Cover of book: The Struggle in Online Copyright Enforcement
Buy in shop
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Book Titles No access

The Struggle in Online Copyright Enforcement

Problems and Prospects
Authors:
Publisher:
 2015

Bibliographic data

Edition
1/2015
Copyright year
2015
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-2428-4
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-6587-2
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Luxemburger Juristische Studien - Luxembourg Legal Studies
Volume
8
Language
German
Pages
800
Product type
Book Titles

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access 1 - 20
    1. A. Defining Copyright No access
    2. B. Defining Copyright Enforcement No access
      1. I. Ordinary Users Easily Become Infringers No access
      2. II. Changed Concept of Ownership No access
      3. III. Do Consumers Understand the System and Vice Versa? No access
    4. D. The Research Topic: Copyright Enforcement on the Internet No access
      1. I. Unilateral or Multilateral Enforcement: Strengthening Enforcement within and outside of National Borders No access
      2. II. Multilateral: Proposal for New Trade Agreement ACTA No access
      3. III. United States: SOPA and PIPA – Initiatives to Strengthen Enforcement Globally No access
      4. IV. EU: IPRED2 No access
      5. V. Copyright Enforcement in the EU: No Uniform Approach in Member States No access
    6. F. Limits of the Research No access
    7. G. Terminology No access
    8. H. Sources No access
    9. I. Outline of the Research No access
        1. 1. A Short History of Copyright and Copyright Enforcement in the Offline World No access
          1. a) Technological Progress No access
          2. b) Failure of Technological Protection Measures No access
          3. c) Lack of Understanding Intellectual Property Rights No access
          4. d) User-Generated Content and a Participatory Internet No access
          5. e) Necessity to Reform Copyright Law? No access
          1. a) Difficulties in Determining the Scope of Online Copyright Infringements No access
          2. b) The Impact of Illegal Downloads on Sales Figures No access
        1. 1. Peer-to-Peer File-sharing No access
        2. 2. File Hosting Services No access
        3. 3. USENET No access
        4. 4. Streaming No access
        5. 5. File-Sharing as of Today No access
        1. 1. Early Responses to File-Sharing: Legal Action against the Innovators No access
            1. aa) The US Digital Millennium Copyright Act No access
            2. bb) The E-Commerce Directive 2000/31/EC No access
            3. cc) The US and EU Regimes: Similarities and Deficits No access
          2. b) The Necessity to Go Beyond Notice and Take down No access
          1. a) The Evolution of the Internet in a Nutshell No access
          2. b) IP Address Allocation No access
          3. c) Domain Name System No access
          1. a) “On the Internet, Nobody Knows You’re a Dog” No access
          2. b) Dynamic IP Addresses No access
          3. c) Anonymous Web Browsing No access
        3. 3. The Difficulties to Delete or Block Access No access
        4. 4. The Role of Technology in the Assessment of Interferences with Fundamental Rights No access
            1. aa) The Universal Declaration of Human Rights No access
            2. bb) The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights No access
            1. aa) The European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms No access
            2. bb) Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union No access
            3. cc) The Relationship between the Convention and the Charter No access
            1. aa) Freedom of Expression in General No access
            2. bb) The Right to Receive and Seek Information No access
            3. cc) The Right to Impart Information No access
            4. dd) The Right to Internet Access No access
            5. ee) Justification of Interference No access
            1. aa) Privacy Rights in General No access
            2. bb) Right to Respect for Family and Private Life No access
            3. cc) Right to the Confidentiality of Communications No access
            4. dd) Right to Protection of Personal Data No access
            5. ee) Justification of Interference No access
            1. aa) Right to a Fair Trial No access
            2. bb) Presumption of Innocence and Right of Defence No access
            3. cc) Principles of Legality and Proportionality of Criminal Offences and Penalties No access
            4. dd) Ne Bis in Idem Rule No access
          1. a) Freedom to Conduct Business No access
          2. b) Freedom of Expression No access
          1. a) Right to Intellectual Property No access
          2. b) Right to an Effective Remedy No access
        5. 5. In Brief: The Balancing of Fundamental Rights No access
      1. I. The Idea of Enforcement in Peer-to-Peer File-Sharing Networks No access
        1. 1. Peer-to-Peer File-Sharing Networks in General No access
        2. 2. The Third Generation of Peer-to-Peer File Sharing Networks No access
        3. 3. Peer-to-Peer File-Sharing in Numbers No access
          1. a) Uploading Regularly Goes Along with Downloading No access
          2. b) Parts of a Protected Work Enjoy Protection No access
          3. c) Non-Applicability of the Private Copying Exception No access
        5. 5. Explaining the Demand for Enforcement Schemes Focussing on Peer-to-Peer Networks No access
        1. 1. In General: Collecting Digital Evidence No access
        2. 2. The Necessary Evidence No access
          1. a) The Copyright Infringement No access
          2. b) The IP Address No access
          1. a) How Data Is Harvested No access
            1. aa) Manipulation of File-Sharing Clients No access
            2. bb) Mistimed and Mismatched Logs No access
            3. cc) Misreporting by Trackers No access
            4. dd) Problems Belonging to the Sphere of the Subscriber: Unsecured Computers and Wi-Fi Connections No access
            1. aa) Anonymous Peer-to-Peer Networks No access
            2. bb) Friends-to-Friends Networks No access
            3. cc) VPN Clients, Proxies and TOR No access
          4. d) The Burden of Proof No access
      4. IV. Resume No access
          1. a) IPR Enforcement Directive 2004/48/EC No access
          2. b) Information Society Directive 2001/29/EC No access
          3. c) EU Telecoms Reform Package No access
          4. d) Rome II Regulation No access
          1. a) Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC No access
          2. b) E-Privacy Directive 2002/58/EC No access
            1. aa) The Scope of Application of the Data Retention Directive No access
            2. bb) The Declaration of the Invalidity of the Data Retention Directive: Joined cases C-293/12 and C-594/12 Digital Rights Ireland and Seitlinger and Others No access
        3. 3. Liability Exemption for Access Providers under the E-Commerce Directive 2000/31 No access
          1. a) Disclosure of Traffic Data: C-275/06 Promusicae No access
          2. b) Disclosure of Traffic Data to Third Parties: C-557/07 LSG-Gesellschaft zur Wahrnehmung von Leistungsschutzrechten No access
          3. c) Legitimacy of National Disclosure Legislation : C-461/10 Bonnier Audio v Perfect Communication Sweden No access
          4. d) Prohibition of General Monitoring Duty: C-70/10 Scarlet Extended v SABAM No access
          5. e) Practical Impact of the Decisions No access
            1. aa) The Origin of Copyright in France No access
            2. bb) The Private Copying Exception No access
            3. cc) Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights upon Initiative of the Rights-Holder No access
            1. aa) Loi Relative au Droit d’Auteur et aux Droits Voisins dans la Société de l’Information – Loi DADVSI No access
            2. bb) Loi Favorisant la Diffusion et la Protection de la Création sur Internet – Loi HADOPI I No access
            3. cc) Loi Relative à la Protection Pénale de la Propriété Littéraire et Artistique sur Internet – Loi HADOPI II No access
            4. dd) Summary No access
            1. aa) The Missions and Powers of HADOPI No access
              1. (1) Gathering of Information of Infringements No access
              2. (2) The Warning Procedure No access
              3. (3) Consequences: Referral to the Prosecutor’s Office and Criminal Proceedings No access
            1. aa) The Graduated Response Scheme in Numbers No access
            2. bb) The Unsatisfying Results of HADOPI No access
          5. e) A Sustainable Model Regime? The Order of 8 July 2013 and the Lescure Rapport No access
            1. aa) The Origins of Copyright in the UK No access
            2. bb) The Fair Dealing Exception No access
            3. cc) Enforcement of IP Rights upon Initiative of the Rights-Holder No access
            1. aa) Digital Britain Report No access
            2. bb) Digital Economy Act No access
              1. (1) Online Infringement of Copyright Initial Obligations Code No access
              2. (2) Online Infringement of Copyright (Initial Obligations) (Sharing of Costs) Order No access
              3. (3) Technical Obligations Code No access
            4. dd) Summary No access
            1. aa) The Role of the Ofcom No access
              1. (1) Gathering of Information of Infringements No access
              2. (2) The Warnings: Applicant, Content and Proceedings No access
              3. (3) Consequences No access
          4. d) The Status Quo No access
          5. e) The DEA’s Future in Limbo No access
              1. (1) Determination of a Copyright Infringement No access
              2. (2) Fact that IP Address Identification Does Not Necessarily Identify the Actual Infringer No access
              1. (1) Concerns in Relation to Reliability of Data No access
              2. (2) Responses to Evasion of Detection No access
            3. cc) Enforcement of Internet Suspension or Restriction No access
            4. dd) No Prescribed Standard for Securing Internet Access No access
            1. aa) Compliance of Graduated Response Schemes with Secondary EU Law in General No access
              1. (1) Questions of Applicability of Data Protection Law: IP Address as Personal Data No access
              2. (2) Processing of Data No access
              3. (3) Disclosure of Personal Data No access
              4. (4) Processing of Sensitive Data No access
            3. cc) Compliance of Internet Suspension or Restriction Orders with Secondary EU Law No access
            4. dd) Compliance of Cost-Sharing with Secondary EU Law No access
              1. (1) Interference No access
              2. (2) Justification of Interference No access
              1. (1) Interference with the Right to Respect for Family and Private Life No access
              2. (2) Interference with the Right to the Confidentiality of Communications No access
              3. (3) Interference with the Right to the Protection of Personal Data No access
              4. (4) Justification No access
              5. (5) In Specific: Data Retention Requirements for Access Providers No access
              1. (1) Right to a Fair Trial No access
              2. (2) Presumption of Innocence No access
              3. (3) Principles of Legality and Proportionality of Criminal Offences and Penalties No access
            1. aa) Freedom to Conduct Business of Traditional Access Providers No access
            2. bb) Freedom to Conduct Business of Providers of Free Wi-Fi Services No access
            3. cc) Freedom to Conduct Business of Commercial Wi-Fi Operators No access
            4. dd) The UK Graduated Response Scheme Violates the Rights of Access Providers No access
          5. e) Achieving a Fair Balance of the Contravening Interests No access
              1. (1) Direct, Contributory and Vicarious Liability No access
              2. (2) Störerhaftung: Liability as a Disturber No access
              3. (3) Application of the Liability Concepts to the Subscriber of an IP Address No access
              1. (1) Damages No access
              2. (2) Cease and Desist No access
            3. cc) Information Rights No access
            4. dd) The Abmahnung No access
            1. aa) Gathering of Information on Infringements No access
            2. bb) Disclosure Orders No access
            3. cc) Pre-Litigation Correspondence: Request to Cease and Desist and Claim for Damages No access
            1. aa) Information Requests Are not Thoroughly Assessed No access
            2. bb) A Narrow Interpretation of “Non-Complex” Cases No access
            3. cc) Optimisation of Pre-Litigation Correspondence No access
            4. dd) False Allegations – The Redtube.com Case No access
          4. d) Steps Taken to Prevent that “Piracy Turns into Profit” No access
            1. aa) The Service of Disclosure Orders in the UK – Right to Information and Norwich Pharmacal orders No access
            2. bb) Remedies for Copyright Infringement in the UK No access
            1. aa) Introducing the Antipiracy Industry in the UK No access
            2. bb) The History of Speculative Invoicing in the UK No access
              1. (1) Golden Eye v Telefonica UK: Facts of the Case No access
              2. (2) The Conditions for Granting Norwich Pharmacal Relief in Relation to Peer-to-Peer File-Sharing Cases and Speculative Invoicing No access
              3. (3) Establishment of Genuine Intent to Seek Redress for Arguable Wrongs No access
              4. (4) Disclosure Order Must be Necessary to Pursue Redress No access
              5. (5) Proportionality of a Disclosure Order No access
              6. (6) Control of the litigation No access
            4. dd) Summary No access
            5. ee) The UK Application Departs from the German Approach No access
            1. aa) IP Address Subscribers Must Not be Equalled with Actual Infringers No access
            2. bb) Obligations to Secure a Wi-Fi Connection under Private Law No access
            3. cc) Concerns in Relation to Reliability of Data No access
          2. b) Compliance of Information Disclosure with Secondary EU Law No access
            1. aa) Collecting of Personal Data Interfering with Privacy Rights No access
            2. bb) Disclosure of Personal Data Interfering with Privacy Rights No access
            3. cc) Right to Fair Trial of Alleged Infringers No access
          4. d) Achieving a Fair Balance of the Contravening Interests No access
      1. I. The Idea of Enforcement via Online Intermediaries No access
        1. 1. File-Hosting Services, Indexing Sites and Link Directories No access
        2. 2. Streaming No access
        3. 3. File Hosting and Streaming Websites in Numbers No access
          1. a) The Legality of the Provision of File Hosting Services No access
          2. b) The Illegality of Making Available Links to the General Public No access
          3. c) The (Il)Legality of Unauthorised Streaming No access
          4. d) The (Il)Legality of Consumption of Streams No access
        5. 5. The Reasons for Targeting these Services No access
          1. a) Internet Protocol Address Blocking No access
          2. b) Domain Name System Name Blocking No access
          3. c) Uniform Resource Locator Site Blocking No access
          4. d) Deep Packet Inspection-Based Blocking No access
          5. e) Hybrid Systems – The Example of CleanFeed No access
            1. aa) Change of IP Address and/or Additional Domain Names No access
            2. bb) Proxy Services, Anonymising Services and Virtual Private Networking No access
            3. cc) Mirroring No access
            1. aa) Encryption No access
            2. bb) Proxy Services, Anonymising Services and Virtual Private Networking No access
          3. c) The Efficiency of Blocking No access
      4. IV. Resume No access
        1. 1. Liability of Intermediaries in General: The E-Commerce Directive 2000/31 No access
          1. a) Information Society Directive 2001/29/EC No access
          2. b) IPR Enforcement Directive 2004/48/EC No access
          3. c) Data Protection Framework: E-Privacy Directive 2002/58 No access
          1. a) Injunctions in General: Case C-324/09 L’Oréal v eBay No access
          2. b) Injunctions against Access Providers: Case C-70/10 Scarlet Extended v SABAM No access
          3. c) Injunctions against Host Providers: Case C-360/10 SABAM v Netlog No access
          4. d) Injunctions Specifying the Means of Access Blocking: Case C-314/12 UPC Telekabel Wien v Constantin Film Verleih No access
          5. e) Summary of the Case Law of the CJEU No access
          1. a) Access Blocking: Yildirim v Turkey No access
          2. b) Criminal Liability of Intermediaries: Neij and Sunde Kolmisoppi v Sweden No access
          3. c) Civil Liability of Intermediaries: Delfi v Estonia No access
          4. d) Summary of the Case-Law of the ECtHR No access
        1. 1. France: No Competence of Administrative Authorities to Order Access Blocking to Illegal Materials No access
          1. a) “Düsseldorfer Sperrverfügungen” No access
          2. b) The Fate of the “Zugangserschwerungsgesetz” No access
          3. c) No Positive Future for Access Blocking by Administrative Authorities in Germany No access
          1. a) Legal Framework foreseen in the DEA 2010 No access
          2. b) Sections 17 and 18 of the DEA 2010: Unnecessary? No access
        4. 4. Resume: No Blocking of Copyright Infringing Content to Be Ordered by Administrative Authorities No access
          1. a) The Legal Framework: Section 97A CDPA 1988 No access
            1. aa) Excursus: From NewzBin1 (Twentieth Century Fox v NewzBin) to NewzBin2 (Twentieth Century Fox v BT) No access
            2. bb) The Injunctions against BT in NewzBin2 No access
          3. c) Applying the Precedent No access
          4. d) Injunctions under Section 97A CDPA 1988: A Pyrrhic Victory for Copyright Owners No access
        2. 2. Germany: No Injunctions against Access Providers No access
          1. a) Technological Concerns in Relation to Access Blocking No access
          2. b) Compliance with Secondary EU Law No access
            1. aa) Interference with Users’ Rights to Seek, Receive and Impart Information No access
            2. bb) Interference with the Users’ Privacy Rights No access
          4. d) Conformity with Fundamental Rights of Access Providers No access
          5. e) Striking a Fair Balance between the Contravening Interests No access
            1. aa) Telemediengesetz No access
            2. bb) Störerhaftung No access
            3. cc) The Scope of Monitoring Duties of Host Providers No access
          2. b) Liability of File-Hosting Services in General No access
          3. c) Notice and Stay-Down: Scope of Specific Monitoring Duties of File-Hosting Services No access
          4. d) Extensive Monitoring in Practice No access
          1. a) Legal Framework: Loi pour la confiance dans l’économie numerique No access
          2. b) Scope of Any Blocking Obligation: Take down and Stay Down? No access
          3. c) Limits of Notice and Take down and the Shift to Content Blocking by Search Engines No access
          1. a) Dealing with Technological Matters: The Difficulties to Identify Similar or Identical Infringements No access
          2. b) Compliance with Secondary EU Law No access
            1. aa) Freedom to Pursue Business and Property Rights No access
            2. bb) Right to Impart Information Created by Third Parties No access
          4. d) Extensive Monitoring and a Fair Balance of Rights No access
      1. I. Copyright Enforcement on the Internet is a Struggle to Find the Right Target No access
      2. II. Copyright Enforcement on the Internet Puts Disproportionate Weight on Intellectual Property Rights No access
      3. III. Copyright Enforcement Discourages Innovation and Creativity No access
      4. IV. Copyright Enforcement on the Internet Targets End-Users Rather than Commercial Infringers No access
      5. V. No Evidence of Effectiveness of Current Initiatives No access
      6. VI. Access Blocking is Playing Cat and Mouse No access
      1. I. The German Cease and Desist Letter Regime: Not so Bad as it May Seem No access
      2. II. Search Engines as Law Enforcement Officers: Limiting Visibility of Illegal Materials No access
      3. III. A Promising Alternative: Follow the Money No access
        1. 1. In Specific: Remove Obstacles to the Provision of Cross-Border Digital Content Services No access
        2. 2. In Specific: Education of Users and Promotion of Legal Offers No access
      5. V. Exciting Time with Pitfalls No access
  7. List of References No access 747 - 789
  8. Table of Cases No access 789 - 800

Bibliography (602)

  1. Google/PRS for Music/BAE Systems Detica, The six business models for copyright infringement (27.06.2012), http://www.prsformusic.com/aboutus/policyandresearch/researchandeconomics/Documents/TheSixBusinessModelsofCopyrightInfringement.pdf (last accessed on 06.06.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  2. Gröflin, Simon, RapidShare ohne Führung und Angestellte, PC Tipp (25.02.2014), http://www.pctipp.ch/news/firmen/artikel/rapidshare-ohne-fuehrung-und-angestellte-70690/ (last accessed on 06.06.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  3. Guillemin, Gabrielle, Case Law, Strasbourg: Delfi AS v Estonia: Court strikes serious blow to free speech online, Inform's blog (15.10.2013), http://inforrm.wordpress.com/2013/10/15/case-law-strasbourg-delfi-as-v-estonia-court-strikes-serious-blow-to-free-speech-online-gabrielle-guillemin/ (last accessed: 05.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  4. heise.de, LTE-A-Modems liefern bald bis zu 300 MBit/s, Heise online (11.09.2013), http://www.heise.de/netze/meldung/LTE-A-Modems-liefern-bald-bis-zu-300-MBit-s-1953525.html (last accessed on 15.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  5. heise.de, Porno-Abmahnungen: Indizienkette zur IP-Adressen-Ermittlung verdichtet sich, Heise online (13.12.2013), http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Porno-Abmahnungen-Indizienkette-zur-IP-Adressen-Ermittlung-verdichtet-sich-2065879.html (last accessed on 15.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  6. Hogge, Becky, IWF censors Wikipedia, chaos ensues, Open Rights Group (08.12.2008), http://www.openrightsgroup.org/blog/2008/iwf-censors-wikipedia-chaos-ensues (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  7. Holzel, Mark, The connected TV landscape: Why smart TVs and streaming gadgets are con-quering the living room, Business Insider (03.03.2014), http://www.businessinsider.com/the-connected-tv-landscape-why-smart-tvs-and-streaming-gadgets-are-conquering-the-living-room-2-2014-2 (last accessed on 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  8. Kaufman, Gil, Madonna to pirates: 'What the F--- do you think you're doing?', Singer lashes out at file traders on P2P networks, MTV news (16.04.2003), http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1471321/madonna-rips-file-traders.jhtml (last accessed on 15.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  9. Kleinz, Torsten, Sperrverfügungen gegen Wettanbieter in NRW, Heise online (04.05.2011), http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Sperrverfuegungen-gegen-Wettanbieter-in-NRW-1237731.html (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  10. Knoke, Felix, Kim Dotcom: US-Justizministerium legt seine Erkenntnisse gegen Megaupload vor, Der Spiegel online (23.12.2013), http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/web/us-justizministerium-legt-erkenntnisse-gegen-megaupload-vor-a-940627.html (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  11. Knoke, Felix, Streaming: Disney löscht Weihnachtsfilm für Amazon-Kunden, Der Spiegel Online (16.12.2013), http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/web/streaming-disney-loescht-weihnachtsfilm-fuer-amazon-kunden-a-939297.html (last accessed on 06.06.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  12. Korff, Douwe/Brown, Ian, Opinion on the compatibility of ACTA with the ECHR and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights (2011), http://www.greens-efa.eu/fileadmin/dam/Documents/Studies/ACTA_fundamental_rights_assessment.pdf (last accessed on 15.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  13. Kremp, Matthias, Streaming-Portal: Redtube will für Recht auf Porno kämpfen, Der Spiegel online (20.12.2013), http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/web/redtube-betreiber-alex-taylor-bestreitet-weitergabe-von-ip-adressen-a-940113.html (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  14. Krempl, Stefan SPD-Sprecher verreißt die rheinischen Sperrungsverfügungen, Heise online (20.02.2002), http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/SPD-Sprecher-verreisst-die-rheinischen-Sperrungsverfuegungen-56316.html (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  15. Krempl, Stefan, Arcor installiert leicht umgehbare Netzsperre für YouPorn, Heise online (24.10.2007), http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Arcor-installiert-leicht-umgehbare-Netzsperre-fuer-YouPorn-188617.html (last accessed: 04.12.2012) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  16. Krempl, Stefan, Arcor muss YouPorn sperren, Heise online (19.10.2007), http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Arcor-muss-YouPorn-sperren-Update-187184.html (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  17. Krempl, Stefan, Provider in Nordrhein-Westfalen erhalten Sperrungsverfügungen, Heise online (08.02.2002), http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Provider-in-Nordrhein-Westfalen-erhalten-Sperrungsverfuegungen-53926.html (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  18. La Quadrature du Net, French LOPPSI Bill adopted: the Internet under control?, La Quadrature du Net (09.02.2011), http://www.laquadrature.net/en/french-loppsi-bill-adopted-the-Internet-under-control (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  19. Lainé, Pascal, Belfortain poursuivi pour téléchargement illégal : 150 € d'amende, LePays.fr (13/09/2012), http://www.lepays.fr/faits-divers/2012/09/13/belfort-un-quadragenaire-poursuivi-pour-Telechargement-illegal-hadopi-mp3-lepuix (last accessed on 15.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  20. Le Monde, Le budget de la Hadopi passe à 8 millions d'euros, Le Monde (03.10.2012), http://www.lemonde.fr/technologies/article/2012/10/03/le-budget-de-la-hadopi-reduit-a-8-millions-d-euros_1769154_651865.html (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  21. Le Monde, Loppsi 2: le gouvernement pourrait abandonner le blocage des sites sans juge, Le Monde (25.07.2012), http://www.lemonde.fr/technologies/article/2012/07/25/loppsi-2-le-gouvernement-pourrait-abandonner-le-blocage-des-sites-sans-juge_1738020_651865.html (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  22. Le Monde, RSF critique le filtrage du Net prévu par la Loppsi 2, Le Monde (16.09.2010), http://www.lemonde.fr/technologies/article/2010/09/16/rsf-critique-le-filtrage-du-net-prevu-par-la-loppsi-2_1411897_651865.html (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  23. Lee, Doug Jay/Kim, Misung/Hong, Jong Won, Annual Report 2009, Korea APAA Copyright Committee, http://www.apaaonline.org/pdf/APAA_56th_&_57th_council_meeting/copyright/2-Korea%20Copyright%20Cttee%20Country%20Report%202009.pdf (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  24. Leeds, Jeff, Labels win suit against song sharer, The New York Times (05.10.2007), http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/05/business/media/05music.html?_r=0 (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  25. Leparisien.fr, Téléchargement illégal: Fleur Pellerin confirme qu’HADOPI va disparaître, Le Parisien (24.05.2013), http://www.leparisien.fr/high-tech/telechargement-illegal-fleur-pellerin-confirme-qu-hadopi-va-disparaitre-24-05-2013-2831541.php (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  26. Levene, Tony, Porn bill for couple who can’t download, The Guardian (29.11.2008), http://www.theguardian.com/money/2008/nov/28/internet-porn-bill-mistake (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  27. Lewis, Rita, What is DRM and why should I care?, Firefox News (08.01.2008), http://firefox.org/news/articles/1045/1/What-is-DRM-and-why-should-I-care/Page1.html (last accessed on 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  28. Lindvall, Helienne, Piracy sites are raking in ad money from some of the World's biggest brands, Business Insider (05.02.2013), http://www.businessinsider.com/piracy-sites-raking-in-ad-money-2013-2 (last accessed on 06.06.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  29. Lischka, Konrad, Anti-Abzock-Gesetz: Das Märchen von der Abmahn-Deckelung, Der Spiegel Online (30.01.2013), http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/netzpolitik/anti-abzock-gesetz-das-maerchen-von-der-abmahn-deckelung-a-880503.html (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  30. Lischka, Konrad, Fehlerhafte Zensur-Methode: Arcor stoppt den Porno-Filter, Der Spiegel online (17.09.2007), http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/web/fehlerhafte-zensur-methode-arcor-stoppt-den-porno-filter-a-506143.html (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  31. Löhr, Katrin, Skandal-Rapper fordert Ablasszahlung – Vorwurf Musik-Klau! So jagt Bushido seine Fans, Bild (17.04.2010), http://www.bild.de/unterhaltung/musik/bushido/jagt-weiter-fans-wegen-musik-klau-12228662.bild.html (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  32. LTO-Redaktion, Entwicklungen in Sachen Redtube – Gegenwind für Abmahnanwälte, Neues zu IP-Ermittlung, Legal Tribune online (13.12.2013), http://www.lto.de/recht/nachrichten/n/abmahnwelle-redtube-strafanzeige-erfolgshonorar-mandantenvereinbarung/ (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  33. Manenti, Boris, Aurélie Filippetti : « Je vais réduire les crédits de l'Hadopi », Le nouvel Observateur (01.08.2012), http://obsession.nouvelobs.com/high-tech/20120801.OBS8587/aurelie-filippetti-je-vais-reduire-les-credits-de-l-hadopi.html (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  34. Manenti, Boris, L'abrogation de l'Hadopi est en marche, Le nouvel Observateur (03.07.2012), http://obsession.nouvelobs.com/high-tech/20120703.OBS5858/l-hadopi-court-toujours.html (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  35. Mansmann, Urs, Arcor sperrte zahlreiche Websites, Heise online (17.09.2007), http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Arcor-sperrte-zahlreiche-Websites-Update-175906.html (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  36. Marchive, Valéry, Three years and millions of euros later, Hadopi has its first conviction. Now what?, ZDnet (30.10.2012), http://www.zdnet.com/three-years-and-millions-of-euros-later-hadopi-has-its-first-conviction-now-what-7000006612/ (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  37. Masons, Pinsent, Ofcom anti-piracy code delayed until 2015, out-law.com (10.06.2013), http://www.out-law.com/en/articles/2013/june/ofcom-anti-piracy-code-delayed-until-2015/ (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  38. McBride, Sarah / Smith, Ethan, Music Industry to Abandon Mass Suits (19.12.2008), Wall Street Journal, http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB122966038836021137 (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  39. Meller, Paul, Leaked ACTA draft reveals plans for Internet clampdown, Computerworld (20.02.2010), http://www.computerworld.co.nz/article/490341/leaked_acta_draft_reveals_plans_internet_clampdown/ (last accessed on 06.06.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  40. Mennecke, Thomas, RIAA announces new campus lawsuit strategy, Slyck News (28.02.2007), http://www.slyck.com/story1422.html (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  41. Mölleken, Jan, Filehoster: Hehler oder Helfer ?, Der Spiegel online (14.09.2010), http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/web/0,1518,717333,00.html (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  42. Mühlbauer, Peter, Die Geister, die er rief..., Heise online (25.03.2010), http://www.heise.de/tp/artikel/32/32327/1.html (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  43. Müller, Carl Christian, Abmahnwelle gegen Redtube-Nutzer, Vom Leerlaufen des Richtervor-behalts, Legal Tribune Online (12.12.2013), http://www.lto.de/recht/hintergruende/h/redtube-streaming-abmahnung-Internetporno-urmann/ (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  44. National Association of Citizens Advice Bureaux, Online infringement of copyright and the Digital Economy Act 2010 – Draft Initial Obligations Code, Response from Citizens Advice to Ofcom (July 2010) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  45. Neal, Ryan W., Pirates of the Caribbean: The Pirate Bay moves to island of St. Martin (30.04.2013), International Business Times, http://www.ibtimes.com/pirates-caribbean-pirate-bay-moves-island-st-martin-1226787 (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  46. Ofcom Consultation Report, Online infringement of copyright and the Digital Economy Act 2010: Draft Initial Obligations Code (28.05.2010), http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/copyright-infringement/condoc.pdf (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  47. Ofcom, New Measures to Protect Online Copyright and Inform Consumers (26.06.2012), http://media.ofcom.org.uk/2012/06/26/new-measures-to-protect-online-copyright-and-inform-consumers/ (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  48. Ofcom, Online infringement of copyright and the Digital Economy Act 2010, Notice of Ofcom’s proposal to make by order a code for regulating the initial obligations (26.06.2012), http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/consultations/online-notice/summary/notice.pdf (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  49. Pany, Thomas, Beginnt jetzt die Sanktionsphase von Hadopi?, heise.de blogs (05.07.2011), http://www.heise.de/tp/blogs/6/150095 (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  50. PC Magazin, Youtube-GEMA-Sperre umgehen – so geht’s, PC Magazin (16.05.2014), http://www.pc-magazin.de/ratgeber/youtube-sperre-gema-umgehen-1343989.html (last accessed on 06.06.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  51. Pépin, Guénaël, La Hadopi défend le bilan de la réponse graduée, Le Monde (05.09.2012), http://www.lemonde.fr/technologies/article/2012/09/05/la-hadopi-defend-le-bilan-de-la-reponse-graduee_1755909_651865.html (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  52. Pepitone, Julianne, SOPA explained: What is is and why it matters, CNN (20.01.2012), http://money.cnn.com/2012/01/17/technology/sopa_explained/ (last accessed on 06.06.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  53. Philips, Jeremy, Digital Opportunity Knocks..., IPkat (03.08.2011), http://ipkitten.blogspot.de/2011/08/digital-opportunity-knocks.html (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  54. Poort, Joost/ Leenheer, Jorna/ von der Ham, Jeroen/ Dumitru, Cosmin, Baywatch : Two Approaches to Measure the Effects of Blocking Access to The Pirate Bay (Working Paper, 22.08.2013), available via http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2314297 (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  55. Ramalho, Ana, The EU mandate to negotiate the TTIP: should copyright be an outcast?, Kluwer Copyright Blog (21.05.2013), http://kluwercopyrightblog.com/2013/05/21/the-eu-mandate-to-negotiate-the-ttip-should-copyright-be-an-outcast/ (last accessed 07.07.2015) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  56. Rawlinson, Kevin, Turkey Steps up Bid to Block Twitter after Users Flout Ban, The Guardian (23.03.2014), http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/23/turkey-twitter-ban (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  57. Rees, Marc, Hadopi : 600 € d’amende et quinze jours de suspension pour un abonné , PC Inpact (12.06.2013), http://www.pcinpact.com/news/80487-hadopi-600-d-amende-et-quinze-jours-suspension-pour-abonne.htm (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  58. Rees, Mark, LOPPSI: le gouvernement abandonne le blocage de sites sans juge, PC Inpact (25.07.2012), http://www.pcinpact.com/news/72658-loppsi-gouvernement-abandonne-blocage-sites-sans-juge.htm (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  59. Reißmann, Ole, Geschäft mit Raubkopien: Wie kino.to Millionen verdiente, Der Spiegel online (14.06.2012), http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/netzpolitik/die-geschichte-von-kino-to-wer-mit-den-raubkopien-verdiente-a-838816.html (last accessed on 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  60. Riden, Jamie, How Fast-Flux service networks work, The Honeynet Project (16.08.2008), http://www.honeynet.org/node/132 (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  61. Robertson, Struan, The legislative farce of the Digital Economy Bill, out-law.com (07.04.2010), http://www.out-law.com/page-10900 (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  62. Rowlands, Max, UK: “Speculative invoicing” schemes target internet file-sharers and individuals accused of minor retail crime (2011), http://www.statewatch.org/analyses/no-156-speculative-invoicing.pdf (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  63. Rundle, Micheal, Government Scraps Plans to Block Content-Sharing Websites, Huffington Post (03.08.2011), http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2011/08/03/website-blocking-plans-sc_n_916826.html (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  64. Salzenberg, Chip/Spafford, Gene/Moraes, Mark, What is Usenet? (1998), http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/lawofcyberspace/news.html (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  65. Satter, Raphael, Wikipedia article blocked in UK over child photo, The Independent (08.12.2008), http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/wikipedia-article-blocked-in-uk-over-child-photo-1057010.html (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  66. Schneider, Adrian, OLG Hamburg: Die Rapidshare-Entscheidung, ein Meilenstein?, Telemedicus (29.03.2012), http://www.telemedicus.info/article/2229-OLG-Hamburg-Die-Rapidshare-Entscheidung,-ein-Meilenstein.html (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  67. Schumpeter, Joseph, Net Neutraliy, More equal than others, The Economist (25.04.2014), http://www.economist.com/blogs/schumpeter/2014/04/net-neutrality (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  68. Sisario, Ben, 7 Charged as F.B.I. closes a top file-sharing site, The New York Times (20.01.2012), http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/21/technology/megaupload-indictment-Internet-piracy.html?ref=technology (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  69. Smith, Graham, Who will sort out the Delfi mess?, Cyberleagle blog (16.10.2013), http://cyberleagle.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/who-will-sort-out-delfi-mess.html (last accessed 05.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  70. Software & Information Industry Association (SIIA), SIIA Releases Sequel to Classic Anti-Piracy Music Video “Don’t Copy That Floppy”, Reuters (09.09.2009), http://www.reuters.com/article/2009/09/09/idUS141575+09-Sep-2009+PRN20090909 (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  71. Solmecke, Christian, Redtube: Wave of Streaming Letters hits Germany (12.12.2013), http://www.wbs-law.de/eng/streaming/redtube-wave-streaming-warning-letters-hits-germany-49182/ (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  72. Spiegel Online, “The Pirate Bay”: IT-Experten warnen vor Piraten-Browser, Der Spiegel online (13.08.2013), http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/web/piratebrowser-it-experten-warnen-vor-piraten-browser-a-916279.html (last accessed 13.08.2013) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  73. Spiegel Online, 22-Jähriger festgenommen: Ermittler entdecken riesige Kinderporno-Sammlung in Köln, Der Spiegel online (19.09.2013), http://www.spiegel.de/panorama/koeln-ermittler-entdecken-riesige-kinderporno-sammlung-a-923284.html (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  74. Spiegel Online, Gesetz gegen Abzocke: Bundestag setzt Massenabmahnungen Grenzen, Der Spiegel online (27.06.2013), http://www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/service/gesetz-gegen-abzocke-bundestag-setzt-massenabmahnungen-grenzen-a-908267.html (last accessed on 06.06.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  75. Spiegel Online, Sven Regener zum Urheberrecht: “Man pinkelt uns ins Gesicht!”, Der Spiegel Online (22.03.2012), http://www.spiegel.de/kultur/gesellschaft/sven-regener-im-bayerischen-rundfunk-zum-urheberrecht-a-823144.html (last accessed on 06.06.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  76. Spiegel Online, Urheberrechtskampagne: 1500 Künstler gegen Gier und Geiz, Der Spiegel Online (10.05.2012), http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/netzpolitik/kuenstler-schreiben-offenen-brief-fuer-das-urheberrecht-a-832538.html (last accessed on 06.06.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  77. Spier, Alexander, Darf’s ein bisschen schneller sein? Wie sich LTE im mobilen Alltag schlägt, c't 2012, Issue 22, http://www.heise.de/ct/artikel/Darf-s-ein-bisschen-schneller-sein-1722006.html (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  78. Steier, Henning, Ersten Piraten Drohen Netzsperren, Neue Züricher Zeitung (07.10.2011), http://www.nzz.ch/aktuell/digital/frankreich-hadopi-bilanz-1.12873303 (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  79. Streams, Kimber, France's controversial Hadopi piracy law nets its first conviction, a man who says he didn't do It, The Verge (14.09.2012), http://www.theverge.com/2012/9/14/3332056/france-hadopi-piracy-law-conviction-alain-prevost (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  80. Sweney, Mark, Ofcom outlines new anti-piracy rules, The Guardian (26.06.2012), http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2012/jun/26/ofcom-outlines-anti-piracy-rules (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  81. Syndicat National de l’édition Phonographique (SNEP), Presentation des Resultats du 1er semestre 2013 (18.09.2013), http://www.actu.snepmusique.com/snep/actualites-du-snep/presentation-des-resultats-du-1er-semestre-2013/ (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  82. Syndicat National de l'Edition Phonographique, Bilan Economique 2012 (2013), http://proxy.siteo.com.s3.amazonaws.com/www.snepmusique.com/file/bilaneconomiquesnepmidem2013etpresentationmidem.pdf (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  83. Tait, Morgan, Dotcom extradition hearing delayed, The New Zealand Herald (01.05.2015), http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11441894 (last accessed on 07.07.2015). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  84. Taplin, Jonathan and Others, Advertising transparency report, monthly updates are available at http://www.annenberglab.com/projects/ad-piracy-report-0 (last accessed on 06.06.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  85. Techradar, Cheap promotion, Twitter and peer-to-peer, How one band used YouTube, Twitter and file-sharing to create a community of fans, Techradar (16.01.2010), http://www.techradar.com/news/internet/how-to-get-famous-online-663244/2 (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  86. The British Record Music Industry (BPI), Digital Music Nation 2010, the UK’s legal and illegal digital music landscape (2010), http://www.bpi.co.uk/assets/files/Digital%20Music%20Nation%202010.pdf (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  87. The Economist, Criminalising the consumer – Where digital rights went wrong, The Economist (27.04.2007), http://www.economist.com/node/9096421 (last accessed on 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  88. Thévenet, Sébastien, Hadopi: Un premier internaute condamné, Le Figaro (13.09.2012), http://www.lefigaro.fr/secteur/high-tech/2012/09/13/01007-20120913ARTFIG00599-hadopi-un-premier-internaute-condamne.php (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  89. Tréguer, Félix, France on its way to total Internet censorship?, Index on Censorship (27.06.2011), http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2011/06/france-on-its-way-to-total-internet-censorship/ (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  90. Tulkens, Francoise, EU Accession to the European Convention on Human Rights (2013), http://www.ejtn.eu/Documents/About%20EJTN/Independent%20Seminars/Human%20Rights%20and%20Access%20to%20Justice%20Seminar/Krakow_Tulkens_final.pdf (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  91. Verein zur Hilfe und Unterstützung gegen den Abmahnwahn e.V., Annual statistic 2010, http://www.verein-gegen-den-abmahnwahn.de/zentrale/download/statistiken/2010/jahresbilanz_2010.html (last accessed 16.06.2011) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  92. Voorhoof, Dirk, Copyright vs Freedom of Expression Judment, ECHR Blog (22.01.2013), http://echrblog.blogspot.de/2013/01/copyright-vs-freedom-of-expression.html (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  93. Voorhoof, Dirk, Treating a news portal as publisher of users’ comment may have far-reaching consequences for online freedom of expression, Inform's blog (29.10.2013), http://inforrm.wordpress.com/2013/10/29/treating-a-news-portal-as-publisher-of-users-comment-may-have-far-reaching-consequences-for-online-freedom-of-expression-dirk-voorhoof/ (last accessed on 05.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  94. Waehlisch, Nathalie, Kampagne der Filmindustrie: “Raubkopierer sind Verbrecher“, Der Spiegel online (27.11.2003), http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/web/kampagne-der-filmindustrie-raubkopierer-sind-verbrecher-a-275867.html (last accessed on 06.06.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  95. Walder, Adam, Popular music platform 'Spotify' launches in Luxembourg, Luxemburger Wort (13.11.2012), http://www.wort.lu/en/view/popular-music-platform-spotify-launches-in-luxembourg-50a26ee3e4b0f09219140f0a (last accessed on 06.06.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  96. Washington Post, NSA slides explain the PRISM data-collection program, The Washington Post (06.06.2013, updated 10.07.2013), http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/special/politics/prism-collection-documents/ (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  97. WBS Law, Nach dem BGH Filesharing Urteil (Morpheus) – Wie geht es nun weiter? (16.11.2012), http://www.wbs-law.de/abmahnung-filesharing/nach-dem-bgh-filesharing-urteil-morpheus-wie-geht-es-nun-weiter-32204/ (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  98. Weber, Sara, Der Piraten-Jäger, UniSpiegel 2012, Issue 3, 14–16, (last accessed on 15.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  99. Wienand, Lars, Das ist heftig: Die Viralseiten-Macher und ihr Verhältnis zu Urheberrechten, Rhein-Zeitung (27.05.2014), http://www.rhein-zeitung.de/nachrichten/netzwelt/news_artikel,-Das-ist-heftig-Die-Viralseiten-Macher-und-ihr-Verhaeltnis-zu-Urheberrechten-_arid,1158093.html#.U5HapSiuNEP (last accessed on 06.06.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  100. Williams, Christopher, E-books Drive Older Women to Piracy, The Telegraph (17.05.2011), http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/8518755/E-books-drive-older-women-to-digital-piracy.html (last accessed on 06.06.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  101. Wyatt, Edward, Rebuffing F.C.C. in 'Net Neutrality' Case, court allows streaming deals, The New York Times (14.01.2014), http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/15/technology/appeals-court-rejects-fcc-rules-on-Internet-service-providers.html?_r=0 (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  102. Books and Commentaries Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  103. Ahlberg, Hartwig/Götting, Horst-Peter, Beck’scher Online-Kommentar Urheberrecht (updated 01.02.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  104. Barendt, Eric, Freedom of Speech (2nd ed. 2007) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  105. Benedek, Wolfgang/Kettemann, Matthias C., Freedom of expression and the Internet (2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  106. Bentley, Lionel/Sherman, Brad, Intellectual Property Law (2001) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  107. Berners-Lee, Tim, Weaving the Web: The original design and ultimate destiny of the World Wide Web by its inventor (2000) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  108. Billmeier, Eva, Die Düsseldorfer Sperrungsverfügung: ein Beispiel für verfassungs- und gefahrenabwehrrechtliche Probleme der Inhaltsregulierung in der Informationsgesell¬schaft (2007) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  109. Brownsword, Roger/Goodwin, Morag, Law and the technologies of the twenty-first century (2012) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  110. Brunn, Inka Frederike, Cache me if you can (2012) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  111. Calliess, Christian, Die neue Europäische Union nach dem Vertrag von Lissabon (2010) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  112. Cassese, Antonio, International Law (2001) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  113. de Schutter, Olivier, International Human Rights Law (2010) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  114. Deibert, Ronald/Palfrey, John/Rohozinski, Rafal/Zittrain, Jonathan (eds.), ‘Access denied’ – The practice and policy of global Internet filtering (2008) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  115. Dreier, Thomas/Schulze, Gernot, UrhG, Kommentar (3rd ed. 2008) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  116. Dreier, Thomas/Schulze, Gernot, UrhG, Kommentar (4th ed. 2013) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  117. Greiner, Arved, Die Verhinderung verbotener Internetinhalte im Wege polizeilicher Gefahr-enabwehr (2001) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  118. Heckmann, Dirk, Juris PraxisKommentar Internetrecht, (2nd ed. 2009) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  119. Helfer, Laurence R./Austin, Graeme W., Human rights and intellectual property: Mapping the global interface (2011) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  120. Hoeren, Thomas/Sieber, Ulrich/Holznagel, Bernd (eds.), Handbuch Multimedia-Recht (36th amended ed. 2013) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  121. Horten, Monica, A copyright masquerade: How corporate lobbying threatens online freedoms (2013) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  122. Horten, Monica, The copyright enforcement enigma, Internet politics and the ‘Telecoms Package’ (2011) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  123. Ibing, Stefan, Die Einschränkung der europäischen Grundrechte durch Gemeinschafts¬recht (2006) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  124. Janis, Mark W./Kay, Richard S./Bradley, Anthony Wilfred, European Human Rights Law: Text and Materials (3rd ed. 2008) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  125. Jørgensen, Rikke Frank (ed.), Human Rights in the global information society (2006) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  126. Klett, Alexander/Sonntag, Matthias/Wilske, Stephan, Intellectual Property Law in Ger¬many (2008) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  127. Köhler, Markus/Arndt, Hans-Wolfgang/Fetzer, Thomas, Recht des Internet, (7th ed. 2011) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  128. Laidlaw, Emily, Internet gatekeepers, human rights and corporate social responsibilities (2012), http://etheses.lse.ac.uk/317/1/Laidlaw_Internet%20Gatekeepers,%20 Human%20 Rights%20and%20Corporate%20Social%20Responsibilities.pdf (last accessed 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  129. Lessig, Lawrence, Code: Version 2.0 (2006) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  130. Leupold, Andreas/Glossner, Silke, Münchener Anwaltshandbuch IT-Recht (3rd ed. 2013) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  131. Lloyd, Ian J., Information Technology Law (6th ed. 2011) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  132. Löwenheim, Ulrich (ed.), Handbuch des Urheberrechts (2nd ed. 2010) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  133. MacQueen, Hector/Waelde, Charlotte/Laurie, Graeme/Brown, Abbe, Contemporary in¬tellectual property, Law and policy (2nd ed. 2011) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  134. Marsden, Christopher, Net neutrality: Towards a co-regulatory solution (2010) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  135. Meyer-Ladewig, Jens, EMRK, Handkommentar (3rd ed. 2011) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  136. Mock, William B. T./Demuro, Gianmario (eds.), Human Rights in Europe, Commentary on the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (2010) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  137. Mowbray, Alastair, Cases, materials and comments on the European Convention on Human Rights (3rd ed. 2012) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  138. Murray, Andrew, Information Technology Law, The law and society (2nd ed. 2013) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  139. Nowak, Manfred, U.N. Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, CCPR Commentary (2005) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  140. Pettiti, Louis-Edmond/Decaux, Emmanuel/Imbert, Pierre-Henri (eds.), La Convention Euro–péenne des Droits de l’Homme, Commentaire (1999) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  141. Pieroth, Bodo/Schlink, Bernhard/Kniesel, Michael, Polizei- und Ordnungsrecht (2002) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  142. Reed, Chris, Making laws for cyberspace (2012) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  143. Reed, Chris, Internet Law, Text and Materials (2nd ed. 2004) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  144. Rowland, Diane/Kohl, Uta/Charlesworth, Andrew, Information Technology Law (4th ed. 2012) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  145. Schaar, Peter, Datenschutz im Internet (2002) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  146. Schulz, Wolfgang/Held, Thorsten/Laudien, Arne, Suchmaschinen als Gatekeeper in der öffent-lichen Kommunikation: Rechtliche Anforderungen an Zugangsoffenheit und Transpa¬renz bei Suchmaschinen im WWW (2005) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  147. Siemen, Birte, Datenschutz als Europäisches Grundrecht (2006) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  148. Spindler, Gerald/Schuster, Fabian, Recht der elektronischen Medien (2nd ed. 2011) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  149. Spindler, Gerald/Wiebe, Andreas, Internet-Auktionen und elektronische Marktplätze (2nd ed. 2005) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  150. Steegmann, Matthias, Die Haftung der Basisinfrastruktur bei rechtswidrigen Internetangeboten, Verantwortlichkeit von Internet- und Finanzdienstleistern im Rahmen des illegalen Online-Glücksspiels (2010) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  151. Stokes, Simon, Digital Copyright (2nd ed. 2005) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  152. Tanenbaum, Andrew/Wetherall, David, Computer Networks (5th ed. 2011) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  153. van Bockel, Bas, The Ne Bis In Idem Principle in EU Law (2010) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  154. van Dijk, Peter/Hoof, Godefridus J. H. (eds.), Theory and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights (4th ed. 2006) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  155. Walter, Michel/von Lewinski, Silke, European Copyright Law (2010) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  156. Wandtke, Artur-Axel/Bullinger, Winfried, Praxiskommentar zum Urheberrecht (3rd ed. 2009) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  157. Scientific Papers and Journal Articles Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  158. Abbotts, Gillie, A catch for TVCatchup – Limits of the cable defence, Entertainment Law Review 2014, Vol. 25 Issue 1, 17–18 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  159. Adermon, Adrian / Liang, Che-Yuan, Piracy, music, and movies: A natural experiment, Uppsala Universitet Working Paper 2010: 18, http://www.nek.uu.se/Pdf/wp201018.pdf (last accessed on 20.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  160. Aguiar, Luis/Martens, Bertin, Digital music consumption on the Internet: Evidence from clickstream data (2013), European Commission JRC Technical Reports, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, http://ftp.jrc.es/EURdoc/JRC79605.pdf (last accessed 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  161. Ahlert, Christian/Marsden, Chris/Yung, Chester, How “liberty” disappeared from Cyberspace: The mystery shopper tests Internet content self-regulation, http://www.rootsecure.net/content/downloads/pdf/liberty_disappeared_from_cyberspace.pdf (last accessed on 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  162. Akdeniz, Yaman, To block or not to block: European approaches to content regulation, and implications for freedom of expression, Computer Law & Security Review 2010, 260–272 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  163. Alexander, Rachel, FirstRow – access denied, Entertainment Law Review 2013, Vol. 24 Issue 8, 280–283 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  164. Alsbih, Amir/Janson, Thomas/Schindelhauer, Christian, Analysis of peer-to-peer traffic and user behaviour (2009), http://archive.cone.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/pubs/ITA11_bittorrent_alsbih_janson_schindelhauer.pdf (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  165. Angelopoulos, Christina, Beyond the Safe Harbours: Harmonising substantive intermediary liability for copyright infringement in Europe, http://www.ivir.nl/publications/angelopoulos/IPQ_2013_3.pdf Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  166. Barron, Anne, 'Graduated Response' à l'Anglaise: Online Copyright Infringement and the Digital Economy Act 2010, Journal of Media Law 2011, Vol. 3 Issue 2, 305–347 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  167. Bastard Irène/Bourreau, Marc/Moreau, François, L'impact du piratage sur l'achat et le tele-chargement legal: une comparaison de quatre filieres culturelles (2012), Working paper, http://manzanamecanica.org/files/Piratage4filieres_06avril2012.pdf (last accessed on 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  168. Benabou, Valérie-Laure, The Chase: The French insight into the ‘Three Strikes’ system, in: Stamatoudi, Irini A. (ed.), Copyright enforcement and the Internet (2010), 163–182 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  169. Benassiano, William, Décision n° 2009-590 DC du 22 octobre 2009, La sanction de l'incompétence négative, Revue française de droit constitutionnel 2010, 390–396 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  170. Benassiano, William, L'inconstitutionnalité, sanction de l'identification d'un pouvoir de répression pénale dévalué. Décision no 2009-580 DC du 10 juin 2009, Revue française de droit consti-tutionnel 2010, no 81, 168–174 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  171. Benkler, Yochai, WikiLeaks and the PROTECT-IP Act: A new public-private threat to the Internet Commons, Daedalus 2011, Vol. 140 Issue 4, 154–164 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  172. Bernault, Carine/Lebois, Audrey, Peer-to-peer file sharing and literary and artistic property, A feasibility study regarding a system of compensation for the exchange of works via the Internet (2005), http://privatkopie.net/files/Feasibility-Study-peer-to-peer-acs_Nantes.pdf (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  173. Besselink, Leonard, Entrapped by the maximum standard: On fundamental rights and subsidiarity in the European Union, Common Market Law Review 1998, Vol. 35, 629–680 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  174. Binet-Grosclaude, Aurélie, La décision du Conseil constitutionnel du 10 juin 2009 relative à la loi favorisant la diffusion et la protection de la création sur internet : un coup d'arrêt au pouvoir de sanction des AAI ?, Droit Pénal 2009, No. 11, 11–17 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  175. Bölling, Markus, Unterlassungsantrag und Streitgegenstand im Falle der Störerhaftung, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht 2013, 1092–1099 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  176. Borges, Georg, Pflichten und Haftung beim Betrieb privater WLAN, Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 2010, 2624–2627 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  177. Borges, Georg, Zur Haftung des Betreibers einer Handelsplattform für Markenverletzungen der Nutzer („L'Oréal/eBay“), Entscheidungen zum Wirtschaftsrecht 2011, 823–824 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  178. Borghi, Maurizio, Chasing copyright infringement in the streaming landscape, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 2011, 316–343 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  179. Bornkamm, Joachim, E-Commerce Directive vs. IP rights enforcement – Legal balance achieved?, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht – Internationaler Teil 2007, 642–644 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  180. Boubekeur, Iliana, De la « loi HADOPI » à la « loi HADOPI 2 ». Analyse de la décision du Conseil constitutionnel 2009-580 DC et de ses conséquences, Revue Lamy Droit de l'Immatériel 2009, No. 51, 107–113 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  181. Brömmekamp, Birgit, Der Fall L'Oréal gegen eBay: Prüfstein für die Informationsgesellschaft, Wettbewerb in Recht und Praxis 2011, 306–316 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  182. Buchmann, Felix/Brüggemann, Sebastian, Der Preis des „Filesharing“ – Streitwert, Schadenser-satz und Kostendeckelung nach § 97 a Abs. 2 UrhG, Kommunikation und Recht 2011, 368–373 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  183. Burnett, Rachel, The role of Ofcom, ITNOW 2010, Vol. 52 Issue 6, 24 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  184. Calliess, Christian, Die Charta der Grundrechte der Europäischen Union – Fragen der Kon-zeption, Kompetenz und Verbindlichkeit, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 2001, 261–268 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  185. Cammaerts, Bart/Mansell, Robin/Meng, Bingchun, Copyright & Creation, A case for promoting inclusive online sharing (September 2013), London School of Economics and Political Science, Media Policy Brief 9, http://www.lse.ac.uk/media@lse/documents/MPP/LSE-MPP-Policy-Brief-9-Copyright-and-Creation.pdf (last accessed on 06.06.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  186. Caron, Christophe, Responsabilité des hébergeurs : requiem pour le «take down, stay down», Communication Commerce éléctronique 2012, Vol. 14 Issue 9, 28–30 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  187. Chaltiel, Florence, La loi HADOPI II de nouveau censurée, Petites affiches 2009, No. 235 (25.11.2009), 7–13 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  188. Chang, Liliana, The red flag test for apparent knowledge under the DMCA § 512 (c) Safe Harbor, Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 28, 195–222 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  189. Chen, Erik/Brown, Mark, Taiwan: Taiwan enacts ISP ‘safe harbour’ amendments to Copyright Act, Computer Law & Security Review 2009, Vol. 25 Issue 4, 389–390 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  190. Chothia, Tom/Chatzikokolakis, Konstantinos, A survey of anonymous peer-to-peer file-sharing, http://www.lix.polytechnique.fr/~tomc/P2P/Papers/AnonP2PSurvey.pdf (last accessed on 13.08.2013) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  191. Christiansen, Per, Störerhaftung des Betreibers einer Video-Plattform wegen Urheberrechts-verletzung, Anmerkung zu LG Hamburg, 310 O 461/10 vom 20.04.2012, Kommunikation & Recht 2012, 533 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  192. Christoffersen, Jonas, Human Rights and balancing: The principle of proportionality, in: Geiger, Christophe (ed.), Research Handbook on Human rights and Intellectual Property (2015), pp. 19 – 38 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  193. Christopherson, Kimberly M., The positive and negative implications of anonymity in Internet social interaction: “On the Internet, nobody knows you’re a dog”, Computers in Human Behaviour 2007, Vol. 23 Issue 6, 3038–3056 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  194. Clarke, Ian/Miller, Scott G./Hong, Theodore W./Sandberg, Oskar/Wiley, Brandon, Protecting free expression online with Freenet, IEEE Internet Computing 2011, Vol. 6 Issue 1, 40–49 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  195. Clayton, Richard, Anonymity and traceability in cyberspace (August 2005), Technical Report UCAM-CL-TR-653, http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/techreports/UCAM-CL-TR-653.pdf (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  196. Clayton, Richard, Expert Opinion in case R (on the application of British Telecommunications Plc) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, https://www.openrightsgroup.org/assets/JK1RC.pdf (last accessed 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  197. Clayton, Richard, Harmful Content on the Internet and in Video Games (2008), http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rnc1/080129-cms.pdf (last accessed 13.04.2012) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  198. Clayton, Richard, Online traceability: Who did that?, Technical expert report on collecting robust evidence of copyright infringement through peer-to-peer filesharing (2012), http://www.consumerfocus.org.uk/files/2012/07/Online-traceability.pdf (last accessed 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  199. Clayton, Richard/et al., A study of Whois privacy and proxy services abuse, National Physical Laboratory (20.09.2013), http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/whois/pp-abuse-study-20sep13-en.pdf (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  200. Costes, Lionel, Peer to Peer et recherche des contrefacteurs: les précisions de la CJCE, Droit de l'immatériel : informatique, médias, communication 2009, No. 48, 22–23 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  201. Czychowski, Christian/Nordemann, Jan Bernd, Grenzenloses Internet – entgrenzte Haftung?, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht-Beilage 2014, 3–13 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  202. Czychowski, Christian/Nordemann, Jan Bernd, Vorratsdaten und Urheberrecht – Zulässige Nutzung gespeicherter Daten, Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 2008, 3095–3099 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  203. D’Erme, Roberto/Geiger, Christophe/Große Ruse-Khan, Henning/ Heinze, Christian/Jaeger, Thomas and Others, Opinion of European academics on anti-counterfeiting trade agreement, Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law 2011, Vol. 2 Issue 1, 65–72 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  204. Danaher, Brett/Smith, Michael D/Telang, Rahul/Chen, Siwen, The Effect of Graduated Response Anti-Piracy Laws on Music Sales: Evidence from an Event Study in France (2012), http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1989240 (last accessed on 15.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  205. Danckert, Burkhard/Mayer, Frank Joachim, Die vorherrschende Meinungsmacht von Google – Bedrohung durch einen Informationsmonopolisten?, MultiMedia und Recht 2010, 219–222 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  206. Danckwerts, Rolf, Neues vom Störer: Was ist ein „von der Rechtsordnung gebilligtes Geschäftsmodell“?, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberecht-Prax 2011, 260–262 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  207. Dara, Rishabh, Intermediary liability in India: Chilling effects on free expression on the Internet (2011), http://cis-india.org/internet-governance/intermediary-liability-in-india.pdf/view (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  208. de Hert, Paul/Kloza, Dariusz, Internet (Access) as a new fundamental right. Inflating the current rights framework?, European Journal of Law and Technology 2012, Vol. 3 No. 3, http://ejlt.org/article/view/123/268 (last acccessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  209. de Silva, Sam/Weedon, Faye, The Digital Economy Act 2010: Past, present and a future “in limbo”, Computer and Telecommuncations Law Review 2011, Vol. 17 No. 3, 55–62 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  210. Derieux, Emmanuel, Le droit communautaire n'impose pas que les législations nationales prévoient l'obligation de communiquer des données à caractère personnel dans le cadre d'une procédure civile, La Semaine Juridique – édition générale 2008, No. 21 (21.05.2008), 40–42 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  211. Derieux, Emmanuel, Validation par le Conseil constitutionnel de l'essentiel des dispositions de la loi 'HADOPI 2', Revue Lamy Droit de l'Immatériel 2009, No. 54, 6–8 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  212. Devigne, Luc Pierre/Velasco-Martins, Pedro/Iliopoulou, Alexandra, Where is ACTA taking us? Policies and politics, in: Irini Stamatoudi (ed.), Copyright enforcement and the Internet (2010), pp. 29–42 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  213. Dimita, Gaetano, Six characters in search of infringement: potential liability for creating, downloading, and disseminating .torrent files, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2012, Vol. 7 Issue 6, 466–472 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  214. Dix, Alexander, Vorratsdatenspeicherung von IP-Adressen?, Datenschutz und Datensicher¬heit 2003, 234–235 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  215. Dnes, Antony W., Should the UK Move to a Fair-Use Copyright Exception, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 2013, 418–444 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  216. Dornseif, Maximilian, Government mandated blocking of foreign Web content, in: von Knop, Jan/Haverkamp, Wilhelm/Jessen, Eike (eds.), Security, E-Learning, E-Services: Pro-ceedings of the 17. DFN-Arbeitstagung über Kommunikationsnetze (2013), Lecture Notes in Informatics, pp. 617–647 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  217. Drexl, Josef Nérisson, Sylvie/Trumpke, Felix/Hilty, Reto M., Comments of the Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property and Competition Law on the Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on collective management of copyright and related rights and multi-territorial licensing of rights in musical works for online uses in the internal market COM (2012)372 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  218. Dussollier, Séverine, L’utilisation légitime de l’œuvre: un noveau sesame pour le benefice des exceptions en droit d’auteur?, Communication commerce électronique November 2005, No. 11, 19 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  219. Edelman, Benjamin, Web sites sharing IP addresses: Prevalence and Significance (September 2003), http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/archived_content/people/edelman/ip-sharing/ ((last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  220. Edstrom, Jerker/Nillson, Henrik, The Pirate Bay verdict – predictable, and yet…, European Intellectual Property Review 2009, Vol. 31 No. 9, 483–487 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  221. Edwards, Lilian, Next steps in the UK, in: Hargreaves, Ian /Hofheinz, Paul (eds.), Intellectual property and innovation. A framework for 21st century growth and jobs, pp. 37–41 http://www.lisboncouncil.net/index.php?option=com_downloads&id=693 (last accessed on 06.06.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  222. Edwards, Lilian, Mandy and Me: Some Thoughts on the Digital Economy Bill, ScriptED 2009, Vol. 6 Issue 3, 534–537 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  223. Edwards, Lilian/Waelde, Charlotte, Online intermediaries and liability for copyright in¬fringement, WIPO Workshop Keynote Paper (2005), http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1159640 (last accessed 16.06.2009) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  224. Engel, Christoph, Die Internet-Service-Provider als Geiseln deutscher Ordnungsbehörden – Eine Kritik an den Verfügungen der Bezirksregierung Düsseldorf, Mul⁠t⁠i⁠Media und Recht 2003, Beilage 4 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  225. Engström, Christian/Falkvinge, Rick, The case for copyright reform (2012), http://www.copyrightreform.eu/sites/copyrightreform.eu/files/The_Case_for_Copyright_Reform.pdf (last accessed on 06.06.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  226. Ensthaler, Jürgen/Heinemann, Jürgen, Die Fortentwicklung der Providerhaftung durch die Rechtsprechung, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht 2012, 433–440 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  227. Fangerow, Kathleen/Schulz, Daniela, Die Nutzung von Angeboten auf www.kino.to, Eine urheberrechtliche Analyse des Film-Streamings im Internet, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht 2010, 677–682 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  228. Farrand, Benjamin, The Digital Economy Act 2010: A cause for celebration, or a cause for concern, European Intellectual Property Review 2010, Vol. 32 Issue 10, 536–541 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  229. Feeman, Vickie L./Coats, William S./Rafter, Heather D./Given, John G., Revenge of the Record Industry Association of America: The rise and fall of Napster, Villanova Sports & Entertainment Law Journal 2002, Vol. 9, 35–36 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  230. Feiler, Lukas, Tor als Prüfstein der Data Retention Richtlinie (2005), http://www.lukasfeiler.com/Tor.pdf (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  231. Finger, Manuel/Apel, Simon, Anmerkung zu BGH, Urteil vom 15. August 2013 – I ZR 80/12 – File-Hosting Dienst, Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht 2013, 879–882 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  232. Fiscor, Milhály J., The WIPO “Internet Treaties” and copyright in the “cloud”, ALAI 2012 Congress, pp.40 et seq., http://www.alai.jp/ALAI2012/program/paper/The%20WIPO%20Internet%20Treaties%20and%20copyright%20in%20the%20Cloud%20%EF%BC%88Dr.%20Mih%C3%A1ly%20J.%20Ficsor%EF%BC%89.pdf Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  233. Francillon, Jacques, Téléchargement illégal. Heur et malheur de la loi Création et Internet : la loi HADOPI censurée par le Conseil constitutionnel, Revue de science criminelle et de droit pénal comparé 2009, No. 3, 609–622 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  234. Frey, Dieter/Rudolph, Matthias, Zugangserschwerungsgesetz: Schnellschuss mit Risiken und Nebenwirkungen, Computer und Recht 2009, 644–651 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  235. Frey, Dieter/Rudolph, Matthias/Oster, Jan, Internetsperren und der Schutz der Kommunikation im Internet, Am Beispiel behördlicher und gerichtlicher Sperrungsverfügungen im Bereich des Glücksspiel- und Urheberrechts, MultiMedia und Recht-Beilage 2012 to Issue 3, 1–26 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  236. Frhr. Raitz von Frentz, Wolfgang/Masch, Christian L., Anmerkung zu EuGH, Urteil vom 7. März 2013 – EUGH 2013-03-07 Aktenzeichen C-607/11 – Livestreaming, ITV Broadcasting Ltd. u. a./ TVCatchup Ltd., Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht 2013, 393–395 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  237. Gallant, Kenneth S., Legality as a Rule of Customary International Law: Non-Retroactivity of Crimes and Punishments – research through 2010 (14.06.2011), UALR Bowen School Re¬search Paper No. 11–12, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1864930 (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  238. Gardiner, Paddy/Abbotts, Gillie, Sky’s the limit for ISP blocking orders, Entertainment Law Review 2013, Vol. 24 Issue 6, 217–219 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  239. Gardiner, Paddy/Althoff, Juliane, High Court grants further blocking injunction against film and TV streaming websites, Entertainment Law Review 2014, Vol. 25 Issue 3, 108–110 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  240. Gautron, Allan, La « réponse graduée » (à nouveau) épinglée par le Conseil constitutionnel. Ou la délicate adéquation des moyens aux fins, Revue Lamy Droit de l'Immatériel 2009, No. 51, 63–73 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  241. Geiger, Christophe, Counterfeiting and the music industry: towards a criminalization of end users? The French ‘HADOPI’ example, in: Geiger, Christophe (ed.), Criminal enforcement of intellectual property (2012), pp. 386–402 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  242. Geiger, Christophe, Honourable attempt but (ultimately) dis-proportionately offensive against peer-to-peer on the internet (HADOPI) – a critical analysis of the recent anti-file-sharing legislation in France, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 2011, Vol. 42, 457–472 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  243. Geiger, Christophe, Intellectual Property Shall be Protected!? – Article 17(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union: a Mysterious Provision with an Unclear Scope, European Intellectual Property Review 2009, 113–117 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  244. Geiger, Christophe, Les exceptions au droit d’auteur en France, in: Geiger, Christophe/Bouyssi-Ruch, Michele/Hilty, Reto M. (eds.), Perspectives d’harmonisation du droit d’auteur en Europe, pp. 335–360 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  245. Giblin, Rebecca, Evaluating graduated response, Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts 2014, Vol. 37 No. 2, 147–209 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  246. Griffin, James, Copyright evolution – creation, regulation and the decline of substantively rational copyright law, Intellectual Property Quarterly 2013, 234–252 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  247. Griffin, James G. H., The effect of the Digital Economy Act 2010 upon ‘Semiotic Democracy’, International Review of Law, Computers & Technology 2010, Vol. 24 No. 3, 251–262 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  248. Griffiths, Jonathan, Constitutionalising or harmonising? – the Court of Justice, the right to property and European copyright law, European Law Review 2013, Vol. 38, 65–78 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  249. Griffiths, Jonathan, Criminal liability for intellectual property infringement in Europe: the role of fundamental rights, in: Geiger, Christophe (ed.), Criminal enforcement of intellectual property (2012), pp. 191–212 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  250. Griffiths, Jonathan, Enforcement of intellectual property rights and the right to a fair trial, in: Geiger, Christophe (ed.), Research handbook on human rights and intellectual property (2015), pp. 438 - 454 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  251. Grosskopf, Lambert, Anmerkung zum Urteil des LG Hamburg: Störerhaftung des Internan-schlussinhabers für Urheberrechtsverletzungen, Computer und Recht 2007, 122–124 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  252. Hammond, Robert G., Profit Leak? Pre-released file-sharing and the music industry (2013), Working paper, http://www4.ncsu.edu/~rghammon/Hammond_File_Sharing_Leak.pdf (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  253. Hauck, Ronny/Heim, Sebastian, Schwerpunktbereich Urheberrecht: Die rechtliche Bewertung von „Filesharing“- und „Streaming“- Sachverhalten, Juristische Schulung 2014, 303–307 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  254. Headdon, Toby, Beyond liability: on the availability and scope of injunctions against online intermediaries after L’Oréal v eBay, European Intellectual Property Review 2012, Vol 34 Issue 3, 137–144 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  255. Hečko, Zuzana, Data retention by Internet service providers for IP rights protection: Bonnier Audio (C-461/10), Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice 2012, 449–456 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  256. Heidrich, Joerg, Weitergehende Prüfpflichten bei besonderer Gefahrengeneigtheit eines File-Hosting-Diensts, K&R-Kommentar, Kommunikation & Recht 2013, 655–662 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  257. Heinemeyer, Dennis/Kreitlow, Matthias/Nordmeyer, Arne/Sabellek, André: Kampf gegen File-sharing als Modell verfehlter Mehrfachkompensation? – Fragen zur Schadenshöhe, zu Gesamtschuldnern und Beweisen bei Tauschbörsen, MultiMedia und Recht 2012, 279–284 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  258. Helfer, Laurence R., The new innovation frontier? Intellectual property and the European Court of Human Rights, in: Torremans, Paul L. C. (ed.), Intellectual Property and Human Rights, Enhanced Edition of Copyright and Human Rights (2008), pp. 25–76 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  259. Herr, Robin Elizabeth, Can Human Rights Law Support Access to Communication Tech¬nology? A Case Study under Article 10 of the Right to Receive Information, Information & Communications Technology Law 2013, Vol. 22, No. 1, 1–13 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  260. Hocking, Ryan, Secondary liability in copyright infringement: still no ‘Newz’?, Entertainment Law Review 2012, Vol. 23 Issue 4, 83–90 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  261. Hoeren, Thomas, Anmerkung zu BGH: Störerhaftung von RapidShare – Alone in the Dark, MultiMedia und Recht 2013, 185–189 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  262. Hoeren, Thomas, Kurzgutachten zur BMWi-Studie über Modelle zur Versendung von Warnhinweisen durch Internet-Zugangsanbieter an Nutzer bei Urheberrechtsverletz¬ungen (2012), http://politik.eco.de/files/2012/03/20120227-Hoeren-eco-Gutachten_final-2702.pdf (last accessed on 10.03.2013) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  263. Hoeren, Thomas, The European liability and responsibility of providers of online-platforms such as “Second Life”, Journal of Information, Law & Technology 2009, Issue 1, http://go.warwick.ac.uk/jilt/2009_1/hoeren (last accessed on 10.03.2013) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  264. Hoeren, Thomas/Bilek, Julia Ariella, Die territoriale Exklusivitätsvereinbarung bei Fußball-Übertragungen – Ein Modell der Vergangenheit!, Computer und Recht 2011, 735–741 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  265. Hoeren, Thomas/Yankova, Silviya, The liability of Internet intermediaries – The German pers-pective, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 2012, 501–531 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  266. Höfinger, Frank Michael, Anmerkung zu EuGH, Urteil vom 13. Februar 2014 – C-466/12 – Nils Svensson u.a./Retriever Sverige AB, Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrect 2014, 293–295 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  267. Hofmann, Herwig/Mihaescu, Bucura, The relation between the Charter's fundamental rights and the unwritten general principles of EU law: good administration as the test case, European Constitutional Law Review 2013, Vol. 9. No. 1, 73–101 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  268. Hörnle, Julia, Premature or Stillborn? – The Recent Challenge to the Digital Economy Act, Computer Law & Security Review 2012, Vol. 28, 83–89 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  269. Horten, Monica, The Digital Economy Act in the dock: A proportionate ruling? Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law 2012, 81–87 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  270. Hoy, Ruth/Wilks, John/Edbrooke, Nick, Dramatico Entertainment v BskyB: Pirate Bay runs aground in English waters, Entertainment Law Review 2012, Vol. 23 Issue 5, 151–153 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  271. Hyland, Mark, The seductive interface between adult entertainment and Norwich Pharmacal Relief, Communications Law 2013, Vol. 18 Issue 2, 56–60 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  272. Imbert-Quaretta, Mireille/Monfort, Jean-Yves/Carpentier, Jean-Baptiste, La contravention de négligence caractérisée à la lumière de la mise en œuvre de la procédure de réponse graduée, La Semaine Juridique – Édition Générale 2012, No. 19, 966–971 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  273. Introna, Lucas D./Nissenbaum, Helen, Shaping the Web: Why the politics of search engine matters, The Information Society 2000, Vol. 16, 169–185 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  274. Jasserand, Catherine, YouTube guilty but not liable for late removal of infringing material, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2012, Vol. 7 Issue 11, 790–791 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  275. Lynn, Jeff, Copyright for growth, in: Hargreaves, Ian/Hofheinz, Paul (eds.), Intellectual property and innovation. A framework for 21st century growth and jobs, pp. 11-16, http://www.lisboncouncil.net/index.php?option=com_downloads&id=693 (last accessed on 06.06.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  276. Johnson, M. Eric/McGuire, Dan/Willey, Nicholas D., The evolution of the peer-to-peer file sharing industry and the security risks for users, Proceedings of the 41st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2008, http://cds.tuck.dartmouth.edu/digital/assets/images/30750383.pdf (last accessed 13.03.2013) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  277. Jones, Joseph, Internet pirates walk the plank with Article 10 kept at bay: Neij and Sunde Kolmisoppi v Sweden, European Intellectual Property Review 2013, Vol. 35 Issue 11, 695–700 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  278. Joseph, Paul/Ward, Charlotte, Golden Eye (International) Ltd v Telefonica UK Ltd, Entertain-ment Law Review 2012, Vol. 23 Issue 6, 183–185 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  279. Kahlert, Henning, Urheberrecht kontra Datenschutz: EuGH bremst Forderungen nach einem zivilrechtlichen Auskunftsanspruch gegen Internet-Provider über die Identität von Tauschbörsen-Benutzern, European Law Reporter 2008, 78¬82 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  280. Kennedy, Rónán, No Three Strikes for Ireland (yet): EU Copyright Law and individual liability in recent Internet file sharing litigation, Journal of Internet Law 2011, Vol. 14, 15–28 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  281. Keplinger, Michael, Enforcement of IP rights in the digital environment: The role of the World Intellectual Property Organisation, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht – Internationaler Teil 2007, 648–649 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  282. Kern, Benjamin D., Whacking, joyriding and war-driving: Roaming use of Wi-Fi and the Law, CIPerati – a Cyberspace and I.P. Law newsletter 2005, Vol. 2 Issue 4, http://apps.americanbar.org/buslaw/committees/CL320010pub/newsletter/0009/ (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  283. Kioupis, Dimitris, Criminal liability on the Internet, in: Stamatoudi, Irini (ed.), Copyright enforcement on the Internet (2010), pp. 233–254 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  284. Klett, Alexander, Cloud und Privatkopie, Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht 2014, 18–22 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  285. Kohl, Uta, The rise and rise of online intermediaries in the governance of the Internet and beyond – connectivity intermediaries, International Review of Law, Computers & Technology 2012, Vol. 26 Issue 2–3, 185–210 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  286. Kortlander, Jenny, Is filtering the new silver bullet in the fight against child pornography on the Internet? A legal study into the experiences of Australia and Germany, Computer and Telecommunications Law Review, 2011, Vol. 17 Issue 7, 199–208 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  287. Kraßer, Rudolf, Schadensersatz für Verletzungen von gewerblichen Schutzrechten und Urheberrechten nach deutschem Recht, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Internationaler Teil 1980, 259–272 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  288. Krüger, Stefan/Apel, Simon, Haftung von Plattformbetreibern für urheberrechtlich geschützte Inhalte – Wie weit geht die Haftung und wann droht Schadensersatz?, MultiMedia und Recht 2012, 144–151 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  289. Krüger, Stefan/Maucher, Svenja-Ariane, IP-Adresse wirklich ein personenbezogenes Datum? – Ein falscher Trend mit großen Auswirkungen auf die Praxis, MultiMedia und Recht 2011, 433–439 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  290. Kulk, Stefan/Zuiderveen Borgesius, Frederik, Filtering for Copyright Enforcement in Europe after the SABAM cases, European Intellectual Property Review 2012, 54–58 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  291. Kuner, Christopher, Data Protection and Rights Protection on the Internet: The Promusicae Judgment of the European Court of Justice, European Intellectual Property Review 2008, 199–202 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  292. Larsson, Stefan, Metaphors, Law and digital phenomena: the Swedish pirate bay court case, International Journal of Law and Information Technology 2013, Vol. 21 No. 4, 354–379 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  293. Larusson, Haflidi Kristjan, Uncertainty in the scope of copyright: the case of illegal file-sharing in the UK, European Intellectual Property Review 2009, Vol. 31 No. 3, 124–134 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  294. Lauinger, Tobias/Kirda, Engin/Michiardi, Pietro, Paying for piracy? An analysis of one-click hosters’ controversial reward schemes, in: Balzarotti, Davide/Stolfo, Salvatore J./Cova, Marco (eds.), Research in attacks, intrusions, and defenses (2012), Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 7462, pp. 169–189 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  295. Leistner, Matthias, Grundlagen und Perspektiven der Haftung für Urheberrechtsver¬letzungen im Internet, Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht 2012, 722–740 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  296. Leistner, Matthias, Structural aspects of secondary (provider) liability in Europe, Journal of Intellectual Property and Practice 2014, Vol. 9 No. 1, 75–90. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  297. Leistner, Matthias/Stang, Felix, Die Neuerung der wettbewerbsrechtlichen Ver¬kehrspflichten – Ein Siegeszug der Prüfungspflichten? Wettbewerb in Recht und Praxis 2008, 533–555 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  298. Lemarchand, Stéphane/Lampe, Anne-Sophie, L'arrêt eBay c/ L'Oréal de la CJUE du 12 juillet 2011 revisite les conditions de la qualification de fournisseur d'hébergement au sens de l'article 14 de la directive « e-commerce », Droit de l'immatériel : informatique, médias, communication 2011, No. 75, 53–58 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  299. Lemley, Mark/Levine, David/Post, David, Don't break the Internet, Stanford Law Review Online 2011, Vol. 64, 34–38, http://www.stanfordlawreview.org/online/dont-break-internet (last accessed on 12.06.2012) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  300. Lievens, Dennis, L'Oréal v. eBay – Welcomed in France, resented in England, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 2012, 68–76 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  301. Lindner, Brigitte, The WIPO Treaties, in: Lindner, Brigitte/Shapiro, Ted, Copyright in the In-formation Society (2011), pp. 3–26 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  302. Liu, Zhengye/Dhungel, Prithula/Wu, Di/Zhang, Chao/Ross, Keith W., Understanding and im-proving incentives in private P2P communities (2010), http://www.cis.poly.edu/~ross/papers/private_incentive.pdf (last accessed on 20.04.2013) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  303. Lodder, Arno R./van der Meulen, Nicole S., Evaluation of the role of access providers, Discussion of Dutch Pirate Bay case law and introducing principles on directness, effectiveness, costs, relevance, and time, Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law 2013, Vol. 4 Issue 2, 130–141 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  304. Lou, Xiaosong/Hwang, Kai, Adaptive content poisoning to prevent illegal file distribution in P2P networks (2006), http://gridsec.usc.edu/files/publications/IEEE-TC-Lou-Hwang-Aug24-2006.pdf (last accessed on 20.04.2013) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  305. Maaßen, Stefan, Urheberrechtlicher Auskunftsanspruch und Vorratsdatenspeicherung, MultiMedia und Recht 2009, 511–515 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  306. MacEwan, Neil, A tricky situation: deception in cyberspace, Journal of Criminal Law 2013, Vol. 77 Issue 5, 417–432 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  307. Mac Síthigh, Daithí, The fragmentation of intermediary liability in the UK, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2013, Vol. 8 No. 7, 521-531 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  308. Mankowski, Peter, Die Düsseldorfer Sperrungsverfügung – alles andere als rheinischer Karneval, MultiMedia und Recht 2002, 277–278 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  309. Mansell, Robin/Steinmueller, W. Edward, Copyright infringement online: The case of the Digital Economy Act Judicial Review in the United Kingdom, New Media & Society 2013, Vol. 15, 1312–1328 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  310. Marino, Laure, Le droit d'accès à internet, nouveau droit fondamental, Recueil Dalloz 2009, Issue 30, 2045–2046 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  311. Matthews, Duncan/Zikovska, Petra, The rise and fall of the Anti-counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA): lessons for the European Union, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 2013, Vol. 44 Issue 6, 626–655 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  312. McIntyre, T.J., Child abuse images and Cleanfeeds: Assessing Internet blocking systems, in: Ian Brown (ed.), Research handbook on governance of the Internet (2012), 277–302 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  313. Meale, Darren, A triple strike against piracy as the music industry secures three more blocking injunctions, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2013, Vol. 8, No. 8, 591–594 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  314. Meale, Darren, Avast, ye file sharers! The Pirate Bay is sunk, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2012, Vol. 7 No. 9, 646–648 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  315. Meale, Darren, NewzBin2: the first section 97A injunction against an ISP, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2011, Vol. 6 No. 12, 854–857 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  316. Meale, Darren, Premier League 1, Internet pirates 0: sports streaming website the latest to be blocked, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2013, Vol. 8 No. 11, 821–823 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  317. Meale, Darren, SABAM v Scarlet: of course blanket filtering of the Internet is unlawful, but this isn’t the end of the story, European Intellectual Property Review 2012, Vol. 34 Issue 7, 429–432 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  318. Meier-Beck, Peter, Herausgabe des Verletzergewinns – Strafschadensersatz nach deutschem Recht, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht 2005, 617–623 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  319. Mendis, Dinusha, Digital Economy Act 2010: fighting a losing battle? Why the ‘three strikes’ law is not the answer to copyright law’s latest challenge, International Review of Law, Computers & Technology 2013, Vol. 27 Issue 1–2, 60–84 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  320. Meyerdierks, Per, Personenbeziehbarkeit Statischer IP-Adressen – Datenschutzrechtliche Ein-ordnung der Verarbeitung durch Betreiber von Webseiten, Mul⁠t⁠i⁠Media und Recht 2013, 705–708 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  321. Meyerdierks, Per, Sind IP-Adressen personenbezogene Daten, MultiMedia und Recht 2009, 8–14 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  322. Michel, Norbert, The impact of digital file sharing on the music industry: An empirical analysis, B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy 2006, Vol. 6 Issue 1, 1–24 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  323. Miller, Ernest/Feigenbaum, Joan, Taking the copy out of copyright, in: Sander, Tomas (ed.), Security and Privacy in Digital Rights Management, ACM CSS-8 Workshop DRM 2001 (2002), 233–244 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  324. Milstein, Alexander, Anmerkung zu EGMR: Haftung eines Forenbetreibers für anonyme Nutzerkommentare mit Meinungsfreiheit vereinbar, MultiMedia und Recht 2014, 41–42 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  325. Möller, Doris, Urheber-/Datenschutzrecht: Herausgabe gespeicherter Verkehrsdaten zur zivilrechtlichen Verfolgung von Urheberrechtsverletzungen, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 2012, 519–520 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  326. Montéro, Étienne/van Enis, Quentin, Ménager la liberté d’expression au regard des mesures de filtrage imposées aux intermédiaires de l’internet : la quadrature du cercle ?, Revue Lamy Droit de l'Immatériel 2008, No. 40 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  327. Moos, Flemming, Die Entwicklung des Datenschutzrechts im Jahr 2007, Kommunikation & Recht 2008, 137–145 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  328. Moreno, Felipe Romero, Incompatibility of the Digital Economy Act 2010 subscriber appeal process provisions with Article 6 of the ECHR, International Review of Law, Computers & Technology 2014, 1–17 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  329. Morgenstern, Holger, Zuverlässigkeit von IP-Adressen-Ermittlungssoftware, Zur Sicherheit der eingesetzten Programme und Verfahren zur Verletzungsdokumentation, Computer und Recht 2011, 203–208 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  330. Moss, Gary, Golden Eye v Telefonica: Media CAT revisited, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2012, Vol. 7 No. 12, 872–878 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  331. Moss, Gary, Media CAT v Adams: the CAT that did not get the cream, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2011, Vol. 6 No. 11, 813–820 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  332. Mueller, Milton/Kuehn, Andreas/Santoso, Stephanie Michelle, Policing the Network: Using DPI for Copyright Enforcement, Surveillance & Society 2012, Vol. 9 Issue 4, 348–364 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  333. Mühlberger, Sven, Die Haftung des Internetanschlussinhabers bei Filesharing-Konstell¬ationen nach den Grundsätzen der Störer-haftung, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht 2009, 1022–1027 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  334. Nas, Sjoera, The Multatuli Project ISP Notice & take down, revised article (27.10.2004), http://www.bof.nl/docs/researchpaperSANE.pdf (last accessed on 24.06.2009) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  335. Nasir, Colin, Taming the beast of file-sharing—Legal and technological solutions to the problem of copyright infringement over the Internet: Part 2, Entertainment Law Review 2005, Vol. 16 No. 4, 82–88 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  336. Neill, Art, Does a new wave of filesharing lawsuits represent a new business model for copyright owners?, Journal of Internet Law 2011, Vol. 14 No.12, 1–17 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  337. Nguyen, Godefroy Dang/Dejean, Sylvain/Moreau, François, Are streaming and other music consumption modes substitutes or complements? (2012), http://ssrn.com/abstract=2025071 (last accessed on 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  338. Nicol, Danny, Original Intent and the European Convention on Human Rights, Public Law 2005, 152–172 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  339. Nolte, Georg/Wimmers, Jörg, Wer stört? Gedanken zur Haftung von Intermediären im Internet, GRUR-Beilage 2014, 58–69 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  340. Nordemann, Jan Bernd, Haftung von Providern im Urheberrecht, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht 2011, 977–981 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  341. Nordemann, Jan Bernd, Störerhaftung für Urheberrechtsverletzungen – Welche konkreten Prüfpflichten haben Hostprovider (Contentprovider)?, Computer und Recht 2010, 653–661 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  342. Nordemann, Jan Bernd/Schaefer, Martin, Vermittlereigenschaft eines Access-Providers, Ge-werblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht 2009, 583–584 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  343. Oberholzer-Gee, Felix/Strumpf, Koleman, The effect of file sharing on record sales: An empirical analysis, Journal of Political Economy 2007, Vol. 115 Issue 1, 1–42 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  344. Paal, Boris/Hennemann, Moritz, Schutz von Urheberrechten im Internet, ACTA, Warnhinweis-modell und Europarecht, MultiMedia und Recht 2012, 288–293 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  345. Peguera, Miquel, The DMCA safe harbors and their European counterparts: A comparative analysis of some common problems, Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts 2009, Vol. 32, 481–482 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  346. Peitz, Martin/Waelbroeck, Patrick, The effect of internet piracy on music sales: Cross-section evidence, Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues 2004, Vol. 1 Issue 2, 71–79 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  347. Perez, Nico, New creative- and content-delivery services, in: Hargreaves, Ian/Hofheinz, Paul (eds.), Intellectual property and innovation. A framework for 21st century growth and jobs, pp. 22–26, http://www.lisboncouncil.net/index.php?option=com_downloads&id=693 (last accessed on 06.06.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  348. Peter, Markus, Störer im Internet – Haften Eltern für ihre Kinder? Kommunikation und Recht 2007, 371–375 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  349. Piasentin, Robert C., Unlawful? Innovative? Unstoppable? A comparative analysis of the potential legal liability facing P2P end-users in the United States, United Kingdom and Canada, International Journal of Law and Information Technology 2006, No. 14, 195–241 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  350. Piatek, Michael/Kohno, Tadayoshi/Krishnamurthy, Arvind, Challenges and directions for monitoring P2P file sharing networks – or – Why my printer received a DMCA takedown notice, University of Washington Technical Report 2008, UW-CS, http://dmca.cs.washington.edu/uwcse_dmca_tr.pdf (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  351. Poort, Joost/Leenheer, Jorna/von der Ham, Jeroen/Dumitru, Cosmin, Baywatch: Two approaches to measure the effects of blocking access to the Pirate Bay, Telecommunications Policy 2014, Vol. 38 Issue 4, 383–392 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  352. Prechal, Sacha, Competence creep and general principles of Law, Review of European Ad-ministrative Law 2010, Vol. 3 Issue 1, 5–22 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  353. Psychogiopoulou, Evangelia, Copyright enforcement, human rights protection and the re-sponsibilities of Internet service providers after Scarlet, European Intellectual Property Review 2012, 552–555 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  354. Reinbacher, Tobias, Strafbarkeit der Privatkopie von offensichtlich rechtswidrig hergestellten oder öffentlich zugänglich gemachten Vorlagen, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Ur¬heberrecht 2008, 394–401 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  355. Reinbothe, Jörg, The EU Enforcement Directive 2004/48/EC as a tool for copyright en-forcement, in: Stamatoudi, Irini (ed.), Copyright enforcement and the Internet (2010), pp. 3–28 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  356. Revet, Thierry, Droit de propriété sur droit de propriété ne vaut, Revue trimestrielle de droit civil 2009, No. 4, 754–756 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  357. Revet, Thierry, La consécration de la liberté d'accéder aux services de communication au public en ligne, protection comme res de la position contractuelle permettant l'accès au réseau internet ?, Revue trimestrielle de droit civil 2009, No. 4, 756–757 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  358. Ricke, Thorsten/Wild, Fabian, Konten in Sachen „kino.to“ beschlagnahmt, MultiMedia und Recht-Aktuell 2011, 319492 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  359. Roemer, Ryan, The digital evolution: Freenet and the future of copyright in the Internet, UCLA Journal of Law & Technology 2002, Vol. 6 Issue 2, 1–28 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  360. Rogers, Michael/Bhatti, Saleem, How to disappear completely: A survey of private peer-to-peer networks 2 (2007), http://www.cs.st-andrews.ac.uk/~saleem/papers/2007/space2007/space2007-rb2007.pdf (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  361. Rosenkranz, Timo, Sperrungsverfügungen gegen Access-Provider, JurPC 2003, Web–Dok. 16/2003, http://www.jurpc.de/jurpc/show?id=20030016 (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  362. Rösler, Hannes, Comment to OLG Hamburg, Decision of 08.02.2006 – 5 U 78/05 (Cybersky), International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 2006, 994–996 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  363. Ross, Alexander/Livingstone, Claire, Communication to the public: Part 2, Entertainment Law Review 2012, Vol. 23 Issue 7, 209–213 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  364. Rössel, Markus, Filterpflichten des Providers im Lichte des EuGH – Eine Entlastung des I. Zivilsenates, Computer und Recht 2011, 589–597 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  365. Roth, Hans-Peter, Überwachungs- und Prüfungspflicht von Providern im Lichte der aktuellen EuGH-Rechtsprechung, zugleich Anm. zu EuGH, Urteil vom 24..11.2011 – C-70/10, Zeit¬schrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht 2012, 125–128 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  366. Roth, Hans-Peter, Verantwortlichkeit von Betreibern von Internet-Marktplätzen für Marken-rechtsverletzungen durch Nutzer: L'Oréal gegen eBay, Wettbewerb in Recht und Praxis 2011, 1258–1268 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  367. Rousseau, Dominique, Après HADOPI 1et HADOPI 2, HADOPI 3 ? La décision du Conseil constitutionnel du 22 octobre 2009, Légipresse 2009, No. 267, 173–174 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  368. Rousseau, Dominique, Hado-pirate la Constitution : le Conseil sanctionne !, Revue Lamy Droit de l'Immatériel 2009, No. 51, 103–105 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  369. Rudkin-Binks, Jason/Melbourne Stephanie, The new ‘three strikes’ regime for copyright enforcement in New Zealand – requiring ISPs to step up to fight, Entertainment Law Review 2009, Vol. 20, 146–149 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  370. Rühmkorf, Andreas, The Liability of online auction portals: Towards a Uniform Approach?, Journal of Internet Law 2010, Vol. 14 Issue 4, 3–10 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  371. Sachdeva, Akash/McDonald, Jonathan, The use of Norwich Pharmacal orders to identify online infringers – an old remedy updated for modern times, Entertainment Law Review 2013, Vol. 24 Issue 3, 103–106 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  372. Salsas, Eduard/Härting, Niko, L'Oréal v. eBay – Consequences for EU Member States, Computer Law Review International 2011, Issue 5, 137–142 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  373. Savola, Pekka, Blocking injunctions and website operators’ liability for copyright infringement for user-generated links, European Intellectual Property Review 2014, Vol. 36 Issue 5, 279–288 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  374. Schapiro, Leo, Anhaltende Rechtsunsicherheit für die Betreiber von Internetmeinungs¬portalen?, Das Urteil des EGMR „Delfi AS v. Estonia“ und seine Auswirkungen auf die deutsche Rechtslage, Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht 2014, 201–210. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  375. Scharf Nick, Napster’s long shadow: copyright and peer-to-peer technology, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2011, Vol. 6 No. 11, 806–812 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  376. Schmitz, Sandra, The US SOPA and PIPA – A European Perspective, International Review of Law, Computers & Technology 2013, Vol. 27 Issue 1-2, 213–229 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  377. Schmitz, Sandra, Die Verfolgung von Urheberrechtsverletzungen im Internet – Neues vom EUGH, in: Taeger, Jürgen (ed.), IT und Internet – Mit Recht gestalten, Tagungsband Herbstakademie 2012 (2012), pp. 227–243 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  378. Schmitz, Sandra, Facebook’s real name policy, Bye-bye, Max Mustermann?, Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law 2013, Vol. 4 Issue 3, 190–204 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  379. Schmitz, Sandra, The RedTube copyright infringement affair in Germany: Shame on who?, International Review of Law, Computers & Technology 2015, Vol. 29 Issue 1, pp. 33 - 49 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  380. Schmitz, Sandra/Ries, Thorsten, Three songs and you are disconnected from Cyberspace? Not in Germany where the industry may “turn Piracy into Profit”, European Journal of Law and Technology 2012, Vol. 3 No. 1 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  381. Schmitz, Sandra/Siry, Lawrence, Online-Archive – „Der ewige Pranger im Internet”? in: Taeger, Jürgen (ed.), Digitale Evolution, Tagungsband Herbstakademie 2010 (2010), pp. 217–232 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  382. Schnabel, Christoph, Das Zugangserschwerungsgesetz – Zum Access-Blocking als ultima ratio des Jugendschutzes, Juristenzeitung 2009, 996–1001 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  383. Schreier, Thorsten, Düsseldorfer Sperrungsverfügung: Warum ein Provider erfolgreich war, MultiMedia und Recht 2004, 297–302 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  384. Schrijvers, Marlous, European Court rules on the position of eBay regarding the sale of infringing products: L'Oréal v eBay, European Intellectual Property Review 2011, Vol. 33 Issue 11, 723–724 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  385. Schwartmann, Rolf, Filesharing, Sharehosting & Co, Funktionsweise und rechtliche Be¬wertung aktueller Erscheinungsformen von Urheberrechtsverletzungen im Internet, Kommunikation und Recht 2011, Beihefter 2 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  386. Seltzer, Wendy, Free speech unmoored in copyright’s safe harbor: Chilling effects of the DMCA on the First Amendment, Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 2010, Vol. 24 No. 1, 171–232 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  387. Senftleben, Martin, The International Three-Step Test, A model provision for EC fair use legislation, Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law 2010, 67–82 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  388. Sesing, Andreas, Anmerkung zur Entscheidung des BGH-Urteil vom 15.08.2013 (I ZR 80/12, MMR 2013, 733) – Zur Frage der Prüfungs- und Handlungspflichten für Sharehoster, MultiMedia und Recht 2013, 737–739 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  389. Sieber, Ulrich, Sperrverpflichtungen gegen Kinderpornografie im Internet, Juristenzeitung 2009, 653–662 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  390. Sieber, Ulrich/Nolde, Malaika, Sperrverfügungen im Internet, Territoriale Rechtsgeltung im globalen Cyberspace? (2008), http://www.mpicc.de/de/data/pdf/mpi_sperrverfuegungen_pm-gutachten.pdf (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  391. Sieber, Ulrich/Volkmann, Christian, Die öffentlich-rechtliche Störerhaftung der Access-Pro¬vider, Kommunikation & Recht 2002, 398–409 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  392. Simon, Charles, Les adresses IP sont des données personnelles selon le Conseil constitutionnel, Revue Lamy Droit de l'Immatériel 2009, No. 51, 114–115 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  393. Siry, Lawrence/Schmitz, Sandra, A right to be forgotten? – How recent developments in Germany may affect the internet publishers in the US, European Journal of Law and Technology, Vol.3, No. 1, 2012, 1–12 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  394. Smith, Joel/Burke, Sarah, Record companies win first round v The Pirate Bay in the United Kingdom but pirates remain at large: Dramatico Entertainment Ltd v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd, European Intellectual Property Review 2012, Vol. 34 Issue 6, 416–419 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  395. Smits, Catherine/Ligot, Johanne, Arrêt « L'Oréal » : clarifications sur le cadre légal des activités et des responsabilités des hébergeurs de sites internet, Journal de droit européen 2011, No. 184, 294–296 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  396. Solmecke, Christian, Darlegungs- und Beweislast in Filesharing-Verfahren – Eine Auswertung der Aktuellen Rechtsprechung, in: Taeger, Jürgen (ed.), Law as a Service (LaaS) – Recht im Internet- und Cloud-Zeitalter (2013), Band 1, pp. 447–459 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  397. Solmecke, Christian, LG Köln: Erstattung von Anwaltskosten einer (Massen-) Abmahnung wegen P2P-Urheberrechtsverletzung, MultiMedia und Recht 2008, 129–130 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  398. Solmecke, Christian, Wenn sich die Abmahnindustrie verzockt – Rechtsprobleme bei Massen-abmahnungen im Internet, in: Taeger, Jürgen (ed.), Digitale Evolution – Herausforder¬ungen für das Informations- und Medienrecht (2010), pp. 627–633 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  399. Solmecke, Christian/Bärenfänger, Jan, Urheberrechtliche Schutzfähigkeit von Dateifragmenten – Nutzlos = Schutzlos, MultiMedia und Recht 2011, 567–573 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  400. Solmecke, Christian/Rüther, Felix/Herkens, Thomas, Uneinheitliche Darlegungs- und Beweislast in Filesharing-Verfahren – Abweichen von zivilprozessualen Grund¬sätzen zu Gunsten der Rechteinhaber?, MultiMedia und Recht 2013, 217–221 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  401. Spindler, Gerald, „Die Tür ist auf“ – Europarechtliche Zulässigkeit von Auskunftsansprüchen gegenüber Providern, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht 2008, 574–577 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  402. Spindler, Gerald, Das Gesetz zum elektronischen Geschäftsverkehr – Verantwortlichkeit der Diensteanbieter und Herkunftslandprinzip, Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 2002, 921–927 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  403. Spindler, Gerald, Die zivilrechtliche Verantwortlichkeit von Internetauktionshäusern – Haftung für automatisch registrierte und publizierte Inhalte?, MultiMedia und Recht 2001, 737–743 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  404. Spindler, Gerald, Europarechtliche Rahmenbedingungen der Störerhaftung im Internet, Multimedia und Recht 2011, 703–707 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  405. Spindler, Gerald, Präzisierungen der Störerhaftung im Internet – Besprechung des BGH-Urteils „Kinderhochstühle im Internet” Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht 2011, 101–108 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  406. Stadler, Thomas, Kein erschwerter Zugang, MultiMedia und Recht 2009, 581–582 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  407. Stadler, Thomas, Sperrungsverfügungen gegen Access-Provider, MultiMedia und Recht 2002, 343–347 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  408. Stamatoudi, Irini, Ethics, reality and the Law – The example of Promusicae v Telefonica & LSG v Tele 2, Revue Hellénique de droit international 2010, 921–948 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  409. Stieper, Malte, Rezeptiver Werkgenuss als rechtmäßige Nutzung, MultiMedia und Recht 2012, 12–17 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  410. Strowel, Alain, La loi création et Internet : de la confirmation d’un ‘droit d’accès’ en droit d’auteur à l’analyse de la proportionalité de la réponse graduée, in : Institut de Recherche en Propriété Intellectuelle (ed.), Contrefaçon sur Internet : Les enjeux du droit d'auteur sur le Web 2.0 (2009), pp. 99–121 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  411. Strowel, Alain, The “Graduated Response” in France, in: Stamatoudi, Irini, Copyright en-forcement and the Internet (2010), pp. 147–162 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  412. Sujecki, Bartosz, Wettbewerbsverstoß durch territoriale Exklusivitätsvereinbarungen bei Fußball-Übertragungen, Anmerkung, Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 2012, 214 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  413. Szuskin, Laurent/De Guillenschmidt, Maxime, L'arrêt « Promusicae » beaucoup de bruit pour rien?, Droit de l'immatériel : informatique, médias, communication 2008, No. 37, 6–8 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  414. Taylor, Mark/Haggerty, John/Gresty, David/Berry, Tom, Digital evidence from peer-to-peer networks, Computer Law & Security Review 2011, Vol. 27, 647–652 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  415. Terré, François, Être ou ne pas être… responsable – À propos des prestataires de service par Internet, La Semaine Juridique – édition générale 2011, Nos. 43–44, 1943–1948 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  416. Thoumyre, Lionel, La licence globale optionelle: un pare-feu contre le bugs de la repression, Revue Lamy Droit de l'Immateriél 2006, 80–84 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  417. Tibber, Andrew, Know your enemy, Magazine of the Society for Computers and Law 2008, Vol. 19 Issue 4, 1–3 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  418. Tikk, Eneken, IP Addresses Subject to Personal Data Regulation, in: Tikk, Eneken/Talihärm, Anna-Mari (eds.), International Cyber Security Legal & Policy Proceedings (2010), pp. 24–39 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  419. Tully, Stephen, A human right to access the Internet? Problems and Prospects, Human Rights Law Review 2014, Vol. 14, 175–195 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  420. Tyra, Frank, Ausgewählte Probleme aus der Abmahnpraxis bei Privatnutzungen in Musiktauschsystemen, Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht 2009, 934–944 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  421. Usai, Andrea, The freedom to conduct a business in the EU, its limitations and its role in the European legal order: A new engine for deeper and stronger economic, social and political integration, German Law Journal 2010, Vol. 14 No. 9, 1867–1888 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  422. Vamialis, Anna, Online defamation: confronting anonymity, International Journal of Law and Information Technology 2013, Vol. 21 Issue 1, 31–65 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  423. van Eecke, Patrick/Truyens, Maarten, L'Oréal v eBay: Is the tide finally turning for hosting providers?, Computer und Recht 2011, 1–8 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  424. van Eecke, Patrick/Truyens, Maarten, L'Oréal v. eBay: The Court of Justice clarifies the position of online auction providers, Computer Law Review International 2011, Issue 5, 129–136 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  425. van Eimeren, Birgit/Gerhard, Heinz/Frees, Beate, ARD/ZDF-Online-Studie 2004, Internetver-breitung in Deutschland: Potenzial vorerst ausgeschöpft?, Media Perspektiven 2004, No. 8, 350–370 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  426. Venzke, Sven, Die Personenbezogenheit der IP-Adresse, Zeitschrift für Datenschutz 2011, 114–118 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  427. Verpeaux, Michel, Loi Hadopi 2, contrôle à double détente : 1. A propos de la décision du Conseil constitutionnel du 22 octobre 2009, La Semaine Juridique, Édition générale 2009, No. 46, 15–17 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  428. Verweyen, Urs, Grenzen der Störerhaftung in Peer to Peer-Netzwerken, MultiMedia und Recht 2009, 590–594 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  429. Vincents, Okechukwu Benjamin, When Rights Clash Online: The tracking of P2P copyright infringements vs. the EC Personal Data Directive, International Journal of Law and Information Technology 2011, Vol.16, No.3, 270–296 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  430. Volkmann, Christian, Aktuelle Entwicklungen in der Providerhaftung im Jahr 2013, Kommunikation & Recht 2014, 375–381 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  431. Völzmann-Stickelbrock, Barbara, BGH: Prüfpflichten für Sharehoster im Rahmen der Störerhaftung – File-Hosting-Dienst, Kommentierte BGH-Rechtsprechung Lindenmaier-Möhring 2013, 352737 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  432. von Lohmann, Fred, Measuring the Digital Millennium Copyright Act against the Darknet: Implications for the regulation of Technological Protection Measures, Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review 2004, Vol. 24, 635–648 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  433. Voorhoof, Dirk, Freedom of expression and the right to information: Implications for copyright, in Geiger, Christophe (ed.), Research Handbook on Human Rights and Intellectual Property (2015), pp. 331 – 353 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  434. Wandtke, Artur-Axel/von Gerlach, Felix-Tessen, Die urheberrechtliche Rechtmäßigkeit der Nutzung von Audio-Video Streaminginhalten im Internet, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht 2013, 676–683 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  435. Wang, Xiaoyun/Yu, Hongbo, How to break MD5 and other hash functions, in: Cramer, Ronald (ed.), Advances in Cryptology – EUROCRYPT 2005: 24th Annual International Conference on the Theory and Applications of Cryptographic Techniques, Proceedings, Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 3494 (2005), pp. 19–35 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  436. Wechsler, Andrea, Criminal enforcement of intellectual property law: an economic approach, in: Geiger, Christophe (ed.), Criminal enforcement of intellectual property (2012), pp. 128–150 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  437. Weinstein, Debra, Defining Expeditious: Uncharted territory of the DMCA safe harbor provision – A survey of what we know and do not know about the expeditiousness of service provider responses to takedown notifications, Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal 2009, Vol. 26, 589–621 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  438. Wilmer, Thomas, Überspannte Prüfpflichten für Host-Provider? – Vorschlag für eine Haft-ungsmatrix, 61 Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 2008, 1845–1851 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  439. Wolfgang Schulz/Thorsten Held/Arne Laudien, Search engines as gatekeepers of public communication: Analysis of the German framework applicable to Internet search engines including Media Law and Anti-trust Law, German Law Journal 2005, 1419–1432 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  440. Wood, Jessica A., The Darknet: A digital copyright revolution, Richmond Journal of Law & Technology 2010, Vol. 16 Issue 4, Article 14 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  441. Yu, Peter K., Six secret (and now open) fears of ACTA, Southern Methodist University Law Review 2011, Vol. 64 Issue 3975–1094 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  442. Yu, Peter K., Intellectual Property and Human Rights in the Nonmultilateral Era, Florida Law Review 2012, Vol. 64, 1045–1100 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  443. Yu, Peter K., The Graduated Response, Florida Law Review 2010, Vol 62, 1373–1430 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  444. Zentner, Alejandro, Measuring the effect of file sharing on music purchases, Journal of Law and Economics 2006, Vol. 49 Issue 1, 63–90 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  445. Government Materials and Official Documents Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  446. Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, Opinion 01/2008 on Data Protection Issues related to Search Engines, 00737/EN, WP 148 of 04.04.2008, http://ec.europa.eu/justice/policies/privacy/docs/wpdocs/2008/wp148_en.pdf (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  447. Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, Opinion 4/2007 on the Concept of Personal Data, 01248/07/EN, WP 136 of 20.06.2007, http://ec.europa.eu/justice/policies/privacy/docs/wpdocs/2007/wp136_en.pdf (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  448. Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, Statement of the Working Party on Current Discussions Regarding the Data Protection Reform Package (27.02.2013), http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data-protection/article-29/documentation/other-document/files/2013/20130227_statement_dp_reform_package_en.pdf (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  449. Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, WP 37: Privacy on the Internet – An integrated EU Approach to Online Data Protection, 5063/00/EN/FINAL, WP 37 of 21.11.2000 http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data-protection/article-29/documentation/opinion-recommendation/files/2000/wp37_en.pdf (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  450. Assemblée Nationale, Réponse à la Question écrite No. 3096, Journal Officiel de la Republique Francaise of 25.12.2012, 7918, http://questions.assemblee-nationale.fr/q14/14-3096QE.htm (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  451. Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie, Gesamt-wirtschaftliche Perspektiven der Kultur- und Kreativwirtschaft in Deutschland, Forschungsbericht Nr. 577, http://www.kultur-kreativ-wirtschaft.de/Dateien/KuK/PDF/doku-577-gesamtwirtschaftliche-perspektiven-kultur-und-kreativwirtschaft-kurzfassung,property=pdf,bereich=kuk,sprache=de,rwb=true.pdf (last accessed on 15.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  452. Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie, Monitoring zu ausgewählten wirtschaft¬lichen Eckdaten der Kultur- und Kreativwirtschaft 2009, Forschungsbericht Nr.589 (2010), http://www.creative.nrw.de/fileadmin/files/downloads/Publikationen/589_BMWI_StudieKuK2009.pdf (last accessed on 15.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  453. Bundesverband Musikindustrie, Musikindustrie in Zahlen 2009, http://www.musikindustrie.de/uploads/media/MiZ_2009_gesamt_01.pdf (last accessed on 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  454. Bureau of the Convention, Draft Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, New proposal for Articles 1 to 30 (Civil and political rights and citizens' rights) (05.05.2000), CHARTE 4284, Convent 28 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  455. Bureau of the Convention, Note from the Praesidium, Draft Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Text of the Explanations Relating to the Complete Text of the Charter as set out in CHARTE 4487/00 CONVENT 50 (11.10.2000), CHARTE 4473/00, Convent 49 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  456. Bureau of the Convention, Note from the Presidium, Draft Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, New Proposal for Articles 1 to 12 (now 1 to 16) (08.03.2000), CHARTE 4149/00, Convent 13 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  457. Bureau of the Convention, Presidency Note, Draft Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Text of the explanations relating to the complete text of the Charter as set out in CHARTE 4422/00 CONVENT 45 (31.07.2000), CHARTE 4423/00, Convent 46 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  458. Commission of the European Communities, Commission Staff Working Document, Report to the Council, the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee on the appli¬cation of Directive 2001/29/EC on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society (30.11.2007), SEC(2007) 1556, http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/copyright/docs/copyright-infso/application-report_en.pdf (last accessed on 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  459. Commission of the European Communities, Green Paper, Copyright in the Knowledge Economy (16.07.2008), COM(2008) 466 final, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2008:0466:FIN:EN:PDF (last accessed on 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  460. Commission of the European Parliament, First Report on the Application of Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on Certain Legal Aspects of Information Society Services, in particular Electronic Commerce, in the Internal Market (Directive on Electronic Commerce) COM(2003) 702 final, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2003:0702:FIN:EN:PDF (last accessed on 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  461. Council of Europe, Internet: Case-Law of the European Court of Human Rights (June 2011), http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Research_report_Internet_ENG.pdf (last accessed on 05.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  462. De Wolf & Partners, Study on the Application of Directive 2001/29/EC on Copyright and Related Rights in the Information Society (The “InfoSoc Directive”) (2013), http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/copyright/docs/studies/131216_study_en.pdf (last accessed on 15.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  463. Department for Culture, Media and Sport and Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, Digital Britain Report (2009), http://www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/cm76/7650/7650.pdf (last accessed on 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  464. Department of Trade and Industry, Consultation Document on Electronic Commerce Directive: the liability of Hyperlinkers, Location Tool Services and Content Aggregators (June 2005), http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file13986.pdf (last accessed on 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  465. Détraigne, Yves/Escoffier, Anne-Marie, Rapport d’information fait au nom de la Commission des lois constitutionnelles, de législation, du suffrage universel, du Règlement et d’administration générale, par le groupe de travail relatif au respect de la vie privée à l’heure des mémoires numériques (27.05.2009), http://www.senat.fr/rap/r08-441/r08-441.html (last accessed on 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  466. Deutscher Bundesrat, Empfehlungen der Ausschüsse zum Gesetz zur Neuregelung der Telekommunikationsüberwachung und anderer verdeckter Ermittlungsmaßnahmen sowie zur Umsetzung der Richtlinie 2006/24/EC, Bundesratsdrucksache 798/1/07 (19.11.2007) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  467. Deutscher Bundestag, Bundestagsdrucksache 16/5048 (20.04.2007) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  468. Deutscher Bundestag, Dritter Zwischenbericht der Enquete-Kommission 'Internet und digitale Gesellschaft', Bundestagsdrucksache 17/7899 (23.11.2011) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  469. Deutscher Bundestag, Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Produktpiraterie, Bundestagsdrucksache 11/4792 (15.06.1989) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  470. Deutscher Bundestag, Entwurf eines Zweiten Gesetzes zur Regeleung des Urheberrechts in der Informationsgesellschaft, Bundestagsdrucksache 16/1828 (05.06.2006) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  471. Edwards, Lilian, Role and responsibility of Internet intermediaries in the field of copyright and related rights (2011), http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/copyright/en/doc/role_and_responsibility_of_the_Internet_intermediaries_final.pdf (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  472. Espinel, Victoria / Chopra, Aneesh / Schmidt, Howard, Combating online piracy while protecting an open and innovative Internet: Official White House response to stop the E-PARASITE Act (2012), https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petition-tool/response/combating-online-piracy-while-protecting-open-and-innovative-internet (last accessed: 12.07.2012) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  473. Espinel, Victoria/Chopra, Aneesh/Schmidt, Howard, Combating online piracy while protecting an open and innovative Internet, Official White House response to the petitions “Stop the E-Parasite Act” and “VETO the SOPA bill and any other future bills that threaten to diminish the free flow of information” (14.01.2012), https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/response/combating-online-piracy-while-protecting-open-and-innovative-internet (last accessed on 06.06.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  474. EU Commission, Code of EU online rights (2012), https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/sites/digital-agenda/files/Code%20EU%20online%20rights%20EN%20final%202.pdf (last accessed on 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  475. EU Network of Independent Experts on Fundamental Rights, Commentary of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (June 2006), http://ec.europa.eu/justice/fundamental-rights/files/networkcommentaryfinal_en.pdf, Article 7 CFR (last accessed on 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  476. European Commission, Antitrust: Commission obtains from Google comparable display of specialised search rivals, Press release of 05.02.2014, http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-14-116_en.htm (last accessed on 06.06.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  477. European Commission, Civil enforcement of intellectual property rights: public consultation on the efficiency of proceedings and accessibility of measures, consultation period 30.11.2012 to 30.03.2013 (July 2013), http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/consultations/docs/2012/intellectual-property-rights/questionnaire_en.pdf (last accessed on 06.06.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  478. European Commission, Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the European Economic and Social Committee, The Management of Copyright and Related Rights in the Internal Market, COM(2004) 0261 final, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:52004DC0261:EN:NOT (last accessed on 06.06.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  479. European Commission, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, A Single Market for intellectual property rights – Boosting creativity and innovation to provide economic growth, high quality jobs and first class products and services in Europe, Com(2011) 287 final, http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/copyright/docs/ipr_strategy/COM_2011_287_en.pdf (last accessed on 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  480. European Commission, DG Internal Market and Services, Civil enforcement of intellectual property rights: Public Consultation of the efficiency of proceedings and accessibility of measures, synthesis of the responses (July 2013), http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/consultations/docs/2012/intellectual-property-rights/summary-of-responses_en.pdf (last accessed on 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  481. European Commission, DG Internal Market and Services, Study on Online Copyright Enforcement and Data Protection in Selected Member States (November 2009), http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/iprenforcement/docs/study-online-enforcement_en.pdf (last accessed on 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  482. European Commission, Directive on collective management of copyright and related rights and multi-territorial licensing - frequently asked questions, MEMO/14/79 of 04.02.2014, http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-14-79_en.pdf (last accessed on 06.06.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  483. European Commission, Evidence Dossier – Evidence for Necessity of Data Retention in the EU (2013) http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/pdf/policies/police_cooperation/evidence_en.pdf (last accessed on 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  484. European Commission, Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on measures and procedures to ensure the enforcement of intellectual property rights, COM (2003) 46 final (20.01.2003), http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2003:0046:FIN:EN:PDF (last accessed on 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  485. European Commission, Proposal for a European Parliament and Council Directive on criminal measures aimed at ensuring the enforcement of intellectual property rights, COM(2005) 276 final (12.07.2005), http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2005/0276/COM_COM%282005%290276_EN.pdf (last accessed on 06.06.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  486. European Commission, Proposal for a revision of the Directive on the enforcement of intellectual property rights (Directive 2004/48/EC), http://ec.europa.eu/smart-regulation/impact/planned_ia/docs/2011_markt_006_review_enforcement_directive_ipr_en.pdf (last accessed on 06.06.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  487. European Commission, Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, Evaluation Report on the Data Retention Directive (Directive 2006/24/EC), Com(2011) 225 final (18.04.2011), http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0225:FIN:en:PDF (last accessed on 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  488. European Commission, Strategy for the enforcement of intellectual property rights in third countries, OJ C 129 (26.05.2005), pp. 3–16. http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2010/december/tradoc_147070.pdf (last accessed on 06.06.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  489. European Commission, Synthesis of Comments on the Commission Report on the Application of Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 29 April 2004 on the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights (July 2011), COM(2010) 779 final, http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/consultations/docs/2011/intellectual_property_rights/summary_report_replies_consultation_en.pdf (last accessed on 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  490. European Commission, Synthesis of the responses “Civil enforcement of intellectual property rights: public consultation on the efficiency of proceedings and accessibility of measures” (July 2013), http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/consultations/docs/2012/intellectual-property-rights/summary-of-responses_en.pdf (last accessed on 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  491. European Convention, Working Group II "Intégration de la Charte/adhésion à la CEDH", Speaking note of M. le juge Vassilios Skouris (17.09.2002), http://european-convention.eu.int/ docs/wd2/3063.pdf (last accessed on 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  492. European Data Protection Supervisor, Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor on the current negotiations by the European Union of an Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA), OJ C 147 (05.06.2010), 1, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2010:147:0001:0013:EN:PDF (last accessed on 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  493. European Observatory on Counterfeiting and Piracy, Evidence and right of information in Intellectual Property Rights (2010), http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/iprenforcement/docs/evidence_en.pdf. (last accessed on 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  494. European Parliament, ACTA before the European Parliament, press release Ref. no. 20120217BKG38488 of 04.06.2012, http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/pressroom/content/20120217BKG38488/ht (last accessed on 06.06.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  495. European Parliament, DG for Internal Policies, Policy Department C: Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs, File Sharing (2011), http://www.ivir.nl/publications/vaneijk/pe432775_en-rev-fin.pdf (last accessed on 15.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  496. European Parliament, Freedom of expression on the Internet, resolution, P6_TA(2006)0324 (6.07.2006), http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&reference=P6-TA-2006-0324&language=EN Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  497. European Parliament, Legislative resolution of 4 February 2014 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on collective management of copyright and related rights and multi-territorial licensing of rights in musical works for online uses in the internal market (COM(2012) 0372 – C7-0183/2012 – 2012/0180(COD)), http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P7-TA-2014-0056+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN (last accessed on 06.06.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  498. European Telecommunications Standards Institute, ETSI TS 101 331 (August 2001), http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/101300_101399/101331/01.01.01_60/ts_101331v010101p.pdf (last accessed on 15.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  499. Executive Office of the President of the United States, US Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator, Joint Strategic Plan on Intellectual Property Enforcement (June 2010), http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/intellectualproperty/intellectualproperty_strategic_plan.pdf (last accessed on 06.06.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  500. Gowers, Andrew, Gowers Review of Intellectual Property (December 2006), http://www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/other/0118404830/0118404830.pdf (last accessed on 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  501. HADOPI, 2010 Activity Report (2011), http://hadopi.fr/sites/default/files/page/pdf/Hadopi_Rapportannuel_ENG.pdf (last accessed on 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  502. HADOPI, Biens culturels et usages d’Internet : pratiques et perceptions des internautes français (January 2013), http://hadopi.fr/sites/default/files/page/pdf/HADOPI-160113-BU2-Complet.pdf (last accessed on 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  503. HADOPI, HADOPI – 1 ½ year after the launch (March 2012), http://www.hadopi.fr/sites/default/files/page/pdf/note17_en.pdf (last accessed on 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  504. HADOPI, Rapport Annuel 2012/2013 (2013), http://www.hadopi.fr/sites/default/files/page/pdf/HADOPI_RapportAnnuel_2013.pdf (last accessed on 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  505. HADOPI, Réponse graduée – Les chiffres clés (06.11.2013), http://www.hadopi.fr/sites/default/files/Chiffres_reponsegraduee_Octobre2013.pdf (last accessed on 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  506. Hargreaves, Ian, Digital Opportunity, A Review of Intellectual Property and Growth (2011), http://www.ipo.gov.uk/ipreview-finalreport.pdf (last accessed on 15.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  507. HM Government, Modernising Copyright: A modern, robust and flexible framework, Government Response to Consultation on Copyright Exceptions and Clarifying Copy¬right Law (December 2012), http://www.ipo.gov.uk/response-2011-copyright-final.pdf (last accessed on 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  508. House of Commons, Digital Economy Act: Copyright, Standard Note: SN/HA/5515 (28.06.2013), www.parliament.uk/briefing-papers/sn05515.pdf (last accessed on 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  509. House of Lords, Hansard, Debate 18.01.2010, http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200910/ldhansrd/text/100118-0004.htm#1001185000078 (last accessed on 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  510. House of Lords, House of Commons, Joint Committee on Human Rights, Legislative Scrutiny: Digital Economy Bill, Fifth Report of Session 2009-10, HL Paper 44 = HC 327 (05.02.2010), http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt200910/jtselect/jtrights/44/44.pdf (last accessed on 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  511. House of Representatives, Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998, Report, H.R. Rep. No. 105–551, Part II, 49 (1998), http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname =105_cong_reports&docid=f:hr551p2.105.pdf (last accessed on 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  512. International Telecommunication Union, Understanding Cybercrime: A guide for developing countries (April 2009), http://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-d/oth/01/0B/D010B0000073301PDFE.pdf (last accessed on 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  513. Joint Committee on Human Rights, Legislative Scrutiny: Digital Economy Bill, Fifth Report of Session 2009 – 10, http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt200910/jtselect/jtrights/44/44.pdf (last accessed on 15.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  514. Kuner, Christoper/Burton, Cédric/Hladjk, Jörg/Proust, Oliver, Study on online copyright enforce-ment and data protection in selected Member States (November 2009), http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/iprenforcement/docs/study-online-enforcement_en.pdf (last accessed on 15.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  515. Lescure, Pierre, Culture-acte 2, Mission « Acte II de l’exception culturelle », Contribution aux politiques culturelles à l’ére numérique (May 2013), http://www.culturecommunication.gouv.fr/content/download/67159/514925/version/1/file/Rapport_Lescure.pdf (last accessed on 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  516. Macovei, Monica, Freedom of Expression, Council of Europe Human Rights Handbooks, No. 2 (2nd ed. 2004), http://www.coe.int/t/dgi/publications/hrhandbooks/HRHAND-02%282004%29_en.pdf (last accessed on 20.04.2013) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  517. Ministère de la Culture et de la Communication, Publication du décret supprimant la peine complémentaire de la suspension d’accès á Internet, Press release (09.07.2013), http://culturecommunication.gouv.fr/Espace-Presse/Communiques/Publication-du-decret-supprimant-la-peine-complementaire-de-la-suspension-d-acces-a-Internet (last accessed on 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  518. OECD, Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry, Committee for Information, Computer and Communications Policy, Working Party on the Information Economy, Participative Web: User-Created Content (12.04.2007), DSTI/ICCP/IE(2006)7/FINAL, http://www.oecd.org/sti/38393115.pdf (last accessed on 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  519. OECD, Magnitude of counterfeiting and piracy of tangible products – November 2009 update, http://www.oecd.org/document/23/0,3343,en_2649_34173_44088983_1_1_1_1,00.html (last accessed on 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  520. Ofcom, “Site Blocking” to reduce online copyright infringement: A review of sections 17 and 18 of the Digital Economy Act (2011), http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/internet/site-blocking.pdf (last accessed 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  521. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, General Comment No. 16: The right to respect of privacy, family, home and correspondence, and protection of honour and reputation (Article 17), CCPR General Comment No. 16 (08.04.1988) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  522. Parliament, Hansard (House of Commons), Column 1142 (07.04.2010), http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200910/cmhansrd/cm100407/debtext/100407-0032.htm (last accessed 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  523. Parliament, Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport, Memorandum submitted by Dr Richard Clayton (2008), http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200708/cmselect/cmcumeds/353/353we05.htm (last accessed 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  524. Praesidium of the European Convention, Explanations relating to the Charter, OJ C 303 (14.12.2007), 17–35, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2007:303:0017:0035:EN:PDF (last accessed 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  525. Schwartmann, Rolf, Vergleichende Studie über Modelle zur Versendung von Warnhinweisen durch Internet-Zugangsanbieter an Nutzer bei Urheberrechtsverletzungen, Studie im Auftrag des Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie (Januar 2012), http://bmwi.de/BMWi/Redaktion/PDF/Publikationen/Technologie-und-Innovation/warnhinweise-lang,property=pdf,bereich=bmwi,sprache=de,rwb=true.pdf (last accessed on 06.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  526. Sénat, Explanatory Memorandum, Projet de loi favorisant la diffusion et la protection de la création sur Internet, Annexe au procès-verbal de la séance du 18.06.2008, http://www.senat.fr/leg/pjl07-405.html (last accessed 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  527. Senate, Digital Millennium Copyright Act, S. Rep. No. 105-190, (1998), http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=105_cong_reports&docid=f:sr190.105.pdf (last accessed 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  528. Söndermann, Michael / Backes, Christoph / Arndt, Olaf, Gesamtwirtschaftliche Perspektiven der Kultur- und Kreativwirtschaft in Deutschland, Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie, Forschungsbericht Nr. 577 (2009), http://www.kultur-kreativ-wirtschaft.de/Dateien/KuK/PDF/doku-577-gesamtwirtschaftliche-perspektiven-kultur-und-kreativwirtschaft-kurzfassung,property=pdf,bereich=kuk,sprache=de,rwb=true.pdf (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  529. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Information Economy Report 2005, UNCTAD/SDTE/ECB/2005/1, http://www.unctad.org/en/docs/sdteecb20051ch6_en.pdf (last accessed on 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  530. United Nations Human Rights Committee, General comment No. 34. Article 19: Freedoms of opinion and expression, CCPR/C/GC/34 (21.07.2011), http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrc/docs/gc34.pdf (last accessed 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  531. United Nations Human Rights Council, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, Frank La Rue (16.05.2011), A/HRC/17/27, http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrcouncil/docs/17session/A.HRC.17.27_en.pdf (last accessed 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  532. United States Department of Justice, Justice Department Charges Leaders of Megaupload with Widespread Online Copyright Infringement, Press release of 29.01.2012, http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2012/January/12-crm-074.html (last accessed 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  533. United States Government Accountability Office, Observations on Efforts to Quantify the Economic Effects of Counterfeit and Pirated Goods, Report to Congressional Committees (12.04.2010) http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d10423.pdf (last accessed on 15.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  534. US Senate, Committee on the Judiciary, Statement from Chairman Smith on Senate Delay of Vote on PROTECT IP Act, Senate press release of 20.01.2012, http://judiciary.house.gov/index.cfm/2012/1/statementfromchairmansmithonsenatedelayofvoteonprotectipact (last accessed on 06.06.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  535. Other Sources Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  536. Aereo, Statement from Aereo CEO and founder Chet Kanoja, Press release of 10.01.2014, http://blog.aereo.com/2014/01/statement-aereo-ceo-founder-chet-kanojia-2/ (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  537. AFP, HADOPI : Première condamnation d’un internaute, Libération (13.09.2012), http://www.liberation.fr/cultuere/2012/09/13/premiere-condamnation-d-un-internaute-dans-le-cadre-de-hadopi_846042 (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  538. Algemene Vereniging van Beroepsjournalisten in Belgie et al., Open letter to President Dean Spielmann of 13.01.2014, www.mediadefence.org/sites/default/files/DelfiSupportLetter.pdf (last accessed 05.05.2014). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  539. Anderson, Nate, Darknets and the future of P2P investigators, Ars Technica (05.03.2009), http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2009/03/the-new-version-of-p2p/ (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  540. Apple, Apple reports second quarter results, net profit increases 94 % year-over-year, Press release (24.04.2012), http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2012/04/24Apple-Reports-Second-Quarter-Results.html (last accessed 30.04.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  541. Arthur, Charles, Are downloads really killing the music industry? Or is it something else?, The Guardian (09.06.2009), http://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2009/jun/09/games-dvd-music-downloads-piracy (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  542. Arthur, Charles/Dredge, Stuart, Google ads to be blocked from sites offering pirated content, The Guardian (16.07.2013), http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/jul/16/google-ads-block-pirated-content (last accessed on 06.06.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  543. Ball, James/Borger, Julian/Greenwald, Glenn, Revealed: How US and UK spy agencies defeat Internet piracy and security, The Guardian (06.09.2013), http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/05/nsa-gchq-encryption-codes-security/print (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  544. Bangemann, Eric, Pass or fail? RIAA's college litigation campaign turns one, Ars Technica (28.02.2008), http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2008/02/riaa-college-lawsuit-anniversary/ (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  545. Barnett, Emma, Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales defends SOPA protest blackout, The Telegraph (17.01.2012), http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/wikipedia/9020053/Wikipedia-founder-Jimmy-Wales-defends-SOPA-protest-blackout.html (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  546. BBC News, Music fans back legal downloads, BBC News (12.10.2008), http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7664088.stm (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  547. BBC News, UK piracy warning letters delayed until 2015, BBC News (06.06.2013), http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-22796723 (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  548. BBC World Service, Four in five regard Internet access as a fundamental right: global poll, BBC News (08.03.2010), www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/pressreleases/stories/2010/03_march/07/poll.shtml (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  549. Beckedahl, Markus/Lüke, Falk, Wie die Musikbranche zum Internet-gegner wurde, Der Spiegel Online (23.05.2012), http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/netzpolitik/die-digitale-gesellschaft-ein-buchauszug-a-834398.html (last accessed on 15.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  550. Berry, Philippe, LOPPSI 2 donne les pleins pouvoirs au ministère de l'Intérieur pour censurer le Net, 20 minutes (21.12.2010), http://www.20minutes.fr/web/642783-web-loppsi-2-donne-pleins-pouvoirs-ministere-interieur-censurer-net (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  551. Bitkom, Trend zu Musik-Streaming per Internet, Press release of 10.07.2012, http://www.bitkom.org/files/documents/BITKOM-Presseinfo_Musik-Streaming_10_07_2012%281%29.pdf (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  552. BitTorrent Inc., BitTorrent, inc. grows to over 100 million active monthly users (03.01.2011), Business Wire, http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20110103005337/en/BitTorrentGrows-100-Million-Active-Monthly-Users (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  553. Bleich Holger, Die Abmahn-Industrie – Wie mit dem Missbrauch des Urheberrechts Kasse gemacht wird, c´t 2010, Issue 1, 154–156 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  554. Bleich, Holger, Briefkasten-Ermittlungen, c't 2014, Issue 5, 28, http://www.heise.de/ct/heft/2014-5-Pornostreaming-Richter-geben-Fehler-in-Auskunftsverfahren-zu-2107127.html (last accessed on 15.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  555. Bleich, Holger/Heidrich, Joerg/Stadler, Thomas, Schwierige Gegenwehr – Was tun bei unbe-rechtigten Filesharing-Abmahnungen?, c´t 2010, Issue 19, http://www.heise.de/ct/artikel/Schwierige-Gegenwehr-1069835.html (last accessed on 15.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  556. Bleich, Holger/Kossel, Axel, Verschleierungstaktik: Die Argumente für Kinderporno-Sperren laufen ins Leere, Der Spiegel online (17.04.2009), http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/web/verschleierungstaktik-die-argumente-fuer-kinderporno-sperren-laufen-ins-leere-a-619505.html (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  557. Blocman, Amélie, Adoption of the Act on Copyright and Neighbouring Rights in the Information Society (2006), http://merlin.obs.coe.int/iris/2006/7/article20.en.html (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  558. Blocman, Amélie, Illegal downloading: Penalty of refusing Internet access abolished, IRIS 2013-8:1/16, http://merlin.obs.coe.int/iris/2013/8/article16.en.html (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  559. Brauck, Markus/Hülsen, Isabell/Kühn, Alexander/Nezik, Ann-Kathrin, Was glotzen Sie so?, Der Spiegel online (13.01.2014), http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-124381357.html (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  560. Bright, Martin, BT puts block on child porn sites, The Observer (06.06.2004), http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2004/jun/06/childrensservices.childprotection (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  561. Brignall, Miles, File sharers targeted with legal action over music downloads, The Guardian (17.07.2010), http://www.theguardian.com/money/2010/jul/17/file-sharers-legal-action-music-downloads (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  562. British Record Music Industry (BPI), Digital Music Nation 2013, the UK’s legal and illegal digital music landscape (2013), http://www.bpi.co.uk/assets/files/BPI_Digital_Music_Nation_2013.PDF (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  563. Business Wire, BitTorrent, Inc. grows to over 100 million active monthly users, Business Wire (03.01.2011), http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20110103005337/en/BitTorrent-Grows-100-Million-Active-Monthly-Users (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  564. Business Wire, Strategy Analytics: A Quarter of Households Worldwide Now Have Wireless Home Networks, Business Wire (04.04.2012), http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20120404006331/en/Strategy-Analytics-Quarter-Households-Worldwide-Wireless-Home (last accessed on 15.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  565. Champeau, Guillaume, Le transfert HADOPI > CSA n’est “plus l’axe prioritaire”, Numerama.com (19.02.2015), http://www.numerama.com/magazine/32267-le-transfert-hadopi-csa-n-est-plus-l-axe-prioritaire.html (last accessed on 07.07.2015) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  566. Chmielewski, Dawn C., Report links Google, Yahoo to Internet piracy sites, LA Times (02.01.2013), http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jan/02/entertainment/la-et-ct-piracy-ads-20130102 (last accessed on 06.06.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  567. Cisco Systems Inc., Cisco Visual Networking Index: Forecast and Methodology, 2012–2017 (2013), http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/service-provider/ip-ngn-ip-next-generation-network/white_paper_c11-481360.pdf (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  568. Columbus, Simon, French Government plans to extend internet censorship, OpenNet Initiative (21.06.2011), https://opennet.net/blog/2011/06/french-government-plans-extend-internet-censorship (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  569. Conseil National du Numérique, Avis n° 2 du Conseil National du Numérique relatif au projet de décret pris pour l’application de l’article 18 de la loi pour la confiance dans l’économie numérique (20.06.2011), http://www.cnnumerique.fr/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/2011-06-20_CP_LCENArticle8.pdf (last accessed on 17.05.2014). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  570. Consumer Focus, Consumer Focus Submission to the Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee on the Digital Economy Cost Sharing Order (July 2012), http://www.consumerfocus.org.uk/files/2010/10/Consumer-Focus-submission-to-the-Secondary-legislation-Scrutiny-Committee-on-the-Digital-Economy-cost-sharing-order.pdf (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  571. Consumer Focus, Outdated copyright law confuses consumers, press release (24.02.2010), http://www.consumerfocus.org.uk/news/outdated-copyright-law-confuses-consumers (last accessed on 15.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  572. Coslin, Christelle/Gateau, Christine, No 'stay down' obligation for hosting providers in France, Society for Computers and Law (02.07.2013), http://www.scl.org/site.aspx?i=ed32661 (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  573. Cowell, Simon/Daltrey, Roger/Professor Green/John, Elton/Lloyd-Webber, Andrew/May, Brian/ Plant, Robert/Taylor, Roger/Tinie Tempah/Townshend, Pete, Musicians need strong copyright laws to excel globally, The Telegraph (24.07.2012), http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/letters/9421416/Musicians-need-strong-copyright-laws-to-excel-globally.html (last accessed on 06.06.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  574. Crocker, Steve/Dagon, David/Kaminsky, Dan/McPherson, Danny/Vixie, Paul, Security and other technical concerns raised by the DNS filtering requirements in the PROTECT IP Bill (May 2011), http://domainincite.com/docs/PROTECT-IP-Technical-Whitepaper-Final.pdf (last accessed: 12.06.2012) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  575. Darnstädt, Thomas, Wem gehören die Gedanken? Der Spiegel online (21.05.2012), http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/urheberrecht-a-833984.html (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  576. Der Spiegel, Erpressung im Internet: 21-jähriger Münchner zu Facebook-Verbot verurteilt, Der Spiegel online (25.03.2014), http://www.spiegel.de/panorama/justiz/muenchner-zu-facebook-verbot-verurteilt-a-960688.html (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  577. Eckersley, Peter/Higgins, Parker, An Open Letter From Internet Engineers to the U.S. Congress, EFF (15.12.2011), https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/12/internet-inventors-warn-against-sopa-and-pipa (last accessed on 06.06.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  578. Eco, 300.000 Adressen pro Monat: erfolgreicher Kampf gegen illegale Downloads, Press release (31.05.2011), http://www.eco.de/verband/202_9137.htm (last accessed 16.06.2011) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  579. Electronic Frontier Foundation, Lawrence Lessig settles fair use lawsuit over Phoenix music snippets, EFF press release of 27.02.2014, https://www.eff.org/press/releases/lawrence-lessig-settles-fair-use-lawsuit-over-phoenix-music-snippets (last accessed on 06.06.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  580. Electronic Frontier Foundation, Lawrence Lessig strikes back against bogus copyright takedown, EFF press release of 22.08.2013, https://www.eff.org/press/releases/lawrence-lessig-strikes-back-against-bogus-copyright-takedown (last accessed on 06.06.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  581. Electronic Frontier Foundation, Lenz v Universal, https://www.eff.org/cases/lenz-v-universal (last accessed on 06.06.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  582. Electronic Frontier Foundation, RIAA v. the People: Five years later (2008), https://www.eff.org/files/eff-riaa-whitepaper.pdf (last accessed on 15.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  583. Enigmax (= Maxwell, Andy), Which are the best anonymous VPN providers, TorrentFreak (07.10.2011), http://torrentfreak.com/which-vpn-providers-really-take-anonymity-seriously111007/ (last accessed on 15.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  584. Enigmax, Rapidshare: Traffic and piracy dipped after new business model kicked in, TorrentFreak (09.01.2013), http://torrentfreak.com/rapidshare-traffic-and-piracy-dipped-after-new-business-model-kicked-in-130109/ (last accessed on 06.06.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  585. Enigmax/Ernesto, Review: Is your VPN service really anonymous?, TorrentFreak (02.01.2014), http://torrentfreak.com/vpn-services-that-take-your-anonymity-seriously-2013-edition/ (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  586. Envisional, Technical Report: An Estimate of Infringing Use of the Internet (2011), http://documents.envisional.com/docs/Envisional-Internet_Usage-Jan2011.pdf (last accessed on 15.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  587. Ernesto (= Renkema, Lennart), Anonymous, decentralized and uncensored file-sharing is booming, TorrentFreak (03.03.2012), https://torrentfreak.com/anonymous-decentralized-and-uncensored-file-sharing-is-booming-120302/ (last accessed on 15.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  588. Ernesto, BitTorrent's Future? DHT, PEX and magnet Links explained, TorrentFreak (20.11.2009), http://torrentfreak.com/bittorrents-future-dht-pex-and-magnet-links-explained-091120/ (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  589. Ernesto, BTGuard review: How does it work?, TorrentFreak (19.01.2013), http://torrentfreak.com/make-bittorrent-transfers-anonymous-with-btguard-100419/ (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  590. Ernesto, Leaked emails reveal profits of anti-piracy cash scheme, TorrentFreak (26.09.2010), http://torrentfreak.com/leaked-emails-reveal-profits-of-anti-piracy-cash-scheme-100926/ (last accessed on 15.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  591. Ernesto, Pirate parties plan to shoot torrent site into orbit, TorrentFreak (20.10.2010), http://torrentfreak.com/pirate-parties-plan-to-shoot-torrent-site-into-orbit-101020/ (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  592. Ernesto, The Pirate Bay adds domain to bypass court order, TorrentFreak (05.10.2011), https://torrentfreak.com/the-pirate-bay-adds-domain-to-bypass-court-order-111005/ (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  593. Ernesto, The Pirate Bay, now without torrents, TorrentFreak (28.02.2012), https://torrentfreak.com/the-pirate-bay-dumps-torrents-120228/ (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  594. Ernesto, When pirates become copyright cash cows, Torrentfreak.com (30.08.2009), http://torrentfreak.com/when-pirates-become-copyright-cash-cows-090830/ (last accessed on 15.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  595. European Digital Rights, ACTA fact sheet, EDRi (02.02.2012), http://www.edri.org/ACTAfactsheet (last accessed on 06.06.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  596. Farivar, Cyrus, After sailing the domain name seas, Pirate Bay returns to Sweden, ars technica (19.12.2013), http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/12/after-sailing-the-domain-name-seas-pirate-bay-returns-to-sweden/ (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  597. Fisher, David, Dotcom trial may not occur, The New Zealand Herald (21.04.2012), http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10800409 (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  598. Fisher, Ken, Students largely ignore RIAA instant settlement offers, Ars technica (26.03.2007), http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2007/03/students-largely-ignore-riaa-instant-settlement-offers/ (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  599. Fleishman, Glenn, Cartoon Captures Spirit of the Internet, The New York Times (14.12.2000), http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/technology/14DOGG.html (last accessed on 17.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  600. GfK Consumer Panel, Studie zur digitalen Content-Nutzung (DCN-Studie) 2011 (2011), http://www.musikindustrie.de/uploads/media/DCN-Studie_2011_Presseversion_FINAL.pdf (last accessed on 15.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  601. Gillmor, Dan, The Bruce Willis dilemma? In the digital era, we own nothing, The Guardian (03.09.2012), http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/sep/03/bruce-willis-dilemmadigital-era-own-nothing (last accessed on 06.06.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872
  602. Google, Google Transparency Report (updated weekly), http://www.google.com/transparencyreport/removals/copyright/domains/?r=last-year (last accessed on 05.05.2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845265872

Similar publications

from the series "Luxemburger Juristische Studien - Luxembourg Legal Studies"
Cover of book: Interfaces between National and EU Law
Book Titles No access
Giovanni Chiapponi
Interfaces between National and EU Law
Cover of book: Experimental Law
Edited Book No access
Stefan Braum
Experimental Law
Cover of book: Studies on Enforcement in Multilevel Regulatory Systems
Edited Book No access
Katalin Ligeti, Kei Hannah Brodersen
Studies on Enforcement in Multilevel Regulatory Systems
Cover of book: Implications of Blockchain-Based Smart Contracts on Contract Law
Book Titles No access
Chantal Bomprezzi
Implications of Blockchain-Based Smart Contracts on Contract Law
Cover of book: Data Protection by Design in the E-Health Care Sector
Book Titles Full access
Giorgia Bincoletto
Data Protection by Design in the E-Health Care Sector

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via your Institution (SSO, Shibboleth, OpenAthens)
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex