
Transformation, Politics and Implementation
Smart Implementation in Governance Programs- Editors:
- | |
- Publisher:
- 2017
Summary
Working in environments characterised by a high degree of uncertainty, uncontrollability and unpredictability, development agents try to organise complex realities into manageable units. What principles influence the decision on adequate approaches and necessary steps?
Through theoretical considerations and nine case studies, the GIZ traces implementation processes and identifies underlying guiding principles which provide the flexibility and adaptability that is necessary for acting in complex contexts.
Main findings show that an adaptive and reflexive management structure is crucial for successful implementation. Quick iteration and tight feedback loops facilitate adaptation and reorientation. Contextsensitive knowledge and constant monitoring create a space for learning and innovation. A joint vision for the future which is used for orientation purposes and can be modified according to new findings and developments fosters fruitful cooperation.
Search publication
Bibliographic data
- Edition
- 1/2017
- Copyright Year
- 2017
- ISBN-Print
- 978-3-8487-3738-3
- ISBN-Online
- 978-3-8452-8051-6
- Publisher
- Nomos, Baden-Baden
- Language
- German
- Pages
- 372
- Product Type
- Edited Book
Table of contents
- Titelei/InhaltsverzeichnisPages 1 - 20 Download chapter (PDF)
- Authors: | |Download chapter (PDF)
- Modes of implementation in development cooperationAuthors: | |
- Balancing directive and adaptive approaches in implementationAuthors: | |
- Authors: | |
- 1 Conceptual considerations for smart implementation: facilitating the complexity of social changeAuthors: | |
- Moving from a linear to a complex understanding of developmentAuthors: | |
- Transformation as the conceptual frame for GIZ governance programsAuthors: | |
- The role of governance in transformationAuthors: | |
- Transformation is political by natureAuthors: | |
- Authors: | |
- 2 Institutional considerations for smart implementationAuthors: | |
- GIZ – an implementing agency for sustainable developmentAuthors: | |
- Authors: | |
- 3 Questions concerning implementation in the nine case studiesAuthors: | |
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- Lost in trivialityAuthors:
- Cooperation systems and development partnerships are not organizationsAuthors:
- Polka or Parker?Authors:
- Smart implementation is art and craft – and not the science (of delivery)Authors:
- Capacity WORKS as an attempt to codify jazz improvisationAuthors:
- Capacity WORKSAuthors:
- Authors:
- The modelAuthors:
- StrategyAuthors:
- CooperationAuthors:
- Steering structureAuthors:
- ProcessesAuthors:
- Learning and innovationAuthors:
- ConclusionAuthors:
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- What does the landscape of new ideas look like?Authors:
- Authors:
- Applications in countryAuthors:
- The World Development Report 2017 and its potential influenceAuthors:
- What are the emerging lessons from implementation and the outlook for cooperation?Authors:
- Authors: |Download chapter (PDF)
- Executive SummaryAuthors: |
- Authors: |
- Development challengeAuthors: |
- Implementation challengesAuthors: |
- Structure of the paperAuthors: |
- ContextAuthors: |
- Authors: |
- Orientation stageAuthors: |
- Adoption stageAuthors: |
- Mainstreaming stageAuthors: |
- Lessons learnedAuthors: |
- Authors: | | |Download chapter (PDF)
- Context of the case studyAuthors: | | |
- The GIZ good governance project cluster to support public-sector reformAuthors: | | |
- Authors: | | |
- 1. Governance training for changeAuthors: | | |
- Authors: | | |
- a) Tool adaptationAuthors: | | |
- b) Institutional reorientationAuthors: | | |
- c) Policy-making for decentralizationAuthors: | | |
- 3. Transforming Tunisia’s Centre for Training and Support for DecentralizationAuthors: | | |
- 4. Municipalities acting for tomorrow: Bringing youth to the tableAuthors: | | |
- How did we steer the implementation process?Authors: | | |
- Lessons from the case studyAuthors: | | |
- Authors: | | |Download chapter (PDF)
- Executive SummaryAuthors: | | |
- Introduction to the case studyAuthors: | | |
- Authors: | | |
- (1) Support of a common approach for a government-wide M&E systemAuthors: | | |
- (2) Support to improve communication between the state, the media, and citizens in the Eastern Cape provinceAuthors: | | |
- How does the selected mode of operation make for smart implementation? Lessons learned from the case studiesAuthors: | | |
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- Executive SummaryAuthors:
- IntroductionAuthors:
- Authors:
- Development challengeAuthors:
- Implementation challenges and hypothesesAuthors:
- Authors:
- Strategy developmentAuthors:
- Building alliancesAuthors:
- Learning by doing, learning from failure, and learning from dataAuthors:
- ConclusionsAuthors:
- Authors: | |Download chapter (PDF)
- Executive SummaryAuthors: | |
- Authors: | |
- Development challenge(s)Authors: | |
- Implementation challenge(s)Authors: | |
- Implementation questionsAuthors: | |
- Contextual conditions of the case studyAuthors: | |
- Authors: | |
- Multi-stakeholder business breakfasts held to start a conversation on VAW with companiesAuthors: | |
- A government seal to reward companies’ effortsAuthors: | |
- Using research to prove to companies that VAW is a critical matterAuthors: | |
- Advising companies on implementing campaigns and educating staffAuthors: | |
- A handbook to support training in companiesAuthors: | |
- Different reactions in different countriesAuthors: | |
- Main resultsAuthors: | |
- Authors: | |
- Principles of managing and steering implementationAuthors: | |
- Authors: |Download chapter (PDF)
- Executive SummaryAuthors: |
- IntroductionAuthors: |
- Contextual analysisAuthors: |
- Development challengeAuthors: |
- Approach of the projectAuthors: |
- Implementation challengeAuthors: |
- Authors: |
- Critical junction I: Short timeframe in GeorgiaAuthors: |
- Critical junction II: Resistance from the administrationAuthors: |
- Critical junction III: Radical political changeAuthors: |
- Baseline: Continuous investment in people to establish long-term working relationships between the program and the national agents of changeAuthors: |
- Authors: |
- Principles of managing and steering implementationAuthors: |
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- Executive SummaryAuthors:
- Authors:
- Project objectivesAuthors:
- Links and synergies with other projects or programsAuthors:
- Framework for project implementationAuthors:
- Authors:
- Development of TNA methodologyAuthors:
- Development of training modulesAuthors:
- Authors:
- Fact-finding phaseAuthors:
- Preparation for implementationAuthors:
- Decision-making phaseAuthors:
- Identification of pilot institutionsAuthors:
- Pilot applicationAuthors:
- Relevance of results from pilotAuthors:
- Authors: |Download chapter (PDF)
- Executive SummaryAuthors: |
- IntroductionAuthors: |
- Authors: |
- The government has no “face” and no safe entry in the project areaAuthors: |
- Interrupted relations between the two key partnersAuthors: |
- Political pressure on the City mayorAuthors: |
- Unclear legitimacy of claims by local settlers and Indigenous peopleAuthors: |
- Authors: |
- Phase 1: Vision and design for the inclusive co-management projectAuthors: |
- Phase 2: Re-entry of the government into the co-management areaAuthors: |
- Phase 3: Realization of the inclusive co-management project with the communitiesAuthors: |
- Lessons from the case study: Achievements and principles that guided the project implementationAuthors: |
- Principles guiding the implementation process and its designAuthors: |
- Authors: |
- Ensuring the leadership of the main change agentsAuthors: |
- Trust-building with the support of intermediariesAuthors: |
- GIZ as external broker and advisorAuthors: |
- Authors: |
- Comprehensive support for key actors to increase their capacities and maintain their commitment to the project despite setbacks and delaysAuthors: |
- Providing time and space for trust-building and ensuring monitoring through reflection and feedback loopsAuthors: |
- Keep your vision in mind but maintain flexibility and openness to readjust strategies and support measuresAuthors: |
- Authors: |Download chapter (PDF)
- Executive SummaryAuthors: |
- IntroductionAuthors: |
- Authors: |
- Relevance of climate change mitigation in Indonesia and its impact on the worldAuthors: |
- Political commitments from President Yudhoyono and governmental responseAuthors: |
- Estimated financial needs to achieve the GHG emission reduction targetsAuthors: |
- Indonesia’s complex state administrationAuthors: |
- The institutional setup of bilateral German development cooperation with IndonesiaAuthors: |
- Authors: |
- Changing role for the Ministry of FinanceAuthors: |
- From reactive to proactive: GIZ’s response to the changing institutional environmentAuthors: |
- The elephant in the room: Fuel price subsidiesAuthors: |
- From three to seven: Increasing coordination challengesAuthors: |
- Conclusion: Smart, but not smart enough?Authors: |
- Authors: | | |Download chapter (PDF)
- Implementation in giz governance programs: experiences and findings from nine case studiesAuthors: | | |
- Authors: | | |
- Most implementation challenges are political by natureAuthors: | | |
- Solutions need to be crafted to fit the local contextAuthors: | | |
- Authors: | | |
- Multi-stakeholder approaches are a craftsman’s hammer for smart implementationAuthors: | | |
- Working incrementally allows for gradual adaptations during implementationAuthors: | | |
- A multi-level program design assists in addressing implementation hurdles and risksAuthors: | | |
- Short, quick, ad-hoc information collection and analysis is needed to still the constant demand for informationAuthors: | | |
- The aim of learning is to create a ground for joint actionAuthors: | | |
- A mutual focus on results and process provides sound orientation for implementersAuthors: | | |
- Authors: | | |
- Long-term engagement shapes implementationAuthors: | | |
- Ownership defines, and at times constrains, what is implemented and how implementation occursAuthors: | | |
- Program implementation is a local affair, which requires discretion for local decision-makingAuthors: | | |
- Implementation is a craft with some transferrable skillsAuthors: | | |
- The composition and roles of advisory teams change throughout implementationAuthors: | | |
- Linking smart implementation to doing development differentlyAuthors: | | |
- About the authorsPages 361 - 372 Download chapter (PDF)




