Cover of book: Agenda-Setting
Buy in shop
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Educational Book No access

Agenda-Setting

Authors:
Publisher:
 20.05.2010

Bibliographic data

Publication year
2010
Publication date
20.05.2010
ISBN-Print
978-3-8329-4585-5
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-6037-2
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Konzepte. Ansätze der Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaft
Volume
1
Language
German
Pages
101
Product type
Educational Book

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access 1 - 8
  2. Grundzüge der Theorie No access 9 - 17
  3. Entwicklungsgeschichte des Ansatzes No access 18 - 25
  4. Forschungslogik der Methode No access 26 - 39
  5. Empirische Befunde No access 40 - 56
  6. Kritik / Weiterentwicklungen No access 57 - 71
  7. Verwandte / konkurrierende Ansätze No access 72 - 83
  8. Fazit: Die gesellschaftliche Relevanz des Agenda-Setting- Effekts No access 84 - 87
  9. „Top Ten“ der Forschungsliteratur No access 88 - 90
  10. Literatur No access 91 - 100
  11. Bildnachweise No access 101 - 101

Bibliography (126)

  1. Ader, C. (1995). A longitudinal study of agenda-setting for the issue of environmental pollution. Journalism & Mass Commuication Quarterly, 72, 300-311. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769909507200204
  2. Althaus, S. L., & Tewksbury, D. (2002). Agenda setting and the “new” news. Patterns of issue importance on the paper and online versions of the New York Times. Communication Research, 29, 180-207. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0093650202029002004
  3. Asp, K. (1983). The struggle for the agenda. Party agenda, media agenda, and voter agenda in the 1979 Swedish election campaign. Communication Research, 10, 333-355. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/009365083010003004
  4. Behr, R. L., & Iyengar, S. (1985). Television news, real world cues and changes in the public agenda. Public Opinion Quarterly, 49, 38-57. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/268900
  5. Brettschneider, F. (2002). Die Medienwahl 2002. Themenmanagement und Berichterstattung. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, B49-50, 36-47. Open Google Scholar
  6. Brosius, H.-B. (1994). Agenda-Setting nach einem Vierteljahrhundert Forschung. Methodischer und theoretischer Stillstand? Publizistik, 39, 269-288. Open Google Scholar
  7. Brosius, H.-B., & Kepplinger, H. M. (1995). Killer and victim issues. Issue competition in the agenda-setting process of German television. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 7, 211-231. Open Google Scholar
  8. Bushman, B. J. (1998). Priming effects of media violence on the accessibility of aggressive contructs in memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 537-545. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0146167298245009
  9. Capella, J. N., & Jamieson, K. H. (1997). The spiral of cynicism. The press and the public good. Oxford: University Press. Open Google Scholar
  10. Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). A theory of framing and opinion formation in competitive elite environments. Journal of Communication, 57, 99-118. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00331.x
  11. Cohen, B. (1963). The press and foreign policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  12. Coleman, R., & Banning, S. (2006). Network TV news’ affective framing of the presidential candidates: Evidence for a second-level agenda-setting effect through visual framing. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83, 313-328. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769900608300206
  13. Coleman, R., & McCombs, M. E. (2007). The young and agenda-less? Exploring age-related differences in agenda setting on the youngest generation, baby boomers, and the civic generation. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 84, 495-508. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769900708400306
  14. Dahinden, U. (2006). Framing. Eine integrative Theorie der Massenkommunikation. Konstanz: UVK. Open Google Scholar
  15. Danielian, L. H., & Reese, S. D. (1989). A closer look at intermedia influences on agenda-setting: The cocaine issue of 1986. In P. J. Shoemaker (Hrsg.), Communication campaigns about drugs: Government, media, and the public (47-66). New Jersey: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar
  16. Dearing, J. W., & Rogers, E. M. (1996). Agenda-Setting. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Open Google Scholar
  17. Druckman, J. N., & Holmes, J. W. (2004). Does presidential rhetoric matter? Priming and presidential approval. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 34, 755-778. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5705.2004.00222.x
  18. Edwards, G. C., & Wood, B. D. (1999). Who influences whom? The president, congress, and the media. American Political Science Review, 93, 327-344. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2585399
  19. Eichhorn, W. (1996). Agenda-Setting-Prozesse. München: Reinhard Fischer. Open Google Scholar
  20. Entman, R. M. (1991). Framing U.S. coverage of international news: Contrasts in narratives of the KAL and Iran Air accidents. Journal of Communication, 41(4), 6-28. Open Google Scholar
  21. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43, 51-58. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
  22. Entman, R. M., Matthes, J., & Pellicano, L. (2009). Nature, sources, and effects of news framing. In K. Wahl-Jorgensen & T. Hanitzsch (Hrsg.), The handbook of journalism studies (pp. 175-190). New York/London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  23. Erbring, L., Goldenberg, E. N., & Miller, A. H. (1980). Front-Page news and real-world cues. A new look at agenda-setting by the media. American Journal of Political Science, 24, 16-49. Open Google Scholar
  24. Esser, F., Schwabe, C., & Wilke, J. (2005). Metaberichterstattung im Krieg. Wie Tageszeitungen die Rolle der Nachrichtenmedien und der Militär-PR in den Irakkonflikten 1991 und 2003 framen. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 53, 314-332. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1615-634x-2005-2-3-314
  25. Fan, D. P., & Tims, A. R. (1989). The impact of the mass media on public opinion: American presidential election 1987-1988. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 1, 151-163. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/1.2.151
  26. Fröhlich, R., Scherer, H., & Scheufele, B. (2007). Kriegsberichterstattung in deutschen Qualitätszeitungen. Eine inhaltsanalytische Langzeitstudie zu Framingprozessen. Publizistik, 52, 11-32. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s11616-007-0003-4
  27. Funkhouser, G. R. (1973). The issues of the sixties. An exploratory study in the dynamics of public opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37, 62-76. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/268060
  28. Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95, 1-37. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/229213
  29. Gerbner, G., & Gross, L. (1976). Living with television: The violence profile. Journal of Communication, 26, 173-199. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1976.tb01397.x
  30. Gonzenbach, W. J. (1992). A time series analysis of the drug issue, 1985-1990. The press, the president, and public opinion. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 4, 126-147. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/4.2.126
  31. Gormley, W. T. (1975). Newspaper agendas and political elites. Journalism Quarterly, 52, 304-308. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769907505200216
  32. Gross, K., & Aday, S. (2003). The scary world in your living room and neighborhood. Using local broadcast news, neighborhood crime rates, and personal experience to test agenda setting and cultivation. Journal of Communication, 53, 411-426. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2003.tb02599.x
  33. Haider-Markel, D. P., & Joslyn, M. R. (2001). Gun policy, opinon, tragedy, and blame attribution: The conditional influence of issue frames. Journal of Politics, 63, 520-543. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/0022-3816.00077
  34. Hansen, C. H., & Krygowski, W. (1994). Arousal-Augmented priming effects. Rock music videos and sex object schemas. Communication Research, 21, 24-47. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/009365094021001003
  35. Hayes, D. (2008). Does the messenger matter? Candidate-media agenda convergence and its effects on voter issue salience. Political Research Quarterly, 61, 134-146. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/1065912907306472
  36. Higgins, E. S., Rhodes, W. S., & Jones, C. R. (1977). Category accessibility and impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 141-154. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(77)80007-3
  37. Hill, D. B. (1985). Viewer charactersitics and agenda-setting by television news. Public Opinion Quarterly, 49, 340-350. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/268932
  38. Holbert, R. L., Pillion, O., Tschida, D. A., Arnfield, G. G., Kinder, K., Cherry, K., & Daulton, A. (2003). The West Wing as endorsement of the U.S. presidency. Expanding the bounds of priming in political communication. Journal of Communication, 53, 427-443. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2003.tb02600.x
  39. Hügel, R., Degenhardt, W., & Weiss, H. J. (1989). Structural equation models for the analysis of the agenda-setting process. European Journal of Communication, 4, 191-210. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0267323189004002005
