Legal Theory and Interpretation in a Dynamic Society

Prof. Dr. Alexander Bruns LL.M.; Prof. Dr. Yuanshi Bu LL.M.; Prof. Dr. Hanno Merkt LL.M.; Prof. Dr. Sonja Meier LL.M.; Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Michael Pawlik LL.M.; Prof. Dr. Dr. Eiji Takahashi; Prof. Dr. Silja Vöneky; Prof. Dr. Jan von Hein

doi:10.5771/9783748925842

Summary

This volume is a collection of edited papers presented at the occasion of the 7th Seoul-Freiburg Law Faculties Symposium held in Seoul in September 2019. The cooperation and academic exchange between the Law Faculties of the Seoul National University (SNU) and the Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg keeping alive an old and precious tradition of close relationship between Korean and German law.

The 7th Symposium was devoted to “Legal Theory and Interpretation in a Dynamic Society” and covered a broad range of subjects divided in six sections on I. Legal Theory and Interpretation, II. Enterprise Law, III. International Private Law and Civil Procedure Law, IV. Artificial Intelligence Law, Property Law, Criminal Law. V. Contract Law, and VI. the Relation of Supranational and Domestic Constitutional Law. Most of the papers presented at the Symposium are collected in this volume.

Keywords

Search publication

Bibliographic data

Edition: 1/2021
Copyright Year: 2021
ISBN-Print: 978-3-8487-8155-3
ISBN-Online: 978-3-7489-2584-2
Publisher: Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series: Recht in Ostasien
Volume: 19
Language: English
Pages: 433
Product Type: Edited Book

Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access Pages 1 - 10
1. Authors:
  1. I. Legislative Intent and Group Agency No access
    Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. A. The Minimal Collective Intent to Legislate No access
      Authors:
    2. B. The Anaphorical Structure of Legislative Intent No access
      Authors:
  3. Authors:
    1. A. The Diligent and Competent Lawmaker No access
      Authors:
    2. B. Legislative Intent and Semantic Meaning No access
      Authors:
    3. C. A Substantively Rational Legislature? No access
      Authors:
    4. D. Standing deferential intentions? No access
      Authors:
    5. E. The Relevant Context and Materials No access
      Authors:
    6. F. Legislative Intent and Legal Hermeneutics No access
      Authors:
  4. Authors:
    1. Résumé de l’article : No access
      Authors:
    2. Notice bio-bibliographique : No access
      Authors:
    3. Adresse postale : No access
      Authors:
    4. Adresse électronique : No access
      Authors:
2. Authors:
  1. I. The different forms of legal dynamics No access
    Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. 1. All the law is judge-made law No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Development of the law by judges (Richterliche Rechtsfortbildung) No access
      Authors:
    3. 3. Interpretation in conformity with the constitution (verfassungskonforme Auslegung) No access
      Authors:
    4. 4. Interpretation is a form of concretisation No access
      Authors:
    5. 5. Implicit constitutional change (Verfassungswandel) No access
      Authors:
    6. 6. Living constitution No access
      Authors:
  3. Authors:
    1. 1. The application of law as law-creation and vice versa No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Two meanings of creativity in the law No access
      Authors:
    3. 3. Between legal formalism and the Free Law School (Freirechtsschule) No access
      Authors:
  4. IV. Focussing on the concept of interpretation No access
    Authors:
3. Authors:
  1. I. Legal History and Present Law No access
    Authors:
  2. II. An Obsolete Contrast No access
    Authors:
  3. Authors:
    1. 1. Outline No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Constitutional Guidelines No access
      Authors:
    3. 3. Hierarchy of Interpretation No access
      Authors:
  4. Authors:
    1. 1. Fundamental Change of Circumstances No access
      Authors:
    2. Authors:
      1. a. The Fluctuating Legislator No access
        Authors:
      2. b. The Flawed Legislator No access
        Authors:
      3. c. The Self-Restraining Legislator No access
        Authors:
      4. d. The Hidden Legislator No access
        Authors:
  5. V. Conclusions No access
    Authors:
4. Authors:
  1. Ⅰ. Introduction No access
    Authors:
  2. Ⅱ. Worthlessness of historical interpretation as a standard of legal interpretation: three cases No access
    Authors:
  3. Ⅲ. Hard case and the (hypothetical or real) intention of ‘current’ legislators No access
    Authors:
  4. Authors:
    1. 1. Introduction of Korean Supreme Court case No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Evaluation No access
      Authors:
  5. Authors:
    1. 1. Unconstitutionality issue No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Volatility issue No access
      Authors:
1. Authors:
  1. Authors:
    1. I. Fiduciary duties in a nutshell No access
      Authors:
    2. Authors:
      1. Authors:
        a) Historical background No access
        Authors:
        b) Fiduciary duties as corporate governance instrument No access
        Authors:
        c) Two guiding ideas of the duty of loyalty No access
        Authors:
      2. Authors:
        a) Special regulations No access
        Authors:
        b) General principles in stock corporation law No access
        Authors:
        c) General principles in limited liability company law No access
        Authors:
      3. Authors:
        a) Relationship to no-competition rule No access
        Authors:
        b) Elements of corporate opportunies No access
        Authors:
        c) Justification and permission No access
        Authors:
      4. 4. Legal consequences No access
        Authors:
    3. Authors:
      1. Authors:
        a) Differentiation to managerial duty of loyalty No access
        Authors:
        b) Case law and scope of application No access
        Authors:
        c) General considerations No access
        Authors:
      2. 2. Duty of considerateness No access
        Authors:
      3. Authors:
        a) Restructuring of a firm No access
        Authors:
        b) “Restructure or Retire“ No access
        Authors:
        c) “Media-Saturn“ No access
        Authors:
      4. 4. Scope of Application No access
        Authors:
      5. 5. Legal consequences No access
        Authors:
    4. IV. Theses and Conclusion No access
      Authors:
2. Authors:
  1. Introduction No access
    Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. 1. Korean Commercial Code No access
      Authors:
    2. Authors:
      1. (1) Facts No access
        Authors:
      2. (2) Trial Court & Appellate Court Decision No access
        Authors:
      3. (3) Supreme Court Decision No access
        Authors:
    3. Authors:
      1. (1) Korea No access
        Authors:
      2. (2) Japan No access
        Authors:
    4. 4. Why the contractarian view fails No access
      Authors:
  3. Authors:
    1. 1. History No access
      Authors:
    2. Authors:
      1. (1) Autonomy No access
        Authors:
      2. (2) Effect of the Lack of Anstellung Contract No access
        Authors:
    3. 3. Why Does the Anstellung Matter in Korea? No access
      Authors:
  4. Concluding Remarks No access
    Authors:
3. Authors:
  1. A. Introduction No access
    Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. Authors:
      1. 1. Corporate Law No access
        Authors:
      2. 2. Capital Market Law No access
        Authors:
      3. 3. Differences between the Two Regulation Schemes No access
        Authors:
      4. 4. The Relationship between both Regulation Schemes No access
        Authors:
    2. Authors:
      1. 1. Historical Background No access
        Authors:
      2. 2. The Right to Information under Stock Corporation Law known as Know Your Shareholder No access
        Authors:
      3. 3. The Relationship towards the Capital Market Law Transparency Requirements No access
        Authors:
    3. Authors:
      1. 1. Mandatory Bid Rule Compatible with Corporation Law? No access
        Authors:
      2. 2. Legal Nature of the Mandatory Bid Rule No access
        Authors:
      3. 3. Justification of Mandatory Bid Rule under Capital Market Law No access
        Authors:
      4. 4. Conclusion No access
        Authors:
    4. Authors:
      1. 1. The Purpose of „Acting in Concert“ No access
        Authors:
      2. 2. Requirements of Acting in Concert No access
        Authors:
      3. 3. Legal Classification of Acting in Concert No access
        Authors:
    5. Authors:
      1. 1. Corporate Law No access
        Authors:
      2. 2. Capital Market Law No access
        Authors:
      3. 3. Differences between both Types of Squeeze-Out No access
        Authors:
      4. 4. Relationship between both Types of Squeeze-Out No access
        Authors:
  3. C. Conclusion No access
    Authors:
1. Authors:
  1. Authors:
    1. I. Introduction No access
      Authors:
    2. II. The personal status of migrants No access
      Authors:
    3. Authors:
      1. 1. Control of the result in the specific case No access
        Authors:
      2. 2. Spatial relativity No access
        Authors:
      3. 3. Temporal relativity No access
        Authors:
      4. 4. Critique No access
        Authors:
    4. Authors:
      1. Authors:
        a) The traditional approach No access
        Authors:
        b) Effects of the Rome III Regulation No access
        Authors:
        c) Reform 2018 No access
        Authors:
      2. Authors:
        a) German court practice before 2017 No access
        Authors:
        b) The law against child marriages No access
        Authors:
        c) Practical consequences No access
        Authors:
      3. Authors:
        a) The traditional approach No access
        Authors:
        b) The Bavarian reform proposal of 2018 No access
        Authors:
        c) Actual Reform No access
        Authors:
    5. V. Evaluation No access
      Authors:
2. Authors:
  1. Ⅰ. Introduction No access
    Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. A. ML Regime v. EU Regime No access
      Authors:
    2. B. Object of Recognition: Insolvency Proceedings v. Judgments Constituting the Insolvency Proceeding No access
      Authors:
    3. C. Process of Recognition: Is recognition automatic or not? No access
      Authors:
    4. D. Effect of Recognition: Extension or Assimilation? No access
      Authors:
    5. E. Characteristics of the KInsolA regarding the Recognition of Foreign Insolvency Proceedings No access
      Authors:
  3. Authors:
    1. A. Progress of the Hanjin Insolvency Proceedings No access
      Authors:
    2. B. Overview of BBCHP Financing No access
      Authors:
    3. C. Characterization of BBCHP in the Insolvency Proceedings of a Charterer No access
      Authors:
  4. Authors:
    1. A. Hanjin Insolvency Representative’s Application for Recognition and Stay Orders in Foreign Countries No access
      Authors:
    2. Authors:
      1. Authors:
        (1) Adoption of the MLCBI by the U.S. No access
        Authors:
        (2) Were the Hanjin BBCHP Vessels Included in the Stay Order of the New Jersey BC? No access
        Authors:
        (3) Implications of the New Jersey BC’s Stay Order No access
        Authors:
      2. 2. Recognition and Stay Orders of Korean Rehabilitation Proceedings in Japan No access
        Authors:
      3. 3. Recognition and Stay Order of Korean Rehabilitation Proceedings in Germany No access
        Authors:
    3. C. Evaluation of the Scope of Foreign Courts’ Stay Orders No access
      Authors:
  5. Authors:
    1. A. Effect of a Decision to Commence Rehabilitation Proceedings under the KInsolA No access
      Authors:
    2. Authors:
      1. 1. Characterization of BBCHP under the KInsolA No access
        Authors:
      2. 2. Split of Opinions and Practical Differences No access
        Authors:
      3. 3. Decision of the Changwon District Court No access
        Authors:
      4. 4. Evaluation of the Decision of the Changwon District Court No access
        Authors:
    3. C. Is Korean Courts’ Characterization Binding on the Courts of Recognizing Countries? No access
      Authors:
    4. C. Necessity of Amendment of the KInsolA? No access
      Authors:
  6. Authors:
    1. A. Issues in the Todd Oh Case No access
      Authors:
    2. B. Split of Opinions and the KSC’s View No access
      Authors:
    3. Authors:
      1. 1. EIR’s Position and the KSC’s Decision No access
        Authors:
      2. 2. MLIRJ’s Position and the KSC’s Decision No access
        Authors:
  7. Authors:
    1. English Abstract No access
      Authors:
3. Authors:
  1. Authors:
    1. 1. The Basic Antinomy of the Guarantee of Judicial Protection and Efficiency No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Enforcement of Individual Subjective Rights as Primary Purpose of Civil Procedure No access
      Authors:
    3. 3. Procedural Economy, Efficiency and the Insufficiency of the Data Bases No access
      Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. 1. The Constitutional Guarantee of Effective Judicial Protection of Rights No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Warranty of Efficient Civil Procedure? No access
      Authors:
    3. 3. Perspectives for Future Development in Europe No access
      Authors:
  3. Authors:
    1. Authors:
      1. a) The Principle of Party-Disposition of the Matter in Controversy (Dispositionsgrundsatz) No access
        Authors:
      2. b) The Principle of Party-Responsibility for Evidentiary Issues (Beibringungsgrundsatz) No access
        Authors:
      3. c) The Principle of Concentration and Acceleration No access
        Authors:
      4. d) Right to be Heard, Procedural Fairnees and Equality of the Parties No access
        Authors:
    2. Authors:
      1. a) Single Judge and Plurality of Judges No access
        Authors:
      2. b) The Roles of Judge and Parties No access
        Authors:
      3. c) Standard of Proof No access
        Authors:
      4. d) Amicable Dispute Resolution and Judgment No access
        Authors:
      5. e) Allocation of Costs No access
        Authors:
      6. f) Appeals No access
        Authors:
    3. 3. Balance of the Juridical-Economic Analysis No access
      Authors:
  4. IV. Summary No access
    Authors:
4. Authors:
  1. Authors:
    1. Authors:
      1. I. Introduction No access
        Authors:
      2. Authors:
        1. Enactment process No access
        Authors:
        Authors:
        (1) Causes of Action No access
        Authors:
        Authors:
        ① Lead Plaintiff and the Counsel No access
        Authors:
        ② Jurisdiction and Limitation No access
        Authors:
        ③ Filing of Complaint and Permission Application No access
        Authors:
        ④ Requirements for Permission No access
        Authors:
        ⑤ Permission Procedure No access
        Authors:
        ⑥ Opt-Out Notices No access
        Authors:
        ⑦ Evidences No access
        Authors:
        ⑧ Damages No access
        Authors:
        ⑨ Res Judicata No access
        Authors:
        3. Current Situation of SCAA No access
        Authors:
      3. Authors:
        1. Case Summary and Concentration into Procedural Perspective No access
        Authors:
        2. Time Consuming Permission Process No access
        Authors:
        3. Litigation Cost No access
        Authors:
        4. Contingency Fee No access
        Authors:
        5. Discovery System No access
        Authors:
        6. On Other Requirements in Filing SCAA Action No access
        Authors:
        IV. Ways to Activate SCAA No access
        Authors:
        1. No Royal Road for activation No access
        Authors:
        Authors:
        (1) Court’s Attitude No access
        Authors:
        (2) Issue of Fee Reduction by Court No access
        Authors:
        Authors:
        (1) Relaxation of the Counsel Requirements to Foster Specialized Lawyers No access
        Authors:
        (2) Limitations on Attorney Fee and Filing Fee No access
        Authors:
        (3) Reduction of Member Requirement No access
        Authors:
        (4) Issue of Litigation Funding No access
        Authors:
      4. V. Conclusion No access
        Authors:
1. Authors:
  1. I. Introduction No access
    Authors:
  2. II. Legal Objectives and Guiding Principles: Diversity of Opinion and Media Pluralism No access
    Authors:
  3. III. The Use of Artificial Intelligence and Algorithms No access
    Authors:
  4. Authors:
    1. 1. Anti-Competitive Behaviour No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Regulatory Options No access
      Authors:
  5. V. Implications of the General Data Protection Regulation No access
    Authors:
  6. VI. Conclusions and Final Remarks No access
    Authors:
2. Authors:
  1. Authors:
    1. A. Introduction No access
      Authors:
    2. Authors:
      1. I. Overview No access
        Authors:
      2. II. Context of Cloud Computing No access
        Authors:
    3. Authors:
      1. I. Overview No access
        Authors:
      2. II. Context of Cloud Computing No access
        Authors:
    4. Authors:
      1. I. Absolute Property Rights in Insolvency Proceedings No access
        Authors:
      2. II. Tangible Property in Insolvency Proceedings No access
        Authors:
      3. Authors:
        1. Copyright No access
        Authors:
        2. Database No access
        Authors:
        3. Trade Secrets No access
        Authors:
        4. Protection of Personal Data No access
        Authors:
    5. E. Comparative Aspects No access
      Authors:
    6. Authors:
      1. I. The Pari Passu Principle No access
        Authors:
      2. II. Property or Intellectual Property? No access
        Authors:
      3. Authors:
        1. Scope of the Absolute Right to Data No access
        Authors:
        2. Separating Data from the Estate No access
        Authors:
        3. Costs No access
        Authors:
        4. Deletion and Release No access
        Authors:
        5. Right to Follow No access
        Authors:
    7. G. Cross-Border Insolvency No access
      Authors:
    8. H. Summary No access
      Authors:
3. Authors:
  1. Introduction No access
    Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. 1. Notions and Foundations No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Risks and Chances No access
      Authors:
    3. Authors:
      1. a. Bases No access
        Authors:
      2. Authors:
        (1) AI Systems Driven by (Big) Data No access
        Authors:
        (2) AI Systems as Medical Devices No access
        Authors:
        (3) AI Systems as (Semi-)Autonomous Cars No access
        Authors:
        (4) AI Systems as (Semi-)Autonomous Weapons No access
        Authors:
        (5) First Conclusions No access
        Authors:
  3. Authors:
    1. 1. Basis and Content No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. (Dis-)Advantages and Legitimacy No access
      Authors:
    3. 3. Second Conclusions No access
      Authors:
  4. Authors:
    1. 1. Legitimacy No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Ethical Paradigms No access
      Authors:
    3. 3. Human Rights-based AI Regulation No access
      Authors:
  5. IV. Future AI Regulation No access
    Authors:
4. Authors:
  1. I. Introduction No access
    Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. 1. Definition No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Narrow and General AI No access
      Authors:
    3. 3. Weak and Strong AI No access
      Authors:
    4. 4. What Legally Matters No access
      Authors:
  3. Authors:
    1. Authors:
      1. A. The Perpetration-via-Another Liability Model No access
        Authors:
      2. B. The Natural-Probable-Consequence-Liability Model No access
        Authors:
      3. C. The Direct Liability Model No access
        Authors:
      4. D. Concurrence of Models No access
        Authors:
    2. Authors:
      1. A. Human Only Perspective No access
        Authors:
      2. B. Similarity to Human Perspective (Negative) No access
        Authors:
      3. C. Similarity to Human Perspective (Positive) No access
        Authors:
    3. Authors:
      1. A. Decline of Person-Thing Dualism No access
        Authors:
      2. B. Post-humanism: Expansion of Ethical Subjects No access
        Authors:
      3. C. from Human to Person No access
        Authors:
      4. D. Constructivism No access
        Authors:
  4. Authors:
    1. 1. Crime as Social Creation No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Switch the Approach No access
      Authors:
    3. 3. Punish or Fix? No access
      Authors:
    4. Authors:
      1. A. Mandatary Requirements No access
        Authors:
      2. B. Minimal Requirement No access
        Authors:
      3. C. Supplementary Requirement No access
        Authors:
    5. 5. Criminal Person No access
      Authors:
  5. V. Conclusion No access
    Authors:
5. Authors:
  1. 1. Introduction No access
    Authors:
  2. 2. Torn between Protecting Human Rights and Protecting Cultural Diversity No access
    Authors:
  3. 3. Culture is Challenging Criminal Law No access
    Authors:
  4. Authors:
    1. 4.1 Penalizing Hatred and Protecting Feelings No access
      Authors:
    2. 4.2 Enhancing Criminal Sentences for Hate Motives No access
      Authors:
    3. 4.3 Cultural Defenses No access
      Authors:
    4. Authors:
      1. 4.4.1 Honor Crimes No access
        Authors:
      2. 4.4.2 Female Genital Mutilation No access
        Authors:
      3. 4.4.3 Forced Marriage No access
        Authors:
    5. 5. Conclusions No access
      Authors:
1. Authors:
  1. I. Introduction No access
    Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. 1. The Economic Rationality of Standard Form Contracting No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. The Rationale for Unfair term regulation in standard form contract (1): Customer’s Situational Subordination No access
      Authors:
    3. 3. The Rationale of Unfair term regulation in standard form contract (2): Provider’s Abuse of Situational Dominance No access
      Authors:
  3. Authors:
    1. 1. The Intensity of Unfair term regulation in standard form contract No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. The Remedial Alternatives of Unfair term regulation in standard form contract No access
      Authors:
  4. IV. Conclusion No access
    Authors:
2. Authors:
  1. Statutory prohibitions No access
    Authors:
  2. Public policy No access
    Authors:
  3. General trends No access
    Authors:
3. Authors:
  1. A. Introduction No access
    Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. Authors:
      1. 1. Cooperation of Companies No access
        Authors:
      2. 2. Outsourcing No access
        Authors:
    2. Authors:
      1. Authors:
        a. The Options for Employers in a World of Liberalized Trade No access
        Authors:
        Authors:
        aa. National Level No access
        Authors:
        bb. International Level No access
        Authors:
        c. The Posting of Workers No access
        Authors:
      2. 2. Flexible Labor through Atypical Forms of Employment No access
        Authors:
  3. Authors:
    1. I. Disassociation of the Place of Work and the Employer’s Plant No access
      Authors:
    2. II. Dynamization of Possible Forms of Cooperation No access
      Authors:
    3. III. Replacing Employees by Machines No access
      Authors:
  4. D. Conclusions No access
    Authors:
1. Authors:
  1. I. Einleitung No access
    Authors:
  2. II. Entgegenstehende (Rechts- und) Gesetzeskraft einer früheren Entscheidung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts No access
    Authors:
  3. Authors:
    1. 1. Rechte nichtehelicher Väter No access
      Authors:
    2. Authors:
      1. a) Freiheit No access
        Authors:
      2. b) Rückwirkung No access
        Authors:
    3. 3. Zwischenergebnis No access
      Authors:
  4. Authors:
    1. 1. Die EMRK – und die auf ihr beruhende Rechtsprechung des EGMR – in der deutschen (Verfassungs-)Rechtsordnung No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Schutzbereich No access
      Authors:
    3. 3. Eingriff No access
      Authors:
    4. 4. Rechtfertigung No access
      Authors:
    5. 5. Zwischenergebnis No access
      Authors:
  5. V. Konstellationen, in denen das Verhältnismäßigkeitsprinzip nicht zum Tragen kommt: Das NPD-Parteiverbotsurteil No access
    Authors:
  6. VI. Das Urteil zum Streikverbot der Beamten No access
    Authors:
  7. VII. Gesamtbetrachtung No access
    Authors:
  8. VIII. Ergebnis No access
    Authors: