Internet and New Technologies Law: Perspectives and Challenges

Prof. Dariusz Szostek; Prof. Mariusz Załucki

doi:10.5771/9783748926979

Summary

Seit dem ersten IGF-Gipfel der Vereinten Nationen 2006 in Athen dient das Treffen Entscheidungsträgern als Forum und Informationsquelle – v.a., was die Nutzung neuer Technologien– einschließlich rechtlicher und politischer Konsequenzen – angeht. Die Diskussionsbeiträge der 6. Tagung in Polen zum Thema „Internet und neue Technologien“ sind in diesem Band zusammengefasst.

Keywords

Search publication

Bibliographic data

Edition: 1/2021
Copyright Year: 2021
ISBN-Print: 978-3-8487-8307-6
ISBN-Online: 978-3-7489-2697-9
Publisher: Nomos, Baden-Baden
Language: English
Pages: 479
Product Type: Edited Book

Titelei/InhaltsverzeichnisPages 1 - 4 Download chapter (PDF)
IntroductionPages 5 - 12 Download chapter (PDF)
1. 1. The IGF and its role in the global digital diplomacyPages 13 - 13 Download chapter (PDF)
2. Download chapter (PDF)
  1. 1. 2.1.1. Economic and social inclusion and human rights
    2. 2.1.2. Universal access and meaningful connectivity
  2. 1. 2.2.2. Environmental sustainability and climate change
    2. 2.2.3. Inclusive IG ecosystems and digital cooperation
    3. 2.2.4. Trust, security, stability
3. Download chapter (PDF)
  1. 3.1. What and how to regulate in the world of technology?
  2. 3.2. What and how to finance in the world of technologies?
  3. 3.3. Technologies and sustainable development
4. 4. The new skills neededPages 26 - 26 Download chapter (PDF)
5. 5. Digitalising our way into a post-pandemic recoveryPages 27 - 28 Download chapter (PDF)
6. 6. How the IGF’s current format aligns with the challenges aheadPages 29 - 30 Download chapter (PDF)
7. 7. Looking forwardPages 31 - 32 Download chapter (PDF)
1. Authors:
  Download chapter (PDF)
  1. 1. Introduction
    Authors:
  2. 2. New Technologies - The Future of Law
    Authors:
  3. 3. Conclusion
    Authors:
2. Authors:
  Download chapter (PDF)
  1. 1. Introduction
    Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. 2.1 Departing from sales contract
      Authors:
    2. 2.2 Departing from the off-line world
      Authors:
  3. 3. Changes in the notion of a consumer
    Authors:
  4. 4. Changes in consumer model
    Authors:
  5. 5. Conclusions
    Authors:
3. Authors:
  Download chapter (PDF)
  1. 1. Introduction
    Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. 2.1. Emerging Technologies Used by Financial Services Firms
      Authors:
    2. 2.2. Use of AI and Big Data in Retail Financial Services
      Authors:
    3. 2.3. (Concerning) Characteristics of the Technologies
      Authors:
  3. Authors:
    1. 3.1. Overview of Potential Consumer Harms
      Authors:
    2. 3.2. Algorithmic Bias and Discrimination
      Authors:
    3. 3.3. Excessive Data Collection
      Authors:
    4. 3.4. Digital Consumer Manipulation
      Authors:
    5. 3.5. Personalisation of Financial Services
      Authors:
  4. 4. Conclusions
    Authors:
4. Authors:
  Download chapter (PDF)
  1. Authors:
    1. 1.1 The social political context.
      Authors:
    2. 1.2 The social security context:
      Authors:
    3. 1.3 The first global risk to the social security system at the XXI century: What came up?
      Authors:
    4. 1.4 The digital inclusion challenge in Brazil
      Authors:
  2. Conclusions
    Authors:
5. Authors:
  Download chapter (PDF)
  1. 1. Introduction
    Authors:
  2. 2. Definition of e-voting
    Authors:
  3. 3. Standards and regulations that e-voting has to face
    Authors:
  4. 4. Threats connected with introduction of e-voting.
    Authors:
  5. 5. Summary
    Authors:
6. Authors:
  Download chapter (PDF)
  1. 1. Introduction
    Authors:
  2. 2. Control over codes at EU level
    Authors:
  3. Authors:
    1. 3.1. General remarks
      Authors:
    2. 3.2. A risk-based approach
      Authors:
    3. 3.3. Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence Act
      Authors:
    4. 3.4. The Council of Europe's role in regulating algorithmic codes
      Authors:
  4. 4. Conclusions
    Authors:
1. Authors:
  Download chapter (PDF)
  1. Authors:
    1. 1.1. The AI-supported decision-making
      Authors:
    2. 1.2. New business model
      Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. 2.1. Confidentiality
      Authors:
    2. 2.2. Conflict of interests
      Authors:
    3. 2.3. Acting based on the professional skills and knowledge
      Authors:
  3. 3. Changing the legal education of lawyers in the AI-age
    Authors:
  4. 4. Conclusions
    Authors:
2. Authors:
  Download chapter (PDF)
  1. 1. Introduction
    Authors:
  2. 2. New Means of Production
    Authors:
  3. 3. Hybrid Disruption Through Lawtech
    Authors:
  4. 4. New Challenges Posed by the Use of AI
    Authors:
  5. 5. Innovation as a Must on the Long Run
    Authors:
3. A Quest for Technological Competence: Raising the BarPages 145 - 158
  Authors:
  Download chapter (PDF)
4. Authors:
  Download chapter (PDF)
  1. 1. Introduction
    Authors:
  2. 2. The current state and recent developments in the judiciary
    Authors:
  3. 3. Selected solutions from around the world
    Authors:
  4. 4. Towards the modernisation of the judiciary (instead of a conclusion)
    Authors:
5. Authors:
  Download chapter (PDF)
  1. 1. Introduction
    Authors:
  2. 2. Definition of AI
    Authors:
  3. 3. Stages of development of IT support for the judiciary
    Authors:
  4. Authors:
    1. Authors:
      1. 4.1.1 Information Retrieval, Data Extraction
        Authors:
      2. 4.1.2 Automated analysis and statistical evaluation of sentencing considerations in criminal judgments.
        Authors:
      3. 4.1.3 Use of AI for criminal investigative services to detect child pornography and child abuse.
        Authors:
      4. 4.1.4 Use of AI to categorize offenders
        Authors:
      5. 4.1.5 Automated Translation
        Authors:
      6. 4.1.6 Anonymizing court judgments
        Authors:
      7. 4.1.7 Interaction
        Authors:
      8. 4.1.8 Further possibilities of AI use in the judiciary
        Authors:
    2. 4.2 Use of AI by the European Union
      Authors:
  5. Authors:
    1. 5.1 GDPR
      Authors:
    2. Authors:
      1. 5.2.1 Constitutional principles that suggest the use of artificial intelligence
        Authors:
      2. Authors:
        (1) Right to human dignity
        Authors:
        (2) Principle of non-discrimination
        Authors:
        (3) Principle of the natural and independent judge
        Authors:
        (4) The right to an effective remedy
        Authors:
        (5) Fair trial
        Authors:
        (6) Right to the legal judge
        Authors:
        (7) Transparency principle
        Authors:
        (8) Principle of the right to be heard
        Authors:
  6. 6. European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice
    Authors:
  7. 7. Proposal for a Regulation laying down harmonized rules on artificial intelligence.
    Authors:
  8. 8. Conclusion
    Authors:
6. Authors:
  Download chapter (PDF)
  1. 1. Introduction
    Authors:
  2. 2. A Forced Transition: Online Justice at the Federal Level
    Authors:
  3. 3. The Constitutionalization of Digital Justice: A Future Fundament Right or a Characterization of Justice in Mexico?
    Authors:
  4. 4. More Challenges than Certainties: A Provisional Conclusion
    Authors:
7. Authors:
  Download chapter (PDF)
  1. Introduction
    Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. 1) Complaint form
      Authors:
    2. 2) Collection and retention of personal data contained in the complaint
      Authors:
    3. 3) Pre-dispute information
      Authors:
    4. 4) Handling of the case by the ODR entity
      Authors:
  3. Part II. Arbitration covenant. The concept
    Authors:
1. Authors:
  Download chapter (PDF)
  1. 1. Beyond the Web
    Authors:
  2. 2. Lack of a universal self-validating/authenticating membership model
    Authors:
  3. 3. Disintermediating the Intermediaries
    Authors:
  4. 4. Disintermediating the Web Browser
    Authors:
  5. 5. The Benefits of Membership
    Authors:
  6. 6. We are at the beginning of the beginning
    Authors:
  7. 7. Fiefdoms to Hyperconnectivity
    Authors:
  8. 8. The Need for a New Framework
    Authors:
  9. 9. The Transformation
    Authors:
  10. 10. MultiKey Infrastructure (MKI)
    Authors:
  11. 11. Summary
    Authors:
2. Authors:
  Download chapter (PDF)
  1. Introduction
    Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. 2.1. Definition
      Authors:
    2. 2.2. Modalities
      Authors:
  3. Authors:
    1. 3.1. Historical Context
      Authors:
    2. 3.2. General Background
      Authors:
    3. 3.3. Main dispositions
      Authors:
  4. Authors:
    1. 4.1. Case study 1: Enel Distribution Ceara (EDC)
      Authors:
    2. 4.2. Case study 2: Petrobras
      Authors:
  5. 5. Conclusion
    Authors:
3. Authors:
  Download chapter (PDF)
  1. 1. Introduction
    Authors:
  2. 2. SDG Background and History
    Authors:
  3. Authors:
    1. SDG 1 – End poverty in all its forms everywhere
      Authors:
    2. SDG 2 – end hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture
      Authors:
    3. SDG 3 – ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages
      Authors:
    4. SDG 4 – ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all
      Authors:
    5. SDG 6 – ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all
      Authors:
    6. SDG 7 – ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all
      Authors:
    7. SDG 8 – promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all
      Authors:
    8. SDG 9 – build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovation
      Authors:
    9. SDG 11 – make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable
      Authors:
    10. SDG 13 – take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts & SDG 15 – protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertificati...
      Authors:
    11. SDG 16 – promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutional at all levels
      Authors:
    12. SDG 17 – strengthen the means of implementation and revitalize the global partnership for sustainable development
      Authors:
  4. 4. Conclusion
    Authors:
4. Authors:
  Download chapter (PDF)
  1. 1. Introduction
    Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. 2.1. Smart city and the 2030 Agenda
      Authors:
    2. 2.2. Smart areas
      Authors:
  3. 3. Selected technological issues
    Authors:
  4. Authors:
    1. Authors:
      1. 4.1.1. Decision loop
        Authors:
      2. 4.1.2. Trustworthy artificial intelligence
        Authors:
      3. 4.1.3. Human-Centered Automation
        Authors:
    2. 4.2. The question of full autonomy of systems
      Authors:
    3. 4.3. Scope of responsibilities of system users
      Authors:
  5. Authors:
    1. 5.1. Man-in-the-loop
      Authors:
    2. 5.2. Man-on-the-loop
      Authors:
  6. 6. Conclusion
    Authors:
5. Authors:
  Download chapter (PDF)
  1. Introduction
    Authors:
  2. 2. Social and Environmental Responsibility of Companies
    Authors:
  3. Authors:
    1. 3.1. Mediation as an instrument of compliance and prevention of environmental disasters: Negotiated conflict resolution strategy for environmental risk management, through governance
      Authors:
  4. 4. Conclusions
    Authors:
1. Authors:
  Download chapter (PDF)
  1. 1. Introduction
    Authors:
  2. 2. Concepts of privacy by design and data protection by design
    Authors:
  3. 3. Functional use of data protection by design model in the design of AI systems
    Authors:
  4. 4. Training
    Authors:
  5. 5. Requirements
    Authors:
  6. 6. Design
    Authors:
  7. 7. Coding
    Authors:
  8. 8. Testing
    Authors:
  9. 9. Release
    Authors:
  10. 10. Maintenance
    Authors:
  11. 11. Summary and conclusions
    Authors:
2. Authors:
  Download chapter (PDF)
  1. Authors:
    1. 1.1 Introduction of Privacy by Design and Its Foundational Principles
      Authors:
    2. 1.2 An Overview of the Application of Private by Design in EU and U.S.
      Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. Authors:
      1. 2.1.1 China’s Coordinated Legislative Approach to Digital Privacy Protection
        Authors:
      2. 2.1.2 China’s Recent Endeavor to a Unified Digital Privacy Protection Law
        Authors:
      3. 2.1.3 Supplementing Rules to Digital Privacy Legislation
        Authors:
    2. Authors:
      1. 2.2.1 The “Proactive not Reactive” Principle Is Embodied in the Chinese Criminal and Administrative Legislations
        Authors:
      2. 2.2.2 The “Privacy as the Default Setting” Principle Is Embodied in the Relevant Stipulations on Mobile Internet Application Program (APP).
        Authors:
      3. 2.2.3 The Principles of “Privacy Embedded into Design” and “Full Lifecycle Protection” are Applied in The Civil Code and The Cybersecurity Law
        Authors:
      4. 2.2.4 The Full Functionality Principle Is Applied in The Civil Code and The Personal Information Protection Law.
        Authors:
      5. 2.2.5 The Visibility and Transparency Principle Is Embodied in Preliminary Informing and Later-stage Processing.
        Authors:
      6. 2.2.6 The Keep It User-Centric Principle Is Applied in Confirming Users’ Right by Laws and Regulations.
        Authors:
  3. Authors:
    1. 3.1 China’s Smart City Building and the Entailed Privacy Concerns
      Authors:
    2. 3.2 The General Application of Privacy by Design in China’s Smart Cities
      Authors:
    3. 3.3 Case Study: Applying Privacy by Design in Face Recognition Technology
      Authors:
  4. 4. Conclusion
    Authors:
3. Authors:
  Download chapter (PDF)
  1. 1. Cloud Computing, Outsourcing
    Authors:
  2. 2. Features of the Services
    Authors:
  3. 3. Advantages and Disadvantages of Cloud Computing
    Authors:
  4. 4. Legal Aspects: Security and Risk in Cloud Computing
    Authors:
  5. 5. A Possible Solution
    Authors:
4. Authors:
  Download chapter (PDF)
  1. Introduction
    Authors:
  2. 1. Transposition of the E-commerce Directive and the System of Safe Harbours
    Authors:
  3. 2. Establishing the Liability of ISPs
    Authors:
  4. 3. Conclusion and Outlook
    Authors:
5. Authors:
  Download chapter (PDF)
  1. 1. Introduction
    Authors:
  2. 2. Society Resilience
    Authors:
  3. 3. ICT threats and vulnerabilities
    Authors:
  4. Authors:
    1. Malware and security incidents detection techniques
      Authors:
    2. Early warnings of cyber threats
      Authors:
    3. DDoS defence systems
      Authors:
    4. Prevention of fraud in electronic transactions
      Authors:
  5. 5. Global situational awareness
    Authors:
  6. 6. Conformity assessment and certification
    Authors:
  7. 7. Future perspectives and open issues
    Authors:
1. Download chapter (PDF)
  1. Section One
2. Monika Jagielska, Monika Namysłowska, Aneta Wiewiórowska-Domagalska:Pages 434 - 434 Download chapter (PDF)
3. Zofia Bednarz, Kayleen Manwaring:Pages 434 - 434 Download chapter (PDF)
4. Heloísa Helena Silva Pancotti, Renato Bernardi:Pages 435 - 435 Download chapter (PDF)
5. Download chapter (PDF)
  1. Section Two
6. Fryderyk Zoll:Pages 436 - 436 Download chapter (PDF)
7. Gabriela Bar, Silvia A. Carretta, Shobana Iyer:Pages 436 - 436 Download chapter (PDF)
8. Doug Surtees, Craig Zawada:Pages 437 - 437 Download chapter (PDF)
9. Wilfried Bernhardt:Pages 437 - 437 Download chapter (PDF)
10. Download chapter (PDF)
  1. Section Three
11. Charlie Northrup:Pages 438 - 438 Download chapter (PDF)
12. Alexandra R. Harrington, Magdalena Stryja:Pages 439 - 440 Download chapter (PDF)
13. Download chapter (PDF)
  1. Section Four
14. Maddalena Castellani, Cesare Triberti, Roberto Giacobazzi:Pages 441 - 441 Download chapter (PDF)
15. Matej Myška, Pavel Koukal, Zuzana Vlachová, Ondřej Woznica:Pages 442 - 442 Download chapter (PDF)
16. Niewiadomska-Szynkiewicz, Amanowicz, Wrońska, Kostkiewicz:Pages 442 - 444 Download chapter (PDF)
About the AuthorsPages 445 - 458 Download chapter (PDF)
BibliographyPages 459 - 479 Download chapter (PDF)

Bibliography (346 entries)

‘Artificial intelligence summit focuses on fighting hunger, climate crisis and transition to ‘smart sustainable cities’’ UN News (28 May 2019) <https://news.un.org/en/story/2019/05/1039311> accessed on 14 April 2020; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
‘Dronomat zamiast paczkomatu. Czy wkrótce niebo zaroi się od dronów?’ (Rozmowy Instytutu Nowej Europy on Anchor.fm, 10 June 2020) <https://anchor.fm/instytutnowejeuropy/episodes/Dronomat-zamiast-paczkomatu--Czy-wkrtce-niebo-zaroi-si-od-dronw-ef77ru> accessed 27 February 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
‘ISO 3720:2018. Sustainable development of communities — Indicators for city services and quality of life’ (International Organization for Standardization, July 2017) <https://www.iso.org/standard/68498.html> accessed 14 April 2020; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
‘Secure, sustainable smart cities and the IoT’ <https://www.gemalto.com/iot/inspired/smart-cities> accessed 27 February 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
‘Smart city. What is a smart city?’ (Official website of the City of Vienna) <https://www.wien.gv.at/stadtentwicklung/studien/pdf/b008403j.pdf> accessed 14 April 2020; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
‘Take Action for the Sustainable Development Goals’ <https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals> accessed on 14 April 2020; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
‘GB/T39335-2020 Information Security Technology Personal Information Security Assessment Guidelines’ (China Standard Press 2020); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
‘Privacy and Data Protection by Design – from policy to engineering’ <https://www.enisa.europa.eu/publications/privacy-and-data-protection-by-design> accessed 23 March 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Abbott R and Sarch A, ‘Pushing Artificial Intelligence: Legal Fiction or Science Fiction’ (2019) 53 University of California, Davis Law Review 323; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Act on the National Cybersecurity System. Journal of Laws of 2018, item 1560; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Adamski A, Prawo karne komputerowe (CH Beck 2000); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Advisory Board on Artificial Intelligence and Human Society, Report on Artificial Intelligence and Human Society, (2017) <https://www8.cao.go.jp/cstp/tyousakai/ai/summary/aisociety_en.pdf> accessed 22 June 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Agencia Estado. Entenda melhor os ADRS. In: Estadão, 20 nov. 2000. Available in: <https://economia.estadao.com.br/noticias/geral,entenda-melhor-os-adrs,20001120p1082> Accessed: 12 November 2019; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Aletras N and others, ‘Predicting Judicial Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: A Natural Language Processing Perspective’ (2016) 19 PeerJ Computer Science 93; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Aletras N, Tsarapatsanis D, Preoţiuc-Pietro D, Lampos V, ‘Predicting judicial decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: a Natural Language Processing perspective’ (PeerJ Computer Science 2016) <https://peerj.com/articles/cs-93/> accessed 20 May 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Angelopoulos C, ‘European Intermediary Liability in Copyright: A Tort-Based Analysis’ <https://dare.uva.nl/search?identifier=a406e67d-b537-49ae-9f46-80e831b988d4> accessed 10 June 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Angwin J, Larson J, Mattu S, Kirchner L, ‘Machine Bias. There’s software used across the country to predict future criminals. And it’s biased against blacks’, (ProPublica, 23 May 2016) <https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing> accessed 25 June 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Anthopoulos LG, Understanding Smart Cities: A Tool for Smart Government or an Industrial Trick? (Springer 2018); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Apple, ‘The App Store Turns 10’ (Apple.com, 2018) <https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2018/07/app-store-turns-10/> accessed 7 July 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Araszkiewicz M and Rodriguez-Doncel V (eds), Legal Konwledge and Information Systems (IOS Press 2019); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Araszkiewicz M, 'Algorithmization of legal thinking. Models, possibilities, limitations', in Dariusz Szostek (ed), Legal Tech (C.H. Beck 2021); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Arbeitsgruppe ‘Modernisierung des Zivilprozesses’ <https://www.justiz.bayern.de/media/images/behoerden-und-gerichte/oberlandesgerichte/nuernberg/thesenpapier_der_arbeitsgruppe.pdf> accessed 25 June 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Arkin RC, Ulam P and Duncan B, ‘An Ethical Governor for Constraining Lethal Action in an Autonomous System’ (Technical Report GIT-GVU-09-02, Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta Mobile Robot Lab, 2009); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Arkuszewska AM, Informatyzacja postępowania arbitrażowego (Wolters Kluwer 2019); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Armour J, Eidenmueller H, ‘Self-Driving Corporations’ (2019) 475 European Corporate Governance Institute - Law Working Paper; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Armour J, Parnham R, Sako M, ‘Augmented Lawyering’ (2020) 558 European Corporate Governance Institute - Law Working Paper; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Ashworth A and Holder J, Principles of Criminal Law (7th edn., Oxford University Press 2013); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Assembleia Geral da Organização das Nações Unidas, Transformar nuestro mundo: la Agenda 2030 para el Desarrollo Sostenible (A/70/L.1, 2015) (online at <https://unctad.org/meetings/es/SessionalDocuments/ares70d1_es.pdf> accessed 24 Nov 2020); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Azevedo R, Entenda o que é ADR: Criados há 70 anos, os American Depositary Receipts permitem que investidores dos EUA coloquem recursos em empresas estrangeiras. In: Revista Exame, 4 out. 2017. Available in: https://exame.abril.com.br/mercados/entenda-o-que-e-adr/. Acessed: 12 nov. 2019. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Bahia C, Carvalho E and Beninça A, Sociedade de Risco, mudanças climáticas e a função reguladora do Direito Ambiental (Instituto O Direito por um Planeta Verde, 2017); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Baig ZA and others, ‘Future challenges for smart cities: Cyber-security and digital forensics’ (2017) 22 Digital Investigation 3; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Bandara E, Keong W, Ranasinghe N, de Zoysa K, 'Smart contract Made Smart' in (ed) Zheng Z, Dai H, Tang M, Chen X, 'Blockchain and Trustworthy System' (Singapore 2020); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Bar G, ‘Sztuczna inteligencja w kancelarii prawnej przyszłości’ in Dariusz Szostek (ed), Legal Tech. Czyli jak bezpiecznie korzystać z narzędzi informatycznych w organizacji, w tym w kancelarii oraz dziale prawnym (C.H. Beck 2021); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Bar G, Explainability as a legal requirement for Artificial Intelligence, Medium.com, November 2020, <https://medium.com/womeninai/explainability-as-a-legal-requirement-for-artificial-intelligence-systems-66da5a0aa693> accessed 2 July 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Barbieri J and Cajazeira J, Responsabilidade social e empresarial e empresa sustentável: da teoria à prática (Saraiva, 2010); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Barfield W, Pagallo U, Advanced Introduction to Law and Artificial Intelligence (Edward Elgar Publishing 2020); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Beck U, Sociedade de risco: rumo a uma outra modernidade (Editora 34, 2011); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Becker D, Ferrari I, Artificial Intelligence and the Supreme Court of Brazil –Beauty or a Beast? (22 June 2020) 2 <https://sifocc.org/app/uploads/2020/06/Victor-Beauty-or-the-Beast.pdf> accessed 31 May 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Becker D, Ferrari Isabela F, The Brazilian Supreme Court's Artificial Intelligence: a beauty or a beast? (22 June 2020) <https://sifocc.org/app/uploads/2020/06/Victor-Beauty-or-the-Beast.pdf.> accessed 25 June 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Bellaouar S, Guerroumi M, Derhan A and Moussaoui S, ‘Towards Heterogeneous Architectures of Hybrid Vehicular Sensor Networks for Smart Cities’ in Z Mahmood (ed.), Smart Cities, Development and Governance Frameworks (Springer 2018); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Bernhardt W, Leeb C, 'Elektronischer Rechtsverkehr‘ in Dirk Heckmann and Anne Paschke (ed) jurisPK-Internetrecht 7th edition, chapter 6 (status: 01 June2021); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Bertoncelli R de P, Compliance. In: Carvalaho AC, Bertoccelli R de P, Alvim TC, Venturini O, (Coordenadores). Manual de Compliance. Rio de Janeiro: Forense, 2019, Cap. 3, s. p. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
BEUC, ‘EU Consumer Protection 2.0 Structural Asymmetries in Digital Consumer Markets’ (March 2021) <https://www.beuc.eu/publications/beuc-x-2021-018_eu_consumer_protection.0_0.pdf> accessed 13 May 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Beyerlin U and Marauhn T, International Enviromental Governance (Hart Publishng, 2011); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
BGH, 12 July 2012, I ZR 18/11 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
BGH, 22 April 2009, I ZR 216/06 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
BGH, 26 September 1985, I ZR 86/83 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Biallaß I, ‘Legal Tech und künstliche Intelligenz’ in Ory and Weth (ed), jurisPK-ERV vol 1, 1st edition, chapter 8, status 28 August 2020; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Bienias M, ‘Ochrona danych w fazie projektowania oraz domyślna ochrona danych (privacy by design oraz privacy by default) w ogólnym rozporządzeniu o ochronie danych’ in Sibiga G (ed) Ogólne rozporządzenie o ochronie danych. Aktualne problemy prawnej ochrony danych osobowych (C. H. Beck 2016); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Billings ChE, ‘Human-Centered Aviation Automation: Principles and Guidelines’ (NASA Technical Memorandum 110381, Ames Research Center, February1996); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Bolton R, Hand D, Unsupervised profiling methods for fraud detection, Proceedings of credit scoring and credit control VII (2001); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Booth B, ‘The Cloud: A Critical Smart City Asset’ in S McCleallan, JA Jimenez and G Koutitas (eds.), Smart Cities, Applications, Technologies, Standards, and Driving Factors (Springer 2018); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Boyd JR, ‘The Essence of Winning and Losing’ (September 2012) <https://fasttransients.files.wordpress.com/2010/03/essence_of_winning_losing.pdf> accessed on 14 April 2020; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Bröhmer J, Transparenz als Verfassungsprinzip. Grundsatz und Europäische Union ( Mohr Siebeck 2004); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Brunton F, Nissenbaum H, A User's Guide for Privacy and Protest (MIT Press 2015); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Bryce J, Flexible and Rigid Constitutions (1st edn Oxford University Press 1905); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
C-236 to 238/08 Google France and Google [2010] ECR I–2417; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
C-324/09, L’Oréal v eBay, ECR [2011] I-06011; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Campuzano A, Manual para entender el Juicio de Amparo (1st edn Thomson Reuters 2016); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Cannon JC, Bayers M, Compliance Descontructed. In: Queue Magazine, v. 4, 7 ed., setembro de 2006. Nova York, NY, USA. p. 30-37. Available in: <http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/1170000/1160449/p30-cannon.pdf?ip=187.65.179.69&id=1160449&acc=OPEN&key=4D4702B0C3E38B35%2E4D4702B0C3E38B35%2E4D4702B0C3E38B35%2E6D218144511F3437&__acm__=1572443475_b950d9527f97833505d1901c3ce36234> Acessed: 30 October 2019; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Carioca KJF; De Luca M M M; Ponte VMR, Implementação da Lei Sarbanes-Oxley e seus Impactos nos controles internos e nas práticas de governança corporativa: um estudo na Companhia Energética do Ceará – Coelce, In: Revista Universo Contábil, v. 6, n. 4, p. 50-67, out./dez. 2010. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Carretta SA, Blockchain challenges to copyright : Revamping the online music industry, 2019. <http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-173248> accessed 2 July 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Carvalho VM de; Rodrigues EF (org.). Guia Programas de Compliance: Orientações sobre estruturação e benefícios da adoção dos programas de compliance concorrencial. Brasília: Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (CADE), 2016. 43 p. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Case N, How To Become A Centaur, Journal of Design and Science MIT Media Lab, 02/02/2018, <https://jods.mitpress.mit.edu/pub/issue3-case/release/6> accessed 2 July 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Castelnovo W, Misuraca G, Savoldelli A, ‘Smart Cities Governance: The Need for a Holistic Approach to Assessing Urban Participatory Policy Making’ (2015) Social Science Computer Review <https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439315611103> accessed 2 July 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Castillo Y, “Las notificaciones” in Juan González and Fernando Sosa et al (eds), Teoría y Práctica del Juicio de Amparo (Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Ciudad de México 2020); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Caton JL, Autonomous Weapon Systems: A Brief Survey of Developmental, Operational, Legal, and Ethical Issues (United States Army War College Press 2015); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Cavoukian A, ‘Ethics by design’ <www.ryerson.ca/pbdce> accessed 23 March 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Cavoukian A, ‘Private by Design. The 7 Foundational Principles. Originally’ <https://www.ipc.on.ca/wp-content/uploads/resources/7foundationalprinciples.pdf> accessed on 25 April 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Cholasta R and others, ‘Safe Harbour: Režim Vyloučení Odpovědnosti Poskytovatelů Služeb Informační Společnosti v Kontextu Pasivní Role Poskytovatele’ (2017) Právní rozhledy <www.beck-online.cz> accessed 10 June 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Chomiczewski W, Lubasz D, ‘Privacy by design a sztuczna inteligencja’ (2020) 20 MoP 20 67 ff; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Choudhary M, ‘Six technologies crucial for smart cities’ (Geospatial world, 19 November 2019) <https://www.geospatialworld.net/blogs/six-technologies-crucial-for-smart-cities> accessed 14 April 2020; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Christensen C, Disruptive Innovation (2020), http://www.claytonchristensen.com/key-concepts accessed 14 April 2020; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Chui M, Manyika J, Miremadi M, Four fundamentals of workplace automation (McKinsey Digital, November 2015), <https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/four-fundamentals-of-workplace-automation> accessed 14 April 2020; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Chunkun W, Security Fundamentals for Internet of Things (Science Press 2013); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Clooney A and Webb P, The Right to a Fair Trial in International Law (Oxford University Press 2021); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Collberg C, Davidson J, Giacobazzi R, Gu Y, Herzberg A, Wang F., ‘Towards Digital Asset Protection’ (2011) 26(6)IEEE Intelligent Systems; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Collins DAA: American Company. In: Encyplopaedia Britannica, 2018. Available in: https://www.britannica.com/topic/Arthur-Andersen. Acessed: 12 nov. 2019. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Comissão sobre Governança Global. Nossa comunidade global (Editora FGV, 1996); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Commission (EC) ‘Guidance on Article 17 of Directive 2019/790 on Copyright in the Digital Single Market Guidelines’ (Communication) COM (2021) 288 final 4 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, ‘A coordinated plan for artificial intelligence’ (Communication) COM (2018) 795 final; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, ‘Artificial Intelligence for Europe’ (Communication) COM (2018) 237 final; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Commission, ‘Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions - Building Trust in Human Centric Artificial Intelligence’, COM (2019) 168 final; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Commission, ‘Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Laying Down Harmonised Rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and Amending Certain Union Legislative Acts’ COM 2021 206 final; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Commission, ‘White Paper on Artificial Intelligence – A European approach to excellence and trust’ (Communication), COM (2020) 65 final; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Committee of Experts on Internet Intermediaries (MSI-NET), Study on the Human Rights Dimensions of Automated Data Processing Techniques (in Particular Algorithms) and Possible Regulatory Implications (6 October 2017) <https://rm.coe.int/study-hr-dimension-of-automated-data-processing-incl-algorithms/168075b94a> accessed 31 May 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Contissa G, ‘Automation and Liability: an Analysis in the Context of Socio-Technical Systems’ (2017) 11 i-lex 17; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights, Recommendation Unboxing Artificial Intelligence: 10 steps to protect Human Rights (2019) <https://rm.coe.int/unboxing-artificial-intelligence-10-steps-to-protect-human-rights-reco/1680946e64> accessed 31 May 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Coveware, ‘Ransonware Costs Double in Q4 as Ryuk, Sodinokibi Proliferate’ (Coveware.com, 2020) <https://www.coveware.com/blog/2020/1/22/ransomware-costs-double-in-q4-as-ryuk-sodinokibi-proliferate> accessed 7 July 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Craig P and others, Rule of Law in Europe Perspectives From Practitioners and Academics (European Judicial Training Network 2020); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Croft J, More than 100,000 legal roles to become automated, Financial Times, 15 March 2016, https://www.ft.com/content/c8ef3f62-ea9c-11e5-888e-2eadd5fbc4a4; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Cui Y, Shanghai Intelligent Assistive Case-Handling System for Criminal Cases - System 206 (Springer 2020); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Cummings ML, ‘Automation and Accountability in Decision Support System Interface Design’ (2006) 32 The Journal of Technology Studies 23; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners, ‘The Resolution on Privacy by Design’ (32nd International Conference of Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners, Jerusalem, 27–29 October 2010. <http://www.giodo.gov.pl/pl/1520084/3830> accessed 13 May 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
De Almeida LCSS; Duarte Junior AMarcos, Desafios e soluções da Petrobras em seu projeto de atendimento à Lei Sarbanes-Oxley. In: RAUnP - Revista Eletrônica do Mestrado Profissional em Administração da Universidade Potiguar, Ano III, n. 1, out. 2010/mar. 2011. p. 27-40; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
De Souza MMP, Figueiredo MD, A Lei Sarbanes-Oxley e Sua Importância para as Companhias Abertas Brasileiras a partir do Ano de 2004. In: Revista Pensar Contábil, Rio de Janeiro, v. 10, n. 42, p. 31-35, out./dez. 2008; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Decreto nº 9571 of 2018 <http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2018/Decreto/D9571.htm> accessed 12 Dec 2020; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Der Standard (Internet edition), ‘Estland will Richter durch künstliche Intelligenz ersetzen’ (Der Standard, 3 April 2019) <https://www.derstandard.at/story/2000100613536/justiz-estland-will-richter-durch-kuenstliche-intelligenz-ersetzen> accessed 29 May 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Directive (EU) 2016/1148 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning measures for a high common level of security of network and information systems across the Union; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Directive (EU) 2019/790 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on Copyright and related rights in the Digital Single Market and amending Directives 96/9/EC and 2001/29/EC [2019] OJ L130/92; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market [2002] OJ L178/1; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Donahue L, A Primer on Using Artificial Intelligence in the Legal Profession, JOLT Digest, 3 January 2018, https://jolt.law.harvard.edu/digest/a-primer-on-using-artificial-intelligence-in-the-legal-profession; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Drobek P, in Bielak-Jomaa E, Lubasz D (eds) RODO. Ogólne rozporządzenie o ochronie danych. Komentarz (C. H. Beck 2017); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Dysart J, AI Removes the Drudgery from Legal Due Diligence, Communications of the ACM, 8 January 2019, https://cacm.acm.org/news/233886-ai-removes-the-drudgery-from-legal-due-diligence/fulltext; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Ebers M and Navas S (eds), Algorithms and Law (Cambridge University Press 2020); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Ejaz W and Anpalagan A, Internet of Things for Smart Cities (Springer 2019); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Endsley MR, ‘Automation and situation awareness’ in R Parasuraman and M Mouloua (eds.), Automation and Human Performance. Theory and Applications (reprint, CRC Press 2009); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Engelman D, ‘Kevin Kelly Holos Rising’ (2014) <https://blog.longnow.org/02014/12/01/kevin-kellyseminar-media/> accessed 7 July 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Engstrom DF and Gelbach JB, ‘Legal Tech, Civil Procedure, and the Future of American Adversarialism’ (2020) 169 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Engstrom DF, ‘Post COVID Courts’ (2020) 68 UCLA Law Review Discourse 246; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Escajeda HG, The Vitruvian Lawyer: How to Thrive in an Era of AI and Quantum Technologies, XXIX Kansas J. of Law & Pub. Pol'y 421-521 (2020), https://ssrn.com/abstract=3534683; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ), European ethical Charter on the use of Artificial Intelligence in judicial systems and their environment (2018) <https://rm.coe.int/ethical-charter-en-for-publication-4-december-2018/16808f699c> accessed 31 May 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ), Report on the CEPEJ Conference "Artificial intelligence at the service of the Judiciary" (27 September 2018) <https://www.coe.int/en/web/cepej/justice-of-the-future-predictive-justice-and-artificial-intelligence> accessed 31 May 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
European Commission, ‘Assessment list of trustworthy artificial intelligence’ (Study, 1 March 2021) <https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/assessment-list-trustworthy-artificial-intelligence-altai-self-assessment> accessed 27 April 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
European Commission, ‘EU member states sign up to cooperate on artificial intelligence’ (News, 8 March 2020) <https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/eu-member-states-sign-cooperate-artificial-intelligence> accessed 6 March 2019; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
European Commission, ‘Member States and Commission to work together to boost artificial intelligence „made in Europe”’ (Press release, 7 December 2018) <http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-18-6689_en.htm> access: 6 March 2019; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
European Commission, Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonized rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending certain Union legislative acts, COM (2021) 206 final <https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/proposal-regulation-laying-down-harmonised-rules-artificial-intelligence> accessed 30 May 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
European Commission’s High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence (2018): Draft Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI <https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/draft-ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai>, accessed 30 Mai 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
European Data Protection Board, ‘Guidelines 4/2019 on Article 25 Data Protection by Design and by Default’ (20 October 2020) <https://edpb.europa.eu/sites/edpb/files/files/file1/edpb_guidelines_201904_dataprotection_by_design_and_by_default_v2.0_en.pdf> accessed 13 May 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
European Parliament, Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC [2016] OJ L199/1 (General Data Protection Regulation); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Farias F, Principais impactos da Sarbanes-Oxley Act. In: Revista ConTexto, Porto Alegre, v. 4, n. 6, 1º Semestre 2004. ISSN 1676-6016. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Federal Trade Commission, ‘Consumer Privacy on the World Wide Web’ (FTC,1998) <https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/public_statements/prepared-statement-federal-trade-commission-consumer-privacy-worldwide-web/privac98.pdf> accessed 7 July 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Fereira F, ‘Artificial Intelligence Makes its Mark in the Brazilian Judicial System’ (Folha de S.Paulo, 10 March 2020) <https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/internacional/en/brazil/2020/03/artificial-intelligence-makes-its-mark-in-the-brazilian-judicial-system.shtml> accessed 31 May2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Fernandes P, Globalização, Sociedade de Risco e o futuro do Direito Penal (Livraria Almedina, 2001). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Fernández C, ‘La sustitución directa de la actividad humana en la decisión judicial, al día de hoy, es puramente quimérica a corto y medio plazo’ (Legal today, 11 September 2020) <https://www.legaltoday.com/legaltech/nuevas-tecnologias/la-realidad-y-el-deseo-inteligencia-artificial-y-decision-judicial-2020-09-11/> accessed 31 May 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Filipkowski W, ‘Prawo karne wobec sztucznej inteligencji’ in L Lai and M Świerczyński (eds.), Prawo sztucznej inteligencji (C. H. Beck 2020); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Flavio Fereira, in Folha de S.Paulo” (Internet edn 10 March2020) „Artificial Intelligence Makes its Mark in the Brazilian Judicial System”<https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/internacional/en/brazil/2020/03/artificial-intelligence-makes-its-mark-in-the-brazilian-judicial-system.shtml> accessed 31 May2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Forester M, ‘Catch Up on Privacy Around the World on Data Privacy Day 2021’ (Morrison Foerster, 2021) <https://www.mofo.com/resources/insights/210127-data-privacy-day.html> accessed 7 July 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Freitas GP, Ilícito Penal ambiental e reparação do dano (Revista dos Tribunais, 2005); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
FTC, Protecting Consumer Privacy in an Era of Rapid Change, (FTC 2010); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Garlicki L, Polskie prawo konstytucyjne. Zarys wykładu (Wolters Kluwer Polska 2020); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Gentry C, ‘Fully Homomorphic Encryption Using Ideal Lattices’ (the 41st ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC) 2009); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Gerards J, General Principles of the European Convention on Human Rights (Cambridge University Press 2019); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Gesley J, ‘Comparative Summary’, Law Library of Congress (ed) Regulation of Artificial Intelligence in Selected Jurisdictions (January 2019) 1 <https://www.loc.gov/law/help/artificial-intelligence/regulation-artificial-intelligence.pdf> accessed 24 June 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Gesley J, Comparative Summary, Law Library of Congress (ed), Regulation of Artificial Intelligence in Selected Jurisdictions (January 2019) 1 <https://www.loc.gov/law/help/artificial-intelligence/regulation-artificial-intelligence.pdf> accessed 24 June 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Ghosal A and Halder S, ‘Chapter 5. Building Intelligent Systems for Smart Cities: Issues, Challenges and Approaches’ in Z Mahmood (ed.), Smart Cities, Development and Governance Frameworks (Springer 2018); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Gibney A (dir.), Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room. Nova Iorque: Magnolia Pictures, 2015. Documentary. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Giezek J, ‘Teorie związku przyczynowego oraz koncepcje obiektywnego przypisania’ in R Dębski (ed.), System prawa karnego, tom 3: Nauka o przestępstwie. Zasady odpowiedzialności (C. H. Beck 2017); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Glavanits J and Bálint P (eds), Law 4 . 0 – Challenges of the Digital Age (Széchenyi István University 2019); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Gless S, Silverman E and Weigend T, ‘If Robots Cause Harm, Who is to Blame? Self-Driving Cars and Criminal Liability’ (2016) 19 New Criminal Law Review 412; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Global Pact, Sdg Action Manager (2020) <https://www.pactoglobal.org.br/pg/sdg-action-manager> accessed 14 December 2020; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Global Pandemic Network Ecological Rights Working Group, Position Paper: Environmental Protection and Human Rights in the Pandemic (2021); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Gonçalves A and Costa JJA, “Governança Ambiental Global: possibilidades e limites” in Granziera MLM and Rei FCF (eds), Direito Ambiental Internacional: Avanços e retrocessos (Atlas, 2015); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Gonçalves A, “Governança Global e o Direito Internacional Público” in JUBILUT LL (ed), Direito Internacional Atual (Elsevier, 2014); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
González R, “Sobre la competencia” in Guadalupe Tafoya (ed), Elementos para el estudio del Juicio de Amparo (Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación 2017); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Goodenough O R, ‘Legal Technology 3.0’ (HuffPost, 6 April 2015) <https://www.huffpost.com/entry/legal-technology-30_b_6603658> accessed 29 May 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Goodman C, AI/Esq: Impacts of Artificial Intelligence in Lawyer-Client Relationships, (2019) 72 Okla. L. Rev. 149; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Grześkowiak A, ‘Komentarz do art. 2 k.k.’ in A Grześkowiak, and K Wiak (eds.), Kodeks karny. Komentarz (6th edn, CH Beck 2018); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Guo Bing v. Hangzhou Wildlife Park Co., Ltd, Zhe0111MinChu No.6971(2019); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Gyuranecz FZ, Krausz B and Papp D, The AI Is Now in Session. The Impact of Digitalization on Courts (European Judicial Training Network 2019); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Hacker P, Krestel R, Grundmann S et al. Explainable AI under contract and tort law: legal incentives and technical challenges, Artificial Intelligence Law 28, 415–439 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-020-09260-6; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Hallevy G, ‘The Criminal Liability of Artificial Intelligence Entities - from Science Fiction to Legal Social Control’ (2016) 4 Akron Intellectual Property Journal 171; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Hallevy G, Liability for Crimes Involving Artificial Intelligence Systems (Springer 2015); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Hao K, ‘When algorithms mess up, the nearest human gets the blame’ (MIT Technology Review, 28 May 2019) <https://www.technologyreview.com/2019/05/28/65748/ai-algorithms-liability-human-blame> accessed on 26 April 2020; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Harašta J, ‘Obecná Prevenční Povinnost Poskytovatele Služeb Informační Společnosti ve Vztahu k Informacím Ukládaným Uživatelem’ (2014) Právní rozhledy 590 <www.beck-online.cz> accessed 10 June 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Harrington A R, International Law and Global Governance: Treaty Regimes and Sustainable Development Goals Implementation (Routledge 2021); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, (1996) <https://www.congress.gov/104/plaws/publ191/PLAW-104publ191.pdf> accessed 7 July 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Held D and McGrew A, Prós e Contras da Globalização (Zahar, 2001); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Hert P, Gutwirth S, ‘Privacy, data protection and law enforcement: Opacity of the individual and transparency of power’ in Claes E, Duff A, Gutwirth S (eds) Privacy and the Criminal Law (Intersentia, 2006); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
High Court in Prague, 2 March 2011, file no. 3 Cmo 197/2010–82; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
High Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence, ‘The Assessment List on Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence’ <https://futurium.ec.europa.eu/en/european-ai-alliance/pages/altai-assessment-list-trustworthy-artificial-intelligence> accessed 27 April 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence, ‘Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence’ (2019); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Hosseini SB, Mahesh R, The lesson from Enron Case – Moral and Managerial Responsilities. In: International Journal of Current Research, vol. 8, Issue 8, pp. 37451-37460, August, 2016. ISSN 0975-833X. <http://www.openvotingconsortium.org/files/voting_good_bad_stupid.pdf> access by day 30.06. 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Husovec M, ‘Zodpovednosť na Internete: podľa českého a slovenského práva’ (CZ.NIC 2014); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Husovec M, ‘Zodpovednosť poskytovateľa za obsah diskusných príspevkov’ (2011) 2 Revue pro právo a technologie 40, 41 <https://journals.muni.cz/revue/article/view/4015> accessed 10 June 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Husovec M, Injunctions against Intermediaries in the European Union: Accountable but Not Liable? (Cambridge University Press 2017); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Hutson M, Artificial Intelligence Prevails at Predicting Supreme Court Decisions, Science, 2 May 2017, <https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/05/artificial-intelligence-prevails-predicting-supreme-court-decisions> accessed 10 June 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Iaione C, The Right to the Co-City, 9 Italian J. Pub. L. 80; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
ICO, Guidance on AI and data protection; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Inagaki T, ‘Design of human-machine interactions in light of domain dependence of human centered automation’ (2006) 8 Cognition, Technology & Work 161; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
IPC, ‘Privacy by Design. The 7 Foundational Principles’ <https://www.ipc.on.ca/wp-content/uploads/Resources/7foundationalprinciples.pdf> accessed 23 March 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Istoé, A constituição cidadã (2011) <https://istoe.com.br/161883_A+CONSTITUICAO+CIDADA/> accessed 09 December 2020; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Jabłonowska A, Kuziemski M, Nowak A M, Micklitz H, Pałka P, Sartor G, ‘Consumer law and artificial intelligence. Challenges to the EU consumer law and policy stemming from the business’ use of artificial intelligence’ (EUI Working Papers, Florence 2018); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Jackson T, ‘This Bug in Your PC is a Smart Cookie’ (Financial Times, 02 December 1996); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Jimenez JA, ‘Smart Transportation Systems’ in S McCleallan, JA Jimenez and G Koutitas (eds.), Smart Cities, Applications, Technologies, Standards, and Driving Factors (Springer 2018); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Jiménez JML, ‘Sistemas Judiciales Justos Y… Eficientes’ (2013) 2013 eXtoikos 31; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Jobin A, Ienca M, ‘Artificial Intelligence: the global landscape of ethics guidelines’ (2019) AL/Digital ethics project <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334082218_Artificial_Intelligence_the_global_landscape_of_ethics_guidelines> accessed 22 June 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Johnston C, Artificial intelligence judge developed by UCL computer scientists, The Guardian (29 October 2016)<https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/oct/24/artificial-intelligence-judge-university-college-london-computer-scientists> accessed 25 June 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Jones K, Jones M, Strategies supporting the development and deployment of high-quality legal software (221), Legal evolution blog, January 31, 2021 https://www.legalevolution.org/2021/01/tactics-supporting-the-development-and-deployment-of-high-quality-legal-software-221; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Junior PCN, Judiciário 5.0. Inovação, Governança, Usucentrismo, Sustentabilidade e Segurança Jurídica (Edgard Blücher 2020); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Kaminski M, Binary Governance: Lessons from the GDPR’s approach to Algorithmic Accountability, (2019) 92 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1529; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Kasperska A, ‘Problemy zastosowania sztucznych sieci neuronalnych w praktyce prawniczej’ (2017) 11 Przegląd Prawa Publicznego 25; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Katz DM, Bommarito II MJ and Blackman J, ‘A General Approach for Predicting the Behavior of the Supreme Court of the United States’ (2017) 12 Plos One; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Kerikmäe T and Pärn-Lee E, ‘Legal Dilemmas of Estonian Artificial Intelligence Strategy: In between of e-Society and Global Race’ AI & Society 2020; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
King T, ‘The Future of Legal Education from the Profession’s Viewpoint: A Brave New World?’ in H Sommerlad et al. (eds), The Futures of Legal Education and the Legal Profession (Hart 2015); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Kirit N, Sarkar P, EscrowChain: Leveraging Ethereum Blockchain as Escrow in Real Estate, International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer and Communication Engineering, Vol. 5, Issue 10, October 2017, DOI: 10.15680/IJIRCCE.2017.0510022; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Kliś M, ‘Źródła obowiązku gwaranta w polskim prawie karnym’ (1999) 2 Czasopismo Prawa Karnego i Nauk Penalnych 169 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Kluttz D, Mulligan D, ‘Automated Decision Support Technologies and the Legal Profession’ (2019) 34 Berkeley Technology Law Journal; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Kontargirys X., IT laws in the era of cloud computing, (Nomos, 2018); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Korbel F, Cholasta R and Molitorisová A, ‘Safe Harbour: Vyloučení Odpovědnosti Poskytovatelů Hostingových Služeb Za Obsah Vložený Uživateli Internetu’ [2016] Soudce 9; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Korenik A, Smart cities, Inteligentne miasta w Europie i Azji, (CeDeWu 2019) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Koulu R and Kontiainen L (eds), How Will AI Shape the Future of Law? (University of Helsinki Legal Tech Lab publications 2019); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Koutitas G, ‘The Smart Grid: Anchor of the Smart City’ in S McCleallan, JA Jimenez and G Koutitas (eds.), Smart Cities, Applications, Technologies, Standards, and Driving Factors (Springer 2018) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Kowalski Ł, ‘Inteligentne miasta - przegląd rozwiązań’ in M Soja and A Zborowski (eds.), Miasto w badaniach geografów (Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego 2015) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Kristol D, Montulli L, ‘HTTP State Management Mechanism’ (1997) IETF RFC 2109 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2109> accessed 7 July 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Krzysztofek M, ‘Commentary to Article 10’ in Ochrona danych osobowych w Unii Europejskiej po reformie. Komentarz do rozporządzenia Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady (UE) 2016/679 (Legalis 2016); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Kulesza J, Problemy teorii kryminalizacji. Studium z zakresu prawa karnego i konstytucyjnego (Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego 2017) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Kurowska I, Szpyt K, ‘Legal Tech w kancelariach prawnych oraz pracy prawników in-house’ in Dariusz Szostek (ed), Legal Tech. Czyli jak bezpiecznie korzystać z narzędzi informatycznych w organizacji, w tym w kancelarii oraz dziale prawnym (C.H. Beck 2021); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Kurzweill R, The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology (Viking Press 2005); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Lawlor RC, What computers can do: analysis and prediction of judicial decisions, (1963) 49 American Bar Association Journal 337; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Lee JD and Seppelt BD, ‘Human factors and ergonomics in automation design’ in G Salvendy (ed.), Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics (John Wiley & Sons 2012) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Lee T B, ‘Information Management: A Proposal’ (w3.org,1989-1990) <https://www.w3.org/History/1989/proposal.html> accessed 7 July 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Lei nº 12846 of 2013 (online at <http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2011-2014/2013/lei/l12846.htm> accessed 10 Dec 2020); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Lei nº 130140 of 2015 (online at <http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13140.htm> accessed 10 Dec 2020); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Leistner M, ‘Structural Aspects of Secondary (Provider) Liability in Europe’ (2014) 9 Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 75; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Leite JRM, “Sociedade de risco e estado” in Canotilho JJG and Leite JRM (eds), Direito constitucional ambiental brasileiro (Saraiva, 2015); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Leith P, Hoey A, The Computerised Lawyer (Springer 1998); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Lele A, ‘Debating Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems’ (2019) 13 Journal of Defense Studies 51 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Ling L, Shancang L, Shanshan Z, ’QoS-aware scheduling of service-oriented Internet of things’ (2014) IEEE Trans on Industial Informatics; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Lubasz D (ed) Meritum Ochrona danych osobowych (Wolters Kluwer 2020); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Lubasz D, Witkowska K, ‘Europejska reforma ochrony danych osobowych z perspektywy pełnomocnika przedsiębiorcy’ in Flaga-Gieruszyńska K, Gołaczyński J, Szostek D (eds) Media elektroniczne. Współczesne problemy prawne (C. H. Beck 2016); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Lubasz D, Witkowska K, ‘RODO. Ogólne rozporządzenie o ochronie danych. Komentarz’ (LEX/el., comments on Art. 25 No 5); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Maddox T, ‘Smart cities: 6 essential technologies’ (TechRepublic, 1 August 2016) <https://www.techrepublic.com/article/smart-cities-6-essential-technologies> accessed 14 April 2020 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Maisner M, ‘Snaha o Zakázané Těžení Ze Zdánlivé Absence Výslovné Legislativní Úpravy a Nebezpečná Situace pro Poskytovatele Služeb Informační Společnosti’ (Bulletin advokacie, 24 September 2015) <http://www.bulletin-advokacie.cz/snaha-o-zakazane-tezeni-ze-zdanlive-absence-vyslovne-legislativni-upravy> accessed 10 June 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Maisner M, Zákon o Některých Službách Informační Společnosti: Komentář (C H Beck 2016); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Marra WC and McNeil SK, ‘Understanding “The Loop”: Regulating the Next Generation of War Machines’ (2012) 36 Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 1139 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Marrow PB, Karol M and Kuyan S, ‘Artificial Intelligence and Arbitration: The Computer as an Arbitrator — Are We There Yet ?’ (2020) 74 Dispute Resolution Journal 35; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Matejka J, Krausová A, ‘Odpovědnost poskytovatelů hostingových služeb se zřetelem k povaze a druhu přenášeného obsahu’ (2017) 156 Právník; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
McAfee A and Brynjolfsson E, Human Work in the Robotic Future: Policy for the Age of Automation, Foreign Affairs Vol. 95, No. 4 (JULY/AUGUST 2016), pp. 139-150, https://www.jstor.org/stable/43946940; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
McGinnis JO, Pearce RG, The Great Disruption: How Machine Intelligence Will Transform the Role of Lawyers in the Delivery of Legal Services (2013) 82 Fordham L. Rev. 3041; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Mckamey M, ‘Legal Technology: Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Law Practice’ (2017) 22 Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform 45; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Mclean B, Is Enron Overpriced? It's in a bunch of complex businesses. Its financial statements are nearly impenetrable. So why is Enron trading at such a huge multiple? In: Fortune Magazine, Nova Iorque, 5 mar. 2001. Available in: https://archive.fortune.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2001/03/05/297833/index.htm. Acessed: 12 nov. 2019. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Mednis A, ‘Cechy zgody na przetwarzanie danych osobowych w opinii Grupy Roboczej Art. 29 dyrektywy 95/46 Nr 15/2011 (WP 187)’ (2012) 7 MoP 26; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Medvedeva M, Vols M and Wieling M, ‘Using Machine Learning to Predict Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights’ (2020) 28 Artificial Intelligence and Law 237; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Melzer F in: Filip M and Petr T, Občanský Zákoník: Velký Komentář. Svazek IX: § 2894-3081 (Leges 2018); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
México Evalúa, Guía de Buenas Prácticas en el uso de nuevas tecnologías para la impartición de justicia (1st edn Tinker Foundation 2020); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Milaré E, Direito do Ambiente (Editora Revista dos Tribunais, 2013); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Monreale A, Rinzivillo S, Pratesi F, Giannotti F, Pedreschi D, Privacy-by-design in big data analytics and social mining. (EPJ Data Science, 2014); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Mulligan D K, King J, ‘Bridging the gap between privacy and design’ (2012) 14 U. Pa. J. Const. L.; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Municipal Court in Prague, 12. 1. 2015, file no. 66 C 143/2013; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Municipal Court in Prague, 17 March 2010, file no. 10 Cm 47/2009; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
N Helberger, B Zuiderveen, F and R Agustin, ‘The Perfect Match? A Closer Look at the Relationship between EU Consumer Law and Data Protection Law’ Common Market Law Review (October 6, 2017, vol. 54, No. 5), p. 11; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Nakamoto S, ‘Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System’ (Bitcoin.org, 2008) <https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf> accessed 7 July 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Nauman J, Commentary to § 19 in Zbiór Zasad Etyki Adwokackiej i Godności Zawodu (Legalis 2020) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Nay J, Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning for Law and Policy Texts, April 7, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3438276; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Nesterova I, ‘Mass data gathering and surveillance: the fight against facial recognition technology in the globalized world’ (SHS Web of Conferences 74, 03006, 2020); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Neumann T, ‘Perspektywy wykorzystania pojazdów autonomicznych w transporcie drogowym w Polsce’ (2018) 19 Autobusy 787 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Newman P, ‘Sustainable Cities of the Future: The Behavior Change Driver’, (2010) 11, 7 Sustainable Dev. L & Pol’y; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Nordemann J B, ‘Liability for Copyright Infringements on the Internet: Host Providers (Content Providers) - The Geman Approach’, 2 JIPITEC 37 <https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-29629> accessed 10 June 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Norwegian data protection supervisory authority, ‘Software development with Data Protection by Design and by Default’ (Guidelines) <https://www.datatilsynet.no/en/about-privacy/virksomhetenes-plikter/innebygd-personvern/data-protection-by-design-and-by-default/?print=true> accessed 13 May 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Oliviera MC, Linhares JS, A implantação de controle interno adequado às exigências da Lei Sarbanes-Oxley em empresas brasileiras – Um estudo de caso. In: BASE – Revista de Administração e Contabilidade da Unisinos, v. 4, n. 2, p. 160-170, maio/ago. 2007. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Opaliński B, Wolność wyborów parlamentarnych i jej gwarancje na gruncie Konstytucji Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej, „Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego“ 2012, no 2, p. 59 i n; http://www.marszalek.com.pl/przegladprawakonstytucyjnego/ppk10/03.pdf; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Organização das Nações Unidas, Agenda 2030 (2015) (online at <https://nacoesunidas.org/pos2015> accessed 10 Nov 2020); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Pantin L and Escamilla S, “La justicia digital en México: el saldo a un año del inicio de la Pandemia”, <https://bit.ly/3sTibJi> accessed 27 April 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Parasuraman R, Sheridan TB and Wickens ChD, ‘A Model for Types and Levels of Human Interaction with Automation’ (2000) 30 IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics - Part A Systems and Humans 286 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Payandeh M, Judikative Rechtserzeugung: Theorie, Dogmatik und Methodik der Wirkungen von Präjudizien (Mohr Siebeck 2017); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Pérez F, “Artículo 17. Párrafo segundo” in José Ramón Cossío (ed), Constitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos Comentada” (Tirant lo Blanch 2017); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Polčák R, ‘Information Society Between Orwell and Zapata: A Czech Perspective on Safe Harbours’ in Graeme B Dinwoodie (ed), Secondary Liability of Internet Service Providers (Springer International Publishing 2017); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Polčák R, ‘Odpovědnost ISP’ in Radim Polčák and others, Právo Informačních Technologií (Wolters Kluwer ČR 2018); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Possible Introduction of a Mechanism for Certifying Artificial Intelligence Tools and Services in the Sphere of Justice and the Judiciary : Feasibility Study (European Comission 2020); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Put M van der, ‘Kan artificiële intelligentie de rechtspraak betoveren’ (2019) 2 Rechtstreeks 50; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Quintas JS, Introdução à gestão ambiental pública (IBAMA, 2006); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Radwan A, ‘Edukacja prawnicza wobec wyzwań XXI wieku’ in R Czarny et al. (eds), Państwo i prawo wobec wyzwań u progu trzeciej dekady XXI wieku. Księga jubileuszowa z okazji 70. urodzin Profesora Jerzego Jaskierni (Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek 2020); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Ramos A and Márquez L, Observatorio: Avances de Justicia Abierta en línea en México 2020 (1st edn Escuela Libre de Derecho 2020); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Realing ADD, ‘Courts and Artificial Intelligence’ (2020) 11 International Journal for Court Administration 1; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Redo S, ‘Chapter II. Priorytety Agendy na rzecz Zrównoważonego rozwoju 2030’ in EW Pływaczewski, Redo S, Guzik-Makaruk EM, Laskowska K, Filipkowski W, Glińska E, Jurgielewicz-Delegacz E and Perkowska M, Kryminologia, Stan i perspektywy rozwoju, Z uwzględnieniem założeń Agendy ONZ na rzecz zrównoważonego rozwoju 2030 (Wolters Kluwer 2019) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Reeves J, BRIC Investing – ADR List for Brazil, Russia, India and China. In: Investor Place, 16 jun. 2010. Available in: https://investorplace.com/2010/06/bric-adr-list-brazil-china-india-russia-american-depositary-receipt-directory-listing/. Acessed: 12. nov. 2019. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Resolution no. 196 of the Council of Ministers of 28 December 2020 on establishing the ‘Policy for the development of artificial intelligence in Poland until 2020’ Monitor Polski 2021, item 23, Annex; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Rexha B, Neziri V, Dervishi R, Improving authentication and transparency of e-Voting system – Kosovo case, „International Journal Of Computers And Communications” 2012, Issue 1, Volume 6, s. 84; http://www.universitypress.org.uk/journals/cc/17-858.pdf [Access by day 30.06. 2021]; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Ribas FS and Costa Junior A, ‘A importância do compliance ambiental para as empresas: Interfaces entre governança corporativa e impactos socioambientais’, Revista Jurídica Luso-Brasileira (2019) <http://www.cidp.pt/revistas/rjlb/2019/3/2019_03_0581_0610.pdf> accessed 12 Nov 2020; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Rivera M, “De Directores y Orquestas: Análisis comparado de la posición institucional del Consejo de la Judicatura Federal en México”, (2020) 159 Boletín Mexicano de Derecho Comparado 1139; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Rivera M, “Understanding Constitutional Amendments in Mexico: Perpetuum Mobile Constitution” (2017) 2 Mexican Law Review 3; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Rodriguez JJF, ODS 16: paz, justicia e instituciones flertes (Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 2018) <http://www.ieee.es/Galerias/fichero/docs_investig/2018/DIEEEINV18-2018ODS.pdf> accessed 24 Nov 2020; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Roseman A, State constitutional law—equal protection—the Indiana Supreme Court’s less than rational basis review of equal protection claims resulted in the validation of the Indiana voter id law. League of Women Voters of Indiana, inc. v. Rokita, 929 n.e.2d 758 (ind. 2010), „Rutgers Law Journal” 2013, t. 43. No 3, p. 873 and n. http://lawjournal.rutgers.edu/sites/lawjournal.rutgers.edu/files/issues/16RosemanVol.43.4_v3.pdf; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Rożek S, Sprawność sądowego postępowania cywilnego na tle rozstrzygania spraw spadkowych (Krakowska Akademia 2020); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Salamon J, Polityczne konsekwencje wyboru metody dystrybucji mandatów na przykładzie elekcji do Sejmu RP z 21 października 2007 roku Studia Politicae Universitatis Silesiensis 4-5, p. 139 i n. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Santos L de AA, Lemes S, Desafios das empresas brasileiras na implantação da Lei Sarbanes-Oxley. In: BASE – Revista de Administração e Contabilidade da Unisinos, v. 4, jan./abr. 2007. p. 37-46. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Schabas WA, The European Convention on Human Rights: A Commentary (Oxford University Press 2015); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Schwab K, ‘The Fourth Industrial Revolution: What it means and how to response’ (weforum.org, 2014) <https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-what-it-means-and-how-to-respond/> accessed 7 July 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Sharkey N, ‘Saying ‘No!’ to Lethal Autonomous Targeting’ (2010) 9 Journal of Military Ethics 369; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Sheppard B, Does Machine-Learning-Powered Software Make Good Research Decisions? Lawyers Can’t Know for Sure, Legal Rebels, 22 November 2016, http://www.abajournal.com/legalrebels/article/does_machine-learning-powered_software_make_good_research_decisions_lawyers; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Sheppard B, Incomplete Innovation and the Premature Disruption of Legal Services, (2015) Mich. St. L. Rev. 1797 at 1842; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Sheridan TB and Parasuraman R, ‘Human-Automation Interaction’ (2006) 1 Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics 89; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Shi C, Sourdin T and Li B, ‘The Smart Court – A New Pathway to Justice in China?’ (2021) 12 International Journal for Court Administration 4; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Shimshaw D, ‘Ethical Issues in Robo-Lawyering: The Need for Guidance on Developing and Using Artificial Intelligence in the Practice of Law’ (2018) Hastings Law Journal; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Shneiderman B, ‘Human Responsibility for Autonomous Agents’ (2007) 22 IEEE Intelligent Systems 60; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Simmon E, ‘Evaluation on cloud computing servicesbased on NIST 800-145’ (National Institute of standards and Technology (NIST), February 2018) <https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.500-322> accessed 1 August 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Simons B, Electronic Voting Systems: the Good, the Bad, and the Stupid, p. 3-11; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Singh IB and Pelton JN, ‘The cyber city of the future’ (2013) 47 The Futurist 22; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Skitka LJ, Mosier K and Burdick MD, ‘Accountability and automation bias’ (2000) 52 International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 701; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Skotnicki K, Kilka słów o i-votingu, http://repozytorium.uni.wroc.pl/Content/89856/35_K_Skotnicki_Kilka_slow_o_i-votingu.pdf. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Sobol A, ‘INTELIGENTNE MIASTA VERSUS ZRÓWNOWAŻONE MIASTA’ (2017) 320 Studia Ekonomiczne. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach 76; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Sourdin T and Zariski A (eds), The Responsive Judge: International Perspectives (Springer); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Spamann H, Klöhn L, Justice is Less Blind, and Less Legalistic, Than We Thought: Evidence from an Experiment with Real Judges, (2017) 45 J.L.S. 255; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Staffler L, Jany O, ‘Künstliche Intelligenz und Strafrechtspflege –eine Orientierung’ (2020) 164 Zeitschrift für Internationale Strafrechtsdogmatik 170. < http://www.zis-online.com/dat/artikel/2020_4_1357.pdf> accessed 25 June 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Staicu MAM, La réforme du système judiciaire roumain dans le processus d ’ adhésion de la Roumanie à l ’ Union européenne Mémoire présenté par (2006); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Staśkiewicz W, Stawecki T, ‘Legal Databases and Their Functions in the Process of Interpreting and Applying the Law’ (2012) 1 Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Stephenson N, Snow Crash (Bantam Books (US) 1992); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Stępień-Załucka B, E-voting a Konstytucja RP [w:] Dwadzieścia lat obowiązywania Konstytucji RP. Polska myśl konstytucyjna a międzynarodowe standardy demokratyczne, red. Jaskiernia J, Spryszak K, Toruń 2017, s. 223-225; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Stępień-Załucka B, E-voting. Sukces czy porażka na przykładzie Estonii i Szwajcarii, [w:] Aktualne wyzwania demokracji partycypacyjnej w Polsce i na świecie, red. Kuczma P, Polkowice 2017, s. 244; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Study on the Use of Innovative Technologies in the Justice Field. Final Report (European Commission 2020); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Supreme Court of the Czech Republic, 31 July 2013, file no. 23 Cdo 2623/2011; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Susskind R, Online Courts and the Future of Justice (Oxford University Press 2019); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Susskind R, Susskind D, The Future of the Professions. How Technology Will Transform the Work of Human Experts (Oxford University Press 2015); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Susskind R, Tomorrow’s Lawyers. An Introduction to Your Future (Oxford University Press 2017); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Szostek D (ed), LegalTech. Czyli jak bezpiecznie korzystać z narzędzi informatycznych w organizacji, w tym w kancelarii oraz dziale prawnym (C H Beck 2021); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Szostek D, Przechowywanie danych kancelarii w chmurze in D Szostek (ed), Bezpieczeństwo danych i IT w kancelarii prawnej. Czyli jak bezpiecznie przechowywać dane w kancelarii prawnej (C.H. Beck 2018); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Telec I, ‘Zakázané těžení a nebezpečná situace na elektronických úložištích dat’ 1–2 (2015) Bulletin advokacie; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Telec I, Tůma P, Autorský Zákon: Komentář (2nd edition, C H Beck 2019); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Thomas Hoeren and Silviya Yankova, ‘The Liability of Internet Intermediaries – The German Perspective’ (2012) International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Timana T, Manna Z (ed), Data Protection in The Era of Artificial Intelligence. Trends, existing solutions and recommendations for privacy-preserving technologies (GDVA, 2019); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Toka G, The impact of partial results on election, http://www.personal.ceu.hu/staff/Gabor_Toka/Papers/Toka04Chicago.pdf [Access by day 30.06. 2021]; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Tokarczyk D, ‘Obowiązek gwaranta w prawie karnym’ (2014) 76 Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny 203; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Transparencia Mexicana, “¿Cómo será la justicia digital en la Nueva Era: Episodio 2” <https://bit.ly/3sl4UsG> accessed 10 April 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Triberti C and Carrella G, Internet ,aspetti tecnici, tematiche sociali, incidenze giuridiche civili e penali, (Edizioni Maros Milano (ITA), 2000; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
UNESCO, AI and the Rule of Law: Capacity Building for Judicial Systems <https://en.unesco.org/artificial-intelligence/mooc-judges> accessed 31 May 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
UNESCO, AI and the Rule of Law: Capacity Building for Judicial Systems <https://en.unesco.org/artificial-intelligence/mooc-judges> accessed 31 May 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
United Nations Conference on Trade Development, “UNCTAD Estimates of Global e-commerce 2018” (2020) <https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/tn_unctad_ict4d15_en.pdf> accessed 7 July 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
United Nations General Assembly, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, A/RES/70/1 (25 September 2015); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Urszczak W, Historia Państwa i Prawa Polskiego. Tom I (966-1795) (Wolters Kluwer 2013); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Valadés D, La Constitución reformada, (1st edn IIJ-UNAM 1987); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
van Hooijdonk R, ‘Top 10 smart cities that use tech to transform urban life’ (Richard van Hooijdonk blog, 9 December 2019) <https://www.richardvanhooijdonk.com/blog/en/top-10-smart-cities-that-use-tech-to-transform-urban-life> accessed 14 April 2020; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Verizon, ‘2021 Data Breach Investigation’ (Verizon.com, 2021) <https://www.verizon.com/business/resources/reports/dbir/> accessed 7 July 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Wachter S, Mittelstandt B, ‘A Right to Reasonable Interferences: R-thinking Data Protection Law in the Age of Big Data and Ai’ (2019) Columbia Business Law Review; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Wagner B, ‘Liable, but Not in Control? Ensuring Meaningful Human Agency in Automated Decision-Making Systems’ (2019) 11 Policy & Internet 104; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Wagner J, Legal Tech und Legal Robots (Springer Gabler 2nd edn 2020); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Wahedi F, Verfassungsrechtliche Anforderungen an die Automatisierung der Justiz (Dr. Kovač 2021); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Walters E, ‘The Model Rules of Autonomous Conduct: Ethical Responsibilities of Lawyers and Artificial Intelligence’ (2019) 35.4 Georgia State University Law Review; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Watcher S, Mittelstadt B, Russel C, Counterfactual explanations without opening the black box: automated decisions and the GDPR, 2018 Harvard Journal of Law and Technology Vol 31.No2, https://jolt.law.harvard.edu/assets/articlePDFs/v31/Counterfactual-Explanations-without-Opening-the-Black-Box-Sandra-Wachter-et-al.pdf; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Wiewiórowski W R, ‘Privacy by design jako paradygmat ochrony prywatności’ in Szpor G, i Wiewiórowski W R (eds) Internet. Prawno-informatyczne problemy sieci, portali i e-usług (C. H. Beck 2012); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Wissenschaftliche Dienste Deutscher Bundestag „Künstliche Intelligenz in der Justiz - Internationaler Überblick“ WD 7 -3000 -017/2<https://www.bundestag.de/resource/blob/832204/6813d064fab52e9b6d54cbbf5319cea3/WD-7-017-21-pdf-data.pdf> accessed 29 May 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Wissenschaftliche Dienste Deutscher Bundestag „Künstliche Intelligenz in der Justiz - Internationaler Überblick“ WD 7 -3000 -017/21,7 <https://www.bundestag.de/resource/blob/832204/6813d064fab52e9b6d54cbbf5319cea3/WD-7-017-21-pdf-data.pdf> accessed 29 May 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
World Commission on Environment and Development, ‘Our Common Future. From one earth to one world’ (Report, Annex A/RES/42/187, 11 December 1987); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Wortham L, ‘The Future of the Legal Profession and Legal Services Delivery’ in Wortham L et al. (eds), Learning from Practice. A Text for Experiential Legal Education (West Academic Publishing 2016); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
WP29, ‘Opinion 15/2011 on the definition of consent’ (13 July 2011, WP 187), <http://www.giodo.gov.pl/pl/file/5341> accessed 13 May 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Wu Feng S, The myth of the impartial machine, Parametric Press, 1 May 2019, <https://parametric.press/issue-01/the-myth-of-the-impartial-machine>; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Wu J, ‘AI Goes to Court: The Growing Landscape of AI for Access to Justice’ (Medium, 2019) <https://medium.com/legal-design-and-innovation/ai-goes-to-court-the-growing-landscape-of-ai-for-access-to-justice-3f58aca4306f> accessed 29 May 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Wu J, AI Goes to Court: The Growing Landscape of AI for Access to Justice (2019) <https://medium.com/legal-design-and-innovation/ai-goes-to-court-the-growing-landscape-of-ai-for-access-to-justice-3f58aca4306f> accessed 29 May 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Yanisky-Ravid S, Hallisey S K, ‘Equality and Privacy by Design: Ensuring Artificial Intelligence (AI) is Properly Trained & Fed: A New Model of AI Data Transparency & Certification as Safe Harbor Procedures’ <https://ssrn.com/abstract=3278490> accessed 13 May 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Yong Y, Dumas-Menijvar M, Garcia-Banuelos L, Polyvyanyy A and Zhang L, ‘Generalized aggregate Quality of Service computation for composite services’ (2012) 85, 8 Journal of Systems and Software; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Zacharzewski K and Kłoda MT, Przegląd zastosowania technologii blockchain w wymiarze sprawiedliwości w wybranych państwach (Instytut Wymiaru Sprawiedliwości 2019); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Zaldívar A, Hacia una Nueva Ley de Amparo (1st ed IIJ-UNAM 2002); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Zalewski T, ‘Definicja sztucznej inteligencji’ in L Lai and M Świerczyński (eds.), Prawo sztucznej inteligencji (CH Beck 2020); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Zalewski T, Podstawowe zasady skutecznego wykorzystania narzędzi Legal Tech in Szostek D (ed), Legal Tech. Czyli jak bezpiecznie korzystać z narzędzi informatycznych w organizacji, w tym w kancelarii oraz dziale prawnym (C.H. Beck 2021); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Zalnieriute M, Moses B, Williams G, The Rule of Law and Automation of Government Decision-Making, (2019) 82 M.L.R. 425; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Załucki M, AI and dispute resolution (Javier García González, Álvaro Alzina Lozano and Gabriel Martín Rodríguez eds, Dykinson 2020); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Završnik A, ‘Criminal justice, artificial intelligence systems and human rights’ (Springer 2020) <https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12027-020-00602-0> accessed 31 May 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Završnik A, Criminal justice, artificial intelligence systems and human rights, <https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12027-020-00602-0> accesssed 31 May 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Zawłocki R, ‘Pojęcie przestępstwa’ in R Dębski (ed.), System prawa karnego, tom 3: Nauka o przestępstwie. Zasady odpowiedzialności (CH Beck 2017); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Zeleznikow J, Stranieri A, ‘Split Up: An Intelligent Decision Support System Which Provides Advice Upon Property Division Following Divorce’(1998) 6, 2 International Journal of Law and Information Technology; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Zeleznikow J, Stranieri A, Split Up: An Intelligent Decision Support System Which Provides Advice Upon Property Division Following Divorce (1998), International Journal of Law and Information Technology, Vol 6. No. 2, 190–213; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Zhang Ch and others, ‘Human-centered automation for resilient nuclear power plant outage control’ (2017) 82 Automation in Construction 179; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Zhong H and others, ‘Legal Judgment Prediction via Topological Learning’ (2018) 1 Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Zoll A, ‘Komentarz do art. 1 k.k.’ in W Wróbel and A Zoll (eds.), Kodeks karny. Część ogólna. Tom I. Komentarz do art. 1-52 (Wolters Kluwer 2016); Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Zoll A, ‘Komentarz do art. 2 k.k.’ in W Wróbel and A Zoll (eds.), Kodeks karny. Część ogólna. Tom I. Komentarz do art. 1-52 (Wolters Kluwer 2016); 31 May 2021; Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979
Zoll F, ‘Przyszłość kształcenia prawników w Polsce’ (2010) 6 Państwo i Prawo 25. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748926979

Similar publications

from the keywords "Digitalisierung"

Edited Book Full access

Dariusz Szostek, Mariusz Załucki

Legal Tech

Internet and New Technologies Law