Cover of book: Reconceiving Extraterritorial Jurisdiction
Book Titles Open Access Full access

Reconceiving Extraterritorial Jurisdiction

From Formality to Function
Authors:
Publisher:
 2022

Keywords

Bibliographic data

Copyright year
2022
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-8984-9
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-3321-2
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht
Volume
313
Language
English
Pages
368
Product type
Book Titles

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 - 12 Download chapter (PDF)
  2. Download chapter (PDF)
    1. I. Purpose and Scope of the Study
    2. II. Structure of the Argument
      1. 1. State Jurisdiction and State Sovereignty
      2. 2. Extraterritoriality and Extraterritorial Jurisdiction
      3. 3. The Concept of Jurisdiction in International Human Rights Treaties
      4. 4. Categories of State Jurisdiction
      5. 5. Regulation, Public Law and Jurisdiction
  3. Download chapter (PDF)
      1. 1. The Case of the S.S. Lotus
          1. aa) The Territoriality Principle and Cross-border Criminal Offenses
          2. bb) The US Presumption against Extraterritoriality
          1. aa) The Effects Principle in Competition Law
          2. bb) The Effects Principle in Other Areas of Substantive Law
        3. c) Active Personality
        4. d) Passive Personality
        5. e) The Protective Principle
        6. f) The Universality Principle
      3. 3. Treaty-based Extensions of Jurisdiction
      4. 4. Territoriality-based Jurisdiction and the Internet
        1. a) Genuine Link
        2. b) Abuse of Rights
        3. c) Proportionality
      2. 2. Comity
      3. 3. Reasonableness
  4. Download chapter (PDF)
    1. I. Focus and Structure
        1. a) Economic Sanctions under International Law
        2. b) Primary and Secondary Sanctions
          1. aa) US Sanctions against Cuba
          2. bb) US Sanctions against Iran
          3. cc) US Sanctions against Russia
        1. a) Practice in the United States
          1. aa) The Personal Scope of EU Restrictive Measures
          2. bb) Diplomatic Protest against US Assertions of Control-based Jurisdiction
          3. cc) Jurisprudence with regard to US Assertions of Control-based Jurisdiction
        3. c) Comparative Normative Analysis
        1. a) Practice in the United States
        2. b) Practice in Europe
        3. c) Comparative Normative Analysis
        1. a) Practice in the United States
        2. b) Practice in Europe
        3. c) Comparative Normative Analysis
        1. a) Practice in the United States
        2. b) Practice in Europe
      6. 6. Conclusion
      1. 1. Introduction
        1. a) International Treaties
        2. b) Informal Multilateral Regimes
        3. c) Security Council Resolutions
        1. a) Practice in the United States
        2. b) Practice in China
        3. c) Practice in Europe
        4. d) Comparative Normative Analysis
        1. a) Practice in the United States
        2. b) Practice in Europe
        3. c) Comparative Normative Analysis
      5. 5. Conclusion
      1. 1. Introduction
      2. 2. Foundations of Transnational Anti-Corruption Regulation
        1. a) The Jurisdictional Provisions of the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention
        2. b) The Jurisdictional Provisions of the UN Convention Against Corruption
          1. aa) The Jurisdictional Scope of the FCPA
          2. bb) Parent and Subsidiary Liability Based on the Accounting Provisions
          3. cc) Parent and Subsidiary Liability Based on the Agency Theory
          1. aa) The UK Bribery Act 2010
          2. bb) The French Law Regarding Transparency, the Fight against Corruption and the Modernization of Economic Life
          1. aa) The Assertion of Jurisdiction in respect of Corporate Group Policies
          2. bb) The Assertion of Control-based Jurisdiction under the FCPA
      5. 5. Correspondent Account Jurisdiction under the FCPA
        1. a) Practice in the United States
          1. aa) The UK Bribery Act 2010
          2. bb) The French Law Regarding Transparency, the Fight Against Corruption and the Modernization of Economic Life
        3. c) Comparative Normative Analysis
      7. 7. Conclusion
      1. 1. Introduction
        1. a) Corporate Social Responsibility and Business and Human Rights
        2. b) Historic Development of Business and Human Rights at the International Level
        3. c) The UN Guiding Principles
        1. a) Extraterritorial Jurisdiction as a Matter of Permission
        2. b) Extraterritorial Jurisdiction as a Matter of Obligation
          1. aa) Practice in the United States
          2. bb) Practice in Europe
          1. aa) Practice in the United States
          2. bb) Practice in Europe
          1. aa) Practice in the United States
          2. bb) Practice in Europe
        4. d) Comparative Normative Analysis
        1. a) Practice in the United States
          1. aa) Amicus Curiae Briefs in the Kiobel Proceedings
          2. bb) Transnational Human Rights Litigation in Europe
          1. aa) Jurisdiction over Corporations Domiciled in the Forum State
          2. bb) Jurisdiction over Corporations Domiciled in Third States
      6. 6. Conclusion
        1. a) Market Access Regulation Conditioned on Extraterritorial Circumstances
        2. b) Parent-based Regulation of Multinational Corporations
        3. c) Regulation of Conduct Based on Only Fleeting Territorial Connections or Based on Territorial ‘Presence’
      2. 2. The Restriction to Considerations of State Sovereignty
      3. 3. Conclusion
  5. Download chapter (PDF)
        1. a) Substantive Harmonization
        2. b) Cooperation
      2. 2. The History of the Territoriality Principle
      3. 3. Extraterritorial Jurisdiction regulated by the Principle of Non-Intervention
      4. 4. Extraterritorial Jurisdiction as an Exercise of Public Authority
          1. aa) Territoriality
          2. bb) Nationality
          3. cc) Conclusion
        2. b) Universality and Community Interests
        3. c) Proximity, Community Interests and the Rule of Law
        1. a) The Potential for Individuals to Shape State Jurisdiction
        2. b) Individual Fairness as a Principle Restraining the Exercise of Jurisdiction
        3. c) Individual Rights Catalysing the Exercise of Jurisdiction
      3. 3. Conclusion
      1. 1. Practical Requirements and Objectives of the New Framework
        1. a) Proximity and Substantial Connection
        2. b) Legitimate Interest and the Subject Matter of Regulation
        3. c) The Intrusiveness of the Measure
        1. a) The Abuse of Rights Test
          1. aa) True Conflicts
          2. bb) False Conflicts
      4. 4. Procedural Safeguards, Reasoning and Participation
        1. a) Market Access Regulation Conditioned on Extraterritorial Circumstances
        2. b) Parent-based Regulation of Multinational Corporations
        3. c) Regulation Based on Individual Consent of the Affected
      6. 6. Pre-empting Some Potential Objections
  6. E. Conclusion 325 - 329 Download chapter (PDF)
  7. Download chapter (PDF)
    1. A. Einleitung
    2. B. Die Regelungshoheit im Völkerrecht
    3. C. Fallstudien zur Staatenpraxis
    4. D. Ein neuer Ansatz
    5. E. Ausblick
  8. Download chapter (PDF)
    1. Permanent Court of International Justice
    2. International Court of Justice
    3. Human Rights Committee
    4. International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia
    5. International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda
    6. African Commission on Human and People’s Rights
    7. European Court of Human Rights
    8. Inter-American Commission on Human Rights
    9. Inter-American Court of Human Rights
    10. Court of Justice of the European Union
    11. European Commission
    12. WTO Appellate Body and WTO Panel
    13. US Supreme Court
    14. US Federal Appeals Court
    15. US Federal District Court
    16. US State Courts
    17. Other US Case Documents
    18. British Cases
    19. German Cases
    20. French Cases
    21. Dutch Cases
    22. Israeli Cases
    23. Hong Kong Cases
  9. Bibliography 351 - 368 Download chapter (PDF)

Bibliography (224)

  1. Cooreman B, Global Environmental Protection through Trade: A Systematic Approach to Extraterritoriality (Edward Elgar Publishing 2017). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  2. Cossart S, Chaplier J and Beau de Lomenie T, ‘The French Law on Duty of Care: A Historic Step Towards Making Globalization Work for All’ (2017) 2(2) Business and Human Rights Journal 317. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  3. Coughlan SG and others, Law Beyond Borders: Extraterritorial Jurisdiction in an Age of Globalization (Irwin Law; Canadian Electronic Library 2014). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  4. Crawford J and Brownlie I, Brownlie's Principles of Public International Law (Eighth edition, Oxford University Press 2012). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  5. Criminal Division of the U.S. Department of Justice and the Enforcement Division of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, ‘A Resource Guide to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: Second Edition’ (2020). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  6. Currie RJ, ‘Cross-Border Evidence Gathering in Transnational Criminal Investigation: Is the Microsoft Ireland Case the “Next Frontier”?’ (2017) 54 Canadian Yearbook of international Law/ 63. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  7. de la Torre, Mateo J. ‘The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: Imposing an American Definition of Corruption on Global Markets’ (2016) 49 Cornell International Law Journal 469. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  8. De Schutter O, ‘Extraterritorial Jurisdiction as a Tool for Improving the Human Rights Accountability of Transnational Corporations’ (2006). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  9. Deva S, ‘Corporate Human Rights Violations: A Case for Extraterritorial Regu­ lation’ in Christoph Luetge (ed), Handbook of the Philosophical Foundations of Business Ethics (Springer Netherlands 2013). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  10. Diamant MS, Sullivan CW and Smith Jason H. ‘FCPA Enforcement Against U.S. and Non-U.S. Companies’ (2019) 8 Michigan Business & Entrepreneurial Law Review 353. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  11. Dietrich T, Die Erstreckung der Strafbarkeit auf Auslandssachverhalte nach § 35 AWG: Die Vereinbarkeit von §35 AWG mit dem Völkerrecht (Zugl.: München, Univ. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  12. Diss. 2013. Schriftenreihe Studien zum Völker- und Europarecht vol 121, Kovač 2014). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  13. Dimant E and Schulte Thorben, ‘The Nature of Corruption: An Interdisciplinary Perspective’ (2016) 17(1) German Law Journal 53. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  14. Dobson NL and Ryngaert C, ‘Provocative Climate Protection: EU "Extraterritorial" Regulation of Maritime Emissions’ (2017) 66(02) ICLQ 295. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  15. Donovan DF and Roberts A, ‘The Emerging Recognition of Universal Civil Juris­ diction’ (2006) 100 AJIL 142. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  16. Drobak J, ‘Personal Jurisdiction in a Global World: The Impact of the Supreme Court's Decisions in Goodyear Dunlop Tires and Nicastro’ (2013) 90 Washing­ ton University Law Review 1707. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  17. Eckert S, ‘The Business Transparency on Trafficking and Slavery Act: Fighting Forced Labor in Complex Global Supply Chains’ (2013) 12(2) Journal of Inter­ national Business and Law. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  18. Bibliography Edoardo Varisco A, Brockmann K and Robin L, ‘Post-shipment Control Measures: European Approaches to On-site Inspections of Exported Military Materiel’ (2020), https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/2020-12/bp_2012_post-ship ment_controls.pdf. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  19. Elagab OY, The Legality of Non-Forcible Counter-Measures in International Law (Ox­ ford Monographs in International Law, Clarendon Press 1988). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  20. Emmenegger S, ‘Extraterritorial Economic Sanctions and Their Foundation in International Law’ (2016) 33 Arizona Journal of International & Comparative Law 631. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  21. Engelhart M, ‘Der britische Bribery Act 2010’ (2016) 128(3) Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  22. Enneking LFH, Foreign Direct Liability and Beyond: Exploring the Role of Tort Law in Promoting International Corporate Social Responsibility and Accountability (Zugl.: Utrecht, Univ. Diss. 2012, Eleven Internat. Publ 2012). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  23. Erman E, ‘Global Political Legitimacy beyond Justice and Democracy?’ (2016) 8(1) Int Theory 29. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  24. Fassbender B, ‘Targeted Sanctions Imposed by the UN Security Council and Due Process Rights’ (2006) 3 International Organizations Law Review 437. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  25. Faure M and Zhang X, ‘Towards an Extraterritorial Application of the Chinese Anti-Monopoly Law that Avoids Trade Conflicts’ (2013) 45 The George Wash­ ington International Law Review 101. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  26. Ford RT, ‘Law's Territory (a History of Jurisdiction)’ (1999) 97 Michigan Law Review 843. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  27. Fornara C, ‘Plutarch and the Megarian Decree’ in Donald Kagan (ed), Studies in the Greek historians: In memory of Adam Parry (Yale classical studies vol 24. Cambridge University Press 1975). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  28. Forwick C, Extraterritoriale US-amerikanische Exportkontrollen: Folgen für die Vertrags­ gestaltung (Abhandlungen zum Recht der Internationalen Wirtschaft vol 25, Verlag Recht und Wirtschaft (c)1992). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  29. Friedberg J, ‘The Arab League Boycott of Israel: Warring Histories, International Trade, and Human Rights’ in Jena Martin and Karen E Bravo (eds), The Business and Human Rights Landscape: Moving Forward, Looking Back (Cambridge Univer­ sity Press 2015). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  30. Genard Q, ‘European Union Response to Extraterritorial Claims by the United States: Lessons from Trade Control Cases’ [2014] Non-Proliferation Papers 1. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  31. George E, ‘Influencing the Impact of Business on Human Rights: Corporate Social Responsibility through Transparency and Reporting’ in Lara Blecher, Nancy K Stafford and Gretchen C Bellamy (eds), Corporate Responsibility for Human Rights Impacts: New Expectations and Paradigms (American Bar Association 2014). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  32. Gerber DJ, ‘The Extraterritorial Application of the German Antitrust Laws’ (1983) 77(4) AJIL 756. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  33. Gibney MP, ‘The Extraterritorial Application of U.S. Law: The Perversion of Democratic Governance, the Reversal of Institutional Roles, and the Imperative of Establishing Normative Principles’ (1996) 19(2) Boston College International and Comparative Law Review 297. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  34. Goldhaber MD, ‘Corporate Human Rights Litigation in Non-U.S. Courts: A Com­ parative Scorecard (Human Rights Litigation in State Courts and Under State Laws)’ (2013) 3 University of California Irvine Law Review 127. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  35. Goldsmith JL, ‘Against Cyberanarchy’ (1998) 65(4) The University of Chicago Law Review 1199. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  36. Grossfeld B and Rogers CP, ‘A Shared Values Approach to Jurisdictional Conflicts in International Economic Law’ (1983) 32(4) ICLQ 931. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  37. Grosswald Curran V, ‘Harmonizing Multinational Parent Company Liability for Foreign Subsidiary Human Rights Violations’ (2016) 17 Chicago Journal of Interanational Law 403. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  38. Grosswald Curran V and Sloss D, ‘Reviving Human Rights Litigation After Kiobel’ (2013) 107 AJIL 858. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  39. Gruson M, ‘The U.S. Jurisdiction over Transfers of U.S. Dollars between Foreign­ ers and over Ownership of U.S. Dollar Accounts in Foreign Banks’ [2004] Columbia Business Law Review 721. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  40. Handl G, ‘Extra-Territoriality and Transnational Legal Authority’ in Günther Han­ dl, Joachim Zekoll and Peer Zumbansen (eds), Beyond Territoriality: Transnation­ al Legal Authority in an Age of Globalization (Queen Mary studies in international law. Martinus Nijhofff Publishers 2012). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  41. Happold M, ‘Economic Sanctions and International Law: An Introduction’ in Matthew Happold and Paul Eden (eds), Economic Sanctions and International Law (Studies in international law volume 62. Hart Publishing 2016). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  42. Harris KD, ‘The California Transparency in Supply Chains Act: A Resource Guide’. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  43. ‘Harvard Research Draft Convention on Jurisdiction with Respect to Crime’ (1935) 29 Supp AJIL 439. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  44. Hatcher SL, ‘Circuit Board Jurisdiction: Electronic Payments and the Presumption against Extraterritoriality’ (2020) 48 Georgia Journal of International and Com­ parative Law 591. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  45. Hertogen A, ‘Sovereignty as Decisional Independence over Domestic Affairs: The Dispute over Aviation in the EU Emissions Trading System’ (2012) 1(02) TEL 281. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  46. Hertogen A, ‘Letting Lotus Bloom’ (2015) 26(4) EJIL 901. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  47. Hills L, ‘Universal Anti-Bribery Legislation Can Save International Business: A Comparison of the FCPA and the UKBA in an Attempt to Create Universal Legislation to Combat Bribery around the Globe’ (2014) 13 Richmond Journal of Global Law and Business 469. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  48. Hocke E and others, Außenwirtschaftsrecht (Heidelberger Kommentar, C.F. Müller 2017). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  49. Hoffman PL, ‘Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co: First Impressions’ [2013] Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 28. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  50. Holthausen D, ‘Die Strafbarkeit von Auslandstaten Deutscher und das völker­ rechtliche Interventionsverbot’ [1992] NJW 214. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  51. Hovell D, ‘The Authority of Universal Jurisdiction’ (2018) 29(2) EJIL 427. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  52. Huntington SP, Political Order in Changing Societies (11. printing, Yale Univ. Press 1976). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  53. Illingworth P, ‘Global Need: Rethinking Business Norms’ in Jena Martin and Karen E Bravo (eds), The Business and Human Rights Landscape: Moving Forward, Looking Back (Cambridge University Press 2015). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  54. International Bar Association, Report of the Task Force on Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (International Bar Association 2008). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  55. International Law Commission, Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of its Fifty-eighth Session (UN Doc A 61/10, 2006). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  56. Ireland-Piper D, ‘Prosecutions of Extraterritorial Criminal Conduct and the Abuse of Rights Doctrine’ (2013) 9(4) ULR 68. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  57. Ireland-Piper D, Accountability in Extraterritoriality: A Comparative and International Law Per­ spective (Edward Elgar Publishing 2017). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  58. Jackson JH, ‘Sovereignty – Modern: A new Approach to an Outdated Concept’ (2003) 97(4) AJIL 782. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  59. Jankowitsch-Prevor O and Michel Q (eds), European Dual-Use Trade Controls: Be­ yond Materiality and Borders (Peter Lang 2014). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  60. Johnson DR and Post D, ‘Law and Borders: The Rise of Law in Cyberspace’ (1996) 48 Stanford Law Review 1367. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  61. Joyner DH, ‘International Legal Limits on the Ability of States to Lawfully Impose International Economic/Financial Sanctions’ in Ali Z Marossi and Marisa R Bassett (eds), Economic Sanctions under International Law (T.M.C. Asser Press 2015). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  62. Kaeb C and Scheffer DJ, ‘The Paradox of "Kiobel" in Europe’ (2013) 107 AJIL 852. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  63. Kämmerer JA, ‘Comity’ in R. Wolfrum (ed), The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  64. Kamminga MT, ‘Extraterritoriality’ in R. Wolfrum (ed), The Max Planck Encyclope­ dia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  65. Kappel J and Lagodny O, ‘Der UK Bribery Act – Ein Strafgesetz erobert die Welt: Ein kritischer Diskussionsanstoß’ [2012] StV 695. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  66. Kassan S, ‘Extraterritorial Jurisdiction in the Ancient World’ (1935) 29 AJIL 237. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  67. Katz Cogan J, ‘The Regulatory Turn in International Law’ (2011) 52(2) HarvIntlLJ 322. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  68. Katzenstein S, ‘Dollar Unilateralism: The New Frontline of National Security’ (2015) 90 Indiana Law Journal 293. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  69. Kelsen H, Principles of international law (Rinehart and Co 1952). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  70. Kingsbury B, Krisch N and Stewart RB, ‘The Emergence of Global Administrative Law’ (2005) 68(3) Law and Contemporary Problems 15. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  71. Kinley D and Chambers R, ‘The UN Human Rights Norms for Corporations: The Private Implications of Public International Law’ (2006) 6(3) HRLRev 447. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  72. Kiss A, ‘Abuse of Rights’ in R. Wolfrum (ed), The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  73. Koehler M, ‘The Facade of FCPA Enforcement’ (2010) 41 Georgetown Journal of International Law 907. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  74. Koehler M, ‘The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act under the Microscope’ (2012) 15 Universi­ ty of Pennsylvania Journal of Business Law 1. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  75. Kohl U, ‘Corporate Human Rights Accountability: The Objections Of Western Governments To The Alien Tort Statute’ (2014) 63(03) ICLQ 665. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  76. Kohl U, ‘Jurisdiction in Cyberspace’ in Nikolaos K Tsagourias and Russell Buchan (eds), Research Handbook on International Law and Cyberspace (Research hand­ books in international law, Paperback edition 2017. Edward Elgar Publishing 2015). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  77. Kokott J and Sobotta C, ‘The Kadi Case – Constitutional core values and interna­ tional law – finding the balance?’ (2013) 23(4) EJIL 1015–1014. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  78. Koskenniemi M, ‘What Use for Sovereignty Today?’ (2011) 1(1) Asian Journal of International Law 61. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  79. Krisch N, ‘The Decay of Consent: International Law in an Age of Global Public Goods’ (2014) 108 AJIL 1. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  80. Krisch N and Kingsbury B, ‘Introduction: Global Governance and Global Adminis­ trative Law in the International Legal Order’ (2006) 17(1) EJIL 1. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  81. Layton A and Parry AM, ‘Extraterritorial Jurisdiction: European Responses’ (2004) 26 Houston Journal of International Law 309. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  82. Leff NH, ‘Economic Development Through Bureaucratic Corruption’ (1964) 8(3) American Behavioral Scientist 8. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  83. Leibold A, ‘Extraterritorial Application of the FCPA under International Law’ (2015) 51 Willemette Law Review 223. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  84. Letzien C, Internationale Korruption und Jurisdiktionskonflikte: Die Sanktionierung von Unternehmen im Fall der Bestechung ausländischer Amtsträger (Juridicum – Schriftenreihe zum Strafrecht, Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2018). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  85. Liivoja R, ‘Review of "Jurisdiction in International Law" by Cedric Ryngaert’ (2008) 19 Finnish Yearbook of International Law 397. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  86. Loomis W, ‘The Responsibility of Parent Corporations for the Human Rights Violations of their Subsidiaries’ in Michael K Addo (ed), Human rights standards and the responsibility of transnational corporations (Kluwer 1999). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  87. Lordi JA, ‘The U.K. Bribery Act: Endless Jurisdictional Liability on Corporate Violaters’ (2012) 44 Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 955. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  88. Lowe A, ‘Blocking Extraterritorial Jurisdiction: The British Protection of Trading Interests Act, 1980’ (1981) 75 AJIL 257. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  89. Lowe V, ‘US Extraterritorial Jurisdiction: The Helms-Burton and d'Amato Acts’ (1997) 46 ICLQ 378. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  90. Lowe V and Staker C, ‘Jurisdiction’ in Malcolm D Evans (ed), International Law (5th ed. Oxford University Press 2018). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  91. Lowenfeld AF, International Economic Law (International Economic Law Series, 2nd ed. Oxford University Press 2008). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  92. Luo W, ‘Research Guide to Export Control and WMD Nonproliferation Law’ (2007) 35 International Journal of Legal Information 447. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  93. Magnuson W, ‘International Corporate Bribery and Unilateral Enforcement’ (2013) 51(2) Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 360. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  94. Magnuson W, ‘Unilateral Corporate Regulation’ (2016) 17 Chicago Journal of Interanation­ al Law 521. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  95. Maier HG, ‘Jurisdictional Rules in Customary International Law’ in Karl M Meessen (ed), Extraterritorial Jurisdiction in Theory and Practice (Kluwer Law Internat 1996). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  96. Maine HS, Ancient Law: Its Connection with the Early History of Society, and its Relation to Modern Ideas (3rd American, from 5th London ed. H. Holt 1873). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  97. Mann FA, ‘The Doctrine of Jurisdiction in International Law’ (1964) 111 Recueil des Cours 1. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  98. Marauhn T, ‘Global Governance of Dual-Use Trade: The Contribution of Inter­ national Law’ in Oliver Meier (ed), Technology Transfers and Non-Proliferation: Between Control and Cooperation (Routledge global security studies. Routledge/ Taylor & Francis Group 2014). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  99. Marceau JF, ‘A Little Less Conversation, A Little More Action: Evaluating and Forecasting the Trend of More Frequent and Severe Prosecutions Under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act’ (2007) 12 Fordham Journal of Corporate & Finance Law 285. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  100. Marcuss S, ‘Jurisdiction with Respect to Foreign Branches and Subsidiaries: Judi­ cial Power in the Foreign Affairs Context under Section 414 of the Foreign Relations Restatement’ (1992) 26 The International Lawyer 1. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  101. Marcuss S and Mathias Stephen, ‘U.S. Foreign Policy Export Controls: Do They Pass Muster under International Law’ (1984) 2 Berkeley Journal of International Law 1. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  102. Martyniszyn M, ‘Japanese Approaches to Extraterritoriality in Competition Law’ (2017) 66(03) ICLQ 747. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  103. Massey DB, ‘How the American Law Institute Influences Customary Law: The Rea­ sonableness Requirement of the Restatement of Foreign Relations Law’ (1997) 22 YaleJIntLaw 419. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  104. Massoud S, Menschenrechtsverletzungen im Zusammenhang mit wirtschaftlichen Aktiv­ itäten von transnationalen Unternehmen (Interdisziplinäre Studien zu Menschen­ rechten vol 2, 1. Auflage 2018, Springer Berlin; Springer 2018). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  105. Mauro P, ‘Corruption and Growth’ (1995) 110(3) The Quarterly Journal of Eco­ nomics 681. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  106. McCorquodale R, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and International Human Rights Law’ (2009) 87 (2009) JOBE 385. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  107. McCorquodale R, ‘International Human Rights Law Perspectives on the UN Framework and Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights’ in Lara Blecher, Nancy K Stafford and Gretchen C Bellamy (eds), Corporate Responsibility for Human Rights Impacts: New Expectations and Paradigms (American Bar Association 2014). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  108. Meeran R, ‘Access to Remedy: the United Kingdom Experience of MNC Tort Litigation for Human Rights Violations’ in Surya Deva and David Bilchitz (eds), Human Rights Obligations of Business: Beyond the Corporate Responsibility to Respect? (Cambridge University Press 2013). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  109. Meeran R, ‘Multinational Human Rights Litigation in the UK: A Retrospective’ (2021) 6(2) Business and Human Rights Journal 255. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  110. Meessen KM, ‘Antitrust Jurisdiction under Customary International Law’ (1984) 78 AJIL 783. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  111. Meessen KM, ‘Extraterritoriality of Export Control: A German Lawyer Analysis of the Pipeline Case’ (1985) 27 German Yearbook of International Law 97. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  112. Mehle B and Mehle V, ‘Die notwendige Einhaltung von EU-Embargoregelungen durch Unternehmen mit Sitz in Drittstaaten’ (2015) 61(7) Recht der interna­ tionalen Wirtschaft 397. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  113. Meier O, ‘Dual-Use Technology Transfers and the Legitimacy of Non-Prolifera­ tion Regimes’ in Oliver Meier (ed), Technology Transfers and Non-Proliferation: Between Control and Cooperation (Routledge global security studies. Routledge/ Taylor & Francis Group 2014). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  114. Meijer H, Trading with the Enemy: The Making of US Export Control Policy toward the People's Republic of China (First edition, Oxford University Press 2016). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  115. Meng W, Extraterritoriale Jurisdiktion im öffentlichen Wirtschaftsrecht: Extraterritorial Jurisdiction in Public Economic Law (Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht vol 119, Springer 1994). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  116. Meng W, ‘Wirtschaftssanktionen und staatliche Jurisdiktion – Grauzonen im Völker­ recht’ (1997) 47 ZaöRV 269. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  117. Mestral AL de and Gruchalla-Wesierski T, Extraterritorial application of export control legislation: Canada and the USA (Research study/ Canadian Council of Interna­ tional Law vol 1, Nijhoff 1990). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  118. Meyer JA, ‘Second Thoughts on Secondary Sanctions’ (2009) 30(3) University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 905. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  119. Meyer JA, ‘Dual Illegality and Geoambiguous Law: A New Rule for Extraterritorial Application of U.S. Law’ (2010) 95 Minnesota Law Review 110. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  120. Meyer K, Grenzen und Entwicklungsmöglichkeiten des Souveränitätsprinzips in transnationalen Handelsbeziehungen: Zur Legitimation grenzüberschreitender Ver­ waltungszusammenarbeit am Beispiel des Lebensmittelhandels zwischen der Europä­ ischen Union und Drittstaaten (Jus Internationale et Europaeum, 1. Auflage, Mohr Siebeck 2018). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  121. Milanovic M, ‘From Compromise to Principle: Clarifying the Concept of State Jurisdiction in Human Rights Treaties’ (2008) 8(3) HRLRev 411. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  122. Mills A, ‘Rethinking Jurisdiction in International Law’ (2014) 84 BYIL 187. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  123. Ministry of Justice, ‘The Bribery Act 2010: Guidance about Procedures which Relevant Commercial Organisations Can Put into Place to Prevent Persons Associated with them from Bribing (Section 9 of the Bribery Act 2010)’ (2011). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  124. Mora PD, ‘The Alien Tort Statute After Kiobel: The Possibility For Unlawful Assertions Of Universal Civil Jurisdiction Still Remains’ (2014) 63(03) ICLQ 699. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  125. Moreno-Lax V and Costello C, ‘The Extraterritorial Application of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: From Territoriality to Facticity, the Effectiveness Mod­ el’, The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Hart Publishing 2014). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  126. Nash JR, ‘The Curious Legal Landscape of the Extraterritoriality of US Environ­ mental Laws’ in Günther Handl, Joachim Zekoll and Peer Zumbansen (eds), Beyond Territoriality: Transnational Legal Authority in an Age of Globalization (Queen Mary studies in international law. Martinus Nijhofff Publishers 2012). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  127. Niestedt M, ‘Die Geltung des EU-Sanktionsrechts für Tochtergesellschaften und Niederlassungen’ in Arnold Wallraff, Dirk Ehlers and Hans-Michael Wolffgang (eds), Recht der Exportkontrolle: Bestandsaufnahme und Perspektiven: Handbuch zum Exportkontrollrecht. zugleich Festgabe für Dr. Arnold Wallraff zum 65. Geburtstag (Schriften zum Aussenwirtschaftsrecht 2015). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  128. Nolan J, ‘From Principles to Practice: Implementing Corporate Responsibility for Human Rights’ in Jena Martin and Karen E Bravo (eds), The Business and Human Rights Landscape: Moving Forward, Looking Back (Cambridge University Press 2015). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  129. Note, ‘Developments in the Law – Extraterritoriality’ (2011) 124 HarvLRev 1226. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  130. Note, ‘Clarifying Kiobel's "Touch and Concern" Test’ (2017) 130 HarvLRev 1902. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  131. Nowrot K, ‘Steuerungssubjekt und -mechanismen im Internationalen Wirtschaft­ srecht (einschließlich regionale Wirtschaftsintegration)’ in Christian Tietje (ed), Internationales Wirtschaftsrecht (2. Aufl. De Gruyter 2015). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  132. Nuyts A, ‘Study on Residual Jurisdiction: Review of the Member States’ Rules concerning the “Residual Jurisdiction” of their Courts in Civil and Commercial Matters pursuant to the Brussels I and II Regulations’ (2007). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  133. Nwapi C, ‘A Necessary Look at Necessity Jurisdiction’ (2014) 47 UBC Law Review 211. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  134. Obidairo S, Transnational Corruption and Corporations: Regulating Bribery through Corporate Liability (Taylor and Francis 2016). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  135. O'Brien CM, ‘The Home State Duty to Regulate TNCs Abroad’ (2016). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  136. O'Brien CM, Vander Meulen N and Mehra A, ‘Public Procurement and Human Rights: A Survey of Twenty Jurisdictions’ (2016). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  137. O'Keefe R, ‘Universal Jurisdiction: Clarifying the Basic Concept’ (2004) 2(3) JICJ 735. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  138. Oxman BH, ‘Jurisdiction of States’ in R. Wolfrum (ed), The Max Planck Encyclope­ dia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  139. Pantaleo L, ‘Sanctions Cases in the European Courts’ in Matthew Happold and Paul Eden (eds), Economic Sanctions and International Law (Studies in interna­ tional law volume 62. Hart Publishing 2016). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  140. Parrish AL, ‘The Effects Test: Extraterritoriality’s Fifth Business’ (2008) 61 Vander­ bilt Law Review 1455. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  141. Parrish AL, ‘Reclaiming International Law from Extraterritoriality’ (2009) 93 Minnesota Law Review 815. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  142. Parrish AL, ‘Evading Legislative Jurisdiction’ (2012) 87 Notre Dame Law Review 1673. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  143. Peters A, Jenseits der Menschenrechte: Die Rechtsstellung des Individuums im Völkerrecht (Jus Internationale et Europaeum vol 88, Mohr Siebeck 2014). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  144. Peters A, ‘Verhältnismäßigkeit als globales Verfassungsprinzip’ in Björnstjern Baade and others (eds), Verhältnismässigkeit im Völkerrecht (Jus Internationale et Eu­ ropaeum vol 116. Mohr Siebeck 2016). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  145. Pieth M, Low LA and Bonucci N, The OECD Convention on Bribery: A Commentary on the Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions of 21 November 1997 (2. ed. Cambridge University Press 2014). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  146. Planitzer J, ‘Trafficking in Human Beings for the Purpose of Labour Exploitation: Can Obligatory Reporting by Corporations Prevent Trafficking?’ (2016) 34(4) Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 318. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  147. Posadas A, ‘Corruption under International Law’ (2000) 10 Duke Journal of Com­ parative and International Law 345. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  148. Pottmeyer K, ‘Die Strafbarkeit von Auslandstaten nach dem Kriegswaffenkontroll- und dem Außenwirtschaftsrecht’ [1992] Neue Zeitschrift für Strafrecht 57. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  149. Prete L, ‘On Implementation and Effects: The Recent Case-law on the Territorial (or Extraterritorial?) Application of EU Competition Rules’ [2018] Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 1. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  150. Putnam TL, Courts without Borders: Law, Politics, and U.S. Extraterritoriality (Cam­ bridge University Press 2016). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  151. Ramasastry A, ‘Closing the Governance Gap in the Business and Human Rights Arena: lessons from the anti-corruption movement’ in Surya Deva and David Bilchitz (eds), Human Rights Obligations of Business: Beyond the Corporate Respon­ sibility to Respect? (Cambridge University Press 2013). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  152. Rathbone M, Jeydel P and Lentz A, ‘Sanctions, sanctions everywhere: Forging a path through complex transnational sanctions laws’ (2013) 44(3) Georgetown Journal of International Law 1055. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  153. Raustiala K, ‘The Geography of Justice’ (2005) 73 FordhamLR 101. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  154. Raustiala K, Does the Constitution Follow the Flag?: The Evolution of Territory in American law (Oxford University Press 2009). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  155. Rehbinder E, ‘Extra-Territoriality of Pollution Control Laws from a European Per­ spective’ in Günther Handl, Joachim Zekoll and Peer Zumbansen (eds), Beyond Territoriality: Transnational Legal Authority in an Age of Globalization (Queen Mary studies in international law. Martinus Nijhofff Publishers 2012). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  156. Reinisch A, ‘Human Rights Extraterritoriality: Controlling Companies Abroad’ in Eyal Benvenisti and Georg Nolte (eds), Community Interests Across International Law (First edition. Oxford University Press 2018). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  157. Reisman M and Stevick DL, ‘The Applicability of International Law Standards to United Nations Economic Sanctions Programmes’ (1998) 9 EJIL 86. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  158. Rennack DE, ‘Iran: U.S. Economic Sanctions and the Authority to Lift Restric­ tions’ (May 2018), https://fas.org/sgp/crs/mideast/R43311.pdf. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  159. Rensmann T, ‘Völkerrechtliche Grenzen extraterritorialer Wirtschaftssanktionen’ in Arnold Wallraff, Dirk Ehlers and Hans-Michael Wolffgang (eds), Recht der Exportkontrolle: Bestandsaufnahme und Perspektiven: Handbuch zum Exportkontroll­ recht. zugleich Festgabe für Dr. Arnold Wallraff zum 65. Geburtstag (Schriften zum Aussenwirtschaftsrecht 2015). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  160. Restatement (Fourth) of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States (American Law Inst. Publ 2018). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  161. Restatement (Third) of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States (American Law Inst. Publ 1987). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  162. Rice S, ‘Discriminating for World Peace’ in Jeremy M Farrall and Kim Rubenstein (eds), Sanctions, Accountability and Governance in a Globalised World (Connecting international law with public law. Cambridge University Press 2009). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  163. Ronzitti N, ‘Sanctions as Instruments of Coercive Diplomacy: An International Law Perspective’ in Natalino Ronzitti (ed), Coercive Diplomacy, Sanctions and International Law (Brill Nijhoff 2016). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  164. Rose C, International Anti-Corruption Norms: Their Creation and Influence on Domes­ tic Legal Systems (Oxford University Press 2015). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  165. Rose-Ackerman S and Palifka BJ, Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform (Second edition, Cambridge University Press 2016). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  166. Ruggie JG, Just business: Multinational corporations and human rights (Amnesty inter­ national global ethics series, First edition, W.W. Norton & Company 2013). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  167. Ruys T and Ryngaert C, ‘Secondary Sanctions: A Weapon out of Control? The International Legality of, and European Responses to, US Secondary Sanctions’ [2020] BYIL. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  168. Ryngaert C, Jurisdiction in International Law (Oxford Monographs in International Law, Second edition.). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  169. Ryngaert C, ‘Extraterritorial Export Controls (Secondary Boycotts)’ (2008) 7 Chinese Jour­ nal of International Law 625. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  170. Ryngaert C, Unilateral Jurisdiction and Global Values: Oratie in verkorte vorm uitgesproken bij de aanvaarding van het ambt van hoogleraar Internationaal Publiekrecht aan de Faculteit Recht, Economie, Bestuur en Organisatie van de Univ. Utrecht op maandag 30 maart 2015 (Eleven International 2015). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  171. Ryngaert C, ‘Whither Territoriality?: The European Union's Use of Territoriality to set Norms with Universal Effects’ in Cedric Ryngaert and others (eds), What's Wrong with International Law?: Liber amicorum A.H.A. Soons (Nova et vetera iuris gentium. Brill Nijhoff 2015). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  172. Ryngaert C, ‘From Universal Civil Jurisdiction To Forum Of Necessity: Reflections On The Judgment Of The European Court Of Human Rights In Nait-Liman’ [2017] Rivista di Diritto Internazionale 782. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  173. Ryngaert C, Selfless intervention: Exercising jurisdiction in the common interest (Oxford schol­ arship online, First edition, Oxford University Press 2020). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  174. Ryngaert C and Koekkoek M, ‘Extraterritorial Regulation of Natural Resources: a Functional Approach’ in Jan Wouters and others (eds), Global Governance through Trade: EU Policies and Approaches (Leuven Global Governance. Edward Elgar Publishing 2015). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  175. Ryngaert C and Ringbom H, ‘Introduction: Port State Jurisdiction: Challenges and Potential’ (2016) 31(3) The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 379. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  176. Sagafi-nejad T and Dunning JH, The UN and Transnational Corporations: From Code of Conduct to Global Compact (United Nations Intellectual History Project, Indiana University Press 2008). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  177. Salbu SR, ‘Extraterritorial Restriction of Bribery: A Premature Evocation of the Normative Global Village’ (1999) 24(1) YaleJIntLaw 223. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  178. Sarfaty GA, ‘Shining Light on Global Supply Chains’ (2015) 56 HarvIntlLJ 419. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  179. Schaefer ME, ‘Should a Parent Company Be Liable for the Misdeeds of Its Sub­ sidiary?: Agency Theories Under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act’ (2019) 94 New York University Law Review 1654. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  180. Schalber R, Der UK Bribery Act und seine Bedeutung im Rahmen von Criminal Com­ pliance (Schriften zu Compliance v.13, 1st ed. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft 2018). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  181. Schmahl S, ‘Zwischenstaatliche Kompetenzabgrenzung im Cyberspace’ (2009) 47 Archiv des Völkerrechts 284. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  182. Schöppner T, Wirtschaftssanktionen durch Bereitstellungsverbote (Zugl.: Münster, Univ. Diss, 2013. Schriftenreihe des Europäischen Forums für Aussenwirtschaft, Verbrauchsteuern und Zoll e.V. an der Westfälischen Wilhelms-Universität Münster vol 51, Mendel 2013). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  183. Schultz T, ‘Carving up the Internet: Jurisdiction, Legal Orders, and the Pri­ vate/Public International Law Interface’ (2008) 19(4) EJIL 799. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  184. Schuster G, Die internationale Anwendung des Börsenrechts (Beiträge zum ausländis­ chen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht, Springer 1996). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  185. Scott C, ‘Analysing Regulatory Space: Fragmented Resources and Institutional Design’ [2001] PL 329. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  186. Scott J, ‘Extraterritoriality and Territorial Extension in EU Law’ (2013) 62 AJCL 87. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  187. Scully EP, Bargaining with the State from Afar: American Citizenship in Treaty Port China, 1844–1942 (Columbia University Press 2012). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  188. Second Annual International Business Law Symposium, ‘Trading with Cuba: The Cuban Democracy Act and Export Rules’ (1993) 8 Florida Journal of Interna­ tional Law 335. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  189. Sève M, ‘Sapin II: Is the Era of Compliance and Criminal Settlements upon France?’ [2017] RTDF 2. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  190. Simma B, ‘From Bilateralism to Community Interest in International Law’ (1994) 250 Recueil des Cours 217. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  191. Skinner G, ‘Rethinking Limited Liability of Parent Corporations for Foreign Sub­ sidiaries’ Violations of International Human Rights Law’ (2015) 72 Washington and Lee Law Review 1769. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  192. Spiro PJ, ‘Perfecting Political Diaspora’ (2006) 81(1) New York University Law Review 207. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  193. Stephens B, ‘The Amorality of Profit: Transnational Corporations and Human Rights’ (2002) 20 Berkeley Journal of International Law 45. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  194. Stigall DE, ‘International Law and Limitations on the Exercise of Extraterritorial Jurisdiction in U. S. Domestic Law’ (2012) 35 Hastings International and Com­ parative Law Review 323. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  195. Stilz A, ‘Why do States have Territorial Rights?’ (2009) 1(2) Int Theory 185. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  196. Svantesson DJB, Solving the Internet Jurisdiction Puzzle (Oxford University Press 2017). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  197. Sweet AS and Mathews J, ‘Proportionality Balancing and Global Constitutional­ ism’ (2008) 47(1) Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 72. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  198. Thoms A, ‘Offenlegungspflichten für Konfliktmineralien in den USA und der EU’ in Arnold Wallraff, Dirk Ehlers and Hans-Michael Wolffgang (eds), Recht der Exportkontrolle: Bestandsaufnahme und Perspektiven: Handbuch zum Exportkontroll­ recht. zugleich Festgabe für Dr. Arnold Wallraff zum 65. Geburtstag (Schriften zum Aussenwirtschaftsrecht 2015). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  199. Thorhauer NI, Jurisdiktionskonflikte im Rahmen transnationaler Kriminalität (Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG 2019). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  200. Turner R, ‘Transnational Supply Chain Regulation: Extraterritorial Regulation as Corporate Law's new Frontier’ (2016) 17 MelbJIntLaw 1. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  201. Uecker P, Extraterritoriale Regelungshoheit im Datenschutzrecht (Frankfurter Studien zum Datenschutz vol 52, 1. Auflage, Nomos 2017). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  202. Vagts DF, ‘Extraterritoriality and the Corporate Governance Law’ (2003) 97(2) AJIL 289. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  203. Vázquez CM, ‘Trade Sanctions and Human Rights: Past, Present and Future’ (2003) 6 JIEL 797. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  204. Verdier P-H, ‘Transnational Regulatory Networks and their Limits’ (2009) 34(1) YaleJIntLaw 113. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  205. Volz M, Extraterritoriale Terrorismusbekämpfung (Tübinger Schriften zum interna­ tionalen und europäischen Recht Bd. 86, Duncker & Humblot 2007). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  206. Wade R, ‘The System of Administrative and Political Corruption: Canal Irrigation in South India’ (1982) 18(3) The Journal of Development Studies 287. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  207. Wagner-von Papp F, ‘Competition Law and Extraterritoriality’ in Ariel Ezrachi (ed), Research handbook on international competition law (Elgar 2012). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  208. Wallace CD, The Multinational Enterprise and Legal Control: Host State Sovereignty in an Era of Economic Globalization ([2. ed.], Martinus Nijhoff 2002). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  209. Walter C, ‘Grundlagen und Rahmenbedingungen für die Steuerungskraft des Völkerrechts’ (2016) 76(2) ZaöRV 363. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  210. Weissbrodt DS and Kruger M, ‘Norms on the Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises with Regard to Human Rights’ (2003) 97 AJIL 901–922. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  211. Whang C, ‘The Challenges of Enforcing International Military-Use Technology Export Control Regimes: An Analysis of the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty’ (2015) 33(1) Wisconsin international law journal 114. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  212. White ND and Abass A, ‘Countermeasures and Sanctions’ in Malcolm D Evans (ed), International Law (5th ed. Oxford University Press 2018). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  213. Wilson N, ‘Pushing the Limits of Jurisdiction Over Foreign Actors Under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act’ (2014) 91 Washington University Law Review 1063. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  214. Windholz EL, Governing through Regulation: Public Policy, Regulation and the Law (Routledge critical studies in public management, Routledge Taylor & Francis Group 2018). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  215. Woody KE, ‘Conflict Minerals Legislation: The SEC’s New Role as Diplomatic and Humanitarian Watchdog’ (2013) 81 FordhamLR 1315. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  216. Woody KE, ‘No Smoke and no Fire: The Rise of internal Controls absent anti-bribery Violations in FCPA Enforcement’ (2017) 38 Cardozo Law Review 1727. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  217. Wouters J, Ryngaert C and Cloots AS, ‘The International Legal Framework against Corruption: Achievements and Challenges’ (2013) 14 MelbJIntLaw 1–76. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  218. Wu Z, ‘Perspectives on the Chinese Anti-Monopoly Law’ (2008) 75(1) Antitrust Law Journal 73. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  219. Yee S, ‘Universal Jurisdiction: Concept, Logic, and Reality’ (2011) 10(3) Chinese Journal of International Law 503. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  220. Yihdego Z, The Arms Trade and International Law (Studies in international law vol. 15, Hart Pub 2007). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  221. Yilmaz Vastardis A and Chambers R, ‘Overcoming the Corporate Veil Challenge: Could Investment Law Inspire the Proposed Business and Human Rights Treaty?’ (2018) 67(02) ICLQ 389. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  222. Zagaris B, International White Collar Crime: Cases and Materials (2. ed. Cambridge University Press 2015). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  223. Zerk JA, Extraterritorial Jurisdiction: Lessons for the Business and Human Rights Sphere from Six Regulatory Areas (A Report for the Harvard Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative to Help Inform the Mandate of the Unsg's Special Rep­ resentative on Business and Human Rights. Working paper/ Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative vol 59, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government 2010). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212
  224. Ziegenhain H-J, Extraterritoriale Rechtsanwendung und die Bedeutung des GenuineLink-Erfordernisses: Eine Darstellung der deutschen und amerikanischen Staatenpraxis (Zugl.: München, Univ. Diss. 1991/92. Münchener Universitätsschriften Reihe der Juristischen Fakultät vol 92, Beck 1992). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748933212

Similar publications

from the topics "European Law & International Law & Comparative Law"
Cover of book: Unbeabsichtigte Normenkonflikte zwischen EU-Recht und nationalem Recht
Book Titles No access
Yannis Ockernahl
Unbeabsichtigte Normenkonflikte zwischen EU-Recht und nationalem Recht
Cover of book: Der Volkseinwand
Book Titles No access
Florian Feigl
Der Volkseinwand
Cover of book: Wie fördert die EU Menschenrechte in Drittstaaten?
Book Titles No access
Dennis Traudt
Wie fördert die EU Menschenrechte in Drittstaaten?
Cover of book: Future-Proofing in Public Law
Edited Book No access
Nicole Koblenz LL.M., Nicholas Otto, Gernot Sydow
Future-Proofing in Public Law
Cover of book: Das Weltraumrecht und seine Eignung für den Rohstoffabbau durch Privatakteure
Book Titles No access
Justus Schmidt
Das Weltraumrecht und seine Eignung für den Rohstoffabbau durch Privatakteure

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via Open Athens
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex