
Transformation, Politics and Implementation
Smart Implementation in Governance Programs- Herausgeber:innen:
- | |
- Verlag:
- 2017
Zusammenfassung
Working in environments characterised by a high degree of uncertainty, uncontrollability and unpredictability, development agents try to organise complex realities into manageable units. What principles influence the decision on adequate approaches and necessary steps?
Through theoretical considerations and nine case studies, the GIZ traces implementation processes and identifies underlying guiding principles which provide the flexibility and adaptability that is necessary for acting in complex contexts.
Main findings show that an adaptive and reflexive management structure is crucial for successful implementation. Quick iteration and tight feedback loops facilitate adaptation and reorientation. Contextsensitive knowledge and constant monitoring create a space for learning and innovation. A joint vision for the future which is used for orientation purposes and can be modified according to new findings and developments fosters fruitful cooperation.
Publikation durchsuchen
Bibliographische Angaben
- Auflage
- 1/2017
- Copyrightjahr
- 2017
- ISBN-Print
- 978-3-8487-3738-3
- ISBN-Online
- 978-3-8452-8051-6
- Verlag
- Nomos, Baden-Baden
- Sprache
- Deutsch
- Seiten
- 372
- Produkttyp
- Sammelband
Inhaltsverzeichnis
- Titelei/InhaltsverzeichnisSeiten 1 - 20 Download Kapitel (PDF)
- Autor:innen: | |Download Kapitel (PDF)
- Modes of implementation in development cooperationAutor:innen: | |
- Balancing directive and adaptive approaches in implementationAutor:innen: | |
- Autor:innen: | |
- 1 Conceptual considerations for smart implementation: facilitating the complexity of social changeAutor:innen: | |
- Moving from a linear to a complex understanding of developmentAutor:innen: | |
- Transformation as the conceptual frame for GIZ governance programsAutor:innen: | |
- The role of governance in transformationAutor:innen: | |
- Transformation is political by natureAutor:innen: | |
- Autor:innen: | |
- 2 Institutional considerations for smart implementationAutor:innen: | |
- GIZ – an implementing agency for sustainable developmentAutor:innen: | |
- Autor:innen: | |
- 3 Questions concerning implementation in the nine case studiesAutor:innen: | |
- Autor:innen:Download Kapitel (PDF)
- Lost in trivialityAutor:innen:
- Cooperation systems and development partnerships are not organizationsAutor:innen:
- Polka or Parker?Autor:innen:
- Smart implementation is art and craft – and not the science (of delivery)Autor:innen:
- Capacity WORKS as an attempt to codify jazz improvisationAutor:innen:
- Capacity WORKSAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- The modelAutor:innen:
- StrategyAutor:innen:
- CooperationAutor:innen:
- Steering structureAutor:innen:
- ProcessesAutor:innen:
- Learning and innovationAutor:innen:
- ConclusionAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:Download Kapitel (PDF)
- What does the landscape of new ideas look like?Autor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- Applications in countryAutor:innen:
- The World Development Report 2017 and its potential influenceAutor:innen:
- What are the emerging lessons from implementation and the outlook for cooperation?Autor:innen:
- Autor:innen: |Download Kapitel (PDF)
- Executive SummaryAutor:innen: |
- Autor:innen: |
- Development challengeAutor:innen: |
- Implementation challengesAutor:innen: |
- Structure of the paperAutor:innen: |
- ContextAutor:innen: |
- Autor:innen: |
- Orientation stageAutor:innen: |
- Adoption stageAutor:innen: |
- Mainstreaming stageAutor:innen: |
- Lessons learnedAutor:innen: |
- Autor:innen: | | |Download Kapitel (PDF)
- Context of the case studyAutor:innen: | | |
- The GIZ good governance project cluster to support public-sector reformAutor:innen: | | |
- Autor:innen: | | |
- 1. Governance training for changeAutor:innen: | | |
- Autor:innen: | | |
- a) Tool adaptationAutor:innen: | | |
- b) Institutional reorientationAutor:innen: | | |
- c) Policy-making for decentralizationAutor:innen: | | |
- 3. Transforming Tunisia’s Centre for Training and Support for DecentralizationAutor:innen: | | |
- 4. Municipalities acting for tomorrow: Bringing youth to the tableAutor:innen: | | |
- How did we steer the implementation process?Autor:innen: | | |
- Lessons from the case studyAutor:innen: | | |
- Autor:innen: | | |Download Kapitel (PDF)
- Executive SummaryAutor:innen: | | |
- Introduction to the case studyAutor:innen: | | |
- Autor:innen: | | |
- (1) Support of a common approach for a government-wide M&E systemAutor:innen: | | |
- (2) Support to improve communication between the state, the media, and citizens in the Eastern Cape provinceAutor:innen: | | |
- How does the selected mode of operation make for smart implementation? Lessons learned from the case studiesAutor:innen: | | |
- Autor:innen:Download Kapitel (PDF)
- Executive SummaryAutor:innen:
- IntroductionAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- Development challengeAutor:innen:
- Implementation challenges and hypothesesAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- Strategy developmentAutor:innen:
- Building alliancesAutor:innen:
- Learning by doing, learning from failure, and learning from dataAutor:innen:
- ConclusionsAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen: | |Download Kapitel (PDF)
- Executive SummaryAutor:innen: | |
- Autor:innen: | |
- Development challenge(s)Autor:innen: | |
- Implementation challenge(s)Autor:innen: | |
- Implementation questionsAutor:innen: | |
- Contextual conditions of the case studyAutor:innen: | |
- Autor:innen: | |
- Multi-stakeholder business breakfasts held to start a conversation on VAW with companiesAutor:innen: | |
- A government seal to reward companies’ effortsAutor:innen: | |
- Using research to prove to companies that VAW is a critical matterAutor:innen: | |
- Advising companies on implementing campaigns and educating staffAutor:innen: | |
- A handbook to support training in companiesAutor:innen: | |
- Different reactions in different countriesAutor:innen: | |
- Main resultsAutor:innen: | |
- Autor:innen: | |
- Principles of managing and steering implementationAutor:innen: | |
- Autor:innen: |Download Kapitel (PDF)
- Executive SummaryAutor:innen: |
- IntroductionAutor:innen: |
- Contextual analysisAutor:innen: |
- Development challengeAutor:innen: |
- Approach of the projectAutor:innen: |
- Implementation challengeAutor:innen: |
- Autor:innen: |
- Critical junction I: Short timeframe in GeorgiaAutor:innen: |
- Critical junction II: Resistance from the administrationAutor:innen: |
- Critical junction III: Radical political changeAutor:innen: |
- Baseline: Continuous investment in people to establish long-term working relationships between the program and the national agents of changeAutor:innen: |
- Autor:innen: |
- Principles of managing and steering implementationAutor:innen: |
- Autor:innen:Download Kapitel (PDF)
- Executive SummaryAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- Project objectivesAutor:innen:
- Links and synergies with other projects or programsAutor:innen:
- Framework for project implementationAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- Development of TNA methodologyAutor:innen:
- Development of training modulesAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- Fact-finding phaseAutor:innen:
- Preparation for implementationAutor:innen:
- Decision-making phaseAutor:innen:
- Identification of pilot institutionsAutor:innen:
- Pilot applicationAutor:innen:
- Relevance of results from pilotAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen: |Download Kapitel (PDF)
- Executive SummaryAutor:innen: |
- IntroductionAutor:innen: |
- Autor:innen: |
- The government has no “face” and no safe entry in the project areaAutor:innen: |
- Interrupted relations between the two key partnersAutor:innen: |
- Political pressure on the City mayorAutor:innen: |
- Unclear legitimacy of claims by local settlers and Indigenous peopleAutor:innen: |
- Autor:innen: |
- Phase 1: Vision and design for the inclusive co-management projectAutor:innen: |
- Phase 2: Re-entry of the government into the co-management areaAutor:innen: |
- Phase 3: Realization of the inclusive co-management project with the communitiesAutor:innen: |
- Lessons from the case study: Achievements and principles that guided the project implementationAutor:innen: |
- Principles guiding the implementation process and its designAutor:innen: |
- Autor:innen: |
- Ensuring the leadership of the main change agentsAutor:innen: |
- Trust-building with the support of intermediariesAutor:innen: |
- GIZ as external broker and advisorAutor:innen: |
- Autor:innen: |
- Comprehensive support for key actors to increase their capacities and maintain their commitment to the project despite setbacks and delaysAutor:innen: |
- Providing time and space for trust-building and ensuring monitoring through reflection and feedback loopsAutor:innen: |
- Keep your vision in mind but maintain flexibility and openness to readjust strategies and support measuresAutor:innen: |
- Autor:innen: |Download Kapitel (PDF)
- Executive SummaryAutor:innen: |
- IntroductionAutor:innen: |
- Autor:innen: |
- Relevance of climate change mitigation in Indonesia and its impact on the worldAutor:innen: |
- Political commitments from President Yudhoyono and governmental responseAutor:innen: |
- Estimated financial needs to achieve the GHG emission reduction targetsAutor:innen: |
- Indonesia’s complex state administrationAutor:innen: |
- The institutional setup of bilateral German development cooperation with IndonesiaAutor:innen: |
- Autor:innen: |
- Changing role for the Ministry of FinanceAutor:innen: |
- From reactive to proactive: GIZ’s response to the changing institutional environmentAutor:innen: |
- The elephant in the room: Fuel price subsidiesAutor:innen: |
- From three to seven: Increasing coordination challengesAutor:innen: |
- Conclusion: Smart, but not smart enough?Autor:innen: |
- Autor:innen: | | |Download Kapitel (PDF)
- Implementation in giz governance programs: experiences and findings from nine case studiesAutor:innen: | | |
- Autor:innen: | | |
- Most implementation challenges are political by natureAutor:innen: | | |
- Solutions need to be crafted to fit the local contextAutor:innen: | | |
- Autor:innen: | | |
- Multi-stakeholder approaches are a craftsman’s hammer for smart implementationAutor:innen: | | |
- Working incrementally allows for gradual adaptations during implementationAutor:innen: | | |
- A multi-level program design assists in addressing implementation hurdles and risksAutor:innen: | | |
- Short, quick, ad-hoc information collection and analysis is needed to still the constant demand for informationAutor:innen: | | |
- The aim of learning is to create a ground for joint actionAutor:innen: | | |
- A mutual focus on results and process provides sound orientation for implementersAutor:innen: | | |
- Autor:innen: | | |
- Long-term engagement shapes implementationAutor:innen: | | |
- Ownership defines, and at times constrains, what is implemented and how implementation occursAutor:innen: | | |
- Program implementation is a local affair, which requires discretion for local decision-makingAutor:innen: | | |
- Implementation is a craft with some transferrable skillsAutor:innen: | | |
- The composition and roles of advisory teams change throughout implementationAutor:innen: | | |
- Linking smart implementation to doing development differentlyAutor:innen: | | |
- About the authorsSeiten 361 - 372 Download Kapitel (PDF)




