EU Gas Supply Security

Dr. Mirja Schröder

doi:10.5771/9783748900290

Zusammenfassung

Die wiederholten Gaskrisen zwischen Russland und der Ukraine haben auf europäischer Ebene in den letzten Jahren zu einem erheblichen Bedeutungszuwachs von Fragen der Energiesicherheit geführt. Das Buch untersucht vor diesem Hintergrund die geopolitische Vision der EU-Außenenergiepolitik am Beispiel des Südlichen Gaskorridors. Basierend auf den theoretischen Annahmen der Kritischen Geopolitik analysiert die Autorin den Diskurs der Europäischen Kommission im Zuge der Gaskrisen und geht der Frage nach, inwiefern geopolitische Narrative die europäische Energiesicherheitspolitik tatsächlich beeinflussen. Sie beobachtet dabei, wie die Diversifizierung von Gaslieferungen über den Südlichen Gaskorridor zu dem zentralen Narrativ der EU-Kommission wird, um letztlich die Abhängigkeit von russischem Gas zu reduzieren und Energiesicherheit für Europa zu gewährleisten.

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Copyrightjahr: 2019
ISBN-Print: 978-3-8487-5901-9
ISBN-Online: 978-3-7489-0029-0
Verlag: Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe: Studies on the European Union
Band: 16
Sprache: Englisch
Seiten: 209
Produkttyp: Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten

Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Kein Zugriff Seiten 1 - 18
1. 1.1 State of the Art, Research Aim and Research Question Kein Zugriff
2. 1.2 The Research Focus on Natural Gas Kein Zugriff
3. 1.3 Outline of the Study Kein Zugriff
1. 1. 1st phase: 1950s – 1980s: pooling of national energy interests Kein Zugriff
  2. 2nd phase: 1980s – mid-2000s: liberalisation of gas and electricity Kein Zugriff
  3. 1. 2.1.1 The European Commission as Promoter of a Common Energy Policy Kein Zugriff
    2. 2.1.2 The External Dimensions of the EU’s Energy Policy Kein Zugriff
    3. 1. 2.1.3.1 Externalisation of Internal Energy Market Rules: The Gas Directive Kein Zugriff
      2. 2.1.3.2 Security of Supply Regulation Kein Zugriff
      3. 2.1.3.3 A Pan-European Energy Infrastructure – TEN-E Guidelines Kein Zugriff
2. 1. 2.2.1 Energy Dependence: the EU’s Import Dependence Kein Zugriff
  2. 2.2.2 A Policy Response: The EU’s Drive for Diversification Kein Zugriff
3. 1. 2.3.1 Mapping the EU’s Import Dependency on Russian Gas Pipelines Kein Zugriff
  2. 2.3.2 The Search for Alternative Supply Sources – Prospects for the Caspian Region Kein Zugriff
  3. 2.3.3 Pipeline Projects for the Southern Gas Corridor Kein Zugriff
1. 3.1 Geopolitics – a Contested Term Kein Zugriff
2. 1. Phase I: Imperialist Geopolitics Kein Zugriff
  2. Phase II: Cold War Geopolitics Kein Zugriff
  3. Phase III: New World Order Geopolitics Kein Zugriff
  4. Phase IV: Environmental Geopolitics Kein Zugriff
3. 3.3 The Antipode: Anti or Critical Geopolitics as Alternative to Classical Geopolitics Kein Zugriff
1. 1. 4.1.1 Political Space: Territoriality and Power Kein Zugriff
  2. 4.1.2 Intellectuals of Statecraft Kein Zugriff
  3. 4.1.3 Geopolitical Visions Kein Zugriff
2. 1. 4.2.1.1 Energy Community Kein Zugriff
  2. 4.2.1.2 European Neighbourhood Policy Kein Zugriff
  3. 4.2.1.3 Strategic Energy Dialogues Kein Zugriff
3. 4.3 Criticism and Limits of Critical Geopolitics Kein Zugriff
1. 5.1 Applying Critical Geopolitics’ Discourse Analysis to EU Studies Kein Zugriff
2. 1. Formal, Practical and Popular Geopolitics Kein Zugriff
  2. 1. 5.2.1 Phase 1: Geopolitical Reasoning and the Grammar of Geopolitics Kein Zugriff
    2. 5.2.2 Phase 2: The Three Dimensions of the Geopolitical Vision Kein Zugriff
3. 1. 5.3.1 Policy Narratives and Geopolitical Reasoning Kein Zugriff
  2. 5.3.2 Single Case Study: Turkey and the Southern Gas Corridor Kein Zugriff
  3. 5.3.3 Collection of Documents Kein Zugriff
1. 1. The Grammar of Geopolitics: Gas Crisis 2006 Kein Zugriff
2. 1. The Grammar of Geopolitics: Gas crisis 2009 Kein Zugriff
3. 1. The Grammar of Geopolitics: Gas crisis 2014 Kein Zugriff
4. 6.4 The Assemblage of Storylines Kein Zugriff
1. 7.1 Diversification as Key Policy Solution Kein Zugriff
2. 7.2 From Nabucco to TANAP: The Southern Gas Corridor – a Geopolitical Exercise Kein Zugriff
1. 1. 8.1.1 The Symbolic Construction of the Southern Gas Corridor Kein Zugriff
  2. 8.1.2 Turkey – a Hub, a Crossroad, a Bridge Kein Zugriff
2. 1. 8.2.1 The Territorial Scope of the SGC Kein Zugriff
  2. 8.2.2 Turkey as One of ‘Us’? Kein Zugriff
3. 1. 8.3.1 The Energy Chapter Kein Zugriff
  2. 8.3.2 The Energy Community Kein Zugriff
  3. 8.3.3 Regional Initiatives and Bilateral Agreements Kein Zugriff
  4. 8.3.4 The Institutional Energy Map of the Caspian Region Kein Zugriff
1. 9.1 Research Results I: The ‘Spatialisation’ of Russian-Ukrainian Gas Crises Kein Zugriff
2. 9.2 Research Results II: The Geopolitical Vision of the SGC Kein Zugriff
3. 9.3 Contribution to the Academic Debate, Outlook and Future Research Agendas Kein Zugriff
10 References Kein Zugriff Seiten 173 - 191
11 Primary Sources Kein Zugriff Seiten 192 - 206
12 Annex Kein Zugriff Seiten 207 - 209

Literaturverzeichnis (312 Einträge)

Aalto, P., & Korkmaz, D. (2014). European energy security: natural gas and the integration process. Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(4), 758–774. Google Scholar öffnen
Abbasov, F. G. (2014). EU’s external energy governance: A multidimensional analysis of the southern gas corridor. Energy Policy, 65, 27–36. Google Scholar öffnen
Agnew, J. (2003). Geopolitics: Re-visioning world politics (2nd ed.). London/New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
Agnew, J. (2005). Hegemony. The new shape of global power. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Atkinson, D., & Dodds, K. (Eds.). (2000). Geopolitical traditions. A century of geopolitical thought. London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
Austvik, O. G., & Rzayeva, G. (2016). Turkey in the geopolitics of natural gas. M-RCBG Associate Working Paper Series, 66, 09/16. Google Scholar öffnen
Baku Initiative. (2004). Ministerial Declaration on enhanced energy co-operation between the EU, the littoral states of the Black and Caspian Seas and their neighbouring countries. Baku. Google Scholar öffnen
Baku Initiative. (2006). Ministerial Declaration on enhanced energy co-operation between the EU, the littoral states of the Black and Caspian Seas and their neighbouring countries. Annex I, Road Map. Astana. Google Scholar öffnen
Baran, Z. (2007). EU Energy Security: Time to end Russian leverage. The Washington Quarterly, 30(4), 131–144. Google Scholar öffnen
Baumann, F., & Simmerl, G. (2011). Between conflict and convergence: the EU member states and the quest for a common external energy policy. CAP discussion paper, München: Centrum für angewandte Politikforschung, Forschungsgruppe Europa. Google Scholar öffnen
Beauguitte, L., Richard, Y., & Guérin-Pace, F. (2015). The EU and Its Neighbourhoods: A Textual Analysis on Key Documents of the European Neighbourhood Policy. Geopolitics, 20(4), 853–879. Google Scholar öffnen
Berk, I., Schulte, S., & Cam, E. (2017). An economic assessment of Turkey’s future role in European oil and gas supply security. In M. Schröder, M. O. Bettzüge & W. Wessels (Eds.), Turkey as an Energy Hub? Contributions on Turkey’s Role in EU Energy Supply (Vol. 1, pp. 141–183). Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen
Bettzüge, M. O., & Hecking, H. (2017). Geopolitical Dynamics in the European Gas Market from an Economic Perspective. In M. Schröder, M. O. Bettzüge & W. Wessels (Eds.), Turkey as an Energy Hub? Contributions on Turkey’s Role in EU Energy Suppl (Vol. 1, pp. 123–139). Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen
Bialasiewicz, L. (Ed.). (2011). Europe in the world: EU geopolitics and the making of European space. London; New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
Bialasiewicz, L. (2012). Spectres of Europe: Europe’s past, present, and future. In D. Stone (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Postwar European History (1st ed., pp. 98–119). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Biesenbender, S. (2015). The EU’s energy policy agenda: directions and developments. In J. Tosun, S. Biesenbender, & K. Schulze (Eds.), Energy policy making in the EU: building the agenda (Vol. 28, pp. 21–40). London: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen
Bilgin, M. (2009). Geopolitics of European natural gas demand: Supplies from Russia, Caspian and the Middle East. Energy Policy, 37(11), 4482–4492. Google Scholar öffnen
Biresselioglu, M. E. (2011). European energy security: Turkey’s future role and impact. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen
Blackwill, R. D., & Harris, J. M. (2016). War by other means. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Boedeltje, F., & van Houtum, H. (2011). Brussels is Speaking: The Adverse Speech Geo-Politics of the European Union Towards its Neighbours. Geopolitics, 16(1), 130–145. Google Scholar öffnen
Boersma, T. (2015). Energy security and natural gas markets in Europe. Lessons from the EU and the United States. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
Bordoff, J., & Houser, T. (2014). American Gas to the Rescue? The Impact of US LNG Exports on European Security and Russian Foreign Policy. Center on Global Energy Policy, Columbia SIPA, 09/2014. Google Scholar öffnen
Borg, S., & Diez, T. (2016). Postmodern EU? Integration between Alternative Horizons and Territorial Angst: Postmodern EU? Journal of Common Market Studies, 54(1), 136–151. Google Scholar öffnen
Borger, J., Dehghan, S. K., & Holmes, O. (2018). Iran deal: Trump breaks with European allies over ‘horrible, one-sided’ nuclear agreement. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/may/08/iran-deal-trump-withdraw-us-latest-news-nuclear-agreementhttps://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/may/08/iran-deal-trump-withdraw-us-latest-news-nuclear-agreement Google Scholar öffnen
Bosse, G. (2011). The EU’s geopolitical vision of a European energy space: When ‘Gulliver’ meets ‘White Elephants’ and Verdi’s Babylonian King. Geopolitics, 16, 512–535. Google Scholar öffnen
Bosse, G., & Schmidt-Felzmann, A. (2011). The geopolitics of energy supply in the ‘Wider Europe’. Geopolitics, 16(3), 479–485. Google Scholar öffnen
BP (2017). BP statistical review of world energy 2017, June 2017. Google Scholar öffnen
Brinkmann, S. (2013). Qualitative interviewing. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Bryn, A., & Coletti, R. (2015). Global empires and the European neighbourhood: China, Russia and the US. In F. Celata & R. Coletti (Eds.), Neighbourhood Policy and the Construction of the European External Borders (pp. 179–197). Cham: Springer International Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen
Buchan, D. (2010). Energy policy: sharp challenges and rising ambitions. In H. Wallace (Ed.), Policy-making in the European Union (6., pp. 357–379). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Buzan, B., Wæver, O., & Wilde, J. de. (1998). Security: a new framework for analysis. Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienner Pub. Google Scholar öffnen
Cagaptay, S., & Evans, T. (2013). The geopolitics of natural gas - Turkey’s energy policy and the future of natural gas. Houston: Baker Institue, Rice University. Google Scholar öffnen
Celata, F., & Coletti, R. (2015a). Beyond fortress ’EU’rope? Bordering and cross-bordering along the European external frontiers. In F. Celata & R. Coletti (Eds.), Neighbourhood Policy and the Construction of the European External Borders (pp. 1–26). Cham: Springer International Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen
Celata, F., & Coletti, R. (Eds.). (2015b). Neighbourhood policy and the construction of the European external borders. Cham: Springer International Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen
Celata, F., & Coletti, R. (2017). Borderescapes of external Europeanization in the Mediterranean neighbourhood. European Urban and Regional Studies, 1–13. Google Scholar öffnen
Colantoni, L., Korkmaz, D., Sartori, N., Schröder, M., Sever-Mehmetoglu, D., & Yilmaz, S. (2017). Energy and climate strategies, interests and priorities of the EU and Turkey. FEUTURE Online Paper, 2. Google Scholar öffnen
Colombo, S., Harrak, M. E., & Sartori, N. (Eds.). (2016). The future of natural gas: Markets and geopolitics. Hof van Twente: Lenthe. Google Scholar öffnen
Commission of the European Communities. (1968). First Guidelines for a Community energy policy. Memorandum presented by the Commission to the Council, COM(68) 1040 final, 18.12.1968, Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen
Commission of the European Communities. (2000). Towards a European strategy for the security of energy supply. Green Paper, COM(2000)769 final, 29.11.2000, Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen
Commission of the European Communities. (2003). Wider Europe - Neighbourhood: A New Framework for Relations with our Eastern and Southern Neighbours. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, COM(2003) 104 final, Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen
Commission of the European Communities. (2006a). A European Strategy for Sustainable, Competitive and Secure Energy. Green Paper, COM(2006) 105 final, 08.03.2006, Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen
Commission of the European Communities. (2006b). An External Policy to Serve Europe’s Energy Interests. Paper from Commission/ Secretary General/ High Representative for the European Council, No. S160/06, June 2006, Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen
Commission of the European Communities. (2006c). External energy relations - from principles to action. Communication from the Commission to the European Council, COM(2006) 590 final, 12.10.2006, Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen
Commission of the European Communities. (2007). An Energy Policy for Europe. Communication from the Commission to the European Council and the European Parliament, COM(2007) 1 final, 10.01.2007, Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen
Commission of the European Communities. (2008a). Second Strategic Energy Review. An EU energy security and solidarity action plan. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions, COM(2008) 781 final, 13.11.2008, Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen
Commission of the European Communities. (2008b). Towards a secure, sustainable and competitive European energy network. Green Paper, COM(2008)782 final, 13.11.2008, Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen
Coote, B. (2017). The Caspian Sea and Southern Gas Corridor. A view from Russia, 04/2017 Retrieved from https://www.naturalgasworld.com/pdfs/Caspian%https://www.naturalgasworld.com/pdfs/Caspian% 20Sea%20and%20Southern%20Gas%20Corridor%20FINAL.pdf Google Scholar öffnen
Correljé, A. (2016). The European natural gas market. Current Sustainable/ Renewable Energy Reports, 3(1–2), 28–34. Google Scholar öffnen
Correljé, A., & van der Linde, C. (2006). Energy supply security and geopolitics: A European perspective. Energy Policy, 34(5), 532–543. Google Scholar öffnen
Council of the European Union. (2009). Joint Declaration of the Prague Eastern Partnership Summit. 07.05.2009, Prague. Google Scholar öffnen
Council of the European Union. (2011). Council conclusions on strengthening the external dimension of EU energy policy, 3127th TTE Council meeting, 24.11.2011, Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen
Council of the European Union. (2015). Council Conclusions on Energy Diplomacy. No. 10995/15, 20.07.2015, Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen
Council of the European Union. (2017a). Climate and energy diplomacy: Council gives guidance on strengthening synergies. Press Release No. 106/17, 06.03.2017, Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen
Council of the European Union. (2017b). Council conclusions on the EU strategy for Central Asia. Council Conclusions No. 10387/17, 19.06.2017, Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen
Council of the European Union. (2018). The Fourth Ministerial Meeting of the Southern Gas Corridor Advisory Council, Baku 15 February 2018. Joint Declaration, General Secretariat of the Council to the Permanent Representatives Committee/ Council No. 5651/18, 29.01.2018, Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen
Crespy, A. (2015). Analysing European discourse. In K. Lynggaard, I. Manners, & K. Löfgren (Eds.), Research Methods in European Union Studies. Basingstoke [England]; New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen
Cronshaw, I., Marstrand, J., Pirovska, M., Simmons, D., & Wempe, J. (2008). Development of competitive gas trading in continental Europe. How to achieve workable competition in European gas markets. IEA Information Paper, Paris: International Energy Agency. Retrieved from https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/gas_trading.pdfhttps://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/gas_trading.pdf Google Scholar öffnen
