Cover des Buchs: IUU Fishing and the Obligations of Vessel Owner States
Im Shop erwerben
, um zu prüfen, ob Sie einen Vollzugriff auf diese Publikation haben.
Monographie Kein Zugriff

IUU Fishing and the Obligations of Vessel Owner States

A West African Perspective
Autor:innen:
Verlag:
 03.01.2025

Zusammenfassung

In diesem Buch wird die Frage untersucht, ob Staaten, deren Staatsangehörige wirtschaftliche Eigentümer oder Betreiber von Schiffen sind, die in einer ausländischen Ausschließlichen Wirtschaftszone (AWZ) illegalen Fischfang betreiben (Schiffseignerstaaten), verpflichtet sind, gegen diese Staatsangehörigen vorzugehen, wobei der Schwerpunkt auf der Situation in Westafrika liegt, einer der am stärksten betroffenen Regionen. Es wird ein Überblick über das internationale Rechtssystem gegeben, das für die Fischerei in einer AWZ gilt, und es werden verschiedene Quellen des internationalen Rechts sowie die staatliche Praxis, einschließlich der Vorschriften der Europäischen Union und der USA, betrachtet, die die Argumentation stützen, dass eine solche Verpflichtung besteht. Es werden Vorschläge gemacht, wie Schiffseigner, Küsten- und Flaggenstaaten dieser Verpflichtung nachkommen können.

Schlagworte

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Erscheinungsjahr
2025
Erscheinungsdatum
03.01.2025
ISBN-Print
978-3-7560-2974-7
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-5173-5
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe
Studies in International Law of the Sea and Maritime Law - Internationales Seerecht und Seehandelsrecht
Band
16
Sprache
Englisch
Seiten
287
Produkttyp
Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Kein Zugriff 1 - 16
    1. 1.1 Study’s objective Kein Zugriff
    2. 1.2 Limitation to EEZ Kein Zugriff
    3. 1.3 Focus on West Africa Kein Zugriff
    4. 1.4 Terminology and translations Kein Zugriff
    5. 1.5 Methodology Kein Zugriff
    6. 1.6 Organisation of the study Kein Zugriff
      1. 2.1 Introduction Kein Zugriff
      2. 2.2 Impact of IUU fishing Kein Zugriff
      3. 2.3 IUU fishing and fisheries regulations Kein Zugriff
      4. 2.4 IUU fishing in West Africa Kein Zugriff
      5. 2.5 Forms of IUU fishing Kein Zugriff
      1. 3.1 Introduction Kein Zugriff
      2. 3.2 Global governmental organisations Kein Zugriff
      3. 3.3 Regional governmental organisations Kein Zugriff
      4. 3.4 Role of NGOs Kein Zugriff
      5. 3.5 West Africa: Status quo Kein Zugriff
      1. 4.1 Introduction Kein Zugriff
      2. 4.2 Vessel-related persons Kein Zugriff
      3. 4.3 Vessel owners Kein Zugriff
      4. 4.4 Vessel operators Kein Zugriff
      5. 4.5 Market-related persons Kein Zugriff
      1. 5.1 Introduction Kein Zugriff
      2. 5.2 Maritime zones Kein Zugriff
      1. 6.1 Introduction Kein Zugriff
      2. 6.2 Status and legal regime Kein Zugriff
      1. 7.1 Introduction Kein Zugriff
      2. 7.2 EEZ and fishing: Coastal state rights Kein Zugriff
      3. 7.3 EEZ and fishing: Coastal state obligations Kein Zugriff
      4. 7.4 EEZ: Fisheries regulations Kein Zugriff
      5. 7.5 Application of fisheries regulations to vessel owners and operators Kein Zugriff
      1. 8.1 Introduction Kein Zugriff
      2. 8.2 ‘Necessity’ requirement Kein Zugriff
      3. 8.3 No imprisonment Kein Zugriff
      4. 8.4 Prompt release Kein Zugriff
      5. 8.5 Responsibility for sanctioning IUU fishing Kein Zugriff
      6. 8.6 Enforcement of sanctions against foreign offenders Kein Zugriff
      1. 9.1 Introduction Kein Zugriff
      2. 9.2 Bases for prescriptive and enforcement jurisdiction Kein Zugriff
      3. 9.3 Coastal states: Access of foreign vessels to an EEZ Kein Zugriff
      4. 9.4 Coastal states: Authorisation to fish Kein Zugriff
      5. 9.5 Coastal states: Breach of fisheries regulations Kein Zugriff
      6. 9.6 Flag states: General Kein Zugriff
      7. 9.7 Flag states: West African states Kein Zugriff
      8. 9.8 Flag states: Other states Kein Zugriff
      9. 9.9 EEZ fisheries regulations: Summary Kein Zugriff
      1. 10.1 Introduction Kein Zugriff
      2. 10.2 UNCLOS: Flag states and vessel nationality Kein Zugriff
      3. 10.3 UNCLOS: Stateless fishing vessels Kein Zugriff
      4. 10.4 UNCLOS: Scope of flag state fisheries regulations Kein Zugriff
      5. 10.5 Binding international fisheries instruments Kein Zugriff
      6. 10.6 The FSA Kein Zugriff
      7. 10.7 The FAOCA Kein Zugriff
      8. 10.8 The PSMA Kein Zugriff
      9. 10.9 The WTO Agreement on Fisheries Subsidies Kein Zugriff
      10. 10.10 EEZ access agreements Kein Zugriff
      11. 10.11 EU Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreements Kein Zugriff
      12. 10.12 Non-binding international fisheries instruments Kein Zugriff
      13. 10.13 The Code of Conduct Kein Zugriff
      14. 10.14 The IPOA IUU Kein Zugriff
      1. 11.1 Introduction Kein Zugriff
      2. 11.2 Legal status of the IUU Advisory Opinion Kein Zugriff
      3. 11.3 Flag state's obligations relating to foreign EEZs Kein Zugriff
      4. 11.4 Nature of flag state's obligations Kein Zugriff
      5. 11.5 Flag state's liability Kein Zugriff
      6. 11.6 Content of due diligence obligation Kein Zugriff
      7. 11.7 Impact of IUU Advisory Opinion Kein Zugriff
      8. 11.8 Enforcement of flag state’s due diligence obligation Kein Zugriff
      9. 11.9 State responsibility and M/V ‘Virginia G’ Kein Zugriff
      1. 12.1 Introduction Kein Zugriff
      2. 12.2 International case law Kein Zugriff
      3. 12.3 The prevention principle and due diligence Kein Zugriff
      4. 12.4 The prevention principle and cybercrime Kein Zugriff
      5. 12.5 Application of the prevention principle to the EEZ Kein Zugriff
      1. 13.1 Introduction Kein Zugriff
      2. 13.2 UNCLOS: A living treaty Kein Zugriff
      3. 13.3 Flag states and nationals of other states Kein Zugriff
      4. 13.4 Coastal state liability: No exclusive role for flag states Kein Zugriff
      5. 13.5 Vessels and connected persons: No exclusive flag state responsibility Kein Zugriff
      6. 13.6 Responsibility of vessel owner states: Introduction Kein Zugriff
      7. 13.7 Responsibility of vessel owner states: Articles 58(3) and 62(4) UNCLOS Kein Zugriff
      8. 13.8 Responsibility of vessel owner states: Articles 192, 194(2) and 194(5) UNCLOS Kein Zugriff
      1. 14.1 Introduction Kein Zugriff
      2. 14.2 IUU fishing and UN General Assembly resolutions Kein Zugriff
      3. 14.3 IPOA IUU: Paragraphs 18 and 21 Kein Zugriff
      4. 14.4 IPOA IUU: National Plans of Action Kein Zugriff
      5. 14.5 IPOA IUU: Technical Guidelines Kein Zugriff
      6. 14.6 PSMA: Preamble Kein Zugriff
      7. 14.7 IUU Advisory Opinion: Submitted views Kein Zugriff
      8. 14.8 FSA: Review meetings Kein Zugriff
      1. 15.1 Introduction Kein Zugriff
      2. 15.2 Regulation of IUU fishing by nationals: EU IUU Regulation Kein Zugriff
      3. 15.3 EU IUU Regulation and member state obligations Kein Zugriff
      4. 15.4 EU IUU Regulation and member state implementation Kein Zugriff
      5. 15.5 EU IUU Regulation and ‘non-cooperating’ third states Kein Zugriff
      6. 15.6 Impact of EU IUU Regulation Kein Zugriff
      7. 15.7 Regulation of IUU fishing by nationals: The US Lacey Act Kein Zugriff
      8. 15.8 Regulation of IUU fishing by nationals: Other states Kein Zugriff
      9. 15.9 Enforcement action against nationals Kein Zugriff
      10. 15.10 Bengis case Kein Zugriff
      11. 15.11 Vidal Armadores case Kein Zugriff
      1. 16.1 Vessel owner state responsibility Kein Zugriff
      2. 16.2 International law and national fisheries regulations Kein Zugriff
      3. 16.3 West Africa: Obligations of coastal states Kein Zugriff
      4. 16.4 Responsibility of coastal, flag and vessel owner states Kein Zugriff
      1. 17.1 Introduction Kein Zugriff
      2. 17.2 Vessel owner state’s due diligence obligation Kein Zugriff
      3. 17.3 Jurisdictional bases for regulations Kein Zugriff
      4. 17.4 Enforcement of regulations Kein Zugriff
      1. 18.1 Introduction Kein Zugriff
      2. 18.2 Flag states: Disclosure of beneficial owners and operators Kein Zugriff
      3. 18.3 Coastal state fisheries regulations Kein Zugriff
      4. 18.4 STP and Cabo Verde: Scope of application Kein Zugriff
      5. 18.5 STP and Cabo Verde: Access to the EEZ Kein Zugriff
      6. 18.6 STP and Cabo Verde: Infringements and sanctions Kein Zugriff
      7. 18.7 STP and Cabo Verde: Involvement of nationals Kein Zugriff
      8. 18.8 STP and Cabo Verde: Flag and vessel owner states Kein Zugriff
      9. 18.9 EEZ fisheries regulations: Recommendations Kein Zugriff
    4. 19. Conclusion Kein Zugriff
  7. Sources Kein Zugriff 255 - 287

Literaturverzeichnis (371)

