Cover des Buchs: Internet and New Technologies Law
Sammelband Open Access Vollzugriff

Internet and New Technologies Law

Perspectives and Challenges
Herausgeber:innen:
Verlag:
 2021

Zusammenfassung

Seit dem ersten IGF-Gipfel der Vereinten Nationen 2006 in Athen dient das Treffen Entscheidungsträgern als Forum und Informationsquelle – v.a., was die Nutzung neuer Technologien– einschließlich rechtlicher und politischer Konsequenzen – angeht. Die Diskussionsbeiträge der 6. Tagung in Polen zum Thema „Internet und neue Technologien“ sind in diesem Band zusammengefasst.

Schlagworte

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Copyrightjahr
2021
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-8307-6
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-2697-9
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Sprache
Englisch
Seiten
479
Produkttyp
Sammelband

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 - 4 Download Kapitel (PDF)
  2. Introduction 5 - 12 Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. 1. The IGF and its role in the global digital diplomacy 13 - 13 Download Kapitel (PDF)
    2. Download Kapitel (PDF)
        1. 2.1.1. Economic and social inclusion and human rights
        2. 2.1.2. Universal access and meaningful connectivity
        1. 2.2.2. Environmental sustainability and climate change
        2. 2.2.3. Inclusive IG ecosystems and digital cooperation
        3. 2.2.4. Trust, security, stability
    3. Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. 3.1. What and how to regulate in the world of technology?
      2. 3.2. What and how to finance in the world of technologies?
      3. 3.3. Technologies and sustainable development
    4. 4. The new skills needed 26 - 26 Download Kapitel (PDF)
    5. 5. Digitalising our way into a post-pandemic recovery 27 - 28 Download Kapitel (PDF)
    6. 6. How the IGF’s current format aligns with the challenges ahead 29 - 30 Download Kapitel (PDF)
    7. 7. Looking forward 31 - 32 Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. Alexandre Cavalcanti Andrade de Araújo Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. 1. IntroductionAlexandre Cavalcanti Andrade de Araújo
      2. 2. New Technologies - The Future of LawAlexandre Cavalcanti Andrade de Araújo
      3. 3. ConclusionAlexandre Cavalcanti Andrade de Araújo
    2. Monika Jagielska, Monika Namysłowska, Aneta Wiewiórowska-Domagalska Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. 1. IntroductionMonika Jagielska, Monika Namysłowska, Aneta Wiewiórowska-Domagalska
      2. Monika Jagielska, Monika Namysłowska, Aneta Wiewiórowska-Domagalska
        1. 2.1 Departing from sales contractMonika Jagielska, Monika Namysłowska, Aneta Wiewiórowska-Domagalska
        2. 2.2 Departing from the off-line worldMonika Jagielska, Monika Namysłowska, Aneta Wiewiórowska-Domagalska
      3. 3. Changes in the notion of a consumerMonika Jagielska, Monika Namysłowska, Aneta Wiewiórowska-Domagalska
      4. 4. Changes in consumer modelMonika Jagielska, Monika Namysłowska, Aneta Wiewiórowska-Domagalska
      5. 5. ConclusionsMonika Jagielska, Monika Namysłowska, Aneta Wiewiórowska-Domagalska
    3. Zofia Bednarz, Kayleen Manwaring Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. 1. IntroductionZofia Bednarz, Kayleen Manwaring
      2. Zofia Bednarz, Kayleen Manwaring
        1. 2.1. Emerging Technologies Used by Financial Services FirmsZofia Bednarz, Kayleen Manwaring
        2. 2.2. Use of AI and Big Data in Retail Financial ServicesZofia Bednarz, Kayleen Manwaring
        3. 2.3. (Concerning) Characteristics of the TechnologiesZofia Bednarz, Kayleen Manwaring
      3. Zofia Bednarz, Kayleen Manwaring
        1. 3.1. Overview of Potential Consumer HarmsZofia Bednarz, Kayleen Manwaring
        2. 3.2. Algorithmic Bias and DiscriminationZofia Bednarz, Kayleen Manwaring
        3. 3.3. Excessive Data CollectionZofia Bednarz, Kayleen Manwaring
        4. 3.4. Digital Consumer ManipulationZofia Bednarz, Kayleen Manwaring
        5. 3.5. Personalisation of Financial ServicesZofia Bednarz, Kayleen Manwaring
      4. 4. ConclusionsZofia Bednarz, Kayleen Manwaring
    4. Renato Bernardi, Heloísa Pancotti Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. Renato Bernardi, Heloísa Pancotti
        1. 1.1 The social political context.Renato Bernardi, Heloísa Pancotti
        2. 1.2 The social security context:Renato Bernardi, Heloísa Pancotti
        3. 1.3 The first global risk to the social security system at the XXI century: What came up?Renato Bernardi, Heloísa Pancotti
        4. 1.4 The digital inclusion challenge in BrazilRenato Bernardi, Heloísa Pancotti
      2. ConclusionsRenato Bernardi, Heloísa Pancotti
    5. Beata Stępień-Załucka Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. 1. IntroductionBeata Stępień-Załucka
      2. 2. Definition of e-votingBeata Stępień-Załucka
      3. 3. Standards and regulations that e-voting has to faceBeata Stępień-Załucka
      4. 4. Threats connected with introduction of e-voting.Beata Stępień-Załucka
      5. 5. SummaryBeata Stępień-Załucka
    6. Ewa Rott-Pietrzyk, Dariusz Szostek, Marek Świerczynski Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. 1. IntroductionEwa Rott-Pietrzyk, Dariusz Szostek, Marek Świerczynski
      2. 2. Control over codes at EU levelEwa Rott-Pietrzyk, Dariusz Szostek, Marek Świerczynski
      3. Ewa Rott-Pietrzyk, Dariusz Szostek, Marek Świerczynski
        1. 3.1. General remarksEwa Rott-Pietrzyk, Dariusz Szostek, Marek Świerczynski
        2. 3.2. A risk-based approachEwa Rott-Pietrzyk, Dariusz Szostek, Marek Świerczynski
        3. 3.3. Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence ActEwa Rott-Pietrzyk, Dariusz Szostek, Marek Świerczynski
        4. 3.4. The Council of Europe's role in regulating algorithmic codesEwa Rott-Pietrzyk, Dariusz Szostek, Marek Świerczynski
      4. 4. ConclusionsEwa Rott-Pietrzyk, Dariusz Szostek, Marek Świerczynski
    1. Fryderyk Zoll Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. Fryderyk Zoll
        1. 1.1. The AI-supported decision-makingFryderyk Zoll
        2. 1.2. New business modelFryderyk Zoll
      2. Fryderyk Zoll
        1. 2.1. ConfidentialityFryderyk Zoll
        2. 2.2. Conflict of interestsFryderyk Zoll
        3. 2.3. Acting based on the professional skills and knowledgeFryderyk Zoll
      3. 3. Changing the legal education of lawyers in the AI-ageFryderyk Zoll
      4. 4. ConclusionsFryderyk Zoll
    2. Gabriela Bar, Silvia A. Carretta, Shobana Iyer Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. 1. IntroductionGabriela Bar, Silvia A. Carretta, Shobana Iyer
      2. 2. New Means of ProductionGabriela Bar, Silvia A. Carretta, Shobana Iyer
      3. 3. Hybrid Disruption Through LawtechGabriela Bar, Silvia A. Carretta, Shobana Iyer
      4. 4. New Challenges Posed by the Use of AIGabriela Bar, Silvia A. Carretta, Shobana Iyer
      5. 5. Innovation as a Must on the Long RunGabriela Bar, Silvia A. Carretta, Shobana Iyer
    3. A Quest for Technological Competence: Raising the Bar 145 - 158 Doug Surtees, Craig Zawada Download Kapitel (PDF)
    4. Mariusz Załucki Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. 1. IntroductionMariusz Załucki
      2. 2. The current state and recent developments in the judiciaryMariusz Załucki
      3. 3. Selected solutions from around the worldMariusz Załucki
      4. 4. Towards the modernisation of the judiciary (instead of a conclusion)Mariusz Załucki
    5. Wilfried Bernhardt Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. 1. IntroductionWilfried Bernhardt
      2. 2. Definition of AIWilfried Bernhardt
      3. 3. Stages of development of IT support for the judiciaryWilfried Bernhardt
      4. Wilfried Bernhardt
        1. Wilfried Bernhardt
          1. 4.1.1 Information Retrieval, Data ExtractionWilfried Bernhardt
          2. 4.1.2 Automated analysis and statistical evaluation of sentencing considerations in criminal judgments.Wilfried Bernhardt
          3. 4.1.3 Use of AI for criminal investigative services to detect child pornography and child abuse.Wilfried Bernhardt
          4. 4.1.4 Use of AI to categorize offendersWilfried Bernhardt
          5. 4.1.5 Automated TranslationWilfried Bernhardt
          6. 4.1.6 Anonymizing court judgmentsWilfried Bernhardt
          7. 4.1.7 InteractionWilfried Bernhardt
          8. 4.1.8 Further possibilities of AI use in the judiciaryWilfried Bernhardt
        2. 4.2 Use of AI by the European UnionWilfried Bernhardt
      5. Wilfried Bernhardt
        1. 5.1 GDPRWilfried Bernhardt
        2. Wilfried Bernhardt
          1. 5.2.1 Constitutional principles that suggest the use of artificial intelligenceWilfried Bernhardt
          2. Wilfried Bernhardt
            1. (1) Right to human dignityWilfried Bernhardt
            2. (2) Principle of non-discriminationWilfried Bernhardt
            3. (3) Principle of the natural and independent judgeWilfried Bernhardt
            4. (4) The right to an effective remedyWilfried Bernhardt
            5. (5) Fair trialWilfried Bernhardt
            6. (6) Right to the legal judgeWilfried Bernhardt
            7. (7) Transparency principleWilfried Bernhardt
            8. (8) Principle of the right to be heardWilfried Bernhardt
      6. 6. European Commission for the Efficiency of JusticeWilfried Bernhardt
      7. 7. Proposal for a Regulation laying down harmonized rules on artificial intelligence.Wilfried Bernhardt
      8. 8. ConclusionWilfried Bernhardt
    6. Mauro Arturo Rivera León, Rodrigo E. Galán Martínez Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. 1. IntroductionMauro Arturo Rivera León, Rodrigo E. Galán Martínez
      2. 2. A Forced Transition: Online Justice at the Federal LevelMauro Arturo Rivera León, Rodrigo E. Galán Martínez
      3. 3. The Constitutionalization of Digital Justice: A Future Fundament Right or a Characterization of Justice in Mexico?Mauro Arturo Rivera León, Rodrigo E. Galán Martínez
      4. 4. More Challenges than Certainties: A Provisional ConclusionMauro Arturo Rivera León, Rodrigo E. Galán Martínez
    7. Przemysław Polański, Jacek Gołaczyński Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. IntroductionPrzemysław Polański, Jacek Gołaczyński
      2. Przemysław Polański, Jacek Gołaczyński
        1. 1) Complaint formPrzemysław Polański, Jacek Gołaczyński
        2. 2) Collection and retention of personal data contained in the complaintPrzemysław Polański, Jacek Gołaczyński
        3. 3) Pre-dispute informationPrzemysław Polański, Jacek Gołaczyński
        4. 4) Handling of the case by the ODR entityPrzemysław Polański, Jacek Gołaczyński
      3. Part II. Arbitration covenant. The conceptPrzemysław Polański, Jacek Gołaczyński
    1. Charlie Northrup Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. 1. Beyond the WebCharlie Northrup
      2. 2. Lack of a universal self-validating/authenticating membership modelCharlie Northrup
      3. 3. Disintermediating the IntermediariesCharlie Northrup
      4. 4. Disintermediating the Web BrowserCharlie Northrup
      5. 5. The Benefits of MembershipCharlie Northrup
      6. 6. We are at the beginning of the beginningCharlie Northrup
      7. 7. Fiefdoms to HyperconnectivityCharlie Northrup
      8. 8. The Need for a New FrameworkCharlie Northrup
      9. 9. The TransformationCharlie Northrup
      10. 10. MultiKey Infrastructure (MKI)Charlie Northrup