  40. Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone resposible? How television frames political issues. Chicago: University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226388533.001.0001
  41. Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (1987). News that matters. Television and American opinion. Chicago: University Press. Open Google Scholar
  42. Iyengar, S., & Simon, A. (1993). News coverage of the gulf crises and public opinion. Communicatiuon Research, 20, 365-383. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/009365093020003002
  43. Kepplinger, H. M., Gotto, K., Brosius, H.-B., & Haak, D. (1989). Der Einfluss des Fernsehens auf die politische Meinungsbildung. Freiburg: Alber. Open Google Scholar
  44. Kepplinger, H. M., Donsbach, W., Brosius, H.-B., & Staab, J. F. (1986). Medientenor und Bevölkerungsmeinung. Eine empirische Studie zum Image Helmut Kohls. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 38, 247-279. Open Google Scholar
  45. Kepplinger, H. M., & Maurer, M. (2005). Abschied vom rationalen Wähler. Warum Wahlen im Fernsehen entschieden werden. Freiburg/München: Alber. Open Google Scholar
  46. Kim, S.-H., Scheufele, D., & Shanahan, J. (2002). Think about it this way: Attribute agenda-setting function of the press and the public’s evaluation of a local issue. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 79, 7-25. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769900207900102
  47. Klapper, J. T. (1960). The effects of mass communication. Glencoe: Free Press. Open Google Scholar
  48. Kosicki, G. M. (1993). Problems and opportunities in agenda-setting research. Journal of Communication, 43, 100-127. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01265.x
  49. Krause, B., & Gehrau, V. (2007). Das Paradox der Medienwirkung auf Nichtnutzer. Eine Zeitreihenanalyse auf Tagesbasis zu den kurzfristigen Agenda-Setting-Effekten von Fernsehnachrichten. Publizistik, 52, 191-209. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s11616-007-0083-1
  50. Krosnick, J. A., & Brannon, L. A. (1993). The impact of war on the ingredients of presidential evaluations.Multidimensional effects of political involvement. American Political Science Review, 87, 963-975. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2938828
  51. Lang, G. E., & Lang, K. (1981). Watergate. An exploration of the agenda-building process. In G. C. Wilhoit & H. De Bock (Hrsg.), Mass Communication Review Yearbook (447-468). Beverly Hills: Sage. Open Google Scholar
  52. Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1944). The people’s choice. How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. New York: Duell, Sloane & Pearce. Open Google Scholar
  53. Lim, J. (2006). A cross-lagged analysis of agenda setting among online news media. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83, 298-312. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769900608300205
  54. Lippman, W. (1922). Public Opinion. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Company. Open Google Scholar
  55. MacKuen, M. (1984). Exposure to information, belief integration and individual responsiveness to agenda change. American Political Science Review, 78, 372-391. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/1963370
  56. Maier, M. (2010): Nachrichtenwert-Theorie. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar
  57. Mathes, R., & Czaplicki, A. (1993). Meinungsführer im Mediensystem: „Topdown“- und „Bottom-up“-Prozesse. Publizistik, 38, 153-166. Open Google Scholar
  58. Mathes, R., & Pfetsch, B. (1991). The role of the alternative press in the agenda-building process: Spill-over effects and media opinion leadership. European Journal of Communication, 6, 33-62. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0267323191006001003
  59. Matthes, J. (2007). Framing-Effekte. Zum Einfluss der Politikberichterstattung auf die Einstellungen der Rezipienten. München: Reinhard Fischer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845214344
  60. Matthes, J. (2008). Need for orientation as a predictor of agenda-setting effects: Causal evidence from a two-wave panel study. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 20, 440-453. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edn042
  61. Matthes, J., & Kohring, M. (2008). The content analysis of media frames. Toward improving reliability and validity. Journal of Communication, 58, 258-278. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00384.x
  62. Maurer, M. (2004). Das Paradox der Medienwirkungsforschung. Verändern Massenmedien die Bevölkerungsmeinung, ohne Einzelne zu beeinflussen? Publizistik, 49, 405-422. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s11616-004-0108-y
  63. Maurer, M., & Reinemann, C. (2003). Schröder gegen Stoiber. Nutzung, Wahrnehmung und Wirkung der TV-Duelle. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-80456-3
  64. Maurer, M., & Reinemann, C. (2007). Personalisierung durch Priming. Die Wirkung des TV-Duells auf die Urteilskriterien der Wähler. In M. Maurer, C. Reinemann, J. Maier & M. Maier (Hrsg.), Schröder gegen Merkel. Wahrnehmung und Wirkung des TV-Duells 2005 im Ost-West-Vergleich (111-128). Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  65. McClure, R. D., & Patterson, T. E. (1976). Print vs. network news. Journal of Communication, 26, 23-28. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1976.tb01375.x
  66. McCombs, M. E. (1993). The evolution of agenda-setting research: Twenty-Five years in the marketplace of ideas. Journal of Communication, 43(2), 58-67. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01262.x
  67. McCombs, M. E. (1994). News influences on our pictures of the world. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Hrsg.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (1-16). Hillsdale: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar
  68. McCombs, M. E. (2004). Setting the agenda. The mass media and public opinion. Cambridge: Polity Press. Open Google Scholar
  69. McCombs, M. E., Danielan, L, & Wanta, W. (1995). Issues in the news and public agenda: The agenda-setting tradition. In T. L. Glasser & J. T. Salmon (Hrsg.), Public opinion and the communicaion of consent (281-300). New York: Guilford Press. Open Google Scholar
  70. McCombs, M. E., Llamas J. P., Lopez-Escobar, E., & Rey, F. (1997). Candidate images in Spanish elections. Second level agenda-setting effects. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 74, 703-717. Open Google Scholar
  71. McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of the mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176-187. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/267990
  72. McLeod, J., Becker, L. B., & Byrnes, J. E. (1974). Another look at the agenda-setting function of the press. Communication Research, 2, 131-167. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/009365027400100201
  73. Mendelsohn, M. (1996). The media and interpersonal communications. The priming of issues, leaders, and party identification. Journal of Politics, 58, 112-125. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2960351
  74. Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1963). Constituency influences in congress. American Political Science Review, 57, 45-56. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/1952717
  75. Min, Y., Ghanem, S. I., & Evatt, D. (2007). Using a split-ballot survey to explore the robustness of the ‚MIP’ question in agenda-setting research: A metholodical study. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 19, 221-236. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edm003
  76. Moy, P., Xenos, M. A., & Hess, V. K. (2006). Priming effects of late-night comedy. Inernational Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18, 198-210. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edh092
  77. Mutz, D. C. (1994). Contextualizing personal experience. The role of mass media. Journal of Politics, 56, 689-714. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2132188
  78. Neuman, R. W. (1990). The threshold of public attention. Public Opinion Quarterly, 54, 159-176. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/269194
  79. Noelle-Neumann, E. (1973). Return to the concept of powerful mass media. Studies of Broadcasting, 9, 67-112. Open Google Scholar
  80. Noelle-Neumann, E., Kepplinger, H. M., & Donsbach, W. (1999). Kampa. Meinungsklima und Medienwirkung im Bundestagswahlkampf 1998. Freiburg/München: Alber. Open Google Scholar
  81. Quiring, O. (2004). Wirtschaftsberichterstattung und Wahlen. Konstanz: UVK. Open Google Scholar
  82. Peter, J. (2002). Medien-Priming – Grundlagen, Befunde und Forschungstendenzen. Publizistik, 47, 21-44. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s11616-002-0002-4
  83. Petrocik, J. R. (1996). Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a case study. American Journal of Political Science, 40, 825-850. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2111797
  84. Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion. Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1
  85. Price, V., & Tewksbury, D. (1997). News values and public opinion. A theoretical account of media priming and framing. In G. A. Barnett & F. J. Boster (Hrsg.), Progress in communication sciences.Advances in persuasion 13 (172-212). Greenwich: Ablex. Open Google Scholar
  86. Price, V., Tewksbury, D., & Powers, E. (1997). Switching trains of thought. The impact of news frames on reader’s cognitive responses. Communication Research, 24, 481-506. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/009365097024005002
  87. Pritchard, D., & Berkowitz, D. (1993). The limits of agenda-setting. The press and political responses to crime in the United States, 1950-1980. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 5, 86-91. Open Google Scholar
  88. Reese, S. D. (2007). The framing project: A bridging model for media research revisited. Journal of Communication, 57, 148-154. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00334.x
  89. Reinemann, C. (2003). Medienmacher als Mediennutzer. Kommunikations- und Einflussstrukturen im politischen Journalismus der Gegenwart. Köln: Böhlau. Open Google Scholar
  90. Roberts, M. M., Wanta, W., & Dzwo, T.-H. (2002). Agenda setting and issue salience online. Communication Research, 29, 452-465. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0093650202029004004
  91. Rössler, P. (1997). Agenda-Setting. Theoretischer Gehalt und empirische Evidenzen einer Medienwirkungshypothese. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-09228-5
  92. Rössler, P. (2006). Zur Logik der Agenda-Setting-Forschung. In W. Wirth, A. Fahr & E. Lauf (Hrsg.), Forschungslogik und –design in der Kommunikationswissenschaft. Band 2 (139-167). Köln: Halem. Open Google Scholar
  93. Rogers, E. M., & Dearing, J. W. (1988). Agenda-Setting research: Where has it been, where is it going? In J. A. Anderson (Hrsg.): Comunication Yearbook (555-594). Beverly Hills: Sage. Open Google Scholar
  94. Rogers, E. M., Dearing, J. W., & Bregman, D. (1993). The anatomy of agenda-setting research. Journal of Communication, 43(2), 68-84. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01263.x
  95. Schenk, M., & Rössler, P. (1994). Das unterschätzte Publikum. Wie Themenbewuβtsein und politische Meinungsbildung im Alltag von Massenmedien und interpersonaler Kommunikation beeinfluβt werden. In F. Neidhardt (Hrsg.), Öffentlichkeit, öffentliche Meinung, soziale Bewegungen (261-295). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  96. Scheufele, B. (2003). Frames – Framing – Framing-Effekte. Theoretische und methodische Grundlegung des Framing-Ansatzes sowie empirische Befunde zur Nachrichtenproduktion. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-86656-1
  97. Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49, 103-122. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x
  98. Scheufele, D. A. (2000). Agenda-Setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Communication and Society, 3, 297-316. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0323_07
  99. Schoen, H. (2004). Der Kanzler, zwei Sommerthemen und ein Foto-Finish. Priming-Effekte bei der Bundestagswahl 2002. In F. Brettschneider, J. van Deth & E. Roller (Hrsg.), Die Bundestagswahl 2002. Analysen der Wahlergebnisse und des Wahlkampfes (23-50). Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  100. Schönbach, K., de Waal, E., & Lauf, E. (2005). Online and print newspapers. Their impact on the extent of the perceived public agenda. European Journal of Communication, 20, 245-258. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0267323105052300
  101. Semetko, H. A., & Valkenburg, P. (2000). Framing European politics. A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 93-109. Open Google Scholar
  102. Shaw, D. L., & McCombs, M. E. (1977). The emerge of American political issues. The agenda-setting function of the press. St. Paul: West. Open Google Scholar
  103. Shen, F. (2004). Effects of news frames and schemas on individual’s issue interpretations and attitudes. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81, 400-416. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769900408100211
  104. Stone, G., & McCombs. M. E. (1981). Tracing the time lag in agenda-setting. Journalism Quarterly, 58, 51-55. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769908105800108
  105. Sweetser, K. D., Golan, G. J., & Wanta, W. (2008). Intermedia agenda-setting in television, advertising, and blogs during the 2004 election. Mass Communication and Society, 11, 197-216. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/15205430701590267
  106. Tan, Y., & Weaver, D. H. (2007). Agenda-Setting effects among the media, the public, and congress, 1946-2004. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 84, 729-744. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769900708400405
  107. Tichenor, P. J., Donohue, G. A., & Olien, C. N. (1970). Mass media flow and differential growth in knowledge. Public Opinion Quarterly, 34, 159-170. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/267786
  108. Tiele, A., & Scherer, H. (2004). Die Agenda – ein Konstrukt des Rezipienten? Die Bedeutung kognitiver Informationsverarbeitung im Agenda-Setting-Prozess. Publizistik, 49, 439-453. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s11616-004-0110-4
  109. Trenaman, J., & McQuail, D. (1961). Television and the political image. London: Methuen. Open Google Scholar
