Cover des Buchs: International Law and Marine Geoengineering
Im Shop erwerben
, um zu prüfen, ob Sie einen Vollzugriff auf diese Publikation haben.
Monographie Kein Zugriff

International Law and Marine Geoengineering

Institutional and Regulatory Responses within the Framework of the Convention on Biological Diversity, the Climate Change Regime and the Law of the Sea
Autor:innen:
Verlag:
 2025

Zusammenfassung

Der Band untersucht die institutionellen und regulatorischen Reaktionen des Völkerrechts auf marines Geoengineering. Er analysiert die Verpflichtungen der Staaten, die diese Technologien verfolgen, und unterscheidet dabei zwischen ihrer Entwicklung und dem kommerziellen Einsatz. Mit einem Fokus auf das Übereinkommen über die biologische Vielfalt, das internationale Klimaregime und das Seerechtsübereinkommen unterstreicht das Buch, dass der exponentielle Anstieg des Interesses an diesen Technologien mit einem entsprechenden Ausbau der regulatorischen Kontrolle einhergehen muss. Es argumentiert, dass bestehende institutionelle Rahmenwerke die beste Grundlage für die Governance bieten, und hebt die Bedeutung der Interaktion zwischen Regimen hervor, um eine sichere und effektive Regulierung von Marine Geoengineering zu gewährleisten.

Schlagworte

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Auflage
1/2025
Copyrightjahr
2025
ISBN-Print
978-3-7560-3033-0
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-5311-1
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe
Studies in International Law of the Sea and Maritime Law - Internationales Seerecht und Seehandelsrecht
Band
17
Sprache
Englisch
Seiten
313
Produkttyp
Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Kein Zugriff 1 - 16
    1. 1.1 International Engagement with Climate Change Kein Zugriff
      1. 1.2.1 History and Contested Terminology: What is “Geoengineering”? Kein Zugriff
      2. 1.2.2 Geoengineering: Not a Substitute for Traditional Mitigation and Adaptation Kein Zugriff
    3. 1.3 State of the Art and Aim of the Thesis Kein Zugriff
    4. 1.4 Research Questions Kein Zugriff
    5. 1.5 Delimitation of the Analysis Kein Zugriff
    6. 1.6 Structure of the Analysis Kein Zugriff
      1. 2.1.1 Artificial Ocean Upwelling/Downwelling Kein Zugriff
      2. 2.1.2 Macroalgae/Seaweed Cultivation Kein Zugriff
      3. 2.1.3 Nutrient Fertilization in the Ocean Kein Zugriff
      4. 2.1.4 Ocean Alkalinity Enhancement Kein Zugriff
      1. 2.2.1 Marine Cloud Brightening Kein Zugriff
      2. 2.2.2 Enhancing Ocean Surface Reflectivity (Ocean Albedo Change) Kein Zugriff
    3. 2.3 Concluding Remarks: The Need for International Regulation Kein Zugriff
    1. 3.1 General Characteristics of Framework Agreements Kein Zugriff
        1. 3.2.1.1 The CBD and the UNFCCC Kein Zugriff
        2. 3.2.1.2 UNCLOS Kein Zugriff
        1. 3.2.2.1 The CBD and the UNFCCC Kein Zugriff
        2. 3.2.2.2 UNCLOS Kein Zugriff
    3. 3.3 Built-in Flexibility and the Further Elaboration of General Norms Kein Zugriff
    4. 3.4 Concluding remarks Kein Zugriff
      1. 4.1.1 The Adoption of COP Decisions Kein Zugriff
      2. 4.1.2 The Legal Effect of COP Decisions Kein Zugriff
      1. 4.2.1 Decisions of the CBD COP before 2016 Kein Zugriff
      2. 4.2.2 Decisions of the CBD COP after 2016 Kein Zugriff
    3. 4.3 Concluding Remarks Kein Zugriff
      1. 5.1.1 Overview of the regime established under the UNFCCC Kein Zugriff
      2. 5.1.2 The Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Agreement Kein Zugriff
        1. 5.2.1.1 (Ocean-based) CDR is Mitigation: What are the consequences this? Kein Zugriff
        2. 5.2.1.2 Final Remarks: (Ocean-based) CDR as Mitigation Kein Zugriff
        1. 5.2.2.1 SRM and the Paris Agreement: Normative Entry Points Kein Zugriff
        2. 5.2.2.2 Final Remarks: SRM and the IPCC? Kein Zugriff
      3. 5.2.3 The Need to Evaluate Institutional Arrangements Kein Zugriff
      1. 5.3.1 Institutional Bodies Established under the UNFCCC Regime Kein Zugriff
        1. 5.3.2.1 Process and Procedure for Adopting COP/CMA Decisions Kein Zugriff
        2. 5.3.2.2 The Legal Effect of COP/CMA Decisions Kein Zugriff
          1. The Technology Mechanism Kein Zugriff
          2. Subsidiary Bodies: The SBSTA, SBI and the Article 6.4 Supervisory Body Kein Zugriff
          1. Climate Clubs within the Climate Change Regime Kein Zugriff
          2. Practical Example: The Emissions Trading System of the European Union Kein Zugriff
    4. 5.4 Concluding Remarks Kein Zugriff
      1. 6.1.1 The application of UNCLOS beyond and within national jurisdiction Kein Zugriff
      2. 6.1.2 Marine Geoengineering and Part XIII of UNCLOS: Marine scientific research Kein Zugriff
      3. 6.1.3 Marine Geoengineering and Part XII of UNCLOS: The obligation to protect and preserve the marine environment Kein Zugriff
      4. 6.1.4 Final Remarks: UNCLOS Provisions and Marine Geoengineering Kein Zugriff
        1. 6.2.1.1 The General Amendment Procedures in UNCLOS Kein Zugriff
        2. 6.2.1.2 The “undue” Legislative Power of SPLOS Kein Zugriff
        1. 6.2.2.1 The Part XI Agreement Kein Zugriff
        2. 6.2.2.2 The Fish Stocks Agreement Kein Zugriff
        3. 6.2.2.3 The BBNJ Agreement Kein Zugriff
      3. 6.2.3 Final Remarks: The “Legislative Path” Kein Zugriff
      1. 6.3.1 Advisory Proceedings Kein Zugriff
      2. 6.3.2 The Request for an Advisory Opinion before ITLOS Kein Zugriff
      3. 6.3.3 Final Remarks: The “Adjudicative Path” Kein Zugriff
        1. 6.4.1.1 UNCLOS and Pollution caused by “Dumping” Kein Zugriff
        2. 6.4.1.2 The Rule of Reference in Article 210 Kein Zugriff
        1. 6.4.2.1 Marine Geoengineering under the London Convention and Protocol Kein Zugriff
        2. 6.4.2.2 Recent Developments concerning the 2013 Amendments Kein Zugriff
      3. 6.4.3 Final Remarks: The Renvoi Path Kein Zugriff
    5. 6.5 Concluding Remarks Kein Zugriff
    1. 7.1 Regime Interaction: Facilitating Interaction and Avoiding Conflict Kein Zugriff
        1. 7.2.1.1 Explicit Conflict Clauses Kein Zugriff
        2. 7.2.1.2 CBD↔UNCLOS interaction Kein Zugriff
        3. 7.2.1.3 UNFCCC↔UNCLOS interaction Kein Zugriff
        4. 7.2.1.4 CBD↔UNFCCC interaction Kein Zugriff
          1. The Convention on Biological Diversity Kein Zugriff
          2. The Climate Change Regime Kein Zugriff
          3. The Law of the Sea Kein Zugriff
        2. 7.2.2.2 Other (Informal) Calls for “Soft” Interaction Kein Zugriff
    3. 7.3 Concluding Remarks Kein Zugriff
    1. 8.1 Addressing the Primary Research Questions Kein Zugriff
    2. 8.2 Outlook – Where to Now? Kein Zugriff
    1. Academic Literature and Other Publications Kein Zugriff
    2. Legal Texts Kein Zugriff
    3. Case Law Kein Zugriff
    4. Online Resources Kein Zugriff

Literaturverzeichnis (540)

  1. UNFCCC Article 6.4 Supervisory Body, Information note: Removal activities under the Article 6.4 mechanism, Doc. No.: A6.4-SB004-AA-A04 (ver. 03.0) (28 February 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  2. UNFCCC Article 6.4 Supervisory Body, Recommendation: Activities involving removals under the Article 6.4 mechanism, Doc. No.: A6.4-SB003-A03 (ver. 01.0) (6 November 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  3. UNFCCC SBSTA, Recommendation: Activities involving removals under the Article 6.4 mechanism, Doc. No.: A6.4-SB009-A02 (17 November 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  4. UNFCCC SBSTA and SBI, Joint annual report of the Technology Executive Committee and the Climate Technology Centre and Network for 2023, Doc. No.: FCCC/SB/2023/3 (12 October 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  5. UNFCCC SBSTA, Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice: Ocean and Climate Change Dialogue 2023 – Information note by the Co-Facilitators of the ocean and climate change dialogue 2023–2024 (30 May 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  6. UNFCCC SBSTA, Summary of cooperative activities with United Nations entities and other international organizations that contribute to the work under the Convention, Doc. No.: FCCC/SBSTA/2023/INF.1 (24 May 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  7. UNFCCC SBSTA, Ocean and climate change dialogue 2023: Informal summary report by the co-facilitators of the Ocean and Climate Change Dialogue 2023–2024 (15 September 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  8. UNFCCC SBSTA, Ocean and climate change dialogue 2022: Informal summary report by the Chair of the Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice (23 September 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  9. UNFCCC SBSTA, Report of the Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice on its fifty-sixth session, held in Bonn from 6 to 16 June 2022, Doc. No.: FCCC/SBSTA/2022/6 (28 July 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  10. UNFCCC SBSTA, Ocean and climate change dialogue to consider how to strengthen adaptation and mitigation action: Informal summary report by the Chair of the Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice (29 April 2021). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  11. UNFCCC SBSTA, Report of the Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice on its fourteenth session, Bonn 24–27 July 2001, Doc. No.: FCCC/SBSTA/2001/2 (18 September 2001). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  12. UNGA, Oceans and the law of the sea: Report of the Secretary-General, Doc. No.: A/79/68 (19 March 2024). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  13. UNGA, Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly on 5 December 2023: Oceans and Law of the Sea, Doc. No.: A/RES/78/69 (11 December 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  14. UNGA, Report on the work of the United Nations Open-ended Informal Consultative Process on Oceans and the Law of the Sea at its twenty-third meeting, Doc. No.: A/78/129 (3 July 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  15. UNGA, Report of the resumed Review Conference on the Agreement for the Implementation of the Provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982 relating to the Conservation and Management of Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks, Doc. No.: A/CONF.210/2023/6 (20 June 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  16. UNGA, Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 29 March 2023: Request for an advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice on the obligations of States in respect of climate change, Doc. No.: A/RES/77/276 (4 April 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  17. UNGA, Oceans and the law of the sea: Report of the Secretary-General, Doc. No.: A/78/67 (14 March 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  18. UNGA, Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly on 30 December 2022: Oceans and Law of the Sea, Doc. No.: A/RES/77/248 (9 January 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  19. UNGA, Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 14 December 2022: Protection of global climate for present and future generations of humankind, Doc. No.: A/RES/77/165 (21 December 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  20. UNGA, Oceans and the law of the sea: Report of the Secretary-General, Doc. No.: A/77/331 (9 September 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  21. UNGA, Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 9 December 2021: Protection of the Atmosphere, Doc. No.: A/RES/76/112 (17 December 2021). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  22. UNGA, Agenda item 35: Law of the sea – Report of the Secretary-General (A/49/631 and Corr.1), Doc. No.: A/49/PV.77 (6 December 1994). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  23. UNHCR, Resolution adopted by the Human Rights Council on 7 July 2022: Human rights and climate change, Doc. No.: A/HRC/RES/50/9 (14 July 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  24. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 23 May 1969, 1155 UNTS 331 (entered into force 27 January 1980). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  25. Court of Appeal of The Hague, Urgenda Foundation v the State of the Netherlands, (2018) Case No. 200.178.245/01 (Netherlands). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  26. ECHR, Case of Al-Dulimi and Montana Management Inc. v. Switzerland, Judgment. 2016 (App. No. 5809/08). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  27. High Court of Justice: Business and Property Courts of England and Wales (Insolvency and Companies List), ClientEarth v. Shell PLC [2023] EWHC 1897 (Ch). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  28. ICJ, Obligations of States in Respect of Climate Change (Request for Advisory Opinion), Order of 15 December 2023. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  29. ICJ, Question of the Delimitation of the Continental Shelf between Nicaragua and Colombia beyond 200 Nautical Miles from the Nicaraguan Coast (Nicaragua v. Colombia), ICJ Judgment of 13 July 2023. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  30. ICJ, Arbitral Award of 3 October 1899 (Guyana v. Venezuela), Judgment of 6 April 2023. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  31. ICJ, Jadhav (India v. Pakistan), Judgment, ICJ Reports 2019, p. 418. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  32. ICJ, Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v. Japan: New Zealand intervening), Judgment, ICJ Reports 2014, p. 226. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  33. ICJ, Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. Uruguay) (Judgment, ICJ Reports 2010, p. 14. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  34. ICJ, Certain Questions of Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters (Djibouti v. France), Judgment, ICJ Reports 2008, p. 232. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  35. ICJ, Avena and Other Mexican Nationals (Mexico v. United States of America), Judgment, ICJ Reports 2004, p. 48. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  36. ICJ, Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America), Judgment, ICJ Reports 2003, p. 161. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  37. ICJ, Case Concerning Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America), Preliminary Objections, Judgment, ICJ Reports 1996, p. 803. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  38. ICJ, Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, ICJ Reports 1996, p. 226. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  39. ICJ, Legal Consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia (South West Africa) notwithstanding Security Council Resolution 276 (1970), Advisory Opinion, ICJ Reports 1971, p. 16. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  40. ICJ, Voting Procedure on Questions relating to Reports and Petitions concerning the Territory of South-West Africa, Advisory Opinion, ICJ Reports 1955, p. 67. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  41. ICJ, Fisheries Case (United Kingdom v. Norway), Dissenting Opinion of Judge J. E. Read, ICJ Reports 1951, p. 116. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  42. ITLOS, Request for an Advisory Opinion submitted by the Commission of Small Island States on Climate Change and International Law (Request for Advisory Opinion submitted to the Tribunal), Advisory Opinion of 21 May 2024. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  43. ITLOS, Request for an Advisory Opinion submitted by the Commission of Small Island States on Climate Change and International Law (Request for Advisory Opinion submitted to the Tribunal), Written Statement of Rwanda, 17 June 2023. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  44. ITLOS, Request for an Advisory Opinion submitted by the Commission of Small Island States on Climate Change and International Law (Request for Advisory Opinion submitted to the Tribunal), Written statement of France (translation by the Registry), 16 June 2023. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  45. ITLOS, Request for an Advisory Opinion submitted by the Commission of Small Island States on Climate Change and International Law (Request for Advisory Opinion submitted to the Tribunal), Written statement of the Netherlands, 16 June 2023. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  46. ITLOS, Request for an Advisory Opinion submitted by the Commission of Small Island States on Climate Change and International Law (Request for Advisory Opinion submitted to the Tribunal), Written Statement of the United Kingdom, 16 June 2023. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  47. ITLOS, Request for an Advisory Opinion submitted by the Commission of Small Island States on Climate Change and International Law (Request for Advisory Opinion submitted to the Tribunal), Written Statement of the AU, 16 June 2023. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  48. ITLOS, Request for an Advisory Opinion submitted by the Commission of Small Island States on Climate Change and International Law (Request for Advisory Opinion submitted to the Tribunal), Written Statement of the IMO, 16 June 2023. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  49. ITLOS, Request for an Advisory Opinion submitted by the Commission of Small Island States on Climate Change and International Law (Request for Advisory Opinion submitted to the Tribunal), Written Statement of the UN, 16 June 2023. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  50. ITLOS, Request for an Advisory Opinion submitted by the Commission of Small Island States on Climate Change and International Law (Request for Advisory Opinion submitted to the Tribunal), Written Statement of the IUCN, 13 June 2023. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  51. ITLOS, Request for an Advisory Opinion submitted by the Commission of Small Island States on Climate Change and International Law (Request for Advisory Opinion submitted to the Tribunal), Written Statement of Australia, 6 June 2023. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  52. ITLOS, Dispute concerning delimitation of the maritime boundary between Mauritius and Maldives in the Indian Ocean (Mauritius/Maldives), Preliminary Objections, Judgment, ITLOS Reports 2020–2021, p. 17. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  53. ITLOS, M/V “Norstar” (Panama v. Italy), Judgment, ITLOS Reports 2019, p. 10. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  54. ITLOS, Request for Advisory Opinion submitted by the Sub-Regional Fisheries Commission, Advisory Opinion, ITLOS Reports 2015, p. 4. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  55. ITLOS, M/V “Virginia G” (Panama v. Guinea-Bissau), Judgment, ITLOS Reports 2014, p. 4. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  56. ITLOS, Responsibilities and Obligations of States Sponsoring Persons and Entities with Respect to Activities in the Area, Advisory Opinion, ITLOS Report 2011, p. 10. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  57. ITLOS, Southern Bluefin Tuna (New Zealand v. Japan; Australia v. Japan), Provisional Measures, Order of 27 August 1999, ITLOS Reports 1999, p. 280. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  58. PCA, South China Sea Arbitration (Philippines v China), Award on the Merits (2016) 33 RIAA 1. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  59. Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, R (on the application of Friends of the Earth Ltd and others) v. Heathrow Airport Ltd (16 December 2020) UKSC 52, [2021] 2 All ER 967. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  60. The Hague District Court, Milieudefensie et al. v Royal Dutch Shell plc, (2021) Case No. C/09/571932/HA ZA 19–379 (Netherlands). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  61. The Hague District Court, Urgenda Foundation v The State of the Netherlands, (2015) Case No. C/09/456689/HA ZA 13–1396 (Netherlands). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  62. Trail Smelter (United States v. Canada) (Arbitral Awards, RIAA III (16 April 1938), p. 1905. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  63. Anmol Ahuja (22 May 2022). ‘The Planet After Geoengineering’ by Design Earth: Cautionary Tales of Human Intervention in the Climate Crisis, STIRworld, available at: < https://www.stirworld.com/think-books-and-movies-the-planet-after-geoengineering-by-design-earth >. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  64. Antonius Gagern, Greg Rau, Debora Iglesias Rodriguez, Phil Renforth, Wil Burns and Elisabeth Graffy, “Ocean Alkalinity Enhancement: Current State of Knowledge and Potential Role of Philanthropy. Report for Our Shared Seas” (2019), available at: Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  65. < https://oursharedseas.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Ocean-Alkalinity-Enhancement.pdf >. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  66. Arctic Ice Project (2023), “The Project”, available at: < http://www.arcticiceproject.org/the-project/#solution > (accessed 22.05.2024). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  67. ARPA-E (n.d.), “(Macroalgae Research Inspiring Novel Energy Resources”, available at: < https://arpa-e.energy.gov/technologies/programs/mariner > (accessed 22.05.2024). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  68. Atmocean (n.d.), “Ocean Surface Carbon Relocation (OSCAR)”, available at: < https://atmocean.com/carbonsink/ > (accessed 22.05.2024). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  69. Benoit Mayer, The Curious Fate of the Doha Agreement, EJIL Talk! (4 May 2020), available at: < https://ejiltalk.org/the-curious-fate-of-the-doha-amendment/ >. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  70. Business Wire, “Carbon Removal Startup Planetary Technologies Announces $7.8M in Funding, Offer of 3,000 Carbon Credits”, available at: < https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20220317005935/en/Carbon-Removal-Startup-Planetary-Technologies-Announces-7.8M-in-Funding-Offer-of-3000-Carbon-Credits > (accessed 22.05.2024). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  71. Carbon Gap (2023), “CCS Directive”, available at: < https://tracker.carbongap.org/policy/eu-ccs-directive/ > (accessed 22.05.2024). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  72. Carnegie Climate Governance Initiative, “Emerging Technologies Terminology – A Living Guide”, available at: < https://www.c2g2.net/terminology-guide/ > (accessed 22.05.2024). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  73. Clare Heyward, “Time to stop talking about ‘climate engineering’”. Forum for Climate Engineering Assessment, available at: < https://ceassessment.org/time-to-stop-talking-about-climate-engineering-clare-heyward/ > (accessed 22.05.2024). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  74. Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water, Reef Restoration and Adaptation (2022), Australian Government, available at: < https://www.dcceew.gov.au/parks-heritage/great-barrier-reef/protecting/our-investments/restoration-adaptation > (accessed 22.05.2024). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  75. Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea (2023), “United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982: Overview and full text”, available at: < https://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_convention.htm > (accessed 22.05.2024). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  76. Duncan McLaren and Olaf Corry, “Countries failed to agree first steps on solar geoengineering at the UN. What went wrong?”, Legal Planet Blog (7 March 2024), available at: < https://legal-planet.org/2024/03/07/countries-failed-to-agree-first-steps-on-geoengineering-what-went-wrong/ >. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  77. European Commission (2024), “What is the EU ETS?”, available at: < https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/eu-emissions-trading-system-eu-ets/what-eu-ets_en#eu-ets-legislative-framework > (accessed 22.05.2024). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  78. European Commission (2023), “Scoping paper: Solar Radiation Modification”. Scientific Advice Mechanism: European Commission’s Group of Chief Scientific Advisors (3 August 2023), available at: < https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2023-08/Scoping_paper_SRM.pdf >. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  79. European Commission (2009), “German-Indian Study Dampens Ocean Fertilisation Hopes”, available at < https://cordis.europa.eu/article/id/30616-germanindian-study-dampens-ocean-fertilisation-hopes >. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  80. European Commission, “Certification of permanent carbon removals, carbon farming and carbon storage in products” (n.d.), available at: < https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/certification-permanent-carbon-removals-carbon-farming-and-carbon-storage-products/certification-permanent-carbon-removals-carbon-farming-and-carbon-storage-products_en > (accessed 22.05.2024). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  81. Eve Tamme, “COP28 — Mixed Results on Removals, Markets and Carbon Capture”, Inside Climate Policy Blog (14 December 2023), available at: < https://evetamme.com/2023/12/14/cop28-on-carbon-removal-ccs-and-markets/ >. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  82. Geoengineering Monitor (2019), “Arctic Geoengineering Experiment is Dangerous, Lacks Community Consent: Inupiaq Organizer”, available at: < https://www.geoengineeringmonitor.org/2019/02/arctic-geoengineering-experiment-is-dangerous-lacks-community-consent-inupiaq-organizer/ > (accessed 22.05.2024). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  83. Geoengineering Monitor Map, “Geoengineering Map”, available at < https://map.geoengineeringmonitor.org/ > (accessed 22.05.2024). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  84. GEOMAR (2022), “Greening the ocean to combat climate change”, available at: < https://www.geomar.de/en/news/article/greening-the-ocean-to-combat-climate-change > (accessed 22.05.2024). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  85. German Research Foundation (DFG), Climate engineering and our climate targets – a long-overdue debate (Brochure SPP 1689, 2019), available at: < https://www.spp-climate-engineering.de/climateengineering_spp1689_english259b.pdf?file=files/ce-projekt/media/download_PDFs/climateengineering_spp1689_english.pdf > (accessed 22.05.2024). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  86. GESAMP (2024), “Our Work: Ocean Interventions for Climate Change Mitigation”, available at: < http://www.gesamp.org/work/groups/41 > (accessed 22.05.2024). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  87. Gold Standard, “Vision and Mission”, available at: < https://www.goldstandard.org/about-us/vision-and-mission > (accessed 22.05.2024). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  88. Indigenous Environmental Network (2022), “Arctic Ice Project”, available at: < https://www.ienearth.org/arctic-ice-project/ > (accessed 22.05.2024). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  89. Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources of Mexico (January 2023), “La experimentación con geoingeniería solar no será permitida en México”, available at: < https://www.gob.mx/semarnat/prensa/la-experimentacion-con-geoingenieria-solar-no-sera-permitida-en-mexico?idiom=es > (accessed 22.05.2024). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  90. Jacob Werksman (1999), “Procedural and Institutional Aspects of the Emerging Climate Change Regime: Improvised Procedures and Impoverished Rules?”, available at: < https://www.ucl.ac.uk/cserge/Werksman.pdf > (accessed 22.05.2024). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  91. Ocean CDR Science (2024), “A Letter from 400+ World Scientists on Advancing Responsible Research and Development of Ocean-Based Carbon Dioxide Removal”, available at: < https://www.oceancdrscience.org/ > (accessed 22.05.2024). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  92. Ocean Visions (April 2024), “Ocean Visions Unveils Ocean Iron Fertilization (OIF) Site Suitability Planning Tool”, available at: < https://oceanvisions.org/news-oif-planning-tool/ > (accessed 22.05.2024). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  93. Ocean Visions and Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute (2022). “Answering Critical Questions About Sinking Macroalgae for Carbon Dioxide Removal: A Research Framework to Investigate Sequestration Efficacy and Environmental Impacts”, available at: < http://oceanvisions.org/seaweedresearch > (accessed 22.05.2024). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  94. Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) of the USA (2023), “Congressionally Mandated Research Plan and an Initial Research Governance Framework Related to Solar Radiation Modification”, available at: < https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Congressionally-Mandated-Report-on-Solar-Radiation-Modification.pdf > (accessed 22.05.2024). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  95. Project Vesta (n.d.), “The Project: Overview”, available at: < https://www.projectvesta.org/the-project#About > (accessed 22.05.2024). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  96. Pull To Refresh (2022), “How it works”, available at: < https://pulltorefresh.earth/ > (accessed 22.05.2024). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  97. Rio Conventions Pavilion (2023), “Rio Conventions Pavilion Journey at UNFCCC COP28” at < http://www.riopavilion.org/unfccc-cop28-uae-2023/ > (accessed 22.05.2024). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  98. Reef Restoration and Adaptation Program (n.d.), “Cooling by cloud brightening”, available at: < https://gbrrestoration.org/program/cooling-by-cloud-brightening/ > (accessed 22.05.2024). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  99. Running Tide (2022), “Running Tide White Paper – Sustainably Amplifying the Natural Carbon Cycle”, available at: < https://www.runningtide.com/carbonremoval > (accessed 22.05.2024). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  100. TEC (24 November 2023), “Rolling workplan of the Technology Executive Committee for 2023–2027”, available at: < https://unfccc.int/ttclear/misc_/StaticFiles/gnwoerk_static/tec_workplan_index/0a3d1410186045dfa5c5c5e7695be2cd/1a8adab665ff4037bb982c64df50f191.pdf > (accessed 22.05.2024). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  101. UK Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, Plymouth Marine Laboratory (2021), “‘Champagne’ technology to capture carbon dioxide via the oceans”, available at: < https://www.pml.ac.uk/news/Champagne-technology-to-capture-carbon-dioxide-via#:~:text=SeaCURE%20technology%20will%20temporarily%20make,CO2%20from%20the%20air > (accessed 22.05.2024)). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  102. UN DOALOS (2023), “Review Conference on the Agreement for the Implementation of the Provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982 relating to the Conservation and Management of Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks”, available at: < https://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/review_conf_fish_stocks.htm > (accessed 22.05.2024). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  103. UNFCCC (2024), “Call for input 2024 – Stakeholder interactions: Further input – Requirements for methodologies and activities involving removals”, available at: < https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/paris-agreement-crediting-mechanism/calls-for-input/call-for-input-2024-stakeholder-interactions-further-input-requirements-for-methodologies-and > (accessed 22.05.2024). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  104. UNFCCC (10 December 2023), “Unlocking Climate Ambition: the Significance of Article 6 at COP28”, available at: < https://unfccc.int/news/unlocking-climate-ambition-the-significance-of-article-6-at-cop28 > (accessed 22.05.2024). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  105. UNFCCC (n.d.), “A Guide to the UNFCCC and its Processes”, available at: < https://unfccc.int/resource/bigpicture/ > (accessed 22.05.2024). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  106. UNFCCC (n.d.), “Background – Cooperation with the IPCC”, available at: < https://unfccc.int/topics/science/workstreams/cooperation-with-the-ipcc/ Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  107. background-cooperation-with-the-ipcc > (accessed 22.05.2024). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  108. UNFCCC (n.d.), “Cooperative Implementation”, available at: < https://unfccc.int/process/the-paris-agreement/cooperative-implementation > (accessed 22.05.2024). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  109. UNFCCC (n.d.), “Past conferences overview”, available at: < https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/conferences/past-conferences/past-conferences-overview > (accessed 22.05.2024). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  110. UNFCCC (n.d.), “REDD+ Web Platform!”, available at: < https://redd.unfccc.int/ > (accessed 22.05.2024). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  111. UNFCCC (n.d.), “What are governing, process management, subsidiary, constituted and concluded Bodies?”, available at: < https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/what-are-governing-process-management-subsidiary-constituted-and-concluded-bodies > (accessed 22.05.2024). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  112. UNFCCC (n.d.), “What is the Kyoto Protocol”, available at: < https://unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol > (accessed 22.05.2024). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  113. UN Secretariat (n.d.), “Consensus in UN practice General”, available at < https://legal.un.org/ola/media/GA_RoP/GA_RoP_EN.pdf > (accessed 22.05.2024). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  114. UN Secretary-General, Secretary-General's remarks at the UN Biodiversity Conference — COP15 (6 December 2022) available at: < https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/statement/2022-12-06/secretary-generals-remarks-the-un-biodiversity-conference-%E2%80%94-cop15-bilingual-delivered-follows-scroll-down-for-all-english-and-all-french >. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  115. UN Secretary-General, Statement by the Secretary-General at the conclusion of COP27 in Sharm el-Sheikh (19 November 2022) available at: < https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/statement/2022-11-19/statement-the-secretary-general-the-conclusion-of-cop27%C2%A0-sharm-el-sheikh%C2%A0%C2%A0 >. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  116. UN Treaty Collection (2024), “Status of Treaties: Convention on Biological Diversity”, available at: < https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XXVII-8&chapter=27&clang=_en > (accessed 22.05.2024). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  117. University of Cambridge (Centre for Climate Repair) (2023), “Refreeze the Arctic”, available at: < https://www.climaterepair.cam.ac.uk/refreeze > (accessed 22.05.2024). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  118. XPRIZE Carbon Removal (n.d.), “Truly meaningful impact”, available at: < https://www.xprize.org/prizes/carbonremoval > (accessed 22.05.2024). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  119. Aaron L. Strong, John J. Cullen and Sallie W. Chisholm, “Ocean Fertilization: Science, Policy, and Commerce”, Oceanography 22(3) (2009), pp. 252–254. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  120. Alain Pellet, “The Normative Dilemma: Will and Consent in International Law-Making”, Australian Year Book of International Law 12 (1988–1989), pp. 22–53. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  121. Alan Boyle, “Further Development of the Law of the Sea Convention: Mechanisms for Change”, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 54 (2005), pp. 563–584. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  122. Alan Boyle and Catherine Redgwell, Birnie, Boyle & Redgwell’s International Law and the Environment (OUP: Oxford, 2021). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  123. Alan Boyle and Christine Chinkin, The Making of International Law (OUP: Oxford, 2007), pp. 157–160. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  124. Albert C. Lin, “Carbon Dioxide Removal after Paris”, Ecology Law Quarterly 45 (2018), pp. 533–582. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  125. Alex Oude Elferink, “Reviewing the Implementation of the LOSs Convention: The Role of the United Nations General Assembly and the Meeting of States Parties”. In: Alex Oude Elferink and Donald Rothwell (eds.), Oceans Management in the 21st Century: Institutional Frameworks and Responses (Koninklijke Brill NV: Leiden, 2004), pp. 295–312. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  126. Alexander Gillespie, “The Problem of Methane in International Environmental Law”, Review of European, Comparative and International Environmental Law 12(3) (2003), pp. 321–328. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  127. Alexander Orakhelashvili, “1969 Vienna Convention: Article 30”. In: Olivier Corten and Pierre Klein (eds.), The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary Volume I (OUP: Oxford, 2011), pp. 764–800. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  128. Alexander Proelss, “Law of the Sea and Geoengineering”. In: Nele Matz-Lück, Øystein Jensen and Elise Johansen (eds.), The Law of the Sea: Normative Context and Interactions with other Legal Regimes (Routledge: Oxon, 2023), pp. 93–120. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  129. Alexander Proelss, “Fragmentation and Coherence in the Legal Framework for the Protection of the Marine Environment”. In: Rosemary Rayfuse, Aline Jaecke; and Natalie Klein (eds.), Research Handbook on International Marine Environmental Law (Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, 2023), pp. 57–79. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  130. Alexander Proelss, “Implicated Issues and Renvoi Clauses: Challenges to the Regime for the Peaceful Settlement of Disputes under the Law of the Sea Convention”. In James Kraska and Hee Cheol Yang (eds.), Peaceful Management of Maritime Disputes, (Routledge: Oxon, 2023), pp. 29–54. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  131. Alexander Proelss, “Article 56”. In Alexander Proelss (ed.), United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea – A Commentary (Hart Publishing: Oxford and Nomos: Baden-Baden, 2017). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  132. Alexander Proelss and Robert C. Steenkamp, “Geoengineering: Methods, Associated Risks and International Liability”. In: Peter Gailhofer, David Krebs, Alexander Proelss, Kirsten Schmalenbach and Roda Verheyen, Corporate Liability for Transboundary Environmental Harm: An International and Transnational Perspective (Springer: Cham, 2023), pp. 419–503. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  133. Alexander Proelss and Chang Hong, “Ocean Upwelling and International Law”, Ocean Development & International Law 43 (2012), pp. 371–385. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  134. André Nollkaemper, “Causation Puzzles in International Climate Litigation”, Italian Yearbook of International Law (2024, forthcoming). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  135. Andreas Oschlies, Wolfgang Koeve, Wilfried Rickels and Katrin Rehdanz, “Side effects and accounting aspects of hypothetical large-scale Southern Ocean iron fertilization”, Biogeosciences 7 (2010), pp. 4017–4035. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  136. Andrew Jordan, Dave Huitema, Harro van Asselt and Johanna Forster (eds.), Governing Climate Change: Polycentricity in Action? (CUP: Cambridge, 2018). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  137. Andy Parker and Peter Irvine, “The Risk of Termination Shock from Solar Geoengineering”, Earth’s Future 6 (2017), pp. 456–467. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  138. Andy Parker and Oliver Geden, “No fudging on geoengineering”, Nature Geoscience 9 (2016), pp. 859–860. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  139. Anja Lindroos, “Addressing Norm Conflicts in a Fragmented Legal System: The Doctrine of Lex Specialis”, Nordic Journal of International Law 74 (2005), pp. 27–66. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  140. Annalisa Savaresi, “The Paris Agreement: An International Law Odyssey”. In: George Ulrich and Ineta Ziemele (eds.), How International Law Works in Times of Crisis (OUP: Oxford, 2019), pp. 189–205. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  141. Anne Peters, “The Refinement of International Law: From Fragmentation to Regime Interaction and Politicization”, International Journal of Constitutional Law 15(3) (2017), pp. 671–704. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  142. Annecoos Wiersema, “The New International Law-Makers? Conferences of the Parties to Multilateral Environmental Agreements”, Michigan Journal of International Law 31(1) (2009), pp. 231–287. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  143. Anthony Aust, Modern Treaty Law and Practice (CUP: Cambridge, 2007). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  144. Antto Vihma, “Climate of Consensus: Managing Decision Making in the UN Climate Change Negotiations”, Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 24(1) (2015), pp. 58–68. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  145. Arvid Pardo, “Before and After”, Law and Contemporary Problems 46 (1983), pp. 95–105. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  146. Aurora M. Ricart, Dorte Krause-Jensen, Kasper Hancke, Nichole N. Price, Pere Masqué and Carlos M. Duarte, “Sinking seaweed in the deep ocean for carbon neutrality is ahead of science and beyond the ethics”, Environmental Research Letters 17 (2022), Art. No.: 081003. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  147. Axel Michaelowa, “Opportunities for and alternatives to global climate regimes post-Kyoto”, Annual Review of Environment and Resources 40 (2015), pp. 395–417. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  148. Barry Buzan, “Negotiating by Consensus: Developments in Technique at the United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea”, American Journal of International Law 75(2) (1981), pp. 324–348. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  149. Ben Orlove, “The Concept of Adaptation”, Annual Review of Environment and Resources 47 (2022), pp. 535–581. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  150. Benjamin Bratton, “Geoengineering a Rare Earth (for Rare-Earths)”. In: Rania Ghosn and El Hadi Jazairy, The Planet After Geoengineering (Actar Publishers: New York, 2021), pp. 10–17. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  151. Benoit Mayer, International Law Obligations on Climate Change Mitigation (OUP: United Kingdom, 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  152. Benoit Mayer, “Temperature Targets and State Obligations on the Mitigation of Climate Change”, Journal of Environmental Law 33 (2021), pp. 585–610. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  153. Bernard Oxman, “The Rule of Law and the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea”, European Journal of International Law 7(3) (1996), pp. 353–371. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  154. Bernard Oxman, “Institutional Arrangements and the Law of the Sea”, University of Miami Inter-American Law Review 10(3) (1978), pp. 687–711. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  155. Bjørn Kunoy, “Disputed Areas and the 10-Year Time Frame: A Legal Lacuna?”, Ocean Development and International Law 41 (2010), pp. 112–130. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  156. Bleuenn Gaëlle Guilloux, “Ocean and Climate Regime Interactions”, Ocean Yearbook 34 (2020), pp. 45–88. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  157. Bruno Simma and Dirk Pulkowski, Of Planets and the Universe: Self-contained Regimes in International Law, European Journal of International Law 17(3) (2006), pp. 483–529. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  158. Camilla W. Stjern, Helene Muri, Lars Ahlm, Olivier Boucher, Jason N. S. Cole, Duoying Ji, Andy Jones, Jim Haywood, Ben Kravitz, Andrew Lenton, John C. Moore, Ulrike Niemeier, Steven J. Phipps, Hauke Schmidt, Shingo Watanabe and Jón Egill Kristjánsson, “Response to marine cloud brightening in a multi-model ensemble”, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 18 (2018), pp. 621–634. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  159. Campbell McLachlan, “The Principle of Systemic Integration and Article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention”, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 54 (2005), pp. 279–320. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  160. Catherine Mackenzie, “A Comparison of the Habitats Directive with the 1992 Convention on Biological Diversity”. In: Gregory Jones (ed.), The Habitats Directive: A Developer’s Obstacle Course? (Hart Publishing: Oxford, 2012), pp. 25–41. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  161. Catherine Redgwell, “Treaty Evolution, Adaptation and Change: Is the LOSC ‘Enough’ to Address Climate Change Impacts on the Marine Environment?”, International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 34 (2019), pp. 440–457. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  162. Catherine Tinker, “A ‘New Breed’ of Treaty: The United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity”, Pace Environmental Law Review 13 (1995), pp. 191–218. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  163. CBD Legal and Intergovernmental Affairs Unit, Managing Processes within the Framework of the Convention on Biological Diversity: A Guide for Presiding Officers (Secretariat of the CBD: Montreal, 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  164. Charlotte Streck, “Filling in for Governments? The Role of the Private Actors in the International Climate Regime”, Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law 17 (2020), pp. 5–28. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  165. Chiara Armeni, “Global Experimentalist Governance, International Law and Climate Change Technologies”, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 64 (2015), pp. 875–904. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  166. Chie Kojima and Vladlen S. Vereshchetin, “Implementation Agreements”, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (2013). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  167. Chris Whomersley, “How to Amend UNCLOS and Why It Has Never Been Done”, Korean Journal of International and Comparative Law 9 (2021), pp. 72–83. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  168. Christian Kreuder-Sonnen and Michael Zürn, “After Fragmentation: Norm Collisions, Interface Conflicts, and Conflict Management”, Global Constitutionalism 9(2) (2020), pp. 241–267. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  169. Christina Voigt, Sustainable Development as a Principle of International Law: Resolving Conflicts between Climate Measures and WTO Law (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers: Leiden, 2008). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  170. Christine M. Chinkin, “The Challenge of Soft Law: Development and Change in International Law”, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 38(4) (1989), pp. 850–866. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  171. Christopher H. Trisos, Giuseppe Amatulli, Jessica Gurevitch, Alan Robock, Lili Xia and Brian Zambri, “Potentially dangerous consequences for biodiversity of solar geoengineering implementation and termination”, Nature Ecology & Evolution 2 (2018), pp. 475–482. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  172. Christopher J. Borgen, “Resolving Treaty Conflicts”, George Washington International Law Review 37(3) (2005), pp. 573–648. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  173. Clare Heyward, “Situating and Abandoning Geoengineering: A Typology of Five Responses to Dangerous Climate Change”, Political Science and Politics 46(1) (2013), pp. 23–27. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  174. Danae Georgoula, “The LOSC Renvois as a Source of Untapped Jurisdiction”, The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 38 (2023), pp. 228–248. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  175. Daniel Bodansky, “Advisory opinions on climate change: Some preliminary questions”, Review of European, Comparative and International Environmental Law 32(2) (2023), p. 185–192. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  176. Daniel Bodansky, “The Paris Climate Change Agreement: A New Hope?”, American Journal of International Law 110 (2016), pp. 288–319. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  177. Daniel Bodansky, Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (Technical Briefing Series): The Framework Convention/Protocol Approach), Doc. No.: WHO/NCD/TFI/99.1 (1999). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  178. Daniel Bodansky, Jutta Brunnée and Lavanya Rajamani, International Climate Change Law (OUP: United Kingdom, 2017). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  179. Daniel P. Carlisle, Pamela M. Feetham, Malcolm J. Wright and Damon A. H. Teagle, “The public remain uninformed and wary of climate engineering”, Climatic Change 160 (2020), pp. 303–322. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  180. Daniel Vignes, “Will the Third Conference on the Law of the Sea Work According to the Consensus Rule?”, American Journal of International Law 69(1) (1975), pp. 119–129. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  181. David Archer, The Global Carbon Cycle (Princeton University Press: Princeton, 2010). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  182. David Freestone and Alex G. Oude Elferink, “Flexibility and Innovation in the Law of the Sea – Will the LOS Convention Amendment Procedures Ever be Used”. In: Alex G. Oude Elferink (ed.), Stability and Change in the Law of the Sea: The Role of the LOS Convention (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers: Leiden, 2005), pp. 169–221. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  183. David T. Ho, “Carbon dioxide removal is not a current climate solution — we need to change the narrative”, Nature 616 (2023), p 9. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  184. David VanderZwaag, Nilufer Oral and Tim Stephens (eds.), Research Handbook on Ocean Acidification Law and Policy (Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, 2021). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  185. David W. Keith and Douglas G. MacMartin, “A temporary, moderate and responsive scenario for solar geoengineering”, Nature Climate Change 5 (2015), pp. 201–206. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  186. David W. Keith, “Geoengineering the Climate: History and Prospect”, Annual Review of Environment and Resources 25 (2000), pp. 245–284. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  187. Deborah Russo, “Addressing the Relation between Treaties by Means of ‘Saving Clauses’”, British Yearbook of International Law 85(1) (2015), pp. 133–170. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  188. Detlef Czybulka, “Article 192”. In Alexander Proelss (ed.), United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea – A Commentary (Hart Publishing: Oxford and Nomos: Baden-Baden, 2017). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  189. Detlef Czybulka, “Article 194”. In Alexander Proelss (ed.), United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea – A Commentary (Hart Publishing: Oxford and Nomos: Baden-Baden, 2017). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  190. Detlef Czybulka, “Article 237”. In Alexander Proelss (ed.), United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea – A Commentary (Hart Publishing: Oxford and Nomos: Baden-Baden, 2017). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  191. Dirk Pulkowski, “Lex Specialis Derogat Legi Generali/Generalia Specialibus Non Derogat”. In: Joseph Klingler, Yuri Parkhomenko and Constantinos Salonidis (eds.), Between the Lines of the Vienna Convention? Canons and Other Principles of Interpretation in Public International Law (Kluwer Law International: Alphen aan den Rijn, 2019), pp. 161–196. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  192. Dirk Pulkowski, The Law and Politics of International Regime Conflict (OUP: Oxford, 2017). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  193. Douglas Guilfoyle, “Article 87”. In Alexander Proelss (ed.), United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea – A Commentary (Hart Publishing: Oxford and Nomos: Baden-Baden, 2017). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  194. Duncan McLaren, “Governing Emerging Solar Geoengineering: A Role for Risk-Risk Evaluation?”, Georgetown Journal of International Affairs 24(2) (2023), pp. 234–243. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  195. Edith Brown Weiss, “The Rise or the Fall of International Law?”, Fordham Law Review 69(2) (2000), pp. 345–372. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  196. Eike Blitza, “Article 204”. In Alexander Proelss (ed.), United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea – A Commentary (Hart Publishing: Oxford and Nomos: Baden-Baden, 2017). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  197. Eleanor Stein and Alex Geert Castermans “Case Comment – Urgenda v The State of the Netherlands: The ‘Reflex Effect’ – Climate Change, Human Rights, and the Expanding Definitions of the Duty of Care”, The McGill Journal of Sustainable Development Law 13(2) (2017), pp. 305–324. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  198. Elinor Ostrom, “Polycentric Systems for Coping with Collective Action and Environmental Change”, Global Environmental Change 20(4) (2010), pp. 550–557. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  199. Elisa Morgera, “Faraway, So Close: A Legal Analysis of the Increasing Interactions between the Convention on Biological Diversity and Climate Change Law”, University of Edinburgh School of Law Working Paper Series No. 2011/05 (2010). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  200. Elisabeth Mann Borgese, “A Constitution for the Oceans”. In: Elisabeth Mann Borgese and David Krieger (eds.), Tides of Change: Peace, Pollution, and Potential of the Oceans (Mason/Charter: New York, 1975). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  201. Elisabeth Mann Borgese, “A Constitution for the Oceans: Comments and Suggestions Regarding Part XI of the Informal Composite Negotiating Text”, San Diego Law Review 15 (1978), pp. 371–401. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  202. Ellen Hey and Sophia Paulini, “Common but Differentiated Responsibilities”, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (2021). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  203. Emily Cox and Neil Robert Edwards, “Beyond Carbon Pricing: Policy Levers for Negative Emissions Technologies” Climate Policy 19 (2019), pp. 1144–1156. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  204. European Commission, EU ETS Handbook (European Commission: Brussels, 2015). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  205. FAO, FAO Strategy on Climate Change 2022–2031 (FAO: Rome, 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  206. Farhana Yamin and Joanna Depledge, The international climate change regime: A guide to rules, institutions and procedures (CUP: Cambridge, 2004). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  207. Felix Schenuit, Miranda Böttcher and Oliver Geden, “Carbon Dioxide Removal as an Integral Building Block of the European Green Deal”, German Institute for International and Security Affairs, SWP Comment No. 40 (June 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  208. Fons Dingenen and Sammy W. Verbruggen, “Tapping hydrogen fuel from the ocean: A review on photocatalytic, photoelectrochemical and electrolytic splitting of seawater”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 142 (2021), Art. No.: 110866. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  209. Francesco Sindico, “Paris, Climate Change, and Sustainable Development”, Climate Law 6 (2016), pp. 130–141. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  210. Frank Wacht, “Article 210”. In Alexander Proelss (ed.), United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea – A Commentary, ed. Alexander Proelss (Hart Publishing: Oxford and Nomos: Baden-Baden, 2017). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  211. Georg Nolte, “Still Setting the Frame: The Vienna Convention’s Rules on Treaty Interpretation in the Light of the ILC Conclusions on Subsequent Agreements and Subsequent Practice”, Austrian Review of International and European Law 24 (2021), pp. 53–66. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  212. Gerd Winter, “Climate Engineering and International Law: Last Resort or the End of Humanity?”, Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 20(3) (2011), pp. 277–289. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  213. Gilbert Guillaume, “The Proliferation of International Judicial Bodies: The Outlook for the International Legal Order”, Speech by His Excellency Judge Gilbert Guillaume, President of the International Court of Justice, to the Sixth Committee of the General Assembly of the United Nations (27 October 2000). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  214. Graham Feingold, Virendra P. Ghate, Lynn Russell, Shaima Nasiri, Gregory Frost and Victoria Breeze, “DOE-NOAA Marine Cloud Brightening Workshop”, (U.S. Department of Energy and U.S. Department of Commerce NOAA, November 2022), NOAA Technical Report OAR ESRL/CSL-1. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  215. Graham Readfearn, “Artificial fog and breeding coral: study picks best Great Barrier Reef rescue ideas”, The Guardian (15 April 2020). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  216. H. Damon Matthews and Ken Caldeira, “Transient climate–carbon simulations of planetary geoengineering”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104(24) (2007), pp. 9949–9954. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  217. Haomiao Du, An International Legal Framework for Geoengineering: Managing the Risks of an Emerging Technology (Routledge: Oxon, 2018). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  218. Hari M. Osofsky, “Polycentrism and Climate Change”. In Daniel A. Farber and Marjan Peeters (eds.), Climate Change Law (Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, 2016), pp. 325–336. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  219. Harriett Bulkeley, Liliana B. Andonova, Michele M. Betsill, Daniel Compagnon, Thomas Hale, Matthew J. Hoffmann, Peter Newell, Matthew Paterson, Charles Roger and Stacy D. VanDeveer, Transnational Climate Change Governance (CUP: Cambridge, 2014). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  220. Harro van Asselt, “Integrating Biodiversity in the Climate Regime’s Forest Rules: Options and Tradeoffs in Greening REDD Design”, Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 20(2) (2011), pp. 139–149. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  221. Harro Van Asselt, Francesco Sindico and Michael A. Mehling, “Global Climate Change and the Fragmentation of International Law”, Law and Policy 30(4) (2008), pp. 423–449. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  222. Heleen de Coninck and Ambuj Sagar, “Technology Development and Transfer (Article 10)”. In: Daniel Klein, María Pía Carazo, Meinhard Doelle, Jane Bulmer and Andrew Higham (eds.), The Paris Agreement on Climate Change: Analysis and Commentary (OUP: Oxford, 2017), pp. 258–276. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  223. Hersch Lauterpacht, The Function of Law in the International Community (OUP: Oxford, 2011). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  224. Hugh Powell, “Fertilizing the Ocean with Iron: Should we add iron to the sea to help reduce greenhouse gases in the air?”, Oceanus 46(1) (2008), pp. 2–27. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  225. Human Rights Watch, Carbon Offsetting’s Casualties: Violations of Chong Indigenous People’s Rights in Cambodia’s Southern Cardamom REDD+ Project (Human Rights Watch: USA, 2024). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  226. ILC, Draft guidelines on the protection of the atmosphere, with commentaries thereto (2021), (forthcoming in Yearbook of the International Law Commission, 2021, vol. II, Part Two (United Nations: New York)). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  227. ILC, Yearbook of the International Law Commission: Report of the Commission to the General Assembly on the work of its seventieth session, vol. II, Part Two (United Nations: New York, 2018). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  228. ILC, “Report on Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law – Finalized by Martti Koskenniemi”, Report of the Study Group of the ILC, Doc. No.: A/CN.4/L.682 (13 April 2006). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  229. ILC, Yearbook of the International Law Commission: Documents of the second part of the seventeenth session and of the eighteenth session including the reports of the Commission to the General Assembly, vol. II (United Nations: New York, 1967). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  230. ILC, Yearbook of the International Law Commission: Documents of the sixteenth session including the report of the Commission to the General Assembly, vol. II (United Nations: New York, 1965). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  231. ILC, Yearbook of the International Law Commission: Documents of the eighth session including the report of the Commission to the General Assembly, vol. II (United Nations: New York, 1956). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  232. Ina Möller, The Emergent Politics of Geoengineering (PhD Thesis, Lund University, 2019). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  233. IPCC, Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC: Geneva, 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  234. IPCC, Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Working Group III Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (CUP: United Kingdom, 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  235. IPCC, Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (CUP: United Kingdom, 2021). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  236. IPCC, Global warming of 1.5°C: An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty (CUP: United Kingdom, 2018). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  237. IPCC, Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC: Geneva, 2014). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  238. Irina Buga, Modification of Treaties by Subsequent Practice (OUP: Oxford, 2018). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  239. Irini Papanicolopulu, “Article 56”. In Alexander Proelss (ed.), United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea – A Commentary (Hart Publishing: Oxford and Nomos: Baden-Baden, 2017). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  240. J. R. Flemming, Fixing the Sky: The Checkered History of Weather and Climate Control (Columbia University Press: New York, 2010). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  241. Jacqueline Peel, Lee Godden and Rodney J. Keenan, “Climate Change Law in an Era of Multi-Level Governance”, Transnational Environmental Law 1(2) (2012), pp. 245–280. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  242. Jael Eli Makagon, Analyzing the Binding Nature of COP Decisions through the Convention on Biological Diversity (Natural Justice: New York, 2012). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  243. James Crawford, Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law, 9th ed., (OUP: Oxford, 2019). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  244. James Harrison, “Litigation under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea: Opportunities to Support and Supplement the Climate Change Regime”. In Ivano Alogna, Christine Bakker and Jean- Pierre Gauci (eds.), Climate Change Litigation: Global Perspectives (Koninklijke Brill: Leiden, 2021), pp. 415–432. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  245. James Harrison, Making the Law of the Sea: A Study in the Development of International Law (CUP: Cambridge, 2011). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  246. James Temple, “Researchers launched a solar geoengineering test flight in the UK last fall”, MIT Technology Review (1 March 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  247. James Temple, “A startup says it’s begun releasing particles into the atmosphere, in an effort to tweak the climate” MIT Technology Review (24 December 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  248. James Temple “Companies hoping to grow carbon-sucking kelp may be rushing ahead of the science”, MIT Technology Review (19 September 2021). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  249. Jan Klabbers, “The Redundancy of Soft Law”, Nordic Journal of International Law 65 (1996), pp. 167–182. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  250. Jan McDonald, Jeffrey McGee, Kerryn Brent and Wil Burns, “Governing geoengineering research for the Great Barrier Reef”, Climate Policy 19(7) (2019), pp. 1–11. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  251. Jan C. Minx, William F. Lamb, Max W. Callaghan, Sabine Fuss, Jérôme Hilaire, Felix Creutzig, Thorben Amann, Tim Beringer and Wagner de Oliveira Garcia, “Negative emissions – Part 1: Research landscape and synthesis”, Environmental Research Letters 13(6) (2018), Art. No.: 063001. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  252. Janos Pasztor, “Solar Radiation Modification Governance in the Context of Temperature Overshoot”, New England Journal of Public Policy 35(2) (2023), pp. 1–8. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  253. Jean-Pierre Levy, “De quelques ‘modifications’ et ‘interpretations’ de la Convention sur le droit de la mer”, Revue Generale de Droit International Public 111 (2007), pp. 407–422. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  254. Jasper Finke, “Regime-collisions: Tensions between Treaties (and how to solve them)”. In: Christian J. Tams, Antonios Tzanakopoulos and Andreas Zimmermann (eds.), Research Handbook on the Law of Treaties (Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, 2016), pp. 416–418. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  255. Jeff Tollefson, “Can artificially altered clouds save the Great Barrier Reef?”, Nature 596 (2021), pp. 476–478. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  256. Jeffrey McGee, Kerryn Brent and Wil Burns, “Geoengineering the Oceans: An Emerging Frontier in International Climate Change Governance”, Australian Journal of Maritime and Ocean Affairs 10(1) (2018), pp. 97–80. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  257. Jesse Reynolds, “Is solar geoengineering ungovernable? A critical assessment of governance challenges identified by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change”, WIREs Climate Change 12(2) (2021), Art. No.: 12:e690. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  258. Jesse Reynolds, “Climate Engineering and International Law”. In: Daniel A. Farber and Marjan Peeters (eds.), Climate Change Law (Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, 2016), pp. 178–188. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  259. Jesse Reynolds, Andy Parker and Peter Irvine, “Five solar geoengineering tropes that have outstayed their welcome”, Earth’s Future 4 (2016), pp. 562–568. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  260. Jill Barrett and Richard Barnes (eds.), Law of the Sea: UNCLOS as a Living Treaty (BIICL: London, 2016). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  261. Jon Hovi, Detlef F. Sprinz, Håkon Sælen and Arild Underdal, “Climate Change Mitigation: A Role for Climate Clubs?”, Palgrave Communications 2 (2016), Art. No.: 16020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  262. Johannes Quaas, Hailing Jia, Chris Smith, Anna Lea Albright, Wenche Aas, Nicolas Bellouin, Olivier Boucher, Marie Doutriaux-Boucher, Piers M. Forster, Daniel Grosvenor, Stuart Jenkins, Zbigniew Klimont, Norman G. Loeb, Xiaoyan Ma, Vaishali Naik, Fabien Paulot, Philip Stier, Martin Wild, Gunnar Myhre and Michael Schulz, “Robust evidence for reversal of the trend in aerosol effective climate forcing”, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 22 (2022), pp. 12 222–12 239. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  263. Jonathan Kuyper, Heike Schroeder and Björn-Ola Linnér, “The Evolution of the UNFCCC”, Annual Review of Environment and Resources 43 (2018), pp. 349–350. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  264. Jonathan Symons, Courtney Fung, Dhanasree Jayaram, Sofia Kabbej and Matt McDonald, “Australia, we need to talk about solar geoengineering”, Australian Journal of International Affairs 78 (2024) (forthcoming). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  265. Jonathan Verschuuren, “Introduction to climate change adaptation”. In: Jonathan Verschuuren (ed.), Research Handbook on Climate Change Adaptation Law (Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, 2022), pp. 1–13. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  266. Jonathan Verschuuren, “The State of the Netherlands v Urgenda Foundation: The Hague Court of Appeal upholds Judgment Requiring the Netherlands to further Reduce its Greenhouse Gas Emissions”, Review of European, Comparative and International Environmental Law 28(1) (2019), pp. 94–98. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  267. Joost Pauwelyn, Conflict of Norms in Public International Law: How WTO Law Relates to other Rules of International Law (CUP: Cambridge, 2003), pp. 244–274. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  268. José Alvarez, International Organizations as Law-makers (OUP: Oxford, 2006). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  269. Joseph Dellapenna, “Law in a Shrinking World: The Interaction of Science and Technology with International Law”, Kentucky Law Journal 88 (1999), pp. 809–883. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  270. Joseph Orangias, “The Nexus between International Law and Science: An Analysis of Scientific Expert Bodies in Multilateral Treaty-Making”, International Community Law Review 25 (2023), pp. 60–93. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  271. Joshua Horton, “The Emergency Framing of Solar Geoengineering: Time for a Different Approach”, The Anthropocene Review 2(2) (2015), pp. 147–151. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  272. Joshua B. Horton, David W. Keith and Matthias Honegger, “Implications of the Paris Agreement for Carbon Dioxide Removal and Solar Geoengineering”, Harvard Project on Climate Agreements (July 2016). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  273. Joshua Wells, Geoengineering Governance: Addressing the Problems of Moral Corruption, Moral Hazard, and Intergenerational Inclusion (PhD Thesis, University of Reading, 2020). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  274. Jule Siegfried, “Article 155”. In Alexander Proelss (ed.), United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea – A Commentary, ed. Alexander Proelss (Hart Publishing: Oxford and Nomos: Baden-Baden, 2017). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  275. Juli Berwald “A Wild Idea to Protect the Great Barrier Reef”, Nautilus (11 October 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  276. Julian Arrato, “Subsequent Practice and Evolutive Interpretation: Techniques of Treaty Interpretation Over Time and Their Diverse Consequences”, The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 9 (2010), pp. 443–494. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  277. Jutta Brunnée, “COPing with Consent: Law-Making Under Multilateral Environmental Agreements”, Leiden Journal of International Law 15(1) (2002), pp. 1–52. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  278. Jutta Brunnée, “International Environmental Law and Climate Change: Reflections on Structural Challenges in a ‘Kaleidoscopic’ World”, Georgetown Environmental Law Review 33 (2020), pp. 113–134. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  279. Kaitlin T. Raimi Alexander Maki, David A. Dana and Michael P. Vandenbergh, “Framing of Geoengineering Affects Support for Climate Change Mitigation”, Environmental Communication 13(3) (2019), pp. 300–319. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  280. Karen J. Alter and Kal Raustiala, “The Rise of International Regime Complexity”, Annual Review of Law and Social Science 14 (2018), pp. 329–349. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  281. Karen Scott, “The LOSC: ‘A Constitution for the Oceans’ in the Anthropocene?”, The Australian Yearbook of International Law 41 (2023), pp 269–298. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  282. Karen Scott, “From Ocean Dumping to Marine Geoengineering: The Evolution of the London Protocol”. In: Rosemary Rayfuse, Aline Jaeckel and Natalie Klein (eds.), Research Handbook on International Marine Environmental Law (Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, 2023), pp. 240–263. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  283. Karen Scott, “Ocean Acidification: A due diligence obligation under the LOSC”, International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 35 (2020), pp. 382–408. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  284. Karen Scott, “Geoengineering and the Marine Environment”. In: Rosemary Rayfuse (ed.), Research Handbook on International Marine Environmental Law, (Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, 2015), pp. 451–472. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  285. Karen Scott, “International Law in the Anthropocene: Responding to the Geoengineering Challenge”, Michigan Journal of International Law 34(2) (2013), pp. 309–358. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  286. Karen Scott, “International Environmental Governance: Managing Fragmentation through Institutional Connection”, Melbourne Journal of International Law 12 (2011), p. 177–216. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  287. Kari De Pryck and Miranda Böttcher, “The rise, fall and rebirth of ocean carbon sequestration as a climate ’solution’”, Global Environmental Change 85 (2024), Art. No.: 102820. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  288. Katharina Rietig, Christine Peringer, Sarina Theys and Jecel Censoro, “Unanimity or standing aside? Reinterpreting consensus in United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change negotiations”, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 23 (2023), pp. 221–234. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  289. Katie Lebling Eliza Northrop, Colin McCormick and Liz Bridgwater, Towards Responsible and Informed Ocean-Based Carbon Dioxide Removal: Research and Governance Priorities (World Resources Institute: Washington DC, 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  290. Kelly E. McCusker, Kyle C. Armour, Cecilia M. Bitz and David S. Battisti, “Rapid and extensive warming following cessation of solar radiation management”, Environmental Research Letters 9 (2014), pp. 1–9. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  291. Kenneth Abbott, “The Transnational Regime Complex for Climate Change”, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30(4) (2012), pp. 571–590. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  292. Kerry Hebden, “Scientists produce green hydrogen from seawater”, The Chemical Engineer (13 February 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  293. Kerryn Brent “Marine geoengineering governance and the law of the sea”. In: Jan McDonald, Jefferey McGee and Richard Barnes (eds.), Research Handbook on Climate Change, Oceans and Coasts (Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, 2021), pp. 442–461. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  294. Kerryn Brent, Wil Burns and Jeffrey McGee, Governance of marine geoengineering: Special report (CIGI: Waterloo, 2019). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  295. Keyuan Zou and Qiang Ye, “The relationship between UNCLOS and Customary International Law: Some reflections”, Marine Policy 154 (2023), Art. No.: 105691. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  296. Klaus Radunsky, “Questions Triggered by Recent Developments Around Solar Radiation Modification (SRM) and Suggestions How to Strengthen the Paris Agreement by Additional Mandatory Requirements”, Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences 6(5) (2023), pp. 161–166. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  297. L. Dolliver M. Nelson, “The New Deep Sea-bed Mining Regime”, International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 10(2) (1995), pp. 189–203. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  298. Lan Ngoc Nguyen, “Expanding the Environmental Regulatory Scope of UNCLOS Through the Rule of Reference: Potentials and Limits”, Ocean Development and International Law 52 (2021), pp. 419–444. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  299. Lavanya Rajamani, Innovation and Experimentation in the International Climate Change Regime (Brill Nijhoff: Leiden, 2020). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  300. Lavanya Rajamani, “Due diligence in climate change law”. In: Heike Krieger, Anne Peters and Leonhard Kreuzer (eds.), Due Diligence in the International Legal Order (OUP, United Kingdom, 2020), pp. 163–180. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  301. Lavanya Rajamani, “Addressing the ‘Post-Kyoto’ Stress Disorder: Reflections on the Emerging Legal Architecture of the Climate Regime”, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 58 (2009), pp. 803–834. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  302. Lavanya Rajamani and Jacob D. Werksman, “Climate Change”. In: Lavanya Rajamani and Jacqueline Peel (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law (OUP: Oxford, 2021), pp. 492–511. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  303. Leonie Reins and Jonathan Verschuuren (eds.), Research Handbook on Climate Change Mitigation Law (Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, 2022), pp. 1. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  304. Linbin Zhou, Fengjie Liu, Qingxia Liu, Claude Fortin, Yehui Tan, Liangmin Huang and Peter G. C. Campbell, “Aluminum increases net carbon fixation by marine diatoms and decreases their decomposition: Evidence for the iron–aluminium hypothesis”, Limnology and Oceanography (2021) pp. 1–16. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  305. Lukas Schuett, “Permanence and Liability: Legal Considerations on the Integration of Carbon Dioxide Removal into the EU Emissions Trading System”, Transnational Environmental Law (2024), pp. 87–110. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  306. Luke Kemp, “Framework for the future? Exploring the possibility of majority voting in the climate negotiations”, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 16 (2016), pp. 757–779. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  307. Lyle Glowka, Françoise Burhenne-Guilmin and Hugh Synge, A Guide to the Convention on Biological Diversity (IUCN: Gland, 1994). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  308. M. Mace, Claire L. Fyson, Michiel Schaeffer and William L. Hare, “Large-Scale Carbon Dioxide Removal to Meet the 1.5°C Limit: Key Governance Gaps, Challenges and Priority Responses, Global Policy 12 (2021), pp. 67–81. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  309. Makane Moïse Mbengue and Elena Cima, “‘Clubbing in the Club’: Could Climate-Related Trade Arrangements Set the Pace for Future Climate Cooperation?”, AJIL Unbound 116 (2022), pp. 219–224. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  310. Malcolm T. McCulloch Amos Winter, Clark E. Sherman and Julie A. Trotter, “300 years of sclerosponge thermometry shows global warming has exceeded 1.5°C”, Nature Climate Change 14 (2024), pp. 171–177. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  311. Malgosia Fitzmaurice, “Subsequent Agreement and Subsequent Practice: Some Reflections on the International Law Commission’s Draft Conclusions”, International Community Law Review 22 (2020), pp. 14–32. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  312. Margaret Young (ed.), Regime Interaction in International Law: Facing Fragmentation (CUP: Cambridge, 2012). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  313. Margaret Young, “Climate Change Law and Regime Interaction”, Carbon and Climate Law Review 2 (2011), pp. 147–157. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  314. Margaret Young (ed.), Trading Fish, Saving Fish: The Interaction Between Regimes in International Law (CUP: Cambridge, 2011). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  315. Margaretha Wewerinke-Singh, Julian Aguon and Julie Hunter, “Bringing Climate Change before the International Court of Justice: Prospects for Contentious Cases and Advisory Opinions”. In Ivano Alogna, Christine Bakker and Jean- Pierre Gauci (eds.), Climate Change Litigation: Global Perspectives (Koninklijke Brill: Leiden, 2021), pp. 393–414. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  316. Mark G. Lawrence, Stefan Schäfer, Helene Muri, Vivian Scott, Andreas Oschlies, Naomi E. Vaughan, Olivier Boucher, Hauke Schmidt, Jim Haywood and Jürgen Scheffran, “Evaluating climate geoengineering proposals in the context of the Paris Agreement temperature goals”, Nature Communications 9 (2018), Art. No.: 3734 (2018). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  317. Martti Koskenniemi, From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument (CUP: United Kingdom, 2006). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  318. Martti Koskenniemi and Päivi Leino, “Fragmentation of International Law? Postmodern Anxieties”, Leiden Journal of International Law 15 (2002), pp. 553–579. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  319. Matthias Honegger, Christian Baatz, Samuel Eberenz, Antonia Holland-Cunz, Axel Michaelowa, Benno Pokorny, Matthias Poralla and Malte Winkler, “The ABC of Governance Principles for Carbon Dioxide Removal Policy”, Frontiers in Climate 4 (2022), pp. 1–15. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  320. Matthias Honegger, Wil Burns and David R. Morrow, “Is carbon dioxide removal ‘mitigation of climate change’?”, Review of European, Comparative and International Environmental Law 30 (2021), pp. 327–335. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  321. Michael Lodge and Satya Nandan, “Some Suggestions Towards Better Implementation of the United Nations Agreement on Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks of 1995”, International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 20(3) (2005), pp. 345–379. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  322. Miranda Böttcher, Language, Knowledge, Power: The Discursive Construction of Climate Engineering Governance (PhD Thesis, Utrecht University, 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  323. Miranda Böttcher and Stefan Schäfer, “Reflecting upon 10 years of geoengineering research: introduction to the Crutzen + 10 special issue”, Earth’s Future 5(3) (2017), pp. 266–277. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  324. Morten Broberg, “Interpreting the UNFCCC’s provisions on ‘mitigation’ and ‘adaptation’ in light of the Paris Agreement’s provision on ‘loss and damage’”, Climate Policy 20(5) (2020), pp. 527–533. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  325. Myron Nordquist, Shabtai Rosenne, Alexander Yankov and Neal Grandy (eds.), United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982: A Commentary, vol. IV (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers: Dordrecht, 1991). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  326. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, A Research Strategy for Ocean-based Carbon Dioxide Removal and Sequestration (National Academies Press: Washington DC, 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  327. National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, Reflecting Sunlight: Recommendations for Solar Geoengineering Research and Research Governance (National Academies Press: Washington DC, 2021). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  328. National Research Council, Climate Intervention: Reflecting Sunlight to Cool Earth (National Academies Press: Washington DC, 2015). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  329. Nathaniel Mollica, Weifu Guo, Anne L. Cohen and Andrew R. Solow, “Ocean Acidification Affects Coral Growth by Reducing Skeletal Density”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115(8) (2018), pp. 1754–1759. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  330. Neil Craik, “Solar radiation modification and loss & damage: Mapping interactions between climate responses”. In: Meinhard Doelle and Sara L. Seck (eds.), Research Handbook on Climate Change Law and Loss & Damage (Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham 2021), p. 287–302. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  331. Neil Craik and Wil Burns, “Climate engineering and the Paris Agreement”, Environmental Law Report 49 (2019), pp. 11,113–11,129. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  332. Neil Craik and Wil Burns, Climate Engineering under the Paris Agreement: A Legal and Policy Primer (CIGI: Waterloo, 2016). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  333. Nele Matz-Lück, “Article 311”. In Alexander Proelss (ed.), United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea – A Commentary (Hart Publishing: Oxford and Nomos: Baden-Baden, 2017). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  334. Nele Matz-Lück, “Framework Conventions as a Regulatory Tool”, Goettingen Journal of International Law 1 (2009), pp. 439–458. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  335. Nigel White “Lawmaking”. In: Jacob Katz Cogan, Ian Hurd and Ian Johnstone (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Organizations (OUP: Oxford, 2016), p. 559–580. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  336. Nilufer Oral, “Ocean Acidification: Falling between the Legal Cracks of UNCLOS and the UNFCCC”, Ecology Law Quarterly 45 (2018), pp. 9–30. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  337. NOAA, Carbon Dioxide Removal Research: A white paper documenting a potential NOAA CDR Science Strategy as an element of NOAA’s Climate Interventions Portfolio (NOAA: Washington DC, 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  338. Oliver Dörr, “Article 31: General Rule of Interpretation”. In: Oliver Dörr and Kirsten Schmalenbach (eds.), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (Springer: Berlin, 2018), pp. 603–613. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  339. Olivier Boucher, Nicolas Gruber and Jason Blackstock, “Summary of the Synthesis Session and Main Outcomes of the IPCC Expert Meeting on Geoengineering”. In: IPCC Expert Meeting Report on Geoengineering (IPCC: Potsdam, 2012). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  340. Panos Merkouris, Article 31(3)(c) VCLT and the Principle of Systemic Integration: Normative Shadows in Plato’s Cave (Brill Nijhoff: Leiden, 2015). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  341. Paul Crutzen, “Albedo Enhancement by Stratospheric Sulfur Injections: A Contribution to Resolve a Policy Dilemma?”, Climatic Change 77 (2006), pp. 211–219. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  342. Paul Voosen, “In a paradox, cleaner air is now adding to global warming: Satellites capture fall in pollution that helps cool the planet”, Science (20 July 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  343. Peter Thomson, “Achieving a Healthy Ocean through International Cooperation”. Speech by Ambassador Peter Thomson (UNSG’s Special Envoy for the Ocean) at the Ocean University of China, Qingdao, China (29 June 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  344. Phil Renforth, Rob Bellamy, David Beerling, Miranda Boettcher, Davide Bonalumi, Miguel Brandão, Mathias Fridahl, Sabine Fuss, Anders Hansson, Clare Heyward, Ben Kolosz, Patrick Lamers, Duncan McLaren, Raffaella Pomi, Daniel L. Sanchez, Soheil Shayegh, Volker Sick, Mijndert Van der Spek, Vikram Vishal and Jennifer Wilcox, “Specialty grand challenge: renaming our section to ‘Carbon Dioxide Removal’”, Frontiers in Climate 5 (2023), Art. No.: 1279109. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  345. Philippe Sands, “1969 Vienna Convention: Article 39”. In: Olivier Corten and Pierre Klein (eds.), The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary Volume II (OUP: Oxford, 2011), pp. 963–976. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  346. Philippe Sands and Jacqueline Peel, Principles of international environmental law, 2018 (CUP, New York). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  347. Pierre-Marie Dupuy, “Evolutionary Interpretation of Treaties: Between Memory and Prophecy”. In: Enzo Cannizzaro (ed.), The Law of Treaties Beyond the Vienna Convention (OUP: Oxford, 2011), pp. 123–137. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  348. Quirin Schiermeier, “Ocean fertilization experiment suspended” Nature (2009). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  349. Rafael Leal-Arcas and Andrew Filis, “International Cooperation on Climate Change Mitigation: The Role of Climate Clubs”, European Energy and Environmental Law Review 30(5) (2021), pp. 195–218. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  350. Rahim Moloo, “When Actions Speak Louder than Words: The Relevance of Subsequent Party Conduct to Treaty Interpretation”, Berkeley Journal of International Law 31(1) (2013), pp. 39–79. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  351. Rain Liivoja, “The Scope of the Supremacy Clause of the United Nations Charter”, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 57 (2008), pp. 583–612. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  352. Rainer Lagoni, “Resolution, Declaration, Decision”. In: Rüdiger Wolfrum and Christine Philipp (eds.), United Nations: Law, Policies and Practice (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers: Dordrecht. 1995). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  353. Ralph Bodel, “Geoengineering and International Law: The Search for Common Legal Ground”, Tulsa Law Review 46 (2010), pp. 305–322. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  354. Rhonda Ferguson, The Right to Food and the World Trade Organization's Rules on Agriculture: Conflicting, Compatible, or Complementary? (Brill Nijhoff: Leiden, 2017). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  355. Richard Caddell, “‘Only Connect’? Regime Interaction and Global Biodiversity Conservation”. In: Michael Bowman, Peter Davies and Edward Goodwin (eds.), Research Handbook on Biodiversity Law (Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, 2016), pp. 437–471. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  356. Robbie Sabel, Procedure at International Conferences: A Study of the Rules of Procedure at the UN and at other International Inter-governmental Conferences (CUP: Cambridge, 2006). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  357. Robert C. Steenkamp and Romany Webb, “Legal considerations relevant to research on ocean alkalinity enhancement”. In: Andreas Oschlies, Angela Stevenson, Lennart Bach, Katja Fennel, Rosalind Rickaby, Terre Satterfield, Romany Webb, and Jean-Pierre Gattuso, Guide to Best Practices in Ocean Alkalinity Enhancement Research (Copernicus Publications (State of the Planet): Göttingen, 2023), Chapter 10. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  358. Robert Chris, Geoengineering, Climate Change and Future Generations: The Emergence of Systems Thinking in Response to Complexity and Uncertainty (PhD Thesis, The Open University, 2013). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  359. Robert Falkner, “A Minilateral Solution for Global Climate Change? On Bargaining Efficiency, Club Benefits, and International Legitimacy”, Perspectives on Politics 14(1) (2016), pp. 87–101. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  360. Robert Keohane, “International Institutions: Two Approaches”, International Studies Quarterly 32 (1988), pp. 379–396. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  361. Robert Kolb, The International Court of Justice (Hart Publishing: Oxford, 2013). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  362. Robert Kolb, “Does Article 103 of the Charter of the United Nations Apply Only to Decisions or Also to Authorizations Adopted by the Security Council?” Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 64 (2004), pp. 21–35. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  363. Robert O. Keohane and David G. Victor, “The Regime Complex for Climate Change”, Perspectives on Politics 9(1) (2011), pp. 7–23. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  364. Robert Olsen, “Soft Geoengineering: A Gentler Approach to Addressing Climate Change”, Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 54(5) (2012), pp. 29–39. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  365. Robin Churchill, Vaughan Lowe and Amy Sander, The Law of the Sea (Manchester University Press: Manchester, 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  366. Robin Churchill and Geir Ulfstein, “Autonomous Institutional Arrangements in Multilateral Environmental Agreements: A Little Noticed Phenomenon in International Law”, The American Journal of International Law 94(4) (2000), pp. 623–659. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  367. Robin Kundis Craig, “Mitigation and Adaptation”. In: Elise Johansen Signe Veierud Busch, and Ingvild Ulrikke Jakobsen (eds.), The Law of the Sea and Climate Change: Solutions and Constraints (CUP, Cambridge, 2021), pp. 49–80. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  368. Romany Webb, Korey Silverman-Roati and Michael Gerrard (eds.), Ocean Carbon Dioxide Removal for Climate Mitigation: The Legal Framework (Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  369. Romany Webb and Korey Silverman-Roati, “Ocean CDR Approaches”. In: Romany Webb, Korey Silverman-Roati and Michael Gerrard (eds.), Ocean Carbon Dioxide Removal for Climate Mitigation: The Legal Framework (Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  370. Romany Webb, Korey Silverman-Roati and Michael Gerrard, “Removing Carbon Dioxide Through Ocean Alkalinity Enhancement and Seaweed Cultivation: Legal Challenges and Opportunities”, Sabin Center for Climate Change Law (2021). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  371. Rozemarijn J. Roland Holst, “Taking the current when it serves: Prospects and challenges for an ITLOS advisory opinion on oceans and climate change,” Review of European, Comparative and International Environmental Law 32(2) (2023), pp. 217–225. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  372. Rozemarijn J. Roland Holst, Change in the Law of the Sea: Context, Mechanisms and Practice (Brill Nijhoff: Leiden, 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  373. Rüdiger Wolfrum and Nele Matz, “The Interplay of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and the Convention on Biological Diversity”, Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 4 (2000), pp. 445–480. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  374. Sandrine Maljean-Dubois and Matthieu Wemaëre, “Biodiversity and Climate Change”. In: Elisa Morgera and Jona Razzaque, Biodiversity and Nature Protection Law (Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, 2017), pp. 295–308. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  375. Sara García-Poza, Adriana Leandro, Carla Cotas, João Cotas, João C. Marques, Leonel Pereira and Ana M. M. Gonçalves, “The Evolution Road of Seaweed Aquaculture: Cultivation Technologies and the Industry 4.0”, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17 (2020), Art. No.: 6528. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  376. Secretariat of the CBD, Voluntary guidelines for the design and effective implementation of ecosystem-based approaches to climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction and supplementary information. Technical Series No. 93 (Secretariat of the CBD: Montreal, 2019). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  377. Secretariat of the CBD, Update on climate geoengineering in relation to the convention on biological diversity: potential impacts and regulatory framework. Technical Series No. 84 (Secretariat of the CBD: Montreal, 2016). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  378. Secretariat of the CBD, Geoengineering in relation to the convention on biological diversity: Technical and regulatory matters. Technical Series No. 66 (Secretariat of the CBD: Montreal, 2012). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  379. Secretariat of the CBD, Scientific synthesis of the impacts of ocean fertilization on marine biodiversity. Technical Series No. 45 (Secretariat of the CBD: Montreal, 2009). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  380. Secretariat of the CBD, Handbook of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Including its Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (Secretariat of the CBD: Montreal, 2005). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  381. Secretariat of the CBD, Interlinkages between Biological Diversity and Climate Change: Advice on the integration of biodiversity considerations into the implementation of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and its Kyoto Protocol. Technical Series No. 10 (Secretariat of the CBD: Montreal, 2003). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  382. Security Council Report, The UN Security Council and Climate Change (21 June 2021), Research Report No. 2. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  383. Seline Trevisanut, Nikolaos Giannopoulos and Rozemarijn Roland Holst, “Introduction: Regime Interaction in Ocean Governance”. In: Seline Trevisanut, Nikolaos Giannopoulos and Rozemarijn Roland Holst (eds.), Regime Interaction in Ocean Governance: Problems, Theories and Methods (Brill Nijhoff: Leiden, 2020), pp. 1–21. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  384. Shabtai Rosenne, Developments in the Law of Treaties, 1945–1986 (CUP: Cambridge, 1989). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  385. Shannon Osaka, Rob Bellamy and Noel Castree, “Framing ‘nature-based’ Solutions to Climate Change”, WIREs Climate Change 12(5) (2021), Art. No.: e729. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  386. Shirley Scott, “The LOS Convention as a Constitutional Regime for the Oceans”. In: Alex Oude Elferink (ed.), Stability and Change in the Law of the Sea: The Role of the LOS Convention (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers: Leiden, 2005), pp. 9–38. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  387. Sookyeon Huh and Kentaro Nishimoto, “Article 245”. In Alexander Proelss (ed.), United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea – A Commentary (Hart Publishing: Oxford and Nomos: Baden-Baden, 2017). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  388. Sophie Gambardella, “The Stormy Emergence of Geoengineering in the International Law of the Sea”, Carbon and Climate Law Review 13(2) (2019), pp. 122–129. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  389. Stefan Kadelbach, “The International Law Commission and Role of Subsequent Practice as a means of Interpretation under Articles 31 and 32 VCLT”, Questions of International Law Zoom-in 46 (2018), pp. 5–18. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  390. Stefan Schäfer, Mark Lawrence, Harald Stelzer, Wanda Born and Sean Low (eds). (2015). The European Transdisciplinary Assessment of Climate Engineering (EuTRACE): Removing greenhouse gases from the atmosphere and reflecting sunlight away from earth. Funded by the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme under Grant Agreement 306993. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  391. Stephen Minas, “The Paris Agreement’s Technology Framework and the Need for ‘Transformational Change’”, Carbon & Climate Law Review 14(4) (2020), pp. 241–254. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  392. Steve Rayner, Clare Heyward, Tim Kruger, Nick Pidgeon, Catherine Redgwell and Julian Savulescu, “The Oxford Principles”, Climatic Change 121 (2013), pp. 499–512. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  393. Steven Smith and Philip Rasch, “The Long-term Policy Context for Solar Radiation Management”, Climatic Change 121 (2013), pp. 487–497. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  394. Terese Thoni Silke Beck, Malgorzata Borchers, Johannes Förster, Knut Görl, Alena Hahn, Nadine Mengis, Angela Stevenson and Daniela Thrän, “Deployment of Negative Emissions Technologies at the National Level: A Need for Holistic Feasibility Assessments”, Frontiers in Climate 2 (2020), Art. No.: 590305. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  395. Timothy McClanahan, “Coral responses to climate change exposure”, Environmental Research Letters 17(7) (2022), pp. 1–20. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  396. Tingzhen Ming, Wei Li, Qingchun Yuan, Philip Davies, Renaud de Richter, Chong Peng, Qihong Deng, Yanping Yuan, Sylvain Caillol and Nan Zhou, “Perspectives on removal of atmospheric methane”, Advances in Applied Energy 5 (2022), Art. No.: 100085. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  397. The Royal Society, Geoengineering the Climate: Science, Governance and Uncertainty (The Royal Society: London, 2009). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  398. Tracy Hester and Kirsten Williams, “Greenhouse Gas Removal”. In: Leonie Reins and Jonathan Verschuuren (eds.), Research Handbook on Climate Change Mitigation Law (Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, 2022), p. 502–526. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  399. Tullio Scovazzi, “The Progressive Development of International Law of the Sea: Within or (in Certain Cases) without the UNCLOS”, China Oceans Law Review 16(3) (2020), pp. 12–26. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  400. Tullio Treves, “The General Assembly and the Meeting of States Parties in the Implementation of the LOS Convention”. In: Alex G. Oude Elferink (ed.), Stability and Change in the Law of the Sea: The Role of the LOS Convention (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers: Leiden, 2005), pp. 55–74. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  401. Tullio Treves, “The Law of the Sea ‘System’ of Institutions”. In: Jochen Frowein and Rüdiger Wolfrum (eds.), Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law (Kluwer Law International: London, 1998), pp. 325–340. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  402. UN, The Law of the Sea: Marine Scientific Research – A Guide to the Implementation of the Relevant Provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (United Nations: New York, 2010). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  403. UN Office of Legal Affairs, Final Clauses of Multilateral Treaties: Handbook (United Nations: New York, 2003). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  404. UNEP, One Atmosphere: An independent expert review on Solar Radiation Modification research and deployment (UNEP: Nairobi, 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  405. UNEP, The Emissions Gap Report 2017: A UN Environment Synthesis Report (UNEP: Nairobi, 2017). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  406. UK House of Lords (International Relations and Defence Committee), “UNCLOS: The Law of the Sea in the 21st Century”. 2nd Report of Session 2021–22 (1 March 2022) (House of Lords: London, 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  407. US President’s Science Advisory Committee, Restoring the quality of our environment: Report of the Environmental Pollution Panel (US Government Printing Office: Washington DC, 1965). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  408. Valentin Jeutner, Irresolvable Norm Conflicts in International Law: The Concept of a Legal Dilemma (OUP: Oxford, 2017). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  409. Volker Röben, “Institutional Developments under Modern International Environmental Agreements”, Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 4 (2000), pp. 363–443. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  410. W. van Reenen, “Rules of Reference in the new Convention on the Law of the Sea in particular connection with pollution of the sea by oil from tankers”, Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 12 (1981), pp. 3–44. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  411. Wei Fan, Ruolan Zhao, Zhongzhi Yao, Canbo Xiao, Yiwen Pan, Ying Chen, Nianzhi Jiao and Yao Zhang, “Nutrient Removal from Chinese Coastal Waters by Large-Scale Seaweed Aquaculture Using Artificial Upwelling”, Water 11 (2019), Art. No.: 1754. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  412. Wil Burns, “Governance of Ocean-Based Carbon Dioxide Removal Research under the United Nations Conventions on the Law of the Sea”, Maine Law Review 75(1) (2023), pp. 37–70. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  413. Wil Burns, “Climate Geoengineering: Solar Radiation Management and its Implications for Intergenerational Equity”, Stanford Journal of Law, Science & Policy 37(4) (2011), pp. 38–55. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  414. William Hollier, Greg Rau, Andrew Dicks and Scott Bainbridge, “Reef climate adaptation research and technology”, International Journal of Climate Change: Impacts Responses 2(4) (2011), pp. 127–142. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  415. William Morrissey, “Avoiding atmospheric anarchy: Geoengineering as a source of interstate tension”, Environment and Security (2024), pp. 1–25. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  416. William Nordhaus, “The Climate Club: How to Fix a Failing Global Effort”, Foreign Affairs 99(3) (2020), pp. 10–17. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  417. William Nordhaus, “Climate Clubs: Overcoming Free-riding in International Climate Policy”, American Economic Review 105(4) (2015), pp. 1339–1370. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  418. WMO, Provisional State of the Global Climate 2023 (WMO: Geneva, 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  419. Wilfried Rickels Alexander Proelss, Oliver Geden, Julian Burhenne and Mathias Fridahl, “Integrating Carbon Dioxide Removal into European Emissions Trading”, Frontiers in Climate 3 (2021), Art. No.: 690023. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  420. Wilfried Rickels, Gernot Klepper and Jonas Dovern (eds.), Large-scale intentional interventions into the climate system? Assessing the climate engineering debate. Scoping report conducted on behalf of the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), (Kiel Earth Institute: Kiel, 2011). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  421. World Bank Group, Climate Change Action Plan 2021–2025: Supporting Green, Resilient, and Inclusive Development (World Bank Group: Washington DC, 2021). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  422. World Ocean Review, The Ocean -A Climate Champion? How to Boost Marine Carbon Dioxide Uptake (maribus gGmbH: Germany, 2024). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  423. Working Group 41 of GESAMP, High level review of a wide range of proposed marine geoengineering techniques (IMO: London, 2019), Reports and Studies No. 98. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  424. Yoshifumi Tanaka, The International Law of the Sea (CUP: Cambridge, 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  425. Yoshifumi Tanaka, “Law of the Sea”. In: Simon Chesterman, David M. Malone and Santiago Villalpando (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of United Nations Treaties (OUP: Oxford, 2019), pp. 521–538. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  426. Agreement relating to the implementation of Part XI of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982, 28 July 1994, 1836 UNTS 3 (entered into force 28 July 1996). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  427. Agreement for the Implementation of the Provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982 relating to the Conservation and Management of Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks, 4 August 1995, 2167 UNTS 3 (entered into force 11 December 2001). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  428. Amendments to the Annex of the Protocol of 1997 to amend the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973, as modified by the Protocol of 1978 relating thereto: 2021 Revised MARPOL Annex VI, Doc. No.: Resolution MEPC.328 (76) (2021). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  429. Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, 29 January 2000, 2226 UNTS 208 (entered into force 11 September 2003). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  430. CBD SBSTA, Biodiversity and climate change: Note by the Secretariat, Doc. No.: CBD/SBSTTA/25/12 (16 August 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  431. Charter of the United Nations and Statute of the International Court of Justice, 26 June 1945, 1 UNTS XVI (entered into force 24 October 1945). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  432. Convention on Biological Diversity, 5 June 1992, 1760 UNTS 79 (entered into force 29 December 1993). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  433. Convention on the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 20 October 1972, 1050 UNTS 16 (entered into force 15 July 1977). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  434. COP to the CBD, Decision 15/30. Biodiversity and climate change, Doc. No.: UNEP/CBD/COP/DEC/15/30 (19 December 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  435. COP to the CBD, Decision 15/13: Cooperation with other conventions and international organizations, Doc. No.: CBD/COP/DEC/15/13 (19 December 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  436. COP to the CBD, Kunming-Montreal Global biodiversity framework: Draft decision submitted by the President, CBD/COP/15/L.25 (18 December 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  437. COP to the CBD, Report of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity on its Fourteenth Meeting, Doc. No.: CBD/COP/14/14 (20 March 2019). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  438. COP to the CBD, Decision 14/5. Biodiversity and climate change, Doc. No.: UNEP/CBD/COP/DEC/14/5 (30 November 2018). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  439. COP to the CBD, Decision 14/30: Cooperation with other conventions, international organizations and initiatives, Doc. No.: CBD/COP/DEC/14/30 (30 November 2018). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  440. COP to the CBD, Decision: XIII/24: Cooperation with other conventions and international organizations, Doc. No.: UNEP/CBD/COP/DEC/XIII/24 (16 December 2016). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  441. COP to the CBD, Decision XIII/4. Biodiversity and climate change, Doc. No.: UNEP/CBD/COP/DEC/XIII/4 (10 December 2016). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  442. COP to the CBD, Decision XII/20. Biodiversity and climate change and disaster risk reduction, Doc. No.: UNEP/CBD/COP/DEC/XII/20 (17 October 2014). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  443. COP to the CBD, Decision: XII/6: Cooperation with other conventions, international organizations and initiatives, Doc. No.: UNEP/CBD/COP/DEC/XII/6 (17 October 2014). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  444. COP to the CBD, Decision XII/26. Improving the efficiency of structures and processes of the Convention: Subsidiary Body on Implementation, Doc. No.: UNEP/CBD/COP/DEC/XII/26 (17 October 2014). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  445. COP to the CBD, Decision XI/19. Biodiversity and climate change related issues: advice on the application of relevant safeguards for biodiversity with regard to policy approaches and positive incentives on issues relating to reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries; and the role of conservation, sustainable management of forests and enhancement of forest carbon stocks in developing countries, Doc. No.: UNEP/CBD/COP/DEC/XI/19 (5 December 2012). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  446. COP to the CBD, Decision: XI/6: Cooperation with other conventions, international organizations, and initiatives, Doc. No.: UNEP/CBD/COP/DEC/XI/6 (5 December 2012). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  447. COP to the CBD, Decision X/33. Biodiversity and climate change, Doc. No.: UNEP/CBD/COP/DEC/X/33 (29 October 2010). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  448. COP to the CBD, Decision: X/20: Cooperation with other conventions and international organizations and initiatives, Doc. No.: UNEP/CBD/COP/DEC/X/20 (29 October 2010). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  449. COP to the CBD, Decision X/33. Biodiversity and climate change, Doc. No.: UNEP/CBD/COP/DEC/IX/16 (9 October 2008). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  450. COP to the CBD, Decision IX/27: Cooperation among multilateral environmental agreements and other organizations, Doc. No.: UNEP/CBD/COP/DEC/IX/27 (9 October 2008). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  451. COP to the CBD, Decision VIII/16: Cooperation with other conventions and international organizations and initiatives, Doc. No.: UNEP/CBD/COP/DEC/VIII/16 (15 June 2006). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  452. COP to the CBD, Decision VII/15. Biodiversity and climate change, Doc. No.: UNEP/CBD/COP/DEC/VII/15 (13 April 2004). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  453. COP to the CBD, Decision VII/29: Transfer of technology and technology cooperation (Articles 16 to 19), Doc. No.: UNEP/CBD/COP/DEC/VII/29 (13 April 2004). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  454. COP to the CBD, Decision VII/26: Cooperation with other conventions and international organizations and initiatives, Doc. No.: UNEP/CBD/COP/DEC/VII/26 (13 April 2004). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  455. COP to the CBD, Decision VI/20: Cooperation with other organizations, initiatives and conventions, Doc. No.: UNEP/CBD/COP/6/20 (27 May 2002). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  456. COP to the CBD, Decision V/3: Progress report on the implementation of the programme of work on marine and coastal biological diversity (implementation of decision IV/5), Doc. No.: UNEP/CBD/COP/5/23 (22 June 2000). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  457. COP to the CBD, Decision V/21: Cooperation with other bodies, Doc. No.: UNEP/CBD/COP/5/23 (22 June 2000). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  458. COP to the CBD, Operations of the Convention, Doc. No.: UNEP/CBD/COP/DEC/V/20 (15–26 May 2000). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  459. COP to the CBD, Decision IV/5: Conservation and sustainable use of marine and coastal biological diversity, including a programme of work, Doc. No.: UNEP/CBD/COP/4/27 (15 June 1998). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  460. COP to the CBD, Decision IV/15: The relationship of the Convention on Biological Diversity with the Commission on Sustainable Development and biodiversity-related conventions, other international agreements, institutions and processes of relevance, Doc. No.: UNEP/CBD/COP/4/27 (15 June 1998). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  461. COP to the CBD, Relationship of the Convention with the Commission on Sustainable Development and biodiversity-related conventions, other international agreements, institutions and processes of relevance, Doc. No.: UNEP/CBD/COP/3/38 (11 February 1997). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  462. COP to the CBD, Cooperation with Other Biodiversity-related Conventions, Doc. No.: UNEP/CBD/COP/2/19 (30 November 1995). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  463. COP to the CBD, Rules of procedure for the Conference of the Parties, Doc. No.: UNEP/CBD/COP/DEC/I/1 (28 February 1995). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  464. COP to the UNFCCC, Decision 1/CP.27: Sharm el-Sheikh Implementation Plan, Doc. No.: FCCC/CP/2022/10/Add.1 (17 March 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  465. COP to the UNFCCC, Decision 3/CMA.3: Rules, modalities and procedures for the mechanism established by Article 6, paragraph 4, of the Paris Agreement, Doc. No.: FCCC/PA/CMA/2021/10/Add.1 (8 March 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  466. COP to the UNFCCC, Decision 1/CP.25: Chile Madrid Time for Action, Doc. No.: FCCC/CP/2019/13/Add.1 (16 March 2020). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  467. COP to the UNFCCC, Decision 1/CP.24: Preparations for the implementation of the Paris Agreement and the first session of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement, Doc. No.: FCCC/CP/2018/10/Add.1 (19 March 2019). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  468. COP to the UNFCCC, Adoption of the Paris Agreement, Doc. No.: FCCC/CP/2015/10/Add. 1 (29 January 2016). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  469. COP to the UNFCCC, Decision 1/CP.21: Adoption of the Paris Agreement, Doc. No.: FCCC/CP/2015/10/Add.1 (29 January 2016). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  470. COP to the UNFCCC, Decision 17/CP.20: Joint annual report of the Technology Executive Committee and the Climate Technology Centre and Network for 2014, Doc. No.: FCCC/CP/2014/10/Add.3 (2 February 2015). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  471. COP to the UNFCCC, Report of the Conference of the Parties on its nineteenth session, held in Warsaw from 11 to 23 November 2013, Doc. No.: FCCC/CP/2013/10 (31 January 2014). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  472. COP to the UNFCCC, Report of the Conference of the Parties on its seventeenth session, held in Durban from 28 November to 11 December 2011, Doc. No.: FCCC/CP/2011/9/Add.1 (15 March 2012). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  473. COP to the UNFCCC, Decision 1/CP.16: The Cancun Agreements: Outcome of the work of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action under the Convention, Doc. No.: FCCC/CP/2010/7/Add.1 (15 March 2011). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  474. COP to the UNFCCC, Decision 13/CP.8: Cooperation with other conventions, Doc. No.: FCCC/CP/2002/7/Add.1 (28 March 2003). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  475. COP to the UNFCCC, Decision 7/CP.7: Funding under the Convention, Doc. No.: FCCC/CP/2001/13/Add.1 (21 January 2002). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  476. COP to the UNFCCC, Organizational Matters: Adoption of the Rules of Procedure: Note by the Secretariat, Doc. No.: FCCC/CP/1996/2 (22 May 1996). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  477. COP to the UNFCCC, Decision 6/CP.1: The subsidiary bodies established by the Convention, Doc. No.: FCCC/CP/1995/7/Add.1 (6 June 1995). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  478. CMA, Decision 1/CMA.5: Outcome of the first global stocktake, Doc. No.: FCCC/PA/CMA/2023/16/Add. 1 (15 March 2024). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  479. CMA, Draft decision -/CMA.5: Outcome of the first global stocktake (revised advance version), Doc. No.: FCCC/PA/CMA/2023/L.17 (13 December 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  480. CMA, Annual report of the Supervisory Body for the mechanism established by Article 6, paragraph 4, of the Paris Agreement to the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement, Doc. No.: FCCC/PA/CMA/2023/15/Add.1 (1 December 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  481. CMA, Decision 7/CMA.4: Guidance on the mechanism established by Article 6, paragraph 4, of the Paris Agreement, Doc. No.: FCCC/PA/CMA/2022/10/Add.2 (17 March 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  482. CMA, Decision 3/CMA.3: Rules, modalities and procedures for the mechanism established by Article 6, paragraph 4, of the Paris Agreement, Doc. No.: FCCC/PA/CMA/2021/10/Add.1 (8 March 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  483. Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter, 29 December 1972, 1046 UNTS 120 (entered into force 30 August 1975). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  484. Doha Amendment to the Kyoto Protocol, 8 December 2012, C.N.718.2012. Treaties-XXVII.7.c (entered into force 31 December 2020). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  485. EU Directive 2003/87/EC as regards Aviation’s Contribution to the Union’s Economy-Wide Emission Reduction (Target and the Appropriate Implementation of a Global Market-Based Measure [2023] OJ L 130/115. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  486. EU Directive 2023/959 amending Directive 2003/87/EC Establishing a System for Greenhouse Gas Emission Allowance Trading within the Union and Decision (EU) 2015/1814 concerning the Establishment and Operation of a Market Stability Reserve for the Union Greenhouse Gas Emission Trading System [2023] OJ L 130/134. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  487. European Commission (2022), “Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Establishing a Union Certification Framework for Carbon Removals”, (30 November 2022), COM (2022) 672 final. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  488. European Commission (2020), “Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: A New Circular Economy Action Plan for a Cleaner and More Competitive Europe”, (11 March 2020) COM (2020) 98 final. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  489. European Parliament, Union certification framework for carbon removals: European Parliament legislative resolution of 10 April 2024 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Union certification framework for carbon removals, Doc. No.: P9_TA (2024) 0195 (10 April 2024). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  490. FAO, Report of the Council of FAO: Hundred and Seventieth Session 13–17 June 2022, Doc. No: CL 170/REP (17 June 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  491. IMO, Provisional Agenda for the Forty-sixth Consultative Meeting of Contracting Parties to the Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter, 1972 (London Convention) and the nineteenth Meeting of Contracting Parties to the 1996 Protocol to the London Convention (London Protocol), to be held at IMO Headquarters, 4 Albert Embankment, London, SE1 7SR, Doc. No.: LC 46/1 (15 April 2024). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  492. IMO, Report of the forty-fifth consultative meeting and the eighteenth meeting of the contracting parties, Doc. No.: LC 45/17 (30 October 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  493. IMO, Concerns over renewed research and commercial interest in ocean fertilization and the rate of development of other marine geoengineering proposals: Submitted by Greenpeace International, Doc. No.: 45/5/5 (28 July 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  494. IMO, Draft background paper on provisional application of the 2013 LP amendment (resolution LP.4(8)) from the Legal Intersessional Correspondence Group on Marine Geoengineering: Submitted by the Co-Chairs of the Correspondence Group, Doc. No.: LC 45/5/4 (28 July 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  495. IMO, Progress report from the Legal Intersessional Correspondence Group on Marine Geoengineering: Submitted by the Co-Chairs of the Correspondence Group, Doc. No.: LC 45/5/1 (30 June 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  496. IMO, Report of the forty-sixth meeting of the Scientific Group under the London Convention and the seventeenth meeting of the Scientific Group under the London Protocol, Doc. No.: LC/SG 46/16 (31 March 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  497. IMO, A preliminary evaluation of the need for a specific assessment framework on macroalgae cultivation for carbon sequestration: Submitted by Canada, Doc. No.: LC/SG 46/3 (10 January 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  498. IMO, Report of the Forty-fourth Consultative Meeting and the Seventeenth Meeting of Contracting Parties, Doc. No.: LC 44/17 (20 October 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  499. IMO, Progress report from the Correspondence Group on Marine Geoengineering: Submitted by the Chair of the Correspondence Group, Doc. No.: LC 44/5 (1 August 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  500. IMO, Report of the forty-fourth meeting of the Scientific Group of the London Convention and the fifteenth meeting of the Scientific Group of the London Protocol, Doc. No.: LC/SG 44/16 (29 April 2021). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  501. IMO, Marine Geoengineering: Advice from GESAMP Working Group 41 to the London Protocol Parties to assist them in identifying marine geoengineering techniques that it might be prudent to consider for listing in the new annex 4 of the Protocol, Doc. No.: LC/SG 44/3/Add.1 (29 March 2021). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  502. IMO, Guidance for consideration of marine geoengineering activities, Doc. No.: LC-LP.1/Circ.67 (6 January 2015). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  503. IMO, Implications of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea for the International Maritime Organization, Doc. No.: LEG/MISC/8 (30 January 2014). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  504. IMO, Report of the Thirty-fifth Consultative Meeting and the Eighth Meeting of Contracting Parties, Doc. No.: LC 35/15 (21 October 2013), Annex 4 (Resolution LP.4(8) on the Amendment to the London Protocol to Regulate the Placement of Matter for Ocean Fertilization and other Marine Geoengineering Activities (Adopted 18 October 2013). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  505. IMO, Report of the Thirty-second Consultative Meeting and the Fifth Meeting of Contracting Parties, Doc. No.: LC 32/15 (9 November 2010), Annex 5 (Resolution LC-LP. 2 on the Assessment Framework for Scientific Research Involving Ocean Fertilization). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  506. IMO, Report of the Thirty-second Consultative Meeting and the Fifth Meeting of Contracting Parties, Doc. No.: LC 32/15 (9 November 2010), Annex 6 (Assessment Framework for Scientific Research Involving Ocean Fertilization (Adopted on 14 October 2010). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  507. IMO, Report of the Thirtieth Consultative Meeting and the Third Meeting of Contracting Parties, Doc. No.: LC 30/16 (9 December 2008), Annex 6 (Resolution LC-LP.1 (2008) on the Regulation of Ocean Fertilization). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  508. IMO, Report of the thirtieth meeting of the Scientific Group of the London Convention and the first meeting of the Scientific Group of the London Protocol, Doc. No.: LC/SG 30/14 (25 July 2007). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  509. IMO, Implications of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, 1982, for the International Maritime Organization (IMO). Study by the Secretariat of IMO, Doc. No.: LEG/MISC/1 (27 July 1987). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  510. International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling (2 December 1946, 161 UNTS 72 (entered into force 10 November 1948. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  511. IPCC Secretariat, Matters Related to UNFCCC and Other International Bodies, Doc. No.: IPCC-XLVII/INF.10 (23 February 2018). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  512. Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 11 December 1997, 2303 UNTS 162 (entered into force 16 February 2005). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  513. Official Records of the Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea, Volume VI (Summary Records, Plenary, General Committee, First, Second and Third Committees, as well as Documents of the Conference, Fifth Session), Doc. No.: A/CONF.62/BUR/SR.24 (23 August 1976). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  514. Paris Agreement, 12 December 2015, C.N.92.2016. Treaties-XXVII.7.d (entered into force 4 November 2016). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  515. Protocol of 1978 relating to the International Convention for the prevention of pollution from ships, 1973, 17 February 1978, 1340 UNTS 61 (entered into force 2 October 1983). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  516. Protocol to the Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter, 14 November 1996, ILM 36 (1997), p. 7 (entered into force 24 March 2006). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  517. Nagoya-Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol on Liability and Redress to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, 15 October 2010, 3240 UNTS 27 (entered into force 5 March 2018). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  518. Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity, 29 October 2010, 3008 UNTS 3 (entered into force 12 October 2014). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  519. Report of the UN Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, June 1992, UN Doc. A/CONF.151/26/Rev.1 (vol. I). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  520. SPLOS to UNCLOS, Provisional Agenda, Doc. No.: SPLOS/34/L.1 (27 March 2024). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  521. SPLOS to UNCLOS, Report of the thirty-third Meeting of States Parties, Doc. No.: SPLOS/33/15 (10 July 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  522. SPLOS to UNCLOS, Report of the thirty-second Meeting of States Parties, Doc. No.: SPLOS/32/15 (5 July 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  523. SPLOS to UNCLOS, Report of the thirty-first Meeting of States Parties, Doc. No.: SPLOS/31/9 (12 July 2021). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  524. SPLOS to UNCLOS, Decision on the extension of the term of office of the current members of the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf, Doc. No.: SPLOS/31/10 (21 June 2021). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  525. SPLOS to UNCLOS, Report of the twenty-seventh Meeting of States Parties, Doc. No.: SPLOS/316 (10 July 2017). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  526. SPLOS to UNCLOS, Report of the twenty-fifth Meeting of States Parties, Doc. No.: SPLOS/287 (13 July 2015). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  527. SPLOS to UNCLOS, Report of the twentieth Meeting of States Parties, Doc. No.: SPLOS/218 (13 July 2010). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  528. SPLOS to UNCLOS, Report of the fourteenth Meeting of States Parties, Doc. No.: SPLOS/119 (23 July 2004). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  529. SPLOS to UNCLOS, Decision regarding the workload of the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf and the ability of States, particularly developing States, to fulfil the requirements of article 4 of annex II to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, as well as the decision contained in SPLOS/72, paragraph (a), Doc. No.: SPLOS/183 (20 June 2008). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  530. SPLOS to UNCLOS, Report of the twelfth Meeting of States Parties, Doc. No.: SPLOS/91 (13 June 2002). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  531. SPLOS to UNCLOS, Decision regarding the date of commencement of the ten-year period for making submissions to the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf set out in article 4 of Annex II to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Doc. No.: SPLOS/72 (29 May 2001). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  532. SPLOS to UNCLOS, Report of the Meeting of States Parties, Doc. No.: SPLOS/3 (28 February 1995). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  533. Statement of Sri Lanka, 187th Plenary Meeting, Official Records of the Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea, vol. XVII, Doc. No.: A/CONF.62/SR.187. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  534. UNEP, Resolution for consideration at the 4th United Nations Environment Assembly: Geoengineering and its governance. Submitted by Switzerland and supported by Burkina Faso, Federated States of Micronesia, Georgia, Liechtenstein, Mali, Mexico, Montenegro, Niger, Republic of Korea, and Senegal (25 February 2019). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  535. UNEP, Decision 27/2: Implementation of paragraph 88 of the outcome document of the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, Doc. No.: UNEP/GC.27/17 (12 March 2013). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  536. United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, 10 December 1982, 1833 UNTS 3 (entered into force 16 November 1994). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  537. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 9 May 1992, 1771 UNTS 107 (entered into force 21 March 1994). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  538. United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification in those Countries Experiencing Serious Drought and/or Desertification, particularly in Africa, 14 October 1994, 1954 UNTS 3 (entered into force 26 December 1996). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  539. UNFCCC Article 6.4 Supervisory Body, Draft recommendation: Activities involving removals under the Article 6.4 mechanism, Doc. No.: A6.4-SB007-A07 (ver. 02.0) (14 September 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111
  540. UNFCCC Article 6.4 Supervisory Body, Information note: Draft elements for the recommendation on activities involving removals, Doc. No.: A6.4-SB007-AA-A14 (ver. 02.0) (28 August 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748953111

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus der Reihe "Studies in International Law of the Sea and Maritime Law - Internationales Seerecht und Seehandelsrecht"
Cover des Buchs: Regulatory Challenges of Ship-Source Pollution
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Nina Tavakkoli
Regulatory Challenges of Ship-Source Pollution
Cover des Buchs: Collective Compliance Mechanisms in International Law Relating to Marine Pollution
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Young-Kyung Yoon
Collective Compliance Mechanisms in International Law Relating to Marine Pollution
Cover des Buchs: Rechtsfragen zur Resilienz maritimer Infrastrukturen
Sammelband Vollzugriff
Katharina Reiling, Till Markus
Rechtsfragen zur Resilienz maritimer Infrastrukturen
Cover des Buchs: IUU Fishing and the Obligations of Vessel Owner States
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Pieter van Welzen
IUU Fishing and the Obligations of Vessel Owner States
Cover des Buchs: Plastic Pollution of the World’s Oceans as a Legal Problem
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Liv Christiansen
Plastic Pollution of the World’s Oceans as a Legal Problem

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Feedback geben

Wir freuen uns über Ihr Feedback zu Inhalten und Funktionen. Ihre Nachricht hilft uns, unseren Service stetig zu verbessern.

Bewertung
Bild anhängen
oder hier ablegen
PNG oder JPG (max. 3 MB)

Anmelden

Passwort vergessen?
Login über Ihre Institution (SSO, Shibboleth, OpenAthens)
Noch kein Benutzerkonto?
Jetzt registrieren

Publikation zitieren

Download: RIS BibTex