Data as Counter-Performance - Contract Law 2.0?: Münster Colloquia on EU Law and the Digital Economy V

Prof. Dr. Sebastian Lohsse; Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Reiner Schulze; Prof. Dr. Dirk Staudenmayer

doi:10.5771/9783748908531

Summary

Wissenschaftler und Praktiker aus mehreren europäischen Ländern befassen sich in dem Band mit den vertragsrechtlichen Konsequenzen, die sich daraus ergeben, dass „Daten als Gegenleistung“ zur Verfügung gestellt werden. Dieses praktische Phänomen, das in der sog. „Digitale-Inhalte-Richtlinie“ auch durch den europäischen Gesetzgeber Anerkennung gefunden hat, wirft etwa Fragen des Rechts der Erfüllung, aber auch der Rückabwicklung von Verträgen auf; beleuchtet wird ferner der Zusammenhang von Vertragsrecht und Datenschutzrecht. Die Reihe der „Münster Colloquia on EU Law and the Digital Economy“ wendet sich damit in ihrem nunmehr fünften Band wiederum einer der wichtigen Herausforderungen zu, die sich als Folge der Digitalisierung für Rechtswissenschaft und Praxis im Privatrecht stellen.

Search publication

Bibliographic data

Edition: 1/2020
Copyright year: 2020
ISBN-Print: 978-3-8487-7606-1
ISBN-Online: 978-3-7489-0853-1
Publisher: Nomos, Baden-Baden
Language: English
Pages: 284
Product type: Edited Book

Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access Pages 1 - 8
Authors:
1. I. Background No access
  Authors:
2. II. The response of the European legislator No access
  Authors:
3. III. Provision of data and conclusion and performance of contract No access
  Authors:
4. IV. Conclusion and outlook No access
  Authors:
1. Authors:
  1. I. Data as counter-performance in consumer contracts No access
    Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. 1. Offer to conclude a contract No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Acceptance by the consumer No access
      Authors:
    3. 3. Personal data as consideration? No access
      Authors:
    4. 4. Contract with or without consent to data processing No access
      Authors:
    5. 5. Obligation to provide data as counter-performance No access
      Authors:
    6. 6. Validity of contract No access
      Authors:
  3. Authors:
    1. 1. Why taking the risks of a market model? No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Indications for market failure No access
      Authors:
  4. IV. Conclusions No access
    Authors:
2. Authors:
  1. I. Introduction No access
    Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. 1. Market valuation methods No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Individuals’ valuation methods No access
      Authors:
    3. 3. Key insights No access
      Authors:
  3. Authors:
    1. 1. Counter-performance and the Directive on Contracts for the Supply of Digital Content and Digital Services No access
      Authors:
    2. Authors:
      1. Authors:
        aa) The role of data protection law – the Facebook example No access
        Authors:
        bb) The illegality doctrine revisited: against the invalidation of contracts No access
        Authors:
      2. b) The scope of the DCDS Directive No access
        Authors:
  4. Authors:
    1. 1. Market failures in data-based consumer markets No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Applicability in parallel to the GDPR No access
      Authors:
    3. 3. Transparency obligations No access
      Authors:
    4. Authors:
      1. Authors:
        aa) Data as a price No access
        Authors:
        bb) Broad service obligations No access
        Authors:
      2. Authors:
        aa) Data protection law No access
        Authors:
        bb) Data protection principles No access
        Authors:
        cc) Beyond data protection law No access
        Authors:
      3. Authors:
        aa) Data collection via social plug-ins and third-party tracking No access
        Authors:
        bb) Broad service obligations: personalised advertisements No access
        Authors:
      4. d) Consequences No access
        Authors:
  5. V. Conclusion and outlook: further limits for data as counter-performance? No access
    Authors:
3. Authors:
  1. I. Introduction No access
    Authors:
  2. II. A hybrid private law No access
    Authors:
  3. III. Data property law: management as ownership No access
    Authors:
  4. IV. Concluding remarks No access
    Authors:
4. Authors:
  1. I. Introduction No access
    Authors:
  2. II. From res extra commercium to data extra commercium No access
    Authors:
  3. Authors:
    1. 1. Inalienability of personal data? No access
      Authors:
    2. Authors:
      1. a) The first variable for limited alienability of data: the dynamic and uncertain nature of data No access
        Authors:
      2. b) The second variable: legal bases for primary data trade No access
        Authors:
      3. c) Dynamically limited alienability rule for personal data under the GDPR No access
        Authors:
  4. IV. The two-stage data extra commercium test No access
    Authors:
  5. V. The unique benefits of the data extra commercium test No access
    Authors:
  6. VI. Conclusions No access
    Authors:
1. Authors:
  1. I. Introduction No access
    Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. 1. Separation of contract from standards of processing No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. (Re-)connecting contract and lawfulness of processing No access
      Authors:
    3. 3. The scope of Art 6(1)(b) GDPR No access
      Authors:
  3. Authors:
    1. 1. GDPR adheres to freedom of contract No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Illegality and voidness as the exception No access
      Authors:
  4. IV. Impediments to performance affecting binding effect No access
    Authors:
  5. V. Right to withdraw from consent as a part of the ordre public interne No access
    Authors:
  6. Authors:
    1. 1. Consequences under data protection law No access
      Authors:
    2. Authors:
      1. a) Replacement by an obligation to pay? No access
        Authors:
      2. b) Termination of the contract? No access
        Authors:
    3. 3. Relevant restitutionary rules within the acquis No access
      Authors:
    4. 4. No generalization of the rules so far established! No access
      Authors:
  7. VI. Seven short conclusions No access
    Authors:
2. Authors:
  1. Authors:
    1. 1. First stage of the dialogue: the competition law’s objective of equal treatment between economic operators No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Second stage of the dialogue: personal data are not tradeable commodities… No access
      Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. 1. Definition of the nature of the contract for the supply of digital services at the national level: the contribution of three recent decisions of the Paris Court of First Instance No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Future impacts on the contractual rules concerning termination No access
      Authors:
3. Authors:
  1. I. Contract extinction and contract termination No access
    Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. 1. Comparison between access/portability/erasure in the GDPR and retrieval/impeding use in the DCDC No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Legislative evolution, basis and criticism No access
      Authors:
    3. 3. Kind of data included in the new rights: ‘personal data provided’ vs. ‘any content other than personal data provided or created’ No access
      Authors:
  3. Authors:
    1. Authors:
      1. a) Rules and exceptions No access
        Authors:
      2. b) How No access
        Authors:
      3. c) Proof No access
        Authors:
    2. Authors:
      1. a) Rules and exceptions No access
        Authors:
      2. b) How? No access
        Authors:
      3. c) Proof No access
        Authors:
    3. 3. Relationship between the rights at the time they are exercised No access
      Authors:
4. Authors:
  1. I. Introduction No access
    Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. Authors:
      1. a) Type A: use for the controller’s own purposes No access
        Authors:
      2. b) Type B: use for a service provided by the controller to third parties No access
        Authors:
      3. c) Type C: use by third party controllers after a controller-to-controller transfer No access
        Authors:
      4. d) Type D: provision of framework for collection of data by third party controllers No access
        Authors:
    2. Authors:
      1. a) Recent CJEU case law No access
        Authors:
      2. b) Consequences for personal data utilisation in type B and type D scenarios No access
        Authors:
  3. Authors:
    1. Authors:
      1. a) Contract No access
        Authors:
      2. b) Legitimate interests No access
        Authors:
      3. c) Consent No access
        Authors:
    2. Authors:
      1. a) The ‘Recital 50 debate’ No access
        Authors:
      2. b) Arguments derived from the Open Data Directive No access
        Authors:
    3. Authors:
      1. a) Consent to harmful processing No access
        Authors:
      2. b) Unfairness control – revision of the GDPR or application of rules implementing Directive 93/13/EEC No access
        Authors:
  4. Authors:
    1. Authors:
      1. a) Principle of direct effect and equal status of controllers No access
        Authors:
      2. b) Dual legal basis No access
        Authors:
      3. c) Limited responsibility of supplier No access
        Authors:
    2. Authors:
      1. a) Purpose Limitation, Notice and Choice Principles No access
        Authors:
      2. b) Accountability for onward transfer No access
        Authors:
    3. Authors:
      1. a) Lack of central documentation No access
        Authors:
      2. b) Unknown identity of recipients No access
        Authors:
      3. c) Disproportionate difficulties in exercising data subjects’ rights No access
        Authors:
      4. d) Silence as to first controller’s duties of due diligence No access
        Authors:
    4. Authors:
      1. a) Revision of the GDPR No access
        Authors:
      2. b) Contract and tort law No access
        Authors:
  5. Authors:
    1. 1. The situation under Directives 2019/770 and 771 No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Data-specific product safety standards No access
      Authors:
    3. 3. Product liability law No access
      Authors:
  6. VI. Summary No access
    Authors:
5. Authors:
  1. I. Introduction No access
    Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. 1. Fundamentals of platform economies No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Legal framework No access
      Authors:
  3. Authors:
    1. 1. Acknowledging the other side of the coin No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Personal data as object of trade No access
      Authors:
    3. 3. Courts as bridge builders No access
      Authors:
  4. Authors:
    1. 1. Personal data as condition No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Option: extensive application of Art 6(1)(b) GDPR No access
      Authors:
    3. 3. Option: Extensive Application of Art 6(1)(f) GDPR No access
      Authors:
  5. V. Proposal for a two-tier interpretation of Art 6 GDPR No access
    Authors:
  6. VI. Conclusions No access
    Authors:
6. Authors:
  1. I. Introduction No access
    Authors:
  2. II. Data as counter-performance as a regulatory topic No access
    Authors:
  3. Authors:
    1. 1. Data trading platforms No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Social networking services No access
      Authors:
    3. 3. Free online services No access
      Authors:
  4. Authors:
    1. 1. Contract law: wait and see No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Platform law: observe the effects of new regulation No access
      Authors:
    3. 3. Data protection law: the enforcement challenge No access
      Authors:
  5. V. Conclusion No access
    Authors:
1. Authors:
  1. I. Rules for goods with digital elements No access
    Authors:
  2. II. Update obligations No access
    Authors:
  3. III. Economic value of data No access
    Authors:
2. Authors:
  1. Authors:
    1. Value of Data No access
      Authors:
    2. New legal framework? No access
      Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. Consumer Rights No access
      Authors:
    2. Data Subject No access
      Authors:
    3. This raises the following questions: No access
      Authors:
  3. Authors:
    1. Could the Directive shed light on the situation? No access
      Authors:
  4. IV. Conclusion No access
    Authors:
3. Data as Counter-Performance & the Digital Content Directive – The End of a Debate? No access Pages 279 - 282
  Authors:
Contributors No access Pages 283 - 284