  110. Trumbo, C. (1995). Longitudinal modelling of public issues. An application of the agenda-setting process to the issue of global warming. Journalism & Mass Communication Monographs, 152, 1-57. Open Google Scholar
  111. Walgrave, S., & van Aelst, P. (2006). The contingency of the mass media’s political agenda setting power. Toward a preliminary theory. Journal of Communication, 56, 88-109. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00005.x
  112. Wanta, W. (1988). The effects of dominant photographs: An agenda-setting experiment. Journalism Quarterly, 65, 107-111. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769908806500114
  113. Wanta, W. (1992). The influence of the president on the news media and public agendas. Mass Communication Review, 19, 14-21. Open Google Scholar
  114. Wanta, W., & Ghanem, S. (2007). Effects of agenda-setting. In R. W. Preiss, B. M.Gayle, N. Burrell, M. Allen & J. Bryant (Hrsg.), Mass media effects research. Advances through meta-analysis (37-52). New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  115. Wanta, W., Golan, G., & Lee, C. (2004). Agenda-Setting and international news. Media infuence on the public perceptions of foreign news. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81, 364-377. Open Google Scholar
  116. Wanta, W., & Hu, Y.-W. (1994). The effects of credibility, reliance, and exposure on media agenda-setting. A path analysis model. Journalism Quarterly, 71, 90-98. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769909407100109
  117. Wanta, W., & Kalyango, Y. (2007). Terrorism and Africa: A study of agenda building in the United States. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 19, 434-450. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edm028
  118. Wanta, W., Stephenson, M. A., Turk, J. V., & McCombs M. E. (1989). How president’s state of the union talk influenced news media agendas. Journalism Quarterly, 66, 537-541. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769908906600301
  119. Wanta, W., & Wu, Y.-C. (1992). Interpersonal communication and the agenda-setting process. Journalism Quarterly, 69, 847-855. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769909206900405
  120. Weaver, D. H. (2007). Thoughts on agenda-setting, framing, and priming. Journal of Communication, 57, 142-147. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00333.x
  121. Weimann, G., & Brosius, H.-B. (1995). Is there a two-step flow of agenda-setting? International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 6, 323-341. Open Google Scholar
  122. Weingart, P., Engels, S., & Pansegrau, P. (2000). Risks of Communication: Discourses on climate change in science, politics, and the mass media. Public Understanding of Science, 9, 261-283. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/3/304
  123. Winter, J. P., & Eyal, C. H. (1983). Agenda-setting for the civil rights issue. Public Opinion Quarterly, 45, 376-383. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/268671
  124. Yagade, A., & Dozier, D. M. (1990). The media agenda-setting effect of concrete versus abstract issues. Journalism Quarterly, 67, 3-10. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769909006700102
  125. Zhu, J. H. (1992). Issue competition and attention distraction. A zero-sum theory of agenda-setting. Journalism Quarterly, 69, 825-836. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769909206900403
  126. Zucker, H. G. (1978). The variable nature of media influence. In B. D. Ruben (Hrsg.), Communication Yearbook 2 (225-245). New Brunswick: Transaction. Open Google Scholar

Similar publications

from the topics "Theories and Methods of Communication Science"
Cover of book: Spotlights on Media Borders / Perspektiven auf Mediengrenzen
Edited Book Full access
Spotlights on Media Borders / Perspektiven auf Mediengrenzen
Cover of book: Social Media
Edited Book No access
Stefan Stumpp, Daniel Michelis, Thomas Schildhauer
Social Media
Cover of book: „Wir wollen Sonne statt Reagan!"
Book Titles No access
Manuel Kögelmaier
„Wir wollen Sonne statt Reagan!"
Cover of book: Transkulturelle Medien und Kommunikation
Educational Book No access
Nadja-Christina Schneider
Transkulturelle Medien und Kommunikation
Cover of book: Medienrezeption
Edited Book No access
Volker Gehrau, Helena Bilandzic, Holger Schramm, Carsten Wünsch
Medienrezeption

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Welcome to Inlibra – Your Platform for Digital Professional Information

Nomos, C.H.Beck, VDI and over 100 other publishers combine their content here to create one of the largest platforms for digital professional information.

Research efficiently, cite long-term, use reliably – all united in one place.

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via Open Athens
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex