The Influence of the 2014 UNCITRAL Transparency Rules on Treaty-based Investor-State-Arbitration

RAin Dr. Camilla Marie Kamrad LL.M. (Durham)

doi:10.5771/9783748933984

Zusammenfassung

Investor-Staat Streitbeilegungsverfahren haben lange Zeit hinter verschlossenen Türen stattgefunden. Aufgrund der Beteiligung von Nationalstaaten und der Tatsache, dass solche Verfahren hoch politische Kontroversen tangieren können, ist ein Mindestmaß an Transparenz zur Legitimation notwendig. Die UNCITRAL Rules on Transparency in Treaty-based Investor-State Arbitration sind ein Vorstoß zu mehr Transparenz in solchen Verfahren. In der vorliegenden Dissertation wird untersucht ob und inwieweit sich die Schiedspraxis und Nationalstaaten, bei der Verhandlung von internationalen Investitionsschutzverträgen, seit Einführung der UNCITRAL Transparenzregeln zu mehr Transparenz bekannt haben.

Schlagworte

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Copyrightjahr: 2022
Erscheinungsdatum: 15.07.2022
ISBN-Print: 978-3-8487-8838-5
ISBN-Online: 978-3-7489-3398-4
Verlag: Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe: Schriften zur Europäischen Integration und Internationalen Wirtschaftsordnung
Band: 60
Sprache: Englisch
Seiten: 194
Produkttyp: Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten

Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Kein Zugriff Seiten 1 - 17
1. I. What is transparency? – Terminology and definition Kein Zugriff
2. 1. 1. ISDS and public policy issues Kein Zugriff
  2. 2. From strict confidentiality towards more transparency Kein Zugriff
1. 1. 1. The ICSID System Kein Zugriff
  2. 2. The UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules Kein Zugriff
  3. 3. Institutionally supported arbitration Kein Zugriff
  4. 4. Ad hoc arbitration Kein Zugriff
  5. 1. a) The commencement of arbitral proceedings Kein Zugriff
    2. b) The appointment of the tribunal Kein Zugriff
    3. c) The seat of the arbitration Kein Zugriff
    4. d) The language of the arbitration Kein Zugriff
    5. e) The final award Kein Zugriff
2. 1. 1. Advantages of transparent proceedings Kein Zugriff
  2. 2. Disadvantages of transparent proceedings Kein Zugriff
  3. 3. Third-party participation and amicus curiae submissions Kein Zugriff
  4. 4. Publication of documents and awards Kein Zugriff
  5. 5. Public hearings Kein Zugriff
  6. 1. a) Treaty interpretation by state parties Kein Zugriff
    2. b) The use of precedent Kein Zugriff
    3. c) The establishment of a permanent international investment court and an appellate mechanism Kein Zugriff
  7. 7. ICSIDs approach to transparency in ISDS Kein Zugriff
  8. 8. Other institutions and their approach on transparency Kein Zugriff
  9. 1. a) Third party participation Kein Zugriff
    2. b) Public hearings Kein Zugriff
    3. c) Publication of documents Kein Zugriff
    4. d) NAFTAs influence on North American treaty practise Kein Zugriff
    5. e) From NAFTA to USMCA Kein Zugriff
3. III. Background on the UNCITRAL Transparency Rules Kein Zugriff
4. 1. 1. Scope of application Kein Zugriff
  2. 2. Ratione temporis Kein Zugriff
  3. 3. Publication of information at the commencement of arbitral proceedings Kein Zugriff
  4. 4. Publication of documents Kein Zugriff
  5. 5. Submission by a third person Kein Zugriff
  6. 6. Submission by a non-disputing Party to the treaty Kein Zugriff
  7. 7. Oral hearings Kein Zugriff
  8. 8. Exceptions to transparency Kein Zugriff
  9. 9. Repository of published information Kein Zugriff
  10. 10. Consequences of a violation of the UNCITRAL TR Kein Zugriff
5. V. The UNCITRAL TR and third-party funding Kein Zugriff
6. VI. The UNCITRAL TR and their influence on commercial arbitration and on other international arbitration institutions Kein Zugriff
7. 1. 1. International Court of Justice Kein Zugriff
  2. 2. WTO Dispute Settlement Body Kein Zugriff
  3. 3. Court of Justice of the European Union Kein Zugriff
  4. 4. Conclusion Kein Zugriff
1. 1. 1. Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement Kein Zugriff
  2. 2. EU-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement Kein Zugriff
  3. 3. EU-Singapore Investment Protection Agreement Kein Zugriff
  4. 4. EU-Vietnam Investment Protection Agreement (EUVIPA) Kein Zugriff
  5. 5. EU-China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment Kein Zugriff
  6. 6. EU-United Kingdom Trade and Cooperation Agreement Kein Zugriff
2. 1. 1. BITs with India Kein Zugriff
  2. 2. Australian investment agreements Kein Zugriff
  3. 3. IIAs with Japan Kein Zugriff
  4. 4. Central America-Republic of Korea FTA Kein Zugriff
  5. 5. Hong Kong-Mexico BIT Kein Zugriff
  6. 6. China-Mauritius FTA Kein Zugriff
3. III. Conclusion Kein Zugriff
1. I. The UNCITRAL TR and the publication of settlement agreements Kein Zugriff
2. 1. 1. OOO Manolium Processing v. Belarus Kein Zugriff
  2. 1. a) Iberdrola, S.A. (España), Iberdrola Energía, S.A.U. v. Bolivia Kein Zugriff
    2. b) The Estate of Julio Miguel Orlandini-Agreda; Compañía Minera Orlandini Ltda. v. Bolivia Kein Zugriff
  3. 1. a) Transparency provisions Kein Zugriff
    2. b) The redaction of footnote 11 of the non-disputing party submission Kein Zugriff
  4. 4. Michael Ballantine and Lisa Ballantine v. Dominican Republic Kein Zugriff
  5. 5. Nord Stream 2 AG v. European Union Kein Zugriff
  6. 6. BSG Resources Limited, BSG Resources Limited and BSG Resources SÀRL v. Republic of Guinea Kein Zugriff
  7. 7. Christian Doutremepuich and Antoine Doutremepuich v. Mauritius Kein Zugriff
  8. 8. Patel Engineering Limited v. Republic of Mozambique Kein Zugriff
  9. 1. a) Gramercy Funds Management LLC and Gramercy Peru Holdings LLC v. Peru Kein Zugriff
    2. 1. aa) Renco Group Inc. v. Republic of Peru, UNCT/13/1 Kein Zugriff
      2. bb) Renco Group, Inc. v. The Republic of Peru, PCA Case No. 2019-46 Kein Zugriff
    3. c) Bacilio Amorrortu (USA) v. Peru Kein Zugriff
  10. 10. Rand Investments Ltd. and others v. Serbia Kein Zugriff
3. III. Conclusion Kein Zugriff
G. Chapter 5: Conclusion and prospects Kein Zugriff Seiten 165 - 170
References Kein Zugriff Seiten 171 - 180
Online Resources (accessed 7 June 2021) Kein Zugriff Seiten 181 - 188
Table of Cases Kein Zugriff Seiten 189 - 194

Literaturverzeichnis (121 Einträge)

Alexander, Klint, ‘Article 6. Hearings’ in: Dimitrij Euler and others (eds), Transparency in international investment arbitration: a guide to the UNCITRAL Rules on transparency in treaty-based investor-state arbitration (Cambridge 2015), pp. 227–248. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Alvarez, José E, ‘Implications for the Future of International Investment Law’ in: Karl P Sauvant and Michael Chiswick-Patterson (eds), Appeals Mechanism in International Investment Disputes (Oxford 2008), pp. 29–35. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Augsburger, Thierry P, ‘Article 7. Exceptions to transparency’ in: Dimitrij Euler and others (eds), Transparency in international investment arbitration: a guide to the UNCITRAL Rules on transparency in treaty-based investor-state arbitration (Cambridge 2015), pp. 249–306. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Baetens, Freya, ‘Preferential Trade and Investment Agreements and the Trade/Investment Divide, Is the Whole More than the Sum of Its Parts?’ in: Rainer Hofmann (ed), Preferential trade and investment agreements: from recalibration to reintegration (Baden-Baden 2013), pp. 91–128. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Baker, John S/Keiser, Lindsey, ‘NAFTA/USMCA Dispute Settlement Mechanisms and the Constitution’ 50 University of Miami Inter-American Law Review (U Miami Inter-Am L Rev) 2019, pp. 1–57. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Banerjee, Arpan/Murthy, Ashwin, ‘Rand Investments v. Republic of Serbia: Transparency and the Limits of Consent’ 38 Journal of International Arbitration 2021, pp. 105–122. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Benvenisti, Eyal/Downs, George W, ‘The Empire's New Clothes, Political Economy and the Fragmentation of International Law’ 60 Stanford Law Review 2007, pp. 595–632. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Besch, Morris, ‘Typical Questions Arising within Negotiations’ in: Marc Bungenberg (ed), International investment law: A handbook (Baden-Baden 2015), pp. 93–152. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Bianco, Giuseppe, ‘Article 2. Publication of information at the commencement of arbitral proceedings’ in: Dimitrij Euler and others (eds), Transparency in international investment arbitration: a guide to the UNCITRAL Rules on transparency in treaty-based investor-state arbitration (Cambridge 2015), pp. 64–90. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Blackaby, Nigel and others, Redfern and Hunter on international arbitration, (5th edn. Oxford 2009). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Blavi, Francisco, ‘A Case in Favour of Publicly Available Awards in International Commercial Arbitration, Transparency v. Confidentiality’ International Business Law Journal (IBLJ) 2016, pp. 83–92. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Bogdandy, Armin v/Venzke, Ingo, ‘On the Democratic Legitimation of International Judicial Lawmaking’ in: Armin v Bogdandy and Ingo Venzke (eds), International judicial lawmaking: On public authority and democratic legitimation in global governance (Heidelberg 2012), pp. 473–509. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Bogdandy, Armin v/Venzke, Ingo, In wessen Namen?: Internationale Gerichte in Zeiten globalen Regierens (Berlin 2014). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Bronckers, Marco, ‘Is Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) Superior to Litigation Before Domestic Courts?, An EU View on Bilateral Trade Agreements’ 18 Journal of International Economic Law 2015, pp. 655–677. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Brower, Charles H, ‘Structure, Legitimacy, and NAFTA's Investment Chapter’ 36 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law (Vand J Transnat'l L) 2003, pp. 37–94. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Brown, Chester, ‘The evolution of the Regime of International Investment Agreements, History, Economics and Politics’ in: Marc Bungenberg (ed), International investment law: A handbook (Baden-Baden 2015), pp. 153–185. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Bungenberg, Marc and others, ‘General Introduction to International Investment Law’ in: Marc Bungenberg (ed), International investment law: A handbook (Baden-Baden 2015), pp. 1–5. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Bungenberg, Marc/Reinisch, August, ‘Special Issue: The Anatomy of the (Invisible) EU Model BIT’ 15 Journal of World Investment & Trade (JoWIT) 2014, pp. 375–378. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Bungenberg, Marc/Titi, Catherine, ‘Precedents in International Investment Law’ in: Marc Bungenberg (ed), International investment law: A handbook (Baden-Baden 2015), pp. 1505–1516. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Burgstaller, Markus, ‘Dispute Settlement in EU International Investment Agreements with Third States: Three Salient Problems’ 15 Journal of World Investment & Trade (JoWIT) 2014, pp. 551–569. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Büstgens, Johanna, Transparenz und Öffentlichkeit gemischter Schiedsverfahren. Dissertation (Berlin 2016). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Calamita, N J, ‘Dispute Settlement Transparency in Europe's Evolving Investment Treaty Policy’ 15 Journal of World Investment & Trade (JoWIT) 2014, pp. 645–678. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Claussen, Kathleen, ‘Article 8. Repository of published information’ in: Dimitrij Euler and others (eds), Transparency in international investment arbitration: a guide to the UNCITRAL Rules on transparency in treaty-based investor-state arbitration (Cambridge 2015), pp. 307–320. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Coe, Jack J, ‘Transparency in the Resolution of Investor-State Disputes - Adoption, Adaption, and NAFTA Leadership’ Kansas Law Review (Kan L Rev) 2006, pp. 1339–1385. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Condon, Bradley J, ‘From NAFTA to USMCA, Two's Company, Three's a Crowd’ Latin American Journal of Trade Policy 2018, pp. 30–48. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
De Brabandere, Eric, ‘Co-existence, complementarity or Conflict?, Interaction between Preferential Trade and Investment Agreements and Bilateral Investment Treaties’ in: Rainer Hofmann (ed), Preferential trade and investment agreements: from recalibration to reintegration (Baden-Baden 2013), pp. 37–70. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Delaney, Joachim/Magraw, Daniel B, ‘Procedural Transparency’ in: Peter T Muchlinski (ed), The Oxford handbook of international investment law (Oxford 2008), pp. 723–787. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Delimatsis, Panagiotis, ‘Institutional Transparency in the WTO’ in: Andrea Bianchi and Anne Peters (eds), Transparency in international law (Cambridge 2013), pp. 112–141. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Díaz, Hugo P, ‘Transparency in International Dispute Settlement Proceedings on Trade and Investment’ in: Karl P Sauvant and Michael Chiswick-Patterson (eds), Appeals Mechanism in International Investment Disputes (Oxford 2008), pp. 193–200. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Dimsey, Mariel, ‘Article 4. Submission by a third person’ in: Dimitrij Euler and others (eds), Transparency in international investment arbitration: a guide to the UNCITRAL Rules on transparency in treaty-based investor-state arbitration (Cambridge 2015), pp. 128–195. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Dolzer, Rudolf/Schreuer, Christoph, Principles of International Investment Law, (Oxford 2012). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Dugan, Christopher and others, Investor-state arbitration, (New York 2008). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Euler, Dimitrij/Scherer, Maxi, ‘Conclusion: The Rules as a swing of the pendulum? ’ in: Dimitrij Euler and others (eds), Transparency in international investment arbitration: a guide to the UNCITRAL Rules on transparency in treaty-based investor-state arbitration (Cambridge 2015), pp. 351–356. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Franck, Susan D, ‘The Legitimacy Crisis in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Privatizing Public International Law through Inconsistent Decisions’ 73 Fordham Law Review 2005, pp. 1521–1625. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Franck, Susan D, ‘Challenges Facing Investment Disputes, Reconsidering Dispute Resolution in International Investment Agreements’ in: Karl P Sauvant and Michael Chiswick-Patterson (eds), Appeals Mechanism in International Investment Disputes (Oxford 2008), pp. 143–192. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Gaffney, John P/Akçay, Zeynep, ‘European Bilateral Approaches’ in: Marc Bungenberg (ed), International investment law: A handbook (Baden-Baden 2015), pp. 186–201. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Garcia, Frank J and others, ‘Reforming the International Investment Regime, Lessons from International Trade Law’ 18 Journal of International Economic Law 2015, pp. 861–892. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Garner, Bryan A, Black's law dictionary, (10th edn. St. Paul, Minn. 2014). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Gehring, Markus/Euler, Dimitrij, ‘Public interest in investment arbitration’ in: Dimitrij Euler and others (eds), Transparency in international investment arbitration: a guide to the UNCITRAL Rules on transparency in treaty-based investor-state arbitration (Cambridge 2015), pp. 7–27. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M/Victor, David G, ‘Secrecy in International Investment Arbitration: An Empirical Analysis’ Journal of International Dispute Settlement (JIDS) 2016, 161-182. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Herdegen, Matthias, Principles of International Economic Law, (1st edn. Oxford 2013). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Hindelang, Steffen, ‘Part II: Study on Investor-State Dispute Settlement ('ISDS') and Alternatives of Dispute Resolution in International Investment Law’ in: Pieter J Kuijper and others (eds), Investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) provisions in the EU's international investment agreements: Study (Luxembourg 2014), pp. 39–119. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Hindelang, Steffen/Hagemeyer, Teoman M, In pursuit of an international investment court: Recently negotiated investment chapters in EU comprehensive free trade agreements in comparative perspective (Brussels 2017). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Hobe, Stephan, ‘The Development of the Law of Aliens and the Emergence of General Principles of Protection under Public International Law’ in: Marc Bungenberg (ed), International investment law: A handbook (Baden-Baden 2015), pp. 6–22. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Hoffmeister, Frank/Alexandru, Gabriela, ‘A First Glimpse of Light on the Emerging Invisible EU Model BIT’ 15 Journal of World Investment & Trade (JoWIT) 2014, pp. 379–401. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Hughes, Valerie, ‘The institutional dimension’ in: Daniel L Bethlehem (ed), The Oxford Handbook of International Trade Law (Oxford 2009), pp. 270–297. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Jackson, John H, Sovereignty, the WTO and Changing Fundamentals of International Law, (Cambridge 2006). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Kaufmann-Kohler, Gabrielle, ‘Chapter Fifteen, Non-Disputing State Submissions in Investment Arbitration: Resurgence of Diplomatic Protection?’ in: Laurence Boisson de Chazournes, Marcelo G Kohen and Jorge E Viñuales (eds), Diplomatic and judicial means of dispute settlement (Leiden 2013), pp. 307–326. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Kee, Christopher, ‘Article 3. Publication of documents’ in: Dimitrij Euler and others (eds), Transparency in international investment arbitration: a guide to the UNCITRAL Rules on transparency in treaty-based investor-state arbitration (Cambridge 2015), pp. 91–127. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Koepp, Johannes/Sim, Cameron, ‘The application of transparency’ in: Dimitrij Euler and others (eds), Transparency in international investment arbitration: a guide to the UNCITRAL Rules on transparency in treaty-based investor-state arbitration (Cambridge 2015), pp. 321–350. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Korzun, Vera, ‘The Right to Regulate in Investor-State Arbitration, Slicing and Dicing Regulatory Carve-Outs’ 50 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law (Vand J Transnat'l L) 2017, pp. 355–413. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Kuijper, Pieter J, ‘Part I: Study on Investment Protection Agreements as Instruments of International Economic Law’ in: Pieter J Kuijper and others (eds), Investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) provisions in the EU's international investment agreements: Study (Luxembourg 2014), pp. 8–35. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Lamb, Sophie/Harrison, Daniel/Hen, Jonathan, ‘Recent Developments in the Law and Practice of Amicus Briefs in Investor-State Arbitration’ 5 Indian Journal of Arbitration Law (Indian J Arb L) 2016, pp. 72–92. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Lamm, Carolyn B/Nagarajan, Karthik, ‘The Continuing Evolution of Investor-State Arbitration as a Dynamic and Resilient form of Dispute Settlement’ 5 Indian Journal of Arbitration Law (Indian J Arb L) 2017, pp. 93–112. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Legum, Barton, ‘Options to Establish an Appellate Mechanism for Investment Disputes’ in: Karl P Sauvant and Michael Chiswick-Patterson (eds), Appeals Mechanism in International Investment Disputes (Oxford 2008), pp. 231–239. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Lester, Simon/Mercurio, Bryan/Davies, Arwel, World Trade Law: Text, Materials and Commentary (2nd edn. Oxford, Portland, Oregon 2012). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Lin, Wei-Chung, ‘Safeguarding the Environment, The Effectiveness of Amicus Curiae Submissions in Investor-State Arbitration’ 19 International Community Law Review 2017, pp. 207–301. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Loken, Keith, ‘Introductory note to UNCITRAL Rules on Transparency in Treaty-based Investor-State Arbitration’ 52 International Legal Materials (ILM) 2013, pp. 1300–1308. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Lowenfeld, Andreas F, International Economic Law, (2nd edn. Oxford 2008). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Mann, Howard, ‘Transparency and Consistency in International Investment Law, Can the Problems be Fixed by Tinkering?’ in: Karl P Sauvant and Michael Chiswick-Patterson (eds), Appeals Mechanism in International Investment Disputes (Oxford 2008), pp. 213–221. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Markert, Lars, ‘International Investment Law and Treaty Interpretation, Problems, Particularities and Possible Trends’ in: Rainer Hofmann and Christian J Tams (eds), International Investment Law and General International Law: From Clinical Isolation to Systemic Integration? (Schriften zur Europäischen Integration und Internationalen Wirtschaftsordnung, Baden-Baden 2011), pp. 53–69. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
McRae, D, ‘The WTO Appellate Body: A Model for an ICSID Appeals Facility?’ 1 Journal of International Dispute Settlement (JIDS) 2010, pp. 371–387. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Menaker, Andrea J, ‘Piercing the Veil of Confidentiality, The Recent Trend Towards Greater Public Participation and Transparency in Investor-State Arbitration’ in: Katia Yannaca-Small (ed), Arbitration under international investment agreements: A guide to the key issues (Oxford, New York 2010), pp. 129–160. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Miller, Kristin, ‘The Future of Investor-State Arbitration, Greater Transparency on the Horizon for UNCITRAL Rules’ Arbitration Law Review (ALR) 2011, pp. 602–619. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Mitchell, Andrew D, Legal Principles in WTO Disputes, (Cambridge 2008). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Moses, Margaret L, The principles and practice of international commercial arbitration, (New York 2008). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Muchlinski, Peter T, ‘The Role of Preferential Trade and Investment Agreements in International Investment Law, From Unforeseen Historical Developments to an Uncertain Future’ in: Rainer Hofmann (ed), Preferential trade and investment agreements: from recalibration to reintegration (Baden-Baden 2013), pp. 211–228. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Nakagawa, Junji/Magraw, Daniel B, ‘Introduction’ in: Junji Nakagawa (ed), Transparency in International Trade and Investment Dispute Settlement (London 2012), pp. 1–14. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Neumann, Thore/Simma, Bruno, ‘Transparency in International Adjudication’ in: Andrea Bianchi and Anne Peters (eds), Transparency in international law (Cambridge 2013), pp. 436–476. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Newcombe, Andrew/Paradell, Lluis, Law and practice of investment treaties: Standards of treatment (Alphen aan den Rijn 2009). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Ngangjoh-Hodu, Yenkong/Ajibo, Collins C, ‘ICSID Annulment Procedure and the WTO Appellate System: The Case for an Appellate System for Investment Arbitration’ 6 Journal of International Dispute Settlement (JIDS) 2015, pp. 308–331. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Onwuamaegbu, Ucheora, ‘International Dispute Settlement Mechanisms, Choosing Between Institutionally Supported and Ad Hoc; and Between Institutions’ in: Katia Yannaca-Small (ed), Arbitration under international investment agreements: A guide to the key issues (Oxford, New York 2010), pp. 63–88. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Ortino, Federico, ‘Transparency of investment awards’ in: Junji Nakagawa (ed), Transparency in International Trade and Investment Dispute Settlement (London 2012), pp. 119–158. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Palmeter, David/Mavroidis, Petros C, Dispute Settlement in the World Trade Organization, (The Hague 1999). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Paparinskis, Martins/Howley, Jessica, ‘Article 5. Submission by a non-disputing Party to the treaty’ in: Dimitrij Euler and others (eds), Transparency in international investment arbitration: a guide to the UNCITRAL Rules on transparency in treaty-based investor-state arbitration (Cambridge 2015), pp. 196–226. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Parlett, Kate, ‘Diplomatic Protection and Investment Arbitration’ in: Rainer Hofmann and Christian J Tams (eds), International Investment Law and General International Law: From Clinical Isolation to Systemic Integration? (Schriften zur Europäischen Integration und Internationalen Wirtschaftsordnung, Baden-Baden 2011), pp. 211–229. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Pernice, Ingolf, ‘Part IIII: Study on International Investment Protection Agreements and EU Law 132’ in: Pieter J Kuijper and others (eds), Investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) provisions in the EU's international investment agreements: Study (Luxembourg 2014), pp. 132–164. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Qureshi, Asif H/Ziegler, Andreas R, International Economic Law, (3rd edn. London 2011). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Reinisch, August, ‘Chapter VI: Investment Arbitration - The Role of Precedent in ICSID Arbitration’ in: Christian Klausegger and Peter Klein (eds), Austrian Arbitration Yearbook (2008), pp. 495–510. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Reinisch, August, ‘Internationales Investitionsschutzrecht’ in: Christian Tietje and Horst-Peter Götting (eds), Internationales Wirtschaftsrecht (Berlin 2009), pp. 398–434. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Reinisch, August, ‘Putting the Pieces Together … an EU Model BIT?’ 15 Journal of World Investment & Trade (JoWIT) 2014, pp. 679–704. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Reinisch, August, ‘Most Favoured Nation Treatment’ in: Marc Bungenberg (ed), International investment law: A handbook (Baden-Baden 2015), pp. 807–845. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Reinisch, August/Malintoppi, Loretta, ‘Methods of Dispute Resolution’ in: Peter T Muchlinski (ed), The Oxford handbook of international investment law (Oxford 2008), pp. 692–720. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Richman, Lisa M, ‘NAFTA in Transition, The current state of play and what comes next’ in: Barton Legum (ed), The Investment Treaty Arbitration Review (4th edn2019), pp. 352–381. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Ruscalla, Gabriele, ‘Transparency in International Arbitration, Any (Concrete) Need to Codify the Standard?’ Groningen Journal of International Law (GroJIL) 2015, pp. 1–26. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Sacerdoti, Giorgio, ‘The Proliferation of BITs, Conflicts of Treaties, Proceedings and Awards’ in: Karl P Sauvant and Michael Chiswick-Patterson (eds), Appeals Mechanism in International Investment Disputes (Oxford 2008), pp. 127–136. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Salacuse, Jeswald W, ‘Explanations for the Increased Recourse to Treaty-Based Investment Dispute Settlement, Resolving the Struggle of Life Against Form?’ in: Karl P Sauvant and Michael Chiswick-Patterson (eds), Appeals Mechanism in International Investment Disputes (Oxford 2008), pp. 105–125. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Sasson, Monique, ‘Investment Arbitration, Procedure’ in: Marc Bungenberg (ed), International investment law: A handbook (Baden-Baden 2015), pp. 1288–1372. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Schefer, Krista N, ‘Article 1. Scope of application’ in: Dimitrij Euler and others (eds), Transparency in international investment arbitration: a guide to the UNCITRAL Rules on transparency in treaty-based investor-state arbitration (Cambridge 2015), pp. 28–63. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Scherer, Maxi/Gehring, Markus/Euler, Dimitrij, ‘Introduction’ in: Dimitrij Euler and others (eds), Transparency in international investment arbitration: a guide to the UNCITRAL Rules on transparency in treaty-based investor-state arbitration (Cambridge 2015), pp. 1–6. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Schill, Stephan W, ‘International Investment Law and the Host State's Power to Handle Economic Crises’ 24 Journal of International Arbitration 2007, pp. 265–286. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Schill, Stephan W, ‘System-Building in Investment Treaty Arbitration and Lawmaking’ in: Armin v Bogdandy and Ingo Venzke (eds), International judicial lawmaking: On public authority and democratic legitimation in global governance (Heidelberg 2012), pp. 133–177. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Schill, Stephan W, ‘Editorial: Five Times Transparency in International Investment Law’ 15 Journal of World Investment & Trade (JoWIT) 2014, pp. 363–374. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Schill, Stephan W, ‘Ordering Paradigms in International Investment Law, Bilateralism, Multilateralism, Multilateralization’ in: Zachary Douglas, Joost Pauwelyn and Jorge E Viñuales (eds), The foundations of international investment law: Bringing theory into practice (Oxford 2014), pp. 109–141. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Schill, Stephan W, ‘Editorial: The Mauritius Convention on Transparency, A Piece of Constitutional Reform of the International Investment Regime’ 16 Journal of World Investment & Trade (JoWIT) 2015, pp. 201–204. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Schreuer, Christoph and others, The ICSID convention: A commentary (2nd edn. Cambridge 2009). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Shelton, Dinah, ‘The Participation of Nongovernmental Organizations in International Judicial Proceedings’ 88 American Journal of International Law (AJIL) 1994, pp. 611–642. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Simões, Fernando D, ‘A Guardian and a Friend?, The European Commission's Participation in Investment Arbitration’ 25 Michigan State International Law Review (Michigan State ILR) 2017, pp. 234–303. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Sornarajah, M, ‘A Coming Crisis, Expansionary Trends in Investment Treaty Arbitration’ in: Karl P Sauvant and Michael Chiswick-Patterson (eds), Appeals Mechanism in International Investment Disputes (Oxford 2008), pp. 39–79. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Stern, Brigitte, ‘The Intervention of Private Entities and States as "Friends of the Court" in WTO Dispute Settlement’ in: Patrick F Macrory, Arthur E Appleton and Michael G Plummer (eds), The World Trade Organization: Legal, economic and political analysis (New York, NY 2005), pp. 1427–1458. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Subedi, Surya P, International investment law: Reconciling policy and principle (2nd edn. Oxford 2012). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Swan, Alan C, ‘Ethyl Corporation v. Canada, Award on Jurisdiction’ 94 American Journal of International Law (AJIL) 2000, pp. 159–166. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Tams, Christian J, ‘Procedural Aspects of Investor-State Dispute Settlement: The Emergence of a European Approach?’ 15 Journal of World Investment & Trade (JoWIT) 2014, pp. 585–611. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Tao, Lifeng/Shen, Wei, ‘The Gap Between the EU and China on the ISDS Mechanisms in Context of the EU-China BIT Negotiations, Evolving Status and Underlying Logic’ 48 Hong Kong Law Journal (HKLJ) 2018, pp. 1159–1214. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Tracton, Michael K, ‘Provisions in the New Generation of U.S. Investment Agreements to Achieve Transparency and Coherence in Investor-State Dispute Settlement’ in: Karl P Sauvant and Michael Chiswick-Patterson (eds), Appeals Mechanism in International Investment Disputes (Oxford 2008), pp. 201–212. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Tung, Sherlin H/Lin, Brian (Po Yen), ‘More Transparency in International Commercial Arbitration, To have or not to have’ 11 Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal (CAA) 2018, pp. 21–44. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), ‘UNCTAD Handbook of Statistics 2020, Economic trends’ https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/tdstat45_FS09_en.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), World Investment Report 2018: Investment and New Industrial Policies (New York, Geneva 2018). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
van Harten, Gus/Loughlin, Martin, ‘Investment Treaty Arbitration as a Species of Global Administrative Law’ 17 European Journal of International Law (EJIL) 2006, pp. 121–150. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
VanDuzer, Anthony J, ‘Enhancing the Procedural Legitimacy of Investor-State Arbitration Through Transparency and Amicus Curiae Participation’ 52 McGill Law Journal 2007, pp. 681–723. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Vierucci, Luisa, ‘NGOs before international courts and tribunals’ in: Pierre-Marie Dupuy and Luisa Vierucci (eds), NGOs in international law: Efficiency in flexibility? (Cheltenham, Northampton 2008), pp. 155–180. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Waibel, Michael, ‘International Investment Law and Treaty Interpretation’ in: Rainer Hofmann and Christian J Tams (eds), International Investment Law and General International Law: From Clinical Isolation to Systemic Integration? (Schriften zur Europäischen Integration und Internationalen Wirtschaftsordnung, Baden-Baden 2011), pp. 29–52. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Wilson, Bruce, ‘The WTO dispute settlement system and its operation, a brief overview of the first ten years’ in: Rufus H Yerxa and Bruce Wilson (eds), Key issues in WTO dispute settlement: The first ten years (Cambridge 2005), pp. 15–24. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Wilson, Timothy R, ‘Trade Rules: Ethyl Corporation v. Canada (NAFTA Chapter 11)’ 6 Law and Business Reviews of the Americas 2000, pp. 52–71. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
World Trade Organization, A handbook on the WTO dispute settlement system, (Cambridge 2004). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Yannaca-Small, Katia, ‘Improving the System of Investor-State Dispute Settlement’ in: Karl P Sauvant and Michael Chiswick-Patterson (eds), Appeals Mechanism in International Investment Disputes (Oxford 2008), pp. 223–228. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Yannaca-Small, Katia, ‘Annulment of ICSID Awards, Limited Scope But is There Potential?’ in: Katia Yannaca-Small (ed), Arbitration under international investment agreements: A guide to the key issues (Oxford, New York 2010), pp. 603–634. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Yanovich, Alan/Zdouc, Werner, ‘Procedural and Evidentiary Issues’ in: Daniel L Bethlehem (ed), The Oxford Handbook of International Trade Law (Oxford 2009), pp. 345–377. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Yu, Hong-Lin, ‘Who Is in - Who Is out, How the UNCITRAL Transparency Rules Can Influence the Upcoming Amendments of the ICSID Arbitration Rules’ 11 Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal (CAA) 2018, pp. 45–72. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Yu, Hong-Lin/Giupponi, Belen O, ‘The Pandora's Box Effects under the UNCITRAL Transparency Rules’ Journal of Business Law 2016, pp. 347–372. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984
Zlatanska, Elina, ‘To Publish, or Not To Publish Arbitral Awards: That is the Question’ 81 The International Journal of Arbitration, Mediation and Dispute Management (Int J Arb) 2015, pp. 25–37. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748933984