Relationship between the Legislature and the Judiciary: Contributions to the 6th Seoul-Freiburg Law Faculties Symposium

Prof. Dr. Jan von Hein; Prof. Dr. Hanno Merkt LL.M.; Prof. Dr. Sonja Meier LL.M.; Prof. Dr. Alexander Bruns LL.M.; Prof. Dr. Yuanshi Bu LL.M.; Prof. Dr. Silja Vöneky; Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Michael Pawlik LL.M.; Prof. Dr. Dr. Eiji Takahashi

doi:10.5771/9783845280493

, to see if you have full access to this publication.

Edited Book No access

Relationship between the Legislature and the Judiciary

Contributions to the 6th Seoul-Freiburg Law Faculties Symposium

Editors:
Series:: Recht in Ostasien, Volume 17
Publisher:: 2017

Summary

Der Band enthält die Vorträge des 6. Seoul-Freiburg Law-Faculties Symposium, das im Juni 2016 in Freiburg i. Br. stattfand. Seit ihrem Beginn im Jahre 1996 hat die Partnerschaft zwischen der Law School der Seoul National University und der Rechtswissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Albert-Ludwigs Universität vielfältige Früchte getragen, wesentlich zum gegenseitigen Verständnis des Rechtsdenkens und der Rechtsforschung in beiden Rechtskulturen und Rechtsordnungen beigetragen und damit zugleich die ebenso alte wie wertvolle Tradition der engen Verknüpfung zwischen koreanischem und deutschem Recht fortgeführt. Wie bereits die vorangehenden Symposien widmete sich das Symposium des Jahres 2016 mit dem Generalthema „Relationship between the Legislature and the Judiciary" einem grundsätzlichen Problem, dessen spezifische Ausprägungen im Verfassungsrecht, in der Rechtstheorie, im Privatrecht, im Strafrecht, im Handelsrechts und im Verwaltungsrechts Gegenstand der Vorträge und Diskussionen waren.

Mit Beiträgen von:

Un Jong Pak, Matthias Jestaedt, Ralf Poscher, Hong Sik Cho, Kye Joung Lee, Frank Schäfer, Jinsu Yune, Jan von Hein, Sank Won Lee, Ok-Rial Song, Boris Paal, Maximilian Haedicke, Seongwook Heo, Dongjin Lee

Search publication

Bibliographic data

Edition: 1/2017
Copyright Year: 2017
ISBN-Print: 978-3-8487-3736-9
ISBN-Online: 978-3-8452-8049-3
Publisher: Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series: Recht in Ostasien
Volume: 17
Language: English
Pages: 296
Product Type: Edited Book

Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access Pages 1 - 10
1. Authors:
  1. The Gap between the Theories of Justice and Judicial Practice No access
    Authors:
  2. Dilemma intrinsic in the Concept of Justice No access
    Authors:
  3. Division of Justice No access
    Authors:
  4. Justice as a Communicative Procedure No access
    Authors:
  5. The Justice as a ‘Vanishing Point’ No access
    Authors:
2. Authors:
  1. I. An Instrument of Constitutionalisation No access
    Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. 1. Derivation, Premises and Mode of Action No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Limits No access
      Authors:
  3. III. A Legal Key Concept No access
    Authors:
  4. Authors:
    1. Authors:
      1. a) Competing Contents of a Norm No access
        Authors:
      2. b) The Character of the Exclusion of Interpretation No access
        Authors:
    2. 2. Do the Constraints Work? No access
      Authors:
    3. Authors:
      1. a) Hierarchically Structured Unity and Consistency of the Legal Order No access
        Authors:
      2. b) Legal Capacity and Legal Ability No access
        Authors:
    4. Authors:
      1. a) Reducing a Norm’s Content Without Reducing a Norm’s Shape No access
        Authors:
      2. b) The Constitution Conformant Interpretation by Ordinary Courts No access
        Authors:
      3. c) The Constitution Conformant Interpretation by the FCC No access
        Authors:
  5. V. A Preliminary Conclusion No access
    Authors:
1. Authors:
  1. Authors:
    1. 1. Interpretation as Intentional Explanation No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Meaning and Intentions No access
      Authors:
    3. 3. Legislative Intent No access
      Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. 1. Legal Construction as the Interpretation of a Text No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Construction Versus Association No access
      Authors:
    3. 3. The Fiction of an Author No access
      Authors:
    4. Authors:
      1. a) Generality No access
        Authors:
      2. b) Consistency No access
        Authors:
      3. c) Instrumental Rationality No access
        Authors:
      4. d) Evaluative Rationality No access
        Authors:
      5. e) “The Fusion of Horizons” No access
        Authors:
    5. 5. Legal Construction Versus Legislation No access
      Authors:
    6. 6. Legal Construction and the Rule of Law No access
      Authors:
    7. 7. Legal Construction and Truth No access
      Authors:
  3. III. Résumé No access
    Authors:
  4. Authors:
    1. Bibliography No access
      Authors:
1. Authors:
  1. I. Misunderstanding and Truth of the Civil Law Country No access
    Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. Authors:
      1. 1) Ordinary Wage Case(Supreme Court en banc Decision Case No. 2012Da72582 Decided May 16, 2014) No access
        Authors:
      2. 2) BMW Case (Supreme Court Decision Case No. 2012Da72582 Decided May 16, 2014) No access
        Authors:
      3. 3) The Beauty of The Golden Field Case(Daejeon High Court Case No. 2006Na1846 Decided Nov. 1, 2006) No access
        Authors:
    2. Authors:
      1. 1) The statute regarding the status of the transferee of the security deposit of the lessee No access
        Authors:
      2. 2) The statute regarding Obligee's Duty to Provide Information and to Give Written Notice No access
        Authors:
    3. Authors:
      1. 1) Interest Limitation Case(Supreme Court en banc Decision Case No. 2004Da50426 Decided Feb 15, 2007) No access
        Authors:
      2. 2) Divorce Claim Case(Supreme Court en banc Decision 2013Meu568 Decided September 15, 2015) No access
        Authors:
  3. Authors:
    1. 1. Intrinsic Constraints of Clarity of Language No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Judges Seeking the Substantive Justice in Each Specific Case No access
      Authors:
    3. 3. Role of the Legislative and Court Ruling Overturned by the Legislative No access
      Authors:
    4. 4. Distrust in Legislature No access
      Authors:
  4. Authors:
    1. 1. Possible Solutions No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. How to Control Logic of the Judge No access
      Authors:
2. Authors:
  1. I. Introduction: A Decisive Distinction No access
    Authors:
  2. II. Types of Judicial Development of Law No access
    Authors:
  3. III. Justification for Judicial Development of Law beyond Statutes No access
    Authors:
  4. Authors:
    1. 1. Constitutional Boundaries No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. The Case of European Law No access
      Authors:
  5. Authors:
    1. 1. Case Law No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Customary Law No access
      Authors:
  6. Authors:
    1. 1. Substantiation of Statutes No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Filling Gaps in Statutes No access
      Authors:
    3. 3. Supplementing Statutes No access
      Authors:
    4. 4. Correcting Statutes No access
      Authors:
  7. VII. Conclusions No access
    Authors:
3. Authors:
  1. I. Introduction No access
    Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. 1. The Situation Before the Decision No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Underlying Facts of the Decision No access
      Authors:
    3. 3. The Decision No access
      Authors:
    4. 4. The Influence of Foreign Laws No access
      Authors:
    5. 5. The Response to the Decision No access
      Authors:
  3. Authors:
    1. 1. The Concept of Judicial Activism No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Judicial Activism in the Interpretation No access
      Authors:
    3. 3. General Clauses as a Means of Judicial Activism No access
      Authors:
  4. Authors:
    1. 1. The Text of Statute No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. The Compatibility with the Existing Law System No access
      Authors:
    3. 3. The Comparative Advantage Between the Legislature and the Court No access
      Authors:
    4. 4. The Magnitude of the Impact Upon Legal Relations No access
      Authors:
    5. 5. Application to This Case No access
      Authors:
  5. Authors:
    1. 1. Prospective Overruling No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Criticism No access
      Authors:
  6. VI. Conclusion No access
    Authors:
4. Authors:
  1. I. Introduction No access
    Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. 1. In the domestic context No access
      Authors:
    2. Authors:
      1. a) Autonomous characterisation No access
        Authors:
      2. b) Assessment of damages No access
        Authors:
      3. c) Culpa in contrahendo No access
        Authors:
      4. d) The relationship between European and domestic judges No access
        Authors:
  3. Authors:
    1. 1. In the domestic context No access
      Authors:
    2. Authors:
      1. a) The tension between flexibility and certainty No access
        Authors:
      2. b) The relationship between European and domestic judges No access
        Authors:
  4. Authors:
    1. 1. In the domestic context No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. In the European context No access
      Authors:
  5. Authors:
    1. 1. In the domestic context No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. In the European context No access
      Authors:
  6. Authors:
    1. 1. In the domestic context No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. In the European context No access
      Authors:
  7. VII. Conclusion No access
    Authors:
1. Authors:
  1. I. Introduction No access
    Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. A. Models and Structures No access
      Authors:
    2. Authors:
      1. 1. Crime Control Model No access
        Authors:
      2. 2. Due Process Model No access
        Authors:
    3. Authors:
      1. Authors:
        (1) Crime Control Model No access
        Authors:
        (2) Due Process Model No access
        Authors:
      2. Authors:
        (1) Crime Control Model No access
        Authors:
        (2) Due Process Model No access
        Authors:
    4. D. Linear and Triangle Structures No access
      Authors:
    5. E. Use of Models and Structures No access
      Authors:
  3. Authors:
    1. Authors:
      1. 1. Structure of the Colonial System No access
        Authors:
      2. 2. Power Makes Rule No access
        Authors:
    2. Authors:
      1. 1. Design of the Interim Government No access
        Authors:
      2. 2. Transplant of US System No access
        Authors:
    3. C. Intention of the Founders of Korean Criminal Procedure Act (1954) No access
      Authors:
    4. Authors:
      1. 1. Ideals and Reality No access
        Authors:
      2. 2. Voluntary Restraint (Accompanying the Police Voluntarily) No access
        Authors:
      3. 3. The Ostrich Court No access
        Authors:
      4. 4. Wriggling through the Frozen Land No access
        Authors:
    5. Authors:
      1. 1. Amendment of 1995 No access
        Authors:
      2. 2. Amendment of 1997 No access
        Authors:
      3. 3. Amendment of 2007 No access
        Authors:
      4. F. Doctrine of Trial-Centered Procedure No access
        Authors:
  4. IV. Models and Experience No access
    Authors:
  5. V. Conclusion No access
    Authors:
2. Authors:
  1. 1. Introduction No access
    Authors:
  2. 2. Pursuit of Security through Criminal Law and Criminal Sanctions No access
    Authors:
  3. 3. Crime Trends and Security Policies No access
    Authors:
  4. 4. Security an d Criminal Law Reform: Developments in Germany No access
    Authors:
  5. 5. Developments in Korea No access
    Authors:
  6. 6. Korean and German Perspectives Compared No access
    Authors:
1. Authors:
  1. Authors:
    1. Authors:
      1. 1. Unique Legislation on Valuation of Shares No access
        Authors:
      2. 2. Court Decisions No access
        Authors:
    2. Authors:
      1. 1. Merger No access
        Authors:
      2. 2. Disputes on Valuation of Listed Shares No access
        Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. 1. Measuring Value of Control No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Fairness of Merger Ratio No access
      Authors:
    3. 3. Effect of Legislation on Valuation of Shares No access
      Authors:
  3. Concluding Remarks No access
    Authors:
2. Authors:
  1. I. Introduction No access
    Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. Authors:
      1. a. ECJ – Shevill (1995) No access
        Authors:
      2. b. ECJ – eDate Advertising (2012) No access
        Authors:
      3. c. Evaluation No access
        Authors:
    2. Authors:
      1. a. Objective Domestic Relations No access
        Authors:
      2. b. Legal Evaluation No access
        Authors:
      3. c. Reaction of the FCJ No access
        Authors:
    3. 3. Interim Conclusion No access
      Authors:
  3. Authors:
    1. Authors:
      1. Authors:
        Decision-Making Rationale No access
        Authors:
        Legal Evaluation No access
        Authors:
    2. Authors:
      1. a. European Level No access
        Authors:
      2. b. National Level No access
        Authors:
  4. Authors:
    1. Authors:
      1. a. Data-Protection Impairments of Personality Rights No access
        Authors:
      2. b. Rights of the Person Concerned and Weighing of Interests No access
        Authors:
      3. Authors:
        Outlook No access
        Authors:
    2. 2. Assessment No access
      Authors:
  5. V. Overall Summary No access
    Authors:
3. Authors:
  1. I. Introduction No access
    Authors:
  2. II. The status quo of the patent system in Europe No access
    Authors:
  3. Authors:
    1. 1. Basic features of the EUPC Court No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Dismissal of the EUPC by the CJEU by Opinion 1/09 No access
      Authors:
  4. Authors:
    1. 1. Basic features of the Unitary Patent and the Unified Patent Court No access
      Authors:
    2. Authors:
      1. a. Primacy of EU Law for the entire UPC system No access
        Authors:
      2. b. Removal of substantive patent law from the EU Regulation No access
        Authors:
      3. c. Removal of the scope of patent protection from the EU Regulation No access
        Authors:
  5. Authors:
    1. 1. Close links between different sources of law lead to an interconnected body of law No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Primacy of EU law for the entire UPC body of law No access
      Authors:
    3. 3. Primacy of EU law for references to other EU sources law in the UPCA No access
      Authors:
    4. 4. Primacy of EU law in cases of “autonomous implementation” of EU law into the UPCA No access
      Authors:
  6. Authors:
    1. 1. The CJEU might find itself competent to hear cases in which the primacy of EU law in the UPCA is at issue No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. CJEU Jurisdiction in cases of “overreaching implementation” No access
      Authors:
    3. 3. The CJEU might find itself competent to hear cases in which the scope of a patent is at issue No access
      Authors:
  7. VII. Conclusion No access
    Authors:
1. Authors:
  1. I. Green growth and new climate regime in Korea No access
    Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. 1. Introduction No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Allocation of Permits No access
      Authors:
    3. 3. Trading of Permits No access
      Authors:
    4. 4. Flexible mechanism No access
      Authors:
    5. 5. Market stabilization measures by competent authority No access
      Authors:
    6. 6. Penalties No access
      Authors:
    7. 7. ETA litigations No access
      Authors:
    8. 8. “Green Growth” in the judiciary No access
      Authors:
    9. 9. Climate change in the judiciary No access
      Authors:
  3. Authors:
    1. 1. Introduction No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Regulation failure No access
      Authors:
    3. 3. Risk society and challenges of environmental law No access
      Authors:
    4. 4. Government reactions No access
      Authors:
  4. Authors:
    1. 1. Aggravated punishment of environmental offenses No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Disparity between the norm and the reality No access
      Authors:
    3. 3. Lessons for the humidifier sterilizer case No access
      Authors:
  5. V. Legislature and judiciary in environmental law No access
    Authors:
  6. VI. Conclusion No access
    Authors:
2. Authors:
  1. I. Introduction No access
    Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. 1. The Boramae Medical Center Case No access
      Authors:
    2. Authors:
      1. (1) Requirements of Discontinuance of Life-Extending Treatment No access
        Authors:
      2. (2) How to Confirm the Patient’s Intent? No access
        Authors:
      3. (3) Procedural Aspect No access
        Authors:
    3. Authors:
      1. (1) The Kim Case’s Flaws and Limitations No access
        Authors:
      2. (2) Legislative Reaction: The Enactment of Act on Hospice, Palliative Care and Decision on Life-Extending Treatment for the Patient in Dying Process No access
        Authors:
  3. Authors:
    1. Authors:
      1. (1) Compulsory Public Insurance No access
        Authors:
      2. (2) Nomination Ipso Jure as a Health Care Service Provider for NHIS No access
        Authors:
      3. (3) Standards and Costs of Health Care Service Covered by NHI No access
        Authors:
    2. 2. Treatment Uncovered and Unauthorized by NHI No access
      Authors:
    3. 3. Discussion No access
      Authors:
  4. IV. Conclusion No access
    Authors:
List of Contributors No access Pages 295 - 296