Cover des Buchs: Antitrust and the Multivalued Function of Competition
Im Shop erwerben
, um zu prüfen, ob Sie einen Vollzugriff auf diese Publikation haben.
Monographie Kein Zugriff

Antitrust and the Multivalued Function of Competition

Autor:innen:
Verlag:
 2021

Zusammenfassung

Das Buch bietet einen neuen Ansatz für die Debatte über die Ziele des Kartellrechts. Ausgehend von einer rechtssoziologischen Perspektive begreift es die Konkurrenz als eine Form mit sozialen Funktionen. So ist Konkurrenz keine bloße Ableitung von Effizienz oder Verbraucherwohlfahrt, sondern ein eigenständiges Ziel des Kartellrechts, das Kartell-, einseitige Verhaltens- und Fusionsfälle durchdringt. Nach Tobias Werron ist dies ein „großartiges Stück Gelehrsamkeit (...), das eine Offenheit des Geistes und Unabhängigkeit des Denkens nahelegt”. Celso Campilongo schreibt: „Die Veröffentlichung dieser Arbeit sollte gefeiert werden. Es ist alles andere als trivial oder üblich, (...) eine Soziologie des Kartellrechts zu rekonstruieren“.

Schlagworte

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Auflage
1/2021
Copyrightjahr
2021
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-8313-7
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-2703-7
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe
Recht und Gesellschaft - Law and Society
Band
14
Sprache
Englisch
Seiten
306
Produkttyp
Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Kein Zugriff 1 - 25
      1. i.i.i. Antitrust goals in the origins of antitrust Kein Zugriff
      2. i.i.ii. A “paradox”, a “windy city” and a meaning of “competition” Kein Zugriff
      3. i.i.iii. A contemporary debate Kein Zugriff
      1. i.ii.i. Is there an antitrust dogmatics? Three challenges Kein Zugriff
      2. i.ii.ii. Goals and competition in Brazilian antitrust doctrine. Kein Zugriff
      3. i.ii.iii. Goals and competition in CADE’s case law Kein Zugriff
      1. i.iii.i. Wealth maximization: from political philosophy to economic analysis Kein Zugriff
      2. i.iii.ii. Scarcity: from economic analysis to law and economics Kein Zugriff
      3. i.iii.iii. Competition: from law and economics to law and society Kein Zugriff
      1. ii.i.i. Classics of political economy and pioneers of a sociology of competition Kein Zugriff
      2. ii.i.ii. The 1940s: one “missing link” and two influential works Kein Zugriff
      3. ii.i.iii. The last forty years: sociological approaches to economics Kein Zugriff
      1. ii.ii.i. Since colonial times? monopolies and the “other side” Kein Zugriff
      2. ii.ii.ii. The phenomenon of competition: a “myth” in the tropics? Kein Zugriff
      3. ii.ii.iii. Social forms in Brazilian self-descriptions Kein Zugriff
      1. ii.iii.i. Causality, functional approach and systems theory Kein Zugriff
      2. ii.iii.ii. From the environment’s structure to the multivalued function Kein Zugriff
      3. ii.iii.iii. Triadic competition, indirect audience and the Brazilian mirror Kein Zugriff
      1. iii.i.i. Collusion and triadic competition Kein Zugriff
      2. iii.i.ii. Mergers and intermediates Kein Zugriff
      3. iii.i.iii. Exclusionary conduct and the state-third Kein Zugriff
      1. iii.ii.i. For antitrust: protecting competitive behavior beyond psychology Kein Zugriff
      2. iii.ii.ii. For legal doctrine: producing socially adequate differences Kein Zugriff
      3. iii.ii.iii. For legal sociology: the laughing third in nobody’s land Kein Zugriff
  5. FINAL REMARKS Kein Zugriff 269 - 278
    1. ANTITRUST CASES Kein Zugriff
    2. INSTITUTIONAL MATERIAL Kein Zugriff
    3. DICTIONARIES Kein Zugriff
    4. REPORTS Kein Zugriff
    5. ARTICLES AND BOOKS Kein Zugriff

Literaturverzeichnis (540)

  1. Abrabe and Cervejaria Kaiser v. Ambev (2012), CADE, 08012.006439/2009-65; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  2. ABRIVE v. Several Insurance Companies (2013), CADE, 08012.008224/1998-38; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  3. ABTA v. ECAD and others (2013), CADE, 08012.003745/2010-83; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  4. American Needle, Inc. v. National Football League (2010) Supreme Court of the United States, 560 U.S. 183; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  5. ANFAPE v. Volkswagen, Fiat and Ford (2018), CADE, 08012.002673/2007-5; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  6. ANP and MPF/SP v. Several gas stations (2013), CADE, 08012.004472/2000-12; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  7. ANS v. HC Lagos Hospital das Clínicas (2012), CADE, 08012.005969/2009-96; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  8. ANS v. Unimed Araruama (2013), CADE, 08012.011935/2008-50; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  9. ANS v. Unimed de Ibitinga (2013), CADE, 08012.009534/2006-78; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  10. ANS v. Unimed Maceió (2013), CADE, 08012.008143/2008-06; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  11. ANS v. Unimed Nordeste RS (2013), CADE, 08012.009866/2008-14; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  12. ANS v. Unimed Pato de Minas (2013), CADE, 08700.003447/2008-11; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  13. APEC v. Unimed Presidente Prudente (2013), CADE, 08012.006253/2005-82; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  14. Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp. (1985) Supreme Court of the United States. 472 U.S. 585. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  15. Associação Hospital de Caridade Ijuí v. Unimed Ijuí (2013), CADE, 08012.002440/2005-97; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  16. Associated Press v. United States (1945) Supreme Court of the United States, 326 U.S.1; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  17. Atl. Richfield Co. v. USA Petroleum Co. (1990), 495 U.S. 328; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  18. Board of Trade of City of Chicago v. United States (1918) 246 U.S. 231; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  19. Broadcom Corp. v. Qualcomm, Inc. (2007) United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. 501 F.3d 297; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  20. Brooke Group v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco (1993) Supreme Court of the United States; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  21. Brown Shoe Co. v. United States (1962) 370 U.S. 294; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  22. CAA/DF v. Livraria do Advogado and others (2013), CADE, 08012.012420/1999-61; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  23. CADE v. Arcal Consultoria and SIPROCFC/MG (2013), CADE, 08012.003874/2009-38; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  24. CADE v. Independent Aftermarket (several firms) (2016), CADE, 08012.006386/2016-53; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  25. CADE v. Unimed do Brasil (2013), CADE, 08012.001305/2003-62; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  26. CDC v. Devanlay Ventures Comércio, Importados, Exportação e Participações Ltda. (2011), CADE, 08012.002764/2009-59; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  27. CIEFAS v. SOBED-CE and Sociedade Cearense de Radiologia (2011), CADE, 08000.011516/1994-72; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  28. Continental T.V., Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc. (1977) Supreme Court of the United States, 433 U.S; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  29. Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp. (1984) Supreme Court of the United States, 467 U.S. 752; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  30. DECOM-PI and MP/PI v. SINDIPETRO/PI and José Duarte Saraiva (2013), CADE, 08700.000547/2008-95; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  31. DPC/PR v. several gas stations (2013), CADE, 08012.011668/2007-30; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  32. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc. (1992) Supreme Court of the United States, 504 U.S. 451; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  33. E-Commerce v. Google (ongoing), CADE, 20108012.010483/2011-94; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  34. Fashion Originators’ Guild of America v. Federal Trade Commission (1941) Supreme Court of the United States. 312 U.S. 457; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  35. Federal Trade Commission v. Procter & Gamble Co. (1967), 386 U.S. 568; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  36. Fernando A. Dulce, Conegundes P. Moreira and others v. Unimed de Barbacena, Bebedouro e Santos Dumont/MG (2013), CADE, 08012.001046/2003-70; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  37. Grupo Executivo para Modernização dos Portos do Ministério da Marinha v. SINDAMAR and others (2013), CADE, 08000.009391/1997-17; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  38. GVT and others v. Americel and others (2013), CADE, 08012.008501/2007-91; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  39. H. Buster v. PST Eletrônica (2020), CADE, 08012.005009/2010-60 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  40. Hosp. e Maternidade Jardim América Ltda. v. Unimed Goiânia (2013), CADE, 08012.003368/2004-34; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  41. Hospital de Caridade Dr. Astrogildo de Azevedo v. Unimed Santa Maria (2013), CADE, 08012.003035/2008-39; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  42. IG, Telemar, Ongoing (2012), CADE [merger], 08012.005394/2012 -15; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  43. Image Technical Services, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co. (1997) United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. 125 F.3d 1195; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  44. In re Text Messaging Antitrust Litigation (2015) United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. 782 F.3d 867; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  45. International Distribution Centers v. Walsh Trucing Co. (1987), 812 F.2d 786 2d Circuit; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  46. Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. Hyde (1984) Supreme Court of the United States, 466 U.S. 2; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  47. Juizo de Direito da 3a VC – RS v. Several gas stations in Caxias do Sul (2013), CADE, 08012.010215/2007-96; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  48. Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc. (2007) Supreme Court of the United States, 551 U.S. 877; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  49. Leistung Comércio e Serviços Ltda. v. Siemens Engenharia e Service Ltda (2011), CADE, 08012.000478/1998-62; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  50. Marimex Despachos Transportes e Serviços Ltda. v. Rodrimar S/A Transportes, Equipamentos Industriais e Armazéns Gerais (2016), CADE, 08012.001518/2006-37; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  51. Med Life Saúde v. Unimed de Araraquara e Região (2013), CADE, 08012.001792/2007-97; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  52. Monsanto Co. v. Spray–Rite Service Corp (1984) Supreme Court of the United States. 465 U.S; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  53. MP Pará v. Unimed Sul do Pará (2013), CADE, 08012.008031/2008-47; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  54. MP RS v. Gas Stations (2013), CADE, 08012.007149/2009-39; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  55. MP/CE and DECOM v. Sindipostos and others (2012), CADE, 08012.000998/1999-83; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  56. MP/GO v. Sindiposto/GO and others (2012), CADE, 08012.000444/2002-98; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  57. MP/PI v. SINDIPETRO/PI (2013), CADE, 08012.007301/2000-38; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  58. MP/Pilar do Sul v. Bakeries (2004), CADE, 08012.006539/1997-97; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  59. MP/RS v. Auto Abastecedora Visentin and others (2011), CADE, 08012.005495/2002-14; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  60. MP/RS v. Gas stations (2013), CADE, 08012.004573/2004-17; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  61. MP/SP v. Associação dos despachantes de Santa Bárbara D’Oeste (2016), CADE, 08012.011791/2010-56; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  62. MP/SP v. Hidrópolis Engenharia Ltda. and others (2011), CADE, 08012.0006768/2000-78; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  63. MP/SP v. SINCOPETRO and others (2011), CADE, 08012.000921/2000-53; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  64. MPF Amazonas v. AMAZONPETRO and others (2013), CADE, 08012.002959/1998-11; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  65. National Society of Professional Engineers v. United States (1978) Supreme Court of United States. 435 U.S. 679; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  66. Northern Securities Co v. United States (1904), 193 U.S. 197; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  67. Northwest Wholesale Stationers, Inc. v. Pacific Stationery & Printing Co. (1985) Supreme Court of the United States, 472 U.S. 284; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  68. Pepsico v. Recofarma and Spal (2013), CADE, 08012.006450/2000-97; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  69. PNBE (1999), CADE [query] n. 0038/99; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  70. Polícia Civil do DF v Several bakeries (2013), CADE, 08012.004039/2001-68; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  71. Polygram Holding, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission (2005) United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. 416 F.3d 29; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  72. Pró Genéricos v. Janssen Cilag Farmacêutica Ltda. (2013), CADE, 08012.000841/2011-51; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  73. Procon-SP v. SKF do Brasil Ltda. (2011), CADE, 08012.001271/2001-44; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  74. Rambus Inc. v. FTC (2008) United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. 522 F.3d; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  75. Rede D’Or, Acreditas Oncologia (2013) CADE [merger], 08700.0044151/2012-01; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  76. Reiter v. Sonotone Corp. (1979) Supreme Court of the United States 442 U.S. 330; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  77. SDE and SEAE v. TAM, Varig, Vasp, Transbrasil (1999), CADE, 08012.000677/99-70; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  78. SDE v. ABAV RJ (2013), CADE, 08012.006923/2002-18; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  79. SDE v. Associação Paranaense dos Produtores de Cal (2013), CADE, 08012.009834/2006-57; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  80. SDE v. ATPC (2014), CADE, 08012.002028/2002-24; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  81. SDE v. Fecombustíveis; Luiz Gil Siuffo Pereira (2011), CADE, 08012.006431/1997-31; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  82. SDE v. KLM and others (2013), CADE, 08012.011027/2006-02; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  83. SDE v. Peróxidos do Brasil and others (2012), CADE, 08012.004702/2004-77; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  84. SDE v. Santher and others (2011), CADE, 08012.006059/2001-73; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  85. SDE v. Sindipedras and others (2002), CADE, 08012.002127/2002-14; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  86. SDE v. Unimed Angra dos Reis (2013), CADE, 08012.006748/2009-35; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  87. SDE v. Unimed Caçador (2013), CADE, 08012.006762/2009-39; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  88. SDE v. Unimed Campina Grande (2013), CADE, 08012.008736/2007-83; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  89. SDE v. Unimed de Bauru (2013), CADE, 08012.008733/2007-40; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  90. SDE v. Unimed de Ilhéus (2013), CADE, 08012.008740/2007-41; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  91. SDE v. Unimed de Londrina (2013), CADE, 08012.008737/2007-28; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  92. SDE v. Unimed Divinópolis (2013), CADE, 08012.003884/2010-15; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  93. SDE v. Unimed Frutal (2013), CADE, 08012.006755/2009-37; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  94. SDE v. Unimed Itajubá (2013), CADE, 08012.003779/2010-78; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  95. SDE v. Unimed Itatiba (2013), CADE, 08012.007204/2009-91; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  96. SDE v. Unimed Nordeste Goiano (2013), CADE, 08012.007205/2009-35; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  97. SDE v. Unimed Norte do Mato Grosso (2013), CADE, 08012.007203/2009-46; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  98. SDE v. Unimed Poços de Caldas (2013), CADE, 08012.008741/2007-96; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  99. SDE v. Unimed Porto Alegre (2013), CADE, 08012.008735/2007-39; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  100. SDE v. Unimed Regional de Maringá (2013), CADE, 08012.008738/2007-72; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  101. SDE v. Unimed São Carlos (2013), CADE, 08012.004596/2004-21; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  102. SDE v. Unimed Vale do Caí (2013), CADE, 08012.011124/2008-59; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  103. SDE v. Unimed Vales do Taquari (2013), CADE, 08012.010576/2009-02; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  104. SDE v. Unimed Vitória (2013), CADE, 08012.004993/2009-16; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  105. SDE, Lucia Curti Guedes v. Petrocoque Indústria e Comércio S.A (2011), CADE, 08012.004520/1999-50; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  106. SINAMGE v. Unimed da Caçapava – Cooperativa de Trabalho Médico (2013), CADE, 08012.006271/2009-98; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  107. Sindeprestem v. Tática, Sellan and others (2011), CADE, 08012.000792/1999-16; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  108. Sindicato dos Empregados em Estabelecimentos Bancários de Araxá/MG v. Unimed Araxá (2013), CADE, 08012.002112/200-88; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  109. Sindicato dos Estivadores nos Portos do Estado de Pernambuco and others vs. Tecon Suape S.a and Suape (2015), CADE, 08012.006504/2005-29; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  110. Sindicato Nacional das Empresas de Medicina de Grupo v. Unimed de Taubaté (2013), CADE, 08012.007885/2008-14; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  111. Sindicato Rural de Presidente Prudente and others v. SUDAN and others (2011), CADE, 08001.000852/99-21; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  112. SINOG v. Uniodonto de Lençóis Paulista (2013), CADE, 08012.001503/2006-79; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  113. SITEL v. Telma (2013), CADE, 08700.000783/2001-35; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  114. Smart Rio v. SINDACAD/RJ and Ricardo Marques de Abreu (2013), CADE, 08012.005524/2010-40; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  115. Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. McQuillan (1993) Supreme Court of the United States, 506 U.S. 447. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  116. Standard Fashion Co. v. Magrane-Houston Co. (1922) United States Supreme Court. 258 U.S. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  117. Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. United States (1911) Supreme Court of the United States, 221 U.S. 1. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  118. Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. United States (1911) Supreme Court of the United States, 221 U.S. 1. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  119. Steel Placas Indústria e Comércio Ltda. v. Comepla Indústria e Comércio Ltda and others (2012), CADE, 08012.001099/1999-71; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  120. Swift & Co. v. United States (1905) 196 U.S. 375; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  121. Tampa Electric Co. v. Nashville Coal Co. (1961), Supreme Court of the United States. 365 U.S. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  122. Telefonica, Phorm (2011), CADE [merger], 08012.010585/2010-29; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  123. TFWS, Inc. v. Schaefer (2001), F.3d 198 4th Circuit; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  124. T-Mobile Netherlands BV v. Raad van bestuur van de Nederlandse Mededingingsautoriteit (2009), European Court Reports; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  125. Union Carbide v. Alipio Gusmão and others (2011), CADE, 08012.007412/1999-93; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  126. United States v. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. (1898) Circuit Court of Appeals of the United States, Sixth Circuit, 85 F. 271, affirmed, 175 U.S. 211 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  127. United States v. Aluminum Co. of America (1945) United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 148 f.2d 416. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  128. United States v. American Express Co. (2016) United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. 838 F.3d Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  129. United States v. American Tobacco Company (1911), Supreme Court of the United States, 221 U.S. 106. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  130. United States v. AMR Corp., American Airlines Inc. (2003) United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. 335 F.3d 1109 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  131. United States v. Andreas (2000) United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, 216 F.3d 645 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  132. United States v. Apple, Inc (2015) United States Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, 791 F.3d 290. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  133. United States v. Arnold, Schwinn & Co. (1967) 388 U.S. 365. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  134. United States v. Brown University (1993) United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. 5 F.3d Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  135. United States v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. (1956) Supreme Court of the United States, 351 U.S. 377 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  136. United States v. Microsoft Corp. (2001) United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. 253 F.3d 34. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  137. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. (1940) Supreme Court of the United States, 310 U.S. 150 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  138. United States v. Topco Associates, Inc., 405 U.S. 596, 610 (1972). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  139. United States v. Trans–Missouri Freight Association (1897) Supreme Court of the United States, 166 U.S. 290 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  140. United States v. Trenton Potteries Co. (1927) Supreme Court of the United States, 273 U.S. 392. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  141. United States v. Visa U.S.A., Inc., et al. (2003) United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. 344 F.3d 229. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  142. Verizon Communications v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko (2004) Supreme Court of the United States. 540 U.S. 398 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  143. Viação Oliveira Torres v. Empresa Valadares de Transporte Coletiva Ltda. and others (2011), CADE, 08012.005610/2000-81; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  144. CADE, Guia de Análise de Atos de Concentração Horizontal (2016), available at http://www.cade.gov.br/acesso-a-informacao/publicacoes-institucionais/guias_do_Cade/guia-para-analise-de-atos-de-concentracao-horizontal.pdf; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  145. CADE, Guia Remédios Antitruste (2018) available at http://www.cade.gov.br/acesso-a-informacao/publicacoes-institucionais/guias_do_Cade/copy_of_GuiaRemdios.pdf; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  146. CADE, Guidelines for Cease and Desist Agreement for cartel cases (“TCC”) (2016), 29-30, available at http://www.cade.gov.br/acesso-a-informacao/publicacoes-institucionais/guias_do_Cade/guidelines_tcc-1.pdf; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  147. CADE, Guidelines for the Analysis of Previous Consummation of Merger Transactions (2016), 7, available at http://www.cade.gov.br/acesso-a-informacao/publicacoes-institucionais/guias_do_Cade/guideline-gun-jumping-september.pdf; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  148. Commissioner Margrethe Vestager, Commission fines Google €2.42 billion for abusing dominance as search engine by giving illegal advantage to own comparison shopping service (2017) European Commission, Press release, Brussels; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  149. Democrats, A Better Deal: Cracking Down on Corporate Monopolies and the Abuse of Economic and Political Power (2017), available at https://www.democrats.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2017/07/A-Better-Deal-on-Competition-and-Costs-1.pdf; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  150. Federal Trade Commission and Department of Justice, Antitrust Guidelines for Collaborations Among Competitors (2000), available at https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/public_events/joint-venture-hearings-antitrust-guidelines-collaboration-among-competitors/ftcdojguidelines-2.pdf; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  151. Federal Trade Commission In the Matter of Google Inc (2013) Statement regarding Google’s Search Practices, January 3. FTC File Number 111-0163; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  152. https://necsousp.wordpress.com; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  153. International Competition Network, Competition Enforcement and Consumer Welfare — setting the agenda 14 (2011), available at http://www.internationalcompetitionnetwork.org/uploads/library/doc857.pdf; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  154. International Competition Network, Report on the Objectives of Unilateral Conduct Laws, Assessment of Dominance/Substantial Market Power, and State-Created Monopolies 9 (2007), available at http://www.internationalcompetitionnetwork.org/uploads/library/doc353.pdf; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  155. OECD, Summary of Discussion of the Roundtable on Algorithms and Collusion, available at https://one.oecd.org/document/DAF/COMP/M(2017)1/ANN2/FINAL/en/pdf; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  156. U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, Horizontal Merger Guidelines (2010); Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  157. AULETE, Caldas. Dicionário Contemporâneo da Língua Portuguesa (1958), Rio de Janeiro, Delta; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  158. AULETE, Caldas. Dicionário Contemporâneo da Língua Portuguesa (1964), Rio de Janeiro, Delta; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  159. AULETE, Caldas. Dicionário Contemporâneo da Língua Portuguesa (1970), Rio de Janeiro, Delta; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  160. DA CUNHA, Antônio Geraldo. Vocabulário histórico-cronológico do Português Medieval (1984), Fundação Casa de Rui Barbosa; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  161. DE FIGUEIREDO, Cândido. Dicionário da Língua Portuguesa (1949) Livraria Bertrand; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  162. DE HOLANDA FERREIRA, Aurelio Buarque. Dicionário da Língua Portuguesa (1980), Editora Nova Fronteira; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  163. DE HOLANDA FERREIRA, Aurelio Buarque. Novo Dicionário da Língua Portuguesa (2nd ed. 1986), J.E.M.M. Editores Ltda; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  164. DE MORAIS, Orlando Mendes. Dicionário de Sinônimos (1944) Rio de Janeiro, Editora Getulio Costa; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  165. NASCENTES, Antenor. Dicionario Ilustrado da Língua Portuguesa (1972), Academia Brasileira de Letras, Rio de Janeiro, Bloch Editores; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  166. Novo Dicionario da Lingua Portuguesa (5a ed. 1939), W. M. Jackson, Rio de Janeiro; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  167. SILVEIRA BUENO, Francisco da. Dicionário Escolar da Língua Portuguesa (1965), Saraiva; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  168. TORRINHA, Francisco. Novo Dicionário da Língua Portuguesa (1946), Porto, Rua de Oliveira Monteiro. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  169. MOURA, Eduardo. Crise das redes Saraiva e Cultura expõe problemas de gestão no setor livreiro (2018), Folha de São Paulo [November 2], available at https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/ilustrada/2018/11/crise-das-redes-saraiva-e-cultura-expoe-problemas-de-gestao-no-setor-livreiro.shtml Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  170. PARKER, Emily. To Be Read by All Parties (2012) The New York Times Book Review [February 19], available at https://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/19/books/review/the-impact-of-books-on-washington-policy.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  171. The Sugar Trust Illegal (1890), New York Times, available at http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=990DEFD6123BE533A25756C2A9609C94619ED7CF. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  172. “The Economist”, The University of Chicago worries about a lack of competition (Apr 12, 2017). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  173. “The Economist”, Too much of a good thing (Mar 26, 2016). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  174. ACKERMAN, Bruce. Law, Economics, and the Problem of Legal Culture (1986) in Duke Law Journal, vol. 1986, n. 6; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  175. ACKERMAN, Bruce. Reconstructing American Law (1984), Cambridge, Harvard University Press; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  176. ALCHOURRÓN, Carlos E.; BULYGIN, Eugenio. Introducción a la metodologia de las ciências jurídicas y sociales (1975, 3rd reprint 1998), Buenos Aires, Astrea; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  177. ALENCASTRO, Luis Felipe de. O trato dos viventes. Formação do Brasil no Atlântico Sul (2000), São Paulo, Companhia das Letras; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  178. ALEXY, Robert. Theorie der Juristischen Argumentation (1983; 1991), Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp Verlag; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  179. AREEDA, Philipp; TURNER, Donald. Predatory Pricing and Related Practices under Section 2 of the Sherman Act (1975), Harvard Law Review vol. 88, n. 4; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  180. AREEDA, Phillip; HOVENKAMP, Herbert. Antitrust Law: An Analysis of Antitrust Principles and Their Application (2013), New York, Wolters Kluwer; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  181. ARNOLD, Thurman. The Bottlenecks of Business (1940), New York, Reynal & Hitchcock; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  182. ARNOLD, Thurman. The Folklore of Capitalism (1937), Washington, Yale University Press; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  183. ARRUDA DE ANDRADE, José Maria. Economicização do Direito Concorrencial (2014), São Paulo, Quartier Latin; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  184. ARRUDA DE ANDRADE, José Maria. Reflexões sobre o more economic approach no direito concorrencial europeu in Celso Campilongo, Roberto Pfeiffer, A evolução do antitruste no Brasil (2018), São Paulo, Singular; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  185. ASSOCIATION, American Bar. The rule of reason (1999), Section of Antitrust Law, Monograph 23; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  186. AZAR, José; SCHMALZ, Martin; TECU, Isabel. Anti-Competitive Effects of Common Ownership (2018), The Journal of the American Finance Association vol. 73, 4; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  187. AZEVEDO PALU, Guilherme Augusto. Grundrechte, Spielräume und Kompetenzen: Eine Untersuchung formeller Prinzipien vor dem Hintergrund der Prinzipientheorie (2017), PhD Dissertation at Heidelberg University; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  188. BACHUR, João Paulo. Inclusão e exclusão na teoria dos sistemas sociais: um balanço crítico (2014), Revista Brasileira de Informação Bibliográfica em Ciências Sociais – BIB, São Paulo, n. 73; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  189. BAKER, Jonathan B. Economics and Politics: Perspectives on the Goals and Future of Antitrust in The Goals of Antitrust (2013) 81 Fordham Law Review; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  190. BASTIAT, Fréderic. Harmonies économiques (1850) translated by W. Hayden Boyers, Economic Harmonies (1996), New York, Foundation for Economic Education; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  191. BEARD, Charles. Introduction in Alfred Lief (org.) The Social and Economic Views of Mr. Justice Brandeis (1996), Florida, Gaunt. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  192. BECKERT, Jens. The Great Transformation of Embeddedness. Karl Polanyi and the New Economic Sociology (2007), MPIfG Discussion Paper 07/1, Cologne, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies Cologne; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  193. BELLO, Carlos Alberto. Autonomia frustrada: o Cade e o poder econômico (2005), São Paulo, Boitempo Editorial; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  194. BLACK, Oliver. Conceptual foundations of antitrust (2005), Cambridge, University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  195. BLAIR, Roger; SOKOL, Daniel. Welfare Standards in U.S. and E.U. Antitrust Enforcement in The Goals of Antitrust (2013) 81 Fordham Law Review; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  196. BOBBIO, Norberto. Dalla struttura alla funzione. Nuovi studi di teoria del diritto (1977), Milano, Edizioni di Comunità. Bork seems to ascribe here a repressive role for antitrust; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  197. BORK, Robert H. Legislative Intent and the Policy of the Sherman Act (1966), The Journal of Law & Economics, vol. 9; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  198. BORK, Robert H. The Antitrust Paradox: a Policy at War with Itself (1978; 1993), New York, The Free Press; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  199. BOURDIEU, Pierre. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales (1997), translated by Suzana Cardoso and Cécile Raud-Mattedi, Política & Sociedade (2005), v. 4, n. 6. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  200. BOURDIEU, Pierre. Le champ économique in Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales (1997), translated by Suzana Cardoso and Cécile Raud-Mattedi, Política & Sociedade (2005), v. 4, n. 6. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  201. BOURDIEU, Pierre. Le marché des biens symboliques (1971) translated by Sergio Miceli, A economia das trocas simbólicas (1987), Rio de Janeiro, Ed. Perspectiva; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  202. BRANDEIS, Louis. An Interview in Osmond Fraenkel, Clarence Lewis, The Curse of Bigness: Miscellaneous Papers of Louis D. Brandeis (1935), New York, The Viking Press; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  203. BRANDEIS, Louis. Competition, in Osmond Fraenkel, Clarence Lewis, The Curse of Bigness: Miscellaneous Papers of Louis D. Brandeis (1935), New York, The Viking Press; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  204. BRANDEIS, Louis. Dissenting Opinion (Liggett Company vs. Lee - 1933) in Osmond Fraenkel, Clarence Lewis, The Curse of Bigness: Miscellaneous Papers of Louis D. Brandeis (1935), New York, The Viking Press; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  205. BRANDEIS, Louis. Dissenting Opinion (New State Ice Company vs. Liebmann) in Osmond Fraenkel, Clarence Lewis, The Curse of Bigness: Miscellaneous Papers of Louis D. Brandeis (1935), New York, The Viking Press; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  206. BRANDEIS, Louis. Manufacturers in Cooperation in Alfred Lief (org.) The Social and Economic Views of Mr. Justice Brandeis (1996), Florida, Gaunt; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  207. BRANDEIS, Louis. Shall we Abandon the Policy of Competition? In Osmond Fraenkel, Clarence Lewis, The Curse of Bigness: Miscellaneous Papers of Louis D. Brandeis (1935), New York, The Viking Press; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  208. BRANDEIS, Louis. The Democracy of Business in Osmond Fraenkel, Clarence Lewis, The Curse of Bigness: Miscellaneous Papers of Louis D. Brandeis (1935), New York, The Viking Press; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  209. BRANDEIS, Louis. The Living Law (1916), Illinois Law Review, February; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  210. BRANDEIS, Louis. The Solution of the Trust Problem in Osmond Fraenkel, Clarence Lewis, The Curse of Bigness: Miscellaneous Papers of Louis D. Brandeis (1935), New York, The Viking Press; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  211. BRANKOVIC, Jelena; RINGEL, Leopold; WERRON, Tobias. How rankings produce competition. The case of global university rankings (2018), Zeitschrift für Soziologie 47(4): 270-288; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  212. BUARQUE DE HOLANDA, Sergio. Raízes do Brasil (1936, 2016), São Paulo, Companhia das Letras; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  213. BURT, Ronald S. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (1992), Cambridge, Harvard University Press; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  214. BUSS, Eugen. Der Wettbewerb: eine rechtssoziologische Untersuchung (1973), Tübingen, J.C.B. Mohr. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  215. CABRAL, Mario André Machado. Estado, Concorrência e Economia: Convergência entre Antitruste e Pensamento Econômico no Brasil (2016), PhD Dissertation, University of São Paulo; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  216. CALABRESI, Guido. The Future of Law and Economics: Essays in Reform and Recollection (2016), Yale University Press, New Haven; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  217. CALLON, Michel. Introduction: the embeddedness of economic markets in economics (1998) in The Sociological Review (Special Issue: Sociological Review Monograph Series: The Laws of the Markets), Ed. vol. 46: S1; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  218. CAMPILONGO, Celso Fernandes. O direito na sociedade complexa (2000, 2nd 2011), São Paulo, Saraiva; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  219. CAMPILONGO, Celso Fernandes. Ruptura com mitos e superação de obstáculos: direito, economia e mercado (Prefácio) in Fernando Herren Aguillar, Direito Econômico: do direito nacional ao direito supranacional (3rd. 2012), São Paulo, Editora Atlas; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  220. CAMPILONGO, Celso Fernandes. Prefácio in Antônio Maristrello Porto, Patrícia Sampaio, Direito e economia em dois mundos: doutrina jurídica e pesquisa empírica (2014), Rio de Janeiro, Editora GV Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  221. CAPELATO, Maria Helena. Os Arautos do Liberalismo: Imprensa Paulista 1920-1945 (1989) Editora Brasiliense; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  222. CARR, Edward. What is history? (1961) translated by Lúcia Maurício de Alverga, Que é historia? (3. ed 1982) São Paulo, Paz e Terra; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  223. CARVALHO FILHO, Irineu; COLISTETE, Renato. Education performance: was it all determined 100 years ago? Evidence from São Paulo, Brazil (2010), MPRA Papers; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  224. CASTILHO MISSALI, Guilherme Teno; VIEIRA, Yan Villela. Why (not) talk about the sociology of competition? (2017) available at https://www.competitionpolicyinternational.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Why-we-should-not-talk-about-sociology-of-competition.pdf; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  225. CASTRO Dinorah; PINHEIRO JR, Francisco. Idéias filosóficas na Faculdade de Direito da Bahia (1997), Salvador, Ufba; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  226. COASE, Ronald. The Nature of the Firm (1937), Economica, New Series, Vol. 4, N. 16; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  227. COASE, Ronald. The Problem of Social Cost (1960), Journal of Law and Economics, vol.3; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  228. COHEN, Felix. The Problems of a Functional Jurisprudence (1937) Modern Law Review 1.1; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  229. COLEMAN, Jules L. Efficiency, Utility, and Wealth Maximization (1980), Hofstra Law Review vol. 8; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  230. COMPARATO, Fábio Konder. Função social da propriedade dos bens de produção in Revista de Direito Mercantil, Industrial, Econômico e Financeiro (1986) 63; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  231. COMPARATO, Fábio Konder. Funções e disfunções do resgate acionário in Direito Empresarial: Estudos e Pareceres (1995), São Paulo, Saraiva; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  232. Congressional Record Senate (1890), available at https://www.govinfo.gov/. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  233. COOLEY, Charles. Personal Competition: Its Place in the Social Order and Effect Upon Individuals; With Some Considerations on Success in Sociological Theory and Social Research: Being Selected Papers of Charles Horton Cooley (1894), Economic Studies 4, No. 2; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  234. COOLEY, Charles. Social Process (1918), New York, Charles Schriber’s Sons; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  235. COSER, Lewis. The Functions of Social Conflict (1964), New York, The Free Press; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  236. CROUCH, Colin. The Strange Non-Death of Neoliberalism (2011), Cambridge, Polity Press; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  237. DE CARVALHO, Vinicius Marques. Defesa da concorrência: estudos e votos (2015), São Paulo, Singular; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  238. DE CASTRO, Viveiros. Prefácio in Beatriz Azevedo, Antropofagia: Palimpsesto selvagem (2018), São Paulo, Sesi SP; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  239. DE GIORGI, Raffaele. Argomentazione giuridica a partire dalla Costituzione in Temi di filosofia del diritto vol. 2 (2015), Lecce, Pensa MultiMedia Editore; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  240. DE GIORGI, Raffaele. Scienza del diritto e legitimazione (1979; 1998), Bari, Pena Multimedia; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  241. DENNIS, Kenneth. ‘Competition’ in the History of Economic Thought (1975), Oxford, Faculty of Social Studies, 1-53; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  242. DEVLIN, Alan; JACOBS, Michael. Antitrust Error (2010) 52 William & Mary Law Review 75; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  243. DI LORENZO, Thomas J. The Origins of Antitrust: An Interest-Group Perspective (1985) 5 International Review. Law & Economics 73; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  244. DIEKMANN, Andreas, VOSS, Thomas. Die Theorie rationale Handelns. Stand und Perspectiven in Rational-Choice-Theorie in den Sozialwissenschaften. Anwendungen und Probleme (2004), Munich, Oldenbourg; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  245. DUARTE, José. A Constituição brasileira de 1946 vol. 3 (1947) Rio de Janeiro; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  246. DUARTE, Nestor. Direito, noção e norma (1933), Salvador, Oficina dos Dois Mundos; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  247. DUGUIT, Léon. Les transformations genérales du droit privé depuis le code Napoléon (1912), Paris, Félix Alcan; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  248. DURET, Pascal. Sociologie de la compétition (2009), Armand Colin; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  249. DWORKIN, Ronald. Is Wealth a Value? In Symposium, 9 J. Leg. Stud. 191-253 (1980): essays by Dworkin and Kronman, response by Posner; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  250. DWORKIN, Ronald. Taking Rights Seriously (1977, 1978) Massachusetts, Harvard University Press; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  251. EDGEWORTH, Francis Y. Competition and Regulation in Robert Palgrave, Dictionary of Political Economy (1910), London, 378-380; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  252. EHRLICH, Eugen. Grundlegung der Soziologie des Rechts (1913), translated by René Ernani Gertz and revised by Vamireh Chacon, Fundamentos da Sociologia do Direito (1986), Brasília, Editora da UNB; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  253. ENGERMAN, Stanley L.; SOKOLOFF, Kenneth L. Factor Endowments, Inequality, and Paths of Development among New World Economies (2002), Cambridge, New World Economies; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  254. EVANS, David S. Trustbusting Goes Global (2009), available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1430659; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  255. EVANS, David; SCHMALENSEE, Richard. The Antitrust Analysis of Multi-sided Platform Businesses (2012), Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Working Paper n. 623; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  256. EZRACHI, Ariel. Eu Competition Law Goals and The Digital Economy (2018), Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 17/2018, available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=3191766. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  257. FAORO, Raymundo. Os donos do poder: formação do patronato político brasileiro (1958, 5a ed. 2012), São Paulo, Globo; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  258. FARIA, José Eduardo; CAMPILONGO, Celso Fernandes. A Sociologia Jurídica no Brasil (1991) Porto Alegre, Sergio Antonio Fabris; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  259. FARIA, José Eduardo. Juristas fora da curva: três perfis (2016), Revista Direito GV vol 12, n. 2; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  260. FERNANDES, Florestan. A integração do negro na sociedade de classes: vol.1 o legado da “raça branca” (1964, 5th ed. 2008), São Paulo, Globo; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  261. FERRAZ JR., Tercio Sampaio. Direito da concorrência: sua função social nos países desenvolvidos e em desenvolvimento in João Grandino Rodas, Direito econômico e social: atualidades e reflexões sobre direito concorrencial, do consumidor, do trabalho e tributário (2012), São Paulo, Revista dos Tribunais; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  262. FERRAZ JR., Tercio Sampaio. Função social da dogmática jurídica (1980), São Paulo, Revista dos Tribunais; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  263. FERREIRA DE SOUZA, Jose. Uniões de Emprezas Concorrentes (1939), Rio de Janeiro; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  264. FIRST, Harry; WALLER, Spencer Weber. Antitrust’s Democracy Deficit in The Goals of Antitrust (2013) 81 Fordham Law Review; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  265. FISCHER, Joachim. Der lachende Dritte in V.V.a.a, Die Figur des Dritten: Ein kulturwissenschafliches Paradigma (2010), Berlin, Suhrkamp Verlag; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  266. FISHLOW, Albert. Origens e consequências da substituição de importações no Brasil (1972), Estudos Econômicos v. 2 n. 6; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  267. FOGEL, Robert William. The Specification Problem in Economic History (1967), Volume XXVII, number 3; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  268. FORGIONI, Paula. Os Fundamentos do Antitruste (1998; 9ª ed. 2016), São Paulo, Editora Revista dos Tribunais; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  269. FOUCAULT, Michel. Naissance de la biopolitique (1979), translated by Eduardo Brandão, Nascimento da biopolítica (2008), São Paulo, Martins Fontes; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  270. FOX, Eleanor M. Against Goals in The Goals of Antitrust (2013) 81 Fordham Law Review, 2158; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  271. FOX, Eleanor M. The Battle for the Soul of Antitrust (1987) 75 California Law Review 917; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  272. FOX, Eleanor M. Power: Trust and Distruts (2020), Concurrentialiste, Journal of Antitrust Law. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  273. FRAGOSO, João; FLORENTINO, Manolo. O arcaísmo como projeto. Mercado Atlântico, sociedade agrária e elite mercantil no Rio de Janeiro, c. 1790-1840 (1993), Rio de Janeiro, Diadorim; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  274. FRANCESCHINI, José Inácio Gonzaga. Introdução ao Direito da Concorrência (1996) São Paulo, Malheiros Editores; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  275. FRANK, Robert H. Microeconomics and Behavior (2006, 9th ed. 2015), New York, McGraw-Hill Education; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  276. FRAZÃO, Ana. Direito da Concorrência: Pressupostos e perspectivas (2017), São Paulo, Saraiva; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  277. FREYRE, Gilberto. Casa-Grande & Senzala (1933, 51st ed. 2006), Global, São Paulo; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  278. FRIEDMAN, Milton. The Methodology of Positive Economics (1953), in Essays in Positive Economics (1966), Chicago, University of Chicago Press; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  279. FUCCI, Paulo Ruggiero. Concorrência no Sistema Financeiro Nacional: um estudo crítico sobre a competência do CADE em atos de concentração (2020), Master’s Dissertation in Law, University of São Paulo; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  280. FUDENBERG, Drew; TIROLE, Jean. Non-Cooperative Game Theory for Industrial Organization: An Introduction and Overview (1989) in Richard Schmalensee, Robert Willig, 1 Handbook of Industrial Organization 259; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  281. FURTADO, Celso. Formação Econômica do Brasil (32a ed. 2005), São Paulo, Companhia Editora Nacional; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  282. GEIGER, Theodor. Konkurrence: en sociologisk analyse (1940), translated by Gert J. Fode, Konkurrenz. Eine soziologische Analyse (2012), Frankfurt am Main, Peter Lang; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  283. GIBSON, Rajna; CALMONTE, Carmen; WAGNER, Alexander. Preferences for truthfulness: Heterogeneity among and within individuals (2013) American Economic Review, 103 (1); Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  284. GILISSEN, John. Le problème des lacunes du droit dans l’évolution du droit médiéval et moderne (1967), in Chaim Perelman, Le problem des lacunes en droit (1968), Bruxelles, Établissements Émile Bruylant; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  285. GLASNER, David; SULLIVAN, Sean. The Logic of Market Definition (2018), University of Iowa, Legal Studies Research Paper; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  286. GOMES, Orlando. A casta dos juristas in Escritos menores (1981), São Paulo, Saraiva; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  287. GOMES, Orlando. A crise do direito (1945), Salvador, Vera-Cruz; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  288. GOMES, Orlando. A função social da propriedade (1984) in Boletim da Faculdade de Direito de Coimbra: estudos em homenagem a A. Ferrer-Correia 2 (1989); Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  289. GOMES, Orlando. As classes sociais na formação do direito, in A crise do direito (1945), Salvador, Vera-Cruz; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  290. GOMES, Orlando. Novas Considerações sôbre alguns conceitos jurídicos, in Direito privado (novos aspectos) (1961), Rio de Janeiro, Freitas Bastas; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  291. GOMES, Orlando. O problema da natureza jurídica da convenção coletiva de trabalho, in Transformações gerais do direito das obrigações (1967), São Paulo, Revista dos Tribunais; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  292. GOMES, Orlando. Relações entre o direito e a economia, in Direito econômico e outros ensaios [1975], Salvador, Distribuidora de Livros Salvador; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  293. GRANDY, Christopher. Original Intent and the Sherman Antitrust Act: A Re-examination of the Consumer-Welfare Hypothesis (1993), The Journal of Economic History vol. 53, n. 2; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  294. GRANOVETTER, Mark. Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness (1985) in Mark Granovetter, Richard Swedberg, The Sociology of Economic Life (2011), Westview Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  295. GREEN, Edward; PORTER, Robert. Non-cooperative Collusion under Imperfect Price Information (1984), Econometrica, Vol. 52, n. 1; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  296. GUIMARÃES, Nadya Araujo, VERETA-NAHOUM, André. Apresentação: Explorando os sentidos sociais da economia (2017) Tempo Social v. 29, Universidade de São Paulo; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  297. GURVITCH, George. Sociology of Law (1942), translated by Djacir Menezes, Sociologia jurídica (1946), Rio de Janeiro, Kosmos; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  298. HARRINGTON JR., Joseph. How Do Hub-and-Spoke Cartels Operate? Lessons from Nine Case Studies (2018), available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3238244; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  299. HART, Herbert. Concept of Law (1961), translated by Antônio de Oliveira Sette-Câmara, O Conceito de Direito (2009), São Paulo, Martins Fontes; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  300. HAYEK, Friedrich von. The Use of Knowledge in Society (1945), The American Economic Review Vol. XXXV, n. 4; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  301. HAYEK, Friedrich von. Individualism and Economic Order (1948), Chicago, University of Chicago Press; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  302. HAYEK, Friedrich von. Wettbewerb als Entdeckungsverfahren (1968), Kiel, Institut für Weltwirtschaft; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  303. HECK, Philipp. Begriffsbildung und Interessenjurisprudenz (1932), Tübingen, Mohr; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  304. HIRSCHMAN, Albert O. Rival Interpretations of Market Society: Civilizing, Destructive, or Feeble? In Journal of Economic Literature (December 1982), Vol. XX.; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  305. HOLZHAUSER, Nicole. Konkurrenz als Erklärungsansatz im Werk Theodor Geigers: Untersucht am Beispiel der sozialen und wirtschaftlichen Konkurrenz als Triebfeder des Strukturwandels der Öffentlichkeit (2015), available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270584779; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  306. HOVENKAMP, Erik. Platform Antitrust (2019), Journal of Corporation Law; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  307. HOVENKAMP, Herbert. Implementing Antitrust’s Welfare Goals in The Goals of Antitrust (2013) 81 Fordham Law Review; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  308. HOVENKAMP, Herbert. Is Antitrust’s Consumer Welfare Principle Imperiled? (2018) Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law. 1985; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  309. HOVENKAMP, Herbert. On the Meaning of Antitrust’s Consumer Welfare Principle (2020), Revue Concurrentialiste, Jan. 17. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  310. HOVENKAMP, Herbert. Platforms and the Rule of Reason: the American Express Case (2019), Columbia Business Law Review; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  311. HOVENKAMP, Herbert. The Antitrust Enterprise: Principle and Execution (2005), Cambridge, Harvard University Press; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  312. HOVENKAMP, Herbert. The Sherman Act and the Classical Theory of Competition (1989), 74 Iowa Law Review; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  313. HUBERLANT, Charles. Les Mecanismes intitués pour combler les lacunes de la loi (1964) in Chaim Perelman, Le problem des lacunes en droit (1968), Bruxelles, Établissements Émile Bruylant, 54-55; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  314. HYLTON, Keith; DENG, Fei. Antitrust around the World: an Empirical Analysis of the Scope of Competition Laws and their Effects (2007), Antitrust Law Journal, Vol. 74, n. 2, Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  315. HYMAN, David A; KOVACIC, William E. Institutional Design, Agency Life Cycle, and the Goals of Competition Law in The Goals of Antitrust (2013) 81 Fordham Law Review; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  316. JHERING, Rudolf von. Der Zweck im Recht (1877, 3. 1904), Leipzig, Breittopf und Gärtel; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  317. JHERING, Rudolf von. Geist des römischen Rechts auf den verschiedenen Stufen seiner Entwicklung (1883) translated by José Ignacio Coelho Mendes Neto, A dogmática jurídica (2013), São Paulo, Ícon; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  318. JIA, Kai; KENNEY, Martin; ZYSMAN, John. Global Competitors? Mapping the Internationalization Strategies of Chinese Digital Platforms (2018), available at http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3220936; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  319. JOHNSON, Harold. The Portuguese Settlement of Brazil, 1500-1580 in Leslie Bethell, The Cambridge History of Latin America vol. 1 (1984) Cambridge, Cambridge University Press; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  320. JOLIET, René. The rule of reason in antitrust law: American, German and Common Market laws in comparative perspective (1967), Liège, Faculté de Droit; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  321. JOSKOW, Paul; KLEVORICK, Alvin. A Framework for Analyzing Predatory Pricing Policy (1979), Yale Law Journal 213; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  322. JUNQUEIRA, Eliane Botelho. A Sociologia do Direito no Brasil: introdução ao debate atual (1993), Rio de Janeiro, Lumen Juris; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  323. KALMAN, Laura. Legal Realism at Yale 1927-1960 (2001), New Jersey, The Lawbook Exchange Ltda; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  324. KAPLOW, Louis. On the Choice of Welfare Standards in Competition Law in Daniel Zimmer, The Goals of Competition Law (2012), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  325. KAPLOW, Louis. Why (Ever) Define Markets? (2010) 124 Harvard Law Review 437; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  326. KELSEN, Hans. Reine Rechtslehre (1934, 2nd ed. 1960) translated by João Baptista Machado, Teoria Pura do Direito (1985; 7a ed. 2006), São Paulo, Martins Fontes; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  327. KHAN, Lina. Amazon’s Antitrust Paradox (2017), 126 Yale Law Journal 710; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  328. KINCAID, Harold. Assessing Functional Explanations in the Social Sciences (1990), in Contributed Papers to proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, The University of Chicago Press; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  329. KIRKWOOD, John B. The Essence of Antitrust: Protecting Consumers and Small Suppliers from Anticompetitive Conduct in The Goals of Antitrust (2013) 81 Fordham Law Review; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  330. KIRKWOOD, John B.; LANDE, Robert H. The Fundamental Goal of Antitrust: Protecting Consumers, Not Increasing Efficiency (2008) 84 Notre Dame Law Review 191. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  331. KITCH, Edmund W. The Fire of Truth: A Remembrance of Law and Economics at Chicago, 1932-1970 (1983), 26 Journal of Law & Economics; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  332. KOSCHORKE, Albrecht. Ein neues Paradigma der Kulturwissenschaften in V.V.a.a, Die Figur des Dritten: Ein kulturwissenschafliches Paradigma (2010), Berlin, Suhrkamp Verlag; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  333. KOVACIC, William. Module 1: Origins and Aims of Competition Policy (2011), International Competition Network, available at http://www.icnblog.org/ftc/ftc-1-module-4-28-11/player.html; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  334. KRAAKMAN ET. AL, Reinier. The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional Approach (2nd ed. 2009), New York, Oxford University Press; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  335. KRONMAN, Anthony. Wealth Maximization as a Normative Principle in Symposium, 9 J. Leg. Stud. 191-253 (1980): essays by Dworkin and Kronman, response by Posner; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  336. LANDE, Robert H; AVERITT, Neil W. Using the ‘Consumer Choice’ Approach to Antitrust Law (2007), Antitrust Law Journal, vol. 74; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  337. LANDE, Robert H. A Traditional and Textualist Analysis of the Goals of Antitrust: Efficiency, Preventing Theft from Consumers, and Consumer Choice in The Goals of Antitrust (2013) 81 Fordham Law Review; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  338. LANDE, Robert H. Wealth Transfers as the Original and Primary Concern of Antitrust: The Efficiency Interpretation Challenged (1982) 34 Hastings Law Journal 65. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  339. LARENZ, Karl. Methodenlehre der Rechtwissenschaft (1965, 3. 1995), Berlin, Springer Verlag; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  340. LAUTERPACHT, Hersch. Some observations on the prohibition of ‘Non Liquet’ and the completeness of the law (1958) in International Law: Collected Papers (1975), vol. 2, part 1, Cambridge, University Press; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  341. LAZZARINI, Sérgio. Capitalismo de Laços: os Donos do Brasil e suas Conexões (2011, 2nd ed. 2018), São Paulo, Bei Comunicação; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  342. LEFF, Nathaniel. Economic Retardation in Nineteenth-Century Brazil (Aug., 1972), in The Economic History Review, vol. 25, n. 3; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  343. LEIFER, Eric M, WHITE, Harrison C. A Structural Approach to Markets in M. Schwartz, M. Mizruchi (1988), New York, Cambridge University Press; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  344. LEME DE BARROS, Marco Antonio Loschiavo. Sociedade, Direito e Concorrência: reflexões sociológicas sobre o sistema brasileiro de defesa da concorrência (2018), Juruá, Curitiba; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  345. LEOPOLDINO DA FONSECA, João Bosco. Lei de proteção da concorrência (2001), Rio de Janeiro, Forense; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  346. LETWIN, William. Law and Economic Policy in America: the Evolution of the Sherman Antitrust Act (1965; 1981), Chicago, The University of Chicago Press; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  347. LIMA, Heitor Ferreira. História do pensamento econômico no Brasil (1976), São Paulo, Companhia Editora Nacional; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  348. LIMA LOPES, José Reinaldo; FREITAS FILHO, Roberto. Law and Society in Brazil at the Crossroads: A Review (2014), The Annual Review of Law and Social Science 10, 91-103; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  349. LONG, Sarah. Gender Inequality, Market Distortion and Consumer Welfare: a Call to Action for Competition Authorities (2019), Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, vol. 10, issue 5, 267-268; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  350. LUHMANN, Niklas. “Was ist Kommunikation?” in Soziologische Aufklärung 6 (1995), Wiesbaden, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  351. LUHMANN, Niklas. Ausdifferenzierung des Rechts. Beiträge zur Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie (1999), Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  352. LUHMANN, Niklas. Das Recht der Gesellschaft (1993) Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp Verlag; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  353. LUHMANN, Niklas. Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft (1997), Frankfurt a.M, Suhrkamp; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  354. LUHMANN, Niklas. Die Rückgabe des zwölften Kamels (1985; publicado em 2000) translated by Dalmir Lopes Jr. A restituição do décimo segundo camelo: do sentido de uma análise sociológica do direito in Niklas Luhmann: Do sistema social à sociología jurídica (2004), Rio de Janeiro, Editora Lumen Juris; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  355. LUHMANN, Niklas. Die Wirtschaft der Gesellschaft (1988), Frankfurt am main, Suhrkamp; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  356. LUHMANN, Niklas. Die Wirtschaft der Gesellschaft als autopoietisches System (1984), in Zeitschrift für Soziologie (1984), vol. 13. N. 4; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  357. LUHMANN, Niklas. Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft (1992), Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp Verlag; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  358. LUHMANN, Niklas. Ebenen der Systembildung – Ebenendifferenzierung (1975, 2014), Unveröffentlichtes Manuskript; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  359. LUHMANN, Niklas. Einführung in die Systemtheorie (2004). Heidelberg, Carl-Auer-Systeme Verlag; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  360. LUHMANN, Niklas. Funktion und Kausalität, in Soziologische Aufklärung 1. Aufsätze zur Theorie sozialer Systeme (1970), Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  361. LUHMANN, Niklas. Ich sehe das, was Du nicht siehst in Soziologische Aufklärung 5 (1990), Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  362. LUHMANN, Niklas. Interaktion, Organisation, Gesellschaft. Anwendung der Systemtheorie in Soziologische Aufklärung 2. Aufsätze zur Theorie der Gesellschaft (1975, 6 ed. 2009), VS Verlag; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  363. LUHMANN, Niklas. Ist Konkurrenz zu empfehlen? (-) Unveröffentlichtes Manuskript; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  364. LUHMANN, Niklas. Kontingenz und Recht (1971; 2013), Frankfurt, Suhrkamp; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  365. LUHMANN, Niklas. Legitimation durch Verfahren (1969; 2nd 1975), Hermann Luchterhand Verlag, Darmstadt; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  366. LUHMANN, Niklas. Ökologische Kommunikation. Kann die moderne Gesellschaft sich auf ökologische Gefährdungen einstellen? (1985; 5ª ed. 2008), Wiesbaden, VS Verlag; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  367. LUHMANN, Niklas. Organisation und Gesellschaft in Organisation und Entscheidung (2000), Opladen, Wiesbaden; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  368. LUHMANN, Niklas. Probleme mit operativer Schliessung in Soziologische Aufklärung 6 (1995), Wiesbaden, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  369. LUHMANN, Niklas. Rechtssystem und Rechtsdogmatik (1974) Stuttgart, Kohlhammer Urban-Taschenbücher; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  370. LUHMANN, Niklas. Soziale Systeme: Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie (1984) Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  371. LUHMANN, Niklas. Soziologie des Risikos (1991) Berlin-New York, de Gruyter; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  372. LUHMANN, Niklas. Soziologische Aufklärung 1 (1970; 6 ed. 1991), Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag GmbH; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  373. LUHMANN, Niklas. Vorbemerkungen zu einer Theorie sozialer System in Soziologische Aufklärung 33. Soziales System, Gesellschaft, Organisation (1981), Westdeutscher Verlag; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  374. MACHADO NETO, Antônio Luís. Contribuição baiana à filosofia jurídica e à sociologia do direito (1966), in Revista da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de São Paulo 61; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  375. MACKENZIE, Donald; MILLO, Yuval. Constructing a Market, Performing Theory: The Historical Sociology of a Financial Derivatives Exchange (2003), American Journal of Sociology, vol. 109, n. 1; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  376. MANDEVILLE, Bernard. The fable of the bees or private vices, public benefits (1732), available at https://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/m/mandeville/bernard/bees/complete.html; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  377. MANNHEIM, Karl. Die Bedeutung der Konkurrenz im Gebiet des Geistigen in Verhandlungen des Sechsten Deutschen Soziologentages vom 17. Bis 19. September 1928 in Zürich (1929), Tübingen, Mohr; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  378. MARTINS, Izabel Andrade. Monarquia, empreendimentos e revolução: entre o laissez-faire e a proteção à ‘indústria nacional’ – origens da Revolução Praieira (1842-1848) in Izabel Andrade Marson, Cecília de S. Oliveira, Monarquia, Liberalismo e Negócios no Brasil: 1780-1860 (2013), São Paulo, Editora da Universidade de São Paulo; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  379. MATTOON, Robert. Railroads, coffee, and the growth of big business in São Paulo, Brazil (1977) Hispanic American Historical Review 7 (2); Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  380. MATTOS, Cesar. A revolução do antitruste no Brasil (2003), São Paulo, Singular; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  381. MAUSS, Marcel. Essai sur le don (1925), translated by Paulo Neves, Ensaio sobre a dádiva (2003) Presses Universitaires de France; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  382. MAY, James. Antitrust in the Formative Era: Political and Economic Theory in Constitutional and Antitrust Analysis, 1880 – 1918 (1989), in Ohio State Law Journal vol. 50 n. 2; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  383. MEESE, Alan J. Reframing the (False?) Choice Between Purchaser Welfare and Total Welfare in The Goals of Antitrust (2013) 81 Fordham Law Review; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  384. MELAMED, Douglas; PETIT, Nicolas. Before ‘After Consumer Welfare’ – A Response to Professor Wu (2018), CPI’s North America Column; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  385. MELAMED, Douglas; PETIT, Nicolas. The Misguided Assault on the Consumer Welfare Standard in the Age of Platform Markets (2018), available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=3248140; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  386. MELAMED, Douglas. Antitrust is not that complicated responding to Louis Kaplow, On the Relevance of Market Power (2017), 130 Harvard Law Review 1303; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  387. MELAMED, Douglas. Exclusionary Conduct under the Antitrust Laws: Balancing, Sacrifice, and Refusals to Deal (2005), Berkeley Technology Law Journal, vol. 20, issue 2; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  388. MELAMED, Douglas. Exclusive Dealing Arrangements and Other Exclusionary Conduct – Are There Unifying Principles? (2006) 73 Antitrust Law Journal 375; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  389. MERCADANTE, Paulo. A consciência conservadora no Brasil (1965) Rio de Janeiro, Editora Saga; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  390. MESTMÄCKER, Ernst-Joachim. Das Prinzip der Rule of Reason und ähnliche Ausnahmemechanismen im Recht der Wettbewerbsbeschränkungen in Erich Hoppmann, Ernst-Joachim Mestmäcker, Normenzwecke und Systemfunktionen im Recht der Wettbewerbsbeschränkungen (1974), Tübingen, J.C.B. Mohr; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  391. MILL, John Stuart. Principles of Political Economy with some of their Applications to Social Philosophy (1848, 7th. 1909), London, Longmans, Green and co; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  392. MILLER, Nathan Strategic Leniency and Cartel Enforcement (2009), The American Economic Review vol. 99, n. 3; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  393. MINHOTO, Laurindo Dias; LEITE GONÇALVES, Guilherme. Nova ideologia alemã? A teoria social envenenada de Niklas Luhmann (Jul/Dez 2015), São Paulo, Tempo Social, vol. 27, n. 2; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  394. MIOLA, Iagê Zendron. Law and the Economy in Neoliberalism: the Politics of Competition Regulation in Brazil (2014), dissertation presented to the “Renato Treves” International PhD Program in Law and Society; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  395. MIRANDA ROSA, Felippe Augusto de. Sociologia do Direito: O Fenômeno Jurídico como Fato Social (1970, 5th ed. 1977), Rio de Janeiro, Zahar Editores; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  396. MORAES FILHO, Evaristo de. O Problema de uma Sociologia do Direito (1950), São Paulo, Livraria Freitas Bastos S.A; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  397. MOREIRA ALVES, José Carlos. Orlando Gomes e sua obra (2009), in Revista Brasileira de Direito Comparado, número especial: o centenário do nascimento de Orlando Gomes; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  398. MOTTA, Massimo. Competition Policy: Theory and Practice (2004), Cambridge, UK; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  399. MUSACCHIO, Aldo. Experiments in financial democracy. Corporate governance and financial development in Brazil, 1882-1950 (2009), Cambridge, Cambridge University Press; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  400. NAVARRETE, Pedro Henrique. As Origens do Sistema Brasileiro de Defesa da Concorrência: o CADE (1962-1994), Master Dissertation, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  401. NEUMEYER, Fredrik. Monopolkontrolle in USA (1953), Berlin, Duncker & Humblot; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  402. NIEDERLE, Muriel. Gender in Handbook of Experimental Economics (2015), available at https://web.stanford.edu/~niederle/Gender.Niederle.pdf; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  403. NOWAG, Julian. When Sharing Platforms Fix Sellers’ Prices (2018 forthcoming) Journal of Antitrust Enforcement (OUP); Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  404. OCTAVIANI, Alessandro. A Bênção de Hamilton na Semiperiferia: Ordem Econômico-Social e os Juros da Dívida Pública Interna, in José Conti; Fernando Scaff, Orçamentos Públicos e Direito Financeiro (2011), São Paulo, Revista dos Tribunais; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  405. OLIVEIRA MOURÃO, Fernando Emanuel de. A figura do cidadão no direito da concorrência: uma análise de sociologia jurídica (2001), Masters Dissertation in Sociology, University of São Paulo; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  406. OLIVEIRA, Gesner; RODAS, João Grandino. Direito e Economia da Concorrência (2004), Rio de Janeiro, Renovar; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  407. OLIVER, Alex; SMILEY, Timothy. Plural Descriptions and Many-valued Functions (2005) Mind Association, vol. 114; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  408. ONTO, Gustavo. Ficções Econômicas e Realidades Jurídicas: uma Etnografia da Política de Defesa da Concorrência no Brasil (2016), PhD dissertation presented to the Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  409. ORBACH, Barak; REBLING, Grace Campbell. The Antitrust Curse of Bigness (2012), Southern California Law Review vol. 85; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  410. ORBACH, Barak. How Antitrust Lost its Goal in The Goals of Antitrust (2013) 81 Fordham Law Review; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  411. OSTROM, Vincent; OSTROM, Elinor. Public Goods and Public Choices (1977) Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Indiana University; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  412. PAGE, William. Ideological Conflict and the Origins of Antitrust Policy (1991), Tulane Law Review Association vol. 66 n. 1; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  413. PARISI, Francesco. Positive, Normative and Functional Schools in Law and Economics (2004), European Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 18, n. 3; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  414. PARRET, Laura. The multiple personalities of EU competition law: time for a comprehensive debate on its objectives in Daniel Zimmer, The Goals of Competition Law (2012), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  415. PARSONS, Talcott; SMELSER, Neil. Economy and Society: a Study in the Integration of Economic and Social Theory (1956) New York, The Free Press; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  416. PELAEZ, Carlos Manuel. A balança comercial, a grande depressão e a industrialização brasileira (1968), Revista Brasileira de Economia 2; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  417. PEREIRA JUNIOR, Ademir Antonio. Infraestrutura, regulação e Internet: a disciplina jurídica da neutralidade das redes (2018), PhD thesis presented at University of Sao Paulo; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  418. PEREIRA JUNIOR, Ademir Antonio; RAMOS, Luiz Felipe. Data or Data Protection? Antitrust Implications of a Missing Distinction in IBRAC, The Future of Antitrust (2020), São Paulo, available at https://ibrac.org.br/UPLOADS/Eventos/519/The_Future_of_Antitrust.pdf; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  419. PEREIRA NETO, Caio Mário da Silva; CASAGRANDE, Paulo Leonardo. Direito Concorrencial: Doutrina, Jurisprudência e Legislação (2016), São Paulo, Editora Saraiva; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  420. PEREIRA NETO, Caio Mário da Silva; LANCIERI, Filippo Maria. Towards a layered approach to a relevant market in multi-sided transaction platforms (2019), Antitrust Law Journal; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  421. PFEIFFER, Roberto Augusto Castellanos. Defesa da concorrência e bem-estar do consumidor (2015), São Paulo, Editora Revista dos Tribunais; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  422. PINTO, Adolpho. Ensaios de Sociologia do Direito (1925), Rio de Janeiro, Livraria Francisco Alves; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  423. PITOFSKY, Robert. The Political Content of Antitrust (1979) 127 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1051; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  424. POLANYI, Karl. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time (1944), New York, Rinehart & Company; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  425. POSNER, Richard. Antitrust Law (1978, 2nd 2001) Chicago, The University of Chicago Press; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  426. POSNER, Richard. Antitrust Law: An Economic Perspective (1978) Chicago, The University of Chicago Press; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  427. POSNER, Richard. Oligopoly and the Antitrust Laws: A Suggested Approach (1969), 21 Stanford Law Review; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  428. POSNER, Richard. The Chicago School of Antitrust Analysis (1979), 127 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 925; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  429. POSNER, Richard. The Economic Approach to Law (1975) 53 Texas Law Review; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  430. POSNER, Richard. The Ethical and Political Basis of the Efficiency Norm in Common Law Adjudication (1980) 8 Hofstra Law Review 487; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  431. POSNER, Richard. The Problems of Jurisprudence (1990), Massachusetts, Harvard University Press; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  432. POSNER, Richard. The Value of Wealth: a Comment on Dworkin and Kronman in Symposium, 9 J. Leg. Stud. 191-253 (1980): essays by Dworkin and Kronman, response by Posner; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  433. POSNER, Richard. Utilitarianism, Economics and Legal Theory (1979), 8 J. Leg. Stud. 103; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  434. POSSAS, Mario. Limites normativos da análise econômica antitruste (2009), Revista do IBRAC, v. 16; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  435. PRADO JR., Caio. Formação do Brasil contemporâneo: colônia (1942, 2008), São Paulo, Brasiliense; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  436. PRADO JR., Caio. História econômica do Brasil. (1945, 11 ed., 1969) São Paulo, Brasiliense; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  437. PRIEST, George L. Ronald Coase, Firms and Markets (2014), Man and the Economy, 1(2), 144; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  438. PRIEST, George L. The Limits of Antitrust and the Chicago School Tradition (2009), in Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 00(00); Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  439. PROENÇA, José Marcelo Martins. Concentração empresarial e o direito da concorrência (2001), São Paulo, Editora Saraiva; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  440. RAMOS, Luiz Felipe; SILVA FILHO, Osny da. Orlando Gomes (2015), Rio de Janeiro, Elsevier; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  441. RAMOS, Luiz Felipe; WERRON, Tobias. Concorrência como um conceito histórico-sociológico: trazendo variação para a “evolução do antitruste” in Celso Campilongo, Roberto Pfeiffer, Evolução do antitruste no Brasil (2018), São Paulo, Singular; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  442. RAMOS, Luiz Felipe. Por trás dos casos difíceis (2017), Curitiba, Editora Juruá; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  443. RICARDO, David. On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation (1817/1821, 2001), Ontario, Kitchener; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  444. RIZZO, Mario. The Mirage of Efficiency (1980), Hofstra Law Review Vol. 8, Iss. 3; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  445. ROSA, Hartmut. Wettbewerb als Interaktionsmodus. Kulturelle und sozialstrukturelle Konsequenzen der Konkurrenzgesellschaft, (2006), Leviathan 34, Nr. 1, S., 91; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  446. ROSS, Edward Alsworth. The Principles of Sociology (1920), New York, The Century CO; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  447. SALDANHA, Nelson Nogueira. Sociologia do Direito (1970), São Paulo, RT; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  448. SALOMÃO FILHO, Calixto. A Legal Theory of Economic Power: Implications for Social and Economic Development (2011), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  449. SALOMÃO FILHO, Calixto. A paralisia do Antitruste, in Revista do IBRAC – Direito da Concorrência, Consumo e Comércio Internacional (2009), vol. 16, 305-323; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  450. SALOMÃO FILHO, Calixto. Direito Concorrencial (2013), São Paulo, Malheiros; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  451. SALOMÃO FILHO, Calixto. Monopolies and Underdevelopment: From Colonial Past to Global Reality (2015), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  452. SALOMÃO FILHO, Calixto. Teoria crítico-estruturalista do direito comercial (2015) São Paulo, Marcial Pons; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  453. SALOP, Steven. Exclusionary Conduct, Effect on Consumers, and the Flawed Profit-Sacrifice Standard (2006) 73 Antitrust Law Journal; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  454. SALOP, Steven. Strategy, Predation and Antitrust Analysis (1981) Federal Trade Commission, Bureau of Economics; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  455. SAMUELSON, Paul. The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure (1954), The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 36, n. 4; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  456. SAVIGNY, Karl von. System des heutigen römischen Rechts (1849), translated by Jacinto Mesía and Manuel Poley, Sistema del derecho romano actual (1878), Tomo I, Madrid, F. Góngora y Compañia Editores; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  457. SAUDER, Michael. Third Parties and Status Systems. How the Structures of Status Systems Matter in Theory and Society 35 (2006) 299-32; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  458. SCAFF, Fernando Facury. Tributação, concorrência, sonegação e renúncias fiscais (2018) Conjur, October, available at https://www.conjur.com.br/2018-out-29/tributacao-concorrencia-sonegacao-renuncias-fiscais; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  459. SCHELLING, Thomas. The Strategy of Conflict (1980), Cambridge, Harvard University; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  460. SCHUARTZ, Luis Fernando. A desconstitucionalização do Direito de Defesa da Concorrência in Cláudio Pereira de Souza Neto; Daniel Sarmento; Gustavo Binenbojm (Org.) Vinte Anos da Constituição Federal de 1988 (2009), Rio de Janeiro, Lumen Juris; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  461. SCHUARTZ, Luis Fernando. Quando o bom é o melhor amigo do ótimo. A autonomia do direito perante a economia e a política da concorrência (2007), Revista de direito administrativo, v. 1, 97. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  462. SCHWARTZ, Louis. “Justice” and Other Non-Economic Goals of Antitrust (1979), 127 University of Pennsylvania Law Review; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  463. SCHWARTZ, Stuart. Plantations and peripheries, c. 1580-c.1750” in Lesle Bethell, Colonial Brazil (1987), Cambridge, Cambridge University Press; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  464. SCHWARZ, Roberto. As idéias fora do lugar, in Ao Vencedor as batatas (1992), São Paulo, Duas Cidades; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  465. SCHWARZ, Roberto. Nacional por subtração, in Que horas são? (1987), São Paulo, Companhia das Letras; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  466. SELLA, Emanuele. La Concorrenza I (1916), Torino, Fratelli Bocca; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  467. SHAPIRO, Carl. Antitrust in a Time of Populism (2018), International Journal of Industrial Organization, available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3058345; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  468. SILBER, Simão Davi. Política econômica; defesa do nível de renda e industrialização no período 1929/1939 (1973), Master dissertation presented at Fundação Getúlio Vargas, Rio de Janeiro; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  469. SILVA REIS, Luciana. A modernização crítica do pensamento jurídico brasileiro no século XX: ciência do direito, ensino e pesquisa (2018), São Paulo, PhD thesis presented at the University of Sao Paulo; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  470. SIMMEL, Georg. Soziologie der Konkurrenz (1903), Neue Deutsche Rundschau XIV; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  471. SIMMEL, Georg. Soziologie. Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung (1908; 5 ed. 1968), Berlin, Duncker & Humblot; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  472. SIMON, Herbert. A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice (1955), The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 69, No. 1; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  473. SIMON, Herbert. Rational choice and the structure of the environment (1956), Psychological Review, 63 (2); Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  474. SIMONSON, Itamar; TVERSKY, Amos. Choice in Context: Tradeoff Contrast and Extremeness Aversion (1992) Journal of Marketing Research vol. XXIX; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  475. SMITH, Adam. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (1776; 1905), London, Cannan ed; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  476. SOKOL, Daniel, COMERFORD, Roisin. Antitrust and Regulating Big Data (2016), 23 Geo. Mason Law Review; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  477. SOKOL, Daniel, Anti Antitrust’s Curse of Bigness Problem (2020), Legal Studies Research Paper Series Paper n. 20-12; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  478. SOLOW, Robert M. Economic History and Economics (1985), The American Economic Review, vol. 75, n. 2; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  479. SOUTO, Claudio; SOUTO, Solange. Sociologia do Direito (1981) São Paulo, EDUSP; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  480. SOUZA, Jesse. A tolice da inteligência brasileira (2nd ed. 2018), Rio de Janeiro, Leya; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  481. SOUZA, Jesse. Uma interpretação alternativa do dilema brasileiro, in A modernização seletiva (2000), Brasília, UnB; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  482. STAVROULAKI, Theodosia. Mind the Gap: Antitrust, Health Disparities and Telemedicine (2018 forthcoming), American Journal of Law and Medicine available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=3257606; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  483. STEINER, Philippe. Altruísmo, dons e trocas simbólicas (2016), São Paulo, Editora Unesp; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  484. STEINER, Philippe. Altruísmo, egoísmo e solidariedade na Escola Durkheimiana in Alexandre Masella et alii, Durkheim 150 anos (2009), Argumentum Editora. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  485. STEINER, Philippe. Comte, altruism and the critique of Political Economy (2015), Gemass Working Paper; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  486. STERN, Louis. Antitrust Implications of a Sociological Interpretation of Competition, Conflict, and Cooperation in the Marketplace (1971) 16 Antitrust Bulletin; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  487. STIGLER, George. Perfect Competition, Historically Contemplated (1957) 65 The Journal of Political Economy; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  488. STIGLER, George. The Origin of the Sherman Act (1985), in The Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 14, n. 1, 1-12; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  489. STIGLITZ, Joseph. Foreword in Karl Polany, The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time (1944, 2nd ed 2001), Boston, Beacon Press; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  490. STONE, Julius. Non Liquet and the function of law in the International Community (1960), in The British Year Book of International Law 1959 (1960), Oxford, University Press; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  491. STUCKE, Maurice. Does the Rule of Reason Violate the Rule of Law? (2009) 42 University of California Davis Law Review; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  492. STUCKE, Maurice. New Antitrust Realism (2009), Global Competition Policy Magazine, 7 and Avishalom Tor, Understanding Behavioral Antitrust (2013), 92 Texas Law Review 573; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  493. STUCKE, Maurice. Reconsidering Antitrust’s Goals (2012), 53 Boston College Law Review 551; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  494. STUCKE, Maurice. Should Competition Policy Promote Happiness? in The Goals of Antitrust (2013) 81 Fordham Law Review; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  495. STUCKE, Maurice. What is competition? in Daniel Zimmer, The Goals of Competition Law (2012), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  496. SUMMERHILL, William. Order against progress. Government, foreign investment and railroads in Brazil, 1854-1913 (2003). Stanford, Stanford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  497. SWEDBERG, Richard. Markets in Society in N. Smelser, R. Swedberg, Handbook of Economic Sociology (2005), Princeton, Princeton University Press, 250, n. 1; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  498. TABOSA PINTO, Agerson. Sociologia Geral e Jurídica (2005), Fortaleza, Qualygraf Editora e Gráfica; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  499. TAUSCHEK, Markus. Kulturen des Wettbewerbs: Formationen kompetitiver Logiken (2013), Münster, Waxmann; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  500. TEPPER, Jonathan; HEARN, Denise. The myth of capitalism: monopolies and the death of competition (2019), New Jersey, Hoboken; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  501. THALER, Richard. Toward a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice (1980), Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  502. THORELLI, Hans. The Federal Antitrust Policy: Origination of an American Tradition (1954), Stockholm, Norstedt & Söner; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  503. TOR, Avishalom. Understanding Behavioral Antitrust (2013), 92 Texas Law Review 573; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  504. TROESKEN, Werner. The Letters of John Sherman and the Origins of Antitrust (2002), available at http://www.pitt.edu/~troesken/papers/letters.pdf; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  505. TURNER Donald F.. The Definition of Agreement under the Sherman Act (1962), 75 Harvard Law Review. 655; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  506. TVERSKY, Amos; KAHNEMAN, Daniel. The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice in Science (1981) 211. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  507. ULHOA COELHO, Fábio. Direito antitruste brasileiro (1995), São Paulo, Saraiva; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  508. VARIAN, Hal. Intermediate Microeconomics: a modern approach (1987, 8th ed. 2010), W.W. Norton & Company, New York; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  509. VAZ, Isabel. Direito econômico da concorrência (1993), Rio de Janeiro, Forense; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  510. VIEIRA, Yan Villela, Concorrência e cooperação: uma variação sobre a evolução do combate a cartéis no Brasil (2020), Master’s Dissertation in Law, University of São Paulo; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  511. VON WIESE, Leopold. Die Konkurrenz vorwiegend in soziologisch-systematischer Betrachtung in Deutsche Gesellschaft für Soziologie (DGS), Verhandlungen des 6. Deutschen Soziologentages vom 17. bis 19. September 1928 in Zürich: Vorträge und Diskussionen in der Hauptversammlung und in den Sitzungen der Untergruppen (1929), Tübingen, Mohr Siebeck; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  512. WAKED, Dina I. Antitrust Goals in Developing Countries: Policy Alternatives and Normative Choices (2015), in Seattle University Law Review, vol. 38; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  513. WALLER, Spencer Weber. The Antitrust Legacy of Thurman Arnold (2004), 78 St. John’s Law Review; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  514. WALLER, Spencer Weber. Thurman Arnold: Biography (2005), New York University Press, New York; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  515. WARAT, Luis Alberto. La linguística jurídica, la problemática definitoria y el condicionamiento ideológico del accionar humano, in Luis Alberto Warat, Antonio Anselmo Martino, Lenguaje y definicion juridica (1973), Buenos Aires, Cooperadora de Derecho y Ciencias Sociales; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  516. WEBER, Max. Die protestantische Ethik und der ‘Geist’ des Kapitalismus translated by José Marcos Mariani de Macedo, A ética protestante e o “espírito” do capitalismo (2004), São Paulo, Companhia das Letras; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  517. WEBER, Max. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft (1922, 2006), Paderborn, Voltmedia; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  518. WERDEN, Gregory. Back to School: What the Chicago School and New Brandeis School Get Right (2018), available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=3247116; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  519. WERDEN, Gregory. Identifying Exclusionary Conduct Under Section 2: The ‘No Economic Sense’ Test (2006) Antitrust Law Journal 413; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  520. WERDEN, Gregory. Why (Ever) Define Markets? An Answer to Professor Kaplow (2013), Antitrust Law Journal vol. 78, n. 3; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  521. WERRON, Tobias; RAMOS, Luiz Felipe. Why do we believe in (sociology of) competition? (2017) available at https://necsousp.files.wordpress.com/2016/09/why-do-we-believe-in-sociology-of-competition_necso.pdf; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  522. WERRON, Tobias. Wettbewerb als historischer Begriff in Ralph Jessen, Konkurrenz in der Geschichte (2014), Frankfurt am Main, Campus Verlag; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  523. WERRON, Tobias. Why do we believe in competition? A historical-sociological view of competition as an institutionalized modern imaginary In E. Hartmann & P.F. Kjaer Competition, Special Issue of Distinktion (2015) Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  524. WETZEL, Dietmar J. Soziologie des Wettbewerbs. Eine kultur- und wirtschaftssoziologische Analyse der Marktgesellschaft (2013), Wiesbaden, Springer VS; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  525. WHITE, Harrison. Identity and Control: How Social Formations Emerge (1992; 2nd ed. 2008), Princeton, Princenton University Press; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  526. WHITE, Harrison. Where do markets come from? (1981), American Journal of Sociology, Volume 87, Issue 3, November; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  527. WILDE, Anna, EVANS, Melanie. The Hidden System That Explains How Your Doctor Makes Referrals (2018), The Wall Street Journal, available at https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-hidden-system-that-explains-how-your-doctor-makes-referrals-11545926166?mod=hp_lista_pos1; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  528. WILLIAMSON, Oliver. Economies as an Antitrust Defense: The Welfare Tradeoffs (1968), 58 American Economic Review 18; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  529. WRIGHT, Joshua; DORSEY, Elyse; KLICK, Jonathan; RYBNICEK, Jan. Requiem for a Paradox: the Dubious Rise and Inevitable Fall of Hipster Antitrust (forthcoming 2019), Arizona State Law Journal available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3249524&download=yes; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  530. WRIGHT, Joshua; GINSBURG, Douglas. The Goals of Antitrust: Welfare Trumps Choice in The Goals of Antitrust (2013) 81 Fordham Law Review; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  531. WRIGHT, Joshua; PORTUESE, Aurelien. Antitrust Populism: Towards a Taxonomy (2020), Stanford Journal of Law, Business, and Finance, vol. 21, n. 01; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  532. WRIGHT, Joshua; STONE, Judd. Misbehavioral Economics: the Case Against Behavioral Antitrust (2012), Cardozo Law Review, vol. 33, n. 4; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  533. WRIGHT, Larry. Teleological Explanations: An Etiological Analysis of Goals and Functions (1976), Berkeley, University of California Press; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  534. WU, Tim. After Consumer Welfare, Now What? The ‘Protection of Competition’ Standard in Practice (2018), CPI Antitrust Chronicle; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  535. WU, Tim. The Curse of Bigness: Antitrust in the New Guilded Age (2018), New York, Columbia Global Reports; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  536. YERGIN, Daniel. The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money and Power (1991), available at https://erenow.com/modern/theepicquestforoilmoneyandpower/3.html; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  537. YUN, John. Antitrust After Big Data (2019), Criterion Journal on Innovation 4. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  538. ZANATTA, Rafael. Desmistificando a Law & Economics: a receptividade da disciplina Direito e Economia no Brasil (2012), available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266344891_Desmistificando_a_Law_Economics_a_receptividade_da_disciplina_Direito_e_Economia_no_Brasil; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  539. ZIMMER, Daniel. The basic goal of competition law: to protect the opposite side of the market in Daniel Zimmer, The Goals of Competition Law (2012), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037
  540. ZUCKERMANN, Ezra. The Categorial Imperative: Securities Analysts and the Illegitimacy Discount in American Journal of Sociology 104 (1999), 1398-1438; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748927037

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus der Reihe "Recht und Gesellschaft - Law and Society"
Cover des Buchs: Politikvermittlung durch Parteien in der Spätmoderne
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Marcel Valentin
Politikvermittlung durch Parteien in der Spätmoderne
Cover des Buchs: Die Heimat der Anderen
Monographie Vollzugriff
Valentin Feneberg
Die Heimat der Anderen
Cover des Buchs: Mit Recht Politik machen
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Alik Mazukatow
Mit Recht Politik machen
Cover des Buchs: Die Umsetzung schulischer Inklusion nach der UN-Behindertenrechtskonvention in den deutschen Bundesländern
Monographie Vollzugriff
Sebastian Steinmetz, Michael Wrase, Marcel Helbig, Ina Döttinger
Die Umsetzung schulischer Inklusion nach der UN-Behindertenrechtskonvention in den deutschen Bundesländern
Cover des Buchs: Protest und Rechtsstreit
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Ulrike A. C. Müller
Protest und Rechtsstreit

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Feedback geben

Wir freuen uns über Ihr Feedback zu Inhalten und Funktionen. Ihre Nachricht hilft uns, unseren Service stetig zu verbessern.

Bewertung
Bild anhängen
oder hier ablegen
PNG oder JPG (max. 3 MB)

Anmelden

Passwort vergessen?
Login über Ihre Institution (SSO, Shibboleth, OpenAthens)
Noch kein Benutzerkonto?
Jetzt registrieren

Publikation zitieren

Download: RIS BibTex