Dalby, S. (1990a). American security discourse: the persistence of geopolitics. Political Geography Quarterly, 9(2), 171–188. Google Scholar öffnen
Dalby, S. (1990b). Creating the Second World War: The discourse of politics. New York: Guilford. Google Scholar öffnen
Dalby, S. (1991). Critical Geopolitics: Discourse, difference and dissent, 9(3), 261–283. Google Scholar öffnen
Dalby, S. (2002). Environmental security. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Dalby, S. (2003). Geopolitics, knowledge and power at the end of the century. In The Geopolitics Reader (pp. 305–312). London/ New York. Google Scholar öffnen
Dalby, S. (2009). Security and environmental change. Cambridge, UK; Malden, MA: Polity. Google Scholar öffnen
Dalby, S. (2016). Interpreting climate geopolitics: knowledge, power, and security. Geopolitics, 21(1), 236–241. Google Scholar öffnen
Damro, C. (2012). Market power Europe. European Journal of Public Policy, 19(5), 682–699. Google Scholar öffnen
Del Sarto, R. A. (2016). Normative Empire Europe: The European Union, its Borderlands, and the ‘Arab Spring’: Normative Empire Europe. Journal of Common Market Studies, 54(2), 215–232. Google Scholar öffnen
Demiryol, T. (2013). The Geopolitics of energy co-operation between Turkey and the European Union. L’Europe En Formation, 367(1), 109–134. Google Scholar öffnen
Devlin, B., & Heer, K. (2010). The Southern Corridor - Strategic Aspects for the EU. In K. Linke & M. Vietor (Eds.), Beyond Turkey. The EU’s Energy Policy and the Southern Gas Corridor (pp. 5–9). Berlin: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. Google Scholar öffnen
Dickel, R., Hassanzadeh, E., Henderson, J., Honoré, A., El-Katiri, L., Pirani, S., Yafimava, K. (2014). Reducing European dependence on Russian gas: distinguishing natural gas security from geopolitics. OIES Paper, 92. Google Scholar öffnen
Diez, T. (2005). Constructing the self and changing others: Reconsidering ‘Normative Power Europe’. Millenium, 33(3), 613–636. Google Scholar öffnen
Dijkink, G. (1996). National identity and geopolitical visions. Maps of pride and pain. London; New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
Dijkink, G., & Van der Wusten, H. (2002). German, British and French Geopolitics: The enduring differences. Geopolitics, 7(3), 19–38. Google Scholar öffnen
Directorate-General for Research. (2007). Energy corridors. European Union and neighbouring countries, No. EUR 22581, Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved from http://www.ecn.nl/docs/library/report/2007/b07016.pdfhttp://www.ecn.nl/docs/library/report/2007/b07016.pdf Google Scholar öffnen
Dodds, K. (2014). Geopolitics. A very short introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Dodds, K., Kuus, M., & Sharp, J. P. (2016). Introduction: Geopolitics and its Critics. In K. Dodds, M. Kuus, & J. P. Sharp (Eds.), The Ashgate Research Companion to Critical Geopolitics (2nd ed., pp. 1–18). New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
EEAS. (2014). Black Sea Synergy. Brussels. Retrieved from: https://eeas.europa.eu/diplomatic-network/black-sea-synergy/346/black-sea-synergy_enhttps://eeas.europa.eu/diplomatic-network/black-sea-synergy/346/black-sea-synergy_en Google Scholar öffnen
EEAS. (2016a). Joint Statement on Energy. Statement on the establishment of an EU-Iran High Level Energy Dialogue, 17.04.2016, Teheran. Google Scholar öffnen
EEAS. (2016b). Shared Vision, Common Action: a stronger Europe. A global strategy for the European Union’s Foreign and Security Policy. June 2016, Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen
EEAS. (2017). Remarks by High-Representative/Vice President Federica Mogherini at the joint press conference with Minister for Foreign Affairs of Malta George Vella, 28.04.2017, Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen
EIA. (2011). Annual Energy Outlook 2011, US Energy Information Administration, Washington DC. Retrieved from http://www.eia.gov/pressroom/releases/imahttp://www.eia.gov/pressroom/releases/ima ges/2010_13_figure1.jpg. Google Scholar öffnen
EIA. (2017). Country analysis brief: Russia, US Energy Information Administration, Washington DC. Retrieved from https://www.eia.gov/beta/international/analysis_includes/countries_long/Russia/russia.pdfhttps://www.eia.gov/beta/international/analysis_includes/countries_long/Russia/russia.pdf Google Scholar öffnen
EIA. (2018). EIA expects 2018 and 2019 natural gas prices to remain relatively flat. In Today in Energy, 25.01.2018, Washington DC. Retrieved from https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=34672https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=34672 Google Scholar öffnen
Ellinas, C., Roberts, J., & Tzimitras, H. (2016). Hydrocarbon Developments in the Eastern Mediterranean: the Case for Pragmatism. Atlantic Council, 08/2016. Google Scholar öffnen
Energy Community Secretariat. (2017). Energy Community Facts in Brief, Vienna. Retrieved from www.energy-community.orgwww.energy-community.org Google Scholar öffnen
Euractiv. (2018). EU bank approves largest ever energy loan, for TAP pipeline. Euractiv.Com, 07.02.2018, Retrieved from https://www.euractiv.com/section/energy/news/eu-bank-approves-largest-ever-energy-loan-for-tap-pipeline/https://www.euractiv.com/section/energy/news/eu-bank-approves-largest-ever-energy-loan-for-tap-pipeline/ Google Scholar öffnen
Eurogas. (2011). The external policy of the European Union: an industry and market perspective from Eurogas. Retrieved from http://www.eurogas.org/uploads/media/Position_Paper_External_Energy_Policy_Paper_31.05.11.pdfhttp://www.eurogas.org/uploads/media/Position_Paper_External_Energy_Policy_Paper_31.05.11.pdf Google Scholar öffnen
European Commission. (2006). Annex to the Green Paper - A European Strategy for Sustainable, Competitive and Secure Energy What is at stake - Background document. Commission Staff Working Document, SEC(2006)317, Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen
European Commission. (2007a). Black Sea Synergy: A regional co-operation initiative, COM(2007) 160 final, 11.04.2007, Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen
European Commission. (2007b). ENPI Armenia Country strategy paper 2007–2013. Retrieved from http://www.enpi-info.eu/library/content/armenia-country-strategy-paper-2007-2013http://www.enpi-info.eu/library/content/armenia-country-strategy-paper-2007-2013 Google Scholar öffnen
European Commission. (2007c). ENPI Azerbaijan Country strategy paper 2007–2013. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/sites/devco/files/csp-azerbaijan-2007-2013_en.pdfhttps://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/sites/devco/files/csp-azerbaijan-2007-2013_en.pdf Google Scholar öffnen
European Commission. (2007d). ENPI Georgia Country strategy paper 2007–2013. Retrieved from http://www.enpi-info.eu/library/content/georgia-country-strategy-paper-2007-2013http://www.enpi-info.eu/library/content/georgia-country-strategy-paper-2007-2013 Google Scholar öffnen
European Commission. (2010a). Energy 2020, A Strategy for competitive, sustainable and secure energy. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions, COM(2010) 639 final, 10.11.2010, Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen
European Commission. (2010b). Energy infrastructure priorities for 2020 and beyond - A blueprint for an integrated European energy network. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions, COM(2010) 677 final, 17.11.2010 Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen
European Commission. (2010c). On the Implementation of Trans-European Energy Networks in the Period 2007–2009. Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM(2010) 203 final, 04.05.2010, Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen
European Commission. (2011a). A new response to a changing Neighbourhood. Joint Communication to the European Parliament, the Council the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM(2011) 303 final, 25.05.2011, Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen
European Commission. (2011b). Energy Roadmap 2050. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions, COM(2011) 885 final, 15.12.2011, Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen
European Commission. (2011c). On security of energy supply and international co-operation - ‘The EU Energy Policy: Engaging with Partners beyond Our Borders’. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions, COM(2011) 539 final, 07.09.2011, Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen
European Commission. (2012). Turkey-EU Positive agenda. Enhanced EU-Turkey energy co-operation. 14.06.2012, Stuttgart. Google Scholar öffnen
European Commission. (2013a). Enlargement Strategy and Main Challenges 2013-2014. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council, COM(2013)700 final, Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen
European Commission. (2013b). Long term infrastructure vision for Europe and beyond. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions, COM(2013) 711 final, 14.10.2013, Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen
European Commission. (2014a). A policy framework for climate and energy in the period from 2020 to 2030. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions, COM(2014) 15 final, 22.01.2014, Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen
European Commission. (2014b). Communication on the exploration and production of hydrocarbons (such as shale gas) using high volume hydraulic fracturing in the EU. Communication from the Commission to the European Council and the European Parliament, COM(2014) 23 final, Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen
European Commission. (2014c). European Energy Security Strategy. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council, COM(2014) 330 final, 28.05.2014, Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen
European Commission. (2014d). In-depth study of European Energy Security. Accompanying the document Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament: European energy security strategy, Commission Staff Working Document, SWD(2014) 330 final, 02.07.2014, Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen
European Commission. (2014e). Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA II). Indicative Strategy Paper for Turkey (2014-2020). 26.08.2014, Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen
European Commission. (2015a). Black Sea Synergy: review of a regional co-operation initiatve. Joint Staff Working Document, SWD(2015) 6 final, 20.01.2015, Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen
European Commission. (2015b). Energy Union Package. A Framework Strategy for a Resilient Energy Union with a Forward-Looking Climate Change Policy. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions and the European Investment Bank, COM(2015) 80 final, 25.02.2015, Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen
European Commission. (2015c). Review of the European Neighbourhood Policy. JOIN(2015) 50 final, Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen
European Commission. (2015d). State of the Energy Union 2015. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions and the European Investment Bank, COM(2015) 572 final, 18.11.2015, Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen
European Commission. (2015e). Turkey-EU High Level Energy Dialogue EU-Turkey Strategic Energy Co-operation. Joint Declaration, Ankara. Google Scholar öffnen
European Commission. (2016). Communication on an EU strategy for liquefied natural gas and gas storage. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions, COM(2016) 49 final, 16.02.2016, Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen
European Commission. (2017a). Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2009/73/EC concerning common rules for the internal market in natural gas, COM(2017) 660 final, Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen
European Commission. (2017b). Second Report on the State of the Energy Union. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions and the European Investment Bank, COM(2017) 53 final, 01.02.2017, Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen
European Commission. (2017c). The Union list of projects of common interests. Annex VII to Regulation (EU) No 347/2013, C(2017) 7834 final, Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen
European Commission. (2017d). Third Report on the State of the Energy Union. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions and the European Investment Bank, COM(2017) 688 final, 23.11.2017, Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen
European Commission. (2018a). Quarterly Report on European Gas Markets. Market Observatory for Energy, DG Energy, 11(4). Google Scholar öffnen
European Commission. (2018b). Turkey 2018 report. Commission Staff Working Document, SWD(2018) 153 final, 17.04.2018, Strasbourg. Google Scholar öffnen
European Commission. (2018c). EU energy in figures. Statistical pocketbook 2018. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union. Retrieved from https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/99fc30eb-c06d-11e8-9893-01aa75ed71a1/language-en/format-PDF/source-79929745https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/99fc30eb-c06d-11e8-9893-01aa75ed71a1/language-en/format-PDF/source-79929745 Google Scholar öffnen
European Commission, & High Representative for Foreign and Security Policy. (2014). Neighbourhood at the Crossroads: Implementation of the European Neighbourhood Policy in 2013. Joint Communication to the European Parliament, the Council the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, JOIN(2014) 12 final, Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen
European Commission, & High Representative for Foreign and Security Policy. (2017). Report on EU-Azerbaijan relations in the framework of the revised ENP. Joint Staff Working Document, SWD(2017) 485 final, Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen
European Council. (2003). European Security Strategy. A secure Europe in a better world. Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen
European Council. (2007). Presidency Conclusions, 8/9 March 2007, No. 7224/1/07, Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen
European Council. (2011a). Conclusions on energy, 04.02.2011, No. PCE 026/11, Brussels: European Council. Google Scholar öffnen
European Council. (2011b). European Council Conclusions, No. EUCO 2/11, Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen
European Council. (2014). European Council Conclusions, 20-21 March 2014, No. EUCO 7/1/14, Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen
European Council. (2015). European Council Conclusions, 19-20 March 2015, No. EUCO 11/15, Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen
European Council. (2018). European Council Conclusions, 22 March 2018, No. EUCO 1/18, Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen
European Parliament. (2001). Provisional 2001/2071 (COS), Committee on Industry, External Trade, Research and Energy. Google Scholar öffnen
European Parliament. (2016). Energy Union: Key decisions for the realisation of a fully integrated energy market. Study for the ITRE Committee, Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen
Far, S., & Youngs, R. (2015). Energy Union and EU Global Strategy. The undefined link (No. 5). Stockholm: Swedish Institute for European Policy (SIEPS). Retrieved from http://www.sieps.se/sites/default/files/sieps_%202015_5_rapp.pdfhttp://www.sieps.se/sites/default/files/sieps_%202015_5_rapp.pdf Google Scholar öffnen
Ferrero-Waldner, B. (2005, October). Azerbaijan. Speech to the European Parliament, Strasbourg. Google Scholar öffnen
Forsberg, T. (1996). Beyond sovereignty, within territoriality: mapping the space of late-modern (geo)politics. Co-operation and Conflict, 31(4), 355–386. Google Scholar öffnen
Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. In H. L. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (pp. 208–226). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Francés, G. E. (2013). Market or geopolitics? The Europeanization of EU’s energy corridors. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 5(1), 39–60. Google Scholar öffnen
Frandsen, F., & Johansen, W. (2017). Organizational crisis communication. London: SAGE Publications. Google Scholar öffnen
Franza, L., de Jong, D., & van der Linde, C. (2016). The future of gas: the transition fuel? In S. Colombo, M. E. Harrak, & N. Sartori (Eds.), The future of natural gas. Markets and geopolitics (pp. 25–40). Hof van Twente: Lenthe. Google Scholar öffnen
Fukuyama, F. (1992). The end of the history and the last man. New York: Free Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Furlong, P., & Marsh, D. (2002). A skin not a sweater: ontology and epistemology in political science. In D. Marsh & G. Stoker (Eds.), Theory and methods in political science (2nd ed, pp. 17–41). Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire ; New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen
Gaddis, J. L. (2005). Strategies of containment: A critical appraisal of American national security policy during the Cold War (rev. and expanded ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Gadinger, F., Jarzebski, S., & Yildiz, T. (2014) (Eds.). Politische Narrative. Konzepte – Analysen – Forschungspraxis. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Google Scholar öffnen
George, A., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT press. Google Scholar öffnen
George, J. (1994). Discourses and global politics: a critical (re)introduction to International Relations. Boulder: Lynne Rienner. Google Scholar öffnen
Ghaleb, A. (2011). Natural gas as an instrument of Russian state power. Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, US Army War College. Google Scholar öffnen
Goldthau, A. (2008). Resurgent Russia? Rethinking energy inc. Policy Review, 147(02-03/2008), 53–66. Google Scholar öffnen
Goldthau, A. (2010). Energy diplomacy in trade and investment of oil and gas. In A. Goldthau & J. M. Witte (Eds.), Global energy governance: the new rule of the game (pp. 25–47). Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Goldthau, A. (2013). The geopolitics of natural gas. The politics of natural gas development in the European Union. Houston: James Baker III Institute for Public Policy. Google Scholar öffnen
Goldthau, A. (2015). Addressing the Russian energy challenge: why regulation trumps geopolitics, The German Marshall Fund, Policy Brief, 12/2005. Google Scholar öffnen
Goldthau, A., & Sitter, N. (2014). A liberal actor in a realist world? The Commission and the external dimension of the single market for energy. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(10), 1452–1472. Google Scholar öffnen
Goldthau, A., & Sitter, N. (2015). Soft power with a hard edge: EU policy tools and energy security. Review of International Political Economy, 22(5), 941–965. Google Scholar öffnen
Gstöhl, S., & Schunz, S. (Eds.). (2017). Theorizing the European neighbourhood policy. London; New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. Google Scholar öffnen
Gürel, A. (2016). Eastern Mediterranean gas: source of prosperity for the region? In S. Colombo, N. Sartori, & M. E. Harrak (Eds.), The Future of Natural Gas: Markets and Geopolitics. (pp. 117–138). Hof van Twente: Lenthe. Google Scholar öffnen
Gusev, A., & Westphal, K. (2015). Russian energy policies revisited. SWP Research Paper, 8, 12/2015. Google Scholar öffnen
Haghighi, S. S. (2007). Energy security: the external legal relations of the European Union with major oil- and gas-supplying countries. Oxford: Hart Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen
Hanke, S., & de Jong, J. (2007). Energy as a bond: relations with Russia in the European and Dutch context. Clingendael Institute for International Relations, The Hague. Google Scholar öffnen
Haushofer, K. (1931). Geopolitik der Pan-Ideen. Berlin: Zentral. Google Scholar öffnen
Haushofer, K. (1941). Der Kontinentalblock: Mitteleuropa - Eurasien - Japan. Munich: Eher. Google Scholar öffnen
Haverluk, T. W., Beauchmin, K. M., & Mueller, B. A. (2014). The three flaws of Critical Geopolitics: Towards a Neo-Classical Geopolitics. Geopolitics, 19, 19–39. Google Scholar öffnen
Hecking, H., Schulte, S., Vatansever, A., & Raszewski, S. (2016). Options for gas supply diversification for the EU and Germany in the next two decades (Study to the Federal Foreign Office (Germany)). Cologne and London: ewi Energy Research & Scenarios gGmbH (ewi ER&S) and European Centre for Energy and Resource Security (EUCERS). Google Scholar öffnen
Heffernan, M. (1998). The Meaning of Europe. Geography and Geopolitics. London: Arnold Publishers. Google Scholar öffnen
Henderson, J., & Mitrova, T. (2015). The political and commercial dynamics of Russia’s gas export strategy. OIES Paper, NG 102(09/2015). Google Scholar öffnen
Herranz-Surrallés, A. (2016). An emerging EU energy diplomacy? Discursive shifts, enduring practices. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(9), 1386–1405. Google Scholar öffnen
Herranz-Surrallés, A., & Natorski, M. (2012). The European Energy Policy towards Eastern Neighbors: Rebalancing Priorities or Changing Paradigms? In F. Morata & I. Sandoval (Eds.), European Energy Policy: An environmental approach (pp. 132–155). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Google Scholar öffnen
Hilpert, H. G., & Wacker, G. (2015). Geoökonomik trifft Geopolitik. Chinas neue außenwirtschaftliche und außenpolitische Initiativen. SWP-Aktuell, 52, 05/2015. Google Scholar öffnen
Howarth, R., Santoro, R., & Ingraffea, A. (2011). Methane and the greenhouse-gas footprint of natural gas from shale formations. Climatic Change, 106, 679–690. Google Scholar öffnen
Huntington, S. P. (1996). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. New York: Simon and Schuster. Google Scholar öffnen
Hurriyet Daily News. (2017). Ankara launches new national energy policy. Hurriyet Daily News, 6 April 2017. Retrieved from http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/ ankara-launches-new-national-energy-policy—111712 Google Scholar öffnen
IEA. (2018). What is Energy Security? Website: https://www.iea.org/topics/energyhttps://www.iea.org/topics/energy security/ whatisenergysecurity/ Google Scholar öffnen
IEA. (2016a). Gas. Medium-term market report 2016. Market analysis and forecasts to 2021. Paris: International Energy Agency/ OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/ MTGMR2016.pdf Google Scholar öffnen
IEA. (2016b). Key Natural Gas Trends. Excerpt from: Natural Gas Information, Natural Gas Information (2016 edition), Paris: International Energy Agency/ OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/KeyNaturalGasTrends.pdfhttp://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/KeyNaturalGasTrends.pdf Google Scholar öffnen
IEA. (2017a). Natural gas information: overview. Paris: International Energy Agency/ OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/NaturalGasInformation2017Overview.pdfhttps://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/NaturalGasInformation2017Overview.pdf Google Scholar öffnen
IEA. (2017b). World Energy Outlook 2017. Paris: International Energy Agency/ OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.iea.org/weo2017/https://www.iea.org/weo2017/ Google Scholar öffnen
IHS CERA. (2010). Caspian Development Corporation. Final Implementation Report (IHS Energy Research Associates presented to the EC, EIB and World Bank). Cambridge, Massachusetts. Google Scholar öffnen
Jensen, O. B., & Richardson, T. (2004). Making European Space: Mobility, Power and Territorial Identity. London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
Johnston, R. (2001). Out of the ‘moribund backwater’: territory and territoriality in political geography. Political Geography, 20(6), 677–693. Google Scholar öffnen
Jonavicius, L. (2008). The Democracy Promotion policies of Central and Eastern European States. FRIDE Working Papers, 55. Madrid: Fundación para las Relaciones Internacionales y el Diálogo Exterior. Google Scholar öffnen
Jones, A. (2011). Making regions for EU action: The EU and the Mediterranean. In L. Bialasiewicz (Ed.), Europe in the World: EU Geopolitics and the Making of European Space (pp. 42–58). London; New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
Jones, A., & Clark, J. (2008). Europeanisation and discourse building: The European Commission, European narratives and European Neighbourhood Policy. Geopolitics, 13(3), 545–571. Google Scholar öffnen
Jones, M., & McBeth, M. (2010). A narrative policy framework: clear enough to be wrong? The Policy Studies Journal, 38(2), 329–353. Google Scholar öffnen
Kanellakis, M., Martinopoulos, G., & Zachariadis, T. (2013). European energy policy—A review. Energy Policy, 62(3), 1020–1030. Google Scholar öffnen
Kaplan, R. (1994). The coming anarchy: How scarcity, crime, overpopulation, tribalism, and disease are rapidly destroying the social fabric of our planet. Atlantic Monthly, 273(2), 44–76. Google Scholar öffnen
Kaplan, R. (2009). The revenge of geography. Foreign Policy, 05-06/2009. Google Scholar öffnen
Kelly, P. (2006). A critique of critical geopolitics. Geopolitics, 11(1), 24–53. Google Scholar öffnen
Kjellén, R. (1917). Der Staat als Lebensform. Leipzig: S. Hirzel. Google Scholar öffnen
Klinke, I. (2009). Five minutes for critical geopolitics: A slightly provocative introduction. Retrieved from http://www.exploringgeopolitics.org/publicationhttp://www.exploringgeopolitics.org/publication _klinke_ian_five_minutes_for_critical_geopolitics_a_slightly_provocative_introduction/ Google Scholar öffnen
Kostadinova, V. (2009). The Commission, ENP and Construction of Borders. Geopolitics, 14(2), 235–255. Google Scholar öffnen
Krauer-Pacheco, K. (2011). Turkey as a transit country and energy hub: the link to its foreign policy aims. Retrieved from http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/44092/ssoar-2011-krauer-pacheco-Turkey_as_a_transit_country.pdf?sequence=1http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/44092/ssoar-2011-krauer-pacheco-Turkey_as_a_transit_country.pdf?sequence=1 Google Scholar öffnen
Kropatcheva, E. (2011). Playing both ends against the middle: Russia’s geopolitical energy games with the EU and Ukraine. Geopolitics, 16, 553–573. Google Scholar öffnen
Kustova, I. (2015). EU–Russia energy relations, EU energy integration, and energy security: the state of the art and a roadmap for future research. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 11(3), 287‐295. Google Scholar öffnen
Kuus, M. (2007). Geopolitics reframed: security and identity in Europe’s eastern enlargement. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen
Kuus, M. (2010). Critical Geopolitics. In R. A. Denemark (Ed.), The International Studies Encyclopedia (Vol. 2, pp. 683–701). London; New York: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Google Scholar öffnen
Kuus, M. (2011). Policy and geopolitics: bounding Europe and EUrope. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101(5), 1140–1155. Google Scholar öffnen
Kuus, M. (2014). Geopolitics and expertise: knowledge and authority in European diplomacy. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell. Google Scholar öffnen
Kuzemko, C. (2014). Ideas, power and change: explaining EU–Russia energy relations. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(1), 58–75. Google Scholar öffnen
Lavenex, S. (2004). EU external governance in ‘wider Europe’. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(4), 680–700. Google Scholar öffnen
Lavenex, S. (2008). A Governance perspective on the European neighbourhood policy: Integration beyond conditionality? Journal of European Public Policy, 15(6), 791–812. Google Scholar öffnen
Lavenex, S. (2011). Concentric circles of flexible ‘EUropean’ integration: A typology of EU external governance relations. Comparative European Politics, 9(4–5), 372–393. Google Scholar öffnen
Lavenex, S., & Schimmelfennig, F. (2009). EU rules beyond EU borders: theorizing external governance in European politics. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(6), 791–812. Google Scholar öffnen
Loskot-Strachota, A. (2016). Winds of change. Challenging future for Russia’s gas. In S. Colombo, N. Sartori, & M. E. Harrak (Eds.), The Future of Natural Gas: Markets and Geopolitics. (pp. 159–179). Hof van Twente: Lenthe. Google Scholar öffnen
Luciani, G. (2016). The EU and LNG as a flexible tool for energy security: constraints and opportunities. In S. Colombo, N. Sartori, & M. E. Harrak (Eds.), The Future of Natural Gas: Markets and Geopolitics. (pp. 101–116). Hof van Twente: Lenthe. Google Scholar öffnen
Luttwak, E. (1990). From geopolitics to geo-economics: logic of conflict, grammar of commerce. The National Interest, 20, 17–24. Google Scholar öffnen
Luttwak, E. (1993). The coming global war for economic power: There are no nice guys on the battlefield of geo-economics. The International Economy, 7(5), 18–67. Google Scholar öffnen
Lynggaard, K., Manners, I., & Löfgren, K. (2015). Research methods in European Union studies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen
Mackinder, H. J. (1904). The geographical pivot of history. The Geographical Journal, 23(4), 421. Google Scholar öffnen
Mackinder, H. J. (1919). Democratic ideals and reality: a study in the politics of reconstruction. New York: Henry Holt and Company. Google Scholar öffnen
Maltby, T. (2013). European Union energy policy integration: A case of European Commission policy entrepreneurship and increasing supranationalism. Energy Policy, 55, 435–444. Google Scholar öffnen
Mamadouh, V., & Dijkink, G. (2006). Geopolitics, International Relations and Political Geography: The politics of geopolitical discourse. Geopolitics, 11, 349–366. Google Scholar öffnen
Mané, A. (2006). European energy security: towards the creation of the geo-energy space. Energy Policy, 34(18), 3773–3786. Google Scholar öffnen
Manners, I. (2002). Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms? Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(2), 235–258. Google Scholar öffnen
McGowan, F. (2011). Putting Energy Insecurity into Historical Context: European Responses to the Energy Crises of the 1970s and 2000s. Geopolitics, 16(3), 486–511. Google Scholar öffnen
Megoran, N. (2010). Neoclassical geopolitics. Political Geography, 29(4), 187–190. Google Scholar öffnen
Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation (2018). Annual report on execution of the federal budget (updated 07.05.2018), Moscow. Retrieved from http://old.minfin.ru/en/statistics/fedbud/execute/?id_4=25609http://old.minfin.ru/en/statistics/fedbud/execute/?id_4=25609 Google Scholar öffnen
Mitchell, J. (2001). The new economy of oil: impacts on business, geopolitics and society. London: Earthscan Pub. Ltd. Google Scholar öffnen
Mogherini, F. (2016). Remarks by the High Representative/ Vice-President Federica Mogherini at the Southern Gas Corridor Advisory Council. Baku. Retrieved from https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/headquarters-homepage_fa/5333/https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/headquarters-homepage_fa/5333/ Remarks%20by%20the%20High%20Representative/Vice-President%20Federica%20Mogherini%20at%20the%20Southern%20Gas%20 Corridor%20Advisory%20Council Google Scholar öffnen
Müller, M. (2008). Reconsidering the concept of discourse for the field of critical geopolitics: Towards discourse as language and practice. Political Geography, 27(3), 322–338. Google Scholar öffnen
Müller, M. (2010). Doing discourse analysis in critical geopolitics. L’Espace Politique, 12(3), 1–20. Google Scholar öffnen
Müller, M. (2013). Text, discourse, affect and things. In K. Dodds, M. Kuus, & J. P. Sharp (Eds.), The Ashgate research companion to critical geopolitics (pp. 49–68). Farnham: Ashgate. Google Scholar öffnen
Müller-Kraenner, S. (2015). Energy security. Re-measuring the world (2.). New York: Taylor and Francis. Google Scholar öffnen
Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft power: the means to success in world politics. New York: Public Affairs. Google Scholar öffnen
Observatoire Méditerranéen de l’Energie (OME). (2015). Global Energy for the Mediterranean (GEM), 13, 12/15. Google Scholar öffnen
Ó Tuathail, G. (1989). Critical geopolitics: The social construction of space and place in the practice of statecraft. Syracause University, Syracuse, New York. Google Scholar öffnen
Ó Tuathail, G. (1994). Critical Geopolitics and Development Theory: Intensifying the Dialogue. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 19(2), 228–233. Google Scholar öffnen
Ó Tuathail, G. (1996). Critical geopolitics the politics of writing global space. London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
Ó Tuathail, G. (2002). Theorizing practical geopolitical reasoning: the case of the United States’ response to the war in Bosnia. Political Geography, 21(3), 601–628. Google Scholar öffnen
Ó Tuathail, G. (2003). Thinking critically about geopolitics. In G. Ó Tuathail, S. Dalby, & P. Routledge (Eds.), The Geopolitics Reader (pp. 1–12). London; New York: Taylor and Francis. Google Scholar öffnen
Ó Tuathail, G., & Agnew, J. (1992). Geopolitics and discourse: Practical geopolitical reasoning in American foreign policy. Political Geography, 11(2), 190–204. Google Scholar öffnen
Ó Tuathail, G., & Dalby, S. (1998a). Introduction: Rethinking Geopolics: Towards a Critical Geopolitics. In G. Ó Tuathail & S. Dalby (Eds.), Rethinking Geopolitics (pp. 1–15). London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
Ó Tuathail, G., & Dalby, S. (Eds.). (1998b). Rethinking geopolitics. London/ New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
Ó Tuathail, G., Dalby, S., & Routledge, P. (1998). The geopolitics reader. London; New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
Ó Tuathail, G., Dalby, S., & Routledge, P. (Eds.). (2003). The geopolitics reader. London/ New York: Taylor and Francis. Google Scholar öffnen
O’Byrne, D. (2018). Turkey’s BOTAŞ wins new LNG import licence. Natural Gas World. Retrieved from https://www.naturalgasworld.com/turkeys-BOTAhttps://www.naturalgasworld.com/turkeys-BOTAŞ-wins-new-lng-import-licence-59092 Google Scholar öffnen
Offenberg, P. (2016). The European Neighbourhood and the EU’s security of gas supply with natural gas. Policy Paper, 156. Google Scholar öffnen
Patterson, M., & Renwick Monroe, K. (1998). Narrative in political science. Annual Review of Political Science, 1, 315–331. Google Scholar öffnen
Piebalgs, A. (2006). External projection of the EU internal energy market. Opening speech at the External Energy Policy Conference, SPEECH/06/712, Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen
Pirani, S. (2014). Ukraine’s imports of Russian gas: how a deal might be reached. Oxford Energy Comment, Oxford Institute of Energy Studies, 07/2014. Google Scholar öffnen
Pirani, S. (2016). Azerbaijan’s gas supply squeeze and the consequences for the Southern Corridor. OIES Paper, NG 110, 07/2016. Google Scholar öffnen
Pirani, S., Stern, J., & Yafimava, K. (2009). The Russo-Ukrainian gas dispute of January 2009: a comprehensive assessment. OIES Paper, NG 27, 02/2009. Google Scholar öffnen
Prange-Gstöhl, H. (2009). Enlarging the EU’s internal market: why would third countries accept EU rule export? Energy Policy, 37, 5296–5303. Google Scholar öffnen
Prontera, A. (2017). The new politics of energy security in the European Union and beyond: states, markets, institutions. London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
Raspotnik, A. (2016). The European Union and its Northern Frontier: EUropean Geopolitics and its Arctic Context. Universität zu Köln, Cologne. Google Scholar öffnen
Ratzel, F. (1903). Politische Geographie oder die Geographie der Staaten, des Verkehres und des Krieges. München: Oldenbourg. Google Scholar öffnen
Rehn, O. (2005). Speech to civil society Belgrade, SPEECH/05/32, Belgrade. Google Scholar öffnen
Renner, S. (2009). The Energy Community of Southeast Europe: A neo-functionalist project of regional integration. European Integration Online Papers (EIoP). Google Scholar öffnen
Renner, S., & Trauner, F. (2009). Creeping EU Membership in South‐east Europe: The Dynamics of EU Rule Transfer to the Western Balkans. Journal of European Integration, 31(4), 449–465. Google Scholar öffnen
Republic of Turkey, Ministry for Foreign Affairs (2018). Turkey’s Energy Profile and Strategy. Website: http://www.mfa.gov.tr/turkeys-energy-strategy.en.mfahttp://www.mfa.gov.tr/turkeys-energy-strategy.en.mfa Google Scholar öffnen
Reuters. (2018a). Turkish blockade of ship off Cyprus is out of Eni’s control: CEO. Reuters, 16.02.2018, Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-cyprus-natgas-turkey-eni/turkish-blockade-of-ship-off-cyprus-is-out-of-enis-control-ceo-idUSKCN1G01K0https://www.reuters.com/article/us-cyprus-natgas-turkey-eni/turkish-blockade-of-ship-off-cyprus-is-out-of-enis-control-ceo-idUSKCN1G01K0 Google Scholar öffnen
Reuters. (2018b). Europeans work to save Iran deal, and business, after Trump pulls out, 08.05.2018, Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-iran-nuclear/trump-expected-to-pull-u-s-from-iran-nuclear-deal-on-tuesday-idUSKhttps://www.reuters.com/article/us-iran-nuclear/trump-expected-to-pull-u-s-from-iran-nuclear-deal-on-tuesday-idUSK Google Scholar öffnen
Ringel, M., & Knodt, M. (2018). The governance of the European Energy Union: Efficiency, effectiveness and acceptance of the Winter Package 2016. Energy Policy, 112, 209–220. Google Scholar öffnen
Roberts, J. (2015). The impact of Turkish Stream on European energy security and the Southern Gas Corridor. Atlantic Council, July 2015, Retrieved from http://www.atlanticcouncil.org/publications/reports/the-impact-of-turkish-stream-on-european-energy-security-and-the-southern-gas-corridorhttp://www.atlanticcouncil.org/publications/reports/the-impact-of-turkish-stream-on-european-energy-security-and-the-southern-gas-corridor Google Scholar öffnen
Roe, E. (1994). Narrative policy analysis: Theory and practice. Durham: Duke University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Rogers, J. (2009). From ‘Civilian Power’ to ‘Global Power’: Explicating the European Union’s ‘Grand Strategy’ Through the Articulation of Discourse Theory. Journal of Common Market Studies, 47(4), 831–862. Google Scholar öffnen
Rosamond, B. (2000). Theories of European integration. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen
Rosamond, B. (2012). Supranational governance as economic patriotism? The European Union, legitimacy and the reconstruction of state space. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(3), 324–341. Google Scholar öffnen
Russell, J. (1983). Geopolitics of natural gas. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Ballinger Publishing Company. Google Scholar öffnen
Rzayeva, G. (2017). Turkey’s gas demand decline: reasons and consequences. OIES Energy Insight, 11. Retrieved from https://www.oxfordenergy.org/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Turkeys-gas-demand-decline-reasons-and-consequences-OIES-Energy-Insight.pdfhttps://www.oxfordenergy.org/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Turkeys-gas-demand-decline-reasons-and-consequences-OIES-Energy-Insight.pdf Google Scholar öffnen
Rzayeva, G. (2018). Where the gas will come to fill the SGC pipelines? Global Gas Perspectives, 10.04.2018. Retrieved from https://www.naturalgashttps://www.naturalgas world.com/ggp-where-the-gas-will-come-to-fill-the-sgc-pipelines-60225 Google Scholar öffnen
Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books. Google Scholar öffnen
Sartori, N., & Koranyi, D. (2014). EU-Turkey energy relations in the context of EU accession negotiations. In S. Aydın-Düzgit, D. Huber, M. Müftlüer-Bac, F. Keyman, J. Tasci, & N. Tocci (Eds.), Global Turkey in Europe II. Energy, migration, civil society and citizenship issues in Turkey-EU relations (pp. 23–39). Rome: Edizioni Nuova Cultura. Google Scholar öffnen
Schmidt-Felzmann, A. (2011). EU Member States’ energy relations with Russia: Conflicting approaches to securing natural gas supplies. Geopolitics, 16(3), 574–599. Google Scholar öffnen
Schröder, M., Bettzüge, M. O., & Wessels, W. (Eds.). (2017). Turkey as an Energy Hub? Contributions on Turkey’s role in EU energy supply (Vol. 1). Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen
Schröder, M., & Öner Tangör, N. (2017). ‘Turkey as a Future Energy Hub’ - a comparative analysis of the hub narratives in Turkey and in the EU. In M. Schröder, M. O. Bettzüge & W. Wessels (Eds.), Turkey as an Energy Hub? Contributions on Turkey’s Role in EU Energy Supply (Vol. 1, pp. 185–201). Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen
Schröder, M., & Wessels, W. (2017). The energy geopolitics of Turkey - from classical to critical reading. In M. Schröder, M. O. Bettzüge & W. Wessels (Eds.), Turkey as an Energy Hub? Contributions on Turkey’s Role in EU Energy Supply (Vol. 1, pp. 27–47). Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen
Schubert, S., Pollak, J., & Kreutler, M. (2016). Energy policy of the European Union. London/ New York: Palgrave. Google Scholar öffnen
Schulte, S., & Berk, I. (2017). Turkey’s future in natural gas - becoming a transit country? EWI Working Papers, 2017/01. Google Scholar öffnen
Schulte, S., & Weiser, F. (2017). Natural Gas Transits and Market Power - the case of Turkey. EWI Working Papers, 2017/06. Google Scholar öffnen
Schulze, K. (2015). Exporting the energy acquis: the external agenda shaping power of the EU. In J. Tosun, S. Biesenbender, & K. Schulze (Eds.), Energy policy making in the EU: building the agenda (Vol. 28, pp. 63–83). London: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen
Scott, James W. (2009). Bordering and ordering the European Neighbourhood: A critical perspective on EU territoriality and geopolitics. TRAMES: A Journal of the Humanities & Social Sciences, 13(3), 232–247. Google Scholar öffnen
Scott, James W. (2011). Reflections on EU Geopolitics. Consolidation, Neighbourhood and Civil Society in the reordering of European space. Geopolitics, 16(1), 146–175. Google Scholar öffnen
Scott, James W. (2015). Bordering, border politics and cross-border co-operation in Europe. In F. Celata & R. Coletti (Eds.), Neighbourhood Policy and the Construction of the European External Borders (Vol. 115, pp. 27–44). Cham: Springer International Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen
Scott, James Wesley. (2006). EU enlargement, region building and shifting borders of inclusion and exclusion. Aldershot Burlington: Ashgate. Google Scholar öffnen
Shah, R. (2009). The Geopolitics of Water and Oil in Turkey. Actuelles de l’Ifri, December 2009. Google Scholar öffnen
Sharp, J. P. (1993). Publishing American identity: popular geopolitics, myth and the reader’s digest. Political Geography, 12(6), 491–503. Google Scholar öffnen
Siddi, M. (2017a). The EU’s Botched Geopolitical Approach to External Energy Policy: The Case of the Southern Gas Corridor. Geopolitics, 1–21. Google Scholar öffnen
Siddi, M. (2017b). The Southern Gas Corridor. Challenges to a geopolitical approach in the EU’s external energy policy. FIIA Briefing Paper, 216, March 2017. Google Scholar öffnen
Siles-Brügge, G. (2014). Constructing European Union trade policy: a global idea of Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen
Skalamera, M. (2016). The Russian reality check on Turkey’s gas hub hopes. Policy Brief, Belfer Center. Google Scholar öffnen
Slaugther, A. M. (2017). The chessboard and the web: strategies of connection in a networked world. New Haven: Yale University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Slodatkin, V., & Zinets, N. (2018). Gazprom seeks to halt Ukraine gas contracts as dispute escalates. Reuters, 02.03.2018, Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-ukraine-gas/gazprom-seeks-to-halt-ukraine-gas-contracts-as-dispute-escalates-idUSKCN1GE2DWhttps://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-ukraine-gas/gazprom-seeks-to-halt-ukraine-gas-contracts-as-dispute-escalates-idUSKCN1GE2DW Google Scholar öffnen
Sparke, M. (2007). Geopolitical fears, geoeconomic hopes, and the responsibilities of geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 97(2), 338–349. Google Scholar öffnen
Sparke, M. (2017). Geoeconomics, globalisation and the limits of economic strategy in statecraft: A response to Vihma. Geopolitics, 1–8. Google Scholar öffnen
Spykman, N. J. (1938a). Geography and Foreign Policy, I. The American Political Science Review, 32(1), 28. Google Scholar öffnen
Spykman, N. J. (1938b). Geography and Foreign Policy, II. The American Political Science Review, 32(2), 213. Google Scholar öffnen
Spykman, N. J. (1944). The Geography of Peace. Hartcourt Brace: New York. Google Scholar öffnen
Stern, J. (2002). Security of European natural gas supplies. The impact of import dependence and liberalization. Royal Institute of International Affairs. Google Scholar öffnen
Stern, J. (2006). The Russian-Ukrainian gas crisis of January 2006. Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. Google Scholar öffnen
Stoddard, E. (2012). Capturing contestation in Caspian Energy: regime complexity and Eurasian energy governance. Political Perspectives, 6(1), 3–25. Google Scholar öffnen
Stoddard, E. (2017). Tough times, shifting roles: examining the EU’s commercial diplomacy in foreign energy markets. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(7), 1048–1068. Google Scholar öffnen
Stulberg, A. N. (2005). Moving beyond the great game: The geoeconomics of Russia’s influence in the Caspian energy bonanza. Geopolitics, 10(1), 1–25. Google Scholar öffnen
Svarin, D. (2016). The construction of ‘geopolitical spaces’ in Russian foreign policy discourse before and after the Ukraine crisis. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 7(2), 129–140. Google Scholar öffnen
Tagliapietra, S. (2014). Turkey as a regional natural gas hub: Myth or reality? An analysis of the regional gas market outlook, beyond the mainstream rhetoric. FEEM Working Paper, 02/2014. Google Scholar öffnen
Taylor, P. J. (1993). Geopolitical world orders. In P. J. Taylor (Ed.), Political Geography of the Twentieth Century. A Global Analysis. London: Belhaven Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Thirwell, M. (2010). The return of geo-economics. Retrieved from https://www.lowyinstitute.org/publications/return-geo-economicshttps://www.lowyinstitute.org/publications/return-geo-economics Google Scholar öffnen
Tosun, J., Biesenbender, S., & Schulze, K. (Eds.). (2015). Energy policy making in the EU: building the agenda (Vol. 28). London: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen
Umbach, F. (2010). Global energy security and the implications for the EU. Security, Prosperity and Community – Towards a Common European Energy Policy? Energy Policy, 38(3), 1229–1240. Google Scholar öffnen
Umbach, F. (2015). Strategic Perspectives of the EU’s Energy Union and the Southern Gas Corridor. Caspian Report, Spring 2015(9), 11–25. Google Scholar öffnen
US Secretary of State. (2006). Remarks at the State Department Correspondents Association’s Inaugural Newsmaker Breakfast, 05.01.2006. Retrieved 5 May 2018, from https://2001-2009.state.gov/secretary/rm/2006/58725.htmhttps://2001-2009.state.gov/secretary/rm/2006/58725.htm Google Scholar öffnen
Victor, D., Jaffe, A., & Hayes, M. (Eds.). (2006). Natural gas and geopolitics. From 1970 to 2040. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Vihma, A. (2017). Geoeconomic analysis and the limits of critical geopolitics: A new engagement with Edward Luttwak. Geopolitics, 1–21. Google Scholar öffnen
Vollaard, H. (2009). The logic of political territoriality. Geopolitics, 14(4), 687–706. Google Scholar öffnen
Walters, W. (2004). The frontiers of the European Union: A geo-strategic perspective. Geopolitics, 9(3), 674–698. Google Scholar öffnen
Waltz, K. (1979). Theory of international politics. Reading: Addison-Wesley. Google Scholar öffnen
Westphal, K. (2006). Energy policy between multilateral governance and geopolitics: whither Europe? Internationale Politik und Gesellschaft, April 2006, 44–62. Google Scholar öffnen
Wigell, M., & Vihma, A. (2016). Geopolitics versus geoeconomics: the case of Russia’s geostrategy and its effects on the EU. International Affairs, 92(3), 605–627. Google Scholar öffnen
Wilson, A. B. (2015). Liquefied natural gas in Europe (European Parliamentary Research Service No. PE 571.314). Brussels. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2015/571314/EPRS_BRIhttp://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2015/571314/EPRS_BRI(2015)571314_EN.pdf Google Scholar öffnen
Winrow, G. M. (2009a). Problems and prospects for the ‘fourth corridor’: the positions and role of Turkey in gas transit to Europe. Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, NG 30, June 2009. Google Scholar öffnen
Winrow, G. M. (2009b). Turkey, Russia and the Caucasus: Common and diverging interests. Chatham House. Google Scholar öffnen
Winrow, G. M. (2013). The Southern Gas Corridor and Turkey’s role as an energy transit state and energy hub. Insight Turkey, 15(1), 145–163. Google Scholar öffnen
Yafimava, K. (2015). European energy security and the role of Russian gas: Assessing the feasibility and the rationale of reducing dependence. IAI Working Papers, 15(54). Google Scholar öffnen
Youngs, R. (2009). Energy security. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
Youngs, R. (2014). A new geopolitics of EU energy security. Carnegie Europe, 23 September 2014. Retrieved from http://carnegieeurope.eu/publications/?fa=56705http://carnegieeurope.eu/publications/?fa=56705 Google Scholar öffnen
Youngs, R. (2017). Europe’s Eastern crisis. The geopolitics of asymmetry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Zaman, A. (2018). Ankara vows to ignore Iran sanctions. Al-Monitor, 27 June 2018. Retrieved from https://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2018/06/turkey-refuses-us-stop-iran-oil.html?utm_campaign=20180627&utm_source=sailthruhttps://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2018/06/turkey-refuses-us-stop-iran-oil.html?utm_campaign=20180627&utm_source=sailthru &utm_medium=email&utm_term=Briefly%20Turkey Google Scholar öffnen