Cover des Buchs: Decentralized Finance Unmasked
Monographie Open Access Vollzugriff

Decentralized Finance Unmasked

Behavioral Finance and Public Policy Insights on Financial Market Regulation
Autor:innen:
Verlag:
 2023

Zusammenfassung

Decentralized Finance (DeFi) ist eine Form der Finanzwirtschaft ohne zentrale Finanzintermediäre. Dieses Werk analysiert das Zusammenspiel von Behavioral Finance und Public Policy im aufkommenden Bereich des DeFi. Das Werk erklärt die zugrundeliegenden Mechanismen von DeFi aus sozial-, wirtschafts- und rechtswissenschaftlicher Sicht untersucht den potenziellen Einfluss von DeFi auf Finanzsysteme und die damit verbundenen Risiken, einschließlich Schwachstellen bei Smart Contracts und Vertrauensmechanismen, liefert Einblicke in finanzielle Entscheidungsprozesse in DeFi, bietet Vorschläge zur Verbesserung regulatorischer Rahmenbedingungen.

Schlagworte

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Copyrightjahr
2023
ISBN-Print
978-3-7560-0715-8
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-4301-3
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Sprache
Englisch
Seiten
227
Produkttyp
Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 - 20 Download Kapitel (PDF)
  2. Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. 2.1 Interdisciplinarity of law and economics, sociology, psychology and information technology with regard to financial markets
    2. 2.2 Sciences vs Humanities – the lost sociology of law in Europe?
    3. 2.3 Scope & Research Subject
    4. 2.4 Methodology
  3. Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. 3.1.1 Representativeness bias
      2. 3.1.2 Familiarity bias
      3. 3.1.3 Cognitive dissonance
      4. 3.1.4 Endowment effect
      5. 3.1.5 Overconfidence bias
      6. 3.1.6 Status quo bias
      7. 3.1.7 Law of small numbers
      8. 3.1.8 Anchoring
      9. 3.1.9 Mental accounting
      10. 3.1.10 Disposition effect
      11. 3.1.11 Attachment bias
      12. 3.1.12 Prospect Theory – loss aversion and risk seeking
      13. 3.1.13 Social norming
      14. 3.1.14 Interim conclusion
      1. 3.2.1 Investor decision making process and consumer biases
      2. 3.2.2 Interim conclusion
      3. 3.2.3 Behavioral corporate finance and managerial biases
      4. 3.2.4 Interim conclusion
      5. 3.2.5 Behavioral biases, financial literacy and demographic variables
      1. 3.3.1 How attention and presentation impact information processing and memory retention
      2. 3.3.2 The impact of omission bias on decision making, social norms and procyclical behavior
      3. 3.3.3 How ideological dimensions may shape financial regulation
      4. 3.3.4 Interim conclusion
      1. 3.4.1 Diversification and the value of financial intermediation
      2. 3.4.2 Regulation of investors? Balancing investor protection and diversification in regulatory frameworks
      3. 3.4.3 Negative implications of the fix-it-fallacy on social policymaking
      4. 3.4.4 Exploring the role of regulatory ideologies in shaping economic public policy
      5. 3.4.5 Advancing policy instruments research: Addressing key gaps and enhancing public policy outcomes on the crossroads of behavioral finance and neuroscience
      6. 3.4.6 Interim conclusion
      1. 3.5.1 Considerations when applying behavioral economic findings in real-world situations and policymaking
      2. 3.5.2 Who does banking regulation protect?
      3. 3.5.3 Case study 1
      4. 3.5.4 Case study 2
      5. 3.5.5 Case study 3
      6. 3.5.6 Interim conclusions
  4. Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. 4.1.1 Types of blockchains
      2. 4.1.2 The decentralization promise of DeFi
      3. 4.1.3 DeFi architecture
      4. 4.1.4 Decentralization shams and other supervisory challenges
      5. 4.1.5 Interim conclusion
        1. 4.2.1.1 Evolution of the theory of the firm, social economy organizations and decentralized autonomous organizations
        2. 4.2.1.2 Public policy goals of MiCAR and classification of crypto assets
        3. 4.2.1.3 Interim conclusion
        1. 4.2.2.1 Traditional regulated markets
        2. 4.2.2.2 Trust in intermediating technology platforms
        3. 4.2.2.3 Lateral exchange markets in the form of blockchain-based decentralized exchanges (DEX)
        4. 4.2.2.4 DLT Pilot Regime
        5. 4.2.2.5 Interim conclusion
      3. 4.2.3 Crowdfunding Services & emerging markets of DeFi lending
      4. 4.2.4 Decentralized derivatives – a growing trend in the DeFi ecosystem
      5. 4.2.5 DeFi portfolio management and investment schemes
      6. 4.2.6 The role of crypto asset mixers as privacy enhancing protocols and financial intermediaries
      7. 4.2.7 DORA – digital operational resilience
      8. 4.2.8 Global financial regulation?
      1. 4.3.1 Perceived risk and uncertainty in decision research and implications for public policy and behavioral finance
      2. 4.3.2 Choice architecture, framing effects, and default options in DeFi policy
      3. 4.3.3 Potential for herding and mass contagion in AI-driven investment decisions
      4. 4.3.4 The role of behavioral economics in public policy and its challenges
      1. 4.4.1 Decentralized organizations, tokenization as well as centralized and decentralized market infrastructures under the EU digital finance package
      2. 4.4.2 DeFi lending, derivatives, portfolios and privacy enhancing protocols
      3. 4.4.3 Additional EU digital finance packages
      4. 4.4.4 Behavioral finance and regulatory public policy implications
  5. Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. 5.1 Interpretation and classification of the results
    2. 5.2 Implications in practice
    3. 5.3 Implications in theory and research
    4. 5.4 Limitations and future research
    5. 5.5 Conclusion
  6. 6 List of sources 205 - 227 Download Kapitel (PDF)

Literaturverzeichnis (351)

  1. Adato, M., Carter, M. R., & May, J. (2006). Exploring poverty traps and social exclusion in South Africa using qualitative and quantitative data. The Journal of Development Studies, 42(2), 226-247. Google Scholar öffnen
  2. Aikman, D., Galesic, M., Gigerenzer, G., Kapadia, S., Katsikopoulos, K., Kothiyal, A., Murphy, E. & Neumann, T. (2021). Taking uncertainty seriously: simplicity versus complexity in financial regulation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 30(2), 317-345. Google Scholar öffnen
  3. Akerlof, G. A., & Dickens, W. T. (1982). The economic consequences of cognitive dissonance. The American economic review, 72(3), 307-319. Google Scholar öffnen
  4. Akerlof, G. A., & Shiller, R. J. (2009). Animal spirits: How human psychology drives the economy, and why it matters for global capitalism. Princeton university press. Google Scholar öffnen
  5. Al-mansour, B. Y. (2020). Cryptocurrency market: Behavioral finance perspective. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(12), 159-168. Google Scholar öffnen
  6. Al-mansour, B. Y., & Arabyat, Y. A. (2017). Investment decision making among Gulf investors: behavioural finance perspective. International Journal of Management Studies, 24(1), 41-71. Google Scholar öffnen
  7. Altman, M. (2012). Implications of behavioural economics for financial literacy and public policy. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 41(5), 677-690. Google Scholar öffnen
  8. Anson, C. M., Schwegler, R. A. (2000). The Longman Handbook for Writers and Readers, . Google Scholar öffnen
  9. Arner, D. W., & Taylor, M. W. (2009). The Global Financial Crisis and the Financial Stability Board: Hardening the Soft Law of International Financial Regulation?. University of New South Wales Law Journal, The, 32(2), 488-513. Google Scholar öffnen
  10. Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D., Akert, R. M., & Sommers, S. R. (2020). Social psychology. Pearson Higher Ed. Google Scholar öffnen
  11. Ashraf, N., Camerer, C. F., & Loewenstein, G. (2005). Adam Smith, behavioral economist. Journal of economic perspectives, 19(3), 131-145. Google Scholar öffnen
  12. Ateş, S., Coşkun, A., Şahin, M. A., & Demircan, M. L. (2016). Impact of Financial Literacy on the Behavioral Biases of Individual Stock Investors: Evidence from Borsa Istanbul. Business & Economics Research Journal, 7(3). Google Scholar öffnen
  13. Baker, H. K., & Nofsinger, J. R. (2002). Psychological biases of investors. Financial services review, 11(2), 97-116. Google Scholar öffnen
  14. Baker, H. K., Kumar, S., Goyal, N., & Gaur, V. (2019). How financial literacy and demographic variables relate to behavioral biases. Managerial Finance, 45(1), 124-146. Google Scholar öffnen
  15. Banerjee, A. V. (1992). A simple model of herd behavior. The quarterly journal of economics, 107(3), 797-817. Google Scholar öffnen
  16. Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2001a). Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. The quarterly journal of economics, 116(1), 261-292. Google Scholar öffnen
  17. Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2001b). The internet and the investor. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(1), 41-54. Google Scholar öffnen
  18. Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2002). Online investors: do the slow die first?. The Review of financial studies, 15(2), 455-488. Google Scholar öffnen
  19. Barberis, N., & Huang, M. (2001). Mental accounting, loss aversion, and individual stock returns. the Journal of Finance, 56(4), 1247-1292. Google Scholar öffnen
  20. Barberis, N., Thaler, R. (2003). A survey of behavioral finance. G. Constantinides, M. Harris, R. Stulz, eds. Handbook of the Economics of Finance, 1052-1121. Google Scholar öffnen
  21. Barros, L. A., & Di Miceli da Silveira, A. (2007). Overconfidence, managerial optimism and the determinants of capital structure. Available at SSRN 953273. Google Scholar öffnen
  22. Bauer, R. A. (1960). Consumer Behavior as risk taking in RS Hancock (Ed.) Dynamic marketing for a changing world (pp. 389-398). Chicago: American Marketing Association. Google Scholar öffnen
  23. Beck, A.T., Prisoners of Hate: The Cognitive Basis of Anger, Hostility, and Violence. HarperCollins, New York, 1999. Google Scholar öffnen
  24. Becker, M. (2012). Hinweise zur Anfertigung eines Literatur-Reviews. Leipzig: Universität Leipzig. Google Scholar öffnen
  25. Béland, D., & Howlett, M. (2016). How solutions chase problems: Instrument constituencies in the policy process. Governance, 29(3), 393-409. Google Scholar öffnen
  26. Belk, R. (2014a). Sharing versus pseudo-sharing in Web 2.0. The anthropologist, 18(1), 7-23. Google Scholar öffnen
  27. Belk, R. (2014b). You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online. Journal of business research, 67(8), 1595-1600. Google Scholar öffnen
  28. Belsky, G., & Gilovich, T. (2010). Why smart people make big money mistakes and how to correct them: Lessons from the life-changing science of behavioral economics. Simon and Schuster. Google Scholar öffnen
  29. Benartzi, S. (2001). Excessive extrapolation and the allocation of 401 (k) accounts to company stock. The Journal of Finance, 56(5), 1747-1764. Google Scholar öffnen
  30. Benartzi, S., & Thaler, R. H. (1995). Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle. The quarterly journal of Economics, 110(1), 73-92. Google Scholar öffnen
  31. Berentsen, A., & Schär, F. (2018). A short introduction to the world of cryptocurrencies. FRB of St. Louis Working Review. Google Scholar öffnen
  32. Berentsen, A., & Schär, F. (2019). Stablecoins: The quest for a low-volatility cryptocurrency. The economics of Fintech and digital currencies, 65-75. Google Scholar öffnen
  33. Bergt, J. (2020). Token als Wertrechte und Token Offerings und dezentrale Handelsplätze: Eine wertpapierzivilrechtliche und wertpapieraufsichtsrechtliche Analyse aus der Perspektive Liechtensteins unter besonderer Berücksichtigung einschlägiger Unionsrechtsakte (Vol. 1). BoD–Books on Demand. Google Scholar öffnen
  34. *also published under the following translations Google Scholar öffnen
  35. Bergt, J. (2020). Les Tokens comme Droits de Valeur & Offres de Tokens et Centres Commerciaux Décentralisés: Une analyse du droit civil des valeurs mobilières et du droit de la surveillance des valeurs mobilières du point de vue du Liechtenstein, avec une référence particulière aux actes pertinents de l'Union (Vol. 1). BoD–Books on Demand. Google Scholar öffnen
  36. Bergt, J. (2020). Token als Waarderechten & Tokenanbiedingen en Gedecentraliseerde Handelscentra: Een analyse van het burgerlijk effectenrecht en het recht inzake effectentoezicht vanuit het oogpunt van Liechtenstein, met bijzondere aandacht voor de desbetreffende besluiten van de Unie (Vol. 1). BoD–Books on Demand. Google Scholar öffnen
  37. Bergt, J. (2020). Token als Wertrechte und Token Offerings und dezentrale Handelsplätze: Eine wertpapierzivilrechtliche und wertpapieraufsichtsrechtliche Analyse aus der Perspektive Liechtensteins unter besonderer Berücksichtigung einschlägiger Unionsrechtsakte (Vol. 1). BoD–Books on Demand. Google Scholar öffnen
  38. Bergt, J. (2020). Token as Value Rights & Token Offerings and decentralized Trading Venues (Japanese): An analysis of securities civil law and securities supervision law from the perspective of Liechtenstein, with particular reference to relevant Union acts (Vol. 1). BoD–Books on Demand. Google Scholar öffnen
  39. Bergt, J. (2020). Token as value rights & Token offerings and decentralized trading venues (English): An analysis of securities civil law and securities supervision law from the perspective of Liechtenstein, with particular reference to relevant Union acts (Vol. 1). BoD–Books on Demand, ISBN 9783751937962. Google Scholar öffnen
  40. Bergt, J. (2020). Token as Value Rights & Token Offerings and decentralized Trading Venues (Russian): An analysis of securities civil law and securities supervision law from the perspective of Liechtenstein, with particular reference to relevant Union acts (Vol. 1). BoD–Books on Demand, ISBN 9783751935968. Google Scholar öffnen
  41. Bergt, J. (2020). Token as Value Rights & Token Offerings and decentralized Trading Venues (Chinese simplified): An analysis of securities civil law and securities supervision law from the perspective of Liechtenstein, with particular reference to relevant Union acts (Vol. 1). BoD–Books on Demand. Google Scholar öffnen
  42. Bergt, J. (2020). Token come Diritti di Valore &Offerte a Token e Centri Commerciali Decentralizzati: Un'analisi del diritto civile dei titoli e del diritto di vigilanza sui titoli dal punto di vista del Liechtenstein, con particolare rifer-imento ai pertinenti atti dell'Unione europea (Vol. 1). BoD–Books on Demand. Google Scholar öffnen
  43. Bergt, J. (2020). Token como Derechos de Valor & Ofertas de Token y Centros de Comercio Descentralizados: Un análisis del derecho civil de valores y la legislación de su-pervisión de valores desde la perspectiva de Liechtenstein, con especial referencia a los actos pertinentes de la Unión (Vol. 1). BoD–Books on Demand. Google Scholar öffnen
  44. Bergt, J. (2020). Token como Direitos de Valor & Token Offerings e Centros Comerciais Descentralizados: Uma análise do direito civil e do direito de supervisão dos valores mobiliários na perspectiva do Liechtenstein, com especial referência aos actos relevantes da União (Vol. 1). BoD–Books on Demand. Google Scholar öffnen
  45. Bergt, J. (2020). Tokenowe Prawa do Wartosci & Oferty Tokenowe i Zdecentralizowane Centra Handlowe: Analiza prawa cywilnego w zakresie papierów wartosciowych i prawa nadzoru nad papierami wartosciowymi z perspektywy Liechtensteinu, ze szczegolnym uwzglednieniem odpowiednich aktow Unii (Vol. 1). BoD–Books on Demand. Google Scholar öffnen
  46. Bergt, J. (2021a). Trust in Blockchain-Technology in a Sharing Economy. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16079.56480/6. Google Scholar öffnen
  47. Bergt, J. (2021b). Token als Wertrechte - Podium Recht. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11046.40000/2. Google Scholar öffnen
  48. Bergt, J., Esneault, A., Feldkircher, T., & Nägele, T. (2019). National legal & regulatory frameworks in select European countries. Country Analysis Liechtenstein in The Regulation of Tokens in Europe Parts A & B: The EU legal and regulatory framework, 117. Google Scholar öffnen
