Contemporary Issues of Human Rights Protection in International and National Settings
- Editors:
- |
- Publisher:
- 2018
Summary
Der englischsprachige Sammelband beleuchtet die Auswirkungen internationaler Menschenrechte auf den nationalen und europäische Rechtsordnung aus mehreren Perspektiven. Neben den Auswirkungen des Gutachtens 2/13 des EuGH auf das Verhältnis der EU zur EMRK werden auch die Auswirkungen der Menschenrechtskonvention auf die Rechtsordnungen von Nachbarstaaten wie Norwegen und der Türkei analysiert. Ebenfalls wird eine Bestandsaufnahme der menschenrechtlichen Vorschriften des Assoziierungsabkommens der Europäischen Union mit der Ukraine und deren Auswirkungen auf die interne ukrainische Rechtsordnung vorgenommen. Daneben gestellt werden rechtsvergleichend Analysen der Rechtssysteme größerer und kleinerer Mitgliedstaaten der EU wie Deutschland, Polen, Portugal und Slowenien.
Mit Beiträgen von
Ass.-Prof. Pinar Bacaksiz, Dokuz Eylül Universität Izmir; Ass.-Prof. Vibeke Blaker Strand und Prof. Kjetil Mujezinovic Larsen, Norwegisches Menschenrechtsinstitut Oslo, Ass.-Prof. Rui Guerra de Fonseca, Universität Lissabon, Prof. Roman Petrov, Universität Kiew-Mohyla, Ass.-Prof. Dr. Vasilka, Sancin, Universität Ljubljana und Prof. Mirjam Skrk, Universität Ljubljana. AkadR Dr. Stefan Lorenzmeier, LL.M. (Lugd.), Universität Augsburg; Dr. Daniel Engel, LL.M. (GWU), Universität Augsburg; Dasa Bajec Korent, Universität Ljubljana; Akad. Rätin Jennifer Hölzlwimmer, Universität Augsburg; Tina Korosec, LL.M. (Groningen), Universität Ljubljana; Masa Kovic Dine, LL.M. (Toronto), Universität Ljubljana; Dorota Miler, LL.M. (McGill), Universität Augsburg; Isabella Risini, LL.M. (Chicago-Kent), Ruhr-Universität Bochum; Désirée Rühle, Universität Augsburg; Marina Zagar, Universität Rijeka/Ljubljana
Search publication
Bibliographic data
- Edition
- 1/2018
- Copyright Year
- 2018
- ISBN-Print
- 978-3-8487-2128-3
- ISBN-Online
- 978-3-8452-6228-4
- Publisher
- Nomos, Baden-Baden
- Language
- English
- Pages
- 316
- Product Type
- Edited Book
Table of contents
- Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access Pages 1 - 9
- Authors: |
- Authors: |
- Authors: |
- a. Norway, Poland and Slovenia No accessAuthors: |
- b. Germany No accessAuthors: |
- Authors: |
- a. De lege lata status of the ECHR in the EU legal order No accessAuthors: |
- b. De lege ferenda – Accession to the ECHR No accessAuthors: |
- III. Protection of Human Rights by the EU – Internally and Externally No accessAuthors: |
- Authors: |
- 1. International Sports Organizations and Human Rights No accessAuthors: |
- Authors: |
- a. A Driver for Self-Determination? No accessAuthors: |
- b. Social Rights and Global Constitutionalism No accessAuthors: |
- c. Enforcement of Social Human Rights No accessAuthors: |
- 3. International Criminal Law No accessAuthors: |
- V. Concluding Remarks No accessAuthors: |
- Authors: |
- Abstract No accessAuthors: |
- 1 Introduction No accessAuthors: |
- Authors: |
- 2.1 The Convention as International Law and as Domestic Law No accessAuthors: |
- 2.2 The Legal Status of the Convention before 1999 No accessAuthors: |
- 2.3 The Human Rights Act No accessAuthors: |
- 2.4 The Protection of Human Rights in the Norwegian Constitution No accessAuthors: |
- 3 Interpreting the ECHR within the Domestic Legal Order No accessAuthors: |
- Authors: |
- 4.1 Invoking the ECHR before the Domestic Courts No accessAuthors: |
- 4.2 Judgments by the European Court of Human Rights against Norway No accessAuthors: |
- 5 Interpreting Human Rights after the Constitutional Reforms in 2014 No accessAuthors: |
- 6 Concluding Comments No accessAuthors: |
- Authors:
- Abstract No accessAuthors:
- I. Introduction No accessAuthors:
- II. Impact of the ECtHR’s Judgments on Polish Constitutional Law and Judicial Interpretation of Polish Law No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- A. Criminal Procedure No accessAuthors:
- B. Post-Communism Issues No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- A. Right to Marry No accessAuthors:
- B. Exceptions to the Prohibition of Abortion No accessAuthors:
- V. Conclusions No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- Abstract No accessAuthors:
- I. Introduction No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 1. Civil and Political Rights No accessAuthors:
- 2. Economic, Social and Cultural Rights No accessAuthors:
- 3. Special Provisions No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 1. The Position of International Law in the Slovenian Constitution No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- i. The Jurisdiction to Review Laws and Other Regulations No accessAuthors:
- ii. The Jurisdiction to Decide on Constitutional Complaints No accessAuthors:
- iii. The Jurisdiction to Review Treaties No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- i. Direct Application of the ECHR No accessAuthors:
- ii. The Right of the Defendant to Use His Language and Script No accessAuthors:
- iii. The Rights of the Blind Plaintiff in Civil Proceedings No accessAuthors:
- iv. The Review of the International Protection Act No accessAuthors:
- IV. Conclusion No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- Abstract No accessAuthors:
- I. Introduction No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- Authors:
- a. Transformation Theory No accessAuthors:
- b. Enforcement Theory No accessAuthors:
- c. Art. 59 (2) Under Those Theories No accessAuthors:
- d. Status of Human Rights Treaties No accessAuthors:
- 2. Status and Adoption of Customary Human Rights No accessAuthors:
- 3. Interpretation of German Law in Conformity with International Human Rights No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 1. International Remedies No accessAuthors:
- 2. Enforcement by German Courts No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- Authors:
- a. Non-Examination of Human Rights Treaties No accessAuthors:
- b. No Violation of Human Rights Treaties No accessAuthors:
- c. Human Rights Treaties Not Directly Applicable No accessAuthors:
- d. Indirect Application of Human Rights Treaties No accessAuthors:
- e. Direct Application of Human Rights Treaties No accessAuthors:
- 2. ECHR before German Courts No accessAuthors:
- V. Difference between Universal Human Rights Treaties and the ECHR No accessAuthors:
- VI. Conclusion No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- Abstract No accessAuthors:
- I. Introduction No accessAuthors:
- II. Fundamental Rights Federalism No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 1. Rules for Conflict of Laws No accessAuthors:
- 2. Consequences for the Relationship between Federal Fundamental Rights Protection and Fundamental Rights Protection by the German Länder No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 1. Rules for Conflict of Laws – The status quo No accessAuthors:
- 2. Consequences of the status quo of Rules for Conflict of Laws for the Relationship between National and EU Fundamental Rights Protection No accessAuthors:
- V. The Future of Fundamental Rights Federalism within the EU and its Member States No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- Abstract No accessAuthors:
- I. Introduction No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- A. The Development of the Equivalent Protection Formula in Bosphorus No accessAuthors:
- B. The Formula’s Extension beyond the Bosphorus Scenario No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- Authors:
- 1. Rationale of the Bosphorus-Presumption No accessAuthors:
- 2. Equality of the High Contracting Parties No accessAuthors:
- 3. Purpose of Accession No accessAuthors:
- C. Continuance for EU Member States No accessAuthors:
- IV. A Better Solution: The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine No accessAuthors:
- V. Summary No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- Authors:
- 1. Introduction No accessAuthors:
- 2. Developments in the Accession Process No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 3.1 Procedural Alternatives No accessAuthors:
- 3.2 Third Party Intervention No accessAuthors:
- 3.3 More than One Respondent No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 4.1 Gaps in Participation, Accountability, and Enforceability No accessAuthors:
- 4.2 Autonomy of the EU’s Legal Order No accessAuthors:
- 4.3 Other No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- Authors:
- 5.1.1 EU as a Co-Respondent No accessAuthors:
- 5.1.2 EU Member State(s) as a Co-Respondent No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 5.2.1 Change of Status No accessAuthors:
- 5.3 Joint Responsibility No accessAuthors:
- 5.4 Internal Rules as a Next Step No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 6.1 Voluntary Nature No accessAuthors:
- 6.2 Preservation of the EU’s Autonomy No accessAuthors:
- 6.3 Effective Protection of Human Rights No accessAuthors:
- 7. Conclusion No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- Abstract No accessAuthors:
- I. Introduction No accessAuthors:
- II. The Inter-State Application under Article 33 ECHR No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- Authors:
- a. The Charter of Fundamental Rights: a Yardstick, but no Competence for the EU No accessAuthors:
- b. Article 2 TEU: A Value Platform, but no Competence No accessAuthors:
- c. Result: No Room for the EU as Applicant in Proceedings under Article 33 ECHR No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- a. The Autonomy of the EU Legal Order threatened by the Inter-State application: Taking Stock No accessAuthors:
- b. The CEJU’s Proposition ‘ratione materiae’: A Chilling Effect for the Inter-State Application No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- aa) The Treaty Infringement Proceedings of Articles 258 and 259 TFEU No accessAuthors:
- Article 7 TEU – Prevention and Sanction Mechanism No accessAuthors:
- d. Result: Inter-State Application’s Functions outweigh Interest in Preservation of Autonomy under Article 344 TFEU No accessAuthors:
- IV. Conclusion: More, not less Human Rights Protection after the Accession No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- Authors:
- I. Introduction No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 1. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties between States and International Organizations or between International Organizations No accessAuthors:
- 2. General Accession Requirements, Art. 218 TFEU No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- a. Consent of the European Parliament No accessAuthors:
- b. Decision of the EU Council No accessAuthors:
- 4. Approval of the Member States No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- a. Constitutional Shift? No accessAuthors:
- b. Systematic Interpretation, Art. 311 (3) TFEU No accessAuthors:
- c. View of Advocate General Kokott No accessAuthors:
- d. Applicable for later Protocols to the ECHR? No accessAuthors:
- 6. Special Status for the Council Decision? No accessAuthors:
- 7. Interim Conclusion No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 1. “Shall Accede”, Art. 6 (2) (1) TEU No accessAuthors:
- 2. “Shall not affect the Union’s competences”, Art. 6 (2) 2nd sent. TEU No accessAuthors:
- 3. Competence of the ECJ to challenge envisaged Agreements, Art. 218 (11) TFEU No accessAuthors:
- IV. Does the accession affect the national legal orders of the Member States? No accessAuthors:
- V. Concluding Remarks No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- Abstract No accessAuthors:
- I. Introduction No accessAuthors:
- II. Background of the EU’s relations with Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia: From Partnership and Cooperation to Association No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 1. Enhanced Human Rights Conditionality in the AAs No accessAuthors:
- 2. Common Values Conditionality No accessAuthors:
- 3. Mechanisms of Legislative Approximation in Field of Human Rights No accessAuthors:
- 4. New Generation of Legislative Approximation Clauses No accessAuthors:
- 5. Procedures to Amend or Update the Incorporated EU acquis No accessAuthors:
- 6. Scenarios of Potential Legislative Approximation in the Field of Human Rights No accessAuthors:
- IV. Concluding Remarks No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- Abstract No accessAuthors:
- I. The Role of Social Rights in the Context of Human Rights No accessAuthors:
- II. Social Rights and Global Constitutionalism No accessAuthors:
- III. Substantive Legitimacy and Social Rights No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- Authors:
- I. Introduction No accessAuthors:
- II. Core Norm of the Right to Development No accessAuthors:
- III. Internal and External Dimension of the Right to Development No accessAuthors:
- IV. Extraterritorial Obligations of States to Ensure Realization of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights No accessAuthors:
- V. Conclusion No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- Authors:
- 1. Introduction No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 2.1. Subjects of the Olympic Movement No accessAuthors:
- 2.2. The IOC No accessAuthors:
- 2.3. The Olympic Charter No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 3.1. Sanctioning No accessAuthors:
- 3.2. Shaming No accessAuthors:
- 3.3. Cooptation No accessAuthors:
- 4. Conclusion No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- Authors:
- I. International Criminal Procedure as sui generis Mixed Procedure No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- 1. Presumption of Innocence No accessAuthors:
- 2. Independence and Impartiality of the Court No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- a. Fair Trial No accessAuthors:
- b. Public Trial No accessAuthors:
- c. Expeditious Trial No accessAuthors:
- 4. Equality of Arms No accessAuthors:
- III. The Role and Status of Victims No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- Authors:
- a. The Use of Protective Measures: Anonymity No accessAuthors:
- b. The Use of Protective Measures: Exclusion of the Public No accessAuthors:
- Authors:
- a. Victim Participation and the Right to an Expeditious Trial No accessAuthors:
- b. Undermining the Presumption of Innocence No accessAuthors:
- c. The Right to a Fair Trial and Equality of Arms No accessAuthors:
- V. Conclusion No accessAuthors:
- List of Contributors No access Pages 309 - 312
- Index No access Pages 313 - 316





