Cover of book: Politische Journalistinnen und Journalisten auf Twitter
Buy in shop
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Book Titles No access

Politische Journalistinnen und Journalisten auf Twitter

Eine Framing-Analyse der Ibiza-Affäre im deutsch-österreichischen Vergleich
Authors:
Publisher:
 2023

Summary

Do political journalists deviate from their role as objective observers on Twitter? This study addresses this relevant question for democratic theory by means of an international comparative framing analysis on Twitter in Germany and Austria. Its results are based on a quantitative content analysis and are supplemented by guided interviews with political journalists. These results show that journalistic objectivity and neutrality are still apparent on both sides of the Alps, but journalists on Twitter also deviate from the criteria of objective journalism and disseminate opinion-based information. The study also complements research on political scandals.

Keywords

Bibliographic data

Copyright year
2023
ISBN-Print
978-3-7560-0649-6
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-3983-2
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Nomos Universitätsschriften - Medien und Kommunikation
Volume
12
Language
German
Pages
372
Product type
Book Titles

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access 1 - 18
  2. 1 Einleitung No access 19 - 26
    1. 2.1 Begriffsdefinition: Politischer Journalismus und politische Journalist:innen No access
      1. 2.2.1 Merkmale und Einstellungen No access
      2. 2.2.2 Rollenbild No access
      3. 2.2.3 Arbeitsort, Arbeitgeber und Einkommen No access
      4. 2.2.4 Tätigkeiten und Informationsquellen No access
    3. 2.3 Politischer Journalismus im Digitalen No access
      1. 2.4.1 Journalistische Eigenschaften und Vorstellungen No access
      2. 2.4.2 Ebene der Medienorganisationen No access
      3. 2.4.3 Ebene kontextueller Faktoren No access
      4. 2.4.4 Ebene der Mediensysteme No access
      5. 2.4.5 Ebene des politischen Systems No access
      1. 2.5.1 Interpretativer Journalismus No access
      2. 2.5.2 Kommerzialisierung No access
      3. 2.5.3 Personalisierung No access
      4. 2.5.4 Boulevardisierung No access
    6. 2.6 Zusammenfassung No access
      1. 3.1.1 Journalistische Rollenkonzeption No access
      2. 3.1.2 Journalistische Rollenwahrnehmung No access
      3. 3.1.3 Journalistische Rollenausübung No access
      4. 3.1.4 Journalistische Rollenperformanz No access
    2. 3.2 Journalistische Rollen im digitalen Journalismus und sozialen Medien No access
    3. 3.3 Journalistische Normen No access
    4. 3.4 Journalismuskulturen No access
    5. 3.5 Zusammenfassung No access
    1. 4.1 Entwicklung digitaler Medien zu sozialen Medien No access
    2. 4.2 Soziale Medien und Öffentlichkeit No access
    3. 4.3 Journalistisches Gatekeeping in sozialen Medien No access
      1. 4.4.1 Forschungsüberblick No access
      2. 4.4.2 Potenziale für den Journalismus No access
      3. 4.4.3 Journalistische Interaktionsnetzwerke No access
    5. 4.5 Zusammenfassung No access
    1. 5.1 Begriffsdefinition: Skandal und Skandalisierung No access
    2. 5.2 Medialisierte Skandale und Medienskandale No access
    3. 5.3 Digitale Medien, soziale Medien und Skandale No access
    4. 5.4 Mechanismen medialer Skandalisierung No access
    5. 5.5 Phasen des Medienskandals No access
    6. 5.6 Skandalisierung und Framing No access
      1. 5.7.1 Politische Skandale in Deutschland und Österreich No access
      2. 5.7.2 Wirkung politischer Skandale No access
    8. 5.8 Zusammenfassung No access
    1. 6.1 Forschungsüberblick No access
      1. 6.2.1 Begriffsdefinition: Journalistisches Framing No access
      2. 6.2.2 Kommunikationsprozesse journalistischen Framings No access
    3. 6.3 Framing in sozialen Medien No access
    4. 6.4 Frame-Building und Frame-Setting No access
      1. 6.5.1 Begriffsdefinition: Frame-Elemente nach Entman (1993) No access
        1. 6.5.2.1 Entstehung von Medien-Frames No access
        2. 6.5.2.2 Wirkung von Medien-Frames No access
        1. 6.5.3.1 Themenübergreifende Medien-Frames in der politischen Berichterstattung No access
        2. 6.5.3.2 Themenspezifische Medien-Frames in politischen Skandalen No access
    6. 6.6 Zusammenfassung No access
    1. 7.1 Mediensysteme No access
      1. 7.2.1 Kritik No access
      2. 7.2.2 Weiterentwicklung No access
        1. 7.3.1.1 Deutschland No access
        2. 7.3.1.2 Österreich No access
      2. 7.3.2 Pressemarkt ‒ Online No access
      1. 7.4.1 Leitmedien No access
      2. 7.4.2 Qualitätsmedien No access
    5. 7.5 Zusammenfassung No access
    1. 8.1 Forschungsfragen No access
      1. 8.2.1 Akteure No access
      2. 8.2.2 Veröffentlichung und Inhalt No access
      3. 8.2.3 Folgen No access
      4. 8.2.4 Weitere Entwicklungen No access
    3. 8.3 Forschungsdesign No access
    4. 8.4 Untersuchungs- und Erhebungszeitraum No access
      1. 9.1.1 Methodischer Zugang: Framing-Analyse No access
      2. 9.1.2 Stichprobe No access
      3. 9.1.3 Untersuchungsinstrument No access
        1. 9.1.4.1 Aufbau des Codebuchs No access
        2. 9.1.4.2 Variablen und Ausprägungen No access
      5. 9.1.5 Untersuchungsdurchführung No access
      1. 9.2.1 Methodischer Zugang: Expert:inneninterviews No access
      2. 9.2.2 Stichprobe No access
      3. 9.2.3 Untersuchungsinstrument und Untersuchungsdurchführung No access
      1. 10.1.1 Variablengruppe: Formale Kategorien I No access
      2. 10.1.2 Variablengruppe: Formale Kategorien II No access
      3. 10.1.3 Variablengruppe: Inhaltliche Kategorien I No access
      4. 10.1.4 Variablengruppe: Inhaltliche Kategorien II No access
      1. 10.2.1 Themenbereich I: Erfahrungen zur Twitternutzung in der journalistischen Arbeit No access
      2. 10.2.2 Themenbereich II: Erfahrungen zu Kommunikationsstrukturen von Twitter No access
    1. 11.1 Beantwortung der Forschungsfragen No access
    2. 11.2 Vertiefende Befunde No access
    3. 11.3 Einordnung der Ergebnisse No access
    4. 11.4 Implikationen No access
    5. 11.5 Limitationen No access
  13. Literaturverzeichnis No access 295 - 372

Bibliography (1102)

  1. Schuck, A. R., Azrout, R., Boomgaarden, H., Elenbaas, M., van Spanje, J., Vliegenthart, R. & de Vreese, C. (2011). Media visibility and framing of the European parliamentary elections 2009: A media content analysis in 27 countries. In M. Maier, J. Strömbäck & L. L. Kaid (Hrsg.), Political communication in European parliamentary elections (S. 175–196). Ashgate. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  2. Schuck, A. R. & de Vreese, C. H. (2006). Between risk and opportunity: News framing and its effects on public support for EU enlargement. European Journal of Communication, 21(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323106060987 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  3. Schulz, W [Winfried], Berens, H. & Zeh, R. (1998). Der Kampf um Castor in den Medien: Konfliktbewertung, Nachrichtenresonanz und journalistische Qualität. Fischer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  4. Schumacher, N. F., Maurer, P. & Nuernbergk, C. (2023). Towards new standards? Interaction patterns of German political journalists in the Twittersphere. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 28(1) 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612211025502 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  5. Schwarzenegger, C. (2019). Eine Geschichte der Social Media in Österreich. In M. Karmasin & C. Oggolder (Hrsg.), Österreichische Mediengeschichte: Band 2: Von Massenmedien zu sozialen Medien (1918 bis heute) (S. 291–314). Springer VS. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  6. Seethaler, J. (2015). Qualität des tagesaktuellen Informationsangebots in den österreichischen Medien: Eine crossmediale Untersuchung. Rundfunk und Telekom Regulierungs-GmbH (RTR). https://www.rtr.at/medien/aktuelles/publikationen/Band1-2015.pdf Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  7. Seethaler, J., Hanitzsch, T., Keel, G., Lauerer, C., Steindl, N. & Wyss, V. (2019). Zwischen Kontinuität und Wandel: Journalismus in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz. In T. Hanitzsch, J. Seethaler & V. Wyss (Hrsg.), Journalismus in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz (S. 237–256). Springer VS. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  8. Seethaler, J. & Melischek, G. (2006). Die Pressekonzentration in Österreich im europäischen Vergleich. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 35(4), 337–360. https://webapp.uibk.ac.at/ojs/index.php/OEZP/article/view/1204/899 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  9. Seethaler, J. & Melischek, G. (2015). Koexistenz von scheinbar Inkompatiblem? Zum Wandel der österreichischen Medien- und Kommunikationsstrukturen. In K.-D. Altmeppen, P. Donges, M. Künzler, M. Puppis, U. Röttger & H. Wessler (Hrsg.), Soziale Ordnung durch Kommunikation? (S. 67–88). Nomos. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  10. Seethaler, J. & Melischek, G. (2019). Twitter as a tool for agenda building in election campaigns? The case of Austria. Journalism, 20(8), 1087–1107. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919845460 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  11. Sehl, A., Cornia, A. & Nielsen, R. K. (2016). Public service news and digital media. Oxford, UK. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/research/files/Public%2520Service%2520News%2520and%2520Digital%2520Media.pdf Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  12. Sehl, A., Cornia, A. & Nielsen, R. K. (2021). How do funding models and organizational legacy shape news organizations’ social media strategies? A comparison of public service and private sector news media in six countries. Digital Journalism. Online-Vorveröffentlichung. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1968920 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  13. Sehl, A. & Eder, M. (2020). Editorial Analytics: Chancen und Herausforderungen für den digitalen Journalismus. In T. Köhler (Hrsg.), Fake-News, Framing, Fact-Checking: Nachrichten im digitalen Zeitalter. Ein Handbuch (S. 205–220). Transcript. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  14. Sehl, A., Eder, M. & Kretzschmar, S. (2022). Journalismus auf Instagram: Qualität neu definiert? In J. Schützeneder & M. Graßl (Hrsg.), Journalismus und Instagram: Analysen, Strategien, Perspektiven aus Wissenschaft und Praxis (S. 45–58). Springer VS. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  15. Sehl, A., Fletcher, R. & Picard, R. G. (2020). Crowding out: Is there evidence that public service media harm markets? A cross-national comparative analysis of commercial television and online news providers. European Journal of Communication, 35(4), 389–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323120903688 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  16. Semetko, H. A., Blumler, J. G., Gurevitch, M. & Weaver, D. H. (1991). The formation of campaign agendas: A comparative analysis of party and media roles in recent American and British elections. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  17. Semetko, H. A. & Valkenburg, P. M. (2000). Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02843.x Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  18. Shah, D. V., Domke, D. & Wackman, D. B. (2001). The effects of value-framing on political judgment and reasoning. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy & A. E. Grant (Hrsg.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (S. 227–243). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  19. Shah, D. V., Watts, M. D., Domke, D. & Fan, D. P. (2002). News framing and cueing of issue regimes: Explaining Clinton’s public approval in spite of scandal. Public Opinion Quarterly, 66(3), 339–370. https://doi.org/10.1086/341396 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  20. Shehata, A. (2014). Game frames, issue frames, and mobilization: Disentangling the effects of frame exposure and motivated news attention on political cynicism and engagement. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 26(2), 157–177. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edt034 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  21. Shoemaker, P. J. & Reese, S. D. (1996). Mediating the message: Theories of influences on mass media content (2. Aufl.). Longman. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  22. Shoemaker, P. J. & Reese, S. D. (2014). Mediating the message in the 21st century: A media sociology perspective (3. Aufl.). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  23. Shoemaker, P. J. & Vos, T. (2009). Gatekeeping Theory. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203931653 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  24. Sickinger, H. (2007). Von der „Insel der Seligen“ zur „Skandalrepublik“? Politische Skandale in der Zweiten Republik. In M. Gehler (Hrsg.), Politische Affären und Skandale in Österreich: Von Mayerling bis Waldheim (S. 698–743). Studien Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  25. Sickinger, H. (2011). Politische Korruption und der Wandel der Rahmenbedingungen für politische Skandale in der Zweiten Republik. In E. Bruckmüller (Hrsg.), Korruption in Österreich: Historische Streiflichter (S. 111–130). Braumüller. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  26. Sickinger, H. (2019). Wahlkampffinanzierung im Schatten der Wahl 2017. In B. Tóth & T. Hofer (Hrsg.), Wahl 2019: Strategien, Schnitzel, Skandale (S. 151–161). Ecowin. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  27. Siebert, F. S., Peterson, T. & Schramm, W. (1956). Four theories of the press: The authoritarian, libertarian, social responsibility and Soviet communist concepts of what the press should be and do. University of Illinois Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  28. Simon, F. M. (2019). What determines a journalist’s popularity on Twitter? A case study of behaviour and self-presentation. Journalism Studies, 20(8), 1200–1220. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1500491 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  29. Singer, J. B. (2005). The political j-blogger: „Normalizing“ a new media form to fit old norms and parctices. Journalism, 6(2), 173–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884905051009 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  30. Singer, J. B. (2007). Contested autonomy: Professional and popular claims on journalistic norms. Journalism Studies, 8(1), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700601056866 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  31. Singer, J. B. (2010). Quality control: Perceived effects of user-generated content on newsroom norms, values and routines. Journalism Practice, 4(2), 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512780903391979 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  32. Singer, J. B. (2014). User-generated visibility: Secondary gatekeeping in a shared media space. New Media & Society, 16(1), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813477833 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  33. Singer, J. B. (2015). Out of bounds: Professional norms as boundary markers. In M. Carlson & S. C. Lewis (Hrsg.), Boundaries of journalism: Professionalism, practices and participation (S. 21–36). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  34. Sipes, C. (2011). Men, mistresses, and media framing: Examining political sex scandals. In A. Dagnes (Hrsg.), Sex scandals in American politics: A multidisciplinary approach to the construction and aftermath of contemporary political sex scandals (S. 94–112). Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781501300660.ch-006 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  35. Sjøvaag, H. & Ohlsson, J. (2019). Media ownership and journalism. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.839 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  36. Skovsgaard, M., Albæk, E., Bro, P. & de Vreese, C. (2013). A reality check: How journalists’ role perceptions impact their implementation of the objectivity norm. Journalism, 14(1), 22–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884912442286 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  37. Slothuus, R. (2008). More than weighting cognitive importance: A dual-process model of issue framing effects. Political Psychology, 29(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00610.x Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  38. Small, T. A. (2011). What the hashtag? A content analysis of Canadian politics on Twitter. Information, Communication & Society, 14(6), 872–895. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.554572 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  39. Smilova, R. & Smilov, D. (2015). Informal politics and formal media structures. In J. Zielonka (Hrsg.), Media and politics in new democracies: Europe in a comparative perspective (S. 197–213). Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  40. Sniderman, P. M. & Theriault, S. M. (2004). The structure of political argument and the logic of issue framing. In W. E. Saris & P. M. Sniderman (Hrsg.), Studies in public opinion: Attitudes, nonattitudes, measurement error, and change (S. 133–165). Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  41. Snow, D. A., Rochford, E. B., Worden, S. K. & Benford, R. D. (1986). Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 51(4), 464–481. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095581 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  42. Snow, D. A., Vliegenthart, R. & Ketelaars, P. (2019). The framing perspective on social movements: Its conceptual roots and architecture. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, H. Kriesi & H. J. McCammon (Hrsg.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to social movements (2. Aufl., S. 392–410). John Wiley & Sons. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  43. Solomon, E. D., Hackathorn, J. M. & Crittendon, D. (2019). Judging scandal: Standards or bias in politics. The Journal of Social Psychology, 159(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2018.1453468 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  44. Song, H., Tolochko, P., Eberl, J.‑M., Eisele, O., Greussing, E., Heidenreich, T., Lind, F., Galyga, S. & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2020). In validations we trust? The impact of imperfect human annotations as a gold standard on the quality of validation of automated content analysis. Political Communication, 37(4), 550–572. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1723752 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  45. Sparviero, S. & Trappel, J. (2022). Austria. In Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2022 (S. 64–65). Oxford, UK: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  46. Spatzenegger, A. (2020). Social Media als Quelle journalistischer Arbeit: Einfluss der Facebook- und Twitter-Beiträge von PolitikerInnen auf die Berichterstattung von Tageszeitungen. Journalistik. Zeitschrift für Journalismusforschung, 3(3), 197–215. https://doi.org/10.1453/2569-152X-32020-10976-de Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  47. Staab, P. & Thiel, T. (2021). Privatisierung ohne Privatismus: Soziale Medien im digitalen Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit. In M. Seeliger & S. Sevignani (Hrsg.), Leviathan Sonderband: Bd. 37. Ein neuer Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit? (S. 277–297). Nomos. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  48. Standaert, O. (2022). Beyond the family resemblance: Mapping the normative roles of journalists across Europe in the early 2010s. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 27(1), 58-75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161221994093 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  49. Standaert, O., Hanitzsch, T. & Dedonder, J. (2021). In their own words: A normative-empirical approach to journalistic roles around the world. Journalism, 22(4), 919–936. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919853183 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  50. Stanek, J. (2019, 18. Mai). Böhmermann, immer wieder Böhmermann. Spiegel. https://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/jan-boehmermann-und-oesterreich-was-wusste-er-ueber-das-strache-video-a-1268123.html Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  51. Stark, B. & Magin, M. (2013). Boulevardisierungstendenzen deutscher und österreichischer Tageszeitungen im Kontext nationaler Marktstrukturen: Eine ländervergleichende Untersuchung. In M. Puppis, M. Künzler & O. Jarren (Hrsg.), Media structures and media performance: Medienstrukturen und Medienperformanz (S. 401–428). Verlag der österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  52. Stark, B., Riedl, A., Eisenegger, M., Schneider, J., Udris, L. & Jandura, O. (2021). Qualität des politischen Nachrichtenangebots in Deutschland: Empirische Kernbefunde aus dem Projekt „Media Performance and Democracy“. Media Perspektiven(9), 430–449. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  53. Steindl, N., Hanitzsch, T. & Lauerer, C. (2021). Kumpanei oder Disziplinierung? Zur Wahrnehmung politischer und wirtschaftlicher Einflüsse durch österreichische PolitikjournalistInnen im internationalen Vergleich. In M. Magin, U. Rußmann & B. Stark (Hrsg.), Demokratie braucht Medien (S. 159–174). Springer VS. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  54. Steindl, N., Lauerer, C. & Hanitzsch, T. (2017). Journalismus in Deutschland: Aktuelle Befunde zu Kontinuität und Wandel im deutschen Journalismus. Publizistik, 62(4), 401–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-017-0378-9 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  55. Steiner, M. (2020). Soft presentation of hard news? A content analysis of political Facebook posts. Media and Communication, 8(3), 244–257. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i3.3152 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  56. Steininger, C. (2004). Das politische Dilemma medialer Produktion. In K. Imhof, R. Blum, H. Bonfadelli & O. Jarren (Hrsg.), Mediengesellschaft: Strukturen, Merkmale, Entwicklungsdynamiken (S. 295–313). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  57. Steinke, I. (2007). Qualitätssicherung in der qualitativen Forschung. In U. Kuckartz, H. Grunenberg & T. Dresing (Hrsg.), Qualitative Datenanalyse: computergestützt: Methodische Hintergründe und Beispiele aus der Forschungspraxis (2. Aufl., S. 176–187). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  58. Steinmaurer, T. (2002). Österreichs Mediensystem: Ein Überblick. In T. Steinmaurer (Hrsg.), Konzentriert und verflochten: Österreichs Mediensystem im Überblick (S. 11–69). Studien Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  59. Steinmaurer, T. (2012). Medien und Medienpolitik in Österreich - ein Überblick. Informationen zur Politischen Bildung, 35, 5–16. http://www.politischebildung.com/wp-content/uploads/izpb35.pdf Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  60. Stengel, K. & Marschall, J. (2010). Verwandte und konkurrierende Ansätze. In M. Maier, K. Stengel & J. Marschall (Hrsg.), Nachrichtenwerttheorie (S. 116–131). Nomos. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  61. Stępińska, A., Jurga-Wosik, E., Adamczewska, K., Secler, B. & Narożna, D. (2016). Journalistic role performance in Poland. Środkowoeuropejskie Studia Polityczne(2), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssp.2016.2.3 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  62. Stern, S., Livan, G. & Smith, R. E. (2020). A network perspective on intermedia agenda-setting. Applied Network Science, 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-020-00272-4 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  63. Stier, S., Mangold, F., Scharkow, M. & Breuer, J. (2022). Post post-broadcast democracy? News exposure in the age of online intermediaries. American Political Science Review, 116(2), 768–774. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421001222 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  64. Stoycheff, E. (2019). Selecting scandal: How legacy and social media gatekeep the news. In H. Tumber & S. R. Waisbord (Hrsg.), The Routledge companion to media and scandal (S. 86–94). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  65. Strömbäck, J. (2008). Four phases of mediatization: An analysis of the mediatization of politics. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 13(3), 228–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161208319097 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  66. Strömbäck, J. & Dimitrova, D. V. (2011). Mediatization and media interventionism: A comparative analysis of Sweden and the United States. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 16(1), 30–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161210379504 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  67. Strömbäck, J. & Esser, F. (2014). Mediatization of politics: Towards a theoretical framework. In F. Esser & J. Strömbäck (Hrsg.), Mediatization of politics: Understanding the transformation of Western democracies (S. 3–28). Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  68. Strömbäck, J. & Luengo, Ó. G. (2008). Polarized pluralist and democratic corporatist models: A comparison of election news coverage in Spain and Sweden. International Communication Gazette, 70(6), 547–562. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048508096398 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  69. Strömbäck, J., Negrine, R., Hopmann, D. N., Maier, M., Jalali, C., Berganza, R., Seeber, G. U. H., Seceleanu, A., Volek, J., Dobek-Ostrowska, B., Mykkänen, J., Belluati, M. & Róka, J. (2011). The mediatization and framing of European parliamentary election campaigns. In M. Maier, J. Strömbäck & L. L. Kaid (Hrsg.), Political communication in European parliamentary elections (S. 161–174). Ashgate. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  70. Strömbäck, J. & Shehata, A. (2018). Political journalism. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.859 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  71. Stumpp, S. & Michelis, D. (2021). Einführung in die Sozialen Medien. In S. Stumpp, D. Michelis & T. Schildhauer (Hrsg.), Social Media Handbuch: Theorien, Methoden, Modelle und Praxis (4. Aufl., S. 23–38). Nomos. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  72. Taddicken, M. & Schmidt, J.‑H. (2017). Entwicklung und Verbreitung sozialer Medien. In J.-H. Schmidt & M. Taddicken (Hrsg.), Handbuch Soziale Medien (S. 3–22). Springer VS. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  73. Tagle, F. (2021). Generic frames in corruption scandals in Chile (2015-2019): Differences and similarities between print and online media. International Journal of Communication, 15, 3067–3088. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/16852 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  74. Tandoc, E. C., Jr., Cabañes, J. V. A. & Cayabyab, Y. M. (2019). Bridging the Gap: Journalists’ role orientation and role performance on Twitter. Journalism Studies, 20(6), 857–871. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1463168 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  75. Tandoc, E. C., Jr., Hellmueller, L. & Vos, T. P. (2013). Mind the gap: Between journalistic role conception and role enactment. Journalism Practice, 7(5), 539–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2012.726503 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  76. Tandoc, E. C., Jr. & Vos, T. P. (2016). The journalist is marketing the news: Social media in the gatekeeping process. Journalism Practice, 10(8), 950–966. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2015.1087811 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  77. Tankard, J. W., Jr. (2001). The empirical approach to the study of media framing. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy & A. E. Grant (Hrsg.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (S. 95–106). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  78. Tenenboim-Weinblatt, K. & Neiger, M. (2015). Print is future, online is past: Cross-media analysis of temporal orientations in the news. Communication Research, 42(8), 1047–1067. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650214558260 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  79. Tenscher, J. & Golja, R. (2014). Der Fall Grasser im Spiegel der Boulevard- und Qualitätspresse. SWS-Rundschau, 54(4), 362–384. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-51970-1 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  80. Terren, L. & Borge Bravo, R. (2021). Echo chambers on social media: A systematic review of the literature. Review of Communication Research, 9, 99–118. https://doi.org/10.12840/ISSN.2255-4165.028 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  81. Tewksbury, D. & Riles, J. M. (2018). Framing in an interactive news environment. In P. D’Angelo (Hrsg.), Doing news framing analysis II: Empirical and theoretical perspectives (S. 137–162). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  82. Thimm, C. (2016). The mediatization of politics and the digital public sphere: The dynamics of Mini-Publics. In A. Frame & G. Brachotte (Hrsg.), Citizen participation and political communication in a digital world (S. 167–183). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  83. Thimm, C. (2017). Soziale Netzwerke als Arenen politischer Partizipation: Neue Optionen für Demokratie oder aber Datafication, Fragmentierung und Radikalisierung? Medienjournal, 41(2), 76–89. https://doi.org/10.24989/medienjournal.v41i2.1472 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  84. Thomaß, B. (2013a). Mediensysteme vergleichen. In B. Thomaß (Hrsg.), Mediensysteme im internationalen Vergleich (2. Aufl., S. 12–45). UVK. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  85. Thomaß, B. (2013b). Weltregionen im Vergleich: Westeuropa. In B. Thomaß (Hrsg.), Mediensysteme im internationalen Vergleich (2. Aufl., S. 220–238). UVK. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  86. Thompson, J. B. (2000). Political scandal: Power and visibility in the media age. Polity Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  87. Thompson, J. B. (2011). Shifting boundaries of public and private life. Theory, Culture & Society, 28(4), 49–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276411408446 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  88. Thränhardt, D. (1991). Scandals, changing norms and agenda setting in German politics. The Journal of Social Science, 30(2), 13–32. http://id.nii.ac.jp/1130/00003506 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  89. Thurman, N., Moeller, J., Helberger, N. & Trilling, D. (2019). My friends, editors, algorithms, and I: Examining audience attitudes to news selection. Digital Journalism, 7(4), 447–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1493936 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  90. Thussu, D. K. (2007). News as entertainment: The rise of global infotainment. Sage. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  91. Töpfl, F. (2011). Mediensysteme in Transformationsprozessen: Wie entstehen pluralistische Mediensysteme – und warum nicht? Nomos. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  92. Tóth, B. (2019). Einmal Ibiza und zurück. In B. Tóth & T. Hofer (Hrsg.), Wahl 2019: Strategien, Schnitzel, Skandale (S. 127–140). Ecowin. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  93. Trappel, J. (2019). Medienkonzentration - trotz Internet kein Ende in Sicht. In M. Karmasin & C. Oggolder (Hrsg.), Österreichische Mediengeschichte: Band 2: Von Massenmedien zu sozialen Medien (1918 bis heute) (S. 199–226). Springer VS. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  94. Trilling, D., Tolochko, P. & Burscher, B. (2017). From newsworthiness to shareworthiness: How to predict news sharing based on article characteristics. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94(1), 38–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016654682 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  95. Trilling, D. & van Hoof, M. (2020). Between article and topic: News events as level of analysis and their computational identification. Digital Journalism, 8(10), 1317–1337. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1839352 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  96. Tromble, R. & Meffert, M. F. (2016). The life and death of frames: Dynamics of media frame duration. International Journal of Communication, 10, 5079–5101. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/4681 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  97. Trotier, K. (2011). Der Fall Günter Grass: Eine Inhaltsanalyse ausgewählter Qualitätsmedien nach dem Waffen-SS-Geständnis. Publizistik, 56(1), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-010-0105-2 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  98. Trottier, D. (2018). Scandal mining: Political nobodies and remediated visibility. Media, Culture & Society, 40(6), 893–908. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443717734408 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  99. Tuchman, G. (1978). Making news: A study in the construction of social reality. Free Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  100. Tumber, H. (2001). Democracy in the information age: The role of the fourth estate in cyberspace. Information, Communication & Society, 4(1), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180122542 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  101. Tumber, H. & Waisbord, S. R. (2004). Introduction: Political scandals and media across democracies, Volume I. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(8), 1031–1039. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764203262275 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  102. Tumber, H. & Waisbord, S. R. (2019). Media and scandal. In H. Tumber & S. R. Waisbord (Hrsg.), The Routledge companion to media and scandal (S. 10–21). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  103. Twitter. (2020). Global impact report. https://about.twitter.com/content/dam/about-twitter/en/company/global-impact-2020.pdf Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  104. Udris, L. & Lucht, J. (2009). Öffentliche Kommunikation im Umbruch? Wandel der Medienstrukturen und Medieninhalte in ländervergleichender und diachroner Perspektive. In B. Stark & M. Magin (Hrsg.), Die österreichische Medienlandschaft im Umbruch (S. 17–40). Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  105. Umbricht, A. & Esser, F. (2014). Changing political news? Long-term trends in American, British, French, Italien, German, and Swiss print media reporting. In R. Kuhn & R. K. Nielsen (Hrsg.), Political journalism in transition: Western Europe in a comparative perspective (S. 195–217). I.B. Tauris. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  106. Umbricht, A. & Esser, F. (2016). The push to popularize politics: Understanding the audience-friendly packaging of political news in six media systems since the 1960s. Journalism Studies, 17(1), 100–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2014.963369 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  107. Urban, J. & Schweiger, W. (2014). News quality from the recipients’ perspective: Investigating recipients’ ability to judge the normative quality of news. Journalism Studies, 15(6), 821–840. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2013.856670 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  108. Urman, A. (2020). Context matters: Political polarization on Twitter from a comparative perspective. Media, Culture & Society, 42(6), 857–879. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443719876541 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  109. Usher, B. (2021). The celebrified columnist and opinion spectacle: Journalism’s changing place in networked public spheres. Journalism, 22(11), 2836–2854. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919897815 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  110. Usher, N. (2012). Service journalism as community experience: Personal technology and personal finance at The New York Times. Journalism Practice, 6(1), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2011.628782 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  111. Usher, N., Holcomb, J. & Littman, J. (2018). Twitter makes it worse: Political journalists, gendered echo chambers, and the amplification of gender bias. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23(3), 324–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161218781254 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  112. Usher, N. & Ng, Y. M. M. (2020). Sharing knowledge and “microbubbles”: Epistemic communities and insularity in US political journalism. Social Media + Society, 6(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120926639 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  113. Valenzuela, S., Piña, M. & Ramírez, J. (2017). Behavioral effects of framing on social media users: How conflict, economic, human interest, and morality frames drive news sharing. Journal of Communication, 67(5), 803–826. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12325 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  114. Valkenburg, P. M., Semetko, H. A. & de Vreese, C. H. (1999). The effects of news frames on readers’ thoughts and recall. Communication Research, 26(5), 550–569. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365099026005002 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  115. van Aelst, P., Sehata, A. & van Dalen, A. (2010). Members of parliament: Equal competitors for media attention? An analysis of personal contacts between MPs and political journalists in five European countries. Political Communication, 27(3), 310–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2010.496711 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  116. van Aelst, P., Sheafer, T., Hubé, N. & Papathanassopoulos, S. (2017). Personalization. In C. de Vreese, F. Esser & D. N. Hopmann (Hrsg.), Comparing political journalism (S. 112–130). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  117. van Aelst, P., Sheafer, T. & Stanyer, J. (2012). The personalization of mediated political communication: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism, 13(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911427802 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  118. van Aelst, P., Strömbäck, J., Aalberg, T., Esser, F., de Vreese, C., Matthes, J., Hopmann, D., Salgado, S., Hubé, N., Stępińska, A., Papathanassopoulos, S., Berganza, R., Legnante, G., Reinemann, C., Sheafer, T. & Stanyer, J. (2017). Political communication in a high-choice media environment: A challenge for democracy? Annals of the International Communication Association, 41(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2017.1288551 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  119. van Dalen, A. (2012a). The people behind the political headlines: A comparison of political journalists in Denmark, Germany, the United Kingdom and Spain. International Communication Gazette, 74(5), 464–483. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048512445154 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  120. van Dalen, A. (2012b). Structural bias in cross-national perspective: How political systems and journalism cultures influence government dominance in the news. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 17(1), 32–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161211411087 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  121. van Dalen, A., Albæk, E. & de Vreese, C. (2011). Suspicious minds: Explaining political cynicism among political journalists in Europe. European Journal of Communication, 26(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323111404841 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  122. van Dalen, A., de Vreese, C. H. & Albæk, E. (2012). Different roles, different content? A four-country comparison of the role conceptions and reporting style of political journalists. Journalism, 13(7), 903–922. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911431538 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  123. van der Goot, E., Kruikemeier, S., de Ridder, J. & Vliegenthart, R. (2022). Online and offline battles: Usage of different political conflict frames. The International Journal of Press/Politics. Online-Vorveröffentlichung. 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612221096633 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  124. van der Goot, E., van der Meer, T. G. L. A. & Vliegenthart, R. (2021). Reporting on political acquaintances: Personal interactions between political journalists and politicians as a determinant of media coverage. International Journal of Communication(15), 229–251. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/15313 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  125. van der Pas, D. J., van der Brug, W. & Vliegenthart, R. (2017). Political parallelism in media and political agenda-setting. Political Communication, 34(4), 491–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2016.1271374 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  126. van Dijck, J. (2012). Culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  127. van Dijck, J. & Poell, T. (2013). Understanding social media logic. Media and Communication, 1(1), 2–14. https://doi.org/10.12924/mac2013.01010002 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  128. van Eimeren, B. & Frees, B. (2014). 79 Prozent der Deutschen online - Zuwachs bei mobiler Internetnutzung und Bewegtbild: Ergebnisse der ARD/ZDF-Onlinestudie 2014. Media Perspektiven(7-8), 378–396. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  129. van Gorp, B. (2007). The constructionist approach to framing: Bringing culture back in. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 60–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00329.x Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  130. van Zoonen, L. (1998). A professional, unreliable, heroic marionette (M/F): Structure, agency and subjectivity in contemporary journalism. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 1(1), 123–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/136754949800100108 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  131. Vargo, C. J. & Guo, L. (2017). Networks, big data, and intermedia agenda setting: An analysis of traditional, partisan, and emerging online U.S. news. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94(4), 1031–1055. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016679976 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  132. Vasko, V. & Trilling, D. (2019). A permanent campaign? Tweeting differences among members of congress between campaign and routine periods. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 16(4), 342–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2019.1657046 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  133. Vermeer, S., Trilling, D., Kruikemeier, S. & de Vreese, C. (2020). Online news user journeys: The role of social media, news websites, and topics. Digital Journalism, 8(9), 1114–1141. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1767509 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  134. Verweij, P. (2012). Twitter links between politicians and journalists. Journalism Practice, 6(5-6), 680–691. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2012.667272 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  135. Vis, F. (2013). Twitter as a reporting tool for breaking news: Journalists tweeting the 2011 UK riots. Digital Journalism, 1(1), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2012.741316 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  136. Vliegenthart, R., Boomgaarden, H. G. & Boumans, J. W. (2011). Changes in political news coverage: Personalization, conflict and negativity in British and Dutch newspapers. In K. Brants & K. Voltmer (Hrsg.), Political communication in postmodern democracy: Challenging the primacy of politics (S. 92–110). Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  137. Vliegenthart, R. & van Zoonen, L. (2011). Power to the frame: Bringing sociology back to frame analysis. European Journal of Communication, 26(2), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323111404838 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  138. Vobič, I., Maksuti, A. & Deželan, T. (2017). Who leads the Twitter tango? Studying the journalist-politician relationship in Slovenia through Twitter conversations. Digital Journalism, 5(9), 1134–1154. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1259002 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  139. Vogel, A. (2020). Publikumszeitschriften 2020: Konsolidierung und Rückgang der Titelzahl: Daten zum Markt und zur Konzentration der Publikumspresse im I. Quartal 2020. Media Perspektiven(6), 353–378. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  140. Vogelgesang, J. & Scharkow, M. (2012). Reliabilitätstests in Inhaltsanalysen: Eine Analyse der Dokumentationspraxis in Publizistik und Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft. Publizistik, 57(3), 333–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-012-0154-9 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  141. Vogl, E. (2021, 13. Oktober). Erste Festnahmen: Wer packt noch alles aus? Kronen Zeitung. https://www.krone.at/2530259 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  142. Voltmer, K. (2012). How far can media systems travel? Applying Hallin and Mancini’s comparative framework outside the Western world. In D. C. Hallin & P. Mancini (Hrsg.), Comparing media systems beyond the Western world (S. 224–245). Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  143. von Bredow, W. (1992). Legitimation durch Empörung: Vorüberlegungen zu einer politischen Theorie des Skandals. In J. H. Schoeps (Hrsg.), Der politische Skandal (S. 190–208). Burg. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  144. von Nordheim, G., Boczek, K. & Koppers, L. (2018). Sourcing the sources: An analysis of the use of Twitter and Facebook as a journalistic source over 10 years in The New York Times, The Guardian, and Süddeutsche Zeitung. Digital Journalism, 6(7), 807–828. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1490658 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  145. von Sikorski, C. (2017). Politische Skandalberichterstattung: Ein Forschungsüberblick und Systematisierungsversuch. Publizistik, 62(3), 299–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-017-0355-3 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  146. von Sikorski, C. (2018a). The aftermath of political scandals: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Communication, 12, 3109–3133. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/7100 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  147. von Sikorski, C. (2018b). The contents and effects of political scandals: A synopsis. In A. Haller, H. Michael & M. Kraus (Hrsg.), Scandalogy: An interdisciplinary field (S. 135–154). Herbert von Halem. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  148. von Sikorski, C. (2020a). The affective tipping point in political scandals: Explanations from political psychology on the conditional effects of scandals. In A. Haller & H. Michael (Hrsg.), Scandalogy 2: Cultures of scandals – scandals in culture (S. 36–50). Herbert von Halem. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  149. von Sikorski, C. (2020b). Scandalous?! Examining the differential effects of news coverage about (non-)severe political misconduct on voting intentions and news source evaluations. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 97(3), 762–789. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699020911081 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  150. von Sikorski, C., Heiss, R. & Matthes, J. (2020). How political scandals affect the electorate: Tracing the eroding and spillover effects of scandals with a panel study. Political Psychology, 41(3), 549–568. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12638 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  151. von Sikorski, C. & Knoll, J. (2018). All at once or bit by bit? How serialization of news affects people’s attitudes toward politicians involved in scandals. International Journal of Communication, 12, 1389–1407. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/7918 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  152. von Sikorski, C. & Knoll, J. (2019). Framing political scandals: Exploring the multimodal effects of isolation cues in scandal news coverage on candidate evaluations and voting intentions. International Journal of Communication, 13, 206–228. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/9616 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  153. von Sikorski, C. & Kubin, E. (2021). Are we living in a post-scandal era? High-choice media environments, political polarization, and their consequences for political scandals. In A. Haller, H. Michael & L. Seeber (Hrsg.), Scandology 3: Scandals in new media (S. 45–57). Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  154. von Sikorski, C. & Ludwig, M. (2016). Zur Relevanz und Wirkung visueller Skandalberichterstattung: Theoretische Überlegungen und empirische Erkenntnisse. In M. Ludwig, T. Schierl & C. von Sikorski (Hrsg.), Mediated Scandals: Gründe, Genese und Folgeeffekte von medialer Skandalberichterstattung (S. 191–209). Herbert von Halem. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  155. von Weizsäcker, R. (1987, 10. November). Gedanken über Wahrheit und Freiheit in der Politik. Ansprache des Bundespräsidenten bei der Verleihung des Romano-Guardini-Preises in München (Bulletin der Bundesregierung 118-87). https://www.bundesregierung.de/breg-de/service/bulletin/gedanken-ueber-wahrheit-und-freiheit-in-der-politik-ansprache-des-bundespraesidenten-bei-der-verleihung-des-romano-guardini-preises-in-muenchen-810170 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  156. Vonbun, R., Kleinen-von Königslöw, K. & Schoenbach, K. (2016). Intermedia agenda-setting in a multimedia news environment. Journalism, 17(8), 1054–1073. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884915595475 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  157. Vu, H. T., Trieu, L. T. & Nguyen, H. T. (2020). Routinizing Facebook: How journalists’ role conceptions influence their social media use for professional purposes in a socialist-communist country. Digital Journalism, 8(7), 885–903. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1770111 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  158. Wagner, H. (2007). Vom Gespenst, das als „Vierte Gewalt“ erscheint: Bemerkungen zu einer Demokratiegefährdung, die sich als ihr Gegenteil ausgibt. ZfP - Zeitschrift für Politik, 54(3), 324–351. https://doi.org/10.5771/0044-3360-2007-3-324 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  159. Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2014). The production of political coverage: The push and pull of power, routines and constraints. In C. Reinemann (Hrsg.), Political communication (S. 305–324). de Gruyter Mouton. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  160. Waisbord, S. & Russell, A. (2020). News flashpoints: Networked journalism and waves of coverage of social problems. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 97(2), 376–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699020917116 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  161. Wallace, J. (2018). Modelling contemporary gatekeeping: The rise of individuals, algorithms and platforms in digital news dissemination. Digital Journalism, 6(3), 274–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1343648 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  162. Wang, D [Dan], Huang, V. L. & Guo, S. Z. (2020). Malleable multiplicity and power reliance: Identity presentation by Chinese journalists on social media. Digital Journalism, 8(10), 1280–1297. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1832900 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  163. Washietl, E. (2010). „Wiener Zeitung“ ist eine „öffentliche Zeitung“. Der Österreichische Journalist (6+7), S. 60–61. http://www.journalist.at/archiv/2010-2/ausgabe-06072010/wiener-zeitung-ist-eine-offentliche-zeitung/ Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  164. Wasike, B. S. (2013). Framing news in 140 characters: How social media editors frame the news and interact with audiences via Twitter. Global Media Journal - Canadian Edition, 6(1), 5–23. http://gmj-canadianedition.ca//wp-content/uploads/2018/11/v6i1_wasike.pdf Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  165. Weaver, D. H. (2007). Thoughts on agenda setting, framing, and priming. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 142–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00333.x Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  166. Weaver, D. H., Beam, R. A., Brownlee, B. J., Voakes, P. S. & Wilhoit, G. C. (2007). The American journalist in the 21st century: U.S. news people at the dawn of a new millennium. Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  167. Weaver, D. H. & Wilhoit, G. C. (1986). The American journalist: A portrait of U.S. news people and their work. Indiana University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  168. Weaver, D. H. & Wilhoit, G. C. (1996). The American journalist in the 1990s: U.S. news people at the end of an era. Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  169. Weaver, D. H. & Willnat, L. (2012). Journalists in the 21st century: Conclusions. In D. H. Weaver & L. Willnat (Hrsg.), The global journalist in the 21st century (S. 529–551). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  170. Weaver, D. H., Willnat, L. & Wilhoit, G. C. (2019). The American journalist in the digital age: Another look at U.S. news people. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96(1), 101–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018778242 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  171. Weber, P. (2011). Determinanten von Skandalisierung in der politischen Auslandsberichterstattung: Eine empirische Analyse. In K. Bulkow & C. Petersen (Hrsg.), Skandale: Strukturen und Strategien öffentlicher Aufmerksamkeitserzeugung (S. 105–127). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  172. Weischenberg, S. (1995). Journalistik: Theorie und Praxis aktueller Medienkommunikation. Medientechnik, Medienfunktionen, Medienakteure: Bd. 2. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  173. Weischenberg, S. (2006). Medienqualitäten: Zur Einführung in den kommunikationswissenschaftlichen Diskurs über Maßstäbe und Methoden zur Bewertung öffentlicher Kommunikation. In S. Weischenberg, W. Loosen & M. Beuthner (Hrsg.), Medien-Qualitäten: Öffentliche Kommunikation zwischen ökonomischem Kalkül und Sozialverantwortung (S. 9–34). UVK. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  174. Weischenberg, S., Malik, M. & Scholl, A. (2006). Die Souffleure der Mediengesellschaft: Report über die Journalisten in Deutschland. UVK. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  175. Weischenberg, S., Malik, M. & Scholl, A. (2012). Journalism in Germany in the 21st century. In D. H. Weaver & L. Willnat (Hrsg.), The global journalist in the 21st century (S. 205–219). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  176. Weiß, R., Kösters, R. & Mahrt, M. (2020). Democratic theory and the potential of value frames in assessing media performance. Media and Communication, 8(3), 281–292. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i3.3058 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  177. Weissenberger, E. (2021). Die Schauplätze aufsuchen: Orte des politischen Journalismus: Medienhauptstadt Wien. In M. Prinzing & R. Blum (Hrsg.), Handbuch Politischer Journalismus (S. 305–310). Herbert von Halem. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  178. Welbers, K., van Atteveldt, W., Kleinnijenhuis, J., Ruigrok, N. & Schaper, J. (2016). News selection criteria in the digital age: Professional norms versus online audience metrics. Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism, 17(8), 1037–1053. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884915595474 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  179. Welchering, P. (2020). Gesinnung oder Haltung: Klärung in einer journalistischen Werte- und Erkenntnisdebatte. Journalistik. Zeitschrift für Journalismusforschung, 3(3), 234–249. https://doi.org/10.1453/2569-152X-32020-10980-de Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  180. Wessler, H. & Rinke, E. M. (2016). Journalismus und Politik. In M. Löffelholz & L. Rothenberger (Hrsg.), Handbuch Journalismustheorien (S. 639–653). Springer VS. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  181. Wichgers, L., Jacobs, L. & van Spanje, J. (2021). The battle of frame building: The reciprocal relationship between journalists and frame sponsors. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 26(3), 674–698. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220942760 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  182. Wiio, O. A. (1983). The mass media role in the Western world. In L. J. Martin & A. G. Chaudhary (Hrsg.), Comparative mass media systems (S. 85–94). Longman. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  183. Wilhelm, C., Stehle, H. & Detel, H. (2021). Digital visibility and the role of mutual interaction expectations: Reframing the journalist-audience relationship through the lens of interpersonal communication. New Media & Society, 23(5), 1004–1021. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820907023 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  184. Wilke, J. (1999). Leitmedien und Zielgruppenorgane. In J. Wilke (Hrsg.), Mediengeschichte der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (S. 302–329). Böhlau. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  185. Wilke, J. (2009). Historische und intermediale Entwicklungen von Leitmedien: Journalistische Leitmedien in Konkurrenz zu anderen. In D. Müller, A. Ligensa & P. Gendolla (Hrsg.), Leitmedien: Konzepte - Relevanz - Geschichte (S. 29–52). Transcript. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  186. Wilke, J. & Leidecker, M. (2010). Ein Wahlkampf, der keiner war? Die Presseberichterstattung zur Bundestagswahl 2009 im Langzeitvergleich. In C. Holtz-Bacha (Hrsg.), Die Massenmedien im Wahlkampf: Das Wahljahr 2009 (S. 339–372). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  187. Williams, B. A. & Delli Carpini, M. X. (2004). Monica and Bill all the time and everywhere: The collapse of gatekeeping and agenda setting in the new media environment. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(9), 1208–1230. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764203262344 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  188. Willnat, L., Weaver, D. H. & Wilhoit, G. C. (2019). The American journalist in the digital age: How journalists and the public think about journalism in the United States. Journalism Studies, 20(3), 423–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2017.1387071 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  189. Wodak, R. (2013). „Anything Goes!“ – The Haiderization of Europe. In R. Wodak, M. KhosraviNik & B. Mral (Hrsg.), Right-wing populism in Europe: Politics and discourse (S. 23–37). Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472544940.ch-002 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  190. Wodak, R. (2019). Und täglich grüßt „das Silberstein“. In B. Tóth & T. Hofer (Hrsg.), Wahl 2019: Strategien, Schnitzel, Skandale (S. 223–237). Ecowin. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  191. Wolfgang, J. D., Vos, T. P. & Kelling, K. (2019). Journalism’s relationship to democracy: Roles, attitudes, and practices. Journalism Studies, 20(14), 1977–1994. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2018.1547123 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  192. Wolling, J. (2001). Skandalberichterstattung in den Medien und die Folgen für die Demokratie: Die Bedeutung von Wahrnehmung und Bewertung der Berichterstattung für die Einstellung zur Legitimität des politischen Systems. Publizistik, 46(1), 20–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-001-0002-9 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  193. Wu, F. & Choy, C. H. Y. (2018). Frames and framing effects in Chinese online and offline crisis communication: The case study of a celebrity scandal. Chinese Journal of Communication, 11(3), 324–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2018.1473265 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  194. Wu, Y. (2019). How age affects journalists’ adoption of social media as an innovation: A multi-group SEM analysis. Journalism Practice, 13(5), 537–557. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2018.1511821 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  195. Xia, Y., Robinson, S., Zahay, M. & Freelon, D. (2020). The evolving journalistic roles on social media: Exploring “engagement” as relationship-building between journalists and citizens. Journalism Practice, 14(5), 556–573. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2020.1722729 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  196. Yen, N. Y., Zhang, C [Chengcui], Waluyo, A. B. & Park, J. J. (2015). Social media services and technologies towards Web 3.0. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 74(14), 5007–5013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-015-2461-4 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  197. Zamora, R. & Albaladejo, J. A. M. (2010). La representación simbólica del escándalo político: Hacia una tipoloía de los marcos periodícos (frames) utilizados en la narración del escándalo de corrupción política. Razón y Palabra, agosto - octubre(73). http://www.razonypalabra.org.mx/N/N73/Varia73/34ZamoraMarin_V73.pdf Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  198. Zeitungsmarktforschung Gesellschaft der deutschen Zeitungen (ZMG). (2022). Zeitungsqualitäten 2022. https://www.die-zeitungen.de/fileadmin/files/images/01_die-zeitungen.de_ab_Mai_2016/3_Argumente/Zeitungsqualitaeten_2022/Zeitungsqualitaeten2022.pdf Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  199. Zelizer, B. (1993). Journalists as interpretive communities. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 10(3), 219–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295039309366865 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  200. Zelizer, B. (2010). Journalists as interpretative communities, revisited. In S. Allan (Hrsg.), The Routledge companion to news and journalism (181-190). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  201. Zelizer, B. (2013). On the shelf life of democracy in journalism scholarship. Journalism, 14(4), 459–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884912464179 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  202. Zeveleva, O. (2020). Towards a Bourdieusian sociology of self-censorship: What we can learn from journalists adapting to rapid political change in Crimea after 2014. European Journal of Communication, 35(1), 46–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323119897798 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  203. Zhang, X. & Li, W. (2020). From social media with news: Journalists’ social media use for sourcing and verification. Journalism Practice, 14(10), 1193–1210. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2019.1689372 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  204. Zintz, K. & Roennefahrt, S. (1990). Der politische Skandal im Spannungsfeld zwischen Inszenierung und Kontrolle: Zur „Skandalogie“ am Beispiel der Kieler Affäre. Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen, 21(4), 600–609. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24224745 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  205. Zöchling, C. (2015, 7. August). FPÖ: Johann Gudenus, die unheimliche Nummer zwei. Profil. https://www.profil.at/oesterreich/fpoe-johann-gudenus-die-unheimliche-nummer-zwei-5790699 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  206. Zulli, D. (2020). Political scandals in the modern media environment: Applying a new analytical framework to Hillary Clinton’s Whitewater and e-mail scandals. International Journal of Communication, 14, 5218–5236. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/14397 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  207. Jungblut, M. & Zakareviciute, I. (2019). Do pictures tell a different story? A multimodal frame analysis of the 2014 Israel-Gaza conflict. Journalism Practice, 13(2), 206–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2017.1412804 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  208. Jungherr, A. & Schroeder, R. (2021). Digital transformations of the public arena. Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  209. Jungnickel, K. (2011). Nachrichtenqualität aus Nutzersicht: Ein Vergleich zwischen Leserurteilen und wissenschaftlich-normativen Qualitätsansprüchen. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 59(3), 360–378. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634x-2011-3-360 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  210. Juntunen, L. & Väliverronen, E. (2010). Politics of sexting: Re-negotiating the boundaries of private and public in political journalism. Journalism Studies, 11(6), 817–831. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616701003643996 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  211. Just, M. R. & Crigler, A. N. (2019). Media coverage of political scandals: Effects of personalization and potential for democratic reforms. In H. Tumber & S. R. Waisbord (Hrsg.), The Routledge companion to media and scandal (S. 34–45). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  212. Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  213. Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39(4), 341–350. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.39.4.341 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  214. Kaiser, J., Fähnrich, B., Rhomberg, M. & Filzmaier, P. (2018). What happend to the public sphere? The networked public sphere and public opinion formation. In E. G. Carayannis, D. F. J. Campbell & M. P. Efthymiopoulos (Hrsg.), Handbook of cyber-development, cyber-democracy, and cyber-defense (S. 433–459). Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  215. Kalogeropoulos, A. (2019). How younger generations consume news differently. In Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2019 (S. 55–59). Oxford, UK: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  216. Kaltenbrunner, A. (2010). Was bin ich? Leitmotive und Leitmedien im Politikjournalismus. In A. Kaltenbrunner, M. Karmasin & D. Kraus (Hrsg.), Der Journalisten-Report III: Politikjournalismus in Österreich (S. 109–134). Facultas. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  217. Kaltenbrunner, A. (2019). Geschichte der Tagespresse und Magazine nach 1945. In M. Karmasin & C. Oggolder (Hrsg.), Österreichische Mediengeschichte: Band 2: Von Massenmedien zu sozialen Medien (1918 bis heute) (S. 175–197). Springer VS. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  218. Kaltenbrunner, A. (2021). Scheinbar transparent: Inserate und Presseförderung der österreichischen Bundesregierung. Delta X. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  219. Kaltenbrunner, A., Karmasin, M. & Kraus, D. (Hrsg.). (2010). Der Journalisten-Report III: Politikjournalismus in Österreich. Facultas. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  220. Kaltenbrunner, A., Karmasin, M., Kraus, D. & Zimmermann, A. (2007). Der Journalisten-Report: Österreichs Medien und ihre Macher. Eine empirische Erhebung. Facultas. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  221. Kaltenbrunner, A., Karmasin, M., Kraus, D. & Zimmermann, A. (2008). Der Journalisten-Report II: Österreichs Medienmacher und ihre Motive: Eine repräsentative Befragung. Facultas. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  222. Kaltenbrunner, A., Lugschitz, R., Karmasin, M., Luef, S. & Kraus, D. (2020). Der österreichische Journalismus-Report: Eine empirische Erhebung und eine repräsentative Befragung. Facultas. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  223. Kampf, Z. (2019). To bark or to bite? Journalism and entrapment. In H. Tumber & S. R. Waisbord (Hrsg.), The Routledge companion to media and scandal (S. 245–253). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  224. Kantola, A. & Vesa, J. (2013). Mediated scandals as social dramas: Transforming the moral order in Finland. Acta Sociologica, 56(4), 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699313477872 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  225. Kapel, S. & Schmidt, K. D. (2018). Media literacy and newspapers of record. Reference Services Review, 46(2), 205–216. https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-02-2018-0012 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  226. Kapidzic, S., Neuberger, C., Stieglitz, S. & Mirbabaie, M. (2018). The quality of tweets and the adoption of journalistic norms. In K. Otto & A. Köhler (Hrsg.), Trust in media and journalism: Empirical perspectives on ethics, norms, impact and populism in Europe (S. 61–69). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-20765-6_4 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  227. Kaplan, A. M. & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  228. Karidi, M. (2018). News media logic on the move? In search of commercial media logic in German news. Journalism Studies, 19(9), 1237–1256. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2016.1266281 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  229. Karidi, M., Meyen, M. & Mahl, D. (2018). Scandals in the era of commercial media logic. In A. Haller, H. Michael & M. Kraus (Hrsg.), Scandalogy: An interdisciplinary field (S. 115–134). Herbert von Halem. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  230. Karlsson, M. (2010). Rituals of transparency: Evaluating online news outlets’ uses of transparency rituals in the United States, United Kingdom and Sweden. Journalism Studies, 11(4), 535–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616701003638400 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  231. Karmasin, M. (2005). Journalismus: Beruf ohne Moral? Von der Berufung zur Profession. WUV. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  232. Karmasin, M. (2010). Vierte Gewalt oder Hofberichterstatter? Rollenbilder im Politikjournalismus. In A. Kaltenbrunner, M. Karmasin & D. Kraus (Hrsg.), Der Journalisten-Report III: Politikjournalismus in Österreich (S. 11–28). Facultas. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  233. Karmasin, M., Kraus, D., Kaltenbrunner, A. & Bichler, K. (2011). Austria: A border-crosser. In T. Eberwein, S. Fengler, E. Lauk & T. Leppik-Bork (Hrsg.), Mapping media accountability - in Europe and beyond (S. 22–35). Herbert von Halem. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  234. Karner, C. (2021). „Ibizagate“: Capturing a political field in flux. Austrian History Yearbook, 52, 253–269. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0067237820000557 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  235. Karvonen, L. (2010). The personalisation of politics: A study of parliamentary democracies. ECPR monographs. ECPR Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  236. Kearney, M. (2019). Rtweet: Collecting and analyzing Twitter data. Journal of Open Source Software, 4(42), 1829. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01829 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  237. Kelle, U. (2019). Mixed Methods. In N. Baur & J. Blasius (Hrsg.), Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung (2. Aufl., S. 159–172). Springer VS. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  238. Kepplinger, H. M. (1996). Skandale und Politikverdrossenheit - ein Langzeitvergleich. In O. Jarren, H. Schatz & H. Weßler (Hrsg.), Medien und politischer Prozeß: Politische Öffentlichkeit und massenmediale Politikvermittlung im Wandel (S. 41–58). Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  239. Kepplinger, H. M. (1998). Die Demontage der Politik in der Informationsgesellschaft. Alber. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  240. Kepplinger, H. M. (2001). Der Ereignisbegriff in der Publizistikwissenschaft. Publizistik, 46(2), 117–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-001-0032-3 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  241. Kepplinger, H. M. (2009). Publizistische Konflikte und Skandale. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  242. Kepplinger, H. M. (2012). Die Mechanismen der Skandalisierung: Zu Guttenberg, Kachelmann, Sarrazin & Co.: Warum einige öffentlich untergehen - und andere nicht. Olzog. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  243. Kepplinger, H. M. (2018a). Hidden traps: An essay on scandals. International Journal of Communication, 12, 3153–3166. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/9617/2420 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  244. Kepplinger, H. M. (2018b). Die Mechanismen der Skandalisierung: Warum man den Medien gerade dann nicht vertrauen kann, wenn es darauf ankommt (4. aktualisierte und erheblich erweiterte Auflage). Lau. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  245. Kepplinger, H. M. (2018c). Medien und Skandale. Springer VS. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  246. Kepplinger, H. M. (2020). Functional analysis or impact research: Where is scandal research going? In A. Haller & H. Michael (Hrsg.), Scandalogy 2: Cultures of scandals – scandals in culture (S. 16–35). Herbert von Halem. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  247. Kepplinger, H. M., Ehmig, S. C. & Hartung, U. (2002). Alltägliche Skandale: Eine repräsentative Analyse regionaler Fälle. UVK. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  248. Kepplinger, H. M., Geiss, S. & Siebert, S. (2012). Framing scandals: Cognitive and emotional media effects. Journal of Communication, 62(4), 659–681. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01653.x Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  249. Kepplinger, H. M. & Hartung, U. (1993). Am Pranger: Eine Fallstudie zur Rationalität öffentlicher Kommunikation. Verlag Reinhard Fischer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  250. Kepplinger, H. M. & Viererbl, B. (2021). Borderline journalism: Why do journalists accept and justify questionable practices that establish scandals? A quantitative survey. Journalism, 22(3), 650–670. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918801077 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  251. Ketelaars, P. & van Aelst, P. (2021). An actor approach to mediatization: Linking politicians’ media perceptions, communication behaviour and appearances in the news. Politics of the Low Countries, 3(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.5553/PLC/.000004 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  252. Keyling, T. (2017). Kollektives Gatekeeping: Die Herstellung von Publizität in Social Media. Springer VS. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  253. Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I. P. & Silvestre, B. S. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons, 54(3), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.01.005 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  254. Kim, M., Hale, B. J., Grabe, M. E. & Bas, O. (2021). Who is responsible? The impact of emotional personalization on explaining the origins of social problems. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 29(4), 202–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2020.1752693 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  255. Kim, N., Duffy, A., Tandoc, E. C., Jr. & Ling, R. (2022). All news is not the same: Divergent effects of news plattforms on civic and political participation. International Journal of Communication, 16, 1148–1168. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/17302 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  256. Kim, Y [Yonghwan], Kim, Y [Youngju], Lee, J. S., Oh, J. & Lee, N. Y. (2015). Tweeting the public: Journalists’ Twitter use, attitudes toward the public‘s tweets, and the relationship with the public. Information, Communication & Society, 18(4), 443–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.967267 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  257. Kinder, D. R. & Sanders, L. M. (1996). Divided by color: Racial politics and democratic ideals. University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  258. Klawier, T., Prochazka, F. & Schweiger, W. (2022). Comparing frame repertoires of mainstream and right-wing alternative media. Digital Journalism, 10(8), 1387–1408. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2048186 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  259. Kleemans, M., Hendriks Vettehen, P. G. J., Beentjes, J. W. J. & Eisinga, R. (2018). The influence of sensationalist features in television news stories on perceived news quality and perceived sensationalism of viewers in different age groups. Studies in Communication Sciences, 17(2), 183–194. https://doi.org/10.24434/j.scoms.2017.02.004 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  260. Kleinsteuber, H. J. (2003). Medien und Kommunikation im internationalen Vergleich: Konzepte, Methoden und Befunde. In F. Esser & B. Pfetsch (Hrsg.), Politische Kommunikation im internationalen Vergleich: Grundlagen, Anwendungen, Perspektiven (S. 78–103). Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  261. Klenk, C. (2014). Medialisierter Skandal oder skandalöse Medien? Eine kritische Betrachtung der Berichterstattung im Fall Tebartz-van Elst. In J. Valentin (Hrsg.), Der „Fall“ Tebartz-van Elst: Kirchenkrise unter dem Brennglas (S. 25–50). Herder. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  262. Klenk, F. (2019, 23. Juli). Ratsch, Ratsch, Ratsch. Falter. https://www.falter.at/zeitung/20190723/ratsch-ratsch-ratsch Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  263. Klenk, F. (2021, 6. Oktober). Die „Österreich“-Affäre. Falter. https://www.falter.at/zeitung/20211006/razzia-im-kanzleramt-wer-zahlt-schafft-an-ich-liebe-das Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  264. Kligler-Vilenchik, N., Baden, C. & Yarchi, M. (2020). Interpretative polarization across platforms: How political disagreement develops over time on Facebook, Twitter, and WhatsApp. Social Media + Society, 6(3), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120944393 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  265. Klotz, T. M. (2019). Die FPÖ auf dem Weg zur Catch-All Party? In E. Jesse, T. Mannewitz & I.-C. Panreck (Hrsg.), Populismus und Demokratie: Interdisziplinäre Perspektiven (S. 73–97). Nomos. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  266. Knittelfelder, K. (2021). News from a different league: The rise of the digital party press in Austria. Oxford, UK. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2021-12/RISJ%20paper_Klaus%20Knittelfelder_Mt21_FINAL.pdf Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  267. Kohring, M., Marcinkowski, F., Donk, A., Metag, J. & Friedemann, A. (2011). Das Bild der Nanotechnologie in deutschen Printmedien: Eine frameanalytische Langzeitstudie. Publizistik, 56(2), 199–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-011-0117-6 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  268. Kohring, M. & Matthes, J. (2002). The face(t)s of biotech in the nineties: How the German press framed modern biotechnology. Public Understanding of Science, 11(2), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/11/2/304 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  269. Köster, J. & Wolling, J. (2006). Nachrichtenqualität im internationalen Vergleich: Operationalisierungen und empirische Ergebnisse. In S. Weischenberg, W. Loosen & M. Beuthner (Hrsg.), Medien-Qualitäten: Öffentliche Kommunikation zwischen ökonomischem Kalkül und Sozialverantwortung (S. 75–94). UVK. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  270. Kovach, B. & Rosenstiel, T. (2001). Are watchdogs an endangered species? Crucial as they are, their existence isn’t guaranted. Columbia Journalism Review, 40(1), 50-51, 53. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  271. Kovach, B. & Rosenstiel, T. (2010). Blur: How to know what’s true in the age of information overload. Bloomsbury. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  272. Kovach, B. & Rosenstiel, T. (2014). The elements of journalism: What newspeople should know and the public should expect (3. überarbeitete und aktualisierte Auflage). Three Rivers Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  273. Kozman, C. (2017). Measuring issue-specific and generic frames in the media’s coverage of the steroids issue in baseball. Journalism Practice, 11(6), 777–797. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2016.1190660 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  274. Krakovsky, C. (2021). Scandalogy meets field theory: Utilizing scandal theory for the analysis of journalistic practices over time. In A. Haller, H. Michael & L. Seeber (Hrsg.), Scandology 3: Scandals in new media (S. 181–200). Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  275. Kramer, E. (2013). When news becomes entertainment: Representations of corruption in Indonesia’s media and the implication of scandal. Media Asia, 40(1), 60–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/01296612.2013.11689951 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  276. Krämer, B., Schroll, T. & Daschmann, G. (2009). Die Funktion der Koorientierung für den Journalismus. In D. Müller, A. Ligensa & P. Gendolla (Hrsg.), Leitmedien: Konzepte - Relevanz - Geschichte (S. 93–112). Transcript. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  277. Kraus, D. (2010). Total digital? Onlinerecherche im Politikjournalismus. In A. Kaltenbrunner, M. Karmasin & D. Kraus (Hrsg.), Der Journalisten-Report III: Politikjournalismus in Österreich (S. 49–78). Facultas. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  278. Kretzschmar, S., Möhring, W. & Timmermann, L. (2009). Lokaljournalismus. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  279. Kriechbaumer, R. (2016). „Es reicht!“: Die Regierung Gusenbauer - Molterer. Österreich 2007/2008. Böhlau. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  280. Kriesi, H. (2012). Personalization of national election campaigns. Party Politics, 18(6), 825–844. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068810389643 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  281. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Reliability in content analysis: Some common misconceptions and recommendations. Human Communication Research, 30(3), 411–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00738.x Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  282. Krippendorff, K. (2011). Agreement and information in the reliability of coding. Communication Methods and Measures, 5(2), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2011.568376 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  283. Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (3. Aufl.). Sage. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  284. Krippendorff, K. (2017). Three concepts to retire. Annals of the International Communication Association, 41(1), 92–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2017.1291281 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  285. Krippendorff, K. (2021). A quadrilogy for (big) data reliabilities. Communication Methods and Measures, 15(3), 165–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2020.1861592 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  286. Kristensen, L. M. (2021). Audience metrics: Operationalizing news value for the digital newsroom. Journalism Practice. Online-Vorveröffentlichung. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2021.1954058 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  287. Kuckartz, U. (2007). QDA-Software im Methodendiskurs: Geschichte, Potenziale, Effekte. In U. Kuckartz, H. Grunenberg & T. Dresing (Hrsg.), Qualitative Datenanalyse: computergestützt: Methodische Hintergründe und Beispiele aus der Forschungspraxis (2. Aufl., S. 15–31). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  288. Kühne, R. & Schemer, C. (2015). The emotional effects of news frames on information processing and opinion formation. Communication Research, 42(3), 387–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650213514599 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  289. Kumlin, S. & Esaiasson, P. (2012). Scandal fatigue? Scandal elections and satisfaction with democracy in Western Europe, 1977-2007. British Journal of Political Science, 42(2), 263–282. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712341100024X Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  290. Kümpel, A. S. (2022). Social media information environments and their implications for the uses and effects of news: The PINGS framework. Communication Theory, 32(2), 223–242. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtab012 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  291. Künzler, M. (2013). Leitmedien. In G. Bentele, H.-B. Brosius & O. Jarren (Hrsg.), Lexikon Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft (2. Aufl., S. 183–184). Springer VS. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  292. Lacy, S., Watson, B. R., Riffe, D. & Lovejoy, J. (2015). Issues and best practices in content analysis. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 92(4), 791–811. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699015607338 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  293. Landis, B. T. & Allen, W. L. (2022). Cascading activation revisited: How audiences contribute to news agendas using social media. Digital Journalism, 10(4), 537–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1962728 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  294. Landmeier, C. & Daschmann, G. (2011). Im Seichten kann man nicht ertrinken? Boulevardisierung in der überregionalen deutschen Qualitätspresse. In R. Blum, H. Bonfadelli, K. Imhof & O. Jarren (Hrsg.), Krise der Leuchttürme öffentlicher Kommunikation: Vergangenheit und Zukunft der Qualitätsmedien (S. 177–191). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  295. Langenbucher, W. R. (2007). Politik - Medien - Journalisten: Politischer Journalismus. In B. Krause, B. Fretwurst & J. Vogelgesang (Hrsg.), Fortschritte der politischen Kommunikationsforschung: Festschrift für Lutz Erbring (S. 75–106). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  296. Langer, A. I. (2010). The politicization of private persona: Exceptional leaders or the new rule? The case of the United Kingdom and the Blair effect. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 15(1), 60–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161209351003 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  297. Langer, A. I. & Gruber, J. B. (2021). Political agenda setting in the hybrid media system: Why legacy media still matter a great deal. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 26(2), 313–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220925023 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  298. Larsson, A. O. (2011). Interactive to me – interactive to you? A study of use and appreciation of interactivity on Swedish newspaper websites. New Media & Society, 13(7), 1180–1197. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811401254 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  299. Larsson, A. O. (2015). The EU Parliament on Twitter: Assessing the permanent online practices of parliamentarians. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 12(2), 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2014.994158 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  300. Larsson, A. O. & Ihlebæk, K. A. (2017). Beyond “J-Tweeters”: Assessing the social media use of Norwegian journalists across multiple platforms. Journalism Practice, 11(6), 689–704. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2016.1181983 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  301. Larsson, A. O., Kalsnes, B. & Christensen, C. (2017). Elite Interaction: Public service broadcasters’ use of Twitter during national elections in Norway and Sweden. Journalism Practice, 11(9), 1137–1157. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2016.1234943 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  302. Larsson, A. O. & Moe, H. (2012). Studying political microblogging: Twitter users in the 2010 Swedish election campaign. New Media & Society, 14(5), 729–747. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811422894 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  303. Lasorsa, D. L. (2012). Transparency and other journalistic norms on Twitter. Journalism Studies, 13(3), 402–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2012.657909 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  304. Lasorsa, D. L., Lewis, S. C. & Holton, A. E. (2012). Normalizing Twitter: Journalism practice in an emerging communication space. Journalism Studies, 13(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2011.571825 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  305. Lauerer, C., Dingerkus, F. & Steindl, N. (2019). Journalisten in ihrem Arbeitsumfeld. In T. Hanitzsch, J. Seethaler & V. Wyss (Hrsg.), Journalismus in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz (S. 71–102). Springer VS. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  306. Lauf, E. (2001). „.96 nach Holsti“: Zur Reliabilität von Inhaltsanalysen und deren Darstellung in kommunikationswissenschaftlichen Fachzeitschriften. Publizistik, 46(1), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-001-0004-7 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  307. Lawrence, R. G. (2000). Game-framing the issues: Tracking the strategy frame in public policy news. Political Communication, 17(2), 93–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/105846000198422 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  308. Lawrence, R. G. & Bennett, W. L. (2001). Rethinking media politics and public opinion: Reactions to the Clinton-Lewinsky scandal. Political Science Quarterly, 116(3), 425–446. https://doi.org/10.2307/798024 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  309. Lawrence, R. G., Molyneux, L., Coddington, M. & Holton, A. (2014). Tweeting conventions: Political journalists’ use Twitter to cover the 2012 presidential campaign. Journalism Studies, 15(6), 789–806. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2013.836378 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  310. Lazer, D. M. J., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., Metzger, M. J., Nyhan, B., Pennycook, G., Rothschild, D., Schudson, M., Sloman, S. A., Sunstein, C. R., Thorson, E. A., Watts, D. J. & Zittrain, J. L. (2018). The science of fake news. Science, 359(6380), 1094–1096. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao2998 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  311. Leavitt, A. (2014). From #FollowFriday to YOLO: Exploring the cultural salience of Twitter memes. In K. Weller, A. Bruns, J. Burgess, M. Mahrt & C. Puschmann (Hrsg.), Twitter and society (S. 137–154). Peter Lang. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  312. Lecheler, S. (2018). Down the rabbit hole: Integrating emotions into news framing effects research. In P. D’Angelo (Hrsg.), Doing news framing analysis II: Empirical and theoretical perspectives (S. 71–89). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  313. Lecheler, S. & de Vreese, C. H. (2012). News framing and public opinion: A mediation analysis of framing effects on political attitudes. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 89(2), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699011430064 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  314. Lecheler, S. & de Vreese, C. H. (2019). News framing effects. Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  315. Lecheler, S., de Vreese, C. & Slothuus, R. (2009). Issue importance as a moderator of framing effects. Communication Research, 36(3), 400–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650209333028 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  316. Lecheler, S., Keer, M., Schuck, A. R. & Hänggli, R. (2015). The effects of repetitive news framing on political opinions over time. Communication Monographs, 82(3), 339–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2014.994646 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  317. Lecheler, S. & Kruikemeier, S. (2016). Re-evaluating journalistic routines in a digital age: A review of research on the use of online sources. New Media & Society, 18(1), 156–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815600412 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  318. Lee, A. M., Lewis, S. C. & Powers, M. (2014). Audience clicks and news placement: A study of time-lagged influence in online journalism. Communication Research, 41(4), 505–530. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212467031 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  319. Lee, F. L. F. (2019). Scandals, media effects and public opinion. In H. Tumber & S. R. Waisbord (Hrsg.), The Routledge companion to media and scandal (S. 445–455). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  320. Lee, J. (2015). The double-edged sword: The effects of journalists’ social media activities on audience perceptions of journalists and their news products. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(3), 312–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12113 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  321. Lee, J. (2016). Opportunity or risk? How news organizations frame social media in their guidelines for journalists. The Communication Review, 19(2), 106–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2016.1161328 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  322. Lee, J. (2020). “Friending” journalists on social media: Effects on perceived objectivity and intention to consume news. Journalism Studies, 21(15), 2096–2112. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1810102 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  323. Lengauer, G., Esser, F. & Berganza, R. (2012). Negativity in political news: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism, 13(2), 179–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911427800 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  324. Lengauer, G., Pallaver, G. & Pig, C. (2004). Redaktionelle Politikvermittlung in der Mediendemokratie. In F. Plasser (Hrsg.), Politische Kommunikation in Österreich: Ein praxisnahes Handbuch (S. 149–236). WUV. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  325. Levin, Schneider & Gaeth (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 76(2), 149–188. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1998.2804 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  326. Lewis, J. & Cushion, S. (2009). The thirst to be first: An analysis of breaking news stories and their impact on the quality of 24-hour news coverage in the UK. Journalism Practice, 3(3), 304–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512780902798737 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  327. Lewis, S. C. (2012). The tension between professional control and open participation: Journalism and its boundaries. Information, Communication & Society, 15(6), 836–866. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.674150 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  328. Lewis, S. C., Holton, A. E. & Coddington, M. (2014). Reciprocal journalism: A concept of mutual exchange between journalists and audiences. Journalism Practice, 8(2), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2013.859840 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  329. Lewis, S. C. & Molyneux, L. (2018). A decade of research on social media and journalism: Assumptions, blind spots, and a way forward. Media and Communication, 6(4), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i4.1562 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  330. Li, M. & Chitty, N. (2021). Paradox of professionalism: The professional identity of journalists who work across media cultures. Journalism, 22(1), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917743175 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  331. Lilleker, D. G., Tenscher, J. & Štětka, V. (2015). Towards hypermedia campaigning? Perceptions of new media’s importance for campaigning by party strategists in comparative perspective. Information, Communication & Society, 18(7), 747–765. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.993679 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  332. Lilleker, D. G. & Thompson, S. (2022). Protecting the citizen: Political journalists as gatekeepers in the digital age. In Morrison, James, Birks, Jen & M. Berry (Hrsg.), The Routledge companion to political journalism (S. 293–301). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  333. Lim, J. (2011). Intermedia agenda setting and news discourse: A strategic responses model for a competitor’s breaking stories. Journalism Practice, 5(2), 227–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2010.509184 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  334. Lischka, J. A. (2021). Logics in social media news making: How social media editors marry the Facebook logic with journalistic standards. Journalism, 22(2), 430–447. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918788472 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  335. Lischka, J. A. & Garz, M. (2021). Clickbait news and algorithmic curation: A game theory framework of the relation between journalism, users, and platforms. New Media & Society. Online-Vorveröffentlichung. 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211027174 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  336. Liu, J., Lee, B., McLeod, D. M. & Choung, H. (2019). Effects of frame repetition through cues in the online environment. Mass Communication and Society, 22(4), 447–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2018.1560475 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  337. Liu, J. & McLeod, D. M. (2019). Counter-framing effects of user comments. International Journal of Communication, 13, 2484–2503. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/11392 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  338. Liu, S., Boukes, M. & de Swert, K. (2022). Strategy framing in the international arena: A cross-national comparative content analysis on the China-US trade conflict coverage. Journalism. Online-Vorveröffentlichung. 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849211052438 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  339. Liu, Z. & Berkowitz, D. (2020). Blurring boundaries: Exploring tweets as a legitimate journalism artifact. Journalism, 21(5), 652–669. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918775073 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  340. Löblich, M. (2014). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse von Medienframes: Kategoriengeleitetes Vorgehen am Beispiel der Presseberichterstattung über den 12. Rundfunkänderungsstaatsvertrag. In F. Marcinkowski (Hrsg.), Framing als politischer Prozess: Beiträge zum Deutungskampf in der politischen Kommunikation (S. 63–78). Nomos. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  341. Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J. & Bracken, C. C. (2002). Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research, 28(4), 587–604. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00826.x Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  342. Loosen, W. (2016). Das Leitfadeninterview - eine unterschätzte Methode. In S. Averbeck-Lietz & M. Meyen (Hrsg.), Handbuch nicht standardisierte Methoden in der Kommunikationswissenschaft (S. 139–155). Springer VS. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  343. Loosen, W., Reimer, J. & Hölig, S. (2020). What journalists want and what they ought to do: (In)Congruences between journalists’ role conceptions and audiences’ expectations. Journalism Studies, 21(12), 1744–1774. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1790026 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  344. Loosen, W. & Schmidt, J.-H. (2012). (Re-)discovering the audience: The relationship between journalism and audience in networked digital media. Information, Communication & Society, 15(6), 867–887. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2012.665467 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  345. Loosen, W. & Scholl, A. (2011). Validierung oder Ergänzung? Zur Praxis von Methodenkombinationen in der Journalismusforschung. In O. Jandura, T. Quandt & J. Vogelgesang (Hrsg.), Methoden der Journalismusforschung (S. 109–121). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  346. López-Rabadán, P. (2022). Framing studies evolution in the social media era: Digital advancement and reorientation of the research agenda. Social Sciences, 11(1), Artikel 9, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11010009 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  347. Lough, K., Molyneux, L. & Holton, A. E. (2018). A clearer picture: Journalistic identity practices in words and images on Twitter. Journalism Practice, 12(10), 1277–1291. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2017.1389292 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  348. Lovejoy, J., Watson, B. R., Lacy, S. & Riffe, D. (2016). Three decades of reliability in communication content analyses: Reporting of reliability statistics and coefficient levels in three top journals. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 93(4), 1135–1159. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016644558 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  349. Ludwig, M. & Schierl, T. (2016). Mediated scandals und ihre Folgeeffekte: Eine einführende Betrachtung der Risiken und Relevanz medialer Berichterstattung. In M. Ludwig, T. Schierl & C. von Sikorski (Hrsg.), Mediated Scandals: Gründe, Genese und Folgeeffekte von medialer Skandalberichterstattung (S. 16–32). Herbert von Halem. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  350. Luna, J. P., Toro, S. & Valenzuela, S. (2022). Amplifying counter-public spheres on social media: News sharing of alternative versus traditional media after the 2019 Chilean uprising. Social Media + Society, 8(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221077308 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  351. Lünenborg, M. (2008). Die Aufmacher: Geschlechterverhältnisse im Politikressort. In J. Dorer, B. Geiger & R. Köpl (Hrsg.), Medien - Politik - Geschlecht: Feministische Befunde zur politischen Kommunikationsforschung (S. 155–171). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  352. Lünenborg, M. & Berghofer, S. (2010). Politikjournalistinnen und -journalisten: Aktuelle Befunde zu Merkmalen und Einstellungen vor dem Hintergrund ökonomischer und technologischer Wandlungsprozesse im deutschen Journalismus. Berlin. Deutscher Fachjournalisten Verband. https://www.dfjv.de/wp-content/uploads/DFJV-Studie-Politikjournalismus.pdf Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  353. Lünenborg, M. & Sell, S. (2018). Politischer Journalismus als Forschungsfeld: Theoretische Verortung und empirische Zugänge. In M. Lünenborg & S. Sell (Hrsg.), Politischer Journalismus im Fokus der Journalistik (S. 3–31). Springer VS. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  354. Luqiu, L. R. & Lu, S. (2021). Bounded or boundless: A case study of foreign correspondents’ use of Twitter during the 2019 Hong Kong protests. Social Media + Society, 7(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305121990637 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  355. Lüter, A. (2008). Die Kommentarlage: Profilbildung und Polyphonie in medienöffentlichen Diskursen. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  356. Maares, P., Lind, F. & Greussing, E. (2021). Showing off your social capital: Homophily of professional reputation and gender in journalistic networks on Twitter. Digital Journalism, 9(4), 500–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1835513 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  357. Magin, M. (2012). Wahlkampf in Deutschland und Österreich: Ein Langzeitvergleich der Presseberichterstattung (1949–2006). Böhlau. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  358. Magin, M. (2013). Die „Abflachungsspirale“ - Fakt oder Fiktion? Boulevardisierungstendenzen in der Wahlkampfberichterstattung deutscher und österreichischer Tageszeitungen (1949-2006). In T. Roessing & N. Podschuweit (Hrsg.), Politische Kommunikation in Zeiten des Medienwandels (S. 257–287). De Gruyter. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  359. Magin, M. (2019). Attention, please! Structural influences on tabloidization of campaign coverage in German and Austrian elite newspapers (1949-2009). Journalism, 20(12), 1704–1724. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917707843 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  360. Magin, M. & Geiß, S. (2019). Beyond time and space: The impact of autonomy from politics and commercialization pressure on mediatization in German and Austrian newspapers - A multilevel approach. Political Communication, 36(4), 543–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1608605 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  361. Magin, M., Geiß, S., Stark, B. & Jürgens, P. (2022). Common core in danger? Personalized information and the fragmentation of the public agenda. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 27(4), 887–909. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612211026595 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  362. Magin, M., Podschuweit, N., Haßler, J. & Russmann, U. (2017). Campaigning in the fourth age of political communication: A multi-method study on the use of Facebook by German and Austrian parties in the 2013 national election campaigns. Information, Communication & Society, 20(11), 1698–1719. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2016.1254269 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  363. Magin, M. & Stark, B. (2011). Österreich - Land ohne Leuchttürme? Qualitätszeitungen im Spannungsfeld zwischen publizistischer Leistung und strukturellen Zwängen. In R. Blum, H. Bonfadelli, K. Imhof & O. Jarren (Hrsg.), Krise der Leuchttürme öffentlicher Kommunikation: Vergangenheit und Zukunft der Qualitätsmedien (S. 97–114). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  364. Magin, M. & Stark, B. (2015). Explaining national differences of tabloidisation between Germany and Austria: Structure, conduct and performance. Journalism Studies, 16(4), 577–595. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2014.921398 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  365. Magin, M., Steiner, M., Häuptli, A., Stark, B. & Udris, L. (2021). Is Facebook driving tabloidization? A cross-channel comparison of two German newspapers. In M. Conboy & S. A. Eldridge II. (Hrsg.), Global Tabloid: Culture and Technology (S. 56–74). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  366. Maier, J. (2011). The impact of political scandals on political support: An experimental test of two theories. International Political Science Review, 32(3), 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512110378056 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  367. Maier, J., Jansen, C. & von Sikorski, C. (2019). Media framing of political scandals: Theoretical framework and empirical evidence. In H. Tumber & S. R. Waisbord (Hrsg.), The Routledge companion to media and scandal (S. 104–114). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  368. Maier, M. & Marschall, J. (2010). Forschungsdesigns und empirische Befunde der Schlüsselstudien zur Nachrichtenwerttheorie. In M. Maier, K. Stengel & J. Marschall (Hrsg.), Nachrichtenwerttheorie (S. 73–96). Nomos. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  369. Malik, M. & Scholl, A. (2009). Eine besondere Spezies: Strukturen und Merkmale des Internetjournalismus. Ergebnisse der repräsentativen Befragung „Journalismus in Deutschland II“. In C. Neuberger, C. Nuernbergk & M. Rischke (Hrsg.), Journalismus im Internet: Profession, Partizipation, Technisierung (S. 169–195). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  370. Malik, M. M. & Pfeffer, J. (2016). A macroscopic analysis of news content in Twitter. Digital Journalism, 4(8), 955–979. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2015.1133249 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  371. Mancini, P. (2015). The news media between volatility and hybridization. In J. Zielonka (Hrsg.), Media and politics in new democracies: Europe in a comparative perspective (S. 25–37). Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  372. Mancini, P. (2018). „Assassination campaigns”: Corruption scandals and news media instrumentalization. International Journal of Communication, 12, 3067–3086. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/7098 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  373. Mancini, P. (2019). Corruption scandals and the media system. In H. Tumber & S. R. Waisbord (Hrsg.), The Routledge companion to media and scandal (S. 156–164). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  374. Mancini, P. (2020). Comparing media systems and the digital age. International Journal of Communication, 14, 5761–5774. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/14553 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  375. Mancini, P., Mazzoni, M., Cornia, A. & Marchetti, R. (2017). Representations of corruption in the British, French, and Italian Press: Audience segmentation and the Lack of unanimously shared indignation. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 22(1), 67–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161216674652 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  376. Marcinkowski, F. (2014). Framing als politischer Prozess: Eine Einleitung. In F. Marcinkowski (Hrsg.), Framing als politischer Prozess: Beiträge zum Deutungskampf in der politischen Kommunikation (S. 7–13). Nomos. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  377. Marinov, R. (2020). Mapping the infotainment literature: Current trajectories and suggestions for future research. The Communication Review, 23(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2019.1682894 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  378. Marion, N. E. (2010). The politics of disgrace: The role of political scandal in American politics. Carolina Academic Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  379. Markoff, J. (2006). Entrepreneurs see a web guided by common sense. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/12/business/12web.html Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  380. Márquez-Ramírez, M., Mellado, C., Humanes, M. L., Amado, A., Beck, D., Davydov, S., Mick, J., Mothes, C., Olivera, D., Panagiotu, N., Roses, S., Silke, H., Sparks, C., Stępińska, A., Szabó, G., Tandoc, E. & Wang, H. (2020). Detached or interventionist? Comparing the performance of watchdog journalism in transitional, advanced and non-democratic countries. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 25(1), 53–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161219872155 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  381. Martin, J. A. (2022). Agenda-setting theory in a networked world. In Morrison, James, Birks, Jen & M. Berry (Hrsg.), The Routledge companion to political journalism (S. 312–321). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  382. Martini, F. (2020). Wer ist #MeToo? Eine netzwerkanalytische Untersuchung (anti-)feministischen Protests auf Twitter. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 68(3), 255–272. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634X-2020-3-255 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  383. Mast, C. (2018). ABC des Journalismus: Ein Handbuch (13., völlig überarbeitete Auflage). Herbert von Halem. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  384. Masullo Chen, G. (2019). Social media and scandal. In H. Tumber & S. R. Waisbord (Hrsg.), The Routledge companion to media and scandal (S. 165–173). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  385. Matthes, J. (2007). Framing-Effekte: Zum Einfluss der Politikberichterstattung auf die Einstellungen der Rezipienten. Verlag Reinhard Fischer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  386. Matthes, J. (2008). Media frames and political judgments: Exploring the boundaries of framing effects in a two-wave panel study. Studies in Communication Sciences, 8(2-3), 251–278. https://doi.org/10.5169/seals-791028 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  387. Matthes, J. (2009). What’s in a frame? A content analysis of media framing studies in the world’s leading communication journals, 1990-2005. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 86(2), 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900908600206 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  388. Matthes, J. (2010). Frames in political communication: Towards clarification of a research program. In S. Allan (Hrsg.), Rethinking communication: Keywords in communication research (S. 123–136). Hampton Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  389. Matthes, J. (2012). Framing politics: An integrative approach. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(3), 247–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211426324 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  390. Matthes, J. (2014a). Framing. Nomos. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845260259 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  391. Matthes, J. (2014b). Zum Gehalt der Framing-Forschung: Eine kritische Bestandsaufnahme. In F. Marcinkowski (Hrsg.), Framing als politischer Prozess: Beiträge zum Deutungskampf in der politischen Kommunikation (S. 17–28). Nomos. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845246024-15 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  392. Matthes, J. & Kohring, M. (2004). Die empirische Erfassung von Medien-Frames. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 52(1), 56–75. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634x-2004-1-56 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  393. Matthes, J. & Kohring, M. (2008). The content analysis of media frames: Toward improving reliability and validity. Journal of Communication, 58(2), 258–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00384.x Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  394. Mattoni, A. & Ceccobelli, D. (2018). Comparing hybrid media systems in the digital age: A theoretical framework for analysis. European Journal of Communication, 33(5), 540–557. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323118784831 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  395. Maurer, M., Jost, P., Schaaf, M., Sülflow, M. & Kruschinski, S. (2022). How right-wing populists instrumentalize news media: Deliberate provocations, scandalizing media coverage, and public awareness for the Alternative for Germany (AfD). The International Journal of Press/Politics. Online-Vorveröffentlichung. 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612211072692 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  396. Maurer, M. & Reinemann, C. (2006). Medieninhalte: Eine Einführung. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  397. Maurer, P. (2019). In the grip of politics? How political journalists in France and Germany perceive political influence on their work. Journalism, 20(9), 1242–1259. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917707139 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  398. Maurer, P. & Beiler, M. (2021). Die Kontakte aufdröseln: Beziehungsnetze des politischen Journalismus: Nähe und Distanz zu Politikern. In M. Prinzing & R. Blum (Hrsg.), Handbuch Politischer Journalismus (S. 374–380). Herbert von Halem. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  399. Maurer, P. & Riedl, A. (2021). Why bite the hand that feeds you? Politicians’ and journalists’ perceptions of common conflicts. Journalism, 22(11), 2855–2872. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919899304 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  400. Mayring, P. (2015). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken (12., überarbeitete Auflage). Beltz. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  401. McCay-Peet, L. & Quan-Haase, A. (2017). What is social media and what questions can social media research help us answer? In L. Sloan & A. Quan-Haase (Hrsg.), The SAGE handbook of social media research methods (S. 13–26). Sage. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  402. McDowell-Naylor, D., Cushion, S. & Thomas, R. (2023). A typology of alternative online political media in the United Kingdom: A longitudinal content analysis (2015-2018). Journalism, 24(1), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849211059585 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  403. McGregor, S. C. (2019). Social media as public opinion: How journalists use social media to represent public opinion. Journalism, 20(8), 1070–1086. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919845458 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  404. McLachlan, S. & Golding, P. (2000). Tabloidization in the British press: A quantitative investigation into changes in British newspapers, 1952-1997. In C. Sparks & J. Tulloch (Hrsg.), Tabloid tales: Global debates over media standards (S. 75–90). Rowman & Littlefield. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  405. McManus, J. H. (2009). The commercialization of news. In K. Wahl-Jorgensen & T. Hanitzsch (Hrsg.), The handbook of journalism studies (S. 218–233). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  406. McNair, B. (1999). News and journalism in the UK: A textbook (3. Aufl.). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  407. McNair, B. (2000). Journalism and democracy: An evaluation of the political public sphere. Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  408. McNair, B. (2019). Scandal and news values. In H. Tumber & S. R. Waisbord (Hrsg.), The Routledge companion to media and scandal (S. 76–85). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  409. McQuail, D. (2010). McQuail‘s mass communication theory (6. Aufl.). Sage. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  410. Meier, K. (2018). Journalistik (4. überarbeitete Auflage). UVK. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  411. Meier, K. (2019). Quality in Journalism. In T. P. Vos, F. Hanusch, D. Dimitrakopoulou, M. Geertsema-Sligh & A. Sehl (Hrsg.), The international encyclopedia of journalism studies (S. 1–8). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118841570.iejs0041 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  412. Mellado, C. (2015). Professional roles in news content: Six dimensions of journalistic role performance. Journalism Studies, 16(4), 596–614. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2014.922276 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  413. Mellado, C. (2020). Theorizing journalistic roles. In C. Mellado (Hrsg.), Beyond journalistic roles: Role performance and news in comparative perspective (S. 22–45). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  414. Mellado, C. & Alfaro, A. (2020). Platforms, journalists and their digital selves. Digital Journalism, 8(10), 1258–1279. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1817763 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  415. Mellado, C., Hellmueller, L. & Donsbach, W. (2017). Journalistic role performance: A new reserach agenda in a digital and global media environment. In C. Mellado, L. Hellmueller & W. Donsbach (Hrsg.), Journalistic role performance: Concepts, contexts, and methods (S. 1–18). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  416. Mellado, C., Hellmueller, L., Márquez-Ramírez, M., Humanes, M. L., Sparks, C., Stępińska, A., Pasti, S., Schielicke, A.‑M., Tandoc, E. & Wang, H. (2017). The hybridization of journalistic cultures: A comparative study of journalistic role performance. Journal of Communication, 67(6), 944–967. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12339 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  417. Mellado, C. & Hermida, A. (2021). The promoter, celebrity, and joker roles in journalists’ social media performance. Social Media + Society, 7(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305121990643 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  418. Mellado, C. & Hermida, A. (2022). A conceptual framework for journalistic identity on social media: How the personal and professional contribute to power and profit. Digital Journalism, 10(2), 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1907203 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  419. Mellado, C., Humanes, M. L., Scherman, A. & Ovando, A. (2021). Do digital platforms really make a difference in content? Mapping journalistic role performance in Chilean print and online news. Journalism, 22(2), 358–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918792386 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  420. Mellado, C. & Lagos, C. (2014). Professional roles in news content: Analyzing journalistic role performance in the Chilean national press. International Journal of Communication, 8, 2090–2112. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2651 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  421. Mellado, C., Márquez-Ramírez, M., Humanes, M. L., Amado, A., Mothes, C., Silke, H., Stępińska, A., Szabó, G., Davydov, S., Mick, J., Olivera, D., Panagiotou, N. S., Pasti, S., Raemy, P., Roses, S., Schielicke, A.‑M. & Tandoc, E., Jr. (2020). Mapping professional roles in news content across 18 countries: A descriptive overview. In C. Mellado (Hrsg.), Beyond journalistic roles: Role performance and news in comparative perspective (S. 67–84). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  422. Mellado, C., Márquez-Ramírez, M., Mothes, C. & Humanes, M. L. (2021). News beat fluidity in civic, infotainment, and service role performance across cultures. Journalism Practice, 15(9), 1240–1271. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2021.1971548 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  423. Mellado, C. & Mothes, C. (2020). Measuring the link between professional role conceptions, perceived role enactment, and journalistic role performance across countries. In C. Mellado (Hrsg.), Beyond journalistic roles: Role performance and news in comparative perspective (S. 147–166). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  424. Mellado, C., Mothes, C., Hallin, D. C., Humanes, M. L., Lauber, M., Mick, J., Silke, H., Sparks, C., Amado, A., Davydov, S. & Olivera, D. (2020). Investigating the gap between newspaper journalists’ role conceptions and role performance in iine European, Asian, and Latin American countries. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 25(4), 552–575. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220910106 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  425. Mellado, C. & van Dalen, A. (2014). Between rhetoric and practice: Explaining the gap between role conception and performance in journalism. Journalism Studies, 15(6), 859–878. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2013.838046 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  426. Menke, M., Kinnebrock, S., Kretzschmar, S., Aichberger, I., Broersma, M., Hummel, R., Kirchhoff, S., Prandner, D., Ribeiro, N. & Salaverría, R. (2018). Convergence culture in European newsrooms: Comparing editorial strategies for cross-media news production in six countries. Journalism Studies, 19(6), 881–904. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2016.1232175 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  427. Meraz, S. (2011). Twitter. In G. A. Barnett (Hrsg.), Encyclopedia of social networks (S. 885). Sage. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  428. Meraz, S. (2019). Scandals and agenda setting. In H. Tumber & S. R. Waisbord (Hrsg.), The Routledge companion to media and scandal (S. 55–66). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  429. Meraz, S. & Papacharissi, Z. (2013). Networked gatekeeping and networked framing on #Egypt. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(2), 138–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161212474472 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  430. Metag, J. & Rauchfleisch, A. (2017). Journalists’ use of political tweets: Functions for journalistic work and the role of perceived influences. Digital Journalism, 5(9), 1155–1172. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1248989 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  431. Meyen, M. (2009). Medialisierung. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 57(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634x-2009-1-23 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  432. Meyen, M. (2020). Die Leitmedien als Problem: Warum der Gegendiskurs dem Journalismus helfen könnte. Journalistik. Zeitschrift für Journalismusforschung, 3(3), 262–273. https://doi.org/10.1453/2569-152X-32020-10984-de Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  433. Meyer, L. (2016). Gesundheit und Skandal: Organspende und Organspendeskandal in medialer Berichterstattung und interpersonal-öffentlicher Kommunikation. Nomos. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  434. Meyn, H. & Tonnemacher, J. (2012). Massenmedien in Deutschland (4., völlig überarbeitete Neuauflage). UVK. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  435. Michelis, D. & Schildhauer, T. (2018). Social Media. In R. Voigt (Hrsg.), Handbuch Staat (S. 1203–1209). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-20744-1_108 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  436. Midtbø, T. (2012). Do mediated political scandals affect party popularity in Norway? In S. Allern & E. Pollack (Hrsg.), Scandalous! The mediated construction of political scandals in four nordic countries (S. 151–163). Nordicom. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  437. Miecznikowska, J. M. (2019). The 2019 Austrian government crisis: Political consequences of the Ibiza affair. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska, sectio M – Balcaniensis et Carpathiensis, 4, 53. https://doi.org/10.17951/bc.2019.4.53-67 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  438. Miller, M. M. & Riechert, B. P. (2001). The spiral of opportunity and frame resonance: Mapping the issue cycle in news and public discourse. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy & A. E. Grant (Hrsg.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (S. 106–121). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  439. Mills, T., Mullan, K. & Fooks, G. (2021). Impartiality on platforms: The politics of BBC journalists’ Twitter networks. Journalism Studies, 22(1), 22–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1852099 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  440. Mincigrucci, R., Stanziano, A. & Mazzoni, M. (2018). Spectacularization and instrumentalization of political corruption scandals in the Italian press: The case of „Villa in Monte Carlo“. In A. Haller, H. Michael & M. Kraus (Hrsg.), Scandalogy: An interdisciplinary field (S. 88–114). Herbert von Halem. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  441. Mitchell, A., Jurkowitz, M., Oliphant, J. B. & Shearer, E. (2021). How Americans navigated the news in 2020: A tumultuous year in review. Pew Research Center. https://www.journalism.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2021/02/PJ_2021.02.22_News-Pathways-2020-Lookback_FINAL.pdf Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  442. Mitchelstein, E. & Boczkowski, P. J. (2009). Between tradition and change: A review of recent research on online news production. Journalism, 10(5), 562–586. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884909106533 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  443. Möchel, K. & Schreiber, D. (2019, 13. August). Ibiza-Affäre: Die blaue Glücksspiel-Connection. Kurier. https://kurier.at/politik/inland/ibiza-affaere-die-blaue-gluecksspiel-connection/400577501 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  444. Molyneux, L. (2015). What journalists retweet: Opinion, humor, and brand development on Twitter. Journalism, 16(7), 920–935. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884914550135 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  445. Molyneux, L. (2019). A personalized self-image: Gender and branding practices among journalists. Social Media + Society, 5(3), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119872950 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  446. Molyneux, L., Holton, A. & Lewis, S. C. (2018). How journalists engage in branding on Twitter: Individual, organizational, and institutional levels. Information, Communication & Society, 21(10), 1386–1401. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1314532 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  447. Molyneux, L., Lewis, S. C. & Holton, A. E. (2019). Media work, identity, and the motivations that shape branding practices among journalists: An explanatory framework. New Media & Society, 21(4), 836–855. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818809392 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  448. Molyneux, L. & McGregor, S. C. (2022). Legitimating a platform: Evidence of journalists’ role in transferring authority to Twitter. Information, Communication & Society, 25(11), 1577–1595. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1874037 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  449. Molyneux, L. & Mourão, R. R. (2019). Political journalists’ normalization of Twitter: Interaction and new affordances. Journalism Studies, 20(2), 248–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2017.1370978 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  450. Molyneux, L., Mourão, R. R. & Coddington, M. (2017). US political journalists’ use of Twitter: Lessons from 2012 and a look ahead. In R. Davis, C. Holtz-Bacha & M. R. Just (Hrsg.), Twitter and elections around the world: Campaigning in 140 characters or less (S. 43–56). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  451. Moon, S. J. & Hadley, P. (2014). Routinizing a new technology in the newsroom: Twitter as a news source in mainstream media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 58(2), 289–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2014.906435 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  452. Moon, Y. E. & Lawrence, R. G. (2021). Disseminator, watchdog and neighbor? Positioning local journalism in the 2018 #FreePress editorials campaign. Journalism Practice. Online-Vorveröffentlichung. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2021.1981150 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  453. Morasso, S. G. (2012). Contextual frames and their argumentative implications: A case study in media argumentation. Discourse Studies, 14(2), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445611433636 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  454. Mourão, R., Diehl, T. & Vasudevan, K. (2016). I love Big Bird: How journalists tweeted humor during the 2012 presidential debates. Digital Journalism, 4(2), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2015.1006861 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  455. Mourão, R. R. (2015). The boys on the timeline: Political journalists’ use of Twitter for building interpretive communities. Journalism, 16(8), 1107–1123. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884914552268 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  456. Mourão, R. R., Kilgo, D. K. & Sylvie, G. (2021). Framing Ferguson: The interplay of advocacy and journalistic frames in local and national newspaper coverage of Michael Brown. Journalism, 22(2), 320–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918778722 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  457. Müller, D. & Ligensa, A. (2009). Einleitung. In D. Müller, A. Ligensa & P. Gendolla (Hrsg.), Leitmedien: Konzepte - Relevanz - Geschichte (S. 11–27). Transcript. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  458. Münker, S. (2009). Emergenz digitaler Öffentlichkeiten: Die Sozialen Medien im Web 2.0. Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  459. Münker, S. (2015). Kapitel 3: Die Sozialen Medien des Web 2.0. In D. Michelis & T. Schildhauer (Hrsg.), Social Media Handbuch: Theorien, Methoden, Modelle und Praxis (3. Aufl., S. 59–71). Nomos. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845263823-59 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  460. Nawratil, U. & Schönhagen, P. (2021). Die qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Rekonstruktion der Kommunikationswirklichkeit. In H. Wagner & P. Schönhagen (Hrsg.), Qualitative Methoden der Kommunikationswissenschaft (3. Aufl., S. 315–327). Nomos. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  461. Neckel, S. (1989). Das Stellhölzchen der Macht: Zur Soziologie des politischen Skandals. In R. Ebbighausen & S. Neckel (Hrsg.), Anatomie des politischen Skandals (S. 55–80). Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  462. Negreira-Rey, M.‑C., Vázquez-Herrero, J. & López-García, X. (2022). Blurring boundaries between journalists and Tiktokers: Journalistic role performance on TikTok. Media and Communication, 10(1), 146–156. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i1.4699 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  463. Neidhardt, F. & Rucht, D. (1993). Auf dem Weg in die „Bewegungsgesellschaft“? Über die Stabilisierbarkeit sozialer Bewegungen. Soziale Welt, 44(3), 305–326. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40877879 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  464. Nelson, J. L. (2021, 2. Dezember). A Twitter tightrope without a net: Journalists’ reactions to newsroom social media policies. Tow Center for Digital Journalism. https://www.cjr.org/tow_center_reports/newsroom-social-media-policies.php Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  465. Nelson, T. E. & Oxley, Z. M. (1999). Issue framing effects on belief importance and opinion. The Journal of Politics, 61(4), 1040–1067. https://doi.org/10.2307/2647553 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  466. Nelson, T. E. & Willey, E. A. (2001). Issue frames that strike a value balance: A political psychology perspective. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy & A. E. Grant (Hrsg.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (S. 245–266). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  467. Neu, M. (2004). Der Skandal. In J. Bellers & M. Königsberg (Hrsg.), Skandal oder Medienrummel? Starfighter, Spiegel, Flick, Parteienfinanzierung, AKWs, „Dienstreisen“, Ehrenworte, Mehmet, Aktenvernichtungen (S. 3–23). LIT. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  468. Neuberger, C. (2009). Internet, Journalismus und Öffentlichkeit: Analyse des Medienumbruchs. In C. Neuberger, C. Nuernbergk & M. Rischke (Hrsg.), Journalismus im Internet: Profession, Partizipation, Technisierung (S. 19–105). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  469. Neuberger, C. (2014). Social Media und Journalismus. In C. Neuberger, S. Langenohl & C. Nuernbergk (Hrsg.), LfM-Dokumentation: Bd. 50. Social Media und Journalismus (S. 15–33). Landesanstalt für Medien Nordrhein-Westfalen (LfM). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  470. Neuberger, C. (2017). Soziale Medien und Journalismus. In J.-H. Schmidt & M. Taddicken (Hrsg.), Handbuch Soziale Medien (S. 101–127). Springer VS. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  471. Neuberger, C. (2018). Journalismus in der Netzwerköffentlichkeit: Zum Verhältnis zwischen Profession, Partizipation und Technik. In C. Nuernbergk & C. Neuberger (Hrsg.), Journalismus im Internet: Profession - Partizipation - Technisierung (2. Aufl., S. 11–80). Springer VS. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  472. Neuberger, C., Nuernbergk, C. & Langenohl, S. (2019). Journalism as multichannel communication: A newsroom survey on the multiple uses of social media. Journalism Studies, 20(9), 1260–1280. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1507685 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  473. Neuberger, C., Nuernbergk, C. & Rischke, M. (2009). Journalismus – neu vermessen: Die Grundgesamtheit journalistischer Internetangebote – Methode und Ergebnisse. In C. Neuberger, C. Nuernbergk & M. Rischke (Hrsg.), Journalismus im Internet: Profession, Partizipation, Technisierung (S. 197–230). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  474. Neuberger, C., vom Hofe, H. J. & Nuernbergk, C. (2011). Twitter und Journalismus: Der Einfluss des „Social Web“ auf die Nachrichten (3. Aufl.). LfM-Dokumentation: Bd. 38. Landesanstalt für Medien Nordrhein-Westfalen (LfM). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  475. Neuberger, C., vom Hofe, H. J. & Nuernbergk, C. (2014). The use of Twitter by professional journalists: Results of a newsroom survey in Germany. In K. Weller, A. Bruns, J. Burgess, M. Mahrt & C. Puschmann (Hrsg.), Twitter and society (S. 345–358). Peter Lang. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  476. Neuman, W. R., Guggenheim, L., Jang, S. M. & Bae, S. Y. (2014). The dynamics of public attention: Agenda-setting theory meets big data. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 193–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12088 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  477. Neuman, W. R., Just, M. R. & Crigler, A. N. (1992). Common knowledge: News and the construction of political meaning. University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  478. Neveu, E. (2002). Four generations of political journalism. In R. Kuhn & E. Neveu (Hrsg.), Political journalism: New challenges, new practices (S. 22–43). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  479. Newman, N. (2022a). Executive summary and key findings. In Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2022 (S. 9–30). Oxford, UK: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  480. Newman, N. (2022b). Journalism, Media, and technology trends and predictions 2022. Oxford, UK. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2022-01/Newman%20-%20Trends%20and%20Predictions%202022%20FINAL.pdf Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  481. Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A. & Nielsen, R. K. (2019). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2019. Oxford, UK. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/inline-files/DNR_2019_FINAL.pdf Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  482. Newman, N. & Kalogeropoulos, A. (2018). Who uses alternative and partisan brands? In Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2018 (S. 45–47). Oxford, UK: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  483. Newmark, A. J., Vaughan, S. K. & Pleites‐Hernandez, G. D. (2019). Surviving political scandals: Why some transgressions end political careers and others do not. Social Science Quarterly, 100(4), 1268–1283. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12645 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  484. Nielsen, R. K. (2013). The absence of structural americanization: Media system developments in six affluent democracies, 2000-2009. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(4), 392–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161213502285 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  485. Nielsen, R. K., Fletcher, R., Newman, N., Brennen, J. S. & Howard, P. N. (2020). Navigating the „Infodemic“: How people in six countries access and rate news and information about Coronavirus. Oxford, UK. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2020-04/Navigating%20the%20Coronavirus%20Infodemic%20FINAL.pdf Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  486. Nielsen, R. K. & Kuhn, R. (2014). Political journalism in Western Europe: Change and continuity. In R. Kuhn & R. K. Nielsen (Hrsg.), Political journalism in transition: Western Europe in a comparative perspective (S. 1–23). I.B. Tauris. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  487. Noguera Vivo, J. M. (2013). How open are journalists on Twitter? Trends towards the end-user journalism. Communication & Society/Communicación y Sociedad, 26(1), 93–114. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  488. Nölleke, D. (2013). Experten im Journalismus: Systemtheoretischer Entwurf und empirische Bestandsaufnahme. Nomos. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845245317 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  489. Norris, P. (2009). Comparative political communications: Common frameworks or Babelian confusion? Government and Opposition, 44(3), 321–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2009.01290.x Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  490. Nuernbergk, C. (2016). Political journalists’ interaction networks: The German federal press conference on Twitter. Journalism Practice, 10(7), 868–879. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2016.1162669 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  491. Nuernbergk, C. (2020). Das Publikum von Politikjournalisten als Interaktionspartner auf Twitter: Interaktionsstruktur, Motive und Erfahrungen anschreibender Nutzer. Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 30(2), 241–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41358-020-00219-2 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  492. Nuernbergk, C. & Schmidt, J.‑H. (2020). Twitter im Politikjournalismus: Ergebnisse einer Befragung und Netzwerkanalyse von Hauptstadtjournalisten der Bundespressekonferenz. Publizistik, 65(1), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-019-00557-4 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  493. Nyhan, B. (2015). Scandal potential: How political context and news congestion affect the president’s vulnerability to media scandal. British Journal of Political Science, 45(2), 435–466. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123413000458 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  494. Nyhan, B. (2017). Media scandals are political events: How contextual factors affect public controversies over alleged misconduct by U.S. governors. Political Research Quarterly, 70(1), 223–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912916684034 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  495. Obermaier, F. & Obermayer, B. (2019). Die Ibiza-Affäre: Innenansichten eines Skandals. Wie wir die geheimen Pläne von Rechtspopulisten enttarnten und darüber die österreichische Regierung stürzte. Kiepenheuer & Witsch. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  496. Obijiofor, L. & Hanusch, F. (2011). Journalism across cultures: An introduction. Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  497. Oelrichs, I. (2016). Strukturmerkmale der Skandalberichterstattung. In M. Ludwig, T. Schierl & C. von Sikorski (Hrsg.), Mediated Scandals: Gründe, Genese und Folgeeffekte von medialer Skandalberichterstattung (S. 164–190). Herbert von Halem. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  498. Ohliger, U. A. (2019). Komplexitätsreduktion durch Kontextualisierung: Narrativität und Frames in der boulevardjournalistischen Politikberichterstattung. In B. Dernbach, A. Godulla & A. Sehl (Hrsg.), Komplexität im Journalismus (S. 117–129). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  499. Ojala, M., Pantti, M. & Kangas, J. (2018). Professional role enactment amid information warfare: War correspondents tweeting on the Ukraine conflict. Journalism, 19(3), 297–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884916671158 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  500. Olausson, U. (2018). The celebrified journalist: Journalistic self-promotion and branding in celebrity constructions on Twitter. Journalism Studies, 19(16), 2379–2399. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2017.1349548 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  501. Onken, H. (2013). Parteiensysteme im Wandel: Deutschland, Großbritannien, die Niederlande und Österreich im Vergleich. Springer VS. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  502. Opgenhaffen, M. & Scheerlinck, H. (2014). Social media guidelines for journalists: An investigation into the sense and nonsense among Flemish journalists. Journalism Practice, 8(6), 726–741. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2013.869421 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  503. O’Reilly, T. (2005a). Web 2.0: Compact definition? http://radar.oreilly.com/2005/10/web-20-compact-definition.html Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  504. O’Reilly, T. (2005b). What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. https://www.oreilly.com/pub/a/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  505. Oschatz, C., Stier, S. & Maier, J. (2022). Twitter in the news: An analysis of embedded tweets in political news coverage. Digital Journalism, 10(9), 1526–1545. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1912624 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  506. Ostfeld, M. & Mutz, D. (2014). Revisiting the effects of case reports in the news. Political Communication, 31(1), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2013.799106 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  507. Oswald, M. (2019). Strategisches Framing: Eine Einführung. Springer VS. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  508. Otto, L., Glogger, I. & Boukes, M. (2017). The softening of journalistic political communication: A comprehensive framework model of sensationalism, soft news, infotainment, and tabloidization. Communication Theory, 27(2), 136–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12102 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  509. Otto, L. P., Glogger, I. & Maier, M. (2019). Personalization 2.0? Testing the personalization hypothesis in citizens’, journalists’, and politicians’ campaign Twitter communication. Communications, 44(4), 359–381. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2018-2005 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  510. Ottovordemgentschenfelde, S. (2017). „Organizational, professional, personal“: An exploratory study of political journalists and their hybrid brand on Twitter. Journalism, 18(1), 64–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884916657524 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  511. Palau, A. M. & Palomo, J. (2021). The role of the news media in fighting corruption practices: A case study of Spain. Journalism Studies, 22(7), 839–859. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2021.1895871 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  512. Pallaver, G. & Lengauer, G. (2008). Weibliche Repräsentanz und Media Frames: Politikerinnen in Österreichs Medien. In J. Dorer, B. Geiger & R. Köpl (Hrsg.), Medien - Politik - Geschlecht: Feministische Befunde zur politischen Kommunikationsforschung (S. 104–123). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  513. Pan, Z. & Kosicki, G. M. (2001). Framing as a strategic action in public deliberation. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy & A. E. Grant (Hrsg.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (S. 35–65). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  514. Panayırcı, U. C., İşeri, E. & Şekercioğlu, E. (2016). Political agency of news outlets in a polarized media system: Framing the corruption probe in Turkey. European Journal of Communication, 31(5), 551–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323116669455 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  515. Papacharissi, Z. (2015). We have always been social. Social Media + Society, 1(1), 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115581185 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  516. Park, C. S. (September 2012). How the media frame political corruption: Episodic and thematic frame stories found in Illinois newspapers. Paul Simon Public Policy Institute. https://paulsimoninstitute.siu.edu/_common/documents/whats-in-the-water/water-illinois/park.pdf Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  517. Parmelee, J. H. (2013). Political journalists and Twitter: Influences on norms and practices. Journal of Media Practice, 14(4), 291–305. https://doi.org/10.1386/jmpr.14.4.291_1 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  518. Parmelee, J. H., Roman, N., Beasley, B. & Perkins, S. C. (2019). Gender and generational differences in political reporters’ interactivity on Twitter. Journalism Studies, 20(2), 232–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2017.1364140 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  519. Patterson, T. E. (2000). Doing well and doing good: How soft news and critical journalism are shrinking the news audience and weakening democracy - and what news outlets can do about it. Boston. Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics, and Public Policy. https://shorensteincenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/soft_news_and_critical_journalism_2000.pdf Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  520. Patterson, T. E. (2013). The American democracy (11. Aufl.). McGraw-Hill. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  521. Patterson, T. E. & Donsbach, W. (1996). News decisions: Journalists as partisan actors. Political Communication, 13(4), 455–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.1996.9963131 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  522. Paulussen, S. & Harder, R. A. (2014). Social media references in newspapers: Facebook, Twitter and YouTube as sources in newspaper journalism. Journalism Practice, 8(5), 542–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2014.894327 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  523. Pavlik, J. V., Dennis, E. E., Mersey, R. D. & Gengler, J. (2019). Conducting research on the world’s changing mediascape: Principles and practices. Media and Communication, 7(1), 189–192. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i1.1982 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  524. Pearson, G. D. H. & Kosicki, G. M. (2017). How way-finding is challenging gatekeeping in the digital age. Journalism Studies, 18(9), 1087–1105. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2015.1123112 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  525. Peltzer, A. & Pilipets, E. (2020). Die Ironie der Empörung: Affektive Politik im digitalen Afterlife des Ibiza-Videos. Berliner Debatte Initial, 31(2), 108–122. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  526. Pereira, M. M. & Waterbury, N. W. (2019). Do voters discount political scandals over time? Political Research Quarterly, 72(3), 584–595. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912918795059 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  527. Perreault, G. P. & Ferrucci, P. (2020). What is digital journalism? Defining the practice and role of the digital journalist. Digital Journalism, 8(10), 1298–1316. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1848442 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  528. Peruško, Z., Čuvalo, A. & Vozab, D. (2020). Mediatization of journalism: Influence of the media system and media organization on journalistic practices in European digital mediascapes. Journalism, 21(11), 1630–1654. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917743176 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  529. Peter, C. & Zerback, T. (2020). Ordinary citizens in the news: A conceptual framework. Journalism Studies, 21(8), 1003–1016. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2020.1758190 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  530. Pew Research Center. (2011, 14. November). How mainstream media outlets use Twitter. https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/legacy/How-Mainstream-Media-Outlets-Use-Twitter.pdf Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  531. Pew Research Center. (2019, 23. Juli). State of the news media: Digital news fact sheet. https://www.journalism.org/fact-sheet/digital-news Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  532. Pew Research Center. (2021, 7. April). State of the news media: Social media fact sheet. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/social-media Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  533. Pfaffenberger, F. (2016). Twitter als Basis wissenschaftlicher Studien: Eine Bewertung gängiger Erhebungs- und Analysemethoden der Twitter-Forschung. Springer VS. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  534. Pfetsch, B. (1998). Akteure und Institutionen: Bürger - Publikum. In O. Jarren, U. Sarcinelli & U. Saxer (Hrsg.), Politische Kommunikation in der demokratischen Gesellschaft: Ein Handbuch mit Lexikonteil (S. 406–413). Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  535. Pfetsch, B., Eilders, C. & Neidhardt, F. (2004). Das „Kommentariat“: Rolle und Status einer Öffentlichkeitselite. In C. Eilders, F. Neidhardt & B. Pfetsch (Hrsg.), Die Stimme der Medien: Pressekommentare und politische Öffentlichkeit in der Bundesrepublik (S. 39–73). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  536. Pfetsch, B., Maier, D., Stoltenberg, D., Waldherr, A., Kligler-Vilenchik, N. & de Vries Kedem, M. (2021). Topographies of local public spheres on social media: The scope of issues and interactions. International Journal of Communication, 15, 3645–3670. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/17253 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  537. Pfetsch, B. & Mayerhöffer, E. (2011). Vordergründige Nähe: Zur Kommunikationskultur von Politik- und Medieneliten in Deutschland. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 59(1), 40–59. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634x-2011-1-40 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  538. Pflügler, S. & Baugut, P. (2015). Normverstoß, Medienkonstrukt, Machtkampf oder Internethysterie? Der Skandal und die Typen seiner Erforschung. Publizistik, 60(3), 305–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-015-0236-6 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  539. Picard, R. G. (2014). Twilight or new dawn of journalism? Evidence from the changing news ecosystem. Digital Journalism, 2(3), 273–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.895531 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  540. Plasser, F. & Lengauer, G. (2010a). Die österreichische Medienarena: Besonderheiten des politischen Kommunikationssystems. In F. Plasser (Hrsg.), Politik in der Medienarena: Praxis politischer Kommunikation in Österreich (S. 19–52). Facultas. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  541. Plasser, F. & Lengauer, G. (2010b). Politik vor Redaktionsschluss: Kommunikationsorientierungen von Macht- und Medieneliten in Österreich. In F. Plasser (Hrsg.), Politik in der Medienarena: Praxis politischer Kommunikation in Österreich (S. 53–100). Facultas. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  542. Plasser, F., Lengauer, G. & Meixner, W. (2004). Politischer Journalismus in der Mediendemokratie. In F. Plasser (Hrsg.), Politische Kommunikation in Österreich: Ein praxisnahes Handbuch (S. 237–308). WUV. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  543. Plasser, F. & Pallaver, G. (2017). Österreichische Medien und politische Kommunikation in komparativer Sicht. In L. Helms & D. M. Wineroither (Hrsg.), Die österreichische Demokratie im Vergleich (2. Aufl., S. 315–336). Nomos. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  544. Plasser, F. & Seeber, G. U. H. (2010). Wahlentscheidung in der Boulevard-Demokratie: Die Kronen Zeitung, News Bias und Medieneffekte. In F. Plasser (Hrsg.), Politik in der Medienarena: Praxis politischer Kommunikation in Österreich (S. 273–312). Facultas. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  545. Plasser, F. & Ulram, P. A. (2004). Öffentliche Aufmerksamkeit in der Mediendemokratie. In F. Plasser (Hrsg.), Politische Kommunikation in Österreich: Ein praxisnahes Handbuch (S. 37–99). WUV. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  546. Pollack, E., Allern, S., Kantola, A. & Ørsten, M. (2018). The new normal: Scandals as a standard feature of political life in nordic countries. International Journal of Communication, 12, 3087–3108. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/7099 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  547. Pörksen, B. (31. März 2021). Alle mit allen verbinden. Die Zeit, 2021(14), S. 19. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  548. Pörksen, B. & Detel, H. (2011). Evidenzerfahrungen für alle: Das kontraproduktive Krisenmanagement des Verteidigungsministers und die Logik der Skandalisierung im digitalen Zeitalter. In O. Lepsius & R. Meyer-Kalkus (Hrsg.), Inszenierung als Beruf: Der Fall Guttenberg (S. 57–70). Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  549. Pörksen, B. & Detel, H. (2012). Der entfesselte Skandal: Das Ende der Kontrolle im digitalen Zeitalter. Herbert von Halem. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  550. Post, S. (2015). Scientific objectivity in journalism? How journalists and academics define objectivity, assess its attainability, and rate its desirability. Journalism, 16(6), 730–749. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884914541067 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  551. Potthoff, M. (2012). Medien-Frames und ihre Entstehung. Springer VS. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  552. Potthoff, M. & Kohring, M. (2014). Die Berücksichtigung von Kohärenz in der empirischen Analyse textueller Frames. In F. Marcinkowski (Hrsg.), Framing als politischer Prozess: Beiträge zum Deutungskampf in der politischen Kommunikation (S. 29–43). Nomos. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  553. Powers, M. & Vera-Zambrano, S. (2018). How journalists use social media in France and the United States: Analyzing technology use across journalistic fields. New Media & Society, 20(8), 2728–2744. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817731566 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  554. Prager, A. & Hameleers, M. (2021). Disseminating information or advocating peace? Journalists’ role perceptions in the face of conflict. Journalism, 22(2), 395–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918791788 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  555. Prandner, D. & Glatz, C. (2021). News repertoires and information behavior in Austria: What is the role of social inequality? Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 46(1), 45–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11614-020-00433-w Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  556. Prinzing, M. & Blum, R. (2021). Einleitung. In M. Prinzing & R. Blum (Hrsg.), Handbuch Politischer Journalismus (S. 19–29). Herbert von Halem. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  557. Prior, M. (2003). Any good news in soft news? The impact of soft news preference on political knowledge. Political Communication, 20(2), 149–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600390211172 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  558. Prior, M. (2013). Media and political polarization. Annual Review of Political Science, 16, 101–127. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-100711-135242 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  559. Przyborski, A. & Wohlrab-Sahr, M. (2021). Qualitative Sozialforschung: Ein Arbeitsbuch (5., überarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage). De Gruyter. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  560. Pundt, C. (2008). Medien und Diskurs: Zur Skandalisierung von Privatheit in der Geschichte des Fernsehens. Transcript. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  561. Pürer, H. (2015). Medien in Deutschland: Presse - Rundfunk - Online. UVK. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  562. Pürer, H. & Raabe, J. (2007). Presse in Deutschland (3., völlig überarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage). UVK. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  563. Puschmann, C. & Peters, I. (2017). Informationsverbreitung in sozialen Medien. In J.-H. Schmidt & M. Taddicken (Hrsg.), Handbuch Soziale Medien (S. 211–232). Springer VS. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  564. Qin, J. (2015). Hero on Twitter, traitor on news: How social media and legacy news frame Snowden. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 20(2), 166–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161214566709 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  565. Quandt, T., Löffelholz, M., Weaver, D. H., Hanitzsch, T. & Altmeppen, K.‑D. (2006). American and German online journalists at the beginning of the 21st century: A bi-national survey. Journalism Studies, 7(2), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700500533486 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  566. Rädiker, S. & Kuckartz, U. (2019). Analyse qualitativer Daten mit MAXQDA: Text, Audio und Video. Springer VS. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  567. Raemy, P., Beck, D. & Hellmueller, L. (2019). Swiss journalists’ role performance: The relationship between conceptualized, narrated, and practiced roles. Journalism Studies, 20(6), 765–782. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1423631 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  568. Raemy, P., Hellmueller, L. & Beck, D. (2021). Journalists’ contributions to political life in Switzerland: Professional role conceptions and perceptions of role enactment. Journalism, 22(3), 767–786. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918802542 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  569. Raemy, P. & Vos, T. P. (2021). A negotiative theory of journalistic roles. Communication Theory, 31(1), 107–126. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtaa030 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  570. Rainie, L. (2020). The everything-ness and the more-ness of the internet: How digital is different from other media. International Journal of Communication, 14, 5860–5879. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/14555 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  571. Raupp, J. & Kocks, J. N. (2015). Zwischen Anpassung und Kontinuität: Die Beziehungen zwischen politischer Pressearbeit und Journalismus im Zeitalter von Social Media. Zeitschrift für Politikberatung, 7(3), 100–109. https://doi.org/10.5771/1865-4789-2015-3-100 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  572. Raupp, J. & Völker, D. (2014). Was ist strategisch am strategischen Framing? Eine Untersuchung zur Gestaltung von Frame-Elementen am Beispiel der Regierungskommunikation in der Finanzkrise. In F. Marcinkowski (Hrsg.), Framing als politischer Prozess: Beiträge zum Deutungskampf in der politischen Kommunikation (S. 127–141). Nomos. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  573. Razis, G. & Anagnostopoulos, I. (2014a). InfluenceTracker: Rating the impact of a Twitter account. In L. Iliadis, I. Maglogiannis, H. Papadopoulos, S. Sioutas & C. Makris (Hrsg.), Artificial intelligence applications and innovations: AIAI 2014 Workshops: CoPA, MHDW, IIVC, and MT4BD (S. 184–195). Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  574. Razis, G. & Anagnostopoulos, I. (2014b). Semantifying Twitter: The influenceTracker ontology. In 9th International Workshop on Semantic and Social Media Adaptation and Personalization (S. 98–103). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SMAP.2014.23 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  575. Reese, S. D. (2001). Framing public life: A bridging model for media research. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy & A. E. Grant (Hrsg.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (S. 7–31). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  576. Reese, S. D. (2007). The framing project: A bridging model for media research revisited. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 148–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00334.x Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  577. Reese, S. D. (2010). Finding frames in a web of culture: The case of the war on terror. In P. D’Angelo & J. A. Kuypers (Hrsg.), Doing news framing analysis: Empirical and theoretical perspectives (S. 17–42). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  578. Reese, S. D. & Shoemaker, P. J. (2016). A media sociology for the networked public sphere: The hierarchy of influences model. Mass Communication and Society, 19(4), 389–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2016.1174268 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  579. Reich, Z. (2011a). Comparing reporters’ work across print, radio, and online: Converged origination, diverged packaging. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 88(2), 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769901108800204 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  580. Reich, Z. (2011b). Source credibility and journalism: Between visceral and discretional judgment. Journalism Practice, 5(1), 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512781003760519 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  581. Reich, Z. (2016). Comparing news reporting across print, radio, television and online: Still distinct manufacturing houses. Journalism Studies, 17(5), 552–572. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2015.1006898 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  582. Reinemann, C. (2003). Medienmacher als Mediennutzer: Kommunikations- und Einflussstrukturen im politischen Journalismus der Gegenwart. Böhlau. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  583. Reinemann, C. (2005). Bild, BamS und Glotze? Zum Wandel der Kommunikations- und Einflussstrukturen im politischen Journalismus. In M. Behmer, B. Blöbaum, A. Scholl & R. Stöber (Hrsg.), Journalismus und Wandel: Analysedimensionen, Konzepte, Fallstudien (S. 225–244). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  584. Reinemann, C. & Baugut, P. (2014a). Alter Streit unter neuen Bedingungen: Einflüsse politischer Einstellungen von Journalisten auf ihre Arbeit. Zeitschrift für Politik, 61(4), 480–505. https://doi.org/10.5771/0044-3360-2014-4-480 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  585. Reinemann, C. & Baugut, P. (2014b). German political journalism between change and stability. In R. Kuhn & R. K. Nielsen (Hrsg.), Political journalism in transition: Western Europe in a comparative perspective (S. 73–91). I.B. Tauris. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  586. Reinemann, C., Stanyer, J., Scherr, S. & Legnante, G. (2012). Hard and soft news: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism, 13(2), 221–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911427803 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  587. Reisinger, W. (2021, 3. April). Chat-Protokolle: Das „System Kurz“ und die Korruptionsvorwürfe. Augsburger Allgemeine Zeitung. https://www.augsburger-allgemeine.de/politik/Oesterreich-Chat-Protokolle-Das-System-Kurz-und-die-Korruptionsvorwuerfe-id59432691.html Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  588. Reiter, F. & Matthes, J. (2021). Correctives of the mainstream media? A panel study on mainstream media use, alternative digital media use, and the erosion of political interest as well as political knowledge. Digital Journalism. Online-Vorveröffentlichung. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1974916 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  589. Renger, R. & Spudich, H. (2000). Karl Kraus hätte im Internet publiziert: Online-Journalismus in Österreich. In K.-D. Altmeppen, H.-J. Bucher & M. Löffelholz (Hrsg.), Online-Journalismus: Perspektiven für Wissenschaft und Praxis (S. 317–333). Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  590. Renger, R. & Wiesner, C. (2007). Politik zum Lachen: „Feel Good“-Faktoren in der Politikberichterstattung österreichischer Tageszeitungen. In A. Scholl, R. Renger & B. Blöbaum (Hrsg.), Journalismus und Unterhaltung: Theoretische Ansätze und empirische Befunde (S. 233–254). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  591. Revers, M. (2014). The twitterization of news making: Transparency and journalistic professionalism. Journal of Communication, 64(5), 806–826. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12111 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  592. Revers, M. (2017). Contemporary journalism in the US and Germany: Agents of accountability. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51537-7 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  593. Rheingold, H. (1994). Virtuelle Gemeinschaft: Soziale Beziehungen im Zeitalter des Computers. Addison-Wesley. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  594. Rhomberg, M. (2005). Wirklich die „vierte Gewalt“? Funktionsverständnisse für die Massenmedien in der Gesellschaft. In S. A. Jansen & B. P. Priddat (Hrsg.), Korruption: Unaufgeklärter Kapitalismus – multidisziplinäre Perspektiven zu Funktionen und Folgen der Korruption (S. 123–140). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  595. Riedl, A. & Eberl, J.‑M. (2022). Audience expectations of journalism: What’s politics got to do with it? Journalism, 23(8), 1682–1699. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920976422 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  596. Riedl, A. A., Rohrbach, T. & Krakovsky, C. (2022). “I can’t just pull a woman out of a hat”: A mixed-methods study on journalistic drivers of women’s representation in political news. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. Online-Vorveröffentlichung. 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990211073454 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  597. Riegert, K. & Collins, S. (2015). Politainment. In G. Mazzoleni (Hrsg.), The international encyclopedia of political communication (S. 1–11). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118541555.wbiepc157 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  598. Riffe, D., Lacy, S., Watson, B. R. & Fico, F. (2019). Analyzing media messages: Using quantitative content analysis in research (4. Aufl.). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  599. Rimal, R. N. & Lapinski, M. K. (2015). A re-explication of social norms, ten years later. Communication Theory, 25(4), 393–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12080 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  600. Rinke, E. M., Wessler, H., Löb, C. & Weinmann, C. (2013). Deliberative qualities of generic news frames: Assessing the democratic value of strategic game and contestation framing in election campaign coverage. Political Communication, 30(3), 474–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2012.737432 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  601. Riquelme, F. & González-Cantergiani, P. (2016). Measuring user influence on Twitter: A survey. Information Processing & Management, 52(5), 949–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2016.04.003 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  602. Ritzer, G., Dean, P. & Jurgenson, N. (2012). The coming of age of the prosumer. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(4), 379–398. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211429368 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  603. Robinson, S., Xia, Y. & Zahay, M. (2019). Public political talk on Twitter and Facebook: The view from journalists. Knight Foundation. https://knightfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/KF-Twitter-Report-Part2.pdf Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  604. Rogstad, I. D. (2014). Political news journalists in social media: Transforming political reporters into political pundits? Journalism Practice, 8(6), 688–703. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2013.865965 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  605. Röper, H. (2020). Tageszeitungen 2020 - Schrumpfender Markt und sinkende Vielfalt: Daten zur Konzentration der Tagespresse im I. Quartal 2020. Media Perspektiven(6), 331–352. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  606. Roses, S. & Humanes, M. L. (2019). Conflicts in the professional roles of journalists in Spain: Ideals and practice. Comunicar, 27(58), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.3916/C58-2019-06 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  607. Ross, A. R. N. & Dumitrescu, D. (2019). „Vox Twitterati“: Investigating the effects of social media exemplars in online news articles. New Media & Society, 21(4), 962–983. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818817313 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  608. Rössler, P. (2015). Thematisierung und Issues Framing. In R. Fröhlich, P. Szyszka & G. Bentele (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Public Relations: Wissenschaftliche Grundlagen und berufliches Handeln. Mit Lexikon (3. Aufl., S. 461–478). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  609. Rössler, P. (2017). Inhaltsanalyse (3., völlig überarbeitete Auflage). UVK. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  610. Rössler, P. & Geise, S. (2013). Standardisierte Inhaltsanalyse: Grundprinzipien, Einsatz und Anwendung. In W. Möhring & D. Schlütz (Hrsg.), Handbuch standardisierte Erhebungsverfahren in der Kommunikationswissenschaft (S. 269–287). Springer VS. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  611. Rottinghaus, B. (2014). Surviving scandal: The institutional and political dynamics of national and state executive scandals. PS: Political Science & Politics, 47(1), 131–140. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096513001509 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  612. Rowe, D. (2010). Tabloidization of news. In S. Allan (Hrsg.), The Routledge companion to news and journalism (S. 350–361). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  613. Rühl, M. (2009). Journalismuswissen - kommunikationswissenschaftlich rekonstruiert: Thesen zur Spezialisierung des Journalismus. In B. Dernbach & T. Quandt (Hrsg.), Spezialisierung im Journalismus (S. 49–58). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  614. Russmann, U. (2021). With greetings from Ibiza: The 2019 EP election in Austria. In J. Haßler, M. Magin, U. Russmann & V. Fenoll (Hrsg.), Campaigning on Facebook in the 2019 European parliament election: Informing, interacting with, and mobilising voters (S. 55–68). Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  615. Safko, L. & Brake, D. K. (2009). The social media bible: Tactics, tools, and strategies for business success. Wiley. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  616. Safori, A. O. (2018). Journalist use of social media: Guidelines for media organizations. The Journal of Social Sciences Research(Special Issue 5), 772–779. https://doi.org/10.32861/jssr.spi5.772.779 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  617. Salgado, S. & Strömbäck, J. (2012). Interpretive journalism: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism, 13(2), 144–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911427797 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  618. Salgado, S., Strömbäck, J., Aalberg, T. & Esser, F. (2017). Interpretative journalism. In C. de Vreese, F. Esser & D. N. Hopmann (Hrsg.), Comparing political journalism (S. 50–70). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  619. Salonen, M., Olbertz-Siitonen, M., Uskali, T. & Laaksonen, S.‑M. (2022). Conversational gatekeeping: Social interactional practices of post-publication gatekeeping on newspapers’ Facebook pages. Journalism Practice. Online-Vorveröffentlichung. 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2022.2034520 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  620. Sanders, K. (2012). Scandalization in the news. In W. Donsbach (Hrsg.), The international encyclopedia of communication (S. 1–5). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405186407.wbiecs009 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  621. Sanders, K. & Canel, M. J. (2006). A scribbling tribe: Reporting political scandal in Britain and Spain. Journalism, 7(4), 453–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884906068362 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  622. Santana, A. D. & Hopp, T. (2016). Tapping into a new stream of (personal) data: Assessing journalists’ different use of social media. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 93(2), 383–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016637105 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  623. Saxer, U. (1998). Mediengesellschaft: Verständnisse und Mißverständnissse. In U. Sarcinelli (Hrsg.), Politikvermittlung und Demokratie in der Mediengesellschaft: Beiträge zur politischen Kommunikationskultur (S. 52–73). Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  624. Schemer, C. (2013). Priming, Framing, Stereotype. In W. Schweiger & A. Fahr (Hrsg.), Handbuch Medienwirkungsforschung (S. 153–169). Springer VS. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  625. Schemer, C., Wirth, W. & Matthes, J. (2012). Value resonance and value framing effects on voting intentions in direct-democratic campaigns. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(3), 334–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211426329 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  626. Scherr, S., Bachl, M. & de Vreese, C. H. (2019). Searching for watchdogs: Investigating journalistic role performance using latent-class analysis. Journalism Studies, 20(11), 1635–1652. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1533417 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  627. Scheufele, B. (2003). Frames - Framing - Framing-Effekte: Theoretische und methodische Grundlegung des Framing-Ansatzes sowie empirische Befunde zur Nachrichtenproduktion. Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  628. Scheufele, B. (2004). Framing-effects approach: A theoretical and methodological critique. European Journal of Communication, 29(4), 401–428. https://doi.org/10.1515/comm.2004.29.4.401 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  629. Scheufele, B. (2006). Frames, schemata, and news reporting. Communications, 31(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1515/COMMUN.2006.005 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  630. Scheufele, B. & Brosius, H.‑B. (1999). The frame remains the same? Stabilität und Kontinuität journalistischer Selektionskriterien am Beispiel der Berichterstattung über Anschläge auf Ausländer und Asylbewerber. Rundfunk und Fernsehen, 47(3), 409–432. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  631. Scheufele, B. & Engelmann, I. (2013). Die publizistische Vermittlung von Wertehorizonten der Parteien: Normatives Modell und empirische Befunde zum Value-Framing und News Bias der Qualitäts- und Boulevardpresse bei vier Bundestagswahlen. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 61(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634x-2013-4-532 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  632. Scheufele, B. & Engelmann, I. (2016). Journalismus und Framing. In M. Löffelholz & L. Rothenberger (Hrsg.), Handbuch Journalismustheorien (S. 443–456). Springer VS. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  633. Scheufele, B. & Engelmann, I. (2018). Mediale Value-Frames: Theoretisches Konzept und mthodisches Vorgehen. In A. Ziem, L. Inderelst & D. Wulf (Hrsg.), Frame-Theorien im Vergleich: Modelle, Anwendungsfelder, Methoden (S. 123–153). Düsseldorf University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  634. Scheufele, B. & Scheufele, D. A. (2010). Of spreading activation, applicability and schemas: Conceptual distinctions and their operational implications for measuring frames and framing effects. In P. D’Angelo & J. A. Kuypers (Hrsg.), Doing news framing analysis: Empirical and theoretical perspectives (S. 110–134). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  635. Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49(1), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  636. Scheufele, D. A. (2000). Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Communication and Society, 3(2-3), 297–316. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0323_07 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  637. Scheufele, D. A. & Iyengar, S. (2017). The state of framing research: A call for new directions. In K. Kenski & K. H. Jamieson (Hrsg.), The Oxford handbook of political communication (S. 619–632). Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  638. Scheufele, D. A. & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00326.x Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  639. Schicha, C. (2010). Öffentlichkeit und Journalismus in der Mediendemokartie. In T. Eberwein & D. Müller (Hrsg.), Journalismus und Öffentlichkeit: Eine Profession und ihr gesellschaftlicher Auftrag (S. 23–41). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  640. Schimpfössl, E. & Yablokov, I. (2020). Post-socialist self-censorship: Russia, Hungary and Latvia. European Journal of Communication, 35(1), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323119897797 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  641. Schlögl, S. & Maireder, A. (2015). Struktur politischer Öffentlichkeiten auf Twitter am Beispiel österreichischer Innenpolitik. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 44(1), 16–31. https://doi.org/10.15203/ozp.213.vol44iss1 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  642. Schmidauer, D. (2007). „Nix seh‘n, nix hör‘n, nix red‘n, so lebst am besten“: Der Noricum-Skandal. In M. Gehler (Hrsg.), Politische Affären und Skandale in Österreich: Von Mayerling bis Waldheim (S. 568–591). Studien Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  643. Schmid-Petri, H. (2012). Das Framing von Issues in Medien und Politik: Eine Analyse systemspezifischer Besonderheiten. Springer VS. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  644. Schmidt, J.‑H. (2014). Twitter and the rise of personal politics. In K. Weller, A. Bruns, J. Burgess, M. Mahrt & C. Puschmann (Hrsg.), Twitter and society (S. 3–14). Peter Lang. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  645. Schmidt, J.‑H. (2018). Social Media (2., aktualisierte und erweiterte Auflage). Springer VS. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  646. Schmidt, J.‑H., Merten, L., Hasebrink, U., Petrich, I. & Rolfs, A. (2019). How do intermediaries shape news-related media repertoires and practices? Findings from a qualitative study. International Journal of Communication, 13, 853–873. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/9080 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  647. Schmuck, D., Heiss, R., Matthes, J., Engesser, S. & Esser, F. (2017). Antecedents of strategic game framing in political news coverage. Journalism, 18(8), 937–955. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884916648098 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  648. Schneider, B., Schönbach, K. & Stürzebecher, D. (1993). Journalisten im vereinigten Deutschland: Strukturen, Arbeitsweisen und Einstellungen im Ost-West-Vergleich. Publizistik, 38(3), 353–382. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  649. Scholl, A. & Weischenberg, S. (1998). Journalismus in der Gesellschaft: Theorie, Methodologie und Empirie. Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  650. Schraewer, C. (2003). Skandale und Missstände — zur Bedeutung der Sprache für die Realitätsdarstellung. Publizistik, 48(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-003-0003-y Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  651. Schrag, W. (2007). Medienlandschaft Deutschland. UVK. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  652. Schrape, J.‑F. (2012). Komplementarität statt Konkurrenz: Social Media und Massenmedien in der gesellschaftlichen Wirklichkeitskonstruktion. In U. Dolata & J.-F. Schrape (Hrsg.), Internet, Mobile Devices und die Transformation der Medien: Radikaler Wandel als schrittweise Rekonfiguration (S. 277–306). Nomos. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  653. Aalberg, T. (2014). Issues, events and frames in political media coverage. In C. Reinemann (Hrsg.), Political communication (S. 275–388). de Gruyter Mouton. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  654. Aalberg, T., de Vreese, C. & Strömbäck, J. (2017). Strategy and game framing. In C. de Vreese, F. Esser & D. N. Hopmann (Hrsg.), Comparing political journalism (S. 33–49). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  655. Aalberg, T., Strömbäck, J. & de Vreese, C. H. (2012). The framing of politics as strategy and game: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism, 13(2), 162–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911427799 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  656. Aalberg, T., van Aelst, P. & Curran, J. (2010). Media systems and the political information environment: A cross-national comparison. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 15(3), 255–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161210367422 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  657. Aarøe, L. (2011). Investigating frame strength: The case of episodic and thematic frames. Political Communication, 28(2), 207–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2011.568041 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  658. Abdenour, J., McIntyre, K. & Smith Dahmen, N. (2021). Seeing eye to eye: A comparison of audiences’ and journalists’ perceptions of professional roles and how they relate to trust. Journalism Practice, 15(3), 329–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2020.1716828 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  659. Adam, S. & Maier, M. (2010). Personalization of politics: A critical review and agenda for research. Annals of the International Communication Association, 34(1), 213–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2010.11679101 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  660. Agarwal, S. D. & Barthel, M. L. (2015). The friendly barbarians: Professional norms and work routines of online journalists in the United States. Journalism, 16(3), 376–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884913511565 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  661. Ahmad, A. N. (2010). Is Twitter a useful tool for journalists? Journal of Media Practice, 11(2), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1386/jmpr.11.2.145_1 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  662. Albæk, E., van Dalen, A., Jebril, N. & de Vreese, C. H. (2014). Political journalism in comparative perspective. Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  663. Alieva, I. (2023). How American media framed 2016 presidential election using data visualization: The case study of the New York Times and the Washington Post. Journalism Practice, 17(4), 814–840. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2021.1930573 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  664. Allcott, H., Gentzkow, M. & Yu, C. (2019). Trends in the diffusion of misinformation on social media. Research & Politics, 6(2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168019848554 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  665. Allen, M. (2013). What was Web 2.0? Versions as the dominant mode of internet history. New Media & Society, 15(2), 260–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812451567 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  666. Allern, S., Kantola, A., Pollack, E. & Blach-Ørsten, M. (2012). Increased scandalization: Nordic political scandals 1980-2010. In S. Allern & E. Pollack (Hrsg.), Scandalous! The mediated construction of political scandals in four nordic countries (S. 29–50). Nordicom. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  667. Allern, S. & Pollack, E. (2012). Mediated scandals. In S. Allern & E. Pollack (Hrsg.), Scandalous! The mediated construction of political scandals in four nordic countries (S. 9–28). Nordicom. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  668. Allern, S. & Pollack, E. (2019). New nordic noir: Political scandals as drama and media hunts. In H. Tumber & S. R. Waisbord (Hrsg.), The Routledge companion to media and scandal (S. 129–137). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  669. Allern, S. & von Sikorski, C. (2018). Political scandals as a democratic challenge: From important revelations to provocations, trivialities, and neglect. International Journal of Communication, 12, 3014–3023. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/7094 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  670. Al-Serori, L., Das Gupta, O., Münch, P., Obermaier, F. & Obermayer, B. (2019, 17. Mai). Straches Mann fürs Grobe. Süddeutsche Zeitung. https://www.sueddeutsche.de/politik/strache-video-johann-gudenus-fpoe-1.4451178 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  671. Amsalem, E. & Zoizner, A. (2022). Real, but limited: A meta-analytic assessment of framing effects in the political domain. British Journal of Political Science, 52(1), 221–237. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123420000253 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  672. Anderson, C. W. (2011). Between creative and quantified audiences: Web metrics and changing patterns of newswork in local US newsrooms. Journalism, 12(5), 550–566. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911402451 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  673. Anderson, M., Toor, S., Rainie, L. & Smith, A. (2018, 11. Juli). Activism in the social media age. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/2018/07/PI_2018.07.11_social-activism_FINAL.pdf Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  674. Andı, S. (2021). How and why do consumers access news on social media? In Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2021 (S. 52–56). Oxford, UK: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  675. Anger, I. & Kittl, C. (2011). Measuring influence on Twitter. In S. Lindstaedt & M. Granitzer (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Knowledge Management and Knowledge Technologies. ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/2024288.2024326 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  676. Ares, M., Breitenstein, S. & Hernández, E. (2019). The political consequences of corruption scandals: Main findings and challenges. In H. Tumber & S. R. Waisbord (Hrsg.), The Routledge companion to media and scandal (S. 456–465). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  677. Armstrong, C. L. (2004). The influence of reporter gender on source selection in newspaper stories. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81(1), 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900408100110 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  678. Armstrong, C. L. & Gao, F. (2010). Now tweet this: How news organizations use Twitter. Electronic News, 4(4), 218–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/1931243110389457 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  679. Armstrong, C. L. & Gao, F. (2011). Gender, Twitter and news content. Journalism Studies, 12(4), 490–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2010.527548 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  680. Arnold, K. (2009). Qualitätsjournalismus: Die Zeitung und ihr Publikum. UVK. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  681. Arnold, K. (2016). Qualität des Journalismus. In M. Löffelholz & L. Rothenberger (Hrsg.), Handbuch Journalismustheorien (S. 551–563). Springer VS. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  682. Artwick, C. G. (2013). Reporters on Twitter: Product or service. Digital Journalism, 1(2), 212–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2012.744555 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  683. Aruguete, N. & Calvo, E. (2018). Time to #protest: Selective exposure, cascading activation, and framing in social media. Journal of Communication, 68(3), 480–502. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy007 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  684. Ausserhofer, J. & Maireder, A. (2013). National politics on Twitter. Information, Communication & Society, 16(3), 291–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.756050 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  685. Bachmann, P., Eisenegger, M. & Ingenhoff, D. (2022). Defining and measuring news media quality: Comparing the content perspective and the audience perspective. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 27(1), 9–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161221999666 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  686. Baden, C. (2018). Reconstructing frames from intertextual news discourse: A semantic network approach to news framing analysis. In P. D’Angelo (Hrsg.), Doing news framing analysis II: Empirical and theoretical perspectives (S. 3–26). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  687. Baden, C. (2020). Framing the news. In K. Wahl-Jorgensen & T. Hanitzsch (Hrsg.), The handbook of journalism studies (2. Aufl., S. 229–245). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  688. Baden, C. & Lecheler, S. (2012). Fleeting, fading, or far-reaching? A knowledge-based model of the persistence of framing effects. Communication Theory, 22(4), 359–382. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2012.01413.x Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  689. Baden, C., Pipal, C., Schoonvelde, M. & van der Velden, M. A. C. G. (2022). Three gaps in computational text analysis methods for social sciences: A research agenda. Communication Methods and Measures, 16(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2021.2015574 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  690. Baden, C. & Springer, N. (2017). Conceptualizing viewpoint diversity in news discourse. Journalism, 18(2), 176–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884915605028 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  691. Baden, C. & Tenenboim-Weinblatt, K. (2017). Convergent news? A longitudinal study of similarity and dissimilarity in the domestic and global coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Journal of Communication, 67(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12272 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  692. Baden, C. & Tenenboim-Weinblatt, K. (2018). Viewpoint, testimony, action: How journalists reposition source frames within news frames. Journalism Studies, 19(1), 143–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2016.1161495 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  693. Bakker, P. & Seethaler, J. (2009). Supporting concentration or promoting diversity? The impact of free dailies on the Austrian newspaper market. In B. Stark & M. Magin (Hrsg.), Die österreichische Medienlandschaft im Umbruch (S. 67–80). Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  694. Barassi, V. & Treré, E. (2012). Does Web 3.0 come after Web 2.0? Deconstructing theoretical assumptions through practice. New Media & Society, 14(8), 1269–1285. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812445878 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  695. Barberá, P. (2020). Social media, echo chambers, and political polarization. In N. Persily & J. A. Tucker (Hrsg.), Social media and democracy: The state of the field and prospects for reform (S. 34–55). Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  696. Baresch, B., Hsu, S.‑H. & Reese, S. D. (2010). The power of framing: New challenges for researching the structure of meaning in news. In S. Allan (Hrsg.), The Routledge companion to news and journalism (S. 637–647). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  697. Barnard, S. R. (2016). „Tweet or be sacked“: Twitter and the new elements of journalistic practice. Journalism, 17(2), 190–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884914553079 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  698. Barnidge, M., Heath, W., Zhang, J. & Broussard, R. (2020). Business as usual? A social capital approach to understanding interactions with journalists on Twitter. Journalism Studies, 21(3), 406–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2019.1670091 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  699. Bartholomé, G., Lecheler, S. & de Vreese, C. (2015). Manufacturing conflict? How journalists intervene in the conflict frame building process. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 20(4), 438–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161215595514 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  700. Bartholomé, G., Lecheler, S. & de Vreese, C. (2018). Towards a typology of conflict frames. Journalism Studies, 19(12), 1689–1711. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2017.1299033 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  701. Barzilai-Nahon, K. (2008). Toward a theory of network gatekeeping: A framework for exploring information control. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(9), 1493–1512. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20857 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  702. Barzilai-Nahon, K. (2009). Gatekeeping: A critical review. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 43(1), 1–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.2009.1440430117 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  703. Bastos, M. T., Raimundo, R. L. G. & Travitzki, R. (2013). Gatekeeping Twitter: Message diffusion in political hashtags. Media, Culture & Society, 35(2), 260–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443712467594 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  704. Baugut, P. & Scherr, S. (2013). Der Einfluss politischer Einstellungen auf Rollenverständnis und Arbeitszufriedenheit von Journalisten. Studies in Communication and Media, 2(4), 437–468. https://doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2013-4-437 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  705. Baym, G. (2005). The Daily Show: Discursive integration and the reinvention of political journalism. Political Communication, 22(3), 259–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600591006492 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  706. Beam, R. A., Brownlee, B. J., Weaver, D. H. & Di Cicco, D. T. (2009). Journalism and public service in troubled times. Journalism Studies, 10(6), 734–753. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700903274084 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  707. Beck, K. (2006). Computervermittelte Kommunikation im Internet. R. Oldenbourg. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  708. Beck, K. (2018). Das Mediensystem Deutschlands: Strukturen, Märkte, Regulierung (2., überarbeitete und aktualisierte Auflage). Springer VS. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  709. Behmer, M. (2013). Pressesysteme. In B. Thomaß (Hrsg.), Mediensysteme im internationalen Vergleich (2. Aufl., S. 99–116). UVK. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  710. Beiler, M. & Gerstner, J. R. (2019). Newsroom- und Newsdeskstrukturen zur Reduzierung von Binnenkomplexität im crossmedialen Journalismus: Quantitativ-qualitative Mehrmethodenstudie zur Struktur und Bewertung der Redaktionsform bei den deutschen Tageszeitungen. In B. Dernbach, A. Godulla & A. Sehl (Hrsg.), Komplexität im Journalismus (S. 91–99). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  711. Bell, E. J. & Owen, T. (2017). The platform press: How Silicon Valley reengineered journalism. New York. Tow Center for Digital Journalism. https://doi.org/10.7916/D8R216ZZ Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  712. Bene, M., Ceron, A., Fenoll, V., Haßler, J., Kruschinski, S., Larsson, A. O., Magin, M., Schlosser, K. & Wurst, A.‑K. (2022). Keep them engaged! Investigating the effects of self-centered social media communication style on user engagement in 12 European countries. Political Communication, 39(4) , 429–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2022.2042435 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  713. Benford, R. D. & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 611–639. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  714. Beninger, W. (2011). Korruption in der Zweiten Republik: Einige Fälle und deren mediale Aufarbeitung. In E. Bruckmüller (Hrsg.), Korruption in Österreich: Historische Streiflichter (S. 165–190). Braumüller. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  715. Bennett, W. L. (1996). An introduction to journalism norms and representations of politics. Political Communication, 13(4), 373–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.1996.9963126 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  716. Benson, R., Blach-Ørsten, M., Powers, M., Willig, I. & Vera Zambrano, S. (2012). Media systems online and off: Comparing the form of news in the United States, Denmark, and France. Journal of Communication, 62(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01625.x Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  717. Benson, R. & Hallin, D. C. (2007). How states, markets and globalization shape the news: The French and US national press, 1965-97. European Journal of Communication, 22(1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323107073746 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  718. Bentivegna, S. & Marchetti, R. (2018). Journalists at a crossroads: Are traditional norms and practices challenged by Twitter? Journalism, 19(2), 270–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917716594 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  719. Berk, N., Eberl, J.‑M. & Partheymüller, J. (2021). Die Nationalratswahl 2017 unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Silberstein-Affäre. In B. Weßels & H. Schoen (Hrsg.), Wahlen und Wähler: Analysen aus Anlass der Bundestagswahl 2017 (S. 503–520). Springer VS. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  720. Bernhard, U. & Scharf, W. (2008). „Infotainment“ in der Presse: Eine Längsschnittuntersuchung 1980-2007 dreier regionaler Tageszeitungen. Publizistik, 53(2), 231–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-008-0077-7 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  721. Berry, S. J. (2009). Watchdog journalism: The art of investigative reporting. Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  722. Berti, C. (2019). Rotten apples or rotten system? Media framing of political corruption in New Zealand and Italy. Journalism Studies, 20(11), 1580–1597. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1530068 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  723. Berti, C. & Loner, E. (2021). Character assassination as a right-wing populist communication tactic on social media: The case of Matteo Salvini in Italy. New Media & Society. Online-Vorveröffentlichung. 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211039222 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  724. Bird, S. E. (2009). Tabloidization: What is it, and does it really matter? In B. Zelizer (Hrsg.), The changing faces of journalism: Tabloidization, technology and truthiness (S. 40–50). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  725. Birkner, T. (2017). Medialisierung und Mediatisierung. Nomos. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  726. Birkner, T. & Hase, V. (2017). Framing German and global politics over three decades: A quantitative content analysis of the journalistic work of Helmut Schmidt. Medien & Zeit, 32(2), 30–42. https://medienundzeit.at/thomas-birkner-valerie-hase-framing-german-and-global-politics-over-three-decades Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  727. Blassnig, S. & Esser, F. (2022). The „audience logic“ in digital journalism: An exploration of shifting news logics across media types and time. Journalism Studies, 23(1), 48–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2021.2000339 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  728. Blöbaum, B. (2011). Wandel von Qualitätsmedien. In R. Blum, H. Bonfadelli, K. Imhof & O. Jarren (Hrsg.), Krise der Leuchttürme öffentlicher Kommunikation: Vergangenheit und Zukunft der Qualitätsmedien (S. 49–63). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  729. Blöbaum, B. (2016). Journalismus als Funktionssystem der Gesellschaft. In M. Löffelholz & L. Rothenberger (Hrsg.), Handbuch Journalismustheorien (S. 151–163). Springer VS. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  730. Blöbaum, B., Nölleke, D. & Scheu, A. M. (2016). Das Experteninterview in der Kommunikationswissenschaft. In S. Averbeck-Lietz & M. Meyen (Hrsg.), Handbuch nicht standardisierte Methoden in der Kommunikationswissenschaft (S. 175–190). Springer VS. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  731. Bloom, T., Cleary, J. & North, M. (2016). Traversing the “Twittersphere”: Social media policies in international news operations. Journalism Practice, 10(3), 343–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2015.1017408 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  732. Blum, R. (2005). Politikjournalismus. In S. Weischenberg, H. J. Kleinsteuber & B. Pörksen (Hrsg.), Handbuch Journalismus und Medien (S. 346–348). UVK. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  733. Blum, R. (2011). Leidende Leuchttürme: Über die Unentbehrlichkeit von Qualitätsmedien. In R. Blum, H. Bonfadelli, K. Imhof & O. Jarren (Hrsg.), Krise der Leuchttürme öffentlicher Kommunikation: Vergangenheit und Zukunft der Qualitätsmedien (S. 7–14). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Einleitung. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  734. Blum, R. (2014). Lautsprecher und Widersprecher: Ein Ansatz zum Vergleich der Mediensysteme. Herbert von Halem. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  735. Blum, R. (2021). Die Ursprünge ergründen: Geschichte des politischen Journalismus. In M. Prinzing & R. Blum (Hrsg.), Handbuch Politischer Journalismus (S. 71–116). Herbert von Halem. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  736. Blumenthal, S. (1980). The permanent campaign: Inside the world of elite political operatives. Beacon Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  737. Blumler, J. G. (2016). The fourth age of political communication. Politiques de communication, 6(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.3917/pdc.006.0019 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  738. Blumler, J. G. & Gurevitch, M. (1995). The crisis of public communication. Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  739. Böcking, T. (2009). Strategisches Framing: Gesellschaftliche Akteure und ihre Einflussnahmeversuche auf die mediale Debatte über die embryonale Stammzellforschung in Deutschland 2000 bis 2002. Herbert von Halem. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  740. Bodlos, A. & Plescia, C. (2018). The 2017 Austrian snap election: A shift rightward. West European Politics, 41(6), 1354–1363. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2018.1429057 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  741. Boesman, J., Berbers, A., d’Haenens, L. & van Gorp, B. (2017). The news is in the frame: A journalist-centered approach to the frame-building process of the Belgian Syria fighters. Journalism, 18(3), 298–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884915610988 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  742. Bonner, F. & McKay, S. (2003). Magazine features and infotainment values. Media International Australia, 107(1), 117–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X0310700112 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  743. Borah, P. (2011). Conceptual issues in framing theory: A systematic examination of a decade’s literature. Journal of Communication, 61(2), 246–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01539.x Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  744. Borah, P. (2018). Addressing theoretical and methodological challenges of doing news framing analysis in the contemporary media landscape. In P. D’Angelo (Hrsg.), Doing news framing analysis II: Empirical and theoretical perspectives (S. 163–187). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  745. Bösch, F. (2009). Öffentliche Geheimnisse: Skandale, Politik und Medien in Deutschland und Großbritannien 1880-1914. R. Oldenbourg. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  746. Boukes, M. (2019). Infotainment. In T. P. Vos, F. Hanusch, D. Dimitrakopoulou, M. Geertsema-Sligh & A. Sehl (Hrsg.), The international encyclopedia of journalism studies (S. 1–9). Wiley-Blackwell. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  747. Boukes, M. (2022). Episodic and thematic framing effects on the attribution of responsibility: The effects of personalized and contextualized news on perceptions of individual and political responsibility for causing the economic crisis. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 27(2), 374–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220985241 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  748. Boukes, M., Boomgaarden, H. G., Moorman, M. & de Vreese, C. H. (2015). Political news with a personal touch: How human interest framing indirectly affects policy attitudes. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 92(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699014558554 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  749. Bouvier, G. (2019). How journalists source trending social media feeds. Journalism Studies, 20(2), 212–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2017.1365618 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  750. Bowe, B. J., Gosen, J. & Fahmy, S. (2019). Personal choice or political provocation: Examining the visual framing and stereotyping of the burkini debate. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96(4), 1076–1098. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699019826093 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  751. Bowman, S. & Willis, C. (2003). We media: How audiences are shaping the future of news and information. The Media Center at the American Press Institute. https://ict4peace.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/we_media.pdf Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  752. boyd, d. (2015). Social media: A phenomenon to be analyzed. Social Media + Society, 1(1), 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115580148 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  753. boyd, d. m. & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  754. boyd, d. m., Golder, S. & Lotan, G. (2010). Tweet, tweet, retweet: Conversational aspects of retweeting on Twitter. In R. H. Sprague Jr. (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (S. 1–10). IEEE Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2010.412 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  755. Boydstun, A. E., Card, D., Gross, J. H., Resnik, P. & Smith, N. A. (2014). Tracking the development of media frames within and across policy issues. Carnegie Mellon University. https://kilthub.cmu.edu/ndownloader/files/11903384 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  756. Brants, K. (1998). Who’s afraid of infotainment? European Journal of Communication, 13(3), 315–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323198013003002 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  757. Brants, K. & Neijens, P. (1998). The infotainment of politics. Political Communication, 15(2), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609809342363 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  758. Brants, K. & van Kempen, H. (2002). The ambivalent watchdog: The changing culture of political journalism and its effects. In R. Kuhn & E. Neveu (Hrsg.), Political journalism: New challenges, new practices (S. 168–185). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  759. Brants, K. & van Praag, P. (2006). Signs of media logic: Half a century of political communication in the Netherlands. Javnost - The Public, 13(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2006.11008905 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  760. Brekken, T., Thorbjørnsrud, K. & Aalberg, T. (2012). News substance: The relative importance of soft and de-contextualized news. In T. Aalberg & J. Curran (Hrsg.), How media inform the democracy: A comparative approach (S. 64–78). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  761. Brems, C., Temmerman, M., Graham, T. & Broersma, M. (2017). Personal branding on Twitter: How employed and freelance journalists stage themselves on social media. Digital Journalism, 5(4), 443–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1176534 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  762. Brewer, P. R., Graf, J. & Willnat, L. (2003). Priming or Framing. Gazette: The International Journal of Communication Studies, 65(6), 493–508. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016549203065006005 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  763. Brinkmann, S. & Kvale, S. (2018). Doing interviews (2. Aufl.). Sage. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  764. Broersma, M. (2022). Walking the line: Political journalism and social media publics. In Morrison, James, Birks, Jen & M. Berry (Hrsg.), The Routledge companion to political journalism (S. 262–270). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  765. Broersma, M. & Graham, T. (2013). Twitter as a news source: How Dutch and British newspapers used tweets in their news coverage 2007-2011. Journalism Practice, 7(4), 446–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2013.802481 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  766. Brosius, H.‑B. & Eps, P. (1993). Verändern Schlüsselereignisse journalistische Selektionskriterien? Framing am Beispiel der Berichterstattung über Anschläge gegen Ausländer und Asylanten. Rundfunk und Fernsehen, 41(4), 512–530. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  767. Brosius, H.‑B. & Eps, P. (1995). Prototyping through key events: News selection in the case of violence against aliens and asylum seekers in Germany. European Journal of Communication, 10(3), 391–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323195010003005 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  768. Brosius, H.‑B., Haas, A. & Koschel, F. (2016). Methoden der empirischen Kommunikationsforschung: Eine Einführung (7., überarbeitete und aktualisierte Auflage). Springer VS. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  769. Brownlee, B. J. & Beam, R. A. (2012). U.S. journalists in the tumultuous early years of the 21st century. In D. H. Weaver & L. Willnat (Hrsg.), The global journalist in the 21st century (S. 348–362). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  770. Brüggemann, M. (2014). Between frame setting and frame sending: How journalists contribute to news frames. Communication Theory, 24(1), 61–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12027 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  771. Brüggemann, M., Engesser, S., Büchel, F., Humprecht, E. & Castro, L. (2014). Hallin and Mancini revisited: Four empirical types of Western media systems. Journal of Communication, 64(6), 1037–1065. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12127 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  772. Brugman, B. C., Burgers, C. & Steen, G. J. (2017). Recategorizing political frames: A systematic review of metaphorical framing in experiments on political communication. Annals of the International Communication Association, 41(2), 181–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2017.1312481 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  773. Bruno, N. (2011). Tweet first, verify later? How real-time information is changing the coverage of worldwide crisis events (Reuters Institute Fellowship Paper). Oxford, UK. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  774. Bruns, A. (2005). Gatewatching: Collaborative online news production. Peter Lang. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  775. Bruns, A. (2012). Journalists and Twitter: How Australian news organisations adapt to a new medium. Media International Australia, 144(1), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X1214400114 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  776. Bruns, A. (2018). Gatewatching and news curation: Journalism, social media, and the public sphere. Peter Lang. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  777. Bruns, A. (2019). Filter bubble. Internet Policy Review, 8(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1426 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  778. Bruns, A. & Burgess, J. (2012). Researching news discussion on Twitter: New methodologies. Journalism Studies, 13(5-6), 801–814. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2012.664428 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  779. Bruns, A. & Nuernbergk, C. (2019). Political journalists and their social media audiences: New power relations. Media and Communication, 7(1), 198–212. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i1.1759 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  780. Büchel, F., Humprecht, E., Castro-Herrero, L., Engesser, S. & Brüggemann, M. (2016). Building empirical typologies with QCA: Toward a classification of media systems. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(2), 209–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161215626567 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  781. Bucher, H.‑J. (2003). Journalistische Qualität und Theorien des Journalismus. In H.-J. Bucher & K.-D. Altmeppen (Hrsg.), Qualität im Journalismus: Grundlagen, Dimensionen, Praxismodelle (S. 11–34). Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  782. Bude, H. (1989). Typen von Skandalpolitikern. In R. Ebbighausen & S. Neckel (Hrsg.), Anatomie des politischen Skandals (S. 396–414). Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  783. Bulkow, K. & Petersen, C. (2011). Skandalforschung: Eine methodische Einführung. In K. Bulkow & C. Petersen (Hrsg.), Skandale: Strukturen und Strategien öffentlicher Aufmerksamkeitserzeugung (S. 9–25). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  784. Burgess, J., Marwick, A. E. & Poell, T. (2017). Editors’ introduction. In J. Burgess, A. E. Marwick & T. Poell (Hrsg.), The SAGE handbook of social media (S. 1–10). Sage. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  785. Burkart, R. (2021). Die Absichten benennen: Funktionen des politischen Journalismus. In M. Prinzing & R. Blum (Hrsg.), Handbuch Politischer Journalismus (S. 117–150). Herbert von Halem. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  786. Burkhardt, S. (2011). Skandal, medialisierter Skandal, Medienskandal: Eine Typologie öffentlicher Empörung. In K. Bulkow & C. Petersen (Hrsg.), Skandale: Strukturen und Strategien öffentlicher Aufmerksamkeitserzeugung (S. 131–155). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  787. Burkhardt, S. (2015). Medienskandale: Zur moralischen Sprengkraft öffentlicher Diskurse (2., überarbeitete und ergänzte Auflage). Herbert von Halem. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  788. Burkhardt, S. (2018). Scandals in the network society. In A. Haller, H. Michael & M. Kraus (Hrsg.), Scandalogy: An interdisciplinary field (S. 18–44). Herbert von Halem. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  789. Busby, E., Flynn, D. J. & Druckman, J. N. (2018). Studying framing effects on political preferences: Existing research and lingering questions. In P. D’Angelo (Hrsg.), Doing news framing analysis II: Empirical and theoretical perspectives (S. 27–50). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  790. Buturoiu, D. R. & Corbu, N. (2015). Moderators of framing effects on political attitudes: Is source credibility worth investigating? Středoevropské politické studie | Central European Political Studies Review, 17(2), 155–177. https://doi.org/10.5817/CEPSR.2015.2.155 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  791. Cacciatore, M. A., Scheufele, D. A. & Iyengar, S. (2016). The end of framing as we know it … and the future of media effects. Mass Communication and Society, 19(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2015.1068811 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  792. Callaghan, K. J. & Schnell, F. (2005). Introduction: Framing political issues in American politics. In K. J. Callaghan & F. Schnell (Hrsg.), Framing American politics (S. 1–17). University of Pittsburgh Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  793. Canel, M. J. & Sanders, K. (2006). Morality tales: Political scandals and journalism in Britain and Spain in the 1990s. Hampton Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  794. Canter, L. (2013). The interactive spectrum: The use of social media in UK regional newspapers. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 19(4), 472–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856513493698 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  795. Canter, L. (2015). Personalised tweeting: The emerging practices of journalists on Twitter. Digital Journalism, 3(6), 888–907. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.973148 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  796. Canter, L. & Brookes, D. (2016). Twitter as a flexible tool: How the job role of the journalist influences tweeting habits. Digital Journalism, 4(7), 875–885. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1168707 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  797. Cappella, J. N. & Jamieson, K. H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  798. Carlson, J., Ganiel, G. & Hyde, M. S. (2000). Scandal and political candidate image. Southeastern Political Review, 28(4), 747–757. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2000.tb00798.x Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  799. Carlson, M. & Berkowitz, D. (2014). „The emperor lost his clothes“: Rupert Murdoch, News of the World and journalistic boundary work in the UK and USA. Journalism, 15(4), 389–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884913477280 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  800. Carlson, M. & Lewis, S. C. (Hrsg.). (2015). Boundaries of journalism: Professionalism, practices and participation. Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  801. Carpenter, S., Boehmer, J. & Fico, F. (2016). The measurement of journalistic role enactments: A study of organizational constraints and support in for-profit and nonprofit journalism. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 93(3), 587–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699015607335 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  802. Carr, C. T. & Hayes, R. A. (2015). Social media: Defining, developing, and divining. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 23(1), 46–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2015.972282 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  803. Carragee, K. M. & Roefs, W. (2004). The neglect of power in recent framing research. Journal of Communication, 54(2), 214–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02625.x Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  804. Carrera Álvarez, P., Sainz de Baranda Andújar, C., Herrero Curiel, E. & Limón Serrano, N. (2012). Periodismo y social media: Cómo están usando Twitter los periodistas españoles. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 18(1), 31–53. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_eSMP.2012.v18.n1.39353 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  805. Cassidy, W. P. (2005). Variations on a theme: The professional role conceptions of print and online newspaper journalists. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 82(2), 264–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900508200203 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  806. Castells, M. (2019). Communication power: Mass communication, mass self-communication and power relationships in the network society. In J. Curran & Hesmondhalgh (Hrsg.), Media and society (6. Aufl., S. 83–97). Bloomsbury Academic. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  807. Castro Herrero, L., Humprecht, E., Engesser, S., Brüggemann, M. & Büchel, F. (2017). Rethinking Hallin and Mancini beyond the West: An analysis of media systems in Central and Eastern Europe. International Journal of Communication, 11, 4797–4823. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/6035 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  808. Cha, M., Haddadi, H., Benvenuto, F. & Gummadi, K. P. (2010). Measuring user influence in Twitter: The million follower fallacy. In Proceedings of the Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (S. 10–17). AAAI Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  809. Chadwick, A. (2013). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  810. Chadwick, A., Dennis, J. & Smith, A. P. (2016). Politics in the age of hybrid media: Power, systems, and media logics. In A. Bruns, G. Enli, E. Skogerbø, A. O. Larsson & C. Christensen (Hrsg.), The Routledge companion to social media and politics (S. 7–22). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  811. Chandler, D. & Munday, R. (2020). A dictionary of media and communication (3. Aufl.). Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  812. Chan-Olmsted, S. M., Cho, M. & Lee, S. (2013). User perceptions of social media: A comparative study of perceived characteristics and user profiles by social media. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 3(4), 149–178. https://doi.org/10.29333/ojcmt/2451 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  813. Cheas, K. (2019). Permeating boundaries in news media and academia: A comparative analysis of overlapping news frames and disciplinary perspectives. Issues in Interdisciplinary Studies, 37(1), 108–138. http://interdisciplinarystudies.org/docs/Vol37No12019/No7_pp108_138_Chea.pdf Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  814. Chen, M. & Zhang, C [Christina] (2016). Framing corruption in the Chinese government: A comparison of frames between media, government, and netizens. International Journal of Communication, 10, 5494–5513. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/4169 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  815. Cho, S. H. & Gower, K. K. (2006). Framing effect on the public’s response to crisis: Human interest frame and crisis type influencing responsibility and blame. Public Relations Review, 32(4), 420–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2006.09.011 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  816. Chong, A., De La O, A. L., Karlan, D. & Wantchekon, L. (2015). Does corruption information inspire the fight or quash the hope? A field experiment in Mexico on voter turnout, choice, and party identification. The Journal of Politics, 77(1), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1086/678766 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  817. Chong, D. & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 103–126. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  818. Christians, C. G., Glasser, T. L., McQuail, D., Nordenstreng, K. & White, R. A. (2009). Normative theories of the media: Journalism in democratic societies. University of Illinois Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  819. Chyi, H. I. & McCombs, M. (2004). Media salience and the process of framing: Coverage of the Columbine school shootings. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81(1), 22–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900408100103 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  820. Cik, T., Renner, G., Miller, M., & Binder, J. (2022). Das Handy des Thomas S. Kleine Zeitung. https://interaktiv.kleinezeitung.at/handy-thomas-schmid/#medien Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  821. Cleary, J., al Nashmi, E., Bloom, T. & North, M. (2015). Valuing Twitter: Organizational and individual representations at CNN International. Digital Journalism, 3(6), 908–924. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.990255 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  822. Clemente, M. & Gabbioneta, C. (2017). How does the media frame corporate scandals? The case of German newspapers and the Volkswagen diesel scandal. Journal of Management Inquiry, 26(3), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492616689304 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  823. Coddington, M., Molyneux, L. & Lawrence, R. G. (2014). Fact checking the campaign: How political reporters use Twitter to set the record straight (or not). The International Journal of Press/Politics, 19(4), 391–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161214540942 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  824. Cohen, B. C. (1963). The press and foreign policy. Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  825. Conners, J. L. (2014). He “Can’t say with certitude”: Framing the Anthony Weiner scandal in political cartoons. In A. Dagnes & M. Sachleben (Hrsg.), Scandal! An interdisciplinary approach to the consequences, outcomes, and significance of political scandals (S. 231–250). Bloomsbury Academic. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  826. Conway, B. A., Kenski, K. & Wang, D [Di] (2015). The rise of Twitter in the political campaign: Searching for intermedia agenda-setting effects in the presidential primary. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(4), 363–380. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12124 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  827. Conway-Silva, B. A. (2019). Exploring the networks of news production: Frame building and source use during the 2014 U.S. midterm elections. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96(2), 537–557. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018803083 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  828. Coombs, W. T. & Holladay, S. J. (2021). Social amplification of scandals: One social media effect. In A. Haller, H. Michael & L. Seeber (Hrsg.), Scandology 3: Scandals in new media (S. 11–23). Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  829. Cornia, A., Sehl, A., Levy, D. A. L. & Nielsen, R. K. (2018). Private sector news, social media distribution, and algorithmic change. Oxford, UK. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2018-10/Cornia_Private_Sector_News_FINAL.pdf Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  830. Costera Meijer, I. (2020). Understanding the audience turn in journalism: From quality discourse to innovation discourse as anchoring practices 1995-2020. Journalism Studies, 21(16), 2326–2342. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2020.1847681 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  831. Costera Meijer, I. & Groot Kormelink, T. (2015). Checking, sharing, clicking and linking: Changing patterns of news use between 2004 and 2014. Digital Journalism, 3(5), 664–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.937149 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  832. Cunningham, B. (2003). Re-thinking objectivity. Columbia Journalism Review. https://archives.cjr.org/feature/rethinking_objectivity.php Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  833. Cushion, S. (2015). News and politics: The rise of live and interpretive journalism. Communication and Society. Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  834. D’Angelo, P. (2010). Conclusion: Arriving at the horizons of news framing analysis. In P. D‘Angelo & J. A. Kuypers (Hrsg.), Doing news framing analysis: Empirical and theoretical perspectives (S. 356–368). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  835. D’Angelo, P. (Hrsg.). (2018). Doing news framing analysis II: Empirical and theoretical perspectives. Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  836. D’Angelo, P. & Kuypers, J. A. (2010a). Introduction: Doing news framing analysis. In P. D‘Angelo & J. A. Kuypers (Hrsg.), Doing news framing analysis: Empirical and theoretical perspectives (S. 1–13). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  837. D’Angelo, P., Lule, J., Neuman, W. R., Rodriguez, L., Dimitrova, D. V. & Carragee, K. M. (2019). Beyond framing: A forum for framing researchers. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96(1), 12–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018825004 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  838. D’Angelo, P. & Shaw, D. (2018). Journalism as framing. In T. P. Vos (Hrsg.), Journalism (S. 205–233). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501500084-011 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  839. Dagoula, C. (2019). Mapping political discussions on Twitter: Where the elites remain elites. Media and Communication, 7(1), 225–234. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i1.1764 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  840. Dahinden, U. (2006). Framing: Eine integrative Theorie der Massenkommunikation. UVK. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  841. Dahlgren, P. M. (2021). A critical review of filter bubbles and a comparison with selective exposure. Nordicom Review, 42(1), 15–33. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0002 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  842. Dan, V. (2018). Integrative framing analysis: Farming health through words and visuals. Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  843. Dan, V. & Raupp, J. (2018). A systematic review of frames in news reporting of health risks: Characteristics, construct consistency vs. name diversity, and the relationship of frames to framing functions. Health, Risk & Society, 20(5-6), 203–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2018.1522422 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  844. D‘Angelo, P. (2002). News framing as a multiparadigmatic research program: A response to Entman. Journal of Communication, 52(4), 870–888. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02578.x Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  845. D‘Angelo, P. (2017). Framing: Media frames. In P. Rössler, C. A. Hoffner & L. van Zoonen (Hrsg.), The international encyclopedia of media effects (S. 634–644). Wiley. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  846. D‘Angelo, P. & Kuypers, J. A. (Hrsg.). (2010b). Doing news framing analysis: Empirical and theoretical perspectives. Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  847. David, C. C., Atun, J. M., Fille, E. & Monterola, C. (2011). Finding frames: Comparing two methods of frame analysis. Communication Methods and Measures, 5(4), 329–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2011.624873 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  848. Davis, A. (2014). The impact of market forces, new technologies, and political PR on UK journalism. In R. Kuhn & R. K. Nielsen (Hrsg.), Political journalism in transition: Western Europe in a comparative perspective (S. 111–128). I.B. Tauris. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  849. Davis, J. L. & Jurgenson, N. (2014). Context collapse: Theorizing context collusions and collisions. Information, Communication & Society, 17(4), 476–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.888458 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  850. Dawson, P. (2020). Hashtag narrative: Emergent storytelling and affective publics in the digital age. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 23(6), 968–983. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877920921417 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  851. de Beus, J. (2011). Audience democracy: An emerging pattern in postmodern political communication. In K. Brants & K. Voltmer (Hrsg.), Political communication in postmodern democracy: Challenging the primacy of politics (S. 19–38). Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  852. de Miguel Pascual, R. & Berganza, R. (2019). Media priming effects and ethical ambivalence in corruption scandals. In H. Tumber & S. R. Waisbord (Hrsg.), The Routledge companion to media and scandal (S. 466–474). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  853. de Vreese, C. H. (2005). News framing: Theory and typology. Information Design Journal + Document Design, 13(1), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1075/idjdd.13.1.06vre Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  854. de Vreese, C. H. (2012). New avenues for framing research. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(3), 365–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211426331 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  855. de Vreese, C. H., Banducci, S. A., Semetko, H. A. & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2006). The news coverage of the 2004 European parliamentary election campaign in 25 countries. European Union Politics, 7(4), 477–504. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116506069440 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  856. de Vreese, C. H., Boomgaarden, H. G. & Semetko, H. A. (2011). (In)direct framing effects: The effects of news media framing on public support for Turkish membership in the European Union. Communication Research, 38(2), 179–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210384934 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  857. de Vreese, C. H. & Lecheler, S. (2012). News framing research: An overview and new developments. In H. A. Semetko & M. Scammell (Hrsg.), The SAGE handbook of political communication (S. 292–306). Sage. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  858. de Vreese, C. H., Peter, J. & Semetko, H. A. (2001). Framing politics at the launch of the Euro: A cross-national comparative study of frames in the news. Political Communication, 18(2), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/105846001750322934 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  859. Degen, M [Martin]. (2015). Codierer-Effekte in Inhaltsanalysen - ein vernachlässigtes Forschungsfeld. In W. Wirth, K. Sommer, M. Wettstein & J. Matthes (Hrsg.), Qualitätskriterien in der Inhaltsanalyse (S. 78–95). Herbert von Halem. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  860. Degen, M [Matthias] & Olgemöller, M. (2021). German political journalists and the normalization of Twitter. Journalism Studies, 22(10), 1317–1338. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2021.1952472 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  861. Dekavalla, M. (2018). Issue and game frames in the news: Frame-building factors in television coverage of the 2014 Scottish independence referendum. Journalism, 19(11), 1588–1607. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884916674231 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  862. Delli Carpini, M. X. (2005). News from somewhere: Journalistic frames and the debate over „public journalism“. In K. J. Callaghan & F. Schnell (Hrsg.), Framing American politics (S. 21–53). University of Pittsburgh Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  863. Demirhan, K. (2017). Scandal politics and political scandals in the era of digital interactive media. In K. Demirhan & D. Çakır-Demirhan (Hrsg.), Political scandal, corruption, and legitimacy in the age of social media (S. 25–50). IGI Global. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  864. Deuze, M. (2003). The web and its journalisms: Considering the consequences of different types of newsmedia online. New Media & Society, 5(2), 203–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444803005002004 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  865. Deuze, M. (2005). What is journalism? Professional identity and ideology of journalists reconsidered. Journalism, 6(4), 442–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884905056815 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  866. Deuze, M. & Dimoudi, C. (2002). Online journalists in the Netherlands: Towards a profile of a new profession. Journalism, 3(1), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/146488490200300103 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  867. Deuze, M. & Paulussen, S. (2002). Research note: Online journalism in the low countries: Basic, occupational and professional characteristics of online journalists in Flanders and the Netherlands. European Journal of Communication, 17(2), 237–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323102017002697 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  868. Di Salvo, P. (2019). From Snowden to Cambridge Analytica: An overview of whistleblowing cases as scandals. In H. Tumber & S. R. Waisbord (Hrsg.), The Routledge companion to media and scandal (S. 254–262). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  869. Dimitrova, D. V. (2018). Comparative news framing: Explaining and measuring patterns of frames in political news. In P. D’Angelo (Hrsg.), Doing news framing analysis II: Empirical and theoretical perspectives (S. 274–291). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  870. Dingerkus, F. & Keel, G. (2021). Die Personen durchleuchten: Merkmale der politischen Journalisten. In M. Prinzing & R. Blum (Hrsg.), Handbuch Politischer Journalismus (S. 408–419). Herbert von Halem. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  871. Djerf-Pierre, M., Ghersetti, M. & Hedman, U. (2016). Appropriating social media: The changing uses of social media among journalists across time. Digital Journalism, 4(7), 849–860. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1152557 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  872. Djerf-Pierre, M. & Shehata, A. (2017). Still an agenda setter: Traditional news media and public opinion during the transition from low to high choice media environments. Journal of Communication, 67(5), 733–757. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12327 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  873. Djerf-Pierre, M. & Weibull, L. (2008). From public educator to interpreting ombudsman: Regimes of political journalism in Swedish public service broadcasting 1925-2005. In J. Strömbäck, M. Ørsten & T. Aalberg (Hrsg.), Communicating politics: Political communication in the nordic countries (S. 195–214). Nordicom. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  874. Dogruel, L., Berghofer, S., Vonbun-Feldbauer, R. & Beck, K. (2019). Die Publizistische Einheit als Auslaufmodell: Zur abnehmenden Validität eines pressestatistischen Standardmaßes. Publizistik, 64(3), 329–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-019-00505-2 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  875. Doherty, D., Dowling, C. M. & Miller, M. G. (2011). Are financial or moral scandals worse? It depends. PS: Political Science & Politics, 44(04), 749–757. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096511001247 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  876. Donges, P. & Jarren, O. (2017). Politische Kommunikation in der Mediengesellschaft: Eine Einführung (4. Auflage). Springer VS. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  877. Dongo, I., Cardinale, Y., Aguilera, A., Martinez, F., Quintero, Y., Robayo, G. & Cabeza, D. (2021). A qualitative and quantitative comparison between web scraping and API methods for Twitter credibility analysis. International Journal of Web Information Systems, 17(6), 580–606. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWIS-03-2021-0037 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  878. Donsbach, W. (2004). Psychology of news decisions: Factors behind journalists’ professional behavior. Journalism, 5(2), 131–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/146488490452002 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  879. Donsbach, W. (2012). Journalists’ role perception. In W. Donsbach (Hrsg.), The international encyclopedia of communication (S. 1–6). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405186407.wbiecj010.pub2 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  880. Donsbach, W. & Gattwinkel, D. (1998). Öl ins Feuer: Die publizistische Inszenierung des Skandals um die Rolle der Ölkonzerne in Nigeria. Dresden University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  881. Donsbach, W. & Klett, B. (1993). Subjective objectivity: How journalists in four countries define a key term of their profession. International Communication Gazette, 51(1), 53–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/001654929305100104 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  882. Donsbach, W. & Patterson, T. E. (2004). Political news journalists: Partisanship, professionalism, and political roles in five countries. In B. Pfetsch & F. Esser (Hrsg.), Comparing political communication: Theories, cases, and challenges (S. 251–270). Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  883. Döring, N. & Bortz, J. (2016). Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation in den Sozial- und Humanwissenschaften (5. vollständig überarbeitete, aktualisierte und erweiterte Auflage). Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  884. Doudaki, V. & Spyridou, L.‑P. (2013). Print and online news: Remediation practices in content and form. Journalism Studies, 14(6), 907–925. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2012.746860 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  885. Druckman, J. N. (2001a). The implications of framing effects for citizen competence. Political Behavior, 23(3), 225–256. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015006907312 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  886. Druckman, J. N. (2001b). On the limits of framing effects: Who can frame? The Journal of Politics, 63(4), 1041–1066. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-3816.00100 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  887. Druckman, J. N. (2004). Political preference formation: Competition, deliberation, and the (ir)relevance of framing effects. American Political Science Review, 98(4), 671–686. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055404041413 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  888. Druckman, J. N. & Nelson, K. R. (2003). Framing and deliberation: How citizens’ conversations limit elite influence. American Journal of Political Science, 47(4), 729–745. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5907.00051 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  889. Drüecke, R. (2018). Medien, Öffentlichkeit und Demokratie: Zur Watchdog-Funktion von Medien. Forschungsjournal Soziale Bewegungen, 31(3), 19–28. http://forschungsjournal.de/sites/default/files/downloads/fjsb_2018-3_drueeke.pdf Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  890. Dunaway, J. (2013). Media ownership and story tone in campaign news. American Politics Research, 41(1), 24–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x12454564 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  891. Eberl, J.‑M., Huber, L. M. & Plescia, C. (2020). A tale of firsts: The 2019 Austrian snap election. West European Politics, 43(6), 1350–1363. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2020.1717836 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  892. Ebersbach, A., Glaser, M. & Heigl, R. (2016). Social Web (3., überarbeitete Auflage). UVK. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  893. Echeverría, M. (2018). Personalización política e infoentretenimiento periodístico: Un estudio desde los encuadres. Cuadernos de información, 41, 71–87. https://doi.org/10.7764/cdi.41.1099 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  894. Eddy, K. (2022). The changing news habits and attitudes of younger audiences. In Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2022 (S. 42–45). Oxford, UK: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  895. Ehmig, S. C. (2016). Wie der Alltag zum Skandal wird: Implikationen der Anprangerung von Missständen mit regionaler und überregionaler Reichweite. In M. Ludwig, T. Schierl & C. von Sikorski (Hrsg.), Mediated Scandals: Gründe, Genese und Folgeeffekte von medialer Skandalberichterstattung (S. 126–145). Herbert von Halem. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  896. Eichhorn, W. (2005). Agenda-Setting-Prozesse: Eine theoretische Analyse individueller und gesellschaftlicher Themenstrukturierung. München. https://doi.org/10.5282/ubm/epub.734 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  897. Eilders, C. (2004). Von Links bis Rechts: Deutung und Meinung in Pressekommentaren. In C. Eilders, F. Neidhardt & B. Pfetsch (Hrsg.), Die Stimme der Medien: Pressekommentare und politische Öffentlichkeit in der Bundesrepublik (S. 129–166). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  898. Eilders, C. (2006). News factors and news decisions: Theoretical and methodological advances in Germany. Communications, 31(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun.2006.002 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  899. Eilders, C. (2016). Journalismus und Nachrichtenwert. In M. Löffelholz & L. Rothenberger (Hrsg.), Handbuch Journalismustheorien (S. 431–442). Springer VS. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  900. Eisenegger, M. (2016). Negierte Reputation: Zur Logik medienöffentlicher Skandalisierung. In M. Ludwig, T. Schierl & C. von Sikorski (Hrsg.), Mediated Scandals: Gründe, Genese und Folgeeffekte von medialer Skandalberichterstattung (S. 33–57). Herbert von Halem. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  901. Eisenegger, M., Orizet, J. & Schranz, M. (2015). #Journalismus 2.0: Ein Beitrag zur Qualitätssteigerung? In K. Imhof, R. Blum, H. Bonfadelli, O. Jarren & V. Wyss (Hrsg.), Demokratisierung durch Social Media? Mediensymposium 2012 (S. 233–258). Springer VS. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  902. Ekman, M. & Widholm, A. (2015). Politicians as media producers: Current trajectories in the relation between journalists and politicians in the age of social media. Journalism Practice, 9(1), 78–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2014.928467 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  903. Ekström, M. & Johansson, B. (2008). Talk scandals. Media, Culture & Society, 30(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443707084350 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  904. Ekström, M. & Johansson, B. (2019). Talk scandals: The power of mediated talk. In H. Tumber & S. R. Waisbord (Hrsg.), The Routledge companion to media and scandal (S. 183–192). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  905. Ekström, M., Patrona, M. & Thornborrow, J. (2022). Reporting the unsayable: Scandalous talk by right-wing populist politicians and the challenge for journalism. Journalism, 23(5), 955–972. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849211001779 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  906. Ellinas, A. A. (2010). The media and the far right in western Europe: Playing the nationalist card. Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  907. Elter, A. & Raue, S. (2013). Politik: Basiswissen für die Medienpraxis. Herbert von Halem. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  908. Engelke, K. M. (2018). Die journalistische Darstellung von Vertrauen, Misstrauen und Vertrauensproblemen im Kontext der Digitalisierung: Theoretische Entwicklung und empirische Erfassung von Vertrauensdimensions-Frames. Nomos. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  909. Engelmann, I. (2016). Gatekeeping. Nomos. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  910. Engesser, S. & Humprecht, E. (2015). Frequency or skillfulness: How professional news media use Twitter in five Western countries. Journalism Studies, 16(4), 513–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2014.939849 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  911. Enli, G. & Simonsen, C.‑A. (2018). „Social media logic“ meets professional norms: Twitter hashtags usage by journalists and politicians. Information, Communication & Society, 21(8), 1081–1096. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1301515 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  912. Ennser-Jedenastik, L. (2019). Von der Fundamentalopposition auf die Regierungsbank: Die FPÖ unter Heinz-Christian Strache. In E. Tálos (Hrsg.), Die Schwarz-Blaue Wende in Österreich: Eine Bilanz (S. 29–48). LIT. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  913. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  914. Entman, R. M. (2003). Cascading activation: Contesting the White House's frame after 9/11. Political Communication, 20(4), 415–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600390244176 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  915. Entman, R. M. (2007). Framing bias: Media in the distribution of power. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00336.x Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  916. Entman, R. M. (2012). Scandal and silence: Media responses to presidential misconduct. Polity Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  917. Entman, R. M., Matthes, J. & Pellicano, L. (2009). Nature, sources, and framing effects of news framing. In K. Wahl-Jorgensen & T. Hanitzsch (Hrsg.), The handbook of journalism studies (S. 175–190). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  918. Entman, R. M. & Usher, N. (2018). Framing in a fractured democracy: Impacts of digital technology on ideology, power and cascading network activation. Journal of Communication, 68(2), 298–308. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx019 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  919. Eps, P., Hartung, U. & Dahlem, S. (1996). Von der Anprangerung zum Skandal: Konsensbildung im Fall Werner Höfer. In O. Jarren, H. Schatz & H. Weßler (Hrsg.), Medien und politischer Prozeß: Politische Öffentlichkeit und massenmediale Politikvermittlung im Wandel (S. 103–118). Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  920. Eriksson, G. & Östman, J. (2013). Cooperative or adversarial? Journalists’ enactment of the watchdog function in political news production. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(3), 304–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161213482493 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  921. Esser, F. (1999). „Tabloidization“ of news: A comparative analysis of Anglo-American and German press journalism. European Journal of Communication, 14(3), 291–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323199014003001 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  922. Esser, F. (2016). Journalismustheorie und komparative Forschung. In M. Löffelholz & L. Rothenberger (Hrsg.), Handbuch Journalismustheorien (S. 111–129). Springer VS. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  923. Esser, F., de Vreese, C. & Hopmann, D. N. (2017). The explanatory logic: Factors that shape political news. In C. de Vreese, F. Esser & D. N. Hopmann (Hrsg.), Comparing political journalism (S. 22–32). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  924. Esser, F., de Vreese, C. H., Strömbäck, J., van Aelst, P., Aalberg, T., Stanyer, J., Lengauer, G., Berganza, R., Legnante, G., Papathanassopoulos, S., Salgado, S., Sheafer, T. & Reinemann, C. (2012). Political information opportunities in Europe: A longitudinal study of thirteen television systems. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 17(3), 247–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161212442956 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  925. Esser, F., Engesser, S., Matthes, J. & Berganza, R. (2017). Negativity. In C. de Vreese, F. Esser & D. N. Hopmann (Hrsg.), Comparing political journalism (S. 71–91). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  926. Esser, F. & Hanitzsch, T. (2011). Komparative Kommunikationsforschung als Mehrebenenforschung. In T. Quandt & B. Scheufele (Hrsg.), Ebenen der Kommunikation: Mikro-Meso-Makro-Links in der Kommunikationswissenschaft (S. 261–278). VS Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  927. Esser, F. & Hanitzsch, T. (2012). On the why and how of comparative inquiry in communication studies. In F. Esser & T. Hanitzsch (Hrsg.), Handbook of comparative communication research (S. 3–22). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  928. Esser, F. & Hartung, U. (2004). Nazis, pollution, and no sex: Political scandals as a reflection of political culture in Germany. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(8), 1040–1071. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764203262277 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  929. Esser, F., Strömbäck, J. & de Vreese, C. H. (2012). Reviewing key concepts in research on political news journalism: Conceptualizations, operationalizations, and propositions for future research. Journalism, 13(2), 139–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911427795 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  930. Esser, F. & Umbricht, A. (2013). Competing models of journalism? Political affairs coverage in US, British, German, Swiss, French and Italian newspapers. Journalism, 14(8), 989–1007. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884913482551 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  931. Esser, F. & Umbricht, A. (2014). The evolution of objective and interpretative journalism in the Western press: Comparing six news systems since the 1960s. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 91(2), 229–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699014527459 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  932. Eurotopics. (2020). Österreich: Boulevardmedien und Politik auf Du und Du. https://www.eurotopics.net/de/149419/oesterreich-boulevardmedien-und-politik-auf-du-und-du Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  933. Evers, T., Greck, R. & Altmeppen, K.‑D. (2021). Die Strickmuster auseinanderhalten: Konzepte des politischen Journalismus. In M. Prinzing & R. Blum (Hrsg.), Handbuch Politischer Journalismus (S. 439–462). Herbert von Halem. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  934. Fallend, F. (2019). Von Schwarz-Blau zu Türkis-Blau: Ursachen und Folgen der Koalitionsstrategien der ÖVP 1999/2000 und 2017. In E. Tálos (Hrsg.), Die Schwarz-Blaue Wende in Österreich: Eine Bilanz (S. 5–28). LIT. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  935. Feezell, J. T., Glazier, R. A. & Boydstun, A. E. (2021). Framing, identity, and responsibility: Do episodic vs. thematic framing effects vary by target population? Politics, Groups, and Identities, 9(2), 347–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2019.1584751 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  936. Feng, M., Brewer, P. R. & Ley, B. L. (2012). Framing the Chinese baby formula scandal: A comparative analysis of US and Chinese news coverage. Asian Journal of Communication, 22(3), 253–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2012.662517 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  937. Fengler, S. & Vestring, B. (2009). Politikjournalismus. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  938. Ferracioli, P., Kniess, A. B. & Marques, F. P. J. (2022). The watchdog role of fact-checkers in different media systems. Digital Journalism. 10(5). 717–737. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.2021377 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  939. Fidler, H. (2021, 4. August). Österreichs größte Medienhäuser 2021. Der Standard. https://www.derstandard.at/story/2000128050483/oesterreichs-groesste-medienhaeuser-2021 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  940. Fincham, K. (2019). Exploring political journalism homophily on Twitter: A comparative analysis of US and UK elections in 2016 and 2017. Media and Communication, 7(1), 213–224. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i1.1765 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  941. Firmstone, J. & Whittington, R. (2022). Local political journalism: Systematic pressures on the normative functions of local news. In Morrison, James, Birks, Jen & M. Berry (Hrsg.), The Routledge companion to political journalism (S. 84–93). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  942. Flaxman, S., Goel, S. & Rao, J. M. (2016). Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(S1), 298–320. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw006 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  943. Fletcher, R. & Nielsen, R. K. (2017). Are news audiences increasingly fragmented? A cross-national comparative analysis of cross-platform news audience fragmentation and duplication. Journal of Communication, 67(4), 476–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12315 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  944. Flick, U. (2020). Gütekriterien qualitativer Forschung. In G. Mey & K. Mruck (Hrsg.), Handbuch Qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie: Band 2: Designs und Verfahren (2. Aufl., S. 247–263). Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  945. Föderl-Schmid, A. (2021, 10. April). Infantile Politik. Süddeutsche Zeitung. https://www.sueddeutsche.de/politik/oesterreich-politik-kurz-bluemel-1.5259818 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  946. Fogarty, B. J. (2013). Scandals, news coverage, and the 2006 congressional elections. Political Communication, 30(3), 419–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2012.737431 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  947. Frank, R. (2003). „These crowded circumstances”: When pack journalists bash pack journalism. Journalism, 4(4), 441–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849030044003 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  948. Freelon, D. (2019). Tweeting left, right & center: How users and attention are distributed across Twitter. Knight Foundation. https://knightfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/KF-Twitter-Report-Part1-v6.pdf Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  949. Friedland, L. A., Hove, T. & Rojas, H. (2006). The networked public sphere. Javnost - The Public, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2006.11008922 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  950. Früh, W. (2017). Inhaltsanalyse: Theorie und Praxis (9., überarbeitete Auflage). UVK. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  951. Früh, W. & Früh, H. (2015). Empirische Methoden in den Sozialwissenschaften und die Rolle der Inhaltsanalyse: Eine Analyse deutscher und internationaler Fachzeitschriften 2000 bis 2009. In W. Wirth, K. Sommer, M. Wettstein & J. Matthes (Hrsg.), Qualitätskriterien in der Inhaltsanalyse (S. 15–77). Herbert von Halem. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  952. Fuchs, C. (2008). Internet and society: Social theory in the information age. Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  953. Fuchs, C. (2019). Soziale Medien und Kritische Theorie: Eine Einführung. UVK. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  954. Funck, A. S. & McCabe, K. T. (2021). Partisanship, information, and the conditional effects of scandal on voting decisions. Political Behavior. 44. 1389–1409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-020-09670-x Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  955. Gamson, W. A. (1992). Talking politics. Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  956. Gamson, W. A. & Modigliani, A. (1987). The changing culture of affirmative action. In R. G. Braungart & M. M. Braungart (Hrsg.), Research in political sociology: A research annual (S. 137–177). Jai Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  957. Gamson, W. A. & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1086/229213 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  958. García-Perdomo, V., Salaverría, R., Kilgo, D. K. & Harlow, S. (2018). To share or not to share: The influence of news values and topics on popular social media content in the United States, Brazil, and Argentina. Journalism Studies, 19(8), 1180–1201. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2016.1265896 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  959. Garimella, V. R. K. & Weber, I. (2017). A long-term analysis of polarization on Twitter. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (S. 528–531). AAAI Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  960. Garz, M. & Sörensen, J. (2021). Political scandals, newspapers, and the election cycle. Political Behavior, 43(3), 1017–1036. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-019-09577-2 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  961. Geber, S. & Hefner, D. (2019). Social norms as communicative phenomena: A communication perspective on the theory of normative social behavior. Studies in Communication and Media, 8(1), 6–28. https://doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2019-1-6 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  962. Gehler, M. (2007). „… eine grotesk überzogene Dämonisierung eines Mannes…“: Die Waldheim-Affäre 1986-1992. In M. Gehler (Hrsg.), Politische Affären und Skandale in Österreich: Von Mayerling bis Waldheim (S. 614–665). Studien Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  963. Geiger, T. & Steinbach, A. (1996). Auswirkungen politischer Skandale auf die Karriere der Skandalisierten. In O. Jarren, H. Schatz & H. Weßler (Hrsg.), Medien und politischer Prozeß: Politische Öffentlichkeit und massenmediale Politikvermittlung im Wandel (S. 119–133). Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  964. Geiß, S. (2021). Statistical power in content analysis designs: How effect size, sample size and coding accuracy jointly affect hypothesis testing - A Monte Carlo simulation approach. Computational Communication Research, 3(1), 61–89. https://computationalcommunication.org/ccr/article/view/44 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  965. Germis, C. (1988). Parlamentarische Untersuchungsausschüsse und politischer Skandal: Dargestellt am Beispiel des Deutschen Bundestages. Haag + Herchen. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  966. Giglioli, P. P. (1996). Political corruption and the media: The Tangentopoli affair. International Social Science Journal, 48(149), 381–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2451.00039 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  967. Gil de Zúñiga, H., Diehl, T. & Ardèvol-Abreu, A. (2018). When citizens and journalists interact on Twitter: Expectations of journalists’ performance on social media and perceptions of media bias. Journalism Studies, 19(2), 227–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2016.1178593 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  968. Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making and unmaking of the New Left. University of California Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  969. Gläser, J. & Laudel, G. (2010). Experteninterviews und qualitative Inhaltsanalyse als Instrumente rekonstruierender Untersuchungen (4. Auflage). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  970. Gleich, U. (2019). Agenda Setting in der digitalen Medienwelt: Evolution eines Ansatzes der Medienwirkungsforschung. Media Perspektiven(3), 126–140. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  971. Glogger, I. (2019). Soft spot for soft news? Influences of journalistic role conceptions on hard and soft news coverage. Journalism Studies, 20(16), 2293–2311. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2019.1588149 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  972. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  973. Grabe, M. E., Zhou, S. & Barnett, B. (2001). Explicating sensationalism in television news: Content and the bells and whistles of form. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 45(4), 635–655. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4504_6 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  974. Graber, R. (2020, 11. März). Wieder Razzien bei Novomatic, FPÖ-nahe Vereine im Visier. Der Standard. https://www.derstandard.at/story/2000115614258/wieder-razzien-bei-novomatic-wegen-postenschachers-bei-casinos Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  975. Graβl, P., Schaap, G., Spagnuolo, F. & van ’t Riet, J. (2021). The effects of scandalization in political news messages on political trust and message evaluation. Journalism, 22(10), 2566–2582. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919879582 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  976. Greck, R. (2017). Elitäre Verhältnisse: Selbst- und Fremdbild der Eliten in Journalismus und Politik. Springer VS. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  977. Gronemeyer, M.‑E., del Pino, M. & Porath, W. (2020). The use of generic frames in elite press: Between conflict, neutrality, and an empowered journalist. Journalism Practice, 14(8), 954–970. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2019.1665473 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  978. Groshek, J. & Tandoc, E. (2017). The affordance effect: Gatekeeping and (non)reciprocal journalism on Twitter. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 201–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.020 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  979. Gross, K. (2008). Framing persuasive appeals: Episodic and thematic framing, emotional response, and policy opinion. Political Psychology, 29(2), 169–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00622.x Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  980. Grubenmann, S. & Meckel, M. (2017). Journalists’ professional identity: A resource to cope with change in the industry? Journalism Studies, 18(6), 732–748. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2015.1087812 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  981. Grünangerl, M., Trappel, J. & Tomaz, T. (2021). Austria: Confirmed democratic performance while slowly digitalising. In J. Trappel & T. Tomaz (Hrsg.), The media for democracy monitor 2021: How leading news media survive digital transformation (S. 95–152). Nordicom. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  982. Guerrini, F. (2013). Newsroom curators & independent storytellers: Content curation as a new form of journalism (Reuters Institute Fellowship Paper). Oxford, UK. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  983. Guggenheim, L., Jang, S. M., Bae, S. Y. & Neuman, W. R. (2015). The dynamics of issue frame competition in traditional and social media. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 659(1), 207–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716215570549 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  984. Gulyas, A. (2013). The influence of professional variables on journalists’ uses and views of social media: A comparative study of Finland, Germany, Sweden and the United Kingdom. Digital Journalism, 1(2), 270–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2012.744559 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  985. Gulyas, A. (2017). Hybridity and social media adoption by journalists: An international comparison. Digital Journalism, 5(7), 884–902. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1232170 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  986. Habermas, J. (2019). Faktizität und Geltung: Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats (7. Aufl.). Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  987. Habermas, J. (2021). Überlegungen und Hypothesen zu einem erneuten Strukturwandel der politischen Öffentlichkeit. In M. Seeliger & S. Sevignani (Hrsg.), Leviathan Sonderband: Bd. 37. Ein neuer Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit? (S. 470–500). Nomos. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  988. Häder, M. (2019). Empirische Sozialforschung: Eine Einführung (4. Aufl.). Springer VS. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  989. Hagen, L. M. (1995). Informationsqualität von Nachrichten: Meßmethoden und ihre Anwendung auf die Dienste von Nachrichtenagenturen. Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  990. Haim, M., Weimann, G. & Brosius, H.‑B. (2018). Who sets the cyber agenda? Intermedia agenda-setting online: The case of Edward Snowden’s NSA revelations. Journal of Computational Social Science, 1(2), 277–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-018-0016-y Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  991. Hajdu, M., Pápay, B., Szántó, Z. & Tóth, I. J. (2018). Content analysis of corruption coverage: Cross-national differences and commonalities. European Journal of Communication, 33(1), 7–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323117750673 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  992. Halamuda, T., Klimczak, P., Breidenbach, S. & Schilling, N. (2021). Zeitungen auf Twitter: Takt- und Impulsgeber im digitalen Diskurs. Zeitungsmarktforschung Gesellschaft der deutschen Zeitungen (ZMG). https://zmg.de/fileadmin/Mediapool/Dokumente/Studien/Twitter-Studie_Zeitungen_-_Taktgeber_und_Foerderer_im_digitalen_Diskurs.pdf Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  993. Haller, A. (2014). Dissens als kommunikatives Instrument: Theorie der intendierten Selbstskandalisierung in der politischen Kommunikation (2., korrigierte Auflage). University of Bamberg Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  994. Haller, A., Holt, K. & de La Brosse, R. (2019). The other alternatives: Political right-wing alternative media. Journal of Alternative & Community Media, 4(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1386/joacm_00039_2 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  995. Hallin, D. C. (2020). Comparative research, system change, and the complexity of media systems. International Journal of Communication, 14, 5775–5786. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/14550 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  996. Hallin, D. C. & Mancini, P. (2003). Amerikanisierung, Globalisierung und Säkularisierung: Zur Konvergenz von Mediensystemen und politischer Kommunikation in westlichen Demokratien. In F. Esser & B. Pfetsch (Hrsg.), Politische Kommunikation im internationalen Vergleich: Grundlagen, Anwendungen, Perspektiven (S. 35–55). Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  997. Hallin, D. C. & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  998. Hallin, D. C. & Mancini, P. (2012). Conclusion. In D. C. Hallin & P. Mancini (Hrsg.), Comparing media systems beyond the Western world (S. 278–304). Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  999. Hallin, D. C. & Mancini, P. (2017). Ten years after comparing media systems: What have we learned? Political Communication, 34(2), 155–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2016.1233158 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1000. Hallin, D. C. & Mellado, C. (2018). Serving consumers, citizens, or elites: Democratic roles of journalism in Chilean newspapers and television news. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23(1), 24–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161217736888 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1001. Halmburger, A., Rothmund, T., Schulte, M. & Baumert, A. (2012). Psychological reactions to political scandals: Effects on emotions, trust, and the need for punishment. Politische Psychologie, 2(2), 30–51. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1002. Hameleers, M. (2019). Partisan media, polarized audiences? A qualitative analysis of online political news and responses in the United States, U.K., and the Netherlands. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 31(3), 485–505. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edy022 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1003. Hameleers, M., Bos, L. & de Vreese, C. H. (2019). Shoot the messenger? The media’s role in framing populist attributions of blame. Journalism, 20(9), 1145–1164. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917698170 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1004. Hänggli, R. (2012). Key factors in frame building: How strategic political actors shape news media coverage. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(3), 300–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211426327 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1005. Hänggli, R. (2020). The origin of dialogue in the news media. Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1006. Hanitzsch, T. (2007). Deconstructing journalism culture: Toward a universal theory. Communication Theory, 17(4), 367–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00303.x Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1007. Hanitzsch, T. (2013). Journalismuskulturen: „Journalismuskultur“ als Paradigma der Journalismusforschung. In B. Thomaß (Hrsg.), Mediensysteme im internationalen Vergleich (2. Aufl., S. 183–198). UVK. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1008. Hanitzsch, T. (2017). Professional identity and roles of journalists. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.95 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1009. Hanitzsch, T., Anikina, M., Berganza, R., Cangoz, I., Coman, M., Hamada, B., Hanusch, F., Karadjov, C. D., Mellado, C., Moreira, S. V., Mwesige, P. G., Plaisance, P. L., Reich, Z., Seethaler, J., Skewes, E. A., Noor, D. V. & Yuen, K. W. (2010). Modeling perceived influences on journalism: Evidence from a cross-national survey of journalists. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 87(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769901008700101 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1010. Hanitzsch, T., Hanusch, F. & Lauerer, C. (2016). Setting the agenda, influencing public opinion, and advocating for social change: Determinants of journalistic interventionism in 21 countries. Journalism Studies, 17(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2014.959815 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1011. Hanitzsch, T., Hanusch, F., Mellado, C., Anikina, M., Berganza, R., Cangoz, I., Coman, M., Hamada, B., Elena Hernández, M., Karadjov, C. D., Virginia Moreira, S., Mwesige, P. G., Plaisance, P. L., Reich, Z., Seethaler, J., Skewes, E. A., Vardiansyah Noor, D. & Yuen, E. K. W. (2011). Mapping journalism cultures across nations: A comparative study of 18 countries. Journalism Studies, 12(3), 273–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2010.512502 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1012. Hanitzsch, T., Hanusch, F., Ramaprasad, J. & de Beer, A. S. (2019a). Exploring the worlds of journalism: An introduction. In T. Hanitzsch, F. Hanusch, J. Ramaprasad & A. S. de Beer (Hrsg.), Worlds of journalism: Journalistic cultures around the globe (S. 1–22). Columbia University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1013. Hanitzsch, T., Hanusch, F., Ramaprasad, J. & de Beer, A. S. (Hrsg.). (2019b). Worlds of journalism: Journalistic cultures around the globe. Columbia University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1014. Hanitzsch, T. & Lauerer, C. (2019). Berufliches Rollenverständnis. In T. Hanitzsch, J. Seethaler & V. Wyss (Hrsg.), Journalismus in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz (S. 135–161). Springer VS. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1015. Hanitzsch, T. & Örnebring, H. (2020). Professionalism, professional identity and journalistic roles. In K. Wahl-Jorgensen & T. Hanitzsch (Hrsg.), The handbook of journalism studies (2. Aufl., S. 105–122). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1016. Hanitzsch, T., Ramaprasad, J., Arroyave, J., Berganza, R., Hermans, L., Hovden, J. F., Láb, F., Lauerer, C., Tejkalová, A. & Vos, T. P. (2019). Perceived influences: Journalists’ awareness of pressures on their work. In T. Hanitzsch, F. Hanusch, J. Ramaprasad & A. S. de Beer (Hrsg.), Worlds of journalism: Journalistic cultures around the globe (S. 103–132). Columbia University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1017. Hanitzsch, T. & Rick, J. (2021). Prekarisierung im Journalismus: Erster Ergebnisbericht März 2021. München. Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1018. Hanitzsch, T. & Seethaler, J. (2009). Journalismuswelten: Ein Vergleich von Journalismuskulturen in 17 Ländern. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 57(4), 464–483. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634x-2009-4-464 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1019. Hanitzsch, T., Seethaler, J. & Wyss, V. (Hrsg.). (2019). Journalismus in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz. Springer VS. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1020. Hanitzsch, T. & Vos, T. P. (2017). Journalistic roles and the struggle over institutional identity: The discursive constitution of journalism. Communication Theory, 27(2), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12112 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1021. Hanitzsch, T. & Vos, T. P. (2018). Journalism beyond democracy: A new look into journalistic roles in political and everyday life. Journalism, 19(2), 146–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884916673386 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1022. Hanitzsch, T., Vos, T. P., Standaert, O., Hanusch, F., Hovden, J. F., Hermans, L. & Ramaprasad, J. (2019). Role orientations: Journalists’ views on their place in society. In T. Hanitzsch, F. Hanusch, J. Ramaprasad & A. S. de Beer (Hrsg.), Worlds of journalism: Journalistic cultures around the globe (161-197). Columbia University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1023. Hänska, M. & Bauchowitz, S. (2019). Can social media facilitate a European public sphere? Transnational communication and the Europeanization of Twitter during the Eurozone crisis. Social Media + Society, 5(3), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119854686 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1024. Hanusch, F. (2018). Political journalists’ corporate and personal identities on Twitter profile pages: A comparative analysis in four Westminster democracies. New Media & Society, 20(4), 1488–1505. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817698479 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1025. Hanusch, F. (2019). Journalistic roles and everyday life. Journalism Studies, 20(2), 193–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2017.1370977 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1026. Hanusch, F. & Bruns, A. (2017). Journalistic branding on Twitter: A representative study of Australian journalists’ profile descriptions. Digital Journalism, 5(1), 26–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1152161 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1027. Hanusch, F. & Hanitzsch, T. (2019). Modeling journalistic cultures: A global approach. In T. Hanitzsch, F. Hanusch, J. Ramaprasad & A. S. de Beer (Hrsg.), Worlds of journalism: Journalistic cultures around the globe (S. 283–307). Columbia University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1028. Hanusch, F. & Nölleke, D. (2019). Journalistic homophily on social media: Exploring journalists’ interactions with each other on Twitter. Digital Journalism, 7(1), 22–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1436977 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1029. Harcup, T. & O’Neill, D. (2017). What is news? News values revisited (again). Journalism Studies, 18(12), 1470–1488. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2016.1150193 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1030. Harden, L. (2002). Rahmen der Orientierung: Eine Längsschnittanalyse von Frames in der Philosophieberichterstattung deutscher Qualitätsmedien. Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1031. Harder, R. A., Paulussen, S. & van Aelst, P. (2016). Making sense of Twitter buzz. Digital Journalism, 4(7), 933–943. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1160790 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1032. Harder, R. A., Sevenans, J. & van Aelst, P. (2017). Intermedia agenda setting in the social media age: How traditional players dominate the news agenda in election times. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 22(3), 275–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161217704969 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1033. Harlow, S. & Kilgo, D. K. (2022). Perceptions versus performance: How routines, norms and values influence journalists’ protest coverage decisions. Journalism, 23(2), 372–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920983058 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1034. Hart, P. S. (2011). One or many? The influence of episodic and thematic climate change frames on policy preferences and individual behavior change. Science Communication, 33(1), 28–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547010366400 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1035. Hase, V., Mahl, D. & Schäfer, M. S. (2022). Der „Computational Turn“: ein „interdisziplinärer Turn“? Ein systematischer Überblick zur Nutzung der automatisierten Inhaltsanalyse in der Journalismusforschung. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 70(1-2), 60–78. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634X-2022-1-2-60 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1036. Hayes, A. F. & Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1(1), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312450709336664 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1037. Hedman, U. (2015). J-Tweeters: Pointing towards a new set of professional practices and norms in journalism. Digital Journalism, 3(2), 279–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.897833 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1038. Hedman, U. (2016). When journalists tweet: Disclosure, participatory, and personal transparency. Social Media + Society, 2(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115624528 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1039. Hedman, U. (2020). Making the most of Twitter: How technological affordances influence Swedish journalists’ self-branding. Journalism, 21(5), 670–687. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917734054 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1040. Hedman, U. & Djerf-Pierre, M. (2013). The social journalist: Embracing the social media life or creating a new digital divide? Digital Journalism, 1(3), 368–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2013.776804 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1041. Heiberger, R., Majó-Vázquez, S., Castro Herrero, L., Nielsen, R. K. & Esser, F. (2022). Do not blame the media! The role of politicians and parties in fragmenting online political debate. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 27(4). 910–941. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612211015122 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1042. Heiselberg, L. & Stępińska, A. (2022). Transforming qualitative interviewing techniques for video conferencing platforms. Digital Journalism. Online-Vorveröffentlichung. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2047083 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1043. Heiss, R. & Matthes, J. (2021). Funny cats and politics: Do humorous context posts impede or foster the elaboration of news posts on social media? Communication Research, 48(1), 100–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650219826006 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1044. Heiss, R., von Sikorski, C. & Matthes, J. (2019). Populist Twitter posts in news stories: Statement recognition and the polarizing effects on candidate evaluation and anti-immigrant attitudes. Journalism Practice, 13(6), 742–758. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2018.1564883 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1045. Helfer, L. & van Aelst, P. (2016). What makes party messages fit for reporting? An experimental study of journalistic news selection. Political Communication, 33(1), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2014.969464 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1046. Hellmueller, L. & Mellado, C. (2015). Professional roles and news construction: A media sociology conceptualization of journalists’ role conception and performance. Communication & Society, 28(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.28.3.1-11 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1047. Hellmueller, L. & Mellado, C. (2016). Watchdogs in Chile and the United States: Comparing the networks of sources and journalistic role performances. International Journal of Communication, 10, 3261–3280. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/5181 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1048. Henkel, I., Thurman, N., Möller, J. & Trilling, D. (2020). Do online, offline, and multiplatform journalists differ in their professional principles and practices? Findings from a multinational study. Journalism Studies, 21(10), 1363–1383. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1749111 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1049. Heravi, B. R. & Harrower, N. (2016). Twitter journalism in Ireland: Sourcing and trust in the age of social media. Information, Communication & Society, 19(9), 1194–1213. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1187649 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1050. Herkman, J. (2018). Old patterns on new clothes? Populism and political scandals in the Nordic countries. Acta Sociologica, 61(4), 341–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699317737816 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1051. Herkman, J. & Matikainen, J. (2019). Right-wing populism, media and political scandal. In H. Tumber & S. R. Waisbord (Hrsg.), The Routledge companion to media and scandal (S. 147–155). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1052. Hermida, A. (2010a). Tweet the news: Social media streams and the practice of journalism. In S. Allan (Hrsg.), The Routledge companion to news and journalism (S. 671–682). Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1053. Hermida, A. (2010b). Twittering the news: The emergence of ambient journalism. Journalism Practice, 4(3), 297–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512781003640703 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1054. Hermida, A. (2012a). Social journalism: Exploring how social media is shaping journalism. In E. Siapera & A. Veglis (Hrsg.), The Handbook of Global Online Journalism (S. 309–328). Wiley-Blackwell. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1055. Hermida, A. (2012b). Tweets and truth: Journalism as a discipline of collaborative verification. Journalism Practice, 6(5-6), 659–668. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2012.667269 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1056. Hermida, A. (2013). #Journalism: Reconfiguring journalism reserach about Twitter, one tweet at a time. Digital Journalism, 1(3), 295–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2013.808456 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1057. Hermida, A. (2017). Twitter, breaking the news, and hybridity in journalism. In B. Franklin & S. A. Eldridge II. (Hrsg.), The Routledge companion to digital journalism studies (S. 407–416). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315713793-41 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1058. Hermida, A., Fletcher, F., Korell, D. & Logan, D. (2012). Share, like, recommend: Decoding the social media news consumer. Journalism Studies, 13(5-6), 815–824. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2012.664430 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1059. Hermida, A. & Mellado, C. (2020). Dimensions of social media logics: Mapping forms of journalistic norms and practices on Twitter and Instagram. Digital Journalism, 8(7), 864–884. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1805779 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1060. Hermida, A. & Thurman, N. (2008). A clash of cultures: The integration of user-generated content within professional journalistic frameworks at British newspaper websites. Journalism Practice, 2(3), 343–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512780802054538 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1061. Herrera-Damas, S. & Hermida, A. (2014). Tweeting but not talking: The missing element in talk radio’s institutional use of Twitter. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 58(4), 481–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2014.966361 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1062. Hertog, J. K. & McLeod, D. M. (2001). A multiperspectival approach to framing analysis: A field guide. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy & A. E. Grant (Hrsg.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (S. 139–161). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1063. Hitzler, R. (1989). Skandal ist Ansichtssache: Zur Inszenierungslogik ritueller Spektakel in der Politik. In R. Ebbighausen & S. Neckel (Hrsg.), Anatomie des politischen Skandals (S. 334–354). Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1064. Hladík, R. & Štětka, V. (2017). The powers that tweet: Social media as news sources in the Czech Republic. Journalism Studies, 18(2), 154–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2015.1046995 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1065. Hölig, S., Behre, J. & Schulz, W [Wolfgang]. (2022). Germany. In Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2022 (S. 80–81). Oxford, UK: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1066. Holton, A., Lee, N. & Coleman, R. (2014). Commenting on health: A framing analysis of user comments in response to health articles online. Journal of Health Communication, 19(7), 825–837. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2013.837554 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1067. Holtz-Bacha, C. (2003). Bundestagswahl 2002: Ich oder der. In C. Holtz-Bacha (Hrsg.), Die Massenmedien im Wahlkampf: Die Bundestagswahl 2002 (S. 9–28). Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1068. Holtz-Bacha, C. (2008). Die Darstellung von Politikerinnen in den deutschen Medien. In J. Dorer, B. Geiger & R. Köpl (Hrsg.), Medien - Politik - Geschlecht: Feministische Befunde zur politischen Kommunikationsforschung (S. 79–90). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1069. Holtz-Bacha, C., Langer, A. I. & Merkle, S. (2014). The personalization of politics in comparative perspective: Campaign coverage in Germany and the United Kingdom. European Journal of Communication, 29(2), 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323113516727 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1070. Holtz-Bacha, C., Lessinger, E.‑M. & Hettesheimer, M. (1998). Personalisierung als Strategie der Wahlwerbung. In K. Imhof & P. Schulz (Hrsg.), Die Veröffentlichung des Privaten - die Privatisierung des Öffentlichen (S. 240–250). Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1071. Hondrich, K. O. (1989). Skandalmärkte und Skandalkultur. In M. Haller, H.-J. Hoffmann-Nowotny & W. Zapf (Hrsg.), Kultur und Gesellschaft: Verhandlungen des 24. Deutschen Soziologentags, des 11. Österreichischen Soziologentags und des 8. Kongresses der Schweizerischen Gesellschaft für Soziologie in Zürich 1988 (S. 575–586). Campus. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-148657 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1072. Hondrich, K. O. (1992). Skandale als gesellschaftliche Lernmechanismen. In J. H. Schoeps (Hrsg.), Der politische Skandal (S. 175–189). Burg. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1073. Hondrich, K. O. (2002). Enthüllung und Entrüstung: Eine Phänomenologie des politischen Skandals. Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1074. Horz-Ishak, C. & Thomaß, B. (2021). Germany: Solid journalistic professionalism and strong public service media. In J. Trappel & T. Tomaz (Hrsg.), The media for democracy monitor 2021: How leading news media survive digital transformation (S. 197–256). Nordicom. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1075. Howard, P. N. & Parks, M. R. (2012). Social media and political change: Capacity, constraint, and consequence. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 359–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01626.x Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1076. Humanes, M. L. & Roses, S. (2018). Journalistic role performance in the Spanish national press. International Journal of Communication, 12, 1032–1053. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/8109 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1077. Humayun, M. F. & Ferrucci, P. (2022). Understanding social media in journalism practice: A typology. Digital Journalism, 10(9). 1502–1525. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2086594 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1078. Humprecht, E., Castro Herrero, L., Blassnig, S., Brüggemann, M. & Engesser, S. (2022). Media systems in the digital age: An empirical comparison of 30 countries. Journal of Communication, 72(2), 145–164. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab054 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1079. Hurcombe, E., Burgess, J. & Harrington, S. (2021). What’s newsworthy about „social news“? Characteristics and potential of an emerging genre. Journalism, 22(2), 378–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918793933 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1080. Hutter, S. (2019). Quantitative Inhaltsanalyse. In C. Wagemann, A. Goerres & M. Siewert (Hrsg.), Handbuch Methoden der Politikwissenschaft (S. 1–23). Springer VS. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1081. Informationsgemeinschaft zur Feststellung der Verbreitung von Werbeträgern (IVW). (2022). Auflagenliste 4/2021. https://www.ivw.de/sites/default/files/20214_ivw_auflagenliste.pdf Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1082. Iyengar, S. (1990). Framing responsibility for political issues: The case of poverty. Political Behavior, 12(1), 19–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992330 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1083. Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1084. Iyengar, S. (1992). Wie Fernsehnachrichten die Wähler beeinflussen: Von der Themensetzung zur Herausbildung von Bewertungsmaßstäben. In J. Wilke (Hrsg.), Öffentliche Meinung. Theorie, Methoden, Befunde: Beiträge zu Ehren von Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann (S. 123–142). Alber. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1085. Iyengar, S. (1996). Framing responsibility for political issues. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 546(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716296546001006 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1086. Jäger, M. & Jäger, S. (2007). Deutungskämpfe: Theorie und Praxis Kritischer Diskursanalyse. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1087. Jakubowicz, K. (2010). Media systems research: An overview. In B. Dobek-Ostrowska, M. Gtowacki, K. Jakubowicz & M. Sükösd (Hrsg.), Comparative media systems: European and global perspectives (S. 1–22). Central European University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1088. Jandura, O. & Kösters, R. (2017). Neue Medienumgebungen, andere Auswahlkriterien? Überlegungen zur Auswahl von Medienangeboten bei Inhaltsanalysen. Publizistik, 62(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-017-0320-1 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1089. Janowitz, M. (1975). Professional models in journalism: The gatekeeper and the advocate. Journalism Quarterly, 52(4), 618–626. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769907505200402 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1090. Jarren, O. & Donges, P. (2011). Politische Kommunikation in der Mediengesellschaft: Eine Einführung (3. Aufl.). Studienbücher zur Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1091. Jarren, O. & Sarcinelli, U. (1998). „Politische Kommunikation“ als Forschungs- und als politisches Handlungsfeld: Einleitende Anmerkungen zum Versuch der systematischen Erschließung. In O. Jarren, U. Sarcinelli & U. Saxer (Hrsg.), Politische Kommunikation in der demokratischen Gesellschaft: Ein Handbuch mit Lexikonteil (S. 13–20). Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1092. Jarren, O. & Vogel, M. (2009). Gesellschaftliche Selbstbeobachtung und Koorientierung: Die Leitmedien der modernen Gesellschaft. In D. Müller, A. Ligensa & P. Gendolla (Hrsg.), Leitmedien: Konzepte - Relevanz - Geschichte (S. 71–92). Transcript. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1093. Jarren, O. & Vogel, M. (2011). „Leitmedien“ als Qualitätsmedien: Theoretisches Konzept und Indikatoren. In R. Blum, H. Bonfadelli, K. Imhof & O. Jarren (Hrsg.), Krise der Leuchttürme öffentlicher Kommunikation: Vergangenheit und Zukunft der Qualitätsmedien (S. 17–29). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1094. Jebril, N., Albæk, E. & de Vreese, C. H. (2013). Infotainment, cynicism and democracy: The effects of privatization vs personalization in the news. European Journal of Communication, 28(2), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323112468683 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1095. Jecker, C. (2014). Entmans Framing-Ansatz: Theoretische Grundlegung und empirische Umsetzung. UVK. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1096. Jenderek, B. (2006). Excel-Tool für Reliabilitätstests. Universität Leipzig. https://web.archive.org/web/20111107190413/http://www.uni-leipzig.de/~jenderek/tool/Reli.xls Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1097. Jenssen, A. T. & Fladmoe, A. (2012). Ten commandments for the scandalization of political opponents. In S. Allern & E. Pollack (Hrsg.), Scandalous! The mediated construction of political scandals in four nordic countries (S. 51–71). Nordicom. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1098. Jiménez, F. (2004). The politics of scandal in Spain: Morality plays, social trust, and the battle for public opinion. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(8), 1099–1121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764203262279 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1099. Johnson, K. A. (2020). I got a new puppy! The impact of personal, opinion, and objective tweets on a journalist’s and a news organization’s perceived credibility. Journalism Practice, 14(1), 48–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2019.1597637 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1100. Johnson, M., Paulussen, S. & van Aelst, P. (2018). Much ado about nothing? The low importance of Twitter as a sourcing tool for economic journalists. Digital Journalism, 6(7), 869–888. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1490657 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1101. Joslyn, M. R. (2003). Framing the Lewinsky affair: Third-person judgments by scandal frame. Political Psychology, 24(4), 829–844. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-9221.2003.00356.x Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832
  1102. Jukes, S. (2019). Crossing the line between news and the business of news: Exploring journalists’ use of Twitter. Media and Communication, 7(1), 248–258. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i1.1772 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748939832

Similar publications

from the series "Nomos Universitätsschriften - Medien und Kommunikation"
Cover of book: Die Entwicklung des Formatradios in Deutschland
Book Titles Full access
Harald Heckl
Die Entwicklung des Formatradios in Deutschland
Cover of book: Visual Politics
Book Titles No access
Dennis Steffan
Visual Politics
Cover of book: Nafris, Normen, Nachrichten
Book Titles No access
Heike Haarhoff
Nafris, Normen, Nachrichten
Cover of book: Der Einfluss des Blickverhaltens auf die Urteilsbildung über Politiker
Book Titles No access
Michael Sülflow
Der Einfluss des Blickverhaltens auf die Urteilsbildung über Politiker
Cover of book: Influencer in der digitalen Gesundheitskommunikation
Book Titles Partial access
Laura-Maria Altendorfer
Influencer in der digitalen Gesundheitskommunikation

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via your Institution (SSO, Shibboleth, OpenAthens)
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex