Cover of book: Afghan Women in Solidarity
Buy in shop
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Book Titles No access

Afghan Women in Solidarity

Counter Narratives on the Dialectics of Oppression and Token Recognition
Authors:
Publisher:
 08.05.2024

Summary

The book is a historical testimony from the time before the Taliban took power in Afghanistan in 2021. In her qualitative research, the author traces the interwoven narratives of girls' and young Afghan women's experiences of suffering, solidarity and hope, focussing on the subjective realities and agency of girls and young women in Afghanistan. She contextualises how women in Afghanistan have always been exploited as pawns of national and international actors and the extent to which military and humanitarian interventions have ignored the realities of life.

Keywords

Bibliographic data

Publication year
2024
Publication date
08.05.2024
ISBN-Print
978-3-7560-0342-6
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-3642-8
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Schriften zur interdisziplinären Frauen- und Geschlechterforschung. | Series on Interdisciplinary Women’s and Gender Studies.
Volume
15
Language
English
Pages
186
Product type
Book Titles

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access 1 - 10
    1. Afghan Youths’ Position before August 2021 No access
    2. The Afghan Youth Project No access
    1. 2.1 The political discourse No access
    2. 2.2 Humanitarian Aid in Afghanistan No access
    3. 2.3 Postcolonial and transnational feminist perspective No access
    1. 3.1 Afghanistan under King Amir Abdur Rahman—1880 - 1901 No access
    2. 3.2 Afghanistan under King Amanullah—1919 - 1929 No access
    3. 3.3 Afghanistan under Nadir Shah—1929 - 1933 No access
    4. 3.4 Afghanistan under Zahir Shah—1933 - 1973 No access
    5. 3.5 Afghanistan under Communist rule—1978 - 1992 No access
    6. 3.6 Afghanistan under the Mujahideen rule—1992 - 1996 No access
    7. 3.7 Afghanistan under the rule of the Taliban—1996 - 2001 No access
    1. 4.1 Research Context—What it means to do research in a conflict zone No access
      1. Desiderata of the research design and the research—i.e.: failure. No access
        1. Sample No access
      2. 4.3.2 The projective essays No access
      3. 4.3.3 The drawings No access
      4. 4.3.4 The analysis and presentation of the data No access
    1. 5.1 Case vignette: Razia No access
    2. 5.2 Case Vignette: Farishta No access
    3. 5.3 Case Vignette: Nilofar No access
    4. 5.4 Case Vignette: Gul-Afshan No access
    5. 5.5 Case Vignette: Zuhul No access
    6. 5.6 Case Vignette: Shabana No access
    7. 5.7 Case Vignette: Nazeneen No access
    8. 5.8 Case Vignette: Mohsina No access
    9. 5.9 Case Vignette: Satayesh No access
    1. 6.1 Narratives of Suffering and Expressions of Solidarity No access
      1. 6.2.1 What is solidarity? No access
      2. 6.2.2 Solidarity in feminist and postcolonial theory No access
    3. 6.3 Expressions of Solidarity as an Expression of Agency No access
  8. Conclusion No access 163 - 172
  9. Literature No access 173 - 186

Bibliography (252)

  1. Abifareh, L. (2005). Lessons from gender focused international aid in post-conflict Afghanistan ... Learned? Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. Open Google Scholar
  2. Abirafeh, L. (2009). Gender and international aid in Afghanistan: The politics and effects of intervention. McFarland & Co. Open Google Scholar
  3. Abu-Lughod, L. (2002). Do Muslim Women Really Need Saving? Anthropological Reflections on Cultural Relativism and Its Others. American Anthropologist, 104(3), 783–790. Open Google Scholar
  4. Afshar, H. (2004). “Introduction War and Peace: what do women contribute”. In H. Afshar & D. Eade (Eds.), Development, Women, and War: Feminist Perspectives (pp. 1-7). Oxford: Oxfam Publishing. Open Google Scholar
  5. Agathangelou, A. M., & Ling, L. H. M. (2004). The House of IR: From Family Power Politics to the Poisies of Worldism. International Studies Review, 6(4), 21–49. JSTOR. Open Google Scholar
  6. Ahmed, L. (1993). Women and Gender in Islam: Historical Roots of a Modern Debate. New Haven: Yale University Press. Open Google Scholar
  7. Ahmed-Ghosh, H. (2003). A History of Women in Afghanistan: Lessons Learnt for the Future or Yesterdays and Tomorrow: Women in Afghanistan. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 4, 1–14. Open Google Scholar
  8. Ahram, A. I. (2013). Iraq in the Social Sciences: Testing the Limits of Research. The Journal of the Middle East and Africa, 4(3), 251–266. Open Google Scholar
  9. Akhtar, N. (2008). PAKISTAN, AFGHANISTAN, AND THE TALIBAN. International Journal on World Peace, 25(4), 49–73. Open Google Scholar
  10. Akseer, T., & Keats, E. C. (2019). A Survey of the Afghan Returnees 2018. Retrieved at March 14, 2021 from https://think-asia.org/handle/11540/10276. Open Google Scholar
  11. Alimajrooh, P. (1989). Afghan women between Marxism and Islamic fundamentalism. Central Asian Survey, 8(3), 87–98. Open Google Scholar
  12. Allport, G. W. (1945). Human nature and the peace. Psychological Bulletin, 42(6), 376–378. Open Google Scholar
  13. Amin, S. & Clausen, T. (2023). Silencing half the population: The tragic denial of girls and women‘s right to education in Afghanistan. Friedrich-Naumann-Stiftung. Open Google Scholar
  14. Amiri, R., Hunt, S., & Sova, J. (2004). Transition Within Tradition: Women’s Participation in Restoring Afghanistan. Sex Roles, 51(5/6), 283–291. Open Google Scholar
  15. Antonovsky, A. (1997). Salutogenese: Zur Entmystifizierung der Gesundheit (N. Schulte, Translation.). dgvt Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  16. Arat-Koc, S. (2002). Feature-Hot Potato: Imperial Wars or Benevolent Interventions? Reflections on "Global Feminism" Post September 11th. Atlantis: Critical Studies in Gender, Culture & Social Justice, 26(2), 53-65. Open Google Scholar
  17. Arbabzadah, N. (2011). In Search of a Real but Invisible Afghan Feminist Icon: CSW Research Scholar Returns to Kabul to Explore the Legacy of Queen Soraya Tarzi. Retrieved at March 6, 2021 from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0fj0v57p. Open Google Scholar
  18. Arsenault, M. (2019). Research Methods in Counterinsurgency Warfare: Lessons Learned From an Embedded Political Scientist. SAGE Publications Ltd. Open Google Scholar
  19. Asian Development Bank. (2020). Asian Development Bank—Afghanistan. Retrieved at March 14, 2021 from https://www.adb.org/countries/afghanistan/main. Open Google Scholar
  20. Askins, K., & Pain, R. (2011). Contact Zones: Participation, Materiality, and the Messiness of Interaction. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 29(5), 803–821. Open Google Scholar
  21. Atran, S., Axelrod, R., Davis, R., & Fischhoff, B. (2017). Challenges in researching terrorism from the field. Science, 355(6323), 352–354. Open Google Scholar
  22. Auyero, J., & Mahler, M. (2011). (In)visible Connections and the Makings of Collective Violence. In G. P. Dueñas & M. H. Rueda (Eds.), Meanings of Violence in Contemporary Latin America (pp. 197–222). Palgrave Macmillan US. Open Google Scholar
  23. Ayotte, K. J., & Husain, M. E. (2005). Securing Afghan Women: Neocolonialism, Epistemic Violence, and the Rhetoric of the Veil. NWSA Journal, 17, 112–133. Open Google Scholar
  24. Azarbaijani-Moghaddam, S. (2006). Women's groups in Afghan civil society: Women and men working towards equitable participation in civil society organizations. Counterpart International. Open Google Scholar
  25. Azarbaijani-Moghaddam, S. (2004). ‘Women on the Margins of the Twenty-First Century’, In Antonio Donini, Norah Niland & Karin Wermester (Eds.), Nation-Building Unravelled? Aid, Peace and Justice in Afghanistan (pp. 95–113). Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press. Open Google Scholar
  26. Azarbaijani-Moghaddam, S. (2009). The Arrested Development of Afghan Women. In A. Thier (Ed.), The Future of Afghanistan (pp. 63–72). Washington D.C.: United States Institute of Peace. Open Google Scholar
  27. Barakat, S., & Wardell, G. (2002). Exploited by Whom? An Alternative Perspective on Humanitarian Assistance to Afghan Women. Third World Quarterly, 23(5), 909–930. JSTOR. Open Google Scholar
  28. Barfield, T. J. (2010). Afghanistan: A cultural and political history. Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  29. Barker, J., & Weller, S. (2003). “Is it fun?” developing children centred research methods. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 23(1/2), 33–58. Open Google Scholar
  30. Bartky, S. L. (2002). “Sympathy and solidarity” and other essays. Rowman & Littlefield. Open Google Scholar
  31. Bayertz, K. (1999). Four Uses of “Solidarity.” In K. Bayertz (Ed.), Solidarity. Philosophical Studies in Contemporary Culture (pp. 3-28). (Vol. 5). Springer Netherlands. Open Google Scholar
  32. Becker, D. (2014). Die Erfindung des Traumas: Verflochtene Geschichten. Psychosozial-Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  33. Bezhan, F. (2020). “Afghan Lives Matter”: Gruesome Deaths Of Afghan Migrants In Iran Unleash Outrage. Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. Retrieved at March 14, 2021 from https://www.rferl.org/a/iran-afghan-lives-matter-migrants-deaths-outrage/30665907.html. Open Google Scholar
  34. Bhattacharya, S. (2019). Field Research in Conflict Zones: Analyzing Civilian Support for Maoist Rebels in India. SAGE Publications Ltd. Open Google Scholar
  35. Billaud, J. (2015). Kabul carnival: Gender politics in postwar Afghanistan. PENN, University of Pennsylvania Press. Open Google Scholar
  36. Blatter, J., Langer, P. C., & Wagemann, C. (2007). Qualitative Politikanalyse: Eine Einführung in Forschungsansätze und Methoden. VS, Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar
  37. Bloom, P. (2016). Against empathy: The case for rational compassion (First edition). Ecco, an imprint of HarperCollins Publishers. Open Google Scholar
  38. Bogner, A., & Rosenthal, G. (2014). The "Untold" Stories of Outsiders and Their Significance for the Analysis of (Post-) Conflict Figurations. Interviews with Victims of Collective Violence in Northern Uganda (West Nile). Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 15(3). Open Google Scholar
  39. Bohn, L. (2018). “We’re All Handcuffed in This Country.” Why Afghanistan Is Still the Worst Place in the World to Be a Woman. Retrieved at March 14, 2021 from https://time.com/5472411/afghanistan-women-justice-war/. Open Google Scholar
  40. Bohnsack, R. (2003). Qualitative Methoden der Bildinterpretation. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 6(2), 239–256. Open Google Scholar
  41. Boltanski, L. (1999). Distant suffering: Morality, media, and politics. Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  42. Borg, M., Karlsson, B., Kim, H. S., & McCormack, B. (2012). Opening up for Many Voices in Knowledge Construction. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 13(1). Open Google Scholar
  43. Bourdieu, P., & Accardo, A. (Eds.), (1999). The weight of the world: Social suffering in contemporary society. Stanford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  44. Bourke, L. (2009). Reflections on doing participatory research in health: Participation, method and power. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12(5), 457–474. Open Google Scholar
  45. Bouta, T., Frerks, G., & Bannon, I. (2005). Gender, conflict, and development. World Bank. Open Google Scholar
  46. Breithaupt, F. (2017). Die dunklen Seiten der Empathie. Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  47. Bronstein, I., Montgomery, P., & Dobrowolski, S. (2012). PTSD in Asylum-Seeking Male Adolescents From Afghanistan: PTSD Amongst Afghan UASC. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 25(5), 551–557. Open Google Scholar
  48. Brunner, C. (2015). Das Konzept epistemischer Gewalt als Element einer transdisziplinären Friedens- und Konflikttheorie, In W. Wintersteiner, & L. Wolf, (Eds.), Friedensforschung in Österreich, Bilanz und Perspektiven. Jahrbuch Friedenskultur, Volume 10 (pp. 38–53). Klagenfurt/Celovec: Drava Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  49. Bush, G. W. (2002). State of the Union Address, January 29, 2002. Retrieved at March 14, 2021 from https://www.utb.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Material/heideking/13/13_stateoftheunion_2002.htm. Open Google Scholar
  50. Bush, L. (2001). Radio Address by Mrs. Bush. Retrieved at March 14, 2021 from https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2001/11/20011117.html. Open Google Scholar
  51. Bush, L. (2002). Mrs. Bush’s Remarks on International Women’s Day at the United Nations. Retrieved at March 14, 2021 from https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2002/03/20020308-15.html. Open Google Scholar
  52. Butler, J. (2004). Precarious life: The powers of mourning and violence. Verso. Open Google Scholar
  53. Campbell, S. P. (2017). Ethics of Research in Conflict Environments. Journal of Global Security Studies, 2(1), 89–101. Open Google Scholar
  54. Cannella, G. S., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2007). Predatory vs. Dialogic Ethics: Constructing an Illusion or Ethical Practice as the Core of Research Methods. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(3), 315–335. Open Google Scholar
  55. Carter, S. (2010). Iran’s Interests in Afghanistan and their Implications for NATO. International Journal: Canada’s Journal of Global Policy Analysis, 65(4), 977–993. Open Google Scholar
  56. Catani, C., Schauer, E., Elbert, T., Missmahl, I., Bette, J.-P., & Neuner, F. (2009). War trauma, child labor, and family violence: Life adversities and PTSD in a sample of school children in Kabul: Life Adversities and PTSD Prevalence in Afghan School Children. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 22(3), 163–171. Open Google Scholar
  57. Centlivres-Demont. (1994). Afghan women in peace, war, and exile. In M. Weiner & A. Banuazizi (Eds.), The politics of social transformation in Afghanistan, Iran, and Pakistan (pp. 333–365). NY: Syracuse University Press. Open Google Scholar
  58. Central Statistics Organization. (2018). Afghanistan Living Conditions Survey 2016-17. Open Google Scholar
  59. Cieri, M. (2004). Irresolvable Geographies. Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey. Open Google Scholar
  60. Clarke, A. E. (2012). Situationsanalyse: Grounded Theory nach dem Postmodern Turn. Springer VS. Open Google Scholar
  61. Clarke, A. E., Friese, C., & Washburn, R. (Eds.), (2015). Situational analysis in practice: Mapping research with grounded theory. Left Coast Press. Open Google Scholar
  62. Cloud, D. L. (2004). “To veil the threat of terror”: Afghan women and the ⟨clash of civilizations⟩ in the imagery of the U.S. war on terrorism. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 90(3), 285–306. Open Google Scholar
  63. Conceição, P. & United Nations Development Programme. (2019). Human development report 2019: Beyond income, beyond averages, beyond today: inequalities in human development in the 21st century. Open Google Scholar
  64. Constable, Pamela. (2007). A Wake-Up Call in Afghanistan. Journal of Democracy, 18(2), 84–98. Open Google Scholar
  65. Cornwall, A., & Brock, K. (2005). What do buzzwords do for development policy? A critical look at ‘participation’, ‘empowerment’ and ‘poverty reduction.’ Third World Quarterly, 26(7), 1043–1060. Open Google Scholar
  66. Cureton, A. (2012). Solidarity and Social Moral Rules. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 15(5), 691–706. Open Google Scholar
  67. Daulatzai, A. (2008). The Discursive Occupation of Afghanistan. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 35(3), 419–435. Open Google Scholar
  68. De Beauvoir, S. (1949). L’expérience vécue. Gallimard. Open Google Scholar
  69. de Beer, P., & Koster, F. (2009). Sticking Together or Falling Apart?: Solidarity in an Era of Individualization and Globalization. Amsterdam University Press. Open Google Scholar
  70. De Lauri, A. (2013). Corruption, Legal Modernisation and Judicial Practice in Afghanistan. Asian Studies Review, 37(4), 527–545. Open Google Scholar
  71. Dean, J. (1995). REFLECTIVE SOLIDARITY. Constellations, 2(1), 114–140. Open Google Scholar
  72. Dean, J. (1996). Solidarity of strangers: Feminism after identity politics. University of California Press. Open Google Scholar
  73. Decoloniality Europe. (2013). Charter of Decolonial Research Ethics. https://decolonialityeurope.wixsite.com/decoloniality. Open Google Scholar
  74. Deepak, A. C. (2012). Globalization, power and resistance: Postcolonial and transnational feminist perspectives for social work practice. International Social Work, 55(6), 779–793. Open Google Scholar
  75. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2008). Introduction. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The discipline and practice of qualitative research. Strategies of qualitative inquiry (pp. 1–43). Sage Publications, Inc. Open Google Scholar
  76. DiCarlo, M. A., Gibbons, J. L., Kaminsky, D., Wright, J. D., & Stiles, D. A. (2000). Street children’s drawings: Windows into their life circumstances and aspirations. International Social Work, 43(1), 107–120. Open Google Scholar
  77. Dossa, P. (2005). “Witnessing” Social Suffering: Testimonial Narratives of Women from Afghanistan. BC Studies: The British Columbian Quarterly, 27-49. Open Google Scholar
  78. Du Bois, W. E. B. (William E. B., 1868-1963. (1968). The souls of black folk; essays and sketches. Chicago, A. G. McClurg, 1903. New York : Johnson Reprint Corp., [1968]. Open Google Scholar
  79. Dupree, L. (1973). Afghanistan. Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  80. Dupree, Nancy Hatch. 1984. Revolutionary Rhetoric and Afghan Women. In M. Nazif Shahrani & R. L. Canfield (Eds.), Revolutions and Rebellions in Afghanistan: Anthropological Perspectives (pp. 306–340). Berkeley, California.: Institute of International Studies, University of California. Open Google Scholar
  81. Dupree, N. H. (1986). The Women of Afghanistan. Swedish Committee for Afghanistan. Open Google Scholar
  82. Dupree, N. H. (1998). Afghan Women Under the Taliban. In Maley, W. (Ed.), Fundamentalism reborn?: Afghanistan and the Taliban (pp. 145-166). NYU Press. Open Google Scholar
  83. Eggerman, M., & Panter-Brick, C. (2010). Suffering, hope, and entrapment: Resilience and cultural values in Afghanistan. Social Science & Medicine, 71(1), 71–83. Open Google Scholar
  84. Eisenstein, Z. R. (1996). Hatreds: Racialized and sexualized conflicts in the 21st century. Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  85. Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What Is Agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023. Open Google Scholar
  86. Evans, M. (2013). The Meaning of Agency. In S. Madhok, A. Phillips, & K. Wilson (Eds.), Gender, Agency, and Coercion (pp. 47–63). Palgrave Macmillan UK. Open Google Scholar
  87. Exo, M. (2017). Das übergangene Wissen: Eine dekoloniale Kritik des liberalen Peacebuilding durch basispolitische Organisationen in Afghanistan. transcript Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  88. Fairbarin, G. (2004). Devoloping Academic Storytelling. Retrieved at March 12, 2021 from https://www.aare.edu.au/data/publications/2004/fai04793.pdf. Open Google Scholar
  89. Fanon, F. (2008). Black skin, white masks. Grove Press; Distributed by Publishers Group West. Open Google Scholar
  90. Farhatiar, S. (2023). Beyond tokenism: What if we meaningfully involved Afghan Women? Center for feminist foreign policy. CFFP. Retrieved at December 22, 2023 from https://centreforfeministforeignpolicy.org/2023/08/15/beyond-tokenism-what-if-we-meaningfully-involve-afghan-women/. Open Google Scholar
  91. Farley, L., & Mishra Tarc, A. (2014). Drawing Trauma: The Therapeutic Potential of Witnessing the Child’s Visual Testimony of War. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 62(5), 835–854. Open Google Scholar
  92. Farmer, P. (1996). On suffering and structural violence: A view from below. Daedalus, 125(1), 261-283. Open Google Scholar
  93. Fassin, D., & Pandolfi, M. (Eds.), (2010). Contemporary states of emergency: The politics of military and humanitarian interventions. Zone Books ; Distributed by the MIT Press. Open Google Scholar
  94. Feroz, E. (2019). Why Afghanistan’s independence day remains problematic. Available. Retrieved at March 11, 2021 from https://www.trtworld.com/opinion/why-afghanistan-s-independence-day-remains-problematic-29388. Open Google Scholar
  95. Flanders, L. (2001). Beyond the Burqa: The Rights Women Need in Afghanistan are Basic Human Rights. Retrieved at March 14, 2021 from http://www.apc.org.nz/pma/rob00417.htm. Open Google Scholar
  96. Fluri, J. (2012). Capitalizing on Bare Life: Sovereignty, Exception, and Gender Politics. Antipode, 44(1), 31–50. Open Google Scholar
  97. Fluri, J. (2008). ‘Rallying public opinion’ and other misuses of feminism. In R. Riley, C. T. Mohanty, & M. B. Pratt (Eds.), Feminism and war: Confronting U.S. imperialism (pp. 143–160). London: Zed Books. Open Google Scholar
  98. Fluri, J. & Lehr, R. (2017). The carpetbaggers of Kabul and other American-Afghan entanglements: Intimate development, geopolitics, and the currency of gender and grief. University of Georgia Press. Open Google Scholar
  99. Foster, J. E., & Minwalla, S. (2018). Voices of Yazidi women: Perceptions of journalistic practices in the reporting on ISIS sexual violence. Women’s Studies International Forum, 67, 53–64. Open Google Scholar
  100. Foucault, M. (1977). Der Wille zum Wissen. Sexualität und Wahrheit. Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  101. Foucault, M. (1999). In Verteidigung der Gesellschaft. Vorlesungen am Collège De France (1975–76). Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  102. Foucault, M. (2006). Die Geburt der Biopolitik. Geschichte der Gouvernementalität II. Vorlesungen am Collège de France 1978/1979. Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  103. Friedman, H. (2004). ‘Psychological Operations in Afghanistan: Operation Enduring Freedom 2001. Retrieved at March 14, 2021 http://www.psywar.org/afghanistan.php. Open Google Scholar
  104. Frisina, A. (2006). Back-talk Focus Groups as a Follow-Up Tool in Qualitative Migration Research: The Missing Link? Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 7,(3). Open Google Scholar
  105. Frost, L., & Hoggett, P. (2008). Human agency and social suffering. Critical Social Policy, 28(4), 438–460. Open Google Scholar
  106. Gallacher, L.-A., & Gallagher, M. (2008). Methodological Immaturity in Childhood Research?: Thinking through `participatory methods’. Childhood, 15(4), 499–516. Open Google Scholar
  107. Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. Turning Points in Qualitative Research: Tying Knots in a Handkerchief, 3, 143–168. Open Google Scholar
  108. Gregory, T. (2012). Rescuing the women of Afghanistan: Gender, agency and the politics of intelligibility. Doctoral dissertation, University of Manchester. Open Google Scholar
  109. Göle, N. (1996). The Forbidden Modern: Civilization and Veiling. University of Michigan Press. Open Google Scholar
  110. Goodhand, J. (2000). Research in conflict zones: Ethics and accountability. Forced Migration Review, 8(4), 12–16. Open Google Scholar
  111. Guhin, J., & Wyrtzen, J. (2013). The Violences of Knowledge: Edward Said, Sociology, and Post-Orientalist Reflexivity. In J. Go (Ed.), Political Power and Social Theory (pp. 231–262). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Open Google Scholar
  112. Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, Reflexivity, and “Ethically Important Moments” in Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 261–280. Open Google Scholar
  113. Helbardt, S., Hellmann-Rajanayagam, D., & Korff, R. (2010). War’s dark glamour: Ethics of research in war and conflict zones. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 23(2), 349–369. Open Google Scholar
  114. Hemmings, C. (2012). Affective solidarity: Feminist reflexivity and political transformation. Feminist Theory, 13(2), 147–161. Open Google Scholar
  115. Hennink, M. M., Hutter, I., & Bailey, A. (2011). Qualitative research methods. SAGE. Open Google Scholar
  116. Hirschkind, C., & Mahmood, S. (2002). Feminism, the Taliban, and Politics of Counter-Insurgency. Anthropological Quarterly, 75(2), 339–354. Open Google Scholar
  117. Holland, S., Renold, E., Ross, N. J., & Hillman, A. (2010). Power, agency and participatory agendas: A critical exploration of young people’s engagement in participative qualitative research. Childhood, 17(3), 360–375. Open Google Scholar
  118. Hooks, B. (1986). Sisterhood: Political Solidarity between Women. Feminist Review, 23(1), 125–138. Open Google Scholar
  119. Human Rights Watch. (2006). Lessons in Terror: Attacks on Education in Afghanistan. Retrieved at March 14, 2021 https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/afghanistan0706.pdf. Open Google Scholar
  120. Hund, S. A., & Benford, R. A. (2007). Collective Identity, Solidarity, and Commitment. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements (pp. 433–457). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Open Google Scholar
  121. Hunt, K. (2002). The Strategic Co-optation of Women’s Rights. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 4(1), 116–121. Open Google Scholar
  122. Hussain, S. (2012). Looking for ‘tribals’ without politics, ‘warlords’ without history: The drug economy, development and political power in Afghanistan. Identities, 19(3), 249–267. Open Google Scholar
  123. Institute for Economics and Peace. (2019). Global Terrorism Index 2019. Retrieved at March 14, 2021 https://visionofhumanity.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/GTI-2019-briefingweb.pdf. Open Google Scholar
  124. Institute for Economics and Peace (2020). Global Peace Index 2020. Retrieved at March 14, 2021 http://visionofhumanity.org/app/uploads/2020/06/GPI_2020_web.pdf. Open Google Scholar
  125. Jefferess, D. (2009). To be good (again): The Kite Runner as allegory of global ethics. Journal of Postcolonial Writing, 45(4), 389–400. Open Google Scholar
  126. Jeffries, V. (2014). Altruism, Morality, and Social Solidarity as a Field of Study. In V. Jeffries (Ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Altruism, Morality, and Social Solidarity (pp. 3–20). Palgrave Macmillan US. Open Google Scholar
  127. Jones 2004: Bruce D. Jones, “Aid, Peace and Justice in a Reordered World,” In A. Donini, N. Niland, and K. Wermester (Eds.), Nation-Building Unraveled? Aid, Peace and Jutice in Afghanistan (pp. 207–226). Bloomfield: Kumarian Press. Open Google Scholar
  128. Jones, S. G. (2006). Averting failure in Afghanistan. Survival, 48(1), 111–128. Open Google Scholar
  129. Kabeer, N. (1994). Reversed realities: Gender hierarchies in development thought. Verso. Open Google Scholar
  130. Kamminga, J., & Zaki, A. (2018). Returning to Fragility: Exploring the link between conflict and returnees in Afghanistan. Oxfam. Open Google Scholar
  131. Kandiyoti, D. (Ed.), (1991). Women, Islam and the State. Palgrave Macmillan UK. Open Google Scholar
  132. Kandiyoti, D. (2005). The politics of gender and reconstruction in Afghanistan. UNRISD. Open Google Scholar
  133. Kaplan C (1994). ‘The Politics of Location as Transnational Feminist Critical Practice’. In Grewal I and Kaplan C (Eds.), Scattered Hegemonies: Postmodernity and Transnational Feminist Critical Practice (pp. 137–152). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Open Google Scholar
  134. Kapur, R. (2002). The Tragedy of Victimization Rhetoric: Resurrecting the Native Subject in International/Postcolonial Feminist Legal Politics. Harvard Human Rights Law Journal, 15, 1–38. Open Google Scholar
  135. Kearney, K. S., & Hyle, A. E. (2004). Drawing out emotions: The use of participant-produced drawings in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Research, 4(3), 361–382. Open Google Scholar
  136. Kensinger, L. (2003). Plugged in Praxis: Critical Reflections on U.S. Feminism, Internet Activism, and Solidarity with Women in Afghanistan. 5(1), 1–28. Open Google Scholar
  137. Khan Burki, S. (2011). The Politics of Zan from Amanullah to Karzai: Lessons for Improving Afghan Women’s Status. In J. Heath & A. Zahedi A. (Eds.), Land of the Unconquerable (pp. 45–59). University of California Press. Open Google Scholar
  138. Khan, S. (2001). Between Here and There: Feminist Solidarity and Afghan Women. Retrieved at March 14, 2021 https://www.colorado.edu/gendersarchive1998-2013/2001/03/01/between-here-and-there-feminist-solidarity-and-afghan-women. Open Google Scholar
  139. Khan, S. (2008). Afghan women: The limits of colonial rescue. In R. Riley, C. T. Mohanty, & M. B. Pratt (Eds.), Feminism and war: Confronting U.S. imperialism (pp. 161–78). London: Zed Books. Open Google Scholar
  140. Kleinman, A., Das, V., & Lock, M. M. (1997). Introduction. In A. Kleinman, V. Das & M. M. Lock (Eds.), Social Suffering (pp. ix–xxvii). University of California Press. Open Google Scholar
  141. Koloma Beck, T. (2018). “Liberating the Women of Afghanistan”: An ethnographic journey through a humanitarian intervention. Socio, 11, 57–75. Open Google Scholar
  142. Koser, K., & Kuschminder, K. (2015). Comparative Research on the Assisted Voluntary Return and Reintegration of Migrants. IOM. Retrieved at March 14, 2021 https://www.iom.int/files/live/sites/iom/files/What-We-Do/docs/AVRR-Research-final.pdf. Open Google Scholar
  143. Kühner, A., Ploder, A., & Langer, P. C. (2016). Introduction to the Special Issue: European Contributions to Strong Reflexivity. Qualitative Inquiry, 22(9), 699–704. Open Google Scholar
  144. Kühner, A., & Langer, P. C. (2010). Dealing with Dilemmas of Difference—Ethical and Psychological Considerations of “Othering” and “Peer Dialogues” in the Research Encounter. MIGRATION LETTERS, 7(1), 69–78. Open Google Scholar
  145. Langer, P. C. (2016). The Research Vignette: Reflexive Writing as Interpretative Representation of Qualitative Inquiry—A Methodological Proposition. Qualitative Inquiry, 22(9), 735–744. Open Google Scholar
  146. Langer, P. C. (2018). Emanzipatorische Forschung: Fürsorgeversprechen, Widerstandsdynamiken und eine Ethik der Zurückhaltung In E. Zadow, A. Lohl, M. S. Löhlein & P. Schweder (Eds.). Widerstand und Fürsorge: Beiträge zum Thema Psychoanalyse und Gesellschaft (pp. 141–161). Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. Open Google Scholar
  147. Langer, P. C., Ahmad, A.-N., Auge, U. & Majidi, K. (2021). Jugend in Afghanistan Ringen um Zukunft in Zeiten des Krieges. Psychosozial-Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  148. Langer, P. C., Dymczyk, A., Brehm, A., & Ronel, J. (2020). Traumakonzepte in Forschung und Praxis. Heidelberg: Springer. Open Google Scholar
  149. Langer, P. C. & Pietsch, C. (2012). Studying cross-cultural competence in the military: methodological considerations of applied contract research for the German Armed Forces. In H. Carreiras & C. Castro (Eds.), Qualitative Methods in Military Studies (pp. 45–63). London & New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  150. Leavy, P. (2020). Methods meets art: Arts-based research practice (Third edition). The Guilford Press. Open Google Scholar
  151. Liamputtong, P., & Ezzy, D. (2005). Qualitative research methods (2nd ed). Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  152. Littler, J., & Rottenberg, C. (2021). Feminist solidarities: Theoretical and practical complexities. Gender, Work & Organization, 28(3), 864– 877. Open Google Scholar
  153. Loch, U. (2008). Spuren von Traumatisierungen in narrativen Interviews. Forum: Qualitative Social Research,9(1). Open Google Scholar
  154. Madhok, S. (2014). Rethinking agency: Developmentalism, gender and rights. Retrieved at March 14, 2021 http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=none&isbn=9781315816074. Open Google Scholar
  155. Madhok, S., Phillips, A., & Wilson, K. (2013). Introduction. In S. Madhok, A. Phillips, & K. Wilson (Eds.), Gender, Agency, and Coercion (pp. 1–13). Palgrave Macmillan UK. Open Google Scholar
  156. Majidi, N. (2017). From Forced Migration to Forced Returns in Afghanistan: Policy and Program Implications. Retrieved at March 14, 2021 from https://www.migrationpolicy.org/sites/default/files/publications/TCM2017-Afghanistan-FINAL.pdf. Open Google Scholar
  157. Manganaro, L. L., & Alozie, N. O. (2011). Gender Role Attitudes: Who Supports Expanded Rights for Women in Afghanistan? Sex Roles, 64(7–8), 516–529. Open Google Scholar
  158. Mani, L. (1998). Contentious traditions: The debate on Sati in colonial India. University of California Press. Open Google Scholar
  159. Marcus, G. (2001). Afghan women enjoy their freedom. Retrieved at March 14, 2021 from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/1672488.stm. Open Google Scholar
  160. Mernissi, F. (1987). Beyond the veil: Male-female dynamics in modern Muslim society (Vol. 423). Indiana University Press. Open Google Scholar
  161. Merriman, B., & Guerin, S. (2006). Using Children’s Drawings as Data in Child-Centred Research. The Irish Journal of Psychology, 27(1–2), 48–57. Open Google Scholar
  162. Ministry of Education, Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), & Samuel Hall. (2018). All in School and Learning: Global Initiative on Out-Of-School Children – Afghanistan Country Study. Ministry of Education, Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, UNICEF, Samuel Hall. Retrieved at March 14, 2021 from xhttps://www.unicef.org/afghanistan/sites/unicef.org.afghanistan/files/2018-05/afg-report-oocs2018.pdf. Open Google Scholar
  163. Moghadam, V. M. (1994). Building human resources and women’s capabilities in Afghanistan: A retrospect and prospects. World Development, 22(6), 859–875. Open Google Scholar
  164. Moghadam, V. M. (1997). Nationalist Agendas and Women’s Rights: Conflicts in Afghanistan in the Twentieth Century. In L. West (Ed.), Feminist Nationalism (pp. 75–100). Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  165. Moghadam, V. M. (2002). Patriarchy, the Taleban, and politics of public space in Afghanistan. Women’s Studies International Forum, 25(1), 19–31. Open Google Scholar
  166. Moghissi, H. (1999). Feminism and Islamic fundamentalism: The limits of postmodern analysis. Zed Books. Open Google Scholar
  167. Mohanty, C. T. (1984). Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses. Boundary 2, 12(3), 333. Open Google Scholar
  168. Mohanty, C. (1988). Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses. Feminist Review, 30(1), 61–88. Open Google Scholar
  169. Mohanty, C. T. (2003). Feminism without borders: Decolonizing theory, practicing solidarity. Duke University Press. Open Google Scholar
  170. Monsutti, A. (2013). Anthropologizing Afghanistan: Colonial and Postcolonial Encounters. Annual Review of Anthropology, 42(1), 269–285. Open Google Scholar
  171. Mosse, D. (2015). Cultivating Development: An Ethnography of Aid Policy and Practice. Pluto Press. Open Google Scholar
  172. Mulligan, M., Globalism Institute (Melbourne, Vic.), Victorian Health Promotion Foundation, & RMIT University. (2006). Creating community: Celebrations, arts and wellbeing within and across local communities. Globalism Institute, RMIT University : VicHealth. Open Google Scholar
  173. Nato. (2012). International Security Assistance Force (ISAF): Key Facts and Figures. Retrieved at March 14, 2021 from https://www.nato.int/isaf/placemats_archive/2012-04-18-ISAF-Placemat.pdf. Open Google Scholar
  174. Nato. (2015). ISAF’s mission in Afghanistan (2001-2014) (Archived). Retrieved at March 14, 2021 from https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_69366.htm. Open Google Scholar
  175. Nayak, M. (2006). Orientalism and ‘saving’ US state identity after 9/11. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 8(1), 42–61. Open Google Scholar
  176. Nguyen, L. (2011). The Ethics of Trauma: Re-traumatization in Society’s Approach to the Traumatized Subject. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 61(1), 26–47. Open Google Scholar
  177. Nind, M. (2011). Participatory data analysis: A step too far? Qualitative Research, 11(4), 349–363. Open Google Scholar
  178. Nordstrom, C., & Robben, A. C. G. M. (Eds.), (1995). Fieldwork under fire: Contemporary studies of violence and survival. University of California Press. Open Google Scholar
  179. OCHA. (2023). Asia and the Pacific. Afghanistan. Retrieved at December 22, 2023 from https://www.unocha.org/afghanistan. Open Google Scholar
  180. OHCHR. (2023). A/HRC/53/21: Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Afghanistan and the Working Group on discrimination against women and girls. Retrieved at December 22, 2023 from https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/g23/125/67/pdf/g2312567.pdf?token=n1HizwubCHKa4S5Typ&fe=true. Open Google Scholar
  181. Office of the Special Adviser on Gender Issues and Advancemet of Women. (1997). Report of the United Nations Interagency Gender Mission to Afghanistan. Retrieved at March 14, 2021 from http://afghandata.org:8080/jspui/bitstream/azu/3952/1/azu_acku_pamphlet_hv6250_4_w65_r47_1997_w.pdf. Open Google Scholar
  182. Olesen, A. (1995). Islam and politics in Afghanistan. Curzon. Open Google Scholar
  183. Ozernoy, I. (2001). "Liberation Day." U.S. News & World Report., 26 November, 30. Open Google Scholar
  184. Panter-Brick, C., Eggerman, M., Gonzalez, V., & Safdar, S. (2009). Violence, suffering, and mental health in Afghanistan: A school-based survey. The Lancet, 374(9692), 807–816. Open Google Scholar
  185. Peceny, M., & Bosin, Y. (2011). Winning with warlords in Afghanistan. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 22(4), 603–618. Open Google Scholar
  186. Peter, M., & Strazzari, F. (2017). Securitisation of research: Fieldwork under new restrictions in Darfur and Mali. Third World Quarterly, 38(7), 1531–1550. Open Google Scholar
  187. Peters, C. 2001. ‘What Does Feminism Have To Say?’, In S. Hawthorne & B. Winter (Eds.), September 11, 2001: Feminist Perspectives, (pp. 120–128). North Melbourne, Vic.: Spinifex. Open Google Scholar
  188. Plummer, K. (2015). Cosmopolitan sexualities: Hope and the humanist imagination. Polity Press. Open Google Scholar
  189. Plummer, K. (2010). Sociology: The basics. Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  190. Puar, J. K. (2005). On Torture: Abu Ghraib. Radical History Review, 2005(93), 13–38. Open Google Scholar
  191. Rashid, A. (2001). Taliban: The story of the Afghan warlords ; including a new foreword following the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001. Pan Macmillan. Open Google Scholar
  192. Rashid, A. (2010). Sturz ins Chaos: Afghanistan, Pakistan und die Rückkehr der Taliban. Weltkiosk. Open Google Scholar
  193. Renner, W., Salem, I., & Ottomeyer, K. (2006). CROSS-CULTURAL VALIDATION OF MEASURES OF TRAUMATIC SYMPTOMS IN GROUPS OF ASYLUM SEEKERS FROM CHECHNYA, AFGHANISTAN, AND WEST AFRICA. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 34(9), 1101–1114. Open Google Scholar
  194. Reuters. (2001). ‘Cherie Blair Condemns Taliban “Cruelty” to Women’. Reuters News. Open Google Scholar
  195. Rippe, K. P. (1998). Diminishing Solidarity. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 1(3), 355–373. Open Google Scholar
  196. Roane, K. R., & Ozernoy, I. (2001). Afghan Women Find New Hope. U.S. News & World Report, 22–24. Open Google Scholar
  197. Romano, D. (2006). Conducting Research in the Middle East’s Conflict Zones. PS: Political Science & Politics, 39(03), 439–441. Open Google Scholar
  198. Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  199. Rosenthal, G. (Ed.), (2015). Etablierte und Aussenseiter zugleich: Selbst- und Fremdbilder von Palästinensern im Westjordanland und in Israel. Campus Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  200. Rostami-Povey, E. (2007a). Afghan women: Identity and invasion. Zed Books. Open Google Scholar
  201. Rostami-Povey, E. (2007b). Gender, agency and identity, the case of Afghan women in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iran. The Journal of Development Studies, 43(2), 294–311. Open Google Scholar
  202. Rubin, A. (2015, December 26). Flawed Justice After a Mob Killed an Afghan Woman. The New York Times. Retrieved at March 14, 2021 from https://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/27/world/asia/flawed-justice-after-a-mob-killed-an-afghan-woman.html. Open Google Scholar
  203. Rubin, J. A. (1984). Child art therapy: Understanding and helping children grow through art. Wiley. Open Google Scholar
  204. Russo, A. (2006). The Feminist Majority Foundation’s Campaign to Stop Gender Apartheid: THE INTERSECTIONS OF FEMINISM AND IMPERIALISM IN THE UNITED STATES. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 8(4), 557–580. Open Google Scholar
  205. Sabaratnam, M. (2011). IR in Dialogue … but Can We Change the Subjects? A Typology of Decolonising Strategies for the Study of World Politics. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 39(3), 781–803. Open Google Scholar
  206. Said, E. W. (1994). Culture and imperialism. Vintage. Open Google Scholar
  207. Said, E. W. (1995). Orientalism. Penguin Books. Open Google Scholar
  208. Scheid, C. (2012). Eine Erkundung zur Methodologie sozialwissenschaftlicher Analysen von gezeichneten und gemalten Bildern anhand der Analyse zweier Kinderzeichnungen. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 14(1), 1–26. Open Google Scholar
  209. Scholz, S. J. (2007). Political Solidarity and Violent Resistance. Journal of Social Philosophy, 38(1), 38–52. Open Google Scholar
  210. Scholz, S. J. (2008). Political solidarity. Pennsylvania State University Press. Open Google Scholar
  211. Scholz, S. J. (2009). Feminist Political Solidarity. In L. Tessman (Ed.), Feminist Ethics and Social and Political Philosophy: Theorizing the Non-Ideal (pp. 205–220). Springer Netherlands. Open Google Scholar
  212. Scholz, S. J. (2015). Seeking Solidarity. Philosophy Compass, 10(10), 725–735. Open Google Scholar
  213. Schuster, L., & Majidi, N. (2013). What happens post-deportation? The experience of deported Afghans. Migration Studies, 1(2), 221–240. Open Google Scholar
  214. Sharma, R. (2010). China’s Afghanistan Policy: Slow Recalibration. China Report, 46(3), 201–215. Open Google Scholar
  215. Shepherd, L. J. (2006). Veiled references: Constructions of gender in the Bush administration discourse on the attacks on Afghanistan post-9/11. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 8(1), 19–41. Open Google Scholar
  216. Shissler, A. H. (2004). Beauty Is Nothing to Be Ashamed Of: Beauty Contests As Tools of Women’s Liberation in Early Republican Turkey. Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East, 24(1), 109–126. Open Google Scholar
  217. Singer, T., & Klimecki, O. M. (2014). Empathy and compassion. Current Biology, 24(18), R875–R878. Open Google Scholar
  218. Sluka, J. A. (2020). Too dangerous for fieldwork? The challenge of institutional risk-management in primary research on conflict, violence and ‘Terrorism.’ Contemporary Social Science, 15(2), 241–257. Open Google Scholar
  219. Smith, C., & Sorrell, K. (2014). On Social Solidarity. In V. Jeffries (Ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Altruism, Morality, and Social Solidarity (pp. 219–247). Palgrave Macmillan US. Open Google Scholar
  220. Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. Zed Books. Open Google Scholar
  221. Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the Subaltern Speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture (pp. 271–313). University of Illinois Press. Open Google Scholar
  222. Spivak, G. C. (1999). A critique of postcolonial reason: Toward a history of the vanishing present. Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
  223. Strasser, P. (2001). Kinder legen Zeugnis ab: Gewalt gegen Frauen als Trauma für Kinder. Studien-Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  224. Suhrke, A., & Borchgrevink, K. (2009). Negotiating justice sector reform in Afghanistan. Crime, Law and Social Change, 51(2), 211–230. Open Google Scholar
  225. Tay-Lim, J., & Lim, S. (2013). Privileging Younger Children’s Voices in Research: Use of Drawings and a Co-Construction Process. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 12(1), 65–83. Open Google Scholar
  226. Thomas, G. V., & Jolley, R. P. (1998). Drawing conclusions: A re-examination of empirical and conceptual bases for psychological evaluation of children from their drawings. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 37(2), 127–139. Open Google Scholar
  227. Tickner, J. A. (2001). Gendering world politics: Issues and approaches in the post-Cold War era. Columbia University Press. Open Google Scholar
  228. Tolia-Kelly, D. P. (2007). Participatory art: Capturing spatial vocabularies in a collaborative visual methodology with Melanie Carvalho and South Asian women in London In R. Kindon, R. Painand & M. Kesby. (Eds.), Participatory action research approaches and methods: connecting people, participation and place (pp. 132–140). New York and London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  229. Trani, J.-F., Biggeri, M., & Mauro, V. (2013). The Multidimensionality of Child Poverty: Evidence from Afghanistan. Social Indicators Research, 112(2), 391–416. Open Google Scholar
  230. Tranow, U. (2012). Das Konzept der Solidarität. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar
  231. Turkcan, B. (2013). Semiotic Approach to the Analysis of Children’s Drawings. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 13(1), 600–607. Open Google Scholar
  232. UNESCO. (2021). Afghanistan. Retrieved at March 14, 2021 from http://uis.unesco.org/country/AF. Open Google Scholar
  233. UNICEF. (2016). Education. Providing quality education for all. Retrieved at March 14, 2021 from https://www.unicef.org/afghanistan/education. Open Google Scholar
  234. Unicef Afghanistan. (2018). Unicef Afghanistan—Annual Report. Retrieved at March 14, 2021 from https://www.unicef.org/afghanistan/media/4321/file/English%20.pdf. Open Google Scholar
  235. United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan. (2019). Afghanistan 2019 Mid-Year update. Retrieved at March 14, 2021 from https://unama.unmissions.org/sites/default/files/unama_poc_midyear_update_2019_-_30_july_2019_english.pdf. Open Google Scholar
  236. United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan. (2020). Afghanistan. Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict 2019. Retrieved at March 14, 2021 from https://unama.unmissions.org/sites/default/files/afghanistan_protection_of_civilians_annual_report_2019.pdf. Open Google Scholar
  237. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). (2018). UNHCR Afghanistan Fact Sheet—September 2018. Retrieved at March 14, 2021 from https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/66542.pdf. Open Google Scholar
  238. Ventevogel, P., Jordans, M. J. D., Eggerman, M., van Mierlo, B., & Panter-Brick, C. (2013). Child Mental Health, Psychosocial Well-Being and Resilience in Afghanistan: A Review and Future Directions. In C. Fernando & M. Ferrari (Eds.), Handbook of Resilience in Children of War (pp. 51–79). Springer New York. Open Google Scholar
  239. Vollhardt, J. K., & Bilali, R. (2008). Social Psychology’s Contribution to the Psychological Study of Peace: A Review. Social Psychology, 39(1), 12–25. Open Google Scholar
  240. Waller, T., & Bitou, A. (2011). Research with children: Three challenges for participatory research in early childhood. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 19(1), 5–20. Open Google Scholar
  241. Walter, B. (2017). Gendering human security in Afghanistan: In a time of western intervention. Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  242. Weber, C. (2001). Unveiling Scheherazade: Feminist Orientalism in the International Alliance of Women, 1911-1950. Feminist Studies, 27(1), 125. Open Google Scholar
  243. Wilde, L. (2013). Global solidarity. Edinburgh University Press. Open Google Scholar
  244. Wildt, M. (2006). Biopolitik, ethnische Säuberungen und Volkssouveränität. Eine Skizze. Mittelweg 36, 15(6), 87–106. Open Google Scholar
  245. Wimpelmann, T. (2017). The pitfalls of protection: Gender, violence and power in Afghanistan. Retrieved at March 14, 2021 http://proxy.cm.umoncton.ca/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt1w76wn3. Open Google Scholar
  246. Winthrop, R. (2003). Reflections on Working in Post-Conflict Afghanistan: Local Versus International Perspectives on Gender Relations. Women’s Studies Quarterly, 31(3/4), 247–252. Open Google Scholar
  247. Wood, E. J. (2006). The Ethical Challenges of Field Research in Conflict Zones. Qualitative Sociology, 29(3), 373–386. Open Google Scholar
  248. Young, I. M. (1988). Five Faces of Oppression. Philosophical Forum, 19(4). Open Google Scholar
  249. Zeweri, H. (2017). The specter of failure: Rendering Afghan women as sites of precarity in empowerment regimes. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 19(4), 441–455. Open Google Scholar
  250. Zingel, W.-P. (2014). The Economics of Pakistan–Afghanistan Relations: Implications for the Region. India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, 70(1), 1–14. Open Google Scholar
  251. Zoya, Follain, J., & Cristofari, R. (2003). Zoya’s story: An Afghan woman’s struggle for freedom. William Morrow. keep-with-next Open Google Scholar
  252. Zulfacar, M. (2006). The pendulum of gender politics in Afghanistan. Central Asian Survey, 25(1–2), 27–59. Open Google Scholar

Similar publications

from the topics "Cultural History & Cultural Studies", "Sociology General", "Education General", "Gender Sociology & Body Sociology"
Cover of Volume: Kursbuch Volume 61 (2025), Edition 224
Volume No access
Volume 61 (2025), Edition 224
Kursbuch
Cover of book: Intersektionalität in Therapie und Beratung
Edited Book Full access
(Un-)Möglichkeiten
Intersektionalität in Therapie und Beratung
Cover of book: Sichtbarkeit von weiblicher wissenschaftlicher Leistung im Fokus
Edited Book Full access
Ergebnisse aus drei Projekten der BMBF-Förderlinie „Innovative Frauen im Fokus"
Sichtbarkeit von weiblicher wissenschaftlicher Leistung im Fokus
Cover of book: Women and Terrorism in Bangladesh
Edited Book No access
Women’s Involvement and Roles in Jihadist Networks and the Problem of Human Rights Violations in Counterterrorism
Women and Terrorism in Bangladesh
Cover of book: Gender Dimensions of Health Impact of Climate Change in Nepal
Book Titles No access
A Comprehensive Empirical Study
Gender Dimensions of Health Impact of Climate Change in Nepal

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Welcome to Inlibra – Your Platform for Digital Professional Information

Nomos, C.H.Beck, VDI and over 100 other publishers combine their content here to create one of the largest platforms for digital professional information.

Research efficiently, cite long-term, use reliably – all united in one place.

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via Open Athens
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex