Cover des Buchs: Differentiated Integration at the EU Member State Level
Im Shop erwerben
, um zu prüfen, ob Sie einen Vollzugriff auf diese Publikation haben.
Monographie Kein Zugriff

Differentiated Integration at the EU Member State Level

An Empirical Comparison of European Integration Theories
Autor:innen:
Verlag:
 2016

Zusammenfassung

Mit diesem Buch werden neue Wege beschritten, denn es liefert ein „Large-N“-Design zur Beschreibung und Erklärung des Phänomens der differenzierten Integration auf Ebene der Mitgliedstaaten der Europäischen Union. Es werden Hypothesen aus den bedeutendsten Integrationstheorien – Intergouvernementalismus, Supranationalismus und Konstruktivismus – abgeleitet und einem systematischen Hypothesentest auf Basis der neuen EUDIFF-Datensätze und von Paneldatenanalysen ausgesetzt.

Das Buch untersucht zudem das logische Verhältnis zwischen den drei Theorien sowie deren relative Erklärungskraft und empirische Bestätigung. Diesem Zweck dient auch ein empirischer Vergleich der Theorien und ihrer jeweiligen Annahmen, Hypothesen, Indikatoren und empirischen Modelle.

Dr. Thomas Duttle arbeitet als wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter und Koordinator im Fachbereich Politik- und Verwaltungswissenschaft der Universität Konstanz. Seine Forschungsinteressen beinhalten das politische System der EU, die europäische Integration und die vergleichende Politikfeldanalyse.

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Copyrightjahr
2016
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-3155-8
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-7525-3
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe
Studies on the European Union
Band
11
Sprache
Englisch
Seiten
248
Produkttyp
Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Kein Zugriff 1 - 22
    1. 1.1 Three perspectives on DI Kein Zugriff
    2. 1.2 Research objective Kein Zugriff
    3. 1.3 Book structure Kein Zugriff
    1. 2.1 Conceptual studies: Categorizing DI Kein Zugriff
    2. 2.2 Normative studies: Designing optimal jurisdictions Kein Zugriff
    3. 2.3 Empirical studies: Describing and explaining DI Kein Zugriff
    4. 2.4 Conclusion Kein Zugriff
      1. 3.1.1 Popper’s logical perspective on scientific change and theory comparison Kein Zugriff
      2. 3.1.2 Kuhn’s historicist perspective on scientific change and theory comparison Kein Zugriff
      3. 3.1.3 Lakatos’ historicist perspective on scientific change and theory comparison Kein Zugriff
      4. 3.1.4 Discussion Kein Zugriff
        1. 3.2.1.1 Typology of logical relationships #1: Opp and Wippler (1990c) Kein Zugriff
        2. 3.2.1.2 Typology of logical relationships #2: Wagner and Berger (1985) Kein Zugriff
        3. 3.2.1.3 Typology of logical relationships #3: Nauck (1988) Kein Zugriff
        4. 3.2.1.4 Typology of integration possibilities: Hirschi (1979) and Liska et al. (1989) Kein Zugriff
        5. 3.2.1.5 Integrative typology #1: Seipel (1999) Kein Zugriff
        6. 3.2.1.6 Integrative typology #2: Jupille et al. (2003) Kein Zugriff
      2. 3.2.2 An integrated conceptualization of logical relationships and comparison outcomes Kein Zugriff
        1. 3.2.3.1 Selection of the theories Kein Zugriff
        2. 3.2.3.2 Explication of the theories Kein Zugriff
        3. 3.2.3.3 Operationalization and empirical examination of the theories Kein Zugriff
    3. 3.3 An empirical comparison of three major European integration theories Kein Zugriff
    1. 4.1 Mapping the area of European Integration studies Kein Zugriff
      1. National preference formation Kein Zugriff
      2. Intergovernmental negotiation Kein Zugriff
      3. Institutional design Kein Zugriff
      1. Functional spillover Kein Zugriff
      2. Political spillover Kein Zugriff
      3. Cultivated spillover Kein Zugriff
    4. 4.4 Social constructivism Kein Zugriff
      1. 4.5.1 Epistemological and methodological assumptions Kein Zugriff
      2. 4.5.2 Ontological assumptions Kein Zugriff
      3. 4.5.3 Discussion Kein Zugriff
    1. 5.1 Conceptualization of DI Kein Zugriff
      1. IG-1: The more deviant the international interdependence of an EU member state is from the EU mainstream, the higher will be the extent of its DI arrangements (LI, RI). Kein Zugriff
      2. IG-2: The more deviant the government interest of an EU member state is from the EU mainstream, the higher will be the extent of its DI arrangements (LI). Kein Zugriff
      3. IG-3: If the government interest of an EU member state is constrained by a domestic crisis, then the extent of its DI arrangements will be higher (LI). Kein Zugriff
      4. IG-4: The higher the bargaining power of an EU member state is, the lower will be the extent of its DI arrangements (LI). Kein Zugriff
      5. IG-5: The more constrained an EU member state is by domestic veto players, the higher will be the extent of its DI arrangements (LI). Kein Zugriff
      6. IG-6: The more side payments an EU member state receives, the lower will be the extent of its DI arrangements (LI). Kein Zugriff
      1. SN-1: The higher the economic interdependence of an EU member state is with the other member states, the lower will be the extent of its DI arrangements (NF). Kein Zugriff
      2. SN-2: The higher the transnational exchange of an EU member state is with the other member states, the lower will be the extent of its DI arrangements (SI). Kein Zugriff
      3. SN-3: The older the EU membership of a country is, the lower will be the extent of its DI arrangements (NF). Kein Zugriff
      1. CV-1: The more deviant the government ideology of an EU member state is from the EU mainstream, the higher will be the extent of its DI arrangements. Kein Zugriff
      2. CV-2: The more deviant the public attitudes towards European integration of an EU member state are from the EU mainstream, the higher will be the extent of its DI arrangements. Kein Zugriff
      3. CV-3: The older the EU membership of a country is, the lower will be the extent of its DI arrangements. Kein Zugriff
    5. 5.5 Logical comparison between the respective DI-specific hypotheses Kein Zugriff
      1. 6.1.1 Units of analysis in EU primary law Kein Zugriff
      2. 6.1.2 Units of analysis in EU secondary law Kein Zugriff
        1. Hypothesis IG-1: International interdependence deviation Kein Zugriff
        2. Hypothesis IG-2: Government interest deviation Kein Zugriff
        3. Hypothesis IG-3: Domestic crisis Kein Zugriff
        4. Hypothesis IG-4: Bargaining power Kein Zugriff
        5. Hypothesis IG-5: Domestic political institutions Kein Zugriff
        6. Hypothesis IG-6: Side payments received Kein Zugriff
        1. Hypothesis SN-1: International interdependence Kein Zugriff
        2. Hypothesis SN-2: Transnational exchange Kein Zugriff
        3. Hypothesis SN-3: Socialization Kein Zugriff
        1. Hypothesis CV-1: Government ideology deviation Kein Zugriff
        2. Hypothesis CV-2: Public attitudes deviation Kein Zugriff
          1. Control variables Kein Zugriff
    1. 7.1 Research design: characteristics and advantages of the panel design Kein Zugriff
    2. 7.2 Methodology: Introduction to and specification of the count data regressions Kein Zugriff
      1. 7.3.1 DI arrangements in EU primary law Kein Zugriff
      2. 7.3.2 DI arrangements in EU secondary law Kein Zugriff
      1. 7.4.1 Isolated testing of the intergovernmentalist hypotheses Kein Zugriff
      2. 7.4.2 Isolated testing of the supranationalist hypotheses Kein Zugriff
      3. 7.4.3 Isolated testing of the constructivist hypotheses Kein Zugriff
        1. 7.4.4.1 Sign test and t-test Kein Zugriff
        2. 7.4.4.2 Goodness-of-fit test Kein Zugriff
        3. 7.4.4.3 Explained variation Kein Zugriff
      5. 7.4.5 Horizontal integration Kein Zugriff
    1. 8.1 Meta-theoretical and theoretical insights Kein Zugriff
    2. 8.2 Empirical insights Kein Zugriff
    3. 8.3 Outlook Kein Zugriff
  10. 9. Bibliography Kein Zugriff 219 - 238
  11. Annex: Coding of the government position variables Kein Zugriff 239 - 248

Literaturverzeichnis (318)

  1. Adler-Nissen, Rebecca (2009). Behind the scenes of differentiated integration: Circumventing national opt-outs in Justice and Home Affairs. Journal of European Public Policy, 16 (1): 62-80. Google Scholar öffnen
  2. Adler, Emanuel (1997). Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics. European Journal of International Relations, 3 (3): 319-63. Google Scholar öffnen
  3. Adler, Emanuel (1997). Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics. European Journal of International Relations (2013). Constructivism in International Relations: Sources, Contributions, and Debates. In: Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse and Beth A. Simmons (eds.), Handbook of International Relations. 2nd edition. London et al.: Sage, pp. 112-44. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.4135/9781446247587.n5
  4. Akaike, Hirotugu (1973). Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle. In: B. N. Petrov and F. Csaki (eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Information Theory. Budapest: Akademiai Kiado, pp. 267–81. Google Scholar öffnen
  5. Akaike, Hirotugu (1973). Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle. In: B. N. Petrov and F. Csaki (eds.) (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19 (6): 716-23. Google Scholar öffnen
  6. Albert, Hans (1975). Traktat über kritische Vernunft. 3rd edition. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. Google Scholar öffnen
  7. Allison, Paul D. and Waterman, Richard P. (2002). Fixed-effects negative binomial regression models. Sociological Methodology, 32 (1): 247-65. Google Scholar öffnen
  8. Andersen, Erling Bernhard (1970). Asymptotic Properties of Conditional Maximum-Likelihood Estimators. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 32 (2): 283-301. Google Scholar öffnen
  9. Andersen, Svein and Sitter, Nick (2006). Differentiated Integration: What is it and How Much Can the EU Accommodate? Journal of European Integration, 28 (4): 313-30. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/07036330600853919
  10. Barkin, J. Samuel (2003). Realist Constructivism. International Studies Review, 5 (3): 325-42. Google Scholar öffnen
  11. Barkin, J. Samuel (2003). Realist Constructivism. International Studies Review (2010). Realist Constructivism: Rethinking International Relations Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750410
  12. Barnard, Catherine (2000). Flexibility and Social Policy. In: Gráinne De Búrca and Joanne Scott (eds.), Constitutional Change in the EU: From Uniformity to Flexibility? Oxford & Portland: Hart, pp. 197-218. Google Scholar öffnen
  13. Berger, Joseph and Zelditch, Morris (1993). Orienting Strategies and Theory Growth. In: Joseph Berger and Morris Zelditch (eds.), Theoretical Research Programs: Studies in the Growth of Theory. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 3-19. Google Scholar öffnen
  14. Beutel, Jochen (2006). Differenzierte Integration in der Europäischen Wirtschafts- und Währungsunion. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1515/9783110918052
  15. Bhaskar, Roy (1979). The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences. Brighton: Harvester. Google Scholar öffnen
  16. Brackhane, Birgit (2008). Differenzierte Integration im Recht der Europäischen Union. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845208435
  17. Budge, Ian, Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, Volkens, Andrea, Bara, Judith, Tanenbaum, Eric, Fording, Richard, Hearl, Derek J., Kim, Hee Min, McDonald, Michael and Mendez, Silvia (2001). Mapping Policy Preferences. Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945-1998. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  18. Bull, Hedley (1966). International Theory: The Case for a Classical Approach. World Politics, 18 (3): 361-77. Google Scholar öffnen
  19. Burley, Anne-Marie and Mattli, Walter (1993). Europe before the Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration. International Organization, 47 (2): 41-76. Google Scholar öffnen
  20. Burnham, Kenneth P. and Anderson, David R. (2002). Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. 2nd edition. Berlin et al.: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen
  21. Burnham, Kenneth P. and Anderson (2004). Multimodel Inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in Model Selection. Sociological Methods and Research, 33 (2): 261-304. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/b97636
  22. Cameron, A. Colin and Trivedi, Pravin K. (2013). Regression Analysis of Count Data. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139013567
  23. Cameron, A. Colin and Windmeijer, Frank A.G. (1996). R-squared measures for count data regression models with applications to health-care utilization. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 14 (2): 209-20. Google Scholar öffnen
  24. Cameron, A. Colin and Windmeijer (1997). An R-Squared Measure of Goodness of Fit for Some Common Nonlinear Regression Models. Journal of Econometrics, 77 (2): 329-42. Google Scholar öffnen
  25. Caporaso, James A. (1998). Regional integration theory: understanding our past and anticipating our future. Journal of European Public Policy, 5 (1): 1-16. Google Scholar öffnen
  26. Caporaso, James A. and Keeler, John T. S. (1995). The European Union and Regional Integration Theory. In: Carolyn Rhodes and Sonia Mazey (eds.), The State of the European Union: Building a European Polity? Boulder: Lynne Rienner, pp. 29-62. Google Scholar öffnen
  27. Carnap, Rudolf (1936). Testability and Meaning. Philosophy of Science, 3 (4): 419-71. Google Scholar öffnen
  28. Carnap, Rudolf (1936). Testability and Meaning. Philosophy of Science (1950). Logical Foundations of Probability. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  29. Carnap, Rudolf (1936). Testability and Meaning. Philosophy of Science (1952). The Continuum of Inductive Methods. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  30. Carr, Edward H. (1939). The Twenty Years' Crisis, 1919-1939. London: Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen
  31. Carrubba, Clifford J. (1997). Net Financial Transfers in the European Union: Who Gets What and Why? The Journal of Politics, 59 (2): 469-96. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/S0022381600053536
  32. Carrubba, Clifford J. (1997). Net Financial Transfers in the European Union: Who Gets What and Why? The Journal of Politics (2001). The Electoral Connection in European Union Politics. The Journal of Politics, 63 (1): 141-58. Google Scholar öffnen
  33. Cederman, Lars-Erik and Schneider, Gerald (1994). The Change of Tide in Political Cooperation: A Limited Information Model of European Integration. International Organization, 48 (4): 633-62. Google Scholar öffnen
  34. Checkel, Jeffrey T. (1998). The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory. World Politics, 50 (2): 324-48. Google Scholar öffnen
  35. Checkel, Jeffrey T. (1998). The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory. World Politics (1999). Social construction and integration. Journal of European Public Policy, 6 (4): 545-60. Google Scholar öffnen
  36. Checkel, Jeffrey T. (1998). The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory. World Politics (2004). Social constructivisms in global and European politics: a review essay. Review of International Studies, 30 (2): 229-44. Google Scholar öffnen
  37. Checkel, Jeffrey T. and Moravcsik, Andrew (2001). A Constructivist Research Program in EU Studies? European Union Politics, 2 (2): 219-49. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/1465116501002002004
  38. Christiansen, Thomas, Jorgensen, Knud E. and Wiener, Antje (2001a). Introduction. In: Thomas Christiansen, Knud E. Jorgensen and Antje Wiener (eds.), The Social Construction of Europe. London et al.: Sage, pp. 1-21. Google Scholar öffnen
  39. Christiansen, Thomas (eds.) (2001b). The Social Construction of Europe. London et al.: Sage. Google Scholar öffnen
  40. Commission (2009). EU Budget 2008: Financial Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Google Scholar öffnen
  41. Christiansen, Thomas (2010). EU Budget 2009: Financial Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Google Scholar öffnen
  42. Christiansen, Thomas (2011). EU Budget 2010: Financial Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Google Scholar öffnen
  43. Christiansen, Thomas (2012). EU Budget 2011: Financial Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Google Scholar öffnen
  44. Christiansen, Thomas (2013). EU Budget 2012: Financial Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Google Scholar öffnen
  45. Craig, Paul and De Búrca, Gráinne (2011). EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 5th edition. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  46. Creath, Richard (2013). Logical empiricism. In: Edward N. Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Google Scholar öffnen
  47. Davidson, Donald (1974). On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 47 (1973/1974): 5-20. Google Scholar öffnen
  48. De Andrade, Gomes and Nuno, Norberto (2005). Enhanced cooperation: the ultimate challenge of managing diversity in Europe. Intereconomics, 40 (4): 201-16. Google Scholar öffnen
  49. De Búrca, Gráinne (2000). Differentiation Within the "Core"? The Case of the Internal Market. In: Gráinne De Búrca and Joanne Scott (eds.), Constitutional Change in the EU: From Uniformity to Flexibility? Oxford & Portland: Hart, pp. 133-72. Google Scholar öffnen
  50. De Neve, Jan-Emmanuel (2007). The European Onion? How Differentiated Integration is Reshaping the EU. Journal of European Integration, 29 (4): 503-21. Google Scholar öffnen
  51. De Witte, Bruno, Hanf, Dominik and Vos, Ellen (eds.) (2001). The Many Faces of Differentiation in EU Law. Antwerpen et al.: Intersentia. Google Scholar öffnen
  52. Dessler, David (1989). What's at stake in the agent-structure debate? International Organization, 43 (3): 441-73. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300032999
  53. Deutsch, Karl W., Burrell, Sidney A., Kann, Robert A., Lee, Maurice, Lichterman, Martin, Lindgren, Raymond E., Loewenheim, Francis L. and Van Wagenen, Richard W. (1957). Political Community and the North Atlantic Area: International Organization in the Light of Historical Experience. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  54. Diemer, Alwin (ed.) (1971). Der Methoden- und Theorienpluralismus in den Wissenschaften. Meisenheim am Glan: Hain. Google Scholar öffnen
  55. Diez, Thomas and Wiener, Antje (2009). Introducing the Mosaic of Integration Theory. In: Antje Wiener and Thomas Diez (eds.), European Integration Theory. 2nd edition. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 1-24. Google Scholar öffnen
  56. DODS (2007). The European Public Affairs Directory 2008: the comprehensive guide to the opinion-formers in the capital of Europe. London: DODS. Google Scholar öffnen
  57. Diez, Thomas and Wiener (2008). The European Public Affairs Directory 2009: the essential guide to the public affairs community in Brussels. London: DODS. Google Scholar öffnen
  58. Diez, Thomas and Wiener (2009). The European Public Affairs Directory 2010: the essential guide to the public affairs community in Brussels. London: DODS. Google Scholar öffnen
  59. Diez, Thomas and Wiener (2010). European Union and Public Affairs Directory 2011: the essential guide to the institutions and public affairs community in Brussels. London: DODS. Google Scholar öffnen
  60. Döring, Holger and Manow, Philip (2012). Parliament and government composition database (ParlGov): An infrastructure for empirical information on parties, elections and governments in modern democracies. Version 12/10 – 15 October 2012. Google Scholar öffnen
  61. Dunne, Tim, Kurki, Milja and Smith, Steve (eds.) (2013). International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. 3rd edition. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  62. Duttle, Thomas, Holzinger, Katharina, Schäubli, Thomas, Schimmelfennig, Frank and Winzen, Thomas (2013). The Dynamics of Seconday-Law Differentiation in the European Union. Paper presented at the EPSA General Conference, Barcelona, 20-22 June 2013. Google Scholar öffnen
  63. Duttle, Thomas and Winzen, Thomas (2011). Differentiated Integration in the European Union: Concept, Operationalisation and Measurement. Paper presented at the ECPR Workshop, St. Gallen, 12-17 April 2011. Google Scholar öffnen
  64. Dyson, Kenneth (2010a). 'Euro' Europe: 'Fuzzy' Boundaries and 'Constrained' Differentiation in Macro-Economic Governance. In: Kenneth Dyson and Angelos Sepos (eds.), Which Europe? The Politics of Differentiated Integration. Basingstoke et al.: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 215-32. Google Scholar öffnen
  65. Dyson, Kenneth and Marcussen, Martin (2010). Transverse Integration in European Economic Governance: Between Unitary and Differentiated Integration. Journal of European Integration, 32 (1): 17-39. Google Scholar öffnen
  66. Dyson, Kenneth and Sepos, Angelos (2010a). Conclusions: Generalizations and Patterns. In: Kenneth Dyson and Angelos Sepos (eds.), Which Europe? The Politics of Differentiated Integration. Basingstoke et al.: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 344-51. Google Scholar öffnen
  67. Dyson, Kenneth and Sepos (2010b). Differentiation as Design Principle and as Tool in the Political Management of European Integration. In: Kenneth Dyson and Angelos Sepos (eds.), Which Europe? The Politics of Differentiated Integration. Basingstoke et al.: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 3-23. Google Scholar öffnen
  68. Dyson, Tom (2010b). Defence Policy: Temporal and Spatial Differentiation. In: Kenneth Dyson and Angelos Sepos (eds.), Which Europe? The Politics of Differentiated Integration. Basingstoke et al.: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 322-43. Google Scholar öffnen
  69. Edwards, Geoffrey and Philippart, Eric (1997). Flexibility and the Treaty of Amsterdam: Europe's New Byzantium. CELS Occasional Paper, 3/1997: 1-41. Google Scholar öffnen
  70. Ehlermann, Claus-Dieter (1984). How Flexible Is Community Law? An Unusual Approach to the Concept of "Two Speeds". Michigan Law Review, 82 (5/6): 1274-93. Google Scholar öffnen
  71. Emmanouilidis, Janis A. (2007). Institutional Consequences of Differentiated Integration. C.A.P. Discussion Paper, February 2007: 1-17. Google Scholar öffnen
  72. Emmanouilidis, Janis A. (2007). Institutional Consequences of Differentiated Integration. C.A.P. Discussion Paper (2009). Das differenzierte Europa. Königsweg oder Sackgasse der Integration? In: Frank Decker and Marcus Höreth (eds.), Die Verfassung Europas: Perspektiven des Integrationsprojekts. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag, pp. 344-66. Google Scholar öffnen
  73. Esser, Hartmut, Klenovits, Klaus and Zehnpfennig, Helmut (1977). Wissenschaftstheorie. Teil 1: Grundlagen und Analytische Wissenschaftstheorie. Stuttgart: Teubner. Google Scholar öffnen
  74. EU (2011). Interinstitutional style guide. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Google Scholar öffnen
  75. Euro-Council (2011). Euro Summit Statement (Document No. 125644). pp. 1-15. Brussels: Euro-Council. Google Scholar öffnen
  76. Feenstra, Robert C., Inklaar, Robert and Timmer, Marcel P. (2013). The Next Generation of the Penn World Table. Available for download at www.ggdc.net/pwt. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.3386/w19255
  77. Fligstein, Neil and Mara-Drita, Iona (1996). How to Make a Market: Reflections on the Attempt to Create a Single Market in the European Union. American Journal of Sociology, 102 (1): 1-33. Google Scholar öffnen
  78. Freuding, Beate (2013). Der internationale Politik-Kreislauf: Eine Untersuchung zur Vereinbarkeit und Systematik der Theorien der Internationalen Beziehungen. Schwalbach/Taunus: Wochenschau-Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
  79. Frey, Bruno S. (1996). A Directly Democratic and Federal Europe. Constitutional Political Economy, 7 (4): 267-79. Google Scholar öffnen
  80. Frey, Bruno S. (1996). A Directly Democratic and Federal Europe. Constitutional Political Economy (1997). Ein neuer Föderalismus für Europa: Die Idee der FOCJ. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. Google Scholar öffnen
  81. Frey, Bruno S. and Eichenberger, Reiner (1996). FOCJ: Competitive Governments for Europe. International Review of Law and Economics, 16 (3): 315-27. Google Scholar öffnen
  82. Frey, Bruno S. and Eichenberger (1999). The new democratic federalism for Europe: Functional, overlapping and competing jurisdictions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Google Scholar öffnen
  83. Frings, Cornelia (2010). Soziales Vertrauen: Eine Integration der soziologischen und der ökonomischen Vertrauenstheorie. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92297-3
  84. Gehring, Thomas (1994). Der Beitrag von Institutionen zur Förderung der internationalen Zusammenarbeit: Lehren aus der institutionellen Struktur der Europäischen Gemeinschaft. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 1 (2): 211-42. Google Scholar öffnen
  85. Gehring, Thomas (1994). Der Beitrag von Institutionen zur Förderung der internationalen Zusammenarbeit: Lehren aus der institutionellen Struktur der Europäischen Gemeinschaft. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen (1996). Integrating Integration Theory: Neo-functionalism and International Regimes. Global Society, 10 (3): 225-53. Google Scholar öffnen
  86. Giesen, Bernhard and Schmid, Michael (1978). Methodologische Modelle und soziologische Theorien. In: Karl Otto Hondrich and Joachim Matthes (eds.), Theorienvergleich in den Sozialwissenschaften. Darmstadt & Neuwied: Luchterhand, pp. 232-54. Google Scholar öffnen
  87. Goddard, Stacie (2008). When right makes might: How Prussia overturned the European balance of power. International Security, 33 (3): 110-42. Google Scholar öffnen
  88. Greshoff, Rainer (1994a). Methodische Überlegungen zum Theorienvergleich in den Sozialwissenschaften. In: Frank Benseler, Bettina Blanck, Rainer Greshoff and Werner Loh (eds.), Alternativer Umgang mit Alternativen: Aufsätze zu Philosophie und Sozialwissenschaften. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 125-40. Google Scholar öffnen
  89. Greshoff, Rainer (1994a). Methodische Überlegungen zum Theorienvergleich in den Sozialwissenschaften. In: Frank Benseler (1994b). Theorienentscheidung und Theorienvergleich. Niklas Luhmanns Auseinandersetzung mit Max Weber. In: Frank Benseler, Bettina Blanck, Rainer Greshoff and Werner Loh (eds.), Alternativer Umgang mit Alternativen: Aufsätze zu Philosophie und Sozialwissenschaften. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 141-88. Google Scholar öffnen
  90. Greshoff, Rainer (1994a). Methodische Überlegungen zum Theorienvergleich in den Sozialwissenschaften. In: Frank Benseler (1999a). Die theoretischen Konzeptionen des Sozialen von Max Weber und Niklas Luhmann im Vergleich. Opladen & Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
  91. Greshoff, Rainer (1994a). Methodische Überlegungen zum Theorienvergleich in den Sozialwissenschaften. In: Frank Benseler (1999b). Lassen sich die Konzepte von Max Weber und Niklas Luhmann unter dem Aspekt "Struktur und Ereignis" miteinander vermitteln? In: Rainer Greshoff and Georg Kneer (eds.), Struktur und Ereignis in theorievergleichender Perspektive: Ein diskursives Buchprojekt. Opladen & Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 13-50. Google Scholar öffnen
  92. Greshoff, Rainer (1994a). Methodische Überlegungen zum Theorienvergleich in den Sozialwissenschaften. In: Frank Benseler (2005). Soziologische Grundlagen kontrovers: erklärende Soziologie (Esser) versus soziologische Systemtheorie (Luhmann): wie groß sind die Unterschiede? In: Rainer Greshoff and Uwe Schimank (eds.), Was erklärt die Soziologie? Methodologien, Modelle, Perspektiven. Berlin: Lit, pp. 78-121. Google Scholar öffnen
  93. Greshoff, Rainer (1994a). Methodische Überlegungen zum Theorienvergleich in den Sozialwissenschaften. In: Frank Benseler (2008). Aufklärung und Integration von Theorienvielfalt durch methodische Theorienvergleiche: Die Esser-Luhmann-Kontroverse als Beispiel. In: Andreas Balog and Johann A. Schülein (eds.), Soziologie, eine multiparadigmatische Wissenschaft: Erkenntnisnotwendigkeit oder Übergangsstadium? Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag, pp. 187-224. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91017-8_8
  94. Greshoff, Rainer (1994a). Methodische Überlegungen zum Theorienvergleich in den Sozialwissenschaften. In: Frank Benseler (2010). Die Theorienvergleichsdebatte in der deutschsprachigen Soziologie. In: Georg Kneer and Stephan Moebius (eds.), Soziologische Kontroversen: Beiträge zu einer anderen Geschichte der Wissenschaft vom Sozialen. Berlin: Suhrkamp, pp. 182-216. Google Scholar öffnen
  95. Greshoff, Rainer and Kneer, Georg (eds.) (1999). Struktur und Ereignis in theorievergleichender Perspektive: Ein diskursives Buchprojekt. Opladen & Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-11556-4
  96. Greshoff, Rainer, Kneer, Georg and Schimank, Uwe (eds.) (2003). Die Transintentionalität des Sozialen: Eine vergleichende Betrachtung klassischer und moderner Sozialtheorien. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-80464-8
  97. Greshoff, Rainer and Schimank, Uwe (eds.) (2006). Integrative Sozialtheorie? Esser – Luhmann – Weber. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90259-3
  98. Gstöhl, Sieglinde (2000). The European Union after Amsterdam: Towards a Theoretical Approach to (Differentiated) Integration. In: Maria Green Cowles and Michael Smith (eds.), The State of the European Union: Risks, Reform, Resistance, and Revival. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  99. Guimarães, Paulo (2008). The fixed effects negative binomial model revisited. Economics Letters, 99 (1): 63-66. Google Scholar öffnen
  100. Haas, Ernst B. (1958). The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social and Economic Forces, 1950-1957. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  101. Haas, Ernst B. (1958). The Uniting of Europe: Political (1964). Technocracy, Pluralism, and the New Europe. In: Stephen R. Graubard (ed.), A New Europe? Boston: Hougton Mifflin, pp. 62-88. Google Scholar öffnen
  102. Haas, Ernst B. (1958). The Uniting of Europe: Political (1967). The Uniting of Europe and the Uniting of Latin America. Journal of Common Market Studies, 5 (4): 315-43. Google Scholar öffnen
  103. Haas, Ernst B. (1958). The Uniting of Europe: Political (1970). The Study of Regional Integration: Reflections on the Joy and Anguish of Pretheorizing. International Organization, 24 (4): 607-46. Google Scholar öffnen
  104. Haas, Ernst B. (1958). The Uniting of Europe: Political (1975). The Obsolescence of Regional Integration Theory. Research Series of the Institute of International Studies, 25/1975: 1-123. Google Scholar öffnen
  105. Haas, Ernst B. (1958). The Uniting of Europe: Political (1976). Turbulent Fields and the Theory of Regional Integration. International Organization, 30 (2): 173-212. Google Scholar öffnen
  106. Haas, Ernst B. (1958). The Uniting of Europe: Political (2001). Does Constructivism Subsume Neo-functionalism? In: Thomas Christiansen, Knud E. Jorgensen and Antje Wiener (eds.), The Social Construction of Europe. London et al.: Sage, pp. 22-31. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.4135/9781446221105.n2
  107. Hall, Peter A. and Taylor, Rosemary C.R. (1996). Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44 (5): 936-57. Google Scholar öffnen
  108. Haller, Max (2003). Soziologische Theorie im systematisch-kritischen Vergleich. 2nd edition. Opladen: Leske & Budrich. Google Scholar öffnen
  109. Hanf, Dominik (2001). Flexibility Clauses in the Founding Treaties, from Rome to Nice. In: Bruno De Witte, Dominik Hanf and Ellen Vos (eds.), The Many Faces of Differentiation in EU Law. Antwerpen et al.: Intersentia, pp. 3-26. Google Scholar öffnen
  110. Hausman, Jerry, Hall, Bronwyn H. and Griliches, Zvi (1984). Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R&D Relationship. Econometrica, 52 (4): 909-38. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.3386/t0017
  111. Heinzl, Harald and Mittlböck, Martina (2003). Pseudo R-squared measures for Poisson regression models with over- or underdispersion. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 44 (1-2): 253-71. Google Scholar öffnen
  112. Hellmann, Gunther (2003). Are Dialogue and Synthesis Possible in International Relations? International Studies Review, 5 (1): 123-53. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/1521-9488.501019_1
  113. Henisz, Witold J. (2000). The Institutional Environment for Economic Growth. Economics and Politics, 12 (1): 1-31. Google Scholar öffnen
  114. Henisz, Witold J. (2000). The Institutional Environment for Economic Growth. Economics and Politics (2002). The Institutional Environment for Infrastructure Investment. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11 (2): 355-89. Google Scholar öffnen
  115. Hicks, Alexander M. (1994). Introduction to Pooling. In: Alexander M. Hicks and Thomas Janoski (eds.), The Comparative Political Economy of the Welfare State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  116. Hirschi, Travis (1979). Separate and unequal is better. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 16 (1): 34-38. Google Scholar öffnen
  117. Hoffmann, Stanley (1964). The European Process at Atlantic Crosspurposes. Journal of Common Market Studies, 3 (2): 85-101. Google Scholar öffnen
  118. Hoffmann, Stanley (1964). The European Process at Atlantic Crosspurposes. Journal of Common Market Studies (1966). Obstinate or Obsolete? The Fate of the Nation-State and the Case of Western Europe. Daedalus, 95 (3): 862-915. Google Scholar öffnen
  119. Hoffmann, Stanley (1964). The European Process at Atlantic Crosspurposes. Journal of Common Market Studies (1982). Reflections on the Nation-State in Western Europe Today. Journal of Common Market Studies, 21 (1-2): 21-37. Google Scholar öffnen
  120. Holland, Stuart (1980). UnCommon Market: Capital, Class and Power in the European Community. London: Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen
  121. Hollis, Martin and Smith, Steve (1990). Explaining and Understanding International Relations. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  122. Holzinger, Katharina (2000). Optimal Regulatory Units: A Concept of Regional Differentiation of Environmental Standards in the European Union. In: Katharina Holzinger and Peter Knoepfel (eds.), Environmental Policy in a Europe of Variable Geometry: The Challenge of the Next Enlargement. Basel: Helbig & Lichtenhahn, pp. 65-107. Google Scholar öffnen
  123. Holzinger, Katharina and Schimmelfennig, Frank (2012). Differentiated Integration in the European Union: Many Concepts, Sparse Theory, Few Data. Journal of European Public Policy, 19 (2): 292-305. Google Scholar öffnen
  124. Hondrich, Karl Otto (1976). Entwicklungslinien und Möglichkeiten des Theorievergleichs. In: M. Rainer Lepsius (ed.), Zwischenbilanz der Soziologie: Verhandlungen des 17. Deutschen Soziologentags. Stuttgart: Enke, pp. 14-36. Google Scholar öffnen
  125. Hondrich, Karl Otto (1976). Entwicklungslinien und Möglichkeiten des Theorievergleichs. In: M. Rainer Lepsius (ed.) (1978). Viele Ansätze – eine soziologische Theorie. In: Karl Otto Hondrich and Joachim Matthes (eds.), Theorienvergleich in den Sozialwissenschaften. Darmstadt & Neuwied: Luchterhand, pp. 314-30. Google Scholar öffnen
  126. Hondrich, Karl Otto and Matthes, Joachim (eds.) (1978). Theorienvergleich in den Sozialwissenschaften. Darmstadt & Neuwied: Luchterhand. Google Scholar öffnen
  127. Hooghe, Liesbet and Marks, Gary (2004). Does Identity or Economic Rationality Drive Public Opinion on European Integration? Political Science and Politics, 2004 (3): 415-20. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511492013.008
  128. Hooghe, Liesbet and Marks (2005). Calculation, Community and Cues: Public Opinion on European Integration. European Union Politics, 6 (4): 419-43. Google Scholar öffnen
  129. Hooghe, Liesbet and Marks (2009). A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus. British Journal of Political Science, 39 (1): 1-23. Google Scholar öffnen
  130. Hopf, Ted (1998). The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. International Security, 23 (1): 171-200. Google Scholar öffnen
  131. Hoyningen-Huene, Paul (1990). Kuhn's conception of incommensurability. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 21 (3): 481-92. Google Scholar öffnen
  132. Hristova, Vessela (2008). Exit Through the Backdoor? Differentiated Integration in EU Secondary Law. Paper presented at the MPSA Conference, Chicago, 3-6 April 2008. Google Scholar öffnen
  133. Hsiao, Cheng (2003). Analysis of Panel Data. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511754203
  134. Hume, David (1888 [1739]). A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00032976
  135. IMF (1993). A Guide to Direction of Trade Statistics. Washington, DC: Real Sector Division, IMF Statistics Department. Google Scholar öffnen
  136. Hume, David (1888 [1739]). A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford (2013). Direction of Trade Statistics (December 2013 edition). Manchester: Mimas, University of Manchester. Google Scholar öffnen
  137. Jachtenfuchs, Markus (2001). The Governance Approach to European Integration. Journal of Common Market Studies, 39 (2): 245-64. Google Scholar öffnen
  138. Jachtenfuchs, Markus (2001). The Governance Approach to European Integration. Journal of Common Market Studies (2002). Deepening and widening integration theory. Journal of European Public Policy, 9 (4): 650-57. Google Scholar öffnen
  139. Jackson, Patrick T. (2004). Bridging the Gap: Toward A Realist-Constructivist Dialogue. International Studies Review, 6 (2): 337-52. Google Scholar öffnen
  140. Jackson, Patrick T. (2004). Bridging the Gap: Toward A Realist-Constructivist Dialogue. International Studies Review (2011). The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of Science and its Implications for the Study of World Politics. London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
  141. Jorgensen, Knud E. (2010). International Relations Theory: A New Introduction. Basingstoke et al.: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-36694-7
  142. Junge, Kerstin (1999). Flexibility, Enhanced Cooperation and the Treaty of Amsterdam. London: Kogan Page. Google Scholar öffnen
  143. Jupille, Joseph, Caporaso, James A. and Checkel, Jeffrey T. (2003). Integrating Institutions: Rationalism, Constructivism, and the Study of the European Union. Comparative Political Studies, 36 (1/2): 7-40. Google Scholar öffnen
  144. Kalbfleisch, John D. and Sprott, David A. (1970). Applications of Likelihood Methods to Models Involving Large Numbers of Parameters. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 32 (2): 175-208 Google Scholar öffnen
  145. Kanazawa, Sathosi (1998). In Defense of Unrealistic Assumptions. Sociological Theory, 16 (2): 193-204. Google Scholar öffnen
  146. Kaplan, Morton A. (1969). The New Great Debate: Traditionalism vs. Science in International Relations. In: Klaus Knorr and James N. Rosenau (eds.), Contending Approaches to International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 39-61. Google Scholar öffnen
  147. Katzenstein, Peter J., Keohane, Robert O. and Krasner, Stephen D. (1998). International Organization and the Study of World Politics. International Organization, 52 (4): 645-85. Google Scholar öffnen
  148. Keating, Michael and Della Porta, Donatella (2010). In Defence of Pluralism in the Social Sciences. European Political Science, 9 (1): 111-20. Google Scholar öffnen
  149. Keman, Hans (2007). Experts and manifestos: Different sources – Same results for comparative research? Electoral Studies, 26 (1): 76-89. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2006.04.004
  150. Keman, Hans and Pennings, Paul (2003). The Development of Christian and Social Democracy across Europe: Changing positions and political consequences. In: Dimitris T. Tsatsos, Evangelos Venizelos and Xenophon I. Contiades (eds.), Political Parties in the 21st Century. Athens et al.: Ant. N. Sakkoulas Publishers, Etablissements Emile Bruylant, Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag, pp. 187-217. Google Scholar öffnen
  151. Keohane, Robert O. (1989). International Institutions: Two Approaches. In: Robert O. Keohane (ed.), International Institutions and State Power. Boulder: Westview Press, pp. 158-79. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-00202-4_20
  152. Keohane, Robert O. and Hoffmann, Stanley (1991). Institutional Change in Europe in the 1980s. In: Robert O. Keohane and Stanley Hoffmann (eds.), The New European Community: Decisionmaking and Institutional Change. Boulder: Westview Press, pp. 1-39. Google Scholar öffnen
  153. Klima, Rolf (1971). Theorienpluralismus in der Soziologie. In: Alwin Diemer (ed.), Der Methoden- und Theorienpluralismus in den Wissenschaften. Meisenheim am Glan: Hain, pp. 198-219. Google Scholar öffnen
  154. Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, Volkens, Andrea, Bara, Judith, Budge, Ian and McDonald, Michael (2006). Mapping Policy Preferences II: Estimates for Parties, Electors and Governments in Eastern Europe, the European Union and the OECD, 1990-2003. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  155. Klinkmann, Norbert (1981). Das systematische Vergleichen von Theorien: Ein Versuch und die Unausweichlichkeit seines Scheiterns. Soziale Welt, 32 (2): 249-60. Google Scholar öffnen
  156. Klüver, Jürgen (1991). Formale Rekonstruktion und vergleichende Rahmung soziologischer Theorien. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 20 (3): 209-22. Google Scholar öffnen
  157. Knorr, Klaus and Rosenau, James N. (eds.) (1969). Contending Approaches to International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  158. Kölliker, Alkuin (2001). Bringing Together or Driving Apart the Union? Towards a Theory of Differentiated Integration. West European Politics, 24 (4): 125. Google Scholar öffnen
  159. Kölliker, Alkuin (2001). Bringing Together or Driving Apart the Union? Towards a Theory of Differentiated Integration. West European Politics (2003). Sogwirkungen und Fliehkräfte differenzierter Integration in der EU: Eine Theorie und zwei Fallstudien. In: Thomas Plümper (ed.), Politische Integration. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 53-95. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-80374-0_3
  160. Kölliker, Alkuin (2001). Bringing Together or Driving Apart the Union? Towards a Theory of Differentiated Integration. West European Politics (2006). Flexibility and European Unification: The Logic of Differentiated Integration. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield. Google Scholar öffnen
  161. Kölliker, Alkuin (2001). Bringing Together or Driving Apart the Union? Towards a Theory of Differentiated Integration. West European Politics (2010). The Functional Dimension. In: Kenneth Dyson and Angelos Sepos (eds.), Which Europe? The Politics of Differentiated Integration. Basingstoke et al.: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 39-53. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1057/9780230289529_3
  162. Kroll, Daniela A. and Leuffen, Dirk (2014). Enhanced cooperation in practice: An analysis of differentiated integration in EU secondary law. Journal of European Public Policy, DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2014.956781. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.956781
  163. Kuhn, Thomas S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  164. Kuhn, Thomas S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago (1970a). Reflections on my Critics. In: Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 231-79. Google Scholar öffnen
  165. Kuhn, Thomas S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago (1970b). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  166. Kuhn, Thomas S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago (1977). Objectivity, Value Judgements, and Theory Choice. In: Thomas S. Kuhn (ed.), The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 320-39. Google Scholar öffnen
  167. Kuhn, Thomas S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago (1983a). Commensurability, Comparability, Communicability. In: Peter D. Asquith and Thomas Nickles (eds.), PSA 1982: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Vol. II. East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 669-88. Google Scholar öffnen
  168. Kuhn, Thomas S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago (1983b). Response to Commentaries. In: Peter D. Asquith and Thomas Nickles (eds.), PSA 1982: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Vol. II. East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 712-16. Google Scholar öffnen
  169. Kurki, Milja and Wight, Colin (2013). International Relations and Social Science. In: Tim Dunne, Milja Kurki and Steve Smith (eds.), International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. 3rd edition. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 14-35. Google Scholar öffnen
  170. Lakatos, Imre (1970). Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. In: Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 91-196. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139171434.009
  171. Lakatos, Imre (1970). Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. In: Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave (eds.) (1978). The methodology of scientific research programmes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621123
  172. Landmarks (1990). The European Public Affairs Directory 1991: the comprehensive guide to opinion-formers in the capital of Europe. Brussels: Landmarks. Google Scholar öffnen
  173. Lakatos, Imre (1970). Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. In: Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave (eds.) (1991). The European Public Affairs Directory 1992: the comprehensive guide to opinion-formers in the capital of Europe. Brussels: Landmarks. Google Scholar öffnen
  174. Lakatos, Imre (1970). Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. In: Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave (eds.) (1992). The European Public Affairs Directory 1993: the comprehensive guide to opinion-formers in the capital of Europe. Brussels: Landmarks. Google Scholar öffnen
  175. Lakatos, Imre (1970). Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. In: Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave (eds.) (1993). The European Public Affairs Directory 1994: the comprehensive guide to opinion-formers in the capital of Europe. Brussels: Landmarks. Google Scholar öffnen
  176. Lakatos, Imre (1970). Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. In: Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave (eds.) (1994). The European Public Affairs Directory 1995: the comprehensive guide to opinion-formers in the capital of Europe. Brussels: Landmarks. Google Scholar öffnen
  177. Lakatos, Imre (1970). Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. In: Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave (eds.) (1995). The European Public Affairs Directory 1996: the comprehensive guide to opinion-formers in the capital of Europe. Brussels: Landmarks. Google Scholar öffnen
  178. Lakatos, Imre (1970). Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. In: Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave (eds.) (1996). The European Public Affairs Directory 1997: the comprehensive guide to opinion-formers in the capital of Europe. Brussels: Landmarks. Google Scholar öffnen
  179. Lakatos, Imre (1970). Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. In: Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave (eds.) (1997). The European Public Affairs Directory 1998: the comprehensive guide to opinion-formers in the capital of Europe. Brussels: Landmarks. Google Scholar öffnen
  180. Lakatos, Imre (1970). Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. In: Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave (eds.) (1998). The European Public Affairs Directory 1999: the comprehensive guide to opinion-formers in the capital of Europe. Brussels: Landmarks. Google Scholar öffnen
  181. Lakatos, Imre (1970). Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. In: Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave (eds.) (1999). The European Public Affairs Directory 2000: the comprehensive guide to opinion-formers in the capital of Europe. Brussels: Landmarks. Google Scholar öffnen
  182. Lakatos, Imre (1970). Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. In: Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave (eds.) (2000). The European Public Affairs Directory 2001: the comprehensive guide to opinion-formers in the capital of Europe. Brussels: Landmarks. Google Scholar öffnen
  183. Lakatos, Imre (1970). Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. In: Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave (eds.) (2001). The European Public Affairs Directory 2002: the comprehensive guide to opinion-formers in the capital of Europe. Brussels: Landmarks. Google Scholar öffnen
  184. Lakatos, Imre (1970). Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. In: Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave (eds.) (2002). The European Public Affairs Directory 2003: the comprehensive guide to opinion-formers in the capital of Europe. Brussels: Landmarks. Google Scholar öffnen
  185. Lakatos, Imre (1970). Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. In: Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave (eds.) (2003). The European Public Affairs Directory 2004: the comprehensive guide to opinion-formers in the capital of Europe. Brussels: Landmarks. Google Scholar öffnen
  186. Lakatos, Imre (1970). Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. In: Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave (eds.) (2004). The European Public Affairs Directory 2005: the comprehensive guide to opinion-formers in the capital of Europe. Brussels: Landmarks. Google Scholar öffnen
  187. Lakatos, Imre (1970). Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. In: Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave (eds.) (2005). The European Public Affairs Directory 2006: the comprehensive guide to opinion-formers in the capital of Europe. Brussels: Landmarks. Google Scholar öffnen
  188. Lakatos, Imre (1970). Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. In: Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave (eds.) (2006). The European Public Affairs Directory 2007: the comprehensive guide to opinion-formers in the capital of Europe. Brussels: Landmarks. Google Scholar öffnen
  189. Lapid, Yosef (1989). The Third Debate: On the Prospects of International Theory in a Post-Positivist Era. International Studies Quarterly, 33 (3): 235-54. Google Scholar öffnen
  190. Laudan, Larry (1977). Progress and its Problems: Toward a Theory of Scientific Growth. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  191. Lenaerts, Koen and Van Nuffel, Piet (2004). Constitutional Law of the European Union. 2nd edition. London: Sweet & Maxwell. Google Scholar öffnen
  192. Leuffen, Dirk, Rittberger, Berthold and Schimmelfennig, Frank (2013). Differentiated Integration: Explaining Variation in the European Union. Basingstoke et al.: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-28501-0
  193. Lindberg, Leon N. (1963). The Political Dynamics of European Economic Integration. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  194. Lindberg, Leon N. (1963). The Political Dynamics of European Economic Integration. Stanford (1966). Integration as a Source of Stress on the European Community System. International Organization, 20 (2): 233-65. Google Scholar öffnen
  195. Lindberg, Leon N. and Scheingold, Stuart A. (1970a). Europe's Would-Be Polity: Patterns of Change in the European Community. Englewood Cliffs. Google Scholar öffnen
  196. Lindberg, Leon N. and Scheingold (1970b). Europe's Would-Be Polity: Patterns of Change in the European Community. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall. Google Scholar öffnen
  197. Lindemann, Gesa (2005). Theorievergleich und Theorieinnovation: Plädoyer für eine kritisch-systematische Perspektive. In: Rainer Greshoff and Uwe Schimank (eds.), Was erklärt die Soziologie? Methodologien, Modelle, Perspektiven. Berlin: Lit, pp. 44-64. Google Scholar öffnen
  198. Lindenberg, Siegwart and Wippler, Reinhard (1978). Theorienvergleich: Elemente der Rekonstruktion. In: Karl Otto Hondrich and Joachim Matthes (eds.), Theorienvergleich in den Sozialwissenschaften. Darmstadt & Neuwied: Luchterhand, pp. 219-31. Google Scholar öffnen
  199. Liska, Allen E., Krohn, Marvin D. and Messner, Steven F. (1989). Strategies and Requisites for the Study of Crime and Deviance. In: Steven F. Messner, Marvin D. Krohn and Allen E. Liska (eds.), Theoretical Integration in the Study of Deviance and Crime: Problems and Prospects. Albany: State University of New York Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  200. Louis, Jean-Victor (2001). Differentiation and the EMU. In: Bruno De Witte, Dominik Hanf and Ellen Vos (eds.), The Many Faces of Differentiation in EU Law. Antwerpen et al.: Intersentia, pp. 43-64. Google Scholar öffnen
  201. Maliniak, Daniel, Oakes, Amy, Peterson, Susan and Tierney, Michael J. (2011). International Relations in the US Academy. International Studies Quarterly, 55 (2): 437-64. Google Scholar öffnen
  202. March, James G. and Olsen, Johan P. (1998). The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders. International Organization, 52 (4): 943-69. Google Scholar öffnen
  203. Martinsen, Dorte Sindbjerg and Wessel, Ayca Uygur (2014). On the path to differentiation: upward transfer, logic of variation and sub-optimality in EU social policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 21 (9): 1255-72. Google Scholar öffnen
  204. Mattli, Walter (1999). The Logic of Regional Integration: Europe and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511756238
  205. Merton, Robert K. (1968). Social Theory and Social Structure. 3rd edition. New York: Free Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  206. Merton, Robert K. (1968). Social Theory and Social Structure. 3rd edition. New York (1981). Remarks on Theoretical Pluralism. In: Peter M. Blau (ed.), Continuities in Structural Inquiry. London et al.: Sage, pp. i-vii. Google Scholar öffnen
  207. Miller, David (1974). Popper's Qualitative Theory of Verisimilitude. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 25 (2): 166-77. Google Scholar öffnen
  208. Mills, Charles Wright (1959). The Sociological Imagination. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  209. Mitrany, David (1943). A Working Peace System: An Argument for the Functional Development of International Organization. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs. Google Scholar öffnen
  210. Mittlböck, Martina and Waldhör, Thomas (2000). Adjustments for R²-measures for Poisson regression models. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 34 (4): 461-72. Google Scholar öffnen
  211. Monar, Jörg (2010). The 'Area of Freedom, Security and Justice': 'Schengen' Europe, Opt-outs, Opt-ins and Associates. In: Kenneth Dyson and Angelos Sepos (eds.), Which Europe? The Politics of Differentiated Integration. Basingstoke et al.: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 279-92. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1057/9780230289529_19
  212. Moravcsik, Andrew (1993). Preferences and power in the European Community: A liberal intergovernmentalist approach. Journal of Common Market Studies, 31 (4): 473-524. Google Scholar öffnen
  213. Moravcsik, Andrew (1993). Preferences and power in the European Community: A liberal intergovernmentalist approach. Journal of Common Market Studies (1998). The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  214. Moravcsik, Andrew and Nicolaidis, Kalypso (1999). Explaining the Treaty of Amsterdam: Interests, Influence, Institutions. Journal of Common Market Studies, 37 (1): 59-85. Google Scholar öffnen
  215. Moravcsik, Andrew and Schimmelfennig, Frank (2009). Liberal Intergovernmentalism. In: Antje Wiener and Thomas Diez (eds.), European Integration Theory. 2nd edition. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 67-87. Google Scholar öffnen
  216. Nauck, Bernhard (1988). Sozialstrukturelle und individualistische Migrationstheorien: Elemente eines Theorienvergleichs. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 40 (1): 15-39. Google Scholar öffnen
  217. Niemann, Arne (1998). The PHARE programme and the concept of spillover: neofunctionalism in the making. Journal of European Public Policy, 5 (3): 428-46. Google Scholar öffnen
  218. Niemann, Arne (1998). The PHARE programme and the concept of spillover: neofunctionalism in the making. Journal of European Public Policy (2006). Explaining Decisions in the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511492044
  219. Niemann, Arne and Schmitter, Philippe C. (2009). Neofunctionalism. In: Antje Wiener and Thomas Diez (eds.), European Integration Theory. 2nd edition. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 45-66. Google Scholar öffnen
  220. Niiniluoto, Ilkka (1980). Scientific Progress. Synthese, 45 (3): 427-62. Google Scholar öffnen
  221. Niiniluoto, Ilkka (1980). Scientific Progress. Synthese (1987). Truthlikeness. Dordrecht: Reidel. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3739-0
  222. Nugent, Neill (2010). The Government and Politics of the European Union. 7th edition. Basingstoke & New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-36611-4
  223. Oberheim, Eric and Hoyningen-Huene, Paul (2013). The Incommensurability of Scientific Theories. In: Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Google Scholar öffnen
  224. Olson, Mancur (1969). The Principle of "Fiscal Equivalence": The Division of Responsibilities among Different Levels of Government. American Economic Review, 59 (2): 479-87. Google Scholar öffnen
  225. Opp, Karl-Dieter (1978). Probleme und Strategien des Theorienvergleichs. In: Karl Otto Hondrich and Joachim Matthes (eds.), Theorienvergleich in den Sozialwissenschaften. Darmstadt & Neuwied: Luchterhand, pp. 213-18. Google Scholar öffnen
  226. Opp, Karl-Dieter (1978). Probleme und Strategien des Theorienvergleichs. In: Karl Otto Hondrich and Joachim Matthes (eds.) (1996). Gesellschaftliche Krisen, Gelegenheitsstrukturen oder rationales Handeln? Ein kritischer Theorienvergleich von Erklärungen politischen Protests. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 25 (3): 223-42. Google Scholar öffnen
  227. Opp, Karl-Dieter (1978). Probleme und Strategien des Theorienvergleichs. In: Karl Otto Hondrich and Joachim Matthes (eds.) (2014). Methodologie der Sozialwissenschaften: Einführung in Probleme ihrer Theorienbildung und praktischen Anwendung. 7th edition. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-01911-2
  228. Opp, Karl-Dieter and Wippler, Reinhard (eds.) (1990a). Empirischer Theorienvergleich: Erklärungen sozialen Verhaltens in Problemsituationen. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
  229. Opp, Karl-Dieter and Wippler (1990b). Resümee: Probleme und Ertrag eines empirischen Theorienvergleichs. In: Karl-Dieter Opp and Reinhard Wippler (eds.), Empirischer Theorienvergleich: Erklärungen sozialen Verhaltens in Problemsituationen. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 229-34. Google Scholar öffnen
  230. Opp, Karl-Dieter and Wippler (1990c). Theoretischer Pluralismus und empirische Forschung. In: Karl-Dieter Opp and Reinhard Wippler (eds.), Empirischer Theorienvergleich: Erklärungen sozialen Verhaltens in Problemsituationen. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 3-16. Google Scholar öffnen
  231. Papagianni, Georgia (2001). Flexibility in Justice and Home Affairs: an Old Phenomenon Taking New Forms. In: Bruno De Witte, Dominik Hanf and Ellen Vos (eds.), The Many Faces of Differentiation in EU Law. Antwerpen et al.: Intersentia, pp. 101-28. Google Scholar öffnen
  232. Parsons, Nick and Pochet, Philippe (2010). 'Social' Europe. In: Kenneth Dyson and Angelos Sepos (eds.), Which Europe? The Politics of Differentiated Integration. Basingstoke et al.: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 251-64. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1057/9780230289529_17
  233. Pentland, Charles (1973). International Theory and European Integration. New York: Free Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  234. Philippart, Eric and Edwards, Geoffrey (1999). The Provisions on Closer Co-operation in the Treaty of Amsterdam: The Politics of Flexibility in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 37 (1): 87-108. Google Scholar öffnen
  235. Pierson, Paul (1996). The Path to European Integration: A Historical-Institutionalist Analysis. Comparative Political Studies, 29 (2): 123-63. Google Scholar öffnen
  236. Plümper, Thomas and Schneider, Christina J. (2007). Discriminatory European Union Membership and the Redistribution of Enlargement Gains. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 51 (4): 568-87. Google Scholar öffnen
  237. Plümper, Thomas, Troeger, Vera E. and Manow, Philip (2005). Panel Data Analysis in Comparative Politics: Linking Method to Theory. European Journal of Political Research, 44 (2): 327-54. Google Scholar öffnen
  238. Pollack, Mark A. (2001). International Relations Theory and European Integration. Journal of Common Market Studies, 39 (2): 221-44. Google Scholar öffnen
  239. Pollack, Mark A. (2001). International Relations Theory and European Integration. Journal of Common Market Studies (2005). Theorizing the European Union: International Organization, Domestic Polity, or Experiment in New Governance? Annual Review of Political Science, 8: 357-98. Google Scholar öffnen
  240. Popper, Karl R. (1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Basic Books. Google Scholar öffnen
  241. Popper, Karl R. (1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York (1963). Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
  242. Popper, Karl R. (1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York (1994). The Myth of the Framework: In Defense of Science and Rationality. London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
  243. Puchala, Donald J. (1971). Of Blind Men, Elephants and International Integration. Journal of Common Market Studies, 10 (3): 267-84. Google Scholar öffnen
  244. Putnam, Robert D. (1988). Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-level Games. International Organization, 42 (3): 427-60. Google Scholar öffnen
  245. Reichenbach, Hans (1930). Kausalität und Wahrscheinlichkeit. Erkenntnis, 1 (1): 158-88. Google Scholar öffnen
  246. Reichenbach, Hans (1930). Kausalität und Wahrscheinlichkeit. Erkenntnis (1932). Die logischen Grundlagen des Wahrscheinlichkeitsbegriffs. Erkenntnis, 3 (1): 401-25. Google Scholar öffnen
  247. Risse, Thomas (2009). Social Constructivism and European Integration. In: Antje Wiener and Thomas Diez (eds.), European Integration Theory. 2nd edition. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 144-60. Google Scholar öffnen
  248. Rittberger, Berthold, Leuffen, Dirk and Schimmelfennig, Frank (2014). Differentiated Integration of Core State Powers. In: Philipp Genschel and Markus Jachtenfuchs (eds.), Beyond the Regulatory Polity? The European Integration of Core State Powers. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 189-210. Google Scholar öffnen
  249. Rosamond, Ben (2000). Theories of European Integration. New York: Palgrave. Google Scholar öffnen
  250. Ruggie, John G. (1998a). Constructing the World Polity: Essays on International Institutionalization. London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
  251. Ruggie, John G. (1998a). Constructing the World Polity: Essays on International Institutionalization. London (1998b). What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge. International Organization, 52 (4): 855-85. Google Scholar öffnen
  252. Schäuble, Wolfgang and Lamers, Karl A. (1994). Überlegungen zur europäischen Politik. pp. 1-11. Berlin: CDU/CSU Parliamentary Group. Google Scholar öffnen
  253. Schimmelfennig, Frank (2014). EU enlargement and differentiated integration: discrimination or equal treatment? Journal of European Public Policy, 21 (5): 681-98. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.897744
  254. Schimmelfennig, Frank and Rittberger, Berthold (2006). Theories of European integration: Assumptions and hypotheses. In: Jeremy Richardson (ed.), European Union: Power and policy-making. 3rd edition. Abingdon & New York: Routledge, pp. 73-95. Google Scholar öffnen
  255. Schimmelfennig, Frank and Winzen, Thomas (2014). Instrumental and Constitutional Differentiation in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 52 (2): 354-70. Google Scholar öffnen
  256. Schlick, Moritz (1931). Die Kausalität in der gegenwärtigen Physik. Die Naturwissenschaften, 19 (7): 146-62. Google Scholar öffnen
  257. Schmid, Michael (1996). Rationalität und Theoriebildung: Studien zu Karl R. Poppers Methodologie der Sozialwissenschaften. Amsterdam & Atlanta: Rodopi. Google Scholar öffnen
  258. Schmid, Michael (1996). Rationalität und Theoriebildung: Studien zu Karl R. Poppers Methodologie der Sozialwissenschaften. Amsterdam & Atlanta (2001). Theorienvergleich in den Sozialwissenschaften. Ethik und Sozialwissenschaften, 12 (4): 481-94. Google Scholar öffnen
  259. Schmid, Michael (1996). Rationalität und Theoriebildung: Studien zu Karl R. Poppers Methodologie der Sozialwissenschaften. Amsterdam & Atlanta (2004). Rationales Handeln und soziale Prozesse: Beiträge zur soziologischen Theoriebildung. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-80486-0
  260. Schmid, Michael (1996). Rationalität und Theoriebildung: Studien zu Karl R. Poppers Methodologie der Sozialwissenschaften. Amsterdam & Atlanta (2009). Theorien, Modelle und Erklärungen: Einige Grundprobleme des soziologischen Theorienvergleichs. In: Gerhard Preyer (ed.), Neuer Mensch und kollektive Identität in der Kommunikationsgesellschaft. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag, pp. 323-59. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91471-8_17
  261. Schmitter, Philippe C. (1971). A Revised Theory of European Integration. In: Leon N. Lindberg and Stuart A. Scheingold (eds.), Regional Integration: Theory and Research. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 232-65. Google Scholar öffnen
  262. Schmitter, Philippe C. (1971). A Revised Theory of European Integration. In: Leon N. Lindberg and Stuart A. Scheingold (eds.) (1996). Imagining the Future of the Euro-Polity with the Help of New Concepts. In: Gary Marks, Fritz W. Scharpf, Philippe C. Schmitter and Wolfgang Streeck (eds.), Governance in the European Union. London et al.: Sage, pp. 121-50. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.4135/9781446279328.n6
  263. Schmitter, Philippe C. (1971). A Revised Theory of European Integration. In: Leon N. Lindberg and Stuart A. Scheingold (eds.) (2004). Neo-Neofunctionalism. In: Antje Wiener and Thomas Diez (eds.), European Integration Theory. 1. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 45-74. Google Scholar öffnen
  264. Schneider, Christina J. (2007). Enlargement processes and distributional conflict: the politics of discriminatory membership in the European Union. Public Choice, 132 (1-2): 85-102. Google Scholar öffnen
  265. Schneider, Christina J. (2007). Enlargement processes and distributional conflict: the politics of discriminatory membership in the European Union. Public Choice (2009). Conflict, Negotiation and European Union Enlargement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  266. Schneider, Wolfgang L. (1996). Die Komplementarität von Sprechakttheorie und systemtheoretischer Kommunikationstheorie: Ein hermeneutischer Beitrag zur Methodologie von Theorievergleichen. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 25 (4): 263-77. Google Scholar öffnen
  267. Schwarz, Gideon E. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6 (2): 461-64. Google Scholar öffnen
  268. Seipel, Christian (1999). Strategien und Probleme des empirischen Theorienvergleichs in den Sozialwissenschaften: Rational-Choice-Theorie oder Persönlichkeitstheorie? Opladen: Leske & Budrich. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-11544-1
  269. Seipel, Christian (1999). Strategien und Probleme des empirischen Theorienvergleichs in den Sozialwissenschaften: Rational-Choice-Theorie oder Persönlichkeitstheorie? Opladen (2000). Ein empirischer Vergleich zwischen der Theorie geplanten Verhaltens von Icek Ajzen und der Allgemeinen Theorie der Kriminalität von Michael R. Gottfredson und Travis Hirschi. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 29 (5): 397-410. Google Scholar öffnen
  270. Seipel, Christian and Rippl, Susanne (2000). Ansätze der Rechtsextremismusforschung: Ein empirischer Theorienvergleich. Zeitschrift für Soziologie der Erziehung und Sozialisation, 20 (3): 303-18. Google Scholar öffnen
  271. Sepos, Angelos (2010). Foreign and Security Policies: 'Trilateral' Europe? In: Kenneth Dyson and Angelos Sepos (eds.), Which Europe? The Politics of Differentiated Integration. Basingstoke et al.: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 308-21. Google Scholar öffnen
  272. Seyfarth, Constans (1978). Zur Grundlegung eines nicht-restriktiven Vergleichs soziologischer Theorien. In: Karl Otto Hondrich and Joachim Matthes (eds.), Theorienvergleich in den Sozialwissenschaften. Darmstadt & Neuwied: Luchterhand, pp. 285-313. Google Scholar öffnen
  273. Shaw, Jo (1998). The Treaty of Amsterdam: Challenges of Flexibility and Legitimacy. European Law Journal, 4 (1): 63-86. Google Scholar öffnen
  274. Smith, Steve (1996). Positivism and beyond. In: Steve Smith, Ken Booth and Marysia Zalewski (eds.), International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 11-46. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054.003
  275. Smith, Steve (1996). Positivism and beyond. In: Steve Smith (1997). New approaches to international theory. In: John Baylis and Steve Smith (eds.), The Globalization of World Politics. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 165-90. Google Scholar öffnen
  276. Spindler, Manuela (2013). International Relations: A Self-Study Guide to Theory. Opladen et al.: Barbara Budrich. Google Scholar öffnen
  277. Spindler, Manuela and Schieder, Siegfried (2014). Theory in International Relations. In: Siegfried Schieder and Manuela Spindler (eds.), Theories of International Relations. Abingdon & New York: Routledge, pp. 1-21. Google Scholar öffnen
  278. Spinelli, Altiero (1972 [1957]). The Growth of the European Movement since the Second World War. In: Michael Hodges (ed.), European Integration: Selected Readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin, pp. 43-68. Google Scholar öffnen
  279. Steans, Jill, Pettiford, Lloyd, Diez, Thomas and El-Anis, Imad (2010). An Introduction to International Relations Theory: Perspectives and Themes. 3rd edition. London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
  280. Stone Sweet, Alec and Sandholtz, Wayne (1997). European integration and supranational governance. Journal of European Public Policy, 4 (3): 297-317. Google Scholar öffnen
  281. Steans, Jill (1998). Integration, Supranational Governance, and the Institutionalization of the European Polity. In: Wayne Sandholtz and Alec Stone Sweet (eds.), European Integration and Supranational Governance. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 1-26. Google Scholar öffnen
  282. Stryker, Sheldon (1959). Symbolic Interaction as an Approach to Family Research. Marriage and Family Living, 21 (2): 111-19. Google Scholar öffnen
  283. Stubb, Alexander C. G. (1996). A categorization of differentiated integration. Journal of Common Market Studies, 34 (2): 283-95. Google Scholar öffnen
  284. Stubb, Alexander C. G. (1996). A categorization of differentiated integration. Journal of Common Market Studies (1997). The 1996 Intergovernmental Conference and the management of flexible integration. Journal of European Public Policy, 4 (1): 37-55. Google Scholar öffnen
  285. Stubb, Alexander C. G. (1996). A categorization of differentiated integration. Journal of Common Market Studies (2000). Negotiating Flexible Integration in the Amsterdam Treaty. In: Karlheinz Neunreither and Antje Wiener (eds.), European Integration After Amsterdam: Institutional Dynamics and Prospects for Democracy. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 153-74. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/0198296401.003.0009
  286. Stubb, Alexander C. G. (1996). A categorization of differentiated integration. Journal of Common Market Studies (2002). Negotiating flexibility in the European Union: Amsterdam, Nice and Beyond. Basingstoke et al.: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1057/9781403907615
  287. Tekin, Funda (2012). Differentiated Integration at Work: The Institutionalisation and Implementation of Opt-Outs from European Integration in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845235394
  288. Thym, Daniel (2004). Ungleichzeitigkeit und Europäisches Verfassungsrecht: Die Einbettung der verstärkten Zusammenarbeit, des Schengener Rechts und anderer Formen von Ungleichzeitigkeit in den einheitlichen rechtlichen und institutionellen Rahmen der Europäischen Union. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen
  289. Thym, Daniel (2004). Ungleichzeitigkeit und Europäisches Verfassungsrecht: Die Einbettung der verstärkten Zusammenarbeit (2006). Supranationale Ungleichzeitigkeit im Recht der europäischen Integration. Europarecht, 2006 (5): 637-55. Google Scholar öffnen
  290. Tichý, Pavel (1974). On Popper's Definitions of Verisimilitude. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 25 (2): 155-60. Google Scholar öffnen
  291. Tindemans, Leo (1976). European Union. Report by Mr Leo Tindemans, Prime Minister of Belgium, to the European Council. Bulletin of the European Communities, Supplement 1/76: 1-36. Google Scholar öffnen
  292. Tranholm-Mikkelsen, Jeppe (1991). Neofunctionalism: Obstinate or Obsolete? A Reappraisal in the Light of the New Dynamism of the European Community. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 20 (1): 1-22. Google Scholar öffnen
  293. Tuytschaever, Filip (1999). Differentiation in European Law. Oxford & Portland: Hart. Google Scholar öffnen
  294. Usher, John A. (2002). Enhanced Cooperation or Flexibility in the Post-Nice Era. In: Anthony Arnull and Daniel Wincott (eds.), Accountability and Legitimacy in the European Union. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 97-112. Google Scholar öffnen
  295. Van Raepenbusch, Sean and Hanf, Dominik (2001). Flexibility in Social Policy. In: Bruno De Witte, Dominik Hanf and Ellen Vos (eds.), The Many Faces of Differentiation in EU Law. Antwerpen et al.: Intersentia, pp. 65-82. Google Scholar öffnen
  296. Viotti, Paul R. and Kauppi, Mark V. (2012). International Relations Theory. 5th edition. New York et al.: Pearson. Google Scholar öffnen
  297. Volkens, Andrea, Lehmann, Pola, Merz, Nicolas, Regel, Sven, Werner, Annika, Lacewell, Onawa Promise and Schultze, Henrike (2013). The Manifesto Data Collection. Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR). Version 2013b. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB). Google Scholar öffnen
  298. Von Ondarza, Nicolai (2012). Zwischen Integrationskern und Zerfaserung: Folgen und Chancen einer Strategie differenzierter Integration. Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik. Google Scholar öffnen
  299. Waever, Ole (1996). The rise and fall of the inter-paradigm debate. In: Steve Smith, Ken Booth and Marysia Zalewski (eds.), International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 149-85. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054.009
  300. Wagner, David G. and Berger, Joseph (1985). Do Sociological Theories Grow? American Journal of Sociology, 90 (4): 697-728. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1086/228142
  301. Waismann, Friedrich (1930). Logische Analyse des Wahrscheinlichkeitsbegriffs. Erkenntnis, 1 (1): 228-48. Google Scholar öffnen
  302. Waismann, Friedrich (1930). Logische Analyse des Wahrscheinlichkeitsbegriffs. Erkenntnis (1967). Wittgenstein und der Wiener Kreis. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar öffnen
  303. Walker, Neil (1998). Sovereignty and Differentiated Integration in the European Union. European Law Journal, 4 (4): 355-88. Google Scholar öffnen
  304. Walt, Stephen M. (1998). International Relations: One World, Many Theories. Foreign Policy, 110 (1): 29-46. Google Scholar öffnen
  305. Warleigh, Alex (2002). Flexible Integration: Which Model for the European Union? London & New York: Sheffield Academic Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.4324/9780203470909
  306. WB (2014). World Development Indicators 2014. Washington, DC: World Bank. Google Scholar öffnen
  307. Webb, Carole (1983). Theoretical Perspectives and Problems. In: Helen S. Wallace, William Wallace and Carole Webb (eds.), Policy-Making in the European Community. Chichester: Wiley, pp. 1-41. Google Scholar öffnen
  308. Wendt, Alexander E. (1987). The agent-structure problem in international relations theory. International Organization, 41 (3): 335-70. Google Scholar öffnen
  309. Wendt, Alexander E. (1987). The agent-structure problem in international relations theory. International Organization (1999). Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612183
  310. Wessels, Wolfgang and Jantz, Birke (1997). Flexibilisierung: Die Europäische Union vor einer neuen Grundsatzdebatte? Grundmodelle unter der Lupe. In: Rudolf Hrbek (ed.), Die Reform der Europäischen Union. Positionen und Perspektiven anlässlich der Regierungskonferenz. Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 345-68. Google Scholar öffnen
  311. Wight, Colin (2013). Philosophy of Social Science and International Relations. In: Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse and Beth A. Simmons (eds.), Handbook of International Relations. 2nd edition. London et al.: Sage, pp. 29-56. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.4135/9781446247587.n2
  312. Wight, Colin (1996). Incommensurability and Cross-Paradigm Communication in International Relations Theory: 'What's the Frequency Kenneth?'. Millennium – Journal of International Studies, 25 (2): 291-319. Google Scholar öffnen
  313. Williams, D. (1978). Estimating in Levels or First Differences: A Defence of the Method Used for Certain Demand-for-Money Equations. The Economic Journal, 88 (351): 564-68. Google Scholar öffnen
  314. Wimmer, Per T. (1995). Vers une Europe à la carte après Maastricht? Analyse des dérogations à l'acquis communautaire. Brüssel: Presses Interuniversitaires Européennes. Google Scholar öffnen
  315. Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1922). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Google Scholar öffnen
  316. Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. (1999). Distribution-free estimation of some nonlinear panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 90 (1): 77-97. Google Scholar öffnen
  317. Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. (1999). Distribution-free estimation of some nonlinear panel data models. Journal of Econometrics (2010). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. 2nd edition. Cambridge, MA & London: MIT Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  318. Zielonka, Jan (2006). Europe as Empire: The Nature of the Enlarged European Union. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/0199292213.001.0001

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus dem Schwerpunkt "Politische Theorie", "Europarecht & Internationales Recht & Rechtsvergleichung"
Cover des Buchs: The Function of Political Authority
Monographie Vollzugriff
Carola Hesch
The Function of Political Authority
Cover des Buchs: Unbeabsichtigte Normenkonflikte zwischen EU-Recht und nationalem Recht
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Yannis Ockernahl
Unbeabsichtigte Normenkonflikte zwischen EU-Recht und nationalem Recht
Cover des Buchs: Der Volkseinwand
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Florian Feigl
Der Volkseinwand
Cover des Buchs: Wie fördert die EU Menschenrechte in Drittstaaten?
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Dennis Traudt
Wie fördert die EU Menschenrechte in Drittstaaten?
Cover des Buchs: Future-Proofing in Public Law
Sammelband Kein Zugriff
Nicole Koblenz LL.M., Nicholas Otto, Gernot Sydow
Future-Proofing in Public Law

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Feedback geben

Wir freuen uns über Ihr Feedback zu Inhalten und Funktionen. Ihre Nachricht hilft uns, unseren Service stetig zu verbessern.

Bewertung
Bild anhängen
oder hier ablegen
PNG oder JPG (max. 3 MB)

Anmelden

Passwort vergessen?
Login via Open Athens
Noch kein Benutzerkonto?
Jetzt registrieren

Publikation zitieren

Download: RIS BibTex