Cover of book: Fallbeispieleffekte
Buy in shop
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Educational Book No access

Fallbeispieleffekte

Authors:
Publisher:
 15.04.2021

Keywords

Bibliographic data

Publication year
2021
Publication date
15.04.2021
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-4869-3
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-8987-8
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Konzepte. Ansätze der Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaft
Volume
13
Language
German
Pages
145
Product type
Educational Book

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access 1 - 12
    1. Die Hypothese des Fallbeispieleffekts: Kern und Varianten No access
    2. Einordnung in die Wirkungsforschung und Bezug zu anderen Ansätzen No access
    3. Fallbeispiele als journalistisches Darstellungsmittel No access
    4. Normative Implikationen von Fallbeispielen: Repräsentativität, Rationalität und Medienkompetenz No access
    1. Von der Wirkung von Fallbeispielen zu Fallbeispieleffekten als Medienwirkung No access
    2. Themen- und medienübergreifende Prüfung von Fallbeispieleffekten No access
    3. Ausdifferenzierung der Forschung und die Rolle der summarischen Realitätsbeschreibungen No access
    1. Fallbeispielforschung nach der Logik experimenteller Medienwirkungsforschung No access
    2. Typische Stimuli No access
    3. Varianten abhängiger Variablen No access
    4. Die Auswertung experimenteller Daten No access
    1. Belege für Fallbeispieleffekte No access
    2. Die Rolle summarischer Realitätsbeschreibungen No access
      1. Heuristisches Schlussfolgern No access
      2. Base Rate Fallacy No access
      3. Lebhaftigkeit und Aufmerksamkeit No access
      4. Personenmerkmale No access
      5. Wirkungen der Verteilung von Fallbeispielen No access
      6. Schemabasierte Verarbeitung No access
      7. Persuasion durch Fallbeispiele No access
      8. Ein integratives Modell der persuasiven Wirkung von Fallbeispielen No access
  6. Fazit und Ausblick No access 122 - 127
  7. „Top Ten“ der Forschungsliteratur No access 128 - 130
  8. Literatur No access 131 - 143
  9. Bisher in der Reihe erschienene Bände No access 144 - 145

Bibliography (161)

  1. Abraham, Linus & Appiah, Osei (2006). Framing news stories: The role of visual imagery in priming racial stereotypes. Howard Journal of Communication, 17, 183–203. Open Google Scholar
  2. Ajzen, Icek (1977). Intuitive theories of events and the effects of base-rate information on prediction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 303–314. Open Google Scholar
  3. Allen, Mike et al. (2000). Testing the persuasiveness of evidence: Combining narrative and statistical forms. Communication Research Reports, 17, 331–336. Open Google Scholar
  4. Allen, Mike & Preiss, Raymond W. (1997). Comparing the persuasiveness of narrative and statistical evidence using meta-analysis. Communication Research Reports, 14, 125–131. Open Google Scholar
  5. Allen, Mike, Preiss, Raymond W. & Gayle, Barbara Mae (2006). Meta-analytic examination of the base-rate fallacy. Communication Research Reports, 23, 45–51. Open Google Scholar
  6. Anderson, John R. (2007). Kognitive Psychologie (6. Aufl.). Heidelberg: Spektrum. Open Google Scholar
  7. Anderson, Kim, Skovsgaard, Morten, Albaek, Eric & de Vreese, Claes (2017). The engaging effect of exemplars: How an emotional reaction to (dis)similar people in the news media affects political participation. International Journal of Press/Politics, 22, 490-509. Open Google Scholar
  8. Appel, Markus (2011). A story about a stupid person can make you act stupid (or smart): Behavioral assimilation (and contrast) as narrative impact. Media Psychology, 14, 144–167. Open Google Scholar
  9. Arpan, Laura M. (2006). Examining additional causes and consequences of the hostile media effect. Vortrag auf der Jahrestagung der International Communication Association, Dresden. Open Google Scholar
  10. Arpan, Laura M. (2009). The effects of exemplification on perception of news credibility. Mass Communication and Society, 12, 249–270. Open Google Scholar
  11. Aust, Charles F. & Zillmann, Dolf (1996). Effects of victim exemplification in television news on viewer perception of social issues. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 73, 787–803. Open Google Scholar
  12. Baesler, E. James & Burgoon, Judee K. (1994). The temporal effects of story and statistical evidence on belief change. Communication Research, 21, 582–602. Open Google Scholar
  13. Bandura, Albert (1976). Lernen am Modell. Stuttgart: Klett. Open Google Scholar
  14. Bar-Hillel, Maya (1980). The base-rate fallacy in probability judgments. Acta Psychologica, 44, 211–233. Open Google Scholar
  15. Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering. A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  16. Bas, Ozen & Grabe, Maria Elizabeth (2015). Emotion-provoking personalization of news: Informing citizens and closing the knowledge gap? Communication Research, 42, 159-185 Open Google Scholar
  17. Beckers, Kathleen (2017a). Vox pops in the news: The journalists’ perspective. Communications, 43, 101-111. Open Google Scholar
  18. Beckers, Kathleen (2017b). How ordinary is the ordinary (wo)man on the street? An analysis of vox pop characteristics in television news. Journalism Practice, 11, 1026-1041. Open Google Scholar
  19. Beckers, Kathleen (2019). What vox pops say and how that matters: Effects of vox pops in television news on perceived public opinion and personal opinion. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96, 980-1003. Open Google Scholar
  20. Beckers, Kathleen, Walgrave, Stefaan & van den Bulck, Hilde (2018). Opinion balance in vox pop television news. Journalism Studies, 9, 284-296. Open Google Scholar
  21. Beier, Anne, Fiechtner, Stephanie & Trebbe, Joachim (2020). Ordinary citizens in Swiss public television news: Representing a national public sphere? Journalism Studies, 21, 1055-1075. Open Google Scholar
  22. Berger, Charles R. (2001). Making it worse than it is: Quantitative depictions of threatening trends in the news. Journal of Communication, 51, 655–677. Open Google Scholar
  23. Bigsby, Elisabeth, Bigman, Cabral A., & Martinez Gonzalez, Andrea (2019). Exemplification theory: A review and meta-analysis of exemplar messages. Annals of the International Communication Association, 43, 273-296. Open Google Scholar
  24. Bilandzic, Helena, Hastall, Matthias, Kinnebrock, Susanne & Busselle, Rick (2010). Personalization in news: How format and narrative engagement influence news selection, learning, and attitude change. Vortrag auf der Jahrestagung der International Communication Association, Singapur. Open Google Scholar
  25. Birk, Elisabeth (2007). The use of examples. Online verfügbar unter: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/3175/ Open Google Scholar
  26. Blake, Christopher & Daschmann, Gregor (2007). Experts and base-rates, laymen and single case Information: Can statistical knowledge prevent exemplification effects? Vortrag auf der Jahrestagung der International Communication Association, San Francisco. Open Google Scholar
  27. Bless, Herbert et al. (2001). Personalized versus generalized benefits of stereotype disconfirmation: Trade-offs in the evaluation of atypical exemplars and their social groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 386–397. Open Google Scholar
  28. Blöbaum, Bernd, Bonk, Sophie, Karthaus, Anne, & Kutscha, Annika (2010). Das Publikum im Blick. Die veränderte Publikumsorientierung des Journalismus seit 1990. Journalistik Journal, o. Jg. (1), 33–35. Open Google Scholar
  29. Blumer, Herbert (1948). Public opinion and public opinion polling. American Sociological Review, 13, 542–549. Open Google Scholar
  30. Bodenhausen, Galen V., Schwarz, Norbert, Bless, Herbert & Wänke, Michaela (1995). Effects of atypical exemplars on racial beliefs: Enlightened racism or generalized appraisals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 48–63. Open Google Scholar
  31. Bosch, Brandon (2014). Beyond vox pop: The role of news sourcing and political beliefs in exemplification effects. Mass Communication and Society, 17, 217–235. Open Google Scholar
  32. Boster, Franklin J. et al. (2000). The persuasive effects of statistical evidence in the presence of exemplars. Communication Studies, 51, 296–306. Open Google Scholar
  33. Bourdieu, Pierre (1973). L’opinion publique n’existe pas. Les temps modernes, 29, 1292–1309. Open Google Scholar
  34. Brosius, Hans-Bernd (1995). Alltagsrationalität in der Nachrichtenrezeption. Ein Modell zur Wahrnehmung und Verarbeitung von Nachrichteninhalten. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  35. Brosius, Hans-Bernd (1996). Der Einfluß von Fallbeispielen auf Urteile der Rezipienten. Die Rolle der Ähnlichkeit zwischen Fallbeispiel und Rezipient. Rundfunk und Fernsehen, 44, 51–69. Open Google Scholar
  36. Brosius, Hans-Bernd & Bathelt, Anke (1994). The utility of exemplars in persuasive communications. Communication Research, 21, 48–78. Open Google Scholar
  37. Brosius, Hans-Bernd, Schweiger, Wolfgang, Rossmann, Constanze (2000). Auf der Suche nach den Ursachen des Fallbeispieleffekts: Der Einfluss von Anzahl und Art der Urheber von Fallbeispielinformation. Medienpsychologie, 12, 153–175. Open Google Scholar
  38. Brosius, Hans-Bernd; Mundorf, Norbert (1990). Eins und eins ist ungleich zwei: Differentielle Aufmerksamkeit, Lebhaftigkeit von Information und Medienwirkung. Publizistik, 35, 398–407. Open Google Scholar
  39. Bryant, Jennings, Roskos-Ewoldsen, David & Cantor, Joanne (2003). A brief biography and intellectual history of Dolf Zillmann. In Bryant, Jennings, Roskos-Ewoldsen, David & Cantor, Joanne (Hrsg.), Communication and emotion: Essays in honor of Dolf Zillmann (S. 7–26). Mahwah: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar
  40. Busselle, Rick W. & Shrum, L. J. (2003). Media exposure and exemplar accessibility. Media Psychology, 5, 255–282. Open Google Scholar
  41. Cacioppo, John T. & Petty, Richard E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116–131. Open Google Scholar
  42. Chaiken, Shelly (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 39, 752–766. Open Google Scholar
  43. Collins, Rebecca L. et al. (1988). The vividness effect: elusive or illusory? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 1–18. Open Google Scholar
  44. Craig, David A. (2003). The promise and peril of anecdotes in news coverage: An ethical analysis. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 80, 804–805. Open Google Scholar
  45. Daschmann, Gregor (2001). Der Einfluß von Fallbeispielen auf Leserurteile. Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Medienwirkung. Konstanz: UVK. Open Google Scholar
  46. Daschmann, Gregor (2004). Labordaten vs. Felddaten – theoretische Überlegungen und ein empirisches Beispiel zu den Implikationen der Verwendung studentischer Versuchsgruppen in Laborexperimenten. In Wirth, Werner, Lauf, Edmund & Fahr, Andreas (Hrsg.), Forschungslogik und -design in der Kommunikationswissenschaft (S. 88–114). Köln: Halem. Open Google Scholar
  47. Daschmann, Gregor & Brosius, Hand-Bernd (1999). Can a single incident create an issue? Exemplars in German television magazine shows. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 76, 35–51. Open Google Scholar
  48. Daschmann, Gregor & Brosius, Hans-Bernd (1997). Ist das Stilmittel die Botschaft? Fallbeispiele in deutschen Fernsehmagazinen. Rundfunk und Fernsehen, 45, 486–504. Open Google Scholar
  49. De Swert, Knut & Kuypers, Ine (2020). Ordinary people regularly reported? Looking for patterns in the presence of ordinary citizens in television news in 20 European countries. Journalism Studies, 21, 1037-1054. Open Google Scholar
  50. Dohle, Marco (2013). Third-Person-Effekt. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar
  51. Druckmann, James N. & Kam, Cindy D. (2011). Students as experimental participants: A defense of the “narrow data base”. In Druckmann, James N., Green, Donald P., Kuklinski, James H. & Lupia, Arthur (Hrsg.), Cambridge handbook of experimental political science (S. 41–57). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  52. Edwards, Ward (1986). Conservatism in human information processing. In Kleinmuntz, Benjamin (Hrsg.), Formal representation of human judgment (S. 17–52). New York: Wiley. Open Google Scholar
  53. Einhorn, Hillel J. & Hogarth, Robin M. (1985). Ambiguity and uncertainty in probabilistic inference. Psychological Review, 92, 433–461. Open Google Scholar
  54. Einhorn, Hillel J. & Hogarth, Robin M. (1986). Decision making under ambiguity. Journal of Business, 59, S225–S250. Open Google Scholar
  55. Fagerlin, Angela, Wang, Catharine & Ubel, Peter A. (2005). Reducing the influence of anecdotal reasoning on people’s health care decisions: Is a picture worth a thousand statistics? Medical Decision Making, 25, 398–405. Open Google Scholar
  56. Fast, Victoria, Müller, Philipp & Scherr, Sebastian (2014). Der kombinierte Einsatz von Daten und Fallbeispielen in den Medien: Wirkung und Glaubwürdigkeit. In Loosen, Wiebke & Dohle, Marco (Hrsg.), Journalismus und (sein) Publikum. Schnittstellen zwischen Journalismusforschung und Rezeptions- und Wirkungsforschung (S. 317-334). Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar
  57. Fiske, Susan T. & Taylor, Shelley E. (2013). Social cognition. From brains to culture. London: Sage. Open Google Scholar
  58. Gan, Su-lin et al. (1996). The Hebron massacre. Selective reports of Jewish reactions, and perceptions of volatility in Israel. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 40, 122–131. Open Google Scholar
  59. Gerbner, George & Gross, Larry (1976). Living with television: The violence profile. Journal of Communication, 26, 173–199. Open Google Scholar
  60. Gibson, Rhonda & Zillmann, Dolf (1993). The impact of quotation in news report on issue perception. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 70, 793–800. Open Google Scholar
  61. Gibson, Rhonda & Zillmann, Dolf (1994). Exaggerated versus representative exemplification in news reports: Perception of issues and personal consequences. Communication Research, 21, 603–624. Open Google Scholar
  62. Gibson, Rhonda & Zillmann, Dolf (1998). Effects of citation in exemplifying testimony on issue perception. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 75, 167–176. Open Google Scholar
  63. Gibson, Rhonda & Zillmann, Dolf (2000). Reading between the photographs: The influence of incidential pictorial information on issue perception. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 355–366. Open Google Scholar
  64. Gibson, Rhonda et al. (2011). Quantitative literacy and affective reactivity in processing statistical information and case histories in the news. Media Psychology, 14, 96–120. Open Google Scholar
  65. Gilovich, Thomas, Griffin, Dale W. & Kahnemann, Daniel (Hrsg.) (2002), Heuristics and biases. The psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  66. Ginosar, Zvi & Trope, Yaacov (1980). The effects of base rates and individuating informationon judgments about another person. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 228–242. Open Google Scholar
  67. Griffin, Dale W. et al. (2012). Judgmental heuristics: A historical overview. In Holyoak, Keith J., Morrison, Robert G. & Ammirante, Paolo (Hrsg.), Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (S. 322–345). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  68. Gunther, Albert C. (1998). The persuasive press inference: Effects of mass media on perceived public opinion. Communication Research, 25, 486–504. Open Google Scholar
  69. Hamill, Ruth, Wilson, Timothy DeCamp, Nisbett, Richard E. (1980). Insensity to sample bias: Generalizing from atypical cases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 578–589. Open Google Scholar
  70. Hastall, Matthias R. & Knobloch-Westerwick, Silvia (2007). Heart versus head in health news selections: Effects of exemplification and thinking styles on selective exposure to health information. Vortrag auf der Jahrestagung der International Communication Association, San Francisco. Open Google Scholar
  71. Hastall, Matthias R. & Knobloch-Westerwick, Silvia (2011). Severity, efficacy and exemplification in health communication. Vortrag auf der Jahrestagung der International Communication Association, Boston. Open Google Scholar
  72. Hastall, Matthias R. & Knobloch-Westerwick, Silvia (2013). Severity, efficacy, and evidence type as determinants of health message exposure. Health Communication, 28, 378–388. Open Google Scholar
  73. Hastie, Reid & Park, Bernadette (1986). The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line. Psychological Review, 93, 258–268. Open Google Scholar
  74. Hornikx, Jos (2005). A review of the experimental research on the relative persuasiveness of anecdotal, statistic, causal, and expert evidence. Studies in Communication Sciences, 5, 205–216. Open Google Scholar
  75. Hornikx, Jos (2007). Is anecdotal evidence more persuasive than statistical evidence? A comment on classic cognitive psychological studies. Studies in Communication Sciences, 7, 151–164. Open Google Scholar
  76. Iyengar, Shanto (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  77. Iyengar, Shanto & Kinder, Donald R. (1987). News that matters. Television and American opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  78. Jansen, Carel, Croonen, Marjolein & de Stadler, Leon G. (2005). ‘Take John, for instance’: Effects of exemplars in public information documents on HIV/AIDS in South Africa. Information Design Journal & Document Design, 13, 194–210. Open Google Scholar
  79. Kahneman, Daniel (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. Open Google Scholar
  80. Kahneman, Daniel & Frederick, Shane (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgments. In Gilovich, Thomas, Griffin, Dale & Kahneman, Daniel (Hrsg.), Heuristics and biases. The psychology of intuitive judgments (S. 49–81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  81. Kahneman, Daniel & Tversky, Amos (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80, 237–251. Open Google Scholar
  82. Kahneman, Daniel & Tversky, Amos (1996). On the reality of cognitive illusions. Psychological Review, 103, 582–591. Open Google Scholar
  83. Kazoleas, Dean C. (1993). A comparison of the persuasive effectiveness of qualitative versus quantitative evidence: A test of explanatory hypotheses. Communication Quarterly, 41, 40–50. Open Google Scholar
  84. Kim, Hyun Suk et al. (2012). Narrative health communication and behavior change: The influence of exemplars in the news on intention to quit smoking. Journal of Communication, 62, 473–492. Open Google Scholar
  85. Kleemans, Mariska, Schaap, Gabi & Hermans, Liebseth (2017). Citizen sources in the news: Above and beyond the vox pop? Journalism, 18, 464-481. Open Google Scholar
  86. Klimmt, Christoph, Pompetzki, Verena & Blake, Christopher (2008). Geschlechterrepräsentation in Nachrichtentexten. Medien und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 56, 3–20. Open Google Scholar
  87. Knobloch, Silvia & Hastall, Matthias R. (2005). Effects of informational utility and exemplification on selective exposure to health news. Vortrag auf der Jahrestagung der International Communication Association, New York. Open Google Scholar
  88. Koch, Thomas, Peter, Christina, & Müller, Philipp (2019). Das Experiment in der Kommunikations-und Medienwissenschaft. Wiesbaden: Springer. Open Google Scholar
  89. Koehler, Jonathan J. (1996). The base rate fallacy reconsidered: Descriptive, normative, and methodological challenges. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, 1–17. Open Google Scholar
  90. Krämer, Benjamin & Peter, Christina (2020). Exemplification effects: A meta-analysis. Human Communication Research, 46, 192-221. Open Google Scholar
  91. Krupat, Edward et al. (1997). Generalizing from atypical cases: How general a tendency? Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 19, 345–361. Open Google Scholar
  92. Lee, Eun-Ju (2010). Effects of readers’ comments on Internet news sites on construction of social reality: The moderating role of need for orientation. Vortrag auf der Jahrestagung der International Communication Association, Singapur. Open Google Scholar
  93. Lee, Eun-Ju & Jang, Yoon Jae (2010). What do others’ reactions to news on Internet portal sites tell us? Effects of presentation format and readers’ need for cognition on reality perception. Communication Research, 37, 825–846. Open Google Scholar
  94. Lefevere, Jonas, De Swert, Knut & Walgrave, Stefaan (2012). Effects of popular exemplars in television news. Communication Research, 39, 103–109. Open Google Scholar
  95. Lefevere, Jonas, Walgrave, Stefaan & De Swert, Knut (2011). The effect of popular exemplars and expert account base-rate information on perceived public opinion. Vortrag auf der Jahrestagung der American Political Science Association, Seattle. Open Google Scholar
  96. Limon, M. Sean & Kazoleas, Dean C. (2004). A comparison of exemplar and statistical evidence in reducing counter-arguments and responses to a message. Communication Research Reports, 21, 291–298. Open Google Scholar
  97. Manz, Wolfgang (1970). Experiments on probabilistic information processing. Acta Psychologica, 34, 184–200. Open Google Scholar
  98. Martijn, Carolien et al. (2007). Overcoming ego depletion: The influence of exemplar priming on self-control performance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 231–238. Open Google Scholar
  99. Mastro, Dana & Tukachinsky, Riva (2011). The influence of exemplar versus prototype-based media primes on racial/ethnic evaluations. Journal of Communication, 61, 916–937. Open Google Scholar
  100. Meltzer, Christine, Naab, Thorsten & Daschmann, Gregor (2012). All student samples differ: On participant selection in communication science. Communication Methods and Measures, 6, 251–262. Open Google Scholar
  101. Möhring, Wiebke & Schlütz, Daniela (2010). Die Befragung in der Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaft. Eine praxisorientierte Einführung. Wiesbaden: VS. Open Google Scholar
  102. Müller, Philipp, Scherr, Sebastian & Fast, Victoria (2013). Der Einfluss wahrgenommener Medienwirkungen auf die Verarbeitung von Fallbeispielen. In Jandura, Olaf, Fahr, Andreas & Brosius, Hans-Bernd (Hrsg.), Theorieanpassungen in der digitalen Medienwelt (S. 141–158). Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar
  103. Morgan, Michael & Shanahan, James (2010). The state of cultivation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 54, 337–355. Open Google Scholar
  104. Mutz, D. C. (1997). Mechanisms of momentum: Does thinking make it so? Journal of Politics, 59, 104–125. Open Google Scholar
  105. Nisbett, Richard E. & Ross, Lee (1980). Human inference. Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall. Open Google Scholar
  106. Noelle-Neumann, Elisabeth (2001). Die Schweigespirale. Öffentliche Meinung – unsere soziale Haut. München: Langen Müller. Open Google Scholar
  107. Osborne, Thomas & Rose, Nikolas (1999). Do the social sciences create phenomena? The example of public opinion research. British Journal of Sociology, 50, 367–396. Open Google Scholar
  108. Ostfeld, Mara & Mutz, Diana (2014). Revisiting the effects of case reports in the news. Political Communication, 31, 53-72 Open Google Scholar
  109. Paivio, Allen (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston. Open Google Scholar
  110. Pantti, Mervi & Husslage, Karin (2009). Ordinary people and emotional expression in Dutch public service news. Javnost – The Public, 16, 77-94. Open Google Scholar
  111. Perry, Stephen D. & Gonzenbach, William J. (1997). Effects of news exemplification extended: Considerations of controversiality and perceived future opinion. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 41, 229–244. Open Google Scholar
  112. Perry, Stephen D. & Gonzenbach, William J. (2000). Inhibiting speech through exemplar distribution: Can we predict a spiral of silence? Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44, 268–281. Open Google Scholar
  113. Peter, Christina (2013). Quo vadis Fallbeispielforschung? In Jandura, Olaf, Fahr, Andreas & Brosius, Hans-Bernd (Hrsg.), Theorieanpassungen in der digitalen Medienwelt (S. 123–140). Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar
  114. Peter, Christina (2019). The people’s voice—The people’s choice? How vox pop exemplars shape audience judgments as a function of populist attitudes. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96, 1004–1024. Open Google Scholar
  115. Peter, Christina & Brosius, Hans-Bernd (2010). Grenzen der Wirksamkeit von Fallbeispielen? Publizistik, 55, 275–288. Open Google Scholar
  116. Peter, Christina, Rossmann, Constanze & Keyling, Till (2014). Exemplification 2.0. Journal of Media Psychology, 26, 19-28. Open Google Scholar
  117. Peter, Christina & Zerback, Thomas (2017). The role of similarity for exemplification effects. Studies in Communication | Media, 6, 71-80. Open Google Scholar
  118. Peter, Christina & Zerback, Thomas (2020). Ordinary citizens in the news: A conceptual framework. Journalism Studies, 21, 1003-1016. Open Google Scholar
  119. Peterson, Robert A. (2001). On the use of college students in social science research: Insights from a second-order meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 450–461. Open Google Scholar
  120. Petty, Richard E., & Cacioppo, John T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer. Open Google Scholar
  121. Ramasubramanian, Srividya (2011). The impact of stereotypical versus counterstereotypical media exemplars on racial attitudes, causal attributions, and support for affirmative action. Communication Research, 38, 497–516. Open Google Scholar
  122. Reinard, John C. (1988). The empirical study of the persuasive effects of evidence. The status after fifty years of research. Human Communication Research, 15, 3–59. Open Google Scholar
  123. Rosenthal, Robert (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638–641. Open Google Scholar
  124. Rossmann, Constanze & Pfister, Tanja (2008). Zum Einfluss von Fallbeispielen und furchterregenden Bildern auf die Wirksamkeit von Gesundheitsflyern zum Thema Adipositas. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 56, 368–391. Open Google Scholar
  125. Schmierbach, Mika, Xu, Qian & Boyle, Michael P. (2012). The role of exemplification in shaping third-person perceptions and support for restrictions on video games. Mass Communication and Society, 15, 672–694. Open Google Scholar
  126. Schramm, Holger (2002). Interview with Dean Emeritus Dolf Zillmann, College of Communication & Information Sciences and Department of Psychology, University of Alabama, on occasion of his recent retirement. Zeitschrift für Medienpsychologie, 14, 90–92. Open Google Scholar
  127. Schwarz, Norbert, & Clore, Gerald L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 513–523. Open Google Scholar
  128. Schwarz, Norbert et al. (1991). Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 195–202. Open Google Scholar
  129. Sears, David O. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology’s view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 515–530. Open Google Scholar
  130. Slater, Michael D. & Rouner, Donna (1996). Value-affirmative and value-protective processing of alcohol education messages that include statistical evidence or anecdotes. Communication Research, 23, 210–235. Open Google Scholar
  131. Springer, Sheila A. & Harwood, Jake (2015). The influence of episodic and thematic frames on policy and group attitudes: Mediational analysis. Human Communication Research, 41, 226–244 Open Google Scholar
  132. Taylor, Shelley E. & Thompson, Suzanne C. (1982). Stalking the “elusive” vividness effect. Psychological Review, 89, 155–181. Open Google Scholar
  133. Taylor, Shelley E. & Wood, Joanne V. (1983). The vividness effect: Making a mountain out of a molehill? Advances in Consumer Research, 10, 540–542. Open Google Scholar
  134. Textor, Mark (2008). Samples as symbols. Ratio, 21, 344–359. Open Google Scholar
  135. Thorbjørnsrud, Kjersti & Ytreberg, Espen (2020). A human interest economy: The strategic value of turning ordinary people into exemplars in the news media. Journalism Studies, 21, 1093-1108. Open Google Scholar
  136. Tran, Hai (2013). Exemplification effects of multimedia enhancements. Media Psychology, 15, 396–419. Open Google Scholar
  137. Tukachinsky, Riva, Mastro, Dana & King, Aimee (2011). Is a picture worth a thousand words? The effect of race-related visual and verbal exemplars on attitudes and support for social policies. Mass Communication and Society, 14, 720–742. Open Google Scholar
  138. Tversky, Amos & Kahneman, Daniel (1971). Belief in the law of small numbers. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 105–110. Open Google Scholar
  139. Tversky, Amos & Kahneman, Daniel (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207–232. Open Google Scholar
  140. Vallone, Robert, Ross, Lee & Lepper, Mark R. (1985). The hostile media phenomenon: Biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 577–585. Open Google Scholar
  141. Weaver, Dustin A. (2009). Exemplification in newspapers: A content analysis and case studies. Masterarbeit, Ohio University. Open Google Scholar
  142. Welsh, Matthew B. & Navarro, Daniel B. (2012). Seeing is believing: Priors, trust, and base rate neglect. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119, 1–14. Open Google Scholar
  143. Westermann, David, Spence, Partic R. & Lachlan, Kenneth A. (2009). Telepresence and exemplification effects of disaster news. Communication Studies, 60, 542–557. Open Google Scholar
  144. Westermann, David, Spence, Partic R. & Lachlan, Kenneth A. (2012). Telepresence and exemplification: Does spatial presence impact sleeper effects? Communication Research Reports, 29, 299–309. Open Google Scholar
  145. Wheatley, Dawn (2020) Victims and voices: Journalistic sourcing practices and the use of private citizens in online healthcare-system news. Journalism Studies, 21, 1017-1036. Open Google Scholar
  146. Winterbottom, Anna et al. (2008). Does narrative information bias individual’s decision making? A systematic review. Social Science & Medicine, 67, 2079–2088. Open Google Scholar
  147. Worrell, Tracy & Tamborini, Ron (2009). The TV made me do it: The impact of exemplars and base-rates on behavioral intentions. Vortrag auf der Jahrestagung der National Communication Association, Chicago. Open Google Scholar
  148. Yu, Nan et al. (2010). Communicating the risks of fetal alcohol spectrum disorder. Health Communication, 25, 692–699. Open Google Scholar
  149. Zerback, Thomas, Koch, Thomas & Krämer, Benjamin (2013). Thinking of others: Effects of implicit and explicit media cues on climate of opinion perceptions. Vortrag auf der Jahrestagung der International Association for Media and Communication Research, Dublin. Open Google Scholar
  150. Zerback, Thomas & Peter, Christina (2018). Exemplar effects on public opinion perception and attitudes: The moderating role of exemplar involvement. Human Communication Research, 44, 176-196. Open Google Scholar
  151. Ziegele, Marc & Weber, Mathias (2013). Example, please! Vortrag auf der Jahrestagung der International Communication Association, London. Open Google Scholar
  152. Zillmann, Dolf (1988). Mood management through communication choices. American Behavioral Scientist, 31, 327–340. Open Google Scholar
  153. Zillmann, Dolf (1994). Mechanisms of emotional involvement with drama. Poetics, 23, 33–51. Open Google Scholar
  154. Zillmann, Dolf (1999). Exemplification theory: Judging the whole by some of its parts. Media Psychology, 1, 69–94. Open Google Scholar
  155. Zillmann, Dolf (2006). Exemplification effects in the promotion of safety and health. Journal of Communication, 56, Issue Supplement s1, 221–237. Open Google Scholar
  156. Zillmann, Dolf & Brosius, Hans-Bernd (2000). Exemplification in communication: The influence of case reports on the perception of issues. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar
  157. Zillmann, Dolf, Callison, Coy & Gibson, Rhonda (2009). Quantitative media literacy: Individual differences in dealing with numbers in the news. Media Psychology, 12, 494–416. Open Google Scholar
  158. Zillmann, Dolf, Gibson, Rhonda & Sargent, Stephanie L. (1999). Effects of photographs in news-magazine reports on issue perception. Media Psychology, 1, 207–228. Open Google Scholar
  159. Zillmann, Dolf et al. (1992). Impression-formation effects of printed news varying in descriptive precision and exemplification. Medienpsychologie, 4, 168–185. Open Google Scholar
  160. Zillmann, Dolf et al. (1996). Effects of exemplifications in news reports on the perception of social issues. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 73, 427–444. Open Google Scholar
  161. Zukier, Henri & Pepitone, Albert (1984). Social roles and strategies in prediction: Some determinants of the use of base-rate information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 349–360. Open Google Scholar

Similar publications

from the topics "Theories and Methods of Communication Science", "Media Science, Communication Research", "Journalism"
Cover of book: Spotlights on Media Borders / Perspektiven auf Mediengrenzen
Edited Book Full access
Spotlights on Media Borders / Perspektiven auf Mediengrenzen
Cover of book: Partizipative Kommunikation im interkulturell-doppeltblickenden Kontext
Edited Book No access
Partizipative Kommunikation im interkulturell-doppeltblickenden Kontext
Cover of book: Haltung zeigen – Demokratie stärken
Edited Book Full access
Wirtschafts- und unternehmensethische Perspektiven
Haltung zeigen – Demokratie stärken
Cover of book: Ist neu auch besser?
Book Titles No access
Eine Rezipient:innenstudie zur Qualität innovativer journalistischer Angebote
Ist neu auch besser?
Cover of book: Diffusionstheorie
Educational Book No access
Diffusionstheorie

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Welcome to Inlibra – Your Platform for Digital Professional Information

Nomos, C.H.Beck, VDI and over 100 other publishers combine their content here to create one of the largest platforms for digital professional information.

Research efficiently, cite long-term, use reliably – all united in one place.

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via Open Athens
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex