Lex Digitalis Intermedia

Bodo P. Bützler

doi:10.5771/9783748916727

Keywords

Search publication

Bibliographic data

Copyright year: 2024
ISBN-Print: 978-3-95832-358-2
ISBN-Online: 978-3-7489-1672-7
Publisher: Velbrück Wissenschaft, Weilerswist
Language: English
Pages: 368
Product type: Book Titles

Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access Pages 1 - 8
Preface No access Pages 9 - 10
Introduction: Intermediation on the internet No access Pages 11 - 20
1. 1. 1.1 Multi-sided markets and network effects No access
  2. 1.2 Monopolistic forces and competition through disruption No access
  3. 1.3. The effects of internet intermediation onto societal welfare No access
2. 1. 2.1 From Google to Alphabet No access
  2. 2.2 Information acquisition in the Information Age No access
3. 1. 3.1 Normative network: Guidelines, policies, and contractual web No access
  2. 3.2 Normative paradigm: Maintaining uniformity No access
  3. 3.3 Comparison to social networking platforms: Governing multiplicity No access
  4. 1. 1. 3.4.1.1 Situation in the U.S.: Search results ranking as free speech No access
      2. 3.4.1.2 Situation in the EU: Abuse of dominant market position No access
      3. 3.4.1.3 Transnational fragmentation of competition law No access
      4. 3.4.1.4 The EU’s Digital Markets Act: A way forward? No access
    2. 1. 3.4.2.1 Situation in the U.S.: Search engines not public forums No access
      2. 3.4.2.2 Situation in the EU: Proceduralization of private governance No access
      3. 3.4.2.3 Transnational fragmentation of platforms standards and user rights No access
      4. 3.4.2.4 The EU’s Digital Services Act: A way forward? No access
4. 1. 1. 4.1.1 Why the genealogical premise cannot convince No access
    2. 4.1.2 Why command theories of law cannot convince No access
  2. 1. 4.2.1 Primordial normative powers of incumbent intermediaries No access
    2. 4.2.2 Assessing the primordial normative powers of incumbent intermediaries No access
    3. 4.2.3 Toward lex digitalis intermedia No access
1. 1. 1.1 The three commitments to philosophical liberalism No access
  2. 1.2 Preliminary conceptual clarifications No access
  3. 1.3 Roadmap No access
2. 1. 1. 2.1.1 Proceduralist conceptions No access
    2. 2.1.2 Substantivist conceptions No access
    3. 2.1.3 Epistemic conceptions No access
    4. 2.1.4 Consent-based conceptions No access
    5. 2.1.5 Impartiality-based conceptions No access
    6. 2.1.6 Authority-based conceptions No access
  2. 1. 1. 2.2.1.1 Constitutionalism No access
      2. 2.2.1.2 Global legal pluralism No access
    2. 1. 2.2.2.1.1 The evolution of the global sanctions regime No access
        2.2.2.1.2 Legitimacy conceptions invoked by global security governance No access
      2. 2.2.2.2.1 Hybrid governance regimes No access
        2.2.2.2.2 Legitimacy conceptions invoked by global economic governance No access
      3. 2.2.2.3.1 Chemical safety No access
        2.2.2.3.2 GMO regulation No access
        2.2.2.3.3 Legitimacy conceptions invoked by global risk governance No access
    3. 1. 2.2.3.1.1 The evolution of merchant law No access
        2.2.3.1.2 Legitimacy conceptions invoked by lex mercatoria No access
      2. 2.2.3.2.1 The normative order of global professional sports No access
        2.2.3.2.2 Legitimacy conceptions invoked by lex sportiva No access
      3. 2.2.3.3.1 Parallels between the study of Jewish law and transnational law No access
        2.2.3.3.2 Legitimacy conceptions invoked by Jewish law No access
3. 1. 3.1 Why the inclusive approach cannot convince No access
  2. 3.2 Why the exclusive approach cannot convince No access
  3. 3.3 Why the hybrid approach cannot convince No access
4. 1. 1. 1. 4.1.1.1 From responsive law to self-reflexive law No access
      2. 4.1.1.2 The dual justificatory function of legal legitimacy in public discourse No access
    2. 1. 4.1.2.1 Intention and agent-responsibility No access
      2. 4.1.2.2.1 Established collectives No access
        4.1.2.2.2 Emergent collectives No access
      3. 4.1.2.3 The ascriptive function of legal legitimacy in public discourse No access
  2. 1. 1. 4.2.1.1 Our co-constitutive relationship with technology No access
      2. 4.2.1.2 The opacity of the digital socio-technical domain No access
      3. 4.2.1.3 A practical account of transparency measures for lex digitalis intermedia No access
    2. 1. 4.2.2.1 Why reciprocal normative attitudes matter for lex digitalis intermedia No access
      2. 4.2.2.2 Promising developments No access
      3. 4.2.2.3 Worrisome developments No access
    3. 1. 4.2.3.1 Checks and balances No access
      2. 4.2.3.2 Institutional agency and institutional reasons No access
      3. 4.2.3.3 Checks and balances for lex digitalis intermedia: Entangling normative paradigms No access
Epilogue No access Pages 337 - 341
Table of Abbreviations No access Pages 342 - 343
Bibliography No access Pages 344 - 368