Sammelband Open Access Vollzugriff
The Law between Objectivity and Power
- Herausgeber:innen:
- Verlag:
- 2022
Zusammenfassung
Der Band untersucht das Recht im Spannungsfeld von Objektivität und Macht: Ist Recht ein Instrument der Macht oder im Gegenteil in der Lage, Macht aufgrund seines objektiven Charakters einzugrenzen? Dieser Frage wird im Rahmen eines internationalen sowie inter- und intradisziplinären Ansatzes nachgegangen.Eine Besonderheit des Buches besteht dabei darin, das zentrale Problem nicht nur aus einer theoretischen Perspektive zu beleuchten, sondern auch praktische, am positiven Recht orientierte Beiträge aufzunehmen. Damit folgt das Buch der in seiner Einleitung skizzierten Idee eines an der Verfassung orientierten Pragmatismus (Constitutional Pragmatism): Jede Position im Streit um die Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Objektivität im Recht bringt normative Implikationen mit sich, sodass die verfassungsrechtlichen und die über die Verfassung legitimierten einfachrechtlichen Vorgaben, die normalerweise über Wertungskonflikte entscheiden, auch bei der Lösung dieser epistemologischen Frage zu beachten sind.
Schlagworte
Publikation durchsuchen
Bibliographische Angaben
- Copyrightjahr
- 2022
- ISBN-Print
- 978-3-8487-8334-2
- ISBN-Online
- 978-3-7489-2721-1
- Verlag
- Nomos, Baden-Baden
- Sprache
- Englisch
- Seiten
- 477
- Produkttyp
- Sammelband
Inhaltsverzeichnis
KapitelSeiten
- Titelei/InhaltsverzeichnisSeiten 1 - 16 Download Kapitel (PDF)
- Autor:innen:Download Kapitel (PDF)
- I. IntroductionAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- a. The irrelevance of positivismAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- aa. Observational mode of thoughtAutor:innen:
- bb. Deontological mode of thoughtAutor:innen:
- cc. Consequentialist mode of thoughtAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- aa. Decisionist mode of thoughtAutor:innen:
- bb. Procedural mode of thoughtAutor:innen:
- cc. Critical mode of thoughtAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- aa. Objectivist approaches to contract lawAutor:innen:
- bb. Subjectivist approaches to contract lawAutor:innen:
- cc. The objectivist dimension of private autonomy in heteronomous lawmakingAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- a. Subjectivity and objectivity in interpretationAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- aa. Productional subjectivity and applicational objectivity (‘Subjectivists’)Autor:innen:
- bb. Productional objectivity and applicational objectivity (‘Objectivists’)Autor:innen:
- cc. Productional subjectivity and applicational subjectivity (‘full nihilists’)Autor:innen:
- dd. Productional objectivity and applicational subjectivity (‘partial nihilists’)Autor:innen:
- c. Parallels in private lawmakingAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- a. The meaning of legitimacy and its connection to objectivityAutor:innen:
- b. The criterion of legitimacy and its connection to objectivityAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- aa. Field-specificity and empirical legitimacyAutor:innen:
- bb. Field-specificity and normative legitimacyAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- aa. Three core aspects of philosophical PragmatismAutor:innen:
- bb. The different perspective of pragmatic adjudicationAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- aa. Pragmatism and the constitution intertwinedAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- (1) Epistemological statements on the productional levelAutor:innen:
- (2) Epistemological statements on the applicational levelAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- 1. StructuralismAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- a. DistinctnessAutor:innen:
- b. Unconsciousness and necessityAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- aa. Form and substance: bundle-structures IAutor:innen:
- bb. Substance and substance: bundle-structures IIAutor:innen:
- cc. Thought-structuresAutor:innen:
- dd. Reception-structuresAutor:innen:
- 3. Parallels in private lawmakingAutor:innen:
- 4. Why to think about structural objectivityAutor:innen:
- V. ConclusionAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:Download Kapitel (PDF)
- I. IntroductionAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- 1. Distinguishing reference points of subjectivism, objectivism, and intuitionismAutor:innen:
- 2. The postulate of methodical accuracy – avoiding ‘pseudo-subjectivism’Autor:innen:
- III. Subjectivism vs Objectivism in Private Law: Referring Legal Solutions to the Parties’ IntentionsAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- 1. General perspective: dependence of the legislator’s intention on fairness and reasonAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- a. The personal soft spotAutor:innen:
- b. The lingual soft spotAutor:innen:
- c. The dynamic dimension soft spotAutor:innen:
- 3. Impossibility of complete legislative pre-determination by ‘authoritative’ legal sourcesAutor:innen:
- 4. The legitimacy of correcting the legislator’s intention on the application/court levelAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- 1. Tendency to overstate the uncertainty issueAutor:innen:
- 2. Intersubjective reliability as ‘first degree objectivity’ of legal reasoningAutor:innen:
- 3. Framing intuition as ‘second degree objectivity’ of legal reasoningAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:Download Kapitel (PDF)
- Autor:innen:
- 1. Historical argumentsAutor:innen:
- 2. Dynamic interpretationAutor:innen:
- 3. ObjectivityAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- 1. The problem of objectivityAutor:innen:
- 2. The practical problem: the availability of historical evidenceAutor:innen:
- 3. Theoretical problems: will and formAutor:innen:
- 4. Objectivity attenuatedAutor:innen:
- III. Dynamic Interpretation and ObjectivityAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- 1. The impermissibility of ‘direct’ historical argumentationAutor:innen:
- 2. Meaning and purpose: two types of legislative intentAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- a. Multiple purposes and the presumption in favour of meaningAutor:innen:
- b. Interconnected purposes and the presumption in favour of the lower levelAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- a. Specific purposesAutor:innen:
- b. Supplementary purposesAutor:innen:
- c. Dynamic interpretation beyond historical argumentsAutor:innen:
- V. ConclusionAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:Download Kapitel (PDF)
- Autor:innen:
- 1. Historical overviewAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- a. General observationsAutor:innen:
- b. The judiciary between rule of law and democracyAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- 1. General remarksAutor:innen:
- 2. The Bundesverfassungsgericht and PowerAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- 1. Dogmatics as a tool to reduce judicial powerAutor:innen:
- 2. Constitutional adjudication, special techniques, and case lawAutor:innen:
- IV. The Bundesverfassungsgericht as a Constitutional OrganAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:Download Kapitel (PDF)
- Autor:innen:
- 1. Preliminary no 1: why we should careAutor:innen:
- 2. Preliminary no 2: some assumptionsAutor:innen:
- 3. Preliminary no 3: a brief summary of today’s originalismAutor:innen:
- II. Conceptual Clarifications: Theories of Law, Theories of Interpretation, and Theories of AdjudicationAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- 1. Legal positivismAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- a. The core of the theory: decision-making (only) according to rulesAutor:innen:
- b. The three key claims of formalismAutor:innen:
- 3. The case against the compatibility of legal positivism with formalismAutor:innen:
- 4. ConclusionAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- 1. Theories of constitutional law: what does American constitutional law consist of?Autor:innen:
- 2. Theories of legal interpretation: how to determine the content of American constitutional law?Autor:innen:
- 3. Theories of adjudication: how must courts resolve constitutional disputes?Autor:innen:
- V. ConclusionAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:Download Kapitel (PDF)
- I. IntroductionAutor:innen:
- II. Remedies, Discretion, and System-building: Some ClassificationsAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- a. Remedial discretion in equitable remediesAutor:innen:
- b. Statutory discretionAutor:innen:
- c. Remedial constructive trusts and ‘discretionary remedialism’Autor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- a. No theory of remedial discretion in private law (yet)Autor:innen:
- b. Contract concretisation and adaptationAutor:innen:
- c. Good faithAutor:innen:
- d. The quantification of damagesAutor:innen:
- 3. ComparisonAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- 1. The uneasy case for remedial discretionAutor:innen:
- 2. Unfettered power? Remedial discretion and the rule of lawAutor:innen:
- V. ConclusionAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:Download Kapitel (PDF)
- I. Judicial Development of the Law as a Constitutional Problem – General AspectsAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- 1. Development of the requirement of a statutory provision (Vorbehalt des Gesetzes)Autor:innen:
- 2. Constitutional basis of the requirement of a statutory provision as developed under the Federal Constitutional Court’s essential-matters doctrineAutor:innen:
- 3. Characteristics of the Federal Constitutional Court’s essential-matters doctrineAutor:innen:
- 4. Institutional extension of the essential-matters doctrine – application to the judiciaryAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- a. Differentiation based on the parties to the disputeAutor:innen:
- b. Change of position? – Application to constellations opposing private individualsAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- a. Judges duty to adjudicate in civil disputesAutor:innen:
- b. The conciliatory character of private lawAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- a. Different functions of private lawAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- aa. Regulation and fundamental rightsAutor:innen:
- bb. Regulation and democratic legitimacy – who defines the common good?Autor:innen:
- c. The functions of balancing interests and of providing infrastructureAutor:innen:
- IV. ConclusionAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:Download Kapitel (PDF)
- I. Introduction: Private International Law, Objectivity, and PowerAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- 1. European private international lawAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- a. Federal lawAutor:innen:
- b. State lawAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- 1. Public policy exceptionAutor:innen:
- 2. Overriding mandatory provisionsAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- 1. Federal lawAutor:innen:
- 2. State law: Draft Restatement (Third) of Conflict of LawsAutor:innen:
- V. Conclusion: Comparative RemarksAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:Download Kapitel (PDF)
- I. IntroductionAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- 1. Sources of lack of objectivityAutor:innen:
- 2. Is algorithmic lack of objectivity superior to human lack of objectivity?Autor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- 1. Concealing controversyAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- a. Man-made definitions of riskAutor:innen:
- b. Uneven distribution of risksAutor:innen:
- c. Tolerated risksAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- 1. Away from the public eye – undemocratic decision-makingAutor:innen:
- 2. Away from law enforcement officials – de-skillingAutor:innen:
- 3. Away from the courts – limited legal scrutiny due to complexityAutor:innen:
- 4. From tool to authority figure – algorithmic thoughtlessnessAutor:innen:
- 5. From the logic of the law to the logic of algorithms – ‘machine logic’Autor:innen:
- V. ConclusionAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:Download Kapitel (PDF)
- I. Introduction to the Concept of InnocenceAutor:innen:
- II. An Epistemological PresumptionAutor:innen:
- III. An Axiological PrincipleAutor:innen:
- IV. A Protected StatusAutor:innen:
- V. ConclusionAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:Download Kapitel (PDF)
- I. IntroductionAutor:innen:
- II. Arbitration as a Spontaneous OrderAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- 1. Disappointing experience: the elimination of the recourse of annulment in Belgium in 1985Autor:innen:
- 2. Successful experience: the recognition of the non-signatory theories in the Peruvian Law of Arbitration in 2014Autor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- 1. The spontaneous evolution of the concept of consentAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- a. The original criterion of arbitrability: economic nature or similar conceptsAutor:innen:
- b. The expansion of arbitrability: broad interpretation of the general criterionAutor:innen:
- c. Concrete examples of extended arbitrabilityAutor:innen:
- d. Towards universal arbitrabilityAutor:innen:
- V. ConclusionAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:Download Kapitel (PDF)
- I. IntroductionAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- 1. The localist approachAutor:innen:
- 2. The pluralist approachAutor:innen:
- 3. The autonomous order approachAutor:innen:
- III. The World Order ApproachAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- 1. Projects and systems (Kahn)Autor:innen:
- 2. Dédoublement fonctionnel (Scelle)Autor:innen:
- 3. Transnational legal process (Jessup and Koh)Autor:innen:
- V. ConclusionAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:Download Kapitel (PDF)
- I. IntroductionAutor:innen:
- II. Positive vs. Normative Economic Analysis of LawAutor:innen:
- III. Economic Analysis and the Legislative ProcessAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- aa. Positive Economic AnalysisAutor:innen:
- bb. Normative Economic AnalysisAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- aa. Positive Economic AnalysisAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- (1) Existing interpretation of the statutory rule in case law and legal scholarshipAutor:innen:
- (2) Non-existent interpretation of the statutory rule in case law and legal scholarshipAutor:innen:
- (3) Absence of legal principlesAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- aa. General features of legal principlesAutor:innen:
- bb. Two ways of establishing legal principles: inference through induction and traceability to the idea of lawAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- (1) Positive lawAutor:innen:
- (2) Legal precedentAutor:innen:
- bb. Traceability to the idea of lawAutor:innen:
- c. Efficiency as the normative basis of an enhancement of the lawAutor:innen:
- V. ConclusionAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:Download Kapitel (PDF)
- I. IntroductionAutor:innen:
- II. The Oresteia: Law as the Institutionalization of PowerAutor:innen:
- III. Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland: Law as the Language of PowerAutor:innen:
- IV. The Trial: Law as the Instrument of PowerAutor:innen:
- V. ConclusionAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:Download Kapitel (PDF)
- I. IntroductionAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- 1. Three judgments, two and a half opinions, one issueAutor:innen:
- 2. Core question: burden of proofAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- 1. Metaphorical feedback-effectAutor:innen:
- 2. Some empirical evidenceAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- a. The corporation is a different personAutor:innen:
- b. The inner structure stays hiddenAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- a. The corporation is a networkAutor:innen:
- b. The inner structure is revealedAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- 1. Come to stayAutor:innen:
- 2. Metaphors matterAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:Download Kapitel (PDF)
- I. IntroductionAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- 1. Historical foundationsAutor:innen:
- 2. Social and legal scholarshipAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- a. Non-exclusivenessAutor:innen:
- b. Not enoughAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- 1. Historical foundationsAutor:innen:
- 2. Social and legal scholarshipAutor:innen:
- 3. Mapping citizenship law as an instrument of powerAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- a. Reclaiming citizenshipAutor:innen:
- b. Instrumental turn of citizenshipAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- 1. Indigenous peoplesAutor:innen:
- 2. TerritoriansAutor:innen:
- V. ConclusionAutor:innen:
