Cover des Buchs: Socialistic Brands
Monographie Open Access Vollzugriff

Socialistic Brands

A Unique Category of Vintage Brands
Autor:innen:
Verlag:
 2017

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Auflage
1/2017
Copyrightjahr
2017
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-3548-8
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-7881-0
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe
Munich Intellectual Property Law Center - MIPLC Studies
Band
28
Sprache
Englisch
Seiten
86
Produkttyp
Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 - 14 Download Kapitel (PDF)
  2. Introduction 15 - 16 Download Kapitel (PDF)
  3. Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. Socialistic brands
    2. Geographical and legal focus
      1. Unitra
      2. Pewex
      3. Herbapol
      4. „Działka Moje Hobby” / Pan Tu Nie Stał
  4. Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. Introduction
      1. Trademark law
      2. Empirical evidence
    3. Implications of semiotics
    4. Implications of social psychology
    5. Conclusion
  5. Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. Introduction and scope of the consideration
      1. Introduction
        1. Socialistic brands as indicators of characteristics of commodities
      3. Bad faith registration
      4. Contrary to public policy
      5. Other grounds of refusal
    3. Unfair competition law
    4. Copyright Law
    5. Geographical indicators
    6. Sui generis protection
  6. The socialistic brands dilemma 73 - 74 Download Kapitel (PDF)
  7. A brand new nostalgia? Case examples touch-down. 75 - 76 Download Kapitel (PDF)
  8. Conclusion 77 - 78 Download Kapitel (PDF)
  9. List of Works Cited 79 - 86 Download Kapitel (PDF)

Literaturverzeichnis (130)

  1. Oxford University Standard for the Citation of Legal Authorities (4th edn, Hart 2012) <http://www.law.ox.ac.uk/published/OSCOLA_4th_edn_Hart_2012.pdf>. Google Scholar öffnen
  2. Guide to Polish Legal Citation (JU-CUA American Law Program 2009) <http://www.law.uj.edu.pl/~citations/>. Google Scholar öffnen
  3. Monographies and Articles Google Scholar öffnen
  4. “Study on the Overall Functioning of the European Trade Mark System“ (Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition Law Munich 2011) <http://www.ip.mpg.de/fileadmin/user_upload/mpi_final_report.pdf>. Google Scholar öffnen
  5. George A. Akerlof, “The Market for ‘Lemons’: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism” (1970) 84 Quarterly Journal of Economics 3, 488. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1879431
  6. Katya Assaf, “The dilution of Culture and the Law of trademarks” (2009) 49 IDEA – The intellectual Property Law Review 1 <http://ssrn.com/abstractc=1410590>. Google Scholar öffnen
  7. J. Barta, „Przeszkody w Rejestracji” Janusz Barta, Ryszard Markiewicz & Andrzej Matlak (eds); Prawo Mediów (LexisNexis 2008). Google Scholar öffnen
  8. Roland Barthes, Adam Dziadek (tr) “Imperium Znaków” (eng.“Empire of Signs”), (Aletheia 2012). Google Scholar öffnen
  9. Roland Barthes, Richard Howard (tr) “Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography” (Farrar, Straus and Giroux 1981). Google Scholar öffnen
  10. Mikhail Bakhtin, Vadim Liapunov (tr), Michael Holquist & Vadim Liapunov (eds) “Art and Answerability” (Austin University of Texas Press 1990). Google Scholar öffnen
  11. Mikhail Bakhtin, Vern W. McGee (tr), Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist (eds) “Speech Genresand, Other Late Essays” (University of Texas Press 2006). Google Scholar öffnen
  12. Burton Beebe, “The Semiotic Analysis of Trademark Law” (2004) 51 UCLA Law Rev. 3, 621. Google Scholar öffnen
  13. Burton Beebe, “The Semiotic Account of Trademark Doctrine and Trademark Culture”, Graeme Dimwoodie, Mark Jamis (eds), Trademark Law and Theory: A Handbook of Contemporary Research (Cheltenham 2008). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.4337/9781848441316.00007
  14. Daphne Berdahl, “’(N)Ostalgie’ for the Present: Memory, Longing, and East German Things” (1999) 64 Ethnos 2, 193. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/00141844.1999.9981598
  15. Edward L. Bernays, “Biography of an Idea: Memoirs of Public Relations Counsel” (Simon and Schuster 1965). Google Scholar öffnen
  16. Jason Bosland, “The Culture of Trade Marks: An Alternative Cultural Theory Perspective” (2005) 10 Media & Arts Law Review 99. Google Scholar öffnen
  17. Laura R. Bradford, “Trademark dilution and emotion” <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1334925&download=yes>. Google Scholar öffnen
  18. Valerie Brennan, T.J. Crane “Gone But Not Goodbye: Residual Goodwill in Abandoned U.S. Trademarks” (Inta Bulletin, 15.8.2015) <http://www.inta.org/INTABulletin/Pages/GoneButNotGoodbyeResidualGoodwillinAbandonedUSTrademarks.aspx>. Google Scholar öffnen
  19. Jan M. Broekman, Larry Catá Backer (eds) “Signs In Law – A Source Book The Semiotics of Law in Legal Education III” (Springer 2015). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09837-1_1
  20. Rosemary J. Coombe, “Embodied Trademarks: Mimesis and Alterity on American Commercial Frontiers” (1996) 11 Cultural Anthropology 2, 202. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1525/can.1996.11.2.02a00030
  21. Norman Davis, “God's Playground: A History of Poland: 1795 to the Present (Volume 2)” (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2005). Google Scholar öffnen
  22. Graeme Dinwoodie, “Reconceptualizing the Inherent Distinctiveness of Product Design Trade Dress” (1997) 75 North Carolina Law Review 2, 471. Google Scholar öffnen
  23. Jennifer Davis “Between a Sign and a Brand”, L. Bently, Jennifer Davis & J.C. Ginsburg (eds) Trademarks and Brands (Cambridge 2008), 65. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511495212.004
  24. Kristofer Erickson, Paul Heald, Fabian Homberg, Martin Kretschmer and Dinusha Mendis, “Copyright and the Value of the Public Domain” (CREATe 2015) <http://www.create.ac.uk/publications/copyright-and-the-value-of-the-public-domain/>. Google Scholar öffnen
  25. Jerome Gilson, Anne Gilson LaLonde, “The Zombie Trademark: A Windfall and A Pitfall”(2006) 98 Trademark Reporter 6, 1280. Google Scholar öffnen
  26. Matt Haig, “Brand Royalty: How the World's Top 100 Brands Thrive & Survive” (Kogan Page Publishers, 2006). Google Scholar öffnen
  27. Susy Frankel, “Trademarks and Traditional Knowledge and Cultural Intellectual Property Rights”, 1 Victoria University of Wellington Legal Research Papers 6, <http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1003608>. Google Scholar öffnen
  28. William M. Landes, Richard A. Posner, “The Economics of Trademark Law” (1988), 78 The Trademark Reporter 3, 267. Google Scholar öffnen
  29. Peter Kelvin, “Book Review: Social Influence and Social Change by Serge Moscovic” (1979) 9 European Journal of Social Psychology, 441. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420090410
  30. Janusz Szwaja (red.) „Ustawa o zwalczaniu nieuczciwej konkurencji Komentarz” (3rd ed. C.H.Beck 2013). Google Scholar öffnen
  31. Philip Kotler, “Marketing Insights from A to Z” (John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2003). Google Scholar öffnen
  32. Piotr Kozarzewski, “Corporate Governance and Secondary Privatisation in Poland: Legal Framework and Changes in Ownership Structure” (Center for Social and Economic Research 2003) <http://ssrn.com/abstract=1443803> accesed on 15 September 2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1443803
  33. Michał Kruk, “Protection of Chopin’s Heritage as a Sui Generis Regulation” (2010), 5 Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 8, 608. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpq072
  34. Paul Manning, “The Semiotics of Brand” (2010) The Annual Review of Anthropology 39, 33. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.104939
  35. Mark P. McKenna, “A Consumer Decision-Making Theory of Trademark Law” (2012) 98 Virginia Law Review 1, 67. Google Scholar öffnen
  36. Anne Meneley, “Time in a Bottle: The Uneasy Circulation of Palestinian Olive Oil” (2008) Middle East Reporter 248, <http://www.academia.edu/474517/Time_in_a_Bottle_The_Uneasy_Circulation_of_Palestinian_Olive_Oil>, 18. Google Scholar öffnen
  37. B. Mercurio, “Awakening the Sleeping Giant: Intellectual Property Right in International Investment Agreement” (2012) 15 J Int Economic Law 3, 874. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgs032
  38. Robert Moore, “From Genericide to Viral Marketing: on ‘Brand’” (2003) Language & Communication 23, 334. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00017-X
  39. Serge Moscovici, Maria Zavalloni, “The Group as a Polarizer of Attitudes” (1969) 12 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2, 125. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1037/h0027568
  40. Serge Moscovici, “Social Influence and Social Change” (Academic Press 1976). Google Scholar öffnen
  41. Serge Moscovici, “Toward a Theory of Conversion Behaviour”, Leonard Berkowitz (eds), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol 13 (Academic Press 1980). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60133-1
  42. Charlan Jeanne Nemeth, „The Differential Contributions of Majority and Minority Influence” (1986) 93 Psychological Review 1, 23. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.93.1.23
  43. Charlan Jeanne Nemeth, „Minority Influence Theory”, Paul A. M. Van Lange, Arie W. Kruglanski, E. Tory Higgins (eds), Handbook of Theories in Social Psychology vol 2 (Sage 2011). Google Scholar öffnen
  44. Ewa Nowińska, Michał du Vall „Pojęcie Złej Wiary w Prawie Znaków Towarowych” in Księga Pamiątkowa z Okazji 85-lecia Ochrony Własności Przemysłowej w Polsce, 143. Google Scholar öffnen
  45. Charles Sanders Peirce in Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss (eds) “Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce: Vol. II, Elements of Logic” (Belknap Press 1932), 228. Google Scholar öffnen
  46. Ferdinand de Saussure, Weds Baskins (tr.), Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye (eds.) “Course in General Linguistics” (1966 McGraw-Hill Book Co), 112. Google Scholar öffnen
  47. Wolgang Sakulin, Trademark Protection and Freedom of Expression: An Inquiry Into the Conflict Between Trademark Rights and Freedom of Expression Under European Law (Kluwer Law International, 2011). Google Scholar öffnen
  48. Frank I. Schechter “The rational basis of trademark protection” (1927) 40 Harv. Law Rev. 6, 813. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1330367
  49. Jonathan E. Schroeder, “Brand Culture: Trade Marks, Marketing and Consumption” in Jane Ginsburg, Lionel Bently & Jennifer Davis (eds) Trade Marks and Brands An Interdisciplinary Critique (Cambridge University Press 2008), 174. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511495212.008
  50. Martin Senftleben, “Bringing EU Trademark Protection Back Into Shape – Lessons to Learn From Keyword Advertising”, <http://www.epip.eu/conferences/epip06/papers/Parallel%20Session%20Papers/SENFTLEBEN%20Martin.pdf>. Google Scholar öffnen
  51. Martin Senftleben, „Trademark Law and the Public Domain” <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2280058>. Google Scholar öffnen
  52. Johnathan E. Shroeder, “Brand Culture: Trade Marks, Marketing and Consumption" in L. Bently, Jennifer Davis & J.C. Ginsburg (eds) Trademarks and Brands (Cambridge 2008), 161. Google Scholar öffnen
  53. Ryszard Skubisz (eds.), „System Prawa Prywatnego tom 14b Prawo własności Przemysłowej” (C·H·Beck 2012). Google Scholar öffnen
  54. Ryszard Skubisz, „Zgłoszenie Znaku Towarowego w Złej Wierze” in L. Ogiegło, W. Popiołek, M. Szpunar (red.) Rozprawy prawnicze, Księga pamiątkowa Profesora Maksymiliana Pazdana (Kraków 2005), 1342. Google Scholar öffnen
  55. Alexander Tsoutsanis, “Trade Mark Registration In Bad Faith” (Oxford 2010). Google Scholar öffnen
  56. Press articles and others Google Scholar öffnen
  57. “Horalky Budú Vyrábať Opavia – LU aj I.D.C. Holding“ (finance.sk, 12.4.2006) <http://www.finance.sk/spravy/finance/4993-horalky-budu-vyrabat-opavia-lu-aj-i-d-c-holding/>. Google Scholar öffnen
  58. “Dohoda o Používaní Názvu Horalka a Tatranka Více” (Strategie.cz, 8.11.2007) <http://strategie.e15.cz/zpravy/dohoda-o-pouzivani-nazvu-horalka-a-tatranka-443643>. Google Scholar öffnen
  59. Saul McLeod “Moscovici and Minority Influence“ (Simple Psychology, 2007) <www.simplypsychology.org/minority-influence.html>. Google Scholar öffnen
  60. Marta Karenova, “Soviet-Era Brands Rise On Socialist Nostalgia” (Wall Street Journal 15.11.2004), <http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB110046692372873477>. Google Scholar öffnen
  61. Sergei Roganov, „Soviet Food Passes Taste Test for New Generation“ (Rossiyskaya Gazeta, Telegraph 3.1.2013) <http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sponsored/rbth/cuisine/9778200/soviet-food-popular.html>. Google Scholar öffnen
  62. Official European Union profile of Poland <http://europa.eu/about-eu/countries/member-countries/poland/index_en.htm>. Google Scholar öffnen
  63. Dawid Kosiński, „Unitra – kultowa polska marka powraca na rynek i oferuje produkty "born in Poland"” (Spider’s web, 22.5.2014) <http://www.spidersweb.pl/2014/05/unitra-wraca-na-rynek.html>. Google Scholar öffnen
  64. “Pewex Wraca na Rynek” (Rzeczpospolita Ekonomia, 16.12.2013) <http://www.ekonomia.rp.pl/artykul/1072971.html>. Google Scholar öffnen
  65. Ewa Cander-Karolewska, „Atlantyda Ludowa” (Onet wiadomości, 1.07.2007) <http://wiadomosci.onet.pl/prasa/atlantyda-ludowa/dxxm3>. Google Scholar öffnen
  66. Grzegorz Marczak, „Dlaczego Chłopaki z Pruszcza Chcą Reaktywować Pewex? Na Moje Pytania Odpowiedział Sebastian Leśniak” (Antyweb 7.6.2013)< http://antyweb.pl/dlaczego-chlopaki-z-pruszcza-chca-reaktywowac-pewex-na-moje-pytania-odpowiedzial-sebastian-lesniak/>. Google Scholar öffnen
  67. Դուք «Գրանդ քենդի» շա՞տ եք սիրում (168 Ժամ, 24.10.2015) <http://archive.168.am/am/articles/20366>. Google Scholar öffnen
  68. Results for “Działka Moje Hobby” in the Polish National Library catalogue <http://katalogi.bn.org.pl/iii/encore/search/C__Sdziałka%20moje%20hobby__Orightresult__U?lang=pol&suite=cobalt>. Google Scholar öffnen
  69. “Tíz Régi Magyar Márka – Emlékszünk-e Még Rájuk” (hvg.hu, 8.7.2011) < http://hvg.hu/tudomany/20110707_regi_magyar_marka>. Google Scholar öffnen
  70. “Az Adidas Cipők is a Tiszánál Készültek” (haszonkulcs.hu, 7.12.2011) <http://archive-hu-2012.com/hu/h/2012-06-21_62606_12/Sikert%C3%B6rt%C3%A9netek-Az-Adidas-cip%C5%91k-is-a-Tisz%C3%A1n%C3%A1l-k%C3%A9sz%C3%BCltek-Haszonkulcs/>. Google Scholar öffnen
  71. Official announcement of the Biedronka launch of the vintage assortment <http://www.biedronka.pl/pl/news,id,877,title,biedronka-zaprasza-w-podroz-sentymentalna-z-produktami-vintage>. Google Scholar öffnen
  72. Mikołaj Lech, „Po 58 Latach Wedel Odzyskuje Prawo do Nazwy "PTASIE MLECZKO”” (Wyborcza biz, 10.11.2014) <http://wyborcza.biz/Prawo/1,128894,16946756,Po_58_latach_Wedel_odzyskuje_prawo_do_nazwy__PTASIE.html>. Google Scholar öffnen
  73. Artur Kawik, „Walka o „Ptasie Mleczko®” Przyczyną Kryzysu Wizerunkowego Wedla” (Socialpress 13.2.2012) < http://socialpress.pl/2012/02/walka-o-ptasie-mleczko-przyczyna-kryzysu-wizerunkowego-wedla/>. Google Scholar öffnen
  74. “Ce au in Comun Automobile Dacia si Arctic Gaesti: Ambele Businessuri Sunt Sustinute de Campaniile „Rabla" si Exporturi” (ZF Companii, 26.8.2009) <http://www.zf.ro/companii/ce-au-in-comun-automobile-dacia-si-arctic-gaesti-ambele-businessuri-sunt-sustinute-de-campaniile-rabla-si-exporturi-4801812/>. Google Scholar öffnen
  75. Robert Mazurek, “Świat Miał Wranglery, My – Dżinsy Odra” (Rzeczpospolita 14.8.2015) <http://www.rp.pl/artykul/1222410-Swiat-mial-Wranglery--my---dzinsy-Odra.html>. Google Scholar öffnen
  76. Daria Różańska, „Twórcy Demotywatory.pl Wprowadzają do Sieci Markę Pewex” (press.pl, 17.12.2013) <http://www.press.pl/personalia/pokaz/43761,Tworcy-Demotywatory_pl-wprowadzaja-do-sieci-marke-Pewex>. Google Scholar öffnen
  77. Unitra official page, <http://unitra.pl/>. Google Scholar öffnen
  78. Unitra club, <http://unitraklub.pl/unitra-dom>. Google Scholar öffnen
  79. Unitra – official facebook page <https://www.facebook.com/unitrapl>. Google Scholar öffnen
  80. Herbapol Poznań < http://www.herbapol.poznan.pl/historia>. Google Scholar öffnen
  81. Herbapol Lublin < http://www.herbapol.com.pl/o-nas/kim-jestesmy>. Google Scholar öffnen
  82. Herbapol w Krakowie < http://herbapol.krakow.pl/o-firmie/historia>. Google Scholar öffnen
  83. Herbapol Warszawa <http://www.herbapol.waw.pl/> Google Scholar öffnen
  84. Herbapol Wrocła < http://herbapol.pl/>. Google Scholar öffnen
  85. Ursus official page <http://en.ursus.com.pl/History>. Google Scholar öffnen
  86. Official Wedel page <https://www.wedelpijalnie.pl/pl/o-nas/e-wede>. Google Scholar öffnen
  87. Legislation Google Scholar öffnen
  88. Council Regulation (EC) 207/2009/EC on the Community trade mark (codified version) [2009] OJ L78/1. Google Scholar öffnen
  89. Council Directive (EC) 2008/95/EC to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks (codified version) [1993] OJ L299/25. Google Scholar öffnen
  90. Polish Industrial Property Act – Ustawa z dnia 30 czerwca 2000 r. Prawo własności przemysłowej, Dz.U. 2001 nr 49 poz. 508 with changes. Google Scholar öffnen
  91. Cases Google Scholar öffnen
  92. EU Google Scholar öffnen
  93. Case C- 106/89 Marleasing SA v La Comercial EU:C:1990:395, [1990] ECR I-4135. Google Scholar öffnen
  94. Case C-363/99 Koninklijke KPN Nederland NV v. Benelux-Merkenbureau EU:C:2004:86, [2004] ECR I-1619. Google Scholar öffnen
  95. Case C-329/02 SAT. 1 SatellitenFernsehen GmbH v. OHIM EU:C:2004:532, [2004] ECR I-08317. Google Scholar öffnen
  96. Case C-320/12 Malaysia Diary Industries Pte. Ltd v. Ankenaevnet for Petendter og Varemaerk EU:C:2013:435. Google Scholar öffnen
  97. Case C-487/07 L'Oréal SA v. Bellure NV EU:C:2009:378, [2009] ECR I-05185. Google Scholar öffnen
  98. Case C-108/05 Bovemij Verzekeringen v. Benelux-Merkenbureau EU:C:2006:530, [2006] ECR I-07605. Google Scholar öffnen
  99. Case C-265/00 Campina Melkunie BV v Benelux EU:C:2004:87, [2004] ECR I-01699. Google Scholar öffnen
  100. Cases C-53/01 and C-55/01 Linde and others EU:C:2003:206, [2003] ECG I-03161. Google Scholar öffnen
  101. Case T-304/06 Reber v OHMI EU:T:2008:268, [2008] ECG II-01927. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.17104/9783406618468-141
  102. Case C-383/99 P Procter & Gamble EU:C:2001:461, [2001] ECG I-06251. Google Scholar öffnen
  103. Case C-529/07 Chocoladenfabriken Lindt & Sprüngli EU:C:2009:361, [2009] EGC I-04893. Google Scholar öffnen
  104. Case C 17/06 Celine EU:C:2007:497, [2007] EGC I-07041. Google Scholar öffnen
  105. Case C 408/01 Adidas v. Salomon EU:C:2003:582, [2003] EGC I-12558. Google Scholar öffnen
  106. Poland Google Scholar öffnen
  107. Judgement of NSA of 12.7.2011, II GSK 746/10. Google Scholar öffnen
  108. Judgment of NSA of 14.1.2015, II GSK 1815/14. Google Scholar öffnen
  109. Judgment of NSA of 24.5.2007, II GSK 377/06. Google Scholar öffnen
  110. Judgements of NSA of 25.5.2006, II GSK 66/06. Google Scholar öffnen
  111. Judgements of NSA of 8.1.2014, II GSK 1542/12. Google Scholar öffnen
  112. Judgement of NSA of 24.5.2005, II GSK 63/05. Google Scholar öffnen
  113. Judgement of NSA of 4.6.2002, II SA 3867/01. Google Scholar öffnen
  114. Judgement of NSA of 25.11.2009, II GSK 203/09. Google Scholar öffnen
  115. Judgement of NSA of 9.1.2015 II GSK 2062/13. Google Scholar öffnen
  116. Jusgement of WSA in Warsaw of 5.9.2014, VI SA/Wa 1995/13. Google Scholar öffnen
  117. Jusgement of WSA in Warsaw of 29.5.2014 VI SA/Wa 1996/13. Google Scholar öffnen
  118. Jusgement of WSA in Warsaw of 29.5.2014 VI SA/Wa 1980/13. Google Scholar öffnen
  119. Judgement of WSA in Warsaw of 7.1.2014, VI SA/Wa 1716/13. Google Scholar öffnen
  120. Judgement of WSA in Warszawie of 18.1.2012 r, VI SA/Wa 1850/11. Google Scholar öffnen
  121. Judgement of WSA in Warsaw of 21.3.2012, VI SA/Wa 1761/06. Google Scholar öffnen
  122. Judgement of WSA in Warsaw of 14.6.2013, VI Sa/Wa 101/13. Google Scholar öffnen
  123. Judgement of the Court of Appeals in Warsaw of 6.11.2015 I ACz 1640/12. Google Scholar öffnen
  124. Judgement of the Supreme Court of 24.10.1972, I CR 177/72, (OSNCP 10/73, p. 171). Google Scholar öffnen
  125. Judgements of the Supreme Court of 12.10.2007, V CSK 249/07 (OSG 2009, 4, 25). Google Scholar öffnen
  126. Judgement of the Supreme Court of 14.2.2003, IV CKN 1782/00 (LexPolonica 379001). Google Scholar öffnen
  127. Judgement of the Supreme Court of 10.8.2006, V CSK 237/06. Google Scholar öffnen
  128. Other jurisdictions Google Scholar öffnen
  129. Anheuser-Busch Inc v Portugal, Merits, App no 73049/01, (2007) 44 EHRR 42, IHRL 3436 (ECHR 2007). Google Scholar öffnen
  130. Judgement of the Dutch Supreme Court of 20.12.2013, 12/05013 TT/AS. Google Scholar öffnen

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus der Reihe "Munich Intellectual Property Law Center - MIPLC Studies"
Cover des Buchs: The Relationship between Law and Biomedical Sciences in the Context of Article 53(a) of the European Patent Convention
Monographie Vollzugriff
Jurgita Randakevičiūtė-Alpman
The Relationship between Law and Biomedical Sciences in the Context of Article 53(a) of the European Patent Convention
Cover des Buchs: Personality Merchandising and the GDPR: An Insoluble Conflict?
Monographie Vollzugriff
Jingzhou Sun
Personality Merchandising and the GDPR: An Insoluble Conflict?
Cover des Buchs: Merger Regulation in Eastern and Southern Africa
Monographie Vollzugriff
Vincent Angwenyi
Merger Regulation in Eastern and Southern Africa
Cover des Buchs: The Notion of Secrecy
Monographie Vollzugriff
Teresa Trallero Ocaña
The Notion of Secrecy
Cover des Buchs: Unlocking the Right to Data Portability
Monographie Vollzugriff
Stephanie Elfering
Unlocking the Right to Data Portability

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Feedback geben

Wir freuen uns über Ihr Feedback zu Inhalten und Funktionen. Ihre Nachricht hilft uns, unseren Service stetig zu verbessern.

Bewertung
Bild anhängen
oder hier ablegen
PNG oder JPG (max. 3 MB)

Anmelden

Passwort vergessen?
Login via Open Athens
Noch kein Benutzerkonto?
Jetzt registrieren

Publikation zitieren

Download: RIS BibTex