  1. S Allen, D Costelloe, M Fitzmaurice et al (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Jurisdiction in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  2. J Barrett and R Barnes (eds), Law of the Sea: UNCLOS as a Living Treaty (London: The British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2016) Google Scholar öffnen
  3. C Blattner (ed), Protecting Animals Within and Across Borders: Extraterritorial Jurisdiction and the Challenges of Globalization (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  4. W Burke, The New International Law of Fisheries – UNCLOS 1982 and Beyond (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994) Google Scholar öffnen
  5. R Churchill, V Lowe and A Sander, The Law of the Sea (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2022, 4th edition) Google Scholar öffnen
  6. J Dugard, M du Plessis, T Maluwa et al, Dugard’s International Law – A South African perspective (Claremont: Juta & Company, 2018, 5th edition) Google Scholar öffnen
  7. P Dupuy and Y Kerbrat, Droit international public (Paris: Dalloz, 2018, 14th edition) Google Scholar öffnen
  8. M Dyson (ed), Regulating Risk through Private Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018) Google Scholar öffnen
  9. E Engdal and K Sæter, Catching Thunder (London: Zed Books Ltd., 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  10. M Forteau and J Thouvenin, Traité de Droit International de la Mer (Paris: Edition A Pedone, 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  11. D Freestone, R Barnes and D Ong (eds), The Law of the Sea: Progress and Prospects (Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 2006) Google Scholar öffnen
  12. S Gless and S Broniszewska-Emdin (eds), Prosecuting Corporations for Violations of International Criminal Law: Jurisdictional Issues (Antwerpen: Maklu, 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  13. C Goodman, Coastal State Jurisdiction over Living Resources in the Exclusive Economic Zone (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021) Google Scholar öffnen
  14. D Guilfoyle, Shipping interdiction and the Law of the Sea (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009) Google Scholar öffnen
  15. Q Hanich and B Tsamenyi (eds), Navigating Pacific Fisheries: Legal and Policy Trends in the Implementation of International Fisheries Instruments in the Western and Central Pacific Region (Wollongong: Oceans Publications, 2009) Google Scholar öffnen
  16. J Harrison, Saving the Oceans through Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  17. J Herring and M Cremona, Criminal Law (London: Palgrave, 1998) Google Scholar öffnen
  18. K Ipsen, Völkerrecht (München: C.H. Beck, 2014, 6th edition) Google Scholar öffnen
  19. O Jansen (ed), Administrative Sanctions in the European Union (Cambridge/Antwerp/Portland: Intersentia, 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  20. N Klein, Maritime Security and the Law of the Sea (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
  21. J Mahinga, La pêche maritime et le droit international (Paris: L’Harmattan, 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  22. T Malick Ndiaye and R Wolfrum (eds), Law of the Sea, Environmental Law and Settlement of Disputes: Liber Amicorum Judge Thomas A.Mensah (Leiden/Boston: Brill/Nijhoff, 2007) Google Scholar öffnen
  23. B Mayer and A Zahar (eds), Debating Climate Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021) Google Scholar öffnen
  24. E Molenaar, Coastal State Jurisdiction over Vessel-Source Pollution (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1998) Google Scholar öffnen
  25. A Orakhelashvili (ed), Research Handbook on Jurisdiction and Immunities in International Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  26. M Palma, M Tsamenyi and W Edeson, Promoting Sustainable Fisheries (Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  27. J Pancracio, Droit de la Mer (Paris: Dalloz, 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  28. E Papastavridis and K Trapp (eds), La Criminalité en Mer/Crimes at Sea, Hague Academy of International Law, The Centre for Studies and Research in International Law and International Relations (Leiden/Boston: Brill Nijhoff, 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  29. A Peters and R Wolfrum (eds), The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008) Google Scholar öffnen
  30. G Petrossian, The Last Fish Swimming – The Global Crime of Illegal Fishing (Santa Barbara: Praeger, 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  31. M Pieth and R Ivory (eds), Corporate Criminal Liability. Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, vol 9 (Dordrecht: Springer, 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
  32. F Platjouw and A Pozdnakova (eds), The Environmental Rule of Law for Oceans: Designing Legal Solutions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  33. N Prayogo and A Amron (eds), 2nd Scientific Communication in Fisheries and Marine Sciences (SCiFiMaS 2018) (Red Hook: Curran Associates, Inc., 2018) Google Scholar öffnen
  34. A Proelss (ed), The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. A Commentary (Munich, Oxford and Baden-Baden: C.H. Beck/Hart/Nomos, 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  35. H Ringbom (ed), Jurisdiction over Ships. Post-UNCLOS Developments in the Law of the Sea (Leiden/Boston: Brill Nijhoff, 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  36. R Roland Holst, Change in the Law of the Sea. Context, Mechanisms and Practice (Leiden/Boston: Brill Nijhoff, 2022) Google Scholar öffnen
  37. G Rose (ed), Following the Proceeds of Environmental Crime – Forests, Fish and Filthy Lucre (New York: Routledge, 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  38. D Rothwell, A Oude Elferink, K Scott and T Stephens (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the Law of the Sea (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  39. D Rothwell and T Stephens, The International Law of the Sea (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2016, 2nd edition) Google Scholar öffnen
  40. M Schmitt (ed), Tallinn Manual 2.0 on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Operations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017, 2nd edition) Google Scholar öffnen
  41. Marko Svicevic (ed), Compendium of documents relating to regional and sub-regional peace and security in Africa (Pretoria: Pretoria University Law Press, 2021, 2nd edition) Google Scholar öffnen
  42. Y Tanaka, The International Law of the Sea (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023, 4th edition) Google Scholar öffnen
  43. S Thomas, L Edwin, P Pravin et al (eds), Fish Harvesting Systems for Resource Conservation (Cochin: Central Institute of Fisheries Technology, 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  44. United Nations, United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea at Thirty – Reflections (New York: United Nations, 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  45. S Vezzani, Jurisdiction in International Fisheries Law: Evolving trends and new challenges (Milan: Wolters Kluwer, 2020) Google Scholar öffnen
  46. D Agnew, J Pearce, G Pramod et al, ‘Estimating the worldwide extent of illegal fishing’ (2009) 4(2) PLOS ONE, 1-8 Google Scholar öffnen
  47. A Al Arif, ‘Legal Status of Maximum Sustainable Yield Concept in International Fisheries Law and its Adoption in the Marine Fisheries Regime of Bangladesh: A Critical Analysis’ (2017) 32 The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 544-569 Google Scholar öffnen
  48. C Allen, ‘Proving Corporate Criminal Liability for Negligence in Vessel Management and Operations: An Allision-Oil Spill Case Study’ (2012) 10(2) Loyola Maritime Law Journal, 269-318 Google Scholar öffnen
  49. A Allison, ‘The Soviet Union and UNCLOS III: Pragmatism and Policy Evolution’ (1986) 16(2) Ocean Development & International Law, 109-136 Google Scholar öffnen
  50. R Anderson, ‘The Lacey Act: America’s Premier Weapon in the Fight against Unlawful Wildlife Trafficking’ (1995) 16 Public Land & Resources Law Review, 27-85 Google Scholar öffnen
  51. R Anderson and M Carraway, ‘Current Issues Arising in Lacey Act Prosecutions’ (2015) 63(3) United States Attorneys’ Bulletin, 3-18 Google Scholar öffnen
  52. G Andreone, ‘The Exclusive Economic Zone’ in Rothwell et al, The Oxford Handbook, 159-180 Google Scholar öffnen
  53. Anon, ‘International Environmental Law’ (1991) 104(7) Harvard Law Review, 1484-1639 Google Scholar öffnen
  54. C Anuradha, ‘An Analysis of the WTO Agreement on “Fisheries Subsidies” Adopted in the 12th Ministerial Conference’ (2023) 5 Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research, 1-13 Google Scholar öffnen
  55. G Arevalo, ‘Free Trade Agreements and the Lacey Act: A Carrot and Stick Approach to Prevent and Deter Trade in IUU Fisheries’ (2015) 10 Florida A & M University Law Review, 349-386 Google Scholar öffnen
  56. E Arthur, ‘Following Game Trails: Identifying the Right Path to Restitution for Conspiracy to Violate the Lacey Act’ (2017) 17(1) Wyoming Law Review, 117-145 Google Scholar öffnen
  57. O Asamoah, ‘The Legal Effect of Resolutions of the General Assembly’ (1964) 3(2) Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 210-230 Google Scholar öffnen
  58. M Asner, ‘To Catch a Wildlife Thief: Strategies and Suggestions for the Fight against Illegal Wildlife Trafficking’ (2016) 12 University of Pennsylvania Asian Law Review, 1-20 Google Scholar öffnen
  59. R Baird, ‘Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing: An Analysis of the Legal, Economic and Historical Factors Relevant to Its Development and Persistence’ (2004) 5(2) Melbourne Journal of International Law, 299-334 Google Scholar öffnen
  60. B Bammer-Whitaker, ‘The Lacey Act and Proof of Foreign Law in Domestic Criminal Proceedings: A Critical Look at the Seventh Circuit’s Approach in Bodum USA v. La Cafetiere’ (2012) 25(1) Georgetown International Environmental Law Review, 175-206 Google Scholar öffnen
  61. M Banda, ‘Regime Congruence: Rethinking the Scope of State Responsibility for Transboundary Environmental Harm’ (2019) 103(4) Minnesota Law Review, 1879-1959 Google Scholar öffnen
  62. K Barclay, ‘Following the proceeds of illegal fishing in the Asia-Pacific’ in Rose (ed), Following the Proceeds of Environmental Crime, 88-99 Google Scholar öffnen
  63. A Bardin, ‘Coastal State’s Jurisdiction over Foreign Vessels’ (2002) 14(1) Pace International Law Review, 27-76 Google Scholar öffnen
  64. R Barnes, ‘Flag States’ in Rothwell et al, The Oxford Handbook, 304-325 Google Scholar öffnen
  65. M Barrett, ‘Illegal Fishing in Zones Subject to National Jurisdiction’ (1998) (5)1 James Cook University Law Review, 1-26 Google Scholar öffnen
  66. S Beaulac, ‘The Lotus Case in Context: Sovereignty, Westphalia, Vattel and Positivism’ in Allen, Costelloe, Fitzmaurice et al (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Jurisdiction in International Law, 40-58 Google Scholar öffnen
  67. D Belhabib, ‘The Black Hole in the Seas’ (2017) 77 The Samudra Report, 20-25 Google Scholar öffnen
  68. D Belhabib, U Sumaila, V Lam et al, ‘Euros vs. Yuan: Comparing European and Chinese Fishing Access in West Africa’ (2015) 10(3) PLOS ONE, 1-22 Google Scholar öffnen
  69. P Bender, ‘A State of Necessity: IUU Fishing in the CCAMLR Zone’ (2008) 13(2) Ocean and Coastal Law Journal, 233-280 Google Scholar öffnen
  70. M Beseng, ‘Cameroon’s choppy waters: The anatomy of fisheries crime in the maritime fisheries sector’ (2019) 108 Marine Policy, 1-10 Google Scholar öffnen
  71. R Bintoro, A Raharjo and T Sudrajat, ‘Corporate criminal liability towards the doer of illegal, unregulated and unreported fishing in Indonesia’ in Prayogo and Amron (eds), 2nd Scientific Communication in Fisheries and Marine Sciences, 348-354 Google Scholar öffnen
  72. J Black, ‘A New Custom Thickens: Increased Coastal State Jurisdiction within Sovereign Waters’ (2017) 37 Boston University International Law Journal, 355-394 Google Scholar öffnen
  73. L Blakely, ‘The End of the Viarsa Saga and the Legality of Australia’s Vessel Forfeiture Penalty for Illegal Fishing in its Exclusive Economic Zone’ (2008) 17(3) Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal, 677-705 Google Scholar öffnen
  74. C Blakesley, ‘United States Jurisdiction over Extraterritorial Crime’ (1982) 73(3) Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 1109-1163 Google Scholar öffnen
  75. C Blakesley, ‘A Conceptual Framework for Extradition and Jurisdiction over Extraterritorial Crimes’ (1984) 4 Utah Law Review, 685-762 Google Scholar öffnen
  76. C Blattner, ‘The Unexplored: Direct Extraterritoriality’ in Blattner (ed), Protecting Animals Within and Across Borders, 161-198 Google Scholar öffnen
  77. S Bleicher, ‘The Legal Significance of Re-Citation of General Assembly Resolutions’ (1969) 63(3) American Journal of International Law, 444-478 Google Scholar öffnen
  78. M Blodgett, R Hunter Jr. and H Lozada, ‘Primer on International Environmental Law: Sustainability as a Principle of International Law and Custom’ (2008) 15(1) ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law, 15-31 Google Scholar öffnen
  79. K Boerder, N Miller and B Worm, ‘Global hot spots of transhipment of fish catch at sea’ (2018) 4 Science Advances, 1-10 Google Scholar öffnen
  80. M Boopendranath, ‘FAO Code of conduct for responsible fishing operations’ in S Thomas, L Edwin, P Pravin et al (eds), Fish Harvesting Systems for Resource Conservation, 72-83 Google Scholar öffnen
  81. M Botha and D Millard, ‘The past, present and future of vicarious liability in South Africa’ (2012) De Jure, 225-253 Google Scholar öffnen
  82. S Bouwhuis, ‘South Africa: The Samudera Pasific and the Exercise of Jurisdiction over Stateless Vessels on the High Seas’ (2014) 29 The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 363-372 Google Scholar öffnen
  83. A Boyle, ‘Litigating Climate Change under Part XII of the LOSC’ (2019) 34 The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 458-481 Google Scholar öffnen
  84. D Bucaj, ‘The Obligation to Prevent Transboundary Cyber Harm: Expand the Regulatory Regime or Continue Deflecting Responsibility’ (2022) 54(2) George Washington International Law Review, 219-284 Google Scholar öffnen
  85. R Buchan, ‘Cyberspace, Non-State Actors and the Obligation to Prevent Transboundary Harm’ (2016) 21(3) Journal of Conflict & Security Law, 429-453 Google Scholar öffnen
  86. R Cantrell, ‘Finding Nemo.. And Eating Him: The Failure of the United Nations to Force Internalization of the Negative Social Costs that Result from Overfishing’ (2006) 5(2) Washington University Global Studies Law Review, 381-402 Google Scholar öffnen
  87. C Carillo, ‘The Advisory Jurisdiction of the ITLOS: From Uncertainties to Opportunities for Ocean Governance’ in F Platjouw and A Pozdnakova (eds), The Environmental Rule of Law for Oceans, 236-251 Google Scholar öffnen
  88. G Carneiro, ‘They Come, They Fish, and They Go: EC Fisheries Agreements with Cape Verde and São Tomé e Príncipe’, 2011 7(1) Marine Fisheries Review, 1-25 Google Scholar öffnen
  89. A Castles, ‘Legal Status of U.N. Resolutions’ (1967-1970) 3(1) Adelaide Law Review, 68-83 Google Scholar öffnen
  90. D Cheever, ‘The Politics of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea’ (1984) 37(2) Journal of International Affairs, 247-252 Google Scholar öffnen
  91. R Churchill, ‘The 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea’, in Rothwell et al, The Oxford Handbook, 24-45 Google Scholar öffnen
  92. R Churchill, ‘10 Years of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea - Towards a Global Ocean Regime: A General Appraisal’ (2005) 48 German Yearbook of International Law, 81-116 Google Scholar öffnen
  93. E de Coning and E Witbooi, ‘Towards a new ‘fisheries crime’ paradigm: South Africa as an illustrative example’ (2015) 60 Marine Policy, 208-215 Google Scholar öffnen
  94. D Czybulka, ‘Article 192: General Obligation’, in Proelss, UNCLOS Commentary, 1277-1287 Google Scholar öffnen
  95. D Czybulka, ‘Article 194: Measures to prevent, reduce and control pollution of the marine environment’ in Proelss, UNCLOS Commentary, 1295-1315 Google Scholar öffnen
  96. J Darnell, ‘Poaching and the Black Market: A Need for Change Enforcing and Amending the Lacey Act’ (2015) 6(2) Journal of Animal & Environmental Law, 105-122 Google Scholar öffnen
  97. T Davenport, ‘The Archipelagic Regime’ in Rothwell et al, The Oxford Handbook, 134-158 Google Scholar öffnen
  98. H Dederer and T Singer, ‘Adverse Cyber Operations: Causality, Attribution, Evidence, and Due Diligence’ (2019) 95 International Law Studies Series. US Naval War College, 430-466 Google Scholar öffnen
  99. H Donovan, ‘The Pressing Global Threat of Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated (IUU) Fishing and the Role of Corporations in Solving It’ (2023) 28 Ocean and Coastal Law Journal, 177-212 Google Scholar öffnen
  100. H Doremus, ‘Why International Catch Shares Won’t Save Ocean Biodiversity’ (2013) 2(2) Michigan Journal of Environmental & Administrative Law, 385-428 Google Scholar öffnen
  101. A Doumbouya, O Camara, J Mamie et al, ‘Assessing the Effectiveness of Monitoring Control and Surveillance of Illegal Fishing: The Case of West Africa’ (2017) 4(50) Frontiers in Marine Science, 1-10 Google Scholar öffnen
  102. D Dzidzornu, ‘Coastal state obligations and powers respecting EEZ environmental protection under Part XII of the UNCLOS: A Descriptive Analysis’ (1997) 8(2) Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy, 283-322 Google Scholar öffnen
  103. S Eberhardt, ‘The Lacey Act Amendments and United States’ Policing of International Trade’ (2013) 35(2) Houston Journal of International Law, 397-430 Google Scholar öffnen
  104. W Edeson, ‘The International Plan of Action on Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing: The Legal Context of a Non-Legally Binding Instrument,’ (2001) 16(4) The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 603-624 Google Scholar öffnen
  105. M Ellis, ‘The New International Economic Order and General Assembly Resolutions: The Debate over the Legal Effects of General Assembly Resolutions Revisited’ (1985) 15(3) California Western International Law Journal, 647-704 Google Scholar öffnen
  106. S Emmenegger, ‘Extraterritorial Economic Sanctions and Their Foundation in International Law’ (2016) 33(3) Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law, 631-660 Google Scholar öffnen
  107. E Engle, ‘Extraterritorial Corporate Criminal Liability: A Remedy for Human Rights Violations’ (2006) 20(2) St. John’s Journal of Legal Commentary, 287-338 Google Scholar öffnen
  108. K Erikstein and J Swann, ‘Voluntary Guidelines for Flag State Performance: A New Tool to Conquer IUU Fishing’ (2014) 29 The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 116-147 Google Scholar öffnen
  109. J Ferrell, ‘Controlling Flags of Convenience: One Measure to Stop Overfishing of Collapsing Fish Stocks’ (2005) 35(2) Environmental Law, 323-390 Google Scholar öffnen
  110. S Fietta, J Saadeh and L Rees-Evans, ‘The South China Sea Award: A Milestone for International Environmental Law, the Duty of Due Diligence and the Litigation of Maritime Environmental Disputes’ (2017) 29(4) Georgetown Environmental Law Review, 711-746 Google Scholar öffnen
  111. C Fisher, ‘Conspiring to Violate the Lacey Act’ (2002) 32(2) Environmental Law, 475-508 Google Scholar öffnen
  112. C Fleischer, ‘The New Regime of Maritime Fisheries’ (1987) 209 Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law, 95-222 Google Scholar öffnen
  113. S Gaines, ‘The WTO’s Reading of the GATT Article XX Chapeau; A Disguised Restriction on Environment Measures’ (2001) 22 University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law, 739-862 Google Scholar öffnen
  114. J Gao, ‘The ITLOS Advisory Opinion for the SRFC’ (2015) 14 Chinese Journal of International Law, 735-756 Google Scholar öffnen
  115. H Gibbs, ‘Criminal law on the high seas’ (1989) 6 Maritime Law Association of Australia and New Zealand Journal, 3-14 Google Scholar öffnen
  116. I Giesen, E de Jong and M Overheul, ‘How Dutch Tort Law Responds to Risks’, in Dyson (ed), Regulating Risk through Private Law, 166-193 Google Scholar öffnen
  117. K Gjerde, ‘High Seas Fisheries Management under the Convention on the Law of the Sea’, in D Freestone, R Barnes and D Ong (eds), The Law of the Sea: Progress and Prospects, 281-307 Google Scholar öffnen
  118. J Glazewski, ‘Current legal developments South Africa/ United States. United States v Bengis: a victory for wildlife law and lessons for international fisheries crime’ (2014) 29 The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 173-183 Google Scholar öffnen
  119. J Glazewski, ‘Legal and practical challenges around restitution, secrecy and asset recovery in transnational fisheries crime: A case study of United States v Bengis, 2013’ (2019) 105 Marine Policy, 151-157 Google Scholar öffnen
  120. J Gonzalez, ‘Putting the Illegal Wildlife Trade in the Crosshairs: How the Global Conservation Crisis Demonstrates the Need for Lacey Act Enforcement of Foreign Laws’ (2016) 41(1) William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review, 321-347 Google Scholar öffnen
  121. C Goodman, ‘Strength through Cooperation: A 21st Century Treaty for Multilateral Maritime Enforcement in the Pacific’ (2013) 31 Australian Yearbook of International Law, 11-40 Google Scholar öffnen
  122. C Goodman, ‘Rights, Obligations, Prohibitions: A Practical Guide to Understanding Judicial Decisions on Coastal State Jurisdiction over Living Resources in the Exclusive Economic Zone’ (2018) 33 The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 558-584 Google Scholar öffnen
  123. J Gruenberg, ‘An Analysis of United Nations Security Council Resolutions: Are All Countries Treated Equally?’ (2009) 41(2) Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 469-511 Google Scholar öffnen
  124. S Guggisberg, ‘The roles of nongovernmental actors in improving compliance with fisheries regulations’ (2019) 28(3) Review of European, Comparative and International Environmental Law, 1-14 Google Scholar öffnen
  125. D Guilfoyle, ‘The High Seas’ in Rothwell et al, The Oxford Handbook, 203-225 Google Scholar öffnen
  126. G Handl, ‘Flag State Responsibility for Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing in Foreign EEZs’ (2014) 44(1-2) Environmental Policy and Law, 158-171 Google Scholar öffnen
  127. J Harrison, ‘Safeguards against Enforcement Measures in the Economic Zone’, in H Ringbom (ed), Jurisdiction over Ships, 217-248 Google Scholar öffnen
  128. J Harrison, ‘Article 68: Sedentary Species’ in Proelss, UNCLOS Commentary, 540-543 Google Scholar öffnen
  129. J Harrison, ‘Article 69: Right of land-locked States’ in Proelss, UNCLOS Commentary, 543-548 Google Scholar öffnen
  130. J Harrison, ‘Article 70: ‘Right of geographically disadvantaged States’ in Proelss, UNCLOS Commentary, 548-552 Google Scholar öffnen
  131. J Harrison, ‘Article 73: Enforcement of laws and regulations of the coastal State’ in Proelss, UNCLOS Commentary, 556-563 Google Scholar öffnen
  132. J Harrison and E Morgera, ‘Article 61: Conservation of the living resources’ in Proelss, UNCLOS Commentary, 480-493 Google Scholar öffnen
  133. J Harrison and E Morgera, ‘Article 62: Utilization of the living resources’ in Proelss, UNCLOS Commentary, 493-506 Google Scholar öffnen
  134. T Henriksen, ‘Revisiting the Freedom of Fishing and Legal Obligations on States Not Party to Regional Fisheries Management Organisations’ (2009) 40(1) Ocean Development and International Law, 80-96 Google Scholar öffnen
  135. T Henriksen and A Hoel, ‘Determining Allocation: From Paper to Practice in the Distribution of Fishing Rights between Countries’ (2011) 42(1) Ocean Development and International Law, 66-93 Google Scholar öffnen
  136. J Higashi, ‘The Role of Resolutions of the United Nations General Assembly in the Formative Process of International Customary Law’ (1982) 25 Japanese Annual of International Law, 11-25 Google Scholar öffnen
  137. A Honniball, ‘What’s in a Duty? EU Identification of Non-cooperating Port States and Their Prescriptive Responses’ (2020) 35 The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 19-54 Google Scholar öffnen
  138. A Honniball, ‘Engaging Asian States on Combating IUU Fishing: The Curious Case of the State of Nationality in EU Regulation and Practice’ (2021) 10(3) Transnational Environmental Law, 543-569 Google Scholar öffnen
  139. A Honniball and V Schatz, ‘“Nationals” at Forty: From an Undefined UNCLOS Term to Due Diligence Obligations on the State of Nationality to Combat IUU Fishing’ (2023) 100 International Law Studies Series. US Naval War College, 229-265 Google Scholar öffnen
  140. G Hosch, B Soule, M Schofield et al, ‘Any Port in a Storm: Vessel Activity and the Risk of IUU-Caught Fish Passing through the World’s Most Important Fishing Ports’ (2019) 6(1) Journal of Ocean and Coastal Economics, 1-48 Google Scholar öffnen
  141. International Law Commission, ‘Articles concerning the Law of the Sea with commentaries’ (1956) 2 Yearbook of the International Law Commission, 265-301 Google Scholar öffnen
  142. International Law Commission, ‘Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts’ (2001) II(2) Yearbook of the International Law Commission, 31-142 Google Scholar öffnen
  143. International Law Commission, ‘Draft articles on Prevention of Transboundary Harm from Hazardous Activities, with commentaries’ (2001) II(2) Yearbook of the International Law Commission, 148-170 Google Scholar öffnen
  144. International Law Commission, ‘Draft Articles on Diplomatic Protection with commentary’ (2006) II(2) Yearbook of the International Law Commission, 26-55 Google Scholar öffnen
  145. D Ireland-Piper, ‘Extraterritorial Criminal Jurisdiction: Does the Long Arm of the Law Undermine the Rule of Law?’ (2012) 13 Melbourne Journal of International Law, 122-157 Google Scholar öffnen
  146. D Ireland-Piper, ‘Prosecutions of Extraterritorial Criminal Conduct and the Abuse of Rights Doctrine’ (2013) 9(4) Utrecht Law Review, 68-89 Google Scholar öffnen
  147. Y Ishii, ‘The ‘Due Regard’ Obligation and the Peaceful and Economic Uses of the EEZ other than Fisheries’ (2019) 34 The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 73-88 Google Scholar öffnen
  148. T Jianye, ‘The Agreement on Port State Measures: A Commentary’ (2009) 2 China Oceans Law Review, 312-334 Google Scholar öffnen
  149. D Johnson, ‘The Effect of Resolutions of the General Assembly of the United Nations’ (1955-1956) 32 British Yearbook of International Law, 97-122 Google Scholar öffnen
  150. C Joyner, ‘Compliance and Enforcement in New International Fisheries Law’ (1998) 12 Temple International & Comparative Law Journal, 271-300 Google Scholar öffnen
  151. L Juda, ‘The Exclusive Economic Zone: Compatibility of National Claims and the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea’ (1986) 16(1) Ocean Development & International Law, 1-58 Google Scholar öffnen
  152. W Kalaidjian, ‘Fishing for Solutions: The European Union’s Fisheries Partnership Agreements with West African Coastal State in an Exploited Ocean’ (2010) 24(1) Emory International Law Review, 389-432 Google Scholar öffnen
  153. J Kateka, ‘United Republic of Tanzania’ in United Nations, United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea at Thirty – Reflections, 125-126 Google Scholar öffnen
  154. S Kao, ‘International Actions against IUU Fishing and the Adoption of National Plans of Action’ (2015) 46(1) Ocean Development & International Law, 2-16 Google Scholar öffnen
  155. B Keulen and E Gritter, ‘Corporate Criminal Liability in the Netherlands’, in M Pieth and R Ivory (eds), Corporate Criminal Liability, 177-191 Google Scholar öffnen
  156. C Kreß, ‘Nulla poena nullum crimen sine lege’ in A Peters and R Wolfrum (eds), Max Planck Encyclopedia for Public International Law Google Scholar öffnen
  157. T Krost, ‘The World’s Laws in American Justice: The Foreign Law Provisions of the 2008 Lacey Act Amendments’ (2013) 8(1) Pittsburgh Journal of Environmental and Public Health Law, 55-79 Google Scholar öffnen
  158. J de La Cuesta, ‘Concurrent National and International Criminal Jurisdiction and the Principle ‘Ne Bis In Idem’ General Report’ (2002) 73(2) Revue internationale de droit pénal, 707-736 Google Scholar öffnen
  159. T Lampert, ‘Stopping illegal fishing and seafood fraudsters: The presidential task force’s plan on tackling IUU fishing and seafood fraud’ (2017) 58(5) Boston College Law Review, 1629-1658 Google Scholar öffnen
  160. G Lande, ‘The Effect of the Resolutions of the United Nations General Assembly’ (1966) 19(1) World Politics, 83-105 Google Scholar öffnen
  161. N Lanzoni, ‘The Authority of ICJ Advisory Opinions as Precedents: The Mauritius/Maldives Case’ (2022) 2 The Italian Review of International and Comparative Law, 296-322 Google Scholar öffnen
  162. K Leigh, ‘Liability for Damage to the Global Commons’ (1992) 14 Australian Yearbook of International Law, 129-156 Google Scholar öffnen
  163. J Lelieur, ‘Transnationalising’ Ne Bis In Idem: How the Rule of Ne Bis In Idem Reveals the Principle of Personal Legal Certainty’ (2013) 9(4) Utrecht Law Review, 198-210 Google Scholar öffnen
  164. A Leroy, F Galletti and C Chaboud, ‘The EU restrictive trade measures against IUU fishing’ (2016) 54 Marine Policy, 82-90 Google Scholar öffnen
  165. C Lewerenz and J Vorrath, ‘Illegal Fishing and Maritime Security- Towards a Land- and Sea-based Response to Threats in West Africa’ (2015) 2 SWP Comments, 1-4 Google Scholar öffnen
  166. R Liivoja, ‘Service Jurisdiction under International Law’ (2010) 11 Melbourne Journal of International Law, 1-29 Google Scholar öffnen
  167. M Lodge and S Nandan, ‘Some Suggestions towards Better Implementation of the United Nations Agreement on Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migration Fish Stocks of 1995’ (2005) 20(3-4) The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 345-380 Google Scholar öffnen
  168. G Lugten, ‘The FAO Global Record of Fishing Vessels: Issues for Pacific Island States and the Forum Fisheries Agency’ in Q Hanich and B Tsamenyi (eds), Navigating Pacific Fisheries, 104-125 Google Scholar öffnen
  169. Y Lyons, D Cheong, M Lin Neo and H Fung Wong, ‘Managing Giant Clams in the South China Sea’ (2018) 33 The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 467-494 Google Scholar öffnen
  170. X Ma, ‘An economic and legal analysis of trade measures against illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing’ (2020) 117 Marine Policy, 1-13 Google Scholar öffnen
  171. M Mackay, B Hardesty and C Wilcox, ‘The Intersection Between Illegal Fishing, Crimes at Sea, and Social Well-Being’ (2020) 7 Frontiers in Marine Science, Article 589000 Google Scholar öffnen
  172. S Maljean-Dubois, ‘The No-Harm Principle as the Foundation of International Climate Law’ in Mayer and Zahar (eds), Debating Climate Law, 15-28 Google Scholar öffnen
  173. J Maillart, ‘The limits of subjective territorial jurisdiction in the context of cybercrime’ (2019) 19 ERA Forum, 375-390 Google Scholar öffnen
  174. T Mallory, ‘China’s distant water fishing industry: Evolving policies and implications’ (2013) 38 Marine Policy, 99-108 Google Scholar öffnen
  175. A Marcopoulos, ‘Flags of terror: An argument for rethinking maritime security policy regarding flags of convenience’ (2007) 32(1) Tulane Maritime Law Journal, 277-312 Google Scholar öffnen
  176. N Matz-Lück and J Fuchs, ‘Marine Living Resources’ in Rothwell et al, The Oxford Handbook, 491-515 Google Scholar öffnen
  177. V Mayer Feitosa Ventura, ‘Tackling Illegal, Unregulated and Unreported Fishing: The ITLOS Advisory Opinion on Flag State Responsibility for IUU Fishing and the Principle of Due Diligence’ (2015) 12 Brazilian Journal of International Law, 50-67 Google Scholar öffnen
  178. M McConnell, ‘Darkening Confusion Mounted upon Darkening Confusion: The Search for the Elusive Genuine Link’ (1985) 16(3) Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce, 365-396 Google Scholar öffnen
  179. M McConnell and E Gold, ‘The Modern Law of the Sea: Framework for the Protection and Preservation of the Marine Environment’ (1991) 23(1) Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 83-106 Google Scholar öffnen
  180. T McDorman, ‘Stateless Fishing Vessels, International Law and the U.N. High Seas Fisheries Conference’ (1994) 25(4) Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce, 531-556 Google Scholar öffnen
  181. K Meyer, ‘Restitution and the Lacey Act: New Solutions, Old Remedies’ (2008) 93(4) Cornell Law Review, 849-871 Google Scholar öffnen
  182. A Miller, S Bush and A Mol, ‘Power Europe: EU and the illegal, unreported and unregulated tuna fisheries regulation in the West and Central Pacific Ocean’ (2014) 45 Marine Policy, 138-145 Google Scholar öffnen
  183. A Mills, ‘Rethinking Jurisdiction in International Law’ (2014) 84(1) The British Yearbook of International Law, 187-239 Google Scholar öffnen
  184. E Molenaar and M Tsamenyi, ‘Satellite-based vessel monitoring systems for fisheries management: International legal aspects’ (2000) 15(1) The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 65-110 Google Scholar öffnen
  185. C Mooradian, ‘Protecting Sovereign Rights: The Case for Increased Coastal State Jurisdiction over Vessel-Source Pollution in the Exclusive Economic Zone’ (2002) 82(3) Boston University Law Review, 767-816 Google Scholar öffnen
  186. J Mossop, ‘Can We Make the Oceans Greener: The Successes and Failures of UNCLOS as an Environmental Treaty’ (2018) 49(4) Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 573-593 Google Scholar öffnen
  187. C Musto and E Papastavridis, ‘Tackling Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing through Port State Measures’ (2021) 22(2) Melbourne Journal of International Law, 259-307 Google Scholar öffnen
  188. R Nanima, ‘The Prevention of Organised Crime Act 1998: The Need for Extraterritorial Jurisdiction to Prosecute the Higher Echelons of Those Involved in Rhino Poaching’ (2019) 22(1) Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 1-46 Google Scholar öffnen
  189. T Ndiaye, ‘Illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing: Responses in General and in West Africa’ (2011) 10(2) Chinese Journal of International Law, 373-406 Google Scholar öffnen
  190. G Oanta, ‘Illegal fishing as a criminal act at sea’ in E Papastavridis and K Trapp (eds), La Criminalité en Mer/Crimes at Sea, 149-197 Google Scholar öffnen
  191. G Oanta, ‘Spain’s Action to Control and Suppress Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing: Current Status and Future Prospects’ (2019) 34 The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 642-667 Google Scholar öffnen
  192. G Oduntan, ‘Access to justice in international courts for indigent states, persons and people’ (2018) 58(3) Indian Journal of International Law, 265-325 Google Scholar öffnen
  193. I Okafor-Yarwood, ‘Illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing, and the complexities of the sustainable development goals (SDGs) for countries in the Gulf of Guinea’ (2019) 99 Marine Policy, 414-422 Google Scholar öffnen
  194. I Okafor-Yarwood, ‘The Cyclical Nature of Maritime Security Threats: Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated Fishing as a Threat to Human and National Security in the Gulf of Guinea’ (2020) 13(2) African Security, 116-146 Google Scholar öffnen
  195. R Olaoluwa, ‘Maritime Security Issues in the Gulf of Guinea’ (2023) 4 International Journal of Law and Clinical Legal Education, 119-129 Google Scholar öffnen
  196. J O’Sullivan, ‘The Extraterritorial Application of Federal Criminal Statutes: Analytical Roadmap, Normative Conclusions, and a Plea to Congress for Direction’ (2018) 106 The Georgetown Law Journal, 1021-1096 Google Scholar öffnen
  197. J Park, J Van Osdel, J Turner et al, ‘Tracking elusive and shifting identities of the global fishing fleet’ (2023) 9(3) Science Advances, 1-10 Google Scholar öffnen
  198. C Parks Gilbert III, ‘The Lacey Act: A Vintage Conservation Tool Still Vital in Today’s Global Economy’ (2015) 29(3) Natural Resources & Environment, 3-6 Google Scholar öffnen
  199. D Pauly, D Belhabib and R Blomeyer, ‘China’s distant water fisheries in the 21st century’ (2014) 15 Fish and Fisheries, 474-488 Google Scholar öffnen
  200. C Payne, ‘Environmental Impact Assessment as a Duty under International Law: The International Court of Justice Judgment on Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay’ (2010) 3(1) European Journal of Risk Regulation, 317-324 Google Scholar öffnen
  201. T Payne, ‘Teaching Old Law New Tricks: Applying and Adapting State Responsibility to Cyber Operations’ (2016) 20(2) Lewis & Clark Law Review, 683-715 Google Scholar öffnen
  202. I Plakokefalos, ‘Current Developments International Court of Justice’ (2011) 26(1) The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 169-183 Google Scholar öffnen
  203. E Podgor, ‘“Defensive Territoriality”: A New Paradigm for the Prosecution of Extraterritorial Business Crimes’ (2002) 31(1) Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, 1-30 Google Scholar öffnen
  204. A Proelss, ‘Article 55: Specific legal regime of the exclusive economic zone’ in Proelss, UNCLOS Commentary, 408-418 Google Scholar öffnen
  205. A Proelss, ‘Article 56: Rights, jurisdiction and duties of the coastal State in the exclusive economic zone’ in Proelss, UNCLOS Commentary, 418-437 Google Scholar öffnen
  206. A Proelss, ‘Article 58: Rights and duties of other States in the exclusive economic zone’ in Proelss, UNCLOS Commentary, 444-457 Google Scholar öffnen
  207. S Putri, ‘State Responsibility on the IUU Fishing: the Reflection of the 2015 ITLOS Advisory Opinion on IUU Fishing and its Relevance to Indonesia’ (2018) 2 Indonesia Law Review, 221-238 Google Scholar öffnen
  208. R Rayfuse, ‘To our Children’s Children: From promoting to Achieving Compliance in High Seas Fisheries’ (2005) 20 The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 509-532 Google Scholar öffnen
  209. R Rayfuse, ‘Regional Fisheries Management Organisations’ in Rothwell et al, The Oxford Handbook, 439-462 Google Scholar öffnen
  210. R Rayfuse, ‘Article 117: Duty of States to adopt with respect to their nationals, measures for the conservation of living resources of the high seas’ in Proelss, UNCLOS Commentary, 803-817 Google Scholar öffnen
  211. C Redgwell, ‘Treaty Evolution, Adaptation and Change: Is the LOSC ‘Enough’ to Address Climate Change Impacts on the Marine Environment?’ (2019) 34 The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 440-457 Google Scholar öffnen
  212. R Roland Holst, ‘Taking the current when it serves: Prospects and challenges for an ITLOS advisory opinion on oceans and climate change’ (November 2022) Review of European, Comparative and International Environmental Law, 1-9 Google Scholar öffnen
  213. M Rosello, ‘Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing Control in the Exclusive Economic Zone: a Brief Appraisal of Regulatory Deficits and Accountability Strategies’ (2016) XXII(75) Croatian International Relations Review, 39-68 Google Scholar öffnen
  214. T Ruys and A Soete, ‘‘Creeping’ Advisory Jurisdiction of International Courts and Tribunals? The case of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea’ (2016) 29 Leiden Journal of International Law, 155-176 Google Scholar öffnen
  215. C Ryngaert, ‘The Concept of Jurisdiction in International Law’ in Orakhelashvili (ed), Research Handbook on Jurisdiction and Immunities in International Law, 50-75 Google Scholar öffnen
  216. J Sanchez, ‘The Present and Future of the 2022 WTO Agreement on Fisheries Subsidies’ (2022) 55(1) New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 165-178 Google Scholar öffnen
  217. Z Scanlon, ‘Upsetting the Balance? The Legality of Vessel Confiscation under the LOSC after the M/V Virginia G Case’ (2018) 33 The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 166-198 Google Scholar öffnen
  218. V Schatz, ‘Combating Illegal Fishing in the Exclusive Economic Zone – Flag State Obligations in the Context of the Primary Responsibility in the Coastal State’ (2016) 7(2) Goettingen Journal of International Law, 383-414 Google Scholar öffnen
  219. V Schatz, ‘Fishing for Interpretation: The ITLOS Advisory Opinion on Flag State Responsibility for Illegal Fishing in the EEZ’ (2016) 47 Ocean Development & International Law, 327-345 Google Scholar öffnen
  220. M Schmitt and S Watts, ‘Beyond State-Centrism: International Law and Non-State Actors in Cyberspace’ (2016) 21(3) Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 595-611 Google Scholar öffnen
  221. S Schwebel, ‘The Effect of Resolutions of the U.N. General Assembly on Customary International Law’ (1979) 73 American Society of International Law Proceedings, 301-309 Google Scholar öffnen
  222. L Seokwoo and B Lowell, ‘Part XII of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and the Duty to Mitigate against Climate Change: Making out a Claim, Causation, and Related Issues’ (2018) 45(1) Ecology Law Quarterly, 129-156 Google Scholar öffnen
  223. A Serdy, ‘The shaky foundations of the FAO Port State Measures Agreement: how watertight is the legal seal against port access for foreign fishing vessels?’ (2016) 31 The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 422-441 Google Scholar öffnen
  224. S Shackelford, S Russell and A Kuehn, ‘Unpacking the International Law on Cybersecurity Due Diligence: Lessons from the Public and Private Sectors’ (2016) 17(1) Chicago Journal of International Law, 1-50 Google Scholar öffnen
  225. H Shen and S Huang, ‘China’s policies and practice on combatting IUU in distant water fisheries’ (2021) 6(1) Aquaculture and Fisheries, 27-34 Google Scholar öffnen
  226. J Shepard, ‘Lacey Act: Extraterritorial Application Based on an Antitrust Paradigm’ (1992) 29(1) The San Diego Law Review, 67-92 Google Scholar öffnen
  227. D Siebels, ‘Pirates, Smugglers and Corrupt Officials – Maritime Security in East and West Africa’ (2020) 1(1) International Journal of Maritime Crime & Security, 34-49 Google Scholar öffnen
  228. J Sobrino Heredia and G Oanta, ‘The Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreements of the European Union and the Objectives of the Common Fisheries Policy: Fisheries and/or Development?’ (2015) 19 Spanish Yearbook of International Law, 61-85 Google Scholar öffnen
  229. D Sodik, ‘Non-Legally Binding International Fisheries Instruments and Measures to Combat Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing’ (2008) 15(1) Australian International Law Journal, 129-164 Google Scholar öffnen
  230. M Sorensen, ‘Law of the Sea’ (1958) 32 International Conciliation, 195-256 Google Scholar öffnen
  231. A Standing, ‘Corruption and state-corporate crime in fisheries’ (2015) 15 www.u4.no, 1-25 (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  232. A Standing, ‘Criminality in Africa’s Fishing Industry: A Threat to Human Security’ Africa Security Brief, Africa Center for Strategic Studies, June 2017, 1-12 Google Scholar öffnen
  233. A Stefanus and J Vervaele, ‘Fishy business: regulatory and enforcement challenges of transnational organised IUU fishing crimes’ (2021) 24 Trends in Organised Crime, 581-604 Google Scholar öffnen
  234. U Sumaila, D Zeller, L Hood et al, ‘Illicit trade in marine fish catch and its effects on ecosystems and people worldwide’ (2020) 6(9) Science Advances, 1-7 Google Scholar öffnen
  235. J Swan, ‘Port State Measures - From Residual Port State Jurisdiction to Global Standards’ (2016) 31(3) The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 395-421 Google Scholar öffnen
  236. A Tahindro, ‘Conservation and Management of Transboundary Fish Stocks: Comments in Light of the Adoption of the 1995 Agreement for the Conservation and management of Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks’ (1997) 28 Ocean Development and International Law, 1-58 Google Scholar öffnen
  237. A Takano, ‘Due Diligence Obligations and Transboundary Environmental Harm: Cybersecurity Applications’ (2018) 7(36) Laws, 1-12 Google Scholar öffnen
  238. A Telesetsky, ‘Laundering fish in the global undercurrents: Illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing and transnational organised crime’ (2014) 41(4) Ecology Law Quarterly, 939-996 Google Scholar öffnen
  239. A Telesetsky, ‘Scuttling IUU Fishing and Rewarding Sustainable Fishing: Enhancing the Effectiveness of the Port State Measures Agreement with Trade-Related Measures’ (2015) 38 Seattle University Law Review, 1237-1270 Google Scholar öffnen
  240. A Telesetsky¸ ‘U.S. Seafood Traceability as Food Law and the Future of Marine Fisheries’ (2017) 47 Environmental Law, 765-795 Google Scholar öffnen
  241. D Tickler, J Meeuwig, M Palomares et al, ‘Far from Home: Distance Patterns of Global Fishing Fleets’ (2018) 4 Science Advances, 1-6 Google Scholar öffnen
  242. T Treves, ‘Historical Development of the Law of the Sea’ in Rothwell et al, The Oxford Handbook, 1-23 Google Scholar öffnen
  243. T Treves, ‘Flags of Convenience before the Law of the Sea Tribunal’ (2004) 6(1) San Diego International Law Journal, 179-190 Google Scholar öffnen
  244. S Trevisanut, ‘Twenty Years of Prompt Release of Vessels: Admissibility, Jurisdiction, and Recent Trends’ (2017) 48(3-4) Ocean Development & International Law, 300-312 Google Scholar öffnen
  245. K Trümpler, ‘Article 8: Internal Waters’ in Proelss, UNCLOS Commentary, 84-96 Google Scholar öffnen
  246. M Tsamenyi, M Palma, B Milligan et al, ‘The European Council Regulation on Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing: An International Fisheries Law Perspective’ (2010) 25(1) The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 5-32 Google Scholar öffnen
  247. O Urrutia, ‘Combating unregulated fishing through unilateral trade measures: time for change in international fisheries law’ (2018) 49(4) Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 671-696 Google Scholar öffnen
  248. P Vrancken, ‘State jurisdiction to investigate and try fisheries crime at sea’ (2019) 105 Marine Policy, 129-139 Google Scholar öffnen
  249. D Warner-Kramer, ‘Control Begins at Home: Tackling Flags of Convenience and IUU Fishing’ (2004) 34 Golden Gate University Law Review, 497-530 Google Scholar öffnen
  250. D Warner-Kramer and K Canty, ‘Stateless Fishing Vessels; The Current International Regime and a New Approach’ (2000) 5 Ocean and Coastal Law Journal, 227-243 Google Scholar öffnen
  251. G Watson, ‘Offenders Abroad: The Case for Nationality Based Criminal Jurisdiction’ (1998) 17(1) Yale Journal of International Law, 41-84 Google Scholar öffnen
  252. P van Welzen, ‘São Tomé & Príncipe: Sinking of F/V Thunder’ (2017) 1 Journal of Ocean Law and Governance in Africa, 56-74 Google Scholar öffnen
  253. P van Welzen, ‘Mending the Net: State Responsibility for Nationals Engaged in IUU Fishing? in Platjouw and Pozdnakova (eds), The Environmental Rule of Law for Oceans: Designing Legal Solutions, 223-235 Google Scholar öffnen
  254. M White, ‘Overcriminalization Based on Foreign Law: How the Lacey Act Incorporates Foreign Law to Overcriminalize Importers and Users of Timber Products’ (2013) 12(2) Washington University Global Studies Law Review, 381-402 Google Scholar öffnen
  255. E Witbooi, ‘Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing on the High Seas: The Port State Measures Agreement in Context’ (2014) 29(2) The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 290-320 Google Scholar öffnen
  256. K Wojnar, ‘Shark Laws with Teeth: How Deep can U.S. Conservation Laws Cut into Global Trade Regulations’ (2012) 19(1) Animal Law, 185-212 Google Scholar öffnen
  257. K Wyman, ‘Unilateral Steps to End High Seas Fishing’ (2018) 6(1) Texas A&M Law Review, 259-296 Google Scholar öffnen
  258. M Yusuf, A Raza, Muhadar and M Karim, ‘Legal Effectiveness in Combating Illegal Fishing’ (2018) 72 Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization, 66-79 Google Scholar öffnen
  259. R Zakaria, ‘Follow The Money Approach in the Management of Fishing Criminals by Fisheries PPNS’ (2020) 4 Lex Scientia Law Review, 103-118 Google Scholar öffnen
  260. Africa Defense Forum, Environmental Groups Lead Charge Against Illegal Fishing (13 January 2021) (https://adf-magazine.com/2021/01/environmental-groups-lead-charge-against-illegal-fishing/) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  261. Africa Defense Forum, New Study Tracks Foreign Ownership of Fishing Vessels (10 February 2023) (https://adf-magazine.com/2023/02/new-study-tracks-foreign-ownership-of-fishing-vessels/)(accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  262. D Agnew and C Barnes, Economic Aspects and Drivers of IUU Fishing: Building a Framework (Paris: OECD Secretariat, 2004) (AGR/FI/IUU(2004)) Google Scholar öffnen
  263. K Alexander, The Lacey Act: Protecting the Environment by Restricting Trade (Washington DC: Congressional Research Service, 2014) (https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/R42067.pdf) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  264. Anon, Sea Shepherd Launches Operation Sola Stella with Three Arrests (Sea Shepherd, 23 February 2017) (https://www.seashepherdglobal.org/latest-news/sea-shepherd-launches-operation-sola-stella-with-t/) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  265. Anon, “Sustainable” Shrimp Trawler Arrested in Liberia (The Maritime Executive, 22 March 2017) (https://www.maritime-executive.com/article/sustainable-shrimp-trawler-arrested-in-liberia) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  266. Anon, Sea Shepherd assists Liberian Coast Guard in arrest of notorious internationally blacklisted vessel for illegal fishing (Sea Shepherd, 23 November 2017) (https://www.seashepherdglobal.org/latest-news/sola-stella-blacklisted-illegal-fishing) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  267. Anon, Finning Operation Busted in The Gambia (Sea Shepherd, 20 January 2020) (https://www.seashepherdglobal.org/latest-news/finning-operation-gambia/#:~:text=During%20a%20routine%20inspection%2C%2054,Atlantide%201%20in%20The%20Gambia.) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  268. M Ansell, E Chu, W Emam et al, Research for PECH Committee – Role and impact of China on world fisheries and aquaculture (Brussels: European Parliament, Policy Department for Structural and Cohesion Policies, 2022) Google Scholar öffnen
  269. AUC-NEPAD, The Policy Framework and Reform Strategy for Fisheries and Aquaculture in Africa (Addis Ababa: African Union, 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  270. Australia, Department of Agriculture, Australia’s Second National Plan of Action to Prevent, Deter and Eliminate Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing (2014) (https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/sitecollectiondocuments/fisheries/iuu/aus-second-npoa-iuu-fishing.pdf) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  271. Australian Government Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Australia’s National Plan of Action to Prevent, Deter and Eliminate Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing (2005) (https://epub.sub.uni-hamburg.de/epub/volltexte/2011/2750/) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  272. H Baumüller, Combating Illegal Fishing in the EU: Interaction with WTO Rules (London: The Royal Institute of International Affairs, 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  273. R Beckman and T Davenport, ‘The EEZ Regime: Reflections after 30 Years’ in H Scheiber and M Kwon (eds), Securing the Ocean for the Next Generation (Papers from the Law of the Sea Institute, UC Berkeley– Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology Conference, 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  274. M Beke and R Blomeyer, Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing: Sanctions in the EU (Brussels: European Parliament (Directorate-General for Internal Policies), 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  275. BirdLife Europe, CFFA, WWF et al, Joint position Paper: 10 Priorities for the Future of Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreements (2020) (https://wwfeu.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/ble_cffa_wwf_sfpa10keyrecommendations_en.pdf) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  276. R Blomeyer, I Goulding, D Pauly et al, The role of China in World Fisheries (Brussel: European Union, 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  277. P Bondaroff and N Teale, The Illegal Fishing and Organised Crime Nexus: Illegal Fishing as Transnational Organised Crime (Geneva: The Global Initiative Against Transnational Organised Crime and The Black Fish, 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  278. A Brush, Strings Attached - Exploring the Onshore Networks behind Illegal, Unreported, & Unregulated Fishing (New York: C4ADS, 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  279. L Burroughs and R Mazurek, Maritime Security in the Indian Ocean: Perceived Threats, Impacts, and Solutions (Caught Red-Handed Brief, One Earth Future, 2019) (https://securefisheries.org/sites/default/files/caught-red-handed-maritime-security-indian-ocean.pdf) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  280. P Cacaud, M Kuruc and M Spreij, Administrative sanctions in fisheries law – FAO Legislative Studies 82 (Rome: FAO, 2003) Google Scholar öffnen
  281. California Environmental Associates, Distant Water Fishing Overview of Research Efforts and Current Knowledge (2018) (https://www.ceaconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/DWF-Research-Summary-Oct-2018pptx.pdf) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  282. ClientEarth, Slipping through the net: The control and enforcement of fisheries in France, Ireland, the Netherlands, Poland, Spain and the UK (England) (Brussel: ClientEarth, undated) (https://www.clientearth.org/media/1rcczhlw/slipping-through-the-net-the-control-and-enforcement-of-fisheries-in-france-ireland-the-netherlands-poland-spain-and-the-uk-england-ce-en.pdf) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  283. A Daniels, M Gutiérrez, G Fanjul et al, Western Africa’s missing fish: The impacts of illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing and under-reporting catches by foreign fleets (London: Overseas Development Institute, 2016) (https://odi.org/documents/5275/Western_Africas_missing_fish.pdf) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  284. C Delpeuch, Combatting Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing - Where countries stand and where efforts should concentrate in the future (Paris: OECD, 2018 (TAD/FI(2017)16/FINAL)) Google Scholar öffnen
  285. D Doulman, The Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries: The Requirement for Structural Change and Adjustment in the Fisheries Sector (Rome: FAO Fisheries Department, 1998) Google Scholar öffnen
  286. S Dukic and M Zerini, Port State Measures Agreement: Tackling IUU fishing through inspections (London: Vertic, 2017) (http://www.vertic.org/media/assets/Publications/VB28.pdf) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  287. C Dutoit, Hout Bay and the illegal lobster trade: a case study in recovering illicit proceeds of IUU fishing and wildlife trafficking (Basel: Basel Institute on Governance, 2021) (https://baselgovernance.org/sites/default/files/2021-03/210329%20Hout%20Bay%20case%20study_0.pdf) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  288. Environmental Justice Foundation, China’s hidden fleet in West Africa: A spotlight on illegal practices within Ghana’s industrial trawl sector (London: Environmental Justice Foundation, 2018) (https://ejfoundation.org/resources/downloads/China-hidden-fleet-briefing-v2.pdf) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  289. Environmental Justice Foundation, Out of the shadows. Improving transparency in global fisheries to stop illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (London: Environmental Justice Foundation, 2018) (https://ejfoundation.org/resources/downloads/Transparency-report-final.pdf) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  290. Environmental Justice Foundation, The “people’s” fishery on the brink of collapse. Small pelagics in landings of Ghana’s industrial trawl fleet (London: Environmental Justice Foundation, 2020) (https://ejfoundation.org/resources/downloads/EJF-report-small-pelagics-2020-final.pdf) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  291. Environmental Justice Foundation, Oceana, The Nature Conservancy, The Pew Charitable Trusts and WWF, A comparative study of key data elements in import control schemes aimed at tackling illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing in the top three seafood markets: the European Union, the United States and Japan (2020) (https://www.iuuwatch.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/CDS-Study-WEB.pdf) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  292. European Commission, EU Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreements (Brussels: European Commission, 2020) (https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/1356ec43-99b7-11ea-aac4-01aa75ed71a1) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  293. European Commission, Report from The Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 establishing a community system to prevent, deter and eliminate illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing (the IUU Regulation) (9 December, 2020; COM(2020) 772 final) Google Scholar öffnen
  294. European Commission, Commission Staff Working Document Impact Assessment Accompanying the document Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009, and amending Council Regulations (EC) No 768/2005, (EC) No 1967/2006, (EC) No 1005/2008, and Regulation (EU) No 2016/1139 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards fisheries controls (SWD/2018/280 final) Google Scholar öffnen
  295. European Court of Auditors, Special report - EU action to combat illegal fishing -Control systems in place but weakened by uneven checks and sanctions by member states (Luxembourg: European Union, 2022) Google Scholar öffnen
  296. European Union, Ocean and Fisheries, Illegal Fishing (undated) (https://ec.europa.eu/oceans-and-fisheries/fisheries/rules/illegal-fishing_en) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  297. P Failler, Consultancy to conduct a review of previous and current fisheries agreements concluded by some African Union Member States (African Union: Inter African Bureau for Animal Resources, 2014) (http://repository.au-ibar.org/bitstream/handle/123456789/1321/gi_20160524_au-ibar_faa_west_africa_fr.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  298. FAO, Report of the Twenty-Second Session of the Fishery Committee for the Eastern Central Atlantic (Libreville, 2019) (RAFI/R1303(Bi)) Google Scholar öffnen
  299. FAO Fisheries Department, Implementation of the International Plan of Action to Prevent, Deter and Eliminate Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing. FAO Technical Guidelines for Responsible Fisheries. No. 9 (Rome: FAO, 2002) Google Scholar öffnen
  300. Financial Action Task Force, International Standards on Combating Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism & Proliferation (Paris: Financial Action Task Force, 2012-2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  301. Financial Action Task Force, Guidance on Transparency and Beneficial Ownership (Paris: FATF/OECD, 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  302. Fishery Committee for the Eastern Central Atlantic, Twenty-first Session Dakar, Senegal, 20 – 22 April 2016, Action on Recommendations of the Twentieth Session (Dakar: Fishery Committee for the Eastern Central Atlantic (CECAF), 2016) (CECAF/XXI/2016/2) Google Scholar öffnen
  303. Fishery Committee for the Eastern Central Atlantic, Fisheries Management in the CECAF Region, Status of the elaboration and implementation of fisheries management plans and uptake of CECAF management recommendations by members) (Dakar: Fishery Committee for the Eastern Central Atlantic (CECAF), 2016) (CECAF/XXI/2016/4) Google Scholar öffnen
  304. Fisheries Committee for the West Central Gulf of Guinea, Regional Plan of Action to Prevent, Deter and Eliminate Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated (IUU) Fishing in the Fisheries Committee for the West Central Gulf of Guinea (FCWC) Member Countries (2019-2023) (Tema: Fisheries Committee for the West Central Gulf of Guinea, 2018) Google Scholar öffnen
  305. D French and T Stephens, First Report, ILA Study Group on Due Diligence in International Law (2014) (https://olympereseauinternational.files.wordpress.com/2015/07/due_diligence_-_first_report_2014.pdf) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  306. S Geall, C Gruber, R Lam et al, Charting a Blue Future for Cooperation between West Africa and China on Sustainable Fisheries, (Washington DC: The Stimson Center, 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  307. M Gianni, Real and Present Danger Flag State Failure and Maritime Security and Safety (Oslo/London: World Wide Fund for Nature and International Transport Workers’ Federation, 2008) (https://www.itfglobal.org/sites/default/files/resources-files/flag_state_performance.pdf) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  308. P Girard and T Du Payrat, Issue Paper: An inventory of new technologies in fisheries (Paris: OECD, 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  309. B Gorez, Position Paper- Cameroon and EU Yellow Card: The EU should also sanction European companies hiding behind its flag (Brussels: Coalition for Fair Fisheries Arrangements. 2021) (https://www.cffacape.org/s/210312-Cameroun-position-paper.pdf) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  310. Government of Canada, Canada’s National Plan of Action to Prevent, Deter and Eliminate Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing (2005) (https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/can162287.pdf) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  311. Greenpeace, Africa’s Fisheries’ Paradise at A Crossroads Investigating Chinese Companies’ Illegal Fishing Practices in West Africa (Greenpeace South East Asia/Africa, 2015) (https://ibdigital.uib.es/greenstone/sites/localsite/collect/cd2/index/assoc/gp0147.dir/gp0147.pdf) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  312. Greenpeace Africa, Seasick: As Covid locks down West Africa, its waters remain open to plunder (Johannesburg: Greenpeace Africa, 2020) (https://www.greenpeace.org/static/planet4-africa-stateless/2020/10/7fef91ec-eng_report_1007.pdf?_ga=2.131629833.728482148.1602177055-2049969189.1602177055) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  313. Greenpeace UK, Ocean Inquirer (London: Greenpeace UK, 2011) (https://www.greenpeace.org/static/planet4-netherlands-stateless/2019/07/059ff019-ocean_inquirer_v10_low_res.pdf) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  314. M Gutiérrez, A Daniels, G Jobbins et al, China’s distant water fishing fleet - Scale, impact and governance (London: ODI, 2020) (https://odi.org/documents/6162/chinesedistantwaterfishing_web.pdf) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  315. G Hosch, Trade Measures to Combat IUU Fishing: Comparative Analysis of Unilateral and Multilateral Approaches (Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD), 2016) (https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Gilles-Hosch/publication/309013233_Trade_Measures_to_Combat_IUU_Fishing_Comparative_Analysis_of_Unilateral_and_Multilateral_Approaches/links/57fe106608aeaf819a5bfd9e/Trade-Measures-to-Combat-IUU-Fishing-Comparative-Analysis-of-Unilateral-and-Multilateral-Approaches.pdf) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  316. B Hutnicza and C Delpeuch, Combatting Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing - Where countries stand and where efforts should concentrate in the future (Paris: OECD, 2018 (TAD/FI(2017)16/FINAL)) Google Scholar öffnen
  317. B Hutniczak, C Delpeuch and A Leroy, Closing Gaps in National Regulations Against IUU Fishing (Paris: OECD Publishing, 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  318. International Institute for Sustainable Development, (2006) 7(59) Earth Negotiations Bulletin Google Scholar öffnen
  319. International Institute for Sustainable Development, (2006) 7(61) Earth Negotiations Bulletin Google Scholar öffnen
  320. International Institute for Sustainable Development, (2010) 7(65) Earth Negotiations Bulletin Google Scholar öffnen
  321. International Transport Workers’ Federation, Flags of Convenience (undated) (https://www.itfglobal.org/en/sector/seafarers/flags-of-convenience) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  322. INTERPOL, Study on Fisheries Crime in the West African Coastal Region (Paris: INTERPOL, 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  323. INTERPOL, International Law Enforcement Cooperation in the Fisheries Sector: A Guide for Law Enforcement Practitioners (Paris: INTERPOL General Secretariat, 2018) Google Scholar öffnen