  49. Beyer, S., & Bowden, E. M. (1997). Gender differences in seff-perceptions: Convergent evidence from three measures of accuracy and bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(2), 157-172. Google Scholar öffnen
  50. Bhandari, G., & Deaves, R. (2006). The demographics of overconfidence. The Journal of Behavioral Finance, 7(1), 5-11. Google Scholar öffnen
  51. Bhargava, S., & Loewenstein, G. (2015). Behavioral economics and public policy 102: Beyond nudging. American Economic Review, 105(5), 396-401. Google Scholar öffnen
  52. Biela, J., Kaiser, A., & Hennl, A. (2013). Policy Making in Multilevel Systems: Federalism, Decentralisation, and performance in the OECD countries. ECPR Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  53. Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., & Welch, I. (1992). A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. Journal of political Economy, 100(5), 992-1026. Google Scholar öffnen
  54. Bilgehan, T. (2014). Psychological biases and the capital structure decisions: a literature review. Theoretical & Applied Economics, 21(12). Google Scholar öffnen
  55. Blank, H., & Launay, C. (2014). How to protect eyewitness memory against the misinformation effect: A meta-analysis of post-warning studies. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 3, 77–88. Google Scholar öffnen
  56. Blau, P. (2017). Exchange and power in social life. Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
  57. Böhme, R., Christin, N., Edelman, B., & Moore, T. (2015). Bitcoin: Economics, technology, and governance. Journal of economic Perspectives, 29(2), 213-238. Google Scholar öffnen
  58. Boissay, F., & Collard, F. (2016). Macroeconomics of bank capital and liquidity regulations. Google Scholar öffnen
  59. Boissay, F., Collard, F., & Smets, F. (2016). Booms and banking crises. Journal of Political Economy, 124(2), 489-538. Google Scholar öffnen
  60. Bolleyer, N., & Börzel, T. A. (2010). Non-hierarchical policy coordination in multilevel systems. European Political Science Review, 2(2), 157-185. Google Scholar öffnen
  61. Borrás, S., & Edquist, C. (2013). The choice of innovation policy instruments. Technological forecasting and social change, 80(8), 1513-1522. Google Scholar öffnen
  62. Borzaga, C., & Tortia, E. (2008). Social economy organisations in the theory of the firm. Google Scholar öffnen
  63. Brenner, L. A., Koehler, D. J., & Tversky, A. (1996). On the evaluation of one‐sided evidence. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 9(1), 59-70. Google Scholar öffnen
  64. Bressers, H., & Klok, P. J. (1988). Fundamentals for a theory of policy instruments. International journal of social economics. Google Scholar öffnen
  65. Brewer, M. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological bulletin, 86(2), 307. Google Scholar öffnen
  66. Brunnermeier, M. K., & Sannikov, Y. (2014). A macroeconomic model with a financial sector. American Economic Review, 104(2), 379-421. Google Scholar öffnen
  67. Buterin, V. (2018). https://twitter.com/VitalikButerin/status/1051160932699770882?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw. Google Scholar öffnen
  68. Camerer, C. F. (2003). Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton university press. Google Scholar öffnen
  69. Camerer, C., Issacharoff, S., Loewenstein, G., O'donoghue, T., & Rabin, M. (2003). Regulation for conservatives: behavioral economics and the case for" asymmetric paternalism". University of Pennsylvania law review, 151(3), 1211-1254. Google Scholar öffnen
  70. Cameron, L., & Shah, M. (2015). Risk-taking behavior in the wake of natural disasters. Journal of human resources, 50(2), 484-515. Google Scholar öffnen
  71. Campbell, H. E., Johnson, R. M., & Larson, E. H. (2004). Prices, devices, people, or rules: the relative effectiveness of policy instruments in water conservation 1. Review of policy research, 21(5), 637-662. Google Scholar öffnen
  72. Capano, G., & Howlett, M. (2020). The knowns and unknowns of policy instrument analysis: Policy tools and the current research agenda on policy mixes. Sage Open, 10(1), 2158244019900568. Google Scholar öffnen
  73. Capano, G., Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (Eds.). (2015). Varieties of governance: Dynamics, strategies, capacities. Springer. Google Scholar öffnen
  74. Caplan, B. (2001). Rational ignorance versus rational irrationality. Kyklos, 54(1), 3-26. Google Scholar öffnen
  75. Cassar, A., & Wydick, B. (2010). Does social capital matter? Evidence from a five-country group lending experiment. Oxford Economic Papers, 62(4), 715-739. Google Scholar öffnen
  76. Cassar, A., Crowley, L., & Wydick, B. (2007). The effect of social capital on group loan repayment: evidence from field experiments. The Economic Journal, 117(517), F85-F106. Google Scholar öffnen
  77. Chantarat, S., & Barrett, C. B. (2012). Social network capital, economic mobility and poverty traps. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 10, 299-342. Google Scholar öffnen
  78. Chetty, R. (2015). Behavioral economics and public policy: A pragmatic perspective. American Economic Review, 105(5), 1-33. Google Scholar öffnen
  79. Chohan, U. W. (2017). The decentralized autonomous organization and governance issues. Available at SSRN 3082055. Google Scholar öffnen
  80. Christensen, Clayton M. (1997). The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  81. Cifuentes, R., Ferrucci, G., & Shin, H. S. (2005). Liquidity risk and contagion. Journal of the European Economic association, 3(2-3), 556-566. Google Scholar öffnen
  82. Coase, R. H. (1991). The nature of the firm (1937). The nature of the firm, 18-33. Google Scholar öffnen
  83. Comer, J. M., Plank, R. E., Reid, D. A., & Pullins, E. B. (1999). Methods in sales research: perceived trust in business-to-business sales: a new measure. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 19(3), 61-71. Google Scholar öffnen
  84. Cooper, H. M. (1988). Organizing knowledge syntheses: A taxonomy of literature reviews. Knowledge in society, 1(1), 104-126. Google Scholar öffnen
  85. Corbitt, B. J., Thanasankit, T., & Yi, H. (2003). Trust and e-commerce: a study of consumer perceptions. Electronic commerce research and applications, 2(3), 203-215. Google Scholar öffnen
  86. Costello, J. P., & Reczek, R. W. (2020). Providers versus platforms: Marketing communications in the sharing economy. Journal of Marketing, 84(6), 22-38. Google Scholar öffnen
  87. Counsel of the European Union. (2022). INFORMATION NOTE. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Markets in Crypto-assets, and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937 (MiCA), incl compromise text, 13198/22, EF 293, ECOFIN 965, CODEC 1428. https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-13198-2022-INIT/en/pdf). Google Scholar öffnen
  88. Coval, J. D., & Moskowitz, T. J. (1999). Home bias at home: Local equity preference in domestic portfolios. The Journal of Finance, 54(6), 2045-2073. Google Scholar öffnen
  89. Cox, D. F., & Rich, S. U. (1964). Perceived risk and consumer decision-making—the case of telephone shopping. Journal of marketing research, 1(4), 32-39. Google Scholar öffnen
  90. Cronqvist, H., & Siegel, S. (2014). The genetics of investment biases. Journal of Financial Economics, 113(2), 215-234. Google Scholar öffnen
  91. Cummins, R. A., & Nistico, H. (2002). Maintaining life satisfaction: The role of positive cognitive bias. Journal of Happiness studies, 3(1), 37. Google Scholar öffnen
  92. D'Acunto, F., Prokopczuk, M., & Weber, M. (2015). The long shadow of Jewish persecution on financial decisions. Available at SSRN 2368073. Google Scholar öffnen
  93. Dakduk, S., Santalla-Banderali, Z., & Siqueira, J. R. (2020). Acceptance of mobile commerce in low-income consumers: evidence from an emerging economy. Heliyon, 6(11), e05451. Google Scholar öffnen
  94. Daniel, K., Hirshleifer, D., & Teoh, S. H. (2002). Investor psychology in capital markets: Evidence and policy implications. Journal of monetary economics, 49(1), 139-209. Google Scholar öffnen
  95. Dawkins, R. (1976). The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  96. De Bondt, W. F., & Thaler, R. (1985). Does the stock market overreact?. The Journal of finance, 40(3), 793-805. Google Scholar öffnen
  97. De Bondt, W. F., Muradoglu, Y. G., Shefrin, H., & Staikouras, S. K. (2008). Behavioral finance: Quo vadis?. Journal of Applied Finance (Formerly Financial Practice and Education), 18(2). Google Scholar öffnen
  98. De Bondt, W. P. (1993). Betting on trends: Intuitive forecasts of financial risk and return. International Journal of forecasting, 9(3), 355-371. Google Scholar öffnen
  99. Deaves, R., Lüders, E., & Schröder, M. (2010). The dynamics of overconfidence: Evidence from stock market forecasters. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 75(3), 402-412. Google Scholar öffnen
  100. Debreu, G. (1954). Valuation equilibrium and Pareto optimum. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 40(7), 588-592. Google Scholar öffnen
  101. Del Guercio, D. (1996). The distorting effect of the prudent-man laws on institutional equity investments. Journal of Financial Economics, 40(1), 31-62. Google Scholar öffnen
  102. Dhar, R., & Zhu, N. (2006). Up close and personal: Investor sophistication and the disposition effect. Management science, 52(5), 726-740. Google Scholar öffnen
  103. Drexler, K. E., & Miller, M. S. (1988). Incentive engineering for computational resource management. The ecology of Computation, 2, 231-266. Google Scholar öffnen
  104. Dunbar, R. I. (1993). Coevolution of neocortical size, group size and language in humans. Behavioral and brain sciences, 16(4), 681-694. Google Scholar öffnen
  105. Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (1981). Sex of researchers and sex-typed communications as determinants of sex differences in influenceability: a meta-analysis of social influence studies. Psychological Bulletin, 90(1), 1. Google Scholar öffnen
  106. Easterly, W., & Levine, R. (1997). Africa's growth tragedy: policies and ethnic divisions. The quarterly journal of economics, 1203-1250. Google Scholar öffnen
  107. Eckel, C. C., El-Gamal, M. A., & Wilson, R. K. (2009). Risk loving after the storm: A Bayesian-Network study of Hurricane Katrina evacuees. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 69(2), 110-124. Google Scholar öffnen
  108. Ecker, U. K., Lewandowsky, S., & Tang, D. T. (2010). Explicit warnings reduce but do not eliminate the continued influence of misinformation. Memory & Cognition, 38, 1087–1100. Google Scholar öffnen
  109. ECLI:AT:OGH0002:2006:0010OB00142.06Y.1017.000 Google Scholar öffnen
  110. ECLI:EU:C:2004:606 Google Scholar öffnen
  111. ECLI:EU:C:2021:249 Google Scholar öffnen
  112. ECLI:AT:OGH0002:2007:0010OB00269.06Z.0327.000 Google Scholar öffnen
  113. ECLI:AT:OGH0002:2022:0010OB00091.22X.0714.000 Google Scholar öffnen
  114. Edler, J., Cunningham, P., & Gök, A. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of innovation policy impact. Edward Elgar Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen
  115. Ehrlich, E., Grundlegung der Soziologie des Rechts. Duncker & Humblot, München, Leipzig 1913. Google Scholar öffnen
  116. Ellison, G., & Fudenberg, D. (1993). Rules of thumb for social learning. Journal of political Economy, 101(4), 612-643. Google Scholar öffnen
  117. Ellison, G., & Fudenberg, D. (1995). Word-of-mouth communication and social learning. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(1), 93-125. Google Scholar öffnen
  118. Elster, J. (1991). Envy in social life. Strategy and choice, 49-82. Google Scholar öffnen
  119. ESMA. (2019). Legal qualification of crypto-assets – survey to NCAs, Annex 1, ESMA50-157-1384, Ref. 16, 20, 23 2019, https://web.archive.org/web/20220201184635/https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/library/esma50-157-1384_annex.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
  120. European Commission. (2020). Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on Markets in Crypto-assets, and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937 including EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:f69f89bb-fe54-11ea-b44f-01aa75ed71a1.0001.02/DOC_1&format=PDF. Google Scholar öffnen
  121. Fairchild, R. (2009). Managerial overconfidence, moral hazard problems, and excessive life cycle debt sensitivity. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 6(3), 35-42. Google Scholar öffnen
  122. Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. The journal of Finance, 25(2), 383-417. Google Scholar öffnen
  123. Feldmann, M. (2021). Hans Kelsens Soziologieverständnis in den 1920er Jahren: Auch eine Geschichte einer Hinwendung?. Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie, 41(2), 316-337. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfrs-2021-0015 Google Scholar öffnen
  124. Fernandes, D., Lynch Jr, J. G., & Netemeyer, R. G. (2014). Financial literacy, financial education, and downstream financial behaviors. Management science, 60(8), 1861-1883. Google Scholar öffnen
  125. Filbeck, G., Ricciardi, V., Evensky, H. R., Fan, S. Z., Holzhauer, H. M., & Spieler, A. (2017). Behavioral finance: A panel discussion. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 15, 52-58. Google Scholar öffnen
  126. Foster, A. D., & Rosenzweig, M. R. (1995). Learning by doing and learning from others: Human capital and technical change in agriculture. Journal of political Economy, 103(6), 1176-1209. Google Scholar öffnen
  127. Francis, B. B., Hasan, I., Wu, Q., & Yan, M. (2014). Are female CFOs less tax aggressive? Evidence from tax aggressiveness. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 36(2), 171-202. Google Scholar öffnen
  128. French, K. R., & Poterba, J. M. (1991). Investor diversification and international equity markets. Google Scholar öffnen
  129. Frey, B. (1997). Not Just for the Money: An Economic Theory of Personal Motivation. Cheltenham: Elgar. Google Scholar öffnen
  130. Friedman, B. M. (2010). Is our financial system serving us well?. Daedalus, 139(4), 9-21. Google Scholar öffnen
  131. Friedman, M. (1953). The methodology of positive economics. Google Scholar öffnen
  132. Friedman, M. (1975). An economist's protest. T. Horton. Google Scholar öffnen
  133. Frydman, C., & Camerer, C. F. (2016). The psychology and neuroscience of financial decision making. Trends in cognitive sciences, 20(9), 661-675. Google Scholar öffnen
  134. Garcia, M. J. R. (2013). Financial education and behavioral finance: new insights into the role of information in financial decisions. Journal of economic surveys, 27(2), 297-315. Google Scholar öffnen
  135. Gärling, T., Kirchler, E., Lewis, A., & Van Raaij, F. (2009). Psychology, financial decision making, and financial crises. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 10(1), 1-47. Google Scholar öffnen
  136. Gefen, D. (2000). E-commerce: the role of familiarity and trust. Omega, 28(6), 725-737. Google Scholar öffnen
  137. Gefen, D., & Straub, D. W. (2004). Consumer trust in B2C e-Commerce and the importance of social presence: experiments in e-Products and e-Services. Omega, 32(6), 407-424. Google Scholar öffnen
  138. Gertler, M., & Kiyotaki, N. (2015). Banking, liquidity, and bank runs in an infinite horizon economy. American Economic Review, 105(7), 2011-2043. Google Scholar öffnen
  139. Gertler, M., Kiyotaki, N., & Prestipino, A. (2016). Wholesale banking and bank runs in macroeconomic modeling of financial crises. In Handbook of macroeconomics (Vol. 2, pp. 1345-1425). Elsevier. Google Scholar öffnen
  140. Gertler, M., Kiyotaki, N., & Queralto, A. (2012). Financial crises, bank risk exposure and government financial policy. Journal of monetary economics, 59, S17-S34. Google Scholar öffnen
  141. Giese, J., Nelson, B., Tanaka, M., & Tarashev, N. (2013). How could macroprudential policy affect financial system resilience and credit? Lessons from the literature. SSRN. Google Scholar öffnen
  142. Giglio, S., Maggiori, M., Stroebel, J., & Utkus, S. (2021). Five facts about beliefs and portfolios. American Economic Review, 111(5), 1481-1522. Google Scholar öffnen
  143. Giné, X., Jakiela, P., Karlan, D., & Morduch, J. (2010). Microfinance games. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2(3), 60-95. Google Scholar öffnen
  144. Glaser, F. (2017). Pervasive decentralisation of digital infrastructures: a framework for blockchain enabled system and use case analysis. Google Scholar öffnen
  145. Glaser, M., Nöth, M. and Weber, M. (2004), “Behavioral finance”, in Koehler, D.J. and Harvey, N. (Eds), Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision-Making, Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ, pp. 527-546. Google Scholar öffnen
  146. Gluth, S., Sommer, T., Rieskamp, J., & Büchel, C. (2015). Effective connectivity between hippocampus and ventromedial prefrontal cortex controls preferential choices from memory. Neuron, 86(4), 1078-1090. Google Scholar öffnen
  147. Goetzmann, W. N., & Peles, N. (1997). Cognitive dissonance and mutual fund investors. Journal of financial Research, 20(2), 145-158. Google Scholar öffnen
  148. Goo, Y. J., Chen, D. H., Chang, S. H. S., & Yeh, C. F. (2010). A study of the disposition effect for individual investors in the Taiwan stock market. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 46(1), 108-119. Google Scholar öffnen
  149. Gooding, A. E. (1973). INVESTORS'EVALUATIONS OF COMMON STOCKS: PERCEPTIONS AND INFORMATION PROCESSED. The Ohio State University. Google Scholar öffnen
  150. Graham, B., Dodd, D. L. F., & Cottle, S. (1934). Security analysis (Vol. 452). New York: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar öffnen
  151. Gregory, R. L. (2001). Perceptions of knowledge. Nature, 410(6824), 21-21. Google Scholar öffnen
  152. Griffin, J. M., & Shams, A. (2020). Is Bitcoin really untethered?. The Journal of Finance, 75(4), 1913-1964. Google Scholar öffnen
  153. Grinblatt, M., & Keloharju, M. (2001). What makes investors trade?. The journal of Finance, 56(2), 589-616. Google Scholar öffnen
  154. Grosse, R. (2012). Bank regulation, governance and the crisis: a behavioral finance view. Journal of financial regulation and compliance. Google Scholar öffnen
  155. Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2006). Does culture affect economic outcomes?. Journal of Economic perspectives, 20(2), 23-48. Google Scholar öffnen
  156. Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2009). Cultural biases in economic exchange?. The quarterly journal of economics, 124(3), 1095-1131. Google Scholar öffnen
  157. Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative politics, 275-296. Google Scholar öffnen
  158. Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II. Journal of theoretical biology, 7(1), 17-52. Google Scholar öffnen
  159. Han, B. (2008). Investor sentiment and option prices. The Review of Financial Studies, 21(1), 387-414. Google Scholar öffnen
  160. Haselton, M. G., & Nettle, D. (2006). The paranoid optimist: An integrative evolutionary model of cognitive biases. Personality and social psychology Review, 10(1), 47-66. Google Scholar öffnen
  161. Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J., & Rapson, R. (1994). Emotional Contagion Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  162. Hawlitschek, F., Notheisen, B., & Teubner, T. (2018). The limits of trust-free systems: A literature review on blockchain technology and trust in the sharing economy. Electronic commerce research and applications, 29, 50-63. Google Scholar öffnen
  163. Hawlitschek, F., Teubner, T., & Gimpel, H. (2016a, January). Understanding the sharing economy--Drivers and impediments for participation in peer-to-peer rental. In 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (pp. 4782-4791). IEEE. Google Scholar öffnen
  164. Hawlitschek, F., Teubner, T., & Weinhardt, C. (2016b). Trust in the sharing economy. Die Unternehmung, 70(1), 26-44. Google Scholar öffnen
  165. Hawlitschek, F., Teubner, T., Adam, M. T. P.; Borchers, N. S., Möhlmann, M., Weinhardt, C. (2016c). Trust in the Sharing Economy: An Experimental Framework, In Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Dublin, IE, December 11-14, 2016. Google Scholar öffnen
  166. Hayek, F. A. (1945). The Use of Knowledge in Society. American Economic Review, 35(4), 520-529. Google Scholar öffnen
  167. Hayek, F. A., Law, Legislation and Liberty, Volume 1: Rules and Order. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1978. Google Scholar öffnen
  168. Heath, C., Bell, C., & Sternberg, E. (2001). Emotional selection in memes: the case of urban legends. Journal of personality and social psychology, 81(6), 1028. Google Scholar öffnen
  169. Heath, C., Huddart, S., & Lang, M. (1999). Psychological factors and stock option exercise. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(2), 601-627. Google Scholar öffnen
  170. Heffernan, S. A. (1990). A characteristics definition of financial markets. Journal of Banking & Finance, 14(2-3), 583-609. Google Scholar öffnen
  171. Herbruck, W. (1928). Forestalling, regrating and engrossing. Mich. L. Rev., 27, 365. Google Scholar öffnen
  172. Hirshleifer, D. (2008). Psychological bias as a driver of financial regulation. European financial management, 14(5), 856-874. Google Scholar öffnen
  173. Hirshleifer, D., & Teoh, S. H. (2009). The psychological attraction approach to accounting and disclosure policy. Contemporary Accounting Research, 26(4), 1067-1090. Google Scholar öffnen
  174. Hirshleifer, D., & Teoh, S. H. (2017). How psychological bias shapes accounting and financial regulation. Behavioural Public Policy, 1(1), 87-105. Google Scholar öffnen
  175. Hirshleifer, D., Peng, L., & Wang, Q. (2023). News diffusion in social networks and stock market reactions (No. w30860). National Bureau of Economic Research. Google Scholar öffnen
  176. Hirshleifer, J. (1987). On the emotions as guarantors of threats and promises. The Dark Side of the Force, 198-219. Google Scholar öffnen
  177. Hodder, L., Koonce, L., & McAnally, M. L. (2001). SEC market risk disclosures: Implications for judgment and decision making. Accounting horizons, 15(1), 49-70. Google Scholar öffnen
  178. Hoffer, E., The Ordeal of Change (New York: Harper and Row, 1963). Google Scholar öffnen
  179. Howlett, M. (2000). Managing the “hollow state”: Procedural policy instruments and modern governance. Canadian Public Administration, 43(4), 412-431. Google Scholar öffnen
  180. Howlett, M. (2019). Designing public policies: Principles and instruments. Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
  181. Huberman, G. (2001). Familiarity breeds investment. The Review of Financial Studies, 14(3), 659-680. Google Scholar öffnen
  182. Hume, D. (1739) A Treatise of Human Nature. Google Scholar öffnen
  183. International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) Research Report on Financial Technologies (Fintech). (2017). Accessed under https://www.iosco.org/library/pubdocs/pdf/IOSCOPD554.pdf on 03/01/2023. Google Scholar öffnen
  184. Ittelson, W. H., & Kilpatrick, F. P. (1951). Experiments in perception. Scientific American, 185(2), 50-56. Google Scholar öffnen
  185. Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing?. Journal of personality and social psychology, 79(6), 995. Google Scholar öffnen
  186. Jacoby, J., & Kaplan, L. B. (1972). The components of perceived risk. ACR special volumes. Google Scholar öffnen
  187. Jeanne, O., & Korinek, A. (2020). Macroprudential regulation versus mopping up after the crash. The Review of Economic Studies, 87(3), 1470-1497. Google Scholar öffnen
  188. Jones, R. W., Bizzaro, P., & Selfe, C. L. (1997). The harcourt brace guide to writing in the disciplines. Harcourt College Pub. Google Scholar öffnen
  189. Jordan, A., & Matt, E. (2014). Designing policies that intentionally stick: Policy feedback in a changing climate. Policy Sciences, 47, 227-247. Google Scholar öffnen
  190. Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. American economic review, 93(5), 1449-1475. Google Scholar öffnen
  191. Kahneman, D., & Riepe, M. W. (1998). Aspects of investor psychology. Journal of portfolio management, 24(4), 52-+. Google Scholar öffnen
  192. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 363-391. Google Scholar öffnen
  193. Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1990). Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem. Journal of political Economy, 98(6), 1325-1348. Google Scholar öffnen
  194. Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1991). Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. Journal of Economic perspectives, 5(1), 193-206. Google Scholar öffnen
  195. Kaminski, K. M., & Lo, A. W. (2014). When do stop-loss rules stop losses?. Journal of Financial Markets, 18, 234-254. Google Scholar öffnen
  196. Kamstra, M. J., Kramer, L. A., & Levi, M. D. (2003). Winter blues: A SAD stock market cycle. American economic review, 93(1), 324-343. Google Scholar öffnen
  197. Kant, I. (1900). Ausgabe der Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin 1900 et seqq. Google Scholar öffnen
  198. Kashyap, A. K., Tsomocos, D. P., & Vardoulakis, A. P. (2014). How does macroprudential regulation change bank credit supply? (No. w20165). National Bureau of Economic Research. Google Scholar öffnen
  199. Keister, T., & Bech, M. L. (2012). On the liquidity coverage ratio and monetary policy implementation. BIS Quarterly Review December. Google Scholar öffnen
  200. Kelsen, H. (2017). Reine Rechtslehre: Mit einem Anhang: Das Problem der Gerechtigkeit. (Studienausgabe der 2. Auflage 1934). Mohr Siebeck. Google Scholar öffnen
  201. Kelsen, H. (2020). Reine Rechtslehre: Einleitung in die rechtswissenschaftliche Problematik (Studienausgabe der 1. Auflage 1934). Mohr Siebeck. Google Scholar öffnen
  202. Kelsen, H., Ringhofer, K., & Walter, R. (1979). Allgemeine Theorie der Normen: im Auftrag des Hans-Kelsen-Instituts aus dem Nachlass. Manzsche Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
  203. Kim, Y. I., & Lee, J. (2012, April). Long run impact of traumatic experience on attitudes toward risk: study of korean war and its impact on risk aversion. In paper delivered at the 4th Annual Meeting on the Economics of Risky Behaviors, Bahçesehir University, Istanbul (April 2012) (Vol. 43). Google Scholar öffnen
  204. Klecatsky, H. R., Marcic, R., Schambeck, H., Kelsen, H., & Merkl, A. (1968). Die Wiener rechtstheoretische Schule. Google Scholar öffnen
  205. Klijn, E. H., Koppenjan, J., & Termeer, K. (1995). Managing networks in the public sector: a theoretical study of management strategies in policy networks. Public administration, 73(3), 437-454. Google Scholar öffnen
  206. Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit (Vol. 31). Houghton Mifflin. Google Scholar öffnen
  207. Koonce, L., McAnally, M. L., & Mercer, M. (2005). How do investors judge the risk of financial items?. The Accounting Review, 80(1), 221-241. Google Scholar öffnen
  208. Kuhnen, C. M., & Miu, A. C. (2017). Socioeconomic status and learning from financial information. Journal of Financial Economics, 124(2), 349-372. Google Scholar öffnen
  209. Kumar, A., & Dhar, R. (2001). A non-random walk down the main street: Impact of price trends on trading decisions of individual investors (No. ysm208). Yale School of Management. Google Scholar öffnen
  210. Kumar, S., & Goyal, N. (2016). Evidence on rationality and behavioural biases in investment decision making. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 8(4), 270-287. Google Scholar öffnen
  211. Kuran, T. and Sunstein, C., ‘Availability cascades and risk regulation’, Stanford Law Review, Vol. 51, 1999, pp. 683–768. Google Scholar öffnen
  212. Lacko, J., & Pappalardo, J. (2004). The Effect of Mortgage Broker Compensation on Consumers and Competition: A Controlled Experiment. Report, Federal Trade Commission. Google Scholar öffnen
  213. Lakonishok, J., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1994). Contrarian investment, extrapolation, and risk. The journal of finance, 49(5), 1541-1578. Google Scholar öffnen
  214. Lamb, S. E. (2006). How to write it: A complete guide to everything you'll ever write. Random House Digital, Inc.. Google Scholar öffnen
  215. Lancaster, K. J. (1966). A new approach to consumer theory. Journal of political economy, 74(2), 132-157. Google Scholar öffnen
  216. Lascoumes, P., & Le Galès, P. (2007). Introduction: Understanding public policy through its instruments—From the nature of instruments to the sociology of public policy instrumentation. Governance, 20(1), 1-21. Google Scholar öffnen
  217. Launch of the European Blockchain Regulatory Sandbox. (2023, February 14). Shaping Europe’s Digital Future. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/news/launch-european-blockchain-regulatory-sandbox. Google Scholar öffnen
  218. Le Galès, P. (2011). Policy instruments and governance. The SAGE handbook of governance, 142-159. Google Scholar öffnen
  219. Lei, A. Y., & Li, H. (2009). The value of stop loss strategies. Financial Services Review, 18(1), 23-51. Google Scholar öffnen
  220. Lessig, L. (2008). Remix: Making art and commerce thrive in the hybrid economy (p. 352). Bloomsbury Academic. Google Scholar öffnen
  221. Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012). Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological science in the public interest, 13(3), 106-131. Google Scholar öffnen
  222. Lin, H. W. (2011). Elucidating rational investment decisions and behavioral biases: Evidence from the Taiwanese stock market. African Journal of Business Management, 5(5), 1630. Google Scholar öffnen
  223. Lindenfors, P., Wartel, A., & Lind, J. (2021). ‘Dunbar's number’deconstructed. Biology Letters, 17(5), 20210158. Google Scholar öffnen
  224. Ling, D. C., Naranjo, A., & Scheick, B. (2014). Investor sentiment, limits to arbitrage and private market returns. Real Estate Economics, 42(3), 531-577. Google Scholar öffnen
  225. Liu, X. (2016). A literature review on the definition of corruption and factors affecting the risk of corruption. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 4(6), 171-177. Google Scholar öffnen
  226. Luhmann, N. (2018). Trust and power. John Wiley & Sons (original release 1979). Google Scholar öffnen
  227. Luu, Y. V. L., & Velner, Y. (2017). Kybernetwork: A trustless decentralized exchange and payment service. URl: https://whitepaper.io/document/43/kyber-network-whitepaper. Google Scholar öffnen
  228. Maines, L. A., & McDaniel, L. S. (2000). Effects of comprehensive‐income characteristics on nonprofessional investors' judgments: The role of financial‐statement presentation format. The accounting review, 75(2), 179-207. Google Scholar öffnen
  229. Malmendier, U., & Nagel, S. (2016). Learning from inflation experiences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(1), 53-87. Google Scholar öffnen
  230. Malmendier, U., Tate, G., & Yan, J. (2011). Overconfidence and early‐life experiences: the effect of managerial traits on corporate financial policies. The Journal of finance, 66(5), 1687-1733. Google Scholar öffnen
  231. May, P. J., Jones, B. D., Beem, B. E., Neff‐Sharum, E. A., & Poague, M. K. (2005). Policy coherence and component‐driven policymaking: Arctic policy in Canada and the United States. Policy Studies Journal, 33(1), 37-63. Google Scholar öffnen
  232. McAuley, I. (2013). Behavioural economics and public policy: Some insights. International Journal of Behavioural Accounting and Finance, 4(1), 18-31. Google Scholar öffnen
  233. McCaffery, E. J., & Baron, J. (2006). Isolation effects and the neglect of indirect effects of fiscal policies. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19(4), 289-302. Google Scholar öffnen
  234. Mehrwald, P., Treffers, T., Titze, M., & Welpe, I. M. (2019, January). Application of blockchain technology in the sharing economy: A model of trust and intermediation. In Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 4585-4594). Google Scholar öffnen
  235. Merry, S. E. (1988). Legal Pluralism. Law & Society Review, 22(5), 869. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053638 Google Scholar öffnen
  236. Miller, M. S., & Drexler, K. E. (1988). Markets and computation: Agoric open systems. The ecology of computation, 1. Google Scholar öffnen
  237. Mintzberg, H., & McHugh, A. (1985). Strategy formation in an adhocracy. Administrative science quarterly, 160-197. Google Scholar öffnen
  238. Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. The American economic review, 48(3), 261-297. Google Scholar öffnen
  239. Montier, J., & Strategy, G. E. (2002). Applied behavioural finance: Insights into irrational minds and market. New York. Wiley Finance. Google Scholar öffnen
  240. Morris, S., & Shin, H. S. (1998). Unique equilibrium in a model of self-fulfilling currency attacks. American Economic Review, 587-597. Google Scholar öffnen
  241. Morris, S., & Shin, H. S. (2001). Global games: Theory and applications. Google Scholar öffnen
  242. Nadler, M., & Schär, F. (2020). Decentralized finance, centralized ownership? an iterative mapping process to measure protocol token distribution. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.09306. Google Scholar öffnen
  243. Nadler, M., & Schär, F. (2023). Tornado Cash and Blockchain Privacy: A Primer for Economists and Policymakers. Available at SSRN 4352337. Google Scholar öffnen
  244. Nägele, T., & Bergt, J. (2018). Cryptocurrencies and Blockchain Technology in Liechtenstein Supervisory Law. Regulatory Grey Zone. Liechtensteinische Juristenzeitung (LJZ). 63. Google Scholar öffnen
  245. Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Google Scholar öffnen
  246. Noctor, M., Stoney, S., & Stradling, R. (1992). Financial literacy: a discussion of concepts and competences of financial literacy and opportunities for its introduction into young people’s learning. National Foundation for Educational Research. Google Scholar öffnen
  247. Nofsinger, J. (2002b). Investment blunders. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Financial Times Prentice Hall. Google Scholar öffnen
  248. Nofsinger, J. R. (2002a). Do optimists make the best investors. Corporate Finance Review, 6(4), 11-17. Google Scholar öffnen
  249. Odean, T. (1998). Are investors reluctant to realize their losses?. The Journal of finance, 53(5), 1775-1798. Google Scholar öffnen
  250. Olsen, R. A. (1997). Investment risk: The experts' perspective. Financial Analysts Journal, 53(2), 62-66. Google Scholar öffnen
  251. Olsen, R. A. (2007). Investors' Predisposition for Annuities: A Psychological Perspective. Journal of Financial Service Professionals, 61(5). Google Scholar öffnen
  252. Ostrom, E. (2003). How types of goods and property rights jointly affect collective action. Journal of theoretical politics, 15(3), 239-270. Google Scholar öffnen
  253. Otuteye, E., & Siddiquee, M. (2015). Overcoming cognitive biases: A heuristic for making value investing decisions. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 16(2), 140-149. Google Scholar öffnen
  254. Oved, M., & Mosites, D. (2017). Swap: A peer-to-peer protocol for trading ethereum tokens. URI: https://www.airswap.io/whitepaper.htm. Google Scholar öffnen
  255. Park, H., & Sohn, W. (2013). Behavioral Finance: A Survey of the Literature and Recent Development. Seoul Journal of Business, 19(1). Google Scholar öffnen
  256. Perotti, E. C., & Suarez, J. (2011). A Pigovian approach to liquidity regulation. Google Scholar öffnen
  257. Perren, R., & Kozinets, R. V. (2018). Lateral exchange markets: How social platforms operate in a networked economy. Journal of Marketing, 82(1), 20-36. Google Scholar öffnen
  258. Peter, J. P., & Tarpey Sr, L. X. (1975). A comparative analysis of three consumer decision strategies. Journal of consumer research, 2(1), 29-37. Google Scholar öffnen
  259. Petersen, N. (2010). Braucht die Rechtswissenschaft eine empirische Wende. Der Staat, 49, 435. Google Scholar öffnen
  260. Peterson, J., Krug, J., Zoltu, M., Williams, A. K., & Alexander, S. (2019). Augur: a decentralized oracle and prediction market platform (v2. 0). Whitepaper, https://augur. net/whitepaper. pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
  261. Pigou, A. C. (1920). The economics of welfare Macmillan and Co. London, United Kingdom. Google Scholar öffnen
  262. Pipes, D. (1999). Conspiracy: How the paranoid style flourishes and where it comes from. Simon and Schuster. Google Scholar öffnen
  263. Pompian, M. M. (2011). Behavioral finance and wealth management: how to build investment strategies that account for investor biases. John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar öffnen
  264. Presson, P. K., & Benassi, V. A. (1996). Illusion of control: A meta-analytic review. Journal of social behavior and personality, 11(3), 493. Google Scholar öffnen
  265. Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on a pilot regime for market infrastructures based on distributed ledger technology. (2020). COM/2020/594 final (Proposal DLT-Pilot-Regime), 2020/0267 (COD). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52020PC0594&from=DE). Google Scholar öffnen
  266. Prosad, J. M., Kapoor, S., & Sengupta, J. (2015). Behavioral biases of Indian investors: a survey of Delhi-NCR region. Qualitative research in financial markets. Google Scholar öffnen
  267. Prusty, N. (2017). Building blockchain projects. Packt Publishing Ltd. Google Scholar öffnen
  268. Rabin, M. (2002). Inference by believers in the law of small numbers. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(3), 775-816 Google Scholar öffnen
  269. Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 on digital operational resilience for the financial sector (DORA). (2022). ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2554/oj). Google Scholar öffnen
  270. Regulation (EU) 2022/858 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2022 on a pilot regime for market infrastructures based on distributed ledger technology, and amending Regulations (EU) No 600/2014 and (EU) No 909/2014 and Directive 2014/65/EU (Text with EEA relevance). (2022). DLT Pilot Regime. ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/858/oj. Google Scholar öffnen
  271. Renn, O. (1989). Risk perception and risk management. Google Scholar öffnen
  272. Ricciardi, V. (2004). A risk perception primer: A narrative research review of the risk perception literature in behavioral accounting and behavioral finance. Available at SSRN 566802. Google Scholar öffnen
  273. Ricciardi, V. (2005). A research starting point for the new scholar: A unique perspective of behavioral finance. Available at SSRN 685685. Google Scholar öffnen
  274. Ricciardi, V. (2008). The psychology of risk: The behavioral finance perspective. Google Scholar öffnen
  275. Ritov, I., & Baron, J. (1990). Reluctance to vaccinate: Omission bias and ambiguity. Journal of behavioral decision making, 3(4), 263-277. Google Scholar öffnen
  276. Ritter, J. R. (2003). Behavioral finance. Pacific-Basin finance journal, 11(4), 429-437. Google Scholar öffnen
  277. Rosen, L. J. (2000). Instructor's Manual for Rosen and Behrens the Allyn & Bacon Handbook Fourth Edition. Allyn and Bacon. Google Scholar öffnen
  278. Roth, J., Schär, F., & Schöpfer, A. (2021). The Tokenization of assets: using blockchains for equity crowdfunding. Theories of change: Change leadership tools, models and applications for investing in sustainable development, 329-350. Google Scholar öffnen
  279. Rousseau, J. J. (1762). Du contrat social, ou, Principes du droit politique. Google Scholar öffnen
  280. Rubin, P. H. (2002). Darwinian politics: the evolutionary origin of freedom. Rutgers University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  281. Sacchetti, S., & Sugden, R. (2003). The governance of networks and economic power: the nature and impact of subcontracting relationships. Journal of economic surveys, 17(5), 669-692. Google Scholar öffnen
  282. Sagan, C. (1996). The demon-haunted world: Science as a candle in the dark. Ballantine books. Google Scholar öffnen
  283. Sagan, C. (1996). The dragon in my garage. The demon-haunted world: Science as a candle in the dark. Also cp the excerpt under http://www.godlessgeeks.com/LINKS/Dragon.htm accessed on 02.02.2023. Google Scholar öffnen
  284. Sahi, S. K., & Arora, A. P. (2012). Individual investor biases: A segmentation analysis. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets. Google Scholar öffnen
  285. Sahi, S. K., Arora, A. P., & Dhameja, N. (2013). An exploratory inquiry into the psychological biases in financial investment behavior. Journal of behavioral finance, 14(2), 94-103. Google Scholar öffnen
  286. Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of risk and uncertainty, 1, 7-59. Google Scholar öffnen
  287. Schär, F. (2021). Decentralized finance: On blockchain-and smart contract-based financial markets. FRB of St. Louis Review. Google Scholar öffnen
  288. Schär, F. (2022). DeFi’s promise and pitfalls. FINANCE & DEVELOPMENT. Google Scholar öffnen
  289. Schmeling, M. (2009). Investor sentiment and stock returns: Some international evidence. Journal of empirical finance, 16(3), 394-408. Google Scholar öffnen
  290. Schneider, A., & Sidney, M. (2009). What is next for policy design and social construction theory? 1. Policy studies journal, 37(1), 103-119. Google Scholar öffnen
  291. Schwartz, H. (1998). Rationality Gone Awry?: decision making inconsistent with economic and financial theory (No. 330.01 SCHr). Google Scholar öffnen
  292. Schwartz, H. H. (1987). Perception, judgment, and motivation in manufacturing enterprises: findings and preliminary hypotheses from in-depth interviews. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 8(4), 543-565. Google Scholar öffnen
  293. Schwarz, N., Newman, E., & Leach, W. (2016). Making the truth stick & the myths fade: Lessons from cognitive psychology. Behavioral Science & Policy, 2(1), 85-95. Google Scholar öffnen
  294. Schwarz, N., Sanna, L. J., Skurnik, I., & Yoon, C. (2007). Metacognitive experiences and the intricacies of setting people straight: Implications for debiasing and public information campaigns. Advances in experimental social psychology, 39, 127-161. Google Scholar öffnen
  295. SEC v. W. J. Howey Co., 328 U.S. 293, 1946 Google Scholar öffnen
  296. Shadlen, M. N., & Shohamy, D. (2016). Decision making and sequential sampling from memory. Neuron, 90(5), 927-939. Google Scholar öffnen
  297. Sharma, A., & Kumar, A. (2020). A review paper on behavioral finance: study of emerging trends. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 12(2), 137-157. Google Scholar öffnen
  298. Shefrin, H. (2002). Beyond greed and fear: Understanding behavioral finance and the psychology of investing. Oxford University Press on Demand. Google Scholar öffnen
  299. Shefrin, H., & Statman, M. (1985). The disposition to sell winners too early and ride losers too long: Theory and evidence. The Journal of finance, 40(3), 777-790. Google Scholar öffnen
  300. Shefrin, H., & Statman, M. (2000). Behavioral portfolio theory. Journal of financial and quantitative analysis, 35(2), 127-151. Google Scholar öffnen
  301. Shiller, R. J. (2000). Irrational exuberance princeton. Prunceton University Paper. Google Scholar öffnen
  302. Shiller, R. J. (2005). Irrational exuberance. New York: Currency. Google Scholar öffnen
  303. Shiller, R. J. (2008). The subprime solution. In The Subprime Solution. Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  304. Shiller, R. J., & Pound, J. (1989). Survey evidence on diffusion of interest and information among investors. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 12(1), 47-66. Google Scholar öffnen
  305. Shleifer, A. (2000). Inefficient markets: An introduction to behavioural finance. Oup Oxford. Google Scholar öffnen
  306. Simon, H. A. (1957). A behavioral model of rational choice. Models of man, social and rational: Mathematical essays on rational human behavior in a social setting, 241-260. Google Scholar öffnen
  307. Simon, H. A. (1987). Behavioral economics. The new Palgrave: A dictionary of economics, 1, 221-24. Google Scholar öffnen
  308. Simon, H. A. (1978). Rationality as a process and as a product of thought. American Economic Review 70, 1–16. Google Scholar öffnen
  309. Sitkin, S. B., & Weingart, L. R. (1995). Determinants of risky decision-making behavior: A test of the mediating role of risk perceptions and propensity. Academy of management Journal, 38(6), 1573-1592. Google Scholar öffnen
  310. Sjöberg, L., & Engelberg, E. (2009). Attitudes to economic risk taking, sensation seeking and values of business students specializing in finance. The Journal of Behavioral Finance, 10(1), 33-43. Google Scholar öffnen
  311. Slovic, P. (1988). Risk perception. Carcinogen risk assessment, 171-181. Google Scholar öffnen
  312. Slovic, P., M. Finucan, E. Peters and D. G. MacGregor (2002), The Affect Heuristic, in Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. (Eds.). (2002). Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge university press. Google Scholar öffnen
  313. Smith, A. (1759) The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Google Scholar öffnen
  314. Starmer, C. (2000). Developments in non-expected utility theory: The hunt for a descriptive theory of choice under risk. Journal of economic literature, 38(2), 332-382. Google Scholar öffnen
  315. Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (1989). Violations of the independence axion in common ratio problems: An experimental test of some competing hypotheses. Annals of Operations Research, 19(1), 79-102. Google Scholar öffnen
  316. Statman, M. (1995, December). Behavioral finance versus standard finance. In AIMR conference Proceedings (Vol. 7, pp. 14-22). Google Scholar öffnen
  317. Stern, T. (2021). Unionsrechtliche Ziele und Instrumente der Bankenaufsicht. Zeitschrift für Finanzmarktrecht (ZFR), 10, 480-486. Google Scholar öffnen
  318. Stern, T. (2022). Schutzzweck des SPG: Anmerkungen zu OGH 05 CG.2017.107 LES 2020 156. Liechtensteinische Juristenzeitung (LJZ), 04, 279-281. Google Scholar öffnen
  319. Stiglitz, J. E. (1989). Using tax policy to curb speculative short-term trading. Regulatory Reform of Stock and Futures Markets: A Special Issue of the Journal of Financial Services Research, 3-17. Google Scholar öffnen
  320. Stone, R. N., & Grønhaug, K. (1993). Perceived risk: Further considerations for the marketing discipline. European Journal of marketing, 27(3), 39-50. Google Scholar öffnen
  321. Strader, T. J., & Ramaswami, S. N. (2002). The value of seller trustworthiness in C2C online markets. Communications of the ACM, 45(12), 45-49. Google Scholar öffnen
  322. Suchman, M. C., & Mertz, E. (2010). Toward a new legal empiricism: empirical legal studies and new legal realism. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 6, 555-579. Google Scholar öffnen
  323. Sugden, R., & Wilson, J. R. (2002). Economic development in the shadow of the consensus: a strategic decision‐making approach. Contributions to political economy, 21(1), 111-134. Google Scholar öffnen
  324. Summers, L. H., & Summers, V. P. (1989). When financial markets work too well: A cautious case for a securities transactions tax. Journal of financial services research, 3, 261-286. Google Scholar öffnen
  325. Sunstein, C. R., & Thaler, R. H. (2003). Libertarian paternalism is not an oxymoron. The University of Chicago law review, 1159-1202. Google Scholar öffnen
  326. Szabo, N. (1994). Smart contracts. URI: https://web.archive.org/web/20011102030833/http://szabo.best.vwh.net/smart.contracts.html. Google Scholar öffnen
  327. Takeda, K., Takemura, T., & Kozu, T. (2013). Investment literacy and individual investor biases: survey evidence in the Japanese stock market. The Review of Socionetwork Strategies, 7, 31-42. Google Scholar öffnen
  328. Taleb, N. N. (2007). The black swan: The impact of the highly improbable (Vol. 2). Random house. Google Scholar öffnen
  329. Taylor, D. M., & Doria, J. R. (1981). Self-serving and group-serving bias in attribution. The Journal of Social Psychology, 113(2), 201-211. Google Scholar öffnen
  330. Tekçe, B., Yılmaz, N., & Bildik, R. (2016). What factors affect behavioral biases? Evidence from Turkish individual stock investors. Research in International Business and Finance, 37, 515-526. Google Scholar öffnen
  331. Thaler, R. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of economic behavior & organization, 1(1), 39-60. Google Scholar öffnen
  332. Thaler, R. H. (2005). Advances in behavioral finance (Vol. 2). R. H. Thaler (Ed.). New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Google Scholar öffnen
  333. Thaler, R. H., & Johnson, E. J. (1990). Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: The effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Management science, 36(6), 643-660. Google Scholar öffnen
  334. Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2003). Libertarian paternalism. American economic review, 93(2), 175-179. Google Scholar öffnen
  335. Thaler, R.T. and Sunstein, C.R. (2008) Nudge: Important Decisions About Health, Wealth and Happiness, Yale University Press Google Scholar öffnen
  336. Thompson, K. (1984). Reflections on trusting trust. Communications of the ACM, 27(8), 761-763. Google Scholar öffnen
  337. Townsend, R. M. (1994). Risk and insurance in village India. Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society, 539-591. Google Scholar öffnen
  338. Travica, B. (1999). New organizational designs: Information aspects. Greenwood Publishing Group. Google Scholar öffnen
  339. Troyka, L. Q. (2002). Simon and Schuster Handbook for Writers with APA Updates and Companion Website Subscription. Prentice Hall. Google Scholar öffnen
  340. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive psychology, 5(2), 207-232. Google Scholar öffnen
  341. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases: Biases in judgments reveal some heuristics of thinking under uncertainty. science, 185(4157), 1124-1131. Google Scholar öffnen
  342. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and uncertainty, 5, 297-323. Google Scholar öffnen
  343. Tversky, A., & Shafir, E. (1992). Choice under conflict: The dynamics of deferred decision. Psychological science, 3(6), 358-361. Google Scholar öffnen
  344. Ullah, Z., Jamil, M., Qamar, E. U., & Waheed, U. (2012). Manager's risk taking behaviour for adjusting capital structure. World Applied Sciences Journal, 20(11), 1478-1483. Google Scholar öffnen
  345. Voß, J. P., & Simons, A. (2014). Instrument constituencies and the supply side of policy innovation: The social life of emissions trading. Environmental Politics, 23(5), 735-754. Google Scholar öffnen
  346. Warren, W., & Bandeali, A. (2017). 0x: An open protocol for decentralized exchange on the Ethereum blockchain. URl: https://0x.org/pdfs/0x_white_paper.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
  347. Waymire, G. B., & Basu, S. (2008). Accounting is an evolved economic institution. Foundations and Trends® in Accounting, 2(1–2), 1-174. Google Scholar öffnen
  348. Weber, E. U. (2004). Perception matters: Psychophysics for economists. The psychology of economic decisions, 2(163-176), 14-41. Google Scholar öffnen
  349. Williams, G. (2007). Some determinants of the socially responsible investment decision: A cross-country study. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 8(1), 43-57. Google Scholar öffnen
  350. Wilson, R. S., Arvai, J. L., & Arkes, H. R. (2006). Evaluating my own and others’ gains and losses: extensions of prospect theory’. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. Google Scholar öffnen
  351. Zak, P. J., & Knack, S. (2001). Trust and growth. The economic journal, 111(470), 295-321. Google Scholar öffnen

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus dem Schwerpunkt "Europarecht & Internationales Recht & Rechtsvergleichung"
Cover des Buchs: Der Volkseinwand
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Florian Feigl
Der Volkseinwand
Cover des Buchs: Wie fördert die EU Menschenrechte in Drittstaaten?
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Dennis Traudt
Wie fördert die EU Menschenrechte in Drittstaaten?
Cover des Buchs: Future-Proofing in Public Law
Sammelband Kein Zugriff
Nicole Koblenz LL.M., Nicholas Otto, Gernot Sydow
Future-Proofing in Public Law
Cover des Buchs: Das Weltraumrecht und seine Eignung für den Rohstoffabbau durch Privatakteure
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Justus Schmidt
Das Weltraumrecht und seine Eignung für den Rohstoffabbau durch Privatakteure
Cover des Buchs: From Outlaws to Equal Players – Rebel Courts in International Law
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Isabella Poewe
From Outlaws to Equal Players – Rebel Courts in International Law

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Feedback geben

Wir freuen uns über Ihr Feedback zu Inhalten und Funktionen. Ihre Nachricht hilft uns, unseren Service stetig zu verbessern.

Bewertung
Bild anhängen
oder hier ablegen
PNG oder JPG (max. 3 MB)

Anmelden

Passwort vergessen?
Login via Open Athens
Noch kein Benutzerkonto?
Jetzt registrieren

Publikation zitieren

Download: RIS BibTex