Cover of book: Reproductive Rights in International Law
Buy in shop
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Book Titles No access

Reproductive Rights in International Law

Contested, Fragmented, Resilient
Authors:
Publisher:
 27.11.2024

Summary

Reproductive Rights remain a contested issue in international law. Yet, they have become resilient and robust in the last three decades. The author analyzes in this book the evolution of reproductive rights in the UN Human Rights and UN development fora since their recognition in 1994. She puts an emphasis on the interaction of pro- and anti-reproductive rights actors with each, the UN institutions, and with the law to shape reproductive rights in their respective view. The author argues that reproductive sources have become interweaved with each other and have become – despite fragmentation and contestation – resilient and robust.

Keywords

Bibliographic data

Copyright year
2024
Publication date
27.11.2024
ISBN-Print
978-3-7560-1601-3
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-4520-8
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Internationales Recht der Gegenwart
Volume
9
Language
English
Pages
273
Product type
Book Titles

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access 1 - 16
  2. Introduction – Reproductive Rights in International Law No access 17 - 24
      1. I. Reproductive Rights Pillars and Elements No access
      2. II. Access to Abortion as a Reproductive Right No access
      1. I. From the Right to Family Planning to Reproductive Health and Rights No access
        1. 1. The Cairo Programme of Action on Sexual and Reproductive Health, Reproductive Rights, and Access to Abortion No access
        2. 2. The Beijing Platform for Action on Sexual and Reproductive Rights, Reproductive Rights, and Access to Abortion No access
        3. 3. The Conferences’ Impact on Reproductive Rights No access
      1. I. The Legal Authority of Reproductive Rights Sources No access
      2. II. Human Rights Interpretation No access
        1. 1. Reproductive Rights as Matters of Autonomy and Privacy No access
        2. 2. Reproductive Rights as Matters of Equality No access
        3. 3. Reproductive Rights as Matters of Life and Health No access
        1. 1. Reproductive Rights in Opposition to Rights of the Fetus No access
        2. 2. Reproductive Rights in Opposition to Religious and Traditional Values No access
        3. 3. Reproductive Rights as Culturally Imperialistic, Liberal Western Ideology No access
    1. A. On Tracing Change in International Law No access
      1. I. First Signs of a Shift in the International Atmosphere on Reproductive Rights No access
        1. 1. The Omission of a Goal on Reproductive Health No access
        2. 2. The Inadequacies of the Millennium Development Goals No access
      3. III. The Prevention of Renegotiation and Pushbacks at the Ten-year Follow-up Events No access
        1. 1. Incorporating Reproductive Rights into the Work of the Treaty Bodies No access
        2. 2. Incorporating Reproductive Rights into the Work of the Special Rapporteur on the Right to Health No access
        3. 3. Incorporating Reproductive Rights in the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities No access
      5. V. Summary No access
      1. I. The Reintroduction of Reproductive Health to the Millennium Development Goals No access
      2. II. The Return of the Conference Follow-up Mechanisms to the Global Stage No access
      3. III. The Sobering Experience of the 2012 Conference on Sustainable Development No access
          1. a. The Human Rights Violations in Denying Access to Legal Abortion No access
          2. b. The First Step Towards Human Right-based Access to Abortion No access
        2. 2. The Beginning of the Human Rights Council’s Work on Reproductive Health and Rights No access
        3. 3. The Special Rapporteur on the Right to Health’s Attempt to Expand Reproductive Rights No access
      5. V. Summary No access
      1. I. The Ambivalent Reintroduction of Reproductive Rights to the 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda No access
      2. II. The Continued Expansion of Reproductive Rights at the International Conference on Population and Development Follow-ups Events No access
          1. a. Affirming Human Rights Violations in Forced Medical Interventions No access
          2. b. Affirming Access to Safe Abortion as Part of the Right to Health No access
          3. c. Expanding Human Rights-based Access to Abortion in cases of Non-vital Pregnancies No access
          4. d. Affirming Access to Safe Abortion as Part of the Right to Life No access
          5. e. Expanding Human Rights Standards on Maternal Health No access
          6. f. Confirming Freedom from Obstetric Violence as a Reproductive Rights Element No access
          1. a. Expanding the Thematic Mandates Addressing Reproductive Rights No access
          2. b. The Working Group on Discrimination against Women and Girls on Reproductive Rights No access
        3. 3. The Resolutions of the Human Rights Council on Reproductive Rights No access
      4. IV. Summary No access
    5. E. Conclusion: The Oscillating Evolution of Reproductive Rights No access
      1. I. A Brief Literature and Theory Review of Contestation No access
      2. II. Reproductive Rights Contestations No access
        1. 1. Contesting Reproductive Rights at the International Conference on Population and Development No access
        2. 2. Contesting Reproductive Rights at the Fourth World Conference on Women No access
        1. 1. Contesting Reproductive Rights at the First Conferences’ Follow-up Sessions No access
        2. 2. Contesting Reproductive Rights during the Drafting of the Millennium Declaration No access
        3. 3. Contesting Reproductive Rights during the Drafting of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities No access
        4. 4. Contesting Reproductive Rights during Rio+20 and the Drafting of the 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda No access
        5. 5. Contesting Reproductive Rights in the Human Rights Council No access
      3. III. The Impact of Contestations during Consensus-finding Processes No access
      1. I. Counterframes within Reproductive Rights Instruments No access
        1. 1. On Reservations and Interpretative Declarations No access
        2. 2. Reservations and Interpretative Declarations on Reproductive Rights in Human Rights Treaties No access
        3. 3. ‘Reservations’ on Reproductive Rights in Non-binding Instruments No access
        4. 4. The Impact of Reservations on Reproductive Rights No access
        1. 1. Attempting to Influence the Drafting of the General Comment on Sexual and Reproductive Health No access
        2. 2. Attempting to Influence the General Comment on the Right to Life No access
      2. II. Contesting the Work of the Special Procedures No access
      3. III. The Impact of Reproductive Rights Contestations in Independent Bodies No access
      1. I. The Human Rights Council’s Agendas on Religion, Traditional Rights, and Family as Counterframe Resolutions No access
      2. II. The San Jose Articles as a Contestation Framework No access
      3. III. The Geneva Consensus Declaration as a Contestation Framework No access
      4. IV. The Impact of Counterframe Agendas and Contestation Frameworks No access
      1. I. The Impact of Reproductive Rights Contestations No access
      2. II. Disingenuous and Incoherent Contestations No access
    1. A. On Robustness and Resilience No access
      1. I. Reproductive Rights Contestations as Legally Irrelevant Practices No access
      2. II. Resilience in Reaction to Extreme Positions of Anti-Reproductive Rights Actors No access
      1. I. The Institutionalization and Legalization of Reproductive Rights No access
      2. II. Institutionalization as a Resource for Pro-Reproductive Rights Actors No access
      1. I. Civil Society Access as a Driver of Robust Reproductive Rights Norms No access
      2. II. The Importance of Institutional and Independent Bodies No access
      3. III. Denouncing Non-compliance No access
      1. I. Robustness and Resilience in the Decentralized Character of International Law No access
        1. 1. The Resilience Network of Reproductive Rights No access
          1. a. The Regional Human Rights Regime on Reproductive Rights No access
          2. b. Strengthening the Resilience Network No access
    6. F. Robust and Resilient Reproductive Rights No access
      1. I. The Fragmented Evolution of Reproductive Rights No access
      2. II. Reproductive Rights Contestations No access
      3. III. Resilient and Robust Reproductive Rights No access
      1. I. The Legal Status of Modern Reproductive Rights No access
      2. II. Reproductive Rights as a Development Imperative No access
      3. III. Reproductive Rights in Contemporary International Human Rights Law No access
      4. IV. International standards on access to legal and safe abortion No access
      5. V. The Future of Reproductive Rights No access
    1. Treaties and Conventions No access
    2. UN Materials No access
    3. Other international materials No access
    4. Regional Materials No access
    5. Domestic Materials No access
    6. Miscellaneous No access
  9. Bibliography No access 257 - 273

Bibliography (266)

  1. ‘About the Geneva Consensus Declaration’ (Geneva Consensus Declaration) <https://gcdintermariumconference.org/> accessed 28 October 2022 Open Google Scholar
  2. Abrahamsen R, ‘The Right Family: The Personal Is Geopolitical’ (Centre for International Policy Studies, 14 December 2020) <https://www.cips-cepi.ca/2020/12/14/the-right-family-the-personal-is-geopolitical/> accessed 28 October 2022 Open Google Scholar
  3. Alston P, ‘Conjuring up New Human Rights: A Proposal for Quality Control’ (1984) 78 The American Journal of International Law 607 Open Google Scholar
  4. Alston P, ‘The Unborn Child and Abortion under the Draft Convention on the Rights of the Child’ (1990) 12 Human Rights Quarterly 156 Open Google Scholar
  5. Alston P, ‘The Historical Origins of the Concept of “General Comments” in Human Rights Law’ in Laurence Boisson de Chazournes and Vera Gowlland-Debbas (eds), The International Legal System in Quest of Equity and Universality / L’ordre juridique international, un système en quête d’équité et d’universalité – Liber Amicorum Georges Abi-Saab (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2001) Open Google Scholar
  6. Alter KJ and Zürn M, ‘Conceptualising Backlash Politics: Introduction to a Special Issue on Backlash Politics in Comparison’ (2020) 22 The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 563 Open Google Scholar
  7. Annan K and Mousavizadeh N, Interventions – A Life of War and Peace (The Penguin Press 2012) Open Google Scholar
  8. Antrobus P, ‘MDGs: Most Distracting Gimmicks?’ (2009) 38 Convergence 49 Open Google Scholar
  9. Archard D and Tobin J, ‘Article 1 The Definition of a Child’ in John Tobin (ed), The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (Oxford University Press 2019) Open Google Scholar
  10. Atwood M, The Handmaid’s Tale (first published 1985, Vintage Classics 2016) Open Google Scholar
  11. Aust A, Modern Treaty Law and Practice (3rd edn., Camebridge University Press 2013) Open Google Scholar
  12. Aust HP, Complicity and the Law of State Responsibility (Cambridge University Press 2011) Open Google Scholar
  13. Ayala T and Caradon, Lord, ‘Declaration on Population: The World Leaders Statements’ (1968) 1 Studies in Family Planning 1 Open Google Scholar
  14. Aylward E, Contested Rights: Abortion and Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in the United Nations (ProQuest 2020) Open Google Scholar
  15. Aylward E and Halford S, ‘How Gains for SRHR in the UN Have Remained Possible in a Changing Political Climate’ (2020) 28 Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters 160 Open Google Scholar
  16. Banda F, ‘The United Nations Working Group on the Issue of Discrimination against Women in Law and Practice’ in Anne Hellum and Henriette Sinding Aasen (eds), Women’s Human Rights – CEDAW in International, Regional and National Law (Cambridge University Press 2013) Open Google Scholar
  17. Barkholdt J and Reiners N, ‘Pronouncements of Expert Treat Bodies: From “Black Boxes” to “Key Catalysts” in International Law?’ KFG Working Paper Series No 1 Berlin Potsdam Research Group “The International Rule of Law – Rise or Decline?” (December 2019) Open Google Scholar
  18. Barnes T and others, ‘Summary of the 23rd Special Session of the General Assembly (Beijing+5): 5–10 June 2000’ (2000) 14 ENB 1 Open Google Scholar
  19. Barton C, ‘Where to for Women’s Movements and the MDGs?’ (2005) 13 Gender and Development 25 Open Google Scholar
  20. Beckwith FJ, Defending Life – A Moral and Legal Case against Abortion Choice (Cambridge University Press 2007) Open Google Scholar
  21. Bendix D, ‘“Impossible to Get to Know These Secret Means” – Colonial Anxiety and the Quest for Controlling Reproduction in "German East Africa’ in Shannon Stettner, Katrina Ackerman, Kristin Burnett, Hay (eds), Transcending Borders – Abortion in the Past and Present (palgrave macmillan 2017) Open Google Scholar
  22. Berer M, ‘Images, Reproductive Health and the Collateral Damage to Women of Fundamentalism and War’ (2001) 9 Reproductive Health Matters 6 Open Google Scholar
  23. Berer M, ‘Medical Abortion: Issues of Choice and Acceptability’ (2005) 13 Reproductive Health Matters 25 Open Google Scholar
  24. Berer M, ‘The Cairo “Compromise” on Abortion and Its Consequences for Making Abortion Safe and Legal’ in Laura Reichenbach and Mindy J Roseman (eds), Reproductive Health and Human Rights – The Way Forward (University of Pennsylvania Press 2009) Open Google Scholar
  25. Berer M, ‘Repoliticising Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights’ (2011) 19 Reproductive Health Matters 4 Open Google Scholar
  26. Berro Pizzarossa L, ‘Here to Stay: The Evolution of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights in International Human Rights Law’ (2018) 7 Laws 29 Open Google Scholar
  27. Biermann F and Kanie N, ‘Conclusion: Key Challenges for Global Governance through Goals’ in Norichika Kanie and Frank Biermann (eds), Governing through Goals: sustainable development goals as governance innovation (The MIT Press 2017) Open Google Scholar
  28. Blake C, ‘Center For Human Rights And Global Justice Working Paper Number 17 – Normative Instruments In International Human Rights Law: Locating The General Comment’ (2008) Open Google Scholar
  29. Bloomfield A and Scott SV (eds), Norm Antipreneurs and the Politics of Resistance to Global Normative Change (Routledge 2016) Open Google Scholar
  30. Boquet SJ, ‘Colombia’s Assault on Human Dignity’ (Human Life International, 28 February 2022) <https://www.hli.org/2022/02/colombias-assault-on-human-dignity/> accessed 24 November 2022 Open Google Scholar
  31. Borowy I, ‘Negotiating International Development: The Making of the Millennium Development Goals’ (2015) 5 Regions & Cohesion 18 Open Google Scholar
  32. Bottini E, Bouaziz M, Hennette-Vauchez S, ‘Abortion Rights in the French Constitution: A Global Statement with Little Domestic Substance?’ (VerfassungsBlog, 09 March 2024) <https://verfassungsblog.de/enshrining-abortion-rights-in-the-french-constitution/> accessed 18 May 2024 Open Google Scholar
  33. Brolan CE, ‘The Right to Health and the Post-2015 Health and Sustainable Development Goal Agenda’ in Sabine Klotz and others (eds), Healthcare as a Human Rights Issue, vol 4 (transcript 2017) Open Google Scholar
  34. Brolan CE and Hill PS, ‘Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights in the Evolving Post-2015 Agenda: Perspectives from Key Players from Multilateral and Related Agencies in 2013’ (2014) 22 Reproductive Health Matters 65 Open Google Scholar
  35. Brownlie I, ‘The Rights of Peoples in Modern International Law’ in James Crawford (ed), The Rights of Peoples (Oxford University Press 1988) Open Google Scholar
  36. Buga I, ‘Subsequent Practice and Treaty Modification’ in Michael J Bowman and Dino Kritsiotis (eds), Conceptual and Contextual Perspectives on the Modern Law of Treaties (Cambridge University Press 2018) Open Google Scholar
  37. Burns K, ‘Trump Officials Attend Hungarian Conference to Promote Women Having More Babies’ (rewire news group, 25 March 2019) <https://rewirenewsgroup.com/2019/03/25/trump-officials-attend-hungarian-conference-to-promote-women-having-more-babies/> accessed 28 October 2022 Open Google Scholar
  38. Buss D, ‘Robes, Relics, and Rights: The Vatican and the Beijing Conference on Women’ (1998) 7 Social and Legal Studies 339 Open Google Scholar
  39. Campbell R and others, ‘ICPD+5 Highlights Thursday 1 July 1999’ (1999) 6 ENB 1 Open Google Scholar
  40. Campbell R and others, ‘Summary of the ICPD+5 PrepCom 24 March-1 April 1999’ (1999) 6 ENB 1 Open Google Scholar
  41. Campbell White A, Merrick TW, and Yazbeck AS, Reproductive Health – The Missing Millennium Goal (The World Bank 2006) Open Google Scholar
  42. Catholics for Choice, ‘Who We Are’ <https://www.catholicsforchoice.org/who-we-are/> accessed 13 June 2022 Open Google Scholar
  43. Center for Reproductive Rights, ‘ICPD+5 Gains for Women’s Rights Despite Opposition’ (Briefing Paper 1999) Open Google Scholar
  44. Center for Reproductive Rights, ‘Accelerating Progress: Liberalization of Abortion Laws since ICPD’ <https://reproductiverights.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/World-Abortion-Map-AcceleratingProgress.pdf> accessed 1 August 2022 Open Google Scholar
  45. Center for Reproductive Rights, ‘Across Borders: How International and Regional Reproductive Rights Cases Influence Jurisprudence Worldwide’ <https://oltem1bixlohb0d4busw018c-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/12012021_Across-Borders_How-International-and-Regional-Reproductive-Rights-Can-INfluencer-Jurisprudence-Worldwide.pdf> accessed 28 May 2022 Open Google Scholar
  46. Center for Reproductive Rights, ‘Mellet v. Ireland, 2016; Whelan v. Ireland, 2017 (United Nations Human Rights Committee)’ <https://reproductiverights.org/case/mellet-v-ireland-2016-whelan-v-ireland-2017-united-nations-human-rights-committee/> accessed 20 July 2022 Open Google Scholar
  47. Center for Reproductive Rights, ‘The World’s Abortion Laws’ <https://reproductiverights.org/maps/worlds-abortion-laws/> accessed 13 June 2022 Open Google Scholar
  48. Center for Reproductive Rights and Poradna pre obcianske a l’udské práva (Centre for Civil and Human Rights), ‘Body and Soul – Forced Sterilization and Other Assaults on Roma Reproductive Freedom in Slovakia’ Open Google Scholar
  49. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, ‘Facts about Anencephaly’ (Birth Defects, 28 December 2020) <https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/birthdefects/anencephaly.html#:~:text=Anencephaly%20is%20a%20serious%20birth,part%20of%20the%20neural%20tube).> accessed 28 May 2022 Open Google Scholar
  50. C-Fam and UN Family Rights Caucus, ‘Civil Society for the Family and the UN Family Rights Caucus to the Questionnaire of the Working Group on Discrimination Against Women and Girls on Women’s and Girl’s Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights in Situation of Crisis’ <https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/Women/WG/ReproductiveHealthRights/CSOs/centerforfamilyandhumanrights/centreforfamilyandhumanrights.pdf> accessed 11 December 2022 Open Google Scholar
  51. Chandrasekaran S, Chandrashekar VS, Dalvie S, Sinha A, ‘The Case for the Use of Telehealth for Abortion in India’ (2022) 29 Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters 1 Open Google Scholar
  52. Chappell L, ‘Contesting Women’s Rights: Charting the Emergence of a Transnational Conservative Counter-Network’ (2006) 20 Global Society 491 Open Google Scholar
  53. Charlesworth H, ‘Feminist Methods in International Law’ (1999) 93 American Journal of International Law 379 Open Google Scholar
  54. Charlesworth H, Chinkin C, and Wright S, ‘Feminist Approaches to International Law’ (1991) 85 The American Journal of International Law 613 Open Google Scholar
  55. Chinkin C, ‘Reservations and Observations to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women’ in JP Gardner (ed), Human Rights as General Norms and a State’s Right to Opt Out (British Institute for International and Comparative Law 1997) Open Google Scholar
  56. Chinkin C, ‘Human Rights’ in Michael J Bowman and Dino Kritsiotis (eds), Conceptual and Contextual Perspectives on the Modern Law of Treaties (Cambridge University Press 2018) Open Google Scholar
  57. Clark C, ‘The Vienna Convention Reservations Regime and the Convention on Discrimination against Women’ (1991) 85 American Journal of International Law 281 Open Google Scholar
  58. Clémençon R, ‘Welcome to the Anthropocene: Rio+20 and the Meaning of Sustainable Development’ (2012) 21 Journal of Environment & Development 311 Open Google Scholar
  59. Clinton HR, Remarks by First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton – United Nations Fourth World Conference on Women (US Federal Depository Documents 1995) Open Google Scholar
  60. Cohen SA, ‘The Safe Motherhood Conference’ (1987) 13 International Family Planning Perspectives 68 Open Google Scholar
  61. Cook R, ‘Reservations to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women’ (1990) 30 Virginia Journal of International Law 643 Open Google Scholar
  62. Cook R, ‘International Protection of Women’s Reproductive Rights’ (1992) 24 NYU Journal of International Law and Politics 645 Open Google Scholar
  63. Cook RJ, ‘Stigmatized Meanings of Criminal Abortion Law’ in Rebecca J Cook, Joanna N Erdman and Bernard M Dickens (eds), Abortion Law in Transnational Perspective (University of Pennsylvania Press 2014) Open Google Scholar
  64. Copelon R, Zampas Z, Brusie E, Devore J, ‘Human Rights Begin at Birth: International Law and the Claim of Fetal Rights’ (2005) 13 Reproductive Health Matters 120 Open Google Scholar
  65. Cosentino C, ‘Safe and Legal Abortion: An Emerging Human Rights? The Long-Lasting Dispute with State Sovereignty in ECHR Jurisprudence’ (2015) 15 Human Rights Law Review 569 Open Google Scholar
  66. Crossette B, ‘Reproductive Health and the Millennium Development Goals: The Missing Link’ (2005) 36 Studies in Family Planning 71 Open Google Scholar
  67. Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, and Bloom SL, ‘Abortion’ in F Gary Cunningham, Kenneth J Leveno, Steven L Bloom, Jodi S Dashe, Barbara L Hoffman, Brian M Casey, and Catherine Y Song, (eds), Williams obstetrics (25th ed, McGraw-Hill Education 2018) Open Google Scholar
  68. Cupać J and Ebetürk I, ‘Backlash Advocacy and NGO Polarization over Women’s Rights in the United Nations’ (2021) 97 International Affairs 1183 Open Google Scholar
  69. de Pauw M, ‘Women’s Rights: From Bad to Worse? Assessing the Evolution of Incompatible Reservations to the CEDAW Convention’ (2013) 29 Merkourios 51 Open Google Scholar
  70. Deitelhoff N, ‘What’s in a Name? Contestation and Backlash against International Norms and Institutions’ (2020) 22 The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 715 Open Google Scholar
  71. Deitelhoff N and Zimmermann L, ‘Norms under Challenge: Unpacking the Dynamics of Norm Robustness’ (2019) 4 Journal of Global Security Studies 2 Open Google Scholar
  72. Deitelhoff N and Zimmermann L, ‘Things We Lost in the Fire: How Different Types of Contestation Affect the Robustness of International Norms’ (2020) 22 International Studies Review 51 Open Google Scholar
  73. Devereux G, A Study of Abortion in Primitive Societies : A Typological, Distributional, and Dynamic Analysis of the Prevention of Birth in 400 Preindustrial Societies (International Universities Press 1976) Open Google Scholar
  74. Dickens BM, ‘The Right to Conscience’ in Rebecca J Cook, Joanna N Erdman, and Bernard M Dickens (eds), Abortion Law in Transnational Perspective (University of Pennsylvania Press 2014) Open Google Scholar
  75. Didion J, Play It As It Lays (first published in 1970, Farrar, Straus and Giroux 2005) Open Google Scholar
  76. Dixon-Mueller R, Population Policy & Women’s Rights: Transforming Reproductive Choice (1. publ., Praeger 1993) Open Google Scholar
  77. Dixon-Mueller R and Germain A, ‘Fertility Regulation and Reproductive Health in the Millennium Development Goals: The Search for a Perfect Indicator’ (2007) 97 American Journal of Public Health 45 Open Google Scholar
  78. Donnelly J, ‘The Relative Universality of Human Rights’ (2007) 29 Human Rights Quarterly 281 Open Google Scholar
  79. Durojaye E, ‘The Human Rights Council’s Resolution on Maternal Mortality: Better Late than Never’ (2010) 10 African Human Rights Law Journal 293 Open Google Scholar
  80. El Fegriery M, ‘Competing Perceptions: Traditional Values and Human Rights’ in Turan Kayaoglu and Marie Juul Petersen (eds), The Organization of Islamic Cooperation and Human Rights (University of Pennsylvania Press 2019) Open Google Scholar
  81. ENB, ‘Summary Report, 4–22 April 1994, 3rd Session of the ICPD Preparatory Committee’ <https://enb.iisd.org/events/3rd-session-icpd-preparatory-committee/summary-report-4-22-april-1994#brief-analysis-prepcom-iii> accessed 12 May 2021 Open Google Scholar
  82. ENB, ‘Summary Report, 5–13 September 1994 ICPD’ <https://enb.iisd.org/events/icpd/summary-report-5-13-september-1994> Open Google Scholar
  83. ENB, ‘Summary Report, 10–21 May 1993 2nd Session on the ICPD Preparatory Committee’ <https://enb.iisd.org/events/2nd-session-icpd-preparatory-committee/summary-report-10-21-may-1993#brief-analysis-prepcom-ii> accessed 12 May 2021 Open Google Scholar
  84. Endres D, ‘Conceptualizing legal change as ‘norm-knitting’ through the example of the environmental human right’ [2023] 36 Leiden Journal of International Law 879 Open Google Scholar
  85. Erdman JN, ‘The Gender Injustice of Abortion Laws’ (2019) 27 Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters 4 Open Google Scholar
  86. Erdman JN and Cook RJ, ‘Decriminalization of Abortion – A Human Rights Imperative’ (2020) 62 Best Practices & Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology 11 Open Google Scholar
  87. Fagan A and Fridlund H, ‘Relative Universality, Harmful Cultural Practices and the United Nations’ Human Rights Council’ (2016) 34 Nordic Journal of Human Rights 21 Open Google Scholar
  88. Fagan PF, Saunders WJ, and Fragoso MA, ‘How U.N. Conventions on Women’s and Children’s Rights Undermine Family, Religion, and Sovereignty’ (2001) Open Google Scholar
  89. Fagbongbe M, ‘The Future of Women’s Rights from a TWAIL Perspective’ (2008) 10 International Community Law Review 401 Open Google Scholar
  90. Family Watch International, ‘The Relentless Push to Create an “International Right” to Abortion’ Open Google Scholar
  91. Farahat A and Leijten I, ‘Human Rights Overreach?’ (2022) 40 Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 83 Open Google Scholar
  92. Fathalla MF, ‘Promotion of Research in Human Reproduction: Global Needs and Perspectives’ (1988) 3 Human Reproduction 7 Open Google Scholar
  93. Faúndes A and Barzelatto J, The Human Drama of Abortion: Seeking a Global Consensus (1st ed, 2nd print, Vanderbilt University Press 2006) Open Google Scholar
  94. Fine JB, Mayall K, and Sepúlveda L, ‘The Role of International Human Rights Norms in the Liberalization of Abortion Laws Globally’ (2017) 19 Health and Human Rights Journal 69 Open Google Scholar
  95. Finnemore M and Sikkink K, ‘International Norm Dynamics and Political Change’ (1998) 52 International Organization 887 Open Google Scholar
  96. Fraser AS, ‘Becoming Human: The Origins and Development of Women’s Human Rights’ (1999) 21 Human Rights Quarterly 853 Open Google Scholar
  97. ‘French Lawmakers Approve Bill Enshrining Abortion Rights in the Constitution’ (France24, 24 November 2022) <https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20221124-%F0%9F%94%B4-french-national-assembly-approves-bill-enshrining-abortion-rights-in-the-constitution> accessed 25 November 2022 Open Google Scholar
  98. Friedman EJ, ‘Gendering the Agenda: The Impact of the Transnational Women’s Rights Movement at the UN Conferences of the 1990s’ (2003) 26 Women’s Studies International Forum 313 Open Google Scholar
  99. Gammeltoft-Hansen T, Lagoutte S, and Cerone J, ‘Introduction – Tracing the Role of Soft Law in Human Rights’ in Thomas Gammeltoft-Hansen, Stéphanie Lagoutte, and John Cerone (eds), Tracing the Roles of Soft Law in Human Rights (Oxford University Press 2016) Open Google Scholar
  100. Garita A and Girard F, ‘Negotiating Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights at the UN: A Long and Winding Road’ in Gita Sen and Marina Durano (eds), The Remaking of Social Contracts: Feminist in a Fierce New World (Zed Books 2014) Open Google Scholar
  101. Geneva Academy, ‘Optimizing the UN Treaty Body System – Academic Platform on the 2020 Review’ <https://www.geneva-academy.ch/joomlatools-files/docman-files/Optimizing%20UN%20Treaty%20Bodies.pdf> accessed 25 July 2022 Open Google Scholar
  102. Gennarini S, ‘Colombian High Court Says Aborting Disabled Children Can Never Be a Crime’ (C-Fam, 24 February 2022) <https://c-fam.org/friday_fax/colombian-high-court-says-aborting-disabled-children-can-never-be-a-crime/> accessed 24 November 2022 Open Google Scholar
  103. Girard F, ‘Advocacy for Sexuality and Women’s Rights: Continuities, Discontinuities, and Strategies Since ICPD’ in Laura Reichenbach and Mindy J Roseman (eds), Reproductive Health and Human Rights – The Way Forward (University of Pennsylvania Press 2009) Open Google Scholar
  104. Girard F, ‘Taking ICPD beyond 2015: Negotiating Sexual and Reproductive Rights in the next Development Agenda’ (2014) 9 Global Public Health 607 Open Google Scholar
  105. Greasley K and Kaczor C, Abortion Rights – For and Against (Cambridge University Press 2018) Open Google Scholar
  106. Guns W, ‘The Influence of the Feminist Anti-Abortion NGOs as Norm Setters at the Level of the UN: Contesting UN Norms on Reproductive Autonomy, 1995 – 2005’ (2013) 35 Human Rights Quarterly 673 Open Google Scholar
  107. Guttmacher Institute, ‘Factsheet Unintended Pregnancy and Abortion Worldwide’ (2022) Open Google Scholar
  108. Haslegrave M, ‘Ensuring the Inclusion of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights under a Sustainable Development Goal on Health in the Post-2015 Human Rights Framework for Development’ (2013) 21 Reproductive Health Matters 61 Open Google Scholar
  109. Haslegrave M, ‘Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights in the Sustainable Development Goals and the Post-2015 Development Agenda: Less than a Year to Go’ (2014) 22 Reproductive Health Matters 102 Open Google Scholar
  110. Herrmann M, ‘Sustainable Development, Demography and Sexual and Reproductive Health: Inseparable Linkages and Their Policy Implications’ (2014) 22 Reproductive Health Matters 28 Open Google Scholar
  111. Herrmann T, ‘Redefining Health: Center for Reproductive Rights and Anand Grover Working Together’ (C-Fam – Turtle Bay and Beyond, 8 November 2011) <https://c-fam.org/turtle_bay/redefining-health-crr-and-anand-grover-working-together/> accessed 10 May 2022 Open Google Scholar
  112. Herrmann T, ‘Rogue UN Officials Reprimanded by UN Member States’ (C-Fam – Turtle Bay and Beyond, 30 November 2011) <https://c-fam.org/friday_fax/rogue-un-officials-reprimanded-by-un-member-states/> accessed 10 May 2022 Open Google Scholar
  113. Hill D, ‘Avoiding Obligations: Reservations to Human Rights Treaties (2016) 60 Journal of Conflict Resolution 1129’ (2016) 60 Journal of Conflict Resolution 1129 Open Google Scholar
  114. Hill PS and others, ‘From Millennium Goals to Post-2015 Sustainable Development: Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights in an Evolving Aid Environment’ (2013) 21 Reproductive Health Matters 113 Open Google Scholar
  115. Hill PS and others, ‘How Can Health Remain Central Post-2015 in a Sustainable Development Paradigm?’ (2014) 10 Globalization and Health Open Google Scholar
  116. Hodoglugil NN, ‘Beijing+5: What Can International Conferences Achieve for Women’s Health?’ in Daniel Perlman and Ananya Roy (eds), The Practice of International Health: A Case-Based Orientation (Oxford Scholarship Online 2009) Open Google Scholar
  117. Horvath R, ‘The Reintervention of “Traditional Values”: Nataliya Narochnitskaya and Russia’s Assault on Universal Human Rights’ (2016) 68 Europe-Asia Studies 868 Open Google Scholar
  118. Hoyert DL, ‘Maternal Mortality Rates in the United States 2020’ (NCHS Health E-Stats 2022) Open Google Scholar
  119. Hulme D, ‘The Millennium Development Goals (MDGs): A Short History of the World’s Biggest Promise, BWPI Working Paper 100’ (September 2009) Open Google Scholar
  120. Hulme D, ‘Reproductive Health and the Millennium Development Goals: Politics, Ethics, Evidence and an “Unholy Alliance” BWPI Working Paper 105’ (October 2009) Open Google Scholar
  121. Hunt JJ, ‘Nuremberg Revisited: Abortion as Human Rights Issue’ <https://www.uffl.org/vol%203/hunt3.pdf> accessed 20 November 2022 Open Google Scholar
  122. Jarvis Thomson J, ‘A Defense of Abortion’ (1971) 1 Philosophy & Public Affairs 47 Open Google Scholar
  123. Joachim J, ‘Structures and Processes of Political Negotiation/Governance – The UN, Women’s NGOs and the Case of Reproductive Rights and Health’ in Barbara Holland-Cunz and Uta Ruppert (eds), Frauenpolitische Chancen globaler Politik – Verhandlungserfarungen im internationalen Kontext (Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2000) Open Google Scholar
  124. Joachim J, Agenda Setting, the UN, and NGOs: Gender Violence and Reproductive Rights (Georgetown University Press 2007) Open Google Scholar
  125. Jose B, Norm Contestation Insights into NonConformity with Armed Conflict Norms (Springer 2018) Open Google Scholar
  126. Joseph A, ‘Keep the Church in Church, Not in Politics’ in Anita Anand and Gouri Salvi (eds), Beijing! UN Fourth Conference on Women (Women’s Feature Service 1998) Open Google Scholar
  127. Joseph R, Human Rights and the Unborn Child (BRILL, Nijhoff 2009) Open Google Scholar
  128. Jütte R (ed), Geschichte Der Abtreibung Von Der Antike Bis Zur Gegenwart (CHBeck 1993) Open Google Scholar
  129. Kameri-Mbote P and Kabira N, ‘SDG 5: Achieve Gender Equality and Empower All Women and Girls’ in Jonas Ebbeson and Ellen Hey (eds), The Cambridge Handbook of the Sustainable Development Goals and International Law (Cambridge University Press 2022) Open Google Scholar
  130. Kanie N, Bernstein S, Biermann F, Haas P, ‘Introduction: Global Governance through Goal Setting’ in Norichika Kanie and Frank Biermann (eds), Governing through Goals: Sustainable Development Goals as Governance Innovation (The MIT Press 2017) Open Google Scholar
  131. Keck M and Sikkink K, Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics (Cornell University Press 1998) Open Google Scholar
  132. Keller H and Grover L, ‘General Comments of the Human Rights Committee and Their Legitimacy’ in Helen Keller and Geir Ulfstein (eds), UN Human Rights Treaty Bodies (Cambridge University Press 2012) Open Google Scholar
  133. Kelly LM, ‘Reckoning with Narratives of Innocent Suffering in Transnational Abortion Litigation’ in Rebecca J Cook, Joanna N Erdman, and Bernard M Dickens (eds), Abortion Law in Transnational Perspectives (University of Pennsylvania Press 2014) Open Google Scholar
  134. Kimport K, No Real Choice – How Culture and Politics Matter for Reproductive Autonomy (Rutgers University Press 2022) Open Google Scholar
  135. Kleinlein T, ‘Matters of Interpretation: How to Conceptualize and Evaluate Change of Norms and Values in the International Legal Order’ in Heike Krieger and Andrea Liese (eds), Tracing Value Change in the International Order – Norm Change or Metamorphosis? (Oxford University Press 2023) Open Google Scholar
  136. Kligman G, The Politics of Duplicity: Controlling Reproduction in Ceausescu’s Romania (University of California Press 1998) Open Google Scholar
  137. Krieger H and Liese A, ‘Conclusion: Turbulence, Robustness, and Value Change’ in Heike Krieger and Andrea Liese (eds), Tracing Value Change in the International Order – Norm Change or Metamorphosis? (Oxford University Press 2023) Open Google Scholar
  138. Krieger H and Liese A, ‘Introduction: A Metamorphosis of International Law?’ in Heike Krieger and Andrea Liese (eds), Tracing Value Change in the International Order – Norm Change or Metamorphosis? (Oxford University Press 2023) Open Google Scholar
  139. Krieger H and Nolte G, ‘The International Rule of Law – Rise or Decline? Points of Departure’ KFG Working Paper Series No. 1, Berlin Potsdam Research Group “The International Rule of Law – Rise or Decline?” (Berlin, October 2016)’ Open Google Scholar
  140. Krisch N and Yildiz E, ‘The Many Paths of Change in International Law – A Frame’, in Nico Krisch and Ezgi Yildiz (eds) The Many Paths of Change in International Law (Oxford University 2023) Open Google Scholar
  141. Krook ML and True J, ‘Rethinking the Life Cycles of International Norms: The United Nations and the Global Promotion of Gender Equality’ (2010) 18 European Journal of International Relations 103 Open Google Scholar
  142. Kuhlmann LB, ‘The Status of International Women’s Rights – Are Women’s Rights in Danger?’ in Heike Krieger and Andrea Liese (eds), Tracing Value Change in the International Order – Norm Change or Metamorphosis? (Oxford University Press 2023) Open Google Scholar
  143. Kunz JL, ‘The Swing of the Pendulum: From Overestimation to Underestimation of International Law’ (1950) 44 American Journal of International Law 135 Open Google Scholar
  144. Langlois E and others, ‘Towards a Better Integration of Global Health and Biodiversity in the New Sustainable Development Goals Beyond Rio+20’ (2012) 9 EcoHealth 381 Open Google Scholar
  145. Lantis JS and Wunderlich C, ‘Resiliency Dynamics of Norm Clusters: Norm Contestation and International Cooperation’ (2018) 44 Review of International Studies 570 Open Google Scholar
  146. Lefton R, ‘Assault on Reproductive Rights and Gender Equality at Rio+20’ (Center for American Progress 2012) Open Google Scholar
  147. Lewin T, ‘Nothing is at it seems: “discourse capture” and backlash politics’ (2021) 29 Gender and Development 253 Open Google Scholar
  148. Lijnzaad L, Reservations to UN-Human Rights Treaties – Ratify and Ruin? (Nijhoff 1995) Open Google Scholar
  149. Madrazoq A, ‘Narratives of Prenatal Personhood in Abortion Law’ in Rebecca J Cook, Joanna N Erdman, and Bernard M Dickens (eds), Abortion Law in Transnational Perspective (University of Pennsylvania Press 2014) Open Google Scholar
  150. Manne K, Down Girl – The Logic of Misogyny (Oxford University Press 2018) Open Google Scholar
  151. Manne K, Entitled – How Male Privilege Hurts Women (Penguin Books 2020) Open Google Scholar
  152. Maracek J, ‘Abortion in Context’ in Jane M Ussher, Joan C Chrisler and Janette Perz (eds), Routledge International Handbook Of Women’s Sexual and Reproductive Health (Routledge 2019) Open Google Scholar
  153. Marks SP, ‘Human Rights and Development’ in Sarah Joseph and Adam McBeth (eds), Research Handbook on International Human Rights Law (Edward Elgar Publishing 2011) Open Google Scholar
  154. Marsden LR, ‘Human Rights and Population Growth – A Feminist Perspective’ (1973) 3 International Journal of Health Services 567 Open Google Scholar
  155. McCall-Smith K, ‘Interpreting International Human Rights Standards’ in Stéphanie Lagoutte, Thomas Gammeltoft-Hansen, and John Cerone (eds), Tracing the Roles of Soft Law in Human Rights (Oxford University Press 2016) Open Google Scholar
  156. McCrudden C, ‘Human Rights and Traditional Values’ in Upendra Baxi, Christopher McCrudden, and Abdul Paliwala (eds), Law’s Ethics, Global and Theoretical Contexts – Essays in Honor of William Twining (Cambridge University Press 2015) Open Google Scholar
  157. McDonagh E, Breaking the Abortion Deadlock: From Choice to Consent (Oxford University Press 1997) Open Google Scholar
  158. McDonald K, ‘Reproductive Rights under Attack’ (1995) 2 Planned Parenthood Challenges 14 Open Google Scholar
  159. McIntosh CA and Finkle JL, ‘The Cairo Conference on Population and Development: A New Paradigm?’ (1995) 21 Population and Development Review 223 Open Google Scholar
  160. McKibben H and Western S, ‘“Reserved Ratifications”: An Analysis of States’ Entry of Reservation Upon Ratification Treaties’ (2020) 50 British Journal of Political Science 687 Open Google Scholar
  161. McLachlan C, ‘The Principle of Systemic Integration and Article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention’ (2008) 54 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 279 Open Google Scholar
  162. McNeilly K, Rimmer SH, and Ogg K, ‘Sex/Gender Is Fluid, What Now for Feminism and International Human Rights Law? A Call to Queer the Foundations’, Research Handbook on Feminist Engagement with International Law (Edward Elgar Publishing 2019) Open Google Scholar
  163. Mężykowska A and Młynarska-Sobaczewska A, ‘Persuasion and Legal Reasoning in the ECtHR Rulings’ (Routledge 2023) Open Google Scholar
  164. Miller AM and Roseman MJ, ‘Sexual and Reproductive Rights at the United Nations: Frustration or Fulfilment?’ (2011) 19 Reproductive Health Matters 102 Open Google Scholar
  165. Moeckli D and White ND, ‘Treaties as “Living Instruments”’ in Michael J Bowman and Dino Kritsiotis (eds), Conceptual and Contextual Perspectives on the Modern Law of Treaties (Cambridge University Press 2018) Open Google Scholar
  166. Mok C, ‘How China Defines Human Rights’ (Friedrich Naumann Foundation, 15 November 2021) <https://www.freiheit.org/southeast-and-east-asia/how-china-defines-human-rights> accessed 21 November 2022 Open Google Scholar
  167. Molyneux M and Razavi S, ‘Occasional Paper 15 – Beijing Plus 10: An Ambivalent Record on Gender Justice’ Open Google Scholar
  168. Morgan L, ‘Anti-Abortion Strategizing and the Afterlife of the Geneva Consensus Declaration’ [2022] Developing World Bioethics 1 Open Google Scholar
  169. Mutua M, ‘Savages, Victims and Saviors. The Metaphor of Human Rights’ (2001) 42 Harvard International Law Journal 201 Open Google Scholar
  170. Mutua M and Anghie A, ‘What Is TWAIL?’ (2000) 94 Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law) 31 Open Google Scholar
  171. National Right to Life Committee, Inc., ‘Abortion Advocates Suffer Major Defeat at Beijing + 5 Pro-Life and Pro-Family Coalition Stops Expansion of Abortion “Rights”’ (2000) 27 National Right to Life News Open Google Scholar
  172. Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation, ‘Lobbying for Faith and Family: A Study of Religious NGOs at the United Nations’ (2013) Norad Report 7/2013 Open Google Scholar
  173. Nowak M, U.N. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Nowak’s CCPR Commentary (3rd revised edition, NPEngel, Publisher 2019) Open Google Scholar
  174. Nowicka W, ‘Sexual and Reproductive Rights and the Human Rights Agenda: Controversial and Contested’ (2011) 19 Reproductive Health Matters 119 Open Google Scholar
  175. Nussbaum M, Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach (Cambridge University Press 2000) Open Google Scholar
  176. Obaid TA, ‘Fifteen Years after the International Conference on Population and Development: What Have We Achieved and How Do We Move Forward?’ (2009) 106 International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 102 Open Google Scholar
  177. Orr J, Abortion Wars – The Fight for Reproductive Rights (Policy Press 2017) Open Google Scholar
  178. Ortega AO, ‘Perpetuating Power: A Response’ (2011) 19 Reproductive Health Matters 35 Open Google Scholar
  179. Packer CAA, The Right to Reproductive Choice – A Study in International Law (Åbo Akademi University, Institute for Human Rights 1996) Open Google Scholar
  180. Palacios Zuloaga P, ‘Pushing Past the Tipping Point: Can the Inter-American System Accommodate Abortion Rights?’ (2021) 21 Human Rights Law Review 899 Open Google Scholar
  181. Paul M, Lichtenberg ES, Borgatta L, Grimes DA, Stubblefield PG, and Creinin MD (eds), Management of Unintended and Abnormal Pregnancy (Wiley-Blackwell 2009) Open Google Scholar
  182. Petechsky R, Abortion and Women’s Choice: The State, Sexuality, and Reproductive Freedom (Northeastern University Press 1990) Open Google Scholar
  183. Peters A, ‘The Refinement of International Law: From Fragmentation to Regime Interaction and Politicization’ (2017) 15 International Journal of Constitutional Law 671 Open Google Scholar
  184. Pietropaoli I, ‘Islamic Reservations to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women’ (2020) 14 The Journal of Human Rights 83 Open Google Scholar
  185. Prandini Assis M and Larrea S, ‘Why Self-Managed Abortion Is so Much More than a Provisional Solution for Times of Pandemic’ (2020) 28 Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters 37 Open Google Scholar
  186. Preciado PB, ‘The Hot War’ (e-flux Journal, December 2020) <https://www.e-flux.com/journal/114/367059/the-hot-war/> accessed 28 October 2022 Open Google Scholar
  187. Prichard AC, ‘A “Grievously Sinful Attempt to Destroy the Life Which God Has Given:” Abortion, Anglicanism, and Debates About Community Composition in Twenieth-Century Zanzibar’ in Shannon Stettner, Katrina Ackerman, Kristin Burnett, Travis Hay (eds), Transcending Abortion – Abortion in the Past and Present (palgrave macmillan 2017) Open Google Scholar
  188. Radford Ruether R, ‘Women, Reproductive Rights and the Catholic Church’ (2008) 16 Feminist Theology 184 Open Google Scholar
  189. Ramina L, ‘TWAIL – “Third World Approaches to International Law” and Human Rights: Some Considerations’ (2018) 5 Revista de Investigações Constitucionais (Journal of Constitutional Research) 261 Open Google Scholar
  190. Ramji-Nogales J, ‘Revisiting the Category “Women”’ in Susan Harris Rimmer and Kate Ogg (eds), Research Handbook on Feminist Engagement with International Law (Edward Elgar Publishing 2019) Open Google Scholar
  191. Razavi S, ‘The 2030 Agenda: Challenges of Implementing to Attain Gender Equality and Women’s Righs’ (2016) 24 Gender and Development 25 Open Google Scholar
  192. Regan D, ‘Rewriting Roe v Wade’ (1979) 77 Michigan Law Review 1569 Open Google Scholar
  193. Reiners N, ‘Despite or Because of Contestation? How Water Became a Human Right’ (2021) 43 Human Rights Quarterly 392 Open Google Scholar
  194. Reiners N, Transnational Lawmaking Coalitions for Human Rights (Cambridge University Press 2022) Open Google Scholar
  195. ‘Resilience, n.’ (Oxford English Dictionary) <https://www.oed.com/view/Entry/163619?redirectedFrom=resilience&> accessed 3 November 2022 Open Google Scholar
  196. Riddle JM, Eve’s Herbs – A History of Contraception and Abortion in the West, John M. Riddle, Harvard University Press 1997 (Second Printing in 1998) (1st ed, 2nd print, Harvard University Press 1998) Open Google Scholar
  197. Rimalt N, ‘The Legal Contestation of Abortion Rights – Why Abortion Should Be Theorized as a Gender-Based Comparative Right’ in Heidemarie Winkel, Julia Roth, and Alexandra Scheele (eds), Global Contestations of Gender Rights (Bielefeld University Press 2022) Open Google Scholar
  198. Risse T, Ropp SC, and Sikkink K, The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change (Cambridge University Press 1999) Open Google Scholar
  199. Risse T, Ropp SC, and Sikkink K, The Persistent Power of Human Rights (Cambridge University Press 2013) Open Google Scholar
  200. Roberts DE, ‘Punishing Drug Addicts Who Have Babies: Women of Color, Equality, and the Right to Privacy’ in Rickie Solinger (ed), Abortion Wars – Half a Century of Struggles, 1950–2000 (University of California Press 1998) Open Google Scholar
  201. ‘Robustness, n.’ (Oxford English Dictionary) <https://www.oed.com/view/Entry/166660?redirectedFrom=robustness#eid> accessed 3 November 2022 Open Google Scholar
  202. Roseman MJ and Reichenbach L, ‘Global Reproductive Health and Rights: Reflecting on the ICPD’ in Mindy J Roseman and Laura Reichenbach (eds), Reproductive Health and Human Rights – The Way Forward (University of Pennsylvania Press 2009) Open Google Scholar
  203. Roseman MJ and Reichenbach L, ‘International Conference on Population and Development at 15 Years: Achieving Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights for All?’ (2010) 100 American Journal of Public Health 403 Open Google Scholar
  204. Ross L and Solinger R, Reproductive Justice: An Introduction (University of California Press 2017) Open Google Scholar
  205. Roth R, How Women Pay for Fetal Rights (Cornell University Press 2003) Open Google Scholar
  206. Sabel R, Rules of Procedure at the UN and at Inter-Governmental Conferences (3rd edn, Cambridge University Press 2018) Open Google Scholar
  207. Sanders R, ‘Norm Spoiling: Undermining the International Women’s Rights Agenda’ (2018) 94 International Affairs 271 Open Google Scholar
  208. Sandholtz W, ‘Dynamics of International Norm Change: Rules Against Wartime Plunder’ (2008) 14 European Journal of International Relations 101 Open Google Scholar
  209. Sandholtz W, ‘Explaining International Norm Change’ in Wayne Sandholtz and Kendall Stiles (eds), International Norms and Cycle of Change (Oxford University Press 2008) Open Google Scholar
  210. Sandholtz W, ‘Is Winter Coming? Norm Challenges and Norm Resilience’ in Heike Krieger and Andrea Liese (eds), ’Tracing Value Change in the International Legal Order: Perspectives from Legal and Political Science (Cambridge University Press 2023) Open Google Scholar
  211. Saul B, Kinley D and Mowbray J, The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Oxford University Press 2014) Open Google Scholar
  212. Saunders WJ, ‘Understanding International Law: The ABCs of an International Right to Abortion’ (2010) XXXVI The Human Life Review 84 Open Google Scholar
  213. Saunders WJ, ‘The San Jose Articles and an International Right to Abortion’ (2015) Spring Ave Maria Law Review 1 Open Google Scholar
  214. Scalia A, ‘Common Law Courts in a Civil Law System: The Role of United States Federal Courts in Interpreting the Constitution and Laws’ in Amy Gutmann (ed), A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law (Princeton University Press 1997) Open Google Scholar
  215. Schaaf M, ‘Negotiating Sexuality in the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disability’ (2011) 8 sur international journal on human rights 113 Open Google Scholar
  216. Schabas W, U.N. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights – Novak’s CCPR Commentary (3rd revised edition, NP Engel Publisher 2019) Open Google Scholar
  217. Sękowska-Kozłowska K, ‘A Tough Job: Recognizing Access to Abortion as Matter of Equality. A Commentary on the View of the UN Human Rights Committee in the Cases of Mellet v. Ireland and Whelan v. Ireland’ (2018) 26 Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters 25 Open Google Scholar
  218. Sen G, ‘Occasional Paper 9 – Neolibs, Neocons and Gender Justice: Lessons from Global Negotiations’ Open Google Scholar
  219. Shannon C and Winikoff B, ‘Unsafe Abortion and Strategies to Reduce Its Impact on Women’s Life’ in Sean Kehoe, James Neilson, and Jane Norman (eds), Maternal and infant deaths: Chasing millennium development goals 4 and 5 (Cambridge University Press 2010) Open Google Scholar
  220. Shelton D, ‘Human Rights’ in Dinah Shelton (ed), Commitment and Compliance: The Role of Non-binding Norms in the International Legal System (Oxford University Press 2000) Open Google Scholar
  221. Shelton D, ‘Introduction: Law, Non-Law and the Problem of “Soft Law”’ in Dinah Shelton (ed), Commitment and Compliance: The Role of Non-binding Norms in the International Legal System (Oxford University Press 2000) Open Google Scholar
  222. Shelton D, ‘The Legal Status of Normative Pronouncements of Human Rights Treaty Bodies’ in Holger Hestermeyer and others (eds), Coexistence, Cooperation and Solidarity: Liber Amicorum Rüdiger Wolfrum (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2012) Open Google Scholar
  223. Simma B, ‘Commission and Treaty Bodies of the UN System’ in Rüdiger Wolfrum and Volker Röben (eds), Developments of International law in treaty making (Springer 2005) Open Google Scholar
  224. Singh JA and Karim SSA, ‘Trump’s “Global Gag Rule”: Implications for Human Rights and Global Health’ (2017) 5 The Lancet E387 Open Google Scholar
  225. Singh JS, Creating A New Consensus on Population – The International Conference on Population and Development (Earthscan Publications 1998) Open Google Scholar
  226. Sjørup L, ‘Negotiating Ethics: The Holy See and the Fourth World Conference on Women, Beijing 1995’ (1997) 5 Feminist Theology 73 Open Google Scholar
  227. Solinger R, Beggars and Choosers – How the Politics of Choice Shapes Adoption, Abortion, and Welfare in the United States (Hill & Wang Pub 2001) Open Google Scholar
  228. Southern NP and Kennedy L, ‘Trump’s Legacy Is a Global Alliance Against Women’s Rights’ (Foreign Policy, 20 January 2021) <https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/01/20/trump-anti-abortion-global-alliance-legacy/> Open Google Scholar
  229. Spieker M, ‘Missbrauch Der UNO – Der Globale Kampf Um Die Legalisierung Der Abtreibung’ in Bernward Büchner, Claudia Kaminski and Mechthild Löhr (eds), Abtreibung – Ein neues Menschenrecht? (SINUS Verlag 2012) Open Google Scholar
  230. Stettner S, Ackerman K, Burnett K, Hay T (eds), Transcending Borders – Abortion in the Past and Present (palgrave macmillan 2017) Open Google Scholar
  231. Stevens A, ‘Pushing a Right to Abortion through the Back Door: The Need for Integrity in the U.N. Treaty Monitoring System, and Perhaps a Treaty Amendment’ (2018) 6 Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs 70 Open Google Scholar
  232. Stewart K, The Power Worshippers Inside the Dangerous Rise of Religious Nationalism (Bloomsbury Publishing 2019) Open Google Scholar
  233. Stoeckl K and Medvedeva K, ‘Double Bind at the UN: Western Actors, Russia and the Traditionalist Agenda’ (2018) 7 Global Constitutionalism 383 Open Google Scholar
  234. Sylva D and Yoshihara S, ‘Rights by Stealth – The Role of UN Human Rights Treaty Bodies in the Campaign for the International Right to Abortion’ White Paper Number Eight (2009) Open Google Scholar
  235. Taylor A, Cunningham E, Tsui K, and Parker C, ‘U.S. Abortion Decision Draws Cheers, Horror Abroad’ (The Washington Post, 25 June 2022) <https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/06/24/global-reaction-roe-abortion-supreme-court/> Open Google Scholar
  236. Theobald B, ‘Settler Colonialism, Native American Motherhood and the Politics of Terminating Pregnancies’ in Shannon Stettner, Karina Ackerman, Kristin Burnett, Travis Hay (eds), Transcending Abortion – Abortion in the Past and Present (palgrave macmillan 2017) Open Google Scholar
  237. ‘“There Is No International Right to Abortion”: U.S. and 10 Other Nations Issue Joint Statement at the End the[Sic] Nairobi Summit.’ (2019) National Right to Life News 39 Open Google Scholar
  238. Thielbörger P, The Right(s) to Water – The Multi-Level Governance of a Unique Human Right (Springer 2014) Open Google Scholar
  239. Tobin J, ‘Seeking to Persuade: A Constructive Approach to Human Rights Treaty Interpretation’ (2010) 23 Harvard Human Rights Journal 1 Open Google Scholar
  240. Tomuschat C, ‘The Right to Life – Legal and Political Foundations’ in Christian Tomuschat, Evelyne Lagrange, and Stefan Oeter (eds), The Right to Life (Brill Nijhoff 2010) Open Google Scholar
  241. Tomuschat C, Human Rights – Between Idealism and Realism (3rd edition, Oxford University Press 2014) Open Google Scholar
  242. True J and Wiener A, ‘Everyone Wants (a) Peace: The Dynamics of Rhetoric and Practice on “Women, Peace and Security”’ (2019) 95 International Affairs 553 Open Google Scholar
  243. Ulfstein G, ‘Who Is the Final Interpreter in Human Rights: The ICJ v CERD?’ (EJIL:Talk, 22 February 2022) <https://www.ejiltalk.org/who-is-the-final-interpreter-in-human-rights-the-icj-v-cerd/> accessed 3 August 2022 Open Google Scholar
  244. Viens A, ‘The Right to Bodily Integrity’ in Andreas von Arnauld, Kerstin von der Decken, and Mart Susi (eds), The Cambridge Handbook of New Human Rights – Recognition, Novelty, Rhetoric (Cambridge University Press 2020) Open Google Scholar
  245. von Arnauld A and Theilen JT, ‘Rhetoric of Rights’ in Andreas von Arnauld, Kerstin von der Decken, and Mart Susi (eds), The Cambridge Handbook of New Human Rights (Cambridge University Press 2020) Open Google Scholar
  246. von Arnauld A, von der Decken K and Susi M, ‘Introduction’ in Andreas von Arnauld, Kerstin von der Decken, and Mart Susi (eds), The Cambridge Handbook of New Human Rights – Recognition, Novelty, Rhetoric (Cambridge University Press 2020) Open Google Scholar
  247. von der Decken K and Koch N, ‘Recognition of New Human Rights’ in Andreas von Arnauld, Kerstin von der Decken, and Mart Susi (eds), The Cambridge Handbook of New Human Rights – Recognition, Novelty, Rhetoric (Cambridge University Press 2020) Open Google Scholar
  248. Voss MJ, ‘The Use (or Misuse) of Amendments to Contest Human Rights Norm at the UN Human Rights Council’ (2019) 20 Human Rights Review 397 Open Google Scholar
  249. Walter C, ‘Article 19 VCLT’ in Oliver Dörr and Kirsten Schmalenbach (eds), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties – A Commentary (2nd edn, Springer Verlag 2018) Open Google Scholar
  250. Warwick BTC, ‘Unwinding Retrogression: Examining the Practice of the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights’ (2019) 19 Human Rights Law Review 467 Open Google Scholar
  251. Watson K, ‘Why We Should Stop the Term “Elective Abortion”’ (2018) 20 AMA Journal of Ethics 1175 Open Google Scholar
  252. Westeson J, ‘Reproductive Health Information and Abortion Services: Standards Developed by the European Court of Human Rights’ (2013) 122 International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 173 Open Google Scholar
  253. Wicks E, ‘A, B, C v Ireland: Abortion Law under the European Convention on Human Rights’ (2011) 11 Human Rights Law Review 556 Open Google Scholar
  254. Wiener A, ‘Enacting Meaning-in-Use: Qualitative Research on Norms and International Relations’ (2009) 35 Review of International Studies 175 Open Google Scholar
  255. Wiener A, Contestation and Constitution of Norms in Global International Relations (Cambridge University Press 2018) Open Google Scholar
  256. Wiener A, ‘Norm(Ative) Change in International Relations: A Conceptual Framework’ in Heike Krieger and Andrea Liese (eds), Tracing Value Change in the International Order – Norm Change or Metamorphosis? (Oxford University Press 2023) Open Google Scholar
  257. Yamin AE, ‘Sexual and Reproductive Health, Rights, and MDG 5 – Taking Stock, Looking Forward’ in Malcolm Langford, Alicia Ely Yamin, and Andy Sumner (eds), The Millennium Development Goals and Human Rights: Past, Present and Future (Cambridge University Press 2013) Open Google Scholar
  258. Yamin AE, When Misfortune Becomes Injustice: Evolving Human Rights Struggles for Health and Social Equality (Stanford University Press 2020) Open Google Scholar
  259. Yamin AE and Boulanger V, ‘Why Global Goals and Indicators Matter: The Experience of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights in the Millennium Development Goals’ (2014) 15 Journal on Human Development and Capabilities 218 Open Google Scholar
  260. Yoon S-Y, ‘The “Yin” and “Yang” of a Political Process’ in Anita Anand and Gouri Salvi (eds), Beijing! UN Fourth World Conference on Women (Women’s Feature Service 1998) Open Google Scholar
  261. Yoshihara S, ‘Lost in Translation: The Failure of the International Reproductive Rights Norm’ (2013) 11 Ave Maria Law Review 367 Open Google Scholar
  262. Young KG, ‘Human Rights Originalism’ (2022) 110 The Georgetown Law Journal 1097 Open Google Scholar
  263. Zampas C and Andión-Ibañez X, ‘Conscientious Objection to Sexual and Reproductive Health Services: International Human Rights Standards and European Law and Practice’ (2012) 19 European Journal of Health Law 231 Open Google Scholar
  264. Zara Ahmed (Guttmacher Institute), ‘The Unprecedented Expansion of the Global Gag Rule: Trampling Rights, Health and Free Speech’ (Guttmacher Policy Review, 28 April 2020) <https://www.guttmacher.org/gpr/2020/04/unprecedented-expansion-global-gag-rule-trampling-rights-health-and-free-speech> accessed 31 July 2022 Open Google Scholar
  265. Zvobgo K, Sandholtz W and Mulesky S, ‘Reserving Rights: Explaining Human Rights Treaty Reservations’ (2020) 64 International Studies Quarterly 785.’ (2020) 64 International Studies Quarterly 785 Open Google Scholar
  266. Zwingel S, ‘How Do Norms Travel? Theorizing International Women’s Rights in Transnational Perspective’ (2012) 56 International Studies Quarterly 115 Open Google Scholar

Similar publications

from the topics "European Law & International Law & Comparative Law"
Cover of book: Der Volkseinwand
Book Titles No access
Florian Feigl
Der Volkseinwand
Cover of book: Wie fördert die EU Menschenrechte in Drittstaaten?
Book Titles No access
Dennis Traudt
Wie fördert die EU Menschenrechte in Drittstaaten?
Cover of book: Future-Proofing in Public Law
Edited Book No access
Nicole Koblenz LL.M., Nicholas Otto, Gernot Sydow
Future-Proofing in Public Law
Cover of book: Das Weltraumrecht und seine Eignung für den Rohstoffabbau durch Privatakteure
Book Titles No access
Justus Schmidt
Das Weltraumrecht und seine Eignung für den Rohstoffabbau durch Privatakteure
Cover of book: »Free Speech« v »Political Correctness«
Book Titles No access
Hans G. Gnodtke
»Free Speech« v »Political Correctness«

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via Open Athens
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex