Cover of book: Leistungsanalyse in der Closed Loop Supply Chain
Buy in shop
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Monograph No access

Leistungsanalyse in der Closed Loop Supply Chain

Eine Simulationsstudie
Authors:
Publisher:
 2016

Bibliographic data

Edition
1/2016
Copyright Year
2016
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-3569-3
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-7932-9
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Language
German
Pages
240
Product Type
Monograph

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access 1 - 20
  2. Abkürzungsverzeichnis No access 21 - 22
  3. Variablenverzeichnis No access 23 - 24
    1. 1.1 Motivation No access
    2. 1.2 Ziele No access
    3. 1.3 Aufbau der Arbeit No access
      1. 2.1.1 Wiederverwendungsmöglichkeiten No access
      2. 2.1.2 Unsicherheiten und Probleme in der Wiederaufbereitung No access
      3. 2.1.3 Closed Loop Supply Chain Management No access
      1. 2.2.1 Auswirkungen No access
      2. 2.2.2 Ursachen No access
      3. 2.2.3 Gegenmaßnahmen No access
      1. 2.3.1 Bullwhip-Effekt No access
      2. 2.3.2 Lagerbestand No access
      3. 2.3.3 Fehlbestand No access
      4. 2.3.4 Kosten No access
    1. 3.1 Aufbau No access
    2. 3.2 Annahmen No access
      1. 3.3.1 Lagerbestände No access
      2. 3.3.2 Lagereingänge No access
      3. 3.3.3 Lagerausgänge No access
      4. 3.3.4 Unterwegsbestände No access
      5. 3.3.5 Bestelleingänge No access
      6. 3.3.6 Fehlbestände No access
      7. 3.3.7 Bestellte, aber noch nicht eingetroffene Produkte No access
      8. 3.3.8 Bestellausgänge No access
      9. 3.3.9 Unterwegsbestellungen No access
      10. 3.3.10 Bullwhip-Effekt No access
      11. 3.3.11 Durchschnittliche Lagerbestände No access
      12. 3.3.12 Durchschnittliche Fehlbestände No access
    1. 4.1 Die Simulation als Lösungsmethode No access
      1. 4.2.1 Wahl der Parameter No access
      2. 4.2.2 Festlegung der erforderlichen Länge der Einschwingphase No access
      3. 4.2.3 Festlegung der Länge eines Simulationslaufs No access
      4. 4.2.4 Festlegung der erforderlichen Anzahl an Simulationsläufen No access
      5. 4.2.5 Fazit zur Planung des Simulationsexperiments No access
      1. 4.3.1 Verifizierung des Simulationsmodells No access
        1. 4.3.2.1 Schätzung des Regressionsmodells No access
        2. 4.3.2.2 Prüfung des Regressionsmodells No access
        3. 4.3.2.3 Prüfung der Regressionskoeffizienten No access
      3. 4.3.3 Fazit zur Analyse der Outputdaten No access
    4. 4.4 Weitere Vorgehensweise No access
    1. 5.1 Problembeschreibung No access
    2. 5.2 Literaturüberblick No access
    3. 5.3 Ableitung der Forschungsfragen No access
      1. 5.4.1 Beschränkte Wiederaufbereitbarkeit der Sekundärrohstoffe No access
      2. 5.4.2 Beschränkte Lagerkapazität für zurückgenommene Sekundärrohstoffe No access
      1. 5.5.1 Beantwortung von Forschungsfrage 5-1 No access
      2. 5.5.2 Beantwortung von Forschungsfrage 5-2 No access
    6. 5.6 Fazit No access
    1. 6.1 Problembeschreibung No access
    2. 6.2 Literaturüberblick No access
    3. 6.3 Ableitung der Forschungsfrage No access
    4. 6.4 Spezifizierung des Simulationsexperiments No access
    5. 6.5 Ergebnisse des Simulationsexperiments No access
    6. 6.6 Fazit No access
    1. 7.1 Problembeschreibung No access
    2. 7.2 Literaturüberblick No access
    3. 7.3 Ableitung der Forschungsfrage No access
    4. 7.4 Spezifizierung des Simulationsexperiments No access
    5. 7.5 Ergebnisse des Simulationsexperiments No access
    6. 7.6 Fazit No access
    1. 8.1 Problembeschreibung No access
    2. 8.2 Literaturüberblick No access
    3. 8.3 Ableitung der Forschungsfragen No access
      1. 8.4.1 Information Sharing der Endkundennachfrage No access
      2. 8.4.2 Information Sharing des Lagerbestands des Sortierers No access
      3. 8.4.3 Zweifaches Information Sharing No access
      1. 8.5.1 Beantwortung von Forschungsfrage 8-1 No access
      2. 8.5.2 Beantwortung von Forschungsfrage 8-2 No access
      3. 8.5.3 Beantwortung von Forschungsfrage 8-3 No access
      4. 8.5.4 Beantwortung von Forschungsfrage 8-4 No access
    6. 8.6 Fazit No access
    1. 9.1 Zusammenfassung No access
    2. 9.2 Ausblick No access
  13. 10 Anhang No access 225 - 232
  14. Quellenverzeichnis No access 233 - 240

Bibliography (100)

  1. Lian, Z./Deshmukh, A. (2009): Analysis of Supply Contracts with Quantity Flexibility. In: European Journal of Operational Research, 196 (2), S. 526–533. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  2. Qingli, D./Hao, S./Hui, Z. (2008): Simulation of Remanufacturing in Reverse Supply Chain based on System Dynamics. In: International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management (2008), S. 1-6. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  3. Rösch, F. (2012): Wege aus der Rohstoffklemme. In: BIP – Best in Procurement (Hrg.), S. 14-19, BME e.V., Frankfurt. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  4. Potter, A./Disney, S. M. (2006): Bullwhip and Batching: An Exploration. In: International Journal of Production Economics, 104, S. 408-418. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  5. Pati, R. K./Vart, P./Kumar, P. (2010): Quantifying Bullwhip Effect in a Closed Loop Supply Chain. In: OPSEARCH, 47 (4), S. 231-253. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  6. Paik, S.-K./Bagchi, P. K. (2007): Understanding the Causes of the Bullwhip Effect in a Supply Chain. In: International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 35 (4), S. 308-324. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  7. O.V. (2010b): Rohstofflager Handy. In: LOG.Kompass, 12, S. 18-19, DVV Media Group GmbH, Hamburg. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  8. O.V. (2010a): Zurück für die Zukunft. In: LOG.Kompass, 12, S. 6-9, DVV Media Group GmbH, Hamburg. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  9. Ouyang, Y. (2007): The Effect of Information Sharing on Supply Chain Stability and the Bullwhip Effect. In: European Journal of Operational Research, 182, S. 1107-1121. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  10. Nepal, B./Murat, A./Chinman, R. B. (2012): The Bullwhip Effect in Capacitated Supply Chains with Consideration for Product Life-Cycle Aspects. In: International Journal of Production and Economics, 136, S. 318-331. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  11. Naylor, T. H. (1971): Computer Simulation Experiments with Models of Economic Systems. John Wiley & Sons, New York. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  12. Moyaux, T./Chaib-draa, B./D’Amours, S. (2007): Information Sharing as a Coordination Mechanism for Reducing the Bullwhip Effect in a Supply Chain. In: IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernatics – Part C: Applications and Reviews, 37 (3), S. 396-409. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  13. Ma, L./Chai, Y. (2014): Dynamics Modeling of Bullwhip Effect in Remanufacturing Closed-loop Supply Chain based on Third-party Recycler. In: Information Technology Journal 13 (13), S. 2137-2144. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  14. Reese, J. (2012): Supply Chain Management – Eine experimentelle Studie. 1. Auflage, Nomos, Baden-Baden. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  15. Lee, H. L./So, K. C./Tang, C. S. (2000): The Value of Information Sharing in a Two-Level Supply Chain. In: Management Science, 46 (5), S. 626-643. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  16. Lee, H. L./Whang, S. (2000): Information Sharing in a Supply Chain. In: International Journal of Technology Management, 20 (3-4), S. 373-387. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  17. Lee, H. L./Padmanabhan, V./Whang, S. (1997): Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect. In: Management Science, 43 (4), S. 546-558. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  18. Law, A. M. (2007): Simulation Modeling and Analysis. 4. Auflage, McGraw Hill, New York. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  19. Küll, R./Stähly, P. (1999): Zur Planung und effizienten Abwicklung von Simulationsexperimenten. In: Biethan, J./Hummeltenberg, W./Schmidt, B./Stähly, P./Witte, T. (Hrsg.): Simulation als betriebliche Entscheidungshilfe: State of the Art und neuere Entwicklungen. Physica, Heidelberg. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  20. Krüger, S. (1975): Simulation – Grundlagen, Techniken, Anwendungen. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  21. Kleijnen, J. P. C. (2008): Design and Analysis of Simulation Experiments. Springer Science + Business Media, New York. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  22. Ketzenberg, M. E. (2009): The Value of Information in a Capacitated Closed Loop Supply Chain. In: European Journal of Operational Research, 198 (2), S. 491-503. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  23. Ketzenberg, M. E./Van der Laan, E./Teunter, R. H. (2006): Value of Information in Closed Loop Supply Chains. In: Production and Operations Management, 15 (3), S. 393-406. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  24. Kayser, J. (2011): Die Simulation als Analyse-Instrument betriebswirtschaftlicher Fragestellungen – dargestellt am Beispiel der Abwrackprämie und ihrer Auswirkungen auf die Ersatzteillogistik in der Kraftfahrzeugindustrie. In: Productivity Management, 16 (1), 53-56. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  25. Jayaraman, V./Guide Jr., V. D. R./Srivastava, R. (1999): A Closed-Loop Logistics Model for Remanufacturing. In: Journal of the Operational Research Society, 50 (5), S. 497-508. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  26. Turrisi, M./Bruccoleri, M./Cannella, S. (2013): Impact of Reverse Logistics on Supply Chain Performance. In: International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 43 (7), S. 564-585. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  27. Zhou, L./Disney, S. M. (2006): Bullwhip and Inventory Variance in a Closed Loop Supply Chain. In: OR Spectrum, 28, S. 127-149. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  28. Zikopoulos, C./Tagaras, G. (2008): On the Attractiveness of Sorting before Disassembly in Remanufacturing. In: IIE Transactions, 40, S. 313-323. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  29. Zhao, X./Xie, J./Zhang, W. J. (2002): The Impact of Information Sharing and Ordering Co-ordination on Supply Chain Performance. In: Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 7 (1), S. 24-60. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  30. Zhang, X./Wu, O./Tian, Z. (2011): Bullwhip Effect Reduction in Closed-Loop Supply Chains Using H-Infinity Control. In: Management Science and Industrial Engineering (International Conference), S. 659-663. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  31. Zanoni, S./Ferretti, I./Tang, O. (2006): Cost Performance and Bullwhip Effect in a Hybrid Manufacturing and Remanufacturing System with Different Control Policies. In: International Journal of Production Research, 44 (18-19), S. 3847-3862. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  32. Witthaut, M./Hellingrath, B. (2009): Simulation von SCM-Strategien. In: Buchholz, P./Clausen, U. (Hrsg.): Große Netze der Logistik. Springer, Berlin, S. 59-74. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  33. Wilke, J. (2011): Supply Chain Koordination durch Lieferverträge mit rollierender Mengenflexibilität. Eine Simulationsstudie am Beispiel von Lieferketten der deutschen Automobilindustrie. Gabler, Wiesbaden. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  34. Waage, M. (2012): Koordination von Supply Chains durch Mengenbindungsvereinbarungen. Ein Instrument zur Senkung des Bullwhip-Effekts. 1. Auflage, Gabler Research, Wiesbaden. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  35. Vlachos, D./Georgiadis, P./Iakovou, E. (2007): A System Dynamics Model for Dynamic Capacity Planning of Remanufacturing in Closed-Loop Supply Chains. In: Computers & Operations Research, 34, S. 367-394. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  36. Van der Laan, E./Dekker, R./Salomon, M. (1996): Product Remanufacturing and Disposal: A Numerical Comparison of Alternative Control Strategies. In: International Journal of Production Economics, 45, S. 489-498. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  37. Urban, T. L. (2000): Supply Contracts with Periodic, Stationary Commitment. In: Production and Operations Management, 9 (4), S. 400-413. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  38. Tversky, A./Kahneman, D. (1974): Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. In: Science, 185, S. 1124-1131. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  39. Janzing, B. (2012): Goldrausch mit Elektromüll. In: Recycling – Sonderbeilage der Financial Times Deutschland, S. A3, Financial Times Deutschland, Hamburg. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  40. Tsay, A. A./Lovejoy, W. S. (1999): Quantity Flexibility Contracts and Supply Chain Performance. In: Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 1 (2), S. 89-111. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  41. Su, C.-T./Wong, J.-T. (2008): Design of a Replenishment System for a Stochastic Dynamic Production/Forecast Lot-Sizing Problem under Bullwhip Effect. In: Expert System with Applications, 34, S. 173-180. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  42. Sterman, J. D. (2006): Operational and Behavioral Causes of Supply Chain Instability. In: Carranza Torres, O. A./Villegas Moran, F. A. (Hrsg.): The Bullwhip Effect in Supply Chains. A Review of Methods, Components and Cases. Basingstoke, S. 17-56. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  43. Sterman, J. D. (1989): Modeling Managerial Behavior: Misperceptions of Feedback in a Dynamic Decision Making Experiment. In: Management Science, 35 (3), S. 321-339. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  44. Spengler, T./Schröter, M. (2005): Konzeption eines System Dynamics Modells zur strategischen Planung von Closed-Loop Supply Chains. In: ZfB-Special Issue, 3, S. 1-29. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  45. Spengler, T./Schröter, M. (2003): Management of Spare Parts in Closed-Loop Supply Chains: A System Dynamics Approach. In: Interfaces, 33 (6), S. 7-17. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  46. Sokolowski, J. A./Banks, C. M. (2009): Principles of Modeling and Simulation. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, England. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  47. Robinson, S. (2004): Simulation: The Practice of Model Development and Use. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, England. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  48. Riddals, C. E./Bennet, S. (2001): The Optimal Control of Batched Production and its Effect on Demand Amplification. In: International Journal of Production Economics, 72, S. 159-168. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  49. Reese, J./Kayser, J. (2014): Closed-Loop Supply Chain Management – Eine Simulationsstudie. In: Gössinger, R./Zäpfel, G. (2014): Management integrativer Leistungserstellung. Festschrift für Hans Corsten. Duncker & Humblot, Berlin. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  50. Reese, J. (2013): Operations Management – Optimale Gestaltung von Wertschöpfungsprozessen im Unternehmen. 1. Auflage, Vahlen, München. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  51. Chen, F. Y./Drezner, Z./Ryan, J. K./Simchi-Levi, D. (2000): Quantifying the Bullwhip Effect in a Simple Supply Chain – The Impact of Forecasting, Lead Times and Information. In: Management Science, 46 (3), S. 436-443. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  52. Ferguson, M./Souza, G. C. (2010): Closed Loop Supply Chain: New Developments to Improve the Sustainability of Business Practices. CRC Press, Boca Raton, London, New York. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  53. Ferguson, M./Guide Jr., V. D./Koca, E./Souza, G. C. (2009): The Value of Quality Grading in Remanufacturing. In: Production and Operations Management, 18 (3), S. 300-314. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  54. Emshoff, J. R./Sisson, R.L. (1972): Simulation mit dem Computer. Verlag Moderne Industrie, München. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  55. Dyckhoff, H./Souren, R./Keilen, J. (2004): The Expansion of Supply Chains to Closed Loop Systems: A Conceptual Framework and the Automotive Industry’s Point of View. In: Dyckhoff, H./Lackes, R./ Reese, J. (2004): Supply Chain Management and Reverse Logistics. Springer , Berlin, Heidelberg. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  56. Disney, S. M./Towill, D. R. (2003): The Effect of Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) Dynamics on the Bullwhip Effect in Supply Chains. In: International Journal of Production Economics, 85, S. 199-215. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  57. Denizel, M./Ferguson, M./Souza, G. C. (2010): Multiperiod Remanufacturing Planning With Uncertain Quality of Inputs. In: IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 57 (3), S. 394-404. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  58. Dekker, R./Fleischmann, M./Inderfurth, K./Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2004): Reverse Logistics – Quantitative Models for Closed-Loop Supply Chains. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  59. Dejonckheere, J./Disney, S. M./Lambrecht, M.R./Towill, D.R. (2004): The Impact of Information Enrichment on the Bullwhip Effect in Supply Chains: A Control Engineering Perspective. In: European Journal of Operational Research, 153, S. 727-750. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  60. Dejonckheere, J./Disney, S. M./Lambrecht, M.R./Towill, D.R. (2003): Measuring and Avoiding the Bullwhip Effect: A Control Theoretic Approach. In: European Journal of Operational Research, 147, S. 567-590. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  61. DB Schenker (2011): Reverse Logistics. In: logistics, 1, S. 42-43, DB Mobility Logistics AG (Hrg.), Berlin. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  62. Das, D./Dutta, P. (2012): A Simulation Study of Bullwhip Effect in a Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Fuzzy Demand and Fuzzy Collection Rate under Possibility Constraints. In: World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 64, S. 1245-1252. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  63. Chen, F. Y./Krass, D. (2001): Analysis of Supply Contracts with Total Order Quantity Commitments and Non-Stationary Demands. In: European Journal of Operational Research, 131, S. 309-323. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  64. Ferrer, G./Ketzenberg, M. E. (2004): Value of Information in Remanufacturing Complex Products. In: IEE Transactions, 36, S. 265–277. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  65. Chen, F./Samroengraja, R. (2004): Order Volatility and Supply Chain Costs. In: Operations Research, 52 (5), S. 707-722. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  66. Chatfield, D. C./Kim, J. G./Harrison, T. P./Hayya, J. C. (2004): The Bullwhip Effect – Impact of Stochastic Lead Time, Information Quality, and Information Sharing: A Simulation Study. In: Production and Operations Management, 13 (4), S. 340-353. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  67. Cachon, G. P./Fisher, M. (2000): Supply Chain Inventory Management and the Value of Shared Information. In: Management Science, 46 (8), S. 1032-1048. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  68. Cachon, G. P. (1999): Managing Supply Chain Demand Variability with Scheduled Ordering Policies. In: Management Science, 45 (6), S. 834-856. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  69. Blackburn, J. D./Guide Jr., V. D. R./Souza, G. C./Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2004): Reverse Supply Chains for Commercial Returns. In: California Management Review, 46 (2), S. 6-22. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  70. Biehl, M./Prater, E./Realff, M. J. (2007): Assessing Performance and Uncertainty in Developing Carpet Reverse Logistics Systems. In: Computers & Operations Research, 34, S. 443-463. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  71. Bassok, Y./Anupindi, R. (2008): Analysis of Supply Contracts with Commitments and Flexibility. In: Naval Research Logistics, 55, S. 459-477. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  72. Bassok, Y./Anupindi, R. (1997): Analysis of Supply Contracts with Total Minimum Commitment. In: IIE Transactions, 29, S. 373-381. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  73. Banks, J./Carson II, J. S./Nelson, B. L./Nicol, D. M. (2005): Discrete-Event System Simulation. 4. Auflage, Prentice Hall, New Jersey. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  74. Backhaus, K./Erichson, B./Plinke, W./Weiber, R. (2011): Multivariate Analysemethoden – Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung. 13. Auflage, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  75. Adenso-Diaz, B./Moreno, P./Gutierrez, E./Lozano, S. (2012): An Analysis of the Main Factors Affecting Bullwhip in Reverse Supply Chains. In: International Journal of Production Economics, 135, S. 917-928. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  76. Georgiadis, P./Vlachos, D. (2004b): The Effect of Environmental Parameters on Product Recovery. In: European Journal of Operational Research, 157, S. 449-464. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  77. Iken, J. (2012): Schwer dranzukommen. In: Recycling – Sonderbeilage der Financial Times Deutschland, S. A2, Financial Times Deutschland, Hamburg. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  78. Hussain, M./Drake, P. R. (2011): Analysis of the Bullwhip Effect with Order Batching in Multi-Echelon Supply Chains. In: International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 41 (10), S. 972-990. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  79. Huang, L./Liu, Y. (2008): Supply Chain Dynamics under the Sustainable Development. In: 4th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, 12.-14. Oktober, S. 1-4. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  80. Holland, W./Sodhi, M.S. (2003): Quantifying the Effect of Batch Size and Order Errors on the Bullwhip Effect using Simulation. In: Proceedings of the 8th Logistics Research Network Conference, London, 11.-12. September, S. 188-195. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  81. Hall, D. C./Yaygin, C. (2012): Impact of Information Sharing on Supply Chain Performance. In: International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 58, S- 397-409. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  82. Guide Jr., V. D. R./Jayaraman, V./Srivastava, R./Benton, W. C. (2000): Supply-Chain Management for Recoverable Manufacturing Systems. In: Interfaces, 30 (3), S. 125-142. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  83. Guide Jr., V. D. R./Harrison, T. P./Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2003): The Challenge of Closed-Loop Supply Chains. In: Interfaces, 33 (6), S. 3-6. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  84. Guide Jr., V. D. R./Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2009): The Evolution of Closed-Loop Supply Chain Research. In: Operations Research, 57 (1), S. 10-18. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  85. Guide Jr., V. D. R./Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2006): Closed-Loop Supply Chains: An Introduction to the Feature Issue (Part 2). In: Production and Operations Management, 15 (4), S. 471-472. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  86. Guide Jr., V. D. R./Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2002): The Reverse Supply Chain. In: Harvard Business Review, 2, S. 25-26. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  87. Guide Jr., V. D. R./Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2001): Managing Product Returns for Remanufacturing. In: Production and Operations Management, 10 (2), S. 142-155. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  88. Georgiadis, P./Vlachos, D./Tagaras, G. (2006): The Impact of Product Lifecycle on Capacity Planning of Closed-Loop Supply Chains with Remanufacturing. In: Production and Operations Management, 15 (4), S. 514-527. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  89. Quellenverzeichnis Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  90. Georgiadis, P./Vlachos, D. (2004a): Decision Making in Reverse Logistics using System Dynamics. In: Yugoslav Journal of Operations Research, 14 (2), S. 259-272. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  91. Georgiadis, P./Vlachos, D. (2003): Analysis of the Dynamic Impact of Environmental Policies on Reverse Logistics. In: Operational Research. An International Journal, 3 (2), S. 123-135. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  92. Georgiadis, P./Besiou, M. (2008): Sustainability in Electrical and Electronic Equipment Closed-Loop Supply Chains: A System Dynamics Approach. In: Journal of Cleaner Production, 16, S. 1665-1678. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  93. Geary, S./Disney, S. M./ Towill, D. R. (2006): On Bullwhip in Supply Chains. Historical Review, Present Practice and Expected Future Impact. In: International Journal of Production Economics, 101 (1), S. 2-18. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  94. Galbreth, M. R./Blackburn, J. D. (2010): Optimal Acquisition Quantities in Remanufacturing with Condition Uncertainty. In: Production and Operations Management 19 (1), S. 61-69. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  95. Galbreth, M. R./Blackburn, J. D. (2006): Optimal Acquisition and Sorting Policies for Remanufacturing. In: Production and Operations Management 15 (3), S. 384-392. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  96. Forrester, J. W. (1961): Industrial Dynamics. MIT Press, Cambridge, 1961. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  97. Forrester, J. W. (1958): Industrial Dynamics: A Major Breakthrough for Decision Makers. In: Harvard Business Review, 36 (4), S. 37-66. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  98. Fleischmann, M./Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J. M./Dekker, R./Van der Laan, E./Van Nunen, J. A. E. E./Van Wassenhove, L. N. (1997): Quantitative Models for Reverse Logistics: A Review. In: European Journal of Operational Research, 103 (1), S. 1-17. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  99. Flapper, S. D. P./Van Nunen, J. A. E. E./Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2005): Managing Closed-Loop Supply Chains. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329
  100. Fiala, P. (2005): Information Sharing in Supply Chains. In: Omega – OR and its Applications, 33 (5), S. 419-423. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845279329

Similar publications

from the topics "Technikpolitik & Umweltpolitik", "Unternehmensführung & Management & Organisation"
Cover of book: Biodiversity Protection Framework at the Intersection of Ethics, Law and Policy
Monograph No access
Natalia Subbotina
Biodiversity Protection Framework at the Intersection of Ethics, Law and Policy
Cover of book: Die Erbschaft- und Schenkungsteuer als Flat Tax
Monograph No access
Marcel Mayer
Die Erbschaft- und Schenkungsteuer als Flat Tax
Cover of book: Weltraumpolitik im Nahen Osten
Monograph No access
Daniel Sidiqie
Weltraumpolitik im Nahen Osten
Cover of book: Digitale Verteidigung
Monograph No access
Gerrit Hohmann
Digitale Verteidigung
Cover of book: Corporate Space Power
Monograph No access
Marieluna Frank
Corporate Space Power

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via your Institution (SSO, Shibboleth, OpenAthens)
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex