Cover of book: Agenda-Setting
Buy in shop
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Educational Book No access

Agenda-Setting

Authors:
Publisher:
 2017

Bibliographic data

Copyright year
2017
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-4022-2
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-8304-3
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Konzepte. Ansätze der Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaft
Volume
1
Language
German
Pages
110
Product type
Educational Book

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access 1 - 8
    1. Ausgangsüberlegungen und Kernbegriffe No access
    2. Explizite und implizite Grundannahmen No access
    3. Theoretische Modelle No access
    4. Agenda-Setting: Theorie, Metapher oder Modell? No access
    1. Die Vorgeschichte No access
    2. Einordnung des Ansatzes in die Geschichte der Medienwirkungsforschung No access
    3. Die Pionierstudien No access
    4. Die sechs Phasen der Agenda-Setting-Forschung No access
    1. Die Abgrenzung von Themen No access
    2. Die Erhebung von Medien- und Publikumsagenda No access
    3. Untersuchungsdesigns: Die Verknüpfung von Medien- und Publikumsagenda No access
    4. Eine Abschlussbemerkung zur Forschungslogik No access
    1. Auftreten und Stärke des Effekts No access
    2. Randbedingungen des Effekts No access
    1. Individuelle Agenda-Setting-Effekte No access
    2. Die Rolle interpersonaler Kommunikation No access
    3. Nonlineare Wirkungsannahmen No access
    4. Agenda-Building: Einflüsse auf die Medienagenda No access
    5. Second-Level Agenda-Setting No access
    6. Third-Level Agenda-Setting No access
    1. Priming No access
    2. Framing No access
  8. Fazit: Die gesellschaftliche Relevanz des Agenda-Setting- Effekts No access 90 - 93
  9. „Top Ten“ der Forschungsliteratur No access 94 - 96
  10. Literatur No access 97 - 108
  11. Bisher in der Reihe erschienene Bände No access 109 - 110

Bibliography (146)

  1. Ader, C. (1995). A longitudinal study of agenda-setting for the issue of environmental pollution. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 72, 300–311. Open Google Scholar
  2. Althaus, S. L., & Tewksbury, D. (2002). Agenda setting and the “new” news. Patterns of issue importance on the paper and online versions of the New York Times. Communication Research, 29, 180–207. Open Google Scholar
  3. Asp, K. (1983). The struggle for the agenda. Party agenda, media agenda, and voter agenda in the 1979 Swedish election campaign. Communication Research, 10, 333–355. Open Google Scholar
  4. Atkinson, M. L., Lovett, J., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2014). Measuring the media agenda. Political Communication, 31, 355–380. Open Google Scholar
  5. Behr, R. L., & Iyengar, S. (1985). Television news, real world cues and changes in the public agenda. Public Opinion Quarterly, 49, 38–57. Open Google Scholar
  6. Brosius, H.-B. (1994). Agenda-Setting nach einem Vierteljahrhundert Forschung. Methodischer und theoretischer Stillstand? Publizistik, 39, 269–288. Open Google Scholar
  7. Brosius, H.-B., & Kepplinger, H. M. (1995). Killer and victim issues. Issue competition in the agenda-setting process of German television. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 7, 211–231. Open Google Scholar
  8. Bulkow, K., Urban, J., & Schweiger, W. (2013). The duality of agenda-setting: The role of information processing. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25, 43–63. Open Google Scholar
  9. Bushman, B. J. (1998). Priming effects of media violence on the accessibility of aggressive contructs in memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 537–545. Open Google Scholar
  10. Capella, J. N., & Jamieson, K. H. (1997). The spiral of cynicism. The press and the public good. Oxford: University Press. Open Google Scholar
  11. Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). A theory of framing and opinion formation in competitive elite environments. Journal of Communication, 57, 99–118. Open Google Scholar
  12. Cohen, B. (1963). The press and foreign policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  13. Coleman, R., & Banning, S. (2006). Network TV news’ affective framing of the presidential candidates: Evidence for a second-level agenda-setting effect through visual framing. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83, 313–328. Open Google Scholar
  14. Coleman, R., & McCombs, M. E. (2007). The young and agenda-less? Exploring age-related differences in agenda setting on the youngest generation, baby boomers, and the civic generation. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 84, 495–508. Open Google Scholar
  15. Conway, M. & Patterson, J. R. (2008). Today’s top story? An agenda-setting and recall experiment involving television and internet news. Southwestern Mass Communication Journal, 24, 31–48. Open Google Scholar
  16. Danielian, L. H., & Reese, S. D. (1989). A closer look at intermedia influences on agenda-setting: The cocaine issue of 1986. In P. J. Shoemaker (Hrsg.), Communication campaigns about drugs: Government, media, and the public (47–66). New Jersey: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar
  17. Dearing, J. W., & Rogers, E. M. (1996). Agenda-Setting. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Open Google Scholar
  18. Donk, A., Metag, J., Kohring, M., & Marcinkowski, F. (2012). Framing emerging technologies. Risk perceptions of nanotechnology in the German press. Science Communication, 34, 5–29. Open Google Scholar
  19. Druckman, J. N., & Holmes, J. W. (2004). Does presidential rhetoric matter? Priming and presidential approval. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 34, 755–778. Open Google Scholar
  20. Edwards, G. C., & Wood, B. D. (1999). Who influences whom? The president, congress, and the media. American Political Science Review, 93, 327–344. Open Google Scholar
  21. Eichhorn, W. (1996). Agenda-Setting-Prozesse. München: Reinhard Fischer. Open Google Scholar
  22. Entman, R. M. (1991). Framing U.S. coverage of international news: Contrasts in narratives of the KAL and Iran Air accidents. Journal of Communication, 41(4), 6–28. Open Google Scholar
  23. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43, 51–58. Open Google Scholar
  24. Entman, R. M., Matthes, J., & Pellicano, L. (2009). Nature, sources, and effects of news framing. In K. Wahl-Jorgensen & T. Hanitzsch (Hrsg.), The handbook of journalism studies (pp. 175–190). New York/London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  25. Erbring, L., Goldenberg, E. N., & Miller, A. H. (1980). Front-Page news and real-world cues. A new look at agenda-setting by the media. American Journal of Political Science, 24, 16–49. Open Google Scholar
  26. Esser, F., Schwabe, C., & Wilke, J. (2005). Metaberichterstattung im Krieg. Wie Tageszeitungen die Rolle der Nachrichtenmedien und der Militär-PR in den Irakkonflikten 1991 und 2003 framen. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 53, 314–332. Open Google Scholar
  27. Flaxman, S., Goel, S, & Rao, J. M. (2016). Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80, 298–320. Open Google Scholar
  28. Fröhlich, R., Scherer, H., & Scheufele, B. (2007). Kriegsberichterstattung in deutschen Qualitätszeitungen. Eine inhaltsanalytische Langzeitstudie zu Framingprozessen. Publizistik, 52, 11–32. Open Google Scholar
  29. Funkhouser, G. R. (1973). The issues of the sixties. An exploratory study in the dynamics of public opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37, 62–76. Open Google Scholar
  30. Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95, 1–37. Open Google Scholar
  31. Geiß, S. (2015). Die Aufmerksamkeitsspanne der Öffentlichkeit. Eine Studie zu Dauer und Intensität von Meinungsbildungsprozessen. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar
  32. Gerbner, G., & Gross, L. (1976). Living with television: The violence profile. Journal of Communication, 26, 173–199. Open Google Scholar
  33. Gonzenbach, W. J. (1992). A time series analysis of the drug issue, 1985–1990. The press, the president, and public opinion. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 4, 126–147. Open Google Scholar
  34. Gormley, W. T. (1975). Newspaper agendas and political elites. Journalism Quarterly, 52, 304–308. Open Google Scholar
  35. Gross, K., & Aday, S. (2003). The scary world in your living room and neighborhood. Using local broadcast news, neighborhood crime rates, and personal experience to test agenda setting and cultivation. Journal of Communication, 53, 411–426. Open Google Scholar
  36. Guo, L. (2012). The application of social network analysis in agenda setting research: A methodological exploration. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56, 616–631. Open Google Scholar
  37. Guo, L. & McCombs, M. (2012). An expanded perspective on agenda-setting effects. Exploring the third level of agenda setting. Revista de Communicacion, 11, 51–68. Open Google Scholar
  38. Guo, L., Vargo, C. J., Pan, Z., Ding, W, & Ishwar, P. (2016). Big social data analytics in journalism and mass communication comparing dictionary-based text analysis and unsupervised topic modelling. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 93, 332–359. Open Google Scholar
  39. Haider-Markel, D. P., & Joslyn, M. R. (2001). Gun policy, opinon, tragedy, and blame attribution: The conditional influence of issue frames. Journal of Politics, 63, 520–543. Open Google Scholar
  40. Hansen, C. H., & Krygowski, W. (1994). Arousal-Augmented priming effects. Rock music videos and sex object schemas. Communication Research, 21, 24–47. Open Google Scholar
  41. Hayes, D. (2008). Does the messenger matter? Candidate-media agenda convergence and its effects on voter issue salience. Political Research Quarterly, 61, 134–146. Open Google Scholar
  42. Higgins, E. S., Rhodes, W. S., & Jones, C. R. (1977). Category accessibility and impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 141–154. Open Google Scholar
  43. Hill, D. B. (1985). Viewer characteristics and agenda-setting by television news. Public Opinion Quarterly, 49, 340–350. Open Google Scholar
  44. Holbert, R. L., Pillion, O., Tschida, D. A., Arnfield, G. G., Kinder, K., Cherry, K., & Daulton, A. (2003). The West Wing as endorsement of the U.S. presidency. Expanding the bounds of priming in political communication. Journal of Communication, 53, 427–443. Open Google Scholar
  45. Hügel, R., Degenhardt, W., & Weiss, H. J. (1989). Structural equation models for the analysis of the agenda-setting process. European Journal of Communication, 4, 191–210. Open Google Scholar
  46. Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago: University Press. Open Google Scholar
  47. Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (1987). News that matters. Television and American opinion. Chicago: University Press. Open Google Scholar
  48. Iyengar, S., & Simon, A. (1993). News coverage of the gulf crises and public opinion. Communication Research, 20, 365–383. Open Google Scholar
  49. Karlsen, R. (2015). Followers are opinion leaders: The role of people in the flow of political communication on and beyond social networking sites. European Journal of Communication, 30, 301–318. Open Google Scholar
  50. Kepplinger, H. M., Gotto, K., Brosius, H.-B., & Haak, D. (1989). Der Einfluss des Fernsehens auf die politische Meinungsbildung. Freiburg: Alber. Open Google Scholar
  51. Kepplinger, H. M. & Lemke, R. (2014). Framing Fukushima. Zur Darstellung der Katastrophe in Deutschland im Vergleich zu Großbritannien, Frankreich und der Schweiz. In J. Wolling & D. Arlt (Hrsg.), Fukushima und die Folgen – Medienberichterstattung, Öffentliche Meinung, Politische Konsequenzen (S. 125–152). Ilmenau: Universitätsverlag. Open Google Scholar
  52. Kim, S.-H., Scheufele, D., & Shanahan, J. (2002). Think about it this way: Attribute agenda-setting function of the press and the public’s evaluation of a local issue. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 79, 7–25. Open Google Scholar
  53. Kim, Y., Gonzenbach, W. J., Vargo, C. J., & Kim, Y. (2016). First and second levels of intermedia agenda setting: Political advertising, newspapers, and twitter during the 2012 U. S. presidential election. International Journal of Communication, 10, 4550–4569. Open Google Scholar
  54. Kiousis, S., Kim J. Y., Ragas, M., Wheat, G., Kochhar, S., Svensson, E., & Miles, M. (2015). Exploring new frontiers of agenda building during the 2012 presidential election pre-convention period: Examining linkages across three levels. Journalism Studies, 363–382. Open Google Scholar
  55. Klapper, J. T. (1960). The effects of mass communication. Glencoe: Free Press. Open Google Scholar
  56. Kosicki, G. M. (1993). Problems and opportunities in agenda-setting research. Journal of Communication, 43, 100–127. Open Google Scholar
  57. Krause, B., & Gehrau, V. (2007). Das Paradox der Medienwirkung auf Nichtnutzer. Eine Zeitreihenanalyse auf Tagesbasis zu den kurzfristigen Agenda-Setting-Effekten von Fernsehnachrichten. Publizistik, 52, 191–209. Open Google Scholar
  58. Krosnick, J. A., & Brannon, L. A. (1993). The impact of war on the ingredients of presidential evaluations. Multidimensional effects of political involvement. American Political Science Review, 87, 963–975. Open Google Scholar
  59. Lang, G. E., & Lang, K. (1981). Watergate. An exploration of the agenda-building process. In G. C. Wilhoit & H. De Bock (Hrsg.), Mass Communication Review Yearbook (447–468). Beverly Hills: Sage. Open Google Scholar
  60. Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1944). The people’s choice. How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. New York: Duell, Sloane & Pearce. Open Google Scholar
  61. Lim, J. (2006). A cross-lagged analysis of agenda setting among online news media. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83, 298–312. Open Google Scholar
  62. Lippman, W. (1922). Public Opinion. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Company. Open Google Scholar
  63. Maier, M., Stengel, K., & Marschall, J. (2010): Nachrichtenwert-Theorie. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar
  64. Mathes, R., & Czaplicki, A. (1993). Meinungsführer im Mediensystem: „Topdown“- und „Bottom-up“-Prozesse. Publizistik, 38, 153–166. Open Google Scholar
  65. Mathes, R., & Pfetsch, B. (1991). The role of the alternative press in the agenda-building process: Spill-over effects and media opinion leadership. European Journal of Communication, 6, 33–62. Open Google Scholar
  66. Matthes, J. (2008). Need for orientation as a predictor of agenda-setting effects: Causal evidence from a two-wave panel study. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 20, 440–453. Open Google Scholar
  67. Matthes, J. (2014): Framing. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar
  68. Matthes, J., & Kohring, M. (2008). The content analysis of media frames. Toward improving reliability and validity. Journal of Communication, 58, 258–278. Open Google Scholar
  69. Maurer, M. (2004). Das Paradox der Medienwirkungsforschung. Verändern Massenmedien die Bevölkerungsmeinung, ohne Einzelne zu beeinflussen? Publizistik, 49, 405–422. Open Google Scholar
  70. Maurer, M. & Holbach, T. (2016). Taking online search queries as an indicator of the public agenda. The role of public uncertainty. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 93, 572–586. Open Google Scholar
  71. Maurer, M., & Reinemann, C. (2003). Schröder gegen Stoiber. Nutzung, Wahrnehmung und Wirkung der TV-Duelle. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  72. Maurer, M., & Reinemann, C. (2007). Personalisierung durch Priming. Die Wirkung des TV-Duells auf die Urteilskriterien der Wähler. In M. Maurer, C. Reinemann, J. Maier & M. Maier (Hrsg.), Schröder gegen Merkel. Wahrnehmung und Wirkung des TV-Duells 2005 im Ost-West-Vergleich (111–128). Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  73. McClure, R. D., & Patterson, T. E. (1976). Print vs. network news. Journal of Communication, 26, 23–28. Open Google Scholar
  74. McCombs, M. E. (1993). The evolution of agenda-setting research: Twenty-Five years in the marketplace of ideas. Journal of Communication, 43(2), 58–67. Open Google Scholar
  75. McCombs, M. E. (1994). News influences on our pictures of the world. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Hrsg.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (1–16). Hillsdale: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar
  76. McCombs, M. E. (2014). Setting the agenda. The mass media and public opinion. 2nd Edition. Cambridge: Polity Press. Open Google Scholar
  77. McCombs, M. E., Danielan, L, & Wanta, W. (1995). Issues in the news and public agenda: The agenda-setting tradition. In T. L. Glasser & J. T. Salmon (Hrsg.), Public opinion and the communication of consent (281–300). New York: Guilford Press. Open Google Scholar
  78. McCombs, M. E., Llamas J. P., Lopez-Escobar, E., & Rey, F. (1997). Candidate images in Spanish elections. Second level agenda-setting effects. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 74, 703–717. Open Google Scholar
  79. McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of the mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176–187. Open Google Scholar
  80. McLeod, J., Becker, L. B., & Byrnes, J. E. (1974). Another look at the agenda-setting function of the press. Communication Research, 2, 131–167. Open Google Scholar
  81. Mellon, J. (2013). Where and when can we use Google Trends to measure issue salience? PS: Political Science & Politics, 46, 280–290. Open Google Scholar
  82. Mendelsohn, M. (1996). The media and interpersonal communications. The priming of issues, leaders, and party identification. Journal of Politics, 58, 112–125. Open Google Scholar
  83. Meraz, S. (2011). Using time series analysis to measure intermedia agenda-setting influence in traditional media and political blog networks. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 88, 176–194. Open Google Scholar
  84. Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1963). Constituency influences in congress. American Political Science Review, 57, 45–56. Open Google Scholar
  85. Min, Y., Ghanem, S. I., & Evatt, D. (2007). Using a split-ballot survey to explore the robustness of the ‚MIP’ question in agenda-setting research: A methodological study. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 19, 221–236. Open Google Scholar
  86. Moy, P., Xenos, M. A., & Hess, V. K. (2006). Priming effects of late-night comedy. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18, 198–210. Open Google Scholar
  87. Muddiman, A., Stroud, N. J., & McCombs, Maxwell (2014). Media fragmentation, attribute agenda setting, and political opinions about Iraq. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 58, 215–233. Open Google Scholar
  88. Mutz, D. C. (1994). Contextualizing personal experience. The role of mass media. Journal of Politics, 56, 689–714. Open Google Scholar
  89. Neuman, R. W. (1990). The threshold of public attention. Public Opinion Quarterly, 54, 159–176. Open Google Scholar
  90. Neuman, R. W., Guggenheim, L., Mo Jang, S., & Bae, S. Y. (2014). The dynamics of public attention: Agenda-setting theory meets big data. Journal of Communication, 64, 193–214. Open Google Scholar
  91. Noelle-Neumann, E. (1973). Return to the concept of powerful mass media. Studies of Broadcasting, 9, 67–112. Open Google Scholar
  92. Noelle-Neumann, E., Kepplinger, H. M., & Donsbach, W. (1999). Kampa. Meinungsklima und Medienwirkung im Bundestagswahlkampf 1998. Freiburg/München: Alber. Open Google Scholar
  93. Quiring, O. (2004). Wirtschaftsberichterstattung und Wahlen. Konstanz: UVK. Open Google Scholar
  94. Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble. What the internet is hiding from you. New York: Penguin Press. Open Google Scholar
  95. Petrocik, J. R. (1996). Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a case study. American Journal of Political Science, 40, 825–850. Open Google Scholar
  96. Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion. Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer. Open Google Scholar
  97. Pingree, R. J. & Stoycheff, E. (2013). Differentiating cueing from reasoning in agenda-setting-effects. Journal of Communication, 63, 852–872. Open Google Scholar
  98. Price, V., & Tewksbury, D. (1997). News values and public opinion. A theoretical account of media priming and framing. In G. A. Barnett & F. J. Boster (Hrsg.), Progress in communication sciences. Advances in persuasion 13 (172–212). Greenwich: Ablex. Open Google Scholar
  99. Price, V., Tewksbury, D., & Powers, E. (1997). Switching trains of thought. The impact of news frames on reader’s cognitive responses. Communication Research, 24, 481–506. Open Google Scholar
  100. Pritchard, D., & Berkowitz, D. (1993). The limits of agenda-setting. The press and political responses to crime in the United States, 1950–1980. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 5, 86–91. Open Google Scholar
  101. Reese, S. D. (2007). The framing project: A bridging model for media research revisited. Journal of Communication, 57, 148–154. Open Google Scholar
  102. Reinemann, C. (2003). Medienmacher als Mediennutzer. Kommunikations- und Einflussstrukturen im politischen Journalismus der Gegenwart. Köln: Böhlau. Open Google Scholar
  103. Reinemann, C., Maurer, M., Zerback, T., & Jandura, O. (2013). Die Spätentscheider. Medieneinflüsse auf kurzfristige Wahlentscheidungen. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar
  104. Roberts, M. M., Wanta, W., & Dzwo, T.-H. (2002). Agenda setting and issue salience online. Communication Research, 29, 452–465. Open Google Scholar
  105. Rössler, P. (1997). Agenda-Setting. Theoretischer Gehalt und empirische Evidenzen einer Medienwirkungshypothese. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  106. Rössler, P. (2006). Zur Logik der Agenda-Setting-Forschung. In W. Wirth, A. Fahr & E. Lauf (Hrsg.), Forschungslogik und -design in der Kommunikationswissenschaft. Band 2 (139–167). Köln: Halem. Open Google Scholar
  107. Rogers, E. M., & Dearing, J. W. (1988). Agenda-Setting research: Where has it been, where is it going? In J. A. Anderson (Hrsg.): Communication Yearbook (555–594). Beverly Hills: Sage. Open Google Scholar
  108. Rogers, E. M., Dearing, J. W., & Bregman, D. (1993). The anatomy of agenda-setting research. Journal of Communication, 43(2), 68–84. Open Google Scholar
  109. Sayre, B, Bode, L., Shah, D., Wilcox, D., & Shah, C. (2010). Agenda setting in a digital age. Tracking attention to California Proposition 8 in social media, online news, and conventional news. Policy & Internet, 2, 7–32. Open Google Scholar
  110. Scharkow, M. & Vogelgesang, J. (2011). Measuring the public agenda using search engine queries. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 23, 104–113. Open Google Scholar
  111. Schenk, M., & Rössler, P. (1994). Das unterschätzte Publikum. Wie Themenbewußtsein und politische Meinungsbildung im Alltag von Massenmedien und interpersonaler Kommunikation beeinflußt werden. In F. Neidhardt (Hrsg.), Öffentlichkeit, öffentliche Meinung, soziale Bewegungen (261–295). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  112. Scheufele, B. (2016). Priming. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar
  113. Scheufele, D. A. (2000). Agenda-Setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Communication and Society, 3, 297–316. Open Google Scholar
  114. Schönbach, K., de Waal, E., & Lauf, E. (2005). Online and print newspapers. Their impact on the extent of the perceived public agenda. European Journal of Communication, 20, 245–258. Open Google Scholar
  115. Searles, K, & Smith, G. (2016). Who’s the boss? Setting the agenda in a fragmented media environment. International Journal of Communication, 10, 2074–2095. Open Google Scholar
  116. Semetko, H. A., & Valkenburg, P. (2000). Framing European politics. A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 93–109. Open Google Scholar
  117. Shaw, D. L., & McCombs, M. E. (1977). The emerge of American political issues. The agenda-setting function of the press. St. Paul: West. Open Google Scholar
  118. Shehata, A. & Strömbäck, J. (2013). Not (yet) a new era of minimal effects: A study of agenda setting at the aggregate and individual level. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18, 234–255. Open Google Scholar
  119. Shen, F. (2004). Effects of news frames and schemas on individual’s issue interpretations and attitudes. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81, 400–416. Open Google Scholar
  120. Stone, G., & McCombs. M. E. (1981). Tracing the time lag in agenda-setting. Journalism Quarterly, 58, 51–55. Open Google Scholar
  121. Sunstein, C. R. (2007). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  122. Sweetser, K. D., Golan, G. J., & Wanta, W. (2008). Intermedia agenda-setting in television, advertising, and blogs during the 2004 election. Mass Communication and Society, 11, 197–216. Open Google Scholar
  123. Tan, Y., & Weaver, D. H. (2007). Agenda-Setting effects among the media, the public, and congress, 1946–2004. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 84, 729–744. Open Google Scholar
  124. Tichenor, P. J., Donohue, G. A., & Olien, C. N. (1970). Mass media flow and differential growth in knowledge. Public Opinion Quarterly, 34, 159–170. Open Google Scholar
  125. Tiele, A., & Scherer, H. (2004). Die Agenda – ein Konstrukt des Rezipienten? Die Bedeutung kognitiver Informationsverarbeitung im Agenda-Setting-Prozess. Publizistik, 49, 439–453. Open Google Scholar
  126. Trenaman, J., & McQuail, D. (1961). Television and the political image. London: Methuen. Open Google Scholar
  127. Trumbo, C. (1995). Longitudinal modelling of public issues. An application of the agenda-setting process to the issue of global warming. Journalism & Mass Communication Monographs, 152, 1–57. Open Google Scholar
  128. Vargo, C. J. & Guo, L. (2016). Networks, big data, and intermedia agenda setting: An analysis of traditional, partisan, and emerging online U. S. news. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, online first. Open Google Scholar
  129. Vu, H. T., Guo, L., & McCombs, Maxwell (2014). Exploring “the world outside and the pictures in our heads”: A network agenda-setting study. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 91, 669–686. Open Google Scholar
  130. Walgrave, S., & van Aelst, P. (2006). The contingency of the mass media’s political agenda setting power. Toward a preliminary theory. Journal of Communication, 56, 88–109. Open Google Scholar
  131. Wanta, W. (1988). The effects of dominant photographs: An agenda-setting experiment. Journalism Quarterly, 65, 107–111. Open Google Scholar
  132. Wanta, W. (1992). The influence of the president on the news media and public agendas. Mass Communication Review, 19, 14–21. Open Google Scholar
  133. Wanta, W., & Ghanem, S. (2007). Effects of agenda-setting. In R. W. Preiss, B. M. Gayle, N. Burrell, M. Allen & J. Bryant (Hrsg.), Mass media effects research. Advances through meta-analysis (37–52). New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  134. Wanta, W., Golan, G., & Lee, C. (2004). Agenda-Setting and international news. Media influence on the public perceptions of foreign news. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81, 364–377. Open Google Scholar
  135. Wanta, W., & Hu, Y.-W. (1994). The effects of credibility, reliance, and exposure on media agenda-setting. A path analysis model. Journalism Quarterly, 71, 90–98. Open Google Scholar
  136. Wanta, W., & Kalyango, Y. (2007). Terrorism and Africa: A study of agenda building in the United States. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 19, 434–450. Open Google Scholar
  137. Wanta, W., Stephenson, M. A., Turk, J. V., & McCombs M. E. (1989). How president’s state of the union talk influenced news media agendas. Journalism Quarterly, 66, 537–541. Open Google Scholar
  138. Wanta, W., & Wu, Y.-C. (1992). Interpersonal communication and the agenda-setting process. Journalism Quarterly, 69, 847–855. Open Google Scholar
  139. Weaver, D. H. (2007). Thoughts on agenda-setting, framing, and priming. Journal of Communication, 57, 142–147. Open Google Scholar
  140. Weimann, G., & Brosius, H.-B. (1995). Is there a two-step flow of agenda-setting? International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 6, 323–341. Open Google Scholar
  141. Weimann, G. & Brosius, H.-B. (2017). Redirecting the agenda. Agenda-setting in the online era. The Agenda Setting Journal, 1, 63–101. Open Google Scholar
  142. Weingart, P., Engels, S., & Pansegrau, P. (2000). Risks of Communication: Discourses on climate change in science, politics, and the mass media. Public Understanding of Science, 9, 261–283. Open Google Scholar
  143. Winter, J. P., & Eyal, C. H. (1983). Agenda-setting for the civil rights issue. Public Opinion Quarterly, 45, 376–383. Open Google Scholar
  144. Yagade, A., & Dozier, D. M. (1990). The media agenda-setting effect of concrete versus abstract issues. Journalism Quarterly, 67, 3–10. Open Google Scholar
  145. Zhu, J. H. (1992). Issue competition and attention distraction. A zero-sum theory of agenda-setting. Journalism Quarterly, 69, 825–836. Open Google Scholar
  146. Zucker, H. G. (1978). The variable nature of media influence. In B. D. Ruben (Hrsg.), Communication Yearbook 2 (225–245). New Brunswick: Transaction. Open Google Scholar

Similar publications

from the topics "Media Effects Research & Media Usage Research", "Media Science, Communication Research"
Cover of book: Israel in deutschen Medien
Book Titles No access
Jonas Hessenauer, Lukas Uwira
Israel in deutschen Medien
Cover of book: Medienmanagement
Educational Book No access
Ingo Knuth, Thomas Kilian
Medienmanagement
Cover of book: Konstruktiver Journalismus
Book Titles Full access
Julia Faltermeier
Konstruktiver Journalismus
Cover of book: Trennen – Verbinden – Takten
Book Titles No access
Patrick Wöhrle, Stephan Hein, Stefan Meißner
Trennen – Verbinden – Takten
Cover of book: Partizipative Kommunikation im interkulturell-doppeltblickenden Kontext
Edited Book No access
Akila Ahouli, Constant Kpao Sarè, Gesine Lenore Schiewer
Partizipative Kommunikation im interkulturell-doppeltblickenden Kontext

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via Open Athens
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex