, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Book Titles No access

Medienbasierte Trainingsangebote zur Unterstützung therapeutischer Übungen

Eine Untersuchung des Einsatzes von Hypervideos in der Rehabilitation von Prostatakrebspatienten
Authors:
Publisher:
 2017


Bibliographic data

Copyright year
2017
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-3804-5
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-8102-5
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Gesundheitskommunikation | Health Communication
Volume
16
Language
German
Pages
286
Product type
Book Titles

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access Pages 1 - 10
    1. Erkenntnisinteresse und theoretischer Rahmen No access
    2. Methodisches Vorgehen und Aufbau der Arbeit No access
      1. eHealth-Anwendungen zur Unterstützung von Bewegungstrainings No access
      2. Multimedialität und Interaktivität in eHealth-Anwendungen No access
    1. Zwischenfazit – Mediale Informationsvermittlung im Gesundheitsbereich No access
    1. Multimedialität – Eine begriffliche Eingrenzung No access
      1. Lernen im Zusammenspiel zwischen Arbeits- und Langzeitgedächtnis No access
      2. Der Lernprozess nach der Cognitive Load Theory No access
      3. Der Lernprozess nach der Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning No access
      1. Typologie von Bildern No access
      2. Dynamik von Bildinhalten No access
      1. Das Kohärenzprinzip No access
      2. Das Redundanzprinzip No access
      3. Das Prinzip der räumlichen und zeitlichen Kontiguität No access
      4. Das Modalitätsprinzip No access
      5. Das Signalisierungsprinzip No access
    2. Zwischenfazit – Lernen mit multimedialen Inhalten No access
    1. Interaktion, Kommunikation und Interaktivität – eine begriffliche Eingrenzung No access
    2. Interaktivität im Kontext instruktionaler Medien No access
      1. Das Prinzip der Segmentierung No access
      2. Das Prinzip des Pacing No access
      1. Vom Cognitive Load zur Usability No access
      2. Modell der Nutzung von Hypermedien No access
      3. Prinzipien zur Gestaltung von Hypermedien No access
    3. Zwischenfazit – Lernen mit interaktiven und hypermedialen Medien No access
    1. Hypervideo – eine begriffliche Eingrenzung No access
    2. Hypervideo für die Wissensvermittlung No access
    3. Erkenntnisse zur Gestaltung der Hypervideos No access
    4. Zwischenfazit – Lernen mit Hypervideos No access
      1. Die Nutzergruppe No access
      2. Kontext der Nutzung No access
      3. Inhaltliche Vorgaben der Klinik No access
      4. Funktionale Anforderungen der Klinik No access
      1. Theoretische Einführung No access
      2. Praktische Anleitungen No access
      1. SIVA-HTML5-Player – Vor dem Redesign No access
      2. Erstes Redesign des SIVA-Players No access
    1. Zwischenfazit – Entwicklung des Beckenbodentrainers No access
    1. Beschreibung des Hypervideos No access
    2. Durchführung des Expertentests No access
      1. Makroebene No access
      2. Mikroebene No access
      3. Weitere Funktionen No access
    3. Diskussion und Fazit No access
    1. Auswahl und Forschungsdesign No access
    2. Beschreibung der Varianten des Hypervideos No access
    3. Durchführung der Nutzertests No access
      1. Körperliche Einschränkungen bei der Durchführung des Trainings No access
      2. Internetkompetenz No access
      3. Nutzung des Beckenbodentrainers No access
      4. Auftreten von Bedienproblemen No access
      5. Wahrgenommene Usability No access
      6. Cognitive Load No access
      7. Selektionsverhalten No access
      8. Nutzung der Unterbrechungen No access
      9. Kompetenz bei der Ausführung der Beckenbodenübungen No access
      1. Voraussetzung für das Training No access
      2. Allgemeine Nutzung des Beckenbodentrainers No access
      3. Auftreten von Bedienproblemen während der Nutzung No access
      4. Wahrgenommene Usability und Cognitive Load No access
      5. Verwendung des Beckenbodentrainers für das selbstständige Training No access
      6. Kompetenz bei der Ausführung der Beckenbodenübungen No access
      7. Zusammenhänge zwischen den Merkmalen No access
    4. Diskussion No access
    5. Limitationen und Fazit zum Nutzertest No access
    1. Auswahl und Forschungsdesign No access
    2. Beschreibung der Varianten des Hypervideos No access
    3. Durchführung des Probebetriebs No access
      1. Körperliche Einschränkungen bei der Durchführung des Trainings No access
      2. Internetkompetenz No access
      3. Umfang des Beckenbodentrainings No access
      4. Umfang der Nutzung des Beckenbodentrainers/Flyers No access
      5. Wahrgenommene Usability No access
      6. Bewertung der Zusatzinformationen No access
      7. Cognitive Load No access
      8. Kompetenzerwerb No access
      9. Kontinenzentwicklung No access
      10. Logging-Daten zur Verwendung des Hypervideos No access
      11. Interviews zu den Nutzungserfahrungen der Patienten No access
      1. Voraussetzungen für Nutzung des Hypervideos im Training No access
      2. Nutzung, Bewertung und Wirkung von Hypervideos & Flyer No access
      3. Verwendung des Hypervideos im Verlauf der Rehabilitation No access
      4. Vergleich zwischen den beiden Varianten des Beckenbodentrainers No access
    4. Diskussion No access
    5. Limitationen und Fazit zum Probebetrieb No access
    1. Zusammenfassung und kritische Bewertung der Ergebnisse No access
    2. Einordnung der Ergebnisse in den Forschungsstand No access
    3. Der Einsatz von Hypervideo in therapeutischen Prozessen No access

Bibliography (219 entries)

  1. Agostini, M.; Moja, L.; Banzi, R.; Pistotti, V.; Tonin, P.; Venneri, A.; Turolla, A. (2015). Telerehabilitation and recovery of motor function: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/1357633X15572201
  2. Ajzen, I. (2005). Attitudes, personality, and behavior. (2. Aufl.). Maidenhead, Berkshire, England, New York: Open University Press. Open Google Scholar
  3. Amadieu, F. ; Tricot, A. ; Mariné, C. (2010). Interaction between prior knowledge and concept-map structure on hypertext comprehension, coherence of reading orders and disorientation. Interacting with Computers, 22(2), 88–97. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2009.07.001
  4. Anderson, J. R. (2007). Kognitive Psychologie. (6. Aufl.). Heidelberg, Berlin, Oxford: Spektrum, Akad. Verl. Open Google Scholar
  5. Antón, D.; Nelson, M.; Russell, T.; Goñi, A., Illarramendi, A. (2015). Validation of a Kinect-based telerehabilitation system with total hip replacement patients. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. Open Google Scholar
  6. Antonenko, P. D.; Niederhauser, D. S. (2010). The influence of leads on cognitive load and learning in a hypertext environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 140–150. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.10.014
  7. ARD-Forschungsdienst. (2015). Statistik - Daten aus der ARD/ZDF Onlinestudie 2015. Media Perspektiven (9), 416–417. Open Google Scholar
  8. Arguel, A.; Jamet, E. (2009). Using video and static pictures to improve learning of procedural contents. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 354–359. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.014
  9. Atkinson, R. C.; Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In: Spence, K. W.; Spence, J. T. (Hrsg.), The psychology of learning and motivation (2. Aufl.) (S. 89–195). New York: Academic Press. Open Google Scholar
  10. Ayres, P.; Marcus, N.; Chan, C.; Qian, N. (2009). Learning hand manipulative tasks: When instructional animations are superior to equivalent static representations. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 348–353. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.013
  11. Ayres, P.; Paas, F. (2007). Making instructional animations more effective: a cognitive load approach. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(6), 695–700. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1002/acp.1343
  12. Ayres, P.; Sweller, J. (2005). The Split-Attention Principle in Multimedia Learning. In: Mayer, R. E. (Hrsg.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (S. 135–146). Cambridge, U.K., New York: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  13. Baddeley, A. D. (1997). Human memory. Theory and practice. Hove, East Sussex: Psychology Press. Open Google Scholar
  14. Baddeley, A. D. (2003). Working Memory: Looking Back and Looking Forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 829–839. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1038/nrn1201
  15. Balzert, H.; Klug, U.; Pampuch, A. (2009). Webdesign & Web-Usability. Basiswissen für Web-Entwickler. (2. Aufl.). Herdecke, Witten: W3L-Verl. Open Google Scholar
  16. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. Open Google Scholar
  17. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy. The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman. Open Google Scholar
  18. Bandura, A. (1998). Health promotion from the perspective of social cognitive theory. Psychology & Health, 13(4), 623–649. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/08870449808407422
  19. Bauhoff, V.; Huff, M.; Schwan, S. (2012). Distance Matters: Spatial Contiguity Effects as Trade-Off between Gaze Switches and Memory Load. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(6), 863–871. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1002/acp.2887
  20. Baumann, F. T.; Zopf, E. M.; Bloch, W. (2012). Clinical exercise interventions in prostate cancer patients – a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Supportive Care in Cancer, 20(2), 221-233. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s00520-011-1271-0
  21. Belenky, D.; Schalk, L. (2014). The Effects of Idealized and Grounded Materials on Learning, Transfer, and Interest: An Organizing Framework for Categorizing External Knowledge Representations. Educational Psychology Review, 26(1), 27-50. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9251-9
  22. Bennett, G. G.; Glasgow, R. E. (2009). The delivery of public health interventions via the Internet: actualizing their potential. Annual review of public health, 30, 273–292. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.031308.100235
  23. Benyon, D. (2014). Designing interactive systems. A comprehensive guide to HCI, UX and interaction design. (3. Aufl.). Harlow: Pearson. Open Google Scholar
  24. Betrancourt, M. (2005). The Animation and Interactivity Princles in Multimedia Learning. In: Mayer, R. E. (Hrsg.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (S. 287–296). Cambridge, U.K., New York: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  25. Bezdan, E.; Kester, L.; Kirschner, P. A. (2013). The influence of node sequence and extraneous load induced by graphical overviews on hypertext learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 870–880. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.016
  26. Bilandzic, H.; Matthes, J.; Schramm, H. (2015). Medienrezeptionsforschung. Konstanz, München: UVK-Verl.-Ges. Open Google Scholar
  27. Bonfadelli, H. (2014). Gesundheitskommunikation: Ein Forschungsfeld in Bewegung. In: Baumann, E.; Hastall, M. R.; Rossmann, C.; Sowka, A. (Hrsg.), Gesundheitskommunikation als Forschungsfeld der Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft (1. Aufl.) (S. 12–35). Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG. Open Google Scholar
  28. Bortz, J.; Döring, N. (2006). Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler. Mit 87 Tabellen. (4. Aufl.). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-33306-7
  29. Boucheix, J.-M.; Lowe, R. K.; Putri, D. K.; Groff, J. (2013). Cueing animations: Dynamic signaling aids information extraction and comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 25(0), 71–84. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.11.005
  30. Boucheix, J.-M.; Schneider, E. (2009). Static and animated presentations in learning dynamic mechanical systems. Learning and Instruction, 19(2), 112–127. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.03.004
  31. Brucker, B.; Scheiter, K.; Gerjets, P. (2014). Learning with dynamic and static visualizations: Realistic details only benefit learners with high visuospatial abilities. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 330–339. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.077
  32. Brunyé, T. T.; Taylor, H. A.; Rapp, D. N.; Spiro, A. B. (2006). Learning procedures: the role of working memory in multimedia learning experiences. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(7), 917–940. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1002/acp.1236
  33. Buller, D. B.; Floyd, A. H. L. (2012). Internet-Based Interventions For Health Behavior Change. In: Noar, S. M.; Harrington, N. G. (Hrsg.), eHealth Applications. Promising strategies for behavior change (S. 59–78). New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  34. Camerini, L.; Camerini, A.-L.; Schulz, P. J. (2013). Do participation and personalization matter? A model-driven evaluation of an Internet-based patient education intervention for fibromyalgia patients. Patient Education and Counseling, 92(2), 229–234. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2013.04.007
  35. Camerini, L.; Giacobazzi, M.; Boneschi, M.; Schulz, P.; Rubinelli, S. (2011). Design and implementation of a web-based Tailored Gymnasium to enhance self-management of Fibromyalgia. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 21(4–5), 485–511. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s11257-010-9088-y
  36. Camerini, L.; Schulz, P. J. (2012). Effects of Functional Interactivity on Patients’ Knowledge, Empowerment, and Health Outcomes: An Experimental Model-Driven Evaluation of a Web-Based Intervention. Journal of medical Internet research, 14(4), e105. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1953
  37. Carroll, J. M.; Carrithers, C. (1984). Training wheels in a user interface. Commun. ACM, 27(8), 800–806. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1145/358198.358218
  38. Castro-Alonso, J.; Ayres, P.; Paas, F. (2014). Dynamic Visualisations and Motor Skills. In: Huang, W. (Hrsg.), Handbook of Human Centric Visualization (S. 551-580): Springer New York. Open Google Scholar
  39. Chambel, T.; Zahn, C.; Finke, M. (2004). Hypervideo design and support for contextualized learning. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (S. 345–349). Open Google Scholar
  40. Champion, V. L.; Skinner, C. S. (2008). The Health Belief Model. In: Glanz, K.; Rimer, B. K.; Viswanath, K. (Hrsg.), Health behavior and health education. Theory, research, and practice (4. Aufl.) (S. 45–65). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Open Google Scholar
  41. Cheon, J.; Crooks, S.; Chung, S. (2013). Does segmenting principle counteract modality principle in instructional animation? British Journal of Educational Technology. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12021
  42. Clark, R. C.; Lyons, C. C. (2011). Graphics for learning. Proven guidelines for planning, designing, and evaluating visuals in training materials. (2. Aufl.). San Francisco: Pfeiffer. Open Google Scholar
  43. Clark, R. C.; Mayer, R. E. (2011). E-learning and the science of instruction. Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. (3. Aufl.). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1002/9781118255971
  44. Clickable Video. (2015). What is clickable Video? http://www.clickablevideo.eu/en/. Zugegriffen: 11. Mai. 2015. Open Google Scholar
  45. ConciseClick. (2012). Clickable Video Made Easy. http://conciseclick.com/. Zugegriffen: 11. Mai. 2015. Open Google Scholar
  46. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
  47. Davies, C. A.; Spence, J. C.; Vandelanotte, C.; Caperchione, C. M.; Kerry, M. W. (2012). Meta-analysis of internet-delivered interventions to increase physical activity levels. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 9(1), 1–13. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-9-52
  48. Deutsches Institut für Normung. (1999). Ergonomische Anforderungen für Bürotätigkeiten mit Bildschirmgeräten – Teil 11: Anforderungen an die Gebrauchstauglichkeit – Leitsätze. Open Google Scholar
  49. Deutsches Institut für Normung. (2006–08). Ergonomie der Mensch-System-Interaktion. Teil 110: Grundsätze der Dialoggestaltung. Open Google Scholar
  50. Deutsches Institut für Normung. (Januar 2011). Ergonomie der Mensch-System-Interaktion – Teil 210: Prozess zur Gestaltung gebrauchstauglicher interaktiver Systeme. Open Google Scholar
  51. Diefenbach, M. A.; Mohamed, N. E.; Butz, B. P.; Bar-Chama, N.; Stock, R.; Cesaretti, J.; Hassan, W.; Samadi, D.; Hall, S. J. (2012). Acceptability and preliminary feasibility of an internet/CD-ROM-based education and decision program for early-stage prostate cancer patients: randomized pilot study. Journal of medical Internet research, 14(1), e6. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1891
  52. Dillon, A., & Jobst, J. (2005). Multimedia Learning with Hypermedia. In: Mayer, R. E. (Hrsg.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (S. 569–588). Cambridge, U.K., New York: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  53. Dix, A. (2004). Human-computer interaction. (3. Aufl.). Harlow, England, New York: Pearson/Prentice-Hall. Open Google Scholar
  54. Domagk, S.; Schwartz, R. N.; Plass, J. L. (2010). Interactivity in multimedia learning: An integrated model. Advancing Educational Research on Computer-supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) through the use of gStudy CSCL Tools, 26(5), 1024–1033. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.003
  55. Eco, U. (1986). Einführung in die Semiotik. München: Fink. Open Google Scholar
  56. Eng, T. (2001). The eHealth landscape: a terrain map of emerging information and communication technologies in health and health care. http://www.hetinitiative.org/media/pdf/eHealth.pdf. Open Google Scholar
  57. Europäische Kommission. (2012). eHealth Action Plan 2012–2020 – Innovative healthcare for the 21 century. Com (2012) 736 final. Open Google Scholar
  58. Europäische Kommission. (2014). European Citizens’ Digital Health Literacy. Flash Eurobarometer 404. Open Google Scholar
  59. Eysenbach, G. (2001). What is e-health? Journal of medical Internet research, 3(2), e20. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3.2.e20
  60. Faria, C.; Silva, J.; Campilho, A. (2015). Rehab@home: a tool for home-based motor function rehabilitation. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 10(1), 67–74. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2013.839749
  61. Fenk, A. (1997). Representation and iconicity. Semiotica, 115(3–4), 215–234. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/semi.1997.115.3-4.215
  62. Fletcher, J.; Tobias, S. (2005). The Multimedia Principle. In: Mayer, R. E. (Hrsg.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (S. 117–133). Cambridge, U.K., New York: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  63. Forster, K.; Stiemerling, S.; Knieper, T. Wissensvermittlung durch animierte Infografiken: Ein Experiment. In: Thimm, C. (Hrsg.), Netz-Bildung. Lehren und Lernen mit Onlinemedien in Wissenschaft und Wirtschaft (S. 75–100). Frankfurt am Main, New York: Peter Lang. Open Google Scholar
  64. Fox, S.; Duggan, M. (2013). Health Online 2013. 35% of U.S. adults have gone online to figure out a medical condition; of these, half followed up with a visit to a medical professional. Washington. Open Google Scholar
  65. Frisch, A.-L.; Camerini, L.; Schulz, P. J. (2013). The impact of presentation style on the retention of online health information: a randomized-controlled experiment. Health communication, 28(3), 286–293. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2012.683387
  66. Gal, N.; Andrei, D.; Nemeş, D. I.; Nădăşan, E.; Stoicu-Tivadar, V. (2015). A Kinect based intelligent e-rehabilitation system in physical therapy. Studies in health technology and informatics, 210, 489–493. Open Google Scholar
  67. Geary, D. C. (2002). Principles of evolutionary educational psychology. Learning and Individual Differences, 12(4), 317–345. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/S1041-6080(02)00046-8
  68. George, D.; Mallery, M. (2003). Using SPSS for Windows step by step: a simple guide and reference. Boston, MA: Allyn y Bacon. Open Google Scholar
  69. Gerber, B. S.; Brodsky, I. G.; Lawless, K. A.; Smolin, L. I.; Arozullah, A. M.; Smith, E. V.; Berbaum, M. L.; Heckerling, P. S.; Eiser, A. R. (2005). Implementation and Evaluation of a Low-Literacy Diabetes Education Computer Multimedia Application. Diabetes Care, 28(7), 1574–1580. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2337/diacare.28.7.1574
  70. Gerhards, J.; Neidhardt, F. (1990). Struktur und Funktion moderner Öffentlichkeiten. Discussions Paper FS III, S. 90–101. Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin. Open Google Scholar
  71. Gerjets, P.; Kirschner, P. (2009). Learning from Multimedia and Hypermedia. In: Technology-Enhanced Learning (S. 251–272): Springer Netherlands. Open Google Scholar
  72. Gerjets, P.; Scheiter, K.; Opfermann, M.; Hesse, F. W.; Eysink, T. H. (2009). Learning with hypermedia: The influence of representational formats and different levels of learner control on performance and learning behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 360–370. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.015
  73. Girgensohn, A.; Wilcox, L.; Shipman, F.; Bly, S. (2004). Designing affordances for the navigation of detail-on-demand hypervideo. In: Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces (S. 290–297). Gallipoli, Italy: ACM. Open Google Scholar
  74. Gleich, U. (2008). Digitales Fernsehen aus Sicht der Nutzer. Media Perspektiven (9), 485–490. Open Google Scholar
  75. Goertz, L. (1995). Wie interaktiv sind Medien? Auf dem Weg zu einer Definition von Interaktivität. Rundfunk und Fernsehen, 43(4), 477–493. Open Google Scholar
  76. Groebel, J. (2013). Das neue Fernsehen. Plattformen, Formate, Verhalten. (1. Aufl.). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH. Open Google Scholar
  77. Hasler, B. S.; Kersten, B.; Sweller, J. (2007). Learner control, cognitive load and instructional animation. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(6), 713–729. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1002/acp.1345
  78. Höffler, T. N.; Leutner, D. (2007). Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 17(6), 722–738. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.013
  79. Höffler, T. N.; Schwartz, R. N. (2011). Effects of pacing and cognitive style across dynamic and non-dynamic representations. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1716–1726. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.03.012
  80. Hollender, N.; Hofmann, C.; Deneke, M.; Schmitz, B. (2010). Integrating cognitive load theory and concepts of human-computer interaction. Comput. Hum. Behav., 26(6), 1278–1288. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.031
  81. Houts, P. S.; Doak, C. C.; Doak, L. G.; Loscalzo, M. J. (2006). The role of pictures in improving health communication: a review of research on attention, comprehension, recall, and adherence. Patient education and counseling, 61(2), 173–190. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2005.05.004
  82. Imhof, B.; Scheiter, K.; Edelmann, J.; Gerjets, P. (2012). How temporal and spatial aspects of presenting visualizations affect learning about locomotion patterns. Learning and Instruction, 22(3), 193–205. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.10.006
  83. Imhof, B.; Scheiter, K.; Gerjets, P. (2011). Learning about locomotion patterns from visualizations: Effects of presentation format and realism. Computers & Education, 57(3), 1961–1970. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.05.004
  84. Jäckel, M. (1995). Interaktion. Soziologische Anmerkungen zu einem Begriff. Rundfunk und Fernsehen, 43(4), 463–476. Open Google Scholar
  85. Johnson, C. I.; Mayer, R. E. (2012). An Eye Movement Analysis of the Spatial Contiguity Effect in Multimedia Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18(2), 178–191. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1037/a0026923
  86. Kim, H.; Stout, P. A. (2010). The Effects of Interactivity on Information Processing and Attitude Change: Implications for Mental Health Stigma. Health Communication, 25(2), 142–154. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/10410230903544936
  87. Kirschner, P. A.; Sweller, J.; Clark, R. E. (2006). Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
  88. Knieper, T. (1995). Infographiken. Das visuelle Informationspotential der Tageszeitung. München: R. Fischer. Open Google Scholar
  89. Knieper, T. (2001). Die Zukunft der politischen Karikatur. In: Knieper, T.; Müller, M. G. (Hrsg.), Kommunikation visuell. Das Bild als Forschungsgegenstand – Grundlagen und Perspektiven (S. 262–278). Köln: Halem. Open Google Scholar
  90. Koning, B. B. de; Tabbers, H. K.; Rikers, R. M. J. P.; Paas, F. (2009). Towards a Framework for Attention Cueing in Instructional Animations: Guidelines for Research and Design. Educational Psychology Review, 21(2), 113–140. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s10648-009-9098-7
  91. Kuckartz, U. (2014). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Methoden, Praxis, Computerunterstützung. (2. Aufl.). Weinheim, Bergstr: Juventa. Open Google Scholar
  92. Kühl, T.; Scheiter, K.; Gerjets, P. (2012). Enhancing Learning from Dynamic and Static Visualizations by Means of Cueing. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 21(1), 71–88. Open Google Scholar
  93. Kuijpers, W.; Groen, W. G.; Aaronson, N. K.; van Harten, W. H. (2013). A systematic review of web-based interventions for patient empowerment and physical activity in chronic diseases: relevance for cancer survivors. Journal of medical Internet research, 15(2), e37. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2281
  94. Lazar, J.; Feng, J. H.; Hochheiser, H. (2010). Research methods in human-computer interaction. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K.: Wiley. Open Google Scholar
  95. Lee, D. Y.; Shin, D.-H. (2012). An empirical evaluation of multi-media based learning of a procedural task. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 1072–1081. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.01.014
  96. Low, R.; Sweller, J. (2005). The Modality Principle in Multimedia Learning. In: Mayer, R. E. (Hrsg.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge, U.K., New York: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  97. Lowe, R. (2003). Animation and learning: selective processing of information in dynamic graphics. External and Internal Representations in Multimedia Learning. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 157–176. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00018-X
  98. Lowe, R. (2008). Where to Look, When to Look. In: Lowe, R.; Schnotz, W. (Hrsg.), Learning with animation (S. 49–68): Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  99. Lowe, R. ; Boucheix, J.-M. (2008). Learning from Animated Diagrams: How Are Mental Models Built?. In: Stapleton, G.; Howse, J.; Lee, J. (Hrsg.), Diagrammatic Representation and Inference (S. 266-281): Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Open Google Scholar
  100. Lustria, M. L. A. (2007). Can interactivity make a difference? Effects of interactivity on the comprehension of and attitudes toward online health content. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(6), 766–776. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1002/asi.20557
  101. Lynch, P. J.; Horton, S. (2008). Web style guide. Basic design principles for creating Web sites. (3. Aufl.). New Haven [Conn.]: Yale University Press. Open Google Scholar
  102. Mangold, R. (2007). Informationspsychologie. (1. Aufl.). München: Elsevier, Spektrum Akad. Verl. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37384-8
  103. Marcus, N.; Cleary, B.; Wong, A.; Ayres, P. (2013). Should hand actions be observed when learning hand motor skills from instructional animations? Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2172–2178. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.04.035
  104. Mayer, R. E. (1989). Systematic thinking fostered by illustrations in scientific text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(2), 240–246. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.2.240
  105. Mayer, R. E. (2005a). Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning. In: Mayer, R. E. (Hrsg.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (S. 31–48). Cambridge, U.K., New York: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  106. Mayer, R. E. (2005b). Introduction to Multimedia Learning. In: Mayer, R. E. (Hrsg.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (S. 1–15). Cambridge, U.K., New York: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  107. Mayer, R. E. (2005c). Principles for Reducing Extraneous Processing in Multimedia Learning: Coherence, Signaling, Redundancy, Spatial Contiguity, and Temporal Contiguity Principles. In: Mayer, R. E. (Hrsg.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (S. 183–200). Cambridge, U.K., New York: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  108. Mayer, R. E. (2010). Multimedia Learning: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  109. Mayer, R. E.; Anderson, R. B. (1991). Animations need narrations: An experimental test of a dual-coding hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(4), 484–490. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.4.484
  110. Mayer, R. E.; Anderson, R. B. (1992). The instructive animation: Helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 444–452. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.4.444
  111. Mayer, R. E.; Bove, W.; Bryman, A.; Mars, R.; Tapangco, L. (1996). When less is more: Meaningful learning from visual and verbal summaries of science textbook lessons. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(1), 64–73. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.88.1.64
  112. Mayer, R. E.; Gallini, J. K. (1990). When is an illustration worth ten thousand words? Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 715–726. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.82.4.715
  113. Mayer, R. E.; Moreno, R. (2003). Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning. Educational Psychologist. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6
  114. Meixner, B. (2014). Annotated interactive non-linear video. Open Google Scholar
  115. Meixner, B.; Kandlbinder, K.; Siegel, B.; Lehner, F.; Kosch, H.; Kohl, A. (2012). What Users Expect from Players for Interactive (Non-linear) Videos. In: Reiterer, H.; Deussen, O. (Hrsg.), Mensch & Computer. interaktiv informiert – allgegenwärtig und allumfassend!? (S. 337–340). München: Oldenbourg Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  116. Meixner, B.; Kosch, H. (2012). Interactive non-linear video. In: Concolato, C.; Schmitz, P. (Hrsg.), the 2012 ACM symposium (S. 49). Open Google Scholar
  117. Meixner, B.; Köstler, J.; Kosch, H. (2011). A mobile player for interactive non-linear video. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on Multimedia (S. 779–780). Scottsdale, Arizona, USA: ACM. Open Google Scholar
  118. Meixner, B.; Matusik, K.; Grill, C.; Kosch, H. (2014). Towards an easy to use authoring tool for interactive non-linear video. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 70(2), 1251–1276. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s11042-012-1218-6
  119. Meixner, B.; Siegel, B.; Hölbling, G.; Lehner, F.; Kosch, H. (2010). SIVA suite. Authoring System and Player for Interactive Non-linear Videos. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM international conference on Multimedia (S. 1563–1566): ACM. Open Google Scholar
  120. Meixner, B.; Siegel, B.; Schultes, P.; Lehner, F.; Kosch, H. (2013). An HTML5 Player for Interactive Non-linear Video with Time-based Collaborative Annotations, in: Proceedings of International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing & Multimedia (S. 490–499). Vienna, Austria: ACM. Open Google Scholar
  121. Merriënboer, J. J. G.; Sweller, J. (2010). Cognitive load theory in health professional education: design principles and strategies. Medical education, 44(1), 85–93. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03498.x
  122. Merriënboer, J. J. G. van; Kester, L. (2005). The Four-Component Instructional Design Model: Multimedia Principles in Environments for Complex Learning. In: Mayer, R. E. (Hrsg.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (S. 71–93). Cambridge, U.K., New York: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  123. Merriënboer, J. J. G. van; Kirschner, P. A. (2012). Ten steps to complex learning. A systematic approach to four-component instructional design. (2. Aufl.). London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.4324/9780203096864
  124. Merriënboer, J. van; Ayres, P. (2005). Research on cognitive load theory and its design implications for e-learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(3), 5–13. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/BF02504793
  125. Merten, K. (1977). Kommunikation. Eine Begriffs- und Prozeßanalyse. Opladen: Westdt. Verl. Open Google Scholar
  126. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81–97. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1037/h0043158
  127. Moreno, R.; Mayer, R. (2007). Interactive Multimodal Learning Environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 309-326. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9047-2
  128. Moreno, R.; Mayer, R. E. (2002). Learning science in virtual reality multimedia environments: Role of methods and media. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 598–610. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.598
  129. Moreno, R.; Ozogul, G.; Reisslein, M. (2011). Teaching with concrete and abstract visual representations: Effects on students’ problem solving, problem representations, and learning perceptions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 32–47. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1037/a0021995
  130. Morville, P.; Rosenfeld, L. (2007). Information architecture for the World Wide Web. (3. Aufl.). Sebastopol, CA: O‘Reilly. Open Google Scholar
  131. Müller, M. G. (2001). Bilder – Visionen – Wirklichkeiten. Zur Bedeutung der Bildwissenschaft im 21. Jahrhundert. In: Knieper, T.; Müller, M. G. (Hrsg.), Kommunikation visuell. Das Bild als Forschungsgegenstand - Grundlagen und Perspektiven (S. 14–24). Köln: Halem. Open Google Scholar
  132. Neuberger, C. (2007). Interaktivität, Interaktion, Internet. Publizistik, 52(1), 33–50. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s11616-007-0004-3
  133. Nielsen, J.; Loranger, H. (2006). Web Usability. München [u.a.]: Addison-Wesley. Open Google Scholar
  134. Nielsen, J.; Molich, R. (1990). Heuristic Evaluation of User Interfaces. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (S. 249–256). New York, NY, USA: ACM. Open Google Scholar
  135. Nielsen, J.; Pernice, K. (2010). Eyetracking web usability: New Riders. Open Google Scholar
  136. Noar, S. M.; Harrington, N. G. (2012). eHealth: Application: An Introduction and Overview. In: Noar, S. M.; Harrington, N. G. (Hrsg.), eHealth Applications. Promising strategies for behavior change (S. 3–16). New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.4324/9780203149096
  137. Norman, G. J.; Zabinski, M. F.; Adams, M. A.; Rosenberg, D. E.; Yaroch, A. L.; Atienza, A. A. (2007). A Review of eHealth Interventions for Physical Activity and Dietary Behavior Change. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 33(4), 336–345.e16. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2007.05.007
  138. Oh, H.; Rizo, C.; Enkin, M.; Jadad, A. (2005). What is eHealth (3): a systematic review of published definitions. Journal of medical Internet research, 7(1), e1. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7.1.e1
  139. Opfermann, M.; Scheiter, K.; Gerjets, P.; Schmeck, A. (2013). Hypermedia and Self-Regulation: An Interplay in Both Directions. In: Azevedo, R.; Aleven, V. (Hrsg.), International handbook of metacognition and learning technologies (S. 129-141). New York, NY: Springer. Open Google Scholar
  140. Oviatt, S. (2008). Multimodal interfaces. In: Sears, A.; Jacko, J. A. (Hrsg.), The human-computer interaction handbook. Fundamentals, evolving technologies, and emerging applications (2. Aufl.) (S. 286–304). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Open Google Scholar
  141. Paas, F.; Renkl, A.; Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design: Recent Developments. Educational Psychologist. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1–4. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_1
  142. Paas, F.; Sweller, J. (2014). Implications of Cognitive Load Theory for Multimedia Learning. The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, 27. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369.004
  143. Paas, F. G. (1992). Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 429–434. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.4.429
  144. Paas, F. G.; Van Merriënboer, J. J.; Adam, J. J. (1994). Measurement of cognitive load in instructional research. Perceptual and motor skills, 79(1 Pt 2), 419–430. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2466/pms.1994.79.1.419
  145. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  146. Part, P. (2012). The 2012 Ageing Report. Economic and budgetary projections for the 27 EU Member States (2010–2060). Open Google Scholar
  147. Peirce, C. S. (1986). Semiotische Schriften. Band 1. (1. Aufl.). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  148. Pfeifer, K.; Sudeck, G.; Brüggemann, S.; Huber, G. (2010). DGRW-Update: Bewegungstherapie in der medizinischen Rehabilitation – Wirkungen, Qualität, Perspektiven. Die Rehabilitation, 49(4), 224–236. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1261909
  149. Piqueras, M.; Marco, E.; Coll, M.; Escalada, F.; Ballester, A.; Cinca, C.; Belmonte, R.; Muniesa, J. M. (2013). Effectiveness of an Interactive Virtual Telerehabilitation System in Patients After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 45(4), 392–396. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2340/16501977-1119
  150. Ploetzner, R.; Lowe, R. (2012). A systematic characterisation of expository animations. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 781–794. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.12.001
  151. Prochaska, J. O.; Redding, C. A.; Evers Kerry E. (2008). The Transtheoretical Model and Stages of Change. In: Glanz, K.; Rimer, B. K.; Viswanath, K. (Hrsg.), Health behavior and health education. Theory, research, and practice (4. Aufl.) (S. 97–121). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Open Google Scholar
  152. Prümper, J. (1997). Der Benutzungsfragebogen ISONORM 9241/10: Ergebnisse zur Reliabilität und Validität. In: Liskowsky, R.; Velichkovsky, B. M.;Wünschmann, W. (Hrsg.), Software-Ergonomie ’97: Usability Engineering: Integration von Mensch-Computer-Interaktion und Software-Entwicklung (S. 253–262). Wiesbaden: Vieweg+Teubner Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  153. Pürer, H. (2003). Publizistik- und Kommunikationswissenschaft. Ein Handbuch. Konstanz: UVK-Verl.-Ges. Open Google Scholar
  154. Quiring, O.; Schweiger, W. (2008). Interactivity: A review of the concept and a framework for analysis. Communications, 33(2). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/COMMUN.2008.009
  155. Rafaeli, S.; Ariel, Y. (2009). Assessing interactivity in computer-mediated research. In: Joinson, A. N. (Hrsg.), The Oxford handbook of Internet psychology (S. 71–88). Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  156. Rahman, M. A.; Qamar, A. M.; Ahmed, M. A.; Rahman, M. A.; Basalamah, S. (2013). Multimedia interactive therapy environment for children having physical disabilities. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM conference on International conference on multimedia retrieval (S. 313–314). Dallas, Texas, USA: ACM. Open Google Scholar
  157. Rasch, B.; Friese, M.; Hofmann, W.; Naumann, E. (2014). Der t-Test. In: Quantitative Methoden 1: Einführung in die Statistik für Psychologen und Sozialwissenschaftler (S. 33–79). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Open Google Scholar
  158. Rey, G. (2009). E-Learning. Theorien, Gestaltungsempfehlungen und Forschung. Bern: Verlag Hans Huber. Open Google Scholar
  159. Riva, S.; Camerini, A.-L.; Allam, A.; Schulz, P. J. (2014). Interactive sections of an Internet-based intervention increase empowerment of chronic back pain patients: randomized controlled trial. Journal of medical Internet research, 16(8), e180. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3474
  160. Robert Koch Institut. (2013). Krebs in Deutschland 2009/2010. (9. Aufl.). Open Google Scholar
  161. Rossmann, C. (2010). Gesundheitskommunikation im Internet. Erscheinungsformen, Potenziale, Grenzen. In: Schweiger, W.; Beck, K. (Hrsg.), Handbuch Online-Kommunikation (S. 338–363). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar
  162. Rossmann, C.; Karnowski, V. (2014). eHealth und mHealth: Gesundheitskommunikation online und mobil. In: Baumann, E.; Hurrelmann, K. (Hrsg.), Handbuch Gesundheitskommunikation (1. Aufl.) (S. 271–285). Bern: Huber. Open Google Scholar
  163. Rossmann, C.; Ziegler, L. (2013). Gesundheitskommunikation: Medienwirkungen im Gesundheitsbereich. In: Schweiger, W.; Fahr, A. (Hrsg.), Handbuch Medienwirkungsforschung (S. 385-400): Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. Open Google Scholar
  164. Rouet, J.-F. ; Potelle, H. (2005). Navigational Principles in Multimedia Learning. In: Mayer, R. E. (Hrsg.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (S. 297–312). Cambridge, U.K., New York: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  165. Sachs-Hombach, K. (2001). Kann die semiotische Bildtheorie Grundlage einer allgemeinen Bildwissenschaft sein? In: K. Sachs-Hombach (Hrsg.), Bildhandeln. Interdisziplinäre Forschungen zur Pragmatik bildhafter Darstellungsformen (S. 9–26). Magdeburg: Scriptum-Verl. Open Google Scholar
  166. Sachs-Hombach, K. (2003). Das Bild als kommunikatives Medium. Elemente einer allgemeinen Bildwissenschaft. (1. Aufl.). Köln: von Halem. Open Google Scholar
  167. Sawhney, N.; Balcom, D.; Smith, I. (1996). HyperCafe: narrative and aesthetic properties of hypervideo. In: Proceedings of the the seventh ACM conference on Hypertext (S. 1–10). Bethesda, Maryland, USA: ACM. Open Google Scholar
  168. Scheiter, K.; Gerjets, P. (2007). Learner Control in Hypermedia Environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 285–307. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9046-3
  169. Scheiter, K.; Gerjets, P.; Huk, T.; Imhof, B.; Kammerer, Y. (2009). The effects of realism in learning with dynamic visualizations. Learning and Instruction, 19(6), 481–494. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.08.001
  170. Scheiter, K.; Gerjets, P.; Schuh, J. (2010). The acquisition of problem-solving skills in mathematics: How animations can aid understanding of structural problem features and solution procedures. Instructional Science, 38(5), 487–502. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s11251-009-9114-9
  171. Schmitt, N. (1996). Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychological Assessment, 8(4), 350–353. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.8.4.350
  172. Schnotz, W. (2005). An Interated Model of Text Picute Comprehension. In: Mayer, R. E. (Hrsg.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (S. 49–69). Cambridge, U.K., New York: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  173. Schnotz, W. (2006). Pädagogische Psychologie: Beltz, PVU. Open Google Scholar
  174. Schnotz, W.; Bannert, M. (2003). Construction and interference in learning from multiple representation. External and Internal Representations in Multimedia Learning, 13(2), 141–156. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00017-8
  175. Schnotz, W.; Lowe, R. (2008). A Unified View of Learning from Animated and Static Graphics. In: Lowe, R.; Schnotz, W. (Hrsg.), Learning with animation (S. 304–356): Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  176. Schnotz, W.; Rasch, T. (2008). Functions of Animation in Comprehension and Learning. In: Lowe, R.; Schnotz, W. (Hrsg.), Learning with animation (S. 92–113): Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  177. Schönhagen, P. (2004). Soziale Kommunikation im Internet. Zur Theorie und Systematik computervermittelter Kommunikation vor dem Hintergrund der Kommunikationsgeschichte. Bern, New York: Lang. Open Google Scholar
  178. Schönhagen, P. (2008). Gesellschaftliche Kommunikation im Wandel der Geschichte. In: Batinic, N.;Appel, M. (Hrsg.), Medienpsychologie (S. 45–76): Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Open Google Scholar
  179. Schwan, S.; Riempp, R. (2004). The cognitive benefits of interactive videos: learning to tie nautical knots. Learning and lnstruction, 14, 293–305. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.005
  180. Schweiger, W. (2001). Hypermedien im Internet: Nutzung und ausgewählte Effekte der Linkgestaltung: R. Fischer. Open Google Scholar
  181. Seidel, T.; Krapp, A. (Hrsg.). (2014). Pädagogische Psychologie. Mit Online-Materialien zum Download. (6. Aufl.). Weinheim, Bergstr: Beltz, J. Open Google Scholar
  182. Shapiro, A. M. (2008). Hypermedia design as learner scaffolding. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(1), 29–44. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s11423-007-9063-4
  183. Shneiderman, B.; & Plaisant, C. (2010). Designing the user interface. Strategies for effective human-computer interaction. (5. Aufl.). Boston: Addison-Wesley. Open Google Scholar
  184. Silk, K. J.; Atkin, C. K.; Salmon, C. T. (2011). Developing Effective Media Campaings for Health Promotion. In: Thompson, T. L.; Parrott, R.; Nussbaum, J. F. (Hrsg.), The Routledge handbook of health communication (2. Aufl.) (S. 203–219). New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  185. Skinner, B. F. (1958). Teaching Machines. Science, 128(3330), 969–977. Open Google Scholar
  186. Spanjers, I. A. E.; Gog, T. van; Merriënboer, J. J. G. van. (2012a). Segmentation of Worked Examples: Effects on Cognitive Load and Learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(3), 352–358. Open Google Scholar
  187. Spanjers, I. A. E.; Gog, T. van; Wouters, P.; Merriënboer, J. J. G. van. (2012b). Explaining the segmentation effect in learning from animations: The role of pausing and temporal cueing. Computers & Education, 59(2), 274–280. Open Google Scholar
  188. Stahl, E.; Finke, M.; Zahn, C. (2006). Knowledge Acquisition by Hypervideo Design: An Instructional Program for University Courses. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 15(3), 285–302. Open Google Scholar
  189. Statistisches Bundesamt. (2009). Bevölkerung Deutschlands bis 2060. 12. koordinierte Bevölkerungsvorausberechnung. Wiesbaden. Open Google Scholar
  190. Statistisches Bundesamt. (2010). Krankheitskosten. Fachserie 12 Reihe 7.2 – 2002, 2004, 2006 und 2008. Wiesbaden. Open Google Scholar
  191. Sundar, S. S. (2009). Social psychology of interactivity in human-website interaction. In: Joinson, A. N. (Hrsg.), The Oxford handbook of Internet psychology (S. 89–102). Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  192. Sundar, S. S.; Rice, R. E.; Kim, H.-S.; Sciamanna, C. N. (2011). Online Health Information: Conceptual Challenges and Theoretical Opportunities. In: Thompson, T. L.; Parrott, R.; Nussbaum, J. F. (Hrsg.), The Routledge handbook of health communication (2. Aufl.) (S. 181–202). New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  193. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
  194. Sweller, J. (2005a). Implications of Cognitive Load Theory for Multimedia Learning. In: Mayer, R. E. (Hrsg.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (S. 19–30). Cambridge, U.K., New York: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  195. Sweller, J. (2005b). The Redundancy Principle in Multimedia Learning. In: Mayer, R. E. (Hrsg.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (S. 159–167). Cambridge, U.K., New York: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  196. Tang, R.; Yang, X.-D.; Bateman, S.; Jorge, J.; Tang, A. (2015). Physio@Home: Exploring Visual Guidance and Feedback Techniques for Physiotherapy Exercises. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (S. 4123–4132). Seoul, Republic of Korea: ACM. Open Google Scholar
  197. Tanzberger, R. (2013). Der Beckenboden. Funktion, Anpassung und Therapie. Das Tanzberger-Konzept. (3. Aufl.). München: Elsevier, Urban & Fischer. Open Google Scholar
  198. Tiellet, C. A.; Pereira, A. G.; Reategui, E. B.; Lima, J. V.; Chambel, T. (2010). Design and evaluation of a hypervideo environment to support veterinary surgery learning. In: Proceedings of the 21st ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia (S. 213–222). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: ACM. Open Google Scholar
  199. Tonndorf, K.; Handschigl, C.; Windscheid, J.; Granitzer, M.; Kosch, H. (2015). The Effekt of Non-linear Structures on the Usage of Hypervideo for Physical Training, in: International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (S. 1–6). Open Google Scholar
  200. Tselios, N.; Avouris, N.; Komis, V. (2007). The effective combination of hybrid usability methods in evaluating educational applications of ICT: Issues and challenges. Education and Information Technologies, 13(1), 55–76. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s10639-007-9045-5
  201. Tufte, E. R. (2001). The visual display of quantitative information. (2. Aufl.). Cheshire, Conn.: Graphics Press. Open Google Scholar
  202. Tversky, B. (2000). Some Ways that Maps and Diagrams Communicate. In: Freksa, C.; Habel, C.; Brauer, W.; Wender, K. (Hrsg.), Spatial Cognition II (S. 72–79): Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Open Google Scholar
  203. Tversky, B.; Bauer Morrision, J.; Betrancourt, M. (2002). Animation: can it facilitate? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57(4), 247–262. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.2002.1017
  204. van Gog, T.; Paas, F.; Marcus, N.; Ayres, P.; Sweller, J. (2009). The Mirror Neuron System and Observational Learning: Implications for the Effectiveness of Dynamic Visualizations. Educational Psychology Review, 21(1), 21–30. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9094-3
  205. Vereinte Nationen. (2013). World Population Ageing 2013. ST/ESA/SER.A/348. New York. Open Google Scholar
  206. Watson, G.; Butterfield, J.; Curran, R.; Craig, C. (2010). Do dynamic work instructions provide an advantage over static instructions in a small scale assembly task? Learning and Instruction, 20(1), 84–93. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.05.001
  207. Weiss, P. L.; Sveistrup, H.; Rand, D.; Kizony, R. (2009). Video capture virtual reality: A decade of rehabilitation assessment and intervention. Physical Therapy Reviews, 14(5), 307–321. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1179/108331909X12488667117339
  208. Weizenbaum, J. (1966). ELIZA – a computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine. Commun. ACM, 9(1), 36–45. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1145/365153.365168
  209. Wertheimer, M. (1923). Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt II. Psychologische Forschung. Zeitschrift für Psychologie und ihre Grenzwissenschaften, 4, 301–350. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/BF00410640
  210. Whitter, P.; Cook, D.; Cornacchine, J. (2011). Telemedicine: Reviewing the Past, Looking toward the Future. In: Thompson, T. L.; Parrott, R.; Nussbaum, J. F. (Hrsg.), The Routledge handbook of health communication (2. Aufl.) (S. 84–99). New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  211. Wirewax. (2015). About us. http://www.wirewax.com/about. Zugegriffen: 11. Mai. 2015. Open Google Scholar
  212. Witte, K. (1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communication Monographs, 59(4), 329–349. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/03637759209376276
  213. Wong, A.; Marcus, N.; Ayres, P.; Smith, L.; Cooper, G. A.; Paas, F.; Sweller, J. (2009). Instructional animations can be superior to statics when learning human motor skills. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 339–347. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.012
  214. Wouters, P.; Paas, F.; van Merriënboer, J. (2010). Observational learning from animated models: effects of studying–practicing alternation and illusion of control on transfer. Instructional Science, 38, 89–104. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9079-0
  215. Wouters, P.; Tabbers, H.; Paas, F. (2007). Interactivity in Video-based Models. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 327–342. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9045-4
  216. Zahn, C. (2003). Wissenskommunikation mit Hypervideo. Untersuchungen zum Design nichtlinearer Informationsstrukturen für audiovisuelle Medien: Waxmann Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  217. Zahn, C.; Barquero, B.; Schwan, S. (2004). Learning with hyperlinked videos – design criteria and efficient strategies for using audiovisual hypermedia. Dynamic Visualisations and Learning. Learning and Instruction, 14(3), 275–291. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.004
  218. Zhang, D.; Zhou, L.; Briggs, R. O.; Nunamaker, J. F.; JR. (2006). Instructional video in e-learning: Assessing the impact of interactive video on learning effectiveness. Information & Management, 43(1), 15–27. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2005.01.004
  219. Zopf, E. M.; Baumann, F. T.; Pfeifer, K. (2014). Körperliche Aktivität und körperliches Training in der Rehabilitation einer Krebserkrankung. Die Rehabilitation, 53(1), 2–7. Open Google Scholar

Similar publications

from the topics "Health and Medicine General", "Computer and Internet", "Media Effects Research & Media Usage Research"
Cover of book: Lehren und Lernen von Bewegungen
Book Titles Full access
Jörg Bietz, Hans-Georg Scherer
Lehren und Lernen von Bewegungen
Cover of book: Ethik der Kryptographie
Book Titles Full access
Laurence Lerch
Ethik der Kryptographie
Cover of book: Israel in deutschen Medien
Book Titles No access
Jonas Hessenauer, Lukas Uwira
Israel in deutschen Medien
Cover of book: Health Psychology
Edited Book No access
Philipp Stang, Maren Weiss, Martin G. Köllner
Health Psychology
Cover of book: Rethinking Obesity Prevention
Book Titles No access
Vasiliki Kolovou
Rethinking Obesity Prevention