Cover of book: Verwandtschaft als Verfassung
Buy in shop
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Book Titles No access

Verwandtschaft als Verfassung

Unbürokratische Muster öffentlicher Ordnung
Authors:
Publisher:
 2016

Bibliographic data

Copyright year
2016
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-2421-5
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-6580-3
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Language
German
Pages
826
Product type
Book Titles

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access 1 - 10
    1. 1. Unangemeldete Verfassungen No access
    2. 2. Fachliche Ansätze No access
    3. 3. Anderes No access
    4. 4. Parallelen bei Kost und Küche No access
    5. 5. Zum Vorhaben No access
    6. 6. Deutsche Verwandtschaft/Schwägerschaft und die Alternativen No access
    7. 7. Definition: Soziozentrik No access
    8. 8. Definition: Egozentrik No access
    9. 9. Übersetzungsversuche No access
    10. 10. Verwandtschaftsorientierte Klassifikationen von Gemeinwesen No access
        1. A1.1.1 Verwandtschaft und Fortschritt No access
        2. A1.1.2 Menschen ohne Tierhaltung und Bodenbau No access
        3. A1.1.3 Wildbeuter als Kaste? No access
        4. A1.1.4 Gegenbeispiel Yanadi No access
        5. A1.1.5 Nayaka No access
        6. A1.1.6 Paliyan No access
        7. A1.1.7 Chewong No access
        8. A1.1.8 Zur Lage auf den Andamanen No access
        9. A1.1.9 Folgerungen No access
        1. B1.1.1 Gärtnerinnen und Pflanzer No access
        2. B1.1.2 Wirtschaft und Umwelt No access
        3. B1.1.3 Relative Einschränkungen No access
        1. B2.1.1 Der Fall No access
        2. B2.1.2 Kopfjagd No access
        3. B2.1.3 Theoretisch-methodische Kritik No access
        4. B2.1.4 Strukturierende Heirat No access
        5. B2.1.5 Historie No access
        6. B2.1.6 Erneut Kopfjagd No access
        1. B2.2.1 Einführung No access
        2. B2.2.2 Autonomie als Wert No access
        3. B2.2.3 Wohnen No access
        4. B2.2.4 Scheidungen No access
        5. B2.2.5 Geburt und Reife No access
        6. B2.2.6 Sozialisation No access
        7. B2.2.7 Verwandtschaftsterminologie No access
      3. B2.3 Feldforschung, Tod und das versteckte Prinzip No access
        1. B2.4.1 Einleitung No access
        2. B2.4.2 Gender und Anarchie No access
        3. B2.4.3 Bilek und bilek No access
        4. B2.4.4 Die Sippschaft (kindred) und unsere Verständnisprobleme No access
        5. B2.4.5 Das Moment der aktivistischen Expansion No access
        6. B2.4.6 Verwandtschaftsterminologie No access
        7. B2.4.7 Muster und Widerspruch No access
        1. B3.1.1 Einführung No access
        2. B3.1.2 Soziale und räumliche Gestaltung No access
        3. B3.1.3 Allgemeine Thesen No access
        4. B3.1.4 Wissende No access
        5. B3.1.5 Die Sache mit der Sippschaft No access
        6. B3.1.6 Stereotype Einstellungen No access
        7. B3.1.7 Terminologische Klassifikation No access
        8. B3.1.8 Heiratspraktiken No access
        9. B3.1.9 Affinität als praktisch-politische Gestaltung No access
        10. B3.1.10 Teknonymie: Affine als Konsanguine No access
        1. B3.2.1 Einführung No access
        2. B3.2.2 Fachjargon No access
        3. B3.2.3 Ausgangsposition: Modell versus Praxis No access
        4. B3.2.4 Mythische Bezüge No access
        5. B3.2.5 Langhausgemeinschaften No access
        6. B3.2.6 Zur Koordination der Statusgruppen No access
        7. B3.2.7 Zur terminologischen Festschreibung von Heirat No access
        8. B3.2.8 Heiratspräferenzen No access
        9. B3.2.9 Heiratspraxis No access
        10. B3.2.10 Vielfalt und Vereinheitlichung No access
        11. B3.2.11 Das androgyne Haus No access
        1. B3.3.1 Einführung No access
        2. B3.3.2 Technische Anmerkungen No access
        3. B5.3.3 Beziehungsterminologie No access
        1. B3.4.1 Rivières Übersicht No access
        2. B3.4.2 Siedlungen No access
        3. B3.4.3 Kategorien der sozialen Klassifikation No access
        4. B3.4.4 Heiraten: Regeln und Praktiken No access
        5. B3.4.5 Dimensionen der Affinität No access
        6. B3.4.6 Fazit No access
        7. B3.4.7 Die amazonische Theorie der Relationalität nach Eduardo Viveiros de Castro No access
      1. C1.1 John A. Barnes‘ Abweichung im Hochland No access
        1. C1.2.1 Einführung No access
        2. C1.2.2 Vorgegebene Bezüge No access
        3. C1.2.3 Die agnatische Gruppe (AG) No access
        4. C1.2.4 Grenzrevision durch Kürzung No access
        5. C1.2.5 Grenzrevision durch Bruch No access
        6. C1.2.6 Heiratsallianzen No access
        7. C1.2.7 Hausordnung No access
        8. C1.2.8 Spirituelle Konzepte und eheliche Kontakte No access
        9. C1.2.9 Heterosexualität und Pädosexualität No access
        1. C1.3.1 Einführung No access
        2. C1.3.2 Grundsätzliche Einflüsse No access
        3. C1.3.3 Grundsätzliche Beziehungen No access
        4. C1.3.4 Kinder, Schwestern und Brüder No access
        5. C1.3.5 Extern tauschen, intern teilen: Die AG No access
        6. C1.3.6 Einwurf: Wagners Sprache und Konsequenzen für den allgemeinen Vergleich No access
        7. C1.3.7 Wiederholungsgebote und -verbote No access
        8. C1.3.8 Prozesse: Imaginäre Gruppen und Bünde No access
        1. C1.4.1 Unterschiede No access
        2. C1.4.2 Zeremonialtausch (moka) No access
        3. C1.4.3 Einschließende Einheiten No access
        4. C1.4.4 Frauen: Umgang und Arbeit No access
        5. C1.4.5 Eheleute No access
        6. C1.4.6 Heiratswege No access
        7. C1.4.7 Beziehungssterminologie No access
        8. C1.4.8 Analytische Ebenen No access
        9. C1.4.9 ‚Den Rücken voll Verwandte‘ No access
        10. C1.4.10 Brautgaben No access
        11. 4.4.11 Produktion und Transaktion No access
        1. C1.5.1 Zur melanesischen Person No access
        2. C1.5.2 Einflüsse No access
        3. C1.5.3 Die Relation Geschwisterschaft im politisch-rechtlichen Bereich No access
        1. C2.1.1 Historisch-geographische Einheiten No access
        2. C2.1.2 Administrative Einheiten No access
        3. C2.1.3 Fachliche Wahrnehmungen No access
        1. C2.2.1 Orissa und die Kond No access
        2. C2.2.2 Die Kategorie Clan No access
        3. C2.2.3 Die Einheit Dorf No access
        4. C2.2.4 Segmentation, Segmente und segmentäre Beziehungen No access
        5. C2.2.5 Heiratsregeln und Heiratsgewohnheiten No access
        6. C2.2.6 Das Muster der Beziehungssterminologie No access
        7. C2.2.7 Die Praxis der Heiraten: Verhandlungen und Aktion No access
        8. C2.2.8 Alterskategorien und Mädchenhäuser No access
        9. C2.2.9 Das Büffelopfer der Dongria Kond als totaler sozialer Tatbestand No access
        1. C2.3.1 Einleitung No access
        2. C2.3.2 Gemeinwesen und Clans No access
        3. C2.3.3 Dörfer der Erdmenschen No access
        4. C2.3.4 Segmente der Erdmenschen eines Dorfes No access
        5. C2.3.5 Heirat: Normen, Praxis, Beziehungsterminologie No access
        6. C2.3.6 Die Sekundärbestattung Go’ter als totaler sozialer Tatbestand No access
        7. C2.3.7 Die andere Dimension des Go´ter No access
        8. C2.3.8 ‚Bausteine‘ der mittelindischen Gemeinwesen: Dongria und Gadaba im Vergleich No access
        1. C2.4.1 Einleitung No access
        2. C2.4.2 Uterine Gruppen und Kategorien No access
        3. C2.4.3 Die Kategorie Haus No access
        4. C2.4.4. Allianz (a*kim) No access
        5. C2.4.5 Zeitlosigkeit No access
        6. C2.4.6 Hierarchie No access
        7. C2.4.7 Bestattungsgaben No access
        8. C2.4.8 Symmetrien und Asymmetrien: Regeln No access
        9. C2.4.9 Symmetrien und Asymmetrien: Beziehungsterminologie No access
        10. C2.4.10 Symmetrien und Asymmetrien: Hälften No access
      1. C3.1 Historische und ethnographische Voraussetzungen No access
        1. C3.2.1 Quellen No access
        2. C3.2.2 Polizei- oder Militärgesellschaften No access
        3. C3.2.3 Mobilität und Bilateralität No access
        4. C3.2.4 Der Verband No access
        5. C3.2.5 Der Stammesrat der Vierundvierzig No access
        6. C3.2.6 Beziehungsterminologie No access
        7. C3.2.7 Sätze reziproker Terme No access
        8. C3.2.8 Werte: Beziehungsterminologie und die Organisation des Gemeinwesens No access
        1. C3.3.1 Quellen und Ethnographie No access
        2. C3.3.2 Moieties und Clans No access
        3. C3.3.3 Zur Stammesregierung No access
        4. C3.3.4 Heiratsregeln No access
        5. C3.3.5 Die Beziehungsterminologie No access
        6. C3.3.6 Auftakt 1:Allgemeines zu Beziehungsterminologien No access
        7. C3.3.7 Auftakt 2:Das klassifikatorische Grundproblem No access
          1. C3.3.8.1 Termini und Interpretation der Omaha Kategorien (männliches ego) No access
          2. C3.3.8.2 Termini und Interpretation der Omaha Kategorien (weibliches ego) No access
          3. C3.3.8.3 Die Einsichten zur Beziehungsterminologie No access
        1. C3.1 Quellen und Ethnographie No access
        2. C3.4.2 Uterine Clans No access
        3. C3.4.3 Zur Stammesregierung No access
        4. C3.4.4 Militär und Polizeigesellschaften No access
        5. C3.4.5 Heirat und Haltung No access
        6. C3.4.6 Die Beziehungsterminologie No access
        1. C4.1.1 Einführung No access
        2. C4.1.2 Ideologische Voraussetzungen No access
        3. C4.1.3 Stätten, Gruppen, Räume No access
        4. C4.1.4 Kleingruppen (Bands) No access
        5. C4.1.5 Sektionen als soziozentrische Kategorien No access
        6. C4.1.6 Initiation No access
        7. C4.1.7 Heirat No access
        8. C4.1.8 Beziehungsterminologie No access
        9. C4.1.9. Fazit No access
        1. C4.2.1 Einführung No access
        2. C4.2.2 Lokalorganisation No access
        3. C4.2.3 Heirat und Affinität No access
        4. C4.2.4 Beziehungsterminologie No access
        5. C4.2.5 Subsektionen als soziozentrische Kategorien No access
        6. C4.2.6 Variationen im rituellen Umgang mit den Kategorien No access
        7. C4.2.7 Variationen im ökonomischen Umgang mit den Kategorien No access
        8. C4.2.8 Diskrepanzen: Regelungen und Rechtspraxis No access
        1. C4.3.1 Einleitung No access
        2. C4.3.2 Länder und Grenzen No access
        3. C4.3.3 Raum und Gender No access
        4. C4.3.4 Raum und Totemismus No access
        5. C4.3.5 Eheliche Angelegenheiten No access
        6. C4.3.6 Eltern und Kinder No access
        7. C4.3.7 Kreuztanten und Kreuzonkel No access
        8. C4.3.8 Verschwägerte No access
        9. C4.3.9 Subsektionen, Moieties und ‚Bindungen‘ No access
        10. C4.3.10 Altersgrade No access
        11. C4.3.11 Initiation und Tod No access
        1. D1.1.1 Auslese No access
        2. D1.1.2 Conus No access
        3. D1.1.3 Primogenitur und Rang No access
        4. D1.1.4 Gender No access
        5. D1.1.5 Sexualität No access
        6. D1.1.6 Brautgaben No access
        7. D1.1.7 Hypergamie No access
        8. D1.1.8 Diachronische Auswirkungen individueller Heiraten No access
        9. D1.1.9 Fazit: Das mosaische Modell No access
        1. D1.2.1 Linien marokkanischer Zuordnung No access
        2. D1.2.2 Aith Waryaghar des Nordens No access
        3. D1.2.3 Segmentation No access
        4. D1.2.4 Marktplätze No access
        5. D1.2.5 Liff oder Bündnisse gegen die Nächsten No access
        6. D1.2.6 Heirat No access
        7. D1.2.7 Das Vokabular der Verwandtschaft No access
        8. D1.2.8 Andere Ethnographien: Pierre Bourdieu No access
        9. D1.2.9 Andere Ethnographien: Hildred Geertz No access
        10. D1.2.10 Vergleiche zwischen Berbern und Hebräern No access
        1. D1.3.1 Pakhtun No access
        2. D1.3.2 Vergleich No access
        3. D1.3.3 Exkurs: Heirat der Hazara No access
        4. D1.3.4 Durrani Heirat als Politik und Wert (nach Nancy Tapper) No access
        5. D1.3.5 Ghilzai Heirat: Prinzipien und Strategien (nach Jon Anderson) No access
        6. D1.3.6 Folgerungen No access
        1. D2.1.1 Einführung No access
        2. D2.1.2 Gegensätzliches No access
        3. D2.1.3 Formaler Aufbau des Staates No access
        4. D2.1.4 Die elementare Einheit Haus No access
        5. D2.1.5 Widersprüchliche Heirat, Hierarchie und Individuation No access
        6. D2.1.6 Das Haus als symbolischer Raum No access
        7. D2.1.7 Die konische Gesamtstruktur des politischen Verbandes No access
        1. D3.1.1 Einführung No access
        2. D3.1.2 Kirchhoffs Übersicht No access
        3. D3.1.3 Die Gegenwart des alten Schemas No access
        4. D3.1.4 Ursprünge No access
        5. D3.1.5 Das Ganze mit seinen Teilen No access
        6. D3.1.6 Die politische Gliederung der Hauptstadt No access
        7. D3.1.7 Terminologische Konstrukte No access
        8. D3.1.8 Gender No access
        9. D3.1.9 Das allumfassende Sonnensystem No access
        1. D3.2.1 Rang und Gender No access
        2. D3.2.2 Forschungsgeschichte No access
        3. D3.2.3 Stand und Rang No access
        4. D3.2.4 Terminologie No access
        5. D3.2.5 Folgerungen und Vergleich No access
        1. D4.1.1 Aus- und Einschlüsse bei Lévi-Strauss No access
        2. D4.1.2 Historisch-ethnographische Einführung No access
        3. D4.1.3 Die operationale Sicht auf iwi und hapu nach Raymond Firth (1963) No access
        4. D4.1.4 Kawharu (1975) und Schwimmer (1990) zu iwi und hapu No access
        5. D4.1.5 Die terminologische Klassifikation der Maori No access
        6. D4.1.6 Andere Regionen: Polynesien allgemein nach Sahlins No access
        7. D4.1.7 Andere Ethnographien: Tonga nach Aletta Biersack No access
        8. D4.1.8 Fazit zur polynesischen Heirat No access
        1. E1.1.1 Gegenwartsbezug No access
        2. E1.1.2 Deszendenz: Diskussion und Definition No access
        3. E1.1.3 Familie und Familienwerte nach Francis Hsu No access
        4. E1.1.4 Vorfahren No access
        5. E1.1.5 Die ego-fokussierte Gruppe No access
        6. E1.1.6 Deszendenz-Einheiten nach Hsu No access
        7. E1.1.7 Segmentation No access
        8. E1.1.8 Deszendenz-Einheiten in Fujjian und Taiwan bei Zheng Zhenman No access
        9. E1.1.9 Regionale Unterschiede nach Myron L. Cohen: Der Südosten No access
        10. E1.1.10 Regionale Unterschiede nach Myron Cohen: Der Norden No access
        11. E1.1.11 Regionale Unterschiede nach Myron Cohen: Der Osten No access
        12. E1.1.12 Beziehungsterminologie No access
        13. E1.1.13 Fazit No access
        1. E2.1.1 Einleitung No access
        2. E2.1.2 König und Geschwister No access
        3. E2.1.3 Fürsten No access
        4. E2.1.4 Die Dimension von Verwandtschaft No access
        5. E2.1.5 Agnatische Rollenerwartungen No access
        6. E2.1.6 ‚Mütter‘ und ihre Kinder No access
        7. E2.1.7 Affinität No access
        8. E2.1.8 Gatten und Kreuzgeschwister No access
        9. E2.1.9 Verhaltenserwartungen als Muster No access
        10. E2.1.10 Beziehungsterminologie No access
        11. E2.1.11 Zusammenfassung No access
        1. E2.2.1 Einleitung No access
        2. E2.2.2 Die Staatsführung No access
        3. E2.2.3 Die Quelle der Bürgerlichkeit No access
        4. E2.2.4 Die Formation der Deszendenz-Gruppen No access
        5. E2.2.5 Führungsaufgaben No access
        6. E2.2.6 Die Körperschaft No access
        7. E2.2.7 Die Teilung (fission) No access
        8. E2.2.8 Hexerei als Inversion No access
        9. E2.2.9 Die väterliche Seite und der Wert affinaler Beziehungen No access
        10. E2.2.10 Heirat No access
        11. E2.2.11 Mehr vom Vater No access
        12. E 2.2.12 Beziehungsterminologie No access
        13. E2.2.13 Fazit No access
        1. E2.3.1 Lovedu Heirat No access
        2. E2.3.2 Konzepte und Auswirkungen von Abstammung No access
        3. E 2.3.3 Lovedu Heirat im südafrikanischen Rahmen No access
        4. E2.3.4 Ehefrau von Mann oder Frau No access
        5. E2.3.5 Historische Herrschaft No access
        6. E2.3.6 Frauen und Rinder der Regenkönigin No access
      1. F1.1 Die Glieder von Anthropos No access
        1. F1.2.1 Der Tempel als Modell No access
        2. F1.2.2 Stiftungen für Brahmanen No access
        3. F1.2.3 Segmente und Heiraten der Elite No access
        4. F1.2.4 Die vedische Spezialisierung No access
        5. F1.2.5 Andere Brahmanen No access
        6. F1.2.6 Regeln, Terminologien und Haltungen No access
        1. F1.3.1 Das Dorf als Modell und als klassifikatorische Wertung No access
        2. F1.3.2 Isomorphe Strukturen No access
        3. F1.3.3 Heirat und Nicht-Heirat No access
        1. F1.4.1 Religiosität und Kaste No access
        2. F1.4.2 Geschäfte No access
        3. F1.4.3 Firma und Familie No access
        4. F1.4.4 Historische Veränderungen No access
        1. F1.5.1 Kangra No access
        2. F1.5.2 Clans No access
        3. F1.5.3 Agnatische Gruppen No access
        4. F1.5.4 Hypergamie No access
        5. F1.5.5 Frauenquote No access
        6. F1.5.6 Exogamie No access
        7. F1:5.7 Das untere Ende der Hierarchie No access
        8. F1.5.8 Folgerungen No access
        1. F1.6.1 Veränderungen No access
        2. F1.6.2 Unterschiede No access
        1. G1.1.1 Inzestverbot: Ilongot, Buid und Iban No access
        2. G1.1.2 Inzestverbot: Piaroa, Barasana und Trio No access
        3. G1.1.3 Fazit No access
        1. G1.2.1 Die Dimension des Soziozentrischen No access
        2. G1.2.2 Kontinuität und Dispersion No access
        3. G1.2.3 Gatten und Geschwister No access
        4. G1.2.4 Formale Entwürfe des Ganzen No access
        5. G1.2.5 Konsanguinität als Variable No access
        6. G1.2.6 Fazit: Vor der Akkumulation No access
        1. G1.3.1 Inklusivität und Exklusivität No access
        2. G1.3.2 Seniorität, Herrschaft und männliche Dominanz No access
        3. G1.3.3 Zusätzliche Kriterien No access
        4. G1.3.4 Ablösung No access
        5. G1.3.5 Fazit: Individualisierung No access
        1. G1.4.1 Die Kombination von Abstammung und Affinität No access
        2. G1.4.2 Ethnographische Variationen No access
        3. G1.4.3 Fazit No access
        1. G1.5.1 Einheit und Vielfalt No access
        2. G1.5.2 Hierarchie und Wettbewerb No access
    1. Literaturverzeichnis No access
  11. Register No access 803 - 826

Bibliography (433)

  1. Aberle, David F. 1953; The Kinship System of the Kalmuk Mongols. Albuquerque, The University of New Mexico Press. Open Google Scholar
  2. Akwabi-Ameyaw, Kofi 1982; „Ashanti Social Organization: Some Ethnographic Clarifications”. Ethnology, Vol. 21, No. 4: 325-333. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/3773763
  3. Allen, Nicholas J. 2011; „Tetradic Theory and the Origin of Human Kinship Systems” pp. 96-112 in: Allen, Nicholas J., Hillary Callan, Robin Dunbar, Wendy James (eds.): Early Human Kinship. From Sex to Social Reproduction. Oxford, Blackwells. Open Google Scholar
  4. Alvi, Anjum 2007; 2007 „India and the Muslim Punjab: a Unified Approach to South Asian Kinship.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 13(3): 657–78. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2007.00449.x
  5. Anderson, Gregory D.S. and Norman H. Zide (eds.) 2008; The Munda Languages. London, Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  6. Anderson, Jon W. 1982; „Cousin Marriage in Context: Constructing Social Relations in Afghanistan.” Folk 24: 7-28. Open Google Scholar
  7. Arvelo-Jimenez, Nelly 1971; Political relations in a tribal society: a study of the Ye’cuana Indians of Venezuela. Cornell University Latin American Program Dissertation Series, 31. Open Google Scholar
  8. Bailey, Frederick G. 1960; Tribe, Caste and Nation: A study of political activity and political change in highland Orissa. Manchester. Manchester University Press. Open Google Scholar
  9. Baker, Hugh D.R. 1968; Chinese Family and Kinship. New York, Columbia University Press. Open Google Scholar
  10. Barnard, Alan & Anthony Good 1984; Research Practices in the Study of Kinship. London, Academic Press. Open Google Scholar
  11. Barnes, John A. 1971 [org. 1962]; „African Models in New Guinea Highlands”. pp. 97-107 in: Langness, L.L. and John C. Weschler (eds.); Melanesia: Readings on a Culture Area. Scranton, Chandler Publishing Co. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2795819
  12. Barnes, Robert H. 1984; Two Crows Denies It. A History of Controversy in Omaha Sociology. Lincoln, University of Nebraska Press. Open Google Scholar
  13. Barrett, S.A. and Robert F. Spencer 1948; „Notes on a Bachelor House in the South China Area.” American Anthropologist 50, no.3:463-78. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1525/aa.1948.50.3.02a00060
  14. Barth, Fredrik 1959; Political Leadership among Swat Pathans. London, Athlone. Open Google Scholar
  15. Barth, Fredrik 1973; „Descent and Marriage Reconsidered” pp 3-20 in: Goody, Jack (ed.): The Character of Kinship. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  16. Basham, Arthur L. 1967; The Wonder that was India. A survey of the history and culture of the Indian sub-continent before the coming of the Muslims. London, Sidwick & Jackson. Open Google Scholar
  17. Bastug, Sharon 1998; „The Segmentary Lineage System. A Reappraisal”. pp. 94-123 in: Ginat, Joseph & Anatoly Khazanov (eds.), Changing nomads in a changing world. Brighton, Sussex Academic Press. Open Google Scholar
  18. Bastug, Sharon 1999; „Tribe, Confederation and State among Altaic Nomads of the Asian Steppes”. pp. 77-110 in Ertürk, Korkut A. (ed.), Rethinking Central Asia. Non-Eurocentric Studies in History, Social Structure and Identity. Reading, Ithaka Press. Open Google Scholar
  19. Bauer, Brian 1998; The Sacred Landscape of the Inca: The Cuzco Ceque System. Austin, University of Texas Press. Open Google Scholar
  20. Bayly, Christopher Allen 1993; „Knowing the Country: Empire and Information in India”, Modern Asian Studies, Vol. 27, 1: 3-43. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X00016061
  21. Beattie, John 1957; „Nyoro Kinship”, Africa: Journal of the International African Institute, Vol. 27/4: 317-340. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/1156215
  22. Beattie, John 1958; „Nyoro Marriage and Affinity”; Africa: Journal of the International African Institute Vol. 28/1: 1-22. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/1156570
  23. Beattie, John 1960; Bunyoro. An African Kingdom. New York, Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Open Google Scholar
  24. Beattie, John 1971; The Nyoro State. Oxford, Clarendon. Open Google Scholar
  25. Berger, Peter 2002; „The Gadaba and the Non-ST Desia of Koraput/Orissa.” pp. 57-90 in: Pfeffer, Georg and Deepak Kumar Behera (eds.): Contemporary Society: Tribal Studies Vol. 5: The Concept of Tribal Society. Delhi, Concept Publishing Company. Open Google Scholar
  26. Berger, Peter 2007; Füttern, Speisen und Verschlingen. Ritual und Gesellschaft im Hochland von Orissa, Indien. LIT, Berlin. Open Google Scholar
  27. Berger, Peter 2010; „Who Are You, Brother and Sister? The Theme of ‘Own’ and ‘Other’ in the Go’ter Ritual of the Gadaba”. pp. 260-287 in: Berger, Peter, Hardenberg, Roland, Kattner, Ellen and Michael Prager (eds.): The Anthropology of Values. Essays in Honour of Georg Pfeffer. New Delhi, Pearson. Open Google Scholar
  28. Berger, Peter 2015; Feeding, Sharing, and Devouring. Ritual and Society in Highland Odisha, India. Boston, de Gruyter. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/9781614513636
  29. Best, Elsdon 1903; „Maori Marriage Customs: being Notes on Ancient Maori Customs, Ritual and Sociological, connected with Courtship, Marriage, and Divorce, together with some Account of the Levirate, and of many Superstitious Beliefs, and Ancient Animistic Myths connected with the same, as held and preserved by the Maori Peoples of the Tuhoe Tribe.” Transactions and Proceedings of the Royal Society of New Zealand 1868-1961 Vol. 36, Art. IV: 14-49. Open Google Scholar
  30. Beteille, André 1964; „A Note on the Referents of Caste“; European Journal of Sociology V: 130-4. Open Google Scholar
  31. Beutner, Stephan 2009; Baiga und Briten. Bewar im kolonialpolitischen Kontext von 1860- 1900 im Mandla Distrikt (Central Provinces/Indien). Magisterarbeit, Institut für Ethnologie, Freie Universität Berlin. Open Google Scholar
  32. Die BIBEL, rev. Text 1964; Die ganze Heilige Schrift nach der Übersetzung D. Martin Luthers. Givatayim, Peli Printing. Open Google Scholar
  33. Die BIBEL 1980; Einheitsübersetzung, Freiburg/Br., Herder. Open Google Scholar
  34. Biersack, Aletta 1982; „Tongan Exchange Structures: Beyond Descent and Alliance.” Journal of the Polynesian Society 91/2: 181-212. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2801811
  35. Bindemann, Rolf 1987; Religion und Politik bei den schi’itischen Hazara in Afghanistan, Iran und Pakistan. Berlin, Das Arabische Buch. Open Google Scholar
  36. Bird-David, Nurit 1990; „The Giving Environment: Another Perspective on the Economic System of Gatherer-Hunters“. Current Anthropology, Vol. 31, No. 2: 189-196. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/203825
  37. Bird-David, Nurit 1992a; „Beyond the ‘Hunting and Gathering Mode of Subsistence’: Culture-Sensitive Observations on the Nayaka and other modern hunter-gatherers.” Man (N.S.) 27: 19-44. Open Google Scholar
  38. Bird-David, Nurit 1992b; „Beyond ‘the Original Affluent Society’. A Culturalist Reformulation”. Current Anthropology Vol. 33, No.1: 25-47. Open Google Scholar
  39. Bloch, Maurice and Jonathan Parry 1982; „Introduction”, in: Bloch Maurice and Jonathan Parry (eds.) 1982; Death and the Regeneration of Life. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607646.001
  40. Boal, Barbara 1997; Human Sacrifice and Religious Change. The Kondhs. New Delhi, Inter- India Publications. Open Google Scholar
  41. Boas, Franz and George Hunt (1897); „The Social Organization and the Secret Societies of the Kwakiutl Indians. ” pp. 311-738 in: Report of the U.S. National Museum for 1895, Washington. Open Google Scholar
  42. Boas, Franz 1904; „The History of Anthropology”. Science 20: 513-524. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1126/science.20.512.513
  43. Bottomore, Tom 1993; “Sociology” pp. 632-637 in: Outhwaite, William & Tom Bottomore (eds.): Twentieth-Century Social Thought. Oxford, Blackwell. Open Google Scholar
  44. Boughter, Judith A. 1998; Betraying the Omaha Nation 1790-1916. Norman, University of Oklahoma Press. Open Google Scholar
  45. Bourdieu, Pierre 1979 [franz. Orig.1972]; Entwurf einer Theorie der Praxis auf der ethnologischen Grundlage der kabylischen Gesellschaft. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  46. Brandenstein, Carl Georg 1982; Names and Substance of the Australian Subsection System. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  47. Brown, Paula 1978; Highland Peoples of New Guinea. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  48. BÜRGERLICHES GESETZBUCH der BUNDESREPUBLIK DEUTSCHLAND www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bundesrecht/bgb/gesamt.pdf Open Google Scholar
  49. Burling, Robbins 1997 [2.ed.]; Rengsanggri: Family and Kinship in a Garo village. Tura, Tura Book Room. Open Google Scholar
  50. Cai Hua 2001; A Society without Fathers or Husbands. The Na of China. New York, Zone Books. Open Google Scholar
  51. Caroe, Olaf 1958; The Pathans 550 B.C.-A.D. 1957. London, Macmillan. Open Google Scholar
  52. Carsten, Janet 1997; The Heat of the Hearth. The Process of Kinship in a Malay Fishing Village. Oxford, Clarendon. Open Google Scholar
  53. Carsten, Janet (Hg.) 2000; Cultures of Relatedness. New Approaches to the Study of Kinship. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  54. Carsten, Janet & Steven Hugh-Jones (eds.) 1995; About the House: Levi-Strauss and Beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607653.001
  55. Chagnon, Napoleon 1968; Ya̦nomamö, the fierce people. New York, Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Open Google Scholar
  56. Cipriani, Lidio 1959; „The Jarawa Problem”. Bulletin of the Bihar Tribal Research Institute. Vol 1, No. 1: 43-55. Open Google Scholar
  57. Cipriani, Lidio 1966; The Andaman Islanders. New York, Praeger. Open Google Scholar
  58. Cohen, Myron L. 2005; Kinship, Contract, Community, and State. Anthropological Perspectives on China. Stanford, Stanford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  59. Collier, Jane Fishburne and Michelle Z. Rosaldo 1981; „Politics and Gender in Simple Societies”. pp. 275-329 in: Ortner, Sherry B. and Harriet Whitehead (eds.): Sexual Meanings: The Cultural Construction of Gender and Sexuality. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/signs.7.1.3173499
  60. Comaroff, Jean 1985; Body of Power, Spirit of Resistance. The Culture and History of a South African People. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  61. Conklin, Harold C. 1955; The relation of Hanunoo culture to the plant world. Yale, Unpubl. PhD Thesis (zitiert nach Gibson 1986). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/soutjanth.11.4.3628909
  62. Cort, John 2004. „Jains, caste and hierarchy in north Gujarat”, pp. 70-111 in: D.Gupta (ed): Caste in Question. Identity or Hierarchy? New Delhi: Sage Publications. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/006996670403800104
  63. Curry, Andrew 2013; „Archaeology: The milk revolution”. nature Vol. 500, Issue 7460. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1038/500020a
  64. Dahrendorf, Ralf 1965 (5. Aufl.); HOMO SOCIOLOGICUS. Ein Versuch zur Geschichte, Bedeutung und Kritik der Kategorie der sozialen Rolle. Köln, Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-98980-2_1
  65. D’Altroy, Terence N. 2002; The Incas. Oxford, Blackwell. Open Google Scholar
  66. DER TAGESSPIEGEL 2014; „Alte Chinesen töten sich, um Sargbestattung zu bekommen“. Der Tagesspiegel (Berlin) 30.5.2014, S. 28. Open Google Scholar
  67. Diniz, Edson Soares 1968; „A terminologia de parentesco dos Índios Wapitxana”. Boletim do Museo Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Antropologia 34. Open Google Scholar
  68. Dorsey, J. Owen 1884; Omaha Sociology. Third Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology. Washington, Smithsonian Institution. Open Google Scholar
  69. Douglas, Mary 1973; Rules and meanings: the anthropology of everyday knowledge. London; Penguin. Open Google Scholar
  70. Douglas, Mary 1982; „Introduction to grid/group analysis”. pp. 1-8 in: Douglas, Mary (ed.): Essays in the Sociology of Perception. London, Routledge & Kegan Paul. Open Google Scholar
  71. Dresch, Paul 1993; Tribes, Government and History in Yemen. Oxford, Clarendon. Open Google Scholar
  72. Dresch, Paul 1986; „The significance of the course events take in segmentary systems.” American Ethnologist 12(4): 659-75. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1525/ae.1986.13.2.02a00070
  73. Driver, Harold E. 1969 [2. ed.]; Indians of North America. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  74. Du Bois, Cora (ed.) 1960; Lowie’s Selected Papers in Anthropology. Berkeley, University of California Press. Open Google Scholar
  75. Dumont, Louis 1953; „The Dravidian Kinship Terminology as an Expression of Marriage.” Man 53, art 54. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2794868
  76. Dumont, Louis 1966; „Marriage in India: The Present State of the Question, III. North India in Relation to South India”. Contributions to Indian Sociology, Old Series, Vol. 9/90-114. Open Google Scholar
  77. Dumont, Louis 1971; Introduction à deux theories d’anthropologie sociale. Groupes de filiation et alliance de marriage. Paris, École pratique des Hautes Études. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/9783111538808
  78. Dumont. Louis 1980 [franz. Orig.1966], Homo Hierarchicus. The Caste System and its Implications. Chicago. The University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  79. Dumont, Louis 1983; Affinity as a Value. Marriage Alliance in South India, with Comparative Essays on Australia. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  80. Dumont, Louis 1986; Essays on Individualism: modern ideology in anthropological perspective. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  81. Dupree, Louis 1973; Afghanistan. Princeton, Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  82. Durkheim, Emile [franz. Orig. 1895] 1961; Regeln der soziologischen Methode. Neuwied, Luchterhand. Open Google Scholar
  83. Durkheim, Emile und Marcel Mauss 1963 [franz. Orig. 1903]; Primitive Classification. Chicago, Chicago University Press. Open Google Scholar
  84. Eggan, Fred 1937/70; „The Cheyenne and Arapaho Kinship System”. pp. 35-98 in: Eggan, Fred (ed.): Social Anthropology of North American Tribes. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1525/aa.1937.39.1.02a00040
  85. Eglar, Zekiye 1960; A Punjabi Village in Pakistan. New York, Columbia University Press. Open Google Scholar
  86. Elkin, Adolphus Peter 1938/1954; The Australian Aborigines. Sydney, Angus and Robertson. Open Google Scholar
  87. Elphinstone, Mountstuart 1819; An account of the kingdom of Caubul, and its dependencies in Persia, Tartary, and India: Comprising a view of the Afghaun nation, and a history of the Dooraunee monarchy. London, Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, Brown, and J. Murry. Open Google Scholar
  88. Elwin, Verrier 1947; The Muria and their Ghotul. London, Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  89. Elwin, Verrier 1955; The Religion of an Indian Tribe. Bombay, Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  90. Endikott Kirk 1979; Batek Negrito religion: the world view and rituals of a hunting and gathering people of peninsular Malaysia. Oxford, Clarendon. Open Google Scholar
  91. Engels, Friedrich 1884; Der Ursprung der Familie, des Privateigenthums und des Staates. Im Anschluss an Lewis H. Morgans Forschungen. Hottimgen-Zürich, Verlag der Schweizerischen Volksbuchhandlung. Open Google Scholar
  92. Eschmann, Anncharlott; Hermann Kulke, Gaya Charan Tripathi (eds.) 1978; The Cult of Jagannath and the Regional Traditions of Orissa. New Delhi: Manohar. Open Google Scholar
  93. Evans-Pritchard, Edward E. 1940; The Nuer. A description of the modes of livelihood and political institutions of a Nilotic people. Oxford, Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  94. Evans-Pritchard, Edward E. and Meyer Fortes 1940; „Introduction“, pp.1-24 in: Fortes, Meyer and Edward E. Evans-Pritchard (eds.): African Political Systems. Oxford, Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  95. Evans-Pritchard, Edward E. 1949; The Sanusi of CYRENAICA. London, Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  96. Evans-Pritchard, Edward E. 1951; Kinship and Marriage among the Nuer. Oxford, Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  97. Evans-Prichard, Edward E. 1962; Essays in Social Anthropology. London, Faber and Faber. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/003776866200900308
  98. Evans-Pritchard, Edward E. 1967; The Position of Women in Primitive Societies and Other Essays in Social Anthropology. London, Faber and Faber. Open Google Scholar
  99. Evers, Hans-Dieter (ed.) 1969; Loosely Structured Social Systems. New Haven, Yale University, Southeast Asian Studies. Open Google Scholar
  100. Ewers, John C. 1955; „The Horse in Blackfoot Culture with Comparative Material from Other Western Tribes”; pp. 331-339 Bulletin of the Smithsonian Institution, Bureau of American Ethnology, 159. Open Google Scholar
  101. Feng Han-chi [Han-yi Feng] 1948; The Chinese Kinship System. Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
  102. Fei Xiaotong [Hsiao-Tung Fei] 1939; Peasant Life in China. London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  103. Fei Xiaotong [Hsiao-Tung Fei] 1946; „Peasantry and gentry: An Interpretation of Chinese Social Structure and Its Changes.“ American Journal of Sociology 52 no.1: 1-17. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/219914
  104. Fenton, F. D. 1879; Important Judgements Delivered in the Compensation Court and Native Land Court, 1866–1879. Auckland, Native Land Court. Open Google Scholar
  105. Firth, Raymond 1959 [1. Aufl. 1929]; Economics of the New Zealand Maori. Wellington, Government Printer. Open Google Scholar
  106. Firth, Raymond 1936; We, the Tikopia. London, Allen & Unwin. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2789929
  107. Firth, Raymond 1963; „Bilateral Descent Groups: an operational Viewpoint.” pp.22-37 in: Schapera, Isaac (ed.): Studies in Kinship and Marriage. Dedicated to Brenda Z. Seligman on her 80th Birthday. London, Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland. Open Google Scholar
  108. Firth, Raymond 1970; „Sibling Terms in Polynesia”. Journal of the Polynesian Society 79:272-287. Open Google Scholar
  109. Fletcher, Alice C. and Francis La Flesche 1911/1970; The Omaha Tribe. 27th Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology. Washington, Smithsonian Institution. Reprint: Johnson Reprint Corporation New York. Open Google Scholar
  110. Fock, Niels 1963; Waiwai. Religion and Society of an Amazonian Tribe. National Museum of Denmark; Ethnographic Series, 8. Open Google Scholar
  111. Fortes, Meyer and Edward E. Evans-Pritchard 1940; „Introduction“, pp.1-24 in: Fortes, Meyer and Edward E. Evans-Pritchard (eds.): African Political Systems. Oxford, Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  112. Fortes, Meyer 1949; “Time and Social Structure: an Ashanti Case Study”, pp.54-84 in: Fortes, Meyer (ed.): Social Structure: studies presented to A.R. Radcliffe-Brown. Oxford, Clarendon. Open Google Scholar
  113. Fortes, Meyer 1950; „Kinship and marriage among the Ashante”. pp. 252-284 in: Radcliffe- Brown, A.R. and Daryll Forde (eds.): African systems of kinship and marriage. London, Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  114. Fortes, Meyer 1953; „The Structure of the Unilineal Descent Group”. American Anthropologist 55: 17-41. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1525/aa.1953.55.1.02a00030
  115. Fortes, Meyer 1959; „Descent, Filiation and Affinity: A Rejoinder to Dr. Leach.” Man 1959; 309, 331. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2797426
  116. Fortes, Meyer 1969; Kinship and the Social Order. The Legacy of Lewis Henry Morgan. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul. Open Google Scholar
  117. Fortune, Reo 1932; Omaha Secret Societies. New York, Columbia University Press. Open Google Scholar
  118. Fox, Richard G. 1969; „’Professional Primitives’: Hunters and Gatherers in Nuclear South Asia“. Man in India 49: 130-160. Open Google Scholar
  119. Fox, Richard G. 1991; „Introduction”. pp. 1-16 in: Fox, Richard G.: Recapturing anthropology: Working in the present. Santa Fe, School of American Research Press. Open Google Scholar
  120. Fox, Robin 1967; Kinship and Marriage: An Anthropological Perspective. Harmonsworth, Pelican. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2799373
  121. Frazer, James George 1890; The Golden Bough. London, Macmillan. Open Google Scholar
  122. Freedman, Maurice 1958; Lineage Organization in Southeastern China. London, Athlone. Open Google Scholar
  123. Freedman, Maurice 1966; Chinese Lineage and Society. Fukien and Kwantung. London, Athlone. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0305741000013394
  124. Freeman, J. Derek 1955; Iban agriculture; a report on the shifting cultivation of hill rice by the Iban of Sarawak, Colonial Office Research Study No. 19 (London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office). Open Google Scholar
  125. Freeman, J. Derek 1957 „The family system of the Iban of Borneo”. pp. 15–52 in: Jack Goody (ed.) The developmental cycle in domestic groups (Cambridge Papers in Social Anthropology, No. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  126. Freeman, J. Derek 1960; „The Iban of Western Borneo”. pp.65–87 in: G.P. Murdock (ed.) Social structure in Southeast Asia,. Chicago: Quadrangle Books. Open Google Scholar
  127. Freeman, J. Derek 1961. „On the Concept of the Kindred”. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 91/2: 192–220. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2844413
  128. Freeman, J. Derek [org. 1955] 1970; Report on the Iban. London: Athlone Press. Open Google Scholar
  129. Friedli, David 2013; „Who Are the Omaha?” teacherweb.esu1.org Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.3139/9783446437661.005
  130. Fürer-Haimendorf, Christoph von 1943; The Aboriginal Tribes of Hyderabad, Vol. 1 Chenchu. London, Macmillan. Open Google Scholar
  131. Fürer-Haimendorf, Christoph von 1948; The Raj Gonds of Adilabad, a peasant culture of the Deccan. London, Macmillan. Open Google Scholar
  132. Gangadharam, V. 2009; „Gatherer-Hunter Chenchu of Nallamalai Forests”, pp. 281-302 in: Pfeffer, Georg and Deepak Kumar Behera (eds.): Structure and Exchange in Tribal India and Beyond. Vol. 8 Contemporary Society: Tribal Studies. New Delhi, Concept. Open Google Scholar
  133. Gardner, Peter M. 1966; „Symmetric Respect and Memorate Knowledge: The Structure and Ecology of Individualistic Culture“. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology Vol. 22: 389-415. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/soutjanth.22.4.3629461
  134. Geertz, Clifford (1980); Negara: The Theatre State in Nineteenth-Century Bali. Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  135. Geertz, Clifford 2001; „The Visit. Review of Cai Hua ’A Society without Fathers and Husbands: The Na of China’”. New York Book Review, Volume 48, Number 16; Oct. 18. Open Google Scholar
  136. Geertz, Hildred 1979; „The meanings of family ties.” pp. 315-392 in: Geertz, Clifford, Hildred Geertz und Lawrence Rosen (eds.): Meaning and order in Moroccan society. Three essays in cultural analysis. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  137. Geertz, Hildred and Clifford Geertz 1968; „Teknonymy in Bali: Parenthood, Age-grading, and Genealogical Amnesia”. pp. 355-76 in: Bohannan, Paul and John Middlton (eds.): Marriage, Family and Residence. Garden City. The Natural History Press. Open Google Scholar
  138. Gell, Simeran Man Singh 1992; The Ghotul in Muria Society. Reading, Harwood Academic Publications. Open Google Scholar
  139. Gellner, Ernest 1963; „Saints of the Atlas” pp.145-158 in: Pitt-Rivers, Julian (ed.): Mediterranean Countrymen. Mouton. Den Haag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/538537
  140. Gellner, Ernest 1969; Saints of the Atlas. London, Weidenfeld and Nickolson. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.1969.tb00044.x
  141. Gellner, Ernest and Charles Micaud 1973; Arabs and Berbers. From Tribe to Nation in North Africa. London, Duckworth. Open Google Scholar
  142. Gellner, Ernest 1973; „Introduction” pp.11-24 in: Gellner, Ernest and Charles Micaud 1973; Arabs and Berbers. From Tribe to nation in North Africa. London, Duckworth. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.4324/9780203009147
  143. Gennep, Arnold van, 2005 [franz. Orig. 1909]; Übergangsriten. Frankfurt/M, Campus-Verlag, Open Google Scholar
  144. Ghassem-Fachandi, Parvis 2012; Pogrom in Gujarat. Hindu Nationalism and Anti-Muslim Violence in India. Princeton, Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  145. Gibson, Thomas 1986; Sacrifice and Sharing in the Philippine Highlands. Religion and Society among the Buid of Mindoro. London, The Athlone Press. Open Google Scholar
  146. Gifford, Edward Winslow 1929; Tongan Society. Honolulu, Bernice P. Bishop Museum. Open Google Scholar
  147. Given, Brian J. 1994; A Most Pernicious Thing. Gun Trading and Native Warfare in the Early Contact Period. Ottawa, Carleton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  148. Glatzer, Bernt 1977; Nomaden von Gharjistan. Aspekte der wirtschaftlichen, sozialen und politischen Organisation nomadischer Durrani-Paschtunen in Nordwestafghanistan. Wiesbaden, Steiner. Open Google Scholar
  149. Goody, Jack 1956; „A Comparative Approach to Incest and Adultery“. British Journal of Sociology, 7/4 pp.286–305. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/586694
  150. Goody, Jack 1983; The Development of the Family and Marriage in Europe. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  151. Goodenough, Ward 1970; Description and Comparison in Cultural Anthropology. Chicago, Aldine. Open Google Scholar
  152. Graves, Robert and Raphael Patai 1966; Hebrew Myths: The Book of Genesis. New York, McGraw-Hill. Open Google Scholar
  153. Gregory, Christopher 1982; Gifts and Commodities. London: Academic Press. Open Google Scholar
  154. Gregory, Christopher 2009; „Brotherhood and Otherhood in Bastar: On the Social Specificity of ‘Dual Organisation’ in Aboriginal India”. pp. 67-82 in: Pfeffer, Georg and Deepak Kumar Behera (eds.): Structure and Exchange in Tribal India and Beyond. Contemporary Society: Tribal Studies, Vol. 8. New Delhi, Concept. Open Google Scholar
  155. Grinnell, George Bird, 1923; The Cheyenne Indians: Their History and Ways of Life. Haven, Yale University Press. Open Google Scholar
  156. Gusinde, Martin 1931; Die Feuerland Indianer. Ergebnisse meiner vier Forschungsreisen in den Jahren 1918 bis 1924. Mölding, Verlag Anthropos. Open Google Scholar
  157. Guzy, Lidia 2002; Baba-s und Alekh-s – Askese und Ekstase einer Religion im Werden. Berlin, Weißensee Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  158. Hage, Per and Frank Harary 1996; Island Networks. Communication, Kinship, and Classification Structures. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511759130.001
  159. Hardenberg, Roland Josef 2006; Children of the Earth Goddess: Society, Marriage and Sacrifice in the Highlands of Orissa. Habilitationsschrift; Fachbereich Philosophie/Geschichte der Universität Münster/Westfalen. Open Google Scholar
  160. Hardenberg, Roland 2011; The Renewal of Jagannatha’s Body. Ritual and Society in Orissa. New Delhi, Manak. Open Google Scholar
  161. Harary, Frank and Per Hage 1996; Island Networks. Communication, Kinship, and Classification Structures. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511759130.001
  162. Harrell, Stevan 2002; Review of „Cai Hua, A Society without Fathers and Husbands. The Na of China”. American Anthropologist 104(3): 982-983. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1525/aa.2002.104.3.982
  163. Hart, Charles M. W. 1943; „A Reconstruction of the Natchez Social Structure.” American Anthropologist 45: 374-386. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1525/aa.1943.45.3.02a00030
  164. Hart, David M. 1973; „The Tribe in Modern Morocco: Two Case Studies“. pp. 25-58 in: Gellner, Ernest and Charles Micaud (eds.): Arabs and Berbers. London, Duckworth. Open Google Scholar
  165. Hart, David M. 1976; The Aith Waryaghar of the Moroccan Rif. An Ethnography and History. Tucson, The University of Arizona Press. Open Google Scholar
  166. Hart, David M. 1884; „Segmentary systems and the role of ‘five fifth’ in tribal Morocco.” pp. 66-105 in: Ahmad, Akbar S. und David M. Hart (eds.): Islam in Tribal Societies. From the Atlas to the Indus. London, Routledge & Kegan Paul. Open Google Scholar
  167. Hart, David M. 2001; Qabila. Tribal Profiles and Tribe-State Relations in Morocco and on the Afghanistan-Pakistan Frontier. Amsterdam, Het Spinhuis. Open Google Scholar
  168. Hazelton, Keith 1986; „Patrilines and the Development of Localized Lineages: The Wu of Hsiu-Ning City, Hui-Chou to 1528.” pp. 137-169 in Ebrey, Patricia B. and James L. Watson (eds): Kinship Organization in Late Imperial China 1000- 1940. Berkeley, University of California Press. Open Google Scholar
  169. Henley, Paul S. 1982; The Panare. Tradition and change on the Amazonian frontier. New Haven, Yale University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt2250x94
  170. Heidemann, Frank 2014; „Objectification and Social Aestetics. Memoranda and the Celebration of ‘Badaga Day’”. Asian Ethnology 73/1-2: 91-110, Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.18874/ae.73.1-2.06
  171. Herdt, Gilbert H.(ed.) 1984; Ritualized Homosexuality in Melanesia. Berkeley, University of California Press Open Google Scholar
  172. Hertz, Robert 1960 [franz. Org. 1905/6]; Death and the Right Hand. London, Cohen and West. Open Google Scholar
  173. Hiatt, Betty 1970; „Woman the Gatherer”. pp. 2-8 in Gale, Fay (ed.): Woman’s Role in Aboriginal Society. Canberra, Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies. Open Google Scholar
  174. Hiatt, Lester H. 1965; Kinship and Conflict. A Study of an Aboriginal Community in Northern Arnhem Land. Canberra, the Australian National University. Open Google Scholar
  175. Hoebel, E. Adamson 1960; The Cheyennes. Indians of the Great Plains. New York, Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Open Google Scholar
  176. Holy, Ladislaw 1987; „Introduction; Description, Generalization and Comparison: Two Paradigms”. pp.1-22 in: Holy, Ladislaw: Comparative Anthropology. Oxford, Basil Blackwell. Open Google Scholar
  177. Hoskins, Janet 1996; „Introduction. Headhunting as Practice and as Trope”, pp. 1-49 in: Hoskins, Janet (ed.) 1996; Headhunting and the Social Imagination in Southeast Asia. Stanford, Stanford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  178. Hoskins, Janet (ed.) 1996; Headhunting and the Social Imagination in Southeast Asia. Stanford, Stanford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  179. Howell, Signe 1984; Society and Cosmos: Chewong of Peninsular Malaysia. Singapore: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  180. Hsu, Francis L.K. 1963; Clan, Caste, and Club. Princeton. D. Van Nostrand Co. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/25155607
  181. Hugh-Jones, Christine 1979; From the Milk River. Spatial and temporal processes in Northwest Amazonia. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  182. Hugh-Jones, Stephen 1979; The Palm and the Pleiades. Initiation and cosmology in Northwest Amazonia. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  183. Hugh-Jones, Stephen 1993; „Clear Descent or Ambiguous Houses? A Re-Examination of the Tukanoan Social Organization”, L’Homme 126-128: 95-120. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.3406/hom.1993.369631
  184. Hugh-Jones, Stevphen & Janet Carsten (eds.) 1995; About the House: Levi-Strauss and Beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607653.001
  185. Hunter, Monica 1936; Reaction to Conquest. London, International Institute of African Languages and Cultures, Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  186. Isbell, William (revised by Terence N. D’Altroy) 2012; „Inca Ruling Dynasties”. pp 79-81 in: Fagan, Brian and Charlotte Beck (eds.): The Oxford Companion to Archeology: Inca Civilization. (2. Edition). Open Google Scholar
  187. Jena, M.K and P. Pathi, J. Dash, K. Patnaik & K. Seeland 2002; Forest tribes of Orissa: Lifestyle and Social Conditions of selected Orissan tribes. Vol. 1. The Dongria Kondh. New Delhi, D.K. Printworld. Open Google Scholar
  188. Jenkins, David 2001; „The Inka conical clan”. Journal of Anthropological Research 57:167- 195. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/jar.57.2.3631566
  189. Kangra District: Census of India 2011 Himachal Pradesh » District List » Kangra District (http://www.census2011.co.in/census/district/230-kangra.html). Open Google Scholar
  190. Kawharu, Ian Hugh 1975; Orakei: A Ngati Whatua Community. Wellington, New Zealand Council for Educational Research. Open Google Scholar
  191. Keesing, Felix and Marie Keesing 1934; Taming Philippine Headhunters; a study of government and of cultural change in northern Luzon. Stanford, Stanford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  192. Keesing, Roger M. 1975; Kin Groups and Social Structure. New York, Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Open Google Scholar
  193. Kelly, Raymond C. 1976; „Witchcraft and Sexual relations: An Exploration in the Social and Semantic Implications of the Structure of Belief”. pp. 36-53 in: Brown, Paula and Georgeda Buchbinder (eds.): Man and Woman in the New Guinea Highlands. Washington D.C.; American Anthropological Association. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1037/e596672011-001
  194. Kelly, Raymond C. 1977; Etoro Social Structure: A Study in Structural Contradiction. Ann Arbor; The University of Michigan Press. Open Google Scholar
  195. Kelly, Raymond C. 1993; Constructing Inequality. The Fabrication of a Hierarchy of Virtue among the Etoro. Ann Arbor, The University of Michigan Press. Open Google Scholar
  196. Khare, R. S. 1970 The Changing Brahmans: Associations and Elites among the Kanya- Kubjas of North India. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1970. Open Google Scholar
  197. King, Victor T. 1976; „Conceptual and analytical problems in the study of the kindred”. pp. 121–145 in Appell, G. N. (ed.), The Societies of Borneo: Explorations in the Theory of Cognatic Social Structure. Washington: American Anthropological Association Special Publication. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1037/e596682011-001
  198. King, Victor T. 1978; Essays on Bornean Societies Oxford, Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  199. Kirchhoff, Paul 1949; „The Social and Political Organization of the Andean Peoples.” pp. 293-311 in Steward, Julian (ed.): Handbook of the South American Indians, Vol. 5, Washington D.C., Government Printing Office. Open Google Scholar
  200. Kirchhoff, Paul 1955; „The Principles of Clanship in Human Society” Davidson Journal of Anthropology 1:1-10. Open Google Scholar
  201. Kirchhoff, Paul 1968; “The Principles of Clanship in Human Society” pp. 370-381 in Fried, Morton H. Readings in Anthropology II; New York, Crowell. Open Google Scholar
  202. Koehn, Sally S. 1975; Force and Persuasion: leadership in an Amazonian society. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  203. Kohler, Josef 1897; Zur Urgeschichte der Ehe: Totemismus, Gruppenehe, Mutterrecht. Enke, Stuttgart. Open Google Scholar
  204. Kolata, Allen L. 2013; Ancient Inca. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  205. Kopecky, Lucas-Michael 1982; „The Imami Sayyed of the Hazarajat: The Maintainance of their Elite Position.” Folk 24: 89-110. Open Google Scholar
  206. Krige Eileen J. and J.D. Krige 1943; The Realm of the Rain Queen: A Study of the Pattern of Lovedu Society. London, Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  207. Kroeber, Alfred L. 1909; „Classificatory Systems of Relationship”. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 39:77-84. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2843284
  208. Kroeber, Alfred L. 1939; Cultural and Natural Areas of Native North America. Berkeley, Univ. of California Press Open Google Scholar
  209. Kuper, Adam 1978; „Determinants of Form in Seven Tswana Kinship Terminologies”. Ethnology 17: 239-286. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/3773197
  210. Kuper, Adam 1982a; „Lineage theory: a critical retrospect.” Annual Review of Anthropology for 1982; 11:71-95. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.11.100182.000443
  211. Kuper, Adam 1982b; Wives for Cattle. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul. Open Google Scholar
  212. La Flesche Francis 1928; The Osage Tribe: Two versions of the child-naming rite. Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology, vol. 43 (1925-26). Washington D. C., Government Printing Office. Open Google Scholar
  213. La Flesche, Francis and Alice C. Fletcher 1911/1970; The Omaha Tribe. 27th Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology. Washington, Smithsonian Institution. Reprint: Johnson Reprint Corporation New York. Open Google Scholar
  214. Lahbabi, Mohammed 1958; Le Gouvernement Marocain à l’Aube du XXe Siècle. Rabat, Editions techniques Nord-Africaines. Open Google Scholar
  215. Leach, Edmund R. 1954; Political Systems of Highland Burma. London: G. Bell & Sons. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/BF00622367
  216. Leach, Edmund R. 1958, „Magical Hair”. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, Vol. 88/2: 147-164. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2844249
  217. Leach, Edmund R. 1961 [org. 1951]; „The Structural Implications of Matrilateral Cross- Cousin Marriage”. pp.54-104 in: Leach E.R. (ed.): Rethinking Anthropology. London, Athlone. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2844015
  218. Leach, Edmund R. 1962; „On certain unconsidered aspects of double descent systems” Man Vol. 62; Art. 214. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2796878
  219. Leach, Edmund R. 1966; „Virgin Birth”. pp. 39-50 in Proceedings of the Royal Anthropological Institute 1966 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/3031713
  220. Leach, Edmund R. 1969; Genesis as Myth and Other Essays. London, Cape. Open Google Scholar
  221. Lee, Richard B. 1979; The !Kung San: men, women, and work in a foraging society. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  222. Lévi-Strauss, Claude 1949; Les structures élémentaires de la parenté. Paris, Presses universitaires de France. Open Google Scholar
  223. Lévi-Strauss, Claude 1959; „Le problem des relations de parenté”. Systèmes de parenté. Entretiens interdisciplinaires sur les sociétés musulmanes, Paris, École Pratique des Hautes Études. Open Google Scholar
  224. Lévi-Strauss, Claude 1963 [franz. Orig. 1958]; Structural Anthropology. Harmondsworth, Penguin. Open Google Scholar
  225. Lévi-Strauss, Claude 1965 [franz. Orig. 1962]; Das Ende des Totemismus. Frankfurt/M., Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  226. Lévi-Strauss, Claude 1966 [franz Orig.1962]; The Savage Mind. London, Weidenfeld and Nicolson. Open Google Scholar
  227. Lévi-Strauss, Claude 1967; Les structures élémentaires de la parenté, Paris, Mouton, 1967, 2ème édition Open Google Scholar
  228. Lévi-Strauss, Claude 1973; „Réflexions sur l’atome de parenté” L’Homme XII(3): S. 5-30. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.3406/hom.1973.367355
  229. Lévi-Strauss, Claude 1981 [2. Aufl., franz. Orig. 1967]; Die elementaren Strukturen der Verwandtschaft (übersetzt von Eva Moldenhauer). Frankfurt/Main, Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  230. Lévi-Strauss, Claude 1983; The Way of the Masks. London, Jonathan Cape. Open Google Scholar
  231. Lévi-Strauss, Claude 1985 [franz. Orig.1983]; A View from Afar. London, Penguin. Open Google Scholar
  232. Lindenbaum, Shirley 1984; „Variations on a sociosexual theme in Melanesia.” pp. 337-61 in: G.H. Herdt (ed.) Ritualized Homosexuality in Melanesia. Berkeley, University of California Press. Open Google Scholar
  233. Lindholm, Charles 1982; Generosity and Jealousy. The Swat Pukhtun of Northern Pakistan. New York, Columbia University Press. Open Google Scholar
  234. Lindholm, Charles 1996; Frontier Perspectives. Essays in Comparative Anthropology. Karachi, Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  235. Lindig, Wolfgang 1970; Geheimbünde und Männerbünde der Prärie- und der Waldlandindianer Nordamerikas untersucht am Beispiel der Omaha und Irokesen. Wiesbaden, Steiner. Open Google Scholar
  236. Lounsbury, Floyd G. 1964; „A Formal Account of the Crow- and Omaha-Type Kinship Terminologies”. pp. 351–393 in: Ward H. Goodenough (ed.), Explorations in Cultural Anthropology: Essays in Honor of George Peter Murdock, New York: McGraw-Hill. Open Google Scholar
  237. Lowie, Robert H. 1912; „Social Life of the Crow Indians”. Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History. Vol IX, Part II, pp. 181-248. Open Google Scholar
  238. Lowie, Robert H. 1917; „Notes on the Social Organization and Customs of the Mandan, Hidatsa, and Crow Indians”. Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History. Vol. XXI, Part I, pp. 1-100. Open Google Scholar
  239. Lowie, Robert H. 1918; „Myths and Traditions of the Crow Indians”. Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History. Vol. XXV, Part I, pp. 1-308. Open Google Scholar
  240. Lowie, Robert H. 1919; „The Tobacco Society of the Crow Indians”. Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History Vol. xxi, Part II pp. 103-200. Open Google Scholar
  241. Lowie, Robert H. 1935; The Crow Indians. New York, Farrar & Rinehart. Open Google Scholar
  242. Lowie, Robert H. 1963 [org. 1954]; Indians of the Plains. New York, The American Museum of Natural History. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.68276
  243. Luithle-Hardenberg, Andrea 2011; Die Reise zum Ursprung. Die Pilgerschaft der Shvetambara-Jaina zum Berg Shatrunjaya in Gujarat, Indien. München, Manya Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  244. Lysgaard, Sverre and Louis Schneider 1953; „The Deferred Gratification Pattern: A Preliminary Study”. American Sociological Review Vol.18, no. 2 :142-149. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2087723
  245. Maaker, Erik de 2006; Negotiating Life. Garo Death Rituals and the Transformation of Society. Copyright Erik de Maaker emaaker@gmail.com. Open Google Scholar
  246. MacLeod, W.C. 1924; „Natchez Political Evolution.” American Anthropologist 26: 201-229. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1525/aa.1924.26.2.02a00050
  247. MacLeod, W.C. 1926; „On Natchez Cultural Origins.” American Anthropologist 28: 409-413. Open Google Scholar
  248. Madan, T.N. 1989 [2nd rev. ed.]; Family and Kinship. A Study of the Pandits of Rural Kashmir. New Delhi: Oxford University Press Open Google Scholar
  249. Malinowski, Bronislaw 1929; The Sexual Life of Savages In North Western Melanesia. London, Routledge & Kegan Paul. Open Google Scholar
  250. Mallebrein, Cornelia 2007; „When the Buffalo Becomes a Pumpkin: Animal Sacrifice Contested.” pp.417-442 in: Pfeffer, Georg (ed.): Periphery and Centre. Studies in Orissan History, Religion and Anthropology. New Delhi, Manohar. Open Google Scholar
  251. Mao-Tse-tung 1927; Report on an Investigation of the Peasant Movement in Hunan; (Fourteen Great Achievements No. 7) www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/selected-works/volume-1/ Open Google Scholar
  252. Marquis, Thomas B. 1918 (reprint 1974); Memoirs of a White Crow Indian (Thomas Leforge). Lincoln, University of Nebraska Press. Open Google Scholar
  253. Marquardt, William H. 1988; „Politics and production among the Calusa of south Florida”. pp.161-188. In: Ingold, Tim , David Riches and James Woodburn (eds.): Hunters and Gatherers. Vol.1 History, Evolution and Social Change. New York, Oxford, Berg. Open Google Scholar
  254. Marriott, McKim 1976; „Hindu Transactions: Diversity Without Dualism.” pp. 109-42 in: Kapferer, Bruce (ed.) Transaction and Meaning, directions in the anthropology of exchange and symbolic behavior. Philadelphia, Institute for the Study of Human Issues. Open Google Scholar
  255. Marx, Karl 1872/1932; Das Kapital. 2. Aufl. Berlin, Gustav Kiepenheuer Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  256. Mauss, Marcel 1975 [franz. Orig. 1923-24]; „Die Gabe. Form und Funktion des Austauschs in archaischen Gesellschaften.” pp.11-144 in: Mauss, Marcel: Soziologie und Anthropologie Bd. II. München, Hanser. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1159/000298353
  257. Maybury-Lewis, David 1967; Akwe-Shawante Society. Oxford, Clarendon Press. Open Google Scholar
  258. Maximilian Prinz zu Wied 1839 bis 1841; Reise in das Innere Nord-Amerika in den Jahren 1832 bis 1834. 2 Bände. Coblenz, J. Hoelscher. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.51529
  259. McDougal, Charles 1963; The Social Structure of the Hill Juang. PhD Dissertation, University of New Mexico, Ann Arbor. University Microfilms. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1520/STP336-EB
  260. McLennan, John Ferguson 1865; Primitive Marriage. Edinburgh, Adam & Charles Black. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.50206
  261. Mead, Margaret 1932; The Changing Culture of an Indian Tribe. New York, Columbia University Press. Open Google Scholar
  262. Meggitt, Mervyn J. 1962; Desert People. A Study of the Walbiri Aborigines of Central Australia. Sydney, Angus and Robertson. Open Google Scholar
  263. Meggitt, Mervyn J. 1965; The Lineage System of the Mae-Enga of New Guinea. Edinburgh, Oliver & Boyd. Open Google Scholar
  264. Meggitt, Mervyn J. 1972; „Understanding Australian Aboriginal Society: Kinship Systems or Cultural Categories?” pp. 64-87 in: Reining, Priscilla (ed.): Kinship Studies in the Morgan Centennial Year. Washington, The Anthropological Society of Washington. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1037/e596452011-005
  265. Metge, Joan 1976 [2. rev. ed. 1967]; Rautahi: The Maoris of New Zealand. London, Routledge &Kegan Paul. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2799552
  266. Metge, Joan 1990; „TE RITO O TE HARAKEKE: Conceptions of the Whaanau“. The Journal of the Polynesian Society Vol.90/1: S. 56-90. Open Google Scholar
  267. Micaud, Charles and Ernest Gellner 1973; Arabs and Berbers. From Tribe to nation in North Africa. London, Duckworth. Open Google Scholar
  268. Moffat, Michael 1979; An Untouchable Community in South India. Structure and Consensus. Princeton, Princeton University Press Open Google Scholar
  269. Montagne, Robert 1930; Les Berbères et le makhzan dans le sud du Maroc. Essai sur la transformation politique du groupe Chleuh. Paris, Felix Alcan. Open Google Scholar
  270. Morgan, Lewis Henry 1871; Systems of Consanguinity and Affinity of the Human Family. Washington D.C., Smithsonian Institution. Open Google Scholar
  271. Morgan, Lewis Henry 1877; Ancient Society. Researches in the Lines of Human Progress from Savagery through Barbarism to Civilization. London, MacMillan & Company. Open Google Scholar
  272. Morton, John 2011; „Splitting the Atom of Kinship: Towards an Understanding of the Symbolic Economy of the Walpiri Fire Ceremony”. pp. 17-38 in : Musharbash, Yasmine and Marcus Barber (eds.): Ethnography & the Production of Anthropological Knowledge Essays in honour of Nicolas Peterson. Canberra, ANU E-Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.22459/EPAK.03.2011.02
  273. Murdock, George Peter 1949 [repr. 1960]; Social Structure. New York, Macmillan. Open Google Scholar
  274. Murdock, George Peter 1960; Social Structure in Southeast Asia. Chicago, Quandrangle Books. Open Google Scholar
  275. Murdock, George Peter, Douglas R White and Richard Scaglion 1971 [elektronisch ergänzt 2007]; „Natchez Class and Rank Reconsidered.“ Ethnology X/4: S. 369-388. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/3773172
  276. Murphy, Robert F. 1960; Headhunter’s Heritage: Social and economic change among Mundurucú Indians. Berkeley. University of California Press. Open Google Scholar
  277. Myers; Fred R. 1976; To Have and to Hold: A Study of Persistence and Change in Pintupi Social Life. Unpubl. Dissertation. Bryn Mawr University (zitiert nach Tonkinson 1978). Open Google Scholar
  278. Nayak, Prasanna Kumar 1989; Blood, Women and Territory. An Analysis of Clan Feuds of the Dongria Kondhs. Delhi, Reliance Publishing House. Open Google Scholar
  279. Needham, Rodney 1958; „The Formal Alliance of Prescriptive Patrilateral Cross-Cousin Marriage”. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 14: S. 199-219. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/soutjanth.14.2.3628958
  280. Needham, Rodney 1966; „Terminology and Alliance I”. Sociologus 16: 141-157. Open Google Scholar
  281. Needham, Rodney 1967; „Terminology and Alliance II.” Sociologus 17: 39-53 Open Google Scholar
  282. Needham; Rodney 1971; „Remarks and Inventions in the Analysis of Kinship and Marriage”. pp 1-34 in: Needham; Rodney (ed.): Rethinking Kinship and Marriage. London, Tavistock. Open Google Scholar
  283. Needham, Rodney 1973; „Prescription”. Oceania 42:166-181. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1002/j.1834-4461.1973.tb01207.x
  284. Needham, Rodney1976; „Skulls and Causality”. Man (N.S.) 11/1: : 71-88. Open Google Scholar
  285. Niggemeyer, Herman, 1964; Kuttia Kond. Dschungel-Bauern in Orissa. München, Klaus Renner. Open Google Scholar
  286. Otten, Tina 2006; Heilung durch Rituale. Vom Umgang mit Krankheit bei den Rona im Hochland Orissas. Berlin, LIT. Open Google Scholar
  287. Otten, Tina 2009; „Kingship, Tribal Society and Fertility in Koraput: Different Aspects of the Ritual Bali Jatra.“ pp. 33-51 in: Pfeffer, Georg and Deepak Kumar Behera (eds.): Structure and Exchange in Tribal India and Beyond. Vol. 8 Contemporary Society: Tribal Studies. New Delhi. Concept. Open Google Scholar
  288. Overing Kaplan, Joanna 1975; The Piaroa, a People of the Orinoco Basin. A Study in Kinship and Marriage. Oxford, Clarendon Press. Open Google Scholar
  289. Overing Kaplan, Joanna (ed.) 1981; Review Article „Amazonian Anthropology”, Journal of Latin American Studies 13: S. 51-65. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X00006209
  290. Padel, Felix 2000 (2. Aufl.); The Sacrifice of Human Being: British Rule & the Konds of Orissa. New Delhi: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  291. Parry, Jonathan and Maurice Marc Bloch 1982; „Introduction” pp.1-43 in: Bloch Maurice and Jonathan Parry (eds.) 1982; Death and the Regeneration of Life. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607646.002
  292. Parry, Jonathan P. 1979; Caste and Kinship in Kangra. London, Routledge & Kegan Paul. Open Google Scholar
  293. Pelzer, Karl 1945; Pioneer Settlement In The Asiatic Tropics: Studies In Land Utilization And Agricultural Colonization in Southeastern Asia. New York, International Secretariat Institute of Pacific Relations in Cooperation with American Geographical Society. Open Google Scholar
  294. Petter, Rodolphe C. 1915; English-Cheyenne Dictionary. Kettle Falls, Washington. Open Google Scholar
  295. Pfeffer, Georg 1976; Puris Sasana-Dörfer. Basis einer regionalen Elite. Unveröffentlichte Habilitationsschrift, Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät, Universität Heidelberg. Open Google Scholar
  296. Pfeffer, Georg 1984; „Mittelindische Megalithen als meritökonomische Kategorien“. Paideuma 30: 231-240. Open Google Scholar
  297. Pfeffer, Georg 1991; „Der intra-agnatische 'Seelentausch' der Gadaba beim großen Lineageritual“. pp. 59-92 in: Matthias Laubscher (Hrsg.), Beiträge zur Ethnologie Mittel- und Südindiens, München, Anacon. Open Google Scholar
  298. Pfeffer, Georg 1997; „The Scheduled Tribes of Middle India as a Unit: Problems of Internal and External Comparison”. pp. 3-27 in: Pfeffer, Georg and Deepak Kumar Behera (eds.), Contemporary Society Tribal Society, Vol. I: Structure and Process; New Delhi: Concept Publishing Company. Open Google Scholar
  299. Pfeffer. Georg 1999; „Gadaba and the Bondo Kinship Vocabularies versus Marriage, Descent and Production”. pp 17-46 in: Behera, Deepak Kumar and Georg Pfeffer (eds.): Social Realities. Vol. 4, Contemporary Society: Tribal Studies. New Delhi, Manohar. Open Google Scholar
  300. Pfeffer, Georg 2001; „A Ritual of Revival among the Gadaba of Koraput”. pp. 123-148 in: Burkhard Schnepel und Hermann Kulke (eds.): Jagannath Revisited: Studying Society, Religion and the State in Orissa. Delhi: Manohar. Open Google Scholar
  301. Pfeffer, Georg 2004; „Order in Tribal Middle Indian 'Kinship'.” Anthropos 99: 381-409. Open Google Scholar
  302. Pfeffer, Georg 2008; „Bondo Violence”. pp. 69-92 in: Carrin, Marine and Harald Tambs- Lyche (eds.): People of the Jangal. Reformulating Identities and Adaptations in Crisis. New Delhi, Manohar. Open Google Scholar
  303. Pfeffer, Georg 2012; „’In the Remote Area’: Recent German Research in Tribal Orissa”. pp 75-103 in: Carrin, Marine and Lidia Guzy (eds.): Voices from the Periphery. Subalternity and Empowerment in India. New Delhi, Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  304. Pfeffer, Georg 2012; „Caste and Kinship in Pakistani Punjab“ pp. 173-192 in: Hermann Kreutzmann und Talat Mahmood (eds.): Understanding Pakistan. Berlin, Wissenschaftlicher Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  305. Pocock, David F. 1972; Kanbi and Patidar: A Study of the Patidar Community of Gujarat Oxford, Clarendon. Open Google Scholar
  306. Popitz, Heinrich 1968 (2. Aufl.); Der Begriff der sozialen Rolle als Element der soziologischen Theorie. Tübingen J.C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck). Open Google Scholar
  307. Prytz-Johansen, J. 1954; The Maori and his religion in its non-ritualistic aspects. Kopenhagen, Ejnar Munksgaard, 1954. Open Google Scholar
  308. Radcliffe-Brown, Alfred R. 1922 [2. Aufl. 1948]; The Andaman Islanders. New York, The Free Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.58812
  309. Radcliffe-Brown, Alfred R. 1924; „The Mother’s Brother in South Africa”, pp 542-555 in: South African Journal of Science Vol. XXI. Open Google Scholar
  310. Radcliffe-Brown, Alfred R. 1930; „The Social Organisation of Australian Tribes” Oceania 1: 34-63; 322-41; 426-56. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1002/j.1834-4461.1930.tb00003.x
  311. Radcliffe-Brown, Alfred R. 1940; „On Joking Relationships”, pp. 195-210 in: Africa: Journal of the International African Institute, Vol. XIII. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/1156093
  312. Radcliffe-Brown, Alfred R. 1950; „Introduction” pp. 3-85 in: Radcliffe-Brown und Daryll Forde (eds.): African Systems of Kinship and Marriage. Oxford, Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  313. Radcliffe-Brown, Alfred R. 1952; Structure and Function in Primitive Society. London, Routledge & Kegan Paul. Open Google Scholar
  314. Radcliffe-Brown, Alfred R. 1977; The Social Anthropology of Radcliffe-Brown (edited by Adam Kuper). London, Routledge & Kegan Paul. Open Google Scholar
  315. Rattray, Robert Sutherland 1923; Ashanti. Oxford, Clatrendon. Open Google Scholar
  316. Rao, Sudharkar Nemalladinne 2002; Ethnography of a Nomadic Tribe. New Delhi, Concept. Open Google Scholar
  317. Reining, Priscilla (ed.) 1972; Kinship Studies in the Morgan Centennial Year. Washington, The Anthropological Society of Washington. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1037/e596452011-001
  318. Richards, Audrey I. 1940; „The Political System of the Bemba Tribe – North-Eastern Rhodesia.” pp. 83-120 in: Fortes, Meyer and E.E. Evans-Pritchard (eds.): African Political Systems. Oxford, Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  319. Rival, Laura and Neil Whitehead (eds.) 2001; Beyond the Visible and the Material. The Amerinanization of Society in the Work of Peter Rivière. Oxford, Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  320. Rivers, William Halse Rivers 1910; „The genealogical method of anthropological inquiry”. Sociological Review, III, pp. 1–12. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1910.tb02078.x
  321. Rivers, William Halse Rivers 1924; Social Organization. London, Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co. Open Google Scholar
  322. Rivière, Peter 1969; Marriage Among the Trio. A Principle of Social Organisation. Oxford, Clarendon Press. Open Google Scholar
  323. Rivière, Peter 1984; Individual and Society in Guiana. A comparative study of Amerindian social organization. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  324. Rivière, Peter 1993; „The Amerindianisation of Descent and Affinity”. pp. 507-516 L’Homme 126-128, avr.-dec. XXXIII (2-4). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.3406/hom.1993.369653
  325. Rosaldo, Michelle 1980; Knowledge and Passion. Ilongot Notions of Self & Social Life. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621833.009
  326. Rosaldo, Michelle Z. and Jane Fishburne Collier, 1981; „Politics and Gender in Simple Societies”. pp. 275-329 in: Ortner, Sherry B. and Harriet Whitehead (eds.): Sexual Meanings: The Cultural Construction of Gender and Sexuality. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/signs.7.1.3173499
  327. Rosaldo, Renato 1980; Ilongot Headhunting 1883-1974. A Study in Society and History. Stanford. Stanford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  328. Rosaldo, Renato 1986; „From the Door of His Tent: The Fieldworker and the Inquisitor”. pp. 77-97 in: Clifford, James and George E. Marcus (eds.): Writing Culture. The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley, University of California Press. Open Google Scholar
  329. Rosaldo, Renato 2004 (org. 1989); „The Rage in Ilongot Grief” (org. „Introduction: Grief and a Headhunter’ s Rage”), pp. 167-178 in: Robben, Antonius C. G. M. (ed.): Death, Mourning, and Burial; A Cross-Cultural Reader. Oxford, Blackwell. Open Google Scholar
  330. Rosman, Abraham and Paula Rubel 1971; Feasting with Mine Enemy: Rank and Exchange Among Northwest Coats Societies. New York, Columbia University Press. Open Google Scholar
  331. Rostworowski de Diez Canseco, Maria 1999 [span. Orig. 1988]; History of the Inca realm. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  332. Rowe, John H. 1946; „Inca Culture at the Time of the Spanish Conquest”. pp. 183-330 in: Julian H. Steward (ed.) Handbook of the South American Indians, Vol. 2 Washington, Smithsonian Institution. Open Google Scholar
  333. Rowe John H. 1985; „La constitición inca del Cuzco”. História 9 (1): 35-73. Open Google Scholar
  334. Roy, Sarat Chandra 1912, The Mundas and their Country. Calcutta, Government Printing. Open Google Scholar
  335. Roy, Sarat Chandra 1925; The Birhors: a little-known jungle tribe of Chota Nagpur. Ranchi, Man in India Office. Open Google Scholar
  336. Roy, Sarat Chandra 1935; The Hill Bhuiyas of Orissa. Ranchi, Man in India Office. Open Google Scholar
  337. Sahlins, Marshall D. 1954; Social Stratification in Polynesia: A Study of Adaptive Variation in Culture. Ann Arbor, Michigan, University Microfilms. Open Google Scholar
  338. Sahlins, Marshall D. 1960; „Evolution, Specific and General“. In: Sahlins, Marshall D. & Elman Service (eds.): Evolution and Culture. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.3998/mpub.8980
  339. Sahlins, Marshall D. 1965; „On the Sociology of Primitive Exchange”. pp. 139-236 in: Banton, Michael (ed.): The Relevance of Models for Social Anthropology. London, Tavistock. Open Google Scholar
  340. Sahlins, Marshall D. 1968; Tribesmen. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall. Open Google Scholar
  341. Sahlins, M. 1968;. „Notes on the Original Affluent Society”, pp. 85-89 in: Lee, Richard B. and I. DeVore (eds.): Man the Hunter. New York: Aldine. Open Google Scholar
  342. Sahlins, Marshall D. 1972; „The original affluent society”. pp. 1-39 in: Sahlins, Marshall (ed.) Stone Age Economics. Chicago: Aldine Open Google Scholar
  343. Sahlins, Marshall D. 1976; Culture and Practical Reason. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Open Google Scholar
  344. Sahlins, Marshall D. 2013; What Kinship Is-And Is Not. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  345. Salomon, Frank 1995; „ ‘The Beautiful grandparents’: Andean Ancestor Shrines and Mortuary Ritual As Seen through Colonial records.” pp. 315-53 in: Dillehay, T.D (ed.): Tombs for the Living: Andean Mortuary Practices. Washington D.C.; Dumbarton Oaks. Open Google Scholar
  346. Scaglion, Richard, Douglas R. White and George Peter Murdock 1971 [elektronisch ergänzt 2007]; „Natchez Class and Rank Reconsidered.“ Ethnology X/4: 369-388. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/3773172
  347. Schapera, Isaac 1950; „Kinship and Marriage among the Tswana”. pp. 140-165 in: Radcliffe-Brown, Alfred Reginald and Daryll Forde (eds.) African Systems of Kinship and Marriage. Oxford, Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  348. Schapera, Isaac 1956; Government and Politics in Tribal Societies. London, Watts. Open Google Scholar
  349. Schapera, Isaac 1970 [Orig.1938]; A Handbook of Tswana Law and Custom. Compiled for Bechuanaland Protectorate Administration. Oxford, Oxford University Press/ repr. Frank Cass. Open Google Scholar
  350. Schebesta, Paul 1927; Bei den Urwaldzwergen von Malaya. Leipzig, Brockhaus. Open Google Scholar
  351. Schebesta, Paul 1932, Bambuti, die Zwerge vom Kongo. Leipzig, Brockhaus. Open Google Scholar
  352. Schlesier, Karl H. 1994; Plains Indians, A.D. 500-1500. The Archeological Past of Historic Groups. Norman, University of Oklahoma Press. Open Google Scholar
  353. Schmidt, Karl 1957; „Zur Problematik von Familie, Sippe und Geschlecht, Haus und Dynastie beim mittelalterlichen Adel“. Zeitschrift für die Geschichte des Oberrheins, 105/1: 1-62. Open Google Scholar
  354. Schneider, Almut 2010; „The Distinction of Sex and Generation in Gawigl Relationship Terminology: An Exercise”. pp. 59-76 in: Berger, Peter and Roland Hardenberg, Ellen Kattner and Michael Prager (eds.): The Anthropology of Values. Essays in Honour of Georg Pfeffer. Delhi, Pearson. Open Google Scholar
  355. Schneider, David M. 1968 (2. Aufl. 1980); American Kinship. A Cultural Account. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  356. Schneider, Louis and Sverre Lysgaard 1953; „The Deferred Gratification Pattern: A Preliminary Study”. American Sociological Review Vol.18, no.2: 142-149. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2087723
  357. Schusky, Ernest L. 1983; Manual for Kinship Analysis. 2. Ed. Lanham, University Press of America. Open Google Scholar
  358. Schwimmer, Brian 2001; „Akan Kin Terms” unimanitoba.ca/faculties/arts/anthropology Open Google Scholar
  359. /tutor/kinterms/akan. Open Google Scholar
  360. Schwimmer, Eric 1978; „Lévi-Strauss and Maori Social Structure”. Anthropologica. New Series 20: 201-22 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/25605005
  361. Schwimmer, Eric 1990; „The Maori Hapu: a generative model“. Journal of the Polynesian Society Vol. 99/3: 297-317. Open Google Scholar
  362. Shapiro, Judith 1987; „Men in Groups: a re-Examination of Patriliny in Lowland South America”, pp. 301-23 in Collier. Jane F. And Sylvia J. Yanagisako (eds.): Gender and Kinship: Essays Toward a Unified Analysis. Stanford, Stanford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  363. Sharma, Satya P. 1973; „Marriage, Family and Kinship among the Jats and the Thakurs of North India. Some Comparisons”. Contributions to Indian Socciology N.S. 7: 81- 103. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/006996677300700106
  364. Shroff Gratier, Gira (in press); „A Shroff Family: From Indigenous Bankers to Cosmopolitans” in: Luithle-Hardenberg, Andrea, John E. Cort and Leslie C. Orr (eds.), Co-operation, Contribution and Contestation: The Jain Community, British Expansion and Jainological Scholarship, 1800-1950. Studies in Asian Art and Culture Series, Vol. II, (ed.: Julia Hegewald), EB-VERLAG, Berlin Open Google Scholar
  365. Sigrist, Christian 1967; Regulierte Anarchie. Untersuchungen zum Fehlen und zur Entstehung politischer Herrschaft in segmentären Gesellschaften Afrikas. Olten und Freiburg, Walter Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  366. Sivin, Nathan 1995; „State, Cosmos, and Body in the Last Three Centuries B.C.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies Vol. 55, No. 1:5-37 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2719419
  367. Skoda, Uwe 2005; The Aghria: A Peasant Caste on a Tribal Frontier. New Delhi, Manohar. Open Google Scholar
  368. Smith, Arthur H. 1970 [org. 1899]; Village life in China. Boston, Little Brown Co. Open Google Scholar
  369. Smith, G. Hubert 1974; Omaha Indians: Ethnohistorical report on the Omaha people. New York, Garland. Open Google Scholar
  370. Song, Yongyi 2004; „The Enduring Legacy of Blood Lineage Theory” China Rights Forum No.4:13-23. Open Google Scholar
  371. Spencer, Robert F. and S.A. Barrett 1948; „Notes on a Bachelor House in the South China Area.” American Anthropologist 50, no.3:463-78. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1525/aa.1948.50.3.02a00060
  372. Spindler, George D., Bert A. Gerow and John W. Dodds 1961; Memorial Resolution. Felix Maxwell Keesing (1902-1961). Stanford University. Open Google Scholar
  373. Stanner, William E. H. 1958; „The Dreaming”. pp. 513-523 in Lessa, W.A. and E.Z. Vogt (eds.): Reader in Comparative Religion. New York, Harper and Row. Open Google Scholar
  374. Stanner, William E. H. 1965; „Aboriginal Territorial Organization: Estate, Range, Domain and Regime”. Oceania 36(1): 1-26. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1002/j.1834-4461.1965.tb00275.x
  375. Steul, Willi 1981; Paschtunwali − ein Ehrenkodex und seine rechtliche Relevanz. Steiner, Wiesbaden. Open Google Scholar
  376. Steward, Julian (ed.) 1948; Handbook of South American Indians. Vol. 3 The Tropical Forest Tribes. Washington D.C., Smithsonian Institution Press. Open Google Scholar
  377. Stocking, George W. 1968; „Edward Burnett Tylor.” International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. New York, Macmillan Vol.16, pp.170–177. Open Google Scholar
  378. Storrie, Robert 2003; „Equivalence, Personhood and Relationality: Processes of relatedness among the Hoti of Venezuelan Guiana” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S.) 9: 407-428. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.00156
  379. Strathern, Andrew 1971; The Rope of Moka. Big-men and Ceremonial Exchange in Mount Hagen New Guinea. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511558160
  380. Strathern, Andrew and Pamela J Stewart 2008; „Exchange and sacrifice”. pp. 229-245 in: Strathern, Andrew and Pamela J. Steward (eds.): Exchange and Sacrifice. Durham NC. Carolina Academic Press. Open Google Scholar
  381. Strathern, Andrew and Pamela J. Stewart 2011; Kinship in Action. Self and Group. Boston, Prentice Hall. Open Google Scholar
  382. Strathern, Marilyn 1972; Women in between: female roles in a male world: Mount Hagen, New Guinea. London, Seminar Press. Open Google Scholar
  383. Strathern, Marilyn 1988; The Gender of the Gift. Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia. Berkeley, University of California Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520064232.001.0001
  384. Straus, Anne S. 1994; „Northern Cheyenne Kinship Reconsidered“. pp.147-171 in: De Mallie, Raymond J and Alfonso Ortiz (eds.) North American Indian Anthropology: Essays on Society and Culture. Norman, University of Oklahoma Press. Open Google Scholar
  385. Strohschneider, Peter 2013; „Die Vergesellschaftung der Wissenschaften”. Abgedruckter Vortrag vom 30.10. 2013 im Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin. Open Google Scholar
  386. Strümpell, Christian 2006; „ ‘Wir arbeiten zusammen, wir essen zusammen‘. Konvivium und soziale Peripherie in einer indischen Werkssiedlung“. Berlin, LIT. Open Google Scholar
  387. Sudharkar Rao, Nemalladinne 2002; Ethnography of a Nomadic Tribe. New Delhi, Concept. Open Google Scholar
  388. Swanton, John R. 1911; „Indian Tribes of the Lower Mississippi Valley.” Bulletins of the Bureau of American Ethnology 43: 1-387. Open Google Scholar
  389. Tambiah, Stanley J. 1969; „Animals Are Good to Think and Good to Prohibit.” Ethnology 8: 423-59. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/3772910
  390. Tambiah, Stanley J. 1973; „From varna to caste through mixed unions” pp. 191-229 in: Goody, Jack (ed.): The Character of Kinship. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  391. Tapper, Nancy 1981; „Direct exchange and brideprice: alternative forms in a complex marriage system.” Man (N.S.) 16:287-407. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2801291
  392. Tapper, Nancy 1991; Bartered Brides. Politics, Gender and Marriage in an Afghan Tribal Society. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511521157
  393. Tapper, Nancy and Richard 1982; „Marriage Preferences and Ethnic Relations among Durrani Pashtuns of Afghan Turkestan.” Folk 24: 157-178. Open Google Scholar
  394. Tapper, Richard and Jon Thomson (eds.) 2002; The nomadic peoples of Iran. London, Azimuth Editions. Open Google Scholar
  395. Thomson, Jon and Richard Tapper, (eds.) 2002; The nomadic peoples of Iran. London, Azimuth Editions. Open Google Scholar
  396. Thurnwald, Richard 1931; Repräsentative Lebensbilder von Naturvölkern. Band 3 von: Die menschliche Gesellschaft in ihren ethno-soziologischen Grundlagen. Berlin u. Leipzig, de Gruyter. Open Google Scholar
  397. Thomas, Lynn L. 1980; „Crow-type skewing in Akan kinship vocabulary and its absence in Minangkabau”. American Ethnologist Vol.7 No.3: 549-566. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1525/ae.1980.7.3.02a00110
  398. Tonkinson, Robert 1978; The Mardudjara Aborigines. Living the Dream in Australia’s Desert. New York, Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Open Google Scholar
  399. Trautmann, Thomas R. 1981; Dravidian Kinship. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  400. Trautmann, Thomas R. 1994; „The Study of Dravidian Kinship” pp.74-90 in: Uberoi, Patricia (ed.): Family, Kinship and Marriage in India. Delhi, Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  401. Trautmann, Thomas R. and Peter M. Whiteley 2012; “Introduction.” pp 1-30 in: Trautmann Thomas and Peter M. Whiteley (eds.) Crow-Omaha: New Light on a Classic Problem of Kinship Analysis. Tucson. The University of Arizona Press. Open Google Scholar
  402. Tripathi, Gaya Charan 1981; The ritual of founding a Brahmin village: A description of the ceremony of establishing a Brāhmaṇa-śāsana in Orissa on the basis of an unpublished manuscript. Delhi, India: GDK Publications. Open Google Scholar
  403. Tsai, Lily Lee 2002; „Cadres, temples and Lineage Institutions, and Governance in Rural China”. The China Journal, No. 48:1-27. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/3182439
  404. Turnbull, Colin 1961; The Forest People. London, Cape. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/1419421
  405. Turnbull, Colin 1965; Wayward servants: the two worlds of the African pygmies. London, Eyre and Spottiswoode Open Google Scholar
  406. Turner, B. L., R. Q. Hanham & A. V. Portararo 1977; „Population pressure and agricultural intensity”. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 67(3): 384-396. Open Google Scholar
  407. Tylor, Edward Burnett 1888; „On a Method of Investigating the Development of Institutions; Applied to Laws of Marriage and Descent.” The Journal of the Anthropological Instituteof Great Britain and Ireland. Vol. 18: S. 245-269. Open Google Scholar
  408. Venkateswar, Sita 2005; „An Ethnographic Overview of Policies of ‚Planned Change’“, pp. 17-48 in: Behera, Deepak Kumar & Georg Pfeffer (eds.): Tribal Situation in India. Vol. 6 Contemporary Society: Tribal Studies. New Delhi, Concept. Open Google Scholar
  409. Verdon, Michel 1982; „Where have all the lineages gone” American Anthropologist 84/3: 566-579. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1525/aa.1982.84.3.02a00030
  410. Vidyarthi, Lalita Prasad 1963; The Maler: A Study in Nature-Man-Spirit Complex of a Hill Tribe. Calcutta, Bookland Private Limited, Open Google Scholar
  411. Vitebsky, Piers 1993 Dialogues with the Dead. The discussion of mortality among the Sora of eastern India. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  412. Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo 2001; „GUT Feelings about Amazonia: Potential Affinity and the Construction of Sociality”, pp. 19-44 in: Rival, Laura M. and Neil L. Whitehead (eds.): Beyond the Visible and the Material. The Amerinidianization of Society in the Work of Peter Rivière. Oxford, Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  413. Vreeland, Herbert Harald 1954; Mongol Community and Kinship Structure. New Haven, Human Relations Area Files. Open Google Scholar
  414. Wagner, Roy 1967; The Curse of Souw: Principles of Daribi Clan Definition and Alliance in New Guinea. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press Open Google Scholar
  415. Waterson, Roxana 1995; „Houses and hierarchies in island Southeast Asia”, pp. 47-68 in: Carsten, Janet and Stephen Hugh-Jones (eds.): About the House. Lévi-Strauss and Beyond. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607653.002
  416. Watson, James B. 1964; „Anthropology in the New Guinea Highlands”. American Anthropologist, Special Edition, Vol. 66, No.4/2: 1-19. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/4617552
  417. Watson, James B. 1975; „Agnates and Outsiders: Adoption in a Chinese Lineage.” Man n. s. 10: 293-306. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2800500
  418. Watson, James B. 1976; „Chattel Slavery in Chinese Peasant Society: A Comparative Analysis.” Ethnology 15, no.4:361-75. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/3773305
  419. Watson, James B. 1977; „Hereditary Tenancy and Corporate Landlordism in Traditional China: A Case Study.” Modern Asian Studies 11, no2: 161-82. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X00015079
  420. Watson, Rubie S. 1981; „Class Differences and Affinal relations in South China.” Man, n.s. 16, no. 4: 593-615. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2801490
  421. Watson, Rubie S. 1982; „The Creation of a Chinese Lineage: The Teng of Ha Tsuen, 1669– 1751”, Modern Asian Studies Vol. 16, No. 1:69-100. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X00000706
  422. Weber, George 1998 (letzte Veränderungen bei den Verweisen); „The Andamanese“.in Lonely Islands. The Negrito People and the Out-of-Africa Story of the Human Race. http//www.Andaman.org/BOOK Open Google Scholar
  423. Weber, Max 1920; Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie. II. Hinduismus und Buddhismus. Tübingen, J.C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck). Open Google Scholar
  424. Weber, Max 1956; Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Tübingen, J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck). Open Google Scholar
  425. Wernke, Steven 2007; “The politics of community and Inka statecraft in the Colca Valley”. Latin American Antiquity 17/7: 177-208. Open Google Scholar
  426. White, Douglas R., George Peter Murdock und Richard Scaglion 1971 [elektronisch ergänzt 2007]; „Natchez Class and Rank Reconsidered.“ Ethnology X/4: 369-388. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/3773172
  427. Whitehead, Neil and Laura Rival (eds.) 2001; Beyond the Visible and the Material. The Amerinanization of Society in the Work of Peter Rivière. Oxford, Oxfrod University Press. Open Google Scholar
  428. Wissler, Clark 1914; „Material Cultures of the North American Indian”. American Anthropologist 16: 447-505. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1525/aa.1914.16.3.02a00030
  429. Witte, Marleen de 2001; Long live the Dead! Changing funeral celebrations in Asante, Ghana. Amsterdam, Aksant Academic Publishers. Open Google Scholar
  430. Woodburn, James 1982; „Egalitarian Societies“. Man, New Series, Vol. 17, No.3: 431- 451. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2801707
  431. Zheng Zhenman 2001; Family Lineage organization and Social Change in Ming and Qing Fujjian.[engl. Translation] Honululu; University of Hawaii Press. Open Google Scholar
  432. Zide Norman H. and Gregory D.S. Anderson, (eds.) 2008; The Munda Languages. London, Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  433. Zuidema, R. Tom 1977; „The Inca Kinship System: A New Theoretical View”. pp. 240-81 in: Bolton, Ralph and Enrique Mayer: Andean Kinship and Marriage. American Anthropological Association Special Publication, no.7; Washington D.C. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1037/e596492011-014

Similar publications

from the topics "Migration Sociology & Ethnicity", "Sociology General", "Political Sociology"
Cover of book: Musical Traces of a Lost Past
Edited Book No access
Dilek Kızıldağ, Martin Greve
Musical Traces of a Lost Past
Cover of book: Systemtheorie und Erzählen
Book Titles No access
Ralf Kellermann
Systemtheorie und Erzählen
Cover of book: Hinter der Lage
Book Titles No access
David Czudnochowski
Hinter der Lage
Cover of book: Verhängnisvolle Antizipationen
Book Titles No access
Carina Schatten
Verhängnisvolle Antizipationen
Cover of book: Secular Humanism in Sweden
Book Titles No access
Susanne Kind
Secular Humanism in Sweden

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via Open Athens
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex