Cover of book: Framing
Buy in shop
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Educational Book No access

Framing

Authors:
Publisher:
 2014

Bibliographic data

Copyright year
2014
ISBN-Print
978-3-8329-5966-1
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-6025-9
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Konzepte. Ansätze der Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaft
Volume
10
Language
German
Pages
106
Product type
Educational Book

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access 1 - 8
  2. Was ist Framing? No access 9 - 23
  3. Entwicklungsgeschichte der Framing-Forschung No access 24 - 35
  4. Forschungslogik und Methode No access 36 - 51
  5. Empirische Befunde No access 52 - 69
  6. Weiterentwicklungen und verwandte Ansätze No access 70 - 81
  7. Kritik und Potenzial des Framing-Ansatzes No access 82 - 88
  8. Die "Top-Ten" der Forschungsliteratur No access 89 - 91
  9. Literatur No access 92 - 104
  10. Bisher in der Reihe erschienene Bände No access 105 - 106

Bibliography (146)

  1. Akhavan-Majid, R. & Ramaprasad, J. (1998). Framing and ideology: A comparative analysis of U.S. and Chinese newspaper coverage of the Fourth United Nations Conference on Woman and the NGO Forum. Mass Communication & Society, 1(3/4), 131–152. Open Google Scholar
  2. Aarøe, L. (2011). Investigating frame strength: The case of episodic and thematic framing. Political Communication, 28(2), 207–226. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2011.568041
  3. Benford, R. D. (1997). An insider's critique of the social movement framing perspective. Sociological Inquiry, 67(4), 409–430. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1997.tb00445.x
  4. Benford, R. D. & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–639. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611
  5. Bennett, L. W. (1990). Toward a Theory of Press-State Relations. Journal of Communication, 40(2), 103–125. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1990.tb02265.x
  6. Brewer, P. R. (2002). Framing, value words, and citizens' explanations of their issue opinions. Political Communication, 19(3), 303–316. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/01957470290055510
  7. Broh, C. A. (1980). Horse-race Journalism: Reporting the Polls in the 1976 Election. Public Opinion Quarterly, 44, 514–29. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/268620
  8. Brosius, H.-B. & Eps, P. (1993). Verändern Schlüsselereignisse journalistische Selektionskriterien? Framing am Beispiel der Berichterstattung über Anschläge gegen Ausländer und Asylanten. Rundfunk und Fernsehen, 41(4), 512–530. Open Google Scholar
  9. Callaghan, K. & Schnell, F. (2005). Introduction: Framing Political Issues in American Politics. In K. Callaghan & F. Schnell (Hrsg.), Framing American politics (S. 1–17). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. Open Google Scholar
  10. Cappella, J. N. & Jamieson, K. H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism. The press and the public good. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  11. Carragee, K. M. & Roefs, W. (2004). The neglect of power in recent framing research. Journal of Communication, 54(2), 214–233. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02625.x
  12. Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 103–126. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054
  13. Chong, D. & Druckman, J. N. (2010). Dynamic public opinion: Communication effects over time. American Political Science Review, 104(4), 663–680. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0003055410000493
  14. D'Angelo, P. (2002). News framing as a multi-paradigmatic research program: A response to Entman. Journal of Communication, 52(4), 870–888. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02578.x
  15. D'Angelo, P. (2012). Persönliche Kommunikation. Open Google Scholar
  16. D’Angelo, P. & Kuypers, J. A. (2010). Introduction. Doing news framing analysis. P. D'Angelo & J. Kuypers (Hrsg.), Doing news framing analysis (S. 1–13). Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  17. Dahinden, U. (2006). Framing. Eine integrative Theorie der Massenkommunikation. Konstanz: UVK Verlagsgesellschaft. Open Google Scholar
  18. Dahinden, U., & Pühringer, K. (2007). Kodierbuch Asylpolitik, Version 15. Unveröffentlichtes Manuskript: Universität Zürich Open Google Scholar
  19. de Vreese, C. H. (2004). The effects of strategic news on political cynicism, issue evaluations, and policy support: a two-wave experiment. Mass Communication & Society, 7(2), 191–214. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1207/s15327825mcs0702_4
  20. de Vreese, C. H. (2005). News framing: Theory and typology. Information Design Journal + Document Design, 13(1), 51–62. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1075/idjdd.13.1.06vre
  21. de Vreese, C. H. & Boomgaarden, H. (2003). Valenced news frames and public support for the EU. Communications, 28(4), 361–381. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/comm.2003.024
  22. Donsbach, W. (2006). The identity of communication research. Journal of Communication, 56, 437–448. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00294.x
  23. Druckman, J. N. (2001). On the limits of framing effects: Who can frame? The Journal of Politics, 63(4), 1041–1066. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/0022-3816.00100
  24. Druckman, J. N. & Nelson, K. R. (2003). Framing and deliberation: How citizens' conversations limit elite influence. American Journal of Political Science, 47(4), 729–745. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/1540-5907.00051
  25. Entman, R. M. (1991). Framing U.S. coverage of international news: Contrasts in narratives of the KAL and Iran Air incidents. Journal of Communication, 41(4), 6–27. Open Google Scholar
  26. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
  27. Entman, R. M. (2004). Projections of power: Framing news, public opinion, and U.S. foreign policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  28. Entman, R. M. (2012). Persönliche Kommunikation. Open Google Scholar
  29. Entman, R. M., Matthes, J., Pellicano, L. (2009). Nature, Sources and Effects of News Framing. In K. Wahl-Jorgensen & T. Hanitzsch (Hrsg.), Handbook of Journalism Studies (S. 175–190). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Open Google Scholar
  30. Fiske, S. T. & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social Cognition. New York: McGraw. Open Google Scholar
  31. Forgas, J.P. Bower, G.H., & Krantz, S. (1984). The influence of mood on perceptions of social interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 497–513. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(84)90040-4
  32. Gamson, W. A. (1989). News as framing. Comments on Graber. American Behavioral Scientist, 33(2), 157–161. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0002764289033002006
  33. Gamson, W. A. (1996). Media discourse as a framing resource. In A. N. Crigler (Hrsg.), The psychology of political communication (S. 111–132). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press Open Google Scholar
  34. Gamson, W. A. & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95, 1–37. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/229213
  35. Gamson, W. A. & Modigliani, A. (1987). The changing culture of affirmative action. In R. G. Braungart & M. M. Braungart (Hrsg.), Research in political sociology (S. 137–177). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Open Google Scholar
  36. Gandy, O. H. J. (2001). Epilogue-Framing at the horizon: A restrospective assessment. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy & A. E. Grant (Hrsg.), Framing public life: Perspectives of media and our understanding of the social world (S. 355–378). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar
  37. Gaskell, G., and Bauer, M. (Eds). (2001). Biotechnology 1996–2000: The years of controversy. London: Science Museum Press Open Google Scholar
  38. Geise, S. (2011). Stephanie Geise: Vision that matters. Die Wirkungs- und Funktionslogik Visueller Politischer Kommunikation am Beispiel des Wahlplakats. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  39. Geise, S., Lobinger, K. & Branter, C. (2013). Fractured Paradigm? Theorien, Konzepte und Methoden der Visuellen Framingforschung: Ergebnisse einer systematischen Literaturschau In. S. Geise, K. Lobinger & C. Schwender (Hrsg.), Visual Framing. Perspektiven und Herausforderungen der Visuellen Kommunikationsforschung. Köln: Halem, in Druck. Open Google Scholar
  40. Gerhards, J. (1993). Neue Konfliktlinien in der Mobilisierung öffentlicher Meinung: eine Fallstudie. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-12481-8
  41. Ghanem, S. (1997). Filling in the tapestry: The second level of agenda setting. In M. E. McCombs, D. Shaw & D. Weaver (Hrsg.), Communication and democracy (S. 3–14). Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar
  42. Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making and unmaking of the new left. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Open Google Scholar
  43. Gerth, M. A., & Siegert, G. (2012). Patterns of consistence and constriction: How news media frame the coverage of direct democratic campaigns. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(3), 279–299. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0002764211426326
  44. Goffman, E. (1980). Rahmen-Analyse. Ein Versuch über die Organisation von Alltagserfahrungen. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  45. Gross, K. (2008). Framing persuasive appeals: Episodic and thematic framing, emotional response, and policy opinion. Political Psychology, 29, 169–192. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00622.x
  46. Hall, A. (2000). The mass media, cultural identity and perceptions of national character. An analysis of frames in US and Canadian coverage of audiovisual materials in the GATT. Gazette: The International Journal for Communication Studies, 62(3-4), 231–249. Open Google Scholar
  47. Hallahan, K. (1999). Seven models of framing: Implications for public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 11(3), 205–242. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr1103_02
  48. Hänggli, R., & Kriesi, H. (2010). Political framing strategies and their impact on media framing in a Swiss direct-democratic campaign. Political Communication, 27, 141–157. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/10584600903501484
  49. Hänggli, R., & Kriesi, H. (2012). Frame construction and frame promotion (strategic framing choices). American Behavioral Scientist, 56(3), 260–278. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0002764211426325
  50. Harden, L. (2002). Rahmen der Orientierung. Eine Längsschnittanalyse von Frames in der Philosophieberichterstattung deutscher Qualitätsmedien. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-08903-2
  51. Hertog, J. K. & McLeod, D. M. (2001). A multiperspectival approach to framing analysis: a field guide. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy & A. E. Grant (Hrsg.), Framing public life: Perspectives of media and our understanding of the social world. (S. 139–161). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar
  52. Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Hrsg.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (S. 133-168). New York: Guilford. Open Google Scholar
  53. Imhof, K. & Eisenegger, M. (2001). Issue Monitoring: Die Basis des Issues Managements. Zur Methodik der Früherkennung organisationsrelevanter Umweltentwicklungen. In U. Röttger (Hrsg.), Issues Management - Theoretische Konzepte und praktische Umsetzung. Eine Bestandesaufnahme (S. 257–278). Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  54. Iyengar, S. (1989). How citizens think about national issues: A matter of responsibility. American Journal of Political Science, 33(4), 878–900. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2111113
  55. Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226388533.001.0001
  56. Iyengar, S. (1996). Framing responsibility for political issues. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 546, 59–70. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0002716296546001006
  57. Jarvis, W. B. G. & Petty, R. E. (1996). The need to evaluate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 172–194. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.1.172
  58. Johnston, H. (1995). A methodology for frame analysis: From discourse to cognitive schemata. In E. Laraña, H. Johnston & J. R. Gusfield (Hrsg.), Social Movements and Culture (S. 217-246). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Open Google Scholar
  59. Ju, Y. (2005). Policy or politics? A study of the priming of media frames of the South Korean president in the public mind. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18(1), 49–66. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edh074
  60. Jungermann, H., Pfister, H.-R. & Fischer, K. (1998). Die Psychologie der Entscheidung. Berlin: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  61. Kepplinger, H. M. & Maurer, M. (2001). Saldo oder Mittelwert? Eine vorläufige Antwort auf eine ungestellte Frage. In F. M. ((Hrsg.), Die Politik der Massenmedien. Heribert Schatz zum 65. Geburtstag (S. 166–180). Köln: Halem. Open Google Scholar
  62. Kim, S.-H., Scheufele, D. A. & Shanahan, J. (2002). Think about it this way: Attribute agenda-setting function of the press and the public's evaluation of a local issue. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 79(1), 7–25. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769900207900102
  63. Kinder, D. R. (2007). Curmudgeonly advice. Journal of Communication, 57, 155–62. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00335.x
  64. Kiousis, S., Mitrook, M., Wu, X. & Seltzer, T. (2006). First- and second-level agenda-building and agenda-setting effects: Exploring the linkages among candidate news releases, media coverage, and public opinion during the 2002 Florida gubernatorial election. Journal of Public Relations Research, 18(3), 265–285. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr1803_4
  65. Kohring, M. & Matthes, J. (2002). The face(t)s of biotech in the nineties: How the German press framed modern biotechnology. Public Understanding of Science, 11(2), 143–154. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/11/2/304
  66. Kuhn, T. S. (1999). Die Struktur wissenschaftlicher Revolutionen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  67. Kühne, R. (2013). Emotionale Framing-Effekte auf Einstellungen: Ein integratives Modell. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 61(1), 5–20. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1615-634x-2013-1-5
  68. Kühne, R., Schemer, C., Matthes, J. & Wirth, W. (2011). Affective Priming in Political Campaigns: How Campaign-Induced Emotions Prime Political Opinions. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 23, 485–507. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edr004
  69. Lakatos, I. (1974). Falsifikation und die Methodologie wissenschaftlicher Forschungsprogramme. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Hrsg.), Kritik und Erkenntnisfortschritt (S. 89-189). Braunschweig: Vieweg. Open Google Scholar
  70. Lawrence, R. G. (2000). Game-framing the issues: Tracking the strategy frame in public policy news Political Communication, 17(2), 93–114. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/105846000198422
  71. Lecheler, S. & de Vreese, C. H. & Slothuus, R. (2009). Issue importance as a moderator of framing effects. Communication Research, 36(3), 400–425. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0093650209333028
  72. Lecheler, S. & de Vreese, C. H. (2011). Getting Real: The Duration of Framing Effects. Journal of Communication, 61, 959–983. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01580.x
  73. Leonarz, M. (2006). Gentechnik im Fernsehen. Eine Framing-Analyse. Konstanz: UVK. Open Google Scholar
  74. Lin, Y. & Kaid, L. L. (2000). Fragmentation of the intellectual structure of political communication study: Some empirical evidence. Sociometrics, 47, 143–164. Open Google Scholar
  75. Maier, M., Stengel, K. & Marschall, J. (2010). Nachrichtenwerttheorie (1. Aufl.). Konzepte. Ansätze der Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaft. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar
  76. Marquart, F. & Matthes, J. (2013). Charakteristika, Inhalte und Wirkungen politischer Plakate aus Sicht der Visuellen Kommunikations- und Framingforschung: Ein Forschungsüberblick. In. S. Geise, K. Lobinger & C. Schwender (Hrsg.), Visual Framing. Perspektiven und Herausforderungen der Visuellen Kommunikationsforschung (S. 216-233). Köln: Halem. Open Google Scholar
  77. Marullo, S., Pagnucco, R. & Smith, J. (1996). Frame changes and social movement contraction: U.S. peace movement framing after the Cold War. Sociological Inquiry, 66(1), 1–28. Open Google Scholar
  78. Matthes, J. (2004). Die Schema-Theorie in der Medienwirkungsforschung: Ein unscharfer Blick in die „Black Box“? Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 52, 545–568. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1615-634x-2004-4-545
  79. Matthes, J. (2007). Framing-Effekte. Zum Einfluss der Politikberichterstattung auf die Einstellungen der Rezipienten. München: Fischer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845214344
  80. Matthes, J. (2008a). Medien-Frames inhaltsanalytisch (be)greifen. Eine Analyse von 135 nationalen und internationalen Fachzeitschriftenaufsätzen, 1990-2005. In J. Matthes, W. Wirth, G. Daschmann & A. Fahr (Hrsg.), Die Brücke zwischen Theorie und Empirie: Operationalisierung, Messung und Validierung in der Kommunikationswissenschaft (S. 159–179). Köln: Halem Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  81. Matthes, J. (2008b). Media Frames and Political Judgments. Exploring the Boundaries of Framing Effects in a Two-Wave Panel Study. Studies in Communication Sciences, 8, 101-128. Open Google Scholar
  82. Matthes, J. (2009a). What’s in a frame? A Content Analysis of Media-Framing Studies in the World’s Leading Communication Journals, 1990-2005. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 86, 349–367. Open Google Scholar
  83. Matthes, J. (2009b). Identität und Vielfalt des Framing-Ansatzes. Eine systematische Analyse der Forschungsliteratur. In P. Schulz, U. Hartung, & S. Keller (Hrsg.), Identität und Vielfalt der Kommunikationswissenschaft (S. 117–131). Konstanz: UVK. Open Google Scholar
  84. Matthes, J. (2009c). Framing Responsibility for Political Issues. The Preference for Dispositional Attributions and the Effects of News Frames. Communication Research Reports, 26, 82–86. Open Google Scholar
  85. Matthes, J. (2010). Frames in Political Communication: Toward Clarification of a Research Program. In S. Allan (Hrsg.), Rethinking Communication: Keywords in Communication Research (S. 123–136). Cresskill: Hampton Press. Open Google Scholar
  86. Matthes, J. (2011). Eine falsche Dichotomie? Überlegungen zum selbstverständlichen Zusammenspiel qualitativer und quantitativer Methoden. In A. Fahr (Hrsg.), Zählen oder Verstehen? Zur aktuellen Diskussion um die Verwendung quantitativer und qualitativer Methoden in der empirischen Kommunikationswissenschaft (S. 91–107). Köln: Halem Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  87. Matthes, J. (2012). Framing Politics: An Integrative Approach. American Behavioral Scientist, 56, 247–259. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0002764211426324
  88. Matthes, J. (2014). Zum Gehalt der Framing-Forschung: Eine kritische Bestandsaufnahme. In F. Marcinkowski (Hrsg.), Framing als politischer Prozess. Aufsätze zu Politischen Kommunikation entwickelter Demokratien. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar
  89. Matthes, J. & Kohring, M. (2003). Operationalisierung von Vertrauen in Journalismus. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 51, 5-23. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1615-634x-2003-1-5
  90. Matthes, J. & Kohring, M. (2004). Die empirische Erfassung von Medien-Frames. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 52(1), 56–75. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1615-634x-2004-1-56
  91. Matthes, J. & Kohring, M. (2008). The Content Analysis of Media Frames: Toward Improving Reliability and Validity. Journal of Communication, 58, 258–279. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00384.x
  92. Matthes, J. & Schemer, C. (2012). Diachronic Framing Effects in Competitive Opinion Environments. Political Communication, 29, 319–339. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2012.694985
  93. Maurer, M. (2004b). Kausalanalysen langfristiger Medienwirkung - Paneleffekt und Panelmortalität bei telefonischen Befragungen. In W. Wirth, E. Lauf & A. Fahr (Hrsg.), Forschungslogik und -design in der Kommunikationswissenschaft. Band 1: Einführung, Problematisierungen und Aspekte der Methodenlogik aus kommunikationswissenschaftlicher Perspektive (S. 197-215). Köln: Halem. Open Google Scholar
  94. Maurer, M. (2010). Agenda-Setting. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar
  95. McAdam, D. (1994). Taktiken von Protestbewegungen: Das "Framing" der amerikanischen Bürgerrechtsbewegung. In F. Neidhardt (Hrsg.), Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie (Bd. Sonderheft 34: Öffentlichkeit, öffentliche Meinung, soziale Bewegungen) (S. 393–412). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  96. McCombs, M. E. (2000). Agenda Setting: Zusammenhänge zwischen Massenmedien und Weltbild. In A. Schorr (Hrsg.), Publikums- und Wirkungsforschung (S. 123–136). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  97. McCombs, M. E. (2004). Setting the agenda: The news media and public opinion. Malden, MA: Polity Press. Open Google Scholar
  98. McCombs, M. E. (2013). Persönliche Kommunikation. Open Google Scholar
  99. McCombs, M. E. & Ghanem, S. I. (2001). The convergence of agenda setting and framing. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy & A. E. Grant (Hrsg.), Framing public life: Perspectives of media and our understanding of the social world (S. 67–81). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar
  100. McCombs, M. E., Llamas, J. P., Lopez-Escobar, E. & Rey, F. (1997). Candidate images in Spanish elections: Second-level agenda-setting effects. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 74(4), 703–717. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769909707400404
  101. McCombs, M. E., Lopez-Escobar, E. & Llamas, J. P. (2000). Setting the agenda of attributes in the 1996 Spanish general election. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 77–92. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02842.x
  102. McCombs, M. E. & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176–187. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/267990
  103. Meyer, D. S. (1995). Framing national security: Elite public discourse on nuclear weapons during the Cold War. Political Communication, 12(2), 173–192. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/10584609.1995.9963064
  104. Miller, M. M. (1997). Frame mapping and analysis of news coverage of contentious issues. Social Sience Computer Review, 15(4), 367–378. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/089443939701500403
  105. Miller, M. M. & Riechert, B. P. (2001). Frame mapping: A quantitative method for investigating issues in the public sphere. In M. D. West (Hrsg.), Theory, method, and practice in computer content analysis (S. 61-76). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing. Open Google Scholar
  106. Miller, M. M., Andsager, J., & Riechert, B. P. (1998). Framing the candidates in presidential primaries: Issues and images in press releases and news coverage. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 75, 312–324. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769909807500207
  107. Minsky, M. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. In P. H. Winston (Hrsg.), The psychology of coputer vision (S. 211–277). New York: McGraw-Hill. Open Google Scholar
  108. Nabi, R. L. (2003). Exploring the framing effects of emotion. Do discrete emotions differentially influence information accessibility, information seeking, and policy preference? Communication Research, 30(2), 224–247. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0093650202250881
  109. Nelson, T. E., Oxley, Z. M. & Clawson, R. A. (1997). Toward a psychology of framing effects. Political Behavior, 19(3), 221–246. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1023/A:1024834831093
  110. Noakes, J. A. & Johnston, H. (2005). Frames of protest: A road map to a perspective. In H. Johnston & J. A. Noakes (Hrsg.), Frames of protest: social movements and the framing perspective (S. 1-29). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Open Google Scholar
  111. Perkins, S. C. (2005). Un-presidented: A qualitative framing analysis of the NAACP's public relations response of the 2000 presidential election. Public Relations Review, 31(1), 63–71. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2004.11.006
  112. Perloff, R. (2008). The dynamics of persuasion: Communication and attitudes in the 21st century. London, England: Taylor & Francis. Open Google Scholar
  113. Peter, J. (2002). Medien-Priming - Grundlagen, Befunde und Forschungstendenzen. Publizistik, 47(1), 21–44. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s11616-002-0002-4
  114. Potthoff, M. (2012). Medien-Frames und ihre Entstehung. Wiesbaden: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19648-0
  115. Price, V. & Tewksbury, D. (1997). News values and public opinion: A theoretical account of media priming and framing. In G. Barnett & F. J. Boster (Hrsg.), Progresses in the Communication Sciences (S. 173–212). Greenwich, CT: Ablex. Open Google Scholar
  116. Price, V., Tewksbury, D. & Powers, E. (1997). Switching trains of thought. The impact of news frames on readers' cognitive responses. Communication Research, 24(5), 481–506. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/009365097024005002
  117. Rademacher, P., Gerth, M. & Siegert, G. (2012). Media organizations in direct-democratic campaigns. In H. Kriesi (Hrsg.), Political communication in direct democratic campaigns: enlightening or manipulating? (S. 93–107). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar
  118. Reese, S. D. (2007). The framing project: A bridging model for media research revisited. Journal of Communication, 57, 148–154. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00334.x
  119. Reese, S. D. & Buckalew, B. (1995). The militarism of local television: The routine framing of the Persian Gulf War. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 12(1), 40–59. Open Google Scholar
  120. Rodriguez, L., & Dimitrova, D. V. (2011). The Levels of Visual Framing. Journal of Visual Literacy, 30(1), 48–65. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/23796529.2011.11674684
  121. Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce & W. F. Brewer (Hrsg.), Theoretical issues in eading comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive psychology (S. 33–58). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar
  122. Schemer, C., Wirth, W. & Matthes, J. (2012). Value resonance und value framing effects on voting intentions in direct-democratic campaigns. American Behavioral Scientist, 56, 334–352. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0002764211426329
  123. Scheufele, B. (2003). Frames - Framing - Framing-Effekte. Theoretische und methodische Grundlegung des Framing-Ansatzes sowie empirische Befunde zur Nachrichtenproduktion. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-86656-1
  124. Scheufele, B. & Brosius, H.-B. (1999). The frame remains the same? Stabilität und Kontinuität journalistischer Selektionskriterien am Beispiel der Berichterstattung über Anschläge auf Ausländer und Asylbewerber. Rundfunk & Fernsehen, 47(3), 409–432. Open Google Scholar
  125. Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49, 103–122. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x
  126. Semetko, H. A. & Valkenburg, P. M. (2000). Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 93–109. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02843.x
  127. Shah, D. V., Watts, M. D., Domke, D. & Fan, D. P. (2002). News framing and cueing of issue regimes. Explaining Clinton's public approval in spite of scandal. Public Opinion Quarterly, 66(3), 339–370. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/341396
  128. Sielschott, S. (2011). Über Terroristen und Spitzensportler. Eine Framing-Analyse stereotyper Bewertungen von Muslimen in ostdeutschen Regionalzeitungen - ein Beitrag zur Theorien- und Methodendiskussion. In: Publizistik. Vierteljahreshefte für Kommunikationsforschung, Jg. 56 (2011). Open Google Scholar
  129. Simon, A. F. (2001). A unified method for analyzing media framing. In R. P. Hart & D. R. Shaw (Hrsg.), Communication in US elections: New agendas (S. 75–89). Lanham, Maryland Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Open Google Scholar
  130. Slothuus, R. (2008). More than weighting cognitive importance: A dual-process model of issue framing effects. Political Psychology, 29, 1–28. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00610.x
  131. Snow, D. A. & Benford, R. D. (1992). Master frames and cycles of protest. In A. D. Morris & C. McClurg Mueller (Hrsg.), Frontiers in social movement theory (S. 133–155). New Haven: Yale University Press. Open Google Scholar
  132. Takeshita, T. (1997). Exploring the media's roles in defining reality: From issue-agenda setting toattribute-agenda setting. In M. E. McCombs, D. Shaw & D. Weaver (Hrsg.), Communication and democracy (S. 15–28). Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar
  133. Takeshita, T. (2006). Current critical problems in agenda-setting research. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18(3), 275–296. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edh104
  134. Tankard, J. W. (2001). An empirical approach to the study of media framing. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy & A. E. Grant (Hrsg.), Framing public life: Perspectives of media and our understanding of the social world (S. 95–106). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar
  135. Taylor, S. E. & Crocker, J. (1981). Schematic bases of social information processing. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman & M. P. Zanna (Hrsg.), Social cognition: The Ontario Symposium on personality and social psychology, Vol. 1. (S. 89–134). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar
  136. Tewksbury, D., & Scheufele, D. A. (2009). News framing theory and research. In J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (S. 17–33). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar
  137. Tewksbury, D., Jones, J., Peske, M. W., Raymond, A. & Vig, W. (2000). The interaction of news and advocate frames: manipulating audience perceptions of a local public policy issue. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(4), 804–829. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107769900007700406
  138. Triandafyllidou, A. & Fotiou, A. (1998). Sustainability and modernity in the European Union: A frame theory approach to policy-making. Sociological Research Online, Sociological Research Online 3(1), [www.socresonline.org.uk/socresonline/3/1/2.html]. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5153/sro.99
  139. Tuchman, G. (1976). Telling stories. Journal of Communication, 26(4), 93–97. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1976.tb01942.x
  140. Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–458. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683
  141. Walgrave, S. & Manssens, J. (2005). Mobilizing the White March: Media frames as alternatives to movement organizations In H. Johnston & J. A. Noakes (Hrsg.), Frames of protest: social movements and the framing perspective (S. 113–140). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Open Google Scholar
  142. Willems, H. (1997). Rahmen und Habitus zum theoretischen und methodischen Ansatz Erving Goffmans Vergleiche, Anschlüsse und Anwendungen. Frankfurt (a. M.): Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  143. Willems, H. (2000). Medienproduktion, Medienprodukt und Medienrezeption: Überlegungen zu den medienanalytischen Möglichkeiten der ‚Rahmentheorie‘ und komplementärer Ansätze. Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 48(2), 212–225. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1615-634x-2000-2-212
  144. Wirth, W. & Matthes, J. (2006). Eine wundervolle Utopie? Möglichkeiten und Grenzen einer normativen Theorie der (medienbezogenen) Partizipation im Lichte der neueren Forschung zum Entscheidungs- und Informationshandeln. In K. Imhof, R. Blum, H. Bonfadelli & O. Jarren (Hrsg.), Demokratie in der Mediengesellschaft (S. 341–361). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar
  145. Wirth, W., Matthes, J., Schemer, C., Wettstein, M., Friemel, T., Hänggli, R. & Siegert, G. (2010). Agenda Building and Setting in a Referendum Campaign. Investigating the Flow of Arguments Among Campaigners, the Media, and the Public. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 86, 328–345. Open Google Scholar
  146. Zoch, L. M. & Molleda, J.-C. (2006). Building a theoretical model of media relations using framing, information subsidies, and agenda-building. In C. H. Botan & V. Hazleton (Hrsg.), Public Relations Theory II (S. 279–309). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar

Similar publications

from the topics "Theories and Methods of Communication Science"
Cover of book: Spotlights on Media Borders / Perspektiven auf Mediengrenzen
Edited Book Full access
Nora Benterbusch
Spotlights on Media Borders / Perspektiven auf Mediengrenzen
Cover of book: Social Media
Edited Book No access
Stefan Stumpp, Daniel Michelis, Thomas Schildhauer
Social Media
Cover of book: „Wir wollen Sonne statt Reagan!"
Book Titles No access
Manuel Kögelmaier
„Wir wollen Sonne statt Reagan!"
Cover of book: Transkulturelle Medien und Kommunikation
Educational Book No access
Nadja-Christina Schneider
Transkulturelle Medien und Kommunikation
Cover of book: Medienrezeption
Edited Book No access
Volker Gehrau, Helena Bilandzic, Holger Schramm, Carsten Wünsch
Medienrezeption

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via Open Athens
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex