Cover des Buchs: MFN Standard as Substantive Treatment
Im Shop erwerben
, um zu prüfen, ob Sie einen Vollzugriff auf diese Publikation haben.
Monographie Kein Zugriff

MFN Standard as Substantive Treatment

Autor:innen:
Verlag:
 2019

Zusammenfassung

Das Meistbegünstigungsprinzip (engl. „Most favoured nation“, MFN) ist ein integraler Bestandteil praktisch aller heutigen Investitionssysteme. MFN-Klauseln in internationalen Investitionsabkommen signalisieren Anlegern staatlichen Schutz vor Diskriminierung. Ihre Durchsetzung in der Praxis ist nicht immer unproblematisch.

Das Buch stellt die Funktionsweisen der Meistbegünstigung als Standard des internationalen Investitionsrechts umfassend dar. Ausgehend der Entwicklung des Konzepts im internationalen Recht, bietet die Autorin einen Überblick über die bestehenden staatlichen Praktiken bei der Aushandlung der MFN-Klauseln in bilateralen und internationalen Investitionsverträgen. Schließlich analysiert die Arbeit MFN-Klauseln auf ihr Potenzial hin, Diskriminierung zu verhindern und den „Import“ von materiellen Schutzrechten in internationalen staatlichen Schiedsverfahren für Investoren zu ermöglichen.

Schlagworte

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Copyrightjahr
2019
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-5740-4
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-9902-0
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe
Studien zum Internationalen Investitionsrecht
Band
30
Sprache
Englisch
Seiten
238
Produkttyp
Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Kein Zugriff 1 - 12
  2. Abbreviations Kein Zugriff 13 - 14
    1. 1. Subject of study Kein Zugriff
    2. 2. Methodology Kein Zugriff
    3. 3. Substance and structure Kein Zugriff
  4. Chapter I. The Concept of MFN Treatment Kein Zugriff 19 - 26
    1. Part 1. The Emergence of the Term ‘Most Favoured Nation’ and its Early Development Kein Zugriff
      1. 2.1. Developments During the Interwar Period Kein Zugriff
        1. (i) The Rise of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation Treaties and Bilateral Investment Treaties Kein Zugriff
        2. (ii) The Emergence of Multilateral Arrangements in the Field of International Trade and Investment Kein Zugriff
        3. (iii) The Growth of International Arbitration Kein Zugriff
      3. 2.3. Developments from 1980 to 2000 Kein Zugriff
      1. 3.1. MFN Treatment Standard in International Law Kein Zugriff
      2. 3.2. MFN Treatment Standard in International Investment Arbitration Kein Zugriff
      3. 3.3. Investment Treaty Practice Relating to MFN Treatment Kein Zugriff
    4. Part 4. Work of International Organisations to Codify MFN Standard Practice Kein Zugriff
    1. Part 1. The Subjective Scope of MFN Treatment Clauses (ratione personae) Kein Zugriff
      1. 2.1. Pre- and Post-establishment Models Kein Zugriff
      2. 2.2. ‘Favourable’ Treatment Kein Zugriff
      3. 2.3. The Relativity of MFN Treatment Standard Kein Zugriff
    3. Part 3. MFN Treatment and Time (ratione temporis) Kein Zugriff
      1. 4.1. National Treatment Standard Kein Zugriff
      2. 4.2. Expropriation Specific Provisions Kein Zugriff
      3. 4.3. Compensation for Losses Kein Zugriff
      4. 4.4. Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard Kein Zugriff
      5. 4.5. Full Protection and Security Kein Zugriff
      6. 4.6. Dispute Resolution Provisions Kein Zugriff
      1. 5.1. General Exceptions Kein Zugriff
      2. 5.2. Industry or Matter Specific Exceptions Kein Zugriff
      3. 5.3. REIO Exceptions Kein Zugriff
    6. Part 6. MFN Clauses in Multilateral Agreements Relating to Investments Kein Zugriff
          1. a. Ordinary Meaning Kein Zugriff
          2. b. Contextual Interpretation Kein Zugriff
          3. c. Object and Purpose Kein Zugriff
          1. a. Travaux Préparatoires Kein Zugriff
          2. b. Interpretative Statements Kein Zugriff
          3. c. Other Materials Kein Zugriff
        1. (i) Reliance on Treaty Practice to Interpret the BIT Parties’ Intent Kein Zugriff
          1. a. The Expressio Unius Est Exclusio Alterius Rule Kein Zugriff
          2. b. The Ejusdem Generis Rule Kein Zugriff
        3. (iii) Effective Interpretation Kein Zugriff
      3. 1.3. Relevance of Prior Arbitral Precedents Kein Zugriff
      1. 2.1. ‘Investor’ or ‘Investment’ Protected by an MFN Clause Kein Zugriff
          1. a. Expanding the Scope of MFN Treatment Kein Zugriff
          2. b. ‘Import’ of Substantive Rights not Envisoned by the Text of BIT Kein Zugriff
          3. c. Use of an MFN Clause to Overcome Limitations in the Text of the BIT Kein Zugriff
          4. d. Findings relating to the Substantive Scope of the MFN Treatment Kein Zugriff
          1. a. Use of MFN Clauses to Circumvent Dispute Admissibility Requirement Kein Zugriff
          2. b. MFN Clauses and Consent to Arbitration Kein Zugriff
          3. c. MFN Clauses and Dispute Resolution under Multilateral Agreements Kein Zugriff
          4. d. Findings as to the Use of MFN Clauses to Import ‘Better’ Dispute Resolution Provisions Kein Zugriff
      3. 2.3. MFN Treatment in Time Kein Zugriff
      1. 3.1. Occidental v. Ecuador Kein Zugriff
      2. 3.2. Bayindir v. Pakistan Kein Zugriff
      3. 3.3. Cargil v. Mexico Kein Zugriff
      4. 3.4. Grand River v. USA Kein Zugriff
      5. 3.5. Gea v. Ukraine Kein Zugriff
      6. 3.6. Apotex v. USA Kein Zugriff
      7. 3.7. Parkerings v. Lithuania Kein Zugriff
      8. 3.8. Other Cases Kein Zugriff
      9. 3.9. Findings relating to the de facto MFN Treatment Case Law Kein Zugriff
          1. (i) Pope & Talbot v. Canada Kein Zugriff
          2. (ii) Chemtura v. Canada Kein Zugriff
          3. (iii) Apotex v. USA Kein Zugriff
          1. (iv) MTD v. Chile Kein Zugriff
          2. (v) Rumeli v. Kazakhstan Kein Zugriff
          3. (vi) LESI v. Algeria Kein Zugriff
          4. (vii) Bayindir v. Pakistan Kein Zugriff
          5. (viii) ATA v. Jordan Kein Zugriff
          6. (ix) Paushok v. Mongolia Kein Zugriff
          7. (x) White Industries v. India Kein Zugriff
          8. (xi) Tatneft v. Ukraine Kein Zugriff
          9. (xii) Al Warraq v. Indonesia Kein Zugriff
          10. (xiii) İçkale v. Turkmenistan Kein Zugriff
          11. (xiv) Key Findings as to ‘Import’ of ‘Better’ FET provisions Kein Zugriff
        1. (i) AAPL v. Sri Lanka Kein Zugriff
        2. (ii) AMT v. Zaire Kein Zugriff
        3. (iii) ADF v. USA Kein Zugriff
        4. (iv) Teinver v. Argentina Kein Zugriff
        5. (v) Key Findings as to ‘Import’ of Full Protection and Security Provisions Kein Zugriff
        1. (i) Impregilo v. Pakistan & Impregilo v. Argentina Kein Zugriff
        2. (ii) Paushok v. Mongolia Kein Zugriff
        3. (iii) MTD v. Chile Kein Zugriff
        4. (iv) EDF v. Argentina Kein Zugriff
        5. (v) Arif v. Moldova Kein Zugriff
        6. (vi) Teinver v. Argentina Kein Zugriff
        7. (vii) Key Findings relating to MFN and Umbrella Clauses Kein Zugriff
        1. (i) RosInvest v. Russia Kein Zugriff
        2. (ii) CME v. Czech Republic Kein Zugriff
        3. (iii) Siemens v. Argentina Kein Zugriff
        4. (iv) Kardassopoulus v. Georgia Kein Zugriff
        5. (v) Key Findings relating to Import of ‘Better’ Expropriation Provisions Kein Zugriff
      5. 4.5. Findings as to ‘Import’ of ‘Better’ substantive treatment via MFN clauses Kein Zugriff
  8. Chapter V. Summary of Findings and Final Remarks Kein Zugriff 205 - 210
  9. Table of Cases Kein Zugriff 211 - 216
    1. (i) Books Kein Zugriff
    2. (ii) Book Chapters Kein Zugriff
    3. (iii) Journal Articles Kein Zugriff
    4. (iv) Online Articles Kein Zugriff
    5. (v) Reports & Other Documents by International Organisations Kein Zugriff
    6. (vi) International Treaties with Investment Provisions Kein Zugriff
    7. (vii) Model BITs Kein Zugriff
    8. (viii) Other international instruments Kein Zugriff
    1. Annex I: Abstract in English Kein Zugriff
    2. Annex II. Abstract in German Kein Zugriff
    3. Die folgende Darstellung ist eine Übersetzung aus der englischen Sprache: Kein Zugriff

Literaturverzeichnis (240)

  1. A Bjorklund and A Reinisch (eds), International Investment Law and Soft Law (Edward Elgar Publishing 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  2. Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law (2012). Google Scholar öffnen
  3. M Bungenberg, J Griebel, S Hobe, A Reinisch, Y-I Kim, International Investment Law Centre Cologne, and Universität Wien (eds), International investment law (First edition, CH BECK ; Hart ; Nomos 2015). Google Scholar öffnen
  4. J Bröhmer, R Bieber, C Callies, C Langenfeld, S Weber, and J Wolf (eds), Internationale Gemeinschaft und Menschenrechte: Festschrift für Georg Ress zum 70 Geburtstag am 21 Januar 2005 (1., Aufl., Heymanns, Carl 2005) Google Scholar öffnen
  5. R Dolzer and C Schreuer, Principles of International Investment Law (Second edition, Oxford University Press 2012). Google Scholar öffnen
  6. R Dolzer and M Stevens, Bilateral Investment Treaties (Nijhoff 1995). Google Scholar öffnen
  7. B Garner and H Black (eds), Black’s Law Dictionary (9th ed, West 2009). Google Scholar öffnen
  8. C Herrmann and J Terhechte (eds), European Yearbook of International Economic Law 2010 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2010). Google Scholar öffnen
  9. M Kinnear, G Fischer, and J Almeida (eds), Building International Investment Law: The First 50 Years of ICSID (Kluwer Law International 2016). Google Scholar öffnen
  10. A Koul, The Legal Framework of UNCTAD in World Trade (BRILL 1977). Google Scholar öffnen
  11. A Lowenfeld, International Economic Law (International economic law series, 2nd ed, Oxford University Press 2008). Google Scholar öffnen
  12. P Muchlinski, F Ortino, and C Schreuer (eds), The Oxford handbook of international investment law (Oxford University Press 2008). Google Scholar öffnen
  13. P Muchlinski, Multinational Enterprises and the Law (Blackwell Publishers 1995). Google Scholar öffnen
  14. C McLachlan, L Shore, and M Weiniger, International investment arbitration: substantive principles (Oxford University Press 2008). Google Scholar öffnen
  15. A Newcombe, Law and Practice of Investment Treaties Standards of Treatment (Kluwer Law International [u.a] 2009). Google Scholar öffnen
  16. L Oppenheim, R Jennings, A Watts, Oppenheim’s International Law. Vol. 1, Peace (9th ed, Longman 1996). Google Scholar öffnen
  17. M Paparinskis, International minimum standard and fair and equitable treatment (Oxford University Press 2013). Google Scholar öffnen
  18. A Reinisch, U Kriebaum, C Binder, and S Wittich (eds), International Investment Law for the 21st Century (Oxford University Press 2009). Google Scholar öffnen
  19. A Reinisch (ed), Standards of Investment Protection (Oxford University Press 2008). Google Scholar öffnen
  20. J Salacuse, The law of investment treaties (The Oxford international law library, Second edition, Oxford University Press 2015). Google Scholar öffnen
  21. L Sachs and K Sauvant (eds), The Effect of Treaties on Foreign Direct Investment (Oxford University Press 2009). Google Scholar öffnen
  22. K Singh and B Ilge (eds), Rethinking Bilateral Investment Treaties : Critical Issues and Policy Choices (Joint Publication of Both ENDS, Madyam and SOMO 2016). Google Scholar öffnen
  23. M Sinclair, The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (Melland Schill monographs in international law, 2nd ed, Manchester University Press 1984) Google Scholar öffnen
  24. S Schill, The Multilateralization of International Investment Law (International trade and economic law, Cambridge University Press 2009). Google Scholar öffnen
  25. M Sornarajah, The International Law on Foreign Investment (3rd ed, Cambridge University Press 2010). Google Scholar öffnen
  26. P Acconci, ‘Part II Substantive Issues, Ch.10 Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment’ in P Muchlinski, F Ortino, and C Schreuer (eds), The Oxford handbook of international investment law (Oxford University Press 2008). Google Scholar öffnen
  27. A Reinisch, ‘Most Favoured Nation Treatment’ in M Bungenberg, J Griebel, S Hobe, and A Reinisch (eds), International Investment Law (Nomos 2015). Google Scholar öffnen
  28. D Caron and E Shirlow, ‘Most-Favored-Nation Treatment: Substantive Protection’ in M Kinnear, GR Fischer, and JM Almeida (eds), Building International Investment Law: The First 50 Years of ICSID (Kluwer Law International 2016). Google Scholar öffnen
  29. R Dolzer and C Schreuer, ‘IV Standards of Protection’ in Principles of international investment law (Second edition, Oxford University Press 2012). Google Scholar öffnen
  30. R Dolzer, ‘Meistbegunstigüngsklauseln in Investitionsschutzverträgen’ in J Bröhmer, R Bieber, C Callies, C Langenfeld, S Weber, and J Wolf (eds), Internationale Gemeinschaft und Menschenrechte: Festschrift für Georg Ress zum 70 Geburtstag am 21 Januar 2005 (1., Aufl., Heymanns, Carl 2005). Google Scholar öffnen
  31. J Gaffney and Z Akçay, ‘Bilateral Approaches’ in M Bungenberg, J Griebel, S Hobe, and A Reinisch (eds), International Investment Law (Nomos 2015). Google Scholar öffnen
  32. J Gaffney and Z Akçay, ‘A. European Bilateral Approaches’ in M Bungenberg, J Griebel, S Hobe, and A Reinisch (eds), International Investment Law (Nomos 2015). Google Scholar öffnen
  33. I Gómez-Palacio and P Muchlinski, ‘Part II Substantive Issues, Ch.7 Admission and Establishment’ in P Muchlinski, F Ortino, and C Schreuer (eds), The Oxford handbook of international investment law (Oxford University Press 2008). Google Scholar öffnen
  34. J Griebel, ‘D. The New EU Investment Policy Approach’ in M Bungenberg, J Griebel, S Hobe, and A Reinisch (eds), International Investment Law (Nomos 2015). Google Scholar öffnen
  35. M Hahn, ‘II. EU Rules and Obligations Related to Investment’ in M Bungenberg, J Griebel, S Hobe, and A Reinisch (eds), International Investment Law (Nomos 2015). Google Scholar öffnen
  36. K Hober, ‘MFN Clauses and Dispute Resolution in Investment Treaties: Have We Reached the End of the Road?’ in C Binder, U Kriebaum, A Reinisch, and S Wittich (eds), International Investment Law for the 21st Century (Oxford University Press 2009). Google Scholar öffnen
  37. M Paparinskis, ‘Most-Favoured-Nation Clause: A Case Study’ in International minimum standard and fair and equitable treatment (Oxford University Press 2013). Google Scholar öffnen
  38. A Reinisch, ‘IV. The Likely Content of Future EU Investment Agreements’ in M Bungenberg, J Griebel, S Hobe, and A Reinisch (eds), International Investment Law (Nomos 2015). Google Scholar öffnen
  39. A Reinisch, ‘The Interpretation of International Investment Agreements’ in M Bungenberg, J Griebel, S Hobe, and A Reinisch (eds), International Investment Law (Nomos 2015). Google Scholar öffnen
  40. J Salacuse, ‘9 General Treatment Standards’ in The law of investment treaties (The Oxford international law library, Second edition, Oxford University Press 2015). Google Scholar öffnen
  41. K Sauvant and J Salacuse, ‘Do BITs Really Work? An Evaluation of Bilateral Investment Treaties and Their Grand Bargain’ in L Sachs and K Sauvant (eds), The Effect of Treaties on Foreign Direct Investment (Oxford University Press 2009). Google Scholar öffnen
  42. S Schill, ‘Maffezini v. Plama: Reflections on the Jurisprudential Schism in the Application of the Most-Favoured-Nation Clauses to Matters of Dispute Settlement’ in M Kinnear, G Fischer, and J Almeida (eds), Building International Investment Law: The First 50 Years of ICSID (Kluwer Law International 2016). Google Scholar öffnen
  43. M Slys, Exporting Legality: The Rise and Fall of Extraterritorial Jurisdiction in the Ottoman Empire and China (Graduate Institute Publications 2014). Google Scholar öffnen
  44. G Tawil, ‘Most Favoured Nation Clauses and Jurisdictional Clauses in Investment Treaty Arbitration’ in A Reinisch, U Kriebaum, C Binder, and S Wittich (eds), International Investment Law for the 21st Century (Oxford University Press 2009). Google Scholar öffnen
  45. T Weiler, The Interpretation of International Investment Law: Equality, Discrimination and Minimum Standards of Treatment in Historical Context (International litigation in practice volume 6, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2013). Google Scholar öffnen
  46. A Yanai, N Shinkōkai, The Function of the MFN Clause in the Global Trading System (APEC Study Center, Institute of Developing Economies, JETRO 2002). Google Scholar öffnen
  47. W Young, German Diplomatic Relations 1871-1945: The Wilhelmstrasse And The Formulation of Foreign Policy (iUniverse 2006). Google Scholar öffnen
  48. Y Zhou, International Relations and Legal Cooperation in General Diplomacy and Consular Relations: Published under the Auspices of the Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law under the Direction of Rudolf Bernhardt (Elsevier 2014). Google Scholar öffnen
  49. A Ziegler, ‘Is the MFN Principle in International Investment Law Ripe for Multilateralization or Codification?’ in A Bjorklund and A Reinisch (eds), International Investment Law and Soft Law (Edward Elgar Publishing 2012). Google Scholar öffnen
  50. A Ziegler, ‘Most-Favoured-Nation (MFN) Treatment’ in A Reinisch (ed), Standards of Investment Protection (Oxford University Press 2008). Google Scholar öffnen
  51. A Ziegler, ‘The Nascent International Law on Most-Favoured-Nation (MFN) Clauses in Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs)’ in C Herrmann and JP Terhechte (eds), European Yearbook of International Economic Law 2010 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2010). Google Scholar öffnen
  52. P Acconci, ‘The Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment and International Law on Foreign Investment’ (2005) 2 Transnational Dispute Management. Google Scholar öffnen
  53. S Adams, ‘Negotiating a Commercial Most Favored Nation Clause’ (2005) 1 International Law and Management Review 79. Google Scholar öffnen
  54. W Alschner, ‘Americanization of the BIT Universe: The Influence of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation (FCN) Treaties on Modern Investment Treaty Law’ [2013] Goettingen Journal of International Law. Google Scholar öffnen
  55. S Batifort and J Heath, ‘The New Debate on the Interpretation of MFN Clauses in Investment Treaties: Putting the Brakes on Multilateralization’ (Oct. 31, 2017) 43-51, available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=3063009 (forthcoming in 111 AJIL (2018) Google Scholar öffnen
  56. T Broude, ‘The Most-Favoured Nation Principle, Equal Protection, and Migration Policy’ (2010) 24 Georgetown Immigration Law Journal 553. Google Scholar öffnen
  57. C Brown, ‘Investment Arbitration as the ‘New Frontier’’ (2009) 28 The Arbitrator and Mediator 59. Google Scholar öffnen
  58. O Browning, ‘The Treaty of Commerce between England and France in 1786’ (1885) 2 Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 349. Google Scholar öffnen
  59. O Chukwumerije, ‘Interpreting Most-Favoured-Nation Clauses in Investment Treaty Arbitrations’ (2007) 8 The Journal of World Investment & Trade 597. Google Scholar öffnen
  60. E Clute and R Wilson, ‘The Commonwealth and Favored-Nation Usage’ (1958) 52 The American Journal of International Law 455. Google Scholar öffnen
  61. R Dolzer and T Myers, ‘After Tecmed: Most-Favored-Nation Clauses in Investment Protection Agreements’ (2004) 19 ICSID Review 49. Google Scholar öffnen
  62. Z Douglas, ‘The MFN Clause in Investment Arbitration: Treaty Interpretation Off the Rails’ (2011) 2 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 97. Google Scholar öffnen
  63. P Dumberry, ‘Shopping for a Better Deal: The Use of MFN Clauses to Get “better” Fair and Equitable Treatment Protection’ [2016] Arbitration International. Google Scholar öffnen
  64. P Dumberry, ‘The Importation of ’Better’ Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard Protection Through MFN Clauses: An Analysis of NAFTA Article 1103’ (2017) 1 Transnational Dispute Management (TDM). Google Scholar öffnen
  65. P Dumberry, ‘The Importation of the FET Standard through MFN Clauses: An Empirical Study of BITs’ (2017) 32 ICSID Review 116. Google Scholar öffnen
  66. A Fatouros, ‘Towards an International Agreement on Foreign Direct Investment?’ (1995) 10 ICSID Review 181. Google Scholar öffnen
  67. S Fietta, ‘Most Favoured Nation Treatment and Dispute Resolution Under Bilateral Investment Treaties: A Turning Point?’ (2005) 8 International Arbitration Law Review 136. Google Scholar öffnen
  68. S Fina and G Lentner, ‘The Scope of the EU’s Investment Competence after Lisbon’ (2016) 14 Santa Clara Journal of International Law 419. Google Scholar öffnen
  69. A Foster, ‘Some Aspects of the Commercial Treaty Program of the United States. Past and Present’ (1946) 11 Law and Contemporary Problems 647. Google Scholar öffnen
  70. E Gaillard and Y Banifatemi, ‘Establishing Jurisdiction through a Most-Favored-Nation Clause’ (2005) 5 Transnational Dispute Management. Google Scholar öffnen
  71. N Gallus, ‘Plama v. Bulgaria and the Scope of Investment Treaty MFN Clauses’ (2005) 2 Transnational Dispute Management. Google Scholar öffnen
  72. J Hazard, ‘Commercial Discrimination and International Law’ (1958) 52 The American Journal of International Law 495. Google Scholar öffnen
  73. M Hilf and R Gieß ‘Most-Favoured-Nation Clause’ (2012) Max Planck Encyclopaedia of Public International Law, VII. Google Scholar öffnen
  74. S Hornbeck, ‘The Most-Favored-Nation Clause’ (1909) 3 The American Journal of International Law 797. Google Scholar öffnen
  75. R Horowitz, ‘International Law and State Transformation in China, Siam, and the Ottoman Empire during the Nineteenth Century’ (2004) 15 Journal of World History 445. Google Scholar öffnen
  76. T Ishikawa, ‘Keeping Interpretation in Investment Treaty Arbitration “on Track”: The Role of States Parties’ (2014) 11 Transnational Dispute Management. Google Scholar öffnen
  77. C Jones, ‘The American Interpretation of the“ Most Favored Nation” Clause’ (1908) 32 Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 119. Google Scholar öffnen
  78. G Kaufmann-Kohler, ‘Arbitral Precedent: Dream, Necessity or Excuse?’ (2007) 23 Arbitration International 357. Google Scholar öffnen
  79. H Kelsey, ‘The Problem of the Most-Favored-Nation Clause’ (1933) 3 Cumulative Digest of International Law and Relations 16. Google Scholar öffnen
  80. G Kofler, ‘Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment in Direct Taxation: Does EC Law Provide for Community MFN in Bilateral Double Taxation Treaties’ (2005) 5 Houston Business & Tax Law Journal 1. Google Scholar öffnen
  81. J Kurtz, ‘The MFN Standard and Foreign Investment an Uneasy Fit’ (2004) 6 Journal of World Investment and Trade 861. Google Scholar öffnen
  82. A Maniruzzaman, ‘Expropriation of Alien Property and the Principle of Non-Discrimination in International Law of Foreign Investment: An Overview’ (1998) 8 Journal of Transnational Law & Policy 57. Google Scholar öffnen
  83. S Murase, ‘The Most-Favored-Nation Treatment in Japan’s Treaty Practice During the Period 1854-1905’ (1976) 70 The American Journal of International Law 273. Google Scholar öffnen
  84. A Newcombe, ‘Canada’s New Model Foreign Investment Protection Agreement’ (2005) 2 Transnational Dispute Management. Google Scholar öffnen
  85. J Paulsson, ‘International Arbitration and the Generation of Legal Norms: Treaty Arbitration and International Law’ (2006) 3 Transnational Dispute Management. Google Scholar öffnen
  86. L Peterson, ‘Evaluating Canada’s 2004 Model Foreign Investment Protection Agreement in Light of Civil Society Concerns’ [2006] Report for the Canadian Council for International Co-operation (June 2006). Google Scholar öffnen
  87. V Pregelj, ‘Most-Favored-Nation (Normal-Trade-Relations) Policy of the United States’ [1999] Congressional Research Service Issue Brief. Google Scholar öffnen
  88. Y Radi, ‘The Application of the Most-Favoured-Nation Clause to the Dispute Settlement Provisions of Bilateral Investment Treaties: Domesticating the “Trojan Horse”’ (2007) 18 European Journal of International Law 757. Google Scholar öffnen
  89. A Reinisch, ‘The EU on the Investment Path–quo Vadis Europe? The Future of EU BITs and Other Investment Agreements’ (2014) 12 Santa Clara Journal of International Law 111. Google Scholar öffnen
  90. S Schill, ‘MFN Clauses as Bilateral Commitments to Multilateralism: A Reply to Simon Batifort and J. Benton Heath’ (2017) 111 American Journal of International Law 914 Google Scholar öffnen
  91. S Schill, ‘Allocating Adjudicatory Authority: Most-Favoured-Nation Clauses as a Basis of Jurisdiction--A Reply to Zachary Douglas’ (2011) 2 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 353. Google Scholar öffnen
  92. S Schill, ‘Mulitilateralizing Investment Treaties through Most-Favored-Nation Clauses’ (2009) 27 Berkeley J Int’l Law 496. Google Scholar öffnen
  93. C Schreuer, ‘Diversity and Harmonization of Treaty Interpretation in Investment Arbitration’ (2006) 3 Transnational Dispute Management. Google Scholar öffnen
  94. G Schwarzenberger, ‘The Most-Favoured-Nation Standard in British State Practice’ (1945) 22 British Yearbook of International Law 96. Google Scholar öffnen
  95. G Schwarzenberger, ‘The Province and Standards of International Economic Law’ (1948) 2 The International Law Quarterly 402. Google Scholar öffnen
  96. G Setser, ‘Did Americans Originate the Conditional Most-Favored-Nation Clause?’ (1933) 5 The Journal of Modern History 319. Google Scholar öffnen
  97. F Shihata and A Parra, ‘The Experience of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes’ (1999) 14 ICSID Review 299. Google Scholar öffnen
  98. R Snyder, ‘The Most Favored Nation Clause and Recent Trade Practices’ (1940) 55 Political Science Quarterly 77. Google Scholar öffnen
  99. P Sutherland, ‘The World Bank Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes’ (1979) 28 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 367. Google Scholar öffnen
  100. R Teitelbaum, ‘Who’s Afraid of Maffezini-Recent Developments in the Interpretation of Most Favored Nation Clauses’ (2005) 22 Journal of International Arbitration 225. Google Scholar öffnen
  101. C Titi, ‘International Investment Law and the European Union: Towards a New Generation of International Investment Agreements’ (2015) 26 European Journal of International Law 639. Google Scholar öffnen
  102. S Vesel, ‘Clearing a Path through a Tangled Jurisprudence: Most-Favored-Nation in Bilateral Investment Treaties’ (2007) 32 Yale Journal of International Law 125. Google Scholar öffnen
  103. T Wälde, ‘Energy Charter Treaty-Based Investment Arbitration: Controversial Issues’ (2004) 5 J World Investment & Trade 373. Google Scholar öffnen
  104. H Walker, ‘The Post-War Commercial Treaty Program of the United States’ (1958) 73 Political Science Quarterly 57. Google Scholar öffnen
  105. U Wolker, ‘The EU as a Player in the BIT Arena: Current and Future Legal Challenges’ (2009) 24 ICSID Review 434. Google Scholar öffnen
  106. L Ankersmit, ‘Investment Court System in CETA to Be Judged by the ECJ’ (European Law Blog, 31 October 2016) <https://europeanlawblog.eu/2016/10/31/investment-court-system-in-ceta-to-be-judged-by-the-ecj/> accessed 4 April 2018. Google Scholar öffnen
  107. J Dahlquist, ‘Qatari Businessman Contends that MFN Clause in Regional Treaty Can Provide Foothold for an ICSID Claim against Jordan’ (IA Reporter, 15 June 2015), available at: <http://www.iareporter.com/articles/qatari-businessman-contends-that-mfn-clause-in-regional-treaty-can-provide-foothold-for-an-icsid-claim-against-jordan>. Google Scholar öffnen
  108. J Doenecke, M Adamson “Most-Favored-Nation Principle” Encyclopaedia of American Foreign Policy, 2002, available at <http://www.encyclopedia.com>. Google Scholar öffnen
  109. C Eckes, ‘Don’t Lead with Your Chin! IF Member States Continue with the Ratification of CETA, They Violate European Union Law’ (European Law Blog, 13 March 2018) <https://europeanlawblog.eu/2018/03/13/dont-lead-with-your-chin-if-member-states-continue-with-the-ratification-of-ceta-they-violate-european-union-law/> accessed 4 April 2018. Google Scholar öffnen
  110. M Feldman, ‘Mega-Regional Investment Arbitration’ (Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 9 December 2016), available at <http://kluwerarbitrationblog.com/2016/12/09/mega-regional-investment-arbitration/>. Google Scholar öffnen
  111. J Hepburn, ‘Investor’s unusual bid to use WTO agreement as gateway to arbitration, as well as Senegal’s corruption allegations come to light in ICSID provisional measures phase’ (IA Reporter, 14 December 2015), available at: <http://www.iareporter.com/ articles/investors-unusual-bid-to-use-wto-agreement-as-gateway-to-arbitration-as-well-as-senegals-corruption-allegations-come-to-light-in-icsid-provisional-measures-phase/>. Google Scholar öffnen
  112. J Karaian, ‘By the Numbers, the Rise of Europe’s Far-Right Looks like a Trend, Not a Blip’ (Quartz, 28 May 2014), available at <http://qz.com/214283/by-the-numbers-the-rise-of-europes-far-right-looks-like-a-trend-not-a-blip/>. Google Scholar öffnen
  113. A Newcombe, ‘Another Misapplication of MFN? Tza Yap Shum v. The Republic of Peru’ (Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 21 October 2009) <http://kluwerarbitrationblog.com/2009/10/21/another-misapplication-of-mfn-tza-yap-shum-v-the-republic-of-peru/> accessed 5 July 2017. Google Scholar öffnen
  114. L Peterson and Z Williams, ‘Another Turkish Firm Initiates Arbitral Proceedings Against Turkmenistan | Investment Arbitration Reporter’ (24 August 2016) <https://www-iareporter-com.uaccess.univie.ac.at/articles/turkish-firm-initiates-proceedings-against-turkmenistan/> accessed 20 April 2018. Google Scholar öffnen
  115. A Rasmussen, ‘The U.S. and EU Can Make Transatlantic Trade Great Again’ (22 March 2018) <https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2018-03-22/the-u-s-and-eu-can-make-transatlantic-trade-great-again> accessed 4 April 2018. Google Scholar öffnen
  116. Reuters, ‘Trump Says Terminating NAFTA Would Yield the “Best Deal” in Renegotiations’ (CNBC, 17 January 2018) <https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/17/trump-nafta-termination-negotiation.html> last accessed on 4 April 2018. Google Scholar öffnen
  117. D Trump, ‘Presidential Memorandum Regarding Withdrawal of the United States from the Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiations and Agreement’ (The White House, Office of the Press Secretary 23 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen
  118. Competition Regulators Attack Pricing Clauses in Distribution Agreements (EU & Competition Law, 18 March 2014), available at <http://www.eu-competitionlaw.com/ lowest-price-guaranteed-best-price-clauses-come-under-fire/>. Google Scholar öffnen
  119. Council Negotiating Directives (Canada, India and Singapore)’ (12 September 2011) <https://www.bilaterals.org/?eu-negotiating-mandates-on&lang=en> accessed 4 April 2018. Google Scholar öffnen
  120. What Would Happen to TTIP If Donald Trump Wins the Presidency? (The Independent, 19 October 2016), available at <http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-elections/donald-trump-ttip-what-will-happen-if-he-wins-us-election-2016-trade-deals-a7369426.html>. Google Scholar öffnen
  121. Admission and Establishment, UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements, United Nations (1999). Google Scholar öffnen
  122. Bilateral Investment Treaties 1959-1999, UNCTAD, United Nations (2000). Google Scholar öffnen
  123. Comments of Member States, Organs of the United Nations, Specialized Agencies and Other Intergovernmental Organizations on the Draft Articles on the Most Favoured Nation Clause adopted by the International Law Commission at its twenty eighth session (Doc. A/CN.4/308) 1978 YBILC, Vol.II(2) 161. Google Scholar öffnen
  124. Commentary on Draft Articles, Yearbook of the International Law Commission (U.N. Doc. A/CN.4/SER.A/1966/Add.1, 1966) vol II, 219. Google Scholar öffnen
  125. Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions - Towards a Comprehensive European International Investment Policy (7 July 2010), available online at: <http://Trade.ec.europa.eu/Doclib/Docs/2010/July/tradoc_146307.pdf>. Google Scholar öffnen
  126. Commission Decision Requesting an Opinion of the Court of Justice Pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU on the Competence of the Union to Sign and Conclude a Free Trade Agreement with Singapore’ (30 October 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  127. Conclusions on a Comprehensive European International Investment Policy, (25 October 2010), text available online at: <https://www.consilium.europa.eu/Uedocs/ Cms_data/Docs/Pressdata/EN/Foraff/117328.pdf>. Google Scholar öffnen
  128. Draft Articles on the Law of Treaties with Commentaries, Yearbook of the International Law Commission, 1966 Vol. II 187. Google Scholar öffnen
  129. Draft Articles on Most-Favoured-Nation Clauses with Commentaries, Yearbook of the International Law Commission, 1978 Vol II Part Two 16. Google Scholar öffnen
  130. European Parliament Resolution on the Future European International Investment Policy No. 2010/2203(INI), text available online at: <http://www.europarl.europa.eu/Sides /getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P7-TA-2011-0141+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN>. Google Scholar öffnen
  131. Fair and Equitable Treatment, UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements, United Nations 1999. Google Scholar öffnen
  132. International Law Commission, Final Report of the Study Group on the Most-Favoured-Nation Clause (29 May 2015), Doc. No. A/CN.4/L.852, available online at: <http://legal.un.org/ilc/guide/1_3_part_two.shtml>. Google Scholar öffnen
  133. International Law Commission and United Nations, Most-Favoured-Nation Clause Report of the Working Group (2007), available online at: <http://legal.un.org/ilc/guide/ 1_3_part_two.shtml>. Google Scholar öffnen
  134. International Investment Law: A Changing Landscape, OECD (2005). Google Scholar öffnen
  135. Joint Interpretative Instrument on the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between Canada and the European Union and Its Member States (27 October 2016), Doc. No. 13541/16, available online at: <http://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/ document/ST-13541-2016-INIT/en/pdf>. Google Scholar öffnen
  136. League of Nations Recommendations of the Economic Committee, Doc. No. C.138.M.53.1929.II, available online at: <http://biblio-archive.unog.ch/Dateien/Council MSD/C-138-M-53-1929-II_EN.pdf>. Google Scholar öffnen
  137. Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment, UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements, United Nations (1999). Google Scholar öffnen
  138. Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment: A Sequel, UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II, United Nations (2010). Google Scholar öffnen
  139. Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment in International Investment Law, OECD Working Papers on International Investment (1 September 2004). Google Scholar öffnen
  140. Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment, UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements, United Nations (1999). Google Scholar öffnen
  141. Most-Favoured-Nation Clause, Report of the Working Group, Doc. A/CN.4/L.719 (20 July 2007). Google Scholar öffnen
  142. News from ICSID, Vol. 16, No. 2 (1999), available online at <www.icsid.worldbank.org>. Google Scholar öffnen
  143. News from ICSID, Vol. 26, No. 1 (2009), available online at <www.icsid.worldbank.org>. Google Scholar öffnen
  144. Regulation (EU) No 1219/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council Establishing Transitional Arrangements for Bilateral Investment Agreements between Member States and Third Countries (12 December 2012). Google Scholar öffnen
  145. Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of Its Thirtieth Session, 8 May -28 July 1978, Official Records of the General Assembly, Thirty-Third Session, Supplement No. 10 (U.N. Doc. A/33/10, Yearbook of the International Law Commission 1978 Vol. II(2)), U.N. Doc. A/33/10. Google Scholar öffnen
  146. Summaries of the Work of the International Law Commission, Most-Favoured-Nation Clause (Part I), <http://legal.un.org/ilc/summaries/1_3.shtml>. Google Scholar öffnen
  147. Summary Records of the Sixteenth Session, Yearbook of the International Law Commission (U.N. Doc. A/CN.4/SER.A/, 1964) vol I, 289. Google Scholar öffnen
  148. The REIO Exception in MFN Treatment Clauses, UNCTAD Series on International Investment Policies for Development, United Nations (2004). Google Scholar öffnen
  149. Towards a G20 Strategy for Promoting Inclusive Global Value Chains, OECD Report (July 2016). Google Scholar öffnen
  150. Ustor E, First Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Most-Favoured-Nation Clause (18 April 1969), Yearbook of the International Law Commission 1969, Vol.II. Google Scholar öffnen
  151. Ustor E, Third Report on the Most-Favoured-Nation Clause, Yearbook of the International Law Commission 1972, Vol II. Google Scholar öffnen
  152. A Watts and Commission UNIL, The International Law Commission 1949-1998: Volume Three: Final Draft Articles and Other Materials (Clarendon Press 1999). Google Scholar öffnen
  153. Agreement among the Government of Japan, the Government of the Republic of Korea and the Government of the People’s Republic of China for the Promotion, Facilitation and Protection of Investment (17 May 2014). Google Scholar öffnen
  154. Agreement between Canada and the Republic of Peru for the Promotion and Protection of Investments (20 June 2007). Google Scholar öffnen
  155. Agreement between Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Government of the Republic of Argentina for the Promotion and Protection of Investment (19 February 1993). Google Scholar öffnen
  156. Agreement between Japan and the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam for the Liberalization, Promotion and Protection of Investment (19 December 2004). Google Scholar öffnen
  157. Agreement between Sweden and Czechoslovakia on the Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments (23 September 1991). Google Scholar öffnen
  158. Agreement between the Federal Republic of Germany and the Argentine Republic on Promotion and Mutual Protection of Investments (8 November 1993). Google Scholar öffnen
  159. Agreement between the Federal Republic of Germany and the Federation of Malaya Concerning Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments (6 July 1963). Google Scholar öffnen
  160. Agreement between the Government of Australia and the Government of the Republic of Lithuania on the Promotion and Protection of Investments (10 May 2002). Google Scholar öffnen
  161. Agreement between the Government of Canada and the Government of the Kingdom of Thailand for the Promotion and Protection of Investments (24 September 1998). Google Scholar öffnen
  162. Agreement between the Government of Canada and the Government of the Republic of Poland for the Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments (22 November 1990). Google Scholar öffnen
  163. Agreement between the Government of Canada and the Government of the Republic of Venezuela for the Promotion and Protection of Investments (28 January 1998). Google Scholar öffnen
  164. Agreement between the Government of Japan and the Government of the Republic of Mozambique on the Reciprocal Liberalisation, Promotion and Protection of Investment (29 August 2014). Google Scholar öffnen
  165. Agreement between the Government of Malaysia and the Government of the Republic of Chile for the Promotion and Protection of Investments (4 August 1995). Google Scholar öffnen
  166. Agreement between the Government of People’s Republic of China and the Government of the Republic of Slovenia Concerning the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investment (1 January 1995). Google Scholar öffnen
  167. Agreement between the Government of the Arab Republic of Egypt and the Government of Armenia for the Protection and Promotion of Investments (1 March 2006). Google Scholar öffnen
  168. Agreement between the Government of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan and the Government of the Italian Republic on the Promotion and Protection of Investments (17 January 2000). Google Scholar öffnen
  169. Agreement between the Government of the Hellenic Republic and the Government of the Republic of Albania for the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investments (4 January 1995). Google Scholar öffnen
  170. Agreement between the Government of the People’s Republic of Bulgaria and the Government of the Republic of Cyprus on Mutual Encouragement and Protection of Investments (18 May 1988). Google Scholar öffnen
  171. Agreement between the Government of the People’s Republic of China and the Government of the Republic of Korea on the Promotion and Protection of Investments (1 December 2007). Google Scholar öffnen
  172. ‘Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Chile and the Government of the Kingdom of Denmark Concerning the Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments’ (3 November 1995). Google Scholar öffnen
  173. ‘Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Chile and the Government of the Republic of Croatia on the Reciprocal Promotion and Protection of Investments’ (15 June 1996). Google Scholar öffnen
  174. Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Finland and the Government of the Republic of Belarus on the Promotion and Protection of Investments (10 April 2008). Google Scholar öffnen
  175. Agreement between the Government of the Republic of France and the Government of the United Mexican States on the Reciprocal Promotion and Protection of Investments (12 October 2000). Google Scholar öffnen
  176. ‘Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Italy and the Government of the People’s Democratic Republic of Algeria on Promotion and Protection of Investments’ (26 November 1993). Google Scholar öffnen
  177. Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Singapore and the Government of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea on the Promotion and Protection of Investments (18 March 2009). Google Scholar öffnen
  178. Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Singapore and the Government of the United Arab Emirates on the Promotion and Protection of Investments (24 June 2011). Google Scholar öffnen
  179. Agreement between the Government of the State of Israel and the Government of the Republic of Uzbekistan for the Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments (18 February 1997). Google Scholar öffnen
  180. Agreement between the Government of the United Kingdom and Northern Ireland and the Government of the Republic of India for the Promotion and Protection of Investments (6 January 1995). Google Scholar öffnen
  181. Agreement between the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Government of the Republic of Indonesia for the Promotion and Protection of Investments (24 March 1977). Google Scholar öffnen
  182. Agreement between the Government of United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Government of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka for the Promotion and Protection of Investments (18 December 1980). Google Scholar öffnen
  183. Agreement Between the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan and the Republic of Turkey Concerning the Reciprocal Promotion and Protection of Investments (23 January 2006). Google Scholar öffnen
  184. Agreement Between The Islamite Republic of Pakistan and The Republic of Turkey Concerning Reciprocal Promotion and Protection of Investments (3 September 1997). Google Scholar öffnen
  185. Agreement between The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and The Republic of Austria Concerning the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investments (25 July 2003). Google Scholar öffnen
  186. Agreement between the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Hungarian People’s Republic for the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investments (1 June 1988). Google Scholar öffnen
  187. Agreement between the Macedonian Government and the Government of the Kingdom of Denmark for the Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments (not in force). Google Scholar öffnen
  188. Agreement between the Republic of Argentina and the Republic of Panama for the Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments (22 June 1998). Google Scholar öffnen
  189. Agreement between the Republic of Chile and the Kingdom of Spain on Protection and Reciprocal Promotion of Investments (28 March 1994). Google Scholar öffnen
  190. Agreement Between the Republic of Colombia and the Swiss Confederation on the Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments (6 October 2009). Google Scholar öffnen
  191. Agreement between the Republic of Serbia and the United Arab Emirates on the Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments (25 December 2014). Google Scholar öffnen
  192. Agreement between the Republic of Turkey and Turkmenistan Concerning the Reciprocal Promotion and Protection of Investments (13 March 1997). Google Scholar öffnen
  193. Agreement on Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investments between the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Czech and Slovak Federal Republic (1 October 1992). Google Scholar öffnen
  194. Agreement on Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investments between the Republic of Honduras and the Kingdom of the Netherlands (1 September 2002). Google Scholar öffnen
  195. Agreement on the Encouragement and Protection of Investments between the Government of Hong Kong and the Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands (1 September 1993). Google Scholar öffnen
  196. Agreement on the Promotion and Protection of Investments between China and Singapore (7 February 1986). Google Scholar öffnen
  197. Agreement on Promotion, Protection and Guarantee of Investments Among Member States of the Organisation of the Islamic Conference (February 1988). Google Scholar öffnen
  198. Agreement on Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments in the Member States of the Eurasian Economic Community (2008). Google Scholar öffnen
  199. ASEAN Implemented Comprehensive Investment Agreement (2012). Google Scholar öffnen
  200. Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between Canada, on the One Part, and the European Union and Its Member States, on the Other Part, No 10973/16 (2016). Google Scholar öffnen
  201. Economic Partnership Agreement between the European Union and Its Member States, of the One Part, and the SADC EPA States, of the Other Part, No L250/3 (2016). Google Scholar öffnen
  202. Energy Charter Treaty (17 December 1994). Google Scholar öffnen
  203. Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and Its Member States, of the One Part, and the Republic of Kazakhstan, of the Other Part, No. L29/3 (2016). Google Scholar öffnen
  204. Framework Agreement on the ASEAN Investment Area (1998). Google Scholar öffnen
  205. Free Trade Agreement between Canada and the Republic of Colombia, Chapter Eight, Investment (15 August 2011). Google Scholar öffnen
  206. Free Trade Agreement between Canada and the United States of America (1988). Google Scholar öffnen
  207. Free Trade Agreement between New Zealand and the Republic of Korea (20 December 2015). Google Scholar öffnen
  208. Free Trade Agreement between the Government of Australia and the Government of the People’s Republic of China (20 December 2015). Google Scholar öffnen
  209. Investment Agreement for the COMESA Common Investment Area (2007). Google Scholar öffnen
  210. North American Free Trade Agreement between Canada, The United States and Mexico (1 January 1994). Google Scholar öffnen
  211. Revised Treaty Establishing the Caribbean Community and Common Market signed at Chaguaramas (2001). Google Scholar öffnen
  212. Treaty between Barbados and the Federal Republic of Germany Concerning the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investments (11 May 2002). Google Scholar öffnen
  213. Treaty between the Federal Republic of Germany and the State of Israel Concerning the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investments (14 April 1980). Google Scholar öffnen
  214. Treaty between the Federal Republic of Germany and the Ukraine Concerning Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments (29 June 1996). Google Scholar öffnen
  215. Treaty between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Hashemite Republic of Jordan Concerning the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investment (12 June 2003). Google Scholar öffnen
  216. Treaty between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Republic of Rwanda Concerning the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investment (1 January 2012). Google Scholar öffnen
  217. Treaty between the Government of Turkey and the Government of Gabonese Republic Concerning Reciprocal Promotion and Protection of Investments (18 July 2012). Google Scholar öffnen
  218. Treaty between the Kingdom of Spain and the Republic of Argentina for Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments (28 September 1992). Google Scholar öffnen
  219. Treaty between the Republic of Korea and the Federal Republic of Germany Concerning the Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments (15 January 1967). Google Scholar öffnen
  220. Treaty between the United States of America and the Argentine Republic Concerning the Reciprocal Encouragement and Protection of Investment (20 October 1994). Google Scholar öffnen
  221. Treaty between the United States of America and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay Concerning the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investment (1 November 2006). Google Scholar öffnen
  222. Austria Model BIT (2010). Google Scholar öffnen
  223. Canada Model Foreign Investment Protection Agreement, FIPA (2004). Google Scholar öffnen
  224. German Model Treaty (2008). Google Scholar öffnen
  225. Norway Model BIT (2007, 2015). Google Scholar öffnen
  226. Swiss Model BIT (1995). Google Scholar öffnen
  227. UK Model BIT (2008). Google Scholar öffnen
  228. U.S. Model Bilateral Investment Treaty (2012). Google Scholar öffnen
  229. Agreement between the Government of the French Republic and the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization Regarding the Headquarters of UNESCO and the Privileges and Immunities of the Organization on French Territory’ (19 July 1954). Google Scholar öffnen
  230. Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (1994). Google Scholar öffnen
  231. Constitution of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (1945). Google Scholar öffnen
  232. Draft of the Central America – United States Free Trade Agreement, (28 January 2004), available at: <http://www.sice.oas.org/TPD/USA_CAFTA/Jan28draft/Chap10_e.pdf> Google Scholar öffnen
  233. General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (1994). Google Scholar öffnen
  234. General Agreement on Trade in Services (1996). Google Scholar öffnen
  235. The Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (1963). Google Scholar öffnen
  236. The Covenant of the League of Nations (1919) Google Scholar öffnen
  237. International Code of Fair Treatment of Foreign Investments, ICC (1949) Google Scholar öffnen
  238. Treaty of Commerce and Navigation between the United States of America and Hanover (10 June 1846) Google Scholar öffnen
  239. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (27 January 1980). Google Scholar öffnen
  240. Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (2007). Google Scholar öffnen

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus der Reihe "Studien zum Internationalen Investitionsrecht"
Cover des Buchs: Die Auswirkungen fragiler Staatlichkeit auf internationale Investitionsschutzabkommen
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Johanna Baumann-Landschein
Die Auswirkungen fragiler Staatlichkeit auf internationale Investitionsschutzabkommen
Cover des Buchs: Die Widerklage des Staates in ICSID-Schiedsverfahren
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Carla Elisabeth Müller
Die Widerklage des Staates in ICSID-Schiedsverfahren
Cover des Buchs: Die investitionsschutzrechtlichen Standards des Energy Charter Treaty
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Christian Schlemann
Die investitionsschutzrechtlichen Standards des Energy Charter Treaty
Cover des Buchs: Host State Circumstances and Absolute Standards of Protection in International Investment Law
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Johanna Braun
Host State Circumstances and Absolute Standards of Protection in International Investment Law
Cover des Buchs: Public Political Risk Investment Insurance
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Nataša Vujinović
Public Political Risk Investment Insurance

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Feedback geben

Wir freuen uns über Ihr Feedback zu Inhalten und Funktionen. Ihre Nachricht hilft uns, unseren Service stetig zu verbessern.

Bewertung
Bild anhängen
oder hier ablegen
PNG oder JPG (max. 3 MB)

Anmelden

Passwort vergessen?
Login via Open Athens
Noch kein Benutzerkonto?
Jetzt registrieren

Publikation zitieren

Download: RIS BibTex