Cover des Buchs: The Challenge of Stability
Monographie Open Access Vollzugriff

The Challenge of Stability

Niklas Luhmann’s Early Political Sociology and Constitutional Adjudication in the United States and Germany
Autor:innen:
Verlag:
 2023

Zusammenfassung

Von Niklas Luhmanns frühem systemtheoretischem Begriff der funktionalen Differenzierung lässt sich sowohl normativ als auch empirisch viel über Verfassungsgerichte lernen. So kann Luhmanns Analyse der rechtlichen Autonomie helfen, das legitimatorische Grundproblem der Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit – die Kontrolle von Parlamentsgesetzen – neu zu beleuchten. Und seine Theorie der Zweiteilung des politischen Systems kann unser begriffliches Verständnis verfassungsgerichtlicher Politisierung schärfen. Das vorliegende Buch veranschaulicht dieses Potential, indem es Legitimation durch Verfahren im Besonderen und Luhmanns frühe Systemtheorie im Allgemeinen auf das Bundesverfassungsgericht und den Supreme Court anwendet.

Schlagworte

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Copyrightjahr
2023
ISBN-Print
978-3-7560-0623-6
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-4158-3
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe
Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht
Band
322
Sprache
Englisch
Seiten
230
Produkttyp
Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 - 12 Download Kapitel (PDF)
  2. Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. I. The Radicality and Currency of Legitimation durch Verfahren
      1. A. Applying Luhmann’s Sociology to a Normative Problem: Chapter 3
      2. B. Using Systems Theory to Remedy an Analytical Problem: Chapter 4
      1. A. Methodology
      2. B. The Research Landscape
      3. C. Structure
  3. Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. A. Man’s Experience of the World
      2. B. Intersubjectivity
      3. C. Social Systems
      4. D. Systemic Differentiation
      1. A. Habermas’s Discourse-Theoretical Conception of Legitimate Law
        1. 1. The Impossibility of Consensus in a Differentiated Society
          1. a) Luhmann’s Political Sociology
          2. b) Luhmann’s Sociology of Law
        1. 1. Role Reciprocity and the Presentation of Self
        2. 2. Courtroom Publicity
        3. 3. Conditional Programming
        4. 4. Contact Systems
        1. 1. Elections
        2. 2. The Legislative Process
        1. 1. Jürgen Habermas’s Debate with Niklas Luhmann
        2. 2. Stefan Lange and Chris Thornhill’s Nuanced Appraisal
        3. 3. Putting Luhmann’s Skepticism of Justifiability in Perspective
      2. B. The Sources of Political Stability
    5. V. Conclusion
  4. Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. A. The Countermajoritarian Difficulty
        1. 1. The Political-Equality Criterion
        2. 2. The Minimal-Justice Criterion
      1. A. The ‘Chain of Legitimation’
      2. B. Constitutional Provisions for Judicial Review
      3. C. Public Support for Judicial Review
            1. i. The Legislature
            2. ii. The Court
            1. i. The United States
            2. ii. Germany
            1. i. The Argument from Democratic Choice
            2. ii. The Argument from Constitutional Precommitment
          4. d) Who Gets to Predict Legislative Behavior?
        2. 2. Public Reason
        3. 3. The Need for Unanimity
          1. a) Forming the General Will
          2. b) Holding Out the Promise of Change
          3. c) Why the Constitutional Court?
          1. a) Underenforcing Our Basic Human Rights
          2. b) Overenforcing Our Basic Human Rights
          3. c) Zero-Sum Rights Controversies
        2. 2. Judicial Review as Insurance Against Future Violations
          1. a) Partial vs. Complete Illegitimacy
          2. b) Defining Marginalized Communities
          3. c) Determining the Essential Rights
        2. 2. Devising a Test for a Court’s Emancipatory Impetus
          1. a) How Expansive Can We Expect the Courts’ Rulings to Be?
          2. b) Focusing on the Concrete Change in the Law
        4. 4. Conclusion
      1. A. The Notion of Legal Autonomy
      2. B. The Notion of Legal Autonomy and Niklas Luhmann’s Political Sociology
        1. 1. Judicial Proceedings and the Absorption of Protest
          1. a) Sensitizing People to the Possibility of Change
          2. b) An Alternative to Positivity Theory?
          1. a) The Judicial-Appointment Process
          2. b) Disavowing Partisanship
            1. i. Examples
            2. ii. Increasing Interpretive Flexibility
        1. 1. Compliance and Institutional Legitimacy
        2. 2. The Causes of Institutional Legitimacy
    5. V. Conclusion
  5. Download Kapitel (PDF)
        1. 1. The Interparty Agreement
        2. 2. Party-Political Affiliations
        1. 1. To Hear or Not to Hear
        2. 2. A Silent Parliament
        1. 1. Politicization Within One Entity vs. Between Entities
        2. 2. The Two Angles to Politicization Between Two or More Entities
        1. 1. What It Means for Constitutional Adjudication to Be or Appear Political
        2. 2. How the Confirmation Process Helps Politicize Constitutional Adjudication
        3. 3. The Effects of Politicization on Constitutional Adjudication
      1. A. Partisan vs. Unanimous Confirmation Votes
        1. 1. The United States
        2. 2. Germany
        1. 1. Perceived Politicization and Institutional Legitimacy
        2. 2. Contentious Appointments and Institutional Legitimacy
        3. 3. Conclusion
      4. D. The Meaning of Partisanship
      1. A. The Concepts of Social Systems and Systemic Differentiation
      2. B. Systems Theory and Politicization by Judicial Appointment
        1. 1. From Unanimous to Partisan Confirmation Votes
        2. 2. The Confirmation Hearings
        1. 1. Partisan Capture and the Political System’s Internal Differentiation
        2. 2. Functional Differentiation and Judicial Authoritativeness
        1. 1. Autopoietic Closure
        2. 2. Autopoietic Closure and Politicization Research
    5. VI. Conclusion
  6. Conclusion 203 - 204 Download Kapitel (PDF)
  7. Bibliography 205 - 230 Download Kapitel (PDF)

Literaturverzeichnis (473)

  1. Ackerman, Bruce A, ‘The Storrs Lectures: Discovering the Constitution’, 93 Yale LJ 1013 (1984) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  2. Alexy, Robert, ‘Constitutional Rights and Proportionality’, 22 Revus: J Const Theory & Phil Law 51 (2014) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  3. Alexy, Robert, ‘Constitutional Rights, Democracy, and Representation’, 3 Ricerche giuridiche 197 (2014) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  4. Anderson, Elizabeth, ‘What Is the Point of Equality?’, 109 Ethics 287 (1999) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  5. Anderson, Elizabeth, The Imperative of Integration (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2010) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  6. Anderson, Joel, ‘Autonomy and Vulnerability Entwined’, in Catriona Mackenzie, Wendy Rogers, and Susan Dodds (eds), Vulnerability: New Essays in Ethics and Feminist Philosophy (OUP, New York, 2013) 134 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  7. Badas, Alex, ‘The Applied Legitimacy Index: A New Approach to Measuring Judicial Legitimacy’, 100 Soc Sci Q 1848 (2019) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  8. Baer, Susanne, ‘Who cares? A defence of judicial review’, 8 J Brit Acad 75 (2020) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  9. Balkin, Jack M, ‘Respect-Worthy: Frank Michelman and the Legitimate Constitution’, 39 Tulsa L Rev 495 (2004) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  10. Balkin, Jack M, and Levinson, Sanford, ‘Understanding the Constitutional Revolution’, 87 Va L Rev 1045 (2001) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  11. Barber, James D, The Lawmakers: Recruitment and Adaptation to Legislative Life (Yale University Press, New Haven, 1965) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  12. Barnes, Robert, ‘The political wars damage public perception of Supreme Court, Chief Justice Roberts says’, The Washington Post, 4 February 2016, available at https://perma.cc/3H8C-98RP Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  13. Barnett, Randy E, ‘Constitutional Legitimacy’, 103 Colum L Rev 111 (2003) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  14. Barroso, Luís R, ‘Countermajoritarian, Representative, and Enlightened: The Roles of Constitutional Courts in Democracies’, 67 Am J Comp L 109 (2019) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  15. Barry, Brian, ‘John Rawls and the Search for Stability’, 105 Ethics 874 (1995) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  16. Barskanmaz, Cengiz, ‘Das Kopftuch als das Andere. Eine notwendige postkoloniale Kritik des deutschen Rechtsdiskurses’, in Sabine Berghahn and Petra Rostock (eds), Der Stoff, aus dem Konflikte sind: Debatten um das Kopftuch in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz (transcript, Bielefeld, 2009) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  17. Bartels, Brandon L, and Johnston, Christopher D, ‘On the Ideological Foundations of Supreme Court Legitimacy in the American Public’, 57 Am J Pol Sci 184 (2013) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  18. Bartels, Brandon L, and Johnston, Christopher D, ‘Political Justice? Perceptions of Politicization and Public Preferences Toward the Supreme Court Appointment Process’, 76 Pub Opin Q 105 (2012) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  19. Bartels, Brandon L, and Kramon, Eric, ‘All the President’s Justices? The Impact of Presidential Copartisanship on Supreme Court Job Approval’, 66 Am J Pol Sci 171 (2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  20. Bartels, Brandon L, Johnston, Christopher D, and Mark, Alyx, ‘Lawyers’ Perceptions of the U.S. Supreme Court: Is the Court a “Political” Institution?’, 49 Law & Soc’y Rev 761 (2015) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  21. Bartlett, Katharine T, ‘Feminist Legal Methods’, 103 Harv L Rev 829 (1990) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  22. Bassok, Or, ‘The Schmitelsen Court: The Question of Legitimacy’, 21 German LJ 131 (2020) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  23. Bassok, Or, ‘The Supreme Court’s New Source of Legitimacy’, 16 U Pa J Const L 153 (2013) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  24. Bassok, Or, and Dotan, Yoav, ‘Solving the countermajoritarian difficulty?’, 11 Int’l J Const L 13 (2013) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  25. Baynes, Kenneth, ‘Democracy and the Rechtsstaat: Habermas’s Faktizität und Geltung’, in Stephen K White (ed), The Cambridge Companion to Habermas (CUP, Cambridge, 1995) 201 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  26. Becker, Mary, ‘Conservative Free Speech and the Uneasy Case for Judicial Review’, 64 U Colo L Rev 975 (1993) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  27. Becker, Mary, Grant Bowman, Cynthia, and Torrey, Morrison, Feminist Jurisprudence: Taking Women Seriously (2nd edn, West Group, St Paul, 2001) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  28. Bell, Derrick, ‘Bell, J., dissenting’, in Jack M Balkin (ed), What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation’s Top Legal Experts Rewrite America’s Landmark Civil Rights Decision (New York University Press, New York, 2001) 185 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  29. Berbuir, Nicole, Lewandowsky, Marcel, and Siri, Jasmin, ‘The AfD and its Sympathisers: Finally a Right-Wing Populist Movement in Germany?’, 24 German Pol 154 (2015) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  30. Berger, Peter L, and Luckmann, Thomas, The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge (Doubleday, Garden City, 1966) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  31. Bethge, Herbert, ‘§ 31’, in Bruno Schmidt-Bleibtreu, Franz Klein and Herbert Bethge, Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz: Kommentar (loose-leaf, 61st delivery, CH Beck, Munich, 2021) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  32. Bickel, Alexander M, The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics (Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis, 1962) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  33. Blau, Peter M, ‘Critical Remarks on Weber’s Theory of Authority’, 57 Am Pol Sci Rev 305 (1963) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  34. Bobbitt, Philip, Constitutional Interpretation (Blackwell, Oxford, 1991) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  35. Böckenförde, Ernst-Wolfgang, ‘Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit: Strukturfragen, Organisation, Legitimation’, 52 Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 9 (1999) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  36. Böckenförde, Ernst-Wolfgang, Verfassungsfragen der Richterwahl: Dargestellt anhand der Gesetzentwürfe zur Einführung der Richterwahl in Nordrhein-Westfalen (2nd edn, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, 1998) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  37. Bohman, James, and Rehg, William, ‘Jürgen Habermas’, in Edward Zalta (ed), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2017 edn), available at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/habermas/ (last accessed 4 March 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  38. Bolsen, Toby, and Druckman, James N, ‘Counteracting the Politicization of Science’, 65 J Commun 745 (2016) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  39. Bora, Alfons, ‘Recht und Politik. Krisen der Politik und die Leistungsfähigkeit des Rechts’, in Armin Nassehi and Markus Schroer (eds), Der Begriff des Politischen (Nomos, Baden-Baden, 2003) 189 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  40. Borch, Christian, Niklas Luhmann (Routledge, London, 2011) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  41. Bornemann, Basil, ‘Politisierung des Rechts und Verrechtlichung der Politik durch das Bundesverfassungsgericht? Systemtheoretische Betrachtungen zum Wandel des Verhältnisses von Recht und Politik und zur Rolle der Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit’, 28 Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 75 (2007) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  42. Bowie, Nikolas, ‘The Contemporary Debate over Supreme Court Reform: Origins and Perspectives’, Written Statement to the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States, 30 June 2021, pp 1, available at https://perma.cc/7HK9-CDQC Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  43. Bravin, Jess, and Kendall, Brent, ‘For Supreme Court Nominee Merrick Garland, Law Prevails Over Ideology’, The Wall Street Journal, 16 March 2016, available at https://perma.cc/Q7YB-NU2N Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  44. Brinkmann, Matthias, ‘Coordination Cannot Establish Political Authority’, 31 Ratio Juris 49 (2018) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  45. Brockell, Gillian, ‘The last Supreme Court nominee confirmed without bipartisan support never heard a single case’, The Washington Post, 27 October 2020, available at https://perma.cc/3NXB-ZFXD Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  46. Brown-Nagin, Tomiko, ‘Elites, Social Movements, and the Law: The Case of Affirmative Action’, 105 Colum L Rev 1436 (2005) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  47. Bubrowski, Helene, ‘Grüne unterstützen Harbarths Wahl’, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 10 November 2018, available at https://perma.cc/8WMZ-MWU2 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  48. Bubrowski, Helene, and Müller, Reinhard, ‘Spielball der Politik? Neue Sorgen um Akzeptanz und Statik des Bundesverfassungsgerichts’, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 21 February 2018, p 8 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  49. Buchanan, Allen, ‘Political Legitimacy and Democracy’, 112 Ethics 689 (2002) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  50. Burke, Kenneth, A Grammar of Motives (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1969) 357 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  51. Cain Miller, Claire, and Sanger-Katz, Margot, ‘On Abortion Law, the U.S. Is Unusual. Without Roe, It Would Be, Too’, The New York Times, 22 January 2022, available at https://perma.cc/U45R-BLP9 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  52. Calabresi, Steven G, and Lindgren, James, ‘Term Limits for the Supreme Court: Life Tenure Reconsidered’, 29 Harv JL & Pub Pol’y 769 (2006) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  53. Caldeira, Gregory A, and Gibson, James L, ‘The Etiology of Public Support for the Supreme Court’, 36 Am J Pol Sci 635 (1992) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  54. Cameron, Charles M, Cover, Albert D, and Segal, Jeffrey A, ‘Senate Voting on Supreme Court Nominees: A Neoinstitutional Model’, 84 Am Pol Sci Rev 525 (1990) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  55. Carrington, Nathan T, and French, Colin, ‘One Bad Apple Spoils the Bunch: Kavanaugh and Change in Institutional Support for the Supreme Court’, 102 Soc Sci Q 1484 (2021) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  56. Chong, Dennis, and Druckman, James N, ‘Framing Theory’, 10 Annu Rev Pol Sci 103 (2007) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  57. Chong, Moohyung, Todd, Jason D, and Vanberg, Georg, ‘Politics, Polarization, and the U.S. Supreme Court’, in Anna-Bettina Kaiser, Niels Petersen and Johannes Saurer (eds), The U.S. Supreme Court and Contemporary Constitutional Law: The Obama Era and Its Legacy (Nomos, Baden-Baden, 2018) 41 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  58. Choper, Jesse H, ‘The Supreme Court and the Political Branches: Democratic Theory and Practice’, 122 U Pa L Rev 810 (1974) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  59. Choper, Jesse H, Judicial Review and the National Political Process: A Functional Reconsideration of the Role of the Supreme Court (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1980) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  60. Christenson, Dino P, and Glick, David M, ‘Chief Justice Roberts’s Health Care Decision Disrobed: The Microfoundations of the Supreme Court’s Legitimacy’, 59 Am J Pol Sci 403 (2015) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  61. Christiano, Thomas, The Constitution of Equality: Democratic Authority and its Limits (OUP, Oxford, 2008) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  62. Collins, Paul M Jr, and Ringhand, Lori A, Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings and Constitutional Change (CUP, Cambridge, 2013) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  63. Coutu, Walter, ‘Role-Playing vs. Role-Taking: An Appeal for Clarification’, 16 Am Soc Rev 180 (1951) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  64. Dahl, Robert A, ‘Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker’, 6 J Pub L 279 (1957) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  65. Dahrendorf, Ralf, Gesellschaft und Freiheit (Piper & Co, Munich, 1961) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  66. Davis, Richard, ‘Symbiosis: The US Supreme Court and the Journalists Who Cover It’, in Richard Davis (ed), Justices and Journalists: The Global Perspective (CUP, Cambridge, 2018) 281 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  67. de Tocqueville, Alexis, Democracy in America (Arthur Goldhammer tr, Library of America, New York, 2004 [1835]) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  68. Devins, Neal, and Baum, Lawrence, ‘Split Definitive: How Party Polarization Turned the Supreme Court into a Partisan Court’, 2016 Sup Ct Rev 301 (2016) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  69. Dhawan, Nikita, and others, ‘Normative Legitimacy and Normative Dilemmas: Postcolonial Interventions’, in Nikita Dhawan and others (eds), Negotiating Normativity: Postcolonial Appropriations, Contestations, and Transformations (Springer, Cham, 2016) 1 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  70. di Fabio, Udo, ‘Art. 4 GG’, in Günter Dürig and others (eds), Grundgesetz: Kommentar (loose-leaf, 94th delivery, CH Beck, Munich, 2021) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  71. Dinh, Viet D, ‘Threats to Judicial Independence, Real and Imagined’, 95 Geo LJ 929 (2007) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  72. Dixon, Rosalind, ‘Creating dialogue about socioeconomic rights: Strong-form versus weak-form judicial review revisited’, 5 Int’l J Const L 391 (2007) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  73. Doerfler, Ryan D, and Moyn, Samuel, ‘Democratizing the Supreme Court’, 109 Cal L Rev 1703 (2021) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  74. Dreier, Horst, ‘Art. 146’, in Horst Dreier (ed), Grundgesetz: Kommentar, vol 3 (3rd edn, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, 2018) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  75. Dreier, Horst, ‘Vorbemerkungen vor Artikel 1’, in Horst Dreier (ed), Grundgesetz: Kommentar, vol 1 (3rd edn, CH Beck, Munich, 2013) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  76. Dressel, Björn, ‘Judicialization of politics or politicization of the judiciary? Considerations from recent events in Thailand’, 23 Pac Rev 671 (2010) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  77. Durkheim, Émile, De la division du travail social (5th edn, Librairie Félix Alcan, Paris, 1926) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  78. Dworkin, Ronald, ‘Equality, Democracy, and Constitution: We the People in Court’, 28 Alta L Rev 324 (1990) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  79. Dworkin, Ronald, ‘Justice Sotomayor: The Unjust Hearings’, The New York Review of Books, 24 September 2009, available at https://perma.cc/BA4F-V5XH Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  80. Dworkin, Ronald, A Matter of Principle (Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, 1985) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  81. Dworkin, Ronald, Freedom’s Law: The Moral Reading of the American Constitution (Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, 1996) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  82. Dworkin, Ronald, Law’s Empire (Belknap, Cambridge MA, 1986) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  83. Dworkin, Ronald, Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality (Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, 2002) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  84. Easton, David, ‘A Re-Assessment of the Concept of Political Support’, 5 Br J Pol Sci 435 (1975) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  85. Easton, David, ‘An Approach to the Analysis of Political Systems’, 9 World Pol 383 (1957) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  86. Easton, David, A Systems Analysis of Political Life (Chicago University Press, Chicago, 1965) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  87. Eckhoff, Torstein, ‘Impartiality, Separation of Powers, and Judicial Independence’, 9 Scandinavian Stud in Law 11 (1965) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  88. Effron, Robin J, ‘Will the Judicial Get Political?’, Brooklyn Law Notes, Fall 2019, available at https://perma.cc/A6N7-A4Y5 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  89. Eisgruber, Christopher, Constitutional Self-Government (Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, 2001) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  90. Engst, Benjamin, and others, ‘Zum Einfluss der Parteinähe auf das Abstimmungsverhalten der Bundesverfassungsrichter – eine quantitative Untersuchung’, 72 JuristenZeitung 816 (2017) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  91. Engst, Benjamin, Gschwend, Thomas, and Sternberg, Sebastian, ‘Die Besetzung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts: Ein Spiegelbild gesellschaftlicher Präferenzen?’, 61 Politische Vierteljahresschrift 39 (2020) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  92. Epps, Daniel, and Sitaraman, Ganesh, ‘How to Save the Supreme Court’, 129 Yale LJ 148 (2019) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  93. Epstein, Lee, and Knight, Jack, ‘Efficacious judging on apex courts’, in Erin F Delany and Rosalind Dixon (eds), Comparative Judicial Review (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, 2018) 272 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  94. Epstein, Lee, and others (eds), The Supreme Court Compendium: Data, Decisions, and Developments (6th edn, SAGE, Los Angeles, 2015) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  95. Epstein, Lee, and others, ‘The Changing Dynamics of Senate Voting on Supreme Court Nominees’, 68 J Pol 296 (2006) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  96. Epstein, Lee, and Posner, Eric, ‘If the Supreme Court Is Nakedly Political, Can It Be Just?’, The New York Times, 9 July 2018, available at https://perma.cc/4K2Z-5YG4 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  97. Epstein, Lee, and Segal, Jeffrey A, Advice and Consent: The Politics of Judicial Appointments (OUP, New York, 2005) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  98. Fallon, Richard H Jr, ‘As-Applied and Facial Challenges and Third-Party Standing’, 113 Harv L Rev 1321 (2000) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  99. Fallon, Richard H Jr, ‘Constitutional Constraints’, 97 Cal L Rev 975 (2009) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  100. Fallon, Richard H Jr, ‘How to Choose a Constitutional Theory’, 87 Cal L Rev 535 (1999) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  101. Fallon, Richard H Jr, ‘Legitimacy and the Constitution’, 118 Harv L Rev 1787 (2005) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  102. Fallon, Richard H Jr, ‘The Core of an Uneasy Case For Judicial Review’, 121 Harv L Rev 1693 (2008) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  103. Fallon, Richard H Jr, Law and Legitimacy in the Supreme Court (Belknap, Cambridge MA, 2018) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  104. Fallon, Richard H Jr, The Nature of Constitutional Rights: The Invention and Logic of Strict Judicial Scrutiny (CUP, Cambridge, 2019) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  105. Fandos, Nicholas, ‘Senate Confirms Barrett, Delivering for Trump and Reshaping the Court’, The New York Times, 26 October 2020, available at https://perma.cc/P3RT-8Y5E Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  106. Farahat, Anuscheh, ‘The German Federal Constitutional Court’, in Armin von Bogdandy, Peter M Huber and Christoph Grabenwarter (eds), The Max Planck Handbooks in European Public Law, vol 3 (OUP, Oxford, 2020) 279 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  107. Farahat, Anuscheh, Transnationale Solidaritätskonflikte: Eine vergleichende Analyse verfassungsgerichtlicher Konfliktbearbeitung in der Eurokrise (Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, 2021) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  108. Ferejohn, John, ‘Judicializing Politics, Politicizing Law’, 65 Law & Contemp Probs 41 (2002). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  109. Ferejohn, John, and Pasquino, Pasquale, ‘Constitutional Adjudication: Lessons from Europe’, 82 Tex L Rev 1671 (2004) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  110. Ferejohn, John, and Pasquino, Pasquale, ‘Rule of Democracy and Rule of Law’, in José María Maravall and Adam Przeworski (eds), Democracy and the Rule of Law (CUP, Cambridge, 2003) 242 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  111. Fine, Adam D, and van Rooij, Benjamin, ‘Legal socialization: Understanding the obligation to obey the law’, 7 J Soc Issues 367 (2021) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  112. Fiorina, Morris P, and Levendusky, Matthew S, ‘Disconnected: The Political Class versus the People’, in Pietro S Nivola and David W Brady (eds), Red and Blue Nation? Characteristics and Causes of America’s Polarized Politics, vol 1 (Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC, 2006) 49 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  113. Forst, Rainer, ‘Justifying Justification: Reply to My Critics’, in Rainer Forst (ed), Justice, Democracy and the Right to Justification: Rainer Forst in Dialogue (Bloomsbury Academic, London, 2014) 169 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  114. Forst, Rainer, ‘The Justification of Basic Rights: A Discourse-Theoretical Approach’, 45 Netherlands J Legal Phil 7 (2016) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  115. Forst, Rainer, Normativity and Power: Analyzing Social Orders of Justification (Ciaran Cronin tr, OUP, Oxford, 2017) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  116. Forst, Rainer, The Right to Justification: Elements of a Constructivist Theory of Justice (Jeffrey Flynn tr, Columbia University Press, New York, 2012) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  117. Frank, Jerome, Courts on Trial: Myth and Reality in American Justice (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1949) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  118. Franklin, Mark, Marsh, Michael, and McLaren, Lauren, ‘Uncorking the Bottle: Popular Opposition to European Unification in the Wake of Maastricht’, 32 J Common Mkt Stud 455 (1994) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  119. Fraser, Nancy, ‘Politics, culture, and the public sphere: toward a postmodern conception’, in Linda Nicholson and Steven Seidman, Social Postmodernism: Beyond Identity Politics (CUP, Cambridge, 1995) 287 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  120. Freeman, Samuel, ‘Constitutional Democracy and the Legitimacy of Judicial Review’, 9 Law & Phil 327 (1991) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  121. Freud, Sigmund, ‘Die Verneinung’, in Gesammelte Werke, vol 14 (Anna Freud and others eds, Fischer, Frankfurt am Main, 1955) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  122. Fried, Charles, ‘Balls and Strikes’, 61 Emory LJ 641, 641 (2012) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  123. Friedman, Lawrence M, Law and Society: An Introduction (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1977) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  124. Fromme, Friedrich K, ‘Verfassungsrichterwahl’, 53 Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 2977 (2000) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  125. Galtung, Johan, ‘Expectations and Interaction Processes’, 2 Inquiry 213 (1959) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  126. Galtung, Johan, ‘Institutionalized Conflict Resolution: A theoretical paradigm’, 2 J Peace Res 348 (1965) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  127. Gay Stolberg, Sheryl, ‘Susan Collins, A Fixture in Maine, Has Twin Troubles: Trump and Kavanaugh’, The New York Times, 6 July 2019, available at https://perma.cc/N28L-UPLM Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  128. Gehlen, Arnold, Der Mensch: Seine Natur und seine Stellung in der Welt (first published 1940, re-worked and re-published 1950, Vittorio Klostermann, Frankfurt am Main, 2016) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  129. Gelinsky, Katja, ‘Wise Old Men and Wise Old Women. Vom Rätselraten über den Einfluss der Frauen am Bundesverfassungsgericht und am Supreme Court’, in Michael Stolleis (ed), Herzkammern der Republik: Die Deutschen und das Bundesverfassungsgericht (CH Beck, Munich, 2011) 82 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  130. Gibson, James L, ‘A Note of Caution About the Meaning of “The Supreme Court Can Usually Be Trusted ...”’, 21 Law & Cts: Newsletter of the Law & Courts Section of the American Political Science Association 10 (2011) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  131. Gibson, James L, ‘Legitimacy Is for Losers: The Interconnections of Institutional Legitimacy, Performance Evaluations, and the Symbols of Judicial Authority’, in Brian H Bornstein and Alan J Tomkins, Motivating Cooperation and Compliance with Authority: The Role of Institutional Trust (Springer, Cham, 2015) 81 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  132. Gibson, James L, ‘Losing Legitimacy: The Challenges of the Dobbs Ruling to Conventional Legitimacy Theory’, last revised 5 January 2023, available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4206986 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  133. Gibson, James L, ‘The Legitimacy of the United States Supreme Court in a Polarized Polity’, 4 J Empirical Legal Stud 507 (2007) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  134. Gibson, James L, ‘Understandings of Justice: Institutional Legitimacy, Procedural Justice, and Political Tolerance’, 23 Law & Soc’y Rev 469 (1989) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  135. Gibson, James L, and Caldeira, Gregory A, ‘Confirmation Politics and The Legitimacy of the U.S. Supreme Court: Institutional Loyalty, Positivity Bias, and the Alito Nomination’, 53 Am J Pol Sci 139 (2009) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  136. Gibson, James L, and Caldeira, Gregory A, ‘Has Legal Realism Damaged the Legitimacy of the U.S. Supreme Court?’, 45 Law & Soc’y Rev 195 (2011) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  137. Gibson, James L, and Nelson, Michael J, ‘Is the U.S. Supreme Court’s Legitimacy Grounded in Performance Satisfaction and Ideology?’, 59 Am J Pol Sci 162 (2015) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  138. Gibson, James L, and Nelson, Michael J, ‘Reconsidering Positivity Theory: What Roles do Politicization, Ideological Disagreement, and Legal Realism Play in Shaping U.S. Supreme Court Legitimacy?’, 14 J Empirical Legal Stud 592 (2017) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  139. Gibson, James L, and Nelson, Michael J, ‘The Legitimacy of the US Supreme Court: Conventional Wisdoms and Recent Challenges Thereto’, 10 Annu Rev Law Soc Sci 201 (2014) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  140. Gibson, James L, Caldeira, Gregory A, and Spence, Lester K, ‘Why Do People Accept Public Policies They Oppose? Testing Legitimacy Theory with a Survey-Based Experiment’, 58 Pol Res Q 187 (2005) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  141. Gibson, James L, Lodge, Milton, and Woodson, Benjamin, ‘Losing, but Accepting: Legitimacy, Positivity Theory, and the Symbols of Judicial Authority’, 48 Law & Soc’y Rev 837 (2014) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  142. Gibson, James L, Pereira, Miguel M, and Ziegler, Jeffrey, ‘Updating Supreme Court Legitimacy: Testing the “Rule, Learn, Update” Model of Political Communication’, 45 Am Pol Res 980 (2017) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  143. Ginsburg, Tom, Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases (CUP, Cambridge, 2003) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  144. Goffman, Erving, ‘On Face-Work’, reprinted in Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior (Doubleday, New York City, 1967) 5 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  145. Goldman, Sheldon, and Jahnige, Thomas P, The Federal Courts as a Political System (Harper & Row, New York, 1971) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  146. Goldmann, Matthias, ‘Judges for Future: The Climate Action Judgment as a Postcolonial Turn in Constitutional Law?’, Verfassungsblog, 30 April 2021, available at https://perma.cc/Z93Y-GJA7 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  147. Graber, Mark A, ‘The Coming Constitutional Yo-Yo: Elite Opinion, Polarization, and the Direction of Judicial Decision Making’, 56 Howard LJ 661 (2013) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  148. Greene, Jamal, ‘Foreword: Rights as Trumps?’, 132 Harv L Rev 28 (2018) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  149. Griffin, Stephen M, ‘The Age of Marbury: Judicial Review in a Democracy of Rights’, in Mark Tushnet (ed), Arguing Marbury v. Madison (Stanford University Press, Stanford, 2005) 104 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  150. Grimm, Dieter, ‘Neue Radikalkritik an der Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit’, 59 Der Staat 321 (2020) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  151. Grimm, Dieter, ‘Politikdistanz als Voraussetzung von Politikkontrolle’, 27 Zeitschrift für Europäische Grundrechte 1 (2000) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  152. Grimm, Dieter, ‘What Exactly Is Political About Constitutional Adjudication?’, in Christine Landfried (ed), Judicial Power: How Constitutional Courts Affect Political Transformations (CUP, Cambridge, 2019) 307 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  153. Gringlas, Sam, ‘Asked About Court Packing, Biden Says He Will Convene Commission To Study Reforms’, npr.org, 22 October 2020, available at https://perma.cc/BP8G-MY56 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  154. Grünberger, Michael, ‘Warum der Stadionverbots-Beschluss weit mehr ist als nur Common Sense’, Verfassungsblog, 1 May 2018, available at https://perma.cc/P85K-UGNZ Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  155. Grunert, Marlene, and Müller, Reinhard, ‘Was kann Karlsruhe? 70 Jahre Bundesverfassungsgericht – Dieter Grimm und Andreas Voßkuhle über Fehler, Leistungen, Corona und Europa’, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 23 September 2021, p 8 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  156. Grünewald, Benedikt, ‘§ 6 BVerfGG’, in Christian Walter and Benedikt Grünewald (eds), Beck’scher Online-Kommentar Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz (13th edn, CH Beck, Munich, 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  157. Gutmann, Amy, and Thompson, Dennis, Democracy and Disagreement (Belknap, Cambridge MA, 1996) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  158. Habermas, Jürgen, ‘Legitimationsprobleme im modernen Staat’, in Peter Graf Kielmansegg (ed), Legitimationsprobleme politischer Systeme (Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen, 1976) 39 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  159. Habermas, Jürgen, ‘Reconciliation Through the Public Use of Reason: Remarks on John Rawls’s Political Liberalism’, 92 J Phil 109 (1995) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  160. Habermas, Jürgen, ‘Technology and Science as “Ideology”’, in Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science, and Politics (Jeremy J Shapiro tr, Beacon Press, Boston, 1970) 81 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  161. Habermas, Jürgen, ‘Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie? Eine Auseinandersetzung mit Niklas Luhmann’, in Jürgen Habermas and Niklas Luhmann, Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie – Was leistet die Systemforschung? (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, 1971) 142 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  162. Habermas, Jürgen, ‘Vorbereitende Bemerkungen zu einer Theorie der kommunikativen Kompetenz’, in Jürgen Habermas and Niklas Luhmann, Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie – Was leistet die Systemforschung? (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, 1971) 101 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  163. Habermas, Jürgen, Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (William Rehg tr, MIT Press, Cambridge MA, 1996) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  164. Habermas, Jürgen, The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society (Thomas McCarthy tr, Polity Press, Cambridge, 1997) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  165. Hagen, Wolfgang, ‘Es gibt keine Biographie’, Interview with Niklas Luhmann, Radio Bremen, 2 October 1997, available at https://perma.cc/U6MA-GUM9 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  166. Hähnig, Anne, Machowecz, Martin, and Wefing, Heinrich, ‘Eine Richterin als der ultimative Kompromiss’, Die Zeit, 1 July 2020, available at https://perma.cc/4Q7H-7LCU Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  167. Hamilton, Alexander, ‘Federalist No. 78’, in Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, The Federalist Papers (Michael A Genovese ed, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 2009 [1787/1788]) 235 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  168. Hamilton, Eric, ‘Politicizing the Supreme Court’, 65 Stan L Rev Online 35 (2012) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  169. Haratsch, Andreas, ‘§ 6 BVerfGG’, in Bruno Schmidt-Bleibtreu and others (eds), Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz: Kommentar (loose-leaf, 61st delivery, CH Beck, Munich, 2021) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  170. Haratsch, Andreas, ‘§ 7 BVerfGG’, in Bruno Schmidt-Bleibtreu and others (eds), Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz: Kommentar (loose-leaf, 61st delivery, CH Beck, Munich, 2021) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  171. Harel, Alon, and Shinar, Adam, ‘The real case for judicial review’, in Erin F Delaney and Rosalind Dixon (eds), Comparative Judicial Review (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, 2018) 13 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  172. Hart Ely, John, Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review (Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, 1981) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  173. Hart, Henry M, and Sacks, Arthur M, The Legal Process: Basic Problems in the Making and Application of Law (tentative edn, Cambridge MA, 1958) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  174. Hart, HLA, ‘American Jurisprudence Through English Eyes: The Nightmare and the Noble Dream’, 11 Ga L Rev 969 (1977) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  175. Hart, HLA, The Concept of Law (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1972) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  176. Hay, Colin, Why We Hate Politics (Polity Press, Cambridge, 2007) 81 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  177. Heck, Justus, Itschert, Adrian, and Tratschin, Luca, ‘Legitimation durch Verfahren: Zum Entstehungskontext und zur Aktualität eines Nicht-Klassikers’, 22 Soziale Systeme 1 (2017) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  178. Hein, Michael, and Ewert, Stefan, ‘Die Politisierung der Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit. Eine ideengeschichtliche und systematische Begriffsrekonstruktion’, in Jörn Knobloch and Thorsten Schlee (eds), Unschärferelationen: Konstruktionen der Differenz von Politik und Recht (Springer VS, Wiesbaden, 2018) 103 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  179. Hein, Michael, and Ewert, Stefan, ‘How Do Types of Procedure Affect the Degree of Politicization of European Constitutional Courts? A Comparative Study of Germany, Bulgaria, and Portugal’, 9 Eur J Legal Stud 62 (2016) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  180. Herdegen, Matthias, ‘Verfassungsinterpretation als methodische Disziplin’, 59 JuristenZeitung 873 (2004) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  181. Higgins, Tracy E, ‘Democracy and Feminism’, 110 Harv L Rev 1657 (1997) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  182. Hillgruber, Christian, ‘Art. 144’, in Volker Epping and Christian Hillgruber (eds), Beck’scher Online Kommentar Grundgesetz (49th edn, CH Beck, Munich, 2021) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  183. Hirschl, Ran, ‘The Judicialization of Politics’, in Gregory A Caldeira, R Daniel Kelemen and Keith E Whittington (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics (OUP, Oxford, 2008) 119 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  184. Hirschmann, Nancy, ‘Toward a Feminist Theory of Freedom’, 24 Pol Theory 46 (1996) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  185. Hobbes, Thomas, Leviathan (Penguin, London, 1981 [1651]) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  186. Hobolt, Sara B, ‘When Europe Matters: The Impact of Political Information on Voting Behaviour in EU Referendums’, 15 J Elections, Pub Opinion & Parties 85 (2005) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  187. Holmes, Stephen, ‘Precommitment and the paradox of democracy’, in Jon Elster and Rune Slagstad (eds), Constitutionalism and Democracy (CUP, Cambridge, 1988) 195 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  188. Hönnige, Christoph, Verfassungsgericht, Regierung und Opposition: Die vergleichende Analyse eines Spannungsdreiecks (Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, 2007) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  189. Hooghe, Liesbet, and Marks, Gary, ‘Politicization’, in Erik Jones, Anand Menon and Stephen Weatherill, The Oxford Handbook of the European Union (OUP, Oxford, 2012) 840 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  190. Huber, Peter M, ‘Constitutional Courts and Politics in the European Legal Space’ (forthcoming) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  191. Husserl, Edmund, Pariser Vorträge und Cartesianische Meditationen (Nijhoff, The Hague, 1950) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  192. Hutchinson, Darren L, ‘The Majoritarian Difficulty: Affirmative Action, Sodomy, and Supreme Court Politics’, 23 Law & Ineq 1 (2005) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  193. Ifill, Sherrilyn A, ‘Racial Diversity on the Bench: Beyond Role Models and Public Confidence’, 57 Wash & Lee L Rev 405 (2000) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  194. Illing, Sean, ‘The case for stripping the Supreme Court of its power’, Vox, 12 October 2018, available at https://www.vox.com/2018/10/12/17950896/supreme-court-amy-coney-barrett-mark-tushnet (last accessed 22 November 2021) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  195. Isensee, Josef, ‘Das Grundrecht als Abwehrrecht und als staatliche Schutzpflicht’, in Josef Isensee and Paul Kirchhof, Handbuch des Staatsrechts, vol 9 (3rd edn, CF Müller, Heidelberg, 2011) 413 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  196. Ivison, Duncan, ‘Pluralising political legitimacy’, 20 Postcolonial Studies 118 (2017) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  197. Jackson, Vicki C, ‘A Democracy of Rights: The Dark Side? – A Comment on Stephen M. Griffin’, in Mark Tushnet (ed), Arguing Marbury v. Madison (Stanford University Press, Stanford, 2005) 147 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  198. Jackson, Vicki C, ‘Methodological Challenges in Comparative Constitutional Law’, 28 Penn State Int’l L Rev 319 (2010) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  199. Jackson, Vicki C, ‘Packages of Judicial Independence: The Selection and Tenure of Article III Judges’, 95 Geo L J 965 (2007) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  200. Janisch, Wolfgang, ‘Institution in Gefahr’, Süddeutsche Zeitung, 12 October 2018, available at https://perma.cc/N479-RXHS Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  201. Johnston, Christopher D, and Bartels, Brandon L, ‘Sensationalism and Sobriety: Differential Media Exposure and Attitudes Toward American Courts’, 74 Pub Opinion Q 260 (2010) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  202. Jost, Sebastian, ‘EZB steht ein zweites Mal vor dem Verfassungsgericht’, Die Welt, 15 February 2016, available at https://perma.cc/9GB8-YVWQ Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  203. Kagan, Elena, ‘Confirmation Messes, Old and New’, 62 U Chi L Rev 919 (1994) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  204. Kant, Immanuel, The Metaphysics of Morals (Mary Gregor tr and ed, CUP, Cambridge, 1996 [1797]) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  205. Kastellec, Jonathan P, Lax, Jeffrey R, and Phillips, Justin H, ‘Public Opinion and Senate Confirmation of Supreme Court Nominees’, 72 J Pol 767 (2010) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  206. Katyal, Neal K, ‘Legislative Constitutional Interpretation’, 50 Duke LJ 1335 (2001) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  207. Kau, Marcel, United States Supreme Court und Bundesverfassungsgericht: Die Bedeutung des United States Supreme Court für die Errichtung und Fortentwicklung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts (Springer, Berlin, 2007) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  208. Kavanagh, Aileen, ‘Participation and Judicial Review’, 22 Law & Phil 451 (2003) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  209. Kelsen, Hans, ‘Wesen und Entwicklung der Staatsgerichtsbarkeit’, in Wer soll Hüter der Verfassung sein? Abhandlungen zur Theorie der Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit in der pluralistischen, parlamentarischen Demokratie (Robert C van Ooyen ed, 2nd edn [reprint], Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, 2019 [1929]) 1 [30] Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  210. Kennedy, Deseriee, ‘Judicial Review and Diversity’, 71 Tenn L Rev 287 (2004) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  211. Kennedy, Duncan, A Critique of Adjudication: fin de siècle (Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, 1997) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  212. Kielmansegg, Peter Graf, ‘Legitimität als analytische Kategorie’, 12 Politische Vierteljahresschrift 367 (1971) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  213. Kieserling, André, ‘Legitimation durch Verfahren (1969)’, in Oliver Jahraus and others (eds), Luhmann-Handbuch: Leben – Werk – Wirkung (JB Metzler, Stuttgart, 2012) 145 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  214. King, Michael, and Thornhill, Chris, Niklas Luhmann’s Theory of Politics and Law (Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, 2003) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  215. Kischel, Uwe, ‘Amt, Unbefangenheit und Wahl der Bundesverfassungsrichter’, in Josef Isensee and Paul Kirchhof (eds), Handbuch des Staatsrechts der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, vol 3 (3rd edn, CH Beck, Munich, 2005) 1233 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  216. Kischel, Uwe, ‘Party, pope, and politics? The election of German Constitutional Court justices in comparative perspective’, 11 Int’l J Con L 962 (2013) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  217. Klarman, Michael J, ‘Constitutional Fact/Constitutional Fiction: A Critique of Bruce Ackerman’s Theory of Constitutional Moments’, 44 Stan L Rev 759 (1992) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  218. Klarman, Michael J, ‘How Brown Changed Race Relations: The Backlash Thesis’, 81 J Am Hist 81 (1994) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  219. Klarman, Michael J, ‘The Puzzling Resistance to Political Process Theory’, 77 Va L Rev 747 (1991) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  220. Klarman, Michael J, ‘What’s So Great About Constitutionalism?’, 93 Nw U L Rev 145 (1998) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  221. Knudsen, Sven-Eric, Luhmann und Husserl: Systemtheorie im Verhältnis zur Phänomenologie (Königshausen & Neumann, Würzburg, 2006) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  222. Koenen, Elmar, ‘Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie – Was leistet die Systemforschung? (1971)’, in Oliver Jahraus and others (eds), Luhmann-Handbuch: Leben – Werk – Wirkung (JB Metzler, Stuttgart, 2012) 150 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  223. Korioth, Stefan, ‘Stellung und Einrichtung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts’, in Klaus Schlaich and Stefan Korioth, Das Bundesverfassungsgericht: Stellung, Verfahren, Entscheidungen (12th edn, CH Beck, Munich, 2021) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  224. Kramer, Larry D, ‘Foreword: We the Court’, 115 Harv L Rev 5 (2001) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  225. Kranenpohl, Uwe, Hinter dem Schleier des Beratungsgeheimnisses: Der Willensbildungs- und Entscheidungsprozess des Bundesverfassungsgerichts (Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, 2010) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  226. Krause, Werner, and Wagner, Aiko, ‘Becoming part of the gang? Established and nonestablished populist parties and the role of external efficacy’, 27 Party Pol 161 (2021) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  227. Krewson, Christopher N, ‘Political Hearings Reinforce Legal Norms: Confirmation Hearings and Views of the United States Supreme Court’ 1 (forthcoming, Pol Res Q, 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  228. Krewson, Christopher N, and Schroedel, Jean R, ‘Modern Judicial Confirmation Hearings and Institutional Support for the Supreme Court’ 1, 2–4 (forthcoming, Soc Sci Q), available at https://perma.cc/SM9P-F7SR Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  229. Lamprecht, Rolf, ‘“Bis zur Verachtung”’, 48 Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 2531 (1995) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  230. Lange, Stefan, Niklas Luhmanns Theorie der Politik: Eine Abklärung der Staatsgesellschaft (Westdeutscher Verlag, Wiesbaden, 2003) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  231. Layman, Geoffrey C, Carsey, Thomas M, and Menasce Horowitz, Juliana, ‘Party Polarization in American Politics: Characteristics, Causes, and Consequences’, 9 Ann Rev Pol Sci 83 (2006) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  232. Legrand, Pierre, ‘How to compare now’, 16 Legal Stud 232 (1996) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  233. Leonhardt, David, ‘How to End the Politicization of the Courts’, The New York Times, 4 April 2017, available at https://perma.cc/AG4G-DEUA Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  234. Letzgus, Klaus, ‘Wiederaufnahme zuungunsten des Angeklagten bei neuen Tatsachen und Beweisen’, 40 Neue Zeitschrift für Strafrecht 717 (2020) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  235. Levinson, Daryl J, and Pildes, Richard H, ‘Separation of Parties, Not Powers’, 119 Harv L Rev 2311 (2006) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  236. Liptak, Adam, ‘A Leaky Supreme Court Starts to Resemble the Other Branches’, The New York Times, 11 May 2022, available at https://perma.cc/D39H-5C5S Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  237. Liptak, Adam, ‘College Diversity Nears Its Last Stand’, The New York Times, 15 October 2011, available at https://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/16/sunday-review/college-diversity-nears-its-last-stand.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all (last accessed 14 February 2022) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  238. Lithwick, Dahlia, ‘Why I Haven’t Gone Back to SCOTUS Since Kavanaugh’, Slate, 30 October 2019, available at https://perma.cc/JAL8-AEKH Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  239. Loughlin, Martin, ‘The Constitutional Imagination’, 78 Mod L Rev 1 (2015) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  240. Ludden, Jennifer, ‘Should We Be Having Kids in The Age of Climate Change?’, npr.org, 18 August 2016, available at https://perma.cc/D9D8-Y7N2 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  241. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘“Distinctions Directrices”: Über Codierung von Semantiken und Systemen’, in Soziologische Aufklärung 4: Beiträge zur funktionalen Differenzierung der Gesellschaft (Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen, 1987) 13 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  242. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Arbeitsteilung und Moral: Durkheims Theorie’, Preface to Émile Durkheim, Über soziale Arbeitsteilung (Ludwig Schmidts tr, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, 1992 [1930]) 19 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  243. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Ausdifferenzierung des Rechtssystems’, 7 Rechtstheorie 121 (1976) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  244. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Autopoiesis, Handlung und kommunikative Verständigung’, 11 Zeitschrift für Soziologie 366 (1982) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  245. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Die Tücke des Subjekts und die Frage nach den Menschen’, in Soziologische Aufklärung 6: Die Soziologie und der Mensch (4th edn, Springer VS, Wiesbaden 2018) 151 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  246. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Differentiation of Society’, 2 Can J Soc 29 (1977) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  247. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Funktionale Methode und Systemtheorie’, in Soziologische Aufklärung 1: Aufsätze zur Theorie sozialer Systeme (6th edn, Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen, 1990) 31 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  248. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Funktionen der Rechtsprechung im politischen System’, in Politische Planung: Aufsätze zur Soziologie von Politik und Verwaltung (4th edn, Springer, Wiesbaden, 1994) 49 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  249. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Gesellschaft’, in Soziologische Aufklärung 1: Aufsätze zur Theorie sozialer Systeme (6th edn, Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen, 1990) 137 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  250. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Interaktion, Organisation, Gesellschaft: Anwendungen der Systemtheorie’, in Soziologische Aufklärung 2: Aufsätze zur Theorie der Gesellschaft (4th edn, Springer Fachmedien, Wiesbaden, 1991) 8 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  251. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Komplexität und Demokratie’, in Politische Planung: Aufsätze zur Soziologie von Politik und Verwaltung (4th edn, Springer, Wiesbaden, 1994) 35 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  252. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Law as a Social System’, 83 Nw U L Rev 136 (1989) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  253. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Lob der Routine’, in Politische Planung: Aufsätze zur Soziologie von Politik und Verwaltung (4th edn, Springer, Wiesbaden, 1994) 113 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  254. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Moderne Systemtheorien als Form gesamtgesellschaftlicher Analyse’, in Jürgen Habermas and Niklas Luhmann, Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie – Was leistet die Systemforschung? (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, 1971) 7 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  255. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Normen in soziologischer Perspektive’, 20 Soziale Welt 28 (1969) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  256. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Operational Closure and Structural Coupling: The Differentiation of the Legal System’, 13 Cardozo L Rev 1419 (1992) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  257. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Organization, membership and the formalization of behavioural expectations [1964]’, 37 Syst Res Behav Sci 425 (2020) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  258. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Positivität des Rechts als Voraussetzung einer modernen Gesellschaft’, in Rüdiger Lautmann, Werner Maihofer and Hartmut Schelsky (eds), Die Funktion des Rechts in der modernen Gesellschaft (Bertelsmann-Universitätsverlag, Bielefeld, 1970) 175 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  259. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Quod Omnes Tangit: Remarks on Jürgen Habermas’s Legal Theory’, 17 Cardozo L Rev 883 (1995) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  260. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Reform und Information: Theoretische Überlegungen zur Reform der Verwaltung’, in Politische Planung: Aufsätze zur Soziologie von Politik und Verwaltung (4th edn, Springer, Wiesbaden, 1994) 181 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  261. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Selbstlegitimation des Staates’, 15 Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 65 (1981) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  262. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Sinn als Grundbegriff der Soziologie’, in Jürgen Habermas and Niklas Luhmann, Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie – Was leistet die Systemforschung? (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, 1971) 25 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  263. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Soziologie als Theorie sozialer Systeme’, in Soziologische Aufklärung 1: Aufsätze zur Theorie sozialer Systeme (6th edn, Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen, 1991) 113 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  264. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Soziologie des politischen Systems’, in Soziologische Aufklärung 1: Aufsätze zur Theorie sozialer Systeme (6th edn, Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen, 1991) 154 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  265. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Soziologische Aufklärung’, in Soziologische Aufklärung 1: Aufsätze zur Theorie sozialer Systeme (6th edn, Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen, 1991) 66 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  266. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Systemtheoretische Argumentationen: Eine Entgegnung auf Habermas’, in Jürgen Habermas and Niklas Luhmann, Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie – Was leistet die Systemforschung? (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, 1971) 291 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  267. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘The Autopoiesis of Social Systems [1986]’, 6 J Sociocybernetics 84 (2008) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  268. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Theorie der politischen Opposition’, 36 Zeitschrift für Politik 13 (1989) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  269. Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Verfassung als evolutionäre Errungenschaft’, 9 Rechtshistorisches Journal 176, 204–5. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  270. Luhmann, Niklas, A Sociological Theory of Law (Elizabeth King-Utz and Martin Albrow tr, 2014) (eBook) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  271. Luhmann, Niklas, Archimedes und wir: Interviews (Dirk Baecker and Georg Stanitzek eds, Merve Verlag, Berlin, 1987) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  272. Luhmann, Niklas, Das Recht der Gesellschaft (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, 1995) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  273. Luhmann, Niklas, Die Grenzen der Verwaltung (Johannes Schmidt and Christoph Gesigora eds, Suhrkamp, Berlin, 2021). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  274. Luhmann, Niklas, Funktionen und Folgen formaler Organisation (Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, 1964) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  275. Luhmann, Niklas, Grundrechte als Institution: Ein Beitrag zur politischen Soziologie (5th edn, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, 2009) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  276. Luhmann, Niklas, Legitimation durch Verfahren (10th edn, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, 2017) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  277. Luhmann, Niklas, Organization and Decision (Dirk Baecker ed, Rhodes Barrett tr, CUP, Cambridge, 2018) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  278. Luhmann, Niklas, Politische Soziologie (André Kieserling ed, Suhrkamp, Berlin, 2010) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  279. Luhmann, Niklas, Social Systems (John Bednarz, Jr, tr with Dirk Baecker, Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1995) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  280. Luhmann, Niklas, Systemtheorie der Gesellschaft (Johannes Schmidt and André Kieserling eds, Suhrkamp, Berlin, 2017) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  281. Luhmann, Niklas, Vertrauen: Ein Mechanismus der Reduktion sozialer Komplexität (5th edn, UVK Verlagsgesellschaft, Konstanz, 2014) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  282. Machura, Stefan, ‘Legitimation durch Verfahren – was bleibt?’, 22 Soziale Systeme 331 (2017) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  283. MacKinnon, Catharine A, ‘“Freedom from Unreal Loyalties: On Fidelity in Constitutional Interpretation’, 65 Fordham L Rev 1773 (1997) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  284. MacKinnon, Catharine A, Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law (Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, 1987) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  285. MacKinnon, Catharine A, Toward a Feminist Theory of the State (Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, 1989) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  286. Malcolm, Joyce L, ‘Whatever the Judges Say It Is? The Founders and Judicial Review’, 26 J Law & Pol 1 (2010) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  287. Maravall, José M, ‘The Rule of Law as a Political Weapon’, in José María Maravall and Adam Przeworski (eds), Democracy and the Rule of Law (CUP, Cambridge, 2003) 261 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  288. Marcus, Ruth, ‘Justice Sotomayor drops the S-bomb’, The Washington Post, 3 December 2021, available at https://perma.cc/YEA2-2K5W Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  289. Marshall, William P, ‘Constitutional Law as Political Spoils’, 26 Cardozo L Rev 525 (2005) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  290. Masing, Johannes, ‘§ 15: Das Bundesverfassungsgericht’, in Matthias Herdegen and others (eds), Handbuch des Verfassungsrechts: Darstellung in transnationaler Perspektive (CH Beck, Munich, 2021) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  291. Mason, Lilliana, ‘“I Respectfully Disagree”: The Differential Effects of Partisan Sorting on Social and Issue Polarization’, 59 Am J Pol Sci 128 (2015) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  292. Mason, Lilliana, ‘The Rise of Uncivil Agreement: Issue Versus Behavioral Polarization in the American Electorate’, 57 Am Behav Scientist 140 (2013) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  293. Maturana, Humberto, ‘The Organization of the Living: A Theory of the Living Organization’, 7 Int’l J Man-Machine Stud 313 (1975) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  294. McConnell, Michael W, Written Testimony Before the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States, 30 June 2021, p 7, available at https://perma.cc/KJT6-HAHM Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  295. McGinnis, John O, and Rappaport, Michael B, ‘In Praise of Supreme Court Filibusters’, 33 Harv JL & Pub Pol’y 39 (2010) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  296. Mead, George H, Mind, Self & Society (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2015 [1934]) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  297. Merton, Robert K, Social Theory and Social Structure (enlarged edn, Free Press, New York, 1968) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  298. Meyer, Hans, ‘Grundgesetzliche Demokratie und Wahlrecht für Nichtdeutsche’, 71 JuristenZeitung 121 (2016) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  299. Michelman, Frank I, ‘Brennan and Democracy’, 86 Cal L Rev 399 (1998) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  300. Michelman, Frank I, ‘Ida’s Way: Constructing the Respect-Worthy Governmental System’, 72 Fordham L Rev 345 (2003) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  301. Michelman, Frank I, ‘Justice as Fairness, Legitimacy, and the Question of Judicial Review’, 72 Fordham L Rev 1407 (2003) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  302. Michelman, Frank I, ‘The bind of tolerance and a call to feminist thought: A reply to Gila Stopler’, 19 Int’l J Con L 408 (2021) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  303. Michelman, Frank I, ‘The Question of Constitutional Fidelity: Rawls on the Reason of Constitutional Courts’, in Silje A Langvatn, Mattias Kumm and Wojciech Sadurski (eds), Public Reason and Courts (CUP, Cambridge, 2020) 90 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  304. Möllers, Christoph, ‘Legality, Legitimacy, and Legitimation of the Federal Constitutional Court’, in Matthias Jestaedt and others, The German Federal Constitutional Court: The Court Without Limits (Jeff Seitzer tr, OUP, Oxford, 2020) 131 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  305. Möllers, Christoph, ‘Why There Is No Governing with Judges’, 30 September 2014, p 30, available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=2503729 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  306. Möllers, Christoph, Freiheitsgrade: Elemente einer liberalen politischen Mechanik (Suhrkamp, Berlin, 2020) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  307. Möllers, Christoph, The Three Branches: A Comparative Model of Separation of Powers (OUP, Oxford, 2013) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  308. Monaghan, Henry Paul, ‘The Confirmation Process: Law or Politics?’, 101 Harv L Rev 1202 (1988) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  309. Mondak, Jeffery J, and Smithey, Shannon I, ‘The Dynamics of Public Support for the Supreme Court’, 59 J Pol 1114 (1997) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  310. Montag, Jerzy, ‘Transparenz und Legitimität: Notwendige Reform der Wahl der Richterinnen und Richter zum Bundesverfassungsgericht’, 44 Recht und Politik 139 (2008) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  311. Müller, Reinhard, ‘Es allen recht machen’, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 3 November 2010, available at https://perma.cc/8VT8-N4EQ Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  312. Müller, Reinhard, ‘Ohne Karlsruhe geht es nicht’, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 6 September 2021, p 1 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  313. Münch, Richard, ‘Luhmann und Parsons’, in Oliver Jahraus and others (eds), Luhmann-Handbuch: Leben – Werk – Wirkung (JB Metzler, Stuttgart, 2012) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  314. Murphy, John W, ‘Talcott Parsons and Niklas Luhmann: Two Versions of the “Social System”’, 12 Int Rev Mod Soc 291 (1982) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  315. Myrdal, Gunnar, An American Dilemma: The Negro Problem and Modern Democracy (Harper & Brothers, New York, 1944) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  316. Nash, Jonathan R, ‘Prejudging Judges’, 106 Colum L Rev 2168 (2006) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  317. Nelson, Michael J, and Tucker, Patrick, ‘The Stability and Durability of the U.S. Supreme Court’s Legitimacy’, 83 J Pol 767 (2021) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  318. Noel, Hans, Political Ideologies and Political Parties in America (CUP, New York, 2013) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  319. Nozick, Robert, Anarchy, State, and Utopia (Blackwell, Oxford, 1974) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  320. O’Scannlain, Diarmuid F, ‘Today’s Senate Confirmation Battles and the Role of the Federal Judiciary’, 27 Harv JL & Pub Pol’y 169 (2003) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  321. Offe, Claus, ‘Politische Legitimation durch Mehrheitsentscheidung?’, in Bernd Guggenberger and Claus Offe (eds), An den Grenzen der Mehrheitsdemokratie: Politik und Soziologie der Mehrheitsregel (Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen, 1984) 150 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  322. Olsen, Jonathan, ‘The Left Party and the AfD’, 36 German Pol & Soc’y 70 (2018) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  323. Ossenbühl, Fritz, ‘§ 15: Grundsätze der Grundrechtsinterpretation’, in Detlef Merten and others (eds), Handbuch der Grundrechte in Deutschland und Europa, vol 1 (CF Müller, Heidelberg, 2004) 595 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  324. Owen, Diana, and Dennis, Jack, ‘Gender Differences in the Politicization of American Children’, 8 Women & Pol 23 (1988) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  325. Palonen, Kari, ‘Four Times of Politics: Policy, Polity, Politicking, and Politicization’, 28 Alternatives 171 (2003) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  326. Parsons, Talcott, and others, ‘Some Fundamental Categories of the Theory of Action: A General Statement’, in Talcott Parsons and Edward A Shils (eds), Toward a General Theory of Action (Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, 1962) 3 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  327. Parsons, Talcott, The Social System (The Free Press, Glencoe, 1951) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  328. Parsons, Talcott, The Structure of Social Action: A Study in Social Theory with Special Reference to a Group of Recent European Writers (Free Press, Glencoe, 1949) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  329. Pateman, Carole, The Disorder of Women: Democracy, Feminism, and Political Theory (Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1989) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  330. Perry, Michael J, The Constitution in the Courts: Law or Politics? (OUP, New York, 1994) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  331. Peter, Fabienne, ‘Political Legitimacy’, in Edward N Zalta (ed), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2017 ed), available at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/legitimacy/#PubReaDemApp (last accessed 17 November 2021) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  332. Peter, Fabienne, ‘The Grounds of Political Legitimacy’, 6 J Am Phil Ass’n 372 (2020) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  333. Pildes, Richard H, ‘Why The Center Does Not Hold: The Causes of Hyperpolarized Democracy in America’, 99 Cal L Rev 273 (2011) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  334. Poscher, Ralf, Grundrechte als Abwehrrechte – Reflexive Regelung rechtlich geordneter Freiheit (Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, 2003) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  335. Posner, Richard A, ‘Foreword: A Political Court’, 119 Harv L Rev 32 (2005) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  336. Post, Robert, ‘Theorizing Disagreement: Reconceiving the Relationship Between Law and Politics’, 98 Cal L Rev 1319 (2010) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  337. Post, Robert, and Siegel, Reva, ‘Popular Constitutionalism, Departmentalism, and Judicial Supremacy’, 92 Cal L Rev 1027 (2004) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  338. Post, Robert, and Siegel, Reva, ‘Questioning Justice: Law and Politics in Judicial Confirmation Hearings’, 115 Yale LJ Pocket Part 38 (2006) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  339. Prantl, Heribert, ‘Der lachende Vierte’, Süddeutsche Zeitung, 12 February 2020, available at https://perma.cc/7GW8-RW58 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  340. Prantl, Heribert, ‘Politische Entpolitisierung: Die Union beruft einen Spitzenrichter für weniger Einmischung’, Süddeutsche Zeitung, 25 November 2018, available at https://perma.cc/5KQE-98JH Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  341. Preuß, Ulrich K, ‘Die Wahl der Bundesverfassungsrichter als verfassungsrechtliches und -politisches Problem’, 21 Zeitschrift für Rechtspolitik 389 (1988) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  342. Quong, Jonathan, Liberalism without Perfection (OUP, Oxford, 2010) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  343. Radcliffe-Brown, Alfred R, ‘On the Concept of Function in Social Science’, 37 Am Anthropologist 394 (1935) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  344. Ramage, Magnus, and Shipp, Karen, Systems Thinkers (2nd edn, Springer, Milton Keynes, 2020) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  345. Ramirez, Mark D, ‘Procedural Perceptions and Support for the U.S. Supreme Court’, 29 Pol Psychol 675 (2008) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  346. Rasch, William, Niklas Luhmann’s Modernity: The Paradoxes of Differentiation (Stanford University Press, Stanford, 2000) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  347. Rawls, John, ‘Reply to Habermas’, 92 J Phil 132 (1995) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  348. Rawls, John, ‘The Idea of Public Reason Revisited’, 64 U Chi L Rev 765 (1997) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  349. Rawls, John, Political Liberalism (Columbia University Press, New York, 1996) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  350. Raz, Joseph, ‘Authority and Justification’, in Joseph Raz (ed), Authority (New York University Press, New York, 1990) 115 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  351. Raz, Joseph, ‘Disagreement in Politics’, 43 Am J Juris 25 (1998) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  352. Raz, Joseph, Practical Reason and Norms (OUP, Oxford, 1999) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  353. Reidy, John A, ‘Rawls’s Wide View of Public Reason: Not Wide Enough’, 6 Res Publica 49 (2000) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  354. Rennert, Klaus, ‘Legitimation und Legitimität des Richters’, 70 JuristenZeitung 529 (2015) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  355. Richter, Paul, ‘Clinton Picks Moderate Judge Breyer for Supreme Court Spot’, Los Angeles Times, 14 May 1994, available at https://perma.cc/S68E-N546 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  356. Ringhand, Lori A, ‘Judicial Activism: An Empirical Examination of Voting Behavior on the Rehnquist Natural Court’, 24 Const Comment 43 (2007) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  357. Roberts, Dorothy E, ‘The Meaning of Blacks’ Fidelity to the Constitution’, 65 Fordham L Rev 1761 (1997) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  358. Robertson, David, The Judge as Political Theorist: Contemporary Constitutional Review (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2010) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  359. Robson, Ruthann, ‘Judicial Review and Sexual Freedom’, 30 U Haw L Rev 1 (2007) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  360. Roellecke, Gerd, ‘Zum Problem einer Reform der Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit’, 56 JuristenZeitung 114 (2001) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  361. Rogowski, Jon C, and Stone, Andrew R, ‘How Political Contestation Over Judicial Nominations Polarizes Americans’ Attitudes Toward the Supreme Court’, 51 Brit J Pol Sci 1251 (2021) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  362. Rogowski, Ralf, ‘Constitutional courts as autopoietic organisations’, in Michael Wrase and Christian Boulanger (eds), Die Politik des Verfassungsrechts: Interdisziplinäre und vergleichende Perspektiven auf die Rolle und Funktion von Verfassungsgerichten (Nomos, Baden-Baden, 2013) 123 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  363. Rogowski, Ralf, and Gawron, Thomas (eds), Constitutional Courts in Comparison: The U.S. Supreme Court and the German Federal Constitutional Court (2nd edn, Berghahn, New York, 2016) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  364. Rosanvallon, Pierre, La légitimité démocratique: Impartialité, réflexivité, proximité (Éditions du Seuil, Paris, 2008) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  365. Rosenberg, Gerald N, The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1991) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  366. Rosenfeld, Michel, Just Interpretations: Law between Ethics and Politics (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1998) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  367. Rottleuthner, Hubert, ‘Niklas Luhmann on the Autonomy of the Legal System’, 23 Law & Soc’y Rev 779 (1989) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  368. Rottleuthner, Hubert, ‘Zur Soziologie richterlichen Handelns (II)’, 4 Kritische Justiz 60 (1971) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  369. Sacksofsky, Ute, ‘Das Frauenbild des Bundesverfassungsgerichts’, 14 Querelles: Jahrbuch für Frauen- und Geschlechterforschung 191 (2009) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  370. Sacksofsky, Ute, ‘Wenn Rechtfertigungen brüchig werden: Verfassungsgerichte in der Diskriminierungsbekämpfung am Beispiel der Geschlechterordnung vor dem Bundesverfassungsgericht’, in Rainer Forst and Klaus Günther (eds), Normative Ordnungen (Suhrkamp, Berlin, 2021) 604 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  371. Sadurski, Wojciech, Equality and Legitimacy (OUP, Oxford, 2008) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  372. Sadurski, Wojciech, Rights Before Courts: A Study of Constitutional Courts in Postcommunist States of Central and Eastern Europe (2nd edn, Springer, Dordrecht, 2014) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  373. Sager, Lawrence G, ‘The Incorrigible Constitution’, 65 NYU L Rev 893 (1990) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  374. Schauer, Frederick, ‘The Boundaries of the First Amendment: A Preliminary Exploration of Constitutional Salience’, 117 Harv L Rev 1765 (2004) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  375. Scheb, John M II, and Lyons, William, ‘The Myth of Legality and Public Evaluation of the Supreme Court’, 81 Soc Sci 928 (2000) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  376. Scheid, Christopher, ‘Demokratieimmanente Legitimation der Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit’, 59 Der Staat 227 (2020) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  377. Schelsky, Helmut, ‘Systemfunktionaler, anthropologischer und personfunktionaler Ansatz der Rechtssoziologie’, in Rüdiger Lautmann, Werner Maihofer and Helmut Schelsky (eds), Die Funktion des Rechts in der modernen Gesellschaft (Bertelsmann-Universitätsverlag, Bielefeld, 1970) 61 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  378. Schlink, Bernhard, ‘Proportionality’, in Michel Rosenfeld and András Sajó (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (OUP, Oxford, 2012) 718 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  379. Schmitt, Carl, ‘Der Hüter der Verfassung’, 55 Archiv des öffentlichen Rechts 161 (1929) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  380. Schmitt, Carl, ‘The Concept of the Political’, in The Concept of the Political (George Schwab tr, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2007) 19 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  381. Schmitt, Carl, Die geistesgeschichtliche Lage des heutigen Parlamentarismus (10th edn, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, 2017 [1923]) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  382. Schmitt, Carl, Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty (George Schwab tr, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2005) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  383. Schoenherr, Jessica A, Lane, Elizabeth A, and Armaly, Miles T, ‘The Purpose of Senatorial Grandstanding during Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings’, 8 J Law & Cts 333 (2020) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  384. Schreier, Nicole, Demokratische Legitimation von Verfassungsrichtern: Eine rechtsvergleichende Analyse am Beispiel des Bundesverfassungsgerichts und des United States Supreme Court (Nomos, Baden-Baden, 2016) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  385. Schröder, Meinhard, ‘Verfassungsrichterwahl im transparenten Konsens?’, 30 Zeitschrift für Gesetzgebung 150 (2015) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  386. Schulze-Fielitz, Helmuth, ‘Art. 103 Abs. 3’, in Horst Dreier (ed), Grundgesetz: Kommentar, vol 3 (3rd edn, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, 2018) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  387. Schütz, Alfred, ‘Das Problem der transzendentalen Intersubjektivität bei Husserl’, 5 Philosophische Rundschau 81 (1957) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  388. Schwartzman, Micah, ‘The Etiquette of Animus’, 132 Harv L Rev 133 (2018) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  389. Segal, Jeffrey A, and Spaeth, Harold A, The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited (CUP, Cambridge, 2002) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  390. Seib, Gerald F, ‘Supreme Court Opening Adds to Pressure on American Institutions’, The Wall Street Journal, 21 September 2020, available at https://perma.cc/HEH6-AY5H Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  391. Serwer, Adam, ‘Obamacare’s Supreme Court Disaster’, Mother Jones, 27 March 2012, available at https://perma.cc/7PYZ-8SGW Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  392. Shapiro, Martin, Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1981) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  393. Shear, Michael D, and Kanno-Youngs, Zolan, ‘As Leak Theories Circulate, Supreme Court Marshal Takes Up Investigation’, The New York Times, 4 May 2022, available at https://perma.cc/6EDP-4ZUJ Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  394. Simmons, A John, ‘Justification and Legitimacy’, 109 Ethics 739 (1999) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  395. Simon, Herbert A, ‘Theories of Decision-Making in Economics and Behavioral Science’, 49 Am Econ Rev 253 (1959) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  396. Smith, Adam, The Theory of Moral Sentiments (D D Raphael and A L Macfie eds, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1976 [1759]) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  397. Soley, Ximena, and Steininger, Silvia, ‘Parting ways or lashing back? Withdrawals, backlash and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights’, 14 Int’l JL in Context 237 (2018) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  398. Solomons, David, ‘The Politicization of Accounting’, 146 J Accountancy 65 (1978) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  399. Sólyom, László, ‘The Constitutional Court of Hungary’, in Armin von Bogdandy, Christoph Grabenwarter and Peter M Huber (eds), The Max Planck Handbooks in European Public Law, vol 3 (OUP, Oxford, 2020) 357 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  400. Somek, Alexander, ‘Zwei Welten der Rechtslehre und die Philosophie des Rechts’, 71 JuristenZeitung 481 (2016) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  401. Somin, Ilya, ‘Political Ignorance and the Countermajoritarian Difficulty: A New Perspective on the Central Obsession of Constitutional Theory’, 89 Iowa L Rev 1287 (2004) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  402. Stone Sweet, Alec, Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe (OUP, Oxford, 2000) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  403. Stone, Adrienne, ‘Judicial Review Without Rights: Some Problems for the Democratic Legitimacy of Structural Judicial Review’, 28 Ox J Legal Stud 1 (2008) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  404. Stone, Geoffrey R, ‘Understanding Supreme Court Confirmations’, 2010 Sup Ct Rev 381 (2010) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  405. Strauss, David A, and Sunstein, Cass R, ‘The Senate, the Constitution, and the Confirmation Process’, 101 Yale LJ 1491 (1992) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  406. Šubrt, Jiří, The Systemic Approach in Sociology and Niklas Luhmann: Expectations, Discussions, Doubts (Emerald Publishing, Bingley, 2020) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  407. Sunstein, Cass R, ‘Foreword: Leaving Things Undecided’, 110 Harv L Rev 4 (1996) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  408. Sunstein, Cass R, The Partial Constitution (Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, 1993) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  409. Táíwò, Olúfémi O, ‘Being-in-the-Room Privilege: Elite Capture and Epistemic Deference’, 108 The Philosopher (2020), available at https://perma.cc/74FG-9D5L Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  410. Talbot, Margaret, ‘Amy Coney Barrett’s Long Game’, The New Yorker, 7 February 2022, available at https://perma.cc/8F35-3RSW Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  411. Tau, Byron, and Hughes, Siobhan, ‘Senate Eliminates Filibuster for Supreme Court Nominees’, The Wall Street Journal, 6 April 2017, available at https://perma.cc/DEC8-AANV Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  412. Taylor, Stuart Jr, ‘Politics in the Bork Battle; Opinion Polls and Campaign-Style Pressure May Change Supreme Court Confirmations’, The New York Times, 28 September 1987, available at https://perma.cc/EPU6-59E5 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  413. Taylor, Stuart Jr, ‘Scalia’s Views, Stylishly Expressed, Line Up with Reagan’s’, The New York Times, 19 June 1986, available at https://perma.cc/KT9K-JS75 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  414. Thayer, James B, ‘The Origin and Scope of the American Doctrine of Constitutional Law’, 7 Harv L Rev 129 (1893/1894) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  415. Thompson, Dennis F, Just Elections: Creating a Fair Electoral Process in the United States (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2002) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  416. Thornhill, Chris, ‘Luhmann and Marx: Social Theory and Social Freedom’, in Anders la Cour and Andreas Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos (eds), Luhmann Observed: Radical Theoretical Encounters (Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, 2013) 263 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  417. Thornhill, Chris, ‘Niklas Luhmann, Carl Schmitt and the Modern Form of the Political’, 10 Eur J Soc Theory 499 (2007) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  418. Thornhill, Chris, ‘Niklas Luhmann: A Sociological Transformation of Political Legitimacy?’, 7 Scandinavian J Soc Theory 33 (2006) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  419. Thornhill, Chris, Political Theory in Modern Germany: An Introduction (Polity Press, Cambridge, 2000) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  420. Tilly, Charles, Durable Inequality (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1998) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  421. Toobin, Jeffrey, ‘Swing Shift: How Anthony Kennedy’s passion for foreign law could change the Supreme Court’, The New Yorker, 12 September 2005, available at https://perma.cc/6MSW-3G5W Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  422. Totenberg, Nina, ‘170-Plus Days And Counting: GOP Unlikely To End Supreme Court Blockade Soon’, npr.org, 6 September 2016, available at https://perma.cc/DSN9-BFK7 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  423. Tribe, Laurence H, American Constitutional Law (2nd edn, Foundation Press, Mineola, 1988) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  424. Troper, Michel, ‘The logic of justification of judicial review’, 1 Int’l J Con L 99 (2003) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  425. Tuleja, Piotr, ‘The Polish Constitutional Tribunal’, in Armin von Bogdandy, Christoph Grabenwarter and Peter M Huber (eds), The Max Planck Handbooks in European Public Law, vol 3 (OUP, Oxford, 2020) 619 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  426. Turner, Ralph H, ‘Role-Taking: Process Versus Conformity’, in Arnold M Rose (ed), Human Behavior and Social Processes: An Interactionist Approach (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1962) 20 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  427. Tushnet, Mark, ‘Constitutional Interpretation, Character, and Experience’, 72 B U L Rev 747 (1992) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  428. Tushnet, Mark, ‘How Different Are Waldron’s and Fallon’s Core Cases For and Against Judicial Review?’, 30 Ox J Legal Stud 49 (2010) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  429. Tushnet, Mark, ‘The Constitution Outside the Courts: A Preliminary Inquiry’, 26 Val U L Rev 437 (1992) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  430. Tushnet, Mark, Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1999) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  431. Tyler, Tom R, ‘Legal socialization: Back to the future’, 77 J Soc Issues 663 (2021) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  432. Tyler, Tom R, and Mitchell, Gregory, ‘Legitimacy and the Empowerment of Discretionary Legal Authority: The United States Supreme Court and Abortion Rights’, 43 Duke LJ 703 (1994) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  433. Tyler, Tom R, and Trinkner, Rick, Why Children Follow Rules: Legal Socialization and the Development of Legitimacy (OUP, New York, 2018) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  434. Tyler, Tom R, Why People Obey the Law (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2006) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  435. Varela, Francisco, Maturana, Humberto, and Uribe, Ricardo, ‘Autopoiesis: The Organization of Living Systems, its Characterization and a Model’, 5 BioSystems 187 (1974) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  436. Verschraegen, Gert, ‘Human Rights and Modern Society: A Sociological Analysis from the Perspective of Systems Theory’, 29 J Law & Soc’y 258 (2002) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  437. Viskovatoff, Alex, ‘Foundations of Niklas Luhmann’s Theory of Social Systems’, 29 Phil Soc Sci 481 (1999) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  438. Volcansek, Mary L, ‘Judicialization of Politics or Politicization of the Courts in New Democracies?’, in Christine Landfried (ed), Judicial Power: How Constitutional Courts Affect Political Transformations (CUP, Cambridge, 2019) 66 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  439. Volkmann, Uwe, ‘Bausteine zu einer demokratischen Theorie der Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit’, in Michael Bäuerle, Philipp Dann and Astrid Wallrabenstein, Demokratie-Perspektiven: Festschrift für Brun-Otto Bryde zum 70. Geburtstag (Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, 2013) 119 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  440. von Bertalanffy, Ludwig, General System Theory: Foundations, Developments, Applications (George Braziller, New York, 1968) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  441. von Bogdandy, Armin, ‘Das Öffentliche im Völkerrecht im Lichte von Schmitts „Begriff des Politischen“: Zugleich ein Beitrag zur Theoriebildung im Öffentlichen Recht’, 77 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht (Heidelberg J Int’l L) 877 (2017) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  442. von Bogdandy, Armin, Grabenwarter, Christoph, and Huber, Peter M, ‘Constitutional Adjudication in the European Legal Space’, in Armin von Bogdandy, Christoph Grabenwarter and Peter M Huber (eds), The Max Planck Handbooks in European Public Law, vol 3 (OUP, Oxford, 2020) 1 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  443. Voßkuhle, Andreas, ‘Art. 94’, in Hermann von Mangoldt, Friedrich Klein and Christian Starck (eds), Grundgesetz: Kommentar, vol 3 (7th edn, CH Beck, Munich, 2018) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  444. Wagner, Aiko, ‘Typwechsel 2017? Vom moderaten zum polarisierten Pluralismus’, 50 Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 114 (2019) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  445. Wagschal, Uwe, ‘Der Parteienstaat der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Parteipolische Zusammensetzung seiner Schlüsselinstitutionen’, 32 Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 861 (2001) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  446. Wahl, Rainer, ‘§ 19: Die objektiv-rechtliche Dimension der Grundrechte im internationalen Vergleich’, in Detlef Merten and others (eds), Handbuch der Grundrechte in Deutschland und Europa, vol 1 (CF Müller, Heidelberg, 2004) 745 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  447. Wahlke, John C, ‘Policy Demands and System Support: the Role of the Represented’, 1 Brit J Pol Sci 271 (1971) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  448. Waldron, Jeremy, ‘A Right-Based Critique of Constitutional Rights’, 13 Oxford J Legal Stud 18 (1993) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  449. Waldron, Jeremy, ‘Five to Four: Why Do Bare Majorities Rule on Courts?’, 123 Yale LJ 1692 (2014) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  450. Waldron, Jeremy, ‘Judges as moral reasoners’, 7 Int’l J Con L 2 (2009) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  451. Waldron, Jeremy, ‘The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review’, 115 Yale LJ 1346 (2006) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  452. Waldron, Jeremy, ‘Theoretical Foundations of Liberalism’, 37 Phil Q 127 (1987) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  453. Waldron, Jeremy, Law and Disagreement (OUP, Oxford, 1999) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  454. Walter, Christian, ‘Art. 94’, in Günter Dürig and others (eds), Grundgesetz: Kommentar (loose-leaf, 95th delivery, CH Beck, Munich, 2021) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  455. Waluchow, Wilfrid, ‘On the Neutrality of Charter Reasoning’, in Jordi Ferrer Beltrán, José Juan Moreso and Diego M Papayannis (eds), Neutrality and Theory of Law (Springer, Dordrecht, 2013) 203 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  456. Wasserstrom, Richard A, The Judicial Decision: Toward a Theory of Legal Justification (Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1961) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  457. Weber, Max, ‘Politics as a Vocation’, in The Vocation Lectures (David Owen and Tracy B Strong eds, Rodney Livingstone tr, Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis, 2004 [1919]) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  458. Weber, Max, Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Society, vol 1 (Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich eds, Ephraim Fischoff and others tr, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1978) 37 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  459. Wefing, Heinrich, ‘Etwas zu politisch?’, Die Zeit, 14 November 2018, available at https://perma.cc/EY5X-YZH3 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  460. Weiden, David L, ‘Judicial Politicization, Ideology, and Activism at the High Courts of the United States, Canada, and Australia’, 62 Pol Res Q 335 (2011) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  461. Weiss, Carol H, ‘The Politicization of Evaluation Research’, 26 J Soc Issues 57 (1970) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  462. Weiß, Johannes, ‘Legitimationsbegriff und Legitimationsleistung der Systemtheorie Niklas Luhmanns’, 18 Politische Vierteljahresschrift 74 (1977) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  463. Wenar, Leif, ‘John Rawls’, in Edward N Zalta (ed), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2021 Edition), available at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/rawls/ (last accessed 30 September 2021) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  464. Wiefelspütz, Dieter, ‘Die Bundesverfassungsrichter werden vom Deutschen Bundestag direkt gewählt!’, 65 Die Öffentliche Verwaltung 961 (2012) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  465. Wiesner, Claudia, ‘Rethinking politicisation as a multi-stage and multilevel concept’, 18 Contemp Pol Theory 255 (2019) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  466. Woodson, Benjamin, ‘Politicization and the Two Modes of Evaluating Judicial Decisions’, 3 J Law & Cts 193 (2015) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  467. Wright, Susan, ‘The Politicization of “Culture”’, 14 Anthropology Today 7 (1998) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  468. Zelditch, Morris Jr, ‘Theories of Legitimacy’, in John T Jost and Brenda Major (eds), The Psychology of Legitimacy: Emerging Perspectives on Ideology, Justice, and Intergroup Relations (CUP, Cambridge, 2001) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  469. Zeleny, Milan, ‘Self-Organization of Living Systems: A Formal Model of Autopoiesis’, 4 Int’l J General Sys 13 (1977) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  470. Zilis, Michael A, ‘Minority Groups and Judicial Legitimacy: Group Affect and the Incentives for Judicial Responsiveness’, 71 Pol Res Q 270 (2018) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  471. Zuck, Rüdiger, ‘Politische Sekundärtugenden: Über die Kunst, Pakete zu schnüren’, 47 Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 497 (1994) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  472. Zürn, Michael, ‘Politicization compared: at national, European, and global levels’, 26 J Eur Pub Pol’y 977 (2019) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583
  473. Zürn, Michael, Binder, Martin, and Ecker-Ehrhardt, Matthias, ‘International authority and its politicization’, 4 Int’l Theory 69 (2012) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748941583

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus der Reihe "Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht"
Cover des Buchs: Partizipation in der Umweltgovernance
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Laura Fischer
Partizipation in der Umweltgovernance
Cover des Buchs: Fusion Energy in Nuclear Weapons Law
Monographie Vollzugriff
Philipp Sauter
Fusion Energy in Nuclear Weapons Law
Cover des Buchs: Comparative Perspectives on the Law of Energy Transition in Europe
Sammelband Vollzugriff
Michael Rodi, Johannes Saurer
Comparative Perspectives on the Law of Energy Transition in Europe
Cover des Buchs: Human Dignity in the General Theory of Fundamental Rights
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Augusto Wiegand Cruz
Human Dignity in the General Theory of Fundamental Rights
Cover des Buchs: The Animal in Public International Law
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Joseph Reeves
The Animal in Public International Law

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Feedback geben

Wir freuen uns über Ihr Feedback zu Inhalten und Funktionen. Ihre Nachricht hilft uns, unseren Service stetig zu verbessern.

Bewertung
Bild anhängen
oder hier ablegen
PNG oder JPG (max. 3 MB)

Anmelden

Passwort vergessen?
Login über Ihre Institution (SSO, Shibboleth, OpenAthens)
Noch kein Benutzerkonto?
Jetzt registrieren

Publikation zitieren

Download: RIS BibTex