Buy in shop
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Book Titles No access

Wildtierethik

Verpflichtungen gegenüber wildlebenden Tieren
Authors:
Publisher:
 2015

Bibliographic data

Copyright year
2015
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-1693-7
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-5747-1
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Ethik in der Nachhaltigkeitsforschung | Ethics of Sustainability Research
Volume
2
Language
German
Pages
158
Product type
Book Titles

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access 1 - 10
  2. 1. Einführung No access 11 - 14
  3. 2. Sentientismus. Die Ansätze wichtiger VertreterInnen No access 15 - 48
  4. 3. Wildtierethik. Aktueller Stand der Diskussionen No access 49 - 126
  5. 4. Der Umgang mit invasiven Arten als konkreter Problemfall No access 127 - 144
  6. 5. Sentientistische Naturschutzethik No access 145 - 148
  7. 6. Literatur No access 149 - 158

Bibliography (139)

  1. Adams, Carol J. (1996): Caring about Suffering. A Feminist Exploration. In: Josephine Donovan; Carol Adams (Hg.): Beyond animal rights. A feminist caring ethic for the treatment of animals. New York, London: Continuum; Cassell, S. 170-196. Open Google Scholar
  2. Adams, Carol J. (2002): Zum Verzehr bestimmt. Eine feministisch-vegetarische Theorie. Wien, Mülheim an der Ruhr: Guthmann-Peterson. Open Google Scholar
  3. Aitken, Gill (1997): Conservation and Individual Worth. In: Environmental Values 6 (4), S. 439-454. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.3197/096327197776679040
  4. Allen, Colin (2004): Animal Pain. In: Nous 38 (4), S. 617-643. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.0029-4624.2004.00486.x
  5. Anderson, Elizabeth (2004): Animal Rights and the Values of Nonhuman Life. In: Cass R. Sunstein; Martha C. Nussbaum (Hg.): Animal rights. Current debates and new directions. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, S. 277-298. Open Google Scholar
  6. Balzer, Philipp; Rippe, Klaus Peter; Schaber, Peter (2008): Menschenwürde versus Würde der Kreatur. In: Ursula Wolf (Hg.): Texte zur Tierethik. Stuttgart: Reclam, S. 61-72. Open Google Scholar
  7. Bekoff, Marc; Pierce, Jessica (2009): Wild Justice. The Moral Lifes of Animals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226041667.001.0001
  8. Benatar, David (2001): Why the Naive Argument against Moral Vegetarianism Really is Naive. In: Environmental Values 10 (1), S. 103-112. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.3197/096327101129340769
  9. Birnbacher, Dieter (1991): „Natur“ als Maßstab menschlichen Handelns. In: Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 45 (1), S. 60-76. Open Google Scholar
  10. Bossert, Leonie (2014): Tierethik. Die verschiedenen Positionen und ihre Auswirkungen auf die Mensch- nichtmenschliches Tier- Beziehung, In: Voget-Kleschin, Lieske; Bossert, Leonie; Ott, Konrad (Hg.): Nachhaltige Lebensstile – Welchen Beitrag kann ein bewusster Fleischkonsum zu mehr Naturschutz, Klimaschutz und Gesundheit leisten?, Marburg: Metropolis, S. 32-57. Open Google Scholar
  11. Bossert, Leonie (2015a): Nichtmenschliche Tiere als moralisch Handelnde? Eine kritische Reflexion der Argumente von Bekoff/Pierce und Rowlands. In: Chimaira (Hg.): Handeln Tiere? Theorien und Konzepte tierlicher Agency (Arbeitstitel), Bielefeld: Transcript, in Vorbereitung. Open Google Scholar
  12. Bossert, Leonie (2015b): Tierschutz (Arbeitstitel). In: Ott, Konrad; Voget-Kleschin, Lieske; Dierks, Jan (Hg.): Handbuch Umweltethik. Stuttgart: Metzler, in Vorbereitung. Open Google Scholar
  13. Boscardin, Livia; Bossert, Leonie (2015): Sustainable Development and Nonhuman Animals: Why anthropocentric concepts of Sustainability are outdated and need to be extended, In: Meisch, Simon; Lundershausen, Johannes; Bossert, Leonie; Rockoff, Marcus (Hg.): Ethics of Science in the Research for Sustainable Development, Baden-Baden: Nomos, in Vorbereitung. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845258430-323
  14. Budiansky, Stephen (1994): The covenant of the wild. Why animals chose domestication. Ist ed. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson. Open Google Scholar
  15. Bulliet, Richard W. (2005): Hunters, herders, and hamburgers. The past and future of human-animal relationships. New York: Columbia University Press. Open Google Scholar
  16. Callicott, J.Baird (1980): Animal Liberation A Triangular Affair. In: Environmental Ethics 2 (4), S. 311-338. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics19802424
  17. Callicott, J.Baird (1988): Animal Liberation and Environmental Ethics: Back Together Again. In: Between the Species, S. 163-169. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.15368/bts.1988v4n3.1
  18. Callicott, J.Baird (1997): Die begrifflichen Grundlagen der land ethics. In: Angelika Krebs (Hg.): Naturethik. Grundtexte der gegenwärtigen tier- und ökoethischen Diskussion. 1. Aufl. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp (Suhrkamp-Taschenbuch Wissenschaft, 1262), S. 211-246. Open Google Scholar
  19. Caney, Simon (2006): Environmental Degradation, Reparations, and the Moral Significance of History. In: J Social Philosophy 37 (3), S. 464-482. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9833.2006.00348.x
  20. Cassidy, Rebecca (2007): Introduction. In: Rebecca Cassidy; Molly H. Mullin (Hg.): Where the wild things are now. Domestication reconsidered. Oxford: Berg, S. 1-26. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521812443.002
  21. Clutton-Brock, Juliet (1994): The Unnatural World. In: Aubrey Manning; James Serpell (Hg.): Animals and human society. Changing perspectives. London, New York: Routledge, S. 23-35. Open Google Scholar
  22. Cohen, Carl (2007): Haben Tiere Rechte? In: Interdisziplinäre Arbeitsgemeinschaft Tierethik (Hg.): Tierrechte. Eine interdisziplinäre Herausforderung. 1. Aufl. Erlangen: Fischer, S. 89-104. Open Google Scholar
  23. Cohen, Carl; Regan, Tom (2001): The animal rights debate. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Open Google Scholar
  24. Cowen, Tyler (2003): Policing nature. In: Environmental Ethics 25 (2), S. 169.182. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics200325231
  25. Curtin, Deane (1996): Toward an Ecological Ethic of Care. In: Josephine Donovan; Carol Adams (Hg.): Beyond animal rights. A feminist caring ethic for the treatment of animals. New York, London: Continuum; Cassell, S. 60-76. Open Google Scholar
  26. Davis, M. A.; Thompson, K. (2000): Eight Ways to be a Colonizer; Two Ways to be an Invader: A Proposed Nomenclature Scheme for Invasion Ecology. In: Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America (81), S. 226-230. Open Google Scholar
  27. DeGrazia, David (1996): Taking animals seriously. Mental life and moral status. Cambridge;, New York: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139172967
  28. DeGrazia, David (2002): Animal rights. A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780192853608.001.0001
  29. DeGrazia, David (2003): Carl Cohen and Tom Regan, The Animal Rights Debate: The Animal Rights Debate. In: ETHICS 113 (3), S. 692-695. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/345630
