Relationship between the Legislature and the Judiciary

Prof. Dr. Jan von Hein; Prof. Dr. Hanno Merkt LL.M.; Prof. Dr. Sonja Meier LL.M.; Prof. Dr. Alexander Bruns LL.M.; Prof. Dr. Yuanshi Bu LL.M.; Prof. Dr. Silja Vöneky; Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Michael Pawlik LL.M.; Prof. Dr. Dr. Eiji Takahashi

doi:10.5771/9783845280493

, to see if you have full access to this publication.

Edited Book No access

Relationship between the Legislature and the Judiciary

Contributions to the 6th Seoul-Freiburg Law Faculties Symposium

Editors:
Series:: Recht in Ostasien, Volume 17
Publisher:: 2017

Summary

Der Band enthält die Vorträge des 6. Seoul-Freiburg Law-Faculties Symposium, das im Juni 2016 in Freiburg i. Br. stattfand. Seit ihrem Beginn im Jahre 1996 hat die Partnerschaft zwischen der Law School der Seoul National University und der Rechtswissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Albert-Ludwigs Universität vielfältige Früchte getragen, wesentlich zum gegenseitigen Verständnis des Rechtsdenkens und der Rechtsforschung in beiden Rechtskulturen und Rechtsordnungen beigetragen und damit zugleich die ebenso alte wie wertvolle Tradition der engen Verknüpfung zwischen koreanischem und deutschem Recht fortgeführt. Wie bereits die vorangehenden Symposien widmete sich das Symposium des Jahres 2016 mit dem Generalthema „Relationship between the Legislature and the Judiciary" einem grundsätzlichen Problem, dessen spezifische Ausprägungen im Verfassungsrecht, in der Rechtstheorie, im Privatrecht, im Strafrecht, im Handelsrechts und im Verwaltungsrechts Gegenstand der Vorträge und Diskussionen waren.

Mit Beiträgen von:

Un Jong Pak, Matthias Jestaedt, Ralf Poscher, Hong Sik Cho, Kye Joung Lee, Frank Schäfer, Jinsu Yune, Jan von Hein, Sank Won Lee, Ok-Rial Song, Boris Paal, Maximilian Haedicke, Seongwook Heo, Dongjin Lee

Search publication

Bibliographic data

Copyright year: 2017
ISBN-Print: 978-3-8487-3736-9
ISBN-Online: 978-3-8452-8049-3
Publisher: Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series: Recht in Ostasien
Volume: 17
Language: English
Pages: 296
Product type: Edited Book

Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access Pages 1 - 10
1. Un Jong Pak
  1. The Gap between the Theories of Justice and Judicial Practice No access Un Jong Pak
  2. Dilemma intrinsic in the Concept of Justice No access Un Jong Pak
  3. Division of Justice No access Un Jong Pak
  4. Justice as a Communicative Procedure No access Un Jong Pak
  5. The Justice as a ‘Vanishing Point’ No access Un Jong Pak
2. Matthias Jestaedt
  1. I. An Instrument of Constitutionalisation No access Matthias Jestaedt
  2. Matthias Jestaedt
    1. 1. Derivation, Premises and Mode of Action No access Matthias Jestaedt
    2. 2. Limits No access Matthias Jestaedt
  3. III. A Legal Key Concept No access Matthias Jestaedt
  4. Matthias Jestaedt
    1. Matthias Jestaedt
      1. a) Competing Contents of a Norm No access Matthias Jestaedt
      2. b) The Character of the Exclusion of Interpretation No access Matthias Jestaedt
    2. 2. Do the Constraints Work? No access Matthias Jestaedt
    3. Matthias Jestaedt
      1. a) Hierarchically Structured Unity and Consistency of the Legal Order No access Matthias Jestaedt
      2. b) Legal Capacity and Legal Ability No access Matthias Jestaedt
    4. Matthias Jestaedt
      1. a) Reducing a Norm’s Content Without Reducing a Norm’s Shape No access Matthias Jestaedt
      2. b) The Constitution Conformant Interpretation by Ordinary Courts No access Matthias Jestaedt
      3. c) The Constitution Conformant Interpretation by the FCC No access Matthias Jestaedt
  5. V. A Preliminary Conclusion No access Matthias Jestaedt
1. Ralf Poscher
  1. Ralf Poscher
    1. 1. Interpretation as Intentional Explanation No access Ralf Poscher
    2. 2. Meaning and Intentions No access Ralf Poscher
    3. 3. Legislative Intent No access Ralf Poscher
  2. Ralf Poscher
    1. 1. Legal Construction as the Interpretation of a Text No access Ralf Poscher
    2. 2. Construction Versus Association No access Ralf Poscher
    3. 3. The Fiction of an Author No access Ralf Poscher
    4. Ralf Poscher
      1. a) Generality No access Ralf Poscher
      2. b) Consistency No access Ralf Poscher
      3. c) Instrumental Rationality No access Ralf Poscher
      4. d) Evaluative Rationality No access Ralf Poscher
      5. e) “The Fusion of Horizons” No access Ralf Poscher
    5. 5. Legal Construction Versus Legislation No access Ralf Poscher
    6. 6. Legal Construction and the Rule of Law No access Ralf Poscher
    7. 7. Legal Construction and Truth No access Ralf Poscher
  3. III. Résumé No access Ralf Poscher
  4. Ralf Poscher
    1. Bibliography No access Ralf Poscher
1. Kye Joung Lee
  1. I. Misunderstanding and Truth of the Civil Law Country No access Kye Joung Lee
  2. Kye Joung Lee
    1. Kye Joung Lee
      1. 1) Ordinary Wage Case(Supreme Court en banc Decision Case No. 2012Da72582 Decided May 16, 2014) No access Kye Joung Lee
      2. 2) BMW Case (Supreme Court Decision Case No. 2012Da72582 Decided May 16, 2014) No access Kye Joung Lee
      3. 3) The Beauty of The Golden Field Case(Daejeon High Court Case No. 2006Na1846 Decided Nov. 1, 2006) No access Kye Joung Lee
    2. Kye Joung Lee
      1. 1) The statute regarding the status of the transferee of the security deposit of the lessee No access Kye Joung Lee
      2. 2) The statute regarding Obligee's Duty to Provide Information and to Give Written Notice No access Kye Joung Lee
    3. Kye Joung Lee
      1. 1) Interest Limitation Case(Supreme Court en banc Decision Case No. 2004Da50426 Decided Feb 15, 2007) No access Kye Joung Lee
      2. 2) Divorce Claim Case(Supreme Court en banc Decision 2013Meu568 Decided September 15, 2015) No access Kye Joung Lee
  3. Kye Joung Lee
    1. 1. Intrinsic Constraints of Clarity of Language No access Kye Joung Lee
    2. 2. Judges Seeking the Substantive Justice in Each Specific Case No access Kye Joung Lee
    3. 3. Role of the Legislative and Court Ruling Overturned by the Legislative No access Kye Joung Lee
    4. 4. Distrust in Legislature No access Kye Joung Lee
  4. Kye Joung Lee
    1. 1. Possible Solutions No access Kye Joung Lee
    2. 2. How to Control Logic of the Judge No access Kye Joung Lee
2. Frank L. Schäfer
  1. I. Introduction: A Decisive Distinction No access Frank L. Schäfer
  2. II. Types of Judicial Development of Law No access Frank L. Schäfer
  3. III. Justification for Judicial Development of Law beyond Statutes No access Frank L. Schäfer
  4. Frank L. Schäfer
    1. 1. Constitutional Boundaries No access Frank L. Schäfer
    2. 2. The Case of European Law No access Frank L. Schäfer
  5. Frank L. Schäfer
    1. 1. Case Law No access Frank L. Schäfer
    2. 2. Customary Law No access Frank L. Schäfer
  6. Frank L. Schäfer
    1. 1. Substantiation of Statutes No access Frank L. Schäfer
    2. 2. Filling Gaps in Statutes No access Frank L. Schäfer
    3. 3. Supplementing Statutes No access Frank L. Schäfer
    4. 4. Correcting Statutes No access Frank L. Schäfer
  7. VII. Conclusions No access Frank L. Schäfer
3. Jinsu Yune
  1. I. Introduction No access Jinsu Yune
  2. Jinsu Yune
    1. 1. The Situation Before the Decision No access Jinsu Yune
    2. 2. Underlying Facts of the Decision No access Jinsu Yune
    3. 3. The Decision No access Jinsu Yune
    4. 4. The Influence of Foreign Laws No access Jinsu Yune
    5. 5. The Response to the Decision No access Jinsu Yune
  3. Jinsu Yune
    1. 1. The Concept of Judicial Activism No access Jinsu Yune
    2. 2. Judicial Activism in the Interpretation No access Jinsu Yune
    3. 3. General Clauses as a Means of Judicial Activism No access Jinsu Yune
  4. Jinsu Yune
    1. 1. The Text of Statute No access Jinsu Yune
    2. 2. The Compatibility with the Existing Law System No access Jinsu Yune
    3. 3. The Comparative Advantage Between the Legislature and the Court No access Jinsu Yune
    4. 4. The Magnitude of the Impact Upon Legal Relations No access Jinsu Yune
    5. 5. Application to This Case No access Jinsu Yune
  5. Jinsu Yune
    1. 1. Prospective Overruling No access Jinsu Yune
    2. 2. Criticism No access Jinsu Yune
  6. VI. Conclusion No access Jinsu Yune
4. Jan von Hein
  1. I. Introduction No access Jan von Hein
  2. Jan von Hein
    1. 1. In the domestic context No access Jan von Hein
    2. Jan von Hein
      1. a) Autonomous characterisation No access Jan von Hein
      2. b) Assessment of damages No access Jan von Hein
      3. c) Culpa in contrahendo No access Jan von Hein
      4. d) The relationship between European and domestic judges No access Jan von Hein
  3. Jan von Hein
    1. 1. In the domestic context No access Jan von Hein
    2. Jan von Hein
      1. a) The tension between flexibility and certainty No access Jan von Hein
      2. b) The relationship between European and domestic judges No access Jan von Hein
  4. Jan von Hein
    1. 1. In the domestic context No access Jan von Hein
    2. 2. In the European context No access Jan von Hein
  5. Jan von Hein
    1. 1. In the domestic context No access Jan von Hein
    2. 2. In the European context No access Jan von Hein
  6. Jan von Hein
    1. 1. In the domestic context No access Jan von Hein
    2. 2. In the European context No access Jan von Hein
  7. VII. Conclusion No access Jan von Hein
1. Sang Won Lee
  1. I. Introduction No access Sang Won Lee
  2. Sang Won Lee
    1. A. Models and Structures No access Sang Won Lee
    2. Sang Won Lee
      1. 1. Crime Control Model No access Sang Won Lee
      2. 2. Due Process Model No access Sang Won Lee
    3. Sang Won Lee
      1. Sang Won Lee
        (1) Crime Control Model No access Sang Won Lee
        (2) Due Process Model No access Sang Won Lee
      2. Sang Won Lee
        (1) Crime Control Model No access Sang Won Lee
        (2) Due Process Model No access Sang Won Lee
    4. D. Linear and Triangle Structures No access Sang Won Lee
    5. E. Use of Models and Structures No access Sang Won Lee
  3. Sang Won Lee
    1. Sang Won Lee
      1. 1. Structure of the Colonial System No access Sang Won Lee
      2. 2. Power Makes Rule No access Sang Won Lee
    2. Sang Won Lee
      1. 1. Design of the Interim Government No access Sang Won Lee
      2. 2. Transplant of US System No access Sang Won Lee
    3. C. Intention of the Founders of Korean Criminal Procedure Act (1954) No access Sang Won Lee
    4. Sang Won Lee
      1. 1. Ideals and Reality No access Sang Won Lee
      2. 2. Voluntary Restraint (Accompanying the Police Voluntarily) No access Sang Won Lee
      3. 3. The Ostrich Court No access Sang Won Lee
      4. 4. Wriggling through the Frozen Land No access Sang Won Lee
    5. Sang Won Lee
      1. 1. Amendment of 1995 No access Sang Won Lee
      2. 2. Amendment of 1997 No access Sang Won Lee
      3. 3. Amendment of 2007 No access Sang Won Lee
      4. F. Doctrine of Trial-Centered Procedure No access Sang Won Lee
  4. IV. Models and Experience No access Sang Won Lee
  5. V. Conclusion No access Sang Won Lee
2. Hans-Jörg Albrecht
  1. 1. Introduction No access Hans-Jörg Albrecht
  2. 2. Pursuit of Security through Criminal Law and Criminal Sanctions No access Hans-Jörg Albrecht
  3. 3. Crime Trends and Security Policies No access Hans-Jörg Albrecht
  4. 4. Security an d Criminal Law Reform: Developments in Germany No access Hans-Jörg Albrecht
  5. 5. Developments in Korea No access Hans-Jörg Albrecht
  6. 6. Korean and German Perspectives Compared No access Hans-Jörg Albrecht
1. Ok-Rial Song
  1. Ok-Rial Song
    1. Ok-Rial Song
      1. 1. Unique Legislation on Valuation of Shares No access Ok-Rial Song
      2. 2. Court Decisions No access Ok-Rial Song
    2. Ok-Rial Song
      1. 1. Merger No access Ok-Rial Song
      2. 2. Disputes on Valuation of Listed Shares No access Ok-Rial Song
  2. Ok-Rial Song
    1. 1. Measuring Value of Control No access Ok-Rial Song
    2. 2. Fairness of Merger Ratio No access Ok-Rial Song
    3. 3. Effect of Legislation on Valuation of Shares No access Ok-Rial Song
  3. Concluding Remarks No access Ok-Rial Song
2. Boris Paal
  1. I. Introduction No access Boris Paal
  2. Boris Paal
    1. Boris Paal
      1. a. ECJ – Shevill (1995) No access Boris Paal
      2. b. ECJ – eDate Advertising (2012) No access Boris Paal
      3. c. Evaluation No access Boris Paal
    2. Boris Paal
      1. a. Objective Domestic Relations No access Boris Paal
      2. b. Legal Evaluation No access Boris Paal
      3. c. Reaction of the FCJ No access Boris Paal
    3. 3. Interim Conclusion No access Boris Paal
  3. Boris Paal
    1. Boris Paal
      1. Boris Paal
        Decision-Making Rationale No access Boris Paal
        Legal Evaluation No access Boris Paal
    2. Boris Paal
      1. a. European Level No access Boris Paal
      2. b. National Level No access Boris Paal
  4. Boris Paal
    1. Boris Paal
      1. a. Data-Protection Impairments of Personality Rights No access Boris Paal
      2. b. Rights of the Person Concerned and Weighing of Interests No access Boris Paal
      3. Boris Paal
        Outlook No access Boris Paal
    2. 2. Assessment No access Boris Paal
  5. V. Overall Summary No access Boris Paal
3. Maximilian Haedicke
  1. I. Introduction No access Maximilian Haedicke
  2. II. The status quo of the patent system in Europe No access Maximilian Haedicke
  3. Maximilian Haedicke
    1. 1. Basic features of the EUPC Court No access Maximilian Haedicke
    2. 2. Dismissal of the EUPC by the CJEU by Opinion 1/09 No access Maximilian Haedicke
  4. Maximilian Haedicke
    1. 1. Basic features of the Unitary Patent and the Unified Patent Court No access Maximilian Haedicke
    2. Maximilian Haedicke
      1. a. Primacy of EU Law for the entire UPC system No access Maximilian Haedicke
      2. b. Removal of substantive patent law from the EU Regulation No access Maximilian Haedicke
      3. c. Removal of the scope of patent protection from the EU Regulation No access Maximilian Haedicke
  5. Maximilian Haedicke
    1. 1. Close links between different sources of law lead to an interconnected body of law No access Maximilian Haedicke
    2. 2. Primacy of EU law for the entire UPC body of law No access Maximilian Haedicke
    3. 3. Primacy of EU law for references to other EU sources law in the UPCA No access Maximilian Haedicke
    4. 4. Primacy of EU law in cases of “autonomous implementation” of EU law into the UPCA No access Maximilian Haedicke
  6. Maximilian Haedicke
    1. 1. The CJEU might find itself competent to hear cases in which the primacy of EU law in the UPCA is at issue No access Maximilian Haedicke
    2. 2. CJEU Jurisdiction in cases of “overreaching implementation” No access Maximilian Haedicke
    3. 3. The CJEU might find itself competent to hear cases in which the scope of a patent is at issue No access Maximilian Haedicke
  7. VII. Conclusion No access Maximilian Haedicke
1. Seongwook Heo
  1. I. Green growth and new climate regime in Korea No access Seongwook Heo
  2. Seongwook Heo
    1. 1. Introduction No access Seongwook Heo
    2. 2. Allocation of Permits No access Seongwook Heo
    3. 3. Trading of Permits No access Seongwook Heo
    4. 4. Flexible mechanism No access Seongwook Heo
    5. 5. Market stabilization measures by competent authority No access Seongwook Heo
    6. 6. Penalties No access Seongwook Heo
    7. 7. ETA litigations No access Seongwook Heo
    8. 8. “Green Growth” in the judiciary No access Seongwook Heo
    9. 9. Climate change in the judiciary No access Seongwook Heo
  3. Seongwook Heo
    1. 1. Introduction No access Seongwook Heo
    2. 2. Regulation failure No access Seongwook Heo
    3. 3. Risk society and challenges of environmental law No access Seongwook Heo
    4. 4. Government reactions No access Seongwook Heo
  4. Seongwook Heo
    1. 1. Aggravated punishment of environmental offenses No access Seongwook Heo
    2. 2. Disparity between the norm and the reality No access Seongwook Heo
    3. 3. Lessons for the humidifier sterilizer case No access Seongwook Heo
  5. V. Legislature and judiciary in environmental law No access Seongwook Heo
  6. VI. Conclusion No access Seongwook Heo
2. Dongjin Lee
  1. I. Introduction No access Dongjin Lee
  2. Dongjin Lee
    1. 1. The Boramae Medical Center Case No access Dongjin Lee
    2. Dongjin Lee
      1. (1) Requirements of Discontinuance of Life-Extending Treatment No access Dongjin Lee
      2. (2) How to Confirm the Patient’s Intent? No access Dongjin Lee
      3. (3) Procedural Aspect No access Dongjin Lee
    3. Dongjin Lee
      1. (1) The Kim Case’s Flaws and Limitations No access Dongjin Lee
      2. (2) Legislative Reaction: The Enactment of Act on Hospice, Palliative Care and Decision on Life-Extending Treatment for the Patient in Dying Process No access Dongjin Lee
  3. Dongjin Lee
    1. Dongjin Lee
      1. (1) Compulsory Public Insurance No access Dongjin Lee
      2. (2) Nomination Ipso Jure as a Health Care Service Provider for NHIS No access Dongjin Lee
      3. (3) Standards and Costs of Health Care Service Covered by NHI No access Dongjin Lee
    2. 2. Treatment Uncovered and Unauthorized by NHI No access Dongjin Lee
    3. 3. Discussion No access Dongjin Lee
  4. IV. Conclusion No access Dongjin Lee
List of Contributors No access Pages 295 - 296