Contemporary Issues of Human Rights Protection in International and National Settings
- Editors:
- |
- Publisher:
- 2018
Summary
Der englischsprachige Sammelband beleuchtet die Auswirkungen internationaler Menschenrechte auf den nationalen und europäische Rechtsordnung aus mehreren Perspektiven. Neben den Auswirkungen des Gutachtens 2/13 des EuGH auf das Verhältnis der EU zur EMRK werden auch die Auswirkungen der Menschenrechtskonvention auf die Rechtsordnungen von Nachbarstaaten wie Norwegen und der Türkei analysiert. Ebenfalls wird eine Bestandsaufnahme der menschenrechtlichen Vorschriften des Assoziierungsabkommens der Europäischen Union mit der Ukraine und deren Auswirkungen auf die interne ukrainische Rechtsordnung vorgenommen. Daneben gestellt werden rechtsvergleichend Analysen der Rechtssysteme größerer und kleinerer Mitgliedstaaten der EU wie Deutschland, Polen, Portugal und Slowenien.
Mit Beiträgen von
Ass.-Prof. Pinar Bacaksiz, Dokuz Eylül Universität Izmir; Ass.-Prof. Vibeke Blaker Strand und Prof. Kjetil Mujezinovic Larsen, Norwegisches Menschenrechtsinstitut Oslo, Ass.-Prof. Rui Guerra de Fonseca, Universität Lissabon, Prof. Roman Petrov, Universität Kiew-Mohyla, Ass.-Prof. Dr. Vasilka, Sancin, Universität Ljubljana und Prof. Mirjam Skrk, Universität Ljubljana. AkadR Dr. Stefan Lorenzmeier, LL.M. (Lugd.), Universität Augsburg; Dr. Daniel Engel, LL.M. (GWU), Universität Augsburg; Dasa Bajec Korent, Universität Ljubljana; Akad. Rätin Jennifer Hölzlwimmer, Universität Augsburg; Tina Korosec, LL.M. (Groningen), Universität Ljubljana; Masa Kovic Dine, LL.M. (Toronto), Universität Ljubljana; Dorota Miler, LL.M. (McGill), Universität Augsburg; Isabella Risini, LL.M. (Chicago-Kent), Ruhr-Universität Bochum; Désirée Rühle, Universität Augsburg; Marina Zagar, Universität Rijeka/Ljubljana
Search publication
Bibliographic data
- Copyright year
- 2018
- ISBN-Print
- 978-3-8487-2128-3
- ISBN-Online
- 978-3-8452-6228-4
- Publisher
- Nomos, Baden-Baden
- Language
- English
- Pages
- 316
- Product type
- Edited Book
Table of contents
- Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access Pages 1 - 9
- Stefan Lorenzmeier, Vasilka Sancin
- Stefan Lorenzmeier, Vasilka Sancin
- Stefan Lorenzmeier, Vasilka Sancin
- a. Norway, Poland and Slovenia No access Stefan Lorenzmeier, Vasilka Sancin
- b. Germany No access Stefan Lorenzmeier, Vasilka Sancin
- Stefan Lorenzmeier, Vasilka Sancin
- a. De lege lata status of the ECHR in the EU legal order No access Stefan Lorenzmeier, Vasilka Sancin
- b. De lege ferenda – Accession to the ECHR No access Stefan Lorenzmeier, Vasilka Sancin
- III. Protection of Human Rights by the EU – Internally and Externally No access Stefan Lorenzmeier, Vasilka Sancin
- Stefan Lorenzmeier, Vasilka Sancin
- 1. International Sports Organizations and Human Rights No access Stefan Lorenzmeier, Vasilka Sancin
- Stefan Lorenzmeier, Vasilka Sancin
- a. A Driver for Self-Determination? No access Stefan Lorenzmeier, Vasilka Sancin
- b. Social Rights and Global Constitutionalism No access Stefan Lorenzmeier, Vasilka Sancin
- c. Enforcement of Social Human Rights No access Stefan Lorenzmeier, Vasilka Sancin
- 3. International Criminal Law No access Stefan Lorenzmeier, Vasilka Sancin
- V. Concluding Remarks No access Stefan Lorenzmeier, Vasilka Sancin
- Vibeke Blaker Strand, Kjetil Mujezinović Larsen
- Abstract No access Vibeke Blaker Strand, Kjetil Mujezinović Larsen
- 1 Introduction No access Vibeke Blaker Strand, Kjetil Mujezinović Larsen
- Vibeke Blaker Strand, Kjetil Mujezinović Larsen
- 2.1 The Convention as International Law and as Domestic Law No access Vibeke Blaker Strand, Kjetil Mujezinović Larsen
- 2.2 The Legal Status of the Convention before 1999 No access Vibeke Blaker Strand, Kjetil Mujezinović Larsen
- 2.3 The Human Rights Act No access Vibeke Blaker Strand, Kjetil Mujezinović Larsen
- 2.4 The Protection of Human Rights in the Norwegian Constitution No access Vibeke Blaker Strand, Kjetil Mujezinović Larsen
- 3 Interpreting the ECHR within the Domestic Legal Order No access Vibeke Blaker Strand, Kjetil Mujezinović Larsen
- Vibeke Blaker Strand, Kjetil Mujezinović Larsen
- 4.1 Invoking the ECHR before the Domestic Courts No access Vibeke Blaker Strand, Kjetil Mujezinović Larsen
- 4.2 Judgments by the European Court of Human Rights against Norway No access Vibeke Blaker Strand, Kjetil Mujezinović Larsen
- 5 Interpreting Human Rights after the Constitutional Reforms in 2014 No access Vibeke Blaker Strand, Kjetil Mujezinović Larsen
- 6 Concluding Comments No access Vibeke Blaker Strand, Kjetil Mujezinović Larsen
- Dorota Miler
- Abstract No access Dorota Miler
- I. Introduction No access Dorota Miler
- II. Impact of the ECtHR’s Judgments on Polish Constitutional Law and Judicial Interpretation of Polish Law No access Dorota Miler
- Dorota Miler
- A. Criminal Procedure No access Dorota Miler
- B. Post-Communism Issues No access Dorota Miler
- Dorota Miler
- A. Right to Marry No access Dorota Miler
- B. Exceptions to the Prohibition of Abortion No access Dorota Miler
- V. Conclusions No access Dorota Miler
- Mirjam Škrk
- Abstract No access Mirjam Škrk
- I. Introduction No access Mirjam Škrk
- Mirjam Škrk
- 1. Civil and Political Rights No access Mirjam Škrk
- 2. Economic, Social and Cultural Rights No access Mirjam Škrk
- 3. Special Provisions No access Mirjam Škrk
- Mirjam Škrk
- 1. The Position of International Law in the Slovenian Constitution No access Mirjam Škrk
- Mirjam Škrk
- i. The Jurisdiction to Review Laws and Other Regulations No access Mirjam Škrk
- ii. The Jurisdiction to Decide on Constitutional Complaints No access Mirjam Škrk
- iii. The Jurisdiction to Review Treaties No access Mirjam Škrk
- Mirjam Škrk
- i. Direct Application of the ECHR No access Mirjam Škrk
- ii. The Right of the Defendant to Use His Language and Script No access Mirjam Škrk
- iii. The Rights of the Blind Plaintiff in Civil Proceedings No access Mirjam Škrk
- iv. The Review of the International Protection Act No access Mirjam Škrk
- IV. Conclusion No access Mirjam Škrk
- Désirée Hofmann
- Abstract No access Désirée Hofmann
- I. Introduction No access Désirée Hofmann
- Désirée Hofmann
- Désirée Hofmann
- a. Transformation Theory No access Désirée Hofmann
- b. Enforcement Theory No access Désirée Hofmann
- c. Art. 59 (2) Under Those Theories No access Désirée Hofmann
- d. Status of Human Rights Treaties No access Désirée Hofmann
- 2. Status and Adoption of Customary Human Rights No access Désirée Hofmann
- 3. Interpretation of German Law in Conformity with International Human Rights No access Désirée Hofmann
- Désirée Hofmann
- 1. International Remedies No access Désirée Hofmann
- 2. Enforcement by German Courts No access Désirée Hofmann
- Désirée Hofmann
- Désirée Hofmann
- a. Non-Examination of Human Rights Treaties No access Désirée Hofmann
- b. No Violation of Human Rights Treaties No access Désirée Hofmann
- c. Human Rights Treaties Not Directly Applicable No access Désirée Hofmann
- d. Indirect Application of Human Rights Treaties No access Désirée Hofmann
- e. Direct Application of Human Rights Treaties No access Désirée Hofmann
- 2. ECHR before German Courts No access Désirée Hofmann
- V. Difference between Universal Human Rights Treaties and the ECHR No access Désirée Hofmann
- VI. Conclusion No access Désirée Hofmann
- Jennifer Hölzlwimmer
- Abstract No access Jennifer Hölzlwimmer
- I. Introduction No access Jennifer Hölzlwimmer
- II. Fundamental Rights Federalism No access Jennifer Hölzlwimmer
- Jennifer Hölzlwimmer
- 1. Rules for Conflict of Laws No access Jennifer Hölzlwimmer
- 2. Consequences for the Relationship between Federal Fundamental Rights Protection and Fundamental Rights Protection by the German Länder No access Jennifer Hölzlwimmer
- Jennifer Hölzlwimmer
- 1. Rules for Conflict of Laws – The status quo No access Jennifer Hölzlwimmer
- 2. Consequences of the status quo of Rules for Conflict of Laws for the Relationship between National and EU Fundamental Rights Protection No access Jennifer Hölzlwimmer
- V. The Future of Fundamental Rights Federalism within the EU and its Member States No access Jennifer Hölzlwimmer
- Daniel Engel
- Abstract No access Daniel Engel
- I. Introduction No access Daniel Engel
- Daniel Engel
- A. The Development of the Equivalent Protection Formula in Bosphorus No access Daniel Engel
- B. The Formula’s Extension beyond the Bosphorus Scenario No access Daniel Engel
- Daniel Engel
- Daniel Engel
- 1. Rationale of the Bosphorus-Presumption No access Daniel Engel
- 2. Equality of the High Contracting Parties No access Daniel Engel
- 3. Purpose of Accession No access Daniel Engel
- C. Continuance for EU Member States No access Daniel Engel
- IV. A Better Solution: The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine No access Daniel Engel
- V. Summary No access Daniel Engel
- Tina Korošec
- Tina Korošec
- 1. Introduction No access Tina Korošec
- 2. Developments in the Accession Process No access Tina Korošec
- Tina Korošec
- 3.1 Procedural Alternatives No access Tina Korošec
- 3.2 Third Party Intervention No access Tina Korošec
- 3.3 More than One Respondent No access Tina Korošec
- Tina Korošec
- 4.1 Gaps in Participation, Accountability, and Enforceability No access Tina Korošec
- 4.2 Autonomy of the EU’s Legal Order No access Tina Korošec
- 4.3 Other No access Tina Korošec
- Tina Korošec
- Tina Korošec
- 5.1.1 EU as a Co-Respondent No access Tina Korošec
- 5.1.2 EU Member State(s) as a Co-Respondent No access Tina Korošec
- Tina Korošec
- 5.2.1 Change of Status No access Tina Korošec
- 5.3 Joint Responsibility No access Tina Korošec
- 5.4 Internal Rules as a Next Step No access Tina Korošec
- Tina Korošec
- 6.1 Voluntary Nature No access Tina Korošec
- 6.2 Preservation of the EU’s Autonomy No access Tina Korošec
- 6.3 Effective Protection of Human Rights No access Tina Korošec
- 7. Conclusion No access Tina Korošec
- Isabella Risini
- Abstract No access Isabella Risini
- I. Introduction No access Isabella Risini
- II. The Inter-State Application under Article 33 ECHR No access Isabella Risini
- Isabella Risini
- Isabella Risini
- a. The Charter of Fundamental Rights: a Yardstick, but no Competence for the EU No access Isabella Risini
- b. Article 2 TEU: A Value Platform, but no Competence No access Isabella Risini
- c. Result: No Room for the EU as Applicant in Proceedings under Article 33 ECHR No access Isabella Risini
- Isabella Risini
- a. The Autonomy of the EU Legal Order threatened by the Inter-State application: Taking Stock No access Isabella Risini
- b. The CEJU’s Proposition ‘ratione materiae’: A Chilling Effect for the Inter-State Application No access Isabella Risini
- Isabella Risini
- aa) The Treaty Infringement Proceedings of Articles 258 and 259 TFEU No access Isabella Risini
- Article 7 TEU – Prevention and Sanction Mechanism No access Isabella Risini
- d. Result: Inter-State Application’s Functions outweigh Interest in Preservation of Autonomy under Article 344 TFEU No access Isabella Risini
- IV. Conclusion: More, not less Human Rights Protection after the Accession No access Isabella Risini
- Stefan Lorenzmeier
- Stefan Lorenzmeier
- I. Introduction No access Stefan Lorenzmeier
- Stefan Lorenzmeier
- 1. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties between States and International Organizations or between International Organizations No access Stefan Lorenzmeier
- 2. General Accession Requirements, Art. 218 TFEU No access Stefan Lorenzmeier
- Stefan Lorenzmeier
- a. Consent of the European Parliament No access Stefan Lorenzmeier
- b. Decision of the EU Council No access Stefan Lorenzmeier
- 4. Approval of the Member States No access Stefan Lorenzmeier
- Stefan Lorenzmeier
- a. Constitutional Shift? No access Stefan Lorenzmeier
- b. Systematic Interpretation, Art. 311 (3) TFEU No access Stefan Lorenzmeier
- c. View of Advocate General Kokott No access Stefan Lorenzmeier
- d. Applicable for later Protocols to the ECHR? No access Stefan Lorenzmeier
- 6. Special Status for the Council Decision? No access Stefan Lorenzmeier
- 7. Interim Conclusion No access Stefan Lorenzmeier
- Stefan Lorenzmeier
- 1. “Shall Accede”, Art. 6 (2) (1) TEU No access Stefan Lorenzmeier
- 2. “Shall not affect the Union’s competences”, Art. 6 (2) 2nd sent. TEU No access Stefan Lorenzmeier
- 3. Competence of the ECJ to challenge envisaged Agreements, Art. 218 (11) TFEU No access Stefan Lorenzmeier
- IV. Does the accession affect the national legal orders of the Member States? No access Stefan Lorenzmeier
- V. Concluding Remarks No access Stefan Lorenzmeier
- Roman Petrov
- Abstract No access Roman Petrov
- I. Introduction No access Roman Petrov
- II. Background of the EU’s relations with Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia: From Partnership and Cooperation to Association No access Roman Petrov
- Roman Petrov
- 1. Enhanced Human Rights Conditionality in the AAs No access Roman Petrov
- 2. Common Values Conditionality No access Roman Petrov
- 3. Mechanisms of Legislative Approximation in Field of Human Rights No access Roman Petrov
- 4. New Generation of Legislative Approximation Clauses No access Roman Petrov
- 5. Procedures to Amend or Update the Incorporated EU acquis No access Roman Petrov
- 6. Scenarios of Potential Legislative Approximation in the Field of Human Rights No access Roman Petrov
- IV. Concluding Remarks No access Roman Petrov
- Rui Guerra da Fonseca
- Abstract No access Rui Guerra da Fonseca
- I. The Role of Social Rights in the Context of Human Rights No access Rui Guerra da Fonseca
- II. Social Rights and Global Constitutionalism No access Rui Guerra da Fonseca
- III. Substantive Legitimacy and Social Rights No access Rui Guerra da Fonseca
- Maša Kovič Dine
- Maša Kovič Dine
- I. Introduction No access Maša Kovič Dine
- II. Core Norm of the Right to Development No access Maša Kovič Dine
- III. Internal and External Dimension of the Right to Development No access Maša Kovič Dine
- IV. Extraterritorial Obligations of States to Ensure Realization of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights No access Maša Kovič Dine
- V. Conclusion No access Maša Kovič Dine
- Daša Bajec Korent
- Daša Bajec Korent
- 1. Introduction No access Daša Bajec Korent
- Daša Bajec Korent
- 2.1. Subjects of the Olympic Movement No access Daša Bajec Korent
- 2.2. The IOC No access Daša Bajec Korent
- 2.3. The Olympic Charter No access Daša Bajec Korent
- Daša Bajec Korent
- 3.1. Sanctioning No access Daša Bajec Korent
- 3.2. Shaming No access Daša Bajec Korent
- 3.3. Cooptation No access Daša Bajec Korent
- 4. Conclusion No access Daša Bajec Korent
- Marina Žagar
- Marina Žagar
- I. International Criminal Procedure as sui generis Mixed Procedure No access Marina Žagar
- Marina Žagar
- 1. Presumption of Innocence No access Marina Žagar
- 2. Independence and Impartiality of the Court No access Marina Žagar
- Marina Žagar
- a. Fair Trial No access Marina Žagar
- b. Public Trial No access Marina Žagar
- c. Expeditious Trial No access Marina Žagar
- 4. Equality of Arms No access Marina Žagar
- III. The Role and Status of Victims No access Marina Žagar
- Marina Žagar
- Marina Žagar
- a. The Use of Protective Measures: Anonymity No access Marina Žagar
- b. The Use of Protective Measures: Exclusion of the Public No access Marina Žagar
- Marina Žagar
- a. Victim Participation and the Right to an Expeditious Trial No access Marina Žagar
- b. Undermining the Presumption of Innocence No access Marina Žagar
- c. The Right to a Fair Trial and Equality of Arms No access Marina Žagar
- V. Conclusion No access Marina Žagar
- List of Contributors No access Pages 309 - 312
- Index No access Pages 313 - 316



