Cover of book: Socialistic Brands
Monograph Open Access Full access

Socialistic Brands

A Unique Category of Vintage Brands
Authors:
Publisher:
 2017

Summary

Socialistic brands are signs with unique characteristics acquired through their use in particular historical circumstances. It is considered whether, decades after the fall of the iron curtain, the shared historical pedigree justifies different treatment of these signs. The author attempts to answer the question of what would constitute as unfair appropriation of these brands and discusses the availability of legal remedies in such cases. The analysis of issues relating to socialistic brands is conducted on the basis of European and Polish law and jurisprudence. Trademark law and other fields of intellectual property law form the core of this consideration. The author additionally employs findings from branches of social sciences such as anthropology, sociology and semiotics, in order to shed light on the complex nature of the attractiveness of signs and how cultural connotations affect it.

Bibliographic data

Edition
1/2017
Copyright Year
2017
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-3548-8
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-7881-0
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Munich Intellectual Property Law Center - MIPLC Studies
Volume
28
Language
English
Pages
86
Product Type
Monograph

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 - 14 Download chapter (PDF)
  2. Introduction 15 - 16 Download chapter (PDF)
  3. Download chapter (PDF)
    1. Socialistic brands
    2. Geographical and legal focus
      1. Unitra
      2. Pewex
      3. Herbapol
      4. „Działka Moje Hobby” / Pan Tu Nie Stał
  4. Download chapter (PDF)
    1. Introduction
      1. Trademark law
      2. Empirical evidence
    3. Implications of semiotics
    4. Implications of social psychology
    5. Conclusion
  5. Download chapter (PDF)
    1. Introduction and scope of the consideration
      1. Introduction
        1. Socialistic brands as indicators of characteristics of commodities
      3. Bad faith registration
      4. Contrary to public policy
      5. Other grounds of refusal
    3. Unfair competition law
    4. Copyright Law
    5. Geographical indicators
    6. Sui generis protection
  6. The socialistic brands dilemma 73 - 74 Download chapter (PDF)
  7. A brand new nostalgia? Case examples touch-down. 75 - 76 Download chapter (PDF)
  8. Conclusion 77 - 78 Download chapter (PDF)
  9. List of Works Cited 79 - 86 Download chapter (PDF)

Bibliography (130)

  1. Oxford University Standard for the Citation of Legal Authorities (4th edn, Hart 2012) <http://www.law.ox.ac.uk/published/OSCOLA_4th_edn_Hart_2012.pdf>. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  2. Guide to Polish Legal Citation (JU-CUA American Law Program 2009) <http://www.law.uj.edu.pl/~citations/>. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  3. Monographies and Articles Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  4. “Study on the Overall Functioning of the European Trade Mark System“ (Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition Law Munich 2011) <http://www.ip.mpg.de/fileadmin/user_upload/mpi_final_report.pdf>. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  5. George A. Akerlof, “The Market for ‘Lemons’: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism” (1970) 84 Quarterly Journal of Economics 3, 488. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  6. Katya Assaf, “The dilution of Culture and the Law of trademarks” (2009) 49 IDEA – The intellectual Property Law Review 1 <http://ssrn.com/abstractc=1410590>. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  7. J. Barta, „Przeszkody w Rejestracji” Janusz Barta, Ryszard Markiewicz & Andrzej Matlak (eds); Prawo Mediów (LexisNexis 2008). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  8. Roland Barthes, Adam Dziadek (tr) “Imperium Znaków” (eng.“Empire of Signs”), (Aletheia 2012). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  9. Roland Barthes, Richard Howard (tr) “Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography” (Farrar, Straus and Giroux 1981). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  10. Mikhail Bakhtin, Vadim Liapunov (tr), Michael Holquist & Vadim Liapunov (eds) “Art and Answerability” (Austin University of Texas Press 1990). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  11. Mikhail Bakhtin, Vern W. McGee (tr), Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist (eds) “Speech Genresand, Other Late Essays” (University of Texas Press 2006). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  12. Burton Beebe, “The Semiotic Analysis of Trademark Law” (2004) 51 UCLA Law Rev. 3, 621. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  13. Burton Beebe, “The Semiotic Account of Trademark Doctrine and Trademark Culture”, Graeme Dimwoodie, Mark Jamis (eds), Trademark Law and Theory: A Handbook of Contemporary Research (Cheltenham 2008). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  14. Daphne Berdahl, “’(N)Ostalgie’ for the Present: Memory, Longing, and East German Things” (1999) 64 Ethnos 2, 193. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  15. Edward L. Bernays, “Biography of an Idea: Memoirs of Public Relations Counsel” (Simon and Schuster 1965). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  16. Jason Bosland, “The Culture of Trade Marks: An Alternative Cultural Theory Perspective” (2005) 10 Media & Arts Law Review 99. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  17. Laura R. Bradford, “Trademark dilution and emotion” <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1334925&download=yes>. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  18. Valerie Brennan, T.J. Crane “Gone But Not Goodbye: Residual Goodwill in Abandoned U.S. Trademarks” (Inta Bulletin, 15.8.2015) <http://www.inta.org/INTABulletin/Pages/GoneButNotGoodbyeResidualGoodwillinAbandonedUSTrademarks.aspx>. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  19. Jan M. Broekman, Larry Catá Backer (eds) “Signs In Law – A Source Book The Semiotics of Law in Legal Education III” (Springer 2015). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  20. Rosemary J. Coombe, “Embodied Trademarks: Mimesis and Alterity on American Commercial Frontiers” (1996) 11 Cultural Anthropology 2, 202. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  21. Norman Davis, “God's Playground: A History of Poland: 1795 to the Present (Volume 2)” (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2005). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  22. Graeme Dinwoodie, “Reconceptualizing the Inherent Distinctiveness of Product Design Trade Dress” (1997) 75 North Carolina Law Review 2, 471. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  23. Jennifer Davis “Between a Sign and a Brand”, L. Bently, Jennifer Davis & J.C. Ginsburg (eds) Trademarks and Brands (Cambridge 2008), 65. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  24. Kristofer Erickson, Paul Heald, Fabian Homberg, Martin Kretschmer and Dinusha Mendis, “Copyright and the Value of the Public Domain” (CREATe 2015) <http://www.create.ac.uk/publications/copyright-and-the-value-of-the-public-domain/>. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  25. Jerome Gilson, Anne Gilson LaLonde, “The Zombie Trademark: A Windfall and A Pitfall”(2006) 98 Trademark Reporter 6, 1280. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  26. Matt Haig, “Brand Royalty: How the World's Top 100 Brands Thrive & Survive” (Kogan Page Publishers, 2006). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  27. Susy Frankel, “Trademarks and Traditional Knowledge and Cultural Intellectual Property Rights”, 1 Victoria University of Wellington Legal Research Papers 6, <http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1003608>. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  28. William M. Landes, Richard A. Posner, “The Economics of Trademark Law” (1988), 78 The Trademark Reporter 3, 267. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  29. Peter Kelvin, “Book Review: Social Influence and Social Change by Serge Moscovic” (1979) 9 European Journal of Social Psychology, 441. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  30. Janusz Szwaja (red.) „Ustawa o zwalczaniu nieuczciwej konkurencji Komentarz” (3rd ed. C.H.Beck 2013). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  31. Philip Kotler, “Marketing Insights from A to Z” (John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2003). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  32. Piotr Kozarzewski, “Corporate Governance and Secondary Privatisation in Poland: Legal Framework and Changes in Ownership Structure” (Center for Social and Economic Research 2003) <http://ssrn.com/abstract=1443803> accesed on 15 September 2015. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  33. Michał Kruk, “Protection of Chopin’s Heritage as a Sui Generis Regulation” (2010), 5 Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 8, 608. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  34. Paul Manning, “The Semiotics of Brand” (2010) The Annual Review of Anthropology 39, 33. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  35. Mark P. McKenna, “A Consumer Decision-Making Theory of Trademark Law” (2012) 98 Virginia Law Review 1, 67. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  36. Anne Meneley, “Time in a Bottle: The Uneasy Circulation of Palestinian Olive Oil” (2008) Middle East Reporter 248, <http://www.academia.edu/474517/Time_in_a_Bottle_The_Uneasy_Circulation_of_Palestinian_Olive_Oil>, 18. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  37. B. Mercurio, “Awakening the Sleeping Giant: Intellectual Property Right in International Investment Agreement” (2012) 15 J Int Economic Law 3, 874. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  38. Robert Moore, “From Genericide to Viral Marketing: on ‘Brand’” (2003) Language & Communication 23, 334. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  39. Serge Moscovici, Maria Zavalloni, “The Group as a Polarizer of Attitudes” (1969) 12 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2, 125. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  40. Serge Moscovici, “Social Influence and Social Change” (Academic Press 1976). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  41. Serge Moscovici, “Toward a Theory of Conversion Behaviour”, Leonard Berkowitz (eds), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol 13 (Academic Press 1980). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  42. Charlan Jeanne Nemeth, „The Differential Contributions of Majority and Minority Influence” (1986) 93 Psychological Review 1, 23. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  43. Charlan Jeanne Nemeth, „Minority Influence Theory”, Paul A. M. Van Lange, Arie W. Kruglanski, E. Tory Higgins (eds), Handbook of Theories in Social Psychology vol 2 (Sage 2011). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  44. Ewa Nowińska, Michał du Vall „Pojęcie Złej Wiary w Prawie Znaków Towarowych” in Księga Pamiątkowa z Okazji 85-lecia Ochrony Własności Przemysłowej w Polsce, 143. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  45. Charles Sanders Peirce in Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss (eds) “Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce: Vol. II, Elements of Logic” (Belknap Press 1932), 228. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  46. Ferdinand de Saussure, Weds Baskins (tr.), Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye (eds.) “Course in General Linguistics” (1966 McGraw-Hill Book Co), 112. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  47. Wolgang Sakulin, Trademark Protection and Freedom of Expression: An Inquiry Into the Conflict Between Trademark Rights and Freedom of Expression Under European Law (Kluwer Law International, 2011). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  48. Frank I. Schechter “The rational basis of trademark protection” (1927) 40 Harv. Law Rev. 6, 813. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  49. Jonathan E. Schroeder, “Brand Culture: Trade Marks, Marketing and Consumption” in Jane Ginsburg, Lionel Bently & Jennifer Davis (eds) Trade Marks and Brands An Interdisciplinary Critique (Cambridge University Press 2008), 174. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  50. Martin Senftleben, “Bringing EU Trademark Protection Back Into Shape – Lessons to Learn From Keyword Advertising”, <http://www.epip.eu/conferences/epip06/papers/Parallel%20Session%20Papers/SENFTLEBEN%20Martin.pdf>. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  51. Martin Senftleben, „Trademark Law and the Public Domain” <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2280058>. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  52. Johnathan E. Shroeder, “Brand Culture: Trade Marks, Marketing and Consumption" in L. Bently, Jennifer Davis & J.C. Ginsburg (eds) Trademarks and Brands (Cambridge 2008), 161. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  53. Ryszard Skubisz (eds.), „System Prawa Prywatnego tom 14b Prawo własności Przemysłowej” (C·H·Beck 2012). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  54. Ryszard Skubisz, „Zgłoszenie Znaku Towarowego w Złej Wierze” in L. Ogiegło, W. Popiołek, M. Szpunar (red.) Rozprawy prawnicze, Księga pamiątkowa Profesora Maksymiliana Pazdana (Kraków 2005), 1342. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  55. Alexander Tsoutsanis, “Trade Mark Registration In Bad Faith” (Oxford 2010). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  56. Press articles and others Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  57. “Horalky Budú Vyrábať Opavia – LU aj I.D.C. Holding“ (finance.sk, 12.4.2006) <http://www.finance.sk/spravy/finance/4993-horalky-budu-vyrabat-opavia-lu-aj-i-d-c-holding/>. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  58. “Dohoda o Používaní Názvu Horalka a Tatranka Více” (Strategie.cz, 8.11.2007) <http://strategie.e15.cz/zpravy/dohoda-o-pouzivani-nazvu-horalka-a-tatranka-443643>. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  59. Saul McLeod “Moscovici and Minority Influence“ (Simple Psychology, 2007) <www.simplypsychology.org/minority-influence.html>. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  60. Marta Karenova, “Soviet-Era Brands Rise On Socialist Nostalgia” (Wall Street Journal 15.11.2004), <http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB110046692372873477>. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  61. Sergei Roganov, „Soviet Food Passes Taste Test for New Generation“ (Rossiyskaya Gazeta, Telegraph 3.1.2013) <http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sponsored/rbth/cuisine/9778200/soviet-food-popular.html>. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  62. Official European Union profile of Poland <http://europa.eu/about-eu/countries/member-countries/poland/index_en.htm>. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  63. Dawid Kosiński, „Unitra – kultowa polska marka powraca na rynek i oferuje produkty "born in Poland"” (Spider’s web, 22.5.2014) <http://www.spidersweb.pl/2014/05/unitra-wraca-na-rynek.html>. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  64. “Pewex Wraca na Rynek” (Rzeczpospolita Ekonomia, 16.12.2013) <http://www.ekonomia.rp.pl/artykul/1072971.html>. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  65. Ewa Cander-Karolewska, „Atlantyda Ludowa” (Onet wiadomości, 1.07.2007) <http://wiadomosci.onet.pl/prasa/atlantyda-ludowa/dxxm3>. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  66. Grzegorz Marczak, „Dlaczego Chłopaki z Pruszcza Chcą Reaktywować Pewex? Na Moje Pytania Odpowiedział Sebastian Leśniak” (Antyweb 7.6.2013)< http://antyweb.pl/dlaczego-chlopaki-z-pruszcza-chca-reaktywowac-pewex-na-moje-pytania-odpowiedzial-sebastian-lesniak/>. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  67. Դուք «Գրանդ քենդի» շա՞տ եք սիրում (168 Ժամ, 24.10.2015) <http://archive.168.am/am/articles/20366>. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  68. Results for “Działka Moje Hobby” in the Polish National Library catalogue <http://katalogi.bn.org.pl/iii/encore/search/C__Sdziałka%20moje%20hobby__Orightresult__U?lang=pol&suite=cobalt>. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  69. “Tíz Régi Magyar Márka – Emlékszünk-e Még Rájuk” (hvg.hu, 8.7.2011) < http://hvg.hu/tudomany/20110707_regi_magyar_marka>. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  70. “Az Adidas Cipők is a Tiszánál Készültek” (haszonkulcs.hu, 7.12.2011) <http://archive-hu-2012.com/hu/h/2012-06-21_62606_12/Sikert%C3%B6rt%C3%A9netek-Az-Adidas-cip%C5%91k-is-a-Tisz%C3%A1n%C3%A1l-k%C3%A9sz%C3%BCltek-Haszonkulcs/>. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  71. Official announcement of the Biedronka launch of the vintage assortment <http://www.biedronka.pl/pl/news,id,877,title,biedronka-zaprasza-w-podroz-sentymentalna-z-produktami-vintage>. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  72. Mikołaj Lech, „Po 58 Latach Wedel Odzyskuje Prawo do Nazwy "PTASIE MLECZKO”” (Wyborcza biz, 10.11.2014) <http://wyborcza.biz/Prawo/1,128894,16946756,Po_58_latach_Wedel_odzyskuje_prawo_do_nazwy__PTASIE.html>. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  73. Artur Kawik, „Walka o „Ptasie Mleczko®” Przyczyną Kryzysu Wizerunkowego Wedla” (Socialpress 13.2.2012) < http://socialpress.pl/2012/02/walka-o-ptasie-mleczko-przyczyna-kryzysu-wizerunkowego-wedla/>. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  74. “Ce au in Comun Automobile Dacia si Arctic Gaesti: Ambele Businessuri Sunt Sustinute de Campaniile „Rabla" si Exporturi” (ZF Companii, 26.8.2009) <http://www.zf.ro/companii/ce-au-in-comun-automobile-dacia-si-arctic-gaesti-ambele-businessuri-sunt-sustinute-de-campaniile-rabla-si-exporturi-4801812/>. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  75. Robert Mazurek, “Świat Miał Wranglery, My – Dżinsy Odra” (Rzeczpospolita 14.8.2015) <http://www.rp.pl/artykul/1222410-Swiat-mial-Wranglery--my---dzinsy-Odra.html>. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  76. Daria Różańska, „Twórcy Demotywatory.pl Wprowadzają do Sieci Markę Pewex” (press.pl, 17.12.2013) <http://www.press.pl/personalia/pokaz/43761,Tworcy-Demotywatory_pl-wprowadzaja-do-sieci-marke-Pewex>. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  77. Unitra official page, <http://unitra.pl/>. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  78. Unitra club, <http://unitraklub.pl/unitra-dom>. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  79. Unitra – official facebook page <https://www.facebook.com/unitrapl>. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  80. Herbapol Poznań < http://www.herbapol.poznan.pl/historia>. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  81. Herbapol Lublin < http://www.herbapol.com.pl/o-nas/kim-jestesmy>. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  82. Herbapol w Krakowie < http://herbapol.krakow.pl/o-firmie/historia>. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  83. Herbapol Warszawa <http://www.herbapol.waw.pl/> Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  84. Herbapol Wrocła < http://herbapol.pl/>. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  85. Ursus official page <http://en.ursus.com.pl/History>. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  86. Official Wedel page <https://www.wedelpijalnie.pl/pl/o-nas/e-wede>. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  87. Legislation Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  88. Council Regulation (EC) 207/2009/EC on the Community trade mark (codified version) [2009] OJ L78/1. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  89. Council Directive (EC) 2008/95/EC to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks (codified version) [1993] OJ L299/25. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  90. Polish Industrial Property Act – Ustawa z dnia 30 czerwca 2000 r. Prawo własności przemysłowej, Dz.U. 2001 nr 49 poz. 508 with changes. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  91. Cases Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  92. EU Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  93. Case C- 106/89 Marleasing SA v La Comercial EU:C:1990:395, [1990] ECR I-4135. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  94. Case C-363/99 Koninklijke KPN Nederland NV v. Benelux-Merkenbureau EU:C:2004:86, [2004] ECR I-1619. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  95. Case C-329/02 SAT. 1 SatellitenFernsehen GmbH v. OHIM EU:C:2004:532, [2004] ECR I-08317. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  96. Case C-320/12 Malaysia Diary Industries Pte. Ltd v. Ankenaevnet for Petendter og Varemaerk EU:C:2013:435. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  97. Case C-487/07 L'Oréal SA v. Bellure NV EU:C:2009:378, [2009] ECR I-05185. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  98. Case C-108/05 Bovemij Verzekeringen v. Benelux-Merkenbureau EU:C:2006:530, [2006] ECR I-07605. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  99. Case C-265/00 Campina Melkunie BV v Benelux EU:C:2004:87, [2004] ECR I-01699. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  100. Cases C-53/01 and C-55/01 Linde and others EU:C:2003:206, [2003] ECG I-03161. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  101. Case T-304/06 Reber v OHMI EU:T:2008:268, [2008] ECG II-01927. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  102. Case C-383/99 P Procter & Gamble EU:C:2001:461, [2001] ECG I-06251. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  103. Case C-529/07 Chocoladenfabriken Lindt & Sprüngli EU:C:2009:361, [2009] EGC I-04893. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  104. Case C 17/06 Celine EU:C:2007:497, [2007] EGC I-07041. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  105. Case C 408/01 Adidas v. Salomon EU:C:2003:582, [2003] EGC I-12558. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  106. Poland Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  107. Judgement of NSA of 12.7.2011, II GSK 746/10. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  108. Judgment of NSA of 14.1.2015, II GSK 1815/14. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  109. Judgment of NSA of 24.5.2007, II GSK 377/06. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  110. Judgements of NSA of 25.5.2006, II GSK 66/06. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  111. Judgements of NSA of 8.1.2014, II GSK 1542/12. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  112. Judgement of NSA of 24.5.2005, II GSK 63/05. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  113. Judgement of NSA of 4.6.2002, II SA 3867/01. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  114. Judgement of NSA of 25.11.2009, II GSK 203/09. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  115. Judgement of NSA of 9.1.2015 II GSK 2062/13. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  116. Jusgement of WSA in Warsaw of 5.9.2014, VI SA/Wa 1995/13. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  117. Jusgement of WSA in Warsaw of 29.5.2014 VI SA/Wa 1996/13. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  118. Jusgement of WSA in Warsaw of 29.5.2014 VI SA/Wa 1980/13. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  119. Judgement of WSA in Warsaw of 7.1.2014, VI SA/Wa 1716/13. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  120. Judgement of WSA in Warszawie of 18.1.2012 r, VI SA/Wa 1850/11. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  121. Judgement of WSA in Warsaw of 21.3.2012, VI SA/Wa 1761/06. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  122. Judgement of WSA in Warsaw of 14.6.2013, VI Sa/Wa 101/13. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  123. Judgement of the Court of Appeals in Warsaw of 6.11.2015 I ACz 1640/12. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  124. Judgement of the Supreme Court of 24.10.1972, I CR 177/72, (OSNCP 10/73, p. 171). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  125. Judgements of the Supreme Court of 12.10.2007, V CSK 249/07 (OSG 2009, 4, 25). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  126. Judgement of the Supreme Court of 14.2.2003, IV CKN 1782/00 (LexPolonica 379001). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  127. Judgement of the Supreme Court of 10.8.2006, V CSK 237/06. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  128. Other jurisdictions Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  129. Anheuser-Busch Inc v Portugal, Merits, App no 73049/01, (2007) 44 EHRR 42, IHRL 3436 (ECHR 2007). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810
  130. Judgement of the Dutch Supreme Court of 20.12.2013, 12/05013 TT/AS. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845278810

Similar publications

from the series "Munich Intellectual Property Law Center - MIPLC Studies"
Cover of book: The Relationship between Law and Biomedical Sciences in the Context of Article 53(a) of the European Patent Convention
Monograph Full access
Jurgita Randakevičiūtė-Alpman
The Relationship between Law and Biomedical Sciences in the Context of Article 53(a) of the European Patent Convention
Cover of book: Personality Merchandising and the GDPR: An Insoluble Conflict?
Monograph Full access
Jingzhou Sun
Personality Merchandising and the GDPR: An Insoluble Conflict?
Cover of book: Merger Regulation in Eastern and Southern Africa
Monograph Full access
Vincent Angwenyi
Merger Regulation in Eastern and Southern Africa
Cover of book: The Notion of Secrecy
Monograph Full access
Teresa Trallero Ocaña
The Notion of Secrecy
Cover of book: Unlocking the Right to Data Portability
Monograph Full access
Stephanie Elfering
Unlocking the Right to Data Portability

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via your Institution (SSO, Shibboleth, OpenAthens)
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex