Legal Tech

Prof. UO Dr. Dariusz Szostek; Prof. Dr. Mariusz Załucki

doi:10.5771/9783748922834

Zusammenfassung

Der Band analysiert umfassend das Zusammenspiel von Recht und neuen Technologien für die anwaltliche Praxis. Die Autoren beschreiben technologische Entwicklungen von Informationssystemen, die die Arbeit von Anwälten nicht nur unterstützen, sondern sie am Ende gar ersetzen könnten. Im Band werden juristische mit technischen Fragen verwoben, die das Verständnis des Rechts erheblich beeinflussen. Das Verständnis technischer Prozesse (einschließlich IT) ermöglicht eine grenzüberschreitende Analyse der damit verbundenen Probleme. Mit Beiträgen vonMichał Araszkiewicz, Gabriela Bar, Wilfried Bernhard, Katarzyna Biczysko-Pudełko, Maddalena Castellani, Tomasz Chomicki, Patryk Ciurak, Wojciech Cyrul, Maria Dymitruk, Ewa Fabian, Tomasz Grzegory, Agnieszka Kubiak-Cyrul, Iga Kurowska, Małgorzata Kurowska, Pierpaolo Marano, Vytautas Nekrošius, Robert Pająk, Aleksandra Partyk, Przemysław Polański, Rafał Prabucki, Janos Puskas, Thiago Santos Rocha, Mauro Arturo Rivera León, Enrico Maria Scavone, Rafał Skibicki, Marek Świerczyński, Dariusz Szostek, Sylwester Szczepanik, Kamil Szpyt, Michał Tabor, Gabriela Wiktorzak, Michał Wódczak, Jakub Wyczik, Anna Zalesińska, Tomasz Zalewski, Mariusz Zalucki, Mario Zanin und Zsolt Ződi.

»an interesting study of the influence of modern technologies on law, its creation, use in the work of a lawyer both preparing substantively to examine a legal problem and supporting the work of his office... shows how to prepare for the growing changes in the way a law firm operates and attempts to indicate the direction in which the legal profession is heading... The study is well documented by the available literature. It also takes into account the work of European institutions, especially the European Commission and the European Parliament. It is therefore not only a practical, simplified guide for practitioners on how lawyers should use modern technologies in their work, but a comprehensive, scientific study of the presented issues.«Prof. Jacek Golaczynski

Schlagworte

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Copyrightjahr: 2021
ISBN-Print: 978-3-8487-7879-9
ISBN-Online: 978-3-7489-2283-4
Verlag: Nomos, Baden-Baden
Sprache: Englisch
Seiten: 673
Produkttyp: Sammelband

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten

Titelei/InhaltsverzeichnisSeiten 1 - 10 Download Kapitel (PDF)
IntroductionSeiten 11 - 14 Download Kapitel (PDF)
1. 1. Dariusz Szostek Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. 1. DefinitionDariusz Szostek
    2. 2. The Categorisation of LegalTechDariusz Szostek
    3. 3. The Scope of the Concept of LegalTech vis-à-vis Other Concepts, such as RegTech, FinTech, Insure Tech, or Legal InformaticsDariusz Szostek
    4. 4. The Consequences of Development of LegalTechDariusz Szostek
    5. 5. Legal EngineeringDariusz Szostek
  2. Rafał Prabucki, Rafał Skibicki, Dariusz Szostek, Jakub Wyczik Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. 1. IntroductionRafał Prabucki, Rafał Skibicki, Dariusz Szostek, Jakub Wyczik
    2. 2. Code, Algorithms, Algorithmic TechnologyRafał Prabucki, Rafał Skibicki, Dariusz Szostek, Jakub Wyczik
    3. 3. Law as a CodeRafał Prabucki, Rafał Skibicki, Dariusz Szostek, Jakub Wyczik
    4. Rafał Prabucki, Rafał Skibicki, Dariusz Szostek, Jakub Wyczik
      1. 4.2. Types of Tokens - the Basic Knowledge of Every Legal EngineerRafał Prabucki, Rafał Skibicki, Dariusz Szostek, Jakub Wyczik
      2. 4.3. Comparative Legal Analysis of Selected Regulations Regarding the Token. Will the European Union Synthesise It?Rafał Prabucki, Rafał Skibicki, Dariusz Szostek, Jakub Wyczik
      3. 4.4. What about Lawyers When the Code Becomes Law? Selected Legal Challenges of TokenisationRafał Prabucki, Rafał Skibicki, Dariusz Szostek, Jakub Wyczik
    5. Rafał Prabucki, Rafał Skibicki, Dariusz Szostek, Jakub Wyczik
      1. 5.1. IntroductionRafał Prabucki, Rafał Skibicki, Dariusz Szostek, Jakub Wyczik
      2. 5.2. Prior controlRafał Prabucki, Rafał Skibicki, Dariusz Szostek, Jakub Wyczik
      3. 5.3. Follow-up actionsRafał Prabucki, Rafał Skibicki, Dariusz Szostek, Jakub Wyczik
      4. 5.4. Soft LawRafał Prabucki, Rafał Skibicki, Dariusz Szostek, Jakub Wyczik
    6. 6. SummaryRafał Prabucki, Rafał Skibicki, Dariusz Szostek, Jakub Wyczik
  3. Maria Dymitruk Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. 1. IntroductionMaria Dymitruk
    2. 2. Searching for Information on the LawMaria Dymitruk
    3. 3. The Automation of Legal Decision-Making ProcessesMaria Dymitruk
    4. 4. ConclusionsMaria Dymitruk
  4. Tomasz Grzegory, Janos Puskas Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. 1. IntroductionTomasz Grzegory, Janos Puskas
    2. 2. “If Only I Had the Right Questions!” Where Are We and Where Do We Go in the Legal Tech?Tomasz Grzegory, Janos Puskas
    3. 3. What’s Hot in the Legal Tech?Tomasz Grzegory, Janos Puskas
    4. 4. ‘All that Glitters Is Not Gold’Tomasz Grzegory, Janos Puskas
    5. 5. So, What Does ‘Artificial Intelligence’ Really Mean in the Legal Tech?Tomasz Grzegory, Janos Puskas
    6. 6. Do Machines Understand Us?Tomasz Grzegory, Janos Puskas
    7. 7. E-discovery - Where Work Became Technology AssistedTomasz Grzegory, Janos Puskas
    8. 8. OK Google, Negotiate! When Do Lawyers Become Obsolete?Tomasz Grzegory, Janos Puskas
2. 1. Michal Araszkiewicz Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. 1. IntroductionMichal Araszkiewicz
    2. 2. Modeling Legal Reasoning and ArgumentationMichal Araszkiewicz
    3. 3. Computational Intelligence for Legal Tasks: How to Combine it with Symbolic Legal Reasoning ModelsMichal Araszkiewicz
    4. 4. ConclusionsMichal Araszkiewicz
  2. Wojciech Cyrul Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. 1. IntroductionWojciech Cyrul
    2. 2. The Role of Technology in the Darfting and Accesing of Legal TextsWojciech Cyrul
    3. 3. Computerization of the Texts of Legal ActsWojciech Cyrul
    4. 4. Machine Consumable LegislationWojciech Cyrul
    5. ConclusionsWojciech Cyrul
  3. Patryk Ciurak Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. 1. IntroductionPatryk Ciurak
    2. 2. Interpretation of Law and Interpretation of CodePatryk Ciurak
    3. 3. Testing Code and Testing LawPatryk Ciurak
    4. 4. The Beginning of the RoadPatryk Ciurak
3. 1. Ewa Fabian, Przemyslaw Polanski Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. 1. IntroductionEwa Fabian, Przemyslaw Polanski
    2. 2. Case study: using LegalTech tools in measuring digital accessibilityEwa Fabian, Przemyslaw Polanski
    3. 3. Lawyer's analysis of digital accessibility - methodologyEwa Fabian, Przemyslaw Polanski
    4. 4. Assistive technology - a new weapon in the LegalTech lawyer's arsenal?Ewa Fabian, Przemyslaw Polanski
    5. 5. Tools for testing digital accessibility in American court proceedingsEwa Fabian, Przemyslaw Polanski
    6. 6. Software used in expert witness testimony in the US and PolandEwa Fabian, Przemyslaw Polanski
    7. 7. SummaryEwa Fabian, Przemyslaw Polanski
  2. Iga Kurowska, Kamil Szpyt Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. 1. IntroductionIga Kurowska, Kamil Szpyt
    2. Iga Kurowska, Kamil Szpyt
      1. 2.1. The Most Popular ToolsIga Kurowska, Kamil Szpyt
      2. 2.2. Best Practices in Omplementing LegalTech 1.0 Solutions.Iga Kurowska, Kamil Szpyt
    3. Iga Kurowska, Kamil Szpyt
      1. 3.1. General RemarksIga Kurowska, Kamil Szpyt
      2. 3.2. Document Management Automation SoftwareIga Kurowska, Kamil Szpyt
      3. 3.3. ChatbotsIga Kurowska, Kamil Szpyt
      4. 3.4. Artificial IntelligenceIga Kurowska, Kamil Szpyt
      5. 3.5. BlockchainIga Kurowska, Kamil Szpyt
    4. 4. LegalTech 3.0Iga Kurowska, Kamil Szpyt
    5. 5. SummaryIga Kurowska, Kamil Szpyt
  3. Malgorzata Kurowska Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. 1. IntroductionMalgorzata Kurowska
    2. Malgorzata Kurowska
      1. 2.1. Principle of ProportionalityMalgorzata Kurowska
      2. 2.2. Principle of TransparencyMalgorzata Kurowska
      3. 2.3. Principle of AccountabilityMalgorzata Kurowska
      4. 2.4. Due DilligenceMalgorzata Kurowska
    3. Malgorzata Kurowska
      1. Malgorzata Kurowska
        How to classify informationMalgorzata Kurowska
        Context of Solution ImplementationMalgorzata Kurowska
        Assessing the Acceptability of Implementing the LegalTech SolutionMalgorzata Kurowska
    4. Malgorzata Kurowska
      1. Malgorzata Kurowska
        Risk-based Approach in Implementing LegalTechMalgorzata Kurowska
      2. Malgorzata Kurowska
        Identification of Risk AreasMalgorzata Kurowska
        Risk IdentificationMalgorzata Kurowska
        Risk Impact AssessmentMalgorzata Kurowska
        Determination of the Likelihood of a Risk OccurringMalgorzata Kurowska
        Estimation of Overall Risk ValueMalgorzata Kurowska
        Issues to be AnalysedMalgorzata Kurowska
      3. 4.3. Simplified Risk AnalysisMalgorzata Kurowska
      4. Malgorzata Kurowska
        Designation of Responsible PersonsMalgorzata Kurowska
      5. 4.5. Identification of CountermeasuresMalgorzata Kurowska
      6. 4.6. Risk MonitoringMalgorzata Kurowska
    5. 5. ConclusionMalgorzata Kurowska
  4. Katarzyna Biczysko-Pudelko Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. 1. IntroductionKatarzyna Biczysko-Pudelko
    2. 2. Cloud Computing 1.0Katarzyna Biczysko-Pudelko
    3. 3. Cloud Computing 2.0 - or Multi-Cloud in the Work of Lawyers.Katarzyna Biczysko-Pudelko
    4. Katarzyna Biczysko-Pudelko
      1. 4.1 General RemarksKatarzyna Biczysko-Pudelko
      2. 4.2. Smart Contract and Personal DataKatarzyna Biczysko-Pudelko
      3. 4.2 Cloud Computing and Electronic CommunicationsKatarzyna Biczysko-Pudelko
    5. 5. SummaryKatarzyna Biczysko-Pudelko
  5. Maria Dymitruk Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. 1. IntroductionMaria Dymitruk
    2. Maria Dymitruk
      1. 2.1. Legal Tech on Administrative and Organisational ActivitiesMaria Dymitruk
      2. Maria Dymitruk
        2.2.1. Crime PredictionMaria Dymitruk
        2.2.2. Automated Detection of Crime and OffendersMaria Dymitruk
        2.2.3. Automatic Evidence AnalysisMaria Dymitruk
        2.2.4. Automating Decision-Making ProcessesMaria Dymitruk
    3. 3. Legal Tech in Law Enforcement - a Regulatory PerspectiveMaria Dymitruk
    4. 4. SummaryMaria Dymitruk
  6. Agnieszka Kubiak-Cyrul, Dariusz Szostek Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. 1. Blockchain, DLT – a Foundation of LegalTechAgnieszka Kubiak-Cyrul, Dariusz Szostek
    2. 2. Influence of Blockchain on the New Paperless Approach. Datafication of the Law.Agnieszka Kubiak-Cyrul, Dariusz Szostek
    3. 3. Using Blockchain in LegalTechAgnieszka Kubiak-Cyrul, Dariusz Szostek
    4. 5. Definition of a smart contractAgnieszka Kubiak-Cyrul, Dariusz Szostek
    5. 6. Examples of the application of the smart contract in LegalTechAgnieszka Kubiak-Cyrul, Dariusz Szostek
    6. 7. Legal problems connected with the use of smart contracts in LegalTechAgnieszka Kubiak-Cyrul, Dariusz Szostek
    7. 8. Summary: Should lawyers be smart?Agnieszka Kubiak-Cyrul, Dariusz Szostek
  7. Malgorzata Kurowska Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. 1. Data vs InformationMalgorzata Kurowska
    2. 2. Information Classification as an Information Security ToolMalgorzata Kurowska
    3. 3. Information Processing via LegalTech ToolsMalgorzata Kurowska
    4. 4. Liability for Data SecurityMalgorzata Kurowska
    5. 5. FranceMalgorzata Kurowska
    6. 6. PolandMalgorzata Kurowska
    7. 7. GermanyMalgorzata Kurowska
    8. 8. ConclusionMalgorzata Kurowska
  8. Kamil Szpyt Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. 1. IntroductionKamil Szpyt
    2. Kamil Szpyt
      1. 2.1. The Past - Professional Liability InsuranceKamil Szpyt
      2. 2.2. The Present - Cyber Risk InsuranceKamil Szpyt
      3. 2.3. The Future - Civil Liability Insurance of Artificial Intelligence System OperatorKamil Szpyt
    3. 3. SummaryKamil Szpyt
  9. Tomasz Zalewski Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. 1. IntroductionTomasz Zalewski
    2. 2. Examples of Typical LegalTech 1.0 Products and ServicesTomasz Zalewski
    3. 3. What Is LegalTech 1.0 Used For?Tomasz Zalewski
    4. 4. How to Implement and Use LegalTech 1.0 Tools?Tomasz Zalewski
    5. 5. LegalTech 2.0 - a Breakthrough in the Way We ThinkTomasz Zalewski
    6. 6. How to Implement and Use LegalTech 2.0 Tools?Tomasz Zalewski
    7. 7. How to Find an Area to Use LegalTech 2.0 Tools?Tomasz Zalewski
    8. 8. LegalTech 2.0 and the Expectations of Lawyers and ClientsTomasz Zalewski
    9. 9. Unstoppable TrendTomasz Zalewski
4. 1. Marek Swierczynski Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. 1. IntroductionMarek Swierczynski
    2. 2 Definition of Artificial IntelligenceMarek Swierczynski
    3. 3. The "Black Box" Problem in AI Decision Making ProcessMarek Swierczynski
    4. 4. Council of Europe Work on Artificial IntelligenceMarek Swierczynski
    5. 5. Council of Europe Guidelines on Common Courts DigitalisationMarek Swierczynski
    6. 6. Summary and ConclusionsMarek Swierczynski
  2. Gabriela Wiktorzak Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. 1. IntroductionGabriela Wiktorzak
    2. 2. AI i rozwój praktyki prawaGabriela Wiktorzak
    3. Gabriela Wiktorzak
      1. 3.1. Document analysis – Document Review and E-discoveryGabriela Wiktorzak
      2. 3.2. Contract review/management softwareGabriela Wiktorzak
      3. 3.3. Legal information systems and predictive analyticsGabriela Wiktorzak
    4. 4. Compliance. Risk managementGabriela Wiktorzak
    5. 5. SummaryGabriela Wiktorzak
  3. Gabriela Bar Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. 1. IntroductionGabriela Bar
    2. 2. Robo-assistant: Support for the Lawyers and Client AdvisorGabriela Bar
    3. 3. Augmented Intelligence: Centaurs and CyborgsGabriela Bar
    4. 4. Artificial LawyerGabriela Bar
    5. 5. Instead of a Summary: Why Changes to Natural Intelligence Are NecessaryGabriela Bar
  4. Michal Wódczak Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. 1. IntroductionMichal Wódczak
    2. 2. Legal Services and StandardizationMichal Wódczak
    3. 3. Technology and LegislationMichal Wódczak
    4. 4. Legal Processes and AutonomicsMichal Wódczak
    5. 5. Agent Systems and Definition of a ThingMichal Wódczak
    6. 6. ConclusionMichal Wódczak
  5. Mariusz Zalucki Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. 1. IntroductionMariusz Zalucki
    2. 2. Experience with LegalTech in the judiciaryMariusz Zalucki
    3. 3. AI in the judiciaryMariusz Zalucki
    4. 4. The potential of AI in the context of the functioning of the judiciary of the futureMariusz Zalucki
    5. 5. Dilemmas related to AI and the judiciary of the futureMariusz Zalucki
    6. 6. ConclusionsMariusz Zalucki
5. 1. Michal Tabor Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. 1. Electronic IdentificationMichal Tabor
    2. 2. Distributed ConfirmationsMichal Tabor
  2. Sylwester Szczepanik, Michal Tabor Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. 1. IntroductionSylwester Szczepanik, Michal Tabor
    2. 2. Correspondence Exchange - Terminological RemarksSylwester Szczepanik, Michal Tabor
    3. 3. Horizontal Exchange of CorrespondenceSylwester Szczepanik, Michal Tabor
    4. 4. Hierarchical Exchange of CorrespondenceSylwester Szczepanik, Michal Tabor
    5. 5. Electronic Delivery - eIDAS RegulationSylwester Szczepanik, Michal Tabor
    6. 6. Qualified Electronic Delivery ServiceSylwester Szczepanik, Michal Tabor
    7. Sylwester Szczepanik, Michal Tabor
      1. 7.1. IntroductionSylwester Szczepanik, Michal Tabor
      2. 7.2. Common Address InfrastructureSylwester Szczepanik, Michal Tabor
      3. 7.3. Reception and Mailing BoxesSylwester Szczepanik, Michal Tabor
      4. 7.4. Mandatory Address for the Legal ProfessionSylwester Szczepanik, Michal Tabor
    8. 8. Qualified Electronic Delivery in Selected EU Member StatesSylwester Szczepanik, Michal Tabor
    9. 9. The PEPPOL System - Description of the Solution Today and Development ProspectsSylwester Szczepanik, Michal Tabor
  3. Anna Zalesinska, Dariusz Szostek Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. 1. IntroductionAnna Zalesinska, Dariusz Szostek
    2. 2. Transmission of Data and Making Data AvailableAnna Zalesinska, Dariusz Szostek
    3. Anna Zalesinska, Dariusz Szostek
      1. 3.1. IntroductionAnna Zalesinska, Dariusz Szostek
      2. 3.2 Automation of Processes Through Use of Aggregated DataAnna Zalesinska, Dariusz Szostek
      3. 3.3 Searching Through DataAnna Zalesinska, Dariusz Szostek
    4. Anna Zalesinska, Dariusz Szostek
      1. 4.1. Communication Within an OrganisationAnna Zalesinska, Dariusz Szostek
      2. 4.2. Communication with Parties from Outside an OrganisationAnna Zalesinska, Dariusz Szostek
    5. Anna Zalesinska, Dariusz Szostek
      1. 5.1. IntroductionAnna Zalesinska, Dariusz Szostek
      2. 5.2. Information and Interaction ServicesAnna Zalesinska, Dariusz Szostek
      3. 5.3. Transactional and Integrative Services. Personalisation as the Fifth Stage of Maturity for e-ServicesAnna Zalesinska, Dariusz Szostek
    6. Anna Zalesinska, Dariusz Szostek
      1. 6.1. IntroductionAnna Zalesinska, Dariusz Szostek
      2. 6.2. Electronic Hearings According to the Example of European StatesAnna Zalesinska, Dariusz Szostek
    7. Anna Zalesinska, Dariusz Szostek
      1. 7.1. PolandAnna Zalesinska, Dariusz Szostek
  4. Tomasz Chomicki Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. 1. IntroductionTomasz Chomicki
    2. 2. CybersecurityTomasz Chomicki
    3. 3. Cybers Hygiene – A Security PackageTomasz Chomicki
    4. 4. AI and ML vs Internet SecurityTomasz Chomicki
    5. 5. The Forecast of the FutureTomasz Chomicki
  5. Robert Pajak Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. 1. IntroductionRobert Pajak
    2. 2. The Concept of Information Security, Data Protection and Cyber securityRobert Pajak
    3. Robert Pajak
      1. 3.1 General Comments. Sources of Information Security Best Practices.Robert Pajak
      2. 3.2. ISO 27001Robert Pajak
      3. 3.3. NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF)Robert Pajak
      4. 3.4. CIS Controls/CIS BenchmarksRobert Pajak
      5. Robert Pajak
        3.5.1. International Bar AssociationRobert Pajak
        3.5.2. Council of Bars and Law Societies of EuropeRobert Pajak
    4. Robert Pajak
      1. 4.1. Roles and ResponsibilitiesRobert Pajak
      2. 4.2. „Digital Hygiene”Robert Pajak
      3. 4.3. Insider ThreatsRobert Pajak
      4. 4.4. Multi-layer SecurityRobert Pajak
      5. 4.5. OutsourcingRobert Pajak
    5. 5. Summary. Security Is a Process.Robert Pajak
1. Thiago Santos Rocha Download Kapitel (PDF)
  1. 1. IntroductionThiago Santos Rocha
  2. 2. Legaltech in BrazilThiago Santos Rocha
  3. 3. Blockchain and DLT in Government SystemsThiago Santos Rocha
  4. 4. Online Court ProceedingsThiago Santos Rocha
  5. 5. Artificial Intelligence in the Justice SystemThiago Santos Rocha
  6. 6. Plans for the FutureThiago Santos Rocha
  7. 7. Final ConsiderationsThiago Santos Rocha
2. Maddalena Castellani Download Kapitel (PDF)
  1. Maddalena Castellani
    1. Bejing Internet CourtMaddalena Castellani
  2. 2. Blockchain and DLT in government systems. Whether there are judicial systems or other registers using blockchain. Legal provisions linking a blockchain entry to a legal presumption.Maddalena Castellani
  3. 4. Online court proceedings. Are it acceptable, in what way, the way of communication, what information systems are used. How is the judgment issued. Is the connection from the court or can it be made...Maddalena Castellani
  4. 5. AI in the justice system. How is it used. Is it permissible to make automatic decisions. China’s Netcourt use AI in the justice system.Maddalena Castellani
3. Iga Kurowska Download Kapitel (PDF)
  1. 1. A progressive but satisfactory Legaltech adoption by French law firmsIga Kurowska
  2. 2. An ambitious but underperformed digital transformation of the French justice systemIga Kurowska
  3. 3. E-deliveryIga Kurowska
  4. 4. Plans for the futureIga Kurowska
4. Wilfried Bernhardt Download Kapitel (PDF)
  1. Wilfried Bernhardt
    1. 1.1. CourtsWilfried Bernhardt
    2. 1.2. Law firmsWilfried Bernhardt
    3. 1.3. ArbitrationWilfried Bernhardt
  2. 2. Blockchain and DLT in government systems. Whether there are judicial systems or other registers using blockchain. Legal provisions linking a blockchain entry to a legal presumption.Wilfried Bernhardt
  3. 3. Electronic communication with the court. Legal basis, method of communication, transmission of documents.Wilfried Bernhardt
  4. 4. Online court proceedings. Are they acceptable, in what way, the way of communication, what information systems are used? How is the judgment issued? Is the connection from the court or can it be ma...Wilfried Bernhardt
  5. 5. AI in the justice system and automatic decisions.Wilfried Bernhardt
  6. 6. The plans for the future.Wilfried Bernhardt
5. Zsolt Ződi Download Kapitel (PDF)
  1. Zsolt Ződi
    1. 1.1. IntroductionZsolt Ződi
    2. 1.2. Technology at the CourtsZsolt Ződi
    3. 1.3. Technology at the Public Prosecutors’ OrganisationZsolt Ződi
    4. 1.4. Technology at Law FirmsZsolt Ződi
  2. 2. Blockchain within the GovernmentZsolt Ződi
  3. Zsolt Ződi
    1. 3.1. A Short History of Electronic Litigation in HungaryZsolt Ződi
    2. 3.2. Legal BasisZsolt Ződi
    3. 3.3. Details of the electronic communication with courtsZsolt Ződi
    4. Zsolt Ződi
      1. 3.4.1. Company Registration Procedure.Zsolt Ződi
      2. 3.4.2. Order for Payment Procedure.Zsolt Ződi
  4. 4. Online ProceduresZsolt Ződi
  5. 5. Use of Artificial Intelligence, and Automated Decision-makingZsolt Ződi
  6. 6. Future PlansZsolt Ződi
6. Pierpaolo Marano, Mario Zanin, Enrico Maria Scavone Download Kapitel (PDF)
  1. 1. IntroductionPierpaolo Marano, Mario Zanin, Enrico Maria Scavone
  2. Pierpaolo Marano, Mario Zanin, Enrico Maria Scavone
    1. 2.1. Legal definition of DLTs and smart contractPierpaolo Marano, Mario Zanin, Enrico Maria Scavone
    2. 2.2. Institutional and governmental initiativesPierpaolo Marano, Mario Zanin, Enrico Maria Scavone
    3. 2.3. Applications of DLTs in the legal sectorPierpaolo Marano, Mario Zanin, Enrico Maria Scavone
  3. Pierpaolo Marano, Mario Zanin, Enrico Maria Scavone
    1. 3.1. Notifications of procedural documents by electronic meansPierpaolo Marano, Mario Zanin, Enrico Maria Scavone
    2. 3.2. Filing of procedural documents and evidence by electronic meansPierpaolo Marano, Mario Zanin, Enrico Maria Scavone
    3. 3.3. Computer trial dossierPierpaolo Marano, Mario Zanin, Enrico Maria Scavone
    4. 3.4. Creation of computer documentPierpaolo Marano, Mario Zanin, Enrico Maria Scavone
    5. 3.5. Communication of the sentence and access to consultation servicesPierpaolo Marano, Mario Zanin, Enrico Maria Scavone
  4. 4. Civil judicial proceedings during epidemiological emergencyPierpaolo Marano, Mario Zanin, Enrico Maria Scavone
  5. 5. Alternative dispute resolution systemsPierpaolo Marano, Mario Zanin, Enrico Maria Scavone
  6. 6. Conclusive remarksPierpaolo Marano, Mario Zanin, Enrico Maria Scavone
7. Vytautas Nekrošius Download Kapitel (PDF)
  1. 1. To which extent are LegalTech means used in your country: in courts, arbitrations, law firms?Vytautas Nekrošius
  2. 2. Are Blockchain and DLT technologies used in courts or other public institutions?Vytautas Nekrošius
  3. Vytautas Nekrošius
    1. Future plansVytautas Nekrošius
8. Mauro Arturo Rivera León Download Kapitel (PDF)
  1. 1. LegalTech used in MexicoMauro Arturo Rivera León
  2. 2. Blockchain and DLT in government systems.Mauro Arturo Rivera León
  3. 3. Electronic communication with the Court.Mauro Arturo Rivera León
  4. 4. Online court proceedings.Mauro Arturo Rivera León
  5. 5. AI in the justice system.Mauro Arturo Rivera León
  6. 6. Future plans and challenges.Mauro Arturo Rivera León
9. Aleksandra Partyk Download Kapitel (PDF)
  1. IntroductionAleksandra Partyk
  2. Electronic writ of payment procedureAleksandra Partyk
  3. Programs used for managing court proceedings and secretariat’s work (Sawa, Sędzia-2)Aleksandra Partyk
  4. Software used for recording court sessionsAleksandra Partyk
  5. Software used for operating remote court hearingsAleksandra Partyk
  6. Information PortalsAleksandra Partyk
  7. PESEL-SADAleksandra Partyk
  8. System of Random Allocation of CasesAleksandra Partyk
  9. SummaryAleksandra Partyk
Summary of the bookSeiten 615 - 616 Download Kapitel (PDF)
About the authorsSeiten 617 - 628 Download Kapitel (PDF)
BibliographySeiten 629 - 673 Download Kapitel (PDF)

Literaturverzeichnis (738 Einträge)

AB2L, ‘Radar de Lawtechs e Legaltechs’ (ab2l.org.br) <https://ab2l.org.br/radar-lawtechs/> accessed 10 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Abrams I R, ‘Statutory Protection of the Algorithm in a Computer Program: A Comparison of the Copyright and patent laws’ (1989) 9:2 Computer Law Journal; Google Scholar öffnen
Abschlussbericht der Länderarbeitgruppe ‘Legal Tech: Herausforderungen für die Justiz’(Schleswig-Holstein, 2019), <https://www.schleswig-holstein.de/DE/Landesregierung/II/Minister/Justizministerkonferenz/Downloads/190605_beschluesse/TOPI_11_Abschlussbericht.pdf;jsessionid=403E9295A2AF9CB0FBA9909024CD2AFA.delivery2-replication?__blob=publicationFile&v=1> accessed 26 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Accident Compensation Better Rules Discovery Team ‘Exploring Machine Consumable Accident Compensation Legislation. Lessons for a structural rewrite of the AC Act and opportunities to make it machine consumable’ (The Service Innovation Lab, 1 July 2019) <https://serviceinnovationlab. github.io/assets/Exploring_Machine_Consumable_Code_With_ACC.pdf> accessed 30 January 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Adamczewski P, `Ku dojrzałości cyfrowej organizacji inteligentnych‘, (2018) 161 Studia i Prace. Kolegium Zarządzania i Finansów; Google Scholar öffnen
Adamczewski P, `Organizacje inteligentne w zintegrowanym rozwoju gospodarki` (2016) 2 Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytet Rzeszowski, Google Scholar öffnen
African Regional Intellectual Property Organization, ‘ARIPO Model Law on Copyright and Related Rights’ (ARIPO, July 2019) <https://www.aripo.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/ARIPO-Model-Law-on-Copyright-and-Related-Rights.pdf> accessed 11 December 2020. Google Scholar öffnen
Agarib A, ‘Dubai Police unveil Artificial Intelligence projects, Smart Tech’ (Khaleej Times, 12 March 2018) <https://www.khaleejtimes.com/nation/dubai/dubai-police-unveil-artificial-intelligence-projects-smart-tech> accessed 8 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Agnoloni T, Francesconi E and Spinosa P, ‘xmLegesEditor: an OpenSource Visual XML Editor for supporting Legal National Standards’ in Proceedings of the V Legislative XML Workshop (European Press Academic Publishing 2007); Google Scholar öffnen
Alchourrón C E and Bulygin E, Normative Systems (Springer-Verlag 1971); Google Scholar öffnen
Aletras N, Tsarapatsanis D, Preotiuc-Pietro D and Lampos V, ‘Predicting judicial decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: a Natural Language Processing perspective’ (2016), 2 Perrj Computer Science; Google Scholar öffnen
Aletras N, Tsarapatsanis D, Preotiuc-Pietro D and Lampos V, ‘Predicting judicial decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: a natural language processing perspective’ (2016) 2 PeerJ Computer Science; Google Scholar öffnen
Aleven V, Teaching Case-Based Argumentation Through A Model and Examples (University of Pittsburgh 1997) <http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.47.3347&rep=rep1&type=pdf> access 10 May 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Alexy R, A Theory of Constitutional Rights, transl. J. Rivers (Oxford University Press 2002); Google Scholar öffnen
Al-Kofahi K, ‘Cognitive Computing: Transforming Knowledge Work, Transforming Knowledge Work’ (27 January 2017) <www.blogs.thomsonreuters.com/answerson/cognitive-computing-transforming-knowledge-work/> accessed 15 December 2020; Google Scholar öffnen
Allen C, ‘The Path to Self-Sovereign Identity’ (Life With Alarcity, 25 April 2016) <http://www.lifewithalacrity.com/2016/04/the-path-to-self-soverereign-identity.html> accessed 21 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Alpaydin E, Machine Learning. The New AI (The MIT Press 2016); Google Scholar öffnen
Alsop T, ‘Legal Tech Market Revenue Worldwide from 2019 to 2025, by Business Type’ (Statista, 26 January 2021) <www.statista.com/statistics/1168096/legal-tech-market-revenue-by-business-type-worldwide/> accessed 30 January 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Ambrogi R, ‘A Chronology of Legal Technology 1842-1995’, <https://www.lawsitesblog.com/2010/02/chronology-of-legal-technology-1842.html> access 17 March 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Ambrogi R, ‘At $1.2 Billion, 2019 Is A Record Year for Legal Tech Investments - And It's Only September’, (Lawsites 14 February 2010) <https://www.lawsitesblog.com/2019/09/at-1-1-billion-2019-is-a-record-year-for-legal-tech-investments-and-its-only-september.html> access 17 March 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Ambrogi R, ‘Judge Penalizes Lawyers For Not Using Artificial Intelligence’ <abovethelaw.com/2019/01/judge-penalizes-lawyers-for-not-using-artificial-intelligence/>, accessed: 13 January 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Amendolagine V, ‘Percorsi di giurisprudenza - il processo civile telematico a cinque anni dalla sua introduzione’ (2020) 1 Giurisprudenza Italiana; Google Scholar öffnen
Amrosz M, ’Sztuczna inteligencja z obowiązkowym ubezpieczeniem OC?’ (2021) 5 Miesięcznik Ubezpieczeniowy; Google Scholar öffnen
Anand S A pioneer in real estate blockchain emerges in Europe, <https://www.wsj.com/ articles/a-pioneer-in-real-estate-blockchain-emerges-in-europe-1520337601> accessed 27 January 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Andoni M, Robu V, Flynn D, Abram S, Geach D, Jenkins D, McCallum P and Peacock A, ‘Blockchain technology in the energy sector: A systematic review of challenges and opportunities‘ (2019) 100 Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews; Google Scholar öffnen
Andrews v. Blick Art Materials LLC 286 F Supp 3d 365 (NY 2017); Google Scholar öffnen
Angwin J, Larson J, Mattu S and Kirchner L, ′Machine Bias′, (ProPublica, 23 May 2016) <https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing> accessed 8 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Angwin J, Larson J, Mattu S and Kirchner L, ‘Machine bias’ (Pro Publica, 23 May 2016) <https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing> accessed 11 March 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Araszkiewicz M, ‘Limits of Constraint Satisfaction Theory of Coherence as a Theory of (Legal) Reasoning’ in Michał Araszkiewicz and Jaromír Šavelka (eds) Coherence. Insights from Philosophy, Jurisprudence and Artificial Intelligence (Springer 2013); Google Scholar öffnen
Araszkiewicz M, ‘Towards Systematic Research on Statutory Interpretation in AI and Law’ in Kevin D. Ashley (ed) Legal Knowledge and Information Systems - JURIX 2013: The Twenty-Sixth Annual Conference. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 259 (IOS Press 2013); Google Scholar öffnen
Araszkiewicz M, Żurek T, ‘Interpreting Agents’ in Floris Bex, Serena Villata (eds) Legal Knowledge and Information Systems - JURIX 2016: The Twenty-Ninth Annual Conference. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 294 (IOS Press 2016); Google Scholar öffnen
Araya D, ‘3 Things You Need To Know About Augmented Intelligence’ (Forbes 22 January 2019) <forbes.com/sites/danielaraya/2019/01/22/3-things-you-need-to-know-about-augmented-intelligence/?sh=4cda84bd3fdc>, accessed: 10 January 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Armour J, Parnham R and Sako M, ‘Augmented Lawyering’ (2020) 558 European Corporate Governance Institute - Law Working Paper; Google Scholar öffnen
Artificial Lawyer, ‘France’s Controversial Judge Data Ban – The Reaction‘ (Artificial Lawyer, 5 June 2019) <https://www.artificiallawyer.com/2019/06/05/frances-controversial-judge-data-ban-the-reaction/> accessed 31 March 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Ashley K D and Brüninghaus S, ‘Automatically Classifying Case Texts and Predicting Outcomes’ (2009) 17(2) Artificial Intelligence and Law; Google Scholar öffnen
Ashley K D and Brüninghaus S, ‘An AI model of case-based legal argument from a jurisprudential viewpoint’ (2002) 10 Artificial Intelligence and Law; Google Scholar öffnen
Ashley K D and Brüninghaus S, Artificial Intelligence and Legal Analytics. New Tools for Legal Practice in the Digital Age (Cambridge University Press 2017); Google Scholar öffnen
Ashley K D and Brüninghaus S, Artificial Intelligence and Legal Analytics: New Tools for Law Practice in the Digital Age (Cambridge University Press 2017); Google Scholar öffnen
Ashley K D and Brüninghaus S, Modeling Legal Argument. Reasoning with Cases and Hypotheticals (MIT Press 1990); Google Scholar öffnen
Atienza M and Ruiz-Manero J, A Theory of Legal Sentences (Springer 1998); Google Scholar öffnen
Atkinson K and Bench-Capon T, Argumentation Schemes in AI and Law (in press 2021); Google Scholar öffnen
Atkinson K and Bench-Capon T, Bench-Capon T and Bollegala D, ‘Explanation in AI and law: Past, present and future’ (2020) 289: 103387 Artificial Intelligence. Google Scholar öffnen
Atkinson K and Bench-Capon T, Bench-Capon T, ‘Reasoning with Legal Cases: Analogy or Rule Application?’ in Floris Bex (ed) Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL 2019 (ACM 2019); Google Scholar öffnen
Atkinson K and Bench-Capon T, Bench-Capon T, Bex F, Gordon T F, Prakken H, Sartor G, Verheij B, ‘In memoriam Douglas N. Walton: the influence of Doug Walton on AI and law’ (2020) 28(3) Artificial Intelligence and Law; Google Scholar öffnen
Bacon J, Michels J D, Millard C and Singh J, ‘Blockchain Demystified’ (2017) 268/2017 Queen Mary School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper <https://ssrn.com/abstract=3091218> accessed 6 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Banasikowska J, Sołtysik-Piorunkiewicz A, `Czynniki kształtujące poziom akceptacji i poziom dojrzałości systemów e-administracji na tle rozwoju społeczeństwa informacyjnego` (2016) 308 Studia Ekonomiczne. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach, Google Scholar öffnen
Bandara E, Keong Ng W, Ranasinghe N, De Zoysa K, ‘Aplos: Smart contract Made Smart’ in Zibin Zheng, Hong-Ning Da, Mingdong Tang, Xiangping Chen (eds), Blockchain and Trustworthy System (Springer 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
Bar G, ‘Przejrzystość, w tym wyjaśnialność, jako wymóg prawny dla systemów Sztucznej Inteligencji’ (2020) 20 Prawo Nowych Technologii; Google Scholar öffnen
Bar G, ‘Robot personhood, czyli po co nam antropocentryczna Sztuczna Inteligencja’ in Luigi Lai and Marek Świerczyński (eds.), Prawo Sztucznej Inteligencji (C. H. Beck 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
Baran P, ‘On Distributed Communications: I. Introduction to Distributed Communications Networks‘ (1964) RAND Corporation <https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_memoranda/RM3420.html> accessed 1 December 2020; Google Scholar öffnen
Baroni P, Gabbay D, Parent X, van der Torre L (eds) Handbook of Formal Argumentation (College Publications 2018); Google Scholar öffnen
Barotanyi B, ‘E-Recht: Law Making in a Contemporary Way’ (2007) 1 Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology; Google Scholar öffnen
Barraclough T, Fraser H and Barnes C, ‘Legislation as a code for New Zeland: opportunities, risks, and recomendations’ (2021) 3 NZLFRRp 12-13; Google Scholar öffnen
Barredo Arrieta A, Díaz-Rodríguez N, Del Ser J, Bennetot A, Tabik S, Barbado A, Garcia S, Gil-Lopez S, Molina D, Benjamins R, Chatila R and Herrera F, ‘Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI’ (2020) 58 Information Fusion; Google Scholar öffnen
Barta P, Kawecki M in Paweł Litwiński (ed), Rozporządzenie UE w sprawie ochrony osób fizycznych w związku z przetwarzaniem danych osobowych i swobodnym przepływem takich danych. Komentarz, Warszawa (C. H. Beck 2018); Google Scholar öffnen
Baum S, “A Survey of Artificial General Intelligence Projects for Ethics, Risk, and Policy” (Global Catastrophic Risk Institute Working Paper 17 January 2017) 29 <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3070741> accessed 4 August 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Beck K, Test Driven Development: By Example (1 ed., Addison-Wesley Professional 2002); Google Scholar öffnen
Beconcini P, ’More ’’NetCourts’’ Opening in China’ (Squire Patton Boggs, 14 November 2018) <https://www.iptechblog.com/2018/11/more-netcourts-opening-in-china/> accessed 21 August 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Belew R K, ‘A connectionist approach to conceptual information retrieval’ (Proceedings of the First International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL '87, Boston, 27-29 May 1987); Google Scholar öffnen
Bellinger G and Castro D, Mills A, ‘Data, Information, Knowledge and Wisdom` (2004) <http://www.Systems-thinking.org/dikw/dikw.htm> accessed 11 January 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Bench-Capon T and others, ‘A History of AI and Law in 50 Papers: 25 Years of the International Conference on AI and Law’ (2012) 20 Artificial Intelligence and Law; Google Scholar öffnen
Bench-Capon T and Coenen F P, ‘Isomorphism and legal knowledge based systems.’ (1992) 1 Artificial Intelligence and Law; Google Scholar öffnen
Bench-Capon T, ‘Before and after Dung: Argumentation in AI and Law’, 11(1-2) Argument and Computation; Google Scholar öffnen
Bench-Capon T, ‘HYPO'S legacy: introduction to the virtual special issue’ (2017), 25(2) Artificial Intelligence and Law; Google Scholar öffnen
Bench-Capon T and Sartor G, ‘A model of legal reasoning with cases incorporating theories and values’, 150(102) Artificial Intelligence; Google Scholar öffnen
Berek M, ‘Rządowa procedura prawodawcza i jej znaczenie dla jakości stanowionego prawa.’ in Federczyk W. and Peszkowski S. (eds.), Doskonalenie i standaryzacja procesu legislacyjnego – dobre praktyki opracowane w ramach projektu LEGIS (Krajowa Szkoła Administracji Publicznej im. Prezydenta Rzeczpospolitej Polskiej Lecha Kaczyńskiego 2019); Google Scholar öffnen
Berger-Walliser G, Barton T D and Haapio H, ‘From Visualization to Legal Design: A Collaborative and Creative Process’ (2017) 54:2 American Business Law Journal; Google Scholar öffnen
Berman D H and Hafner C D, ‘Representing Teleological Structure in Case-based Legal Reasoning: The Missing Link’ in Anja Oskamp and Kevin Ashley (eds), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Artificial intelligence and Law, ICAIL '93 (ACM 1993); Google Scholar öffnen
Bex F, Arguments, Stories and Criminal Evidence. A Formal Hybrid Theory, (Springer 2011); Google Scholar öffnen
Biallaß I D in Stephan Oryand Stephan Weth (eds) Elektronischer Rechtsverkehr (1st edition, juris Allianz, 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
Bieluk M, ‘Cywilnoprawna odpowiedzialność profesjonalnego pełnomocnika za błąd’ (Uniwersytet w Białymstoku 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
Bigelow R P, ‘The Use of Computers in the Law’, (1973) 24, 4 Hastings Law Journal <https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal/vol24/iss4/4> access: 17 March 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
BIK, ’Cybersecurity of Poles 2020’ (Biuro prasowe Grupy BIK, 26 January 2021) <https://media.bik.pl/informacje-prasowe/637189/dobre-praktyki-ochrony-danych-osobowych> accessed 31 March 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Bing J, ‘Performance of Legal Text Retrieval Systems: The Curse of Boole’ (1987) 79 Law. Libr. J.; Google Scholar öffnen
Bing J, ′Let there be LITE: a brief history of legal information retrieval′ (2010), 1 European Journal of Law and Technology; Google Scholar öffnen
Black H C, ‘Token’, The Black’s Law Dictionary (Rev 4th edn, West Publishing Co. 1968); Google Scholar öffnen
Black N, ‘The Latest on Legal Document Management Software’ (ABA Journal, 27 April 2020) <www.abajournal.com/web/article/the-latest-on-legal-document-management-software> accessed 29 May 2020; Google Scholar öffnen
Błaszczak A, ‘Cyberprzestępczość: 2021 będzie rokiem wymuszeń w Internecie’ <www.rp.pl/Biznes/201209783-Cyberprzestepczosc-2021-bedzie-rokiem-wymuszen-w-Internecie.html> accessed 25 April 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Bodo B, Gervais D and Quintais J P, ‘Blockchain and Smart Contracts: the Missing Link in Copyright Licensing?’ (2018) 26 International Journal of Law and Information Technology <https://academic.oup.com/ijlit/article/26/4/311/5106727> accessed 7 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Boicu M, Tecuci G, Stanescu B, Balan G and Popovici E, ‘Ontologies and the Knowledge Acquisition Bottleneck’, <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228549124_Ontologies_and_the_knowledge _acquisition_bottleneck/link/549dbfd20cf2fedbc31198ec/download> accessed 25 April 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Bongiovanni G, Postema G, Rotolo A, Sartor G, Valentini C and Walton D (eds.), Handbook of Legal Reasoning and Argumentation (Springer 2018); Google Scholar öffnen
Boris M, ‘Top Trends in Contract Management 2020’ (Contractbook, 31 August 2020) <www.contractbook.com/legaltechinstitute/top-trends-in-contract-management-2020> accessed 3 September 2020. Google Scholar öffnen
Borstrom N, Superinteligencja. Scenariusze, strategie, zagrożenia (Helion, Gliwice 2016); Google Scholar öffnen
Bosilkovsky I, ‘Stanford Grad Who Created The World’s First ’Robot Lawyer” Raises $ 12 Million In Series A’ (Forbes 23 June2020), <www.forbes.com/sites/igorbosilkovski/2020/06/23/stanford-grad-who-created-the-worlds-first-robot-lawyer-raises-12-million-in-series-a/?sh=1f6b03d03309> accessed 7 January2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Bostick K L, 'Pie in the Sky: Cloud Computing brings an End to the Professionalism Paradigm in the Practice of Law‘, (2012) 60, 5 Buffalo Law Review; Google Scholar öffnen
Bower J L and Christiensen C M, ‘Disruptive Technologies: Catching the Wave’ (January-February 1995) Harvard Business Review <https://hbr.org/1995/01/disruptive-technologies-catching-the-wave> accessed 2 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Branting K and others ′Semi-Supervised Methods for Explainable Legal Prediction′ (Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL '19), Montreal, 17 – 21 June 2019); Google Scholar öffnen
Branting K, ‘Building explanations from rules and structured cases’ (1991) 34(6) International Journal of Man–Machine Studies; Google Scholar öffnen
Branting K, Pfeifer C, Brown B, Ferro L, Aberdeen J, Weiss B, Pfaff M and Liao B, ‘Scalable and explainable legal prediction’ (2020) Artificial Intelligence and Law <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-020-09273-1> accessed 10 May 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Bratus S, Lembree A and Shubina A, 'Software on the witness stand: what should it take for us to trust it?' in Alessandro Acquisti, Sean W Smith, Ahmad-Reza Sadeghi (eds), Trust and Trustworthy Computing, Third International Conference, TRUST 2010, Berlin, Germany, June 21-23, 2010, Proceedings (Springer 2010); Google Scholar öffnen
Brauer J, Programming Smalltalk – Object-Orientation from the Beginning (Springer 2015); Google Scholar öffnen
Braun S, `Remote Interpreting` in Holly Mikkelson and Renėe. Jourdenais (eds) Routledge Handbook of Interpreting (Routledge 2015) 352. Google Scholar öffnen
Brazier F MT and others, ‘Agents and Service-Oriented Computing for Autonomic Computing: A Research Agenda’ (2009) 13(3) IEEE Internet Computing; Google Scholar öffnen
Brennan T, Dieterich W and Ehret B, ‘Evaluating the predictive validity of the Compas risk and needs assessment system’ (2009) 1 Criminal Justice and Behavior; Google Scholar öffnen
Breuker J, Casanovas P, Klein M C.A, Francesconi E ‘The Flood, the Channels and the Dykes: Managing Legal Information in a Globalized and Digital World’ in Joost Breuker, Pompeu Casanovas, Michel C.A. Klein, Enrico Francesconi (eds), Law, Ontologies and the Semantic Web. Channeling the Legal Information Flood (Amsterdam 2009); Google Scholar öffnen
Browne O and Pizzey H, ‘Pyrrho Investments Ltd v MWB Property Ltd: A Landmark Decision on Predictive Coding in e-Discovery’ (Latham.London, 15 July 2016) <https://www.latham.london/2016/07/pyrrho-investments-ltd-v-mwb-property-ltd-a-landmark-decision-on-predictive-coding-in-e-discovery/> accessed 26 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Brożek B, Rationality and Discourse. Towards a Normative Model of Applying Law (Wolters Kluwer 2007); Google Scholar öffnen
Buchanan B and Headrick T, ′Some Speculation About Artificial Intelligence and Legal Reasoning′ (1970) 23, 1 Stan. L.aw Rev; Google Scholar öffnen
Buchanan B, Shortliffe E H, Rule-based Expert Systems. The MYCIN Experiments of the Stanford Heuristic Programming Project (Reading 1984); Google Scholar öffnen
Bues M M and Matthaei E, ‘LegalTech on the Rise: technology Changes Legal Work Behaviors, But Does Not Replace Its Profession’ in Kai Jacob, Dierk Schnidler and Roger Strathausen (eds), Liquid Legal (Springer International Publishing 2017); Google Scholar öffnen
Bues M M, ‘What AI in Law Can and Can’t Do’ (European Legal Tech Association) <www.europe-legaltech.org/what-ai-in-law-can-and-cant-do/> accessed 2 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Burrell J, ‘How the Machine ‘Thinks’: Understanding Opacity in Machine Learning Algorithms‘ (2016) 3(1) Big Data & Society; Google Scholar öffnen
Buss S R, Kechris A S, Pillay A and Shore R A, ‘The Prospects for Mathematical Logic in the Twenty-first Century’ (2001) 7 Bulletin of Symbolic Logic; Google Scholar öffnen
Butterworth M L, ‘The ICO and artificial intelligence: The role of fairness in the GDPR framework’ (2018) 2 Computer Law Security Review; Google Scholar öffnen
Bygrave L and Tosoni L, ‘Commentary on Article 4’ in Christopher Kuner, Lee A. Bygrave, Christopher Docksey (eds) The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). A Commentary (OUP 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
Cahuc P, Malherbet F and Prat J, ‘The detrimental effect of job protection on employment: Evidence from France’ (2019) Iza Institute of Labor Economics; Google Scholar öffnen
Calegari R and Sartor G, ‘A Model for the Burden of Persuasion in Argumentation’ in Serena Villata, Jakub Harašta and Petr Kremen (eds) Legal Knowledge and Information Systems - JURIX 2020: The Thirty-third Annual Conference, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 334 (IOS Press 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
Callister P, ‘Law, Artificial Intelligence, and Natural Language Processing: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to My Search Results’ (2020) 112 Law Library Journal 161-212 <www.papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3712306> accessed 24 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Cambridge Dictionary, ‘Token’ <https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/token> accessed 2 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Campos J, ‘La justicia penal en tiempos del Covid-19. Los retos de las videoconferencias’(2020) VI, 6 Paréntesis legal; Google Scholar öffnen
Canivet G, ‘«Preuve et Blockchain», présentation de la table ronde’, (2019) 2 Dalloz IP/IT 2019; Google Scholar öffnen
Carabantes M, ‘Black-box artificial intelligence: an epistemological and critical analysis‘ (2019) 35 AI & Society; Google Scholar öffnen
Cardenas J, ‘La nueva Ley de Amparo”, Cuestiones Constitucionales’(2013) 29 Cuestiones Constitucionales. Revista Mexicana de Derecho Constitucional; Google Scholar öffnen
Carneiro D, Novais P, Andrade F, Zeleznikow J and Neves J, ‘ODR: an Artificial Intelligence Perspective‘ (2014) 41 Artificial Intelligence Review; Google Scholar öffnen
Carnelutti F, La prova civile. Parte generale. Il concetto giuridico della prova ( Giuffrè, 1992) 9. Google Scholar öffnen
Carnevali D, ‘Great Success that Was on the Brink of Failure: The Case of a Techno-Legal Assemblage in the "Civil Trial On-Line" System in Italy’ (2019) 8(2) EQPAM; Google Scholar öffnen
Casanovas P, Palmirani M, Peroni S, van Engers T and Vitali F, ‘Special Issue on the Semantic Web for the Legal Domain Guest Editors’ Editorial: The Next Step’ (2016) Semantic Web Journal <http://www.semantic-web-journal.net/content/special-issue-semantic-web-legal-domain-guest-editors%E2%80%99-editorial-next-step> access: 16 August 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Case 128/11 UsedSoft GmbH v Oracle International Corp [2012] ECLI:EU:C:2012:407; Google Scholar öffnen
Case 393/09 Bezpečnostní softwarová asociace - Svaz softwarové ochrany v Ministerstvu kultury [2010] ECLI:EU:C:2010:816; Google Scholar öffnen
Case C-311/18 Data Protection Commissioner v. Facebook Ireland Limited and Maximillian Schrems [2020] EU:C:2020:559; Google Scholar öffnen
Case N, ‘How To Become A Centaur’ (2018) Journal of Design and Science MIT Media Lab <jods.mitpress.mit.edu/pub/issue3-case/release/6>, accessed: 14 January 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Casellas N, Legal Ontology Engineering. Methodologies, Modelling Trends, and the Ontology of Professional Judicial Knowledge (Springer 2011); Google Scholar öffnen
Castellani M, Pomi P, Triberti C and Turato A (eds), Blockchain: Guida pratica tecnico giuridica all'uso (Goware 2019); Google Scholar öffnen
CCBE, ‘Komunikacja elektroniczna i Internet –przewodnik CCBE’ (2013)142 Radca Prawny Dodatek Naukowy; Google Scholar öffnen
CCBE, 'CCBE GUIDANCE On Improving The IT Security Of Lawyers Against Unlawful Surveillance' (ccbe.eu, 2016) <https://www.ccbe.eu/fileadmin/speciality_distribution/public/documents/IT_LAW/ITL_Guides_recommendations/EN_ITL_20160520_CCBE_Guidance_on_Improving_the_IT_Security_of_Lawyers_Against_Unlawful_Surveillance.pdf> accessed 17 August 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
CCBE, Considerations on the legal aspects of artificial intelligence (2020) <https://www.ccbe.eu/fileadmin/speciality_distribution/public/documents/IT_LAW/ITL_Guides_recommendations/EN_ITL_20200220_CCBE-considerations-on-the-Legal-Aspects-of-AI.pdf> accessed 12 January 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
CEF Digital, ‘eID’ <https://ec.europa.eu/cefdigital/wiki/display/CEFDIGITAL/eID> accessed: 21 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Cellan-Jones R, ′Dubai Police Unveil Robot Officer′ (BBC, 24 May 2017) <https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-40026940> accessed 8 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Center Information Policy Leadership ‘Artificial Intelligence and Data Protection: Delivering Sustainable AI Accountability in Practice. First. Report: Artificial Intelligence and Data Protection in Tension’ (2018) <https://www.informationpolicycentre.com/uploads/5/7/1/0/57104281/cipl_ai_first_report_-_artificial_intelligence_and_data_protection_in_te....pdf> accessed 8 April 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
CEPEJ ‘Length of court proceedings in the member states of the Council of Europe based on the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights’ (CEPEJ,2018); Google Scholar öffnen
CEPEJ, ‘Possible introduction of a mechanism for certifying artificial intelligence tools and services in the sphere of justice and the judiciary: Feasibility Study’ (15Rev, CEPEJ, 8 December 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
Chan J BL, ′Technological Game: How Information Technology is Transforming Police Practice′ (2001) 1 Criminal Justice: The International Journal of Policy and Practice; Google Scholar öffnen
Chan V and Koo A M, ‘Blockchain Evidence in Internet Courts in China: The Fast Track for Evidence Collection for Online Disputes’ (Lexology, 15 July 2020) <https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=1631e87b-155a-40b4-a6aa-5260a2e4b9bb> accessed 9 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union [2012] OJ C326/391; Google Scholar öffnen
Chaudhuri A, Mandaviya K, Badelia P and Ghosh S K, ′Optical Character Recognition Systems′ in Arindam Chaudhuri, Krupa Mandaviya, Pratixa Badelia and Soumya K Ghosh (eds) ‘Optical Character Recognition Systems for Different Languages with Soft Computing′, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing Vol. 352 (Springer 2017); Google Scholar öffnen
Check Point Data, ‘Raport Cyberbezpieczeństwa’ (2020); Google Scholar öffnen
Chłopecki A, Sztuczna inteligencja - szkice prawnicze i futurologiczne (2nd edn, C. H. Beck 2021); Google Scholar öffnen
Chłopecki A, Sztuczna inteligencja: szkice prawnicze i futurologiczne (C. H. Beck 2018); Google Scholar öffnen
Chmieliński M, 'Możliwości wspomagania wybranych ekspertyz i opinii specjalistycznych w obszarze bezpieczeństwa przy wykorzystaniu różnych programów komputerowych' (2017) 8 2(28) Problemy mechatroniki. Uzbrojenie, lotnictwo, inżynieria bezpieczeństwa; Google Scholar öffnen
Chozick R, ‘The Major Differences Between Digital Forensics and E-discovery’ (Flashback Data, 30 June 2017) <www.flashbackdata.com/digital-forensics-vs-ediscovery/> accessed 20 January 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Christensen C, The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Boston (MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1997); Google Scholar öffnen
Christian G, ‘Predictive Coding: Adopting and Adapting Artificial Intelligence (AI) In Civil Litigation’ (2019) 97 The Canadian Bar Review; Google Scholar öffnen
CIO, ‘Defining your data strategy for a multi-cloud world’ <https://www.cio.com/playlist/the-cloud-control-room/collection/cloud-operations-and-management/article/defining-your-data-strategy-for-a-multi-cloud-world> accessed 18 December 2020; Google Scholar öffnen
Clegg S, `Globalizing the Intelligent Organization: Learning Organizations, Smart Workers, (Not So) Clever Countries and the Sociological Imagination, Management Learning` (1999) Sage journals <https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1350507699303001> accessed 11 January 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
CNIL, ‘Blockchain: Solutions for a responsible use of the blockchain in the context of personal data’ <https://www.cnil.fr/sites/default/files/atoms/files/blockchain_en.pdf> accessed 11 December 2020; Google Scholar öffnen
Coelho F and Younes G, ‘The GDPR-Blockchain paradox: a work around’ (W-GCS'18 2018: 1st workshop on GDPR compliant systems, co-located with 19th ACM international middleware conference, Rennes, 2018); Google Scholar öffnen
Cohen M A, ‘The Rise of Legal Tech Incubators and Why Allen & Overy's 'Fuse' Has the Right Stuff’ (Forbes 12 February 2018) <https://www.forbes.com/sites/markcohen1/2018/02/12/the-rise-of-legal-tech-incubators-and-why-allen-overys-fuse-has-the-right-stuff/#10482014494d> access 17 March 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Cole F K, ‘In What Format Should I Make My Production? And, Does Format Matter?’ (JD Supra, 3 June 2019) <https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/in-what-format-should-i-make-my-61643/> accessed 24 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Cole K, ‘Judges Make the Case for TAR’ (Farrell Fritz, 17 February 2021) <www.allaboutediscovery.com/2021/02/judges-make-the-case-for-tar/> accessed 24 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Collins A M and Quillian R M, ‘Retrieval Time from Semantic Memory’ (1969) 8(2) Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior; Google Scholar öffnen
Collins P, ‘What Is a Blockchain Oracle?’ (Medium, 2 September 2020) <https://medium.com/better-programming/what-is-a-blockchain-oracle-f5ccab8dbd72> accessed 10 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Collomb A, De Filippi P, Sok K, ‘Blockchain Technology and Financial Regulation: A Risk-Based Approach to the Regulation of ICOs’ (2019) 10 European Journal of Risk Regulation <doi:10.1017/err.2019.41> accessed 9 March 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Competition & Markets Authority (UK), ‘Algorithms: How they can reduce competition and harm consumers’ (Crown, 2021) <https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/954331/Algorithms_++.pdf> accessed 19 January 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Conrad J G, ‘E-Discovery revisited: The need for artificial intelligence beyond information retrieval’(2010) 4 Artificial Intelligence and Law; Google Scholar öffnen
Conselho Nacional de Justiça, ’Justiça Em Números 2020’ (Conselho Nacional de Justiça 2020) 93 <https://www.cnj.jus.br/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/WEB-V3-Justiça-em-Números-2020-atualizado-em-25-08-2020.pdf> accessed 9 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Conselho Nacional de Justiça, 'Inteligência Artificial No Poder Judiciário Brasileiro' (Conselho Nacional de Justiça 2019) 37 <https://www.cnj.jus.br/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Inteligencia_artificial_no_poder_judiciario_brasileiro_2019-11-22.pdf> accessed 7 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Consolo C, Spiegazioni di diritto processuale civile (2nd ed., Giappichelli, Torino, 2014); Google Scholar öffnen
Consumer Protection Federal Agency, Procuraduria Federal del Consumidor, ‘Informe Anual de la Procuraduría Federal del Consumidor 2019’ (PROFECO, 2019); Google Scholar öffnen
Contissa G, Godano F and Sartor G, ‘Computation, Cybernetics and the Law at the Origins of Legal Informatics’ [in:] Simona Chiodo and Viola Schiaffonati (eds), Italian Philosophy of Technology: Socio-Cultural, Legal, Scientific and Aesthetic Perspectives on Technology (Vol. 35, Springer 2021); Google Scholar öffnen
Cooper S, Cyber Insurance, [w:] Peter Rogan (ed), The Insurance and Reinsurance Law Review, USA (Law Business Research Ltd 2020) <https://thelawreviews.co.uk/title/the-insurance-and-reinsurance-law-review/editors-preface> accessed 25 April 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Coormen T H, Algorithms Unlocked (MIT Press 2013); Google Scholar öffnen
Corea F, ‘Distributed Artificial Intelligence. A primer on Multi-Agent Systems, Agent-Based Modeling, and Swarm Intelligence’ (Medium March 2019) <https://francesco-ai.medium.com/distributed-artificial-intelligence-3e3491e0771c>, accessed on 14 January 2020; Google Scholar öffnen
Corr J, `An introduction to the digital maturity model` (2020) <https://www.seerinteractive.com/blog/introduction-to-digital-maturity/> accessed 11 January 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Corrales M, Jurčcys M and Kousiouris G, ‘Smart Contracts and Smart Disclosure: Coding a GDPR Compliance Framework’ in Marcelo Corrales, Mark Fenwick and Helena Haapio (eds), Legal Tech, Smart Contracts and Blockchain (Springer 2019); Google Scholar öffnen
Corrales M, Fenwick M and Haapio H, ‘Digital Technologies, Legal Design and the Future of the Legal Profession‘ in MarceloCorrales, Mark Fenwick and Helena Haapio (eds) Legal Tech, Smart Contracts and Blockchain (Springer, 2019); Google Scholar öffnen
Corrales M, Fenwick M, Haapio H (eds), Legal Tech, Smart Contracts and Blockchain (Springer 2019); Google Scholar öffnen
Corrales M, Jurčys P, Kousiouris G, ‘Smart Contracts and Smart Disclosure: Coding a GDPR Compliance Framework’ (2018) SSRN Electronic Journal <www.researchgate.net/publication/323625892_Smart_Contracts_and_Smart_Disclosure_Coding_a_GDPR_Compliance_Framework> accessed 30 November 2020; Google Scholar öffnen
Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe, ‘CCBE Guidelines on the Use of cloud Computing Services by Lawyers’, (CCBE, 7 September .9.2012) r., <http://www.ccbe.eu/fileadmin/speciality_distribution/public/documents/IT_LAW/ITL_Position_papers/EN_ITL_20120907_CCBE_guidelines_on_the_use_of_cloud_computing_services_by_lawyers.pdf.> accessed 21 January 2018; Google Scholar öffnen
Council of Europe European Commission for the efficiency of justice (‘CEPEJ’), ‘European judicial systems – Efficiency and quality of justice’ (CEPEJ, 2016); Google Scholar öffnen
Crowd Research Partners and Cybersecurity Insiders, 'Insider Threat Report 2018' (Crowd Research Partners, 2018) <https://www.veriato.com/resources/whitepapers/insider-threat-report-2018> accessed 17 August 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Cui Y, Artificial Intelligence and Judicial Modernization (Springer, 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
Custers B and Vergouw B, ′Promising policing technologies: Experiences, obstacles and police needs regarding law enforcement technologies′ (2015) 31 Computer Law & Security Review; Google Scholar öffnen
Cyrul W, ‘Tekst jednolity aktu normatywnego w formacie elektronicznym. W kierunku automatyzacji procesu ujednolicania tekstów prawnych’ in Marzena Laskowska (ed) ‘Znaczenie wyroków Trybunału Konstytucyjnego dla tekstu jednolitego ustawy’ (Wydawnictwo Sejmowe 2017); Google Scholar öffnen
Cyrul W and Pełech–Pilichowski T, ‘Legislating in Hypertext’, (2020) 118 OSAP 27; Google Scholar öffnen
Cyrul Wand and Duda J, Opiła J and Pełech-Pilichowski T, Informatyzacja tekstu prawa. Perspektywy zastosowania języków znacznikowych (Wolters Kluwer, Warszawa 2014); Google Scholar öffnen
Czepita S, ‘On the Concept of a Conventional Act and its Varieties‘ (2017) Year LXXIX No. 1 Legal, Economic and Sociological Movement 85; Google Scholar öffnen
D’Amato A, ‘Can/Should Computers Replace Judges?’(1997) 11 Georgia Law Review; Google Scholar öffnen
Da Silva Moore v. Publicis Groupe - 287 F.R.D. 182 (S.D.N.Y. 2012); Google Scholar öffnen
Dale R, ‘Law and Word Order: NLP in Legal Tech’ (2019) 25(1) Natural Language Engineering; Google Scholar öffnen
Dale R, ‘Law and Word Order: NLP in Legal Tech’ (Towards Data Science, 15 December 2018) <www.towardsdatascience.com/law-and-word-order-nlp-in-legal-tech-bd14257ebd06> accessed 4 January 2020; Google Scholar öffnen
DalleMulle L and Devenport T H, ‘What’s Your Data Strategy? The key is to balance offense and defense’, < https://www.hbr.org/2017/05/whats-your-data-strategy> accesed 18 December 2020; Google Scholar öffnen
Daniels J and Rissland E, ′Integrating IR and CBR to locate relevant texts and passages′ (Database and Expert Systems Applications, 8th International Conference, Proceedings, DEXA'97, Toulouse, 1-2 September 1997); Google Scholar öffnen
Davidson S, De Filippi P and Potts J, ‘Disrupting Governance: The New Institutional Economics of Distributed Ledger Technology’ (2016) <http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2811995> accessed 9 March 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Davis A E, ‘The Future of Law Firms (and Lawyers) in the Age of Artificial Intelligence’ (American Bar Association , 2 October 2020) <www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/professional_lawyer/27/1/the-future-law-firms-and-lawyers-the-age-artificial-intelligence/?q=&wt=json&start=0> accessed 30 November 2020; Google Scholar öffnen
Davis A E, ‘The Future of Law Firms (and Lawyers) in the Age of Artificial Intelligence’ (American Bar Association, 2 October 2020) <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340322409_The_Future_of_Law_Firms_and_Lawyers_in_the_Age_of_Artificial_Intelligence> accessed 4 August 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Daylami N, ‘The origin and Construct of Cloud Computing’, (2015) 9, 2 International Journal of the Academic Business World; Google Scholar öffnen
de Caria R, ‘A Digital Revolution in International Trade? The International Legal Framework for Blockchain Technologies, Virtual Currencies and Smart Contracts: Challenges and Opportunities’ (Modernizing International Trade Law to Support Innovation and Sustainable Development Proceedings of the Congress of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law, July 2017) <https://aperto.unito.it/retrieve/handle/2318/1632525/464608/R.%20de%20Caria%2c%20A%20Digital%20Revolution%20%282017%29.pdf> accessed 2 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
de Caria R, ‘Definitions of Smart Contracts: Between Law and Code’ in Larry A. DiMatteo, Michel Cannarsa, and Cristina Poncibò (eds) The Cambridge Handbook of Smart Contracts, Blockchain Technology and Digital Platforms (Cambridge University Press 2019); Google Scholar öffnen
de Maat E, Winkels R and van Engers T, ‘Automated Detection of Reference Structures in Law’ in Tom M. van Engers (ed) Legal Knowledge and Information Systems (IOS Press 2006). Google Scholar öffnen