  324. A Klip and A Massa, Communicerende grondslagen van extraterritoriale rechtsmacht: Onderzoek naar de grondslagen voor extraterritoriale rechtsmacht in België, Duitsland, Engeland en Wales en Nederland met conclusies en aanbevelingen voor de Nederlandse (wetgevings-) praktijk (Den Haag: WODC, 2010) (https://repository.wodc.nl/bitstream/handle/20.500.12832/1720/volledige-tekst_tcm28-70161.pdf?sequence=2) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  325. The Law Commission, Criminal Liability in Regulatory Contexts: a Consultation Paper (London: The Law Commission, 2010) (https://lawcom.gov.uk/document/criminal-liability-in-regulatory-contexts-consultation/) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  326. The Maritime Executive, Spanish long-liner detained over shark fishing ((9 August 2016) (http://www.maritime-executive.com/article/spanish-long-liner-detained-over-shark-fishing) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  327. J Martinsohn, Deterring Illegal Activities in the Fisheries Sector Genetics, Genomics, Chemistry and Forensics to Fight IUU Fishing and in Support of Fish Product Traceability (Luxembourg: European Commission - Joint Research Centre, 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
  328. V Mundy, The impact of the EU IUU Regulation on seafood trade flows: Identification of intra-EU shifts in import trends related to the catch certification scheme and third country carding process (Brussels: Oceana, 2018) (https://www.iuuwatch.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/TDA_report_IUUwatch_HQ.pdf) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  329. National Fisheries and Aquaculture Authority of Liberia, National Plan of Action to Prevent, Deter and Eliminate Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fisheries (2018) (https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/lbr195830.pdf) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  330. NEPAD, Strengthening the Institutional Capacity of the Economic Community of Central African States (ECCAS) (Midrand: NEPAD, 2015) (https://www.nepad.org/file-download/download/public/15621) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  331. North Atlantic Fisheries Intelligence Group, Chasing Red Herrings: Flags of Convenience and the Impact on Fisheries Crime Law Enforcement (Copenhagen: The Nordic Council of Ministers, 2017) (https://norden.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1253427/FULLTEXT01.pdf) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  332. N Noval, The Spanish legal process for prosecuting illegal fishing: A story of success? (Madrid: ClientEarth, 2019) (https://www.clientearth.org/media/cd0jqn3j/the-spanish-legal-process-for-prosecuting-illegal-fishing-a-story-of-success-ce-en.pdf) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  333. J Odom, Europe’s Double Standard for China’s Overfishing (EJIL Talk, 2020) (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID3577628_code1496872.pdf?abstractid=3577628&mirid=1) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  334. OECD, Evading the Net: Tax Crime in the Fisheries Sector (Paris: OECD, 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  335. OECD, Fish piracy: combating illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (Paris: OECD, 2004) Google Scholar öffnen
  336. C Oliver and N Jacobs, Report To Congress Improving International Fisheries Management September 2019 (Washington DC: NOAA Fisheries, 2019) (https://media.fisheries.noaa.gov/dam-migration/improvingintlfisheriesmgmt_2019_report_final.pdf) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  337. Pacific Islands Forum Fisheries Agency, Regional cooperation reduces illegal, unreported & unregulated tuna fishing in Pacific (2021) (https://www.ffa.int/node/2636) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  338. Permanent Mission of Switzerland to the United Nations, The GA Handbook: A practical guide to the United Nations General Assembly (New York: Permanent Mission of Switzerland to the United Nations, 2017, 2nd edition) (https://www.eda.admin.ch/dam/mission-new-york/en/documents/UN_GA__Final.pdf) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  339. The Pew Charitable Trusts, How Interpol’s Project Scale is Changing the Game in Illegal Fishing (2018) (https://www.pewtrusts.org/-/media/assets/2018/04/interpol_project_scale.pdf) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  340. The Pew Charitable Trusts, The Port State Measures Agreement: From Intention to Implementation (2018) (https://www.pewtrusts.org/-/media/assets/2018/04/psma_from-intention-to-implementation.pdf) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  341. M Pincombe, Casting a Neocolonial Net China’s Exploitative Fishing in the Gulf of Guinea (Williamsburg: The Project on International Peace and Security, 2021) Google Scholar öffnen
  342. Poseidon Aquatic Resource Management Ltd., Review of Studies Estimating IUU Fishing and The Methodologies Utilized (FAO, 2016) (http://www.fao.org/3/a-bl765e.pdf) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  343. Republic of Namibia, National plan of action to prevent, deter and eliminate Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing (2007) (https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/nam165163.pdf) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  344. K Rigg, R Parmentier and D Currie, Halting IUU Fishing: Enforcing International Fisheries Agreements (Oceana Report, 2004) (https://oceana.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/18/HaltingIUUFishingEnforcingInternationalFisheriesAgreements.pdf) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  345. S Rinkel, Piracy and Maritime Crime in the Gulf of Guinea: Experience-based Analyses of the Situation and Policy Recommendations (Kiel: Institut für Sicherheitspolitik an der Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  346. C de Rivaz, C Haenlein, A Reid and V Nouwens, Turning the Tide? Learning from Responses to Large-Scale Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing in Five Countries (London: Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies, 2019) (https://static.rusi.org/201911_whr_3-19_turning_the_tide_de_rivaz_web.pdf) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  347. G Rose and M Tsamenyi, Universalizing Jurisdiction over Marine Living Resources Crimes (Gland: World Wide Fund for Nature, 2013) (http://awsassets.panda.org/downloads/wwf_universalised_mlr_crime_jurisdiction_131114_hr_sem.pdf) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  348. St. Kitts and Nevis, Ministry of Agriculture, Marine Resources and Cooperatives, National plan of action to prevent, deter and eliminate Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated (IUU) Fishing (2015) (https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/stk163037.pdf) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  349. Seafish, The Seafish Guide to Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing (IUU) (July 2016) (https://www.seafish.org/document/?id=64546167-9781-464a-a1dd-29bb5e0ef3f0) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  350. A Shaver and S Yozell, Casting a Wider Net: the security implication of illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (Washington DC: Stimson, 2018) (https://www.stimson.org/wp-content/files/file-attachments/Casting%20a%20Wider%20Net%20Report.pdf) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  351. South Korea: Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, National Plan of Action of the Republic of Korea to Prevent, Deter and Eliminate Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing (2014) (https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/kor163041.pdf) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  352. H Stimmler, Sea Shepherd Assists Liberian Coast Guard Against Illegal Fishing (Onboard Online, 29 March 2017) (https://www.onboardonline.com/yacht-industry-news/maritime/sea-shepherd-assists-liberian-coast-guard-against-illegal-fishing/) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  353. Stimson, Shining a Light: The Need for Transparency across Distant Water Fishing (undated) (https://www.stimson.org/wp-content/files/file-attachments/Stimson%20Distant%20Water%20Fishing%20Report.pdf) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  354. J Swan, Fishing Vessels Operating under Open Registers and the Exercise of Flag State Responsibilities - Information and Options (FAO Fisheries Circular No. 980 FIPP/C980, 2002) Google Scholar öffnen
  355. M Taconet, D Kroodsma and J Fernandes, Global Atlas of AIS-based fishing activity - Challenges and opportunities (Rome: FAO, 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  356. Taiwan, Fisheries Agency, Council of Agriculture, National Plan of Action of the Republic of China (Taiwan) to Prevent, Deter and Eliminate Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing (2013) (https://wm.moa.gov.tw/preview_fa/redirect_file.php?theme=Fight_IUU_fisheries&id=936) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  357. I Tani, The control and enforcement of fisheries in Italy (Brussels: ClientEarth, 2018) (https://www.clientearth.org/media/w4uhuurs/the-control-and-enforcement-of-fisheries-in-italy-ce-en.pdf) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  358. Trygg Mat Tracking in cooperation with C4ADS, Spotlight on: The Exploitation of Company Structures by Illegal Fishing Operators (undated) (https://1ae03060-3f06-4a5c-9ac6-b5c1b4a62664.usrfiles.com/ugd/1ae030_4e59a8cf86364c1a83eb385cb57619f7.pdf) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  359. United Nations General Assembly, Report of the Review Conference on the Agreement for the Implementation of the Provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982 relating to the Conservation and Management of Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks (5 July 2006: A/CONF.210/2006/15) Google Scholar öffnen
  360. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Transnational Organised Crime in the Fishing Industry (Vienna: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
  361. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Combating Transnational Organised Crime Committed at Sea (New York: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  362. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Rotten Fish -A Guide to Addressing Corruption in the Fisheries Sector (Vienna: United Nations, 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  363. UN Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea, A Constitution for the Oceans, Remarks by Tommy TB Koh of Singapore, President of the Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea (11 December 1982) Google Scholar öffnen
  364. U.S. Department of State, National Plan of Action of the United States of America to Prevent, Deter, and Eliminate Illegal, Unregulated, and Unreported Fishing (undated) (https://2001-2009.state.gov/documents/organization/43101.pdf) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  365. Vanuatu Department of Fisheries, Vanuatu National Plan of Action to Prevent, Deter and Eliminate Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing (2015) (https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/van167177.pdf) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  366. Veterinarios Sin Fronteras, Pesca ilegal en España (Barcelona: No Et Mengis el Món, 2010) (https://mail.justiciaalimentaria.org/pesca-ilegal-en-espana-suma-y-sigue) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  367. West Africa Task Force, Interagency Cooperation in the FCWC Region (undated) (https://stopillegalfishing.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/WATF_Interagency_Cooperation_in_-the_FCWC_Region_ENG_WEB.pdf) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  368. S Widjaja, T Long, H Wirajuda et al, Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing and Associated Drivers (Washington, DC: World Resources Institute, 2019) (https://oceanpanel.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Illegal-Unreported-and-Unregulated-Fishing-and-Associated-Drivers.pdf) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  369. E Witbooi, K Ali and M Santosa, Organised Crime in the Fisheries Sector (High Level Panel for Sustainable Economy, 2020) (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2913-5.pdf?pdf=button%20sticky) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  370. World Trade Organisation, Agreement on Fisheries Subsidies (undated) (https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/rulesneg_e/fish_e/fish_e.htm (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  371. M Young, Trade-Related Measures to Address Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing (Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, 2015) (https://www0.sun.ac.za/awei/sites/default/files/ICTSDWORLD-ECONOMIC-FORUM2015-Trade-RelatedMeasuresToAddressIllegalUnreportedUnregulatedFishing.pdf.pdf) (accessed 13 November 2023) Google Scholar öffnen

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus dem Schwerpunkt "Umweltrecht & Energierecht & Atomrecht", "Recht allgemein, Übergreifende Werke und Sammlungen", "Europarecht & Internationales Recht & Rechtsvergleichung"
Cover des Buchs: Die Beiträge zu den sondergesetzlichen Wasserverbänden in Nordrhein-Westfalen
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Die Beiträge zu den sondergesetzlichen Wasserverbänden in Nordrhein-Westfalen
Cover des Buchs: Wettbewerbs- und Kartellrecht
Lehrbuch Kein Zugriff
Wettbewerbs- und Kartellrecht
Cover des Buchs: Sportmanagement
Sammelband Kein Zugriff
Praxishandbuch
Sportmanagement
Cover des Buchs: Kartellschadensersatz bei Missbrauch einer beherrschenden Stellung auf den Postmärkten
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Zum Einfluss der Postregulierung auf die parallele Durchsetzung kartellrechtlicher Schadensersatzansprüche
Kartellschadensersatz bei Missbrauch einer beherrschenden Stellung auf den Postmärkten
Cover des Buchs: Collective Compliance Mechanisms in International Law Relating to Marine Pollution
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Collective Compliance Mechanisms in International Law Relating to Marine Pollution

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Feedback geben

Wir freuen uns über Ihr Feedback zu Inhalten und Funktionen. Ihre Nachricht hilft uns, unseren Service stetig zu verbessern.

Bewertung
Bild anhängen
oder hier ablegen
PNG oder JPG (max. 3 MB)

Willkommen auf Inlibra – Ihrer Plattform für digitale Fachinformationen

Nomos, C.H.Beck, VDI und über 100 weitere Verlage bündeln hier ihre Inhalte zu einer der größten Plattformen für digitale Fachinformationen.

Effizient recherchieren, langfristig zitieren, verlässlich nutzen – alles vereint an einem Ort.

Anmelden

Passwort vergessen?
Login via Open Athens
Noch kein Benutzerkonto?
Jetzt registrieren

Publikation zitieren

Download: RIS BibTex