      11. 11. SummaryCharlie Northrup
    2. Felipe Garcia Teló, Ricardo Pinha Alonso Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. IntroductionFelipe Garcia Teló, Ricardo Pinha Alonso
      2. Felipe Garcia Teló, Ricardo Pinha Alonso
        1. 2.1. DefinitionFelipe Garcia Teló, Ricardo Pinha Alonso
        2. 2.2. ModalitiesFelipe Garcia Teló, Ricardo Pinha Alonso
      3. Felipe Garcia Teló, Ricardo Pinha Alonso
        1. 3.1. Historical ContextFelipe Garcia Teló, Ricardo Pinha Alonso
        2. 3.2. General BackgroundFelipe Garcia Teló, Ricardo Pinha Alonso
        3. 3.3. Main dispositionsFelipe Garcia Teló, Ricardo Pinha Alonso
      4. Felipe Garcia Teló, Ricardo Pinha Alonso
        1. 4.1. Case study 1: Enel Distribution Ceara (EDC)Felipe Garcia Teló, Ricardo Pinha Alonso
        2. 4.2. Case study 2: PetrobrasFelipe Garcia Teló, Ricardo Pinha Alonso
      5. 5. ConclusionFelipe Garcia Teló, Ricardo Pinha Alonso
    3. Alexandra R. Harrington, Magdalena Stryja Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. 1. IntroductionAlexandra R. Harrington, Magdalena Stryja
      2. 2. SDG Background and HistoryAlexandra R. Harrington, Magdalena Stryja
      3. Alexandra R. Harrington, Magdalena Stryja
        1. SDG 1 – End poverty in all its forms everywhereAlexandra R. Harrington, Magdalena Stryja
        2. SDG 2 – end hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agricultureAlexandra R. Harrington, Magdalena Stryja
        3. SDG 3 – ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all agesAlexandra R. Harrington, Magdalena Stryja
        4. SDG 4 – ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for allAlexandra R. Harrington, Magdalena Stryja
        5. SDG 6 – ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for allAlexandra R. Harrington, Magdalena Stryja
        6. SDG 7 – ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for allAlexandra R. Harrington, Magdalena Stryja
        7. SDG 8 – promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for allAlexandra R. Harrington, Magdalena Stryja
        8. SDG 9 – build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovationAlexandra R. Harrington, Magdalena Stryja
        9. SDG 11 – make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainableAlexandra R. Harrington, Magdalena Stryja
        10. SDG 13 – take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts & SDG 15 – protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertificati...Alexandra R. Harrington, Magdalena Stryja
        11. SDG 16 – promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutional at all levelsAlexandra R. Harrington, Magdalena Stryja
        12. SDG 17 – strengthen the means of implementation and revitalize the global partnership for sustainable developmentAlexandra R. Harrington, Magdalena Stryja
      4. 4. ConclusionAlexandra R. Harrington, Magdalena Stryja
    4. Wojciech Filipkowski, Rafał Rejmaniak Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. 1. IntroductionWojciech Filipkowski, Rafał Rejmaniak
      2. Wojciech Filipkowski, Rafał Rejmaniak
        1. 2.1. Smart city and the 2030 AgendaWojciech Filipkowski, Rafał Rejmaniak
        2. 2.2. Smart areasWojciech Filipkowski, Rafał Rejmaniak
      3. 3. Selected technological issuesWojciech Filipkowski, Rafał Rejmaniak
      4. Wojciech Filipkowski, Rafał Rejmaniak
        1. Wojciech Filipkowski, Rafał Rejmaniak
          1. 4.1.1. Decision loopWojciech Filipkowski, Rafał Rejmaniak
          2. 4.1.2. Trustworthy artificial intelligenceWojciech Filipkowski, Rafał Rejmaniak
          3. 4.1.3. Human-Centered AutomationWojciech Filipkowski, Rafał Rejmaniak
        2. 4.2. The question of full autonomy of systemsWojciech Filipkowski, Rafał Rejmaniak
        3. 4.3. Scope of responsibilities of system usersWojciech Filipkowski, Rafał Rejmaniak
      5. Wojciech Filipkowski, Rafał Rejmaniak
        1. 5.1. Man-in-the-loopWojciech Filipkowski, Rafał Rejmaniak
        2. 5.2. Man-on-the-loopWojciech Filipkowski, Rafał Rejmaniak
      6. 6. ConclusionWojciech Filipkowski, Rafał Rejmaniak
    5. Gabriela Soldano Garcez, Renata Soares Bonavides Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. IntroductionGabriela Soldano Garcez, Renata Soares Bonavides
      2. 2. Social and Environmental Responsibility of CompaniesGabriela Soldano Garcez, Renata Soares Bonavides
      3. Gabriela Soldano Garcez, Renata Soares Bonavides
        1. 3.1. Mediation as an instrument of compliance and prevention of environmental disasters: Negotiated conflict resolution strategy for environmental risk management, through governanceGabriela Soldano Garcez, Renata Soares Bonavides
      4. 4. ConclusionsGabriela Soldano Garcez, Renata Soares Bonavides
    1. Zanda Davida, Dominik Lubasz Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. 1. IntroductionZanda Davida, Dominik Lubasz
      2. 2. Concepts of privacy by design and data protection by designZanda Davida, Dominik Lubasz
      3. 3. Functional use of data protection by design model in the design of AI systemsZanda Davida, Dominik Lubasz
      4. 4. TrainingZanda Davida, Dominik Lubasz
      5. 5. RequirementsZanda Davida, Dominik Lubasz
      6. 6. DesignZanda Davida, Dominik Lubasz
      7. 7. CodingZanda Davida, Dominik Lubasz
      8. 8. TestingZanda Davida, Dominik Lubasz
      9. 9. ReleaseZanda Davida, Dominik Lubasz
      10. 10. MaintenanceZanda Davida, Dominik Lubasz
      11. 11. Summary and conclusionsZanda Davida, Dominik Lubasz
    2. Hongyu Fu, Chong Liu Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. Hongyu Fu, Chong Liu
        1. 1.1 Introduction of Privacy by Design and Its Foundational PrinciplesHongyu Fu, Chong Liu
        2. 1.2 An Overview of the Application of Private by Design in EU and U.S.Hongyu Fu, Chong Liu
      2. Hongyu Fu, Chong Liu
        1. Hongyu Fu, Chong Liu
          1. 2.1.1 China’s Coordinated Legislative Approach to Digital Privacy ProtectionHongyu Fu, Chong Liu
          2. 2.1.2 China’s Recent Endeavor to a Unified Digital Privacy Protection LawHongyu Fu, Chong Liu
          3. 2.1.3 Supplementing Rules to Digital Privacy LegislationHongyu Fu, Chong Liu
        2. Hongyu Fu, Chong Liu
          1. 2.2.1 The “Proactive not Reactive” Principle Is Embodied in the Chinese Criminal and Administrative LegislationsHongyu Fu, Chong Liu
          2. 2.2.2 The “Privacy as the Default Setting” Principle Is Embodied in the Relevant Stipulations on Mobile Internet Application Program (APP).Hongyu Fu, Chong Liu
          3. 2.2.3 The Principles of “Privacy Embedded into Design” and “Full Lifecycle Protection” are Applied in The Civil Code and The Cybersecurity LawHongyu Fu, Chong Liu
          4. 2.2.4 The Full Functionality Principle Is Applied in The Civil Code and The Personal Information Protection Law.Hongyu Fu, Chong Liu
          5. 2.2.5 The Visibility and Transparency Principle Is Embodied in Preliminary Informing and Later-stage Processing.Hongyu Fu, Chong Liu
          6. 2.2.6 The Keep It User-Centric Principle Is Applied in Confirming Users’ Right by Laws and Regulations.Hongyu Fu, Chong Liu
      3. Hongyu Fu, Chong Liu
        1. 3.1 China’s Smart City Building and the Entailed Privacy ConcernsHongyu Fu, Chong Liu
        2. 3.2 The General Application of Privacy by Design in China’s Smart CitiesHongyu Fu, Chong Liu
        3. 3.3 Case Study: Applying Privacy by Design in Face Recognition TechnologyHongyu Fu, Chong Liu
      4. 4. ConclusionHongyu Fu, Chong Liu
    3. Maddalena Castellani, Roberto Giacobazzi, Cesare Triberti Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. 1. Cloud Computing, OutsourcingMaddalena Castellani, Roberto Giacobazzi, Cesare Triberti
      2. 2. Features of the ServicesMaddalena Castellani, Roberto Giacobazzi, Cesare Triberti
      3. 3. Advantages and Disadvantages of Cloud ComputingMaddalena Castellani, Roberto Giacobazzi, Cesare Triberti
      4. 4. Legal Aspects: Security and Risk in Cloud ComputingMaddalena Castellani, Roberto Giacobazzi, Cesare Triberti
      5. 5. A Possible SolutionMaddalena Castellani, Roberto Giacobazzi, Cesare Triberti
    4. Matěj Myška, Pavel Koukal, Zuzana Vlachová, Ondřej Woznica Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. IntroductionMatěj Myška, Pavel Koukal, Zuzana Vlachová, Ondřej Woznica
      2. 1. Transposition of the E-commerce Directive and the System of Safe HarboursMatěj Myška, Pavel Koukal, Zuzana Vlachová, Ondřej Woznica
      3. 2. Establishing the Liability of ISPsMatěj Myška, Pavel Koukal, Zuzana Vlachová, Ondřej Woznica
      4. 3. Conclusion and OutlookMatěj Myška, Pavel Koukal, Zuzana Vlachová, Ondřej Woznica
    5. E. Niewiadomska-Szynkiewicz, M. Amanowicz, A. Wronska, P. Kostkiewicz Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. 1. IntroductionE. Niewiadomska-Szynkiewicz, M. Amanowicz, A. Wronska, P. Kostkiewicz
      2. 2. Society ResilienceE. Niewiadomska-Szynkiewicz, M. Amanowicz, A. Wronska, P. Kostkiewicz
      3. 3. ICT threats and vulnerabilitiesE. Niewiadomska-Szynkiewicz, M. Amanowicz, A. Wronska, P. Kostkiewicz
      4. E. Niewiadomska-Szynkiewicz, M. Amanowicz, A. Wronska, P. Kostkiewicz
        1. Malware and security incidents detection techniquesE. Niewiadomska-Szynkiewicz, M. Amanowicz, A. Wronska, P. Kostkiewicz
        2. Early warnings of cyber threatsE. Niewiadomska-Szynkiewicz, M. Amanowicz, A. Wronska, P. Kostkiewicz
        3. DDoS defence systemsE. Niewiadomska-Szynkiewicz, M. Amanowicz, A. Wronska, P. Kostkiewicz
        4. Prevention of fraud in electronic transactionsE. Niewiadomska-Szynkiewicz, M. Amanowicz, A. Wronska, P. Kostkiewicz
      5. 5. Global situational awarenessE. Niewiadomska-Szynkiewicz, M. Amanowicz, A. Wronska, P. Kostkiewicz
      6. 6. Conformity assessment and certificationE. Niewiadomska-Szynkiewicz, M. Amanowicz, A. Wronska, P. Kostkiewicz
      7. 7. Future perspectives and open issuesE. Niewiadomska-Szynkiewicz, M. Amanowicz, A. Wronska, P. Kostkiewicz
    1. Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. Section One
    2. Monika Jagielska, Monika Namysłowska, Aneta Wiewiórowska-Domagalska: 434 - 434 Download Kapitel (PDF)
    3. Zofia Bednarz, Kayleen Manwaring: 434 - 434 Download Kapitel (PDF)
    4. Heloísa Helena Silva Pancotti, Renato Bernardi: 435 - 435 Download Kapitel (PDF)
    5. Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. Section Two
    6. Fryderyk Zoll: 436 - 436 Download Kapitel (PDF)
    7. Gabriela Bar, Silvia A. Carretta, Shobana Iyer: 436 - 436 Download Kapitel (PDF)
    8. Doug Surtees, Craig Zawada: 437 - 437 Download Kapitel (PDF)
    9. Wilfried Bernhardt: 437 - 437 Download Kapitel (PDF)
    10. Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. Section Three
    11. Charlie Northrup: 438 - 438 Download Kapitel (PDF)
    12. Alexandra R. Harrington, Magdalena Stryja: 439 - 440 Download Kapitel (PDF)
    13. Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. Section Four
    14. Maddalena Castellani, Cesare Triberti, Roberto Giacobazzi: 441 - 441 Download Kapitel (PDF)
    15. Matej Myška, Pavel Koukal, Zuzana Vlachová, Ondřej Woznica: 442 - 442 Download Kapitel (PDF)
    16. Niewiadomska-Szynkiewicz, Amanowicz, Wrońska, Kostkiewicz: 442 - 444 Download Kapitel (PDF)
  9. About the Authors 445 - 458 Download Kapitel (PDF)
  10. Bibliography 459 - 479 Download Kapitel (PDF)

Literaturverzeichnis (346)

  1. ‘Artificial intelligence summit focuses on fighting hunger, climate crisis and transition to ‘smart sustainable cities’’ UN News (28 May 2019) <https://news.un.org/en/story/2019/05/1039311> accessed on 14 April 2020; Google Scholar öffnen
  2. ‘Dronomat zamiast paczkomatu. Czy wkrótce niebo zaroi się od dronów?’ (Rozmowy Instytutu Nowej Europy on Anchor.fm, 10 June 2020) <https://anchor.fm/instytutnowejeuropy/episodes/Dronomat-zamiast-paczkomatu--Czy-wkrtce-niebo-zaroi-si-od-dronw-ef77ru> accessed 27 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  3. ‘ISO 3720:2018. Sustainable development of communities — Indicators for city services and quality of life’ (International Organization for Standardization, July 2017) <https://www.iso.org/standard/68498.html> accessed 14 April 2020; Google Scholar öffnen
  4. ‘Secure, sustainable smart cities and the IoT’ <https://www.gemalto.com/iot/inspired/smart-cities> accessed 27 February 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  5. ‘Smart city. What is a smart city?’ (Official website of the City of Vienna) <https://www.wien.gv.at/stadtentwicklung/studien/pdf/b008403j.pdf> accessed 14 April 2020; Google Scholar öffnen
  6. ‘Take Action for the Sustainable Development Goals’ <https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals> accessed on 14 April 2020; Google Scholar öffnen
  7. ‘GB/T39335-2020 Information Security Technology Personal Information Security Assessment Guidelines’ (China Standard Press 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
  8. ‘Privacy and Data Protection by Design – from policy to engineering’ <https://www.enisa.europa.eu/publications/privacy-and-data-protection-by-design> accessed 23 March 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  9. Abbott R and Sarch A, ‘Pushing Artificial Intelligence: Legal Fiction or Science Fiction’ (2019) 53 University of California, Davis Law Review 323; Google Scholar öffnen
  10. Act on the National Cybersecurity System. Journal of Laws of 2018, item 1560; Google Scholar öffnen
  11. Adamski A, Prawo karne komputerowe (CH Beck 2000); Google Scholar öffnen
  12. Advisory Board on Artificial Intelligence and Human Society, Report on Artificial Intelligence and Human Society, (2017) <https://www8.cao.go.jp/cstp/tyousakai/ai/summary/aisociety_en.pdf> accessed 22 June 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  13. Agencia Estado. Entenda melhor os ADRS. In: Estadão, 20 nov. 2000. Available in: <https://economia.estadao.com.br/noticias/geral,entenda-melhor-os-adrs,20001120p1082> Accessed: 12 November 2019; Google Scholar öffnen
  14. Aletras N and others, ‘Predicting Judicial Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: A Natural Language Processing Perspective’ (2016) 19 PeerJ Computer Science 93; Google Scholar öffnen
  15. Aletras N, Tsarapatsanis D, Preoţiuc-Pietro D, Lampos V, ‘Predicting judicial decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: a Natural Language Processing perspective’ (PeerJ Computer Science 2016) <https://peerj.com/articles/cs-93/> accessed 20 May 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  16. Angelopoulos C, ‘European Intermediary Liability in Copyright: A Tort-Based Analysis’ <https://dare.uva.nl/search?identifier=a406e67d-b537-49ae-9f46-80e831b988d4> accessed 10 June 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  17. Angwin J, Larson J, Mattu S, Kirchner L, ‘Machine Bias. There’s software used across the country to predict future criminals. And it’s biased against blacks’, (ProPublica, 23 May 2016) <https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing> accessed 25 June 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  18. Anthopoulos LG, Understanding Smart Cities: A Tool for Smart Government or an Industrial Trick? (Springer 2018); Google Scholar öffnen
  19. Apple, ‘The App Store Turns 10’ (Apple.com, 2018) <https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2018/07/app-store-turns-10/> accessed 7 July 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  20. Araszkiewicz M and Rodriguez-Doncel V (eds), Legal Konwledge and Information Systems (IOS Press 2019); Google Scholar öffnen
  21. Araszkiewicz M, 'Algorithmization of legal thinking. Models, possibilities, limitations', in Dariusz Szostek (ed), Legal Tech (C.H. Beck 2021); Google Scholar öffnen
  22. Arbeitsgruppe ‘Modernisierung des Zivilprozesses’ <https://www.justiz.bayern.de/media/images/behoerden-und-gerichte/oberlandesgerichte/nuernberg/thesenpapier_der_arbeitsgruppe.pdf> accessed 25 June 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  23. Arkin RC, Ulam P and Duncan B, ‘An Ethical Governor for Constraining Lethal Action in an Autonomous System’ (Technical Report GIT-GVU-09-02, Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta Mobile Robot Lab, 2009); Google Scholar öffnen
  24. Arkuszewska AM, Informatyzacja postępowania arbitrażowego (Wolters Kluwer 2019); Google Scholar öffnen
  25. Armour J, Eidenmueller H, ‘Self-Driving Corporations’ (2019) 475 European Corporate Governance Institute - Law Working Paper; Google Scholar öffnen
  26. Armour J, Parnham R, Sako M, ‘Augmented Lawyering’ (2020) 558 European Corporate Governance Institute - Law Working Paper; Google Scholar öffnen
  27. Ashworth A and Holder J, Principles of Criminal Law (7th edn., Oxford University Press 2013); Google Scholar öffnen
  28. Assembleia Geral da Organização das Nações Unidas, Transformar nuestro mundo: la Agenda 2030 para el Desarrollo Sostenible (A/70/L.1, 2015) (online at <https://unctad.org/meetings/es/SessionalDocuments/ares70d1_es.pdf> accessed 24 Nov 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
  29. Azevedo R, Entenda o que é ADR: Criados há 70 anos, os American Depositary Receipts permitem que investidores dos EUA coloquem recursos em empresas estrangeiras. In: Revista Exame, 4 out. 2017. Available in: https://exame.abril.com.br/mercados/entenda-o-que-e-adr/. Acessed: 12 nov. 2019. Google Scholar öffnen
  30. Bahia C, Carvalho E and Beninça A, Sociedade de Risco, mudanças climáticas e a função reguladora do Direito Ambiental (Instituto O Direito por um Planeta Verde, 2017); Google Scholar öffnen
  31. Baig ZA and others, ‘Future challenges for smart cities: Cyber-security and digital forensics’ (2017) 22 Digital Investigation 3; Google Scholar öffnen
  32. Bandara E, Keong W, Ranasinghe N, de Zoysa K, 'Smart contract Made Smart' in (ed) Zheng Z, Dai H, Tang M, Chen X, 'Blockchain and Trustworthy System' (Singapore 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
  33. Bar G, ‘Sztuczna inteligencja w kancelarii prawnej przyszłości’ in Dariusz Szostek (ed), Legal Tech. Czyli jak bezpiecznie korzystać z narzędzi informatycznych w organizacji, w tym w kancelarii oraz dziale prawnym (C.H. Beck 2021); Google Scholar öffnen
  34. Bar G, Explainability as a legal requirement for Artificial Intelligence, Medium.com, November 2020, <https://medium.com/womeninai/explainability-as-a-legal-requirement-for-artificial-intelligence-systems-66da5a0aa693> accessed 2 July 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  35. Barbieri J and Cajazeira J, Responsabilidade social e empresarial e empresa sustentável: da teoria à prática (Saraiva, 2010); Google Scholar öffnen
  36. Barfield W, Pagallo U, Advanced Introduction to Law and Artificial Intelligence (Edward Elgar Publishing 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
  37. Beck U, Sociedade de risco: rumo a uma outra modernidade (Editora 34, 2011); Google Scholar öffnen
  38. Becker D, Ferrari I, Artificial Intelligence and the Supreme Court of Brazil –Beauty or a Beast? (22 June 2020) 2 <https://sifocc.org/app/uploads/2020/06/Victor-Beauty-or-the-Beast.pdf> accessed 31 May 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  39. Becker D, Ferrari Isabela F, The Brazilian Supreme Court's Artificial Intelligence: a beauty or a beast? (22 June 2020) <https://sifocc.org/app/uploads/2020/06/Victor-Beauty-or-the-Beast.pdf.> accessed 25 June 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  40. Bellaouar S, Guerroumi M, Derhan A and Moussaoui S, ‘Towards Heterogeneous Architectures of Hybrid Vehicular Sensor Networks for Smart Cities’ in Z Mahmood (ed.), Smart Cities, Development and Governance Frameworks (Springer 2018); Google Scholar öffnen
  41. Bernhardt W, Leeb C, 'Elektronischer Rechtsverkehr‘ in Dirk Heckmann and Anne Paschke (ed) jurisPK-Internetrecht 7th edition, chapter 6 (status: 01 June2021); Google Scholar öffnen
  42. Bertoncelli R de P, Compliance. In: Carvalaho AC, Bertoccelli R de P, Alvim TC, Venturini O, (Coordenadores). Manual de Compliance. Rio de Janeiro: Forense, 2019, Cap. 3, s. p. Google Scholar öffnen
  43. BEUC, ‘EU Consumer Protection 2.0 Structural Asymmetries in Digital Consumer Markets’ (March 2021) <https://www.beuc.eu/publications/beuc-x-2021-018_eu_consumer_protection.0_0.pdf> accessed 13 May 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  44. Beyerlin U and Marauhn T, International Enviromental Governance (Hart Publishng, 2011); Google Scholar öffnen
  45. BGH, 12 July 2012, I ZR 18/11 Google Scholar öffnen
  46. BGH, 22 April 2009, I ZR 216/06 Google Scholar öffnen
  47. BGH, 26 September 1985, I ZR 86/83 Google Scholar öffnen
  48. Biallaß I, ‘Legal Tech und künstliche Intelligenz’ in Ory and Weth (ed), jurisPK-ERV vol 1, 1st edition, chapter 8, status 28 August 2020; Google Scholar öffnen
  49. Bienias M, ‘Ochrona danych w fazie projektowania oraz domyślna ochrona danych (privacy by design oraz privacy by default) w ogólnym rozporządzeniu o ochronie danych’ in Sibiga G (ed) Ogólne rozporządzenie o ochronie danych. Aktualne problemy prawnej ochrony danych osobowych (C. H. Beck 2016); Google Scholar öffnen
  50. Billings ChE, ‘Human-Centered Aviation Automation: Principles and Guidelines’ (NASA Technical Memorandum 110381, Ames Research Center, February1996); Google Scholar öffnen
  51. Bolton R, Hand D, Unsupervised profiling methods for fraud detection, Proceedings of credit scoring and credit control VII (2001); Google Scholar öffnen
  52. Booth B, ‘The Cloud: A Critical Smart City Asset’ in S McCleallan, JA Jimenez and G Koutitas (eds.), Smart Cities, Applications, Technologies, Standards, and Driving Factors (Springer 2018); Google Scholar öffnen
  53. Boyd JR, ‘The Essence of Winning and Losing’ (September 2012) <https://fasttransients.files.wordpress.com/2010/03/essence_of_winning_losing.pdf> accessed on 14 April 2020; Google Scholar öffnen
  54. Bröhmer J, Transparenz als Verfassungsprinzip. Grundsatz und Europäische Union ( Mohr Siebeck 2004); Google Scholar öffnen
  55. Brunton F, Nissenbaum H, A User's Guide for Privacy and Protest (MIT Press 2015); Google Scholar öffnen
  56. Bryce J, Flexible and Rigid Constitutions (1st edn Oxford University Press 1905); Google Scholar öffnen
  57. C-236 to 238/08 Google France and Google [2010] ECR I–2417; Google Scholar öffnen
  58. C-324/09, L’Oréal v eBay, ECR [2011] I-06011; Google Scholar öffnen
  59. Campuzano A, Manual para entender el Juicio de Amparo (1st edn Thomson Reuters 2016); Google Scholar öffnen
  60. Cannon JC, Bayers M, Compliance Descontructed. In: Queue Magazine, v. 4, 7 ed., setembro de 2006. Nova York, NY, USA. p. 30-37. Available in: <http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/1170000/1160449/p30-cannon.pdf?ip=187.65.179.69&id=1160449&acc=OPEN&key=4D4702B0C3E38B35%2E4D4702B0C3E38B35%2E4D4702B0C3E38B35%2E6D218144511F3437&__acm__=1572443475_b950d9527f97833505d1901c3ce36234> Acessed: 30 October 2019; Google Scholar öffnen
  61. Carioca KJF; De Luca M M M; Ponte VMR, Implementação da Lei Sarbanes-Oxley e seus Impactos nos controles internos e nas práticas de governança corporativa: um estudo na Companhia Energética do Ceará – Coelce, In: Revista Universo Contábil, v. 6, n. 4, p. 50-67, out./dez. 2010. Google Scholar öffnen
  62. Carretta SA, Blockchain challenges to copyright : Revamping the online music industry, 2019. <http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-173248> accessed 2 July 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  63. Carvalho VM de; Rodrigues EF (org.). Guia Programas de Compliance: Orientações sobre estruturação e benefícios da adoção dos programas de compliance concorrencial. Brasília: Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (CADE), 2016. 43 p. Google Scholar öffnen
  64. Case N, How To Become A Centaur, Journal of Design and Science MIT Media Lab, 02/02/2018, <https://jods.mitpress.mit.edu/pub/issue3-case/release/6> accessed 2 July 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  65. Castelnovo W, Misuraca G, Savoldelli A, ‘Smart Cities Governance: The Need for a Holistic Approach to Assessing Urban Participatory Policy Making’ (2015) Social Science Computer Review <https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439315611103> accessed 2 July 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  66. Castillo Y, “Las notificaciones” in Juan González and Fernando Sosa et al (eds), Teoría y Práctica del Juicio de Amparo (Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Ciudad de México 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
  67. Caton JL, Autonomous Weapon Systems: A Brief Survey of Developmental, Operational, Legal, and Ethical Issues (United States Army War College Press 2015); Google Scholar öffnen
  68. Cavoukian A, ‘Ethics by design’ <www.ryerson.ca/pbdce> accessed 23 March 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  69. Cavoukian A, ‘Private by Design. The 7 Foundational Principles. Originally’ <https://www.ipc.on.ca/wp-content/uploads/resources/7foundationalprinciples.pdf> accessed on 25 April 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  70. Cholasta R and others, ‘Safe Harbour: Režim Vyloučení Odpovědnosti Poskytovatelů Služeb Informační Společnosti v Kontextu Pasivní Role Poskytovatele’ (2017) Právní rozhledy <www.beck-online.cz> accessed 10 June 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  71. Chomiczewski W, Lubasz D, ‘Privacy by design a sztuczna inteligencja’ (2020) 20 MoP 20 67 ff; Google Scholar öffnen
  72. Choudhary M, ‘Six technologies crucial for smart cities’ (Geospatial world, 19 November 2019) <https://www.geospatialworld.net/blogs/six-technologies-crucial-for-smart-cities> accessed 14 April 2020; Google Scholar öffnen
  73. Christensen C, Disruptive Innovation (2020), http://www.claytonchristensen.com/key-concepts accessed 14 April 2020; Google Scholar öffnen
  74. Chui M, Manyika J, Miremadi M, Four fundamentals of workplace automation (McKinsey Digital, November 2015), <https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/four-fundamentals-of-workplace-automation> accessed 14 April 2020; Google Scholar öffnen
  75. Chunkun W, Security Fundamentals for Internet of Things (Science Press 2013); Google Scholar öffnen
  76. Clooney A and Webb P, The Right to a Fair Trial in International Law (Oxford University Press 2021); Google Scholar öffnen
  77. Collberg C, Davidson J, Giacobazzi R, Gu Y, Herzberg A, Wang F., ‘Towards Digital Asset Protection’ (2011) 26(6)IEEE Intelligent Systems; Google Scholar öffnen
  78. Collins DAA: American Company. In: Encyplopaedia Britannica, 2018. Available in: https://www.britannica.com/topic/Arthur-Andersen. Acessed: 12 nov. 2019. Google Scholar öffnen
  79. Comissão sobre Governança Global. Nossa comunidade global (Editora FGV, 1996); Google Scholar öffnen
  80. Commission (EC) ‘Guidance on Article 17 of Directive 2019/790 on Copyright in the Digital Single Market Guidelines’ (Communication) COM (2021) 288 final 4 Google Scholar öffnen
  81. Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, ‘A coordinated plan for artificial intelligence’ (Communication) COM (2018) 795 final; Google Scholar öffnen
  82. Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, ‘Artificial Intelligence for Europe’ (Communication) COM (2018) 237 final; Google Scholar öffnen
  83. Commission, ‘Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions - Building Trust in Human Centric Artificial Intelligence’, COM (2019) 168 final; Google Scholar öffnen
  84. Commission, ‘Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Laying Down Harmonised Rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and Amending Certain Union Legislative Acts’ COM 2021 206 final; Google Scholar öffnen
  85. Commission, ‘White Paper on Artificial Intelligence – A European approach to excellence and trust’ (Communication), COM (2020) 65 final; Google Scholar öffnen
  86. Committee of Experts on Internet Intermediaries (MSI-NET), Study on the Human Rights Dimensions of Automated Data Processing Techniques (in Particular Algorithms) and Possible Regulatory Implications (6 October 2017) <https://rm.coe.int/study-hr-dimension-of-automated-data-processing-incl-algorithms/168075b94a> accessed 31 May 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  87. Contissa G, ‘Automation and Liability: an Analysis in the Context of Socio-Technical Systems’ (2017) 11 i-lex 17; Google Scholar öffnen
  88. Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights, Recommendation Unboxing Artificial Intelligence: 10 steps to protect Human Rights (2019) <https://rm.coe.int/unboxing-artificial-intelligence-10-steps-to-protect-human-rights-reco/1680946e64> accessed 31 May 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  89. Coveware, ‘Ransonware Costs Double in Q4 as Ryuk, Sodinokibi Proliferate’ (Coveware.com, 2020) <https://www.coveware.com/blog/2020/1/22/ransomware-costs-double-in-q4-as-ryuk-sodinokibi-proliferate> accessed 7 July 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  90. Craig P and others, Rule of Law in Europe Perspectives From Practitioners and Academics (European Judicial Training Network 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
  91. Croft J, More than 100,000 legal roles to become automated, Financial Times, 15 March 2016, https://www.ft.com/content/c8ef3f62-ea9c-11e5-888e-2eadd5fbc4a4; Google Scholar öffnen
  92. Cui Y, Shanghai Intelligent Assistive Case-Handling System for Criminal Cases - System 206 (Springer 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
  93. Cummings ML, ‘Automation and Accountability in Decision Support System Interface Design’ (2006) 32 The Journal of Technology Studies 23; Google Scholar öffnen
  94. Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners, ‘The Resolution on Privacy by Design’ (32nd International Conference of Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners, Jerusalem, 27–29 October 2010. <http://www.giodo.gov.pl/pl/1520084/3830> accessed 13 May 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  95. De Almeida LCSS; Duarte Junior AMarcos, Desafios e soluções da Petrobras em seu projeto de atendimento à Lei Sarbanes-Oxley. In: RAUnP - Revista Eletrônica do Mestrado Profissional em Administração da Universidade Potiguar, Ano III, n. 1, out. 2010/mar. 2011. p. 27-40; Google Scholar öffnen
  96. De Souza MMP, Figueiredo MD, A Lei Sarbanes-Oxley e Sua Importância para as Companhias Abertas Brasileiras a partir do Ano de 2004. In: Revista Pensar Contábil, Rio de Janeiro, v. 10, n. 42, p. 31-35, out./dez. 2008; Google Scholar öffnen
  97. Decreto nº 9571 of 2018 <http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2018/Decreto/D9571.htm> accessed 12 Dec 2020; Google Scholar öffnen
  98. Der Standard (Internet edition), ‘Estland will Richter durch künstliche Intelligenz ersetzen’ (Der Standard, 3 April 2019) <https://www.derstandard.at/story/2000100613536/justiz-estland-will-richter-durch-kuenstliche-intelligenz-ersetzen> accessed 29 May 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  99. Directive (EU) 2016/1148 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning measures for a high common level of security of network and information systems across the Union; Google Scholar öffnen
  100. Directive (EU) 2019/790 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on Copyright and related rights in the Digital Single Market and amending Directives 96/9/EC and 2001/29/EC [2019] OJ L130/92; Google Scholar öffnen
  101. Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market [2002] OJ L178/1; Google Scholar öffnen
  102. Donahue L, A Primer on Using Artificial Intelligence in the Legal Profession, JOLT Digest, 3 January 2018, https://jolt.law.harvard.edu/digest/a-primer-on-using-artificial-intelligence-in-the-legal-profession; Google Scholar öffnen
  103. Drobek P, in Bielak-Jomaa E, Lubasz D (eds) RODO. Ogólne rozporządzenie o ochronie danych. Komentarz (C. H. Beck 2017); Google Scholar öffnen
  104. Dysart J, AI Removes the Drudgery from Legal Due Diligence, Communications of the ACM, 8 January 2019, https://cacm.acm.org/news/233886-ai-removes-the-drudgery-from-legal-due-diligence/fulltext; Google Scholar öffnen
  105. Ebers M and Navas S (eds), Algorithms and Law (Cambridge University Press 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
  106. Ejaz W and Anpalagan A, Internet of Things for Smart Cities (Springer 2019); Google Scholar öffnen
  107. Endsley MR, ‘Automation and situation awareness’ in R Parasuraman and M Mouloua (eds.), Automation and Human Performance. Theory and Applications (reprint, CRC Press 2009); Google Scholar öffnen
  108. Engelman D, ‘Kevin Kelly Holos Rising’ (2014) <https://blog.longnow.org/02014/12/01/kevin-kellyseminar-media/> accessed 7 July 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  109. Engstrom DF and Gelbach JB, ‘Legal Tech, Civil Procedure, and the Future of American Adversarialism’ (2020) 169 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1; Google Scholar öffnen
  110. Engstrom DF, ‘Post COVID Courts’ (2020) 68 UCLA Law Review Discourse 246; Google Scholar öffnen
  111. Escajeda HG, The Vitruvian Lawyer: How to Thrive in an Era of AI and Quantum Technologies, XXIX Kansas J. of Law & Pub. Pol'y 421-521 (2020), https://ssrn.com/abstract=3534683; Google Scholar öffnen
  112. European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ), European ethical Charter on the use of Artificial Intelligence in judicial systems and their environment (2018) <https://rm.coe.int/ethical-charter-en-for-publication-4-december-2018/16808f699c> accessed 31 May 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  113. European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ), Report on the CEPEJ Conference "Artificial intelligence at the service of the Judiciary" (27 September 2018) <https://www.coe.int/en/web/cepej/justice-of-the-future-predictive-justice-and-artificial-intelligence> accessed 31 May 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  114. European Commission, ‘Assessment list of trustworthy artificial intelligence’ (Study, 1 March 2021) <https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/assessment-list-trustworthy-artificial-intelligence-altai-self-assessment> accessed 27 April 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  115. European Commission, ‘EU member states sign up to cooperate on artificial intelligence’ (News, 8 March 2020) <https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/eu-member-states-sign-cooperate-artificial-intelligence> accessed 6 March 2019; Google Scholar öffnen
  116. European Commission, ‘Member States and Commission to work together to boost artificial intelligence „made in Europe”’ (Press release, 7 December 2018) <http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-18-6689_en.htm> access: 6 March 2019; Google Scholar öffnen
  117. European Commission, Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonized rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending certain Union legislative acts, COM (2021) 206 final <https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/proposal-regulation-laying-down-harmonised-rules-artificial-intelligence> accessed 30 May 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  118. European Commission’s High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence (2018): Draft Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI <https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/draft-ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai>, accessed 30 Mai 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  119. European Data Protection Board, ‘Guidelines 4/2019 on Article 25 Data Protection by Design and by Default’ (20 October 2020) <https://edpb.europa.eu/sites/edpb/files/files/file1/edpb_guidelines_201904_dataprotection_by_design_and_by_default_v2.0_en.pdf> accessed 13 May 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  120. European Parliament, Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC [2016] OJ L199/1 (General Data Protection Regulation); Google Scholar öffnen
  121. Farias F, Principais impactos da Sarbanes-Oxley Act. In: Revista ConTexto, Porto Alegre, v. 4, n. 6, 1º Semestre 2004. ISSN 1676-6016. Google Scholar öffnen
  122. Federal Trade Commission, ‘Consumer Privacy on the World Wide Web’ (FTC,1998) <https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/public_statements/prepared-statement-federal-trade-commission-consumer-privacy-worldwide-web/privac98.pdf> accessed 7 July 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  123. Fereira F, ‘Artificial Intelligence Makes its Mark in the Brazilian Judicial System’ (Folha de S.Paulo, 10 March 2020) <https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/internacional/en/brazil/2020/03/artificial-intelligence-makes-its-mark-in-the-brazilian-judicial-system.shtml> accessed 31 May2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  124. Fernandes P, Globalização, Sociedade de Risco e o futuro do Direito Penal (Livraria Almedina, 2001). Google Scholar öffnen
  125. Fernández C, ‘La sustitución directa de la actividad humana en la decisión judicial, al día de hoy, es puramente quimérica a corto y medio plazo’ (Legal today, 11 September 2020) <https://www.legaltoday.com/legaltech/nuevas-tecnologias/la-realidad-y-el-deseo-inteligencia-artificial-y-decision-judicial-2020-09-11/> accessed 31 May 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  126. Filipkowski W, ‘Prawo karne wobec sztucznej inteligencji’ in L Lai and M Świerczyński (eds.), Prawo sztucznej inteligencji (C. H. Beck 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
  127. Flavio Fereira, in Folha de S.Paulo” (Internet edn 10 March2020) „Artificial Intelligence Makes its Mark in the Brazilian Judicial System”<https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/internacional/en/brazil/2020/03/artificial-intelligence-makes-its-mark-in-the-brazilian-judicial-system.shtml> accessed 31 May2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  128. Forester M, ‘Catch Up on Privacy Around the World on Data Privacy Day 2021’ (Morrison Foerster, 2021) <https://www.mofo.com/resources/insights/210127-data-privacy-day.html> accessed 7 July 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  129. Freitas GP, Ilícito Penal ambiental e reparação do dano (Revista dos Tribunais, 2005); Google Scholar öffnen
  130. FTC, Protecting Consumer Privacy in an Era of Rapid Change, (FTC 2010); Google Scholar öffnen
  131. Garlicki L, Polskie prawo konstytucyjne. Zarys wykładu (Wolters Kluwer Polska 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
  132. Gentry C, ‘Fully Homomorphic Encryption Using Ideal Lattices’ (the 41st ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC) 2009); Google Scholar öffnen
  133. Gerards J, General Principles of the European Convention on Human Rights (Cambridge University Press 2019); Google Scholar öffnen
  134. Gesley J, ‘Comparative Summary’, Law Library of Congress (ed) Regulation of Artificial Intelligence in Selected Jurisdictions (January 2019) 1 <https://www.loc.gov/law/help/artificial-intelligence/regulation-artificial-intelligence.pdf> accessed 24 June 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  135. Gesley J, Comparative Summary, Law Library of Congress (ed), Regulation of Artificial Intelligence in Selected Jurisdictions (January 2019) 1 <https://www.loc.gov/law/help/artificial-intelligence/regulation-artificial-intelligence.pdf> accessed 24 June 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  136. Ghosal A and Halder S, ‘Chapter 5. Building Intelligent Systems for Smart Cities: Issues, Challenges and Approaches’ in Z Mahmood (ed.), Smart Cities, Development and Governance Frameworks (Springer 2018); Google Scholar öffnen
  137. Gibney A (dir.), Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room. Nova Iorque: Magnolia Pictures, 2015. Documentary. Google Scholar öffnen
  138. Giezek J, ‘Teorie związku przyczynowego oraz koncepcje obiektywnego przypisania’ in R Dębski (ed.), System prawa karnego, tom 3: Nauka o przestępstwie. Zasady odpowiedzialności (C. H. Beck 2017); Google Scholar öffnen
  139. Glavanits J and Bálint P (eds), Law 4 . 0 – Challenges of the Digital Age (Széchenyi István University 2019); Google Scholar öffnen
  140. Gless S, Silverman E and Weigend T, ‘If Robots Cause Harm, Who is to Blame? Self-Driving Cars and Criminal Liability’ (2016) 19 New Criminal Law Review 412; Google Scholar öffnen
  141. Global Pact, Sdg Action Manager (2020) <https://www.pactoglobal.org.br/pg/sdg-action-manager> accessed 14 December 2020; Google Scholar öffnen
  142. Global Pandemic Network Ecological Rights Working Group, Position Paper: Environmental Protection and Human Rights in the Pandemic (2021); Google Scholar öffnen
  143. Gonçalves A and Costa JJA, “Governança Ambiental Global: possibilidades e limites” in Granziera MLM and Rei FCF (eds), Direito Ambiental Internacional: Avanços e retrocessos (Atlas, 2015); Google Scholar öffnen
  144. Gonçalves A, “Governança Global e o Direito Internacional Público” in JUBILUT LL (ed), Direito Internacional Atual (Elsevier, 2014); Google Scholar öffnen
  145. González R, “Sobre la competencia” in Guadalupe Tafoya (ed), Elementos para el estudio del Juicio de Amparo (Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación 2017); Google Scholar öffnen
  146. Goodenough O R, ‘Legal Technology 3.0’ (HuffPost, 6 April 2015) <https://www.huffpost.com/entry/legal-technology-30_b_6603658> accessed 29 May 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  147. Goodman C, AI/Esq: Impacts of Artificial Intelligence in Lawyer-Client Relationships, (2019) 72 Okla. L. Rev. 149; Google Scholar öffnen
  148. Grześkowiak A, ‘Komentarz do art. 2 k.k.’ in A Grześkowiak, and K Wiak (eds.), Kodeks karny. Komentarz (6th edn, CH Beck 2018); Google Scholar öffnen
  149. Guo Bing v. Hangzhou Wildlife Park Co., Ltd, Zhe0111MinChu No.6971(2019); Google Scholar öffnen
  150. Gyuranecz FZ, Krausz B and Papp D, The AI Is Now in Session. The Impact of Digitalization on Courts (European Judicial Training Network 2019); Google Scholar öffnen
  151. Hacker P, Krestel R, Grundmann S et al. Explainable AI under contract and tort law: legal incentives and technical challenges, Artificial Intelligence Law 28, 415–439 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-020-09260-6; Google Scholar öffnen
  152. Hallevy G, ‘The Criminal Liability of Artificial Intelligence Entities - from Science Fiction to Legal Social Control’ (2016) 4 Akron Intellectual Property Journal 171; Google Scholar öffnen
  153. Hallevy G, Liability for Crimes Involving Artificial Intelligence Systems (Springer 2015); Google Scholar öffnen
  154. Hao K, ‘When algorithms mess up, the nearest human gets the blame’ (MIT Technology Review, 28 May 2019) <https://www.technologyreview.com/2019/05/28/65748/ai-algorithms-liability-human-blame> accessed on 26 April 2020; Google Scholar öffnen
  155. Harašta J, ‘Obecná Prevenční Povinnost Poskytovatele Služeb Informační Společnosti ve Vztahu k Informacím Ukládaným Uživatelem’ (2014) Právní rozhledy 590 <www.beck-online.cz> accessed 10 June 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  156. Harrington A R, International Law and Global Governance: Treaty Regimes and Sustainable Development Goals Implementation (Routledge 2021); Google Scholar öffnen
  157. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, (1996) <https://www.congress.gov/104/plaws/publ191/PLAW-104publ191.pdf> accessed 7 July 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  158. Held D and McGrew A, Prós e Contras da Globalização (Zahar, 2001); Google Scholar öffnen
  159. Hert P, Gutwirth S, ‘Privacy, data protection and law enforcement: Opacity of the individual and transparency of power’ in Claes E, Duff A, Gutwirth S (eds) Privacy and the Criminal Law (Intersentia, 2006); Google Scholar öffnen
  160. High Court in Prague, 2 March 2011, file no. 3 Cmo 197/2010–82; Google Scholar öffnen
  161. High Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence, ‘The Assessment List on Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence’ <https://futurium.ec.europa.eu/en/european-ai-alliance/pages/altai-assessment-list-trustworthy-artificial-intelligence> accessed 27 April 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  162. High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence, ‘Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence’ (2019); Google Scholar öffnen
  163. Hosseini SB, Mahesh R, The lesson from Enron Case – Moral and Managerial Responsilities. In: International Journal of Current Research, vol. 8, Issue 8, pp. 37451-37460, August, 2016. ISSN 0975-833X. <http://www.openvotingconsortium.org/files/voting_good_bad_stupid.pdf> access by day 30.06. 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  164. Husovec M, ‘Zodpovednosť na Internete: podľa českého a slovenského práva’ (CZ.NIC 2014); Google Scholar öffnen
  165. Husovec M, ‘Zodpovednosť poskytovateľa za obsah diskusných príspevkov’ (2011) 2 Revue pro právo a technologie 40, 41 <https://journals.muni.cz/revue/article/view/4015> accessed 10 June 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  166. Husovec M, Injunctions against Intermediaries in the European Union: Accountable but Not Liable? (Cambridge University Press 2017); Google Scholar öffnen
  167. Hutson M, Artificial Intelligence Prevails at Predicting Supreme Court Decisions, Science, 2 May 2017, <https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/05/artificial-intelligence-prevails-predicting-supreme-court-decisions> accessed 10 June 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  168. Iaione C, The Right to the Co-City, 9 Italian J. Pub. L. 80; Google Scholar öffnen
  169. ICO, Guidance on AI and data protection; Google Scholar öffnen
  170. Inagaki T, ‘Design of human-machine interactions in light of domain dependence of human centered automation’ (2006) 8 Cognition, Technology & Work 161; Google Scholar öffnen
  171. IPC, ‘Privacy by Design. The 7 Foundational Principles’ <https://www.ipc.on.ca/wp-content/uploads/Resources/7foundationalprinciples.pdf> accessed 23 March 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  172. Istoé, A constituição cidadã (2011) <https://istoe.com.br/161883_A+CONSTITUICAO+CIDADA/> accessed 09 December 2020; Google Scholar öffnen
  173. Jabłonowska A, Kuziemski M, Nowak A M, Micklitz H, Pałka P, Sartor G, ‘Consumer law and artificial intelligence. Challenges to the EU consumer law and policy stemming from the business’ use of artificial intelligence’ (EUI Working Papers, Florence 2018); Google Scholar öffnen
  174. Jackson T, ‘This Bug in Your PC is a Smart Cookie’ (Financial Times, 02 December 1996); Google Scholar öffnen
  175. Jimenez JA, ‘Smart Transportation Systems’ in S McCleallan, JA Jimenez and G Koutitas (eds.), Smart Cities, Applications, Technologies, Standards, and Driving Factors (Springer 2018); Google Scholar öffnen
  176. Jiménez JML, ‘Sistemas Judiciales Justos Y… Eficientes’ (2013) 2013 eXtoikos 31; Google Scholar öffnen
  177. Jobin A, Ienca M, ‘Artificial Intelligence: the global landscape of ethics guidelines’ (2019) AL/Digital ethics project <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334082218_Artificial_Intelligence_the_global_landscape_of_ethics_guidelines> accessed 22 June 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  178. Johnston C, Artificial intelligence judge developed by UCL computer scientists, The Guardian (29 October 2016)<https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/oct/24/artificial-intelligence-judge-university-college-london-computer-scientists> accessed 25 June 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  179. Jones K, Jones M, Strategies supporting the development and deployment of high-quality legal software (221), Legal evolution blog, January 31, 2021 https://www.legalevolution.org/2021/01/tactics-supporting-the-development-and-deployment-of-high-quality-legal-software-221; Google Scholar öffnen
  180. Junior PCN, Judiciário 5.0. Inovação, Governança, Usucentrismo, Sustentabilidade e Segurança Jurídica (Edgard Blücher 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
  181. Kaminski M, Binary Governance: Lessons from the GDPR’s approach to Algorithmic Accountability, (2019) 92 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1529; Google Scholar öffnen
  182. Kasperska A, ‘Problemy zastosowania sztucznych sieci neuronalnych w praktyce prawniczej’ (2017) 11 Przegląd Prawa Publicznego 25; Google Scholar öffnen
  183. Katz DM, Bommarito II MJ and Blackman J, ‘A General Approach for Predicting the Behavior of the Supreme Court of the United States’ (2017) 12 Plos One; Google Scholar öffnen
  184. Kerikmäe T and Pärn-Lee E, ‘Legal Dilemmas of Estonian Artificial Intelligence Strategy: In between of e-Society and Global Race’ AI & Society 2020; Google Scholar öffnen
  185. King T, ‘The Future of Legal Education from the Profession’s Viewpoint: A Brave New World?’ in H Sommerlad et al. (eds), The Futures of Legal Education and the Legal Profession (Hart 2015); Google Scholar öffnen
  186. Kirit N, Sarkar P, EscrowChain: Leveraging Ethereum Blockchain as Escrow in Real Estate, International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer and Communication Engineering, Vol. 5, Issue 10, October 2017, DOI: 10.15680/IJIRCCE.2017.0510022; Google Scholar öffnen
  187. Kliś M, ‘Źródła obowiązku gwaranta w polskim prawie karnym’ (1999) 2 Czasopismo Prawa Karnego i Nauk Penalnych 169 Google Scholar öffnen
  188. Kluttz D, Mulligan D, ‘Automated Decision Support Technologies and the Legal Profession’ (2019) 34 Berkeley Technology Law Journal; Google Scholar öffnen
  189. Kontargirys X., IT laws in the era of cloud computing, (Nomos, 2018); Google Scholar öffnen
  190. Korbel F, Cholasta R and Molitorisová A, ‘Safe Harbour: Vyloučení Odpovědnosti Poskytovatelů Hostingových Služeb Za Obsah Vložený Uživateli Internetu’ [2016] Soudce 9; Google Scholar öffnen
  191. Korenik A, Smart cities, Inteligentne miasta w Europie i Azji, (CeDeWu 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  192. Koulu R and Kontiainen L (eds), How Will AI Shape the Future of Law? (University of Helsinki Legal Tech Lab publications 2019); Google Scholar öffnen
  193. Koutitas G, ‘The Smart Grid: Anchor of the Smart City’ in S McCleallan, JA Jimenez and G Koutitas (eds.), Smart Cities, Applications, Technologies, Standards, and Driving Factors (Springer 2018) Google Scholar öffnen
  194. Kowalski Ł, ‘Inteligentne miasta - przegląd rozwiązań’ in M Soja and A Zborowski (eds.), Miasto w badaniach geografów (Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  195. Kristol D, Montulli L, ‘HTTP State Management Mechanism’ (1997) IETF RFC 2109 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2109> accessed 7 July 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  196. Krzysztofek M, ‘Commentary to Article 10’ in Ochrona danych osobowych w Unii Europejskiej po reformie. Komentarz do rozporządzenia Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady (UE) 2016/679 (Legalis 2016); Google Scholar öffnen
  197. Kulesza J, Problemy teorii kryminalizacji. Studium z zakresu prawa karnego i konstytucyjnego (Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  198. Kurowska I, Szpyt K, ‘Legal Tech w kancelariach prawnych oraz pracy prawników in-house’ in Dariusz Szostek (ed), Legal Tech. Czyli jak bezpiecznie korzystać z narzędzi informatycznych w organizacji, w tym w kancelarii oraz dziale prawnym (C.H. Beck 2021); Google Scholar öffnen
  199. Kurzweill R, The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology (Viking Press 2005); Google Scholar öffnen
  200. Lawlor RC, What computers can do: analysis and prediction of judicial decisions, (1963) 49 American Bar Association Journal 337; Google Scholar öffnen
  201. Lee JD and Seppelt BD, ‘Human factors and ergonomics in automation design’ in G Salvendy (ed.), Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics (John Wiley & Sons 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  202. Lee T B, ‘Information Management: A Proposal’ (w3.org,1989-1990) <https://www.w3.org/History/1989/proposal.html> accessed 7 July 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  203. Lei nº 12846 of 2013 (online at <http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2011-2014/2013/lei/l12846.htm> accessed 10 Dec 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
  204. Lei nº 130140 of 2015 (online at <http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13140.htm> accessed 10 Dec 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
  205. Leistner M, ‘Structural Aspects of Secondary (Provider) Liability in Europe’ (2014) 9 Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 75; Google Scholar öffnen
  206. Leite JRM, “Sociedade de risco e estado” in Canotilho JJG and Leite JRM (eds), Direito constitucional ambiental brasileiro (Saraiva, 2015); Google Scholar öffnen
  207. Leith P, Hoey A, The Computerised Lawyer (Springer 1998); Google Scholar öffnen
  208. Lele A, ‘Debating Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems’ (2019) 13 Journal of Defense Studies 51 Google Scholar öffnen
  209. Ling L, Shancang L, Shanshan Z, ’QoS-aware scheduling of service-oriented Internet of things’ (2014) IEEE Trans on Industial Informatics; Google Scholar öffnen
  210. Lubasz D (ed) Meritum Ochrona danych osobowych (Wolters Kluwer 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
  211. Lubasz D, Witkowska K, ‘Europejska reforma ochrony danych osobowych z perspektywy pełnomocnika przedsiębiorcy’ in Flaga-Gieruszyńska K, Gołaczyński J, Szostek D (eds) Media elektroniczne. Współczesne problemy prawne (C. H. Beck 2016); Google Scholar öffnen
  212. Lubasz D, Witkowska K, ‘RODO. Ogólne rozporządzenie o ochronie danych. Komentarz’ (LEX/el., comments on Art. 25 No 5); Google Scholar öffnen
  213. Maddox T, ‘Smart cities: 6 essential technologies’ (TechRepublic, 1 August 2016) <https://www.techrepublic.com/article/smart-cities-6-essential-technologies> accessed 14 April 2020 Google Scholar öffnen
  214. Maisner M, ‘Snaha o Zakázané Těžení Ze Zdánlivé Absence Výslovné Legislativní Úpravy a Nebezpečná Situace pro Poskytovatele Služeb Informační Společnosti’ (Bulletin advokacie, 24 September 2015) <http://www.bulletin-advokacie.cz/snaha-o-zakazane-tezeni-ze-zdanlive-absence-vyslovne-legislativni-upravy> accessed 10 June 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  215. Maisner M, Zákon o Některých Službách Informační Společnosti: Komentář (C H Beck 2016); Google Scholar öffnen
  216. Marra WC and McNeil SK, ‘Understanding “The Loop”: Regulating the Next Generation of War Machines’ (2012) 36 Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 1139 Google Scholar öffnen
  217. Marrow PB, Karol M and Kuyan S, ‘Artificial Intelligence and Arbitration: The Computer as an Arbitrator — Are We There Yet ?’ (2020) 74 Dispute Resolution Journal 35; Google Scholar öffnen
  218. Matejka J, Krausová A, ‘Odpovědnost poskytovatelů hostingových služeb se zřetelem k povaze a druhu přenášeného obsahu’ (2017) 156 Právník; Google Scholar öffnen
  219. McAfee A and Brynjolfsson E, Human Work in the Robotic Future: Policy for the Age of Automation, Foreign Affairs Vol. 95, No. 4 (JULY/AUGUST 2016), pp. 139-150, https://www.jstor.org/stable/43946940; Google Scholar öffnen
  220. McGinnis JO, Pearce RG, The Great Disruption: How Machine Intelligence Will Transform the Role of Lawyers in the Delivery of Legal Services (2013) 82 Fordham L. Rev. 3041; Google Scholar öffnen
  221. Mckamey M, ‘Legal Technology: Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Law Practice’ (2017) 22 Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform 45; Google Scholar öffnen
  222. Mclean B, Is Enron Overpriced? It's in a bunch of complex businesses. Its financial statements are nearly impenetrable. So why is Enron trading at such a huge multiple? In: Fortune Magazine, Nova Iorque, 5 mar. 2001. Available in: https://archive.fortune.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2001/03/05/297833/index.htm. Acessed: 12 nov. 2019. Google Scholar öffnen
  223. Mednis A, ‘Cechy zgody na przetwarzanie danych osobowych w opinii Grupy Roboczej Art. 29 dyrektywy 95/46 Nr 15/2011 (WP 187)’ (2012) 7 MoP 26; Google Scholar öffnen
  224. Medvedeva M, Vols M and Wieling M, ‘Using Machine Learning to Predict Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights’ (2020) 28 Artificial Intelligence and Law 237; Google Scholar öffnen
  225. Melzer F in: Filip M and Petr T, Občanský Zákoník: Velký Komentář. Svazek IX: § 2894-3081 (Leges 2018); Google Scholar öffnen
  226. México Evalúa, Guía de Buenas Prácticas en el uso de nuevas tecnologías para la impartición de justicia (1st edn Tinker Foundation 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
  227. Milaré E, Direito do Ambiente (Editora Revista dos Tribunais, 2013); Google Scholar öffnen
  228. Monreale A, Rinzivillo S, Pratesi F, Giannotti F, Pedreschi D, Privacy-by-design in big data analytics and social mining. (EPJ Data Science, 2014); Google Scholar öffnen
  229. Mulligan D K, King J, ‘Bridging the gap between privacy and design’ (2012) 14 U. Pa. J. Const. L.; Google Scholar öffnen
  230. Municipal Court in Prague, 12. 1. 2015, file no. 66 C 143/2013; Google Scholar öffnen
  231. Municipal Court in Prague, 17 March 2010, file no. 10 Cm 47/2009; Google Scholar öffnen
  232. N Helberger, B Zuiderveen, F and R Agustin, ‘The Perfect Match? A Closer Look at the Relationship between EU Consumer Law and Data Protection Law’ Common Market Law Review (October 6, 2017, vol. 54, No. 5), p. 11; Google Scholar öffnen
  233. Nakamoto S, ‘Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System’ (Bitcoin.org, 2008) <https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf> accessed 7 July 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  234. Nauman J, Commentary to § 19 in Zbiór Zasad Etyki Adwokackiej i Godności Zawodu (Legalis 2020) Google Scholar öffnen
  235. Nay J, Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning for Law and Policy Texts, April 7, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3438276; Google Scholar öffnen
  236. Nesterova I, ‘Mass data gathering and surveillance: the fight against facial recognition technology in the globalized world’ (SHS Web of Conferences 74, 03006, 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
  237. Neumann T, ‘Perspektywy wykorzystania pojazdów autonomicznych w transporcie drogowym w Polsce’ (2018) 19 Autobusy 787 Google Scholar öffnen
  238. Newman P, ‘Sustainable Cities of the Future: The Behavior Change Driver’, (2010) 11, 7 Sustainable Dev. L & Pol’y; Google Scholar öffnen
  239. Nordemann J B, ‘Liability for Copyright Infringements on the Internet: Host Providers (Content Providers) - The Geman Approach’, 2 JIPITEC 37 <https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-29629> accessed 10 June 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  240. Norwegian data protection supervisory authority, ‘Software development with Data Protection by Design and by Default’ (Guidelines) <https://www.datatilsynet.no/en/about-privacy/virksomhetenes-plikter/innebygd-personvern/data-protection-by-design-and-by-default/?print=true> accessed 13 May 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  241. Oliviera MC, Linhares JS, A implantação de controle interno adequado às exigências da Lei Sarbanes-Oxley em empresas brasileiras – Um estudo de caso. In: BASE – Revista de Administração e Contabilidade da Unisinos, v. 4, n. 2, p. 160-170, maio/ago. 2007. Google Scholar öffnen
  242. Opaliński B, Wolność wyborów parlamentarnych i jej gwarancje na gruncie Konstytucji Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej, „Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego“ 2012, no 2, p. 59 i n; http://www.marszalek.com.pl/przegladprawakonstytucyjnego/ppk10/03.pdf; Google Scholar öffnen
  243. Organização das Nações Unidas, Agenda 2030 (2015) (online at <https://nacoesunidas.org/pos2015> accessed 10 Nov 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
  244. Pantin L and Escamilla S, “La justicia digital en México: el saldo a un año del inicio de la Pandemia”, <https://bit.ly/3sTibJi> accessed 27 April 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  245. Parasuraman R, Sheridan TB and Wickens ChD, ‘A Model for Types and Levels of Human Interaction with Automation’ (2000) 30 IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics - Part A Systems and Humans 286 Google Scholar öffnen
  246. Payandeh M, Judikative Rechtserzeugung: Theorie, Dogmatik und Methodik der Wirkungen von Präjudizien (Mohr Siebeck 2017); Google Scholar öffnen
  247. Pérez F, “Artículo 17. Párrafo segundo” in José Ramón Cossío (ed), Constitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos Comentada” (Tirant lo Blanch 2017); Google Scholar öffnen
  248. Polčák R, ‘Information Society Between Orwell and Zapata: A Czech Perspective on Safe Harbours’ in Graeme B Dinwoodie (ed), Secondary Liability of Internet Service Providers (Springer International Publishing 2017); Google Scholar öffnen
  249. Polčák R, ‘Odpovědnost ISP’ in Radim Polčák and others, Právo Informačních Technologií (Wolters Kluwer ČR 2018); Google Scholar öffnen
  250. Possible Introduction of a Mechanism for Certifying Artificial Intelligence Tools and Services in the Sphere of Justice and the Judiciary : Feasibility Study (European Comission 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
  251. Put M van der, ‘Kan artificiële intelligentie de rechtspraak betoveren’ (2019) 2 Rechtstreeks 50; Google Scholar öffnen
  252. Quintas JS, Introdução à gestão ambiental pública (IBAMA, 2006); Google Scholar öffnen
  253. Radwan A, ‘Edukacja prawnicza wobec wyzwań XXI wieku’ in R Czarny et al. (eds), Państwo i prawo wobec wyzwań u progu trzeciej dekady XXI wieku. Księga jubileuszowa z okazji 70. urodzin Profesora Jerzego Jaskierni (Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
  254. Ramos A and Márquez L, Observatorio: Avances de Justicia Abierta en línea en México 2020 (1st edn Escuela Libre de Derecho 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
  255. Realing ADD, ‘Courts and Artificial Intelligence’ (2020) 11 International Journal for Court Administration 1; Google Scholar öffnen
  256. Redo S, ‘Chapter II. Priorytety Agendy na rzecz Zrównoważonego rozwoju 2030’ in EW Pływaczewski, Redo S, Guzik-Makaruk EM, Laskowska K, Filipkowski W, Glińska E, Jurgielewicz-Delegacz E and Perkowska M, Kryminologia, Stan i perspektywy rozwoju, Z uwzględnieniem założeń Agendy ONZ na rzecz zrównoważonego rozwoju 2030 (Wolters Kluwer 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  257. Reeves J, BRIC Investing – ADR List for Brazil, Russia, India and China. In: Investor Place, 16 jun. 2010. Available in: https://investorplace.com/2010/06/bric-adr-list-brazil-china-india-russia-american-depositary-receipt-directory-listing/. Acessed: 12. nov. 2019. Google Scholar öffnen
  258. Resolution no. 196 of the Council of Ministers of 28 December 2020 on establishing the ‘Policy for the development of artificial intelligence in Poland until 2020’ Monitor Polski 2021, item 23, Annex; Google Scholar öffnen
  259. Rexha B, Neziri V, Dervishi R, Improving authentication and transparency of e-Voting system – Kosovo case, „International Journal Of Computers And Communications” 2012, Issue 1, Volume 6, s. 84; http://www.universitypress.org.uk/journals/cc/17-858.pdf [Access by day 30.06. 2021]; Google Scholar öffnen
  260. Ribas FS and Costa Junior A, ‘A importância do compliance ambiental para as empresas: Interfaces entre governança corporativa e impactos socioambientais’, Revista Jurídica Luso-Brasileira (2019) <http://www.cidp.pt/revistas/rjlb/2019/3/2019_03_0581_0610.pdf> accessed 12 Nov 2020; Google Scholar öffnen
  261. Rivera M, “De Directores y Orquestas: Análisis comparado de la posición institucional del Consejo de la Judicatura Federal en México”, (2020) 159 Boletín Mexicano de Derecho Comparado 1139; Google Scholar öffnen
  262. Rivera M, “Understanding Constitutional Amendments in Mexico: Perpetuum Mobile Constitution” (2017) 2 Mexican Law Review 3; Google Scholar öffnen
  263. Rodriguez JJF, ODS 16: paz, justicia e instituciones flertes (Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 2018) <http://www.ieee.es/Galerias/fichero/docs_investig/2018/DIEEEINV18-2018ODS.pdf> accessed 24 Nov 2020; Google Scholar öffnen
  264. Roseman A, State constitutional law—equal protection—the Indiana Supreme Court’s less than rational basis review of equal protection claims resulted in the validation of the Indiana voter id law. League of Women Voters of Indiana, inc. v. Rokita, 929 n.e.2d 758 (ind. 2010), „Rutgers Law Journal” 2013, t. 43. No 3, p. 873 and n. http://lawjournal.rutgers.edu/sites/lawjournal.rutgers.edu/files/issues/16RosemanVol.43.4_v3.pdf; Google Scholar öffnen
  265. Rożek S, Sprawność sądowego postępowania cywilnego na tle rozstrzygania spraw spadkowych (Krakowska Akademia 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
  266. Salamon J, Polityczne konsekwencje wyboru metody dystrybucji mandatów na przykładzie elekcji do Sejmu RP z 21 października 2007 roku Studia Politicae Universitatis Silesiensis 4-5, p. 139 i n. Google Scholar öffnen
  267. Santos L de AA, Lemes S, Desafios das empresas brasileiras na implantação da Lei Sarbanes-Oxley. In: BASE – Revista de Administração e Contabilidade da Unisinos, v. 4, jan./abr. 2007. p. 37-46. Google Scholar öffnen
  268. Schabas WA, The European Convention on Human Rights: A Commentary (Oxford University Press 2015); Google Scholar öffnen
  269. Schwab K, ‘The Fourth Industrial Revolution: What it means and how to response’ (weforum.org, 2014) <https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-what-it-means-and-how-to-respond/> accessed 7 July 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  270. Sharkey N, ‘Saying ‘No!’ to Lethal Autonomous Targeting’ (2010) 9 Journal of Military Ethics 369; Google Scholar öffnen
  271. Sheppard B, Does Machine-Learning-Powered Software Make Good Research Decisions? Lawyers Can’t Know for Sure, Legal Rebels, 22 November 2016, http://www.abajournal.com/legalrebels/article/does_machine-learning-powered_software_make_good_research_decisions_lawyers; Google Scholar öffnen
  272. Sheppard B, Incomplete Innovation and the Premature Disruption of Legal Services, (2015) Mich. St. L. Rev. 1797 at 1842; Google Scholar öffnen
  273. Sheridan TB and Parasuraman R, ‘Human-Automation Interaction’ (2006) 1 Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics 89; Google Scholar öffnen
  274. Shi C, Sourdin T and Li B, ‘The Smart Court – A New Pathway to Justice in China?’ (2021) 12 International Journal for Court Administration 4; Google Scholar öffnen
  275. Shimshaw D, ‘Ethical Issues in Robo-Lawyering: The Need for Guidance on Developing and Using Artificial Intelligence in the Practice of Law’ (2018) Hastings Law Journal; Google Scholar öffnen
  276. Shneiderman B, ‘Human Responsibility for Autonomous Agents’ (2007) 22 IEEE Intelligent Systems 60; Google Scholar öffnen
  277. Simmon E, ‘Evaluation on cloud computing servicesbased on NIST 800-145’ (National Institute of standards and Technology (NIST), February 2018) <https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.500-322> accessed 1 August 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  278. Simons B, Electronic Voting Systems: the Good, the Bad, and the Stupid, p. 3-11; Google Scholar öffnen
  279. Singh IB and Pelton JN, ‘The cyber city of the future’ (2013) 47 The Futurist 22; Google Scholar öffnen
  280. Skitka LJ, Mosier K and Burdick MD, ‘Accountability and automation bias’ (2000) 52 International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 701; Google Scholar öffnen
  281. Skotnicki K, Kilka słów o i-votingu, http://repozytorium.uni.wroc.pl/Content/89856/35_K_Skotnicki_Kilka_slow_o_i-votingu.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
  282. Sobol A, ‘INTELIGENTNE MIASTA VERSUS ZRÓWNOWAŻONE MIASTA’ (2017) 320 Studia Ekonomiczne. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach 76; Google Scholar öffnen
  283. Sourdin T and Zariski A (eds), The Responsive Judge: International Perspectives (Springer); Google Scholar öffnen
  284. Spamann H, Klöhn L, Justice is Less Blind, and Less Legalistic, Than We Thought: Evidence from an Experiment with Real Judges, (2017) 45 J.L.S. 255; Google Scholar öffnen
  285. Staffler L, Jany O, ‘Künstliche Intelligenz und Strafrechtspflege –eine Orientierung’ (2020) 164 Zeitschrift für Internationale Strafrechtsdogmatik 170. < http://www.zis-online.com/dat/artikel/2020_4_1357.pdf> accessed 25 June 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  286. Staicu MAM, La réforme du système judiciaire roumain dans le processus d ’ adhésion de la Roumanie à l ’ Union européenne Mémoire présenté par (2006); Google Scholar öffnen
  287. Staśkiewicz W, Stawecki T, ‘Legal Databases and Their Functions in the Process of Interpreting and Applying the Law’ (2012) 1 Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej; Google Scholar öffnen
  288. Stephenson N, Snow Crash (Bantam Books (US) 1992); Google Scholar öffnen
  289. Stępień-Załucka B, E-voting a Konstytucja RP [w:] Dwadzieścia lat obowiązywania Konstytucji RP. Polska myśl konstytucyjna a międzynarodowe standardy demokratyczne, red. Jaskiernia J, Spryszak K, Toruń 2017, s. 223-225; Google Scholar öffnen
  290. Stępień-Załucka B, E-voting. Sukces czy porażka na przykładzie Estonii i Szwajcarii, [w:] Aktualne wyzwania demokracji partycypacyjnej w Polsce i na świecie, red. Kuczma P, Polkowice 2017, s. 244; Google Scholar öffnen
  291. Study on the Use of Innovative Technologies in the Justice Field. Final Report (European Commission 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
  292. Supreme Court of the Czech Republic, 31 July 2013, file no. 23 Cdo 2623/2011; Google Scholar öffnen
  293. Susskind R, Online Courts and the Future of Justice (Oxford University Press 2019); Google Scholar öffnen
  294. Susskind R, Susskind D, The Future of the Professions. How Technology Will Transform the Work of Human Experts (Oxford University Press 2015); Google Scholar öffnen
  295. Susskind R, Tomorrow’s Lawyers. An Introduction to Your Future (Oxford University Press 2017); Google Scholar öffnen
  296. Szostek D (ed), LegalTech. Czyli jak bezpiecznie korzystać z narzędzi informatycznych w organizacji, w tym w kancelarii oraz dziale prawnym (C H Beck 2021); Google Scholar öffnen
  297. Szostek D, Przechowywanie danych kancelarii w chmurze in D Szostek (ed), Bezpieczeństwo danych i IT w kancelarii prawnej. Czyli jak bezpiecznie przechowywać dane w kancelarii prawnej (C.H. Beck 2018); Google Scholar öffnen
  298. Telec I, ‘Zakázané těžení a nebezpečná situace na elektronických úložištích dat’ 1–2 (2015) Bulletin advokacie; Google Scholar öffnen
  299. Telec I, Tůma P, Autorský Zákon: Komentář (2nd edition, C H Beck 2019); Google Scholar öffnen
  300. Thomas Hoeren and Silviya Yankova, ‘The Liability of Internet Intermediaries – The German Perspective’ (2012) International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law Google Scholar öffnen
  301. Timana T, Manna Z (ed), Data Protection in The Era of Artificial Intelligence. Trends, existing solutions and recommendations for privacy-preserving technologies (GDVA, 2019); Google Scholar öffnen
  302. Toka G, The impact of partial results on election, http://www.personal.ceu.hu/staff/Gabor_Toka/Papers/Toka04Chicago.pdf [Access by day 30.06. 2021]; Google Scholar öffnen
  303. Tokarczyk D, ‘Obowiązek gwaranta w prawie karnym’ (2014) 76 Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny 203; Google Scholar öffnen
  304. Transparencia Mexicana, “¿Cómo será la justicia digital en la Nueva Era: Episodio 2” <https://bit.ly/3sl4UsG> accessed 10 April 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  305. Triberti C and Carrella G, Internet ,aspetti tecnici, tematiche sociali, incidenze giuridiche civili e penali, (Edizioni Maros Milano (ITA), 2000; Google Scholar öffnen
  306. UNESCO, AI and the Rule of Law: Capacity Building for Judicial Systems <https://en.unesco.org/artificial-intelligence/mooc-judges> accessed 31 May 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  307. UNESCO, AI and the Rule of Law: Capacity Building for Judicial Systems <https://en.unesco.org/artificial-intelligence/mooc-judges> accessed 31 May 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  308. United Nations Conference on Trade Development, “UNCTAD Estimates of Global e-commerce 2018” (2020) <https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/tn_unctad_ict4d15_en.pdf> accessed 7 July 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  309. United Nations General Assembly, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, A/RES/70/1 (25 September 2015); Google Scholar öffnen
  310. Urszczak W, Historia Państwa i Prawa Polskiego. Tom I (966-1795) (Wolters Kluwer 2013); Google Scholar öffnen
  311. Valadés D, La Constitución reformada, (1st edn IIJ-UNAM 1987); Google Scholar öffnen
  312. van Hooijdonk R, ‘Top 10 smart cities that use tech to transform urban life’ (Richard van Hooijdonk blog, 9 December 2019) <https://www.richardvanhooijdonk.com/blog/en/top-10-smart-cities-that-use-tech-to-transform-urban-life> accessed 14 April 2020; Google Scholar öffnen
  313. Verizon, ‘2021 Data Breach Investigation’ (Verizon.com, 2021) <https://www.verizon.com/business/resources/reports/dbir/> accessed 7 July 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  314. Wachter S, Mittelstandt B, ‘A Right to Reasonable Interferences: R-thinking Data Protection Law in the Age of Big Data and Ai’ (2019) Columbia Business Law Review; Google Scholar öffnen
  315. Wagner B, ‘Liable, but Not in Control? Ensuring Meaningful Human Agency in Automated Decision-Making Systems’ (2019) 11 Policy & Internet 104; Google Scholar öffnen
  316. Wagner J, Legal Tech und Legal Robots (Springer Gabler 2nd edn 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
  317. Wahedi F, Verfassungsrechtliche Anforderungen an die Automatisierung der Justiz (Dr. Kovač 2021); Google Scholar öffnen
  318. Walters E, ‘The Model Rules of Autonomous Conduct: Ethical Responsibilities of Lawyers and Artificial Intelligence’ (2019) 35.4 Georgia State University Law Review; Google Scholar öffnen
  319. Watcher S, Mittelstadt B, Russel C, Counterfactual explanations without opening the black box: automated decisions and the GDPR, 2018 Harvard Journal of Law and Technology Vol 31.No2, https://jolt.law.harvard.edu/assets/articlePDFs/v31/Counterfactual-Explanations-without-Opening-the-Black-Box-Sandra-Wachter-et-al.pdf; Google Scholar öffnen
  320. Wiewiórowski W R, ‘Privacy by design jako paradygmat ochrony prywatności’ in Szpor G, i Wiewiórowski W R (eds) Internet. Prawno-informatyczne problemy sieci, portali i e-usług (C. H. Beck 2012); Google Scholar öffnen
  321. Wissenschaftliche Dienste Deutscher Bundestag „Künstliche Intelligenz in der Justiz - Internationaler Überblick“ WD 7 -3000 -017/2<https://www.bundestag.de/resource/blob/832204/6813d064fab52e9b6d54cbbf5319cea3/WD-7-017-21-pdf-data.pdf> accessed 29 May 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  322. Wissenschaftliche Dienste Deutscher Bundestag „Künstliche Intelligenz in der Justiz - Internationaler Überblick“ WD 7 -3000 -017/21,7 <https://www.bundestag.de/resource/blob/832204/6813d064fab52e9b6d54cbbf5319cea3/WD-7-017-21-pdf-data.pdf> accessed 29 May 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  323. World Commission on Environment and Development, ‘Our Common Future. From one earth to one world’ (Report, Annex A/RES/42/187, 11 December 1987); Google Scholar öffnen
  324. Wortham L, ‘The Future of the Legal Profession and Legal Services Delivery’ in Wortham L et al. (eds), Learning from Practice. A Text for Experiential Legal Education (West Academic Publishing 2016); Google Scholar öffnen
  325. WP29, ‘Opinion 15/2011 on the definition of consent’ (13 July 2011, WP 187), <http://www.giodo.gov.pl/pl/file/5341> accessed 13 May 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  326. Wu Feng S, The myth of the impartial machine, Parametric Press, 1 May 2019, <https://parametric.press/issue-01/the-myth-of-the-impartial-machine>; Google Scholar öffnen
  327. Wu J, ‘AI Goes to Court: The Growing Landscape of AI for Access to Justice’ (Medium, 2019) <https://medium.com/legal-design-and-innovation/ai-goes-to-court-the-growing-landscape-of-ai-for-access-to-justice-3f58aca4306f> accessed 29 May 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  328. Wu J, AI Goes to Court: The Growing Landscape of AI for Access to Justice (2019) <https://medium.com/legal-design-and-innovation/ai-goes-to-court-the-growing-landscape-of-ai-for-access-to-justice-3f58aca4306f> accessed 29 May 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  329. Yanisky-Ravid S, Hallisey S K, ‘Equality and Privacy by Design: Ensuring Artificial Intelligence (AI) is Properly Trained & Fed: A New Model of AI Data Transparency & Certification as Safe Harbor Procedures’ <https://ssrn.com/abstract=3278490> accessed 13 May 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  330. Yong Y, Dumas-Menijvar M, Garcia-Banuelos L, Polyvyanyy A and Zhang L, ‘Generalized aggregate Quality of Service computation for composite services’ (2012) 85, 8 Journal of Systems and Software; Google Scholar öffnen
  331. Zacharzewski K and Kłoda MT, Przegląd zastosowania technologii blockchain w wymiarze sprawiedliwości w wybranych państwach (Instytut Wymiaru Sprawiedliwości 2019); Google Scholar öffnen
  332. Zaldívar A, Hacia una Nueva Ley de Amparo (1st ed IIJ-UNAM 2002); Google Scholar öffnen
  333. Zalewski T, ‘Definicja sztucznej inteligencji’ in L Lai and M Świerczyński (eds.), Prawo sztucznej inteligencji (CH Beck 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
  334. Zalewski T, Podstawowe zasady skutecznego wykorzystania narzędzi Legal Tech in Szostek D (ed), Legal Tech. Czyli jak bezpiecznie korzystać z narzędzi informatycznych w organizacji, w tym w kancelarii oraz dziale prawnym (C.H. Beck 2021); Google Scholar öffnen
  335. Zalnieriute M, Moses B, Williams G, The Rule of Law and Automation of Government Decision-Making, (2019) 82 M.L.R. 425; Google Scholar öffnen
  336. Załucki M, AI and dispute resolution (Javier García González, Álvaro Alzina Lozano and Gabriel Martín Rodríguez eds, Dykinson 2020); Google Scholar öffnen
  337. Završnik A, ‘Criminal justice, artificial intelligence systems and human rights’ (Springer 2020) <https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12027-020-00602-0> accessed 31 May 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  338. Završnik A, Criminal justice, artificial intelligence systems and human rights, <https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12027-020-00602-0> accesssed 31 May 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  339. Zawłocki R, ‘Pojęcie przestępstwa’ in R Dębski (ed.), System prawa karnego, tom 3: Nauka o przestępstwie. Zasady odpowiedzialności (CH Beck 2017); Google Scholar öffnen
  340. Zeleznikow J, Stranieri A, ‘Split Up: An Intelligent Decision Support System Which Provides Advice Upon Property Division Following Divorce’(1998) 6, 2 International Journal of Law and Information Technology; Google Scholar öffnen
  341. Zeleznikow J, Stranieri A, Split Up: An Intelligent Decision Support System Which Provides Advice Upon Property Division Following Divorce (1998), International Journal of Law and Information Technology, Vol 6. No. 2, 190–213; Google Scholar öffnen
  342. Zhang Ch and others, ‘Human-centered automation for resilient nuclear power plant outage control’ (2017) 82 Automation in Construction 179; Google Scholar öffnen
  343. Zhong H and others, ‘Legal Judgment Prediction via Topological Learning’ (2018) 1 Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing; Google Scholar öffnen
  344. Zoll A, ‘Komentarz do art. 1 k.k.’ in W Wróbel and A Zoll (eds.), Kodeks karny. Część ogólna. Tom I. Komentarz do art. 1-52 (Wolters Kluwer 2016); Google Scholar öffnen
  345. Zoll A, ‘Komentarz do art. 2 k.k.’ in W Wróbel and A Zoll (eds.), Kodeks karny. Część ogólna. Tom I. Komentarz do art. 1-52 (Wolters Kluwer 2016); 31 May 2021; Google Scholar öffnen
  346. Zoll F, ‘Przyszłość kształcenia prawników w Polsce’ (2010) 6 Państwo i Prawo 25. Google Scholar öffnen

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus dem Schwerpunkt "Datenschutzrecht & Informationsrecht & Digitalrecht"
Cover des Buchs: Data Act und Datenschutz
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Marc-Philipp Geiselmann
Data Act und Datenschutz
Cover des Buchs: Data Access and Portability
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Yannic Duller
Data Access and Portability
Cover des Buchs: Perspektiven des Datenschutz- und Cybersicherheitsrechts
Sammelband Vollzugriff
Lukas Staffler, Jakob Ebbinghaus
Perspektiven des Datenschutz- und Cybersicherheitsrechts
Cover des Buchs: Bürokratieabbau im Datenschutz
Sammelband Kein Zugriff
Alexander Roßnagel, Astrid Wallmann
Bürokratieabbau im Datenschutz
Cover des Buchs: Personal Data Breaches
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Steffen Sundermann
Personal Data Breaches

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Feedback geben

Wir freuen uns über Ihr Feedback zu Inhalten und Funktionen. Ihre Nachricht hilft uns, unseren Service stetig zu verbessern.

Bewertung
Bild anhängen
oder hier ablegen
PNG oder JPG (max. 3 MB)

Anmelden

Passwort vergessen?
Login via Open Athens
Noch kein Benutzerkonto?
Jetzt registrieren

Publikation zitieren

Download: RIS BibTex