Cover of book: The Challenge of Stability
Book Titles Open Access Full access

The Challenge of Stability

Niklas Luhmann’s Early Political Sociology and Constitutional Adjudication in the United States and Germany
Authors:
Publisher:
 2023

Summary

Niklas Luhmann's early systems-theoretical conception of functional differentiation holds both normative and empirical insights for our understanding of constitutional adjudication. For example, Luhmann's conception of legal autonomy may help to shed new light on the countermajoritarian difficulty. Secondly, his theory of how the political system is differentiated into two sub-systems can improve our conceptual understanding of judicial politicization. To illustrate this potential, this book applies “Legitimation durch Verfahren” in particular and Luhmann's early systems theory in general to Germany’s Federal Constitutional Court and the United States Supreme Court.

Keywords

Bibliographic data

Copyright year
2023
ISBN-Print
978-3-7560-0623-6
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-4158-3
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht
Volume
322
Language
English
Pages
230
Product type
Book Titles

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 - 12 Download chapter (PDF)
  2. Download chapter (PDF)
    1. I. The Radicality and Currency of Legitimation durch Verfahren
      1. A. Applying Luhmann’s Sociology to a Normative Problem: Chapter 3
      2. B. Using Systems Theory to Remedy an Analytical Problem: Chapter 4
      1. A. Methodology
      2. B. The Research Landscape
      3. C. Structure
  3. Download chapter (PDF)
      1. A. Man’s Experience of the World
      2. B. Intersubjectivity
      3. C. Social Systems
      4. D. Systemic Differentiation
      1. A. Habermas’s Discourse-Theoretical Conception of Legitimate Law
        1. 1. The Impossibility of Consensus in a Differentiated Society
          1. a) Luhmann’s Political Sociology
          2. b) Luhmann’s Sociology of Law
        1. 1. Role Reciprocity and the Presentation of Self
        2. 2. Courtroom Publicity
        3. 3. Conditional Programming
        4. 4. Contact Systems
        1. 1. Elections
        2. 2. The Legislative Process
        1. 1. Jürgen Habermas’s Debate with Niklas Luhmann
        2. 2. Stefan Lange and Chris Thornhill’s Nuanced Appraisal
        3. 3. Putting Luhmann’s Skepticism of Justifiability in Perspective
      2. B. The Sources of Political Stability
    5. V. Conclusion
  4. Download chapter (PDF)
      1. A. The Countermajoritarian Difficulty
        1. 1. The Political-Equality Criterion
        2. 2. The Minimal-Justice Criterion
      1. A. The ‘Chain of Legitimation’
      2. B. Constitutional Provisions for Judicial Review
      3. C. Public Support for Judicial Review
            1. i. The Legislature
            2. ii. The Court
            1. i. The United States
            2. ii. Germany
            1. i. The Argument from Democratic Choice
            2. ii. The Argument from Constitutional Precommitment
          4. d) Who Gets to Predict Legislative Behavior?
        2. 2. Public Reason
        3. 3. The Need for Unanimity
          1. a) Forming the General Will
          2. b) Holding Out the Promise of Change
          3. c) Why the Constitutional Court?
          1. a) Underenforcing Our Basic Human Rights
          2. b) Overenforcing Our Basic Human Rights
          3. c) Zero-Sum Rights Controversies
        2. 2. Judicial Review as Insurance Against Future Violations
          1. a) Partial vs. Complete Illegitimacy
          2. b) Defining Marginalized Communities
          3. c) Determining the Essential Rights
        2. 2. Devising a Test for a Court’s Emancipatory Impetus
          1. a) How Expansive Can We Expect the Courts’ Rulings to Be?
          2. b) Focusing on the Concrete Change in the Law
        4. 4. Conclusion
      1. A. The Notion of Legal Autonomy
      2. B. The Notion of Legal Autonomy and Niklas Luhmann’s Political Sociology
        1. 1. Judicial Proceedings and the Absorption of Protest
          1. a) Sensitizing People to the Possibility of Change
          2. b) An Alternative to Positivity Theory?
          1. a) The Judicial-Appointment Process
          2. b) Disavowing Partisanship
            1. i. Examples
            2. ii. Increasing Interpretive Flexibility
        1. 1. Compliance and Institutional Legitimacy
        2. 2. The Causes of Institutional Legitimacy
    5. V. Conclusion
  5. Download chapter (PDF)
        1. 1. The Interparty Agreement
        2. 2. Party-Political Affiliations
        1. 1. To Hear or Not to Hear
        2. 2. A Silent Parliament
        1. 1. Politicization Within One Entity vs. Between Entities
        2. 2. The Two Angles to Politicization Between Two or More Entities
        1. 1. What It Means for Constitutional Adjudication to Be or Appear Political
        2. 2. How the Confirmation Process Helps Politicize Constitutional Adjudication
        3. 3. The Effects of Politicization on Constitutional Adjudication
      1. A. Partisan vs. Unanimous Confirmation Votes
        1. 1. The United States
        2. 2. Germany
        1. 1. Perceived Politicization and Institutional Legitimacy
        2. 2. Contentious Appointments and Institutional Legitimacy
        3. 3. Conclusion
      4. D. The Meaning of Partisanship
      1. A. The Concepts of Social Systems and Systemic Differentiation
      2. B. Systems Theory and Politicization by Judicial Appointment
        1. 1. From Unanimous to Partisan Confirmation Votes
        2. 2. The Confirmation Hearings
        1. 1. Partisan Capture and the Political System’s Internal Differentiation
        2. 2. Functional Differentiation and Judicial Authoritativeness
        1. 1. Autopoietic Closure
        2. 2. Autopoietic Closure and Politicization Research
    5. VI. Conclusion
  6. Conclusion 203 - 204 Download chapter (PDF)
  7. Bibliography 205 - 230 Download chapter (PDF)

Bibliography (473)

  1. Ackerman, Bruce A, ‘The Storrs Lectures: Discovering the Constitution’, 93 Yale LJ 1013 (1984) Open Google Scholar
  2. Alexy, Robert, ‘Constitutional Rights and Proportionality’, 22 Revus: J Const Theory & Phil Law 51 (2014) Open Google Scholar
  3. Alexy, Robert, ‘Constitutional Rights, Democracy, and Representation’, 3 Ricerche giuridiche 197 (2014) Open Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, Elizabeth, ‘What Is the Point of Equality?’, 109 Ethics 287 (1999) Open Google Scholar
  5. Anderson, Elizabeth, The Imperative of Integration (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2010) Open Google Scholar
  6. Anderson, Joel, ‘Autonomy and Vulnerability Entwined’, in Catriona Mackenzie, Wendy Rogers, and Susan Dodds (eds), Vulnerability: New Essays in Ethics and Feminist Philosophy (OUP, New York, 2013) 134 Open Google Scholar
  7. Badas, Alex, ‘The Applied Legitimacy Index: A New Approach to Measuring Judicial Legitimacy’, 100 Soc Sci Q 1848 (2019) Open Google Scholar
  8. Baer, Susanne, ‘Who cares? A defence of judicial review’, 8 J Brit Acad 75 (2020) Open Google Scholar
  9. Balkin, Jack M, ‘Respect-Worthy: Frank Michelman and the Legitimate Constitution’, 39 Tulsa L Rev 495 (2004) Open Google Scholar
  10. Balkin, Jack M, and Levinson, Sanford, ‘Understanding the Constitutional Revolution’, 87 Va L Rev 1045 (2001) Open Google Scholar
  11. Barber, James D, The Lawmakers: Recruitment and Adaptation to Legislative Life (Yale University Press, New Haven, 1965) Open Google Scholar
  12. Barnes, Robert, ‘The political wars damage public perception of Supreme Court, Chief Justice Roberts says’, The Washington Post, 4 February 2016, available at https://perma.cc/3H8C-98RP Open Google Scholar
  13. Barnett, Randy E, ‘Constitutional Legitimacy’, 103 Colum L Rev 111 (2003) Open Google Scholar
  14. Barroso, Luís R, ‘Countermajoritarian, Representative, and Enlightened: The Roles of Constitutional Courts in Democracies’, 67 Am J Comp L 109 (2019) Open Google Scholar
  15. Barry, Brian, ‘John Rawls and the Search for Stability’, 105 Ethics 874 (1995) Open Google Scholar
  16. Barskanmaz, Cengiz, ‘Das Kopftuch als das Andere. Eine notwendige postkoloniale Kritik des deutschen Rechtsdiskurses’, in Sabine Berghahn and Petra Rostock (eds), Der Stoff, aus dem Konflikte sind: Debatten um das Kopftuch in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz (transcript, Bielefeld, 2009) Open Google Scholar
  17. Bartels, Brandon L, and Johnston, Christopher D, ‘On the Ideological Foundations of Supreme Court Legitimacy in the American Public’, 57 Am J Pol Sci 184 (2013) Open Google Scholar
  18. Bartels, Brandon L, and Johnston, Christopher D, ‘Political Justice? Perceptions of Politicization and Public Preferences Toward the Supreme Court Appointment Process’, 76 Pub Opin Q 105 (2012) Open Google Scholar
  19. Bartels, Brandon L, and Kramon, Eric, ‘All the President’s Justices? The Impact of Presidential Copartisanship on Supreme Court Job Approval’, 66 Am J Pol Sci 171 (2022) Open Google Scholar
  20. Bartels, Brandon L, Johnston, Christopher D, and Mark, Alyx, ‘Lawyers’ Perceptions of the U.S. Supreme Court: Is the Court a “Political” Institution?’, 49 Law & Soc’y Rev 761 (2015) Open Google Scholar
  21. Bartlett, Katharine T, ‘Feminist Legal Methods’, 103 Harv L Rev 829 (1990) Open Google Scholar
  22. Bassok, Or, ‘The Schmitelsen Court: The Question of Legitimacy’, 21 German LJ 131 (2020) Open Google Scholar
  23. Bassok, Or, ‘The Supreme Court’s New Source of Legitimacy’, 16 U Pa J Const L 153 (2013) Open Google Scholar
  24. Bassok, Or, and Dotan, Yoav, ‘Solving the countermajoritarian difficulty?’, 11 Int’l J Const L 13 (2013) Open Google Scholar
  25. Baynes, Kenneth, ‘Democracy and the Rechtsstaat: Habermas’s Faktizität und Geltung’, in Stephen K White (ed), The Cambridge Companion to Habermas (CUP, Cambridge, 1995) 201 Open Google Scholar
  26. Becker, Mary, ‘Conservative Free Speech and the Uneasy Case for Judicial Review’, 64 U Colo L Rev 975 (1993) Open Google Scholar
  27. Becker, Mary, Grant Bowman, Cynthia, and Torrey, Morrison, Feminist Jurisprudence: Taking Women Seriously (2nd edn, West Group, St Paul, 2001) Open Google Scholar
  28. Bell, Derrick, ‘Bell, J., dissenting’, in Jack M Balkin (ed), What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation’s Top Legal Experts Rewrite America’s Landmark Civil Rights Decision (New York University Press, New York, 2001) 185 Open Google Scholar
  29. Berbuir, Nicole, Lewandowsky, Marcel, and Siri, Jasmin, ‘The AfD and its Sympathisers: Finally a Right-Wing Populist Movement in Germany?’, 24 German Pol 154 (2015) Open Google Scholar
  30. Berger, Peter L, and Luckmann, Thomas, The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge (Doubleday, Garden City, 1966) Open Google Scholar
  31. Bethge, Herbert, ‘§ 31’, in Bruno Schmidt-Bleibtreu, Franz Klein and Herbert Bethge, Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz: Kommentar (loose-leaf, 61st delivery, CH Beck, Munich, 2021) Open Google Scholar
  32. Bickel, Alexander M, The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics (Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis, 1962) Open Google Scholar
  33. Blau, Peter M, ‘Critical Remarks on Weber’s Theory of Authority’, 57 Am Pol Sci Rev 305 (1963) Open Google Scholar
  34. Bobbitt, Philip, Constitutional Interpretation (Blackwell, Oxford, 1991) Open Google Scholar
  35. Böckenförde, Ernst-Wolfgang, ‘Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit: Strukturfragen, Organisation, Legitimation’, 52 Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 9 (1999) Open Google Scholar
  36. Böckenförde, Ernst-Wolfgang, Verfassungsfragen der Richterwahl: Dargestellt anhand der Gesetzentwürfe zur Einführung der Richterwahl in Nordrhein-Westfalen (2nd edn, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, 1998) Open Google Scholar
  37. Bohman, James, and Rehg, William, ‘Jürgen Habermas’, in Edward Zalta (ed), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2017 edn), available at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/habermas/ (last accessed 4 March 2022) Open Google Scholar
  38. Bolsen, Toby, and Druckman, James N, ‘Counteracting the Politicization of Science’, 65 J Commun 745 (2016) Open Google Scholar
  39. Bora, Alfons, ‘Recht und Politik. Krisen der Politik und die Leistungsfähigkeit des Rechts’, in Armin Nassehi and Markus Schroer (eds), Der Begriff des Politischen (Nomos, Baden-Baden, 2003) 189 Open Google Scholar
  40. Borch, Christian, Niklas Luhmann (Routledge, London, 2011) Open Google Scholar
  41. Bornemann, Basil, ‘Politisierung des Rechts und Verrechtlichung der Politik durch das Bundesverfassungsgericht? Systemtheoretische Betrachtungen zum Wandel des Verhältnisses von Recht und Politik und zur Rolle der Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit’, 28 Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 75 (2007) Open Google Scholar
  42. Bowie, Nikolas, ‘The Contemporary Debate over Supreme Court Reform: Origins and Perspectives’, Written Statement to the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States, 30 June 2021, pp 1, available at https://perma.cc/7HK9-CDQC Open Google Scholar
  43. Bravin, Jess, and Kendall, Brent, ‘For Supreme Court Nominee Merrick Garland, Law Prevails Over Ideology’, The Wall Street Journal, 16 March 2016, available at https://perma.cc/Q7YB-NU2N Open Google Scholar
  44. Brinkmann, Matthias, ‘Coordination Cannot Establish Political Authority’, 31 Ratio Juris 49 (2018) Open Google Scholar
  45. Brockell, Gillian, ‘The last Supreme Court nominee confirmed without bipartisan support never heard a single case’, The Washington Post, 27 October 2020, available at https://perma.cc/3NXB-ZFXD Open Google Scholar
  46. Brown-Nagin, Tomiko, ‘Elites, Social Movements, and the Law: The Case of Affirmative Action’, 105 Colum L Rev 1436 (2005) Open Google Scholar
  47. Bubrowski, Helene, ‘Grüne unterstützen Harbarths Wahl’, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 10 November 2018, available at https://perma.cc/8WMZ-MWU2 Open Google Scholar
  48. Bubrowski, Helene, and Müller, Reinhard, ‘Spielball der Politik? Neue Sorgen um Akzeptanz und Statik des Bundesverfassungsgerichts’, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 21 February 2018, p 8 Open Google Scholar
  49. Buchanan, Allen, ‘Political Legitimacy and Democracy’, 112 Ethics 689 (2002) Open Google Scholar
  50. Burke, Kenneth, A Grammar of Motives (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1969) 357 Open Google Scholar
  51. Cain Miller, Claire, and Sanger-Katz, Margot, ‘On Abortion Law, the U.S. Is Unusual. Without Roe, It Would Be, Too’, The New York Times, 22 January 2022, available at https://perma.cc/U45R-BLP9 Open Google Scholar
  52. Calabresi, Steven G, and Lindgren, James, ‘Term Limits for the Supreme Court: Life Tenure Reconsidered’, 29 Harv JL & Pub Pol’y 769 (2006) Open Google Scholar
  53. Caldeira, Gregory A, and Gibson, James L, ‘The Etiology of Public Support for the Supreme Court’, 36 Am J Pol Sci 635 (1992) Open Google Scholar
  54. Cameron, Charles M, Cover, Albert D, and Segal, Jeffrey A, ‘Senate Voting on Supreme Court Nominees: A Neoinstitutional Model’, 84 Am Pol Sci Rev 525 (1990) Open Google Scholar
  55. Carrington, Nathan T, and French, Colin, ‘One Bad Apple Spoils the Bunch: Kavanaugh and Change in Institutional Support for the Supreme Court’, 102 Soc Sci Q 1484 (2021) Open Google Scholar
  56. Chong, Dennis, and Druckman, James N, ‘Framing Theory’, 10 Annu Rev Pol Sci 103 (2007) Open Google Scholar
  57. Chong, Moohyung, Todd, Jason D, and Vanberg, Georg, ‘Politics, Polarization, and the U.S. Supreme Court’, in Anna-Bettina Kaiser, Niels Petersen and Johannes Saurer (eds), The U.S. Supreme Court and Contemporary Constitutional Law: The Obama Era and Its Legacy (Nomos, Baden-Baden, 2018) 41 Open Google Scholar
  58. Choper, Jesse H, ‘The Supreme Court and the Political Branches: Democratic Theory and Practice’, 122 U Pa L Rev 810 (1974) Open Google Scholar
  59. Choper, Jesse H, Judicial Review and the National Political Process: A Functional Reconsideration of the Role of the Supreme Court (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1980) Open Google Scholar
  60. Christenson, Dino P, and Glick, David M, ‘Chief Justice Roberts’s Health Care Decision Disrobed: The Microfoundations of the Supreme Court’s Legitimacy’, 59 Am J Pol Sci 403 (2015) Open Google Scholar
  61. Christiano, Thomas, The Constitution of Equality: Democratic Authority and its Limits (OUP, Oxford, 2008) Open Google Scholar
  62. Collins, Paul M Jr, and Ringhand, Lori A, Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings and Constitutional Change (CUP, Cambridge, 2013) Open Google Scholar
  63. Coutu, Walter, ‘Role-Playing vs. Role-Taking: An Appeal for Clarification’, 16 Am Soc Rev 180 (1951) Open Google Scholar
  64. Dahl, Robert A, ‘Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker’, 6 J Pub L 279 (1957) Open Google Scholar
  65. Dahrendorf, Ralf, Gesellschaft und Freiheit (Piper & Co, Munich, 1961) Open Google Scholar
  66. Davis, Richard, ‘Symbiosis: The US Supreme Court and the Journalists Who Cover It’, in Richard Davis (ed), Justices and Journalists: The Global Perspective (CUP, Cambridge, 2018) 281 Open Google Scholar
  67. de Tocqueville, Alexis, Democracy in America (Arthur Goldhammer tr, Library of America, New York, 2004 [1835]) Open Google Scholar
  68. Devins, Neal, and Baum, Lawrence, ‘Split Definitive: How Party Polarization Turned the Supreme Court into a Partisan Court’, 2016 Sup Ct Rev 301 (2016) Open Google Scholar
  69. Dhawan, Nikita, and others, ‘Normative Legitimacy and Normative Dilemmas: Postcolonial Interventions’, in Nikita Dhawan and others (eds), Negotiating Normativity: Postcolonial Appropriations, Contestations, and Transformations (Springer, Cham, 2016) 1 Open Google Scholar
  70. di Fabio, Udo, ‘Art. 4 GG’, in Günter Dürig and others (eds), Grundgesetz: Kommentar (loose-leaf, 94th delivery, CH Beck, Munich, 2021) Open Google Scholar
  71. Dinh, Viet D, ‘Threats to Judicial Independence, Real and Imagined’, 95 Geo LJ 929 (2007) Open Google Scholar
  72. Dixon, Rosalind, ‘Creating dialogue about socioeconomic rights: Strong-form versus weak-form judicial review revisited’, 5 Int’l J Const L 391 (2007) Open Google Scholar
  73. Doerfler, Ryan D, and Moyn, Samuel, ‘Democratizing the Supreme Court’, 109 Cal L Rev 1703 (2021) Open Google Scholar
  74. Dreier, Horst, ‘Art. 146’, in Horst Dreier (ed), Grundgesetz: Kommentar, vol 3 (3rd edn, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, 2018) Open Google Scholar
  75. Dreier, Horst, ‘Vorbemerkungen vor Artikel 1’, in Horst Dreier (ed), Grundgesetz: Kommentar, vol 1 (3rd edn, CH Beck, Munich, 2013) Open Google Scholar
  76. Dressel, Björn, ‘Judicialization of politics or politicization of the judiciary? Considerations from recent events in Thailand’, 23 Pac Rev 671 (2010) Open Google Scholar
  77. Durkheim, Émile, De la division du travail social (5th edn, Librairie Félix Alcan, Paris, 1926) Open Google Scholar
  78. Dworkin, Ronald, ‘Equality, Democracy, and Constitution: We the People in Court’, 28 Alta L Rev 324 (1990) Open Google Scholar
  79. Dworkin, Ronald, ‘Justice Sotomayor: The Unjust Hearings’, The New York Review of Books, 24 September 2009, available at https://perma.cc/BA4F-V5XH Open Google Scholar
  80. Dworkin, Ronald, A Matter of Principle (Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, 1985) Open Google Scholar
  81. Dworkin, Ronald, Freedom’s Law: The Moral Reading of the American Constitution (Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, 1996) Open Google Scholar
  82. Dworkin, Ronald, Law’s Empire (Belknap, Cambridge MA, 1986) Open Google Scholar
  83. Dworkin, Ronald, Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality (Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, 2002) Open Google Scholar
  84. Easton, David, ‘A Re-Assessment of the Concept of Political Support’, 5 Br J Pol Sci 435 (1975) Open Google Scholar
  85. Easton, David, ‘An Approach to the Analysis of Political Systems’, 9 World Pol 383 (1957) Open Google Scholar
  86. Easton, David, A Systems Analysis of Political Life (Chicago University Press, Chicago, 1965) Open Google Scholar
  87. Eckhoff, Torstein, ‘Impartiality, Separation of Powers, and Judicial Independence’, 9 Scandinavian Stud in Law 11 (1965) Open Google Scholar
  88. Effron, Robin J, ‘Will the Judicial Get Political?’, Brooklyn Law Notes, Fall 2019, available at https://perma.cc/A6N7-A4Y5 Open Google Scholar
  89. Eisgruber, Christopher, Constitutional Self-Government (Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, 2001) Open Google Scholar
  90. Engst, Benjamin, and others, ‘Zum Einfluss der Parteinähe auf das Abstimmungsverhalten der Bundesverfassungsrichter – eine quantitative Untersuchung’, 72 JuristenZeitung 816 (2017) Open Google Scholar
  91. Engst, Benjamin, Gschwend, Thomas, and Sternberg, Sebastian, ‘Die Besetzung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts: Ein Spiegelbild gesellschaftlicher Präferenzen?’, 61 Politische Vierteljahresschrift 39 (2020) Open Google Scholar
  92. Epps, Daniel, and Sitaraman, Ganesh, ‘How to Save the Supreme Court’, 129 Yale LJ 148 (2019) Open Google Scholar
  93. Epstein, Lee, and Knight, Jack, ‘Efficacious judging on apex courts’, in Erin F Delany and Rosalind Dixon (eds), Comparative Judicial Review (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, 2018) 272 Open Google Scholar
  94. Epstein, Lee, and others (eds), The Supreme Court Compendium: Data, Decisions, and Developments (6th edn, SAGE, Los Angeles, 2015) Open Google Scholar
  95. Epstein, Lee, and others, ‘The Changing Dynamics of Senate Voting on Supreme Court Nominees’, 68 J Pol 296 (2006) Open Google Scholar
  96. Epstein, Lee, and Posner, Eric, ‘If the Supreme Court Is Nakedly Political, Can It Be Just?’, The New York Times, 9 July 2018, available at https://perma.cc/4K2Z-5YG4 Open Google Scholar
  97. Epstein, Lee, and Segal, Jeffrey A, Advice and Consent: The Politics of Judicial Appointments (OUP, New York, 2005) Open Google Scholar
  98. Fallon, Richard H Jr, ‘As-Applied and Facial Challenges and Third-Party Standing’, 113 Harv L Rev 1321 (2000) Open Google Scholar
  99. Fallon, Richard H Jr, ‘Constitutional Constraints’, 97 Cal L Rev 975 (2009) Open Google Scholar
  100. Fallon, Richard H Jr, ‘How to Choose a Constitutional Theory’, 87 Cal L Rev 535 (1999) Open Google Scholar
  101. Fallon, Richard H Jr, ‘Legitimacy and the Constitution’, 118 Harv L Rev 1787 (2005) Open Google Scholar
  102. Fallon, Richard H Jr, ‘The Core of an Uneasy Case For Judicial Review’, 121 Harv L Rev 1693 (2008) Open Google Scholar
  103. Fallon, Richard H Jr, Law and Legitimacy in the Supreme Court (Belknap, Cambridge MA, 2018) Open Google Scholar
  104. Fallon, Richard H Jr, The Nature of Constitutional Rights: The Invention and Logic of Strict Judicial Scrutiny (CUP, Cambridge, 2019) Open Google Scholar
  105. Fandos, Nicholas, ‘Senate Confirms Barrett, Delivering for Trump and Reshaping the Court’, The New York Times, 26 October 2020, available at https://perma.cc/P3RT-8Y5E Open Google Scholar
  106. Farahat, Anuscheh, ‘The German Federal Constitutional Court’, in Armin von Bogdandy, Peter M Huber and Christoph Grabenwarter (eds), The Max Planck Handbooks in European Public Law, vol 3 (OUP, Oxford, 2020) 279 Open Google Scholar
  107. Farahat, Anuscheh, Transnationale Solidaritätskonflikte: Eine vergleichende Analyse verfassungsgerichtlicher Konfliktbearbeitung in der Eurokrise (Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, 2021) Open Google Scholar
  108. Ferejohn, John, ‘Judicializing Politics, Politicizing Law’, 65 Law & Contemp Probs 41 (2002). Open Google Scholar
  109. Ferejohn, John, and Pasquino, Pasquale, ‘Constitutional Adjudication: Lessons from Europe’, 82 Tex L Rev 1671 (2004) Open Google Scholar
  110. Ferejohn, John, and Pasquino, Pasquale, ‘Rule of Democracy and Rule of Law’, in José María Maravall and Adam Przeworski (eds), Democracy and the Rule of Law (CUP, Cambridge, 2003) 242 Open Google Scholar
  111. Fine, Adam D, and van Rooij, Benjamin, ‘Legal socialization: Understanding the obligation to obey the law’, 7 J Soc Issues 367 (2021) Open Google Scholar
  112. Fiorina, Morris P, and Levendusky, Matthew S, ‘Disconnected: The Political Class versus the People’, in Pietro S Nivola and David W Brady (eds), Red and Blue Nation? Characteristics and Causes of America’s Polarized Politics, vol 1 (Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC, 2006) 49 Open Google Scholar
  113. Forst, Rainer, ‘Justifying Justification: Reply to My Critics’, in Rainer Forst (ed), Justice, Democracy and the Right to Justification: Rainer Forst in Dialogue (Bloomsbury Academic, London, 2014) 169 Open Google Scholar
  114. Forst, Rainer, ‘The Justification of Basic Rights: A Discourse-Theoretical Approach’, 45 Netherlands J Legal Phil 7 (2016) Open Google Scholar
  115. Forst, Rainer, Normativity and Power: Analyzing Social Orders of Justification (Ciaran Cronin tr, OUP, Oxford, 2017) Open Google Scholar
  116. Forst, Rainer, The Right to Justification: Elements of a Constructivist Theory of Justice (Jeffrey Flynn tr, Columbia University Press, New York, 2012) Open Google Scholar
  117. Frank, Jerome, Courts on Trial: Myth and Reality in American Justice (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1949) Open Google Scholar
  118. Franklin, Mark, Marsh, Michael, and McLaren, Lauren, ‘Uncorking the Bottle: Popular Opposition to European Unification in the Wake of Maastricht’, 32 J Common Mkt Stud 455 (1994) Open Google Scholar
  119. Fraser, Nancy, ‘Politics, culture, and the public sphere: toward a postmodern conception’, in Linda Nicholson and Steven Seidman, Social Postmodernism: Beyond Identity Politics (CUP, Cambridge, 1995) 287 Open Google Scholar
  120. Freeman, Samuel, ‘Constitutional Democracy and the Legitimacy of Judicial Review’, 9 Law & Phil 327 (1991) Open Google Scholar
  121. Freud, Sigmund, ‘Die Verneinung’, in Gesammelte Werke, vol 14 (Anna Freud and others eds, Fischer, Frankfurt am Main, 1955) Open Google Scholar
  122. Fried, Charles, ‘Balls and Strikes’, 61 Emory LJ 641, 641 (2012) Open Google Scholar
  123. Friedman, Lawrence M, Law and Society: An Introduction (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1977) Open Google Scholar
  124. Fromme, Friedrich K, ‘Verfassungsrichterwahl’, 53 Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 2977 (2000) Open Google Scholar
  125. Galtung, Johan, ‘Expectations and Interaction Processes’, 2 Inquiry 213 (1959) Open Google Scholar
  126. Galtung, Johan, ‘Institutionalized Conflict Resolution: A theoretical paradigm’, 2 J Peace Res 348 (1965) Open Google Scholar
  127. Gay Stolberg, Sheryl, ‘Susan Collins, A Fixture in Maine, Has Twin Troubles: Trump and Kavanaugh’, The New York Times, 6 July 2019, available at https://perma.cc/N28L-UPLM Open Google Scholar
  128. Gehlen, Arnold, Der Mensch: Seine Natur und seine Stellung in der Welt (first published 1940, re-worked and re-published 1950, Vittorio Klostermann, Frankfurt am Main, 2016) Open Google Scholar
  129. Gelinsky, Katja, ‘Wise Old Men and Wise Old Women. Vom Rätselraten über den Einfluss der Frauen am Bundesverfassungsgericht und am Supreme Court’, in Michael Stolleis (ed), Herzkammern der Republik: Die Deutschen und das Bundesverfassungsgericht (CH Beck, Munich, 2011) 82 Open Google Scholar
  130. Gibson, James L, ‘A Note of Caution About the Meaning of “The Supreme Court Can Usually Be Trusted ...”’, 21 Law & Cts: Newsletter of the Law & Courts Section of the American Political Science Association 10 (2011) Open Google Scholar
  131. Gibson, James L, ‘Legitimacy Is for Losers: The Interconnections of Institutional Legitimacy, Performance Evaluations, and the Symbols of Judicial Authority’, in Brian H Bornstein and Alan J Tomkins, Motivating Cooperation and Compliance with Authority: The Role of Institutional Trust (Springer, Cham, 2015) 81 Open Google Scholar
  132. Gibson, James L, ‘Losing Legitimacy: The Challenges of the Dobbs Ruling to Conventional Legitimacy Theory’, last revised 5 January 2023, available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4206986 Open Google Scholar
  133. Gibson, James L, ‘The Legitimacy of the United States Supreme Court in a Polarized Polity’, 4 J Empirical Legal Stud 507 (2007) Open Google Scholar
  134. Gibson, James L, ‘Understandings of Justice: Institutional Legitimacy, Procedural Justice, and Political Tolerance’, 23 Law & Soc’y Rev 469 (1989) Open Google Scholar
  135. Gibson, James L, and Caldeira, Gregory A, ‘Confirmation Politics and The Legitimacy of the U.S. Supreme Court: Institutional Loyalty, Positivity Bias, and the Alito Nomination’, 53 Am J Pol Sci 139 (2009) Open Google Scholar
  136. Gibson, James L, and Caldeira, Gregory A, ‘Has Legal Realism Damaged the Legitimacy of the U.S. Supreme Court?’, 45 Law & Soc’y Rev 195 (2011) Open Google Scholar
  137. Gibson, James L, and Nelson, Michael J, ‘Is the U.S. Supreme Court’s Legitimacy Grounded in Performance Satisfaction and Ideology?’, 59 Am J Pol Sci 162 (2015) Open Google Scholar
  138. Gibson, James L, and Nelson, Michael J, ‘Reconsidering Positivity Theory: What Roles do Politicization, Ideological Disagreement, and Legal Realism Play in Shaping U.S. Supreme Court Legitimacy?’, 14 J Empirical Legal Stud 592 (2017) Open Google Scholar
  139. Gibson, James L, and Nelson, Michael J, ‘The Legitimacy of the US Supreme Court: Conventional Wisdoms and Recent Challenges Thereto’, 10 Annu Rev Law Soc Sci 201 (2014) Open Google Scholar
  140. Gibson, James L, Caldeira, Gregory A, and Spence, Lester K, ‘Why Do People Accept Public Policies They Oppose? Testing Legitimacy Theory with a Survey-Based Experiment’, 58 Pol Res Q 187 (2005) Open Google Scholar
  141. Gibson, James L, Lodge, Milton, and Woodson, Benjamin, ‘Losing, but Accepting: Legitimacy, Positivity Theory, and the Symbols of Judicial Authority’, 48 Law & Soc’y Rev 837 (2014) Open Google Scholar
  142. Gibson, James L, Pereira, Miguel M, and Ziegler, Jeffrey, ‘Updating Supreme Court Legitimacy: Testing the “Rule, Learn, Update” Model of Political Communication’, 45 Am Pol Res 980 (2017) Open Google Scholar
  143. Ginsburg, Tom, Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases (CUP, Cambridge, 2003) Open Google Scholar
  144. Goffman, Erving, ‘On Face-Work’, reprinted in Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior (Doubleday, New York City, 1967) 5 Open Google Scholar
  145. Goldman, Sheldon, and Jahnige, Thomas P, The Federal Courts as a Political System (Harper & Row, New York, 1971) Open Google Scholar
  146. Goldmann, Matthias, ‘Judges for Future: The Climate Action Judgment as a Postcolonial Turn in Constitutional Law?’, Verfassungsblog, 30 April 2021, available at https://perma.cc/Z93Y-GJA7 Open Google Scholar
  147. Graber, Mark A, ‘The Coming Constitutional Yo-Yo: Elite Opinion, Polarization, and the Direction of Judicial Decision Making’, 56 Howard LJ 661 (2013) Open Google Scholar
  148. Greene, Jamal, ‘Foreword: Rights as Trumps?’, 132 Harv L Rev 28 (2018) Open Google Scholar
  149. Griffin, Stephen M, ‘The Age of Marbury: Judicial Review in a Democracy of Rights’, in Mark Tushnet (ed), Arguing Marbury v. Madison (Stanford University Press, Stanford, 2005) 104 Open Google Scholar
  150. Grimm, Dieter, ‘Neue Radikalkritik an der Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit’, 59 Der Staat 321 (2020) Open Google Scholar
  151. Grimm, Dieter, ‘Politikdistanz als Voraussetzung von Politikkontrolle’, 27 Zeitschrift für Europäische Grundrechte 1 (2000) Open Google Scholar
  152. Grimm, Dieter, ‘What Exactly Is Political About Constitutional Adjudication?’, in Christine Landfried (ed), Judicial Power: How Constitutional Courts Affect Political Transformations (CUP, Cambridge, 2019) 307 Open Google Scholar
  153. Gringlas, Sam, ‘Asked About Court Packing, Biden Says He Will Convene Commission To Study Reforms’, npr.org, 22 October 2020, available at https://perma.cc/BP8G-MY56 Open Google Scholar
  154. Grünberger, Michael, ‘Warum der Stadionverbots-Beschluss weit mehr ist als nur Common Sense’, Verfassungsblog, 1 May 2018, available at https://perma.cc/P85K-UGNZ Open Google Scholar
  155. Grunert, Marlene, and Müller, Reinhard, ‘Was kann Karlsruhe? 70 Jahre Bundesverfassungsgericht – Dieter Grimm und Andreas Voßkuhle über Fehler, Leistungen, Corona und Europa’, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 23 September 2021, p 8 Open Google Scholar
  156. Grünewald, Benedikt, ‘§ 6 BVerfGG’, in Christian Walter and Benedikt Grünewald (eds), Beck’scher Online-Kommentar Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz (13th edn, CH Beck, Munich, 2022) Open Google Scholar
  157. Gutmann, Amy, and Thompson, Dennis, Democracy and Disagreement (Belknap, Cambridge MA, 1996) Open Google Scholar
  158. Habermas, Jürgen, ‘Legitimationsprobleme im modernen Staat’, in Peter Graf Kielmansegg (ed), Legitimationsprobleme politischer Systeme (Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen, 1976) 39 Open Google Scholar
  159. Habermas, Jürgen, ‘Reconciliation Through the Public Use of Reason: Remarks on John Rawls’s Political Liberalism’, 92 J Phil 109 (1995) Open Google Scholar
  160. Habermas, Jürgen, ‘Technology and Science as “Ideology”’, in Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science, and Politics (Jeremy J Shapiro tr, Beacon Press, Boston, 1970) 81 Open Google Scholar
  161. Habermas, Jürgen, ‘Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie? Eine Auseinandersetzung mit Niklas Luhmann’, in Jürgen Habermas and Niklas Luhmann, Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie – Was leistet die Systemforschung? (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, 1971) 142 Open Google Scholar
  162. Habermas, Jürgen, ‘Vorbereitende Bemerkungen zu einer Theorie der kommunikativen Kompetenz’, in Jürgen Habermas and Niklas Luhmann, Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie – Was leistet die Systemforschung? (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, 1971) 101 Open Google Scholar
  163. Habermas, Jürgen, Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (William Rehg tr, MIT Press, Cambridge MA, 1996) Open Google Scholar
  164. Habermas, Jürgen, The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society (Thomas McCarthy tr, Polity Press, Cambridge, 1997) Open Google Scholar
  165. Hagen, Wolfgang, ‘Es gibt keine Biographie’, Interview with Niklas Luhmann, Radio Bremen, 2 October 1997, available at https://perma.cc/U6MA-GUM9 Open Google Scholar
  166. Hähnig, Anne, Machowecz, Martin, and Wefing, Heinrich, ‘Eine Richterin als der ultimative Kompromiss’, Die Zeit, 1 July 2020, available at https://perma.cc/4Q7H-7LCU Open Google Scholar
  167. Hamilton, Alexander, ‘Federalist No. 78’, in Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, The Federalist Papers (Michael A Genovese ed, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 2009 [1787/1788]) 235 Open Google Scholar
  168. Hamilton, Eric, ‘Politicizing the Supreme Court’, 65 Stan L Rev Online 35 (2012) Open Google Scholar
  169. Haratsch, Andreas, ‘§ 6 BVerfGG’, in Bruno Schmidt-Bleibtreu and others (eds), Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz: Kommentar (loose-leaf, 61st delivery, CH Beck, Munich, 2021) Open Google Scholar
  170. Haratsch, Andreas, ‘§ 7 BVerfGG’, in Bruno Schmidt-Bleibtreu and others (eds), Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz: Kommentar (loose-leaf, 61st delivery, CH Beck, Munich, 2021) Open Google Scholar
  171. Harel, Alon, and Shinar, Adam, ‘The real case for judicial review’, in Erin F Delaney and Rosalind Dixon (eds), Comparative Judicial Review (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, 2018) 13 Open Google Scholar
  172. Hart Ely, John, Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review (Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, 1981) Open Google Scholar
  173. Hart, Henry M, and Sacks, Arthur M, The Legal Process: Basic Problems in the Making and Application of Law (tentative edn, Cambridge MA, 1958) Open Google Scholar
  174. Hart, HLA, ‘American Jurisprudence Through English Eyes: The Nightmare and the Noble Dream’, 11 Ga L Rev 969 (1977) Open Google Scholar
  175. Hart, HLA, The Concept of Law (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1972) Open Google Scholar
  176. Hay, Colin, Why We Hate Politics (Polity Press, Cambridge, 2007) 81 Open Google Scholar
  177. Heck, Justus, Itschert, Adrian, and Tratschin, Luca, ‘Legitimation durch Verfahren: Zum Entstehungskontext und zur Aktualität eines Nicht-Klassikers’, 22 Soziale Systeme 1 (2017) Open Google Scholar
  178. Hein, Michael, and Ewert, Stefan, ‘Die Politisierung der Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit. Eine ideengeschichtliche und systematische Begriffsrekonstruktion’, in Jörn Knobloch and Thorsten Schlee (eds), Unschärferelationen: Konstruktionen der Differenz von Politik und Recht (Springer VS, Wiesbaden, 2018) 103 Open Google Scholar
  179. Hein, Michael, and Ewert, Stefan, ‘How Do Types of Procedure Affect the Degree of Politicization of European Constitutional Courts? A Comparative Study of Germany, Bulgaria, and Portugal’, 9 Eur J Legal Stud 62 (2016) Open Google Scholar
  180. Herdegen, Matthias, ‘Verfassungsinterpretation als methodische Disziplin’, 59 JuristenZeitung 873 (2004) Open Google Scholar
  181. Higgins, Tracy E, ‘Democracy and Feminism’, 110 Harv L Rev 1657 (1997) Open Google Scholar
  182. Hillgruber, Christian, ‘Art. 144’, in Volker Epping and Christian Hillgruber (eds), Beck’scher Online Kommentar Grundgesetz (49th edn, CH Beck, Munich, 2021) Open Google Scholar
  183. Hirschl, Ran, ‘The Judicialization of Politics’, in Gregory A Caldeira, R Daniel Kelemen and Keith E Whittington (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics (OUP, Oxford, 2008) 119 Open Google Scholar
  184. Hirschmann, Nancy, ‘Toward a Feminist Theory of Freedom’, 24 Pol Theory 46 (1996) Open Google Scholar
  185. Hobbes, Thomas, Leviathan (Penguin, London, 1981 [1651]) Open Google Scholar
  186. Hobolt, Sara B, ‘When Europe Matters: The Impact of Political Information on Voting Behaviour in EU Referendums’, 15 J Elections, Pub Opinion & Parties 85 (2005) Open Google Scholar
  187. Holmes, Stephen, ‘Precommitment and the paradox of democracy’, in Jon Elster and Rune Slagstad (eds), Constitutionalism and Democracy (CUP, Cambridge, 1988) 195 Open Google Scholar
  188. Hönnige, Christoph, Verfassungsgericht, Regierung und Opposition: Die vergleichende Analyse eines Spannungsdreiecks (Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, 2007) Open Google Scholar
  189. Hooghe, Liesbet, and Marks, Gary, ‘Politicization’, in Erik Jones, Anand Menon and Stephen Weatherill, The Oxford Handbook of the European Union (OUP, Oxford, 2012) 840 Open Google Scholar
  190. Huber, Peter M, ‘Constitutional Courts and Politics in the European Legal Space’ (forthcoming) Open Google Scholar
  191. Husserl, Edmund, Pariser Vorträge und Cartesianische Meditationen (Nijhoff, The Hague, 1950) Open Google Scholar
  192. Hutchinson, Darren L, ‘The Majoritarian Difficulty: Affirmative Action, Sodomy, and Supreme Court Politics’, 23 Law & Ineq 1 (2005) Open Google Scholar
  193. Ifill, Sherrilyn A, ‘Racial Diversity on the Bench: Beyond Role Models and Public Confidence’, 57 Wash & Lee L Rev 405 (2000) Open Google Scholar
  194. Illing, Sean, ‘The case for stripping the Supreme Court of its power’, Vox, 12 October 2018, available at https://www.vox.com/2018/10/12/17950896/supreme-court-amy-coney-barrett-mark-tushnet (last accessed 22 November 2021) Open Google Scholar
  195. Isensee, Josef, ‘Das Grundrecht als Abwehrrecht und als staatliche Schutzpflicht’, in Josef Isensee and Paul Kirchhof, Handbuch des Staatsrechts, vol 9 (3rd edn, CF Müller, Heidelberg, 2011) 413 Open Google Scholar
  196. Ivison, Duncan, ‘Pluralising political legitimacy’, 20 Postcolonial Studies 118 (2017) Open Google Scholar
  197. Jackson, Vicki C, ‘A Democracy of Rights: The Dark Side? – A Comment on Stephen M. Griffin’, in Mark Tushnet (ed), Arguing Marbury v. Madison (Stanford University Press, Stanford, 2005) 147 Open Google Scholar
  198. Jackson, Vicki C, ‘Methodological Challenges in Comparative Constitutional Law’, 28 Penn State Int’l L Rev 319 (2010) Open Google Scholar
  199. Jackson, Vicki C, ‘Packages of Judicial Independence: The Selection and Tenure of Article III Judges’, 95 Geo L J 965 (2007) Open Google Scholar
  200. Janisch, Wolfgang, ‘Institution in Gefahr’, Süddeutsche Zeitung, 12 October 2018, available at https://perma.cc/N479-RXHS Open Google Scholar
  201. Johnston, Christopher D, and Bartels, Brandon L, ‘Sensationalism and Sobriety: Differential Media Exposure and Attitudes Toward American Courts’, 74 Pub Opinion Q 260 (2010) Open Google Scholar
  202. Jost, Sebastian, ‘EZB steht ein zweites Mal vor dem Verfassungsgericht’, Die Welt, 15 February 2016, available at https://perma.cc/9GB8-YVWQ Open Google Scholar
  203. Kagan, Elena, ‘Confirmation Messes, Old and New’, 62 U Chi L Rev 919 (1994) Open Google Scholar
  204. Kant, Immanuel, The Metaphysics of Morals (Mary Gregor tr and ed, CUP, Cambridge, 1996 [1797]) Open Google Scholar
  205. Kastellec, Jonathan P, Lax, Jeffrey R, and Phillips, Justin H, ‘Public Opinion and Senate Confirmation of Supreme Court Nominees’, 72 J Pol 767 (2010) Open Google Scholar
  206. Katyal, Neal K, ‘Legislative Constitutional Interpretation’, 50 Duke LJ 1335 (2001) Open Google Scholar
  207. Kau, Marcel, United States Supreme Court und Bundesverfassungsgericht: Die Bedeutung des United States Supreme Court für die Errichtung und Fortentwicklung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts (Springer, Berlin, 2007) Open Google Scholar
  208. Kavanagh, Aileen, ‘Participation and Judicial Review’, 22 Law & Phil 451 (2003) Open Google Scholar
  209. Kelsen, Hans, ‘Wesen und Entwicklung der Staatsgerichtsbarkeit’, in Wer soll Hüter der Verfassung sein? Abhandlungen zur Theorie der Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit in der pluralistischen, parlamentarischen Demokratie (Robert C van Ooyen ed, 2nd edn [reprint], Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, 2019 [1929]) 1 [30] Open Google Scholar
  210. Kennedy, Deseriee, ‘Judicial Review and Diversity’, 71 Tenn L Rev 287 (2004) Open Google Scholar
  211. Kennedy, Duncan, A Critique of Adjudication: fin de siècle (Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, 1997) Open Google Scholar
  212. Kielmansegg, Peter Graf, ‘Legitimität als analytische Kategorie’, 12 Politische Vierteljahresschrift 367 (1971) Open Google Scholar
  213. Kieserling, André, ‘Legitimation durch Verfahren (1969)’, in Oliver Jahraus and others (eds), Luhmann-Handbuch: Leben – Werk – Wirkung (JB Metzler, Stuttgart, 2012) 145 Open Google Scholar
  214. King, Michael, and Thornhill, Chris, Niklas Luhmann’s Theory of Politics and Law (Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, 2003) Open Google Scholar
  215. Kischel, Uwe, ‘Amt, Unbefangenheit und Wahl der Bundesverfassungsrichter’, in Josef Isensee and Paul Kirchhof (eds), Handbuch des Staatsrechts der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, vol 3 (3rd edn, CH Beck, Munich, 2005) 1233 Open Google Scholar
  216. Kischel, Uwe, ‘Party, pope, and politics? The election of German Constitutional Court justices in comparative perspective’, 11 Int’l J Con L 962 (2013) Open Google Scholar
  217. Klarman, Michael J, ‘Constitutional Fact/Constitutional Fiction: A Critique of Bruce Ackerman’s Theory of Constitutional Moments’, 44 Stan L Rev 759 (1992) Open Google Scholar
  218. Klarman, Michael J, ‘How Brown Changed Race Relations: The Backlash Thesis’, 81 J Am Hist 81 (1994) Open Google Scholar
  219. Klarman, Michael J, ‘The Puzzling Resistance to Political Process Theory’, 77 Va L Rev 747 (1991) Open Google Scholar
  220. Klarman, Michael J, ‘What’s So Great About Constitutionalism?’, 93 Nw U L Rev 145 (1998) Open Google Scholar
  221. Knudsen, Sven-Eric, Luhmann und Husserl: Systemtheorie im Verhältnis zur Phänomenologie (Königshausen & Neumann, Würzburg, 2006) Open Google Scholar
  222. Koenen, Elmar, ‘Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie – Was leistet die Systemforschung? (1971)’, in Oliver Jahraus and others (eds), Luhmann-Handbuch: Leben – Werk – Wirkung (JB Metzler, Stuttgart, 2012) 150 Open Google Scholar
  223. Korioth, Stefan, ‘Stellung und Einrichtung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts’, in Klaus Schlaich and Stefan Korioth, Das Bundesverfassungsgericht: Stellung, Verfahren, Entscheidungen (12th edn, CH Beck, Munich, 2021) Open Google Scholar
  224. Kramer, Larry D, ‘Foreword: We the Court’, 115 Harv L Rev 5 (2001) Open Google Scholar
  225. Kranenpohl, Uwe, Hinter dem Schleier des Beratungsgeheimnisses: Der Willensbildungs- und Entscheidungsprozess des Bundesverfassungsgerichts (Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, 2010) Open Google Scholar
  226. Krause, Werner, and Wagner, Aiko, ‘Becoming part of the gang? Established and nonestablished populist parties and the role of external efficacy’, 27 Party Pol 161 (2021) Open Google Scholar
  227. Krewson, Christopher N, ‘Political Hearings Reinforce Legal Norms: Confirmation Hearings and Views of the United States Supreme Court’ 1 (forthcoming, Pol Res Q, 2022) Open Google Scholar
  228. Krewson, Christopher N, and Schroedel, Jean R, ‘Modern Judicial Confirmation Hearings and Institutional Support for the Supreme Court’ 1, 2–4 (forthcoming, Soc Sci Q), available at https://perma.cc/SM9P-F7SR Open Google Scholar
  229. Lamprecht, Rolf, ‘“Bis zur Verachtung”’, 48 Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 2531 (1995) Open Google Scholar
  230. Lange, Stefan, Niklas Luhmanns Theorie der Politik: Eine Abklärung der Staatsgesellschaft (Westdeutscher Verlag, Wiesbaden, 2003) Open Google Scholar
  231. Layman, Geoffrey C, Carsey, Thomas M, and Menasce Horowitz, Juliana, ‘Party Polarization in American Politics: Characteristics, Causes, and Consequences’, 9 Ann Rev Pol Sci 83 (2006) Open Google Scholar
  232. Legrand, Pierre, ‘How to compare now’, 16 Legal Stud 232 (1996) Open Google Scholar
  233. Leonhardt, David, ‘How to End the Politicization of the Courts’, The New York Times, 4 April 2017, available at https://perma.cc/AG4G-DEUA Open Google Scholar
  234. Letzgus, Klaus, ‘Wiederaufnahme zuungunsten des Angeklagten bei neuen Tatsachen und Beweisen’, 40 Neue Zeitschrift für Strafrecht 717 (2020) Open Google Scholar
  235. Levinson, Daryl J, and Pildes, Richard H, ‘Separation of Parties, Not Powers’, 119 Harv L Rev 2311 (2006) Open Google Scholar
  236. Liptak, Adam, ‘A Leaky Supreme Court Starts to Resemble the Other Branches’, The New York Times, 11 May 2022, available at https://perma.cc/D39H-5C5S Open Google Scholar
  237. Liptak, Adam, ‘College Diversity Nears Its Last Stand’, The New York Times, 15 October 2011, available at https://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/16/sunday-review/college-diversity-nears-its-last-stand.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all (last accessed 14 February 2022) Open Google Scholar
  238. Lithwick, Dahlia, ‘Why I Haven’t Gone Back to SCOTUS Since Kavanaugh’, Slate, 30 October 2019, available at https://perma.cc/JAL8-AEKH Open Google Scholar
  239. Loughlin, Martin, ‘The Constitutional Imagination’, 78 Mod L Rev 1 (2015) Open Google Scholar
  240. Ludden, Jennifer, ‘Should We Be Having Kids in The Age of Climate Change?’, npr.org, 18 August 2016, available at https://perma.cc/D9D8-Y7N2 Open Google Scholar
  241. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘“Distinctions Directrices”: Über Codierung von Semantiken und Systemen’, in Soziologische Aufklärung 4: Beiträge zur funktionalen Differenzierung der Gesellschaft (Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen, 1987) 13 Open Google Scholar
  242. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Arbeitsteilung und Moral: Durkheims Theorie’, Preface to Émile Durkheim, Über soziale Arbeitsteilung (Ludwig Schmidts tr, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, 1992 [1930]) 19 Open Google Scholar
  243. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Ausdifferenzierung des Rechtssystems’, 7 Rechtstheorie 121 (1976) Open Google Scholar
  244. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Autopoiesis, Handlung und kommunikative Verständigung’, 11 Zeitschrift für Soziologie 366 (1982) Open Google Scholar
  245. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Die Tücke des Subjekts und die Frage nach den Menschen’, in Soziologische Aufklärung 6: Die Soziologie und der Mensch (4th edn, Springer VS, Wiesbaden 2018) 151 Open Google Scholar
  246. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Differentiation of Society’, 2 Can J Soc 29 (1977) Open Google Scholar
  247. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Funktionale Methode und Systemtheorie’, in Soziologische Aufklärung 1: Aufsätze zur Theorie sozialer Systeme (6th edn, Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen, 1990) 31 Open Google Scholar
  248. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Funktionen der Rechtsprechung im politischen System’, in Politische Planung: Aufsätze zur Soziologie von Politik und Verwaltung (4th edn, Springer, Wiesbaden, 1994) 49 Open Google Scholar
  249. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Gesellschaft’, in Soziologische Aufklärung 1: Aufsätze zur Theorie sozialer Systeme (6th edn, Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen, 1990) 137 Open Google Scholar
  250. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Interaktion, Organisation, Gesellschaft: Anwendungen der Systemtheorie’, in Soziologische Aufklärung 2: Aufsätze zur Theorie der Gesellschaft (4th edn, Springer Fachmedien, Wiesbaden, 1991) 8 Open Google Scholar
  251. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Komplexität und Demokratie’, in Politische Planung: Aufsätze zur Soziologie von Politik und Verwaltung (4th edn, Springer, Wiesbaden, 1994) 35 Open Google Scholar
  252. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Law as a Social System’, 83 Nw U L Rev 136 (1989) Open Google Scholar
  253. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Lob der Routine’, in Politische Planung: Aufsätze zur Soziologie von Politik und Verwaltung (4th edn, Springer, Wiesbaden, 1994) 113 Open Google Scholar
  254. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Moderne Systemtheorien als Form gesamtgesellschaftlicher Analyse’, in Jürgen Habermas and Niklas Luhmann, Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie – Was leistet die Systemforschung? (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, 1971) 7 Open Google Scholar
  255. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Normen in soziologischer Perspektive’, 20 Soziale Welt 28 (1969) Open Google Scholar
  256. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Operational Closure and Structural Coupling: The Differentiation of the Legal System’, 13 Cardozo L Rev 1419 (1992) Open Google Scholar
  257. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Organization, membership and the formalization of behavioural expectations [1964]’, 37 Syst Res Behav Sci 425 (2020) Open Google Scholar
  258. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Positivität des Rechts als Voraussetzung einer modernen Gesellschaft’, in Rüdiger Lautmann, Werner Maihofer and Hartmut Schelsky (eds), Die Funktion des Rechts in der modernen Gesellschaft (Bertelsmann-Universitätsverlag, Bielefeld, 1970) 175 Open Google Scholar
  259. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Quod Omnes Tangit: Remarks on Jürgen Habermas’s Legal Theory’, 17 Cardozo L Rev 883 (1995) Open Google Scholar
  260. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Reform und Information: Theoretische Überlegungen zur Reform der Verwaltung’, in Politische Planung: Aufsätze zur Soziologie von Politik und Verwaltung (4th edn, Springer, Wiesbaden, 1994) 181 Open Google Scholar
  261. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Selbstlegitimation des Staates’, 15 Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 65 (1981) Open Google Scholar
  262. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Sinn als Grundbegriff der Soziologie’, in Jürgen Habermas and Niklas Luhmann, Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie – Was leistet die Systemforschung? (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, 1971) 25 Open Google Scholar
  263. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Soziologie als Theorie sozialer Systeme’, in Soziologische Aufklärung 1: Aufsätze zur Theorie sozialer Systeme (6th edn, Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen, 1991) 113 Open Google Scholar
  264. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Soziologie des politischen Systems’, in Soziologische Aufklärung 1: Aufsätze zur Theorie sozialer Systeme (6th edn, Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen, 1991) 154 Open Google Scholar
  265. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Soziologische Aufklärung’, in Soziologische Aufklärung 1: Aufsätze zur Theorie sozialer Systeme (6th edn, Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen, 1991) 66 Open Google Scholar
  266. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Systemtheoretische Argumentationen: Eine Entgegnung auf Habermas’, in Jürgen Habermas and Niklas Luhmann, Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie – Was leistet die Systemforschung? (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, 1971) 291 Open Google Scholar
  267. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘The Autopoiesis of Social Systems [1986]’, 6 J Sociocybernetics 84 (2008) Open Google Scholar
  268. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Theorie der politischen Opposition’, 36 Zeitschrift für Politik 13 (1989) Open Google Scholar
  269. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Verfassung als evolutionäre Errungenschaft’, 9 Rechtshistorisches Journal 176, 204–5. Open Google Scholar
  270. Luhmann, Niklas, A Sociological Theory of Law (Elizabeth King-Utz and Martin Albrow tr, 2014) (eBook) Open Google Scholar
  271. Luhmann, Niklas, Archimedes und wir: Interviews (Dirk Baecker and Georg Stanitzek eds, Merve Verlag, Berlin, 1987) Open Google Scholar
  272. Luhmann, Niklas, Das Recht der Gesellschaft (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, 1995) Open Google Scholar
  273. Luhmann, Niklas, Die Grenzen der Verwaltung (Johannes Schmidt and Christoph Gesigora eds, Suhrkamp, Berlin, 2021). Open Google Scholar
  274. Luhmann, Niklas, Funktionen und Folgen formaler Organisation (Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, 1964) Open Google Scholar
  275. Luhmann, Niklas, Grundrechte als Institution: Ein Beitrag zur politischen Soziologie (5th edn, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, 2009) Open Google Scholar
  276. Luhmann, Niklas, Legitimation durch Verfahren (10th edn, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, 2017) Open Google Scholar
  277. Luhmann, Niklas, Organization and Decision (Dirk Baecker ed, Rhodes Barrett tr, CUP, Cambridge, 2018) Open Google Scholar
  278. Luhmann, Niklas, Politische Soziologie (André Kieserling ed, Suhrkamp, Berlin, 2010) Open Google Scholar
  279. Luhmann, Niklas, Social Systems (John Bednarz, Jr, tr with Dirk Baecker, Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1995) Open Google Scholar
  280. Luhmann, Niklas, Systemtheorie der Gesellschaft (Johannes Schmidt and André Kieserling eds, Suhrkamp, Berlin, 2017) Open Google Scholar
  281. Luhmann, Niklas, Vertrauen: Ein Mechanismus der Reduktion sozialer Komplexität (5th edn, UVK Verlagsgesellschaft, Konstanz, 2014) Open Google Scholar
  282. Machura, Stefan, ‘Legitimation durch Verfahren – was bleibt?’, 22 Soziale Systeme 331 (2017) Open Google Scholar
  283. MacKinnon, Catharine A, ‘“Freedom from Unreal Loyalties: On Fidelity in Constitutional Interpretation’, 65 Fordham L Rev 1773 (1997) Open Google Scholar
  284. MacKinnon, Catharine A, Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law (Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, 1987) Open Google Scholar
  285. MacKinnon, Catharine A, Toward a Feminist Theory of the State (Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, 1989) Open Google Scholar
  286. Malcolm, Joyce L, ‘Whatever the Judges Say It Is? The Founders and Judicial Review’, 26 J Law & Pol 1 (2010) Open Google Scholar
  287. Maravall, José M, ‘The Rule of Law as a Political Weapon’, in José María Maravall and Adam Przeworski (eds), Democracy and the Rule of Law (CUP, Cambridge, 2003) 261 Open Google Scholar
  288. Marcus, Ruth, ‘Justice Sotomayor drops the S-bomb’, The Washington Post, 3 December 2021, available at https://perma.cc/YEA2-2K5W Open Google Scholar
  289. Marshall, William P, ‘Constitutional Law as Political Spoils’, 26 Cardozo L Rev 525 (2005) Open Google Scholar
  290. Masing, Johannes, ‘§ 15: Das Bundesverfassungsgericht’, in Matthias Herdegen and others (eds), Handbuch des Verfassungsrechts: Darstellung in transnationaler Perspektive (CH Beck, Munich, 2021) Open Google Scholar
  291. Mason, Lilliana, ‘“I Respectfully Disagree”: The Differential Effects of Partisan Sorting on Social and Issue Polarization’, 59 Am J Pol Sci 128 (2015) Open Google Scholar
  292. Mason, Lilliana, ‘The Rise of Uncivil Agreement: Issue Versus Behavioral Polarization in the American Electorate’, 57 Am Behav Scientist 140 (2013) Open Google Scholar
  293. Maturana, Humberto, ‘The Organization of the Living: A Theory of the Living Organization’, 7 Int’l J Man-Machine Stud 313 (1975) Open Google Scholar
  294. McConnell, Michael W, Written Testimony Before the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States, 30 June 2021, p 7, available at https://perma.cc/KJT6-HAHM Open Google Scholar
  295. McGinnis, John O, and Rappaport, Michael B, ‘In Praise of Supreme Court Filibusters’, 33 Harv JL & Pub Pol’y 39 (2010) Open Google Scholar
  296. Mead, George H, Mind, Self & Society (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2015 [1934]) Open Google Scholar
  297. Merton, Robert K, Social Theory and Social Structure (enlarged edn, Free Press, New York, 1968) Open Google Scholar
  298. Meyer, Hans, ‘Grundgesetzliche Demokratie und Wahlrecht für Nichtdeutsche’, 71 JuristenZeitung 121 (2016) Open Google Scholar
  299. Michelman, Frank I, ‘Brennan and Democracy’, 86 Cal L Rev 399 (1998) Open Google Scholar
  300. Michelman, Frank I, ‘Ida’s Way: Constructing the Respect-Worthy Governmental System’, 72 Fordham L Rev 345 (2003) Open Google Scholar
  301. Michelman, Frank I, ‘Justice as Fairness, Legitimacy, and the Question of Judicial Review’, 72 Fordham L Rev 1407 (2003) Open Google Scholar
  302. Michelman, Frank I, ‘The bind of tolerance and a call to feminist thought: A reply to Gila Stopler’, 19 Int’l J Con L 408 (2021) Open Google Scholar
  303. Michelman, Frank I, ‘The Question of Constitutional Fidelity: Rawls on the Reason of Constitutional Courts’, in Silje A Langvatn, Mattias Kumm and Wojciech Sadurski (eds), Public Reason and Courts (CUP, Cambridge, 2020) 90 Open Google Scholar
  304. Möllers, Christoph, ‘Legality, Legitimacy, and Legitimation of the Federal Constitutional Court’, in Matthias Jestaedt and others, The German Federal Constitutional Court: The Court Without Limits (Jeff Seitzer tr, OUP, Oxford, 2020) 131 Open Google Scholar
  305. Möllers, Christoph, ‘Why There Is No Governing with Judges’, 30 September 2014, p 30, available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=2503729 Open Google Scholar
  306. Möllers, Christoph, Freiheitsgrade: Elemente einer liberalen politischen Mechanik (Suhrkamp, Berlin, 2020) Open Google Scholar
  307. Möllers, Christoph, The Three Branches: A Comparative Model of Separation of Powers (OUP, Oxford, 2013) Open Google Scholar
  308. Monaghan, Henry Paul, ‘The Confirmation Process: Law or Politics?’, 101 Harv L Rev 1202 (1988) Open Google Scholar
  309. Mondak, Jeffery J, and Smithey, Shannon I, ‘The Dynamics of Public Support for the Supreme Court’, 59 J Pol 1114 (1997) Open Google Scholar
  310. Montag, Jerzy, ‘Transparenz und Legitimität: Notwendige Reform der Wahl der Richterinnen und Richter zum Bundesverfassungsgericht’, 44 Recht und Politik 139 (2008) Open Google Scholar
  311. Müller, Reinhard, ‘Es allen recht machen’, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 3 November 2010, available at https://perma.cc/8VT8-N4EQ Open Google Scholar
  312. Müller, Reinhard, ‘Ohne Karlsruhe geht es nicht’, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 6 September 2021, p 1 Open Google Scholar
  313. Münch, Richard, ‘Luhmann und Parsons’, in Oliver Jahraus and others (eds), Luhmann-Handbuch: Leben – Werk – Wirkung (JB Metzler, Stuttgart, 2012) Open Google Scholar
  314. Murphy, John W, ‘Talcott Parsons and Niklas Luhmann: Two Versions of the “Social System”’, 12 Int Rev Mod Soc 291 (1982) Open Google Scholar
  315. Myrdal, Gunnar, An American Dilemma: The Negro Problem and Modern Democracy (Harper & Brothers, New York, 1944) Open Google Scholar
  316. Nash, Jonathan R, ‘Prejudging Judges’, 106 Colum L Rev 2168 (2006) Open Google Scholar
  317. Nelson, Michael J, and Tucker, Patrick, ‘The Stability and Durability of the U.S. Supreme Court’s Legitimacy’, 83 J Pol 767 (2021) Open Google Scholar
  318. Noel, Hans, Political Ideologies and Political Parties in America (CUP, New York, 2013) Open Google Scholar
  319. Nozick, Robert, Anarchy, State, and Utopia (Blackwell, Oxford, 1974) Open Google Scholar
  320. O’Scannlain, Diarmuid F, ‘Today’s Senate Confirmation Battles and the Role of the Federal Judiciary’, 27 Harv JL & Pub Pol’y 169 (2003) Open Google Scholar
  321. Offe, Claus, ‘Politische Legitimation durch Mehrheitsentscheidung?’, in Bernd Guggenberger and Claus Offe (eds), An den Grenzen der Mehrheitsdemokratie: Politik und Soziologie der Mehrheitsregel (Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen, 1984) 150 Open Google Scholar
  322. Olsen, Jonathan, ‘The Left Party and the AfD’, 36 German Pol & Soc’y 70 (2018) Open Google Scholar
  323. Ossenbühl, Fritz, ‘§ 15: Grundsätze der Grundrechtsinterpretation’, in Detlef Merten and others (eds), Handbuch der Grundrechte in Deutschland und Europa, vol 1 (CF Müller, Heidelberg, 2004) 595 Open Google Scholar
  324. Owen, Diana, and Dennis, Jack, ‘Gender Differences in the Politicization of American Children’, 8 Women & Pol 23 (1988) Open Google Scholar
  325. Palonen, Kari, ‘Four Times of Politics: Policy, Polity, Politicking, and Politicization’, 28 Alternatives 171 (2003) Open Google Scholar
  326. Parsons, Talcott, and others, ‘Some Fundamental Categories of the Theory of Action: A General Statement’, in Talcott Parsons and Edward A Shils (eds), Toward a General Theory of Action (Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, 1962) 3 Open Google Scholar
  327. Parsons, Talcott, The Social System (The Free Press, Glencoe, 1951) Open Google Scholar
  328. Parsons, Talcott, The Structure of Social Action: A Study in Social Theory with Special Reference to a Group of Recent European Writers (Free Press, Glencoe, 1949) Open Google Scholar
  329. Pateman, Carole, The Disorder of Women: Democracy, Feminism, and Political Theory (Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1989) Open Google Scholar
  330. Perry, Michael J, The Constitution in the Courts: Law or Politics? (OUP, New York, 1994) Open Google Scholar
  331. Peter, Fabienne, ‘Political Legitimacy’, in Edward N Zalta (ed), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2017 ed), available at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/legitimacy/#PubReaDemApp (last accessed 17 November 2021) Open Google Scholar
  332. Peter, Fabienne, ‘The Grounds of Political Legitimacy’, 6 J Am Phil Ass’n 372 (2020) Open Google Scholar
  333. Pildes, Richard H, ‘Why The Center Does Not Hold: The Causes of Hyperpolarized Democracy in America’, 99 Cal L Rev 273 (2011) Open Google Scholar
  334. Poscher, Ralf, Grundrechte als Abwehrrechte – Reflexive Regelung rechtlich geordneter Freiheit (Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, 2003) Open Google Scholar
  335. Posner, Richard A, ‘Foreword: A Political Court’, 119 Harv L Rev 32 (2005) Open Google Scholar
  336. Post, Robert, ‘Theorizing Disagreement: Reconceiving the Relationship Between Law and Politics’, 98 Cal L Rev 1319 (2010) Open Google Scholar
  337. Post, Robert, and Siegel, Reva, ‘Popular Constitutionalism, Departmentalism, and Judicial Supremacy’, 92 Cal L Rev 1027 (2004) Open Google Scholar
  338. Post, Robert, and Siegel, Reva, ‘Questioning Justice: Law and Politics in Judicial Confirmation Hearings’, 115 Yale LJ Pocket Part 38 (2006) Open Google Scholar
  339. Prantl, Heribert, ‘Der lachende Vierte’, Süddeutsche Zeitung, 12 February 2020, available at https://perma.cc/7GW8-RW58 Open Google Scholar
  340. Prantl, Heribert, ‘Politische Entpolitisierung: Die Union beruft einen Spitzenrichter für weniger Einmischung’, Süddeutsche Zeitung, 25 November 2018, available at https://perma.cc/5KQE-98JH Open Google Scholar
  341. Preuß, Ulrich K, ‘Die Wahl der Bundesverfassungsrichter als verfassungsrechtliches und -politisches Problem’, 21 Zeitschrift für Rechtspolitik 389 (1988) Open Google Scholar
  342. Quong, Jonathan, Liberalism without Perfection (OUP, Oxford, 2010) Open Google Scholar
  343. Radcliffe-Brown, Alfred R, ‘On the Concept of Function in Social Science’, 37 Am Anthropologist 394 (1935) Open Google Scholar
  344. Ramage, Magnus, and Shipp, Karen, Systems Thinkers (2nd edn, Springer, Milton Keynes, 2020) Open Google Scholar
  345. Ramirez, Mark D, ‘Procedural Perceptions and Support for the U.S. Supreme Court’, 29 Pol Psychol 675 (2008) Open Google Scholar
  346. Rasch, William, Niklas Luhmann’s Modernity: The Paradoxes of Differentiation (Stanford University Press, Stanford, 2000) Open Google Scholar
  347. Rawls, John, ‘Reply to Habermas’, 92 J Phil 132 (1995) Open Google Scholar
  348. Rawls, John, ‘The Idea of Public Reason Revisited’, 64 U Chi L Rev 765 (1997) Open Google Scholar
  349. Rawls, John, Political Liberalism (Columbia University Press, New York, 1996) Open Google Scholar
  350. Raz, Joseph, ‘Authority and Justification’, in Joseph Raz (ed), Authority (New York University Press, New York, 1990) 115 Open Google Scholar
  351. Raz, Joseph, ‘Disagreement in Politics’, 43 Am J Juris 25 (1998) Open Google Scholar
  352. Raz, Joseph, Practical Reason and Norms (OUP, Oxford, 1999) Open Google Scholar
  353. Reidy, John A, ‘Rawls’s Wide View of Public Reason: Not Wide Enough’, 6 Res Publica 49 (2000) Open Google Scholar
  354. Rennert, Klaus, ‘Legitimation und Legitimität des Richters’, 70 JuristenZeitung 529 (2015) Open Google Scholar
  355. Richter, Paul, ‘Clinton Picks Moderate Judge Breyer for Supreme Court Spot’, Los Angeles Times, 14 May 1994, available at https://perma.cc/S68E-N546 Open Google Scholar
  356. Ringhand, Lori A, ‘Judicial Activism: An Empirical Examination of Voting Behavior on the Rehnquist Natural Court’, 24 Const Comment 43 (2007) Open Google Scholar
  357. Roberts, Dorothy E, ‘The Meaning of Blacks’ Fidelity to the Constitution’, 65 Fordham L Rev 1761 (1997) Open Google Scholar
  358. Robertson, David, The Judge as Political Theorist: Contemporary Constitutional Review (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2010) Open Google Scholar
  359. Robson, Ruthann, ‘Judicial Review and Sexual Freedom’, 30 U Haw L Rev 1 (2007) Open Google Scholar
  360. Roellecke, Gerd, ‘Zum Problem einer Reform der Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit’, 56 JuristenZeitung 114 (2001) Open Google Scholar
  361. Rogowski, Jon C, and Stone, Andrew R, ‘How Political Contestation Over Judicial Nominations Polarizes Americans’ Attitudes Toward the Supreme Court’, 51 Brit J Pol Sci 1251 (2021) Open Google Scholar
  362. Rogowski, Ralf, ‘Constitutional courts as autopoietic organisations’, in Michael Wrase and Christian Boulanger (eds), Die Politik des Verfassungsrechts: Interdisziplinäre und vergleichende Perspektiven auf die Rolle und Funktion von Verfassungsgerichten (Nomos, Baden-Baden, 2013) 123 Open Google Scholar
  363. Rogowski, Ralf, and Gawron, Thomas (eds), Constitutional Courts in Comparison: The U.S. Supreme Court and the German Federal Constitutional Court (2nd edn, Berghahn, New York, 2016) Open Google Scholar
  364. Rosanvallon, Pierre, La légitimité démocratique: Impartialité, réflexivité, proximité (Éditions du Seuil, Paris, 2008) Open Google Scholar
  365. Rosenberg, Gerald N, The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1991) Open Google Scholar
  366. Rosenfeld, Michel, Just Interpretations: Law between Ethics and Politics (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1998) Open Google Scholar
  367. Rottleuthner, Hubert, ‘Niklas Luhmann on the Autonomy of the Legal System’, 23 Law & Soc’y Rev 779 (1989) Open Google Scholar
  368. Rottleuthner, Hubert, ‘Zur Soziologie richterlichen Handelns (II)’, 4 Kritische Justiz 60 (1971) Open Google Scholar
  369. Sacksofsky, Ute, ‘Das Frauenbild des Bundesverfassungsgerichts’, 14 Querelles: Jahrbuch für Frauen- und Geschlechterforschung 191 (2009) Open Google Scholar
  370. Sacksofsky, Ute, ‘Wenn Rechtfertigungen brüchig werden: Verfassungsgerichte in der Diskriminierungsbekämpfung am Beispiel der Geschlechterordnung vor dem Bundesverfassungsgericht’, in Rainer Forst and Klaus Günther (eds), Normative Ordnungen (Suhrkamp, Berlin, 2021) 604 Open Google Scholar
  371. Sadurski, Wojciech, Equality and Legitimacy (OUP, Oxford, 2008) Open Google Scholar
  372. Sadurski, Wojciech, Rights Before Courts: A Study of Constitutional Courts in Postcommunist States of Central and Eastern Europe (2nd edn, Springer, Dordrecht, 2014) Open Google Scholar
  373. Sager, Lawrence G, ‘The Incorrigible Constitution’, 65 NYU L Rev 893 (1990) Open Google Scholar
  374. Schauer, Frederick, ‘The Boundaries of the First Amendment: A Preliminary Exploration of Constitutional Salience’, 117 Harv L Rev 1765 (2004) Open Google Scholar
  375. Scheb, John M II, and Lyons, William, ‘The Myth of Legality and Public Evaluation of the Supreme Court’, 81 Soc Sci 928 (2000) Open Google Scholar
  376. Scheid, Christopher, ‘Demokratieimmanente Legitimation der Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit’, 59 Der Staat 227 (2020) Open Google Scholar
  377. Schelsky, Helmut, ‘Systemfunktionaler, anthropologischer und personfunktionaler Ansatz der Rechtssoziologie’, in Rüdiger Lautmann, Werner Maihofer and Helmut Schelsky (eds), Die Funktion des Rechts in der modernen Gesellschaft (Bertelsmann-Universitätsverlag, Bielefeld, 1970) 61 Open Google Scholar
  378. Schlink, Bernhard, ‘Proportionality’, in Michel Rosenfeld and András Sajó (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (OUP, Oxford, 2012) 718 Open Google Scholar
  379. Schmitt, Carl, ‘Der Hüter der Verfassung’, 55 Archiv des öffentlichen Rechts 161 (1929) Open Google Scholar
  380. Schmitt, Carl, ‘The Concept of the Political’, in The Concept of the Political (George Schwab tr, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2007) 19 Open Google Scholar
  381. Schmitt, Carl, Die geistesgeschichtliche Lage des heutigen Parlamentarismus (10th edn, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, 2017 [1923]) Open Google Scholar
  382. Schmitt, Carl, Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty (George Schwab tr, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2005) Open Google Scholar
  383. Schoenherr, Jessica A, Lane, Elizabeth A, and Armaly, Miles T, ‘The Purpose of Senatorial Grandstanding during Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings’, 8 J Law & Cts 333 (2020) Open Google Scholar
  384. Schreier, Nicole, Demokratische Legitimation von Verfassungsrichtern: Eine rechtsvergleichende Analyse am Beispiel des Bundesverfassungsgerichts und des United States Supreme Court (Nomos, Baden-Baden, 2016) Open Google Scholar
  385. Schröder, Meinhard, ‘Verfassungsrichterwahl im transparenten Konsens?’, 30 Zeitschrift für Gesetzgebung 150 (2015) Open Google Scholar
  386. Schulze-Fielitz, Helmuth, ‘Art. 103 Abs. 3’, in Horst Dreier (ed), Grundgesetz: Kommentar, vol 3 (3rd edn, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, 2018) Open Google Scholar
  387. Schütz, Alfred, ‘Das Problem der transzendentalen Intersubjektivität bei Husserl’, 5 Philosophische Rundschau 81 (1957) Open Google Scholar
  388. Schwartzman, Micah, ‘The Etiquette of Animus’, 132 Harv L Rev 133 (2018) Open Google Scholar
  389. Segal, Jeffrey A, and Spaeth, Harold A, The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited (CUP, Cambridge, 2002) Open Google Scholar
  390. Seib, Gerald F, ‘Supreme Court Opening Adds to Pressure on American Institutions’, The Wall Street Journal, 21 September 2020, available at https://perma.cc/HEH6-AY5H Open Google Scholar
  391. Serwer, Adam, ‘Obamacare’s Supreme Court Disaster’, Mother Jones, 27 March 2012, available at https://perma.cc/7PYZ-8SGW Open Google Scholar
  392. Shapiro, Martin, Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1981) Open Google Scholar
  393. Shear, Michael D, and Kanno-Youngs, Zolan, ‘As Leak Theories Circulate, Supreme Court Marshal Takes Up Investigation’, The New York Times, 4 May 2022, available at https://perma.cc/6EDP-4ZUJ Open Google Scholar
  394. Simmons, A John, ‘Justification and Legitimacy’, 109 Ethics 739 (1999) Open Google Scholar
  395. Simon, Herbert A, ‘Theories of Decision-Making in Economics and Behavioral Science’, 49 Am Econ Rev 253 (1959) Open Google Scholar
  396. Smith, Adam, The Theory of Moral Sentiments (D D Raphael and A L Macfie eds, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1976 [1759]) Open Google Scholar
  397. Soley, Ximena, and Steininger, Silvia, ‘Parting ways or lashing back? Withdrawals, backlash and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights’, 14 Int’l JL in Context 237 (2018) Open Google Scholar
  398. Solomons, David, ‘The Politicization of Accounting’, 146 J Accountancy 65 (1978) Open Google Scholar
  399. Sólyom, László, ‘The Constitutional Court of Hungary’, in Armin von Bogdandy, Christoph Grabenwarter and Peter M Huber (eds), The Max Planck Handbooks in European Public Law, vol 3 (OUP, Oxford, 2020) 357 Open Google Scholar
  400. Somek, Alexander, ‘Zwei Welten der Rechtslehre und die Philosophie des Rechts’, 71 JuristenZeitung 481 (2016) Open Google Scholar
  401. Somin, Ilya, ‘Political Ignorance and the Countermajoritarian Difficulty: A New Perspective on the Central Obsession of Constitutional Theory’, 89 Iowa L Rev 1287 (2004) Open Google Scholar
  402. Stone Sweet, Alec, Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe (OUP, Oxford, 2000) Open Google Scholar
  403. Stone, Adrienne, ‘Judicial Review Without Rights: Some Problems for the Democratic Legitimacy of Structural Judicial Review’, 28 Ox J Legal Stud 1 (2008) Open Google Scholar
  404. Stone, Geoffrey R, ‘Understanding Supreme Court Confirmations’, 2010 Sup Ct Rev 381 (2010) Open Google Scholar
  405. Strauss, David A, and Sunstein, Cass R, ‘The Senate, the Constitution, and the Confirmation Process’, 101 Yale LJ 1491 (1992) Open Google Scholar
  406. Šubrt, Jiří, The Systemic Approach in Sociology and Niklas Luhmann: Expectations, Discussions, Doubts (Emerald Publishing, Bingley, 2020) Open Google Scholar
  407. Sunstein, Cass R, ‘Foreword: Leaving Things Undecided’, 110 Harv L Rev 4 (1996) Open Google Scholar
  408. Sunstein, Cass R, The Partial Constitution (Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, 1993) Open Google Scholar
  409. Táíwò, Olúfémi O, ‘Being-in-the-Room Privilege: Elite Capture and Epistemic Deference’, 108 The Philosopher (2020), available at https://perma.cc/74FG-9D5L Open Google Scholar
  410. Talbot, Margaret, ‘Amy Coney Barrett’s Long Game’, The New Yorker, 7 February 2022, available at https://perma.cc/8F35-3RSW Open Google Scholar
  411. Tau, Byron, and Hughes, Siobhan, ‘Senate Eliminates Filibuster for Supreme Court Nominees’, The Wall Street Journal, 6 April 2017, available at https://perma.cc/DEC8-AANV Open Google Scholar
  412. Taylor, Stuart Jr, ‘Politics in the Bork Battle; Opinion Polls and Campaign-Style Pressure May Change Supreme Court Confirmations’, The New York Times, 28 September 1987, available at https://perma.cc/EPU6-59E5 Open Google Scholar
  413. Taylor, Stuart Jr, ‘Scalia’s Views, Stylishly Expressed, Line Up with Reagan’s’, The New York Times, 19 June 1986, available at https://perma.cc/KT9K-JS75 Open Google Scholar
  414. Thayer, James B, ‘The Origin and Scope of the American Doctrine of Constitutional Law’, 7 Harv L Rev 129 (1893/1894) Open Google Scholar
  415. Thompson, Dennis F, Just Elections: Creating a Fair Electoral Process in the United States (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2002) Open Google Scholar
  416. Thornhill, Chris, ‘Luhmann and Marx: Social Theory and Social Freedom’, in Anders la Cour and Andreas Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos (eds), Luhmann Observed: Radical Theoretical Encounters (Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, 2013) 263 Open Google Scholar
  417. Thornhill, Chris, ‘Niklas Luhmann, Carl Schmitt and the Modern Form of the Political’, 10 Eur J Soc Theory 499 (2007) Open Google Scholar
  418. Thornhill, Chris, ‘Niklas Luhmann: A Sociological Transformation of Political Legitimacy?’, 7 Scandinavian J Soc Theory 33 (2006) Open Google Scholar
  419. Thornhill, Chris, Political Theory in Modern Germany: An Introduction (Polity Press, Cambridge, 2000) Open Google Scholar
  420. Tilly, Charles, Durable Inequality (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1998) Open Google Scholar
  421. Toobin, Jeffrey, ‘Swing Shift: How Anthony Kennedy’s passion for foreign law could change the Supreme Court’, The New Yorker, 12 September 2005, available at https://perma.cc/6MSW-3G5W Open Google Scholar
  422. Totenberg, Nina, ‘170-Plus Days And Counting: GOP Unlikely To End Supreme Court Blockade Soon’, npr.org, 6 September 2016, available at https://perma.cc/DSN9-BFK7 Open Google Scholar
  423. Tribe, Laurence H, American Constitutional Law (2nd edn, Foundation Press, Mineola, 1988) Open Google Scholar
  424. Troper, Michel, ‘The logic of justification of judicial review’, 1 Int’l J Con L 99 (2003) Open Google Scholar
  425. Tuleja, Piotr, ‘The Polish Constitutional Tribunal’, in Armin von Bogdandy, Christoph Grabenwarter and Peter M Huber (eds), The Max Planck Handbooks in European Public Law, vol 3 (OUP, Oxford, 2020) 619 Open Google Scholar
  426. Turner, Ralph H, ‘Role-Taking: Process Versus Conformity’, in Arnold M Rose (ed), Human Behavior and Social Processes: An Interactionist Approach (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1962) 20 Open Google Scholar
  427. Tushnet, Mark, ‘Constitutional Interpretation, Character, and Experience’, 72 B U L Rev 747 (1992) Open Google Scholar
  428. Tushnet, Mark, ‘How Different Are Waldron’s and Fallon’s Core Cases For and Against Judicial Review?’, 30 Ox J Legal Stud 49 (2010) Open Google Scholar
  429. Tushnet, Mark, ‘The Constitution Outside the Courts: A Preliminary Inquiry’, 26 Val U L Rev 437 (1992) Open Google Scholar
  430. Tushnet, Mark, Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1999) Open Google Scholar
  431. Tyler, Tom R, ‘Legal socialization: Back to the future’, 77 J Soc Issues 663 (2021) Open Google Scholar
  432. Tyler, Tom R, and Mitchell, Gregory, ‘Legitimacy and the Empowerment of Discretionary Legal Authority: The United States Supreme Court and Abortion Rights’, 43 Duke LJ 703 (1994) Open Google Scholar
  433. Tyler, Tom R, and Trinkner, Rick, Why Children Follow Rules: Legal Socialization and the Development of Legitimacy (OUP, New York, 2018) Open Google Scholar
  434. Tyler, Tom R, Why People Obey the Law (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2006) Open Google Scholar
  435. Varela, Francisco, Maturana, Humberto, and Uribe, Ricardo, ‘Autopoiesis: The Organization of Living Systems, its Characterization and a Model’, 5 BioSystems 187 (1974) Open Google Scholar
  436. Verschraegen, Gert, ‘Human Rights and Modern Society: A Sociological Analysis from the Perspective of Systems Theory’, 29 J Law & Soc’y 258 (2002) Open Google Scholar
  437. Viskovatoff, Alex, ‘Foundations of Niklas Luhmann’s Theory of Social Systems’, 29 Phil Soc Sci 481 (1999) Open Google Scholar
  438. Volcansek, Mary L, ‘Judicialization of Politics or Politicization of the Courts in New Democracies?’, in Christine Landfried (ed), Judicial Power: How Constitutional Courts Affect Political Transformations (CUP, Cambridge, 2019) 66 Open Google Scholar
  439. Volkmann, Uwe, ‘Bausteine zu einer demokratischen Theorie der Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit’, in Michael Bäuerle, Philipp Dann and Astrid Wallrabenstein, Demokratie-Perspektiven: Festschrift für Brun-Otto Bryde zum 70. Geburtstag (Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, 2013) 119 Open Google Scholar
  440. von Bertalanffy, Ludwig, General System Theory: Foundations, Developments, Applications (George Braziller, New York, 1968) Open Google Scholar
  441. von Bogdandy, Armin, ‘Das Öffentliche im Völkerrecht im Lichte von Schmitts „Begriff des Politischen“: Zugleich ein Beitrag zur Theoriebildung im Öffentlichen Recht’, 77 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht (Heidelberg J Int’l L) 877 (2017) Open Google Scholar
  442. von Bogdandy, Armin, Grabenwarter, Christoph, and Huber, Peter M, ‘Constitutional Adjudication in the European Legal Space’, in Armin von Bogdandy, Christoph Grabenwarter and Peter M Huber (eds), The Max Planck Handbooks in European Public Law, vol 3 (OUP, Oxford, 2020) 1 Open Google Scholar
  443. Voßkuhle, Andreas, ‘Art. 94’, in Hermann von Mangoldt, Friedrich Klein and Christian Starck (eds), Grundgesetz: Kommentar, vol 3 (7th edn, CH Beck, Munich, 2018) Open Google Scholar
  444. Wagner, Aiko, ‘Typwechsel 2017? Vom moderaten zum polarisierten Pluralismus’, 50 Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 114 (2019) Open Google Scholar
  445. Wagschal, Uwe, ‘Der Parteienstaat der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Parteipolische Zusammensetzung seiner Schlüsselinstitutionen’, 32 Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 861 (2001) Open Google Scholar
  446. Wahl, Rainer, ‘§ 19: Die objektiv-rechtliche Dimension der Grundrechte im internationalen Vergleich’, in Detlef Merten and others (eds), Handbuch der Grundrechte in Deutschland und Europa, vol 1 (CF Müller, Heidelberg, 2004) 745 Open Google Scholar
  447. Wahlke, John C, ‘Policy Demands and System Support: the Role of the Represented’, 1 Brit J Pol Sci 271 (1971) Open Google Scholar
  448. Waldron, Jeremy, ‘A Right-Based Critique of Constitutional Rights’, 13 Oxford J Legal Stud 18 (1993) Open Google Scholar
  449. Waldron, Jeremy, ‘Five to Four: Why Do Bare Majorities Rule on Courts?’, 123 Yale LJ 1692 (2014) Open Google Scholar
  450. Waldron, Jeremy, ‘Judges as moral reasoners’, 7 Int’l J Con L 2 (2009) Open Google Scholar
  451. Waldron, Jeremy, ‘The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review’, 115 Yale LJ 1346 (2006) Open Google Scholar
  452. Waldron, Jeremy, ‘Theoretical Foundations of Liberalism’, 37 Phil Q 127 (1987) Open Google Scholar
  453. Waldron, Jeremy, Law and Disagreement (OUP, Oxford, 1999) Open Google Scholar
  454. Walter, Christian, ‘Art. 94’, in Günter Dürig and others (eds), Grundgesetz: Kommentar (loose-leaf, 95th delivery, CH Beck, Munich, 2021) Open Google Scholar
  455. Waluchow, Wilfrid, ‘On the Neutrality of Charter Reasoning’, in Jordi Ferrer Beltrán, José Juan Moreso and Diego M Papayannis (eds), Neutrality and Theory of Law (Springer, Dordrecht, 2013) 203 Open Google Scholar
  456. Wasserstrom, Richard A, The Judicial Decision: Toward a Theory of Legal Justification (Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1961) Open Google Scholar
  457. Weber, Max, ‘Politics as a Vocation’, in The Vocation Lectures (David Owen and Tracy B Strong eds, Rodney Livingstone tr, Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis, 2004 [1919]) Open Google Scholar
  458. Weber, Max, Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Society, vol 1 (Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich eds, Ephraim Fischoff and others tr, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1978) 37 Open Google Scholar
  459. Wefing, Heinrich, ‘Etwas zu politisch?’, Die Zeit, 14 November 2018, available at https://perma.cc/EY5X-YZH3 Open Google Scholar
  460. Weiden, David L, ‘Judicial Politicization, Ideology, and Activism at the High Courts of the United States, Canada, and Australia’, 62 Pol Res Q 335 (2011) Open Google Scholar
  461. Weiss, Carol H, ‘The Politicization of Evaluation Research’, 26 J Soc Issues 57 (1970) Open Google Scholar
  462. Weiß, Johannes, ‘Legitimationsbegriff und Legitimationsleistung der Systemtheorie Niklas Luhmanns’, 18 Politische Vierteljahresschrift 74 (1977) Open Google Scholar
  463. Wenar, Leif, ‘John Rawls’, in Edward N Zalta (ed), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2021 Edition), available at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/rawls/ (last accessed 30 September 2021) Open Google Scholar
  464. Wiefelspütz, Dieter, ‘Die Bundesverfassungsrichter werden vom Deutschen Bundestag direkt gewählt!’, 65 Die Öffentliche Verwaltung 961 (2012) Open Google Scholar
  465. Wiesner, Claudia, ‘Rethinking politicisation as a multi-stage and multilevel concept’, 18 Contemp Pol Theory 255 (2019) Open Google Scholar
  466. Woodson, Benjamin, ‘Politicization and the Two Modes of Evaluating Judicial Decisions’, 3 J Law & Cts 193 (2015) Open Google Scholar
  467. Wright, Susan, ‘The Politicization of “Culture”’, 14 Anthropology Today 7 (1998) Open Google Scholar
  468. Zelditch, Morris Jr, ‘Theories of Legitimacy’, in John T Jost and Brenda Major (eds), The Psychology of Legitimacy: Emerging Perspectives on Ideology, Justice, and Intergroup Relations (CUP, Cambridge, 2001) Open Google Scholar
  469. Zeleny, Milan, ‘Self-Organization of Living Systems: A Formal Model of Autopoiesis’, 4 Int’l J General Sys 13 (1977) Open Google Scholar
  470. Zilis, Michael A, ‘Minority Groups and Judicial Legitimacy: Group Affect and the Incentives for Judicial Responsiveness’, 71 Pol Res Q 270 (2018) Open Google Scholar
  471. Zuck, Rüdiger, ‘Politische Sekundärtugenden: Über die Kunst, Pakete zu schnüren’, 47 Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 497 (1994) Open Google Scholar
  472. Zürn, Michael, ‘Politicization compared: at national, European, and global levels’, 26 J Eur Pub Pol’y 977 (2019) Open Google Scholar
  473. Zürn, Michael, Binder, Martin, and Ecker-Ehrhardt, Matthias, ‘International authority and its politicization’, 4 Int’l Theory 69 (2012) Open Google Scholar

Similar publications

from the topics "Constitutional Law", "European Law & International Law & Comparative Law"
Cover of book: Professioneller eSport in Deutschland im Spannungsfeld von Berufsfreiheit, Arbeits- und Datenschutzrecht
Book Titles No access
Bastian Orlowski
Professioneller eSport in Deutschland im Spannungsfeld von Berufsfreiheit, Arbeits- und Datenschutzrecht
Cover of book: Unbeabsichtigte Normenkonflikte zwischen EU-Recht und nationalem Recht
Book Titles No access
Yannis Ockernahl
Unbeabsichtigte Normenkonflikte zwischen EU-Recht und nationalem Recht
Cover of book: Wie fördert die EU Menschenrechte in Drittstaaten?
Book Titles No access
Dennis Traudt
Wie fördert die EU Menschenrechte in Drittstaaten?
Cover of book: Future-Proofing in Public Law
Edited Book No access
Nicole Koblenz LL.M., Nicholas Otto, Gernot Sydow
Future-Proofing in Public Law
Cover of book: Comparative Perspectives on the Law of Energy Transition in Europe
Edited Book Full access
Michael Rodi, Johannes Saurer
Comparative Perspectives on the Law of Energy Transition in Europe

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via Open Athens
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex