Konsistenztheorien &amp; Selective Exposure

Dr. Arne Freya Zillich

doi:10.5771/9783845272160

Keywords

Search publication

Bibliographic data

Publication year: 2019
Publication date: 13.03.2019
ISBN-Print: 978-3-8487-3072-8
ISBN-Online: 978-3-8452-7216-0
Publisher: Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series: Konzepte. Ansätze der Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaft
Volume: 17
Language: German
Pages: 122
Product type: Educational Book

Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access Pages 1 - 10
1. 1. Balance-Modell No access
  2. ABX-Modell No access
  3. Kongruenzmodell No access
2. 1. Grundzüge der Theorie No access
  2. Kritik und Weiterentwicklung No access
  3. Anwendung in der Medienwirkungsforschung No access
3. 1. Selective Exposure vs. de facto selectivity No access
  2. Einflussfaktoren No access
Entwicklungsgeschichte No access Pages 40 - 48
1. Untersuchungsdesign No access
2. 1. Befragung No access
  2. Beobachtung No access
  3. Big Data No access
1. Forschungsüberblick No access
2. Forschung zur Selektion von politischen Informationen No access
3. Forschung zu Gesundheitskommunikation No access
4. Forschung zu Social Media No access
Alternative Erklärungsansätze No access Pages 103 - 106
„Top Ten“ der Forschungsliteratur No access Pages 107 - 108
Literatur No access Pages 109 - 120
Bisher in der Reihe erschienene Bände No access Pages 121 - 122

Bibliography (129 entries)

Abelson R. P., Aronson, E., McGuire, W. J., Newcomb, T., Rosenberg, M. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (Hrsg.) (1968). Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally. Open Google Scholar
Abelson, R. P., & Rosenberg, M. J. (1958). Symbolic psycho-logic. A model of attitudinal cogni-tion. Behavioral Science, 3, 1–13. Open Google Scholar
Aronson, E. (1968). Dissonance theory. Progress and problems. In: R. P. Abelson, E. Aronson, W. J. McGuire, T. Newcomb, M. J. Rosenberg, & P. H. Tannenbaum (Hrsg.), Theories of cogni-tive consistency: A sourcebook (S. 5–27). Chicago, IL: Rand Mc Nally. Open Google Scholar
Aronson, E. (1978). The theory of cognitive dissonance. A current perspective. In L. Berkowitz (Hrsg.), Cognitive theories in social psychology. Papers from advances in experimental social psychology (S. 181–220). New York, NY: Academic Press. Open Google Scholar
Aronson, E., Turner, J., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1963). Communicator credibility and communication discrepancy as determinants of opinion change. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 31–36. Open Google Scholar
Atkin, C. (1973). Instrumental utilities and information seeking. In P. Clarke (Hrsg.), New models for mass communication research (S. 205–242). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Open Google Scholar
Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348, 1130–1132. Open Google Scholar
Bagby, R. M., Parker, J. D. A., & Bury, A. S. (1990). A comparative citation analysis of attribution theory and the theory of cognitive dissonance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 274–283. Open Google Scholar
Ball-Rokeach, S. J., Grube, J. W., & Rokeach, M. (1981). „Roots: The next generation” – Who watched and with what effect? Public Opinion Quarterly, 45, 58–68. Open Google Scholar
Beam, M. A. (2014). Automating the news. How personalized news recommender system design choices impact news reception. Communication Research, 41, 1019–1041. Open Google Scholar
Beam, M. A. & Kosicki, G. M. (2014). Personalized news portals. Filtering systems and increased news exposure. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 9, 59–77. Open Google Scholar
Berkowitz, L. (Hrsg.) (1978). Cognitive theories in social psychology. Papers from advances in experimental social psychology. New York, NY: Academic Press. Open Google Scholar
Bilandzic, H., Schramm, H., & Matthes, J. (Hrsg.) (2015). Medienrezeptionsforschung. Konstanz: UVK. Open Google Scholar
Bonfadelli, H. (2004). Medienwirkungsforschung I. Grundlagen. 3. Auflage, Konstanz: UVK. Open Google Scholar
Brehm, J. W., & Cohen, A. R. (1962). Explorations in cognitive dissonance. New York, NY: Wiley. Open Google Scholar
Bryant, J., & Miron, D. (2004). Theory and research in mass communication. Journal of Commu-nication, 54, 662–704. Open Google Scholar
Byrne, D. (1961). The repression-sensitizing scale. Rationale, reliability, and validity. Journal of Personality, 29, 334–349. Open Google Scholar
Cartwright, D., & Harary, F. (1956). Structural balance. A generalization of Heiders theory. Psy-chological Review, 63, 277–293. Open Google Scholar
Chaffee, S. H., & Metzger, M. J. (2001). The end of mass communication? Mass Communica-tion & Society, 4, 365–379. Open Google Scholar
Chaffee, S. H., & Miyo, Y. (1983). Selective exposure and the reinforcement hypothesis. An intergenerational panel study of the 1980 presidential campaign. Communication Research, 10(1), 3–36. Open Google Scholar
Chaffee, S. H., Saphir, M. N., Graf, J., Sandvig, C., & Hahn, K. S. (2001). Attention to counter-attitudinal messages in a state election campaign. Political Communication, 18, 247–272. Open Google Scholar
Clay, R., Barber, J. M., & Shook, N. J. (2013). Techniques for measuring selective exposure. A critical review. Communication Methods and Measures, 7, 147–171. Open Google Scholar
Colleoni, E., Rozza, A., & Arvidsson, A. (2014). Echo chamber or public sphere? Predicting polit-ical orientation and measuring political homophily in Twitter using big data. Journal of Communi-cation, 64, 317–332. Open Google Scholar
Cotton, J. L. (1985). Cognitive dissonance in selective exposure. In: Zillman, D., & Bryant, J. (Hrsg.), Selective exposure to communication (S. 11–33). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar
Cranach, M. v., Irle, M., & Vetter, H. (1965). Zur Analyse des Bumerang-Effektes. Größe und Richtung der Änderung sozialer Einstellung als Funktion ihrer Verankerung im Wertesystem. Psychologische Forschung, 28, 535–561. Open Google Scholar
D’Alessio, D., & Allen, M. (2002). Selective exposure and dissonance after decisions. Psycho-logical Reports, 91, 527–532. Open Google Scholar
D’Alessio, D., & Allen, M. (2007). The selective exposure hypothesis and media choice process-es. In: R. W. Preiss, B. M. Gayle, N. Burell, M. Allen, & J. Bryant (Hrsg.), Mass media effects research. Advances through meta-analysis (S. 103–118). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar
Dixon-Woods, M., & Sutton, A. (2004). Systematic review. In M. S. Lewis-Beck, A. Bryman, & T. F. Liao (Hrsg.). The Sage encyclopedia of social science research methods: Band 3 (S. 1110–1111). Sage: Thousand Oaks. Open Google Scholar
Döring, N., & Bortz, J. (2016). Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation in den Sozial- und Hu-manwissenschaften. 5., vollständig überarbeitete, aktualisierte und erweiterte Auflage. Berlin: Springer. Open Google Scholar
Donohew, L., Parker, J. M., & McDermott, V. (1972). Psychophysiological measurement of in-formation selection. Two studies. The Journal of Communication, 22, 54–63. Open Google Scholar
Donsbach, W. (1991). Medienwirkung trotz Selektion. Einflussfaktoren auf die Zuwendung zu Zeitungsinhalten. Köln: Böhlau. Open Google Scholar
Donsbach, W. (2007). Alles nur ein Missverständnis? Wie die Kommunikationswissenschaft die Theorie der kognitiven Dissonanz adaptierte. In: S. Trepte, & E. H. Witte (Hrsg.), Sozialpsycho-logie und Medien (S. 11–34). Lengerich: Pabst Science. Open Google Scholar
donsbach.net. Abgerufen am 27.09.2018, von http://donsbach.net/curriculum-vitae/?lang=en Open Google Scholar
Dvir-Gvirsman, S., Tsfati, Y., & Menchen-Trevino, E. (2016). The extent and nature of ideologi-cal selective exposure online: Combining survey responses with actual web log data from the 2013 Israeli elections. New Media & Society, 18, 587–877. Open Google Scholar
Dylko, I. B. (2015). How technology encourages political selective exposure. Communication Theory, 26, 389–409. Open Google Scholar
Ehrlich, D., Guttman, I., Schönbach, P., & Mills, J. (1957). Postdecision exposure to relevant information. Journal of Abnormal Psychology and Social Psychology, 1, 98–102. Open Google Scholar
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140. Open Google Scholar
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Open Google Scholar
Festinger, L. (1964). Conflict, decision, and dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Open Google Scholar
Festinger, L. (1978). Theorie der kognitiven Dissonanz. Herausgegeben von Martin Irle und Volker Möntmann. Bern: Hans Huber. Open Google Scholar
Festinger, L., Riecken, H. W., & Schachter, S. (1956). When prophecy fails. Minneapolis (MN): University of Minnesota Press. Open Google Scholar
Fischer, P., Jonas, E., Frey, D., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2005). Selective exposure to information. The impact of information limits. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 469–492. Open Google Scholar
Fischer, P., & Greitemeyer, T. (2010). A new look at selective exposure effects. An integrative model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 384–389. Open Google Scholar
Flaxman, S., Goel, S., & Rao, J. M. (2016). Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80, 298–320. Open Google Scholar
Fleck, C. (2015). Lazarsfeld, Paul Felix (1901–76). In: J. D. Wright (Hrsg.), International ency-clopedia of the social and behavioral sciences: Band 13 (2. Auflage, S. 635–640). Oxford: Elsevier. Open Google Scholar
Freedman, J. L., & Sears, D. O. (1965). Selective exposure. In L. Berkowitz (Hrsg.), Advances in experimental social psychology (S. 57–97). New York, NY: Academic Press. Open Google Scholar
Frey, D. (1986). Recent research on selective exposure to information. Advances in Experi-mental Social Psychology, 19, 41–80. Open Google Scholar
Garrett, R. K. (2009a). Echo chambers online? Politically motivated selective exposure among internet news users. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 265–285. Open Google Scholar
Garrett, R. K. (2009b). Politically motivated reinforcement seeking. Reframing the selective exposure debate. Journal of Communication, 59, 676–699. Open Google Scholar
Garrett, R. K. (2013). Selective exposure. New methods and new direction. Communication Methods and Measures, 7, 247–256. Open Google Scholar
Garrett, R. K., Carnahan, D., & Lynch, E. K. (2013). A turn towards avoidance? Selective exposure to online political information, 2004–2008. Political Behavior, 35, 113–134. Open Google Scholar
Geise, S. (2011). Eyetracking in der Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft: Theorie, Methode und kritische Reflexion. Studies in Communication and Media, 2, 149–263. Open Google Scholar
Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2011). Ideological segregation online and offline. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126, 1799–1839. Open Google Scholar
Haim, M., Graefe, A., & Brosius, H.-B. (2018). Burst of the filter bubble? Effects of personalization on the diversity of Google News. Digital Journalism, 6, 330–343. Open Google Scholar
Harmon-Jones, E. & Harmon-Jones, C. (2007). Cognitive dissonance theory after 50 years of development. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 38, 7–16. Open Google Scholar
Hart, W., Albarracín, D., Eagly, A. H., Brechan, I., Lindberg, M. J., & Merrill, L. (2009). Feeling validated versus being correct. A meta-analysis of selective exposure to information. Psychologi-cal Bulletin, 135, 555–588. Open Google Scholar
Hastall, M. R., & Knobloch-Westerwick, S. (2013). Caught in the act. Measuring selective exposure to experimental online stimuli. Communication Methods and Measures, 7, 94–105. Open Google Scholar
Hastall, M. R., & Wagner, A. J. M. (2017). Enhancing selective exposure to health messages and health intentions. Effects of susceptibility cues and gain-loss framing. Journal of Media Psychol-ogy. DOI: 10.1027/1864-1105/a000197. Open Google Scholar
Heider, F. (1946). Attitudes and cognitive organization. The Journal of Psychology, 21, 107–112. Open Google Scholar
Heider, F. (1965). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: Wiley. (erstmals veröffentlicht 1958) Open Google Scholar
Himelboim, I., Smith, M., & Shneiderman, B. (2013). Tweeting apart. Applying network analysis to detect selective exposure clusters in Twitter. Communication Methods and Measures, 7, 195–223. Open Google Scholar
Hoolbrook, A. L., Berent, M. K., Krosnick, J. A., Visser, P. S., & Boninger, D. S. (2005). Attitude importance and the accumulation of attitude-relevant knowledge in memory. Journal of Personal-ity and Social Psychology, 88, 749–769. Open Google Scholar
Hovland, C., Janis, I., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Open Google Scholar
Hwang, Y. (2010). Selective exposure and selective perception of anti-tobacco campaign mes-sages. The impacts of campaign exposure to selective perception. Health Communication, 25, 182–190. Open Google Scholar
Irle, M., & Möntmann, V. (1978). Die Theorie der kognitiven Dissonanz. Ein Resümee ihrer theo-retischen Entwicklung und empirischen Ergebnisse 1957–1976. In: L. Festinger, Theorie der kognitiven Dissonanz. Herausgegeben von Martin Irle und Volker Möntmann (S.274–365). Bern: Hans Huber. Open Google Scholar
Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. S. (2009). Red media, blue media. Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59, 19–39. Open Google Scholar
Jordan, N. (1968). Cognitive balance as an aspect of Heider’s cognitive psychology. In R. P. Abelson, E. Aronson, W. J. McGuire, T. Newcomb, M. J. Rosenberg, & P. H. Tannenbaum (Hrsg.), Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook (S. 169–178). Chicago, IL: Rand Mc Nally. Open Google Scholar
Kessler, S. H., & Zillich, A. F. (2018). Searching online for information about vaccination. As-sessing the influence of user-specific cognitive factors using eye-tracking. Health Communica-tion. DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2018.1465793. Open Google Scholar
Kepplinger, H.-M. (1985). Meinungsverteilung und Medienwirkung. Eine empirische Untersu-chung zur Balancetheorie Fritz Heiders. In: U. Saxer (Hrsg.), Gleichheit oder Ungleichheit durch Massenmedien (S. 33–48). München: Ölschläger. Open Google Scholar
Kim, H. S., Forquer, H., Rusko, J., Hornik, R. C., & Cappella, J. N. (2016). Selective exposure to health information. The role of headline features in the choice of health newsletter articles. Me-dia Psychology. DOI: 10.1080/15213269.2015.1090907. Open Google Scholar
Klapper, J. T. (1960). The effects of mass communication. New York, NY: The Free Press of Glencoe. Open Google Scholar
Klapper, J. T. (1964). Die gesellschaftlichen Auswirkungen der Massenkommunikation. In W. Schramm (Hrsg.), Grundfragen der Kommunikationsforschung (S. 85–98). Juventa: München. Open Google Scholar
Knobloch, S., Carpentier, F. D., & Zillmann, D. (2003). Effects of salience dimensions of infor-mational utility on selective exposure to online news. Journalism & Mass Communication Quar-terly, 80, 91–108. Open Google Scholar
Knobloch-Westerwick, S. (2007). Kognitive Dissonanz „Revisited”. Selektive Zuwendung zu ein-stellungskonsistenten und -inkonsistenten politischen Informationen. Publizistik, 1, 51–62. Open Google Scholar
Knobloch-Westerwick, S. (2015). Choice and preference in media use. Advances in selective exposure theory and research. New York, NY: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
Knobloch-Westerwick, S., Hastall, M. R., Grimmer, D., & Brück, J. (2005). „Informational Utility“. Der Einfluss der Selbstwirksamkeit auf die selektive Zuwendung zu Nachrichten. Publizistik, 50, 462–474. Open Google Scholar
Knobloch-Westerwick, S., Johnson, B. K., & Westerwick, A. (2013). To your health. Self-regulation of health behavior through selective exposure to online health messages. Journal of Communication, 63, 807–829. Open Google Scholar
Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Meng, J. (2009). Looking the other way. Selective exposure to atti-tude-consistent and counterattitudinal political information. Communication Research, 36, 426–448. Open Google Scholar
Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Meng, J. (2011). Reinforcement of the political self through selec-tive exposure to political messages. Journal of Communication, 61, 349–368. Open Google Scholar
Lawrence, D. H., & Festinger, L. (1962). Deterrents and reinforcement. The psychology of in-sufficient reward. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Open Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1942). The effects of radio on public opinion. In: D. Waples (Hrsg.), Print, radio, and film in a democracy. Ten papers on the administration of mass communication in the public interest (S. 66–78). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1944). The people’s choice. How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. Open Google Scholar
Leiner, D. J., Scherr, S., & Bartsch, A. (2016). Using open-source tools to measure online selec-tive exposure in naturalistic settings. Communication Methods and Measures, 10, 199–216. Open Google Scholar
Lewin, K. (1944). Constructs in psychology and psychological ecology. University of Iowa Stud-ies in Child Welfare, 20, 1–29. Open Google Scholar
Lück, H. (2017). Festinger, Leon. In M. A. Wirtz (Hrsg.), Dorsch – Lexikon der Psychologie. Abgerufen am 06.02.2017, von https://portal.hogrefe.com/dorsch/festinger-leon/ Open Google Scholar
Maisel, R. & Cisin, I. H. (1984). In Memorian. Joseph T. Klapper, 1917–1984. Public Opinion Quarterly, 48, 658–659. Open Google Scholar
Mahrt, M. (2012). The attractiveness of magazines as „open” and „closed” texts. Values of women’s magazines and their readers. Mass Communication and Society, 15, 852–874. Open Google Scholar
Marquart, F., Matthes, J., & Rapp, E. (2016). Selective exposure in the context of political advertising. A behavioral approach using eye-tracking methodology. International Journal of Communication, 10, 2576–2595. Open Google Scholar
Matthes, J. (2012). Exposure to counterattitudinal news coverage and the timing of voting decisions. Communication Research, 39, 147–169. Open Google Scholar
McGuire, W. J. (1967). The current status of cognitive consistency theories. In M. Fishbein (Hrsg.), Readings in attitude theory and measurement (S. 401–421). New York, NY: Wiley. Open Google Scholar
Messing, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2014). Selective exposure in the age of social media. Endorsements trump partisan source affiliation when selecting news online. Communication Research, 4, 1042–1063. Open Google Scholar
Milburn, M. A. (1979). A longitudinal test of the selective exposure hypothesis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 43, 507–517. Open Google Scholar
Mills, J. (1968). Interest in supporting and discrepant information. In: R. P. Abelson, E. Aronson, W. J. McGuire, T. Newcomb, M. J. Rosenberg, & P. H. Tannenbaum (Hrsg.), Theories of cogni-tive consistency: A sourcebook (S. 771–776). Chicago, IL: Rand Mc Nally. Open Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1989). Obituary: Leon Festinger. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 263–269. Open Google Scholar
Mutz, D. C., & Martin, P. S. (2001). Facilitating communication across lines of political difference: The role of mass media. American Political Science Review, 95, 97–114. Open Google Scholar
Newcomb, T. M. (1953). An approach to the study of communicative acts. Psychological Review, 60, 393–404. Open Google Scholar
Olson, J. M., & Zanna, M. P. (1979). A new look at selective exposure. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 1–15. Open Google Scholar
Oswald, M. E., & Grosjean, S. (2004). Confirmation bias. In R. E. Pohl (Hrsg.), Cognitive illu-sions. A handbook on fallacies and biases in thinking, judgement and memory (S. 79–96). Hove: Taylor & Francis. Open Google Scholar
Osgood, C. E., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1967). The principle of conguity in the prediction of attitude change. In M. Fishbein (Hrsg.), Readings in attitude theory and measurement (S. 301–311). New York, NY: Wiley. Open Google Scholar
Pariser, E. (2011). Filter Bubble. Wie wir im Internet entmündigt werden. München: Hanser. Open Google Scholar
Prior, M. (2013). Media and political polarization. Annual Review of Political Science, 16, 101–127. Open Google Scholar
Rosenberg, M. J., Hovland, C. I., McGuire, W. J., Abelson, R. P., & Brehm, J. W. (Hrsg.) (1960). Attitude organization and change. An analysis of consistency among attitude components. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Open Google Scholar
Schachter, S. (1994). Leon Festinger 1919–1989. A biographical memoir. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences. Open Google Scholar
Schenk, M. (2007). Medienwirkungsforschung. 3. Auflage, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. Open Google Scholar
Schenk, M. (2016). The effects of mass communication von Joseph T. Klapper (1960). In M. Potthoff (Hrsg.), Schlüsselwerke der Medienwirkungsforschung (S. 85–96). Wiesbaden: Sprin-ger. Open Google Scholar
Scheufele, D. A. (2015). Never indifferent: Reflections on Wolfgang Donsbach. Newsletter der International Communication Association, 43 (6). Open Google Scholar
Schweiger, W. (2007). Theorien der Mediennutzung. Eine Einführung. Wiesbaden: VS. Open Google Scholar
Sears, D. O. (1968). The paradox of de facto selective exposure without preferences for sup-portive information. In R. P. Abelson, E. Aronson, W. J. McGuire, T. Newcomb, M. J. Rosen-berg, & P. H. Tannenbaum (Hrsg.), Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook (S. 777–787). Chicago, IL: Rand Mc Nally. Open Google Scholar
Sills, D. L. (1987). Paul F. Lazarsfeld 1901–1976. A biographical memoir. Washington, D.C., National Academy of Sciences. Open Google Scholar
Smith, S. M., Fabrigar, L. R., & Norris, M. E. (2008). Reflecting on six decades of selective ex-posure research. Progress, challenges, and opportunities. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 464–493. Open Google Scholar
Spinda, J. (2008). Klapper, Joseph (1917–1984). In: L. L. Kaid & C. Holtz-Bacha (Hrsg.). Ency-clopedia of Political Communication: Band 1 (S. 381–382). Los Angeles, CA: Sage. Open Google Scholar
Strippel, C., & Emmer, M. (2015). Proxy-Logfile-Analyse. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der auto-matisierten Messung individueller Online-Nutzung. In: O. Hahn, R. Hohlfeld, & T. Knieper (Hrsg.). Digitale Öffentlichkeit(en) (S. 85–103). Konstanz: UVK. Open Google Scholar
Stroud, N. J. (2008). Media use and political predispositions. Revisiting the concept of selective exposure. Political Behavior, 30, 341–366. Open Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R. (2001). Republic.com. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. (1978). Social categorization, social identity and social comparison. In H. Tajfel (Hrsg.), Differentiation between social groups. Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (S. 61–76). London: Academic Press. Open Google Scholar
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel, & W. G. Austin (Hrsg.), Psychology of intergroup relations (S.7–24). Chicago: Nelson Hall. Open Google Scholar
Tate, E. D., & Surlin, S. H. (1976). Agreement with opinionated TV characters across cultures. Journalism Quarterly, 53, 199–210. Open Google Scholar
Tsang, S. J. (2017). Cognitive discrepancy, dissonance, and selective exposure. Media Psy-chology. DOI: 10.1080/15213269.2017.1282873 Open Google Scholar
Tsfati, Y., & Chotiner, A. (2016). Testing the selective exposure-polarization hypothesis in Israel using three indicators of ideological news exposure and testing for mediating mechanisms. In-ternational Journal of Public Opinion Research, 28, 1–24. Open Google Scholar
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscove-ring the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Open Google Scholar
Vidmar, N., & Rokeach, M. (1974). Archie Bunker’s Bigotry. A study in selective perception and exposure. Journal of Communication, 24, 36–47. Open Google Scholar
Wagner, M. (2017). Selective exposure, information utility, and the decision to watch televised debates. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 29, 533–553. Open Google Scholar
Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12(3), 129–140. Open Google Scholar
Weeks, B. E., Lane, D. S., Kim, D. H., Lee, S. S., & Kwak, N. (2017). Incidental exposure, selec-tive exposure, and political information sharing. Integrating online exposure patterns and ex-pression on social media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22, 363–379. Open Google Scholar
Wills, T. A. (1981). Downward comparison principles in social psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 245–271. Open Google Scholar
Wood, J. V. (1989). Theory and research concerning social comparisons of personal attributes. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 231–248. Open Google Scholar
Zillich, A. F., & Kessler, S. H. (im Druck). Measuring selective exposure to online information. Combining eye-tracking and content analysis of users‘ actual search behavior. In: C. Peter, T. K. Naab, & R. Kühne (Hrsg.), Measuring media use and exposure: Recent developments and chal-lenges. Köln: Herbert von Halem. Open Google Scholar
Zillmann, D., & Bryant, J. (1985). Selective exposure to communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar
Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. J., Trilling, D. C., Möller, J. E., Bodó, B., de Vreese, C. H., & Helber-ger, N. (2016). Should we worry about filter bubbles? Internet Policy Review, 5, DOI: 10.14763/2016.1.401. Open Google Scholar

Similar publications

from the topics "Media Effects Research & Media Usage Research", "Theories and Methods of Communication Science", "Media Science, Communication Research"