Decentralized Identifiers (DIDs) v1.0. Core architecture, data model, and representations’ (W3C, 3 August 2021) <https://www.w3.org/TR/did-core/> accessed 3 August 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Deflem M and Chicoine S, ′History of Technology in Policing′ in Gerben Bruinsma and David Weisburd (eds), Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice (Springer 2017); Google Scholar öffnen
Del Castillo M, Blockchain 50 2021, <https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaeldelcastillo/2021/02/02/blockchain-50/?sh=207076dc231c> accessed 27 January 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Del Castillo M, Forbes Blockchain 50 Of 2021: Cashing In On Bitcoin Mania <https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaeldelcastillo/2021/02/02/forbes-blockchain-50-corporate-america-cashes-in-on-bitcoin-mania/?sh=1bc729216e01> accessed 27 January 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Deloitte Center for Government Insights, ‘Future of Regulation. Case studies.’ (Deloitte Center for Government Insights, 2018) <https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/us/Documents/public-sector/us-fed-future-of-regulation.pdf> accessed 5 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Deloitte Legal, ‘What’s your problem? Legal Technology’ (2018) Legal Management Consulting; Google Scholar öffnen
Denham H, De Vynck G and Lerman R, ‘What is an NFT, and how did an artist called Beeple sell one for $69 million at Christie’s?’ The Washington Post (Washington D.C., 12 March 2021) <https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/03/12/nft-beeple-christies-blockchain/> accessed 15 March 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Departament Oceny Skutków Regulacji, ‘Ocena wpływu w rządowym procesie legislacyjnym.’ (Gov.pl, 13 November 2020) <https://www.gov.pl/web/premier/ocena-wplywu-w-rzadowym-procesie-legislacyjnym> accessed 18 April 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Dertouzos J N, Pace N M and Anderson R H, ‘The Legal and Economic Implications of Electronic Discovery’ 2008 Institute for Civil Justice; Google Scholar öffnen
Di Modica G, Di Stefano A, Morana G, Tomarchio O, ‘On the Cost of the Management of user Applications in a Multicloud Environment’ (7th International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud (FiCloud), Istanbul, 2019); Google Scholar öffnen
Diaz v. Lobel's of New York LLC 16-CV-6349 (NY 2019); Google Scholar öffnen
Dickert T, ‘Modernisierung des Zivilprozesses Diskussionspapier’ (justiz.bayern.de) <https://www.justiz.bayern.de/media/images/behoerden-und-gerichte/oberlandesgerichte/nuernberg/diskussionspapier_ag_modernisierung.pdf> accessed 26 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Die Bundesregierung, ‘Künstliche Intelligenz (KI) ist ein Schlüssel zur Welt von morgen.’ (Die Bundesregierung), <www.ki-strategie-deutschland.de.>accessed 26 Fabruary 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Dignum V, Responsible Artificial Intelligence, How to Develop and Use., AI in a Responsible Way (Springer 2019); Google Scholar öffnen
Dimitropoulos G,‘The Law of Blockchain‘ (2020) 1117 Washington Law Review; Google Scholar öffnen
Diver L, ‘Digisprudence: the design of legitimate code.’ (LawArXiv Papers, 14 July 2020) <https://doi.org/10.31228/osf.io/nechu> accessed 18 March 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Dobjani E T, ‘Length of proceedings as standard of due process of law in the practise of the Constitutional Court of Albania’ (2016) 13 Academicus. International Scientific Journal; Google Scholar öffnen
Domash J, ‘AI and its Impact on the Future of Regulatory Compliance’ (A-Team Insight, 9 September 2020) <www.a-teaminsight.com/ai-and-its-impact-on-the-future-of-regulatory-compliance/?brand=ati> accessed 30 September 2020; Google Scholar öffnen
Domingos P, The Master Algorithm: How the Quest for the Ultimate Learning Machine Will Remake Our World (Brillance Audio 2017); Google Scholar öffnen
Duca L D, ‘Facilitating expansion of Cross-Border E-Commerce- Developing a Global Online Dispute Resolution System’ (2012) 1, 1 Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs; Google Scholar öffnen
Dunbar K, ‘Problem Solving’’ in William Bechtel and George Graham (eds), A Companion to Cognitive Science (Blackwell Publishers 1999); Google Scholar öffnen
Dybała G and Szpyt K, ’Odpowiedzialność odszkodowawcza za sztuczną inteligencję’ (2021) 5 Gazeta Ubezpieczeniowa; Google Scholar öffnen
Dyduch X, ‘Zawód adwokata (abogado) w Hiszpanii’ w Michał. Masior (ed) Analiza prawno-porównawcza ustroju korporacyjnego wolnych zawodów prawniczych oraz rynku usług prawniczych w wybranych państwach, w kontekście regulacji i rynku w Polsce z uwzględnieniem dostępności obywateli do tych usług, (Instytut Wymiaru Sprawiedliwości 2018) <https://iws.gov.pl/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/IWS-Masior-M.-i-inni-Wolne-zawody-prawnicze.pdf> accessed 25 April 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Dymiński M, Ferenc D, ‘GDPR w łańcuchu bloków’ (2020) 6 Przegląd Prawa Publicznego; Google Scholar öffnen
Dymitruk M, ‘Sztuczna inteligencja w wymiarze sprawiedliwości?’ in Luigi Lai and Marek Świerczyński (eds), Prawo sztucznej inteligencji (C. H. Beck 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
Dymitruk M, ′Need for explainable artificial intelligence in automated judicial proceedings′ (Doctoral Consortium at 17th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, Montreal 17 – 21 June 2019); Google Scholar öffnen
Earsl A R,‘Multi-cloud strategy’, <https://<searchcloudcomputing.techtarget.com/definition/multi-cloud-strategy> accessed 9 March 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
EBA, ‘Report with advice for the European Commission on crypto-assets’ (2019) <https://www.eba.europa.eu/sites/default/documents/files/documents/10180/2545547/67493daa-85a8-4429-aa91-e9a5ed880684/EBA%20Report%20on%20crypto%20assets.pdf> accessed 9 March 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Ebers M, ‘Legal Tech and EU Consumer Law’ in: Larry A. DiMatteo, André Janssen, Pietro Ortolani, M. Canarsa, M. Durovic, F. de Elizalde, André Janssen, Pietro Ortolani, Francisco de Elizalde, Francisco de Elizalde, Michel Cannarsa, Mateja Durovic (eds), Lawyering in the Digital Age, (Cambridge University Press 2021); Google Scholar öffnen
Ebers M, ‘Regulating AI and Robotics: Ethical and Legal Challenges’ in Martin Ebers and Susana Navas (eds), Algorithms and Law (Cambridge University Press 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
Ebers M, LegalTech and EU Consumer Law (Cambridge 2021); Google Scholar öffnen
Ebers M and Navas S, Algorithms and law (UCL 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
Electronic Transactions Act <https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/ETA2010#P1I> accessed 27 January 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Endicott T, Vagueness in Law (Oxford University Press 2000); Google Scholar öffnen
Engstron D F, ‘Post-COVID courts’ (2020) 68 UCLA Law Review Discourse; Google Scholar öffnen
Escajeda H G, ‘The Vitruvian Lawyer: How to Thrive in an Era of AI and Quantum Technologies’ (2020) XXIX Kansas J. of Law & Pub. Pol'y <https://ssrn.com/abstract=3534683>, accessed: 14 January 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
ETSI, ‘Generic Framework for Multi-Domain Federated ETSI GANA Knowledge Planes (KPs) for End-to-End Autonomic (Closed-Loop) Security Management & Control for 5G Slices, Networks/Services’ (2020) 6 White Paper; Google Scholar öffnen
ETSI-GS-AFI-001, ‘Autonomic network engineering for the self-managing Future Internet (AFI); ScenariosUse Cases and Requirements for Autonomic/Self-Managing Future Internet’ (ETSI Group Specification 2011); Google Scholar öffnen
ETSI-GS-AFI-002, ‘Autonomic network engineering for the self-managing Future Internet (AFI); Generic Autonomic Network Architecture (An Architectural Reference Model for Autonomic Networking, Cognitive Networking and Self-Management)’ (ETSI Group Specification 2013); Google Scholar öffnen
European Commision, ‘Study on the use of innovative technologies in the justice field. Final report” (Publication Office European Union 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
European Commission, ‘OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE STRATEGY 2020 – 2023 Think Open’ (Communication to the Commission, 21 November 2020) <https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/en_ec_open_source_strategy_2020-2023.pdf> accessed 12 January 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
European Commission, ‘Study on the use of innovative technologies in the justice field – Final Report’ (2020) 120, <https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/4fb8e194-f634-11ea-991b-01aa75ed71a1/language-en> accessed 25 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
European Commission, White Paper On Artificial Intelligence - A European approach to excellence and trust, Brussels, COM(2020) 65 final <https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/commission-white-paper-artificial-intelligence-feb2020_en.pdf> access 17 March 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
European Commission, ‘Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Central Bank, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. FinTech Action plan: For a more competitive and innovative European financial sector’ (eur-lex.europa.eu, 2018); Google Scholar öffnen
European Parliamentary Research Service, ‘Blockchain and the General Data Protection Regulation‘, PE 634.445 (2019) 4, <https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2019/634445/EPRS_STU(2019)634445_EN.pdf> accessed 10 October 2020; Google Scholar öffnen
European Parliament's Policy Department for Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs, Artificial Intelligence and Law Enforcement: Impact on Fundamental Rights, PE 656.295, 2020, <https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2020/656295/IPOL_STU(>(2020)656295_EN.pdf> accessed 8 February 2021. Google Scholar öffnen
Evrotrust, ‘Sending and receiving courts' decisions is already possible through the smartphone’ (www.evrotrust.com, 9 February 2021) <https://www.evrotrust.com/landing/en/a/sending-and-receiving-courts-decisions-is-already-possible-through-the-smartphone> access 19 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Expert Group on Liability and New Technologies – New Technologies Formation, ‘Liability for Artificial Intelligence and Other Emerging Digital Technologies’ (European Commission 2019); Google Scholar öffnen
Expert Group on Liability and New Technologies New Technologies Formation, Liability for Artificial Intelligence and other emerging digital technologies, ‘Report’ (European Union 2019); Google Scholar öffnen
Faccioli M in: Alessio Zaccaria, Martin Schmidt-Kessel, Reiner Schulze and Alberto M Gambino (eds) EU eIDAS Regulation. Commentary (Beck/Hart 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
Faction, ‘What is Multi-Cloud? Everything You Need to Know’, <https://www.factioninc.com/blog/what-is-multi-cloud/> accessed 28 December 2020; Google Scholar öffnen
Falkon S, ‘The Story of the DAO — Its History and Consequences’ (Medium, 24 December 2017) <https://medium.com/swlh/the-story-of-the-dao-its-history-and-consequences-71e6a8a551ee> accessed 19 January 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Farzindar A and Lapalme G, ‘Machine Translation of Legal Information and Its Evaluation’ in Nathalie Japkowicz and Yong Gao (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence (Springer 2009). Google Scholar öffnen
Fédération Suisse des Avocats, ‘Indications et recommandations de la FSA pour la sous-traitanceinformatique et l’utilisation de services cloud’ <https://www.sav-fsa.ch/fr/documents/dynamiccontent/190408-sav-guidelines-outsourcing_f-(4).pdf> accessed 9 January 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Fenwick M, Kaal W A and Vermeulen E P M, ‘Legal Education in a Digital Age. Why Coding Matters for the Lawyer of the Future’ in Marcelo Corrales Compagnucci, Nikolaus Forgó, Toshiyuki Kono, Shinto Teramoto and Erik P. M. Vermeulen (eds) Legal Tech and the New Sharing Economy (Springer, 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
Ferguson A, ′Predictive Policing′ (2017) 94 Washington University Law Review; Google Scholar öffnen
Ferrari F, ‘Il processo civile telematico’ in Lotario Dittrich (ed) Diritto Processuale Civile (Utet Giuridica, 2019); Google Scholar öffnen
Ferrer A J, García Pérez D, Sosa González R, ‘Multi-Cloud Platform-as-a-Service Model’ (2016) 97 Functionalities and Approaches Procedia Computer Science; Google Scholar öffnen
Feteris E, Fundamentals of Legal Argumentation. A Survey of Theories on the Justification of Judicial Decisions (Springer 2017); Google Scholar öffnen
Financial Conduct Authority, ‘Guidance on Cryptoassets Feedback and Final Guidance to CP 19/3’ (2019) <https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/policy/ps19-22.⁠p⁠d⁠f> accessed 7 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Finck M, ‘Blockchain and the General Data Protection Regulation, Can distributed ledgers be squared with European data protection law? ’, (2019) Study. European Parliament; Google Scholar öffnen
Finck M, ‘Smart Contracts as a Form of Solely Automated Processing under the GDPR’ (2019) 9(2) International Data Privacy Law; Google Scholar öffnen
Finck M, Blockchain Regulation and Governance in Europe (CUP 2018); Google Scholar öffnen
Finck M, and Moscon V, ‘Copyright Law on Blockchains: Between New Forms of Rights Administration and Digital Rights Management 2.0.’ (2019) 50 IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law; Google Scholar öffnen
FINMA, ‘Guidelines for enquiries regarding the regulatory framework for initial coin offerings (ICOs)’ (2018) <https://www.finma.ch/en/~/media/finma/dokumente/dokumentencenter/myfinma/1bewilligung/fintech/wegleitung-ico.pdf?la=en⁠⁠> accessed 7 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Finocchiaro G, ‘Intelligenza artificiale e protezione dei dati personali’ (2019) Giursprudenza Italiana. Google Scholar öffnen
Finocchiaro G, ‘Intelligenza artificiale e responsabilità’ (2020) 2 Contr. impr.; Google Scholar öffnen
Fitzgibbons L, ‘Data in use. Definition’, <https://www.whatis.techtarget.com/definition/data-in-use>, accessed 15 January 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Flasiński M, Introduction to Artificial Intelligence (Springer International Publishing 2016); Google Scholar öffnen
Flood J and Robb L, ‘Professions and Expertise: How Machine Learning and Blockchain are Redesigning the Landscape of Professional Knowledge and Organisation’ (2018) 18-20 Griffith University Law School Research Paper <https://<ssrn.com/abstract=3228950> accessed 19 January 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Florida v Espinoza, Case No F14-2923 (Fla 11th Cir Ct) <https://www.morrisoncohen.com/siteFiles/files/2014_02_06%20-%20Florida%20v_%20Espinoza.pdf> accessed 7 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Florida v. Espinoza, Case No. 3D16-1860; Google Scholar öffnen
Ford M, Architects of Intelligence: The truth about AI from the people building it (Packt Publishing, November 2018); Google Scholar öffnen
Francesconi E, ‘A description logic framework for advanced accessing and reasoning over normative provision’ (2014) 22(3) Artificial Intelligence and Law; Google Scholar öffnen
Fraser V and Roberge J-F, ’Legal Design Lawyering: Rebooting Legal Business Model with Design Thinking’ (2016) 16 Prepperdine Dispute Resoluton Law Journal; Google Scholar öffnen
Freeman K, ‘Algorithmic injustice: How the Wisconsin Supreme Court failed to protect due process rights in State v. Loomis’ (2016) 5 North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology; Google Scholar öffnen
Frey C B, Osborne M A, ‘The Future Of Employment: How Susceptible Are Jobs To Computerisation?’ <oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/publications/the-future-of-employment/>, accessed: 13 March 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Frické M H, ‘Data-Information-Knowledge-Wisdom (DIKW) Pyramid, Framework, Continuum’, in Laurie A. Schintler and Connie L. McNeely (eds) Encyclopedia of Big Data (Springer 2018) <https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32001-4_331-1> accessed 11 January 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Fundacja LegalTech Polska, ‘Diagnoza potrzeb prawników w zakresie wykorzystywania narzędzi informatycznych w usługach prawniczych’ (Politechnika Warszawska, 2018) <https://legaltechpolska.pl/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/2018.06.25_Raport_LegalTech_ost.pdf> accessed 17 March 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Furlong J, ‘The evolution of the legal services market’, <law21.ca/2012/11/the-evolution-of-the-legal-services-market-stage-1/>, accessed: 20 January 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Gacyk M, Zabawy w Boga. Ludzie o magnetycznych palcach (Agora 2020) 1901; Google Scholar öffnen
Gajewski M, ‘To były czasy. Kiedy po raz pierwszy uruchomiłem system z graficznym interfejsem i nie rozumiałem, co widzę‘ (Spider’s Web, 7 December 2018) <www.spidersweb.pl/2018/12/microsoft-windows-3-1.html> accessed 20 May 2020; Google Scholar öffnen
Gamito M C and Ebers M, ‘Algorithmic Governance and Governance of Algorithms: An Introduction’ in Martin Ebers and Marta Cantero Gamito (eds), Algorithmic Governance and Governance of Algorithms: Legal and Ethical Challenges (Springer 2021); Google Scholar öffnen
Garapon A, ‘Les enjeux de la justice prédictive’ (2017) 1-2 La Semaine juridique; Google Scholar öffnen
Gatteschi V, Lamberti F and Demartini C, ‘Technology of Smart Contracts’ in Larry DiMatteo, Michel Cannarsa, Cristina Poncibò (eds), The Cambridge Handbook of Smart Contracts, Blockchain Technology and Digital Platforms (CUP 2019) <doi:10.1017/9781108592239.003> accessed 9 March 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Gerard D, ‘The KodakCoin ICO failed, and now everyone wants their money’ (David Gerard, 10 December 2018) <https://davidgerard.co.uk/blockchain/2018/12/10/the-kodakcoin-ico-failed-and-now-everyone-wants-their-money/> accessed 6 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Gerards J and Xenidis R, ‘Algorithmic discrimination in Europe: Challenges and opportunities for gender equality and non-discrimination law’ (European Commission 2020) < https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/082f1dbc-821d-11eb-9ac9-01aa75ed71a1> access 16 March 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Gesetz zur Einführung der elektronischen Akte in der Justiz und zur weiteren Förderung des elektronischen Rechtsverkehrs dated 5. 7. 2017, Bundesgesetzblatt I 2017, 2208; Google Scholar öffnen
Giaccaglia M, ‘Considerazioni su blockchain e smart contracts (oltre le criptovalute)’ (2019) 3 Contr. impr.; Google Scholar öffnen
Gill K S, ‘Data to Decision and Judgment Making – a Question of Wisdom’ (2018) 30 IFAC Papers On Line; Google Scholar öffnen
Girasa R, Artificial Intelligence as a Disruptive Technology. Economic Transformation and Government Regulation (Palgrave Macmillan 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
Gitti G and Maugeri M, ‘Blockchain-Based Financial Services and Virtual Currencies in Italy’ in EuCML, 2020, 43; for further information, see Technical Committees ISO TC 307 available at <https://www.iso.org/committee/6266604.html> accessed 24 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Gołaczyński J (eds), Informatyzacja postępowania sądowego w prawie polskim i wybranych państw (C. H. Beck 2009); Google Scholar öffnen
Gołaczyński J, ‘e-Sąd przyszłości‘ (2019) 2 Monitor Prawniczy; Google Scholar öffnen
Gomez v. General Nutrition Corp. 323 F Supp 3d 1368 (FL 2018); Google Scholar öffnen
González-Espejo M-J and Pavón J (eds), An Introductory Guide to Artificial Intelligence for Legal Professionals (Kluwer Law International 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
Goodenough O R, ‘Computational Jurisprudence 3.0’ (SLS Blog, 5 February 2015) <https://law.stanford.edu/2015/02/05/computational-jurisprudence-3-0/> accessed 19 November 2020; Google Scholar öffnen
Goodenough O R, ‘Legal Technology 3.0’ (HuffPost, 2 April 2015) <https://www.huffpost.com/entry/legal-technology-30_b_6603658?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9kZS53aWtpcGVkaWEub3JnLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAJmQ5R47vQkZD-CLSEI62GMZFfamcZbEroAVqRj0BgQ3GNQ-M7_Mp42oSaiMJThfkfRJZ2XRPcDqKQplfWZyMly0joNI6cn_4BEIooGzWowCm_XIpcCaJidFyB_gju_bruNDzgN9wcy-tWt9MbzUWKIDaN8n4FSY6sEDJ5t-RSeB> accessed 19 November 2020; Google Scholar öffnen
Goodenough O R, ‘Getting to Computational Jurisprudence 3.0’, [in:] Oliver Goodenough, Amedeo Santosuosso and Marta Tomasi (eds), ‘The Challenge of Innovation in Law: The Impact of Technology and Science on Legal Studies and Practice’ (Pavia University PressItaly 2015); Google Scholar öffnen
Goodman A, ‘Predictive Coding: A Better Way to Deal with Electronically Stored Information’ (2016) 43(1) Litigation; Google Scholar öffnen
Gordon T F, Prakken H, Walton D, ‘The Carneades model of argument and burden of proof’ (2007) 171(10-15) Artificial Intelligence; Google Scholar öffnen
Gordon T G, ’20 Years of ICAIL – Reflections on the field of AI and Law’ tfgordon.de 2007 <http://www.tfgordon.de/publications/> access 10 May 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Górska M A and Marcinowska L, ’Czy blockchain namiesza w umowach dotyczących własności intelektualnej?’, <https://newtech.law/pl/blockchain-namiesza-umowach-dotyczacych-wlasnosci-intelektualnej/> accessed 25 April 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Gottschalk v Benson (1972) 409 U.S. 63; Google Scholar öffnen
Goździaszek Ł (ed), Identyfikacja elektroniczna i usługi zaufania w odniesieniu do transakcji elektronicznych na rynku wewnętrznym Unii Europejskiej. Komentarz (C. H. Beck 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
Grabmair M, Modeling Purposive Legal Argumentation and Case Outcome Prediction Using Argument Schemes in the Value Judgment Formalism (University of Pittsburgh 2016) <http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/27608/, 2016> accessed 17 August 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Grabowski M and Zając A, ‘Dane, informacje, wiedza – próba definicji’ (2009) 798 Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie; Google Scholar öffnen
Grant T D and Wischik D, On the path to AI. Law’s prophecies and the conceptual foundations of the machine learning age ( Palgrave Macmillan 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
Greenberg A, ‘A Hacker Tried to Poison a Florida City's Water Supply, Officials Say’ (Wired.com, 2 August 2021) <www.wired.com/story/oldsmar-florida-water-utility-hack> accessed 29 March 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Grin O S, Grin E S and Solovyov A V, ‘The Legal Design of the Smart Contract: The Legal Nature and Scope of Application’ (2019) 8 Lex Russia; Google Scholar öffnen
Grisham J, A Time to Kill (Delta 2004) 369.. Google Scholar öffnen
Grosman M R, Cormack G V, ‘Inconsistent Responsiveness Determination in Document Review: Difference of Opinion or Human Error’ (2012) 32 Pace L. Rev.; Google Scholar öffnen
Grossman M R and Cormack G V, ′Technology-Assisted Review in E-Discovery Can Be More Effective and More Efficient Than Exhaustive Manual Review′ (2010) 17 , Rich. JL & Tech.; Google Scholar öffnen
Grupp M, ‘Legal tech – Impulse fur Streitbeilegung und Rechtsdienstleistung’ (2014) 8-9 Anwaltsblatt <https://www.juris.de/jportal/portal/page/bsabprod.psml?doc.id=jzs-AnwBl2014080019-000_660&st=zs&showdoccase=1&paramfromHL=true> accessed 18 November 2020; Google Scholar öffnen
Grzybowska N, ‘Jest uzasadnienie wyroku ws. Amber Gold. Liczy 9345 stron I zajmie około 47 tomów akt sprawy’ (gdansk.naszemiasto.pl, 29 July 2020) <https://gdansk.naszemiasto.pl/jest-uzasadnienie-wyroku-ws-amber-gold-liczy-9345-stron-i/ar/c1-7827784> accessed 7April 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Guillaume F, ‘Aspects of private international law related to blockchain transactions’ in Daniel Kraus, Thierry Obrist and Olivier Hari (eds), Blockchains, Smart Contracts, Decentralised Autonomous Organisations and the Law (Edward Elgar 2019); Google Scholar öffnen
Gupta S, ‘Sentiment Analysis: Concept, Analysis and Applications’ (January 2018) https://<towardsdatascience.com/sentiment-analysis-concept-analysis-and-applications-6c94d6f58c17> accessed 12 March 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Gürcan B, ‘Jurisdiction on Blockchain’ (2020) ICBEMM-ICISSS 14; Google Scholar öffnen
Gürkaynak G, Yılmaz I, Yeşilaltayy B and Bengi B, ‘Intellectual Property Law and Practice in the Blockchain Realm’ (2018) 34 Computer Law & Security Review; Google Scholar öffnen
Gyuranecz F Z, Krausz B and Papp D, ‘The AI is Now in Session. The Impact of Digitalization on Courts’ (2019); Google Scholar öffnen
Haapio H and Barton T D, ‘Business-Friendly Contracting: How Simplification and Visualization Can Help Bring It to Practice’ in Kai Jacob, Dierk Schindler and Roger Strathausen (eds), Liquid Legal (Springer 2017); Google Scholar öffnen
Hacker P, Krestel R, Grundmann S, Naumann F, ‘Explainable AI under contract and tort law: legal incentives and technical challenges’ (2020) 28 Artificial Intelligence and Law; Google Scholar öffnen
Hacker P, ‘Towards a Flexible Framework for Algorithmic Fairness’, in: Ralf H. Reussner, Anne Koziolek and Robert Heinrich (eds) 50. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Informatik, INFORMATIK 2020 – Back to the Future (Karlsruhe 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
Hadj-Mabrouk H, ‘Contribution of Artificial Intelligence to Risk Assessment of Railway Accidents‘ (2019) 5(2) Urban Rail Transit; Google Scholar öffnen
Hafner C, ‘Representation of knowledge in a legal information retrieval system’ [in:] Proceedings of the 3rd annual ACM conference on research and development in information retrieval 1980; Google Scholar öffnen
Hage J C, Reasoning with Rules. An Essay in Legal Reasoning and its Underlying Logic (Springer 1997); Google Scholar öffnen
Hage J C, ‘Formalizing legal coherence’ in Ronald Prescott Loui (ed) Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL 2001 (ACM 2001); Google Scholar öffnen
Hage J C, Brożek B and Vincent N (eds.), Law and Mind. A Survey of Law and the Cognitive Sciences (Cambridge University Press 2021); Google Scholar öffnen
Halsey M and de Van-Palumbo M, ‘Courts as empathic spaces: reflections on the Melbourne neighbourhood justice centre’ (2018) 2 Grifith Law Review; Google Scholar öffnen
Hangzhou Huatai Media Culture Media Co., Ltd. v. Shenzhen Daotong Technology Development Co., Ltd. Case of Dispute over Right of Dissemination over Internet (The Supreme People’s Court of the People’s Republic of China, 4 April 2019) <http://english.court.gov.cn/2019-12/04/content_37527759.htm> accessed 9 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Harrington W G, ‘A Brief History of Computer-Assisted Legal Research’ (1984) 77, 3 Law. Libr. J.; Google Scholar öffnen
Hartung M, Bues M-M, Halbleib G, Legal Tech. Die Digitalisierung des Rechtsmarkts (C. H. Beck 2018); Google Scholar öffnen
Hartung M, Bues M-M and Halbleib G, Legal Tech: How Technology Is Changing the Legal World (C. H. Beck 2018); Google Scholar öffnen
Hartung M, Bues M-M and Halblieb G, Legal Tech, How Technology is Changing the Legal World (Nomos 2018); Google Scholar öffnen
Hasal M, Nowaková J, Saghair K H, Abdulla H, Snášel V, ‘Chatbots: Security, privacy, data protection, and social aspects’ <https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/cpe.6426> accessed 25 July 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Hassan S and De Filippi P, ‘The Expansion of Algorithmic Governance: From Code is Law to Law is Code’ (2017) 17 Field Actions Science Reports; Google Scholar öffnen
Hellwig D, Karlic G, Huchzermeier A, Build Your Own Blockchain (C. H. Beck 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
Henderson J and Bench-Capon T, ‘Describing the Development of Case Law’ in Floris Bex (ed) Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL 2019 (ACM 2019); Google Scholar öffnen
High Level Group of Independent Stakeholders on Administrative Burdens, Europe can do better. Report on the best practice for implementing EU legislation in Member States in the least burdensome way (European Commission, 15 November 2011); Google Scholar öffnen
High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence, ‘A definition of Al: Main capabilities and scientific disciplines’ (European Commission, April 2019) <https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?doc_id=56341> accessed 11 December 2020; Google Scholar öffnen
Hildebrandt M, ‘The adaptive nature of text-driven law’ (2021) 1(1) Journal of Cross-Disciplinary Research in Computational Law <https://journalcrcl.org/crcl/article/view/2> accessed 26 April 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
HM Land Registry to explore the benefits of blockchain <https://www.gov.uk/government/ news/hm-land-registry-to-explore-the-benefits-of-blockchain> accessed 27 January 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Hoekstra R, Breuker J, Di Bello M, Boer A, ‘LKIF Core: Principled Ontology Development for the Legal Domain’ (2009) 188 Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; Google Scholar öffnen
Holmes O W, ‘The Path of the Law’ (1897) 457 Harvard Law Review; Google Scholar öffnen
Hondius E, Silva M S, Nicolussi A, Coderch P S, Wendehorst C and Zoll F (eds), Coronavirus and the Law in Europe <https://www.intersentiaonline.com/bundle/coronavirus-and-the-law-in-europe>, accessed 12 August 2021. Google Scholar öffnen
Hong J, Dreibholz T, JSchenkel J A,Hu J A, ‘An Overwiew of Multi-Cloud Computing’ in Leonard Barolli, Makoto Takizawa, Fatos Xhafa, Tomoya Enokido (eds), Web, Artificial Intelligence and Network Applications. Proceedings of the Workshops of the 33rd International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (WAINA-2019); Google Scholar öffnen
Hongdao Q and others, ‘Legal Technologies in Action: The Future of the Legal Market in Light of Disruptive Innovations’ (2019) Sustainability; Google Scholar öffnen
Hook A, ‘The Use and Regulation of Technology in the Legal Sector beyond England and Wales, Research Paper for the Legal Services Board’ (Hook Tangaza, 2019) <https://www.legalservicesboard.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/International-AH-Report-VfP-4-Jul-2019.pdfhttps://www.legalservicesboard.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/International-AH-Report-VfP-4-Jul-2019.pdf> accessed 16 March 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Horty J F, ‘Reasoning with dimension and magnitudes’ (2019) 27(3) Artificial Intelligence and Law; Google Scholar öffnen
Hosier R, ‘Evolution of the Law Firm: Why Clients Demand that You Embrace New Technology’ (Legal Futures, 28 October 2020) <www.legalfutures.co.uk/features/evolution-of-the-law-firm-why-clients-demand-that-you-embrace-new-technology> accessed 16 November 2020; Google Scholar öffnen
Houben R and Snyers A, ‘Crypto-assets. Key developments, regulatory concerns and responses’ (European Parliament's Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs 2020) <https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2020/648779/IPOL_STU(2020)648779_EN.pdf> accessed 7 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Houben R and Snyers A, ‘Cryptocurrencies and blockchain. Legal context and implications for financial crime, money laundering and tax evasion’, (European Parliament's Special Committee on Financial Crimes, Tax Evasion and Tax Avoidance 2018), <https://www.europarl.europa.eu/cmsdata/150761/TAX3%20Study%20on%20cryptocurrencies%20and%20blockchain.pdf> accessed 8 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Howard L K, ‘Security by Design’ (2019) 12(2) Journal of Physical Security; Google Scholar öffnen
Howarth D, Law As Engineering: Thinking about What Lawyers Do (Edward Elgar Publishing 2014); Google Scholar öffnen
Hudobnik M, ′Data protection and the law enforcement directive: a procrustean bed across Europe? ′ (2020) 21 ERA Forum; Google Scholar öffnen
HYTrust, ’Protecting sensitive data and achieving compliance in a multi-cloud world’, <https://www.hytrust.com/uploads/Compliance-in-a-Multi-Cloud-World_WP.pdf> accessed 11 January 2021); Google Scholar öffnen
I ACa 504/19, Legalis; Google Scholar öffnen
Ibáñez L-D, O’Hara K, Simperl H, ‘On Blockchains and the General Data Protection Regulation’, <https://www.eublockchainforum.eu/sites/default/files/research-paper/blockchains-general-data_4.pdf> accessed 9 January 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
ILTA's, ‘2020 Technology Survey’, <https://www.iltanet.org/resources/publications/surveys/2020ts?ssopc=1>, accessed 9 March 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Indurkhya N, Damerau F J, Handbook of Natural Language Processing (Chapman & Hall/CRC 2010); Google Scholar öffnen
Innovative Technology Arrangement and Services Act (ITAS) <https://legislation.mt/eli/cap/592/eng/pdf> access 2 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Institut Luxembourgeois de la Normalisation, de l‘Accréditation, de la Sécurité et qualité des produits et services, ‘Trust Services Under the eIDAS Regulation’ (Portail-qualite.lu, June 2018), <https://portail-qualite.public.lu/content/dam/qualite/publications/confiance-numerique/trustservices-under-eIDAS.pdf> access 19 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Insurance Information Institute, ’Facts + Statistics: Identity theft and cybercrime’ (iii.org) <www.iii.org/fact-statistic/facts-statistics-identity-theft-and-cybercrime> accessed 29 March 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
International Bar Association, 'LPRU Cybersecurity' (Ibanet.org, 2018) <https://www.ibanet.org/LPRU/Cybersecurity> accessed 17 August 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
International Software Testing Qualifications Board®, ‘Certified Tester Foundation Level Syllabus.’ (International Software Testing Qualifications Board, 11 November 2019) <https://www.istqb.org/downloads/send/2-foundation-level-documents/281-istqb-ctfl-syllabus-2018-v3-1.html> accessed 18 April 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Islam N, Islam Z and Noor N, ′A Survey on Optical Character Recognition System′ (2016) 10 Journal of Information & Communication Technology -JICT <https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.05703> accessed 8 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Israni E, ′Algorithmic Due Process: Mistaken Accountability and Attribution in State v. Loomis′ (Jolt Digest, 31 August 2017) <https://jolt.law.harvard.edu/digest/algorithmic-due-process-mistaken-accountability-and-attribution-in-state-v-loomis-1> accessed 8 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
ITU-T, ‘Series X: Data Networks and Open System Communications. OSI Networking and System Aspects – Efficiency’ (1998) ITU-T Recommendation X.630; Google Scholar öffnen
IV Ka 290/18, Legalis; Google Scholar öffnen
Jakubik M and Świetnicki T, ‘Technologia coraz bardziej obecna w pracy prawników’ <https://<www.prawo.pl/prawnicy-sady/informatyka-w-pracy-prawnikow-eksperci-pisza-o-legal-tech,504169.html> accessed 25 April 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Janowski J, Informatyka prawa. Zadania i znaczenie w związku z kształtowaniem się elektronicznego obrotu prawnego (Wydawnictwo UMCS 2011) 328 – 340; Google Scholar öffnen
Janowski J, Informatyka prawnicza (C. H. Beck 2011); Google Scholar öffnen
Juang B-H and, Rabiner L R, ′Automatic speech recognition – a brief history of the technology development′ (2005) Georgia Institute of Technology. Atlanta Rutgers University and the University of California. Santa Barbara; Google Scholar öffnen
Judgement of the Federal Supreme Court (BGH) from 27 November 2019, VIII ZR 285/18, NJW 2020; Google Scholar öffnen
Kahnemann D, Thinking fast and slow (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011); Google Scholar öffnen
Karoussos H F, ‘Law & The Digital Disruption: The Impact of ICT and AI on the Legal Profession’ (2017) American College of Greece Research Paper <www.researchgate.net/publication/321527178_Law_The_Digital_Disruption_The_Impact_of_ICT_and_AI_on_the_Legal_Profession> accessed 25 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Kastrop C, ‘Human Rights in the Era of AI – Europe as International Standard Setter for Artificial Intelligence’ (2021) <https://www.coe.int/en/web/artificial-intelligence/human-rights-in-the-era-of-ai> access 17 March 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Katz D M, Bommarito II M J and Blackman J, ‘A General Approach for Predicting the Behavior of the Supreme Court of the United States’(2017) 3 PLOS ONE; Google Scholar öffnen
Kayser-Bril N, ′At least 11 police forces use face recognition in the EU, AlgorithmWatch reveals′ (Algorithm Watch, 11 December 2019, updated 19 June 2020) <https://algorithmwatch.org/en/story/face-recognition-police-europe/> accessed 8 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Kephart J O and Chess D M, ‘The Vision of Autonomic Computing’ (2003) 36(1) IEEE Computer; Google Scholar öffnen
Keppens J, ′Explainable Bayesian Network Query Results via Natural Language Generation Systems′ (Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL '19), Montreal, 17 – 21 June 2019); Google Scholar öffnen
Kerikmae T (ed), Regulating eTechnologies in the European Union. Normative Realities and Trends (Springer 2014); Google Scholar öffnen
Kerikmäe T and others, ‘Legal Technology for Law Firms: Determining Roadmaps for Innovation’ (2018) Croatian International Relations Review; Google Scholar öffnen
Kerikmäe T and Pärn-Lee E, ‘Legal dilemmas of Estonian artificial intelligence strategy: in between of e-society and global race’ (2020) AI & Society <https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01009-8> accessed 7 April 2021. Google Scholar öffnen
Keyvanpour M R, Javideh Mand , Ebrahimi M R, ′Detecting and investigating crime by means of data mining: a general crime matching framework′ (2011) 3 Procedia Computer Science; Google Scholar öffnen
Kitchin R, ‘Thinking critically about and researching algorithms’ (2017) 20:1 Information, Communication & Society; Google Scholar öffnen
Klimas K and Klimas D, `Electronic Communication in European Cross-border Proceedings – Polish Perspective` in Jacek Gołaczyński, Wolfgang Kilian and Tomasz Scheffler (eds) Legal Innovation in Polish Law (C. H. Beck 2019); Google Scholar öffnen
Klimczuk A, ‘Chmura jak powietrze: cyfrowa transformacja kancelarii prawnej Magnusson’ <https://news.microsoft.com/pl-pl/2016/12/13/chmura-jak-powietrze-cyfrowa-transformacja-kancelarii-prawnej-magnusson/> accessed 9 March 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Kõlvart M, Poola M, Rull A, ‘Smart Contracts’ in Tanel Kerikmäe, Addi Rull (eds) The Future of Law and eTechnologies (Springer 2016); Google Scholar öffnen
Kowalski R A., ‘Legislation as Logic Programs’ in Zenon Bankowski and others (eds) Informatics and the Foundations of Legal Reasoning (Springer 1995); Google Scholar öffnen
Krajowa Izba Radców Prawnych,`Sądy w trybie online – zdalna praca sądów w wybranych państwach europejskich w czasach pandemii SARS-COV-19` (2020) <https://kirp.pl/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/opracowanie-komisji-zagranicznej-krrp.-sady-w-trybie-online..pdf> accessed 13 January 2020; Google Scholar öffnen
Krasuski A, Status prawny sztucznego agenta, Podstawy prawne zastosowania sztucznej inteligencji (C. H. Beck 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
Kubat M, An Introduction to Machine Learning (Springer International Publishing 2017); Google Scholar öffnen
Kucharska E, ′BriefCam - one system, many possibilities′ (2019) 12, Stołeczny Magazyn Policyjny; Google Scholar öffnen
Kucharski B, Świadczenie ubezpieczyciela w umowie ubezpieczenia mienia (Wolters Kluwer 2019); Google Scholar öffnen
Kuijer M, ‘The right to a fair trial and the Council of Europe’s efforts to ensure effective remedies on a domestic level for excessively lengthy proceedings’ (2013) 13 Human Rights Law Review; Google Scholar öffnen
Kulawiński M, ‘Transhumanizm, cyborgizacja, ulepszanie człowieka’ <researchgate.net/publication/334448348_Transhumanizm_cyborgizacja_ulepszanie_czlowieka> accessed 13 January 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Kurki V A J, ‘Why Things Can Hold Rights: Reconceptualizing the Legal Person’ in Visa A. J. Kurki, Tomasz Pietrzykowski (eds) Legal Personhood: Animals, Artificial Intelligence and the Unborn (Springer 2017); Google Scholar öffnen
Layne K, Lee J, `Developing Fully Functional e-Government: A Four Stage Model` (2001) 18 Government Information Quarterly 122; Google Scholar öffnen
Lazuashvili N, Norta A and Draheim D, ‘Integration of Blockchain Technology into a Land Registration System for Immutable Traceability: A Casestudy of Georgia’ in Claudio Di Ciccio and others (eds) Business Process Management: Blockchain and Central and Eastern Europe Forum (Springer 2019); Google Scholar öffnen
Leake D B, ‘Case-Based Reasoning,’ in William Bechtel and George Graham (ed), A Companion to Cognitive Science (Blackwell Publishers 1999); Google Scholar öffnen
Lee J, Khan V M, ‘ ‚Blockchain and Smart Contract for Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading Platform: Legal Obstacles and Regulatory Solutions‘ (2020) 19 UIC REV. INTELL. PROP. L.; Google Scholar öffnen
Lee K-F, Inteligencja Sztuczna Rewolucja Prawdziwa. Chiny, USA i przyszłość świata (Media Rodzina 2019); Google Scholar öffnen
Leeb C-M, Digitalisierung, Legal Technology und Innovation (Duncker & Humblot, 2019); Google Scholar öffnen
Legaltechies, ‘El estado de la Legaltech en… Mèxico’ (legaltechies.ec, 25 November 2020) <https://bit.ly/371wbZk> accessed 10 February 2021. Google Scholar öffnen
Legg M and Bell F, ‘Artificial Intelligence and the Legal Profession: Becoming The AI-Enhanced Lawyer’ (2019) 38(2) University of Tasmania Law Review 59, <ssrn.com/abstract=3725949> accessed: 19 January 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Legner Ch and Webernde K, ’Electronic bill presentment and payment’, <https://<www.researchgate.net/publication/221408047_Electronic_Bill_Presentment_and_Payment/link/55746c1f08ae7536374fee56/download> accessed 25 April 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Legrand J, ′Some guidelines for fuzzy sets application in legal reasoning′ (1999) 7 Artificial Intelligence and Law; Google Scholar öffnen
Lehmann J and Gangemi A, ‘An ontology of physical causation as a basis for assessing causation in fact and attributing legal responsibility’ (2007) 15(3) Artificial Intelligence and Law; Google Scholar öffnen
Lehmann M, ‘Who Owns Bitcoin? Private Law Facing the Blockchain’ (2019) 21 Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology <https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1474&context=mjlst> accessed 15 March 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Leiser M and Custers B, ′The Law Enforcement Directive: Conceptual Challenges of EU Directive 2016/680′ (2019) 5, European Data Protection Law Review; Google Scholar öffnen
Leiser M R, ‘Private jurisprudence’ and the right to be forgotten balancing test,’ (2020) 29 Computer Law & Security Review; Google Scholar öffnen
Lemkowska M, ‘Funkcje ubezpieczeń gospodarczych a zrównoważony rozwój’, (2020) 2 Wiadomości Ubezpieczeniowe; Google Scholar öffnen
Lessig L, Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace (1st edn, Basic Books 1999); Google Scholar öffnen
Lessig L, Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace. Version 2.0 (2nd revised edn, Basic Books 2006); Google Scholar öffnen
Leszczyński L, ‘O wykładni prawa i jej wymiarze praktycznym. Kontekst sądowego stosowania prawa’ (2020) 2 Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej; Google Scholar öffnen
Leszczyński L, ‘Wykładnia operatywna (podstawowe właściwości).’ (2009) 6 Państwo i Prawo; Google Scholar öffnen
Łętowska E, ‘Dekalog dobrego sędziego’(2016) 1 Krajowa Rada Sądownictwa; Google Scholar öffnen
Letterton R, ‘L’accés numérique au droit’ (2018) 3 Annales des Mines; Google Scholar öffnen
Licini C, ‘Il notaio dell'era digitale: riflessioni gius-economiche’ (2018) 2 Notariato; Google Scholar öffnen
Linee Guida sulla formazione, gestione e conservazione dei documenti informatici <https://www.agid.gov.it/it/linee-guida> accessed 25 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Lingwall J and Mogallapu R., ’Should Code Be Law? Smart Contracts, Blockchain, and Boilerplate’ (2019) 88:1 University of Missouri-Kansas City Law Review; Google Scholar öffnen
Lippe P and Katz D M, ‘10 Predictions about how IBM’s Watson will impact the Legal Profession’ (ABA Journal: Legal Rebels, 2 October 2014) <https://www.abajournal.com/legalrebels/article/10_predictions_about_how_ibms_watson_will_impact> accessed 19 November 2020; Google Scholar öffnen
Litwiński P (ed.), Rozporządzenie UE w sprawie ochrony osób fizycznych w związku z przetwarzaniem danych osobowych i swobodnym przepływem takich danych. EU Regulation on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (C. H. Beck 2018); Google Scholar öffnen
Liu L, Introduction to the Semantic Web and Semantic Web Services (Chapman and Hall/CRC 2019); Google Scholar öffnen
Lodge M, ‘Software Testing Is Tedious. AI Can Help.’ (Harvard Business Review Home, 22 February 2021) <https://hbr.org/2021/02/software-testing-is-tedious-ai-can-help#> accessed 18 April 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Loevinger L, ‘Jurimetrics: The Next Step Forward’ (1949) 33, 5 Minn L Rev; Google Scholar öffnen
Lord N, ‘Data Protection: Data In transit vs. Data At Rest’, <https://www.digitalguardian.com/blog/data-protection-data-in-transit-vs-data-at-rest> accessed 13 January 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Losano M G, Giuscibernetica: Macchine e modelli cibernetici nel diritto (Einaudi 1969); Google Scholar öffnen
Louis Larret-Chahine, ‘Lille, premier barreau à tester la justice predictive!’ (Predictice Blog, 1- August 2017) <https://blog.predictice.com/lille-est-le-premier-barreau-%C3%A0-tester-la-justice-pr%C3%A9dictive> accessed 31 March 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Lubasz D in Edyta Bielak-Jomaa and, Dominik. Lubasz (eds) RODO. Ogólne Rozporządzenie o Ochronie Danych. komentarz (Wolters Kluwer 2017); Google Scholar öffnen
Łukańko B, ‘Uchybienie przepisom o ochronie danych osobowych jako naruszenie dobra osobistego – analiza na przykładzie orzecznictwa Sądu Najwyższego’ (2016) 46 UWM, Studia Prawnoustrojowe; Google Scholar öffnen
Lynch C, Ashley K D, Pinkwart N and Aleven V, ‘Concepts, Structure and Goals: Redefining Ill-Definededness’ (2009) 19 International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education; Google Scholar öffnen
Macdonald C, ‘Pentagon working to develop technology that would let troops control machines with their MINDS’ (Daily Mail 17 July 2018) <dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5963803/Pentagon-working-develop-technology-let-troops-control-machines-MINDS.html?ns_mchannel=rss&ito=1490&ns_campaign=1490> accessed 18 January 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Magyar Nemzeti Bank, ’Kriptovaluta, nyereségrészesedési jog: fokozott befektetői kockázatok’ (mnb.hu, 14 February 2020) <https://www.mnb.hu/sajtoszoba/sajtokozlemenyek/2020-evi-sajtokozlemenyek/kriptovaluta-nyeresegreszesedesi-jog-fokozott-befektetoi-kockazatok> accessed 1 March 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Malinowska K, ’Aspekty prawne ubezpieczenia cyber ryzyk’ (2018) 2 Prawo Asekuracyjne; Google Scholar öffnen
Mangan D, ‘Lawyers could be the next profession to be replaced by computers’ (CNBC 13 February 2017) <www.cnbc.com/2017/02/17/lawyers-could-be-replaced-by-artificial-intelligence.html> accessed 20 January 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Mapperson J, Ethereum Smart Contracts up 75 % to Almost 2M in March <https://cointelegraph.com/news/ethereum-smart-contracts-up-75-to-almost-2m-in-march> accessed 27 January 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Marano P and Noussia K. (eds), InsurTech: A Legal and Regulatory View (Springer 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
Marano P and Szostek D, Smart Contract and Insurance (Palgrawe McMillan 2021); Google Scholar öffnen
Marczak B and others, ‘Hide and seek, Tracking NSO Group’s Pegasus Spyware to Operations in 45 Countries’ (citizenlab.ca, 18 September 2018) <https://citizenlab.ca/2018/09/hide-and-seek-tracking-nso-groups-pegasus-spyware-to-operations-in-45-countries/> accessed 29 March 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Markowski K, ’Kryptowaluty. Powstanie-typologia-charakterystyka’ (2019) 3 Civitas et Lex; Google Scholar öffnen
Marrow P, Karol M and Kuyan S, ‘Artificial Intelligence and Arbitration: The Computer as an Arbitrator. Are We There Yet?’(2020) 4 Dispute Resolution Journal; Google Scholar öffnen
Martinek J, ‘Lisp – opis, realizacja i zastosowania’ (Wydawnictwa Naukowo-Techniczne, Warszawa 1980); Google Scholar öffnen
Martini M, ‘Fundamentals of a Regulatory System for Algorithm-based Processes’ (2019) <https://www.vzbv.de/sites/default/files/downloads/2019/07/19/martini_regulatory_system_algorithm_based_processes.pdf> accessed 18 November 2020; Google Scholar öffnen
Masior M, ‘Wolne zawody prawnicze w Anglii i Walii oraz reforma ich regulacji’ w Michał. Masior (ed) Analiza prawno-porównawcza ustroju korporacyjnego wolnych zawodów prawniczych oraz rynku usług prawniczych w wybranych państwach, w kontekście regulacji i rynku w Polsce z uwzględnieniem dostępności obywateli do tych usług, (Instytut Wymiaru Sprawiedliwości 2018) <https://iws.gov.pl/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/IWS-Masior-M.-i-inni-Wolne-zawody-prawnicze.pdf> accessed 25 April 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Masoni R, ‘Diritto processuale civile dell'emergenza epidemiologica (a seguito della conversione in legge del decreto ristori)’, (2021) Giust. civ., available at <https://giustiziacivile.com> accessed 25 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Maxwell D, Speed Ch, Pschetz L, ‘Story Blocks: Reimagining Narrative through the Blockchain.’ (2017) 23 Convergence; Google Scholar öffnen
Maxwell T and Schafer B, ′Concept and Context in Legal Information Retrieval′ (Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2008: The Twenty-First Annual Conference, 8 July 2008); Google Scholar öffnen
Maxwell T and Schafer B, ′Concept and Context in Legal Information Retrieval′ (Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2008: The Twenty-First Annual Conference, 8 July 2008); Google Scholar öffnen
Mazzarese T, ′Fuzzy Logic and Judicial Decision-Making: A New Perspective on the Alleged Norm-Irrationalism′ (1993) 2 Proceedings of the Computer and Vagueness: Fuzzy Logic and Neural Nets. Informatica e diritto; Google Scholar öffnen
McCarty L T, and Sridharan N, ‘The Representation of an Evolving System of Legal Concepts: II. Prototypes and Deformations’ (Proceedings of the Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence: IJCAI-81, Vancouver, 24-28 August 1981); Google Scholar öffnen
McCarty L T, ‘An Implementation of Eisner v. Macomber’, in L. Thorne McCarty (ed) Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL’95 (ACM 1995); Google Scholar öffnen
McCarty L T, ‘Some Arguments About Legal Arguments’, in John Zeleznikow, Daniel Hunter, L. Karl Branting (eds) Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL '97 (ACM 1997); Google Scholar öffnen
McCarty L T,′Reflections on TAXMAN: an experiment in artificial intelligence and legal reasoning′ (1977) 90, 5 Harv. L.aw Rev.; Google Scholar öffnen
McEwan I, Maszyny takie jak ja, (Albatros 2019); Google Scholar öffnen
McIntyre H, ‘Spotify Has Acquired Blockchain Startup Mediachain’ <https://www.forbes.com/sites/hughmcintyre/2017/04/27/spotify-has-acquired-blockchain-startup-mediachain/?sh=6c9ffaf369ee> accessed 27 January 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
McJohn S and McJohn I, ‘The Commercial Law of Bitcoin and Blockchain Transactions’ (2016) 16-13 Legal Studies Research Paper Series Research Paper; Google Scholar öffnen
McKamey M, ‘Legal Technology: Artificial Intelligence and the Future of the Law Practice’ (2017) 45 APPEAL 22 Review of Current Law and Law Reform <ssrn.com/abstract=3014408> accessed: 19 January 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Medvedeva M, ‘Using machine learning to predict decisions of the European Court of Human Rights’, (2020) 28 Artificial Intelligence and Law; Google Scholar öffnen
Mehl L, Automation in the legal world (National Physical Laboratory, 1958); Google Scholar öffnen
Mehl L, Automation in the legal world (National Physical Laboratory 1958); Google Scholar öffnen
Mehrabi N, Morstatter F, Saxena N, Lerman K and Galstyan A, ′A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning′ (2019) arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.09635; Google Scholar öffnen
Meijer A and Wessels M, ′Predictive Policing: Review of Benefits and Drawbacks′ (2019) 42, International Journal of Public Administration; Google Scholar öffnen
Mell P and Grance T, ‘The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing: Recommendations of National Institute of Standards and Technology’ (2011) No. 800-145 Computer Security Division, Information Technology Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology <csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/800-145/SP800-145.pdf> accessed January 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Metsker O, Trofimov E, Grechishcheva S, ‘Natural Language Processing of Russian Court Decisions for Digital Indicators Mapping for Oversight Process Control Efficiency: Disobeying a Police Officer Case’ (Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia, 5th International Conference, EGOSE 2018, St. Petersburg 2018); Google Scholar öffnen
Miller E, ‘Can AI Be a Fair Judge in Court? Estonia Thins So’ (WIRED 3 March 2019) <http://www.wired.com/> accessed 7 April 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Miller M S, ‘The Future of Law’ CAPLET.COM (August 1997) <www.caplet.com/security/futurelaw> accessed 16 March 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Mills M, ’Artificial Intelligence in Law: The State of Play, 2016, Part 3’ <https://www.neotalogic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Artificial-Intelligence-in-Law-The-State-of-Play-2016.pdf> accessed 25 April 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Mills M, ′Artificial Intelligence in Law: the State of Play 2016′ (Thomson Reuters, 2016) <https://britishlegalitforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Keynote-Mills-AI-in-Law-State-of-Play-2016.pdf> accessed 8 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Minh Dung P, ‘On the Acceptability of Arguments and Its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-person Games’ (1995) 77(2) Artificial intelligence; Google Scholar öffnen
Ministerstwo Cyfryzacji, Grupa robocza ds. rejestrów rozproszonych i blockchain, ‘GDPR a technologia blockchain’, <https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwj1rtT-scTvAhVmsYsKHcsTAC8QFjAAegQIARAD&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.gov.pl%2Fattachment%2Fd39a05b8-f04c-4e7c-93ac-3b5b9946ed0c&usg=AOvVaw2Ngh2B3Pcf1XAUCdeplnnC9> accessed 19 Ferbruaty 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Ministerstwo Gospodarki and Kancelaria Prezesa Rady Ministrów, ‘Wytyczne do przeprowadzania oceny wpływu oraz konsultacji publicznych w ramach rządowego procesu legislacyjnego.’ (Rządowe Centrum Legislacji) <http://www1.rcl.gov.pl/?q=book/wytyczne> accessed 5 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Minsky M, ‘A Framework for Representing Knowledge’ in Patrick H. Winston (ed) Psychology of Computer Vision (MIT Press 1975); Google Scholar öffnen
Mitchell R L, ′Predictive policing gets personal′ (ComputerWorld, 24 October 2013) <https://www.computerworld.com/article/2486424/predictive-policing-gets-personal.html> accessed 8 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Mitnick Security, ‘The weakest link in safety is still man. Kevin Mitnick showed us how to outsmart us’ < Sobczak K, ‘Coraz więcej cyberataków na firmy prawnicze’ <https://www.prawo.pl/prawnicy-sady/cyberbezpieczenstwo-coraz-wiecej-atakow-na-firmy-prawnicze,505642.html> accessed 25 April 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Modgil S, Prakken H, The ASPIC+ framework for structured argumentation: a tutorial, (2014) Argument and Computation 5(1); Google Scholar öffnen
Modrák V and Šoltysová Z, `Development of an Organizational Maturity Model in Terms of Mass Customization` in Dominik T. Matt, Vladimir Modrák and Helmut Zsifkovits (eds) Industry 4.0 for SMEs (Palgrave Macmillan 2020) 215 <https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25425-4_8> accessed 12 January 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Modrzejewski M, ’Podatkowe aspekty korzystania z oprogramowania komputerowego w modelu SaaS (Software as a Service)’ (2016) 8 Przegląd Podatkowy; Google Scholar öffnen
Moens M-F, Uyttendaele C and Dumortier J, ‘Information extraction from legal texts: the potential of discourse analysis’ (1999) 51 International Journal of Human-Computer Studies; Google Scholar öffnen
Moens M-F, Uyttendaele C and Dumortier J, ′Abstracting of legal cases: The SALOMON experience′ (ICAIL’97: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, Melbourne, 30 June – 3 July 1997); Google Scholar öffnen
Moguillansky M O, Rotolo A, Simari G R, ‘Hypotheses and their dynamics in legal argumentation’ (2019) 129 Expert Systems and Applications; Google Scholar öffnen
Mohun J and Roberts A, ‘Cracking the code. Rulemaking for humans and machines’ (2020) 40 OECD Working Papers on Public Governance <https://doi.org/10.1787/3afe6ba5-en> accessed 5 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Molęda M, ’Cyber is the new black’, (2018) 6 Miesięcznik Ubezpieczeniowy; Google Scholar öffnen
Monash University, ’Deepfakes detect Zoom-bombing culprits’ (monash.edu, 25 January 2021) <www.monash.edu/it/about-us/news-and-events/latest/articles/2021/deepfakes-detect-zoom-bombing-culprits> accessed 29 March 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Morand A-S, ‘So kollidiert die DSGVO mit der Blockchain’ (Netzwoche, 1 September 2020) <https://www.netzwoche.ch/news/2020-09-01/so-kollidiert-die-dsgvo-mit-der-blockchain/0lt0> accessed 25 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Mougayar W, ‘Tokenomics — A Business Guide to Token Usage, Utility and Value’ (Medium, 10 June 2017) <https://medium.com/@wmougayar/tokenomics-a-business-guide-to-token-usage-utility-and-value-b19242053416> accessed 6 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Mouttotos N, ‘Reform of civil procedure in Cyprus: Delivering justice in a more efficient and timely way’(2020) 2 Common Law World Review; Google Scholar öffnen
Murphy J P, ′E-Discovery in Criminal Matters - Emerging Trends & the Influence of Civil Litigation Principles′ (2010) 11 Sedona Conference Journal; Google Scholar öffnen
Myltseva V, ‘The legal nature and principles of the predictive justice’ (2019) 3 Recht der Osteuropäischen Staaten; Google Scholar öffnen
Myrna G, ‘Juzgado sin papel, un paso más de la justicia electrónica’ (2018) 12, 41 Revista Ius; Google Scholar öffnen
Najwyższa Izba Kontroli, ‘Dokonywanie oceny wpływu w ramach rządowego procesu legislacyjnego.’ (Najwyższa Izba Kontroli, 5 March 2018) <https://www.nik.gov.pl/plik/id,16190,vp,18712.pdf> accessed 5 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Nakamoto S, ‘Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System ‘ (31 October 2008) <https:// nakamotoinstitute.org/bitcoin/> accessed 1 December 2020; Google Scholar öffnen
Nardi Y, ‘Cloud computing and the use of legal technology in the cloud’ (Legal Insights Europe, 7 August 2020) <https://blogs.thomsonreuters.com/legal-uk/2020/08/07/cloud-computing-and-the-use-of-legal-technology-in-the-cloud/> accessed 17 March 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Nastri N, ‘Registri sussidiari, Blockchain: #Notaio oltre la lezione di Carnelutti’ (2017) 4 Notariato; Google Scholar öffnen
Navas S, ‘LegalTech Services and the Digital Content and Digital Services Directive’ <https://www.academia.edu/44791640/LegalTech_Services_and_the_Digital_Content_and_Digital_Services_Directive> accessed 12 January 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Nemitz P, ‘Constitutional democracy and technology in the age of artificial intelligence’ (2018) 2133 Royal Society Publishing; Google Scholar öffnen
Neves Jr. P C, ‘Judiciário 5.0’ (Blucher, 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
Newell A and Simon H A, Human Problem Solving (Prentice Hall 1972); Google Scholar öffnen
Ng A, ‘What Artificial Intelligence Can and Can’t Do Right Now’ (Harvard Business Review, 9 November 2016) <www.hbr.org/2016/11/what-artificial-intelligence-can-and-cant-do-right-now> accessed 21 November 2020; Google Scholar öffnen
Nissan E, ‘Digital technologies and artificial intelligence’s present and foreseeable impact on lawyering, judging, policing and law enforcement‘ (2017) 32 AI & Society; Google Scholar öffnen
Nissan E, ′Digital technologies and artificial intelligence’s present and foreseeable impact on lawyering, judging, policing and law enforcement′ (2017) 32 AI & Society; Google Scholar öffnen
Nissan E, Computer Applications for Handling Legal Evidence, Police Investigation and Case Argumentation (Springer 2012); Google Scholar öffnen
Nofer M, Gomber P, Hinz O and Schiereck D, ‘Blockchain’ (2017) 59 Business & Information Systems Engineering <doi 10.1007/s12599-017-0467-3> accessed 15 March 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Nutter P W, 'Machine learning evidence: admissibility and weight.' 21 (2018) U. Pa. J. Const. L.; Google Scholar öffnen
O’Gorman V, ’Cybercrime during the coronavirus pandemic: what does it mean for the legal industry?’, <https://www.lexisnexis.co.uk/blog/in-house/cybercrime-during-the-coronavirus-pandemic-what-does-it-mean-for-the-legal-industry> accessed 25 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
OECD, ‘Building Capacity for Evidence-Informed Policy-Making: Lessons from Country Experiences’ (2020) OECD Public Governance Reviews <https://doi.org/10.1787/86331250-en> accessed 5 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
OECD, Technology and innovation in the insurance sector (2017) <https://www.oecd.org/pensions/Technology-and-innovation-in-the-insurance-sector.pdf> accessed 27 January 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Ojczyk J, ‘LegalTech to nieunikniona przyszłość prawników’, <https://www.prawo.pl/prawnicy-sady/legaltech-day-podsumowanie,503668.html> accessed 25 April 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Omlor S, ‘The CISG and libra: monetary revolution for international commercial transactions?’ (2020) 3(1) Stanford Journal of Blockchain Law & Policy; Google Scholar öffnen
Omni Legal, ‘Artificial Intelligence Won’t Replace Lawyers—It Will Free Them’ (Law Technology Today 27 February 2018); Google Scholar öffnen
Oñate S and Haissiner M, ‘Tribunales digitales y jueces máquina’ (2020) El mundo del abogado; Google Scholar öffnen
Opiła J, Pełech-Pilichowski T, ‘Visual Analysis of Similarity and Relationships Between Legal Texts’ (43rd International Convention on Information, Communication and Electronic Technology MIPRO, Opatija, 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
Opiłek P, ’Kryptowaluty jako przedmiot zabezpieczenia i poręczenia majątkowego’ (2017) 6 Prokuratura i Prawo; Google Scholar öffnen
Oskamp A, Tragter M and Groendijk C, ‘AI and Lain: What about the Future?’ (1995) 3 Artificial Intelligence and Law; Google Scholar öffnen
O'Sullivan D, 'Hacked Celebrity Law Firm Says It Has Not Worked With Trump' (CNN, 17 May 2020) <https://edition.cnn.com/2020/05/17/politics/celebrity-law-firm-hacked-trump/index.html> accessed 17 August 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Palazzo M, ‘Informatica e diritto. Un dialogo necessario’ in (2019) 5 Notariato; Google Scholar öffnen
Paliwala A (ed), A history of legal informatics (Series 9 LEFIS, Prensas de la Universidad de Zaragoza 2010); Google Scholar öffnen
Palmirani M, ‘Legislative Change Management with Akoma-Ntoso’ in Giovanni Sartor and others (eds) Legislative XML for the Semantic Web. Principles, Models, Standards for Document (Springer 2011); Google Scholar öffnen
Papageorgiou A, Mygiakis A, Loupos K and Krousarlis T, ‘DPKI: A Blockchain-Based Decentralized Public Key Infrastructure System’ (2020 Global Internet of Things Summit (GIoTS) Dublin, June 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
Parenti R, ‘Regulatory Sandboxes and Innovation Hubs for FinTech’ (European Parliament Think Tank, 30 September 2020) <https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2020/652752/IPOL_STU(2020)652752_EN.pdf> accessed 5 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Park J, ‘Your Honor, AI.’ (Harvard International Review, 3 April 2020) <https://hir.harvard.edu/your-honor-ai/> accessed 5 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Partyk A, ‘Legitim 2.0., czyli o robocie przyszłości… rozstrzygającym spory zachowkowe‘ (2019) 2(25) Studia Prawnicze; Google Scholar öffnen
Paschke A, Digitale Gerichtsöffentlichkeit (Duncker & Humblot, 2018); Google Scholar öffnen
Pasquale F, ′A Rule of Persons, Not Machines: The Limits of Legal Automation′ (2019) 87, 3 Geo. Wash. L. Rev.; Google Scholar öffnen
Pasquale F, ′A Rule of Persons, Not Machines: The Limits of Legal Automation′ (2019) 87, 1 Geo. Wash. L.aw Rev.; Google Scholar öffnen
Patrick G and Bana A, ‘Report. Rule of Law Versus Rule of Code: A Blockchain-Driven Legal Word’ (2017) International Bar Association Legal Policy & Research Unit 16; Google Scholar öffnen
Pavčnik M, ‘Why Discuss Gaps in the Law?’ (1996) 9/1 Ratio Juris; Google Scholar öffnen
Pecyna M, Behan A, ‘Smart contracts — nowa technologia prawa umów? ’ (2020) 3 Transformacje prawa prywatnego; Google Scholar öffnen
Peczenik A, On Law and Reason (Springer 2008); Google Scholar öffnen
Pereira D, ‘How Watson helps lawyers find answers in legal research’, (Medium 5 January 2017), <https://medium.com/@darylp/how-watson-helps-lawyers-find-answers-in-legal-research-672ea028dfb8> accessed 20 January 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Perelman C, Olbrechts-Tyteca L, The New Rhetoric. A Treatise on Argumentation (University of Notre Dame Press 1971); Google Scholar öffnen
Perrot P, ‘What about AI in criminal intelligence? From predictive policing to AI perspectives’ (2017) 16 European Police Science and Research Bulletin; Google Scholar öffnen
Perry W L, McInnis B, . Price C C, Smith S C and Hollywood J S, ′Predictive Policing: The Role of Crime Forecasting in Law Enforcement Operations′ (2013) National Institute of Justice, Safety and Justice Program, RAND Corporation research report series <https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR233.html⁠> accessed 8 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Peterson A, ‘NoCode And Lawyers’ (NoCode Journal, 12 May 2020) <https://www.nocodejournal.com/posts/nocode-and-lawyers> access 17 March 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Petzel J, Informatyka prawnicza. Zagadnienia teorii i praktyki (LIBER 1999); Google Scholar öffnen
Petzel J, Systemy wyszukiwania informacji prawnej (Wolters Kluwer 2017); Google Scholar öffnen
Philipps L and Sartor G, ′Introduction: from legal theories to neural networks and fuzzy reasoning′ (1999) 7 Artificial Intelligence and Law; Google Scholar öffnen
Piètre-Cambacédès L and Chaudet C, 'The SEMA Referential Framework: Avoiding Ambiguities In The Terms “Security” And “Safety”' (2010) 3 International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection; Google Scholar öffnen
Polański P P, (C. H. Beck LegalTech Forum conference, Warszawa, 16-17 June 2021); Google Scholar öffnen
Polański P P, Customary law of the Internet (1st edn, T.M.C. Asser Press 2007); Google Scholar öffnen
Polański P P, ‘Zwalczanie bezprawnych treści oraz zapewnienie dostępności cyfrowej z pomocą algorytmów sztucznej inteligencji’, in: Luigi Lai and Marek Świerczyński (eds), Prawo sztucznej inteligencji (C. H. Beck 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
Polański P P, (ed.), Ustawa o dostępności cyfrowej. Komentarz (1st edn, C.H.Beck 2021); Google Scholar öffnen
Pollock J L, ‘Defeasible Reasoning’ (1987) 11 Cognitive Science; Google Scholar öffnen
Poullet Y and Jacquemin H, ‘Blockchain: une révolution pour e droit?’ (2018) 6748 Journal des tribunaux; Google Scholar öffnen
Prabucki R, ‘About Chinese Courts and Blockchain — A Simple Chain Foundation commentary’ (Medium, 18 June 2020) <https://medium.com/@prabucki.rafael/chinese-justice-and-blockchain-what-can-we-learn-ed4285e1a34d> accessed 9 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Prakken H, ‘An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments’ (2010) 1(2) Argument and Computation; Google Scholar öffnen
Prakken H, ‘Comparing Alternative Factor- and Precedent-Based Accounts of Precedential Constraint’ in Michal Araszkiewicz and Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel (eds): Legal Knowledge and Information Systems - JURIX 2019: The Thirty-second Annual Conference, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 322 (IOS Press 2019); Google Scholar öffnen
Prakken H, Sartor G, ‘Modelling Reasoning with Precedents in a Formal Dialogue Game’ (1998) 6(2-4) Artificial Intelligence and Law; Google Scholar öffnen
Preukschat A, ‘Understanding the European Self-Sovereign Identity Framework (ESSIF) – Daniël Du Seuil and Carlos Pastor – Webinar 32’ <https://ssimeetup.org/understanding-european-self-sovereign-identity-framework-essif-daniel-du-seuil-carlos-pastor-webinar-32/> accessed 21 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
PRISM Litigation Technology, ‘Predictive Coding: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly’ (Prism Blog, 7 August 2019) <https://prismlit.com/predictive-coding/> accessed 26 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Protalinski E, `Google’s speech recognition technology now has a 4.9% word error rate` <https://venturebeat.com/2017/05/17/googles-speech-recognition-technology-now-has-a-4-9-word-error-rate/> accessed 11 January 2021. Google Scholar öffnen
Pullan T, ‘Experience: the Critical Commodity in Deal Negotiation + Star-Studded Careers’ (Artificial Lawyer, 12 February 2021) <https://www.artificiallawyer.com/2021/02/12/experience-the-critical-commodity-in-deal-negotiation-star-studded-careers/> access 17 March 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Pyrrho Investments Limited v MWB Property Limited [2016] EWHC 256 (Ch); Google Scholar öffnen
Raczyńska M, `Modele dojrzałości procesowej organizacji` (2017) XLIV 2 Acta Universitatis Nicolai Copernici. Zarządzanie, 61; Google Scholar öffnen
Ramos A, (coord.), ‘Observatorio: Avances de Justicia Abierta en Línea en México 2020’ (Escuela Libre de Derecho, 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
Raso F A, Hilligoss H, Krishnamurthy V and Bavitz C, ‘Artificial Intelligence & Human Rights: Opportunities & Risks, Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society, (Harvard University 2018)’ <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3259344> access 17 March 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Rawhan I and Simari G R (eds), Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, (Springer 2009); Google Scholar öffnen
Recommendation of the OECD Council on Artificial Intelligence, ‘OECD/LEGAL/0449’, <https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0449> accessed 8 April 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Redaktion beck-aktuell ‘EDV-Gerichtstag sieht Fortentwicklung der Justiz-IT als wesentliche Zukunftsfrage’ (beck-aktuell Heute im recht, 20 September 2019) <https://rsw.beck.de/aktuell/daily/meldung/detail/edv-gerichtstag-sieht-fortentwicklung-der-justiz-it-als-wesentliche-zukunftsfrage> accessed 26 February2020; Google Scholar öffnen
Regaldo A, ‘Who Coined "Cloud Computing"?’ (MIT Technology Review, 31 October 2011) <https://www.technologyreview.com/s/425970/who-coined-cloud-computing>/ accessed 9 March 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Reidenberg J, ‘Lex Informatica: The formulation of information policy rules through technology’ (1998) 76 Texas Law Review; Google Scholar öffnen
Reiter R, ‘A Logic for Default Reasoning’ (1980) 13 Artificial Intelligence; Google Scholar öffnen
Remus D A, ‘The Uncertain Promise of Predictive Coding’ (2014) 99 Iowa Law Review; Google Scholar öffnen
Ren Y, Tan X, Qin T, Zhao S, Zhao Z and Liu T-Y, ′Almost Unsupervised Text to Speech and Automatic Speech Recognition′ (Volume 97: International Conference on Machine Learning, Long Beach, 9-15 June 2019); Google Scholar öffnen
Richter M M and Weber R O, Case-Based Reasoning. A Textbook (Springer-Verlag 2013); Google Scholar öffnen
Rissland E L, Skalak D B, ‘CABARET: Rule Interpretation in a Hybrid Architecture’ (1991) 34(6) International Journal of Man-Machine Studies; Google Scholar öffnen
Rivera M A, ‘An introduction to Amparo Theory’ (2020) 12, 2 Krytyka Prawa; Google Scholar öffnen
Rivera M A, ‘Las partes en el juicio de amparo’ in Juan González and others (eds) Teoría y Práctica del Juicio de Amparo, (Flores Editor, 2018); Google Scholar öffnen
ROFIEG, ‘30 Recommendations on regulation, innovation and finance. Final Report to the European Commission’ (13 December 2019) 27 ff <https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/business_economy_euro/banking_and_finance/documents/191113-report-expert-group-regulatory-obstacles-financial-innovation_en.pdf> accessed 24 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Roitblat H L, Kershaw A and, Oot P, ′Document categorization in legal electronic discovery: computer classification vs. manual review′ (2010) 61 Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology; Google Scholar öffnen
Rojek-Socha P, ‘Rusza elektroniczny sąd polubowny, skorzysta z profile zaufanego’, (Prawo.pl, of 24 April 2019), <https://www.prawo.pl/prawnicy-sady/elektroniczny-sad-polubowny-ultima-ratio-rusza-przy,402433.html> accessed (11 March.03.2021); Google Scholar öffnen
Rościszewski A, ‘Odpowiedzialność cywilna adwokatów’ (2014) 10 Palestra; Google Scholar öffnen
Roslin R, ‘Legal Technology and In-house Counsels Today’ (Staranise, 1 June 2020) accessed 30 September 2020; Google Scholar öffnen
Ross O, Jensen J R and Asheim T, ‘Assets under Tokenization’ (2019) <https://ssrn.com/abstract=3488344> accessed 9 March 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Roth N, ‘An Architectural Assessment of Bitcoin: Using the Systems Modeling Language‘ (2015) 44 Procedia Computer Science; Google Scholar öffnen
Rott-Pietrzyk E, Szostek D, `A New Approach to the Legal Understanding of “Directness” and “Participation” in the Aftermath of COVID-19’ in: Ewoud Hondius, Marta Santos Silva, Andrea Nicolussi, Pablo Salvador Coderch, Christiane Wendehorst, Fryderyk Zoll (eds) Coronavirus and the Law in Europe <https://www.intersentiaonline.com/publication/coronavirus-and-the-law-in-europe/658?version=v-2f6f01ec-324e-637b-c7ca-a6bc0e384e16> accessed 15 December 2020; Google Scholar öffnen
Rowley J, ‘The wisdom hierarchy: representations of the DIKW hierarchy’ (2007) 33(2) Journal of Information Science; Google Scholar öffnen
Rowley J, ‘The wisdom hierarchy: Representations of the DIKW hierarchy‘ (2007) Journal of Information Science <https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0165551506070706> accessed 11 January 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Ruffini G, ‘Il Processo Civile di fronte alla svolta telematica’ in (2019) 4-5 Riv. dir. Proc; Google Scholar öffnen
Russell S and Norvig P, Artificial Intelligence. A Modern Approach, (3rd ed. Pearson 2016); Google Scholar öffnen
Russell S J, “Artificial Intelligence. A Binary Approach,” in S. Matthew Liao (ed.), Ethics of Artificial Intelligence (Oxford University Press 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
Sajfert J and Quintel T, ‘Data Protection Directive (EU) 2016/680 for Police and Criminal Justice Authorities’ in Mark Cole and Franziska Boehm (eds) GDPR Commentary (Edward Elgar Publishing 2020) <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3285873> accessed 8 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Salen K and Zimmerman E, Rules of play: game design fundamentals (MIT Press 2003); Google Scholar öffnen
Salomão L F (ed), Tecnologia Aplicada à Gestão Dos Conflitos No Âmbito Do Poder Judiciário Brasileiro (FGV Conhecimento 2020) <https://ciapj.fgv.br/publicacoes> accessed 5 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Salter S, ‘Online dispute resolution and justice system integration: British Columbia’s Civil Resolution Tribunal’ (2017) 34 Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice; Google Scholar öffnen
Samek W, Wiegand T and Müller K-R, ‘Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Understanding, Visualizing and Interpreting Deep Learning Models‘ (2017) 1 ITU Journal: ICT Discoveries; Google Scholar öffnen
Samoili S and others, ‘AI Watch. Defining Artificial Intelligence. Towards an operational definition and taxonomy of artificial intelligence, EUR 30117 EN, Publications Office of the European Union’ (2020); Google Scholar öffnen
Samonas S and Coss D, 'The CIA Strikes Back: Redefining, Confidentiality, Integrity And Availability In Security' (2014) 10,3 Journal of Information System Security <http://www.proso.com/dl/Samonas.pdf> accessed 17 August 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Sartor G, ‘Doing justice to rights and values: teleological reasoning and proportionality’ (2010) 18(2) Artificial Intelligence and Law; Google Scholar öffnen
Sartor G, ‘Legislative Information and the Web’ in Giovanni Sartor and others, (eds) Legislative XML for the Semantic Web. Principles, Models, Standards for Document (Springer 2011); Google Scholar öffnen
Sartor G, Casanovas P, Biasiotti M A and Fernández-Barrera M (eds) Approaches to Legal Ontologies. Theories, Domains, Methodologies (Springer 2011); Google Scholar öffnen
Sartor G, Legal Reasoning, (Springer 2005); Google Scholar öffnen
Sartor G, ‘Legal concepts as inferential nodes and ontological categories’ (2009) 17(3) Artificial Intelligence and Law; Google Scholar öffnen
Šavelka J, Westermann H and others, ‘Lex Rosetta: Transfer of Predictive Models across Languages, Jurisdictions and Legal Domains’ (ICAIL 2021: Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, São Paulo, 21-25 June 2021); Google Scholar öffnen
Sawicki J, ’Ubezpieczenie Business Interruption (BI) jako zabezpieczenie przyszłych dochodów przedsiębiorstwa’ (2008) 7 Studia i Prace Wydziału Nauk Ekonomicznych i Zarządzania; Google Scholar öffnen
Scharf J, Künstliche Intelligenz un Recht. Von den Wissensrepräsentation zur automatisierten Entscheidungsfindung (Weblaw 2015); Google Scholar öffnen
Scherer M, ‘Artificial Intelligence and Legal Decision-Making: The Wide Open?‘ (2019) 36 Journal of International Arbitration; Google Scholar öffnen
Schmidt A, `Technologie komunikacyjno-informatyczne w sądownictwie w Holandii – aktualna sytuacja` (2006) 16 Prawo mediów elektronicznych; Google Scholar öffnen
Schwartz J and Pelster B, ’Global Human Capital Trends 2014: Engaging the 21st-century workforce’, <https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/focus/human-capital-trends/2014/hc-trends-2014-introduction.html/#endnote-sup-10> accessed 25 April 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Schweighofer E, Legal Knowledge Representation (Kluwer Law International 1999); Google Scholar öffnen
Sergot M J, Sadri F, Kowalski R A, Kriwaczek F, Hammond P and Cory H T, ‘The British Nationality Act as a logic program’ (1986) 29 Communications of the ACM; Google Scholar öffnen
Shah R, ′Law Enforcement and Data Privacy - A Forward-Looking Approach′ (2015) 125 Yale Law Journal; Google Scholar öffnen
Shcherbak S, ‘Integrating Computer Science into Legal Discipline: The Rise of Legal Programming.’ (14 September 2014) <https://ssrn.com/abstract=2496094> accessed 5 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Shekhar S‘Sarmah, Application of Blockchain in Cloud Computing’ (2019) 8 12 International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering; Google Scholar öffnen
Sheppard B, ‘Incomplete Innovation and the Premature Disruption of Legal Sevices’ (2015) 1797 Michigan State Law Rev; Google Scholar öffnen
Singh B P and Tripathi A K, ‘Blockchain Technology and Intellectual Property Rights’ (2019) 24 Journal of Intellectual Property Rights; Google Scholar öffnen
Sirena P, ‘I sistemi di ADR nel settore bancario e finanziario’ (2018) 9 Nuova giur. civ. Comm; Google Scholar öffnen
Siwek M, ‘Prawa i obowiązki sędziego’(2006) 13 Studenckie Zeszyty Naukowe; Google Scholar öffnen
Size R, ‘Taking advantage of advances in technology to enhance the rule of law’ (2017) 91 Australian Law Journal; Google Scholar öffnen
Smetana D, ‘The Future of Legal Technology: 3 Emerging Trends’ (5 August 2020) <https://www.chalkline.tech/blog/future-of-legal-technology-3-trends> accessed 30 September 2020; Google Scholar öffnen
Smith JC, ′Machine Intelligence and Legal Reasoning′ (1998), 73 Chi.-Kent L. Rev.; Google Scholar öffnen
Smoloń D, Sokoliński O and Szarek G, ’Polisa od sztucznej inteligencji’, (2018) 10 Miesięcznik Ubezpieczeniowy; Google Scholar öffnen
Songkai X, Yurochkin M and,Sun Y, ′Auditing ML Models for Individual Bias and Unfairness′ (2020) 108 (PMLR 108/2020) Proceedings of the Twenty Third International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistic; Google Scholar öffnen
Sourdin T and Cornes R, ‘Do Judges Need to Be Human? The Implications of Technology for Responsive Judging’ in Tania Sourdin and Archie Zariski (eds) The Responsive Judge (Springer, 2018); Google Scholar öffnen
Sourdin T, ‘Judge v. robot? Artificial Intelligence and judicial decision making’(2018) 4 UNSW Law Journal; Google Scholar öffnen
Sowiński R, Majrzak M, ‘Programy do zarządzania kancelarią prawną. Jak wybrać i wdrożyć najlepszy program dla Twojej kancelarii?’ <https://kirp.pl/raport-programy-do-zarzadzania-kancelaria-prawna-juz-dostepny/> accessed 17 March 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Special Counsel, ‘What Predictive Coding Court Rulings Can Teach Us’ blog.specialcounsel.com (3 November 2016) <https://blog.specialcounsel.com/ediscovery/what-predictive-coding-court-rulings-can-teach-us> accessed 26 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Speech by Commissioner for Digital Economy and Society Mariya Gabriel on blockchain applications, Brussels 3 April 2019 <https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/SPEECH_19_1973> accessed 2 December 2020; Google Scholar öffnen
Spinosa P L, Giardiello G, Cherubini M, Marchi S, Venturi G, Montemagni S, ‘NLP-based metadata extraction for legal text consolidation’ (Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ACM, Barcelona 2009); Google Scholar öffnen
Srikanteswara R and others ‘Data security using encryption on multi-cloud’ (2018) 5, 6 International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology; Google Scholar öffnen
Srinivasan S, Cloud Computing Basics (Springer 2014); Google Scholar öffnen
State v. Loomis, 881 N.W. 2d 749, (Wisconsin 2016); Google Scholar öffnen
STF. First Panel. AI 564.765-RJ, DJ 17/3/2006; Google Scholar öffnen
Strutin K, ′Databases, E-Discovery and Criminal Law′ (2008) 15 Rich. JL & Tech.; Google Scholar öffnen
Studnicki F, Łachwa A, Fall J and Stabrawa E, Odesłania w tekstach prawnych. Ku metodom ich zautomatyzowanej interpretacji (ZNUJ 1990); Google Scholar öffnen
Surden H, ‘Machine Learning and Law’ (2014) 89 Washington Law Review; Google Scholar öffnen
Susskind R, Online Courts and the Future of Justice (Oxford University Press 2019); Google Scholar öffnen
Susskind R, Tomorrow’s Lawyers. An Introduction to Your Future (Oxford University Press 2nd edn, 2017); Google Scholar öffnen
Susskind R, ′The Latent Damage System: a jurisprudential analysis′ (ICAIL '89: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Lw, Vancouver 1989); Google Scholar öffnen
Susskind R and Susskind D, The Future of the Professions (Oxford University Press 2015); Google Scholar öffnen
Susskind R and Susskind D, The Future of the Professions: How Technology Will Transform the Work of Human Experts (Oxford University Press 2015); Google Scholar öffnen
Swan M, Blockchain - A Blueprint for a New Economy (O‘Reilly 2015); Google Scholar öffnen
Szabo N, ‘Smart Contracts’, <https://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/rob/Courses/InformationInSpeech/CDROM/Literature/LOTwinterschool2006/szabo.best.vwh.net/smart.contracts.html> accessed 25 April 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Szalai P,‘Elektronikus kommunikáció a polgári perben‘ in Gergely G. Karácsony (ed) Az elektronikus eljárások joga (Gondolat, 2018) <http://real.mtak.hu/80535/1/e-elj%C3%A1r%C3%A1s-jog_Tank%C3%B6nyv_LO.pdf> accessed 1 March 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Szewczuk A, ’Business interruption: ewolucja kompleksowego programu ubezpieczeniowego dla sektora małych i średnich przedsiębiorstw’ (2010) 50 “Ekonomiczne Problemy Usług; Google Scholar öffnen
Szlak G, ‘Online Dispute Resolution in Latin America: Challenges and Opportunities’, in Mohamed Abdel Wahab and others (eds) Online dispute resolution: Theory and Practice (Eleven International Publishing, 2012); Google Scholar öffnen
Szmit M, 'Biegły informatyk w postępowaniu cywilnym' (2010) 121/1078 Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Łódzkiej; Google Scholar öffnen
Szmit M, 'O standardach informatyki śledczej' (2018) 355 Studia Ekonomiczne; Google Scholar öffnen
Szostek D, (ed), Bezpieczeństwo danych i IT w kancelarii prawnej radcowskiej/adwokackiej/notarialnej/komorniczej. Czyli jak bezpiecznie przechowywać dane w kancelarii prawnej (Wydawnictwo C.H.Beck 2018); Google Scholar öffnen
Szostek D, ‘Consequences of applying new technologies to sources of law’ in García G. Javier, Alzina L. Álvaro and Martín R. Gabriel (eds), El derecho público y privado ante las nuevas tecnologías (Dykinson 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
Szostek D, ‘IBAC (IoT, Blockchain, AI i Cyberbezpieczeństwo) – samoregulacja kodów czy kontrola uprzednia?’ in Kinga. Flaga-Gieruszyńska, Jacek Gołaczyński and Dariusz Szostek (eds), Sztuczna inteligencja, blockchain, cyberbezpieczeństwo oraz dane osobowe. Zagadnienia wybrane (C. H. Beck 2019); Google Scholar öffnen
Szostek D, ‘Sztuczna inteligencja a kody. Czy rozwiązaniem dla uregulowania sztucznej inteligencji jest smart contract i blockchain?’ in Luigi Lai and Marek Świerczyński (eds), Prawo sztucznej inteligencji (C.H.Beck 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
Szostek D, Blockchain and the law (1st edn, Nomos 2019); Google Scholar öffnen
Szostek D, in Dariusz Szostek (ed) Legal tech. Czyli jak bezpiecznie korzystać z narzędzi informatycznych w organizacji, w tym w kancelarii oraz dziale prawnym (C. H. Beck 2021); Google Scholar öffnen
Tanenbaum A S and Wetherall D J, Computer Networks (Prentice Hall 2011); Google Scholar öffnen
Tapscott D and Tapscott A, Blockchain revolution. How The Technology Behind Bitcoin Is Changing Money, Business, And The World (Penguin Random House 2016); Google Scholar öffnen
Thagard P, Coherence in Thought and Action (The MIT Press 2000); Google Scholar öffnen
Thakur V, Doja M N, Dwivedi Y K, Ahmad T, Khadanga G, ‘Land records on Blockchain for implementation of Land Titling in India’ (2020) 52 International Journal of Information Management; Google Scholar öffnen
The European Union Blockchain Observatory & Forum, EU Blockchain Ecosystem Developments, <https://www.eublockchainforum.eu/sites/default/files/reports/EU%20Blockchain%20Ecosystem%20Report_final_0.pdf> accessed 2 January 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
The Geneva Association, ’Ten key questions on Cyber Risk and Cyber Risk Insurance’ <https://www.genevaassociation.org/sites/default/files/research-topics-document-type/pdf_public/cyber-risk-10_key_questions.pdf>; Google Scholar öffnen
The Legal Technologist, ‘An interview with Mariana Hagström – From Managing Partner to Legaltech Founder’ (The Legal Technologist 12 August 2020) <https://www.legaltechnologist.co.uk/an-interview-with-mariana-hagstrom-from-managing-partner-to-legaltech-founder/> access 17 March 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
The Service Innovation Lab (LabPlus), ‘Better Rules for Government Discovery Report’ (NZ Digital Government, March 2018) <https://www.digital.govt.nz/dmsdocument/95-better-rules-for-government-discovery-report/html#summary> accessed 31 January 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Thomson Reuters Legal, ‘How to make the e-discovery process more efficient with predictive coding?’ <https://legal.thomsonreuters.com/en/insights/articles/how-predictive-coding-makes-e-discovery-more-efficient> accessed 26 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Thordsen T, Murawski M and Bick M, `How to Measure Digitalization? A Critical Evaluation of Digital Maturity Models` in Marié Hattingh, Machdel Matthee, Hanlie Smuts, Ilias Pappas, Yogesh K. Dwivedi, Matti Mäntymäki (eds) Responsible Design, Implementation and Use of Information and Communication Technology (Springer 2020) <https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44999-5_30P> accessed 11 January 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Thornhill J, ‘Is AI finally closing in on human intelligence’ (Financial Times, 12 November 2020) <https://www.<ft.com/content/512cef1d-233b-4dd8-96a4-0af07bb9ff60>, accessed 13 November 2020; Google Scholar öffnen
Tolan S, Miron M, Gómez E and Castillo C, ′Why Machine Learning May Lead to Unfairness: Evidence from Risk Assessment for Juvenile Justice in Catalonia′ (Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL '19), Montreal, 17 – 21 June 2019); Google Scholar öffnen
Tönnissen S, Beinke J H and Teuteberg F, ‘Understanding Token-based Ecosystems – a Taxonomy of Blockchain-based Business Models of Start-ups’ (2020), 30 Electron Markets <https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-020-00396-6> accessed 8 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Toulmin S, The Uses of Argument, Cambridge University Press 2003 (1st ed. 1958); Google Scholar öffnen
Trautman L J, ‘Is Disruptive Blockchain Technology the Future of Financial Services?’ (2016) 69 The Consumer Finance Law Quarterly Report <https://ssrn.com/abstract=2786186> accessed 15 March 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Tresise A, Goldenfein J and Hunter D, ‘What Blockchain Can and Can't Do for Copyright’ (2018) 28 Australian Intellectual Property Journal 144 <https://ssrn.com/abstract=3227381> accessed 7 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Tribunal de Contas da União, ‘Apêndice 1 -Aplicações Blockchain No Setor Público Do Brasil’, (TCU 2020) <https://portal.tcu.gov.br/levantamento-da-tecnologia-blockchain.htm> accessed 9 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Tribunal de Contas da União, 'Levantamento Da Tecnologia Blockchain' (TCU 2020) <https://portal.tcu.gov.br/levantamento-da-tecnologia-blockchain.htm> accessed 9 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Triumph Controls UK Ltd & anr v Primus International Holding Co & ors [2019] EWHC 565 (TCC); Google Scholar öffnen
Turner J, ′Managing Digital Discovery In Criminal Cases′ (2019) 109 The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology; Google Scholar öffnen
Turner J, Robot Rules. Regulating Artificial Intelligence (Springer 2019); Google Scholar öffnen
Uliasz M in Jacek Gołaczyński and Dariusz Szostek (eds) Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz do ustawy z 4.7.2019 r. o zmianie ustawy – Kodeks postępowania cywilnego oraz niektórych innych ustaw (C. H. Beck 2019); Google Scholar öffnen
Ultima Ratio ‘Sztuczna inteligencja w Ultima Ratio. Czy roboty zastąpią arbitrów?’ (ultimaratio.pl) <https://ultimaratio.pl/sztuczna-inteligencja-w-ultima-ratio-czy-roboty-zastapia-arbitrow> accessed 12 March 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Uzsoki D, ‘Tokenization of Infrastructure: A blockchain-based solution to financing sustainable infrastructure, (International Institute for Sustainable Development 2019) <doi:10.2307/resrep22004.3> accessed: 9 March 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Valles G, ‘Financiamiento Público de los Partidos Políticos en México: tópicos controversiales y propuesta de alternativa tecnológica para su fiscalización’, (2018) 27, 2 Díkaion; Google Scholar öffnen
Van de Ven S, Hoekstra R, Winkels R, De Maat E and Kollár A ‘MetaVex: Regulation Drafting meets the Semantic Web’ in Pompeu Casanovas and others (eds) Computable Models of the Law (Springer 2008); Google Scholar öffnen
van der Meulen R, ‘5 Legal Technology Trends Changing In-House Legal Departments’ (Gartner, 9 February 2021) <www.gartner.com/smarterwithgartner/5-legal-technology-trends-changing-in-house-legal-departments/> accessed 24 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
van der Put M, ‘Kan artificiële intelligentie de rechtspraak betoveren’ (2019) 2 Rechtstreeks; Google Scholar öffnen
van Kralingen R, Frame-based Conceptual Models of Statute Law (Kluwer Law International 1995); Google Scholar öffnen
Verheij B, ‘Artificial Argument Assistants for Defeasible Argumentation’, (2003) 150 (1-2) Artificial Intelligence; Google Scholar öffnen
Verheij B, ‘Artificial intelligence as law. Presidential address to the seventeenth international conference on artificial intelligence and law’ (2020) 28 Artificial Intelligence and Law; Google Scholar öffnen
Verheij B, ‘DefLog: on the Logical Interpretation of Prima Facie Justified Assumptions’, (2003) 13(3) Journal of Logic and Computation; Google Scholar öffnen
Verifiable Credentials Data Model 1.0. Expressing verifiable information on the Web’ (W3C, 19 November 2019) <https://www.w3.org/TR/vc-data-model/> accessed 21 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Vigliotti M G, Jones H, The Executive Guide to Blockchian (Palgrave Macmillan 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
Villaronga E F, Kieseberg P and Li T, ‘Humans forget, machines remember: Artificial intelligence and the Right to Be Forgotten’ (2018) 34, 2 Computer Law & Security Review; Google Scholar öffnen
Virtual Financial Assets Act (VFA) <https://legislation.mt/eli/cap/590/eng/pdf> access 2 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Vitali F, ‘A Standard-Based Approach for the Management for Legislative Documents’ in Giovanni Sartor and others, (eds) Legislative XML for the Semantic Web. Principles, Models, Standards for Document (Springer 2011); Google Scholar öffnen
Von der Leyen U, Mission letter of President-elect Von der Leyen to Vice-President Dombrovskis (10 September 2019) <https://multimedia.europarl.europa.eu/documents/20143/0/mission-letter-valdis-dombrovskis-2019_en+%281%29.pdf/d3645133-8c2e-7fdd-4367-77059b892232?t=1569412036000&download=true> accessed 15 March 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Vorhies W, ‘An Argument in Favor of Centaur AI’ <www.datasciencecentral.com/profiles/blogs/an-argument-in-favor-of-centaur-ai>, accessed: 15 January 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Waddington M, ‘Machine-consumable legislation: A legislative drafter’s perspective – human v artificial intelligence’ (2019) 2 The Loophole - Journal of Commonwealth Assoc of Legislative Counsel; Google Scholar öffnen
Wagner J, Legal Tech und Legal Robots. Der Wandel im Rechtswesen durch neue Technologien und Künstliche Intelligenz (Springer 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
Wagner J, Legaltech und Legal Robots. Der Wandel im Rechtswesen durch neue Technologien und Kunstliche Intelligenz, (Springer 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
Walton D, Argumentation Methods for Artificial Intelligence in Law (Springer 2005); Google Scholar öffnen
Walton D, Reed C and Macagno F, Argumentation Schemes (Cambridge University Press 2008); Google Scholar öffnen
Walton D, Sartor G and Macagno F, Statutory Interpretation: Pragmatics and argumentation (Cambridge University Press 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
Wang Q, Li R, Zhan L, ‘ ‚Blockchain technology in the energy sector: From basic research to real world applications‘ (2021) 39 Computer Science Review; Google Scholar öffnen
Waszczuk P, ‘Trend Micro: W jaki sposób zapewnić bezpieczeństwo infrastruktury IT w modelu multicloud?’ <https://www.itwiz.pl/trend-micro-jaki-sposob-zapewnic-bezpieczenstwo-infrastruktury-modelu-multicloud/> access 8 December 2020; Google Scholar öffnen
Waterman D A and Peterson M A, ‘Models of Legal Decision Making: Research Design and Methods’ (Rand Corporation, The Institute for Civil Justice 1981); Google Scholar öffnen
Weather M, ‘Predictive coding: the current landscape’ disputeresolutionblog.practicallaw.com/ (Thomson Reuters 21 July 2016) <http://disputeresolutionblog.practicallaw.com/predictive-coding-the-current-landscape/> accessed 26 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Weinberger D, `The problem with the data-information-knowledge-wisdom hierarchy` (2010) Harvard Business Review <https://hbr.org/2010/02/data-is-to-info-as-info-is-not> accessed 11 January 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Weinstein J, Abrams N, Brewer S and Medwed D, Evidence (Foundation Press 2017); Google Scholar öffnen
Wen T, `How coronavirus has transformed the way we communicate` (BBC, 9 April 2020) <https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20200408-coronavirus-how-lockdown-helps-those-who-fear-the-phone> accessed 15 December 2020; Google Scholar öffnen
Weng Wong M, ‘Rules as code – Seven levels of digitisation.’ (Research Collection School Of Law, April 2020) <https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3093/> accessed 17 April 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Werbach K, ‘Trust, But Verify: Why the Blockchain Needs the Law’ (2019) 33/2 Berkeley Technology Law Journal; Google Scholar öffnen
Werbach K, The Blockchain and the new architecture of trust (MIT Press 2018); Google Scholar öffnen
Wiewiórowski W R and Wierczyński G, Informatyka prawnicza (4th edn, Wolters Kluver 2006); Google Scholar öffnen
Wilkens R, Falk R, Smart Contracts, Grundlagen, Anwedungsfelder und rechtliche Aspekte (Springer 2019); Google Scholar öffnen
Wilkens R, Falk R, Smart Contracts, Grundlagen, Anwedungsfelder und rechtliche Aspekte (Springer 2019); Google Scholar öffnen
Witkowska-Nowakowska K in Edyta Bielak-Jomaa and Dominik Lubasz (eds), RODO. Ogólne rozporządzenie o ochronie danych. Komentarz (Wolters Kluwer 2018); Google Scholar öffnen
Włodarczyk D, ‘Bezpieczny przedsiębiorca’, (2018) 6 Miesięcznik Ubezpieczeniowy; Google Scholar öffnen
Wódczak M and others, ‘Standardizing a Reference Model and Autonomic Network Architectures for the Self-Managing Future Internet’ (2011) 25(6) IEEE Network; Google Scholar öffnen
Wódczak M, Autonomic Computing Enabled Cooperative Networked Design (Springer 2014); Google Scholar öffnen
Wódczak M, Autonomic Cooperative Networking (Springer 2012); Google Scholar öffnen
Wódczak M, Autonomic Intelligence Evolved Cooperative Networking (Wiley 2018); Google Scholar öffnen
Wood G, ‘Ethereum: A secure decentralised generalised transaction ledger’ GAVWOOD.COM < https://gavwood.com/paper.pdf > accessed 11 December 2020; Google Scholar öffnen
Woodrow B and Ugo P, Advanced Introduction to Law and Artificial Intelligence (Edward Elgar Publishing 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
World Economic Forum, ‘Bridging the Governance Gap: Dispute resolution for blockchain-based transactions’ (White Paper, December 2020) access 16 March 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Wright A and De Filippi P, ‘Decentralized blockchain technology and the rise of Lex Cryptographia’ (2015) <https://ssrn.com/abstract=2580664> accessed 11 December 2020; Google Scholar öffnen
Wróblewski M, ‘Gdzie zaczęła się LegalTechowa rewolucja?’, <https://blockchainext.io/gdzie-zaczela-sie-legaltechowa-rewolucja-wywiad/> accessed 25 April 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Wyner A, ′An ontology in OWL for legal case-based reasoning′ (2008) 16 , Artificial Intelligence and Law; Google Scholar öffnen
Xu A L, ‘Chinese Judicial Justice on the Cloud: A Future Call or a Pandora’s Box? An Analysis of the ‘Intelligent Court System’ of China’(2017) 1 Information & Communications Technology Law; Google Scholar öffnen
Yankovskiy R M, ‘Legal Design: New Challenges and New Opportunities’ (2019), 5 Zakon; Google Scholar öffnen
Yano M, Dai Ch, Masuda K, Kishimoto Y, ‘Creation of Blockchain and a New Ecosystem‘ in Makoto —— Chris Dai, Kenichi Masuda, Yoshio Kishimoto (eds) Blockchain and Crypto Currency (Springer 2019); Google Scholar öffnen
Yeung K, ‘A study of the implications of advanced digital technologies (including AI systems) for the concept of responsibility within a human rights framework’ <https://rm.coe.int/a-study-of-the-implications-of-advanced-digital-technologies-including/168096bdab> access 17 March 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Yu D and Li D, Automatic Speech Recognition (Springer London Limited 2016); Google Scholar öffnen
Yu M, ‘Filing Lawsuits While Living Abroad: China's New Policy’ (China Justice Observer, 7 March 2021) <https://www.chinajusticeobserver.com/a/filing-lawsuits-while-living-abroad-china-s-new-policy> accessed 12 March 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Zaccaria G, ‘Figure del giudicare: calcolabilità, precedenti, decisione robotica’ in Rivista di diritto ir. civile., (Cedam, 2020). Google Scholar öffnen
Żaczkiewicz-Zborska K, ‘Kancelaria w chmurze obliczeniowej naraża na szwank tajemnicę zawodową’ https://<www.prawo.pl/prawnicy-sady/kancelaria-w-chmurze-obliczeniowej-naraza-na-szwank-tajemnice,175923.html> accessed 9 March 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Zakrzewski P, ‘Sztuczna inteligencja rozsadza ramy, w których funkcjonowaliśmy do tej pory – interview with A. Przegalińska’ <culture.pl/pl/artykul/aleksandra-przegalinska-sztuczna-inteligencja-rozsadza-ramy-w-ktorych-funkcjonowalismy-do-tej-pory-wywiad> accessed 14 March 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Zalesińska A, `Electronic Court` in Jacek Gołaczyński, Wolfgang Kilian and Tomasz Scheffler (eds) Legal Innovation in Polish Law (C. H. Beck 2019); Google Scholar öffnen
Zalesińska A, ‘Electronic Court Report in Proceedings Before Common Courts in Poland’ in: Jacek Gołaczyński, Wolfgang Kilian and Tomasz Scheffler (eds) Legal Innovation in Polish Law (C. H. Beck 2019); Google Scholar öffnen
Zalewski T, ‘Definicja sztucznej inteligencji’ in Luigi Lai and Marek Świerczyński (eds), Prawo sztucznej inteligencji (C.H.Beck 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
Zalewski T, ‘LEGALTECH – wyzwanie przyszłości’, (2019) 3 Temidium; Google Scholar öffnen
Załucki M, ‘Computers in gowns and wigs. Some remarks about a new era of judiciary’ in Laura Miraut Martin and Mariusz Załucki (eds) AI and human Rights, (in print 2021). Google Scholar öffnen
Załucki M, ‘Wykorzystanie sztucznej inteligencji do rozstrzygania spraw spadkowych’ in Luigi Lai and Marek Świerczyński (eds) Prawo sztucznej inteligencji (C. H. Beck, 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
Załucki M in Dariusz Szostek (ed) Legal tech. Czyli jak bezpiecznie korzystać z narzędzi informatycznych w organizacji, w tym w kancelarii oraz dziale prawnym (C. H. Beck 2021); Google Scholar öffnen
Zamil A M, ‘Customer Relationship Management: A Strategy to Sustain the Organization’s Name and Products in the Customers’ Minds’ (2011) 3 European Journal of Social Sciences; Google Scholar öffnen
Zanfir-Fortuna G, ‘Commentary to Article 82’ in Christopher Kuner, Lee A. Bygrave, Christopher Docksey (eds) The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). A Commentary (OUP 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
Završnik A, ‘Algorithmic justice: Algorithms and big data in criminal justice settings’ (2019) 11 European Journal of Criminology; Google Scholar öffnen
Zębala J, ’Wybrane problemy ubezpieczeń cyber risk’ (2018) 6 Monitor Ubezpieczeniowy; Google Scholar öffnen
Zeleznikow J, ‘Using Artificial Intelligence to provide Intelligent Dispute Resolution Support‘ (2021) 30 Group Decision and Negotiation; Google Scholar öffnen
Zhong H, Guo Z, Tu C, Xiao C, Liu Z and Sun M, ‘Legal Judgment Prediction via Topological Learning’ (Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Brussels 2018); Google Scholar öffnen
Zhong H, Xiao C, Tu C and others, ‘How Does NLP Benefit Legal System: A Summary of Legal Artificial Intelligence’ (Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, on-line, July 2020) 5218-5230 <www.aclweb.org/anthology/2020.acl-main.466.pdf> accessed 1 July 2020; Google Scholar öffnen
Zhong H, Xiao C, Tu C, Zhang T, Liu Z and Sun M, ′How Does NLP Benefit Legal System: A Summary of Legal Artificial Intelligence′, (2020) arXiv:2004.12158 arXiv.org; Google Scholar öffnen
Zhu H, ’"Zhejiang Experience": Problems and Countermeasures in the Construction of Internet Courts’ (Atlantis Press, September 2019) <https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/jahp-19/125917489> accessed 21 August 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Zieliński M, Wykładnia prawa. Zasady – reguły – wskazówki (7 ed., Wolters Kluwer 2017); Google Scholar öffnen
Zimmerman E, ‘Jerked Around by the Magic Circle - Clearing the Air Ten Years Later’ (Gamasutra, 7 February 2012) <https://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/135063/jerked_around_by_the_magic_circle_.php> accessed 17 January 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Zimmermann Ch, ’Legal Tech – Vielfalt der Anwendungen und richtige Haftungsvorsorge’<https://anwaltsblatt.anwaltverein.de/files/anwaltsblatt.de/anwaltsblatt-online/2019-815.pdf> accessed 25th April 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Zins C, ‘Conceptual approaches for defining data, information, and knowledge’ (2007) 58(4) Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 479 <https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20508> accessed 11 January 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Żok K, ‘Kwalifikacja umowy o korzystanie z programu komputerowego jako usługi (Software as a Service, SaaS) – uwagi na tle prawa polskiego i wybranych zagranicznych systemów prawnych’ (2015) 3 Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego; Google Scholar öffnen
Żok K, ‘Prawna i ekonomiczna analiza umowy o korzystanie z programu komputerowego jako usługi (Software as a Service, SaaS)’ (2017) 4 Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego; Google Scholar öffnen
Zsolt Z, ‘Law and Legal Science in the Age of Big Data’ (2017) 3 Intersections. EEJSP; Google Scholar öffnen
Zuckerman M J, Swedish government land registry soon to conduct first blockchain property transaction <https://cointelegraph.com/news/swedish-government-land-registry-soon-to-conduct-first-blockchain-property-transaction> accessed 27 January 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
Żurek T, Araszkiewicz M, ‘Modeling teleological interpretation’ in Enrico Francesconi and Bart Verheij (eds) International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL '13 (ACM 2013); Google Scholar öffnen