  30. DeGrazia, David; Rowan, Andrew (1991): Pain, suffering, and anxiety in animals and humans. In: Theoretical Medicine Bioethics 12 (3), S. 193-211. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/BF00489606
  31. Donaldson, Sue; Kymlicka, Will (2011): Zoopolis. A political theory of animal rights. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  32. Donovan, Josephine (2008): Aufmerksamkeit für das Leiden. Mitgefühl als Grundlage der moralischen Behandlung von Tieren. In: Ursula Wolf (Hg.): Texte zur Tierethik. Stuttgart: Reclam, S. 105-120. Open Google Scholar
  33. Everett, Jennifer (2001): Environmental Ethics, Animal Welfarism, and the Problem of Predation: A Bambi Lover's Respect For Nature. In: Ethics & the Environment 6 (1), S. 42-67. Open Google Scholar
  34. Fink, Charles K. (2005): The Predation Argument. In: Between the Species 13 (5), S. 1-16. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.15368/bts.2005v13n5.3
  35. Francione, Gary L. (2000): Introduction to animal rights. Your child or the dog? Philadelphia: Temple University Press. Open Google Scholar
  36. Francis, Leslie Pickering; Norman, Richard (1978): Some Animals are More Equal Than Others. In: Philosophy 53 (206), S. 507-527. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0031819100026358
  37. Frey, Raymond G. (2007): Moral Standing, the Values of Lives, and Speciesism. In: Hugh LaFollette (Hg.): Ethics in practice. An anthology. Malden, MA: Blackwell, S. 192-204. Open Google Scholar
  38. Füßler, Claudia (2012): Das Schwein weiß um sein Ich. In: ZEIT ONLINE, 5.6.2012. Online verfügbar unter http://www.zeit.de/wissen/umwelt/2012-05/unterschaetztes-tier-schwein, zuletzt geprüft am 13.10.2014. Open Google Scholar
  39. Gilligan, Carol (1988): Die andere Stimme. Lebenskonflikte und Moral der Frau. München; Zürich: Piper. Open Google Scholar
  40. Gullo, Andrea; Lassiter, Unna; Wolch, Jennifer R. (1998): The Cougar's Tale. In: Jennifer R. Wolch; Jody Emel (Hg.): Animal geographies. Place, politics, and identity in the nature-culture borderlands. London, New York: Verso, S. 139-161. Open Google Scholar
  41. Hadley, John (2006): The Duty to Aid Nonhuman Animals in Dire Need. In: Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (4), S. 445-451. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5930.2006.00358.x
  42. Hettinger, Ned (1994): Valuing Predation in Rolston’s Environmental Ethics. Bambi Lovers versus Tree Huggers. In: Environmental Ethics 16, S. 3-20. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics199416138
  43. Holtmeier, Friedrich-Karl (2002): Tiere in der Landschaft. Einfluss und ökologische Bedeutung. Stuttgart: Ulmer. Open Google Scholar
  44. Horta, Oscar (2010a): Debunking the idyllic view of natural processes: Population dynamics and suffering in the wild. In: Télos 17, S. 73-88. Open Google Scholar
  45. Horta, Oscar (2010b): The Ethics of the Ecology of Fear against the Nonspeciesist Paradigm: A Shift in the Aims of Intervention in Nature. In: Between the Species 13 (10), S. 163-187. Open Google Scholar
  46. Hursthouse, Rosalind (2007): Virtue Theory. In: Hugh LaFollette (Hg.): Ethics in practice. An anthology. Malden, MA: Blackwell, S. 45-55. Open Google Scholar
  47. Hursthouse, Rosalind (2011): Virtue Ethics and the Treatment of Animals. In: Tom L. Beauchamp; R. G. Frey (Hg.): The Oxford handbook of animal ethics. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, S. 119-143. Open Google Scholar
  48. Jamieson, Dale (1998): Animal Liberation is an Environmental Ethic. In: Environmental Values 7 (1), S. 41-57. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.3197/096327198129341465
  49. Jamieson, Dale (1990): Rights, Justice, and Duties to Provde Assistance: A Critique of Regan's Theory of Rights. In: Ethics 100 (2), S. 349-362. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/293181
  50. Jamieson, Dale (1995): Wildlife Conservation and Individual Animal Welfare. In: Bryan G. Norton; Michael Hutchins; Elizabeth F. Stevens; Terry L. Maple (Hg.): Ethics on the ark. Zoos, animal welfare, and wildlife conservation. Washington, [D.C.]: Smithsonian Inst. Press, S. 69-73. Open Google Scholar
  51. Katz, Eric (1983): Is There a Place for Animals in the Moral Consideration of Nature? In: Ethics and Animals 4 (3), S. 74-87. Open Google Scholar
  52. Kirkpatrick, J. F.; Turner, J. W., JR; Liu, I. K.; Fayrer-Hosken, R. (1996): Applications of pig zona pellucida immunocontraception to wildlife fertility control. In: Journal of Reproduction and Fertility Supplement 50, S. 183-189. Open Google Scholar
  53. Kirkwood, J. K.; Sainsbury, A. W. (1996): Ethics of Interventions for the Welfare of Free-living Wild Animals. In: Animal Welfare 5 (3), S. 235-243. Open Google Scholar
  54. Korsgaard, Christine (2004): Fellow Creatures: Kantian Ethics and Our Duties to Animals. In: Grethe Peterson (Hg.): The Tanner Lectures on Human Values. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press (25/26), S. 79-110. Open Google Scholar
  55. Kukathas, Chandran (2006): Who? Whom? Reparations and the Problem of Agency. In: Journal of Social Philosophy 37 (3), S. 330-341. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9833.2006.00340.x
  56. Lamont, Julian (1998): A solution to the puzzle of when death harms its victims. In: Australasian Journal of Philosophy 76 (2), S. 198-212. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/00048409812348351
  57. Lamont, Julian (2003): More solutions to the puzzle of when death harms its victims? In: Charles Tandy (Hg.): Death and Anti-Death Volume 1 One Hundred Years after N.F. Federov (1829-1903). California: Ria University Press, S. 377-396. Open Google Scholar
  58. Linkola, Pentti (2009): Can life prevail? A revolutionary approach to the environmental crisis. London: Arktos. Open Google Scholar
  59. Lodge, David M.; Shrader-Frechette, Kristin (2003): Nonindigenous Species: Ecological Explanation, Environmental Ethics, and Public Policy. In: Conservation Biology 17 (1), S. 31-37. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.02366.x
  60. Luke, Brian (1996): Justice, Caring and Animal Liberation. In: Josephine Donovan; Carol Adams (Hg.): Beyond animal rights. A feminist caring ethic for the treatment of animals. New York, London: Continuum; Cassell, S. 77-102. Open Google Scholar
  61. MacClellan, Joel (2011): Recreating Eden?: Natural Evil And Environmental Ethics. Online verfügbar unter http://macclellan.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/JPM-Writing.Sample-Recreating.Eden_.pdf. Open Google Scholar
  62. MacKinnon, Catharine (2004): Of Mice and Men. A Feminist Fragment on Animal Rights. In: Cass R. Sunstein; Martha C. Nussbaum (Hg.): Animal rights. Current debates and new directions. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, S. 263-376. Open Google Scholar
  63. Maurizi, Marco (2005): Nine Theses on Speciesism. Online verfügbar unter http://apesfromutopia.blogspot.de/2011/03/nine-theses-on-speciesism.html, zuletzt geprüft am 13.10.2014. Open Google Scholar
  64. McMahan, Jeff (2010): The Meat Eaters. Online verfügbar unter http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/09/19/the-meat-eaters/. Open Google Scholar
  65. Meyer, Lukas H. (2006): Reparations and Symbolic Restitution. In: Journal of Social Philosophy 37 (3), S. 406-422. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9833.2006.00345.x
  66. Michelfelder, Diane P. (2003): Valuing Wildlife Populations in Urban Environments. In: Journal of Social Philosophy 34 (1), S. 79-90. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/1467-9833.00166
  67. Milburn, Josh (2014): Not only humans eat meat: Animal politics and carnivorous companions, Veröffentlichung in Arbeit. Open Google Scholar
  68. Narveson, Jan (2003): We Don't Owe Them A Thing! A tough-minded but soft-hearted view of aid to the faraway needy. In: Monist 86, S. 419-433. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5840/monist200386323
  69. Norton, Bryan G. (1995): Caring For Nature: A Broader Look At Animal Stewardship. In: Bryan G. Norton; Michael Hutchins; Elizabeth F. Stevens; Terry L. Maple (Hg.): Ethics on the ark. Zoos, animal welfare, and wildlife conservation. Washington, [D.C.]: Smithsonian Inst. Press, S. 102-121. Open Google Scholar
  70. Norton, Bryan G.; Hutchins, Michael; Stevens, Elizabeth F.; Maple, Terry L. (Hg.) (1995): Ethics on the ark. Zoos, animal welfare, and wildlife conservation. Washington, [D.C.]: Smithsonian Inst. Press. Open Google Scholar
  71. Nozick, Robert (1974): Anarchy, state, and utopia. New York: Basic Books. Open Google Scholar
  72. Nussbaum, Martha C. (2000): Symposium on Cosmopolitanism Duties of Justice, Duties of Material Aid: Cicero's Problematic Legacy. In: Journal for Political Philosophy 8 (2), S. 176-206. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/1467-9760.00098
  73. Nussbaum, Martha C. (2004): Beyond “Compassion and Humanity”. In: Cass R. Sunstein; Martha C. Nussbaum (Hg.): Animal rights. Current debates and new directions. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, S. 299-320. Open Google Scholar
  74. Nussbaum, Martha C. (2010): Die Grenzen der Gerechtigkeit. Behinderung, Nationalität und Spezieszugehörigkeit. Berlin: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  75. Nussbaum, Martha C. (2011): The Capabilities Approach and Animal Entitlements. In: Tom L. Beauchamp; R. G. Frey (Hg.): The Oxford handbook of animal ethics. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, S. 228-251. Open Google Scholar
  76. Ott, Konrad (2003): Zum Verhältnis von Tier- und Naturschutz. In: Andreas Brenner (Hg.): Tiere beschreiben. Erlangen: Fischer, S. 124-152. Open Google Scholar
  77. Ott, Konrad (2005): Moralbegründungen zur Einführung. Hamburg: Junius. Open Google Scholar
  78. Ott, Konrad (2007): Zur ethischen Begründung des Schutzes von Biodiversität. In: Bundesamt für Naturschutz (Hg.): Biodiversität – Schlüsselbegriff des Naturschutzes im 21.Jahrhundert? Erweiterte Ergebnisdokumente einer Vilmer Sommerakademie. Unter Mitarbeit von Thomas Potthast. Bonn; Bad Godesberg, S. 89-124. Open Google Scholar
  79. Ott, Konrad (2008): A Modest Proposal about How to Proceed in Order to Solve the Problem of Inherent Moral Value in Nature. In: Laura Westra; Klaus Bosselmann; Richard Westra (Hg.): Reconciling human existence with ecological integrity. Science, ethics, economics and law. London: Earthscan, S. 39-59. Open Google Scholar
  80. Ott, Konrad (2010): Umweltethik zur Einführung. Hamburg: Junius. Open Google Scholar
  81. Palmer, Clare (1997): The Idea of the Domesticated Animal Contract. In: Environmental Values 6 (4), S. 411-425. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.3197/096327197776679004
  82. Palmer, Clare (2003): Placing Animals in Urban Environmental Ethics. In: Journal of Social Philosophy 34 (1), S. 64-78. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/1467-9833.00165
  83. Palmer, Clare (2010): Animal ethics in context. New York: Columbia University Press. Open Google Scholar
  84. Palmer, Clare (2011): The Moral Relevance of the Distinction between Domesticated and Wild Animals. In: Tom L. Beauchamp; R. G. Frey (Hg.): The Oxford handbook of animal ethics. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, S. 701-725. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195371963.013.0026
  85. Pearce, David (2009): Blueprint for a Cruelty-Free: Reprogramming Predators. The Abolitionist Project. Online verfügbar unter http://abolitionist.com/reprogramming/index.html, zuletzt geprüft am 13.10.2014. Open Google Scholar
  86. Platz, Jeppe von; Reidy, David A. (2006): The Structural Diversity of Historical Injustices. In: Journal of Social Philosophy 37 (3), S. 360-376. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9833.2006.00342.x
  87. Pluhar, Evelyn B. (1995): Beyond prejudice. The moral significance of human and nonhuman animals. Durham: Duke University Press. Open Google Scholar
  88. Pogge, Thomas (2007): Eradicating systematic poverty. In: Hugh LaFollette (Hg.): Ethics in practice. An anthology. Malden, MA: Blackwell, S. 633-646. Open Google Scholar
  89. Rachels, James (2004): Drawing Lines. In: Cass R. Sunstein; Martha C. Nussbaum (Hg.): Animal rights. Current debates and new directions. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, S. 162-174. Open Google Scholar
  90. Raterman, Ty (2008): An Environmentalist's Lament on Predation. In: Environmental Ethics 30, S. 417-434. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics200830443
  91. Regan, Tom (1986): In Sachen Rechte der Tiere. In: Peter Singer (Hg.): Verteidigt die Tiere. Überlegungen für eine neue Menschlichkeit. Wien: Neff, S. 28-47. Open Google Scholar
  92. Regan, Tom (2001): Defending animal rights. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. Open Google Scholar
  93. Regan, Tom (2003): Animal Rights: What's in a Name? In: Andrew Light und Holmes Rolston (Hg.): Environmental ethics. An anthology. Malden, MA: Blackwell, S. 65-73. Open Google Scholar
  94. Regan, Tom (2004): The case for animal rights. Berkeley: University of California Press. Open Google Scholar
  95. Regan, Tom (2007): Die Tierrechtsdebatte. In: Interdisziplinäre Arbeitsgemeinschaft Tierethik (Hg.): Tierrechte. Eine interdisziplinäre Herausforderung. Erlangen: Fischer, S. 71-88. Open Google Scholar
  96. Riechelmann, Cord (2011): Exoten auf dem Vormarsch. Die neuen Deutschen. In: ZOON (6), S. 16-27. Open Google Scholar
  97. Rollin, Bernard E. (2006): Animal rights & human morality. Amherst, N.Y: Prometheus Books. Open Google Scholar
  98. Rolston, Holmes (2007): Feeding People versus Saving Nature. In: Hugh LaFollette (Hg.): Ethics in practice. An anthology. Malden, MA: Blackwell, S. 647-656. Open Google Scholar
  99. Rosenzweig, Michael L. (2001): The four questions: What does the introduction of exotic species do to diversity? In: Evolutionary Ecology Research (3), S. 361-367. Open Google Scholar
  100. Ryder, Richard D. (2010): Speciesism Again: the original leaflet. In: Critical Society (2). Open Google Scholar
  101. Sagoff, Mark (1984): Animal Liberation and Environmental Ethics: Bad Marriage, Quick Divorce. In: Osgoode Hall Law Journal 22, S. 297-307. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.13021/G8PPPQ.41984.1177
  102. Sagoff, Mark (1999): What's Wrong with Exotic Species? Institute for Philosophy and Public Policy. School of Public Affairs. University of Maryland. Online verfügbar unter https://scholar.vt.edu/access/content/user/hullrb/PUBLIC/sagoffexoticspecies.pdf, zuletzt geprüft am 13.10.2014. Open Google Scholar
  103. Sapontzis, Steve (1984): Predation. In: Ethics and Animals 5 (2), S. 27-38. Open Google Scholar
  104. Sapontzis, Steve (1988): Speciesism. In: Between the Species 4 (2). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.15368/bts.1988v4n2.2
  105. Sapontzis, Steve (2008): Die Anwendung des Begriffs der Rechte auf Tiere. In: Ursula Wolf (Hg.): Texte zur Tierethik. Stuttgart: Reclam, S. 73-77. Open Google Scholar
  106. Sapontzis, Steve F. (1987): Morals, reason, and animals. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.15368/bts.1987v3n1.4
  107. Schäfer-Bossert, Stefanie; Bossert, Leonie (2012): Über Anthropozentrismus, Speziezismus und die Würde der Kreatur. In: Stefanie Schäfer-Bossert; Elisabeth Hartlieb (Hg.): Feministische Theologie – Politische Theologie. Entwicklungen und Perspektiven. Sulzbach/Taunus: Helmer, S. 197-218. Open Google Scholar
  108. Scheffler, Samuel (1997): Relationships and Responsibilities. In: Philosophy & Public Affairs 26 (3), S. 189-209. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.1997.tb00053.x
  109. Schopenhauer, Arthur (1977): Preisschrift über die Grundlage der Moral. Einmalige Sonderausgabe. Herrsching: Pawlak. Open Google Scholar
  110. Schroth, Jörg (2001): Die Universalisierbarkeit moralischer Urteile. Paderborn: Mentis. Open Google Scholar
  111. Shelton, Jo-Ann (2004): Killing Animal That Don't Fit In: Moral Dimensions of Habitat Restoration. In: Between the Species 4. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.15368/bts.2004v13n4.3
  112. Simberloff, Daniel (2011): Invasive Species. In: Navjot S. Sodhi; Paul R. Ehrlich (Hg.): Conservation biology for all. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press (Oxford biology), S. 131-152. Open Google Scholar
  113. Simmons, Aaron (2009): Animals, Predators, the Right to Life, and the Duty to Save Lives. In: Ethics & the Environment 14 (1), S. 15-27. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2979/ETE.2009.14.1.15
  114. Singer, Marcus G. (1965): Negative and positive duties. In: Philosophical Quarterly 15 (59), S. 97-103. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2218209
  115. Singer, Peter (1972): Famine, Affluence, and Morality. In: Philosophy & Public Affairs 1 (3), S. 229-243. Open Google Scholar
  116. Singer, Peter (1980): Utilitarianism and Vegetarianism. In: Philosophy & Public Affairs 9 (4), S. 325-337. Open Google Scholar
  117. Singer, Peter (Hg.) (1986): Verteidigt die Tiere. Überlegungen für eine neue Menschlichkeit. Wien: Neff. Open Google Scholar
  118. Singer, Peter (1987): Animal Liberation or Animal Rights? In: The Monist 70 (1), S. 3-14. Open Google Scholar
  119. Singer, Peter (1994): Praktische Ethik. Stuttgart: Reclam. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/089443939401200303
  120. Singer, Peter (1996): Animal liberation. Die Befreiung der Tiere. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt. Open Google Scholar
  121. Singer, Peter (2003): Not for Humans Only: The Place of Nunhumans in Environmental Issues. In: Andrew Light; Holmes Rolston (Hg.): Environmental ethics. An anthology. Malden, MA: Blackwell, S. 55-64. Open Google Scholar
  122. Singer, Peter (2004): Ethics beyond Species and beyond Instincts: A Response to Richard Posner. In: Cass R. Sunstein; Martha C. Nussbaum (Hg.): Animal rights. Current debates and new directions. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, S. 78-92. Open Google Scholar
  123. Slote, Michael A. (2007): The ethics of care and empathy. London, New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  124. Sommer, Volker (2012): Menschenaffen wie wir. Zum Verhältnis von "Mensch" und "Tier" aus evolutionsbiologischer Perspektive. Lust- und leidfähige Kreaturen oder seelenlose Automaten? Warum wir über die Würde und Eigenrechte der Tiere neu nachdenken müssen. Evangelische Akademie in Hessen und Nassau e.V. Evangelische Akademie Arnoldshain. Schmitten/Taunus, 30.11.2012. Open Google Scholar
  125. Sunstein, Cass R. (2004): Can Animals Sue? In: Cass R. Sunstein; Martha C. Nussbaum (Hg.): Animal rights. Current debates and new directions. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, S. 251-262. Open Google Scholar
  126. Teutsch, Gotthard (2008): Die „Würde der Kreatur“. In: Ursula Wolf (Hg.): Texte zur Tierethik. Stuttgart: Reclam, S. 56-60. Open Google Scholar
  127. TIERethik (Hg.) (2011): Tierwürde. Unter Mitarbeit von Edition ALTEX: Monsenstein Und Vannerdat. Open Google Scholar
  128. Unger, Peter (1996): Living high and letting die. Our illusion of innocence. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/0195108590.003.0001
  129. Varner, Gary E. (2003): Can Animal Rights Activists be Environmentalists? In: Andrew Light; Holmes Rolston (Hg.): Environmental ethics. An anthology. Malden, MA: Blackwell, S. 95-113. Open Google Scholar
  130. Voget-Kleschin, Lieske (2012): Sustainable food consumption? Claims for sustainable lifestyles in between normative and eudaimonistic issues. The example of food production and consumption. Dissertation. Universität Greifswald. Open Google Scholar
  131. Wachtendorf, Thomas (2004): Die Würde des Menschen. Ontologischer Anspruch, praktische Verwendung und lebensweltliche Notwendigkeit. Marburg: Tectum. Open Google Scholar
  132. Wenar, Leif (2006): Reparations for the Future. In: Journal of Social Philosophy 37 (3), S. 396-405. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9833.2006.00344.x
  133. Wild, Markus (2012): Fische. Kognition, Bewusstsein und Schmerz. Eine philosophische Perspektive. Bern: EKAH. Open Google Scholar
  134. Wolf, Jean-Claude (2003): Interspezies-Unparteilichkeit? Kritische Rückfragen. In: Andreas Brenner (Hg.): Tiere beschreiben. Erlangen: Fischer, S. 192-207. Open Google Scholar
  135. Wolf, Jean-Claude (2005): Tierethik. Neue Perspektiven für Menschen und Tiere. Erlangen: Fischer. Open Google Scholar
  136. Wolf, Jean-Claude (2009): Eine Ethik der natürlichen Sympathie. In: Carola Otterstedt (Hg.): Gefährten – Konkurrenten – Verwandte. Die Mensch-Tier-Beziehung im wissenschaftlichen Diskurs. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht, S. 348-367. Open Google Scholar
  137. Wolf, Ursula (2004): Das Tier in der Moral. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann. Open Google Scholar
  138. Wolf, Ursula (2008): Die Mensch-Tier-Beziehung und ihre Ethik. In: Ursula Wolf (Hg.): Texte zur Tierethik. Stuttgart: Reclam, S. 170-192. Open Google Scholar
  139. Wolf, Ursula (2012): Die Ethik der Mensch-Tier-Beziehung. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, Vittorio. Open Google Scholar

Similar publications

from the topics "Political Theory"
Cover of book: (Neu-)Ordnung
Edited Book No access
Uwe Wagschal, Marius Fröhle
(Neu-)Ordnung
Cover of book: Arenen des Diskurses
Edited Book No access
Thomas Schölderle, Laura Martena
Arenen des Diskurses
Cover of book: The Multipolar Turn
Book Titles No access
Carla Fetcas, Martin Kreutner
The Multipolar Turn
Cover of book: Hirntod und Organtransplantation
Edited Book No access
Wolfgang Kröll, Walter Schaupp
Hirntod und Organtransplantation
Cover of book: Henry Kissinger
Edited Book No access
Arvid Schors
Henry Kissinger

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via Open Athens
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex