–13. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617058.001
  66. Cairns, S., Sloman, L., Newson, C., Anable, J., Kirkbride, A., and Goodwin, P., 2008. Smarter Choices: Assessing the Potential to Achieve Traffic Reduction Using ‘Soft Measures’. Transport Reviews, 28 (5), 593–618. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/01441640801892504
  67. Calder, G. and McKinnon, C., 2011. Introduction: Climate change and liberal priorities. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 14 (2), 91–97. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2011.529702
  68. Campbell, C., 1994. Consuming goods and the good of consuming. Critical Review, 8 (4), 503–520. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/08913819408443358
  69. Caney, S., 2003. Entitlements, Obligations, and Distributive Justice—The Global Level. In: D.A. Bell and A. de-Shalit, eds. Forms of Justice: Critical Perspectives on David Miller’s Political Philosophy. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 287–313. Open Google Scholar
  70. Caney, S., 2005. Cosmopolitan justice, responsibility, and global climate change. Leiden Journal of International Law, 18 (4), 747–775. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0922156505002992
  71. Caney, S., 2009. Justice and the distribution of greenhouse gas emissions. Journal of Global Ethics, 5 (2), 125–146. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/17449620903110300
  72. Caney, S., 2010. Climate Change, Human Rights, and Moral Thresholds. In: S.M. Gardiner, S. Caney, D. Jamieson, and H. Shue, eds. Climate Ethics—Essential Readings. Oxford (etc.): Oxford University Press, 163–172. Open Google Scholar
  73. Carter, I., 2012. Positive and Negative Liberty. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2012 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2012/entries/liberty-positive-negative/ (last accessed August 2013). Open Google Scholar
  74. Casal, P., 2007. Why sufficiency is not enough. Ethics, 117 (2), 296–326. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/510692
  75. Christen, M. and Schmidt, S., 2011. A Formal Framework for Conceptions of Sustainability—A Theoretical Contribution to the Discourse in Sustainable Development. Sustainable Development (online edition). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1002/sd.518
  76. Christiano, T., 2008. Democracy. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/democracy/ (last accessed June 2013). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198297475.003.0007
  77. Christiano, T., ed., 2003. Philosophy and Democracy: An Anthology. Oxford (etc.): Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  78. Christman, J. and Anderson, J., eds., 2005. Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism—New Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  79. Ciriacy-Wantrup, S. v., 1952. Resource Conservation: Economics and Policies. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press. Open Google Scholar
  80. City of Copenhagen, 2015. Copenhagen—City of Cyclists. The Bicycle Account 2014. Copenhagen. Open Google Scholar
  81. Clark, W.C., 2007. Sustainability Science: A room of its own. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104 (6), 1737–1738. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0611291104
  82. Clark, W.C., Crutzen, P.J., and Schellnhuber, H.J., 2004. Science for Global Sustainability—Toward a New Paradigm. In: H.J. Schellnhuber, P.J. Crutzen, and W.C. Clark, eds. Earth System Analysis for Sustainability. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press, 1–28. Open Google Scholar
  83. Coglianese, C., 1998. Implications of Liberal Neutrality for Environmental Policy. Environmental Ethics, 20 (1), 41–59. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics199820144
  84. Cohen, G.A., 1989. On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice. Ethics, 99 (4), 906–944. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/293126
  85. Cohen, G.A., 2008. Rescuing Justice and Equality. Cambridge (etc.): Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
  86. Cohen, G.A., 2009. Why not socialism? Princeton, New Jersey (etc.): Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  87. Cohen, J. and Sabel, C., 2006. Extra Republicam Nulla Justitia? Philosophy & Public Affairs, 34 (2), 147–175. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2006.00060.x
  88. Cohen, J., 2003. Procedure and Substance in Deliberative Democracy. In: T. Christiano, ed. Philosophy and Democracy: An Anthology. Oxford (etc.): Oxford University Press, 17–38. Open Google Scholar
  89. Cohen, M.J., 2011. Is the UK preparing for ‘war’? Military metaphors, personal carbon allowances, and consumption rationing in historical perspective. Climatic Change, 104 (2), 199–222. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s10584-009-9785-x
  90. Costanza, R., Alperovitz, G., Daly, H.E., Farley, J., Franco, C., Jackson, T., Kubiszewski, I., Schor, J., and Victor, P., 2012. Building a Sustainable and Desirable Economy-in-Society-in-Nature. New York: United Nations Division for Sustainable Development. Open Google Scholar
  91. Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O’Neill, R.V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R.G., Sutton, P., and van den Belt, M., 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253–260. Open Google Scholar
  92. Council of the European Union, 2006. Review of the EU Sustainable Development Strategy (EU SDS)—Renewed Strategy, 10917/06. Open Google Scholar
  93. Cranor, C.F., 1985. Collective and individual duties to protect the environment. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 2 (2), 243–259. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5930.1985.tb00037.x
  94. Cripps, E., 2011. Climate change, collective harm and legitimate coercion. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 14 (2), 171–193. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2011.529707
  95. Crisp, R., 2003. Equality, Priority, and Compassion. Ethics, 113 (4), 745–763. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/373954
  96. Croson, R. and Treich, N., 2014. Behavioral Environmental Economics: Promises and Challenges. Environmental and Resource Economics, 58 (3), 335–351. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s10640-014-9783-y
  97. Dahl, J., 1991. Zwölfzylinder, schadstoffarm. Von den Aporien des sogenannten Umweltschutzes. Scheidewege, 21, 228–245. Open Google Scholar
  98. Dahmus, J.B., 2014. Can Efficiency Improvements Reduce Resource Consumption? A Historical Analysis of Ten Activities. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 18 (6), 883–897. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12110
  99. Daly, H.E., 1977. Steady-State Economics. The Economics of Biophysical Equilibrium and Moral Growth. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company. Open Google Scholar
  100. Daly, H.E., 1991. Steady-state economics. 2nd edn, with new essays. Washington, DC (etc.): Island Press. Open Google Scholar
  101. Daly, H.E., 1993. The Steady-State Economy: Toward a Political Economy of Biophysical Equilibrium and Moral Growth. In: H.E. Daly and K.N. Townsend, eds. Valuing the earth: economics, ecology, ethics. Cambridge, MA (etc.): MIT Press, 325–363. Open Google Scholar
  102. Daly, H.E., 1996. Beyond Growth: the economics of sustainable development. Boston (Mass.): Beacon Press. Open Google Scholar
  103. Daly, H.E., Czech, B., Trauger, D.L., Rees, W.E., Grover, M., Dobson, T., and Trombulak, S.C., 2007. Are We Consuming Too Much—for What? Conservation Biology, 21 (5), 1359–1362. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00770.x
  104. Daniels, N., 1990. Equality of What: Welfare, Resources, or Capabilities? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 50, 273–296. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2108044
  105. Darby, S., 2007. Enough is as good as a feast—sufficiency as policy. In: S. Attali and K. Tillerson, eds. Saving Energy—Just do it! ECEEE 2007 Summer Study. Stockholm, 111–119. Open Google Scholar
  106. Dauvergne, P., 2010. The Problem of Consumption. Global Environmental Politics, 10 (2), 1–10. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1162/glep.2010.10.2.1
  107. de Geus, M., 2001. Sustainability, Liberal Democracy, Liberalism. In: J. Barry and M. Wissenburg, eds. Sustaining liberal democracy. Ecological challenges and opportunities. New York (etc.): Palgrave, 19–36. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1057/9781403900791_2
  108. de Geus, M., 2004. The environment versus individual freedom and convenience. In: M. Wissenburg and Y. Levy, eds. Liberal democracy and environmentalism: The end of environmentalism? London, New York: Routledge, 87–99. Open Google Scholar
  109. De Groot, R., Van der Perk, J., Chiesura, A., and van Vliet, A., 2003. Importance and threat as determining factors for criticality of natural capital. Ecological Economics, 44 (2–3), 187–204. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00273-2
  110. de-Shalit, A., 1995. Is Liberalism Environment-Friendly? Social Theory and Practice, 21 (2), 287–314. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract199521213
  111. de-Shalit, A., 1997. Environmentalism for Europe—One Model? Journal of Applied Philosophy, 14 (2), 177–186. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/1468-5930.00054
  112. de-Shalit, A., 2000. The Environment: Between Theory and Practice. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  113. Defra (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs), 2008. An assessment of the potential effectiveness and strategic fit of personal carbon trading. London: Defra. Open Google Scholar
  114. Delmas, M.A., Fischlein, M., and Asensio, O.I., 2013. Information strategies and energy conservation behavior: A meta-analysis of experimental studies from 1975 to 2012. Energy Policy, 61, 729–739. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.109
  115. Deutscher Bundestag, 2013. Schlussbericht der Enquete-Kommission „Wachstum, Wohlstand, Lebensqualität—Wege zu nachhaltigem Wirtschaften und gesellschaftlichem Fortschritt in der Sozialen Marktwirtschaft“. Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung. Open Google Scholar
  116. Diefenbacher, H. and Habicht-Erenler, S., eds., 1991. Wachstum und Wohlstand: neuere Konzepte zur Erfassung der Sozial- und Umweltverträglichkeit. Marburg: Metropolis. Open Google Scholar
  117. Diefenbacher, H., 2007. Wirtschaftswachstum als Statistik-Phantom. In: S. Rudolph, ed. Wachstum, Wachstum über alles? Ein ökonomisches Leitbild auf dem Prüfstand von Umwelt und Gerechtigkeit. Marburg: Metropolis, 31–51. Open Google Scholar
  118. Diefenbacher, H., 2008. Eine Dritte industrielle Revolution—Die große schöne Lösung für das 21. Jahrhundert? In: BMU (Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit), ed. Die Dritte industrielle Revolution—Aufbruch in ein ökologisches Jahrhundert. Dimensionen und Herausforderungen des industriellen und gesellschaftlichen Wandels. Berlin, 130–132. Open Google Scholar
  119. Diefenbacher, H., Zieschank, R., and Rodenhäuser, D., 2010. Measuring Welfare in Germany: A suggestion for a new welfare index. Dessau-Roßlau: Umweltbund⁠e⁠samt, UBA Texte No. 03/2010. Open Google Scholar
  120. Diekmann, J., 1999. Zwischen Effizienz und Suffizienz. Ökologisches Wirtschaften, 3/1999, 25–26. Open Google Scholar
  121. DiLorenzo, T., 2011. The Trojan Horse of ‘Happiness Research’. https://mises.org/library/trojan-horse-happiness-research (last accessed May 2015). Open Google Scholar
  122. Dinda, S., 2004. Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: A Survey. Ecological Economics, 49, 431–455. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.02.011
  123. Dobson, A. and Lucardie, P., eds., 1993. The politics of nature: explorations in green political theory. London, New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.4324/9780203432457
  124. Dobson, A., 1996a. Democratising Green Theory—Preconditions and principles. In: B. Doherty and M. de Geus, eds. Democracy and Green Political Thought—Sustainability, rights and citizenship. London, New York: Routledge, 132–148. Open Google Scholar
  125. Dobson, A., 1996b. Environmental Sustainabilities: An Analysis and a Typology. Environmental Politics, 5 (3), 401–428. Open Google Scholar
  126. Dobson, A., 2007. Green Political Thought. 4. ed. London, New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  127. Dobson, A., 2010. Environmental citizenship and pro-environmental behaviour. London: Sustainable Development Research Network. Open Google Scholar
  128. Doherty, B. and de Geus, M., eds., 1996. Democracy and Green Political Thought—Sustainability, rights and citizenship. London, New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.4324/9780203449554
  129. Donaldson, S. and Kymlicka, W., 2011. Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  130. Dowding, K., Goodin, R.E., and Pateman, C., eds., 2004. Justice and Democracy: Essays for Brian Barry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490217.013
  131. Doyal, L. and Gough, I., 1991. A Theory of Human Need. Basingstoke, Hampshire (etc.): Macmillan. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21500-3_2
  132. Dryzek, J.S. and Dunleavy, P., 2009. Theories of the Democratic State. Basingstoke, Hampshire (etc.): Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-36645-9_1
  133. Dryzek, J.S., 1992. Ecology and discursive democracy: Beyond liberal capitalism and the administrative state. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, 3 (2), 18–42. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/10455759209358485
  134. Dryzek, J.S., 2005. The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses. 2nd edn Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  135. Durning, A.T., 1992. How much is enough? The consumer society and the future of the Earth. London: Earthscan. Open Google Scholar
  136. Dworkin, G., 2010. Paternalism. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2010 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2010/entries/paternalism/ (last accessed August 2013). Open Google Scholar
  137. Dworkin, R., 1978. Liberalism. In: S. Hampshire, ed. Public and Private Morality. Cambridge (etc.): Cambridge University Press, 113–143. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625329.007
  138. Dworkin, R., 1981a. What is Equality? Part 1: Equality of Welfare. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 10 (3), 185–246. Open Google Scholar
  139. Dworkin, R., 1981b. What is Equality? Part 2: Equality of Resources. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 10 (4), 283–345. Open Google Scholar
  140. Dworkin, R., 1987. What is Equality? Part 3: The Place of Liberty. Iowa Law Review, 73 (1), 1–54. Open Google Scholar
  141. Dworkin, R., 2011. Justice for Hedgehogs. Cambridge (Mass.) (etc.): Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
  142. Easterlin, R.A., 2001. Income and Happiness: Towards a Unified Theory. The Economic Journal, 111 (473), 465–484. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00646
  143. EC (European Commission), 2000. Communication from the Commission on the precautionary principle, COM(2000) 1 final. Brussels. Open Google Scholar
  144. EC (European Commission), 2001. Communication from the Commission: A Sustainable Europe for a Better World: A European Union Strategy for Sustainable Development, COM(2001)264 final. Brussels. Open Google Scholar
  145. EC (European Commission), 2005. Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Thematic Strategy on the sustainable use of natural resources, COM(2005) 670 final. Brussels. Open Google Scholar
  146. EC (European Commission), 2008. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the Sustainable Consumption and Production and Sustainable Industrial Policy Action Plan, COM(2008) 397 final. Brussels. Open Google Scholar
  147. EC (European Commission), 2010. Communication from the Commission—EUROPE 2020: A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, COM(2010) 2020 final. Brussels. Open Google Scholar
  148. EC (European Commission), 2015. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Closing the loop—An EU action plan for the Circular Economy, COM(2015) 614 final. Brussels. Open Google Scholar
  149. EC (European Commission), 2016. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: A European agenda for the collaborative economy, COM(2016) 356 final. Brussels. Open Google Scholar
  150. Eckersley, R., 1996. Greening Liberal Democracy—The rights discourse revisited. In: B. Doherty and M. de Geus, eds. Democracy and Green Political Thought—Sustainability, rights and citizenship. London, New York: Routledge, 212–236. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.4324/9780203449554_chapter_11
  151. EEA (European Environment Agency), 2010. The European Environment—State and Outlook 2010: Consumption and the Environment. Copenhagen. Open Google Scholar
  152. EEA (European Environment Agency), 2012a. Environmental Indicator Report 2012—Ecosystem Resilience and Resource Efficiency in a Green Economy in Europe. Copenhagen. Open Google Scholar
  153. EEA (European Environment Agency), 2012b. The European Environment State and Outlook 2010—Consumption and Environment 2012 Update. Copenhagen. Open Google Scholar
  154. EEA (European Environment Agency), 2013a. Environmental pressures from European consumption and production—A study in integrated environmental and economic analysis. EEA Technical report No. 2/2013, Copenhagen. Open Google Scholar
  155. EEA (European Environment Agency), 2013b. A closer look at urban transport. TERM 2013: transport indicators tracking progress towards environmental targets in Europe. EEA Report No. 11/2013, Copenhagen. Open Google Scholar
  156. EEA (European Environment Agency), 2014. Environmental Indicator Report 2014—Environmental Impacts of Production-Consumption Systems in Europe. Copenhagen. Open Google Scholar
  157. EEA (European Environment Agency), 2015. The European Environment—State and Outlook 2015: Synthesis Report. Copenhagen. Open Google Scholar
  158. Ehrlich, P.R. and Goulder, L.H., 2007. Is Current Consumption Excessive? A General Framework and Some Indications for the United States. Conservation Biology, 21 (5), 1145–1154. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00779.x
  159. Ehrlich, P.R. and Holdren, J.P., 1971. Impact of Population Growth. Science, 171 (3977), 1212–1217. Open Google Scholar
  160. Ekardt, F., 2016. Suffizienz: Politikinstrumente, Grenzen von Technik und Wachstum und die schwierige Rolle des guten Lebens. Soziologie und Nachhaltigkeit, (04/2016), 1–25. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845254593-597
  161. Ekins, P. and Speck, S., 2000. Proposals of environmental fiscal reforms and the obstacles to their implementation. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 2 (2), 93–114. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/714038548
  162. Ekins, P., 1993. ‘Limits to growth’ and ‘sustainable development’: grappling with ecological realities. Ecological Economics, 8, 269–288. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/0921-8009(93)90062-B
  163. Ekins, P., 1999. European Environmental Taxes and Charges: Recent Experience, Issues and Trends. Ecological Economics, 31, 39–62. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00051-8
  164. Ekins, P., 2003. Identifying critical natural capital—Conclusions about critical natural capital. Ecological Economics, 44 (2–3), 277–292. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00278-1
  165. Ekins, P., Simon, S., Deutsch, L., Folke, C., and De Groot, R., 2003. A framework for the practical application of the concepts of critical natural capital and strong sustainability. Ecological Economics, 44 (2–3), 165–185. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00272-0
  166. Elgin, D. and Mitchell, A., 1977. Voluntary Simplicity. The Co-Evolution Quarterly, Summer 1977. http://www.duaneelgin.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/voluntary_simplicity.pdf (last accessed October 2012). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1108/eb053820
  167. Elkington, J., 1997. Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business. Chichester: Capstone Pub. Open Google Scholar
  168. Elster, J., 1986. The market and the forum: three varieties of political theory. In: J. Elster and A. Hylland, eds. Foundations of Social Choice Theory. Cambridge (etc.): Cambridge University Press, 103–132. Open Google Scholar
  169. Elster, J., 1998. Introduction. In: J. Elster, ed. Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge (etc.): Cambridge University Press, 1–18. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139175005.002
  170. Enquete-Kommission, 1994. Die Industriegesellschaft gestalten—Perspektiven für einen nachhaltigen Umgang mit Stoff- und Materialströmen. Bericht der Enquete-Kommission ‘Schutz des Menschen und der Umwelt—Bewertungskriterien und Perspektiven für umweltverträgliche Stoffkreisläufe in der Industriegesellschaft’. Bonn. Open Google Scholar
  171. Enquete-Kommission, 1998. Konzept Nachhaltigkeit: vom Leitbild zur Umsetzung. Abschlussbericht der Enquete-Kommission ‘Schutz des Menschen und der Umwelt—Ziele und Rahmenbedingungen einer nachhaltig zukunftsverträglichen Entwicklung’. Bonn. Open Google Scholar
  172. EPA Network (Network of Heads of European Environment Protection Agencies), 2006. Delivering the sustainable use of natural resources: A contribution from the following members of the Network of Heads of European Environment Protection Agencies on the Thematic Strategy on the Sustainable Use of Natural Resources. Open Google Scholar
  173. Eshel, G., Shepon, A., Makov, T., and Milo, R., 2014. Land, irrigation water, greenhouse gas, and reactive nitrogen burdens of meat, eggs, and dairy production in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PNAS Early Edition. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1402183111
  174. Eshleman, A., 2009. Moral Responsibility. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2009 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2009/entries/moral-responsibility/ (last accessed January 2013). Open Google Scholar
  175. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), 2014. The State of the World Fisheries and Aquaculture—Opportunities and Challenges. Rome: FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department. Open Google Scholar
  176. Fawcett, T., 2010. Personal carbon trading: A policy ahead of its time? Energy Policy, 38, 6868–6876. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.07.001
  177. Fawcett, T., Bottrill, C., Boardman, B., and Lye, G., 2007. Trialling personal carbon allowances. London: UK Energy Research Centre. Open Google Scholar
  178. Feinberg, J., 1984. Harm to Others—The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  179. Felder, S. and Schleiniger, R., 2002. Environmental Tax Reform: Efficiency and Political Feasibility. Ecological Economics, 42, 107–116. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00109-X
  180. Fischer, C. and Grießhammer, R., 2013. Mehr als nur weniger—Suffizienz: Begriff, Begründung und Potenziale. Öko-Institut, Öko-Institut Working Paper No. 2/2013. Open Google Scholar
  181. Fishman, E., Washington, S., and Haworth, N., 2014. Bike share’s impact on car use: Evidence from the United States, Great Britain, and Australia. Transportation Research Part D, 31, 13–20. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2014.05.013
  182. Focus Online, 2013. Arrogante „Verbotsmentalität“ ärgert selbst Ur-Grüne, 5 Aug. http://www.focus.de/politik/deutschland/tid-32754/die-lizenz-zum-vorschreiben-veggie-tag-tueten-abgabe-tempolimit-die-bevormundungs-wut-der-gruenen_aid_1063304.html (last accessed August 2013). Open Google Scholar
  183. FoEE (Friends of the Earth Europe), ed., 1995. Towards Sustainable Europe—The Study. Brussels. Open Google Scholar
  184. Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, L., and Holling, C.S., 2004. Regime shifts, resilience and biodiversity in ecosystem management. Annual Review in Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 35, 557–581. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.021103.105711
  185. Fraenkel, E., 1973. Deutschland und die westlichen Demokratien. Stuttgart (etc.): Verlag W. Kohlhammer. Open Google Scholar
  186. Frankfurt, H., 1987. Equality as a Moral Ideal. Ethics, 98 (1), 21–43. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/292913
  187. Frankfurt, H., 1997. Equality and Respect. Social Research, 64 (1), 3–15. Open Google Scholar
  188. Frankfurt, H.G., 1984. Necessity and Desire. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 45 (1), 1–13. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2107323
  189. Freeden, M., 2008. European Liberalisms: An Essay in Comparative Political Thought. European Journal of Political Theory, 7 (1), 9–30. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/1474885107083401
  190. Freedom House, 2015a. Freedom in the World 2015—Discarding Democracy: Return to the Iron Fist. Washington, New York: Freedom House. Open Google Scholar
  191. Freedom House, 2015b. Freedom in the World 2015 Methodology. Washington, New York: Freedom House. Open Google Scholar
  192. Frevel, B., 2004. Demokratie: Entwicklung, Gestaltung, Problematisierung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar
  193. Frey, B.S. and Stutzer, A., 2002. Happiness and Economics. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  194. Fromm, E., 1976. Haben oder Sein: Die seelischen Grundlagen einer neuen Gesellschaft. Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt. Open Google Scholar
  195. Fudge, S. and Peters, M., 2011. Behaviour Change in the UK Climate Debate: An Assessment of Responsibility, Agency and Political Dimensions. Sustainability, 3, 789–808. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.3390/su3060789
  196. Galbraith, J.K., 1958a. The Affluent Society. London: Hamilton. Open Google Scholar
  197. Galbraith, J.K., 1958b. How Much Should a Country Consume? In: H. Jarrett, ed. Perspectives on Conservation—Essays on America’s Natural Resources. Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins Press, 89–99. Open Google Scholar
  198. Galston, W.A., 2007. Why the new liberalism isn’t all that new, and why the old liberalism isn’t what we thought it was. Social Philosophy and Policy, 24 (1), 289–305. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0265052507070124
  199. Gärling, T. and Schuitema, G., 2007. Travel Demand Management Targeting Reduced Private Car Use: Effectiveness, Public Acceptability and Political Feasibility. Journal of Social Issues, 63 (1), 139–153. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00500.x
  200. Gaus, G. and Courtland, S.D., 2010. Liberalism. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/liberalism/ (last accessed April 2013). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/1470594X09345678
  201. Gaus, G., 2005. The Place of Autonomy within Liberalism. In: J. Christman and J. Anderson, eds. Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism—New Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 272–306. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610325.014
  202. Georgescu-Roegen, N., 1975. Energy and Economic Myths. Southern Economic Journal, 41 (3), 347–381. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/1056148
  203. Getzner, M., 2009. Wirtschaftswachstum und Umweltverbrauch: Über die Zusammenhänge von Energie- und Ressourcenverbrauch, Emissionen und BIP in Österr⁠e⁠i⁠c⁠h. Wissenschaft & Umwelt Interdisziplinär, 13, 22–31. Open Google Scholar
  204. Giddens, A., 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge (UK): Polity Press. Open Google Scholar
  205. Gillingham, K., Kotchen, M.J., Rapson, D.S., and Wagner, G., 2013. Energy policy: The rebound effect is overplayed. Nature, 493 (7433), 475–476. Open Google Scholar
  206. Golub, A., 2016. Mobility and Sustainability. In: H. Heinrichs, P. Martens, G. Michelsen, and A. Wiek, eds. Sustainability Science: An Introduction. Heidelberg, New York, London: Springer, 261–272. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7242-6_21
  207. Goodin, R.E. and Reeve, A., eds., 1989. Liberal Neutrality. London, New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  208. Goodin, R.E., 1988. Reasons for Welfare: The Political Theory of the Welfare State. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  209. Goodin, R.E., 1990. Relative Needs. In: A. Ware and R.E. Goodin, eds. Needs and Welfare. London (etc.): Sage Publications, 12–33. Open Google Scholar
  210. Goodin, R.E., 1992. Green Political Theory. Cambridge, Oxford: Polity Press. Open Google Scholar
  211. Goodin, R.E., 1995. Utilitarianism as a Public Philosophy. Cambridge (etc.): Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  212. Goodland, R. and Daly, H.E., 1996. Environmental Sustainability: Universal and Non-Negotiable. Ecological Applications, Vol. 6 (No. 4), 1002–1017. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2269583
  213. Gosepath, S., 2003. Verteidigung egalitärer Gerechtigkeit. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 51 (2), 257–297. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1524/dzph.2003.51.2.275
  214. Gosepath, S., 2011. Equality. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2011 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2011/entries/equality/ (last accessed August 2013). Open Google Scholar
  215. Gössling, S. and Choi, A.S., 2015. Transport transitions in Copenhagen: Comparing the cost of cars and bicycles. Ecological Economics, 113, 106–113. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.006
  216. Gray, J., 1996. Mill on Liberty: A Defence. Second Edition. London, New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  217. Gray, J., 2004. Back to Mill: Review of ‘The snake that swallowed its tail: some contradictions in modern liberalism’ by Mark Garnett. The New Statesman, 15 Nov. Open Google Scholar
  218. Gregg, R.B., 1936. The Value Of Voluntary Simplicity. Wallingford, Pennsylvania: Pendle Hill. Open Google Scholar
  219. Grober, U., 2002. Tiefe Wurzeln: Eine kleine Begriffsgeschichte von ‘Sustainable Development’—Nachhaltigkeit. Natur und Kultur, 3 (1), 116–128. Open Google Scholar
  220. Grober, U., 2010. Die Entdeckung der Nachhaltigkeit: Kulturgeschichte eines Begriffs. München: Kunstmann. Open Google Scholar
  221. Grunwald, A., 2004. Nachhaltigkeit begreifen: Zwischen Leitbild und Trugbild. GAIA, 13 (1). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.14512/gaia.13.1.1
  222. Grunwald, A., 2006. Technikfolgenabschätzung als Nachhaltigkeitsbewertung—Konzeptionelle Herausforderungen und methodische Probleme. In: J. Kopfmüller, ed. Ein Konzept auf dem Prüfstand—Das integrative Nachhaltigkeitskonzept in der Forschungspraxis. Berlin: Edition Sigma, 39–61. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845267685-39
  223. Grunwald, A., 2008. Technik und Politikberatung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  224. Grunwald, A., 2010. Wider die Privatisierung der Nachhaltigkeit. Warum ökologisch korrekter Konsum die Umwelt nicht retten kann. GAIA, 19 (3), 178–182. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.14512/gaia.19.3.6
  225. Grunwald, A., 2011. Statt Privatisierung: Politisierung der Nachhaltigkeit. GAIA, 20 (1), 17–19. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.14512/gaia.20.1.5
  226. Gutmann, A. and Thompson, D., 2004. Why deliberative democracy? Princeton, New Jersey (etc.): Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  227. Habermas, J., 1996. Drei normative Modelle der Demokratie. In: Die Einbeziehung des Anderen. Studien zur politischen Theorie. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  228. Hailwood, S., 2004. How to be a Green Liberal—Nature, Value and Liberal Philosophy. Chesham: Acumen. Open Google Scholar
  229. Hamilton, L.A., 2003. The Political Philosophy of Needs. Cambridge (etc.): Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  230. Hammitt, J.K., 2000. Are The Costs of Proposed Environmental Regulations Overestimated? Evidence from the CFC Phaseout. Environmental and Resource Economics, 16 (3), 281–301. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1023/A:1008352022368
  231. Hannis, M., 2005. Public Provision of Environmental Goods: Neutrality or Sustainability? A Reply to David Miller. Environmental Politics, 14 (5), 577–595. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/09644010500257862
  232. Hardin, G., 1968. The Tragedy of the Commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248. Open Google Scholar
  233. Hardin, R., 1993. Liberalism: Political and Economic. Social Philosophy and Policy, 10 (2), 121–144. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500004179
  234. Hawken, P., Lovins, A.B., and Lovins, L.H., 1999. Natural Capitalism: Creating the Next Industrial Revolution. Boston (Mass.): Little, Brown and Co. Open Google Scholar
  235. Hawkes, J., 2001. The Fourth Pillar of Sustainability—Culture’s essential role in public planning. Cultural Development Network Victoria, Australia. Open Google Scholar
  236. Hayek, F.A., 1960. The Constitution of Liberty. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Open Google Scholar
  237. Hayward, T., 1994. Ecological Thought. An Introduction. Cambridge (UK): Polity Press. Open Google Scholar
  238. Hayward, T., 1998. Political Theory and Ecological Values. New York: St. Martin’s Press. Open Google Scholar
  239. Hayward, T., 2007. Human Rights Versus Emissions Rights: Climate Justice and the Equitable Distribution of Ecological Space. Ethics & International Affairs, 21 (4), 431–450. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7093.2007.00117.x
  240. Heath, J., 2005. Liberal Autonomy and Consumer Sovereignty. In: J. Christman and J. Anderson, eds. Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism—New Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 204–225. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610325.011
  241. Heidbrink, L. and Reidel, J., 2011. Nachhaltiger Konsum durch politische Selbstbindung. GAIA, 20 (3), 152–156. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.14512/gaia.20.3.3
  242. Heidbrink, L. and Schmidt, I., 2011. Das Prinzip der Konsumentenverantwortung—Grundlagen, Bedingungen und Umsetzungen verantwortlichen Konsums. In: L. Heidbrink, I. Schmidt, and B. Ahaus, eds. Die Verantwortung des Konsumenten. Über das Verhältnis von Markt, Moral und Konsum. Frankfurt, New York: Campus Verlag, 25–56. Open Google Scholar
  243. Heidbrink, L., Schmidt, I., and Ahaus, B., eds., 2011. Die Verantwortung des Konsumenten. Über das Verhältnis von Markt, Moral und Konsum. Frankfurt, New York: Campus Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  244. Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung, ed., 2009. Auf dem Weg zu einem Green New Deal—Die Klima- und die Wirtschaftskrise als transatlantische Herausforderungen. Open Google Scholar
  245. Heinrichs, H., 2013a. Nachhaltigkeitspolitik: Neuer Kontext für Entscheidungen unter Unsicherheit und Risiko. In: R. von Detten, F. Faber, and M. Bemmann, eds. Unberechenbare Umwelt—Zum Umgang mit Unsicherheit und Nicht-Wissen. Wiesbaden: Springer, 219–252. Open Google Scholar
  246. Heinrichs, H., 2013b. Sharing Economy: A Potential New Pathway to Sustainability. GAIA, 22 (4), 228–231. Open Google Scholar
  247. Heinrichs, H., Martens, P., Michelsen, G., and Wiek, A., eds., 2016. Sustainability Science: An Introduction. Heidelberg, New York, London: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7242-6_1
  248. Hellmann, K.-U., 2011. Der Eigensinn der Konsumenten—Zur Frage der Verantwortung bei der Zurechnung von Konsumentenverantwortung. In: L. Heidbrink, I. Schmidt, and B. Ahaus, eds. Die Verantwortung des Konsumenten. Über das Verhältnis von Markt, Moral und Konsum. Frankfurt, New York: Campus Verlag, 269–283. Open Google Scholar
  249. Hennicke, P., 2002. Effizienz und Suffizienz in einem System nachhaltiger Energienutzung. In: M. Linz, P. Bartelmus, P. Hennicke, R. Jungkeit, W. Sachs, G. Scherhorn, G. Wilke, and U. v. Winterfeld, eds. Von nichts zu viel—Suffizienz gehört zur Zukunftsfähigkeit. 57–70. Open Google Scholar
  250. Hertwich, E.G., 2005. Consumption and Industrial Ecology. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9 (1-2), 1–6. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1162/1088198054084635
  251. Heyen, D.A., Fischer, C., Barth, R., Brunn, C., Grießhammer, R., Keimeyer, F., and Wolff, F., 2013. Mehr als nur weniger—Suffizienz: Notwendigkeit und Optionen politischer Gestaltung. Öko-Institut, Working Paper No. 3/2013. Open Google Scholar
  252. Hoeschele, W., 2007. Scarcity. Encyclopedia of Environment and Society. Open Google Scholar
  253. Holzinger, H., 2010. Wirtschaften jenseits von Wachstum? Befunde und Ausblicke. Wien: Österreichisches Lebensministerium. Open Google Scholar
  254. Höpflinger, F., 2010. Alterssicherungssysteme: Doppelte Herausforderung von demografischer Alterung und Postwachstum. In: I. Seidl and A. Zahrnt, eds. Postwachstumsgesellschaft. Konzepte für die Zukunft. Marburg: Metropolis, 53–63. Open Google Scholar
  255. Hopwood, B., Mellor, M., and O’Brien, G., 2005. Sustainable Development: Mapping Different Approaches. Sustainable Development, 13 (1), 38–52. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1002/sd.244
  256. Horstkötter, D., 2004. Sustainability and plurality: From the moderate end of the liberal equilibrium to the open end of a situated liberal neutrality. In: M. Wissenburg and Y. Levy, eds. Liberal democracy and environmentalism: The end of environmentalism? London, New York: Routledge, 155–166. Open Google Scholar
  257. Hösle, V., 1991. Philosophie der ökologischen Krise. München: Beck. Open Google Scholar
  258. Howaldt, J. and Schwarz, M., 2010. Soziale Innovation im Fokus: Skizze eines gesellschaftstheoretisch inspirierten Forschungskonzepts. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.14361/transcript.9783839415351
  259. Huber, J., 1995a. Nachhaltige Entwicklung. Strategien für eine ökologische und soziale Erdpolitik. Berlin: Edition Sigma. Open Google Scholar
  260. Huber, J., 1995b. Nachhaltige Entwicklung durch Suffizienz, Effizienz und Konsistenz. In: P. Fritz, J. Huber, and H.W. Levi, eds. Nachhaltigkeit in naturwissenschaftlicher und sozialwissenschaftlicher Perspektive. Stuttgart: Hirzel, 31–46. Open Google Scholar
  261. Huber, J., 1999. Industrielle Ökologie. Konsistenz, Effizienz und Suffizienz in zyklusanalytischer Betrachtung. Open Google Scholar
  262. Huber, J., 2000. Towards industrial ecology: sustainable development as a concept of ecological modernization. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 2 (4), 269–285. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/714038561
  263. Huber, J., 2008. Technological Environmental Innovations (TEIs) in a Chain-Analytical and Life-Cycle-Analytical Perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16 (18), 1980–1986. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.01.014
  264. Huber, J., 2011. Ökologische Modernisierung und Umweltinnovation. In: M. Groß, ed. Handbuch Umweltsoziologie. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 279–302. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-93097-8_14
  265. Hubin, D.C., 1989. Scarcity and the Demands of Justice. Capital University Law Review, 18, 185–199. Open Google Scholar
  266. Hueting, R. and Reijnders, L., 1998. Sustainability is an objective concept. Ecological Economics, 27, 139–147. Open Google Scholar
  267. Hueting, R., 1980. New Scarcity and Economic Growth. More Welfare through Less Production? Amsterdam (etc.): North-Holland Publishing Company. Open Google Scholar
  268. Humphrey, M., 2002. Preservation Versus the People? Nature, Humanity, and Political Philosophy. Oxford (etc.): Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/0199242674.003.0003
  269. Humphrey, M., 2003. Nonbasic Environmental Goods and Social Justice. In: D.A. Bell and A. de-Shalit, eds. Forms of Justice: Critical Perspectives on David Miller’s Political Philosophy. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 331–346. Open Google Scholar
  270. Hyams, K., 2009. A Just Response to Climate Change: Personal Carbon Allowances and the Normal-Functioning Approach. Journal of Social Philosophy, 40 (2), 237–256. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9833.2009.01449.x
  271. Illich, I., 1973. Tools for conviviality. New York (etc.): Harper & Row. Open Google Scholar
  272. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), 2014. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva: IPCC. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415416
  273. Jackson, T., 2005. Live Better by Consuming Less? Is There a ‘Double Dividend’ in Sustainable Consumption? Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9 (1‐2), 19–36. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1162/1088198054084734
  274. Jackson, T., 2007. Sustainable Consumption. In: G. Atkinson, S. Dietz, and E. Neumayer, eds. Handbook of Sustainable Development. Cheltenham (etc.): Edward Elgar, 254–268. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.4337/9781847205223.00026
  275. Jackson, T., 2009. Prosperity without growth. London (etc.): Earthscan. Open Google Scholar
  276. Jaeger, C.C., Paroussos, L., Mangalagiu, D., Kupers, R., Mandel, A., Tàbara, J.D., Meißner, F., and Lass, W., 2011. A New Growth Path for Europe. Generating Prosperity and Jobs in the Low-Carbon Economy. Final Report. A study commissioned by the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety. Potsdam: European Climate Forum e.V. Open Google Scholar
  277. Jänicke, M., 1996. Erfolgsbedingungen von Umweltpolitik. In: M. Jänicke, ed. Umweltpolitik der Industrieländer. Entwicklung, Bilanz, Erfolgsbedingungen. Berlin: Edition Sigma, 9–28. Open Google Scholar
  278. Jänicke, M., 2003. Umweltpolitik. In: M. Jänicke, P. Kunig, and M. Stitzel, eds. Umweltpolitik. Politik, Recht und Management des Umweltschutzes in Staat und Unternehmen. Bonn: Dietz, 30–157. Open Google Scholar
  279. Jänicke, M., 2009. On ecological and political modernization. In: A.P.J. Mol, D.A. Sonnenfeld, and G. Spaargaren, eds. The ecological modernisation reader: environmental reform in theory and practice. London, New York: Routledge, 28–41. Open Google Scholar
  280. Jänicke, M., 2011. ‘Green Growth’: From a growing eco-industry to a sustainable economy. Berlin: Freie Universität, Environmental Policy Research Centre, No. FFU-Report 09-2011. Open Google Scholar
  281. Jänicke, M. and Jacob, K., 2009. A Third Industrial Revolution? Solutions to the crisis of resource-intensive growth. Berlin: Freie Universität, Environmental Policy Research Centre, FFU-report No. 02-2009. Open Google Scholar
  282. Jänicke, M. and Jörgens, H., 2009. New Approaches to Environmental Governance. In: A.P.J. Mol, D.A. Sonnenfeld, and G. Spaargaren, eds. The ecological modernisation reader: environmental reform in theory and practice. London, New York: Routledge, 156–189. Open Google Scholar
  283. Jenkins, J., Nordhaus, T., and Shellenberger, M., 2011. Energy Emergence: Rebound & Backfire as emergent Phenomena. Oakland (CA): Breakthrough Institute. Open Google Scholar
  284. Jensen, P.D., Basson, L., and Leach, M., 2011. Reinterpreting Industrial Ecology. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 15 (5), 680–692. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00377.x
  285. Johnson, B.L., 2003. Ethical obligations in a tragedy of the commons. Environmental Values, 12 (3), 271–287. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.3197/096327103129341324
  286. Jonas, H., 1979. Das Prinzip Verantwortung: Versuch einer Ethik für die technologis⁠c⁠h⁠e Zivilisation. Frankfurt am Main: Insel-Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  287. Kassenboehmer, S.C. and Schmidt, C.M., 2011. Beyond GDP and Back: What is the Value-Added by Additional Components of Welfare Measurement? Berlin. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1753686
  288. Kates, R.W., Clark, W.C., Corell, R., Hall, J.M., Jaeger, C.C., Lowe, I., McCarthy, J.J., Schellnhuber, H.J., Bolin, B., Dickson, N.M., Faucheux, S., Gallopin, G.C., Grübler, A., Huntley, B., Jäger, J., Jodha, N.S., Kasperson, R.E., Mabogunje, A., Matson, P., Mooney, H., III, B.M., O’Riordan, T., and Svedin, U., 2001. Sustainability Science. Science, 292 (5517), 641–642. Open Google Scholar
  289. Kates, R.W., Parris, T.M., and Leiserowitz, A.A., 2005. What Is Sustainable Development? Goals, Indicators, Values, and Practice. Environment, 47 (3), 9–21. Open Google Scholar
  290. Keesing, F., Belden, L.K., Daszak, P., Dobson, A., Harvell, C.D., Holt, R.D., Hudson, P., Jolles, A., Jones, K.E., Mitchell, C.E., Myers, S.S., Bogich, T., and Ostfeld, R.S., 2010. Impacts of biodiversity on the emergence and transmission of infectious diseases. Nature, 468, 647–652. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1038/nature09575
  291. Kelly, P., 2005. Liberalism. Cambridge (etc.): Polity Press. Open Google Scholar
  292. Kemp, R., 1997. Environmental Policy and Technical Change. A Comparison of the Technological Impact of Policy Instruments. Cheltenham (etc.): Edward Elgar. Open Google Scholar
  293. Kemp, R., 2010. Sustainable technologies do not exist! Ekonomiaz, 3 (75), 2–17. Open Google Scholar
  294. Kernohan, A., 1993. Accumulative Harms and the Interpretation of the Harm Principle. Social Theory and Practice, 19 (1), 51–72. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract19931912
  295. Kernohan, A., 1998. Liberalism, Equality, and Cultural Oppression. Cambridge (etc.): Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625084.002
  296. Kernohan, A., 2000. Individual Acts and Accumulative Consequences. Philosophical Studies, 97 (3), 343–366. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1023/A:1018323220163
  297. Keynes, J.M., 1930. Economic Possibilities for our Grandchildren. Open Google Scholar
  298. Kleinhückelkotten, S., 2005. Suffizienz und Lebensstile : Ansätze für eine milieuorientierte Nachhaltigkeitskommunikation. Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  299. Kollmuss, A. and Agyeman, J., 2002. Mind the Gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8 (3), 239–260. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401
  300. Kopfmüller, J., 2006. Das integrative Konzept nachhaltiger Entwicklung: Motivation, Architektur, Perspektiven. In: J. Kopfmüller, ed. Ein Konzept auf dem Prüfstand—Das integrative Nachhaltigkeitskonzept in der Forschungspraxis. Berlin: Edition Sigma, 23–37. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845267685-23
  301. Kopfmüller, J., Brandl, V., Jörissen, J., Paetau, M., Banse, G., Coenen, R., and Grunwald, A., 2001. Nachhaltige Entwicklung integrativ betrachtet: konstitutive Elemente, Regeln, Indikatoren. Berlin: Edition Sigma. Open Google Scholar
  302. Kraemer, K., 1997. Nachhaltigkeit durch Konsumverzicht? „Sustainable Development“—eine soziologische Betrachtung. Zeitschrift für angewandte Umweltforschung, 10 (2), 198–209. Open Google Scholar
  303. Kraftfahrt-Bundesamt, 2015. Pressemitteilung Nr. 5/2015: Der Fahrzeugbestand am 1. Januar 2015. Open Google Scholar
  304. Krausmann, F., Gingrich, S., Eisenmenger, N., Erb, K.-H., Haberl, H., and Fischer-Kowalski, M., 2009. Growth in global materials use, GDP and population during the 20th century. Ecological Economics, 68 (10), 2696–2705. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.05.007
  305. Krebs, A., 2001. Wieviel Natur schulden wir der Zukunft? Eine Kritik am zukun⁠f⁠t⁠sethischen Egalitarismus. In: D. Birnbacher and G. Brudermüller, eds. Zukunftsverantwortung und Generationensolidarität. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 157–183. Open Google Scholar
  306. Krebs, A., 2003. Warum Gerechtigkeit nicht als Gleichheit zu begreifen ist. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 51 (2), 235–253. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1524/dzph.2003.51.2.235
  307. Krebs, A., ed., 2000. Gleichheit oder Gerechtigkeit. Texte der neuen Egalitarismuskritik. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  308. Kroes, P., 1998. Philosophy of Technology. In: E. Craig, ed. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. London, New York: Routledge, 284–288. Open Google Scholar
  309. Kuhn, K., 2006. Zur kulturellen Dimension nachhaltiger Entwicklung—Eine metatheoretische und diskursanalytische Bestandsaufnahme. INFU-Diskussionsbeiträge 28/06. Lüneburg. Open Google Scholar
  310. Kuhnimhof, T., Armoogum, J., Buehler, R., Dargay, J., Denstadli, J.M., and Yamamoto, T., 2012. Men Shape a Downward Trend in Car Use among Young Adults—Evidence from Six Industrialized Countries. Transport Reviews, 32 (6), 761–779. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2012.736426
  311. Kunig, P., 2003. Umweltrecht. In: M. Jänicke, P. Kunig, and M. Stitzel, eds. Umweltpolitik. Politik, Recht und Management des Umweltschutzes in Staat und Unternehmen. Bonn: Dietz, 159–288. Open Google Scholar
  312. Kurz, R., 2007. Wirtschaftswachstum als Ausweg aus der ökologisch-sozialen Krise? In: S. Rudolph, ed. Wachstum, Wachstum über alles? Ein ökonomisches Leitbild auf dem Prüfstand von Umwelt und Gerechtigkeit. Marburg: Metropolis, 17–30. Open Google Scholar
  313. Kutz, C., 2000. Complicity: Ethics and Law for a Collective Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  314. Kymlicka, W., 1989. Liberal Individualism and Liberal Neutrality. Ethics, 99, 883–905. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/293125
  315. Langhelle, O., 2000. Why ecological modernization and sustainable development should not be conflated. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 2 (4), 303–322. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/714038563
  316. Larmore, C., 2003. Patterns of Moral Complexity. Reprinted excerpts from the original by Cambridge University Press (1987). In: S. Wall and G. Klosko, eds. Perfectionism and Neutrality: Essays in Liberal Theory. Lanham (etc.): Rowman and Littlefield, 47–60. Open Google Scholar
  317. Latouche, S., 2009. Farewell to growth. Cambridge (etc.): Polity Press. Open Google Scholar
  318. Layard, R., 2005. Die glückliche Gesellschaft. Frankfurt/Main, New York: Campus-Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  319. Leahy, E., Lyons, S., and Tol, R.S.J., 2010. An estimate of the number of vegetarians in the world. ESRI working paper No. 340. Open Google Scholar
  320. Leipert, C., 1991. Die andere Seite der Wachstumsmedaille: Ökologische und soziale Folgekosten des Wirtschaftens in der Industriegesellschaft. In: H. Diefenbacher and S. Habicht-Erenler, eds. Wachstum und Wohlstand: neuere Konzepte zur Erfassung der Sozial- und Umweltverträglichkeit. Marburg: Metropolis, 21–41. Open Google Scholar
  321. Lerch, A. and Nutzinger, H.G., 2002. Sustainability: Economic Approaches and Ethical Implications. Journal of Economic and Social Policy, 6 (2). Open Google Scholar
  322. Lerch, A., 2006. Kann man Nachhaltigkeit ökonomisch begründen? In: F. Ekardt, ed. Generationengerechtigkeit und Zukunftsfähigkeit. Philosophische, juristische, ökonomische, politologische und theologische Neuansätze. Hamburg: Lit Verlag, 108–128. Open Google Scholar
  323. Levin, S.A. and Clark, W.C., 2010. Toward a Science of Sustainability: Report from Toward a Science of Sustainability Conference November 29, 2009 - December 2, 2009. Warrenton, Virginia: The National Science Foundation. Open Google Scholar
  324. Lifset, R., 1998. Setting the Boundaries? Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2 (2), 1–2. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1162/jiec.1998.2.2.1
  325. Lin, A.C., 2006. The Unifying Role of Harm in Environmental Law. Wisconsin Law Review, 897–985. Open Google Scholar
  326. Linklater, A., 2011. The Problem of Harm in World Politics—Theoretical Investigations. Cambridge (etc.): Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  327. Linz, M. and Kristof, K., 2007. Suffizienz, nicht Wachstum, ist der Schlüssel für mehr Lebensqualität. In: S. Rudolph, ed. Wachstum, Wachstum über alles? Ein ökonomisches Leitbild auf dem Prüfstand von Umwelt und Gerechtigkeit. Marburg: Metropolis, 177–191. Open Google Scholar
  328. Linz, M. and Scherhorn, G., 2011. Für eine Politik der Energie-Suffizienz. Wuppertal: Wuppertal Institut. Open Google Scholar
  329. Linz, M., 2002. Warum Suffizienz unentbehrlich ist. In: M. Linz, P. Bartelmus, P. Hennicke, R. Jungkeit, W. Sachs, G. Scherhorn, G. Wilke, and U. v. Winterfeld, eds. Von nichts zu viel—Suffizienz gehört zur Zukunftsfähigkeit. 7–14. Open Google Scholar
  330. Linz, M., 2004. Weder Mangel noch Übermaß. Über Suffizienz und Suffizienzforschung. Wuppertal Paper Nr. 145. Open Google Scholar
  331. Linz, M., 2006. Was wird dann aus der Wirtschaft? Über Suffizienz, Wirtschaftswachstum und Arbeitslosigkeit. Wuppertal Paper Nr. 157. Open Google Scholar
  332. Linz, M., 2012a. Suffizienz als Überlebensfrage. Umwelt aktuell, 2–3. Open Google Scholar
  333. Linz, M., 2012b. Weder Mangel noch Übermaß—Warum Suffizienz unentbehrlich ist. München: oekom Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  334. Linz, M., 2015. Suffizienz als politische Praxis—Ein Katalog. Wuppertal, Wuppertal Spezial 49. Open Google Scholar
  335. Linz, M., 2017. Wie Suffizienzpolitiken gelingen. Wuppertal, Wuppertal Spezial 52. Open Google Scholar
  336. Linz, M., Bartelmus, P., Hennicke, P., Jungkeit, R., Sachs, W., Scherhorn, G., Wilke, G., and Winterfeld, U. v., 2002. Von nichts zu viel—Suffizienz gehört zur Z⁠u⁠k⁠u⁠n⁠f⁠t⁠sfähigkeit. Wuppertal Paper Nr. 125. Open Google Scholar
  337. Luks, F., 1999. Der steady-state als Grundlage eines sustainable development. Hamburg: Hamburger Universität für Wirtschaft und Politik. Open Google Scholar
  338. Luks, F., 2001. Die Zukunft des Wachstums: Theoriegeschichte, Nachhaltigkeit und die Perspektiven einer neuen Wirtschaft. Marburg: Metropolis. Open Google Scholar
  339. Luks, F., 2007. Jenseits des Ökonomischen das Nachhaltige suchen. Ökologisches Wirtschaften, (1/2007), 27–29. Open Google Scholar
  340. MacCallum, G.C., 1967. Negative and Positive Freedom. The Philosophical Review, 76 (3), 312–334. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2183622
  341. Macmillan, A., Connor, J., Witten, K., Kearns, R., Rees, D., and Woodward, A., 2014. The Societal Costs and Benefits of Commuter Bicycling: Simulating the Effects of Specific Policies Using System Dynamics Modeling. Environmental Health Perspectives, 122 (4), 335–344. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1307250
  342. Maniates, M., 2002. Individualization: Plant a tree, buy a bike, save the world? In: T. Princen, M. Maniates, and K. Conca, eds. Confronting Consumption. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press, 43–66. Open Google Scholar
  343. Margalit, A., 1997. Decent Equality and Freedom: A Postscript. Social Research, 64 (1), 147–160. Open Google Scholar
  344. Martin, R., 1998. Rights. In: E. Craig, ed. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. London, New York: Routledge, 325–331. Open Google Scholar
  345. Martínez-Alier, J., Pascual, U., Vivien, F.-D., and Zaccai, E., 2010. Sustainable de-growth: Mapping the context, criticisms and future prospects of an emergent paradigm. Ecological Economics, 69 (9), 1741–1747. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.017
  346. Max-Neef, M.A., Elizalde, A., and Hopenhayn, M., 1991. Development and Human Needs. In: M.A. Max-Neef, ed. Human Scale Development: Conception, Application, and Further Reflections. New York, London: The Apex Press, 13–54. Open Google Scholar
  347. Maxwell, D., Owen, P., McAndrew, L., Muehmel, K., and Neubauer, A., 2011. Addressing the Rebound Effect. A report for the European Commission DG Environment. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1109/ICCE-Berlin.2011.6031846
  348. Mayntz, R., 1987. Politische Steuerung und gesellschaftliche Steuerungsprobleme: Anmerkungen zu einem theoretischen Paradigma. In: Jahrbuch zur Staats- und Verwaltungswissenschaft. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 89–110. Open Google Scholar
  349. Mayntz, R., 2004. Governance Theory als fortentwickelte Steuerungstheorie? Open Google Scholar
  350. McDonough, W. and Braungart, M., 1998. The NEXT Industrial Revolution. The Atlantic Monthly, 282 (4), 82–92. Open Google Scholar
  351. McDonough, W. and Braungart, M., 2002. Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things. New York: North Point Press. Open Google Scholar
  352. McDonough, W., 1998. A Boat for Thoreau: A Discourse on Ecology, Ethics, and the Making of Things. In: L. Westra and P.H. Werhane, eds. The Business of Consumption: Environmental Ethics and the Global Economy. Lanham (etc.): Rowman and Littlefield, 297–317. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/1567221
  353. McLaren, D., 2003. Environmental Space, Equity and the Ecological Debt. In: J. Agyeman, R.D. Bullard, and B. Evans, eds. Just sustainabilities: development in an unequal world. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press, 19–37. Open Google Scholar
  354. McLean, I. and McMillan, A., eds., 2009. The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  355. McNeill, J., 2005. Blue Planet—Die Geschichte der Umwelt im 20. Jahrhundert. Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung. Open Google Scholar
  356. Meadows, D.H., Randers, J., and Meadows, D.L., 2004. Limits to Growth: The 30-year Update. White River Junction: Chelsea Green Publishing Company. Open Google Scholar
  357. Meadows, D.L., Meadows, D.H., Randers, J., and Behrens, W.W., 1972. The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. New York: Universe Books. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1349/ddlp.1
  358. Meyer, J.M., 2011. We have never been liberal: the environmentalist turn to liberalism and the possibilities for social criticism. Environmental Politics, 20 (3), 356–373. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2011.573357
  359. Meyer, L., 2008. Intergenerational Justice. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2010/entries/justice-intergenerational/ (last accessed October 2012). Open Google Scholar
  360. Meyer, L.H., 2009. Intergenerationelle Suffizienzgerechtigkeit. In: N. Goldschmidt, ed. Generationengerechtigkeit: Ordnungsökonomische Konzepte. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 281–322. Open Google Scholar
  361. Michelsen, G. and Adomßent, M., 2014. Nachhaltige Entwicklung: Hintergründe und Zusammenhänge. In: H. Heinrichs and G. Michelsen, eds. Nachhaltigkeitswissenschaften. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 3–59. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44643-0_1
  362. Midden, C.J.H., Kaiser, F.G., and McCalley, L.T., 2007. Technology’s Four Roles in Understanding Individuals’ Conservation of Natural Resources. Journal of Social Issues, 63 (1), 155–174. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00501.x
  363. Miegel, M., 2010. Exit. Berlin: Propyläen. Open Google Scholar
  364. Mill, J.S., 1909 [1848]. Principles of Political Economy with some of their Applications to Social Philosophy. Library of Economics and Liberty. Open Google Scholar
  365. Mill, J.S., 2009 [1859]. On Liberty / Über die Freiheit. Stuttgart: Reclam. Open Google Scholar
  366. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC.: Island Press. Open Google Scholar
  367. Miller, D., 1976. Social Justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Open Google Scholar
  368. Miller, D., 1999a. Social Justice and Environmental Goods. In: A. Dobson, ed. Fairness and Futurity—Essays on Environmental Sustainability and Social Justice. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 151–172. Open Google Scholar
  369. Miller, D., 1999b. Justice and Global Inequality. In: A. Hurrell and N. Woods, eds. Inequality, Globalization, and World Politics. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 187–210. Open Google Scholar
  370. Miller, D., 2004. Justice, democracy and public goods. In: K. Dowding, R.E. Goodin, and C. Pateman, eds. Justice and Democracy: Essays for Brian Barry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 127–149. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490217.008
  371. Miller, D., 2008. Global Justice and Climate Change: How Should Responsibilities Be Distributed? The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, 119–156. http://www.tannerlectures.utah.edu/lectures/documents/Miller_08.pdf (last accessed March 2013). Open Google Scholar
  372. Miller, D., 2012. Consumption and its consequences. Cambridge (etc.): Polity Press. Open Google Scholar
  373. Mol, A.P.J. and Jänicke, M., 2009. The origins and theoretical foundations of ecological modernisation theory. In: A.P.J. Mol, D.A. Sonnenfeld, and G. Spaargaren, eds. The ecological modernisation reader: environmental reform in theory and practice. London, New York: Routledge, 17–27. Open Google Scholar
  374. Mol, A.P.J. and Spaargaren, G., 2000. Ecological Modernisation Theory in Debate: A Review. In: A.P.J. Mol and D.A. Sonnenfeld, eds. Ecological Modernisation around the world: perspectives and critical debates. London: Frank Cass Publishers, 17–49. Open Google Scholar
  375. Mol, A.P.J., Sonnenfeld, D.A., and Spaargaren, G., eds., 2009. The ecological modernisation reader: environmental reform in theory and practice. London, New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  376. Molenbroek, E., Smith, M., Groenenberg, H., Waide, P., Attali, S., Fischer, C., Krivošik, J., Fonseca, P., Santos, B., and Fong, J., 2014. Final technical report: Evaluation of the Energy Labelling Directive and specific aspects of the Ecodesign Directive. Utrecht: Ecofys, No. ENER/C3/2012 - 523. Open Google Scholar
  377. Morley, B., 2012. Empirical Evidence on the Effectiveness of Environmental Taxes. Applied Economics Letters, 19 (18), 1817–1820. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2011.650324
  378. Müller, A., 2009. Sufficiency—does energy consumption become a moral issue? In: C. Broussous and C. Jover, eds. Act! Innovate! Deliver! Reducing Energy Demand Sustainably. ECEEE 2009 Summer Study, Stockholm, 83–90. Open Google Scholar
  379. Müller, O.L., 2011. Eine faire Lösung des Klimaproblems. Information Philosophie, 39 (2), 91–98. Open Google Scholar
  380. Muraca, B., 2009. Nachhaltigkeit ohne Wachstum? Auf dem Weg zur Décroissance. In: T. v. Egan-Krieger, J. Schultz, P.P. Thapa, and L. Voget, eds. Die Greifswalder Theorie starker Nachhaltigkeit. Ausbau, Anwendung und Kritik. Marburg: Metropolis, 241–259. Open Google Scholar
  381. Nagel, T., 2005. The Problem of Global Justice. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 33 (2), 113–147. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2005.00027.x
  382. Neumayer, E., 1999. Weak versus strong sustainability: exploring the limits of two opposing paradigms. Cheltenham (etc.): Elgar. Open Google Scholar
  383. Neumayer, E., 2000. Nicht Schuldig! Politische Ökologie, (66), 20–23. Open Google Scholar
  384. Newig, J., 2007. Symbolic environmental legislation and societal self-deception. Environmental Politics, 16 (2), 276–296. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/09644010701211783
  385. Nida-Rümelin, J., 2006. Demokratie und Wahrheit. München: Verlag C.H.Beck. Open Google Scholar
  386. Nida-Rümelin, J., 2007. Politische Verantwortung. In: L. Heidbrink and A. Hirsch, eds. Staat ohne Verantwortung? Zum Wandel der Aufgaben von Staat und Politik. Frankfurt, New York: Campus Verlag, 55–85. Open Google Scholar
  387. Nozick, R., 1969. Coercion. In: S. Morgenbesser, P. Suppes, and M. White, eds. Philosophy, Science, and Method: Essays in Honor of Ernest Nagel. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 440–472. Open Google Scholar
  388. Nozick, R., 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Open Google Scholar
  389. Nussbaum, M.C., 2011. Creating Capabilities. The Human Development Approach. Cambridge, London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
  390. Nutzinger, H.G., 2006. Starke versus schwache Nachhaltigkeit. In: F. Ekardt, ed. Gen⁠erationengerechtigkeit und Zukunftsfähigkeit. Philosophische, juristische, ökonomische, politologische und theologische Neuansätze. Hamburg: Lit Verlag, 186–200. Open Google Scholar
  391. O’Neill, D., Dietz, R., and Jones, N., 2010. Enough is Enough: Ideas for a Sustainable Economy in a World of Finite Resources. The Report of the Steady State Economy Conference. Leeds, UK: Center for the Advancement of the Steady State Economy and Economic Justice for All. Open Google Scholar
  392. O’Neill, J., 2011. The overshadowing of needs. In: F. Rauschmayer, I. Omann, and J. Frühmann, eds. Sustainable Development: Capabilities, needs, and well-being. Oxon, New York: Routledge, 25–42. Open Google Scholar
  393. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), 2002a. Towards Sustainable Household Consumption? Trends and Policies in OECD Countries. OECD Policy Brief. Open Google Scholar
  394. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), 2002b. Policy Case Study Series—Policies to Promote Sustainable Consumption: An Overview. ENV/EPOC/WPNEP(2001)18/FINAL. Open Google Scholar
  395. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), 2003. Voluntary Approaches for Environmental Policy: Effectiveness, Efficiency and Usage in Policy Mixes. Paris: OECD Publishing. Open Google Scholar
  396. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), 2008. Promoting Sustainable Consumption: Good Practices in OECD Countries. Paris: OECD Publishing. Open Google Scholar
  397. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), 2011a. Greening Household Behaviour: The Role of Public Policy. OECD Publishing. Open Google Scholar
  398. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), 2011b. Towards Green Growth. OECD Publishing. Open Google Scholar
  399. oekom, ed., 2013. Vom rechten Maß—Suffizienz als Schlüssel zu mehr Lebensglück und Umweltschutz. Politische Ökologie, 134. Open Google Scholar
  400. Ölander, F. and Thøgersen, J., 2014. Informing Versus Nudging in Environmental Policy. Journal of Consumer Policy, 37, 341–356. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s10603-014-9256-2
  401. Ostrom, E., 1990. Governing the Commons. The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge (etc.): Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  402. Ott, K. and Döring, R., 2004. Theorie und Praxis starker Nachhaltigkeit. Marburg: Metropolis. Open Google Scholar
  403. Ott, K. and Döring, R., 2007. Soziale Nachhaltigkeit: Suffizienz zwischen Lebensstilen und politischer Ökonomie. In: F. Beckenbach, U. Hampicke, C. Leipert, G. Meran, J. Minsch, H.G. Nutzinger, R. Pfriem, J. Weimann, F. Wirl, and U. Witt, eds. Soziale Nachhaltigkeit. Marburg: Metropolis, 35–71. Open Google Scholar
  404. Ott, K. and Voget, L., 2007. Suffizienz: Umweltethik und Lebensstilfragen. http://www.boell.de/downloads/oekologie/Vortrag_Suffizienz_Ende_Konrad_Ott_100607.pdf (last accessed October 2012). Open Google Scholar
  405. Ott, K., 2004. Theoriebildung statt Definitionswirrwarr. GAIA, 13 (1), 38–39. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.14512/gaia.13.1.8
  406. Oxfam, 2008. Another Inconvenient Truth: How biofuel policies are deepening poverty and accelerating climate change. Oxford. Open Google Scholar
  407. Pacala, S. and Socolow, R., 2004. Stabilization Wedges: Solving the Climate Problem for the Next 50 Years with Current Technologies. Science, 305 (5686), 968–972. Open Google Scholar
  408. Paech, N., 2009. Unternehmerische Nachhaltigkeit, Suffizienz und Zeitknappheit. In: I. Antoni-Komar, M. Beermann, C. Lautermann, J. Müller, N. Paech, H. Schattke, U. Schneidewind, and R. Schulz, eds. Neue Konzepte der Ökonomik: Unternehmen zwischen Nachhaltigkeit, Kultur und Ethik. Festschrift für Reinhard Pfriem zum 60. Geburtstag. Marburg: Metropolis, 61–83. Open Google Scholar
  409. Paech, N., 2011. Adiós Konsumwohlstand: Vom Desaster der Nachhaltigkeitskommunikation und den Möglichkeiten der Suffizienz. In: L. Heidbrink, I. Schmidt, and B. Ahaus, eds. Die Verantwortung des Konsumenten. Über das Verhältnis von Markt, Moral und Konsum. Frankfurt, New York: Campus Verlag, 285–304. Open Google Scholar
  410. Page, E.A., 2007a. Justice Between Generations: Investigating a Sufficientarian Approach. Journal of Global Ethics, 3 (1), 3–20. Open Google Scholar
  411. Page, E.A., 2007b. Intergenerational justice of what: Welfare, resources or capabilities? Environmental Politics, 16 (3), 453–469. Open Google Scholar
  412. Paqué, K.-H., 2010. Wachstum! Die Zukunft des globalen Kapitalismus. München: Carl Hanser Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.3139/9783446425415
  413. Parfit, D., 1982. Future Generations: Further Problems. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 11 (2), 113–172. Open Google Scholar
  414. Parfit, D., 1997. Equality and Priority. Ratio, 10 (3), 202–221. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/1467-9329.00041
  415. Parris, T.M. and Kates, R.W., 2003. Characterizing and Measuring Sustainable Development. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 28, 559–586. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.28.050302.105551
  416. Parry, I.W.H., 2002. Comparing the efficiency of alternative policies for reducing traffic congestion. Journal of Public Economics, 85 (3), 333–362. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(00)00163-8
  417. Pearce, D., 1988. Economics, equity and sustainable development. Futures, 20 (6), 598–605. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(88)90002-X
  418. Pearce, D., 1990. Economics and the Global Environmental Challenge. Journal of International Studies, 19 (3), 365–387. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/03058298900190030501
  419. Pearce, D., 1993. Blueprint 3: Measuring Sustainable Development. London: Earthscan. Open Google Scholar
  420. Pearce, D., 1997. Substitution and sustainability: some reflections on Georgescu-Roegen. Ecological Economics, 22, 295–297. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00087-6
  421. Pearce, D.W. and Turner, R.K., 1990. Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment. New York (etc.): Harvester Wheatsheaf. Open Google Scholar
  422. Pellizzoni, L., 2010. Environmental Knowledge and Deliberative Democracy. In: M. Groß and H. Heinrichs, eds. Environmental Sociology European Perspectives and Interdisciplinary Challenges. New York (etc.): Springer, 159–182. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8730-0_10
  423. Peters, G.P. and Hertwich, E.G., 2006. The Importance of Imports for Household Environmental Impacts. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 10 (3), 89–109. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1162/jiec.2006.10.3.89
  424. Peters, G.P., Minx, J.C., Weber, C.L., and Edenhofer, O., 2011. Growth in emission transfers via international trade from 1990 to 2008. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108 (21), 8903–8908. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1006388108
  425. Petersen, T. and Schiller, J., 2011. Politische Verantwortung für Nachhaltigkeit und Konsumentensouveränität. GAIA, 20 (3), 157–161. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.14512/gaia.20.3.4
  426. Petschow, U., 2007. Nachhaltigkeit und Innovation im Brundtland-Bericht—Harmonische Konflikte um die Zukunft des Wirtschaftens. Ökologisches Wirtschaften, (1/2007), 25–26. Open Google Scholar
  427. Pogge, T., 2005. Real World Justice. Ethics, 9, 29–53. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s10892-004-3313-z
  428. Pogge, T.W., 2004. ‘Assisting’ the global poor. In: D.K. Chatterjee, ed. The ethics of assistance: Morality and the distant needy. Cambridge (etc.): Cambridge University Press, 260–288. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817663.014
  429. Princen, T., 1999. Consumption and environment: some conceptual issues. Ecological Economics, 31 (3), 347–363. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00039-7
  430. Princen, T., 2002. Consumption and its externalities: where economy meets ecology. In: T. Princen, M. Maniates, and K. Conca, eds. Confronting Consumption. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press, 23–42. Open Google Scholar
  431. Princen, T., 2005. The logic of sufficiency. Cambridge (Mass.) (etc.): MIT Press. Open Google Scholar
  432. Princen, T., Maniates, M., and Conca, K., eds., 2002. Confronting Consumption. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press. Open Google Scholar
  433. Radkau, J., 2008. Technik in Deutschland vom 18. Jahrhundert bis heute. Frankfurt, New York: Campus Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  434. Radkau, J., 2011. Die Ära der Ökologie—Eine Weltgeschichte. München: Verlag C.H.Beck. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.17104/9783406619021-26
  435. Rauschmayer, F., Omann, I., and Frühmann, J., 2011. Needs, capabilities and quality of life—Refocusing sustainable development. In: F. Rauschmayer, I. Omann, and J. Frühmann, eds. Sustainable Development: Capabilities, needs, and well-being. Oxon, New York: Routledge, 1–24. Open Google Scholar
  436. Rawls, J., 1972. A Theory of Justice. London (etc.): Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  437. Rawls, J., 1998. Politischer Liberalismus. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  438. Rawls, J., 1999a. A Theory of Justice—Revised Edition. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  439. Rawls, J., 1999b. The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, London: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
  440. Raworth, K., 2012. A safe and just space for humanity: Can we live within the Doughnut? Oxfam. Open Google Scholar
  441. Raz, J., 1986. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Open Google Scholar
  442. Rees, W.E. and Westra, L., 2003. When consumption does violence: can there be sustainability and environmental justice in a resource-limited world? In: J. Agyeman, R.D. Bullard, and B. Evans, eds. Just sustainabilities: development in an unequal world. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press, 99–124. Open Google Scholar
  443. Reichel, A., Goll, F., and Scheiber, L., 2009. Linking Sufficiency and Business: Utility Systems Engineering in Producer-Consumer Networks. Presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting. Open Google Scholar
  444. Reisch, L.A. and Hagen, K., 2011. Kann der Konsumwandel gelingen? Chancen und Grenzen einer verhaltensökonomisch basierten sozialen Regulierung. In: L. Heidbrink, I. Schmidt, and B. Ahaus, eds. Die Verantwortung des Konsumenten. Über das Verhältnis von Markt, Moral und Konsum. Frankfurt, New York: Campus Verlag, 221–243. Open Google Scholar
  445. Reisch, L.A. and Sandrini, J., 2015. Nudging in der Verbraucherpolitik. Ansätze verhaltensbasierter Regulierung. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845257747-39
  446. Renn, O., 2008. Risk Governance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World. London (etc.): Earthscan. Open Google Scholar
  447. Reusswig, F. and Battaglini, A., 2006. Lifestyle Dynamics as a Catalyst of a Sustainable Energy Transition. Presented at the KyotoPlus, Berlin. Open Google Scholar
  448. Rietveld, P. and Daniel, V., 2004. Determinants of Bicycle Use: Do Municipal Policies Matter? Transportation Research Part A, 38, 531–550. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2004.05.003
  449. Rifkin, J., 2011. The Third Industrial Revolution: How Lateral Power is Transforming Energy, the Economy, and the World. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar
  450. Risse, M., 2012. On Global Justice. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  451. Röckseisen, S., 1998. Kriterien zur Beurteilung der Leistungsfähigkeit umweltpolitis⁠c⁠h⁠e⁠r Instrumente. In: M. Kotulla, H. Ristau, and U. Smeddinck, eds. Heidelberg: Physica, 171–183. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59011-5_13
  452. Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F.S., Lambin, E.F., Lenton, T.M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H.J., Nykvist, B., Wit, C.A. de, Hughes, T., Leeuw, S. van der, Rodhe, H., Sörlin, S., Snyder, P.K., Costanza, R., Svedin, U., Falkenmark, M., Karlberg, L., Corell, R.W., Fabry, V.J., Hansen, J., Walker, B., Liverman, D., Richardson, K., Crutzen, P., and Foley, J.A., 2009a. Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society, 14 (2), 32. Open Google Scholar
  453. Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F.S., Lambin, E.F., Lenton, T.M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H.J., Nykvist, B., Wit, C.A. de, Hughes, T., Leeuw, S. van der, Rodhe, H., Sörlin, S., Snyder, P.K., Costanza, R., Svedin, U., Falkenmark, M., Karlberg, L., Corell, R.W., Fabry, V.J., Hansen, J., Walker, B., Liverman, D., Richardson, K., Crutzen, P., and Foley, J.A., 2009b. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461, 472–475. Open Google Scholar
  454. Røpke, I., 1999. The dynamics of willingness to consume. Ecological Economics, 28 (3), 399–420. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00107-4
  455. Røpke, I., 2010. Konsum: Der Kern des Wachstumsmotors. In: I. Seidl and A. Zahrnt, eds. Postwachstumsgesellschaft. Konzepte für die Zukunft. Marburg: Metropolis, 103–115. Open Google Scholar
  456. Rosa, H., 2011. Über die Verwechslung von Kauf und Konsum: Paradoxien der spätmodernen Konsumkultur. In: L. Heidbrink, I. Schmidt, and B. Ahaus, eds. Die Verantwortung des Konsumenten. Über das Verhältnis von Markt, Moral und Konsum. Frankfurt, New York: Campus Verlag, 115–132. Open Google Scholar
  457. Rosenberg, A., 1995. Equality, Sufficiency, and Opportunity in the Just Society. Social Philosophy and Policy, 12 (2), 54–71. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500004672
  458. Rubik, F., Scholl, G., Biedenkopf, K., Kalimo, H., Mohaupt, F., Söebech, Ó., Stø, E., Strandbakken, P., and Turnheim, B., 2009. Innovative Approaches in European Sustainable Consumption Policies. Assessing the potential of various instruments for sustainable consumption practises and greening of the market (ASCEE). Berlin: IÖW. Open Google Scholar
  459. Rückert-John, J., Jaeger-Erben, M., Schäfer, M., Aderhold, J., and John, R., 2013. Soziale Innovationen für nachhaltigen Konsum: Kriterien zur Analyse und System⁠atisierung. Berlin: Institut für Sozialinnovation. Open Google Scholar
  460. Rudolph, S., ed., 2007. Wachstum, Wachstum über alles? Ein ökonomisches Leitbild auf dem Prüfstand von Umwelt und Gerechtigkeit. Marburg: Metropolis. Open Google Scholar
  461. Sachs, J.D., 2015. The Age of Sustainable Development. New York (u.a.): Columbia University Press. Open Google Scholar
  462. Sachs, W., 1993. Die vier E’s. Politische Ökologie (Special Sept./Okt. ’93), 69–72. Open Google Scholar
  463. Sachs, W., 2009. Anders! Weniger! Besser! Konturen eines zukunftsfähigen Wirtschaftsmodells. Politische Ökologie, (118), 37–40. Open Google Scholar
  464. Sagoff, M., 1988. The economy of the earth: Philosophy, law, and the environment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  465. Sagoff, M., 1997. Do we consume too much? The Atlantic Monthly, 279 (6), 80–96. Open Google Scholar
  466. Sanne, C., 2002. Willing consumers—or locked-in? Policies for a sustainable consumption. Ecological Economics, 42 (1-2), 273–287. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00086-1
  467. Satz, D., 2003. International Economic Justice. In: H. LaFollette, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Practical Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 620–642. Open Google Scholar
  468. Saward, M., 1993. Green democracy? In: A. Dobson and P. Lucardie, eds. The politics of nature: explorations in green political theory. London, New York: Routledge, 63–80. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.4324/9780203432457
  469. Saward, M., 1996. Must democrats be environmentalists? In: B. Doherty and M. de Geus, eds. Democracy and Green Political Thought—Sustainability, rights and citizenship. London, New York: Routledge, 79–96. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.4324/9780203449554_chapter_4
  470. Scanlon, T.M., 2003. The Diversity of Objections to Inequality. In: T.M. Scanlon, ed. The Difficulty of Tolerance: Essays in Political Philosophy. Cambridge (UK) (etc.): Cambridge University Press, 202–218. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615153.012
  471. Schefczyk, M., 2011. Das John-Stuart-Mill-Problem. In: F. Höntzsch, ed. John Stuart Mill und der sozialliberale Staatsbegriff. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 27–42. Open Google Scholar
  472. Scherhorn, G., 1994. Die Unersättlichkeit der Bedürfnisse und der kalte Stern der Knappheit. In: B. Biervert and M. Held, eds. Das Naturverständnis der Ökonomik. Beiträge zur Ethikdebatte in den Wirtschaftswissenschaften. Frankfurt, New York: Campus Verlag, 224–238. Open Google Scholar
  473. Scherhorn, G., 2002. Die Logik der Suffizienz. In: M. Linz, P. Bartelmus, P. Hennicke, R. Jungkeit, W. Sachs, G. Scherhorn, G. Wilke, and U. v. Winterfeld, eds. Von nichts zu viel—Suffizienz gehört zur Zukunftsfähigkeit. 15–26. Open Google Scholar
  474. Scherhorn, G., 2008. Über Effizienz hinaus. In: S. Hartard, A. Schaffer, and J. Giegrich, eds. Ressourceneffizienz im Kontext der Nachhaltigkeitsdebatte. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845207841-21
  475. Schmidt-Bleek, F., 1998. Das MIPS-Konzept. Weniger Naturverbrauch—mehr Leb⁠e⁠n⁠squalität durch Faktor 10. München: Droemer Knaur. Open Google Scholar
  476. Schmidt, M.G., 2004. Wörterbuch zur Politik. Stuttgart: A. Kröner Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  477. Schmidtz, D., 2004. Satisficing as a Humanly Rational Strategy. In: M. Byron, ed. Satisficing and Maximizing: Moral Theorists on Practical Reason. Cambridge (etc.): Cambridge University Press, 30–58. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617058.003
  478. Schmitt, C., 1991 [1932]. Der Begriff des Politischen. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot. Open Google Scholar
  479. Schneidewind, U. and Palzkill-Vorbeck, A., 2011. Suffizienz als Business Case: Nachhaltiges Ressourcenmanagement als Gegenstand einer transdisziplinären Be⁠t⁠r⁠i⁠e⁠b⁠swirtschaftslehre. Wuppertal. Open Google Scholar
  480. Schneidewind, U. and Zahrnt, A., 2014. The Politics of Sufficiency: Making it easier to live the Good Life. München: oekom Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.14512/OEW290330
  481. Schor, J.B., 2005a. Prices and quantities: Unsustainable consumption and the global economy. Ecological Economics, 55 (3), 309–320. Open Google Scholar
  482. Schor, J.B., 2005b. Sustainable Consumption and Worktime Reduction. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9 (1-2), 37–50. Open Google Scholar
  483. Schor, J.B., 2010. Plenitude—The New Economics of True Wealth. New York: Penguin Press. Open Google Scholar
  484. Schrader, U., 2011. Verbraucherrechte und Verbraucherverantwortung für nachhaltigen Konsum. In: L. Heidbrink, I. Schmidt, and B. Ahaus, eds. Die Verantwortung des Konsumenten. Über das Verhältnis von Markt, Moral und Konsum. Frankfurt, New York: Campus Verlag, 75–92. Open Google Scholar
  485. Schramme, T., 1999. Verteilungsgerechtigkeit ohne Verteilungsgleichheit. Analyse & Kritik, 21, 171–191. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/auk-1999-0202
  486. Schramme, T., 2003. Die Anmaßung der Gleichheitsvoraussetzung. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 51 (2), 255–273. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1524/dzph.2003.51.2.255
  487. Schramme, T., 2004. Zur Währungskrise der egalitären Gerechtigkeit (Teil 2). Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, 58 (1), 129–141. Open Google Scholar
  488. Schramme, T., 2006. Is Rawlsian Justice Bad for the Environment? Analyse & Kritik, 28, 146–157. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/auk-2006-0202
  489. Schramme, T., 2011. When consumers make environmentally unfriendly choices. Environmental Politics, 20 (3), 340–355. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2011.573356
  490. Schultz, J., Brand, F., Kopfmüller, J., and Ott, K., 2008. Building a ‘theory of sustainable development’: two salient conceptions within the German discourse. International Journal for Environment and Sustainable Development, 7 (4), 465–482. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1504/IJESD.2008.022390
  491. Schumacher, E.F., 1973. Small is Beautiful: Economics as if People Mattered. London: Blond & Briggs. Open Google Scholar
  492. Schwenkenbecher, A., 2013. Joint Duties and Global Moral Obligations. Ratio, 26 (3), 310–328. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/rati.12010
  493. Seidl, I. and Zahrnt, A., 2012. Suffizienzpolitik—Damit einfacher leben einfacher wird. Umwelt aktuell, 2–3. Open Google Scholar
  494. Seidl, I. and Zahrnt, A., eds., 2010. Postwachstumsgesellschaft. Konzepte für die Zukunft. Marburg: Metropolis. Open Google Scholar
  495. Sellke, P. and Renn, O., 2010. Risk, Society and Environmental Policy: Risk Governance in a Complex World. In: M. Groß and H. Heinrichs, eds. Environmental Sociology: European Perspectives and Interdisciplinary Challenges. New York (u.a.): Springer, 295–321. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8730-0_17
  496. Sen, A., 1979. Equality of What? The Tanner Lectures on Human Values. http://tannerlectures.utah.edu/_documents/a-to-z/s/sen80.pdf (last accessed August 2013). Open Google Scholar
  497. Sen, A., 1992. Inequality Reexamined. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
  498. Sen, A.K., 1999. Democracy as a Universal Value. Journal of Democracy, 10 (3), 3–17. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1353/jod.1999.0055
  499. Seyfang, G., Lorenzoni, I., and Nye, M., 2009. Personal Carbon Trading: a critical examination of proposals for the UK. Open Google Scholar
  500. Shaheen, S.A. and Cohen, A.P., 2013. Carsharing and Personal Vehicle Services: Worldwide Market Developments and Emerging Trends. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 7 (1), 5–34. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2012.660103
  501. Shove, E. and Warde, A., 1998. Inconspicuous consumption: the sociology of consumption and the environment. http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fass/sociology/papers/shove-warde-inconspicuous-consumption.pdf (last accessed June 2014). Open Google Scholar
  502. Shove, E., 2003. Converging Conventions of Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience. Journal of Consumer Policy, 26, 395–418. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1023/A:1026362829781
  503. Shrader-Frechette, K., 1991. Risk and Rationality—Philosophical Foundations for Populist Reforms. Berkeley (etc.): University of California Press. Open Google Scholar
  504. Shrader-Frechette, K., 1998. Risk. In: E. Craig, ed. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. London, New York: Routledge, 331–334. Open Google Scholar
  505. Shue, H., 1993. Substistence Emissions and Luxury Emissions. Law & Policy, 15 (1), 39–59. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9930.1993.tb00093.x
  506. Shue, H., 1999. Global Environment and International Inequality. International Affairs, 75 (3), 531–545. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.00092
  507. Siebenhüner, B., 2011. Kann die Politik es richten? Konsument(inn)en als politische Akteure. GAIA, 20 (1), 14–16. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.14512/gaia.20.1.4
  508. Simon, H.A., 1955. A Behavioural Model of Rational Choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69 (1), 99–118. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/1884852
  509. Simon, H.A., 1965. Administrative Behaviour: A Study of Decision-Making Process in Administrative Organization. New York: The Free Press. Open Google Scholar
  510. Simon, J.L., 1998. Scarcity or Abundance? In: L. Westra and P.H. Werhane, eds. The Business of Consumption: Environmental Ethics and the Global Economy. Lanham (etc.): Rowman and Littlefield, 237–245. Open Google Scholar
  511. Singer, P., 2004. Outsiders: our obligations to those beyond our borders. In: D.K. Chatterjee, ed. The ethics of assistance: Morality and the distant needy. Cambridge (etc.): Cambridge University Press, 11–32. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817663.003
  512. Sinnott-Armstrong, W., 2010. It’s Not My Fault. In: S.M. Gardiner, S. Caney, D. Jamieson, and H. Shue, eds. Climate Ethics—Essential Readings. Oxford (etc.): Oxford University Press, 332–344. Open Google Scholar
  513. Skidelsky, R. and Skidelsky, E., 2012. How much is enough? Money and the good life. New York: Other Press. Open Google Scholar
  514. Slote, M., 2004. Two views of Satisficing. In: M. Byron, ed. Satisficing and Maximizing: Moral Theorists on Practical Reason. Cambridge (etc.): Cambridge University Press, 14–29. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617058.002
  515. Sloterdijk, P., 2010. How big is ‘big’? http://www.collegium-international.org/index.php/en/contributions/127-how-big-is-big (last accessed September 2014). Open Google Scholar
  516. Smeddinck, U., 2011. Regulieren durch ‘Anstoßen’—Nachhaltiger Konsum durch gemeinwohlverträgliche Gestaltung von Entscheidungssituationen? Die Verwaltung, 44 (3), 375–395. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.3790/verw.44.3.375
  517. Smiley, M., 2011. Collective Responsibility. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2011 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/collective-responsibility/ (last accessed January 2013). Open Google Scholar
  518. Smith, A., 2005 [1776]. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Open Google Scholar
  519. Socolow, R.H., 1994. Six Perspectives from Industrial Ecology. In: R.H. Socolow, C. Andrews, F. Berkhout, and V. Thomas, eds. Industrial Ecology and Global Change. Cambridge (etc.): Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511564550.003
  520. Solow, R.M., 1974. The Economics of Resources or the Resources of Economics. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings of the Eighty-sixth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association (May, 1974), 64 (2), 1–14. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1057/9780230523210_13
  521. Soper, K. and Trentmann, F., eds., 2008. Citizenship and Consumption. Basingstoke, Hampshire (etc.): Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar
  522. Soper, K., 2006. Conceptualizing needs in the context of consumer politics. Journal of Consumer Policy, 29 (4), 355–372. Open Google Scholar
  523. Soper, K., 2007. Re-thinking the ‘Good Life’—The citizenship dimension of consumer disaffection with consumerism. Journal of Consumer Culture, 7 (2), 205–229. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/1469540507077681
  524. Soper, K., 2008a. Alternative Hedonism, Cultural Theory and the Role of Aesthetic Revisioning. Cultural Studies, 22 (5), 567–587. Open Google Scholar
  525. Soper, K., 2008b. ‘Alternative Hedonism’ and the Citizen-Consumer. In: K. Soper and F. Trentmann, eds. Citizenship and Consumption. Basingstoke, Hampshire (etc.): Palgrave Macmillan, 191–205. Open Google Scholar
  526. Spaargaren, G. and Cohen, M.J., 2009. Greening lifecycles and lifestyles: Sociotechnical innovations in consumption and production as core concerns of ecological modernisation theory. In: A.P.J. Mol, D.A. Sonnenfeld, and G. Spaargaren, eds. The ecological modernisation reader: environmental reform in theory and practice. London, New York: Routledge, 257–274. Open Google Scholar
  527. Spaargaren, G. and Vliet, B. van, 2000. Lifestyles, Consumption and the Environment: The Ecological Modernisation of Domestic Consumption. In: A.P.J. Mol and D.A. Sonnenfeld, eds. Ecological Modernisation around the world: perspectives and critical debates. London: Frank Cass Publishers, 50–76. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/714038564
  528. Spaargaren, G., 2000. Ecological modernization theory and domestic consumption. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 2 (4), 323–335. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/714038564
  529. Spaargaren, G., 2009. Sustainable consumption: A theoretical and environmental policy perspective. In: A.P.J. Mol, D.A. Sonnenfeld, and G. Spaargaren, eds. The ecological modernisation reader: environmental reform in theory and practice. London, New York: Routledge, 318–333. Open Google Scholar
  530. Spaemann, R., 2007. Grenzen der Verantwortung. In: L. Heidbrink and A. Hirsch, eds. Staat ohne Verantwortung? Zum Wandel der Aufgaben von Staat und Politik. Frankfurt, New York: Campus Verlag, 37–53. Open Google Scholar
  531. Spector, H., 2010. Four Conceptions of Freedom. Political Theory, 38 (6), 780–808. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0090591710378589
  532. Spengler, L., 2013. Suffizienzpolitik—Eine heikle Mission. Politische Ökologie, (134), 45–50. Open Google Scholar
  533. Spengler, L., 2016a. Two types of ‘enough’: Sufficiency as minimum and maximum. Environmental Politics, 25 (5), 921–940. Open Google Scholar
  534. Spengler, L., 2016b. Ökodesignanforderungen—von der Energie- zur Ressourceneffizienz? In: F. Reimer, ed. Ressourceneffizienz—Leitbild für das Umweltrecht? Baden-Baden: Nomos, 229–241. Open Google Scholar
  535. Spengler, L. and Dick, D., 2007. Selbstverpflichtungen der Wirtschaft: Anmerkungen zu einem überschätzten Instrument. UfU Rundbriefe, 62 (1/2007), 20–25. Open Google Scholar
  536. Spiegel Online, 2013. Heftiger Widerstand gegen ‘Veggie Day’ der Grünen, 5 Aug. http://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/fleischloser-tag-widerstand-gegen-veggie-day-der-gruenen-a-914949.html (last accessed August 2013). Open Google Scholar
  537. Spitznagel, E., 2007. Wirtschaftswachstum als Beschäftigungsgarant? In: S. Rudolph, ed. Wachstum, Wachstum über alles? Ein ökonomisches Leitbild auf dem Prüfstand von Umwelt und Gerechtigkeit. Marburg: Metropolis, 53–73. Open Google Scholar
  538. SRU (Sachverständigenrat für Umweltfragen), 2002. Für eine neue Vorreiterrolle—Umweltgutachten 2002 des Rates von Sachverständigen für Umweltfragen. Berlin, Bundestags-Drucksache 14/8792. Open Google Scholar
  539. SRU (Sachverständigenrat für Umweltfragen), 2012. Umweltgutachten 2012—Verantwortung in einer begrenzten Welt. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  540. Starkey, R., 2012a. Personal carbon trading: A critical survey. Part 1: Equity. Ecological Economics, 73, 7–18. Open Google Scholar
  541. Starkey, R., 2012b. Personal carbon trading: A critical survey. Part 2: Efficiency and effectiveness. Ecological Economics, 73, 19–28. Open Google Scholar
  542. Steen-Olsen, K., Weinzettel, J., Cranston, G., Ercin, A.E., and Hertwich, E.G., 2012. Carbon, Land, and Water Footprint Accounts for the European Union: Consumption, Production, and Displacements through International Trade. Environmental Science & Technology, 46, 10883–10891. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1021/es301949t
  543. Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., Cornell, S.E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E.M., Biggs, R., Carpenter, S.R., de Vries, W., de Wit, C.A., Folke, C., Gerten, D., Heinke, J., Mace, G.M., Persson, L.M., Ramanathan, V., Reyers, B., and Sörlin, S., 2015. Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347 (6223). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855
  544. Steffen, W., Sanderson, A., Tyson, P., Jäger, J., Matson, P., Moore III, B., Oldfield, F., Richardson, K., Schellnhuber, H.J., Turner, B.L.I., and Wasson, R.J., 2004. Global Change and the Earth System: A Planet Under Pressure. Berlin (etc.): Springer. Open Google Scholar
  545. Steinberger, J.K., Krausmann, F., Getzner, M., Schandl, H., and West, J., 2013. Development and Dematerialization: An International Study. PLoS ONE, 8 (10), e70385. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070385
  546. Stengel, O., 2011. Suffizienz—die Konsumgesellschaft in der ökologischen Krise. München: oekom Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  547. Stephens, P.H.G., 2001a. Green Liberalisms: Nature, Agency and the Good. Environmental Politics, 10 (3), 1–22. Open Google Scholar
  548. Stephens, P.H.G., 2001b. The Green only Blooms amid the Millian Flowers. A Reply to Marcel Wissenburg. Environmental Politics, 10 (3), 43–47. Open Google Scholar
  549. Stern, 2013. FDP-Abgeordneter reizt Grüne mit Nazi-Plakat, 6 Aug. http://www.stern.de/politik/deutschland/kritik-am-veggie-day-fdp-abgeordneter-reizt-gruene-mit-nazi-plakat-3368892.html (last accessed August 2013). Open Google Scholar
  550. Stern, P.C., 1997. Toward a Working Definition of Consumption for Environmental Research and Policy. In: P.C. Stern, T. Dietz, V.W. Ruttan, R.H. Socolow, and J.L. Sweeney, eds. Environmentally Significant Consumption: Research Directions. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 12–25. Open Google Scholar
  551. Stiglitz, J.E., Sen, A., and Fitoussi, J.-P., 2009. Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. Open Google Scholar
  552. Stokes, S., 1998. Pathologies of Deliberation. In: J. Elster, ed. Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge (u.a.): Cambridge University Press, 123–139. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139175005.007
  553. Sunstein, C.R. and Reisch, L.A., 2014. Automatically Green: Behavioural Economics and Environmental Protection. Harvard Environmental Law Review, 38, 127–158. Open Google Scholar
  554. Sunstein, C.R., 2005. Laws of Fear: Beyond the Precautionary Principle. Cambridge (etc.): Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790850.006
  555. Sustainable Development Commission, 2009. A Sustainable New Deal—A stimulus package for economic, social and ecological recovery. London. Open Google Scholar
  556. Talisse, R.B., 2005. Democracy after Liberalism. Pragmatism and Deliberative P⁠o⁠l⁠i⁠t⁠i⁠c⁠s. New York, London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  557. Temkin, L.S., 2003a. Equality, Priority or What? Economics and Philosophy, 19 (1), 61–87. Open Google Scholar
  558. Temkin, L.S., 2003b. Egalitarianism Defended. Ethics, 113, 764–782. Open Google Scholar
  559. Tertoolen, G., van Kreveld, D., and Verstraten, B., 1998. Psychological Resistance Against Attempts to Reduce Private Car Use. Transportation Research Part A, 32 (3), 171–181. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(97)00006-2
  560. Thaler, R.H. and Sunstein, C.R., 2008. Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press. Open Google Scholar
  561. Thoreau, H.D., 2010 [1854]. Walden. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  562. Tremmel, J., 2008. A Theory of Intergenerational Justice. Düsseldorf. Open Google Scholar
  563. Tribe, L.H., 1980. Was spricht gegen Plastikbäume? In: D. Birnbacher, ed. Ökologie und Ethik. Stuttgart: Reclam, 20–71. Open Google Scholar
  564. Tukker, A., Cohen, M.J., Hubacek, K., and Mont, O., 2010. The Impacts of Household Consumption and Options for Change. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 14 (1), 13–30. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00208.x
  565. Tukker, A., Eder, P., and Suh, S., 2006. Environmental Impacts of Products: Policy Relevant Information and Data Challenges. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 10 (3), 183–198. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1162/jiec.2006.10.3.183
  566. Turner, G.M., 2014. Is Global Collapse Imminent? Melbourne Sustainable Society Institute, The University of Melbourne. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.18793/LCJ2014.14.12
  567. UBA (Umweltbundesamt), ed., 2012. Glossar zum Ressourcenschutz. Dessau-Roßlau. Open Google Scholar
  568. UBA (Umweltbundesamt), ed., 2014a. Soziale Innovationen im Aufwind: Ein Leitfaden zur Förderung sozialer Innovationen für nachhaltigen Konsum. Dessau-Roßlau. Open Google Scholar
  569. UBA (Umweltbundesamt), ed., 2014b. Klimaneutral leben: Verbraucher starten durch beim Klimaschutz. Dessau-Roßlau. Open Google Scholar
  570. Ullmann-Margalit, E., 1976. The generalization argument: Where does the obligation lie? Journal of Philosophy, 73 (15), 511–522. Open Google Scholar
  571. UN (United Nations), 1992. Convention on Biological Diversity. Open Google Scholar
  572. UN (United Nations), 2015. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. No. A/RES/70/1. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.18356/e5a72957-en
  573. UN (United Nations), 2015a. The Millennium Development Goals Report. New York. Open Google Scholar
  574. UNCED (United Nations Conference on Environment & Development), 1992a. Agenda 21. Rio de Janeiro. Open Google Scholar
  575. UNCED (United Nations Conference on Environment & Development), 1992b. Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. Open Google Scholar
  576. UNCTAD (United Nations Commission on Trade and Development) and UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme), 1974. Cocoyoc Declaration. Cocoyoc. Open Google Scholar
  577. UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme), 2009. Global Green New Deal Policy Brief. Open Google Scholar
  578. UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme), 2011a. Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth. A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Nairobi. Open Google Scholar
  579. UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme), 2011b. Towards a Green Economy: Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication. Open Google Scholar
  580. UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme), 2012. GEO 5—Global Environmental Outlook. Environment for the future we want. Nairobi. Open Google Scholar
  581. UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme), 2014a. Decoupling 2: Technologies, Opportunities and Policy Options. A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Open Google Scholar
  582. UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme), 2014b. Assessing Global Land Use: Balancing Consumption with Sustainable Supply. A Report of the Working Group on Land and Soils of the International Resource Panel. Open Google Scholar
  583. UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change), 2015. Adoption of the Paris Agreement; Conference of the Parties, Twenty-first session. Paris, No. FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.1. Open Google Scholar
  584. Unseld, G., 1991. ‘Für oder gegen Technik?’ Die Streitfrage um unsere Zukunft. Scheidewege, 21, 59–82. Open Google Scholar
  585. UNWSSD (United Nations World Summit on Sustainable Development), 2002a. Johannesburg Declaration on Sustainable Development. Open Google Scholar
  586. UNWSSD (United Nations World Summit on Sustainable Development), 2002b. Plan of Implementation of the World Summit on Sustainable Development. Open Google Scholar
  587. van den Bergh, J.C.J.M., 2011. Environment versus growth—A criticism of ‘degrowth’ and a plea for ‘a-growth’. Ecological Economics, 70 (5), 881–890. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.035
  588. Vanner, R., 2006. Ex-post estimates of costs to business of EU environmental policies: A case study looking at Ozone Depleting Substances. European Commission. Open Google Scholar
  589. Veblen, T., 1961 [1899]. The theory of the leisure class: An economic study of institutions. New York: Random House. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/250640
  590. Verstreng, V., Myhre, G., Fagerli, H., Reis, S., and Tarrasón, L., 2007. Twenty-five years of continuous sulphur dioxide emission reduction in Europe. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 7, 3663–3681. Open Google Scholar
  591. Vincent, A., 1998. Liberalism and the environment. Environmental Values, 7 (4), 443–459. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.3197/096327198129341663
  592. Voget-Kleschin, L., 2012. Sustainable Food Consumption? Claims for Sustainable Lifestyles in between Normative and Eudaimonistic Issues: The Example of Food Production and Consumption. Open Google Scholar
  593. Voget, L., 2009. Suffizienz als politische Frage. In: T. v. Egan-Krieger, J. Schultz, P.P. Thapa, and L. Voget, eds. Die Greifswalder Theorie starker Nachhaltigkeit. Ausbau, Anwendung und Kritik. Marburg: Metropolis, 209–224. Open Google Scholar
  594. Waldron, J., 1989. Legislation and Moral Neutrality. In: R.E. Goodin and A. Reeve, eds. Liberal Neutrality. London, New York: Routledge, 61–83. Open Google Scholar
  595. Wall, S. and Klosko, G., eds., 2003. Perfectionism and Neutrality: Essays in Liberal Theory. Lanham (etc.): Rowman and Littlefield. Open Google Scholar
  596. Wall, S., 2003. Just Savings and the Difference Principle. Philosophical Studies, 116, 79–102. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1023/B:PHIL.0000005559.77848.5d
  597. Wall, S., 2012. Perfectionism in Moral and Political Philosophy. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2012 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/perfectionism-moral/ (last accessed June 2013). Open Google Scholar
  598. Ware, A. and Goodin, R.E., eds., 1990. Needs and Welfare. London (etc.): Sage Publications. Open Google Scholar
  599. Waschkuhn, A., 1998. Demokratietheorien—Politiktheoretische und ideengeschichtliche Grundzüge. München, Wien: R. Oldenbourg Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  600. WBGU (Wissenschaftlicher Beirat der Bundesregierung Globale Umweltveränderungen), 1998. Strategien zur Bewältigung Globaler Umweltrisiken. Jahresgutachten 1998. Berlin (etc.): Springer. Open Google Scholar
  601. WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development), 1987. Our Common Future. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Oslo. Open Google Scholar
  602. Weaver, P., Jansen, L., Van Grootveld, G., Van Spiegel, E., and Vergragt, P., 2000. Sustainable Technology Development. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.9774/GLEAF.978-1-909493-12-4_4
  603. Weber, M., 1992 [1919]. Politik als Beruf. Stuttgart: Reclam. Open Google Scholar
  604. Weinstock, D.M., 2003. Miller on Distributive Justice. In: D.A. Bell and A. de-Shalit, eds. Forms of Justice: Critical Perspectives on David Miller’s Political Philosophy. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 269–286. Open Google Scholar
  605. Weizsäcker, E.U. v., Hargroves, K., Smith, M., Deisha, C., and Stasinopoulos, P., 2009. Factor Five. Transforming the Global Economy through 80% Improvements in Resource Productivity. London: Earthscan. Open Google Scholar
  606. Weizsäcker, E.U. v., Lovins, A.B., and Lovins, L.H., 1995. Faktor Vier: Doppelter Wohlstand—halbierter Naturverbrauch. München: Droemer Knaur. Open Google Scholar
  607. Wells, P. and Zapata, C., 2012. Renewable Eco-industrial Development: A New Frontier for Industrial Ecology? Journal of Industrial Ecology, 16 (5), 665–668. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00487.x
  608. Wenar, L., 2011. Rights. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2011 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/rights/ (last accessed October 2014). Open Google Scholar
  609. Westra, L. and Werhane, P.H., eds., 1998. The Business of Consumption: Environmental Ethics and the Global Economy. Lanham (etc.): Rowman and Littlefield. Open Google Scholar
  610. White, D.F., 2002. A Green Industrial Revolution? Sustainable Technological Innovation in a Global Age. Environmental Politics, 11 (2), 1–26. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/714000603
  611. White, S., 2008. Social Minimum. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/social-minimum/ (last accessed September 2014). Open Google Scholar
  612. Wiebe, K.S., Bruckner, M., Giljum, S., Lutz, C., and Polzin, C., 2012. Carbon and Materials Embodied in the International Trade of Emerging Economies: A Multiregional Input-Output Assessment of Trends Between 1995 and 2005. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 16 (4), 636–646. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00504.x
  613. Wieland, W., 1999. Verantwortung—Prinzip der Ethik? Vorgetragen am 28. Juni 1997. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag C. Winter. Open Google Scholar
  614. Winterfeld, U. v., 1993. Über die Kunst des richtigen Verhaltens. Politische Ökologie, (Special Sept./Okt. ’93), 45–47. Open Google Scholar
  615. Winterfeld, U. v., 2002. Reflexionen zur Suffizienz als politischer Angelegenheit in sieben Etappen. In: M. Linz, P. Bartelmus, P. Hennicke, R. Jungkeit, W. Sachs, G. Scherhorn, G. Wilke, and U. v. Winterfeld, eds. Von nichts zu viel—Suffizienz gehört zur Zukunftsfähigkeit. 27–37. Open Google Scholar
  616. Winterfeld, U. v., 2007. Keine Nachhaltigkeit ohne Suffizienz. Fünf Thesen und Folgerungen. vorgänge, (3), 46–54. Open Google Scholar
  617. Wissenburg, M., 1998. Green liberalism. The free and the green society. London (etc.): UCL Press. Open Google Scholar
  618. Wissenburg, M., 2001a. Liberalism is Always Green on the Other Side of the Mill. A Reply to Piers Stephens. Environmental Politics, 10 (3), 23–42. Open Google Scholar
  619. Wissenburg, M., 2001b. Sustainability and the Limits of Liberalism. In: J. Barry and M. Wissenburg, eds. Sustaining liberal democracy. Ecological challenges and opportunities. New York (etc.): Palgrave, 192–204. Open Google Scholar
  620. Wissenburg, M., 2006a. Ecological Neutrality and Liberal Survivalism—How (not) to Discuss the Compatibility of Liberalism and Ecologism. Analyse & Kritik, 28, 125–145. Open Google Scholar
  621. Wissenburg, M., 2006b. Liberalism. In: A. Dobson and R. Eckersley, eds. Political Theory and the Ecological Challenge. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 20–34. Open Google Scholar
  622. Withers, H., 1920. The Consumer’s Responsibility. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 87, 225–232. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/000271622008700135
  623. WWF, 2014a. Living Planet Report 2014: Species and spaces, people and places. Gland, Switzerland. Open Google Scholar
  624. WWF, 2014b. Fleisch frisst Land. Berlin. Open Google Scholar
  625. Wynne, B., 1992. Uncertainty and environmental learning: Reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm. Global Environmental Change, 2 (2), 111–127. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/0959-3780(92)90017-2
  626. Xenos, N., 1987. Liberalism and the Postulate of Scarcity. Political Theory, 15 (2), 225–243. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0090591787015002004
  627. Young, I.M., 2004. Responsibility and Global Labor Justice. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 12 (4), 365–388. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00205.x
  628. Young, I.M., 2006. Responsibility and Global Justice: A Social Connection Model. Social Philosophy and Policy, 23 (1), 102–130. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0265052506060043
  629. Young, I.M., 2011. Responsibility for Justice. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  630. Zapf, W., 1989. Über soziale Innovationen. Soziale Welt, 40 (1/2), 170–183. Open Google Scholar

Similar publications

from the topics "Environmental Economics & Environmental Management & Energy Economy", "Sociology General"
Cover of book: Comparative Perspectives on the Law of Energy Transition in Europe
Edited Book Full access
Michael Rodi, Johannes Saurer
Comparative Perspectives on the Law of Energy Transition in Europe
Cover of book: Systemtheorie und Erzählen
Book Titles No access
Ralf Kellermann
Systemtheorie und Erzählen
Cover of book: Unlocking the Potential of Sustainable Finance
Book Titles Full access
Isabelle Hinsche-McLardy
Unlocking the Potential of Sustainable Finance
Cover of book: Finance, Accounting, Controlling im Kontext von Digitaler Transformation und Nachhaltigkeit
Edited Book No access
Manuela Ender, Tim Alexander Herberger, Michael Kuttner
Finance, Accounting, Controlling im Kontext von Digitaler Transformation und Nachhaltigkeit
Cover of book: Secular Humanism in Sweden
Book Titles No access
Susanne Kind
Secular Humanism in Sweden

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via Open Athens
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex